DAQ-2024-005180

1

DAQC-193-24
Site ID 10346 (B4)
MEMORANDUM

TO: STACK TEST FILE – KENNECOTT UTAH COPPER – Combined Heat and
Power Unit

THROUGH: Harold Burge, Major Source Compliance Section Manager

FROM: Paul Morris, Environmental Scientist

DATE: February 28, 2024

SUBJECT: Source: Combined Heat and Power Unit (REFCHP)
Contact: Sean Daly: 801-204-2563
Location: Kennecott Smelter Facility, Magna, Salt Lake County, UT
Test Contractor: Alliance Technical Group.
FRS ID #: UT0000004903500030
Permit/AO#: Title V Operating Permit 3500030004, last revised
September 27, 2022
Action Code: 3A
Subject: Review of Stack Test Reports dated February 7, 2024

On February 12, 2024, Utah Division of Air Quality (DAQ) received a test report for the Kennecott Utah
Copper’s Combined Heat and Power Unit (REFCHP). Testing was performed on December 14, 2024, to
demonstrate compliance with the emission limits found in Permit Condition II.B.48.a, II.B.48.b,
II.B.48.d, and II.B.48.e. The DAQ-calculated test results are:

Source Test Date RM/Pollutant DAQ Result Test Result Limit
REFCHP 12/14/2023 RM 7/NOx 3.59 lb/hr 3.58 lb/hr 5.96 lb/hr
Combined RM 10/CO 2.15 lb/hr 2.15 lb/hr 6.43 lb/hr

REFCHP 12/14/2023 RM 7/NOx 6.4 ppmvd * 6.4 ppmvd * 25 ppmvd *
Turbine only

REFCHP 12/14/2023 RM 7/NOx 4.82 lb/hr 4.83 lb/hr 7.49 lb/hr
Duct Burner only 31 ppmvd * 31 ppmvd * 54 ppmvd *
RM 10/CO 2.40 lb/hr 2.40 lb/hr 2.5 lb/hr

*@ 15% O2

DEVIATIONS: None reported.

CONCLUSION: The stack emissions test report appears to be acceptable.

RECOMMENDATION: Kennecott Utah Copper appears to be in compliance with the applicable
conditions of the Title V operating permit at the time of this test.

HPV: No violations occurred.

ATTACHMENT: Stack test report dated February 7, 2024, DAQ spreadsheets

6 , 3
7'-/oo).l
ld.)<),r+o
Rio Tinto Kennecott
47ooDaybreak Parkway
South Jordan, Utah 84oo9
T 8or-S6g-7989
F 8or-569-6688
Jerome Dozol
General Manager, Metals
February oZ,2c24
Mr. Bryce Bird, Director
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Air Quality
PO Box L44B2o
Salt Lake City, Utah 84tt4-49zo
Attn: Mr. Paul Morris
ttJjlrril- .: ..i (,.
El ,, ii,., r,:i ..1-i-;y
FEB 't Z 'd24
in'l -.i ,r ci y' , i , r,,,( *( titli'u';3iON OF AtR eUAUTy
Subject:Stack Test Reports - Kennecott Utah Copper Refinery
Combined Heat and Power Unit (REFCHPI
Title V Operating Permit No. gsoooqoooa
Dear Mr. Bird,
As required by Title V operating permit 35ooo3ooo4 and Approval Order DAQE-
ANro346oo58-2o, Kennecott Utah Copper performed stack testing of the
Refinery Combined Heat and Power Unit (REFCHP) on December L4,2o24.The
testing was conducted following procedures outlined in 4o CFR 6o, Appendix A.
The summary report with test results is attached for submittal within 6o days of
completion of the testing. Results of the testing demonstrate that the units are in
compliance with the permit emission limits.
Based on information and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, the statements
and information contained in this document are true, accurate, and complete
(Rgoz-+rs-sd).
Should you have any questions or need further information regarding these
reports, please feel free to contact me or Sean Daly at 801-204-2563.
Sincerelv.- ;;' behJf .F [e-rz-t-
Jerome Dozol
General Manager, Metals
vF'o).lfr.5FI:o
(This page intentionally left blank)
Allare
Source Test Report
Rio Tinto Kennecott
4700 Daybreak Parkway
South Jordan, UT 84095
Source Tested: REFCHP
Test Dates: December 14,2023 DIVISION OF AIR QUALITY
Proj ect No. AST-2023 -3338-002
Prepared By
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
3683 W 2270 S, Suite E
West Valley City, UT 84120
oll --
I,TAH DEPAHTMENT OF
E}WIBONMENTAL OUATJTV
t- f-l '1 -'
N,AnGe
TEC}INICAL. GROUI-)Source Test Rqort
Tesl Program Summary
Resulatorv Information
Permit Nos.
Regulatory Cilation
Source Information
DAQE-ANo 103460058-20
Title V 3500030004
40 CFR 60, Subpart KKKK
Source Name
Power Unit
Contact Information
Source Name
REFCHP
Source Name
NOx, CO
Test Location
Rio Tinto Kennecott
2500 South 9180 West
Magna, UT 84044
Jenny Esker
j enny. [e-mail]
(801) s69-6494
Sean Daly
sean. daly3 @riotinto. com
[phone]
Test Company
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
3683 W 22705, Suite E
WestValley City, UT 84120
Project Manager
Charles Horton
[e-mail]
(3s2) 663-7s68
Field Team Leader
Tobias Hubbard
[e-mail]
QA/QC Manager
Kathleen Shonk
[e-mail]
(8r2) 4s2-478s
Report Coordinator
Ryan Adam
[e-mail]
(469) 9r8-os4s
RTK - Magnq UTAST-2023-3338-002 Page i
TECHNICAL GROU[-'Source Test Report
C e r ti fi cati on Slate nE nt
Alliance Technical Group, LLC (Alliance) has completed the source testing as described in this report. Results
apply only to the source(s) tested and operating condition(s) for the specific test date(s) and time(s) identified within
this report. All results are intended to be considered in their entirety, and Alliance is not responsible for use of less
than the complete test report without written consent. This report shall not be reproduced in full or in part without
written approval from the customer.
To the best of my knowledge and abilities, all information, facts and test data are correct. Data presented in this
report has been checked for completeness and is accurate, error-free and legible. Onsite testing was conducted in
accordance with approved internal Standard Operating Procedures. Any deviations or problems are detailed in the
relevant sections in the test report.
This report is only considered valid once an authorized representative ofAlliance has signed in the space provided
below; any other version is considered draft. This document was prepared in portable document format (.pd| and
contains pages as identified in the bottom footer of this document.
21712024
Charles Horton, Operations Manager
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
Date
RTK - Magna, UTAST-2023-3338-002 Page ii
plllffirrcE)
I i:CiINICAI Gi1OI]P Source Test Report
Table ofContents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
l. I Source and Control System Descriptions. ............ I - I
1.3 Site Specific Test Plan & Notification .................. .................... l- I
3.1 U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods I and2 - Sampling/Traverse Points and Volumetric Flow Rate..... 3-l
3.2 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3,A - Oxygen/Carbon Dioxide........ ......... 3-l
3.3 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4 - Moisture Content........ ....................... 3-l
3.4 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 7E-Nitrogen Oxides...... ........................ 3-2
3.5 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method l0 - Carbon Monoxide.... ........................3-2
3.6 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 205 - Gas Dilution System Certification. .....................3-2
3.7 Quality Assurance/Quality Control - U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 3A and 7E.............................3-2
LIST OF TABLES
Table 2- l: Summary of Results - Combined Heat & Power.......... ............2-l
Table 2-2: Summary of Results - Turbine On1y............. .......2-l
Table 2-3: Summary of Results - Duct Burners On1y............. ...................2-2
APPENDICES
Appendix A Sample Calculations
Appendix B Field Data
Appendix C Quality Assurance/Quality Control Data
Appendix D Process Operating/Control System Data
RTK - Magna, UTAST-2023-3338-002 Page iii
AImrrce
I t OllhJlOltl Gii()ilr Source Test Report
Introduclion
1.0 Introduction
Alliance Technical Group, LLC (Alliance) was retained by Rio Tinto Kennecott (RTK) to conduct compliance
testing at the Refinery located in Magna, Utah. Portions of the facility are subject to 40 CFR 60, Subpart KKKK per
Title V permit condition II.8.48.e. The facility operates under the Utah Department of Environmental Qualiry,
Division of Air Quality (UDAQ) Approval order (AO) DAQE-AN0103460058-20 and the Title V Operating Permit
3500030004. Testing was conducted to determine the emission rate of nitrogen oxides (NOx) and carbon monoxide
(CO) from the exhaust of REFCHP - Power Unit at three (3) conditions: turbine-only, duct burner only, and
combined-cycle.
l.l Source and Control System Descriptions
REFCHP - Power Unit description: The unit consists of a Solar Taurus 70 turbine generator and TEG firing duct
burners. In March 2014, the original duct bumer was removed, and a redesigned duct burner was installed at the
CHP. With the installation of the redesigned duct burner, the total heat input capacity for the combined heat and
power system is I10.3 million British thermal units per hour (MMBut/hr). The unit is designed to operate in one of
three modes: Combined-Cycle, Turbine-Only, and Duct Burner-Only. All testing will be conducted at 90Yo or
greater ofthe production capacity ofthe unit.
1.2 Project Team
Personnel involved in this project are identified in the following table.
Table l-l: Project Team
1.3 Site Specific Test Plan & Notification
Testing was conducted in accordance with the Site-Specific Test Plan (SSTP) submitted to UDAQ by RTK.
RTK Personnel Sean Daly
AST Personnel
Tobias Hubbard
Cael Krahn
Ryan Lyons
RTK - Magna, UTAST-2023-3338-002 Page l-l
pilt6rpe
TFCI--I NICAI GROUP Source Test Report
Summary efResults
2.0 Summary of Results
Alliance conducted compliance testing at the RTK facility in Magna, Utah on December 14, 2023. Testing
consisted of determining the emission rates of NOx and CO from the exhaust of REFCHP - Power Unit at three (3)
conditions: turbine-only, duct burner only and combined-cycle.
Tables 2-1,2-2 & 2-3 provide summaries of the emission testing results with comparisons to the applicable UDAQ
and Title V permit limits. Any difference between the summary results listed in the following tables and the
detailed results contained in appendices is due to rounding for presentation.
Table 2-1: Summary of Results - Combined Heat & Power
Table 2-2: Summary of Results - Turbine Only
t3.4
3.6
13.4
3.6
13.6
3.6
13.5
3.6
s.96
60
itrogen Oxides Data
Concentration, ppmvd
Emission Rate, lb/hr
Emission Limit,lb/hr
Percent of Limit, %
rbon Monoxide Data
Concentration, ppmvd
Emission Rate, lb/trr
Emission Limit, lb/tr
Percent of Limit, %
13.5
2.2
13.5
2.2
t2.9
2.1
13.3
2.2
6.43
34
I 3:55
l4: l5
3.2
6.3
3.4
6.7
3.2
6.4
25
26
itrogen Oxides Data
Concentration, ppmvd
Concentration, ppmvd @ 15%Oz
Emission Limit, ppmvd @ 15%Oz
Percent of Limit, 7o
3.1
6.2
RTK - Magna, UTAST-2023-3338-002 Page2-l
TECHNICAL GROUP Source Test Report
Suunary qf Results
Table 2-3: Summary of Results - Duct Burners Only
Concentation, ppmvd
Concentration, ppmvd @ l5o/o 02
Emission Limit, ppmvd @l5o/oOz
Percent ofLimit,o/o
Emission Rate, lb/hr
Emission Limit,lb/hr
Percent of Limit, %
16.6
3l.0
5.0
16.0
30.8
4.8
15.9
31.3
4.8
16.2
31.0
54
57
4.8
7.49
o5
rbon Monoxide Data
Concentration, ppmvd
Emission Rate, lb/hr
Emission Limit,lb/hr
Percent of Limit, %
13.5
2.5
12.9
2.3
l3.l
2.4
13.2
2.4
2.5
96
AST-2023-3338-002 RTK -Magn4 UT Page2-2
Aliarpe
Sou'ce Test Report
Testirtg ]Iethodologt
3.0 Testing Methodology
The emission testing program was conducted in accordance with the test methods listed in Table 3-1. Method
descriptions are provided below while quality assurance/quality control data is provided in Appendix C.
Table 3-l : Source Testing Methodology
3.1 U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods I and 2 - Sampling/Traverse Points and Volumetric Flow Rate
The sampling location and number of traverse (sampling) points were selected in accordance with U.S. EPA
Reference Test Method l. To determine the minirnurrr nunrber of traverse points, the upstream and dorvnstream
distauces were equated into equivalent dianreters and compared to Figure l-2 in U.S. EPA Reference Test Method l.
Full velocity traverses were conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 2 to determine the
average stack gas velocity pressure, static pressure and tenrperature. The velocity and static pressure measurement
systenl consisted of a pitot tube and inclined manorrreter. The stack gas temperature was measured with a K-type
therrnocouple and pyrometer.
Stack gas velocity pressure and temperature readings were recorded during each test run. The data collected was
utilized to calculate the volurnetric flow rate in accordance with U.S. E,PA Reference Test Method 2.
3.2 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3A - Oxygen/Carbon Dioxide
The oxygen (O:) and carbon dioxide (CO2) testing was conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test
Method 3A. Data was collected online and reported in one-minute averages. The sampling system consisted of a
stainless-steel probe, Teflon sanrple line(s), gas conditioning system and the identified gas analyzer. The gas
conditioning system was a non-contact condenser used to relnove moisture fi'om the stack gas. If an unheated
Teflon sample line was used, then a portable non-contact condenser was placed in the systenr directly after the
probe. Otherwise, a heated Teflon sanrple line was used. The quality control nleasures are described in Section 3.7.
3.3 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4 - Moisture Content
The stack gas moisture content was detennined in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 4. The gas
condition ing train consisted of a series of chilled inrpingers. Prior to testing, each impinger was filled with a known
quantity of water or silica gel. Each impinger was analyzed gravir.netrically before and after each test run on the
sanre balance to determine the amount of moisture condensed.
Parameter U.S. EPA Reference
r Test Methods Notes/Remarks
Volunretric Flow Rate t&2 Full Velocitv Traverses
Oxygen / Carbon Dioxide 3A Instrumental Analysis
Moisture Content 4 Gravimetric Analysis
Nitrogen Oxides 7F,Instrumental Analysis
Carbon Monoxide r0 Instrumental Analysis
Gas Dilution System Certification 20s
AST-2023-3338-002 RTK - Magna, UT Page 3-l
ff5
, l'.1 I (,: i:'r
Source Test Report
Testittg L[elhodologv
3.4 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 7E - Nitrogen Oxides
The nitrogen oxides (NOx) testing was conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 7E. Data
was collected online and reported in one-minute averages. The sampling system consisted of a stainless-steel probe,
Teflon sample line(s), gas conditioning system and the identified gas analyzer. The gas conditioning system was a
non-contact condenser used to remove moisture from the stack gas. If an unheated Teflon sample line was used,
then a portable non-contact condenser was placed in the system directly after the probe. Otherwise, a heated Teflon
sample line was used. The quality control nleasures are described in Section 3.7.
3.5 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 10 - Carbon Monoxide
The carbon monoxide (CO) testing was conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 10. Data
was collected online and reported in one-minute averages. The sampling system consisted of a stainless-steel probe,
Teflon sanrple line(s), gas conditioning system, and the identified gas analyzer. The gas conditioning system was a
non-contact condenser used to relnove moisfure from the gas. If an unheated Teflon sample line was used, then a
portable non-contact condenser was placed in the system directly after the probe. Otherwise, a heated Teflon sample
lir.re was used. The quality control measures are described in Section 3.7.
3.6 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 205 - Gas Dilution System Certification
A calibration gas dilution system field check was conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Method 205.
Multiple dilution rates and total gas flow rates were utilized to force the dilution system to perform two dilutions on
each mass flow controller. The diluted calibration gases were sent directly to the analyzer, and the analyzer response
recorded in an electronic field data sheet. The analyzer response agreed within 2o/o of the actual diluted gas
concentration. A second Protocol I calibration gas, with a cylinder concentration within l0% of one of the gas
divider settings described above, was introduced directly to the analyzer, and the analyzer response recorded in an
electronic field data sheet. The cylinder concentration and the analyzer response agreed within 2%o. These steps
were repeated three (3) times. Copies of the Method 205 data can be found in the Quality Assurance/Quality
Control Appendix.
3.7 Quality Assurance/Quality Control - U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 3A and 7E
Cylinder calibration gases used met EPA Protocol | (+l- 2%) standards. Copies of all calibration gas certificates can
be found in the Quality Assurance/Quality Control Appendix.
Low Level gas was introduced directly to the analyzer. After adjusting the analyzer to the Low-Level gas
concentration and once the analyzer reading was stable, the analyzer value was recorded. This process was repeated
for the High-Level gas. For the Calibration Error Test, Low, Mid, and High-Level calibration gases were
sequentially introduced directly to the analyzer. All values were within 2.0 percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5
ppmv absolute difference.
High or Mid-Level gas (whichever was closer to the stack gas concentration) was introduced at the probe and the
tinte required for the analyzer reading to reach 95 percent or 0.5 ppm (whichever was less restrictive) of the gas
concentration was recorded. The analyzer reading was observed until it reached a stable value, and this value was
recorded. Next, Low Level gas was introduced at the probe and the time required for the analyzer reading to
decrease to a value within 5.0 percent or 0.5 ppm (whichever was less restrictive) was recorded. If the Low-Level
gas was zero gas, the response was 0.5 ppm or 5.0 percent of the upscale gas concentration (whichever was less
restrictive). The analyzer reading was observed until it reached a stable value and this value was recorded. The
AST-2023-3338-002 RTK - Magna, UT Page 3-2
AIiarpe
lilrii!lCAi (,i i-i () iJ i'j Source Test Reporl
Testinp Methodolosv
measurement system response time and initial system bias were determined from these data. The System Bias was
within 5.0 percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5 ppmv absolute difference.
High or Mid-Level gas (whichever was closer to the stack gas concentration) was introduced at the probe. After the
analyzer response was stable, the value was recorded. Next, Low Level gas was introduced at the probe, and the
analyzer value recorded once it reached a stable response. The Systenr Bias was within 5.0 percent of the
Calibration Span or 0.5 ppmv absolute difference or the data was invalidated and the Calibration Error Test and
System Bias were repeated.
Drift between pre- and post-run System Bias was within 3% of the Catibration Span or 0.5 ppmv absolute
difference. If the drift exceeded 3oh or 0.5 ppmv, the Calibration Error Test and System Bias were repeated.
To determine the number of sampling points, a gas stratification check was conducted prior to initiating testing. The
pollutant concentrations were measured at three traverse points. A twelve-point stratification check was performed
in 2021 per 40 CFR 60, Subpart KKKK. Each traverse point was sampled for a minimum of twice the system
response time. The pollutant concentration at each traverse point did not differ more than 5Yo or 0.5 ppm
(whichever was less restrictive) of the average pollutant concentration. Copies of the 2023 and 2021 stratification
check data can be found in the Quality Assurance/Quality Control Appendix.
An NOz - NO converter check was performed on the analyzer at the completion of testing. An approximately 50
ppm nitrogen dioxide cylinder gas was introduced directly to the NOx analyzer and the instrument response was
recorded in an electronic data sheet. The instrument response was within +/- l0 percent of the cylinder
concentration.
A Data Acquisition Systent with battery backup was used to record the instrurnent response in one (l) minute
averages. The data was continuously stored as a *.CSV file in Excel format on the hard drive of a computer. At the
completion of testing, the data was also saved to the AST server. All data was reviewed by the Field Team Leader
before leaving the facility. Once arriving at AST's office, all written and electronic data was relinquished to the
report coordinator and then a final review was performed by the Project Manager.
AST-2023-3338-002 RTK - Magna, UT Page 3-3
#AIiatrcEr
1 [ () li l.i ! L, A i, (.' f], (i'r; ll
Location: Rio Tinto Kennecott - South Jordan. UT
Source: REFCHP - Duct Burner Only
Project No.: 2023-333!
Run No. /lVlethod Run I / Method 3A
Oz - Outlet Concentration (C6), %" dry
where,
Co,: (Cor,-Co)* ( affi;)
Cor,__]Z_: average analyzer value during test,o/o dry
C" 0.1 : average ofpretest & posttest zero responses,oh dry
CMA I 1.0 : actual concentration of calibration gas,oh dry
CM I 1.0 : average ofpretest & posttest calibration responses, 7o dry
Co, 17.7 : Oz Concentration, 7o dry
COz - Outlet Concentration (Cco), o/o dry
cco,: (cou.-co)* ( #h_)
where,
Cob, 1.8 : average analyzer value duringtest, % dry
Co 0.1 : average ofpretest & posttest zero responses,o/o dry
CMA 10.9 : actual concentration of calibration gas,o/, dry
CM I l.l : average ofpretest & posttest calibration responses, 7o dry
Cco, 1.8 : COz Concentration, 7o dry
I L. (.) ll l.! ! (l ,rt i- (;l ti (l: Lj [r
Location: No Tinto Kennecott - South Jordan, UT
Source: REFCHP - Duct Burner Only
Project No.: 2023-3338
Run No. /MethodRun I / Method 10
CO - Outlet Concentration (C6s), ppmvd
cco: (co5,_c6)x (#foil)
where,
Co6. 13.2 : average analyzer value during test, ppmvd
C" -0.6 : average ofpretest & posttest zero responses, ppmvd
CM^ 25.2 = actual concentration of calibration gas, ppmvd
CM 25.1 : average of pretest & posttest calibration responses, ppmvd
Cco 13.5 : CO Concentration, ppmvd
CO - Outlet Emission Rate (Efus), lh/hr
ERco:
min L
C66xMWxQsx 60.m x28.32 to
24.04 ;**^ 1.0E06 x 453.592 ft
where,
Cco 13.5 : CO - Outlet Concentration, ppmvd
MW 28.01 : CO molecular weight, g/g-mole
Qs 41,885 : stack gas volumetric flow rate at standard conditions, dscfrn
ERco 2.47 : lb/hr
Al6rce
I I (l !l f'.1 i (.: A 1.. (l Fi t-.j i. l Ir
Location: Rio Tinto Kennecott - South Jordan. UT
Source: REFCHP - Duct Burner Only
Project No.: 2023-3338
Run No. /lVlethod Run I / Method 7E
NOx - Outlet Concentration (CNqJ, ppmvd
CNo,: (Co5r-C6)x ( ,?"^, \ous -v , " \ eCM =Col l
where,
Cour_A: average analyzer value during test, ppmvd
Co 0.2 : average of pretest & posttest zero responses, ppmvd
CMA 25.0 : actual concentration of calibration gas, ppmvd
CM 24.0 : average of pretest & posttest calibration responses, ppmvd
CNo* 16.6 : NOx Concentration, ppmvd
NOx - Outlet Concentration (CNo,"rs), ppmvd @ ls%o O,
C*o,ca: Cro^x ' 2o'9-15 '( rw=Tr)
where,
Cro* 16.6 : NOx - Outlet Concentration, ppmvd
Co, 17.7 : oxygen concentration, 7o
CNo,": 31.0 :ppmvd @15%02
NOx - Outlet Emission Rate (ERN9*), lb/hr
,*-..:
where,
C*6-!1![: NOx - Outlet Concentration, ppmvd
MW 46.0055 : NOx molecular weight, g/g-mole
Qs 4 1,885 : stack gas volumetric flow rate at standard conditions, dscfin
ERNo* 4.98 : lb,4r
AlIAIEE)
T l: {l i'l ii i()/', I (:i f i(i ij r
Iacation Rio Tinto Kennecott - South Jordan, UT
Source REFCHP - Duct Burner Onlv
Project No. 20213338
Run No. I
Parameter(s) VFR
Meter Pressure (Pm), in. Hg
AHPm = Pb+-
13.6
where,
Pb-[!|= baometric pressure, in. Hg
AH 1.400 = pressue diflbrcntial oforifice, in H2O
Pn ---7ilii-:i,,. Hg
Absolute Stack Gas Pressure (Ps), in. Hg
PsPs = Ph +---
1,3.6
where,
Pb-]!!|= brometric pressue, in. Hg
Pgg: static pressue, in. H2O
Ps 25.83 : in. Hg
Standard Meter Volume (Vmstd), dscf
lT536xVnrxPnrxY
Vmstd:Tm
where,
Y:LL: meter corectior factor
Vnr 43.853 = meter volmre, cf
pn ............ffi=
absolute nreter pressue, in. Hg
Tm 5l7.l : absolute nleter temperaturc, oR
vn,rtdJlllF= d."f
Standard Wet Volume (Vwstd), scf
Vwstd: 0.04716 x Vlc
where,
Vtc 46.6 : weight ofH2O collected, g
v*.tdTi--..t
l\!oisture Fraction (BWSsat), dimensionles (theoretical at saturated conditions)
rc63?_(ffi)
Example Calculations
BWSsat =
where,
T._A: stack temperatue, "F
P.4= absolute stack gas pressue, in. Hg
BWSsat 1.000 : dinrensionless
Moisture Fraction (BWS), dimensionless
VwstdR\A/q -
-
'"-(vwstd+vmstd)
wnere,
Vwstd 2.198 : standad wet volurre, scf
Vrrrtd.-il,,iil = standad meter volunre, dscf
BWS 0.055 : dimeusionless
Moisture Fraction (BWS), dimensionless
BWS = BWSmsd unless BWSsat < BWSmsd
where,
BWSet 1.000 : moistue fractiou (theoretical at satuated conditions)
BWSmsd 0.055 = moistue fraction (measued)
BWS..........9L
Ps
Alhlrce
lr i,.j i (
Example Calculations
Location Rio Tinao Kennecott - South Jordan, UT
Source REFCHP - Duct Burner Onlv
Proj€ct No. 2023-3338
Run No. I
Parameter(s) VFR
Molecular Weight (DRY) (Md), lb/lbuole
146 = (0.44 x o/oCO2) + (0.32 x o/oO2) + (0.28(100- o/oCO2 - o/oO2))
where.
CO:
o2
Md
___]j_: "arbon
dioxide concentration, o/o
J_= "xygetr
concentration, 7o
28.99 : lbAb nrol
Molecular Weight (WET) (Ms), lb/tbrnole
Ms = Md (1 - BwS) + 18.015 (BWS)
where,
Average Velocity (Vs), ftlsec
Vs=85.49xCp
where,
Cp 0.84
A P,,--]ffi-r'......ffi
Ps 25.83M"Av.a
: molecular weight (DRY), lb/lb mol
: moish!e fi'action, dimetsionless
: lb,4b mol
x (A P r/2) avg x
: pitot tube coeflicient
: average pre/post test velocity head ofstack gas, (in. H2O)r']
: average pre/post test absolute stack temperature, oR
: absolute stack gas prrssue, in. Hg
: molecula rveight ofstack gas, lb/lb mol
= fllsec
Md__32_Bws-g
Ms 28.39
Average Stack Gas Flow at Stack Conditions (Qa), acfm
Qa = 60x Vs x As
where,
Vr_L: stack gas velocity, ft/sec
Oag: cross-sectional arca of stack, ft2
Qa 69,'732 : acfnr
Average Stack Gas Flow at Standard Conditions (Qs), dscfm
Qsd l7.636xQaxrl-BWS;x B
where,
Qu_!!p_: alerage stack gas florv at stack conditions, acfnr
BWS 0.055 : noistue fiaction, diurensionless
Ps 25.83 : absolute stack gas pressure, in. Hg
Tr__ llll_: aYerage pre/post test absolute stack temperatur, oR
Qs 41,885 : dscfm
Dry Gas Meter Calibration Check (Yqa), percent
Y_\
v^H avc.)/s
(*
^H@
x (eu * ffp)x r"ra
Yqa =
where,
x L00
Y 0.982
o60Vm;!!!l
Tnr 5l?J
AH@ l.?63Pb_-4L
AH avg 1.400
Md 28.99(o")''l]]E
YquA
: meter collection factor, dimeusionless
: mn tinre, min.
: total meter volume, dcf
: absolute nleter temperatue, oR
: odfice meter calibration coefficient, in. HrO
= baonretric pressure, il. Hg
= alerage pressure difl'erential oforifice, in HrO
: molecula weight (DRY), tb/lb mol
: average square root pressure differential oforifice, (in. H2O)t2
: percent
allffirce
!1._l.i.l la /\: (,ri { .Jr,
Emissions Calculations
Location Rio Tinto Kennecott - South Jordan, UT
Source REFCHP - Combined Cycle
Project No. 2023-3338
Run Number Runl Run2 Run3 Averase
Date
Start Time
Stop Time
t2lt4l23 tzll4l23 l2lt4l23
7:52 9:20 10:51
8:52 10:20 I l:51
Input Data - Outlet
Moisture Fraction, dimensionless
Volumetric Florv Rate (Ml-4), dscfm
BWS
Qs
0.087
37,499
0.099
37,042
0.01r 0.066
36,658 37,066
Calculated Data - Outlet
Jz Concentration. %o drv c^" 12.44 12.46 12.46 t2.45
loz Concentration, oZ dry Cco, 5.04 5.04 5.04 5.04
lO Concentration, ppmvd
lO Emission Rate, lb/hr'
Cco
ERco
13.47
2.21
13.49
2.18
t2.89
2.06
13.28
2.15
NOx Concentration, ppmvd
NOx Concentration, ppmvd @ 15 % 02
NOx Emission Rate, lb/hr
CNo*
CNo*cts
ERNo*
13.3 8
9.33
3.60
13.44
9.39
3.57
13.64
9.s3
3.58
t3.49
9.42
3.58
Emissions Calculations
Location Rio Tinto Kennecott - South Jordan, UT
Source REFCHP - Turbine Only
Project No. 2023-3338
Run Numtrer Runl Run2 Run3 Average
Date
Starl Time
Stop Time
r2lt4l23 t2lt4l23 t2lt4/23
12:49 13:20 13:55
13:09 13:40 14:15
Calculated Data - Outlet
Oz Concentration, % dry co, 17.93 17.92 17.93 17.93
COz Concentration. % drry cco" 1.66 1.66 1.68 1.67
NOx Concentration, ppmvd
NOx Concentration, ppmvd (@ 15 o/o Oz
CNo*
CNoxcts
3.12
6.19
3.19 3.38 3.23
6.32 6.73 6.41
alI6rce
I i; a-: li f..1 i {-} i\ l. () n () i..} {'}
Emissions Calculations
Location Rio Tinto Kennecott - South Jordan, UT
Source REFCHP - Duct Burner Only
Project No. 2023-3338
Run Number Runl Run2 Run3 Averase
Date
Start Time
Stop Time
t2lt4l23 t2lt4l23 12il4t23
15:44 16:51 18:01
16:44 17:51 19:01
Input Data - Outlet
Moisture Fraction, dimensionless
Volumetric Florv Rate (Ml-4), dscfm
BWS
Qs
0.055
4r,885
0.052
41,535
0.053 0.053
41,704 41,708
Calculated Data - Outlet
Oz Concentration, % dry co. 17.74 17.84 17.90 17.83
COz Concentration, %o dry cco, 1.75 1.71 1.71 1.72
CO Concentration, ppmvd
CO Emission Rate, lb/hr
Cco
ERco
13.53
2.47
12.88
2.33
13.1 3
2.39
13.1 8
2.40
NOx Concentration, ppmvd
NOx Concentration, ppmvd @ 15 % O,
NOx Emission Rate, lb/hr
CNo*
CNoxcts
ERNo*
r6.60
30.96
4.98
15.99
30.84
4.76
15.89
3t.26
4.75
16.16
31.02
4.83
tu:AllalpE)
( ;i i.j Ir,,'ri. r:i i-ii-\I j i)
bcation Rio Tinto Kentrccott- South Jord!n, tlT
Method I Data
Source REFCHP - Conrbined CJclc
Project No. 2023-3338
Drte l2ll1l23
DuctOfi€ntraion: Vcdical
Du.r D""ign,--Tiiii-
Distancc fronr Iar wall ro Outrid" of Pon, ----6li- in
t'lippt" t rgttr----ili-in
o.prt or oucr'----i-i-in
Cross Sectional Area of ou.,,----illiJ-f,'
No. of Tot Pons: -----f-
Numbcr ofReadings ler Point: I
ni.rrn." A, ---]li--ft
Dirtancc A Duct Diamet"..' -----I--1nru* hc > 0.S,
Di.t"n." B,----li]-ft
Distrncc B Duct Dirmelers: 2.4 (must b€ > 2)
MinimomNumb{rofTralersePoidts: l6
Actoal Nunrbcr of I rsr"r.. Poin,.' -----li-
Mcrsurcr (Initial and Drt";, -iil-i]7i?Zi-
Rcri($cr (Inirial and Drt";, TEHiTiiEi
& crrlialirt 5;€rs c! *ar5
I l-
LOCATION OT TRA.VERSI POINTS
Nunbet of rnftrse poitn$ oil a d;otpler
1
2
3
{
s
6
7
8
9
l0
ll
t2
,3 t 5 6 1 8 9 t0 l1 t2
14.6
854
6.7
25.0
7J.0
91.3
44
t4 6
296
70.4
85.4
95.6
3.2
10.5
19.4
3).3
67.7
80.6
89.5
96.8
2.6
8.2
t4.6
22.6
34.2
65.8
77.4
85.4
9 t.8
nr__o
2.1
67
I t.8
17.1
25.0
35.6
64.4
7-i.0
82.3
88.2
93.3
97.9
*Percent ofsrrct dtanetetlrotn inside \el to tnene point.
Traversc
Point
V" ol Distancc uNtane
from
outide ofDi{mcter $rll
I
3
{
5
6
1
8
9
IO
ll
t2
3.).
10.5
19.4
323
677
806
89.5
,:t
t70
-\.59
t0.33
17.20
36.0_r
42.92
47.66,,j,
8 3/t6
12 Ut6
\6 l3?16
23 l r/16
42 9lt6
49 7116
54 3lt6
" _l'o
Stack Diagraill
A= 17fl.
B= t0.5 ft
Dcpth ofDuct = 51.25 in
Cross S*tioilal Ar.a
Downstream
Diaturbance
aaaaaaao
upstream
Diiurbance
Cyclonic Flow Check
Location Rio Tinto Kennecott - South Jordan. UT
Source REFCHP - Combined Cycle
Project No. 2023-3338
Dile l2ll4l23
Sample Point Angle (AP=0)
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
lt
t2
l3
t4
l5
16
Averase
l0
8
5
4
2
2
4
7
II
7
6
3
I
2
5
5
5.1
AIftaTEET
l: (i i i.. i'i
Location
Source
Project No. 2023-3338
Rio Tinto Kennecott - South Jordan. UT
REFCHP - Combined Cvcle
Method 2 Dila
I
t2^4/23
VALID
7:52
8.52
Pass
.,
t2lt4t23
VALID
9'.20
l0:20
Pass
3
t2n4t23
VALID
t0:51
ll.5l
Pass
AI
)
3
4
5
6
7
8
BI
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1.00
I .10
1.20
1.00
0.97
063
0.63
0.77
0.73
0.78
0.86
1.00
120
1.40
1.40
1.40
252
255
262
270
212
273
272
265
266
268
27t
27t
272
274
276
0.98
1.20
1.20
0.91
078
0.64
0.67
0.89
0.75
0.81
0.82
I .10
130
1.40
l.30
r.30
25s
261
266
210
274
277
276
277
258
267
270
272
278
277
27s
0.9s
1.20
1.30
0.92
0.75
0.63
0.65
0.93
0.82
0.80
0.84
l.l0
1.20
1.40
1.30
1.30
261
264
269
272
275
278
275
275
26s
269
272
274
275
277
274
275
Square Root of AP, (in. WC)t/2
Average AP, in. WC
Pitot Tube Coef{icient
Barometric Pressure, in. Hg
Static Pressure, in. WC
Stack Pressure, in. Hg
Average Temperature, oF
Aver:age Temperature, oR
Measured Moisture Fraction
Moisture Fraction @ Saturation
Moisture Fraction
02 Concentl?tion, 9/o
CO2 Concentration, 7o
Molecular Weight, lbflb-mole (dry)
Ntolecular Weight, lbfl b-mole (wet)
Velocity, ftlsec
VFR at stack conditions, acfm
VFR at standard conditions, sclh
VFR at standard conditions, scfm
(^P)"'
(AP)
(cp)
(Pb)
(Pg)
(Ps)
(Ts)
(Ts)
(BWSmsd)
(BWSsat)
(Bws)
(o2)
(c()2)
(Md)
(Ms)
(vs)
(Qa)
(Qsw)
(Qsw)
0.994
r.00
0.840
25.52
-0.25
25.50
268.3
727.9
0.087
1.000
0.087
12.4
5.0
29.30
28.32
71 .7
66,50 I
2,46s,270
41,088
37.499
0.994
1.00
0.840
25.52
-0.20
is.sr
270.6
730.3
0 099
I.000
0.099
125
5.0
29.30
28.19
71.9
66,761
2,467 "210
41,120
37.042
0.99s
l.0l
0.840
25.52
-0.20
25.51
27 t.9
731.5
0lll
1.000
0.lll
t2.5
5.0
29.30
28.05
72.3
67,062
2,474,085
4t,235
0.994
L00
0.840
25.52
-0.22
25.50
270.3
729.9
0.099
1.000
0.099
12.5
5.0
29.30
28.1 8
72.0
66,775
2,468,855
4t,148
37.066
AI ff:.:'i--IA
..i i il .,.
Method 4 Data
I i-r il,l) l.i f,
Locaiion
Soure
Project No.
Prrmet€(s)
Console Units / Method
Run No.
Drte
Status
Stan Time
End Time
Run Time, min (0)
Ilreter ID
I
t2/ I 4t23,
VALID
7:52
8:52
60
Mi- tl
2
t2L4t23
VAIID
9:20
l0:20
60
M5- 14
3
l2/14t23
VALID
l0:il
I l:il
60
Mi- r4
l\teter Correction Fector (Y)
Orific€ Celitlretioil Value (AH @)
Nrar Vacuum, in. Hg
Post Le* Ch€ck. ft.l/nrin let nrer vac.\
0.982
1.163
3
0 000 43"
0.982
t.763
3
000 /, 3"
0.982
1.763
3
N'l€ter Volume, ft3
0
5
l0
l5
20
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
otrl M€ter Volnme. ft3
,r03.76,5
407.505
4t 1.240
4 14.960
4r8.700
422.445
426.180
429.90,5
433.650
431.420
4.11.035
44,1.705
44t.427
41 66)
.{18.697
452 425
45 5.9-i5
459.42_i
462.995
466.6i-i
470 380
.173 965
117.t35
.181 i95
48i.325
48li.6-i-5
49t.Ei6
4l Il9
192.552
496.310
_i00.02,i
503.725
-i07.450
511.285
515.025
i r8.83i
522.65C)
-526.48_i
i30.270
i34.000
537.693
lemper{ture, oF
0
5
l0
15
20
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
\verag€ Temp€rrture, oF (TnD
\verage Temperature, oR (Tn)
,'linimuil Temperature, oF
,trrinn'm Tentnerrh're- oF
Ill€ter
39
40
40
4l
42
42
42
42
42
42
43
44
45
42
502
39
Probe Filter uom Imp. Erit
35
38
38
38
39
39
40
40
12
41
45
46
40
IUeter
45
45
46
47
47
47
47
48
48
48
48
49
49
47
501
45
Pro[re Filter uum Imp. Exit
40
37
37
38
40
4t
ril
4t
43
4,i
46
4l
35
l\leter
11
,t8
48
49
49
50
-50
-50
_51
-it
-il
52
_42
i0
510
Probe Filt€r Imp. Exi
.t0
38
39
40
42
41
45
46
47
1',l
,t8
-i0
50
41
38
50
laromet_ic Pressure, in. Hg
r{eter Orifice Pressure, in. lrl'C
ileter Pressur€, in. Hg
11--i--, M-1-- \/^L.-.- trr
(Pb)
(AH)
(Pm)
25.52
1.400
25.62
L400
25.62
37.182
25.52
1.400
25.62
39.31q
tnalysis Type
mpingel I, Pre/Post Test, g
mpiilger 2, Prc/Post Test, I
mpinger 3, Pre/Post Tesa, I
mpinger 4, Pre/Post Test, 8
,'olume Wrter Collect€d, nrL (\,lc)
itanderd Water Volume, fti (Vwstd)
'Ioisture Fr.ction Mesured (BWS)
;s ll{oleculrr Weight, lbrb-nol€ (d'y) (l!ld)
)Gll Calit retion Ch€ck Vdue (Yoal
Grarimetric Gravintctric
H20
H20
Enpt]
750.9
742.8
633.6
822.9
'741.4
633.8
917.0
720
-1.4
0.2
7.6
H20
H20
Empty
Silica
722 6
74t.4
633.8
9{7.0
lt03.0
742 3
63lt.E
9i3 9
80.4
0.9
0.0
6.9
H20
H20
Empt)
Silica
714.9
7123
638.8
9i3 S
8t2.2
712.2
633.E
960 8
97.3
-0.1
0.0
6S
78.4
3.697
0.087
29.30
2Ct
83.2
4.160
0.099
29 30
10.t. I
4.909
0.lll
29.30
44
pull6rrrce
' = " ;..::"'i;l"l;*ll";];i,1,,
Method L Data
Sorrce Rf,FCHP - Duct Burner Only
Projed No. 202!333E
D^te 12111123
DuctOdetrtxtioo: Vdical
Dr.t D"rigo,---Eii-
DirtMe from Far Wall to Outide of Pon:--]ili-in
Nippt" t*ngrh, ----i3i- in
D"prh of Du"rr ----Ii-in
Cross Sedon sl A rea of orct: ---llli7- fr'
No. of rot po,*,
-i-Number ofRodings per Poitrt: I
Di.t*el:-lii-ft
Distrnce A Duct Diameters: 3J (must ba > 0.5)
Dtutee B: loj ft
Dbtance B Duct Dimeteni 2,4 (must lre > r)
Minimum Number ofTrrve$e Poirts: 16
Actual Number of Trarerr.' Poins, -----lI-
Mcsurer (tnitisl xnd Dr,";, -EI-iiTiiII
Reriwer (Initial rnd Drte\ TCH l2ll4n3
LOCATION OF TMVERSE POINTS
Numbet oJ naverse poits ol o iliatu,
I
2
3
.l
5
6
1
8
9
l0
ll
l7
3 4 s 5 1 E 9 l0 ll l2
t4.6
85.4
6.7
25.0
75.0
14.6
29.6
70.4
8J.4
'1u
3.2
I05
t9.4
32.3
67.7
80.6
89.5
,:t
2.6
8.2
14.6
22.6
34.2
65.8
'1 7.4
85.4
91.8
tr_,
2.t
6.7
I 1.8
t1.7
25.0
35.6
64.4
75.0
82.3
88.2
93.3
919
'Perceil of slekdimebtlroil i6ide uall to tMBe Nin|
Trlverse
Point
'/. of
Dirmeter
Dfutmre from
oubide of$all
I
3
1
6
t
9
l0
ll
t2
3.2
t0.5
t9.4
32.3
67.7
80.6
89.5
968
1.70
5.59
10.33
17.20
36.05
42.92
47.66
5 l.-1,5
8 3/16
t2 Ut6
t6 t3a6
7i tt/t6
42 9lt6
49 "1t6
54 3il6
58 l/t6
-'r'--- -r- - -__.1_- 'i-._..'-l
Lw".,"*.-.1 I
lifi"x*"| I
Ie l'l I -l
Ildl""'**'"' 1 1I ___J J_t srEl o&r?rP : 61 - (?{ -llt.-. ..- . .- . . .,. -. 1I "1't I
i*:";-1;1-t'','"'; I
----r---".--T..--------T----
sGlti ,&.P 6 r*tacr4nav& $6s oi k
. :1.,,._... ..--.-
3"
__-t_,__ l. ._-"_ f_'
J.a
Strck Diagrm
A= 17ft.
B = 10.5 ft.
Depth ofDuct = 53.25 in
CrGs Sational Ar.a
Downstream
Dlsturbance
oaoaooao
Up$ream
Disturbance
pdllffiircEr Cyclonic Flow Check
Location Rio Tinto Kennecott - South Jordan, UT
Source REFCHP - Duct Burner Onlv
Project No. 2023-3338
Dfie l2ll4l23
Sample Point Angle (AP:0)
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
t0
1l
t2
l3
t4
15
l6
Averase 3.5
AIialrcEr Method 2Data
Location Rio Tinto Kennecott - South Jordan. UT
Sourcc REFCHP - Duct Burner Onlv
Proiect No. 2023-3338
Run No
Datr
Statur
Start'I'im(
Stop Timr
Leak Checl
I
l2lt4l23
VALID
t s.44
l6:44
Pass
2
t2lt4l23
VAI-ID
l6:5 I
I 7:51
Pass
3
12il4t23
VALID
l8:01
19.0 t
Pass
Avera
Traverce Point AP
(in. WC)
'I's
cF)
AP
(in. \\'C)
Ts
cF)
AP
(in. wC)
Ts
cF)
AI
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
BI
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
0.73
078
0.85
0.86
1.40
150
170
1.80
1.25
135
l.60
L40
0.90
0.75
0.78
0.75
239
24s
250
255
258
259
260
260
254
258
256
262
26s
266
261
26s
0.70
0.76
082
0.90
1.40
1.45
1.65
1.85
1.35
1.40
1.65
Ll5
082
075
0.12
0.70
245
248
250
2):
2s4
258
260
261
2s8
2s6
258
262
26s
266
264
263
0.68
0.78
0.84
0.91
t.45
I.45
1.60
1.90
L40
t40
1.60
t.25
0.84
0.76
070
071
248
247
249
253
255
262
260
265
263
265
267
26s
259
262
2s8
255
Square Root of AP, (in. \YC)1/2
Average AP, in. WC
Pitot Tube Coefficient
Barometric Pressure, in. Hg
Static Pressure, in. \VC
Stack Pressure, in. Hg
Average Temperature, ol-
Average Tempcl.ature, oR
Measurcd Moisture Fraction
Nloisture Iiraction @ Saturation
Ntoisture F-raction
02 Concentntion. 9/o
CO2 Conccntration. 7o
Ntolccular Weight, lb/lb-mole (d11 )
l\Iolecular Weight, Ib/lb-mole (wet)
velocity, ftlsec
V!-R at stack conditions, acfin
VFR at standard conditions, sclh
VFR at standard conditions, scfm
\/FR at standard conditions, dscfm
(^P)"'
(^P)
(cp)
(Pb)
(Pc)
(Ps)
(Ts)
(rs)
(BWSmsd)
(BWSsat)
(Bws)
(o2)
(co2)
(N{d)
(l\ls)
(vs)
(Qa)
(Qsw)
(Qsw)
(Osd)
I 0s8
l t5
0 840
25.85
-0.25
25.83
257.4
7t7.1
0.055
t.000
0 055
17.7
1.8
28 99
28.39
7 5.1
69,732
2,6s7,988
44,300
41.88s
1.047
l.l3
0.840
25.85
-0.25
2s.83
257.5
717 .2
0 0s2
1 000
0 0s2
17.8
t1
28.99
28.42
74.3
68,969
2,628,663
43,8 t I
4 I .535
1 053
l l4
0 840
25.85
-0.25
2s.83
258.3
718 0
0 053
L000
0.053
17.9
t.7
28.99
28.41
74.8
69,401
2,642,t42
44,036
4t.7 04
1.053
t.14
0.840
25.85
-0.25
25 83
257.8
717 .4
0.053
1.000
0.053
17.8
1.7
28.99
28.4t
74.8
69,368
2,642,931
44,049
4l .708
AIffi
Location
Soure
Project No.
Prramete(s)
Console Units / Method ft3
Method 4 Data
Run No.
Drte
Status
Start Time
End Tim€
Run Tinre, nrin (0)
Meter ID
I
l2/t4/23
VALID
li:4.+
l6:4.1
60
M5-l.l
2
t2lt4/23
VALID
l6:51
l7r5l
60
M5-14
3
t2/t4t23
VALID
l l|01
l9r0l
60
M5-14
l{eter Correction Factor (Y)
lrifice Calibration Value (AH @)
[,Irr Vacuum, in. Hg
'ost L€ak Check. ft3/min lat mar vac.I
0.982
1.763
3
0 001 aa 3"
0.s82
1.763
3
0 000 /a :1.
0.932
1.763
3
O O0l /a 3"
lreter Volume. ft3
0
5
l0
l5
2B
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
538.835
5.t2.510
546.1 l0
549.720
553.350
557.025
560.680
56.1.325
568.035
571.695
575.3r0
578.950
582.688
4t 851
583. I l5
586.615
590. r65
591.690
i97.36,5
600.9E0
601.S.1,s
60i.t 0l,i
6t t.-i50
6t5 02i
618.500
67t .97 5
625 423
625.983
629.-510
633.020
636.56-5
640.035
643.595
647.1 l5
6_i0.685
654.410
6i7.925
661.510
66,5.000
668 i02
lemp€rature, oF
0
5
l0
l5
20
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
iverrge Tenrperature, oF (Tm)
iv€rrge Temperature, oR (Tm)
/liniilun Temp€ratur€, oF
I\reteI
6l
60
6l
6t
60
59
59
5E
56
55
53
52
5l
-i7
517
5l
Probe Filter uum lmp. Eri
55
_i7
57
i8
i8
61
5)
53
52
53
52
52
5l
JJ
;,
llleter
46
46
4i
46
4i
45
45
16
15
14
44
4l
43
45
505
43
Probe Eilte'Vaauum
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Inrp. E
40
4t
15
46
4-i
41
4,i
4.1
.13
43
41
4.1
4l
.10
l\tet€r
4.t
.t,i
4i
44
13
,t3
12
43
12
42
4t
40
.{0
43
,i02
40
Probe Filter Vecuum
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Imp. Eir
.11
42
4l
40
41
4,t
45
16
16
4'l
41
48
47
4-5
40
48
lerometric Prcssure, in. Hg
'leter Oilfice Pressure, in. IVC
'Ieter Pressure, in. Hg
11--i--i M-r-- \r^L.-.- a. r
(Pb)
(AH)
(Pn,
25.8s
t.400
25.95
2i.8_i
t.400
2i.9-i
25.8-5
1.400
25.9i
38.048
inrlysis Type
mpinger l, Pre/Post Test, g
mping€r 2, Pre/Post Test, g
mping€r 3, Pre/Post T€st, g
mpinS€r 4, Pre/Post Test, I
jolume Water Collected, nrL (Vlc)
;tildard Water Volume, ftl (Vsstd)
,loisture frection Measured (BWS)
;as luoleculxr Weight, Ib/lb-mole (d'f) (l!ld)
)Gltl Crlibrztion Check Velne (Yor)
Grarimetric Gra!inratric Gravime*ic
H20
H20
Enpt)
Silica
696.{t
742.2
633.8
960.8
'737.3
'74t.3
638.6
963.0
40._s
-0.9
-0.2.
7.2
H20
H20
Empt)
Silica
137 3
741.3
638.6
9t1 0
719.4
14t.0
638.6
919 0
42.t
-0.3
0.0
10
H20
H20
Enrpty
Silica
754.3
'711.0
638.6
9tq0
796.3
't1t.6
633 9
9)t )
42.0
0.6
0.1
46.6
2 198
0.05-5
28.99
l0
43.8
2.066
0.052
28.99
-1 4
4-\_l
2.t21
0 0-5i
2lt.99
AI *i:FIa Method I Data
l,ocetion Rio Tinto Kennecott - South Jordrn. UT
Source REICHP - Conrbined Cycle
Proje.t No. 202!13J8
Date: l2l14/23
qr,.! P.r.mar.r(
Ductorientrtion: Vc(icl
Du.t D".ign,--iiliil,-
Distanc€ 6 om Far Wall to Outsid€ of Port: 59.75
Nippl. Length, ---iIO--
o"prh of or.t,---II3-
Cross secrionrl Area of Dr.r, ---illJ-
No. ofT"., Po,".,---l-
Number of Readings p". Point,--J-
U,rtrra" a,---lll-
Distance A Ducl Diem","r.,---lI-
oi.t,nc. B,---lil-
Distance B Duct Dianr€ters: 2y' (must be > 2)
lllininrunr Number ofTrav€me Points: 16
Actud Number ofTr{vem€ Points: 3
trleasurer (Initial md Drte): rjl I2lM
Reriewer (Initial and Date): tch l2114
LIRfULAR DLCI
tn
in
in
ft1
ft
(must be > 0.5)
It
LOCATION OF TRAVERSE POINTS
Nunbet oftrut'etse poirls oil o diailtetet
I
2
3
4
5
6
1
8
9
l0
ll
l2
32 54 6 1 8 9 10 ll t2
6 t6.7 67 - 4.4
4 50.0 2-i.0 - t4.6
83.3 75.0 - 29.6: "_' _ ;:1
95.6
-- 3.
-.10
-- 19
-32
-- 67
-- {t0
-89_- 96
14.
85.
- 2.6 - 2.t
- 8.2 - 61
- t16 - |8
- 2).6 - 11. t'
-- 312 - 25.0
-- 65.8 - t5.6
-- 714 - 614
- 85.4 - 750
-- 918 - Ii2.1
__ e14 _ EE.2
- 9t.-i
- 919
tPercenl oJsluck di.iltetet fioil insile udl 10 lree$e poinl
Traverse
Poiil
"/t ot
Diameter
Distance
ftom inside
wall
Distance
fronr
outside of
I
3
4
5
6
1
8
9
l0
ll
t2
t6.7
50.0
83.3
8.89
26.63
41 36
I 5.lg
ji.t3
'ojo
Stacl Diagrur
A= 17ft.
B - 10.5 ft.
Dcpth ofDuct: 53.25 in.
Cross Sectional Ar€
Downstream
Dislurbance
Upstream
Disturban.e
All6rpe-i iri (l ii l,l i (l /. I
Runl-RMData
(.1 n i.l ti [::,
Location:
Source:
Project No,:
REFCHP - Combined Cvcle
Rio Tinto Kennecott - South Jordu. UT
2023-3338
Time
Unit
Ststus
O, - Outlea COr - Outleto/odry %dry
Valid Valid
12.45
10.98
0.1 I
o.12
o.12
I 1.04
10.97
I l.0l
12.30
t2.39
12.42
t2.43
t2.44
t2.45
t2.45
12.45
t2.45
12.46
t2.47
12.46
t2.46
t2.45
12.45
t2.45
12.46
t2.47
t2.44
12.46
12.45
t2.46
t2.4s
t2.45
t2.46
t2.46
t2.45
12.46
t2.46
t2.41
12.48
t2.47
12.46
t2.46
t2.46
12.46
12.45
12.46
t2.48
12.48
12.46
12.46
12.46
12.46
t2.46
12.47
12.46
12.46
12.45
t2.45
t2.46
t2.45
12.44
12.44
t2.45
t2.47
12.47
t2.46
t2.47
12.47
CO - Outlet NOx - Outlet
ppmvd ppmvd
Valid Valid
Uncorrsted Run Average (C"h)
Cal Gas Concentrsiion (CM{)
Pretst System Zero Response
PosttBt System Zero Rsponse
Average Zero Response (Co)
Pr€tst System Cal ReEponse
Posttst Syst€m Cal Response
Average Cal Raponse (Cy)
7:52
7:53
7:54
7:55
7:56
'1 .57
7:58
'7:59
8:00
8:01
8:O2
8:03
8:04
8:05
8:06
8:07
8;08
8:09
8:10
8:l I
8:12
8: l3
8:14
8:15
8:16
8:17
8:18
8:19
8:20
8:21
8:22
8:23
8:24
8:25
8:26
8:2'l
8:28
8.29
8:30
8:31
8.32
8:33
8:34
8:35
8:36
8:37
8:38
8:39
8:40
8:41
8.42
8:43
8:44
8:45
8:46
8:47
8:48
8:49
8:50
8:51
5.l3
5.12
5.13
513
5.13
5.t2
5.t2
5.12
5.13
5.1 I
5.13
s.l3
5.14
5. l4
5.14
5.13
5.t2
5.t2
5.13
5.15
5.r3
5 t3
5. l3
10.90
0.07
0.09
0.08
10.99
I l.0t
1 1.00
5.04
13.53
25.t9
-0.20
-0.37
-0.29
25.53
25.57
25.55
13.41
I 3.85
13.9
13.'75
t3.'75
t4.o2
t4.o7
13.99
13.64
13.51
13.63
13.42
t3.2'.1
13.61
t3.37
t3.41
13.55
13.32
13.42
13.37
13.69
13.45
t4.28
13.'77
13.92
13.63
1 3.19
13.39
13.70
13.45
13.71
13.69
t3.52
13.51
t3.62
13.84
13.t6
13.05
13.53
13.75
t3.'t2
13.68
14.01
13.57
13.14
13.28
t3.29
13.45
t3.52
13.77
13.41
13.48
13.16
13.01
t2.72
12.92
13.04
t 3.18
13.64
I 3.65
l 3.59
13.03
24.95
0.19
o.22
0.2t
24.16
24.O8
24.t2
13.38
14.t2
13.96
l 3.82
13.76
t3.72
13.'76
13.78
13.85
t3.76
13.81
13.69
t3.79
13.84
13.82
13.80
13.73
13.66
I 3.73
13.64
13.66
13.62
t3.47
13.39
13.36
1 3.19
13.09
13.03
12.94
12.9t
12.88
t2.'78
12.67
t2.64
t2.63
12.68
12.56
12.59
12.53
12.58
t2.61
t2.45
t2.55
12.43
t2.48
12.54
12.51
12.46
12.46
t2.43
t2.43
t2.44
12.42
12.42
t2.36
12.25
12.40
t2.29
\2.14
12.38
12.25
t4
l3
l3
l5
t4
r3
t3
t2
l3
l3
l3
t4
l4
l5
l4
t2
t2
l3
t4
I3
t4
t4
5.13
5.14
5.14
5.15
5.13
5.13
5.t4
5.15
5.15
5. l4
5 13
5.12
5. l4
5. t4
5.t2
5.t4
pdlrffitrp
l[].()ilt',rtCAt .:i R I.) I.J F
Run2-RMData
fnetion! Rio Tinto Kemeott - South Jordu, UT
iourcg lffi
Prcject No.: 2023-3338
Source: REFCHP - Combined
Date: I
Time
Urit
Stsaus
9:20
9.21
9:22
9:23
9:24
9:25
9.26
9.2'1
9:28
9.29
9:30
9:31
9:32
9:33
9.34
9:35
9:36
9:3'1
9:38
9.39
9:40
9.4t
9.42
9.43
9:44
9:45
9.46
9:4'l
9:48
9:49
9:50
9:51
9:52
9:53
9:54
9:55
9:56
9:57
9:58
9:59
l0:00
l0:01
l0:02
l0:03
r0 04
l0:05
l0:06
l0:07
10i08
l0:09
l0:10
l0:l I
t0.t2
l0:13
l 0:14
l0:15
I0:16
l0:17
l0:18
l0:19
Or - Outlel
o/r dry
t2.44
r0.98
o.t2
0. l3
0. l3
10.97
10.99
10.98
l2 46
12.41
t2.43
t2.44
t2.44
t2.44
t2.45
t2.44
t2.45
t2.45
t2.43
12.42
12.42
t2.43
t2.43
t2.42
t2.42
12.44
12.45
12.46
12.45
12.43
12.45
t2.47
12.41
12.47
t2 46
12.46
t2.45
12.46
t2.45
12.45
12.44
12.45
t2.45
t2.45
t2.45
12 46
t2.46
t2.47
t2.47
t2.46
t2.45
t2.43
12.42
t2.43
12.44
12.46
t2.47
12.41
t2.45
t2.44
12.43
12.43
t2.43
t2.43
12.42
t2.42
12 43
COr-Outla
o/o dry
CO - Outlet
ppmvd
NOr - Outlet
ppmvd
t2 99
24.95
o.22
0.20
o.2t
24.O8
23.80
23.94
13.44
13.07
t2.87
12.58
12.80
12.'71
t2.76
t2.84
t2.7',|
12.93
12.94
t2.93
12.81
12.85
12.88
12.92
t2.86
12.85
12.68
12.51
12.62
t2.79
t2.82
12.82
13.00
t2.93
I 2.85
t2.'to
t2.'72
r2.'15
t2.90
t2.97
13.08
1 3.02
I 3.09
t2.95
12.96
12.71
12.72
12.83
12.89
l3.l I
l3.t7
13.33
13.27
t3.32
13.30
13.07
13.10
13.26
13.35
t3.34
13.34
13.20
13.25
I 3.30
r 3.48
13.40
t3.4t
13.33
I3.3r
Uncorrsted Rur Average (C.h)
Cal Gas Concentrstion (Cy1)
Pretest System Z€ro Rcpoase
Postt6t Sysiem Zero Reponse
Averege Zero Response (Co)
Pr€test System Cal Rgponse
Postt8t System Cal Rsponse
Average Cal Response (Cy)
5. l4
10.90
0.09
0.07
0.08
I l.0l
1 t.02
l t.o2
504
l2
t4
l3
l4
l4
t4
t3
13.46
25.t9
-0.37
-0.43
-0.40
25.5'1
25.38
25.48
13.49
13.01
13.35
t3.67
13.58
13.89
13.86
13.49
13.48
13.42
13.62
13.56
t3.'16
13.55
t3.76
13.59
13.24
13.28
13.38
13.4't
13.70
13.34
13.06
12.84
13.20
13.67
t3.44
I 3.56
13.t4
13.t2
13. l4
r 3.30
t3.2t
13.61
13.56
13.65
t3.42
13.58
13.15
13.62
13.73
13.85
13.7 t
13.56
13.74
13.34
l3.lo
13.26
13.03
13.43
13.31
t3.'7 t
t3.'t I
t3.'72
t3.32
14.03
13.38
13.s3
13.41
13.38
l3 02
5. l4
l3
t4
l6
l6
l4
l4
t4
l5
l5
t4
l3
t4
t4
t4
t4
ll
t2
5.13
5.13
5.13
5.13
5.13
5.13
5.l4
5.t4
5.13
5.l3
5.13
5.14
5.13
5. l4
5.13
5. l4
5. l5
5. l4
5. l5
5.16
5.16
5.16
5. l4
5.14
5. r3
5.15
5. r6
5. t5
5. t6
5.l5
5.15
5.17
5.16
5. l6
5 t5
AIaArEEr-,rtrClriii( n I
Run3-RMData
(-t R i..) i..j F
Location:
Source: REFCHP - Combined Cycle
Pr^ia.t N^. ,nr1-?1?R
Date: l2ll4/23
Time
Utrit
Or - Outlet
"/o dry
12.46
10.98
0.13
0. l4
0. l4
10.99
I 1.00
l 1.00
t2.46
t2 3t
12.38
t2.43
12.43
12.45
12.44
t2.43
12.43
t2.44
t2.44
t2.45
12.45
12.44
12.44
12.44
t2.43
12.44
12.44
12.45
t2.44
t2.44
12.45
t2.45
12.45
12.46
t2.4'1
12.41
12.47
12.48
12.47
12.45
t2.45
t2.46
t2.45
12.46
12.46
12.46
12.47
12.47
12.46
12.47
t2.49
12.48
t2 47
t2.46
t2.47
12.48
12.48
12.48
12.47
t2.49
t2.49
12.49
12.49
12.47
12.48
12.50
l 2.50
t2.49
t2.4'1
CO: - Outlet
o/o dry
CO - Outlet NOx - Outlet
ppmvd ppmvd
Utrcorrsaed Run Averege (C"6)
Cal Gas Concentrrtion (CMr)
Preaest System ro Rsponse
Postt6t System Z€ro Reponse
Average Zcro Response (Co)
Pretest System C8l Response
Posttst System Cal Rsponse
Average Cal Reponse (Cy)
Correted Run
l0:51
10.52
l0:53
l0:54
10:55
l0:56
l0:57
l0:58
l0:59
I l:00
I l:01
Il:O2
I l;03
I l:04
I l:05
I l:06
I l:07
I l:08
I l:09
I l:10
ll:ll
n.t2
ll:13
ll:14
ll:15
I l:16
1l;17
I l:18
ll:19
ll:20
ll:21
ll:22
ll:23
lI:24
ll:25
ll:26
ll:27
I l:28
ll:29
I 1:30
I l:31
tt.32
I l:33
I l:34
ll:35
I l:36
1.37
I l:38
I t:39
I l:40
I l:41
ll:42
I l:43
ll:44
I l:45
I l:46
ll:47
I l:48
ll:49
I l:50
5.13
10.90
0.07
0.06
0.07
I 1.02
I 1.04
I L03
504
t2.7t
25.t9
-0.43
-0.50
-o.47
2534
25.2t
25.30
12 89
13.07
24.95
0.20
0.20
0.20
23.80
23.64
23.74
l3 64
5.14
5. t3
5.t2
5.13
5.t2
5.14
5.14
5.t4
5. l3
5.13
5.13
5.13
5. l4
5.t4
5. l4
5.15
5.13
5.14
5.13
5.15
5.15
5. l5
5.14
5. l4
5.13
5.t4
5. t3
5. l4
5.t2
5. l4
5. l4
5.13
5.13
5. t5
5.t4
5. l4
5.14
5.13
5. l4
5. t4
13.25
13.04
13.66
t3.74
I 3.65
13.64
13.'t9
13.53
13.44
13.38
13.63
l 3.65
13.62
13.28
13.69
t4 06
t3.47
13.45
13.'t6
13.73
I 3.59
13.43
12.25
t2.27
t2.20
t2.29
I t.92
t2.tt
t2.61
t2.'12
12.3t
12.38
12.32
12.'t9
12.85
12.73
t2.49
t2.3t
12.19
I 1.96
12.23
t2.12
12.t6
12.30
t2.04
t2.25
I l.8t
|.96
t2.oo
12.05
tt.79
t2.3r
t2.13
12.06
t2.2t
I 1.88
tt.'76
12.o5
12.16
12.29
13.60
t3.46
13.3r
t3.22
13.35
t3.29
t3.27
13.28
1 3.14
13.05
t3.02
l3.l I
t2.90
12.66
12.58
12.82
12.98
13. l6
13.27
13.18
12.96
13.02
13.03
13.l0
13.03
t2.94
13.03
13.00
12.99
13.00
12.98
13.07
13.03
13.09
t2.98
13.t4
13.06
13.10
13.07
12.99
12.97
I2.88
13.01
I 3.05
I 3.00
13.06
13.02
13. l7
13.07
13.03
l3.l 7
13.03
13.08
13.t2
12.89
12.9t
13.07
13.t3
13.08
13.06
l3
t2
t4
l3
l3
13
t2
13
t3
t2
t2
t3
12
t4
t4
lt
t2
t2
l3
t4
Method I Data
Location Rio Tinto Kenn€cott - South Jordan, [lT
Source REFCHP - Duct Burner Onh
Proi€ct No. 202'3338
Dete: l2ll.l/23
Strck Parameters
DuctOdentrtion: Vefrical
Duct Design: Circular
Dis(an(e from F.r Wrll to Outside of Po,r,--silf in
Nippl" L"ngth' ---? J6- in
Depth ofDuct: 53.25 in
Cross Sectionai Aree of Duct: 15.47 ft2
No. ofTest Poras: 2
Number of Readiogs p", Poin,' ----J-
Di.trn"" A, ----iJ- o- ft
Distrnce A Duct Dirmeters: 3.li (must be > 0.5)
Distrnce B: 10.5 ft
Dhtrnce B Du(t Dirnre,".., ---1f,-(n,u., b" > 2,
l\{inimunl Number of T.ar".." Point., ----1il
Actual Numher ofTreverse Points: 3
lueesurer (Initial rnd Deie): rjl l, 14
Reviewer (Initiel ,nd Dete): tch 12114
cRiur-,cR DUcT I
LOCATION OF TRAVERSE POINTS
Numher ofburetse poiills on a diailreter
I
3
4
6
1
8
9
l0
ll
t2
3 5 6 1 8 9 r0 ll t2
116
3i.4
l.6.1
50.0
6.7
25.0
7i.0
933
4.4
t4.6
25.6
70.4
Ii.4
'lu
32
105
19.4
323
61.1
Ii0.6
89.,i
'1*
2.6
8.2
t4.6
22.6
342
65.8
77 I
E54
qt.8
2.t
6.7
I 1.8
t7.7
250
35.6
64.1
7-i 0
82.3
83.2
91 3
91.9
*I'erceilt olstuck dviletet/ron tnsit{e vdll to trdrerse point
Trrverse
Poirt
'/o ot
Dianreter
Distence D6tance
fronr
outside ofwrll
I
3
4
5
6
1
8
9
l0
ll
t2
t6.1
50.0
8.89
26.63
44.36
t 5.39
3J. t3
i0.86
Stack Diagrm
A= l7ft.
B = 10.5 ft.
Depth ofDuct = 53.2,i in.
Cross Sectional Area
Downstream
Disturbaace
Upstream
Disturbance
Allffirpe Runl-RMData
Lostion: Rio Tinto Kennecott - South Joldm, UT
JOUrC€: W
Projet No.r 2023-3338
Source: REFCHP - Duct Bu
Datet l2ll4/23
Time
Unit
Or - Outlet COr - Outlet CO - Outlet NOr - Outleto/odry o/odry ppmvd ppmvd
Uncorret€d Run Average (C"6)
Cal Gas Concentration (Cs1)
Pret€st System Zrro Response
Posttst System Zero Response
Average Zero Response (Co)
Pretest System C8l Response
Posttest System Cal ResponEe
Average Cal Rsponse (CM)
l5:44
15:45
l5:46
t5.4'1
15:48
l5:49
l5:50
15:51
l5:52
l5:53
I 5:54
l5:55
I 5:56
l5:57
l5:58
15r59
l6:00
l6:01
l6:02
l6:03
l6:04
l6:05
l6:06
l6:07
l6:08
l6:09
l6:10
l6:l I
l6:12
l6:13
l6:14
l6:15
l6:16
l6:17
l6:1 8
l6:19
l6:20
t6..2t
l6:22
l6:23
l6:24
l6:25
l6:26
l6:2'7
l6:28
16129
l6:30
l6:31
l6:32
16;33
l6:34
l6:35
I6:36
l6:37
I6:38
l6:39
l6:40
l6:41
16.42
l6:43
t7.7 t
10.98
0.1 I
0.10
0.1 I
10.98
il.02
il.00
1 '74
t'1.63
t7.63
t'l.63
t'?.62
t7.64
17.62
t1.63
t'7.64
11.62
t7.64
t'7.63
t'7.63
17.63
t't.63
t7.64
17.&
t7.63
t'7.63
t7.6t
17.63
17.63
t7.63
11.61
t't.62
t7.63
t7.61
17.61
t7.63
t7.61
t7.6t
t7 .6t
t1.62
t7.62
t7.u
17.61
t't .6t
t7.64
t7.63
t'7.63
t7.65
t't.'15
17.86
17.90
17.90
I 7.85
t'7.84
I 7.85
t'7.41
t'l.87
17.87
t7.8't
I 7.88
I 7.88
I 7.88
t7.87
17.87
11.81
I 7.86
l 7.86
I 7.85
1.84
10.90
0.08
0.06
0.07
il.l l
I 1.05
I 1.08
1.88
1.88
l 88
1.88
1.87
L89
1.88
L88
1.88
1.87
1.88
1.88
1.87
l.87
L87
L87
1.87
1.88
1.88
1.87
1.87
1.87
1.89
1.88
1.88
1.89
1.89
1.87
1.89
I.89
l.89
1.88
1.88
1.87
1.88
l 89
1.87
1.88
1.88
1.86
L8l
1.16
t.74
l.?5
t.77
t 7'7
t.76
L76
!,75
I.76
t.'16
t.'t5
t,'t6
I.75
|,76
L'76
l.75
I.71
I.'t6
t.77
I 3.20
25.t9
-0.64
-0.55
-0.60
25.05
25.t4
25.1 0
r153
t3.42
13.2
14.06
13.70
13.74
14.00
t3.62
13.66
15.14
r 3.90
13.61
13.83
13.71
t4.01
13.92
I 3.50
13.'72
13.66
I 3.53
14.25
l 3.34
13.65
13.66
13.65
13.38
13.87
t3.62
13.46
13.7'.|
14.32
13.49
t4.44
13.70
13.52
t4.06
t4.31
I 3.89
13.'17
I 3.50
13.'19
t2.62
t2.I
I t.49
t 1.67
12.09
t2.22
I 1.86
n.92
I t.88
I t.84
I r.75
I t.89
I 1.85
I 1.89
12.15
12.22
1 1.78
12.69
t2.52
12.2t
r 6.01
24.95
0.07
0.41
0.24
23.92
23.94
23.95
t6 60
16.t2
16.20
t6.t7
16.20
16.1 l
16.32
16.t1
16.t7
t6.t't
16.05
16.18
16.25
16.28
16.31
16.26
16.33
t6.47
16.45
16.51
16.43
t6.47
I 6.60
r 6.59
16.49
t6.45
16.55
t6.'72
16.56
16.54
16.52
16.60
r6.57
16.48
t6.45
16.50
t6.64
16.45
16.50
16.58
t6.46
15.88
15.25
15.08
15.06
t5.26
15.28
15.32
15.26
t5.24
t5.26
15.25
15. t4
15.20
l5.ll
15. l5
15. l4
15.14
15.21
t5.21
r 5.31
AIffirrce
I ti.rt,rni{.)ni l: l:, t l f,
Loetion: Rio Tinto Kennecott - South Jordar
Run2-RMData
Source: REFCHP - Duct Bumer C)nlv
Prcject No.:
Date:t2lt4l21
Time
Llnit
Or - Outlet COr - Outlet CO - Outlet
o/o dry o/o dry ppmvd
Valid Valid Valid
t.'t9 l2 58
10.90 25.19
0.06 -0.55
0.08 -0.59
0.07 -0.57
I L05 25.14
ll.l1 25.t6
11.08 25.t5
1.71 t2.88
|.'t6
I.',76
t.'t5
1.78
1.78
r.80
I.'79
1.78
1.78
I.79
t.'19
t.'71
1.78
1.78
1.79
1.78
1.78
1.78
I.'19
t.80
t.78
1.80
I 1.86
1t.92
l 1.66
t2.64
12.38
13.t6
t2.93
12.23
12.81
t2 5t
13.42
12.21
t2.21
12.o5
12.58
t2.39
t2.57
t2.72
t2.'70
t2.45
t2.82
t3.02
t2.94
12.70
12.49
I 1.98
I 1.99
12.6t
12.64
12.77
I2.l8
12.15
t2.55
t2.66
12.82
12 94
r 2.83
t2 30
12.60
12.34
t3.34
12.66
12.24
12.81
12.'13
t2.32
I 3.35
12.91
13.07
12.'t8
12.34
t2.4t
12.46
I 2.89
I 2.85
12.45
t2.67
12.54
12.55
12.63
19
19
't9
78
78
80
80
80
80
80
80
79
80
8I
80
80
80
80
79
80
8t
80
80
80
83
a2
l.80
l.8l
1.80
L80
l.80
L80
L19
l.8l
1.80
t.'79
1.80
l.8l
NOx - Outlet
ppmvd
Valid
15.56
24.95
0.41
0.40
0.41
23.98
24.12
24.O5
15.99
15.08
15.07
14.91
15.18
t5.24
15.49
t5.37
15.37
15.38
l 5.50
15.49
I5.38
15.43
t5.42
t5.41
t5.44
t5.42
t5.46
15.63
15.57
15.59
15.63
r5.57
15.5 t
15.60
t5.4 t
t5.50
15.59
t5.'t4
15.67
15.61
15.60
15.65
15.62
1 5.70
15.80
t5.'16
t 5.61
t5.62
15.67
15.46
I 5.66
l 5.6s
I 5.80
r5.69
r5.57
I 5.84
15.88
I 5.73
15.87
15.66
15.63
I 5.75
15.6'l
15.57
15.'79
l 5.55
I 5.56
t5.62
15.66
Uncorrsted Run Average (Co5)
Cal Gas Concentrstion (CMA)
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttst System Zero Reponse
Average Zero Response (Co)
Pretest System Cal Response
Postt6t System Cal Response
Average Cal Rsponse (CNr)
Corrected Run
16:51
l6:52
16:53
l6:54
l6:55
l6:56
l6:57
l6:58
l6;59
l7:00
l7:01
l7:02
l7:03
17:04
I 7r05
I ?:06
t'7.07
I ?:08
l'7:09
l7: I0
l7:ll
l'l:12
l7: l3
t't.t4
17: l5
t'7 .t6
l'7:l'7
l7: l8
l'7:19
t'l.20
t'? .21
17:22
17:23
t'7.24
l'1:25
17:26
l'1:2'1
l7:28
l'l:29
I 7:30
l7:31
l'7:32
t7 .33
l'1:34
I 7:35
l'1:36
l7:37
I 7:38
l'l:39
l7:40
l7:41
17 .42
17:43
t1 .44
l't.45
l'l:46
t1 .41
l7:48
t'?.49
l7:50
17.81
10.98
0.10
0.10
0.10
1.02
10.98
1 1.00
t7.44
I 7.85
I 7.86
I 7.88
t7.84
11.82
r 7.?8
I 7.80
l7.42
I 7.83
I 7.80
l 7.80
I 7.83
l 7.83
t7.84
I?.8t
r7.83
t1.82
I 7.83
I 7.80
I ?.81
I7.8t
I 7.80
I 7.81
17.81
17.81
i r.r:
l 7.83
17.81
l 7.78
17.79
I 7.80
r 7.80
t7.79
17.81
I 7.80
t7.'74
t7 .'19
17.81
I 7.80
I 7.83
I 7.80
I 7.80
I 7.80
17.81
l 7.81
17.76
I 7.78
t'1.19
I 7.80
17.81
t7.82
17.81
t'l.82
t7.82
I 7.80
I 7.82
17.82
t7.82
l 7.80
pd/lffiipEr
-i i.'(l I i i.l i il,'. I
Run3-RMData
-i l.I ll
laqtion: Rio Tinto Kemecott - South Jordm. UT
Source: RF-FCHP - fJuct Bumer Onlv
Project No.: 2023-
Date: l2ll4l23
Time
Llnit
0r - Outlet
"/. dry
10.98
0.10
0. l0
0. l0
10.98
10.96
10.97
r7.90
t7 .'71
t7.76
t't .7 5
t1.'17
t1.'18
I 7.80
17.81
17.84
t7.82
l 7.80
I 7.80
t1.84
t'7.82
t't.82
I 7.83
17.81
17.80
17.81
t'l.82
I 7.81
t1.84
I 7.83
1'1.82
t7.82
17.81
t'l.82
l 7.83
I 7.84
t'7.84
I 7.83
t7.84
l 7.85
11.84
I 7.84
t'7.84
I 7.84
I 7.84
I 7.85
l 7.83
17.81
t7.78
t'|.82
I 7,8I
17.81
17.81
r7.83
t1.82
11.82
t'7.42
I 7.86
t7.84
l ?.86
I 7.84
11.84
11.44
17.83
r ?.85
r 7.84
r 7.85
r 7.84
CO, - Outlet
"/o dry
10.s0
0.08
0.04
0.06
ll.ll
I l.l0
ll.lt
l8l
t.82
r83
t.82
t82
1.80
1.80
t.79
1.80
1.82
I.80
t.79
1.80
1.80
t.19
l.8l
l.8l
1.81
1.8r
1.80
I.',19
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.79
|.'79
t.79
|.'79
I.79
1.79
l.78
1.80
I.'t9
t.'79
t.19
1.79
1.80
t.80
l.8l
I.79
r.80
1.80
1.80
|.79
|.19
|.'19
|.19
1.71
|.'19
L',t'1
I.79
t.'79
|.'79
L78
1.78
t.'79
t.78
t.'79
CO - Outlet
ppmvd
25.t9
-0.59
-0.55
-o.57
25.16
25.23
25.20
13. I3
t2.87
13.09
t3.26
t2.8 t
t2 7l
t3.12
t2 75
12.37
t2.69
12.69
12.49
12.13
t2.45
12.67
13.48
13.04
13.09
13.39
t2.'t7
t2 52
r2.18
12.24
t2'12
12.68
12.68
12.51
t2.65
12.57
l2 88
12.98
12.48
t2.42
t2.66
12.81
12.9t
1236
12.67
t2.77
t2.97
t2.94
13.25
t3.29
t3.92
14.69
14.00
t2.95
13.19
13.t2
13.20
t2.66
12.73
t2.48
t2.67
r 3.06
13.08
t2.93
t2 59
t21t
t2.'79
t2.92
NOx - Outl€t
ppmvd
17.42 1.80 t2.86Uncorrsted Run Average (C"6)
Cal Gas Concentration (CitA)
Pr€test System Zero Rsponse
Posttst System Zero Response
Aversg€ Zero Rsponse (Co)
Pr€test System Cal Response
Posttst System Cal Rsponse
Average Cal Reponse (C11)
Corrected Run
l8:Ol
l8:02
l8:03
l8:04
l8:05
l8:06
18;07
l8:08
l8:09
l8:10
l8:l I
l8:12
I 8:13
l8: l4
l8: l5
l8: I6
l8:l?
l8: l8
l8: l9
l8:20
l8:21
l8:22
l8:23
l8:24
l8:25
t8.26
t8 27
18.28
18.29
I 8:30
l8:31
I 8:32
I 8:33
I 8:34
I 8:35
I 8:36
l8:37
l8:38
I 8:39
l8:40
l8:41
18.42
l8:43
la:44
l8:45
l8:46
18"41
l8:48
l8:49
l8:50
l8:51
I8:52
l8:53
l8:54
l8:55
l8:56
l8:57
l8:58
l8:59
19:00
15.57
24.95
0.40
0.35
0.38
24.12
24.34
24.23
I 5.89
15.49
l 5.52
t 5.64
15.58
15.53
15.45
15.52
r5.34
15.41
15.63
I 5.56
15.41
15.51
I 5.54
15.49
15.59
15.68
t5.67
t5.62
15.63
r 5.54
I 5.59
15.? I
t5.'16
t5.72
r5.7r
I 5.53
15.48
I 5.53
15.62
r5.46
15.40
15.44
15.41
I 5.50
15.41
t 5.49
15.47
t5.47
15.58
15.86
r5.66
15.68
15.60
15.69
I5.6I
r5.68
15.68
r5.66
15.45
15.65
t5.46
I 5.63
I 5.60
I 5.59
t 5.61
15.49
t5.54
I 5.54
15.49
Runl-RMDataAfjalpEr
i-i a,l;l.j i().,\r (l[i(:[]l:'
Location: Rio Tinto Kennecott - South Jordan, UT
Source: REFCHP - Turbine Only
Project No.: 2023-3338
Date: l2ll4l23
Time
Unit
Status
Uncorrected Run Average (Cou.)
Cal Gas Concentration (CnJ
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Average Zero Response (Co)
Pretest System Cal Response
Posttest System Cal Response
Average Cal Response (Cn)
Corrected Run A
Oz - Outlet
oh dry
Valid
t7.92
10.98
0.09
0.14
0.12
I 1.00
I 1.04
11.02
17.93
COz - Outlet
oh dry
Valid
1.74
10.90
0.03
0.08
0.06
u.l l
r 1.06
I 1.09
1.66
t.73
1.73
1.73
1.73
t.72
t.73
t.72
1.74
1.74
1.74
r.74
1.74
1.74
1.74
1.74
1.74
1.74
1.75
1.74
1.75
NOx - Outlet
ppmvd
Valid
3.04
24.95
0.05
0.10
0.08
23.83
23.74
23.19
3.12
3.05
3.05
3.04
3.08
3.03
3.02
3.02
3.09
3.08
3.05
3.02
3.0 r
3.01
3.04
3.05
3.01
3.04
3.06
3.04
3.0s
l2:49
12:50
l2:51
l2:52
l2:53
12:54
12:55
12:56
12:57
l2:58
12:59
l3:00
l3:01
13:02
I 3:03
l3:04
13:05
l3:06
13:07
l3:08
17.93
11.92
t7.93
17.92
17.94
17.93
11.93
17.91
17.92
17.91
11.93
t7.92
17.93
17.92
17.91
17.92
t7.9t
17.90
17.90
17.89
plllffiipE)
'iL('til',.1 iOr\L {lR(-t. I t:'
Run2-RMData
Rio Tinto Kennecott - South Jordan UTLocation:
Source:
Project No.:
REFCHP - Turbine Only
2023-3338
Datez l2ll4l23
Time
Unit
Status
Uncorrected Run Average (Cot.)
Cal Gas Concentration (C*o)
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Average Zero Response (Co)
Pretest System Cal Response
Posttest System Cal Response
Average Cal Response (Cru)
Corrected Run A
O, - Outlet
o/o dry
Valid
COu - Outlet NOx - Outlet
o/, dry ppmvd
Valid Valid
l3:20
13:21
13:22
l3:23
13:24
13:25
l3:26
13:27
l3:28
l3:29
l3:30
l3:3 I
l3:32
l3:33
13:34
l3:35
13:36
13:37
l3:3 8
I 3:39
r 7.88
17.89
17.88
17.87
11.90
17.91
17.91
r7.89
17,90
17.88
17.90
17.90
17.90
17.90
t7.90
17.89
17.89
17.90
t7.90
17.92
1.74
1.74
1.75
1.75
1.74
t.73
1.74
1.74
1.74
1.75
1.74
r.75
r.74
1.74
t.74
1.75
1.74
1.74
1.74
t.73
10.98
0.14
0.09
0.12
r 1.04
10.98
I l.0l
17.92
r0.90
0.08
0.05
0.07
I 1.06
u.l t
r 1.09
1.66
24.9s
0.10
0.04
0.07
23.74
23.85
23.80
3.19
3.r3
3,t4
3. l5
3.16
3.1 l
3.1 I
3.1 l
3.12
3.12
3.14
3.10
3.07
3.08
3.05
3.0s
3.1 r
3.09
3.1 I
3.09
3.08
plnffirrcG!
'l [ (; l , n.j 1 i.l iri r. (l fi a,,] U i:)
Location: Rio Tinto Kennecott - South Jordan, UT
Run3-RMData
Source: REFCHP - Turbine Only
Project No.: 2023-3338
Date: l2ll4/23
Time
Unit
Status
Uncorrected Run Average (Cou,)
Cal Gas Concentration (CrrrJ
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Average Zero Response (Co)
Pretest System Cal Response
Posttest System Cal Response
Average Cal Response (Cnr)
Corrected Run A
Oz - Outlet
o/o dry
Valid
17.87
10.98
0.09
0.09
0.09
10.98
10.98
10.98
t7.93
COz - Outlet
oh dry
Valid
1.75
10.90
0.05
0.05
0.05
11.11
11.08
I l.l0
r.68
1.76
1.76
1.76
t.16
t.7 5
1.76
t.76
1.76
1.76
1.76
1.75
1.75
1.75
t.75
t.7 5
1.75
1.75
1.14
t.l4
1.75
NOx - Outlet
ppmvd
Valid
3.21
24.95
0.04
0.04
0.04
23.8s
23.80
23.83
3.38
l3:55
l3:56
13:57
l3:58
l3:59
l4:00
l4:01
l4:02
l4:03
l4:04
l4:05
l4:06
l4:07
14:08
l4:09
14:10
l4:11
l4:12
l4:13
l4:14
17.85
17.87
17.86
17.87
17.89
17.87
17.87
17.87
r7.87
17.86
17.89
17.89
17.88
17.87
t7.87
17.87
t7.87
17.88
17.89
t7.89
3.28
3.2s
3.23
3.21
3.23
3.27
3.25
3.26
3.28
3.32
3.26
3.23
3.27
3.32
3.31
3.29
3.27
3.26
3.26
3.28
AthrEE)
Location Rio Tinto Kennecott - South Jordan. UI'
QA Data
Source REFCHP - Combined Cvcle
Project No. 2023-3338
Parameter(s) VFR
Date Pitot ID Evidence of
damase?
Evidence of
mis-alisnment?
Calibration or
Renair reouired?
12t14t23 P6-96 no no no
Date Probe or
Thermocounle ID
Reference
Ternn. (oFI
Indicated
TArnn /otr'\Difference Criterie
l2lt4l23 P6-96 100.0 99.0 0 20/"+ 1.5 % (absolute)
Field Balance Check
Date 12il4t23
Balance ID 5A.2881026
Certified Weight ID:SLC-TKG-3
Certified Weight (g):1000.0
Measured Weight (g):999.7
Weight Difference (g):0.3
Date Barometric Pressurr Evidence of
damase?Reading Verified Calibration or
Reoair reouired?Weather Station [,ocation
12il4t23 Weather Station NA NA NA SALT LAKE CITY AIRPORT
Dete Meter Bor ID Positive Pressure Leak Check
t2n4t23 M5-t4 Pass
anlHrrce DGM Calibration-Orifices
Document I 620.004
Revision 21.0
Effective Date 1/25/23
lssuing Department Iech Servlces Page lof 1
Equipment Detail - Dry Gas Meter
Console lD: M5-14
Meter S/N: 8219521
Critical Orifice S/N. 1330
Calibration Detail
nitial Barometric Pressure, in. Hg (Pb)
Final Barometric Pressure, in. Hg (PbF)
Averaqe Barometric Pressure, in. Hq (Pb)
25 49
25.45
25.47
Critifcal Orifice iD (Y)
K' Factor, ft' R'/'/ in. wc.min (K')
Vacuum Pressure, in. Hg (Vp)
lnitial DGM Volume, ftj Um,)
Final DGM Volume, ft3 (VmF)
Total DGM Volume, ftr (Vm)
r 330-31
0.8429
140
76.900
87 935
11 035
1 330-31 1330-25
4 6728
15.0
105.900
114 669
8.769
1 330-25 1 330-19
0 5186
17.0
139.505
149 849
10 744
1330-19
0.8429 0 673 0 519
14.0
87.935
98.918
11.043
15.0
114.669
123.421
8.752
17.0
149.849
156704
6 855
Ambient Temperature, 'F (Ta)
lnitial DGM Temperature, "F (Tm)
Final DGM Temperature, 'F [mF)
Averaqe DGM Temperature, "F ( Tm)
72
67
67
67
72
67
6B
68
73
69
69
69
13
69
70
70
71
66
67
67
71
67
68
68
Elapsed Time (O)
Meter Orifice Pressure, in. WC (AH)
Standard Meter volume, ftr rymstd)
Starda'd Crit cai Orifice VotrTre, ft3 (Vc0
l''leter Correction Factor (Y)
Tolerance
Orifice Calibration Value (AH @)
Tolerance
Orifrce Cal ChecL
10 00
3.20
9 5003
9 3106
0.980
0.002
1.788
0 025
10.00
3.20
9 4982
9 3106
0.980
0.002
1 786
0 023
10 00
2.00
7 4951
7 4247
0.991
0.008
1.144
0 018
'10.00
2.00
7.4735
7 4247
0.993
0.011
1.743
0 020
15.00
1.20
8.8629
8.6007
0 970
0 012
1759
0.003
10 00
1.20
5.8623
5.7338
0.978
0 004
1.756
0 007
120 183 179
Meter Correction Factor 01 0.982
)rifice Calibration Value (AH @)1.763
Positive Pressure Leak Check Yes
Equipment Detail - Thermocouple Sensor
Reference Calibrator Make. OMEGA
Reference Calibrator Model: CL23A
Reference Calibrator 5/N: T-197207
Calibration Detail
Reference Temp.Display Temp.Accuracy Difference
I oR oF oR V"oF
0
6B
100
460
528
560
-1
66
98
459
526
558
0.2
0.4
0.4
1
2
2
223
248
273
683
708
733
221
246
271
681
706
731
03
03
03
2
2
2
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1,000
1,100
1,200
760
860
960
1,060
1,160
1,260
1,360
1,460
1,560
1,660
298
397
496
597
699
799
899
1,000
1,100
1,200
758
857
956
1,457
'1,159
1,259
1,359
1,460
1,560
1,660
03
0.3
0.4
03
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
00
0.0
2
4
3
1
1
1
0
0
0
Personnel
Stacey Cunninqham
Calibration By
Calibration Date
Revlewed By
RYAN LYONS
6/21/2023
Response Times
'i ir. ll i\.J I ()i\ L- (r F () lJ [)
Location: Rio Tinto Kennecott - South Jordan, UT
Source: REFCHP - Combined Cycle
Project No.: 2023-3338
Res seconds
Parameter Ou - Outlet COz - Outlet CO - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Zero
Low
Mid
Averase
30
NA
30
30
NA
30
30
NA
30
30
NA
30
30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0
A/lffiipe'i l: (_t |1 f'l I {
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
'Ai' iiii(:i'l:
Rio Tinto Kennecott - South Jordan, UT
Response Times
REFCHP - Duct Burner Only
2023-3338
seconds
Parameter Oz - Outlet COz - Outlet CO - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Zero
Low
Mid
Averase
30
NA
30
30
NA
30
30
NA
30
30
NA
30
30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0
TECHNI()AL GROTJT)
Location: Rio Tinto Kennecott - South Jordan. UT
Source: REFCHP - Combined Cycle
Project No.: 2023-3338
Date: 1211412023
Traverse Point Time CO
(nnm)
NOx
(nnm)
A-l
2
J
7:48
7:49
7:50
13.55
13.95
13.82
r 3.8
t5.94
15.60
15.04
15.5Averase
Criteria Met Sinele Point Sinsle Point
AIlffiiEEr
;.{: il t.i tt i {) /, l- qi Ft () l.l P
Location: Rio Tinto Kennecott - South Jordan
Source: REFCHP - Duct Bumer Only
Project No.: 2023-3338
Date: 1211412023
Traverse Point Time o2
(o/ol
Coz
(06l
CO
(nnm)
NOx
(nom)
A-l
2
3
l5:29
l5:30
l5:31
17.63
17.62
17.64
17.6
1.88
1.88
1.87
1.9
13.42
t4.33
12.88
13.5
16.01
16.06
16.r0
l6.lAverage
Criteria Met Sinele Point Sinsle Point Sinele Point Sinsle Point
RIlffirpe
SOURCE TESTING
QA Data
Stratification Check
Location: Rio Tinto Kennecott - Magna, UT
Source: REFCHP - Combined Cycle
Project No.: 2!{!3!
Date: 3/312021
Traverse Point Time NOx
(onm)
CO
(onm)
o2
(Yo\
Coz
(o/"\
A-l
I
2
2
3
J
4
4
5
5
6
6
6:46
6:41
6:48
6:49
6:50
6:51
6:52
6:53
6:54
6:55
6:56
6:57
18.6
18.6
18.8
18.9
18.7
18.8
19. I
19. I
18.9
19.0
19.0
18.9
41.3
41.9
41.5
41.4
39.9
4l.l
40.7
39.8
41.2
40.9
40.7
40.4
I l.s
I 1.5
I 1.5
I 1.5
I 1.5
I 1.5
I1.5
I t.4
I 1.5
I1.5
I 1.5
I 1.5
5.4
5.4
5.3
5.3
5.4
5.3
5.4
5.4
5.4
5.4
5.3
5.4
B-l
I
2
2
J
J
4
4
5
5
6
6
7:00
7:01
7:02
7:03
7:04
7:05
7:06
1:01
7:08
7:09
7:10
7:l I
19.2
19.2
19.2
18.9
18.9
18.9
18.9
18.9
19.0
18.9
18.6
r 8.6
40.9
4r.8
41.9
39.9
4r.8
42.2
40.8
41.4
41.5
4l.s
39.5
41.3
I 1.4
|.4
I 1.4
tt.4
I 1.5
I 1.5
I 1.5
tt.4
I 1.5
I 1.5
I 1.5
11.5
5.4
5.4
5.4
5.4
5.4
5.4
5.4
5.4
5.4
5.4
5.4
5.3
Averase 18.9 4\.1 l 1.5 5.4
Criteria Met Sinele Point Sinele Point Sinele Point Sinele Point
Alffirce
SOURCE TESTING
QA Data
Stratification Check
Location: Rio Tinto Kennecott - South Jordan. UT
Source: REFCHP - Duct Burners
Project No.: 2021-1074
Date: 412812021
Traverse Point Time NOx
(nnm)
CO
(nnm)
o2
(v,\
Cou
(Vol
A-l
2
J
4
5
6
14:40
14:41
l4:42
14:43
l4:44
l4:45
18.6
19.0
r 8.8
18.7
18.9
t8.9
15.9
15.9
16.3
16.0
15.8
16.4
17.6
11.6
17.7
17.6
17.6
tt.6
1.9
2.0
2.0
1.9
2.0
1.9
B-l
2
J
4
5
6
l4:52
l4:53
l4:54
l4:55
l4:56
l4:57
18.4
18.9
t9.6
19.7
19.5
19.7
t6.6
16.6
16.0
16.3
r6.3
16.3
r 7.8
17.6
17.5
17.6
l'7.5
17.6
1.9
1.9
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
Averase 19.0 16.2 17.6 2.0
Criteria Met Sinsle Point Sinsle Point Sinsle Point Sinele Point
AI6rrceTTCIINICAL GROfJP
Location: Rio Tinto Kennecott - South Jordan, UT
Response Times
Source: REFCI{P - Turbine Only
Project No.: 2023-3338
seconds
Parameter Or - Outlet COr - Outlet NOx - Outlet
7*ro
Low
Mid
Averase
30
NA
30
30
NA
30
30
NA
30
30.0 30.0 30.0
QA Data
Location Rio Tinto Kennecott - South Jordan, UT
Source REFCHP - Combined Cycle
Project No. 2023-3338
Parameter Oz - Outlet COz - Outlet CO - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Make
Model
S/N
Ooeratins Ranse
servomex
4900
100269
25
servomex
4900
100269
100
thermo
48i
208845
t00
thenno
42i
132t95897 I
100
Cylinder ID
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
NA
NA
RR03686
RR03384
NA
NA
RR03686
RR03384
NA
NA
EB0097304
EB0097304
NA
NA
EB0097304
E80097304
Cylinder Certifed Values
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
NA
NA
10.98
24.0
NA
NA
10.9
23.7
NA
NA
s0.39
50.39
NA
NA
49.91
49.91
Cylinder Expiration Date
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
NA
NA
9119131
t0lt9/29
NA
NA
9lt9l3l
t0lt9l29
NA
NA
10120130
t0120130
NA
NA
10120130
10120/30
Ivpe of Samnle Line Heated Sample Line
Calibration Data
Location: Rio Tinto Kennecott - South Jordan, UT
Source: REFCHP - Combined Cycle
Project No.: 2023-3338
Date: 12114123
Parameter O, - Outlet CO, - Outlet CO - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Desired Snan 24.00 23.70 50.39 49.9t
Low Range Gas
Low
Hish
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Mid Range Gas
Low
Hish
9.60
14.40
9.48
14.22
20.16
30.23
19.96
29.95
High Range Gas
Low
Hish
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Actual Concentration (7o or ppm)
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
0.00
NA
10.98
24.00
0.00
NA
10.90
23.70
0.00
NA
25.t9
s0.39
0.00
NA
24.95
49.91
Response Time (seconds)30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00
Uoscale Calibration Gas (C"n^)Mid Mid Mid Mid
Instrument Response (7o or ppm)
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
0.01
NA
I I.0l
23.99
0.04
NA
I l.l5
23.7 5
-0.01
NA
25.s7
s0.43
-0.04
NA
24.96
49.90
Performance (7o of Span or Cal. Gas Conc.)
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
0.04
NA
0.12
0.04
0. l7
NA
1.05
0.21
0.02
NA
0.75
0.08
0.08
NA
0.02
0.02
Status
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
PASS
NA
PASS
PASS
PASS
NA
PASS
PASS
PASS
NA
PASS
PASS
PASS
NA
PASS
PASS
AfarpC!Bias/Drift Determinations
Location: Rio Tinto Kennecott - South Jordan. UT
Source: REFCHP - Combined Cycle
Project No.: 2023-3338
Parameter 0z - Outlet CO, - Outlet CO - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Run 1 Date l2ll4l23
Span Value
Initial Instrurnenl Zero Cal Response
Initial Instrument Upscale Cal Response
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Pretest Systenr Upscale Response
Posttest Svsterrr I Joscale Resoonse
24.00
0.01
I l.0l
0.1 I
0.12
I 1.04
10.97
23.70
0.04
ll.t5
0.07
0.09
10.99
l l.0l
50.39
-0.01
25.5'7
-0.20
-0.37
25.53
25.57
49.91
-0.04
24.96
0.t9
0.22
24.16
24.08
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero
Posttest Zero
Pretest Span
Posttest Span
0.42
0.46
0.12
-0. l7
0. l3
0.2t
-0.68
-0.s9
-0.38
-0.71
-0.08
0.00
0.46
0.52
- 1.60
-1.76
Drift(%)
Zero
Mid
0.04
-0.29
0.08
0.08
-0.34
0.08
0.06
-0.r6
Run 2 Date l2ll4l23
Span Value
lnstrument Zero Cal Response
lnstrument Upscale Cal Response
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Pretest System Upscale Response
Posttest Svstem Uoscale Resoonse
24.00
0.0r
ll.0l
0.12
0. l3
t0.97
10.99
23.70
0.04
I 1.15
0.09
0.07
I l.0l
I 1.02
50.39
-0.01
25.57
-0.37
-0.43
25.57
25.38
49.91
-0.04
24.96
0.22
0.20
24.08
23.80
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero
Posttest Zero
Pretest Span
Posttest Span
0.46
0.50
-0.t7
-0.08
0.21
0. l3
-0.59
-0.55
-0.71
-0.83
0.00
-0.38
0.52
0.48
-1.76
-2.32
Drifr (%)
Zero
Mid
0.04
0.08
-0.08
0.04
-0.12
-0.38
-0.04
-0.56
Run 3 Date 12114123
Span Value
Instmment Zero Cal Response
Instmment Upscale Cal Response
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Pretest System Upscale Response
Posttest Svstem l]oscale Resoonse
24.00
0.01
ll.01
0.l3
0. l4
10.99
l1.00
23.70
0.04
I l.l5
0.07
0.06
lt.02
I 1.04
50.39
-0.01
25.57
-0.43
-0.50
25.38
25.2t
49.91
-0.04
24.96
0.20
0.20
23.80
23.68
Bias (7d
Pretest Zero
Posttest Zero
Pretest Span
Posttest Span
0.50
0.54
-0.08
-0.04
0. l3
0.08
-0.55
-0.46
-0.83
-0.9'7
-0.38
-0.71
0.48
0.48
-2.32
-2.s6
Drift(%)
Zero
Mid
0.04
0.04
-0.04
0.08
-0. l4
-0.34
0.00
-0.24
trlaAI QA Data
Location Rio Tinto Kennecott - South Jordan. UT
Source REFCHP - Duct Burner Onlv
Project No. 2023-3338
Parameter Or - Outlet COr - Outlet CO - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Make
Model
SA[
Oneratins Ranse
servomex
4900
100269
25
servomex
4900
100269
r00
thermo
48i
208845
100
thermo
42i
1321958971
100
Cylinder ID
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
NA
NA
RR03686
RR03384
NA
NA
RR03686
RR03384
NA
NA
EB0097304
EB0097304
NA
NA
EB0097304
EB0097304
Cylinder Certifed Values
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
NA
NA
10.98
24.0
NA
NA
r0.9
23.1
NA
NA
50.39
s0.39
NA
NA
49.91
49.91
Cylinder Expiration Date
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
NA
NA
9il9131
t0lt9l29
NA
NA
9/t913t
t0lt9l29
NA
NA
10120130
10120130
NA
NA
t0120/30
10t20130
Tvoe of Samnle Line Heated Sample Line
Calibration Data
Source: REFCHP - Duct Burner Only
Project No.: 2023-3338
Datez l2ll4l23
Parameter O, - Outlet CO, - Outlet CO - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Desired Snan 24.00 23.70 50.39 49.91
Low Range Gas
Low
Hish
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Mid Range Gas
Low
Hieh
9.60
t4.40
9.48
t4.22
20.t6
30.23
19.96
29.95
High Range Gas
Low
Hish
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Actual Concentration (7o or ppm)
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
0.00
NA
10.98
24.00
0.00
NA
10.90
23.70
0.00
NA
25.19
s0.39
0.00
NA
24.95
49.91
Upscale Calibration Gas (Crua)Mid Mid Mid Mid
Instrument Response (% or ppm)
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
0.01
NA
I l.0l
23.99
0.04
NA
l l.l5
23.7s
-0.02
NA
25.57
s0.43
-0.04
NA
24.96
49.90
Performance (7o of Span or Cal. Gas Conc.)
Zero
Low
Mid
Hieh
0.04
NA
0.12
0.04
0.17
NA
1.05
0.21
0.04
NA
0.75
0.08
0.08
NA
0.02
0.02
Status
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
PASS
NA
PASS
PASS
PASS
NA
PASS
PASS
PASS
NA
PASS
PASS
PASS
NA
PASS
PASS
Bias/Drift Determinations
Location: Rio Tinto Kennecott - South Jordan. UT
Source: REFCHP - Duct Burner Onlv
Project No.: 2023-3338
Parameter 0z - Outlet CO" - Outlet CO - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Run I Date l2ll4l23
Span Value
Initial Instrurnent Zero Cal Response
Initial Instrurnent Upscale Cal Response
Pretest Systenl Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Pretest System Upscale Response
Posttest Svstem Uoscale Resoonse
24.00
0.01
I l.0l
0.tI
0. l0
10.98
11.02
23.'70
0.04
I I.15
0.08
0.06
ll.ll
I 1.05
50.39
-0.02
25.57
-0.64
-0.55
25.05
25.t4
49.91
-0.04
24.96
0.07
0.4t
23.92
23.98
Bias (7o)
Pretest Zero
Posttest Zero
Pretest Span
Posttest Span
0.42
0.38
-0.12
0.04
0.17
0.08
-0.r7
-0.42
-r.23
-1.05
- 1.03
-0.85
0.22
0.90
-2.08
-1.96
Drift (7')
Zero
Mid
-0.04
0.17
-0.08
-0.25
0. l8
0.t8
0.68
0.t2
Run 2 Date l2ll4l23
Span Value
lnstrurnent Zero Cal Response
Instrurnent Upscale Cal Response
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Pretest System Upscale Response
Posttest Svstem Upscale ResDonse
24.00
0.01
I l.0r
0.r0
0.r0
11.02
10.98
23.70
0.04
I l.l5
0.06
0.08
I 1.05
I l.l I
50.39
-0.02
25.5',7
-0.55
-0.59
25.14
25.16
49.91
-0.04
24,96
0.41
0.40
23.98
24.12
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero
Posttest Zero
Pretest Span
Posttest Snan
0.38
0.38
0.04
-0.12
0.08
0.t7
-0.42
-0.1'7
- 1.05
-1.13
-0.85
-0.81
0.90
0.88
-1.96
-1.68
Drift(%)
Zero
Mid
0.00
-0.17
0.08
0.2s
-0.08
0.04
-0.02
0.28
Run 3 Date l2ll4l23
Span Value
lnstrument Zero Cal Response
Instnrment Upscale Cal Response
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Pretest System Upscale Response
Posttest Svstenr Upscale ResDonse
24.00
0.01
il.01
0. l0
0. r0
r0.98
r0.96
23.'70
0.04
ll.15
0.08
0.04
I l.l I
l l.l0
50.39
-0.02
25.57
-0.59
-0.55
25.t6
2s.23
49.91
-0.04
24.96
0.40
0.35
24.t2
24.34
Bias (7d
Pretest Zer o
Posttest Zero
Pretest Span
Posttest Soan
0.38
0.38
-0.12
-0.21
0.17
0.00
-0.17
-0.21
-1.13
-r.05
-0.81
-0.67
0.88
0.78
-r.68
-1.24
Drift(%)
Zero
Mid
0.00
-0.08
-0. l7
-0.04
0.08
0. l4
-0.10
0.44
QA Data
Location Rio Tinto Kennecott - South Jordan. UT
Source REFCHP - Turbine Only
Project No. 2023-3338
Parameter O, - Outlet COu - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Make
Model
S/N
Ooeratins Ranse
servomex
4900
t00269
25
servomex
4900
100269
r00
thermo
42i
1321958971
100
Cylinder ID
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
NA
NA
RR03686
RR03384
NA
NA
RR03686
RR03384
NA
NA
880097304
EB0097304
Cylinder Certifed Values
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
NA
NA
r 0.98
24.0
NA
NA
10.9
23.7
NA
NA
49.91
49.91
Cylinder Expiration Date
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
NA
NA
9/t913l
t0lt9l29
NA
NA
9lt913t
t0lt9l29
NA
NA
10120/30
10120/30
Tvoe of Samnle Line Heated Sample Line
Calibration Data
Source: REFCHP - Turbine Only
Project No.: 2023-3338
Date: l2ll4/23
Parameter Oz - Outlet CO: - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Exnected Averase Concentration
Span Between
Low
High
Desired Snan 24.00 23.70 49.91
Low Range Gas
Low
Hish
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Mid Range Gas
Low
Hish
9.60
14.40
9.48
t4.22
19.96
29.95
High Range Gas
Low
Hish
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Actual Concentration (7o or ppm)
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
0.00
NA
10.98
24.00
0.00
NA
10.90
23.70
0.00
NA
24.95
49.91
Uoscale Calibration Gas (C*^Mid Mid Mid
Instrument Response (% or ppm)
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
0.0 r
NA
I l.0l
23.99
0.04
NA
ll.l5
23.7s
-0.04
NA
24.96
49.90
Performance (7o of Span or Cal. Gas Conc.)
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
0.04
NA
0.12
0.04
0.11
NA
1.05
0.21
0.08
NA
0.02
0.02
Status
Zero
Low
Mid
Hish
PASS
NA
PASS
PASS
PASS
NA
PASS
PASS
PASS
NA
PASS
PASS
Bias/Drift Determinations
Location: Rio Tinto Kennecott - South Jordan, UT
Source: REFCHP - Turbine Onlv
Project No.: 2023-3338
Parameter Oz - Outlet COz - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Run I Date l2ll4l23
Span Value
Initial Instmment Zero Cal Response
Initial Instrument Upscale Cal Response
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Pretest System Upscale Response
Posttest Svstem Uoscale Response
24.00
0.01
I l.0l
0.09
0. l4
I 1.00
I 1.04
23.',70
0.04
I l.15
0.03
0.08
ll.l I
I 1.06
49.91
-0.04
24.96
0.05
0.r0
23.83
23.74
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero
Posttest Zel'o
Pretest Span
Posttest Snan
0.33
0.54
-0.04
0.12
-0.04
0.17
-0.1'1
-0.38
0. l8
0.28
-2.26
-2.44
)rift (%o)
Lero
VIid
0.2t
0.17
0.21
-0.21
0. r0
-0.r8
Run 2 Date l2ll4l23
Span Value
Instrument Zero Cal Response
lnstrument Upscale Cal Response
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Pretest System Upscale Response
Posttest Systern Upscale Resoonse
24.00
0.01
ll.0t
0. l4
0.09
11.04
10.98
23.70
0.04
ll.l5
0.08
0.05
I 1.06
I t.l I
49.91
-0.04
24.96
0. l0
0.04
23.74
23.85
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero
Posttest Zero
Pretest Span
Posttest SDan
0.54
0.33
0.12
-0.12
0.t7
0.04
-0.38
-0.17
0.28
0. l6
-2.44
a a1
Drift (%)
Zero
Mid
-0.2t
-0.25
-0.r3
0.21
-0.t2
0.22
Run 3 Date l2ll4l23
Span Value
lnstrunent Zero Cal Response
Instrument Upscale Cal Response
Pretest System Zero Response
Posttest System Zero Response
Pretest System Upscale Response
Posttest System Uoscale Response
24.00
0.01
11.01
0.09
0.09
r0.98
r0.98
23.70
0.04
ll.t5
0.05
0.05
t1.ll
I 1.08
49.91
-0.04
24.96
0.04
0.04
23.85
23.80
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero
Posttest Zero
Pretest Span
Posttest Span
0.33
0.33
-0.12
-0.12
0.04
0.04
-0.17
-0.30
0. t6
0. l6
-2.32
Drift (7o)
Zero
Mid
0.00
0.00
0.00
-0. l3
0.00
-0.10
Airgas.
an Air Liquide company
Airgas SpecialtyGases
Airgas USA LLC
525 Norlh Industrial Loop Road
Tooele, W a4o74
Airgas.com
Part Number: E03N199E15A01D0
Cylinder Number: E80097304Laboratory: 124 - Tooele (SAP) - UT
PGVP Number: 872022
Gas Code: CO,NO,NOX,BALN
Expiration Date:
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Grade of Product: EPA PROTOCOL STAMARD
Reference Number: 153-402560601-1
Cylinder Volume: 144.0 CF
Cylinder Pressure: 2015 PSIG
Valve Outlet: 660
Certification Date: Oct20,2022
Oct 20. 2030
Certification performed in accordance with "EPA Traceability Protocol for Assay and Certification of Gaseous Calibration Standards (May 2012)" document EPA
600/R-121531, using the assay procedures listed. Analytical Methodology does not require correction for analytical interference. This cylinder has a total analytical
uncertainty as stated below with a confidence level of g5%. There are no significant impurities which affect the use of this calibration mixture. All concentrations are on a
mole/mole basis unless otherwise noted. The results relate only to the items tested. The report shall not be reproduced except in full without approval of the laboralory. Do
Not LJse This below'100 psiq, i.e. 0.7
Component Requested
Concentration
ANALYTICAL RESI.]LTS
Actual Protocol Total Relative
Concentration Method Uncertainty
Assay
Dates
NOX 50.00 PPM 49.91 PPM G1 +l-'1.4o/o NIST Traceable 10/1012022, 1012012022
CARBON MONOXIDE 50.00 PPM 50.39 PPM G1 +l- O.8o/o NIST Traceable 'l 0,1102022
NITRIC OXIDE 50.00 PPM 49.85 PPM G1 +l- 'l .4yo NIST Traceable 1011012022, 1012012022
NITROGEN Balance
Type Lot lD
CALIBRATION STANDARDS
Gylinder No Concentration Uncertainty Expiration Date
Aug 31,2024
Feb 20,2020
Sep 21,2025
Feb 02,2022
Sep 24,2025
Feb 01,2023
Apr 30,2024
NTRM 12011221
PRM 12386
NTRM 2',t0607-24
PRM 12395
NTRM 21060713
GMIS 401648675102
GM|S 1534002020104
KALOO4127 49.24PPMCARBONMONOXIDE/NITROGEN 0.6%
D685025 9.9.1 PPM NITROGEN DIOXIDE/AIR
cc708080 48.41 PPM NtTRtC OXTDE/N|TROGEN
D887660 9.91 PPM NITROGEN DIOXIDE/AIR
cc708049 48.41 PPM NITRIC OXTDE/N|TROGEN
CC5OO959 5.074 PPM NITROGEN DIOXIDE/NITROGEN 2.1YO
EBO13OO55 4.81 PPM NITROGEN DIOXIDE/NITROGEN 2.OO/O
The SRM, NTRM, PRM, or RGM noted above is only in reference to the GMIS used in the assav and not oart of the analvsis.
2.Oo/o
1.2o/o
2.Oo
1.2o/o
lnstrumenUMake/Model
ANALYTICAL EQUIPMENT
Analytical Principle Last Multipoint Calibration
Nicolet iS50 AUP2'1 10269 CO LCO
Nicolet iS50 AUP2110269 NO LNO
Nicolet iS50 AUP2110269 NO2 impurity
od05,2022
Oct 13,2022
od 12,2022
FTIR
FTIR
FTIR NO2 impurity
Triad Data Available Upon Request
Sianafrrra an fila
Approved for Release Page I of 1
&*#!***
Accreditation #62754
Red Ball Technical Gas Service
555 Graig Kennedy Way
Shreveport, LA 71'107
800-ss1-8150
PGVP Vendor lD #G12023
EPA PROTOCOL GAS GERTIFIGATE OF ANALYSIS
Cylinder Number:
Product lD Number:
Cylinder Pressure:
coA #
Customer PO. NO.:
Customer:
E80033140
124731
t900 PS|G
:800331 40.20230824-0
Certification Date:
Expiration Date:
MFG Facility:
Lot Number:
Tracking Number:
Previous Certification Dates:
)9115t2023
)91'14t2026
- Snreveoon - LA
=800331
40.20230824
15676001 1
has been certified per the May 2012 EPA Traceability Protocol, Document
G1.
Certified Concentration(s)
Concentration Uncertainty Analytical Principle Assayed On
09lou2o23l/9t15t2onNitrogen Dioxide 5O.O PPM to.s PPM FTIR
Balance
Analytical Measurement Data Available Online.
Reference Standard(s
E80057301 E800s7301.20201020 05t04t2026 cMts AtR NO2 96.4 PPM 1.028 C2190301.02
MKS 2O31DJG2EKVS13T
MKS 2O31DJG2EKVS13T
017146467
017 146467
SMART-CERT
This is to certify the gases referenced have been calibrated/tested, and verified to meet the defined specifications. This
calibration/test was performed using Gases or Scales that are traceable through National lnstitute of Standards and
Technology (NIST) to the lnternational System of Units (Sl). The basis of compliance stated is a comparison of the
measurement parameters to the specified or required calibration/testing process. The expanded uncertainties use a coverage
factor of k=2 to approximale the 95% confidence level of the measurement, unless otheMise noted. This calibration certificate
applies only to the item described and shall not be reproduced other than in full, without written approval from Red Ball
Technical Gas Services. lf not included, the uncertainty of calibrations are available upon request and were taken into account
when determining pass or fail.
fi*u,,4*b
Jasmine Godfrey
Analytical Chemist
Assay Laboratory: Red Ball TGS
Version 02-J. Revised on 20'18-09-17
PJI^A@hdHba
Accreditation #62754
Red Ball Technical Gas Service
555 Craig Kennedy Way
Shreveport, LA 71107
800-551-8150
PGVP Vendor lD # G12021
EPA PROTOGOL GAS CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Cylinder Number:
Product lD Number:
Cylinder Pressure:
coA #
Customer PO. NO.:
Customer:
RR03384
127907
t900 PS|G
1R03384.2021 1012-0
Certification Date:
Expiration Date:
MFG Facility:
Lot Number:
Tracking Number:
Previous Certifacation Dates:
tr)t21t2tJ21
1ot19t2029
- Shreveport - LA
iRU3364.2U21 1 U1 2
03923/81
s calibration standard has been certified per the 12t531,
G2.
Certified Concentration(s)
Concentration
23.7 %
24.0%
Uncertainty Analytical Principle Assayed On
1U2112021
1012012021
rbon Dioxide r0.18 %
r0.13%
NDIR
MPA
Balance
cc727782.20201022
E800391 49.201 9061 0
E80078072.201 80504
EB0100923.20201022
SRi/i 2659a
c1 57901 0.02
071 001
cl 84781 0.03
1 162980025 10t01t2021
1 162980025 10/19t2021
SMART-CERT
This is to certify the gases referenced have been calibrated/tested, and verified to meet the defined specifications. This
calibration/test was performed using Gases or Scales that are traceable through National lnstitute of Standards and
Technology (NIST) to the lnlernational System of Units (Sl). The basis of compliance stated is a comparison of the
measurement parameters to the specified or required calibration/testing process. The expanded uncertainties use a coverage
factor of k=2 to approximate the 95% confidence level of the measurement, unless otherwise noted. This calibration certificate
applies only to the item described and shall not be reproduced other than in full, without written approval from Red Ball
Technical Gas Services. lf not included, the uncertainty of calibrations are available upon request and were laken inlo account
when determining pass or fail.
nfuw
Brittany Johnson
Analytical Chemist
Assay Laboratory: Red Ball TGS
Version 02-J, Revised on 2018-09-17
/#*PJl*,-.*
Accreditation #62754
Red Ball Technical Gas Service
555 Craig Kennedy Way
Shreveport, LA 71107
800-551 -8{ 50
PGVP Vendor lD # G12023
EPA PROTOCOL GAS CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Cylinder Number:
Product lD Number:
Cylinder Pressure:
coA #
Customer PO. NO.:
Customer:
iR03686
125371
I9OO PSIG
1R03686.20230831 -0
Certification Date:
Expiration Date:
MFG Facility:
Lot Number:
Tracking Number:
Previous Certification Dates:
)9t21t2023
J9t19t2031
1R03686.20230831
107553544
per
G1.
Certified Concentration(s)
rbon Dioxide
Concentration
1o.9 %
10.98 %
Uncertainty
xoll %
t0.03 o/o
Analytical Principle
FTIR
MPA
Assayed On
ou21no23
09t18t2023n
Balance
Analytacal Measurement Data Available online,
cc73701220230224
Ea002202120140323
1 16298002s 09t18t2023
017146467 09t21t2023
SMART-CERT
This is to certify the gases referenced have been calibrated/tested, and verified to meet the defined speciflcations. This
calibration/test was performed using Gases or Scales that are traceable through National lnstitute of Standards and
Technology (NIST) to the lnternational System of Units (Sl). The basis of compliance stated is a comparison of the
measurement parameters to the specified or required calibration/testing process. The expanded uncertainties use a coverage
factor of k=2 to approximate lhe 95% confidence level of the measurement, unless otherwise noted. This calibration certificate
applies only to the item described and shall not be reproduced other than in full, without written approval from Red Ball
Technical Gas Services. If not included, the uncertainty of calibrations are available upon request and were taken into account
when determining pass or fail.
(iL^*,- lfuh
Jasmine Godfrey
Analytical Chemist
Assay Laboratory: Red Ball TGS
Version 02-J, Revised on 2018-09-17
pullffinoEr
i L (_l l-I i.,t l(j,\ i_ () Frl (,: [] t]
Location: Rio Tinto Kennecott - South Jordan. UT
Project No.: 2023-3338
NO2 Converter Check - Outlet
Analyzer Make thermo
Analyzer Model 42i
Serial Number 1.3228+09
:ili:Hl?JHii' EB0033'I40
Cvlinder concentration. DDm #
Pre-Test Date Time
Pre-Test Concentration, ppm
Pre-Test Efficiencv. 7o
Post-Test Date 12/15/23 Time 12:31
Post-Test Con""nEll-rpprr, 45.42
Post-Test Efficiencv. 7o 9l
*Required Efficiency is > 90 %.
ffi:.:'AIlatrcEr
i i' r" i' L'a,ii"i'niLri,,l"'i.i,',i"fr:i;"thro,daD.rrr
Source: REFCHP - Combiued Cycle
Project No.: 2023-3338
Date 12/14123
Analyzer Make
Arralyzer Model: 4900
Analyzer SN: 100269
Envilonics ID: 8027
Conponent/BalanceGas: 02,6{2
Cylinder Gas ID (Dilution): RR03384
Cylinder Gas Corcentr"tion (Dilution), 9/o: 24
Cylindet Gas ID (Mid-Level): RR03686
CylinderGas Corcenlatiotr(Mid-Level), 70: 10.98
@ Tlpm and 80% @ Tlpnr iiljecl
Target Mass Flow
Cnnlnllpr<
Target
Dilution
("al
Target I'low
Ratc
Ta rget
Concentration
lo/^\
Actual
Concentration
lnjection I
Analyzer
Concentration
Injection 2
Analyzer
Concentration
Injection 3
Analyzer
Concentration
Average
Analyzer
Concentration
lo/"\
Difference
lo/^\
Average Error
(*2r/o\
r0L/5L 800 50 92 9.2 19.3 19.4 19.3 19.34 0t4
t0L/5L 50.0 5.0 t2.0 12.0 122 12.2 2.1 0. l5 t.jvo
I0t./ IL 200 40 4't 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.76 -0 04 -o 90/"
OLIIL 10.0 4.0 2.4 24 24 4 4 2.40 0.00 0.00/.
*Not all AST Environics Units have 2-l0L Mass Flow Controllers. For drese urits the 907o (O Tlom and 807o @ Tlonr iiliections will not he conducted
Average
Analyzer
Concentration
lnjection I
Error
(+26/r\
lnjection 2
Error
( + 2o/.1
Inj€ction 3
Error
( + 2./"1
t9.34 -o to/"o to/"0.o%
l5 0.ooh 0.0%0.oyo
4.16 o ty" o 10/"-o.tyo
2.40 0.oyo 0.0%o.0v.
ao zef
Calibration
Gas
Concentration
(o/"\
Injection I
Analyzer
Concentration
lo/^\
Injection 2
Analyzer
Concentration
lo/^\
Injection 3
Analyzer
Concentration
lo/,\
Averag€
Analyzer
Concentration Difference
Average
Error
(*2"/"\
10.98 ilt il 1.05 0.07 0.60/0
Mass Flow Controller Calibration
Document lD 620.009
Revisior 22.0
Effectlve Dat(12/16/22
ssuing Departmenl Tech Setuices Paq(lofl
Dilution System Make:
Dilution Sptem Model:
Dilution System S/N:
Calibration Equipment Make:
Calibration Equipment Model:
Calibration Equipment S/N:
Flow Cell S/N:
Flow Cell S/N:
Calibration Gas:
Barometric Pressurg mmHg:
Ambient Temperature,'F:
E nvironics
4040
B02t
Alicat Scientific
M,IOSIPD/5MM D/sIU,
127208/127206
127208
127206
Nitrogen
25.76
66
M lSLPIV D/5M
Mass Flow Controller lD
Size, ccm:
Make:
Model:
S/N:
10,000
Environics
EFC 202
0455242007
10,000
E nvironics
Erc 202
0455242008
#3
1,000
Environics
EFC 202
0455238004
Set Flow True Flow Difference
cdmin cdmin
Set Flow True Flow Difference
cqhin cdmin
Set Flow True Flow Difference
cdmin cdmin
10v"
207o
307o
40%
507o
607o
707o
807o
9)Vo
1000/"
500 508 1.6yo
1,000 1,024 2.4y"
2,000 2,057 2.870
3,000 3,079 2.6yo
4000 4,104 2 6%
5,000 5,113 2.3Vo
6,000 6,129 2.1Yo
7,000 7,136 1.970
8,000 8,145 1.Byo
9,000 9,162 1.8y"
10,000 10,193 1.970
500 5a4 0.870
1,000 1,020 2.070
2,000 2,048 2.4Vo
3,000 3,073 2 4Yo
4,000 4,094 2.470
5,000 5,107 2.170
6,000 6,120 2.07.
7,000 7,134 1.970
8,000 8,152 1.9Vo
9,000 9,171 1.970
10,000 10,189 1.970
50 50 0.6v"
100 101 0.7vo
200 203 1.6%
300 305 1.87o
400 407 1.670
500 507 1.4Vo
600 609 1.570
700 711 16%
800 813 1.770
900 917 1.970
1,000 1,022 2.2yo
Note: The mass flow controller's ca|bration values are used by the dilution system's operating software to improve accuracy. These calibrations are not necessarily
indicative of the systems overall performance. Performance is verified by conducting a Method 205 prior to each field use.
Calibration Performed By: RJL
Dare.. 3/31/2023
o
E
co
{=(o
co
E
o,-o
':t,(o
o-(Uu
No(n
E
.E
.g
E
o
'o(,
f(!
(g
E
lCo.=
oo
.t
ELoo-**
t-(o
E
E
=vl
b!C
Pvlo
C
.9tJl
.9
E
lrJ
(l)(J
C
.g
E-
EoU
o-IU
LoC
o&,
Ls
6.o
ooo
LN
cn
^bocco'E'j3 (o
C,d
0r6
0J=
-oq- co
oolo.:
rl 9sl' i
Cr'fu-fo)o!1 ,i
52v=
.no(oo
c! lJ')(o<'
Ln
.to.r3(J53u(oE(J(u
E(ocrdiox
d(!or)
C.'=(9-i' (,
=dF-
CONo(\
!fFl
e!r{
I
og,
co*{J
Jo:oc(!
oc5
F
o!o:
o
(J
(J
Eoc5
EoL)
P
OJ
c
-i=ae
oJo-Ca
+r(u
Fl!
o)6
CJ
@6
ci
@
@
c;
\oo\\toq
\oo\\tOt
G)
o
6)c
-B
co
U
!o
o_B
OJ
5G
OJ
trs
E
Eb
rR
(nN()
N
sfFl
(\l
F{
I(,:oo
->co
(Uc
-oL
F
OJ
c
-i=LOae-. o-Ir
+r(U
=:Ftr
s(O
ci
g,4o
vto
\R$ar-{
clc
qJ!
olc
!
o
!Uf,!o
a-!
OJ
s
OJ
E5
Es
s
o'
\oo\
(Y)c{oa{
del
N
Fl
I
co
Loc,
co
fJ
o
q)
.=u-
I
EI
6o
L
Po
c
-'6aeorgCe
-O19
Fl!
Irn
CJ
Irl
c;
rlrl
c,
}Rco
O)
O)c
qJ
ol
L
!
osU
to
a-\
OJ
G
OJ
s
5c
tr*-o'
\6o\
La
o
art:.9o
-O-LCfoFt-
F.q
cn(n
O)q
(o
ro
sf
oo6rn =Po)c
0,, 5,EO
-OeLLf0JFF
st(o
od.n
Nd'!
o)co
rn
rYl
Flst
La
P
OJ
o!:.co€Efo,FF
(o
r.o
..i$
sl'4
Flst
(O
oq
@(n
=.Y
ET(E#
(uO
CPo=(90
oq
Fl
Fllrt
ro
rl.iN4(o
cYlr\
F{
rJ)
ro
=J
EI(EP
0r6C#of(90
c!
tnoro
(o
(n.jolrt
(o
cr\ql+
(o *9Ol
(I'P
L=qo.
LPoJ=(90
u.)(\Ctt
C,
tn
c;
(I,-c(9>
0J -ct
_E>
=5Fu-
Lnrnd(nrl
(rl
rlq
r{
cn
Fl
(}1
r'lq
t-{fn
Fl
fYl
rc-c(9>
ot -o
5=
=oFl!
cnr\
c;strl
(n
an\Nfn
-l.ri
Ol
Ol
F.(\l
r'{
(n
oC(t'-C(9>
0,, -o
5=
=oFU-
r.,.
oq
(Yl
lrl
oq
rn
LN
oq
cO
.g
o
o
cfLO(oo(u o.,
60-
Nnc!
LN
o\(N
rn
N
oq
Nrn
.!fq
o.
OJ
c5(oo(I)o)
r/) o-
N
'/)oo(l1
rlnN
d1
Nn6fn
.g6o
oL-=Cq(oo6J OJ
{!/,o-
stnrnsl
CDrl+si
CNrn++
=o^
]J- L
F\.E9(U=
oa=
Nnrt
1r)
(.o
ft.l.j
lJt
(oq
t{
LN
=o
IJ. L
F.\
=6!Y -o(r=
oo
ci
e.lo
CJ
r-{qo *It
=o_u-L
>\
=6o=fiY
Nn
CN(n
$N
c.i
ft1
(O
d!
N(n
o(o(9
OJIClr:UdS6=foOE
@ernro
@o)
N(n
FlN
c.,i
cn
q
(I,
(9
o-E1!L(Jds
ts=:roOE
Nri
ct
No
ci
No
c;
q
(E(9
o-Clr:UdS6=
=oOE
rlrc|
r-st
rln(o
sf
N
rOd$
b>(u=>-Y
E>35u- tr
@\Ntn
Fl6l
c.i!n
sfnNro -.cb>
(o=
=5E=oJ -:lII II
oofn
ci
oo(o
ci
c\q
ri =b>(o=>-Y
E>E6
]J. LL
(onNN
rnq
l,rN
(..{
LnN
P
q.,F
N
qn
oo
Ia{
q?r\
i-l
d.
o
c'joFl
o
c'iot
I
N
d.
Fl
Y'!
Fl
Fl
I
F-lnor-l
(n
&
P
OJt-
O)Irnri
I
O)s(\
F{
r{
d.
O*rnrloql
cr.)rl
ri
d.
rf)
-l+rl
TN
q?
anri
r{
P
oF
srI(o
Fl
I<fg
l.nr{
I
r'{
E
Fint.Fl
Fl
Y'l(o
Fl
I
N
E
FlI
O)rl
ric
@rl
rO
E
Refinery CHP Emission Test
Combined Turbine and Duct Burner
lurbine Rated Capacity
loiler Max Rated Capacity
Test Date
5,263 kW (59 F @ 4100 ft elevation)
54,500 lbs/hr
1,2/t4/2023
Run 1
)ate/time
Feed
water
Flow
tkl hs/hrl
Duct Burner
Gas Flow
(ACFH)
;team
:low
Klbs/hd
Steam
Pressure
(psis)
Turbine
Gas Flow
tl bs/hr)
Senerator
futput
kw)
Turbine
lnlet Air
Temp (F)
turbi ne
\ir lnlet
:ilter
jP(psi)
L2/74/2023 7:5 51.9;33.11 51.5:53.0i 3.t30.7i 6,5L2.7C 33.63 0.8!
72/74/2023 7:s',53.71 33.11 51.8: 52.3( 3,130.6t 6,512.6(33.7C 0.8!
72/Ia/2O23 8:01 51.0!33.1C 57.4i 52.24 3,724.65 6,572.44 33.66 0.8s
72/74/2023 8:o 51.5 33.10 50.9; 53.0! 3,727.Lt 6,572.28 33.6: 0.8!
D/Ia/2023 8:1 53.3:33.0(51.3( 52.5i 3,730.22 6,572.1 33.6( 0.8s
12/74/2023 8:7 54.9(33.0! 51.4i 52.4: 3,730.7 6,511.9( 33.6: 0.8!
L2/t4/2023 8:2i 53.7'33.0r 51.5:52.57 3,L32.55 6,5 11.8C 33.6!0.81
L2/74/2023 8:2,57.91 33,0t 5r.bl s2.8e 3,L30.71 6,5r7.64 33.6!0.81
L2/M/2O23 8:3 s3.0; 33.0t 51.4i 52.51 3.t34.62 6.511.48 33.6(0.81
L2/74/2023 8:3,51.5! 33.0; 51,2(52.55 3,128.8:6,577.32 33.6, 0.8!
12/74/2023 8:a 52.5:33.0;51.4 52.44 3,729.7i 6.5 1 1.16 33.6S 0.8!
12/14/2023 8:4 52.9t 33.0( 51.6(52.21 3.135.4!6.511.0(33.7: 0.8!
12/14/2023 8:5 53.7i 33.0( 51.7t 51.91 3,130.7; 6,510.8r 33.8! 0.8!
Average 52.71 33.0{5t.4i 52.s2 3,130.5! 6,511.t 33.6; 0.8!
Run 2
)ate/time
Feed
water
Flow
( klhs/h rl
Duct Burner
Gas Flow
IACFH)
5team
Flow
IKlhs/hrl
)team
)ressure
osis)
Turbine
Gas Flow
{lhs/h rl
Senerator
)utput
:kw)
Turbine
lnlet Air
Temp (F)
Turbine
Air lnlet
Filter
d P(osi)
72/7a/2023 9:2( 48.8)33.01 50.91 53.2!3.729.7( 6.527.L( 35.0(0.8{
72/74/2023 9:2!52,42 33.01 50.9S 52.8!3,L32.9= 6,527.7 3s.4t 0.8{
72/74/2023 9:3t 52.41 33.0(51.34 52.71 3,L30.7 t 6,527.7 35.91 0.8{
12/74/2023 9:31 52.91 33.0t 51.4S 52.6,3,t27.O1 6,527.77 36,05 0.8t
72/1.4/20D 9:a(53.84 32.95 5L.41 52.5:3,726.91 6,527.7( 35.64 0.8t
72/74/2023 9:4!50.8€ 32.95 5t.72 s2.8t 3,L29.91 6,521.0t 35,23 0.8t
72/1,4/2023 9:s(s2.3S 32.9t 5t.43 52.5(3,734.6i 6,521.0;35.15 0.8t
t2/74/2023 9:5! 55.17 32.9t 51.65 52.4(3,736.91 6,527.O!3s.5C 0.8t
t7/14/2023 1"0:0(51.1t 32.97 51.4:s2.5S 3,734.61 6,521.0:36.3(0.81
t2/74/2023 70:O!5t.o7 32.91 51.59 52.6t ?30.7 6.52L.Ot 36.3 0.8t
12/74/2023 10:I(52.95 32.9(51.58 52.5!?27.74 6,521.0( 37.2 0.8t
12/74/2023 10:1,1 52.3t 32.9C 51.1 52.9(3 30.7 6,520.9S 37.8 0.8t
1,217a/2023 10:2(52.K 32.95 51.55 52.4(3,30.7 6,520.9i 37.4-,0.8t
qverage s2.21 32.9t 51.36 52.7( 3,131.01 6,521.1 36.0! 0.8t
Run 3
)ate/time
Feed
water
Flow
tkl bs/hrI
)uct Burner
3as FIow
ACFH}
;team
:low
Klbs/hr)
Steam
Pressure
(nsip)
l-urbine
Sas Flow
'lhs/h r)
Generator
Output
{kw)
furbine
lnlet Air
Iemo (F)
Turbine
Air lnlet
Filter
d P(nsil
2/M/2023 70:s 53.41 32.92 50.7!53.1"S 3,134.8!6,s20.8i 35.9t 0.8t
2/74/2023 10:5( 53.15 32.92 s 1.3t 53.45 3,729.9( 6,520,4C 35.9( 0.8t
2/1.4/2023 lL:.O 52.85 32.91 51.2(53.27 3,728.6 6,579.71 35.1(0.8t
2/14/2023 7I:O(52.49 32.91 51.1t 53.2(3,733.71 6,s19.1(36.41 0.8i
2/74/2023 7l:7 5L.7C 32.9C s0.8(53.53 3,130.0/ 6.518.5r 36.6:0.8i
2/74/2023 t7:1(51.31 32.5S 51.1 52.95 3.134.6 6,577.9 36.8(0.8€
12/74/2023 77:2 51.4C 32.59 51.1( s2.32 3,132.71 6,517.3(36.91 0.8i
t2/74/2023 11:2( 54.74 32.s9 50.9i 52.23 3,130.7 6,516.6!37.0S 0.8i
72/14/2023 7L:3 52.7e 32.59 51.1! 52.5t 3,L30.7 6,516.0 37.2t 0.8i
2/1.4/2023 1-L:3(52.35 32.s8 51.3:52.34 3,L29.O"6,515.4:37.3!0.8t
2/74/2023 tt:4 52.9t 32.5t 5L.21 52.27 3,t34.6"6,514.8:37.41 0.8t
2/1,4/2023 tt:4(s1.03 32.5t 50.4: 52.8(3,L34.6',6,5t4.2 37.41 0.8;
2/74/2023 1L:5 52.1C 32.st s0.9:52.51 3.128.6:6,513.5! 37.4(0.8(
Werage 52.44 32.77 51.0(52.82 3,131.7{6.5L7.1 36.8r 0.8t
Refinery CHP Emission Test
Turbine Only Mode
[urbine Rated Capacity
fest Date
6,263 kW (59 F @ 4100 ft elevation)
L2/1.4/2023
Run 1
)ate/time
Feed
water
Flow
(klbs/h r)
Duct Burner
Gas Flow
(ACFH)
Steam
Flow
(Klbs/hr)
Steam
Pressu re
(osis)
l-urbine
Sas Flow
'l bs/h r)
Generator
Output
(kw)
Turbine
lnlet Air
Temp (F)
Turbine
Air lnlet
Filter
dP(psi)
L2/14/2023 L2:49 0.28 0.13 0.0c 39.2s 3,142.31 6,506.42 38.32 0.68
t2/14/2023 1.2:54 0.33 o.t2 0.0c 38.99 3,137.37 6,s0s.80 38.64 0.55
12/1,4/2023 t2:59 0.38 o.L2 0.0c 38.49 3,146.06 6,505.18 38.79 0.64
L2/74/2023 1,3:04 0.43 0.11 0.0c 37.79 3,739.44 6,504.56 38.76 0.63
L2/Ia/2023 1,3:09 0.48 0.10 0.0c 38.32 3,138.46 5,503.94 38.73 0.61,
Average 0.38 0.t2 0.0c 38.57 3,L4O,73 6,505.2 38.64 0.64
Rur 2
Date/time
Feed
water
Flow
(klbs/hr)
Duct Burner
Gas Flow
(ACFH)
iteam
:low
lKlbs/hd
Steam
Pressure
(osigl
Turbine
Gas Flow
(lbs/hr)
Generator
Output
(kw)
Turbine
lnlet Air
Temp (F)
Turbine
Air lnlet
Filter
dP(psi)
t2/141202313:20 0.s8 0.09 0.01 37.34 3,L34.62 6,502.58 38.92 0.5t
12/1.4/2023 13:25 0.63 0.08 0.01 37.34 3,L43.20 6,501.96 39.09 0.5;
72/1.4/2023 73:30 0.68 0.07 0.01 37.34 3,138.46 6.501.34 39.27 0.5I
12/1.4/2023 13:35 o.73 0.06 0.01 36.9s 3,138.46 6.s00.72 39.49 o.5l
12/1,4/202313:40 0.78 0.05 0.01 38.07 3,133.90 5.500.11 39.85 o.5i
Average 0.68 o.o7 0.01 37.4t 3.t37.73 6,501.3 39.32 0.5:
Run 3
Date/time
Feed
water
Flow
(klbs/hr)
Duct Burner
Gas Flow
(ACFH)
Steam
Flow
(Klbs/hr)
Steam
Pressu re
(psie)
Turbine
Gas Flow
(lbs/hr)
Generator
)utput
:kw)
furbine
lnlet Air
Iemp (F)
Turbine
Air lnlet
Filter
dP(psi)
12114/202313:55 0.92 0.03 0.01 38.88 3,727.52 6,498.25 40.76 o.41
1,2114/2023 14:OO 0.9i 0.03 0.01 38.61 3,125.44 6,497.63 41.t8 0.4(
1,211,4/2023 1-4:05 t.o2 0.02 0.0r.38.32 3,L24.19 6,497.O1 41.5C 0.44
12/1.4/2023 1,4:10 1.0€0.01 0.01 38.s8 3,L34.62 6,496.39 4L.52 0.4:
12/1.4/2023 1.4:15 1.11 0.0r-0.01 37.71.3,L28.17 6,495.78 41.77 0.41
Average L.O2 0.02 0.01 38.42 3,L21.99 6,497.0 41.35 0.44
Refinery CHP Emission Test
Fresh-Air-Fire (Duct Burner Only) Mode
Boiler Rated Capacity
Test Date
35,000 lbs/hr
1211.4/2023
Run 1
)ate/time
Feed
water
Flow
(klbs/hr)
Duct Burner
Gas Flow
(ACFH)
Steam
Flow
(Klbs/hr)
Steam
Pressure
(osis)
Turbine
Gas Flow
(l bs/hr)
Generator
3utput
'kw)
Turbine
lnlet Air
Temo (F)
Turbine
Air lnlet
Filter
dP(psi)
t2/1.4/2023 1.5:44 30.55 48.97 34.00 46.72 3.85 3.L4 45.24 0.3€
12/1,4/2O23 75:49 28.91 48.97 34.29 46.4 3.8s 3.03 44.27 0.35
1.2/1,4/2O23 75:54 29.38 48.97 34.31 45.14 3.85 2.97 43.55 0.34
1.2/74/2023 1.5:59 27.78 48.97 33.79 46.7E 3.85 2.80 43.79 0.3
t2/1.4/2023 L6:04 26.89 48.96 33.40 47.54 3.8s 2.69 42.82 0.32
L2/L4/2023 t6:09 28.96 48.96 33.72 47.55 3.8s 2.57 42.46 0.31
1.2/14/2023 1,6:44 23.82 45.55 32.35 42.L4 3.8s 1.77 42.87 0.24
Averaqe 27.46 47.6L 33.47 45.M 3.85 2.5 42.66 0.3c
Rur 2
Date/time
Feed
water
Flow
(klbs/hr)
Duct Burner
Gas Flow
(ACFH)
St eam
Flow
(Klbs/hr)
Steam
Pressure
(osig1
Turbine
Gas Flow
(lbs/hr)
Generator
Output
(kw)
Turbine
lnlet Air
Temp (F)
Turbine
Air lnlet
Filter
dP(osi)
1.2/14/20231"6 51 24.97 45.69 32.24 42.45 3.85 7.67 42.62 0.22
12/1.4120231,6 56 23.48 46.04 32.42 43.08 3.8s 7.49 42.44 o.27
t2/1.4/2023 77:Ol 23.37 46.08 32.3s 43.17 3.8s 1.38 42.26 0.24
7211.41202317:06 25.27 46.12 32.18 43.24 3.85 1.27 42.08 0.1-9
t2/74/2023 77:1,7 27.25 46.re 32.26 43.53 3.85 1.15 47.90 0.18
12/1"4/2023 17:16 25.4L 46.27 32.37 43.68 3.8s L.O4 4t.72 o.7t
t2/1.4/2023 17 51 23.85 47.04 32.L2 45.42 3.8s 0.24 40.47 0.09
Average 25.05 46.4L 32.24 44.L9 3.85 0.9 4L.54 0.1(
Run 3
Date/time
Feed
water
Flow
(klbs/hr)
Duct Burner
Gas Flow
(ACFH)
Steam
Flow
(Klbs/hr)
Steam
Pressure
(psie)
Turbine
Gas Flow
(lbs/hr)
Generator
Sutput
ikw)
Turbine
lnlet Air
Temp (F)
Turbine
Air lnlet
Filter
dP(psi)
1.2/1.4/2023 t8:01-27.86 47.O2 32.28 46.01 3.8s 1.09 39.90 o.L1
t2lt4/2023 t8:06 25.89 46.69 32.83 45.46 3.85 1.0c 39.7L 0.1(
t2lt4/2023 t8:11 26.98 46.47 32.63 44.62 3.85 0.91 39.s2 0.15
1.2/1.4/2023 18:1-6 25.06 46.46 32.53 44.24 3.85 0.82 39.32 o.t4
12/74/2023 t8:21 23.08 46.46 32.35 44.!6 3.85 0.73 39.13 0.1
72/1.412023 78:26 25.63 46.46 32.19 44.31. 3.85 0.64 38.94 0.12
12/1.4/2023 t9:Ol 24.78 46.44 32.25 44.58 3.8s 0.01 37.95 0.0€
Average 25.24 46.52 32.36 44.53 3.85 0.5 38.85 0.11
-I,TAH DEPARTUENT OF
EM'IRONMENTAL OUALTTY
FEB 1 2 2024
DIVISION OF AIR QUALTTY
REFCHP combined 2023
Reference Methods 2, 3A, 6C, 7E, 10, & 19
Source Information
Company Name Kennecott Utah Copper
Company Contact:Sean Daly
Contact Phone No.801-204-2563
Stack Designation:Refinery Combined Heat and Power Unit (REFCHPI
Test & Review Dates
Test Date:12/14/2023 &
Review Date: 2/27/2024
Observer:Unobserved
Reviewer:Paul Morris
Emission Limits Emission Rates
SO2 NOX CO SO2 NOX CO
lbs./MMBtu
lbs./hr. 6.0 6.4 3.588 2.151
ppm
Percent
%O2 Correction as a whole #
Test Information Heat Input
Stack I.D. inches As ft^2 Y Dl H @ Cp Pbar Pq (static)
fuel flow rate
(Btu/hr.)
Heat Input
(Btu/hr.)
53.25 15.466 0.9820 1.763 0.84 25.52 -0.22
Contractor Information
Contact: Charles Horton
Contracting Company: Alliance Technical Group, LLC
Address: 3683 W 2270 S, Suite E West Valley City, UT 84120
Phone No.: [phone]
Project No.:

Division of Air Quality
Instrumental Reference Methods - Gaseous Measurements
Round
Method 19 - F factors for Coal, Oil, and Gas
Fd Fw Fc
scf/MMBtu scf/MMBtu scf/MMBtu
Diluent
F factor used
O2
CO2
Anthrocite 2
Bituminous 2
Lignite
Natural
Propane
Butane
10100
COAL
OIL
GAS
9780
9860
9190
8710
8710
8710
10540
10640
11950
320
10610
10200
10390
1970
1800
1910
1420
1040
1190
1250
Wet CEM
Correct For O2
CO2 Interference w/CO
Yes
Yes
Yes
REFCHP combined 2023
Division of Air Quality
NSPS Relative Accuracy Performance Specification Test - CEMS Certification
Kennecott Utah Copper
Refinery Combined Heat and Power Unit (REFCHPI
Average Emission
Dry SO2 NOX CO
lbs./MMbtu Average % concentration
lbs./hr.3.59 2.15 CO2 O2
ppm or % 13.49 13.28 5.04 12.45
Run 1 Enter O2 or CO2
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 1.598E-06 9.794E-07
lbs./hr.3.60 2.20 5.04 12.44
ppm or %13.38 13.47 5.13 12.45
Run 2
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 1.605E-06 9.811E-07
lbs./hr.3.57 2.18 5.04 12.45
ppm or %13.44 13.49 5.13 12.44 Raw Value
Run 3
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 1.629E-06 9.367E-07
lbs./hr.3.60 2.07 5.04 12.46
ppm or %13.64 12.883 5.13 12.46 Raw Value
Run 4
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft
lbs./hr.
ppm or %Raw Value
Run 5
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft
lbs./hr.
ppm or %Raw Value
C For Cal Drift
Raw Value
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
O2
CO2
Clear
lbs./MMBTU
REFCHP combined 2023
Calibration Error Test
Test Date December 14, 2023 O2
CS - Cal. Span 24.00
Units %
Cylinder No. Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.04% Passed Cal.
RR03686 09/19/31 Mid-level 10.98 11.01 0.03 0.12% Passed Cal.
RR03384 10/19/29 High-level 24.00 23.99 0.01 0.04% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of CS - Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 45.75%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date December 14, 2023 CO2
CS - Cal. Span 23.70
Units %
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.169% Passed Cal.
RR03686 09/19/31 Mid-level 10.90 11.15 0.25 1.055% Passed Cal.
RR03384 10/19/29 High-level 23.70 23.75 0.05 0.211% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 45.99%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date SO2
CS - Cal. Span
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level
Mid-level
High-level
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level
100% of Cal. Span High-level
Test Date December 14, 2023 NOx
CS - Cal. Span 49.91
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 -0.04 0.04 0.080% Passed Cal.
EB0097304 10/20/30 Mid-level 24.95 24.96 0.01 0.020% Passed Cal.
High-level 49.91 49.90 0.01 0.020% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 49.99%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date December 14, 2023 CO
6.43 CS - Cal. Span 50.39
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 -0.01 0.01 0.020% Passed Cal.
EB0097304 10/20/30 Mid-level 25.19 25.57 0.38 0.754% Passed Cal.
High-level 50.39 50.43 0.04 0.079% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 49.99%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
REFCHP combined 2023
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review of
Kennecott Utah Copper
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 Refinery Combined Heat and Power Unit (REFCHPI
CS Calibration Span 49.91 50.39 23.70 24.00
Units ppm ppm ppm % % Unprotected
CV - Cylinder Value: SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 24.95 25.19 10.90 10.98
High-Level 49.91 50.39 23.70 24.00
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 50.0% 50.0% 46.0% 45.8%
100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CDir CMA 24.95 25.19 10.90 10.98
Calibration Error Test
Cs - Measured Concentration SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level -0.04 -0.01 0.04 0.01
Mid-Level 24.96 25.57 11.15 11.01
High-Level 49.90 50.43 23.75 23.99
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 24.96 25.57 11.15 11.01
Low-Level 0.08% 0.02% 0.17% 0.04%
ppmdv Difference 0.04 0.01 0.04 0.01
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 0.02% 0.75% 1.05% 0.12%
ppmdv Difference 0.01 0.38 0.25 0.03
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 0.02% 0.08% 0.21% 0.04%
ppmdv Difference 0.01 0.04 0.05 0.01
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.19 -0.20 0.07 0.11 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.46% 0.38% 0.13% 0.42%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.23 0.19 0.03 0.1
Pass or Failed Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 24.16 25.53 10.99 11.04
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 1.60% 0.08% 0.68% 0.12%
Difference TRUE 0.80 0.04 0.16 0.03
Pass or Failed Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:12/14/2023 SO2
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX
13.0 13.53 5.1 12.5 CO
0.0% 26.1% 26.9% 21.6% 51.9% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.22 -0.37 0.09 0.12 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.52% 0.71% 0.21% 0.46%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.3 0.4 0.1 0.1
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 24.08 25.57 11.01 10.97
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 1.76% 0.00% 0.59% 0.17%
Difference TRUE 0.9 0.0 0.1 0.0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift TRUE 0.06% 0.34% 0.08% 0.04% Drift
Difference TRUE 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift TRUE 0.16% 0.08% 0.08% 0.04%
Difference TRUE 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass
Refinery Combined Heat and Power Unit (REFCHPI Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
15.466 25.52 -0.22 25.50 268 5.04 12.44 82.52 29.30 28.31
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws 3.2767
0.9820 0.84 43.662 78.40 41 38.526 3.690 0.0874 0.9990 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs
(ft/sec.)Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat Input
Btu/hr Low Mid High
0.9939 71.680 2,466,475 66,516 2,250,870.60 Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final
Vf
Initial
Vi
1 1.00 1.000 252 39 35 823 751 72
2 1.10 1.049 255 40 38 741 743 -1.4
3 1.20 1.095 262 40 38 639 639 0.2
4 1.00 1.000 270 4l 38 947 939 7.6
5 0.97 0.985 272 42 39
6 0.63 0.794 273 42 39
7 0.63 0.794 272 42 40
8 0.77 0.877 273 42 40
9 0.73 0.854 265 42 41
10 0.78 0.883 266 42 42
11 0.86 0.927 268 43 44
12 1.00 1.000 271 44 45
13 1.20 1.095 271 45 46
14 1.40 1.183 272
15 1.40 1.183 274
16 1.40 1.183 276
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
CO Calibration Gas
Failed Bias Dialog
REFCHP combined 2023
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review of
Kennecott Utah Copper
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 Refinery Combined Heat and Power Unit (REFCHPI
CS Calibration Span 49.91 50.39 23.70 24.00
Units ppm ppm ppm % %
CV - Cylinder Value:SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 24.95 25.19 10.90 10.98
High-Level 49.91 50.39 23.70 24.00
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 50.0% 50.0% 46.0% 45.8%
100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CMA 24.95 25.19 10.90 10.98
Calibration Error Test
Measured Concentration SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level -0.04 -0.01 0.04 0.01
Mid-Level 24.96 25.57 11.15 11.01
High-Level 49.90 50.43 23.75 23.99
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 24.96 25.57 11.15 11.01
Low-Level 0.08% 0.02% 0.17% 0.04%
ppmdv Difference 0.04 0.01 0.04 0.01
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 0.02% 0.75% 1.05% 0.12%
ppmdv Difference 0.01 0.38 0.25 0.03
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 0.02% 0.08% 0.21% 0.04%
ppmdv Difference 0.01 0.04 0.05 0.01
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.22 -0.37 0.09 0.12 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.52% 0.71% 0.21% 0.46%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.26 0.36 0.05 0.11
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 24.08 25.57 11.01 10.97
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 1.76% 0.00% 0.59% 0.17%
Difference TRUE 0.88 0 0.14 0.04
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:12/14/2023 SO2
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX
13.0 13.46 5.1 12.4 CO
0.0% 26.0% 26.7% 21.7% 51.8% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.20 -0.43 0.07 0.12 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.48% 0.83% 0.13% 0.46%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.1
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 23.80 25.38 11.02 10.99
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 2.32% 0.38% 0.55% 0.08%
Difference TRUE 1.2 0.2 0.1 0.0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift TRUE 0.04% 0.12% 0.08% 0.00% Response Spec.
Difference TRUE 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift TRUE 0.56% 0.38% 0.04% 0.08%
Difference TRUE 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass
Refinery Combined Heat and Power Unit (REFCHPI Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
15.47 25.52 -0.22 25.50 271 5.04 12.45 82.50 29.31 28.19
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws 3.4085
0.9820 0.84 43.159 88.20 44 37.864 4.152 0.0988 0.9990 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat Input
Btu/hr Low Mid High
0.9939 71.95 2,467,717 66,767 2,223,881.33 Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final
Vf
Initial
Vi
1 0.98 0.990 255 45 40 803 723 80.4
2 1.20 1.095 261 45 37 742 741 0.9
3 1.20 1.095 266 46 36 639 639 0
4 0.91 0.954 270 47 37 954 947 6.9
5 0.78 0.883 274 47 38
6 0.64 0.800 277 47 40
7 0.67 0.819 276 47 41
8 0.89 0.943 277 48 41
9 0.75 0.866 258 48 41
10 0.81 0.900 267 48 42
11 0.82 0.906 270 48 43
12 1.10 1.049 272 49 45
13 1.30 1.140 278 49 46
14 1.40 1.183 277
15 1.30 1.140 277
16 1.30 1.140 275
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
Failed Bias Dialog
REFCHP combined 2023
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review of
Kennecott Utah Copper
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 Refinery Combined Heat and Power Unit (REFCHPI
CS Calibration Span 49.91 50.39 23.70 24.00
Units ppm ppm ppm % %
CV - Cylinder Value:SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 24.95 25.19 10.90 10.98
High-Level 49.91 50.39 23.70 24.00
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 50.0% 50.0% 46.0% 45.8%
100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CMA 24.95 25.19 10.90 10.98
Calibration Error Test
Measured Concentration SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level -0.04 -0.01 0.04 0.01
Mid-Level 24.96 25.57 11.15 11.01
High-Level 49.90 50.43 23.75 23.99
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 24.96 25.57 11.15 11.01
Low-Level 0.08% 0.02% 0.17% 0.04%
ppmv Difference 0.04 0.01 0.04 0.01
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 0.02% 0.75% 1.05% 0.12%
ppmv Difference 0.01 0.38 0.25 0.03
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 0.02% 0.08% 0.21% 0.04%
ppmv Difference 0.01 0.04 0.05 0.01
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.20 -0.43 0.07 0.12 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.48% 0.83% 0.13% 0.46%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.24 0.42 0.03 0.11
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 23.80 25.38 11.02 10.99
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 2.32% 0.38% 0.55% 0.08%
Difference TRUE 1.16 0.19 0.13 0.02
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:12/14/2023 SO2
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX
13.1 12.71 5.1 12.5 CO
0.0% 26.2% 25.2% 21.6% 51.9% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.20 -0.50 0.06 0.14 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.48% 0.97% 0.08% 0.54%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.2 0.5 0.0 0.1
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 23.68 25.21 11.04 11.00
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 2.56% 0.71% 0.46% 0.04%
Difference TRUE 1.3 0.4 0.1 0.0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift TRUE 0.00% 0.14% 0.04% 0.08% Response Spec.
Difference TRUE 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift TRUE 0.24% 0.34% 0.08% 0.04%
Difference TRUE 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass
Refinery Combined Heat and Power Unit (REFCHPI Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
15.47 25.52 -0.22 25.50 272 5.04 12.46 82.51 29.30 28.05
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws 3.4795
0.9820 0.84 45.146 104.10 47 39.358 4.900 0.1107 0.9990 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat Input
Btu/hr Low Mid High
0.9980 72.49 2,481,992 67,268 2,207,200.06 Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final
Vf
Initial
Vi
1 0.95 0.975 261 47 40 812 715 97.3
2 1.20 1.095 264 48 38 742 742 -0.1
3 1.30 1.140 269 48 39 639 639 0
4 0.92 0.959 272 49 40 961 954 6.9
5 0.75 0.866 275 49 42
6 0.63 0.794 278 50 44 FT```
7 0.65 0.806 275 50 45
8 0.93 0.964 275 50 46
9 0.82 0.906 265 51 47
10 0.80 0.894 269 51 47
11 0.84 0.917 272 51 48
12 1.10 1.049 274 52 50
13 1.30 1.140 275 52 50
14 1.40 1.183 277
15 1.30 1.140 274
16 1.30 1.140 275
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Bias Dialog
REFCHP Duct Burner 2023
Reference Methods 2, 3A, 6C, 7E, 10, & 19
Source Information
Company Name Kennecott Utah Copper
Company Contact:Sean Daly
Contact Phone No.801-204-2563
Stack Designation:Refinery Combined Heat and Power Unit (REFCHPI
Test & Review Dates
Test Date:12/14/2023 &
Review Date: 2/27/2024
Observer:Unobserved
Reviewer:Paul Morris
Emission Limits Emission Rates
SO2 NOX CO SO2 NOX CO
lbs./MMBtu
lbs./hr. 7.5 2.5 4.821 2.399
ppm 54.0 30.893
Percent
%O2 Correction as a whole #15.00 17.80
Test Information Heat Input
Stack I.D. inches As ft^2 Y Dl H @ Cp Pbar Pq (static)
fuel flow rate
(Btu/hr.)
Heat Input
(Btu/hr.)
53.25 15.466 0.9820 1.763 0.84 25.85 -0.25
Contractor Information
Contact: Charles Horton
Contracting Company: Alliance Technical Group, LLC
Address: 3683 W 2270 S, Suite E West Valley City, UT 84120
Phone No.: [phone]
Project No.:

Round
Division of Air Quality
Instrumental Reference Methods - Gaseous Measurements
Method 19 - F factors for Coal, Oil, and Gas
Fd Fw Fc
scf/MMBtu scf/MMBtu scf/MMBtu
Diluent
F factor used
O2
CO2
Anthrocite 2
Bituminous 2
Lignite
Natural
Propane
Butane
10100
COAL
OIL
GAS
9780
9860
9190
8710
8710
8710
10540
10640
11950
320
10610
10200
10390
1970
1800
1910
1420
1040
1190
1250
Wet CEM
Correct For O2
CO2 Interference w/CO
Yes
Yes
Yes
REFCHP Duct Burner 2023
Division of Air Quality
NSPS Relative Accuracy Performance Specification Test - CEMS Certification
Kennecott Utah Copper
Refinery Combined Heat and Power Unit (REFCHPI
Average Emission
Dry SO2 NOX CO
lbs./MMbtu Average % concentration
lbs./hr.4.82 2.40 CO2 O2
ppm corrected for %O2 30.89 13.27 1.72 17.82
Run 1 Enter O2 or CO2
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 1.969E-06 9.835E-07
lbs./hr.4.95 2.47 1.75 17.74
ppm corrected for %O2 30.73 13.25 1.84 17.71
Run 2
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 1.910E-06 9.364E-07
lbs./hr.4.76 2.33 1.70 17.83
ppm corrected for %O2 30.77 13.02 1.84 17.81 Raw Value
Run 3
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 1.898E-06 9.547E-07
lbs./hr.4.75 2.39 1.72 17.89
ppm corrected for %O2 31.18 13.536 1.80 17.82 Raw Value
Run 4
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft
lbs./hr.
ppm corrected for %O2 Raw Value
Run 5
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft
lbs./hr.
ppm corrected for %O2 Raw Value
C For Cal Drift
Raw Value
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
O2
CO2
Clear
lbs./MMBTU
REFCHP Duct Burner 2023
Calibration Error Test
Test Date December 14, 2023 O2
CS - Cal. Span 24.00
Units %
Cylinder No. Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.04% Passed Cal.
RR03686 09/19/31 Mid-level 10.98 11.01 0.03 0.12% Passed Cal.
RR03384 10/19/29 High-level 24.00 23.99 0.01 0.04% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of CS - Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 45.75%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date December 14, 2023 CO2
CS - Cal. Span 23.70
Units %
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.169% Passed Cal.
RR03686 09/19/31 Mid-level 10.90 11.15 0.25 1.055% Passed Cal.
RR03384 10/19/29 High-level 23.70 23.75 0.05 0.211% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 45.99%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date SO2
CS - Cal. Span
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level
Mid-level
High-level
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level
100% of Cal. Span High-level
Test Date December 14, 2023 NOx
CS - Cal. Span 49.91
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 -0.04 0.04 0.080% Passed Cal.
EB0097304 10/20/30 Mid-level 24.95 24.96 0.01 0.020% Passed Cal.
High-level 49.91 49.90 0.01 0.020% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 49.99%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date December 14, 2023 CO
2.5 CS - Cal. Span 50.39
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 -0.01 0.01 0.020% Passed Cal.
EB0097304 10/20/30 Mid-level 25.19 25.57 0.38 0.754% Passed Cal.
High-level 50.39 50.43 0.04 0.079% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 49.99%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
REFCHP Duct Burner 2023
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review of
Kennecott Utah Copper
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 Refinery Combined Heat and Power Unit (REFCHPI
CS Calibration Span 49.91 50.39 23.70 24.00
Units ppm ppm ppm % % Unprotected
CV - Cylinder Value: SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 24.95 25.19 10.90 10.98
High-Level 49.91 50.39 23.70 24.00
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 50.0% 50.0% 46.0% 45.8%
100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CDir CMA 24.95 25.19 10.90 10.98
Calibration Error Test
Cs - Measured Concentration SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level -0.04 -0.01 0.04 0.01
Mid-Level 24.96 25.57 11.15 11.01
High-Level 49.90 50.43 23.75 23.99
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 24.96 25.57 11.15 11.01
Low-Level 0.08% 0.02% 0.17% 0.04%
ppmdv Difference 0.04 0.01 0.04 0.01
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 0.02% 0.75% 1.05% 0.12%
ppmdv Difference 0.01 0.38 0.25 0.03
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 0.02% 0.08% 0.21% 0.04%
ppmdv Difference 0.01 0.04 0.05 0.01
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.70 -0.64 0.08 0.11 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 1.48% 1.25% 0.17% 0.42%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.74 0.63 0.04 0.1
Pass or Failed Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 23.92 25.05 11.11 10.98
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 2.08% 1.03% 0.17% 0.12%
Difference TRUE 1.04 0.52 0.04 0.03
Pass or Failed Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:12/14/2023 SO2
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX
16.0 13.20 1.8 17.7 CO
0.0% 32.1% 26.2% 7.8% 73.8% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.41 -0.55 0.06 0.10 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.90% 1.07% 0.08% 0.38%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.1
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 23.98 25.14 11.05 11.02
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 1.96% 0.85% 0.42% 0.04%
Difference TRUE 1.0 0.4 0.1 0.0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift TRUE 0.58% 0.18% 0.08% 0.04% Drift
Difference TRUE 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift TRUE 0.12% 0.18% 0.25% 0.08%
Difference TRUE 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass
Refinery Combined Heat and Power Unit (REFCHPI Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
15.466 25.85 -0.25 25.83 257 1.75 17.74 80.51 28.99 28.39
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws 2.6938
0.9820 0.84 43.853 46.60 56 38.056 2.193 0.0545 0.9990 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs
(ft/sec.)Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat Input
Btu/hr Low Mid High
1.0583 75.160 2,658,938 69,745 2,514,034.39 Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final
Vf
Initial
Vi
1 0.73 0.854 239 61 55 737 697 40.5
2 0.78 0.883 245 60 57 741 742 -0.9
3 0.85 0.922 250 61 57 639 639 -0.2
4 0.86 0.927 255 61 58 968 961 7.2
5 1.40 1.183 258 60 58
6 1.50 1.225 259 59 67
7 1.70 1.304 260 59 55
8 1.80 1.342 260 53 53
9 1.25 1.118 254 56 52
10 1.35 1.162 258 55 53
11 1.60 1.265 256 53 52
12 1.40 1.183 262 52 52
13 0.90 0.949 265 51 51
14 0.75 0.866 266
15 0.78 0.883 267
16 0.75 0.866 265
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
CO Calibration Gas
Failed Bias Dialog
REFCHP Duct Burner 2023
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review of
Kennecott Utah Copper
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 Refinery Combined Heat and Power Unit (REFCHPI
CS Calibration Span 49.91 50.39 23.70 24.00
Units ppm ppm ppm % %
CV - Cylinder Value:SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 24.95 25.19 10.90 10.98
High-Level 49.91 50.39 23.70 24.00
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 50.0% 50.0% 46.0% 45.8%
100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CMA 24.95 25.19 10.90 10.98
Calibration Error Test
Measured Concentration SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level -0.04 -0.01 0.04 0.01
Mid-Level 24.96 25.57 11.15 11.01
High-Level 49.90 50.43 23.75 23.99
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 24.96 25.57 11.15 11.01
Low-Level 0.08% 0.02% 0.17% 0.04%
ppmdv Difference 0.04 0.01 0.04 0.01
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 0.02% 0.75% 1.05% 0.12%
ppmdv Difference 0.01 0.38 0.25 0.03
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 0.02% 0.08% 0.21% 0.04%
ppmdv Difference 0.01 0.04 0.05 0.01
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.41 -0.55 0.06 0.10 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.90% 1.07% 0.08% 0.38%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.45 0.54 0.02 0.09
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 23.98 25.14 11.05 11.02
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 1.96% 0.85% 0.42% 0.04%
Difference TRUE 0.98 0.43 0.1 0.01
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:12/14/2023 SO2
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX
15.6 12.58 1.8 17.8 CO
0.0% 31.2% 25.0% 7.6% 74.2% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.40 -0.59 0.08 0.10 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.88% 1.15% 0.17% 0.38%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.4 0.6 0.0 0.1
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 24.12 25.16 11.11 10.98
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 1.68% 0.81% 0.17% 0.12%
Difference TRUE 0.8 0.4 0.0 0.0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift TRUE 0.02% 0.08% 0.08% 0.00% Response Spec.
Difference TRUE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift TRUE 0.28% 0.04% 0.25% 0.08%
Difference TRUE 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass
Refinery Combined Heat and Power Unit (REFCHPI Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
15.47 25.85 -0.25 25.83 258 1.70 17.83 80.46 28.99 28.42
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws 2.6967
0.9820 0.84 42.308 43.80 44 37.563 2.062 0.0520 0.9990 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat Input
Btu/hr Low Mid High
1.0473 74.35 2,630,053 68,994 2,493,211.84 Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final
Vf
Initial
Vi
1 0.70 0.837 245 46 40 779 737 42.1
2 0.76 0.872 248 46 41 741 741 -0.3
3 0.82 0.906 250 45 45 639 639 0
4 0.90 0.949 252 46 46 919 917 2
5 1.40 1.183 254 45 45
6 1.45 1.204 258 45 44
7 1.65 1.285 260 45 45
8 1.85 1.360 261 46 46
9 1.35 1.162 258 45 44
10 1.40 1.183 256 44 43
11 1.65 1.285 258 44 43
12 1.15 1.072 262 43 44
13 0.82 0.906 265 43 44
14 0.75 0.866 266
15 0.72 0.849 264
16 0.70 0.837 263
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
Failed Bias Dialog
REFCHP Duct Burner 2023
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review of
Kennecott Utah Copper
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 Refinery Combined Heat and Power Unit (REFCHPI
CS Calibration Span 49.91 50.39 23.70 24.00
Units ppm ppm ppm % %
CV - Cylinder Value:SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 24.95 25.19 10.90 10.98
High-Level 49.91 50.39 23.70 24.00
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 50.0% 50.0% 46.0% 45.8%
100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CMA 24.95 25.19 10.90 10.98
Calibration Error Test
Measured Concentration SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level -0.04 -0.01 0.04 0.01
Mid-Level 24.96 25.57 11.15 11.01
High-Level 49.90 50.43 23.75 23.99
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 24.96 25.57 11.15 11.01
Low-Level 0.08% 0.02% 0.17% 0.04%
ppmv Difference 0.04 0.01 0.04 0.01
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 0.02% 0.75% 1.05% 0.12%
ppmv Difference 0.01 0.38 0.25 0.03
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 0.02% 0.08% 0.21% 0.04%
ppmv Difference 0.01 0.04 0.05 0.01
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.40 -0.59 0.08 0.10 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.88% 1.15% 0.17% 0.38%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.44 0.58 0.04 0.09
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 24.12 25.16 11.11 10.98
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 1.68% 0.81% 0.17% 0.12%
Difference TRUE 0.84 0.41 0.04 0.03
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:12/14/2023 SO2
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX
15.6 12.86 1.8 17.8 CO
0.0% 31.2% 25.5% 7.6% 74.3% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.35 -0.55 0.04 0.10 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.78% 1.07% 0.00% 0.38%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.4 0.5 0.0 0.1
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 24.34 25.23 11.10 10.96
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 1.24% 0.67% 0.21% 0.21%
Difference TRUE 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift TRUE 0.10% 0.08% 0.17% 0.00% Response Spec.
Difference TRUE 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift TRUE 0.44% 0.14% 0.04% 0.08%
Difference TRUE 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass
Refinery Combined Heat and Power Unit (REFCHPI Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
15.47 25.85 -0.25 25.83 258 1.72 17.89 80.39 28.99 28.41
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws 2.7347
0.9820 0.84 42.519 45.10 44 37.808 2.123 0.0532 0.9990 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat Input
Btu/hr Low Mid High
1.0530 74.82 2,643,685 69,430 2,503,138.10 Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final
Vf
Initial
Vi
1 0.68 0.825 248 44 41 796 754 42
2 0.78 0.883 247 45 42 742 741 0.6
3 0.84 0.917 249 45 41 639 639 0.3
4 0.91 0.954 253 44 40 921 919 2.2
5 1.45 1.204 255 43 44
6 1.45 1.204 262 43 45
7 1.60 1.265 260 42 45
8 1.90 1.378 265 43 46
9 1.40 1.183 263 42 46
10 1.40 1.183 265 42 47
11 1.60 1.265 267 41 47
12 1.25 1.118 265 40 48
13 0.84 0.917 259 40 47
14 0.76 0.872 262
15 0.70 0.837 258
16 0.71 0.843 255
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Bias Dialog
REFCHP Turbine 2023
Reference Methods 2, 3A, 6C, 7E, 10, & 19
Source Information
Company Name Kennecott Utah Copper
Company Contact:Sean Daly
Contact Phone No.801-204-2563
Stack Designation:Refinery Combined Heat and Power Unit (REFCHPI
Test & Review Dates
Test Date:12/14/2023 &
Review Date: 2/27/2024
Observer:Unobserved
Reviewer:Paul Morris
Emission Limits Emission Rates
SO2 NOX CO SO2 NOX CO
lbs./MMBtu
lbs./hr.
ppm 25.0 6.403
Percent
%O2 Correction as a whole #15.00
Test Information Heat Input
Stack I.D. inches As ft^2 Y Dl H @ Cp Pbar Pq (static)
fuel flow rate
(Btu/hr.)
Heat Input
(Btu/hr.)
53.25 15.466
Contractor Information
Contact: Charles Horton
Contracting Company: Alliance Technical Group, LLC
Address: 3683 W 2270 S, Suite E West Valley City, UT 84120
Phone No.: [phone]
Project No.:

Round
Division of Air Quality
Instrumental Reference Methods - Gaseous Measurements
Method 19 - F factors for Coal, Oil, and Gas
Fd Fw Fc
scf/MMBtu scf/MMBtu scf/MMBtu
Diluent
F factor used
O2
CO2
Anthrocite 2
Bituminous 2
Lignite
Natural
Propane
Butane
10100
COAL
OIL
GAS
9780
9860
9190
8710
8710
8710
10540
10640
11950
320
10610
10200
10390
1970
1800
1910
1420
1040
1190
1250
Wet CEM
Correct For O2
CO2 Interference w/CO
Yes
Yes
Yes
REFCHP Turbine 2023
Division of Air Quality
NSPS Relative Accuracy Performance Specification Test - CEMS Certification
Kennecott Utah Copper
Refinery Combined Heat and Power Unit (REFCHPI
Average Emission
Dry SO2 NOX CO
lbs./MMbtu Average % concentration
lbs./hr.CO2 O2
ppm corrected for %O2 6.40 1.67 17.92
Run 1 Enter O2 or CO2
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 3.727E-07
lbs./hr.1.67 17.92
ppm corrected for %O2 6.18 1.74 17.92
Run 2
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 3.819E-07
lbs./hr.1.66 17.92
ppm corrected for %O2 6.32 1.74 17.90 Raw Value
Run 3
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 4.047E-07
lbs./hr.1.68 17.92
ppm corrected for %O2 6.71 1.75 17.87 Raw Value
Run 4
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft
lbs./hr.
ppm corrected for %O2 Raw Value
Run 5
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft
lbs./hr.
ppm corrected for %O2 Raw Value
C For Cal Drift
Raw Value
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
O2
CO2
Clear
lbs./MMBTU
REFCHP Turbine 2023
Calibration Error Test
Test Date December 14, 2023 O2
CS - Cal. Span 24.00
Units %
Cylinder No. Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.04% Passed Cal.
RR03686 09/19/31 Mid-level 10.98 11.01 0.03 0.12% Passed Cal.
RR03384 10/19/29 High-level 24.00 23.99 0.01 0.04% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of CS - Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 45.75%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date December 14, 2023 CO2
CS - Cal. Span 23.70
Units %
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.169% Passed Cal.
RR03686 09/19/31 Mid-level 10.90 11.15 0.25 1.055% Passed Cal.
RR03384 10/19/29 High-level 23.70 23.75 0.05 0.211% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 45.99%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date SO2
CS - Cal. Span
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level
Mid-level
High-level
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level
100% of Cal. Span High-level
Test Date December 14, 2023 NOx
CS - Cal. Span 49.91
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 -0.04 0.04 0.080% Passed Cal.
EB0097304 10/20/30 Mid-level 24.95 24.96 0.01 0.020% Passed Cal.
High-level 49.91 49.90 0.01 0.020% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 49.99%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date CO
CS - Cal. Span
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level
Mid-level
High-level
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level
100% of Cal. Span High-level
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
REFCHP Turbine 2023
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review of
Kennecott Utah Copper
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 Refinery Combined Heat and Power Unit (REFCHPI
CS Calibration Span 49.91 23.70 24.00
Units ppm ppm ppm % % Unprotected
CV - Cylinder Value: SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 24.95 10.90 10.98
High-Level 49.91 23.70 24.00
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 50.0% 46.0% 45.8%
100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CDir CMA 24.95 10.90 10.98
Calibration Error Test
Cs - Measured Concentration SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level -0.04 0.04 0.01
Mid-Level 24.96 11.15 11.01
High-Level 49.90 23.75 23.99
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 24.96 11.15 11.01
Low-Level 0.08% 0.17% 0.04%
ppmdv Difference 0.04 0.04 0.01
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 0.02% 1.05% 0.12%
ppmdv Difference 0.01 0.25 0.03
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 0.02% 0.21% 0.04%
ppmdv Difference 0.01 0.05 0.01
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.05 0.03 0.09 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.18% TRUE 0.04% 0.33%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.09 TRUE 0.01 0.08
Pass or Failed Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 23.83 11.11 11.00
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 2.26% TRUE 0.17% 0.04%
Difference TRUE 1.13 TRUE 0.04 0.01
Pass or Failed Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:12/14/2023 SO2
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX
3.0 1.7 17.9 CO
0.0% 6.1% 0.0% 7.3% 74.7% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.10 0.08 0.14 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.28% TRUE 0.17% 0.54%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.1 TRUE 0.0 0.1
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 23.74 11.06 11.04
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 2.44% TRUE 0.38% 0.12%
Difference TRUE 1.2 TRUE 0.1 0.0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift TRUE 0.10% TRUE 0.13% 0.21% Drift
Difference TRUE 0.1 TRUE 0.1 0.1 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift TRUE 0.18% TRUE 0.21% 0.08%
Difference TRUE 0.1 TRUE 0.0 0.0
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass
Refinery Combined Heat and Power Unit (REFCHPI Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
15.466 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.67 17.92 80.41 28.98 28.98
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws #NUM!
0.0000 #DIV/0! 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs
(ft/sec.)Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat Input
Btu/hr Low Mid High
Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final
Vf
Initial
Vi
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
CO Calibration Gas
Failed Bias Dialog
REFCHP Turbine 2023
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review of
Kennecott Utah Copper
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 Refinery Combined Heat and Power Unit (REFCHPI
CS Calibration Span 49.91 23.70 24.00
Units ppm ppm ppm % %
CV - Cylinder Value:SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 24.95 10.90 10.98
High-Level 49.91 23.70 24.00
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 50.0% 46.0% 45.8%
100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CMA 24.95 10.90 10.98
Calibration Error Test
Measured Concentration SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level -0.04 0.04 0.01
Mid-Level 24.96 11.15 11.01
High-Level 49.90 23.75 23.99
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 24.96 11.15 11.01
Low-Level 0.08% 0.17% 0.04%
ppmdv Difference 0.04 0.04 0.01
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 0.02% 1.05% 0.12%
ppmdv Difference 0.01 0.25 0.03
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 0.02% 0.21% 0.04%
ppmdv Difference 0.01 0.05 0.01
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.10 0.08 0.14 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.28% TRUE 0.17% 0.54%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.14 TRUE 0.04 0.13
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 23.74 11.06 11.04
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 2.44% TRUE 0.38% 0.12%
Difference TRUE 1.22 TRUE 0.09 0.03
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:12/14/2023 SO2
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX
3.1 1.7 17.9 CO
0.0% 6.2% 0.0% 7.3% 74.6% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.04 0.05 0.09 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.16% TRUE 0.04% 0.33%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.1 TRUE 0.0 0.1
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 23.85 11.11 10.98
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 2.22% TRUE 0.17% 0.12%
Difference TRUE 1.1 TRUE 0.0 0.0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift TRUE 0.12% TRUE 0.13% 0.21% Response Spec.
Difference TRUE 0.1 TRUE 0.0 0.1 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift TRUE 0.22% TRUE 0.21% 0.00%
Difference TRUE 0.1 TRUE 0.0 0.1
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass
Refinery Combined Heat and Power Unit (REFCHPI Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
15.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.66 17.92 80.43 28.98 28.98
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws
0.0000 #DIV/0! 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat Input
Btu/hr Low Mid High
Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final
Vf
Initial
Vi
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
Failed Bias Dialog
REFCHP Turbine 2023
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review of
Kennecott Utah Copper
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 Refinery Combined Heat and Power Unit (REFCHPI
CS Calibration Span 49.91 23.70 24.00
Units ppm ppm ppm % %
CV - Cylinder Value:SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 24.95 10.90 10.98
High-Level 49.91 23.70 24.00
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 50.0% 46.0% 45.8%
100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CMA 24.95 10.90 10.98
Calibration Error Test
Measured Concentration SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level -0.04 0.04 0.01
Mid-Level 24.96 11.15 11.01
High-Level 49.90 23.75 23.99
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 24.96 11.15 11.01
Low-Level 0.08% 0.17% 0.04%
ppmv Difference 0.04 0.04 0.01
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 0.02% 1.05% 0.12%
ppmv Difference 0.01 0.25 0.03
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 0.02% 0.21% 0.04%
ppmv Difference 0.01 0.05 0.01
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.04 0.05 0.09 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.16% TRUE 0.04% 0.33%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.08 TRUE 0.01 0.08
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 23.85 11.11 10.98
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 2.22% TRUE 0.17% 0.12%
Difference TRUE 1.11 TRUE 0.04 0.03
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:12/14/2023 SO2
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX
3.3 1.8 17.9 CO
0.0% 6.6% 0.0% 7.4% 74.5% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.04 0.05 0.09 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.16% TRUE 0.04% 0.33%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.1 TRUE 0.0 0.1
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 23.80 11.08 10.98
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 2.32% TRUE 0.30% 0.12%
Difference TRUE 1.2 TRUE 0.1 0.0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift TRUE 0.00% TRUE 0.00% 0.00% Response Spec.
Difference TRUE 0.0 TRUE 0.0 0.0 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift TRUE 0.10% TRUE 0.13% 0.00%
Difference TRUE 0.1 TRUE 0.0 0.0
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass
Refinery Combined Heat and Power Unit (REFCHPI Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
15.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.68 17.92 80.40 28.99 28.99
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws
0.0000 #DIV/0! 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat Input
Btu/hr Low Mid High
Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final
Vf
Initial
Vi
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Bias Dialog