DAQ-2024-005159

1

DAQC-201-24
Site ID 10354 (B4)
MEMORANDUM

TO: STACK TEST FILE – UNIVERSITY OF UTAH

THROUGH: Harold Burge, Major Source Compliance Section Manager

FROM: Paul Morris, Environmental Scientist

DATE: February 29, 2024

SUBJECT: Location: High Temp Water Plant, Bldg. 303, University of Utah, Salt Lake City,
Salt Lake County, UT
Contact: Bryan Cracroft [phone]
Tester: Alliance Technical Group
Sources: Cogen Turbine, Boiler 6, Boiler 7, and Boiler 9
FRS Site ID#: UT0000004903500063
Action Code: TR
Permit# Title V operating permit 3500063004 dated August 25, 2023
Subject: Review of Stack Test Report received February 23, 2024

On February 23, 2024, by email, the DAQ received a test report for the University of Utah Solar Taurus
70 CO Gen, Boiler 6, Boiler 7, and Boiler 9 at the High Temperature Water Plant, Building 303 located at
the University of Utah, in Salt Lake City, UT. Testing was performed January 8-10, 2024, to demonstrate
compliance with the emission limits found in Title V operating permit Conditions II.B.3.a and II.B.4.a.
The DAQ-calculated test results are:

Source Test Date RM/Pollutant DAQ Result Test Result Limit

Turbine 1/9/2024 7E/NOX 1.0 lbs/hr 1.1 lbs/hr 2.65 lbs/hr
4 ppmdv** 4 ppmdv** 9 ppmdv**

10/CO 0.16 lbs/hr 0.17 lbs/hr 4.48 lbs/hr
1 ppmdv** 1 ppmdv** 25 ppmdv**
Combined 1/8/2024 7E/NOX 2.6 lbs/hr 2.6 lbs/hr 8.97 lbs/hr
8 ppmdv** 8 ppmdv** 15 ppmdv**

10/CO 1.8 lbs/hr 1.8 lbs/hr 10.84 lbs/hr
9 ppmdv** 9 ppmdv** 30 ppmdv**

Boiler 6 1/10/2024 7E/NOX 0.19 lbs/hr 0.19 lbs/hr 0.54 lbs/hr
8 ppmdv* 8 ppmdv* 9 ppmdv*
Boiler 7 1/10/2024 7E/NOX 0.20 lbs/hr 0.19 lbs/hr 0.54 lbs/hr
8 ppmdv* 8 ppmdv* 9 ppmdv*
Boiler 9 1/9/2024 7E/NOX 0.28 lbs/hr 0.27 lbs/hr 0.79 lbs/hr
8 ppmdv* 8 ppmdv* 9 ppmdv*
* ppmdv @ 3% O2
** ppmdv @ 15% O2

6 , 3
2

DEVIATIONS: None.

CONCLUSION: The overall stack test report appears to be acceptable.

RECOMMENDATION: The emissions appear to have been in compliance with the applicable limits
at the time of testing.

ATTACHMENTS: DAQ generated Excel spreadsheets
Stack test report received February 23, 2024

Source Test Report
University of Utah
200 S. University Avenue
Salt Lake City, UT 84112
Sources Tested: Building 303 – One (1) Solar Taurus 70
CoGen, One (1) Rentech Waste Heat Recovery Unit, One
(1) Gen 9 Boiler & Two (2) NSPS Boilers
Test Dates: January 8-10, 2024
Project No. AST-2024-0023
Prepared By
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
3683 W 2270 S, Suite E
West Valley City, UT 84120
Source Test Report
Test Program Summary
AST-2024-0023 University of Utah – Salt Lake City, UT Page i
Regulatory Information
Permit Nos.
Regulatory Citation
Utah Department of Environmental Quality (UDEQ) Title V Permit No.
3500063004
DAQE-AN103540028-20
40 CFR 60, Subpart Dc
40 CFR 60, Subpart KKKK
Source Information
Source Name Source ID Target Parameters
Solar Taurus 70 CoGen Bldg. 303 - Unit 1 NOx & CO
Rentech Waste Heat Recovery Bldg. 303 - Unit 1 NOx & CO
Gen 9 Boiler LCHTWP Boiler 9 NOx
Two (2) NSPS Boilers Units 6 & 7 NOx
Contact Information
Test Location Test Company
University of Utah
200 S. University Avenue
Salt Lake City, UT 84112
Facility Contact
Bryan Cracroft
[e-mail]
[phone]
David Quinlivan
[e-mail]
[phone]
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
3683 W 2270 S, Suite E
West Valley City, UT 84120
Project Manager / Field Team Leader
Charles Horton
[e-mail]
[phone]
QA/QC Manager
Kathleen Shonk
[e-mail]
[phone]
Report Coordinator
Delaine Spangler
[e-mail]
2 of 97
CERTIFICATION
In accordance with operating permit provision I.K. and UAC R307-415-5d,
and based on information and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, I certify
that the statements and information in this document are true, accurate and
complete.
_______________________________________________________________
Signature of Responsible Official for the Source
Ms. Robin Burr, Chief Facilities Officer
Office of the Chief Financial Officer
02/23/2024
Source Test Report
Certification Statement
AST-2024-0023 University of Utah – Salt Lake City, UT Page ii
Alliance Technical Group, LLC (Alliance) has completed the source testing as described in this report. Results
apply only to the source(s) tested and operating condition(s) for the specific test date(s) and time(s) identified within
this report. All results are intended to be considered in their entirety, and Alliance is not responsible for use of less
than the complete test report without written consent. This report shall not be reproduced in full or in part without
written approval from the customer.
To the best of my knowledge and abilities, all information, facts and test data are correct. Data presented in this
report has been checked for completeness and is accurate, error-free and legible. Onsite testing was conducted in
accordance with approved internal Standard Operating Procedures. Any deviations or problems are detailed in the
relevant sections in the test report.
This report is only considered valid once an authorized representative of Alliance has signed in the space provided
below; any other version is considered draft. This document was prepared in portable document format (.pdf) and
contains pages as identified in the bottom footer of this document.
Charles Horton, QSTI
Alliance Technical Group, LLC
Date
2/5/2024
3 of 97
Source Test Report
Table of Contents
AST-2024-0023 University of Utah – Salt Lake City, UT Page iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 1-1
1.1 Process/Control System Descriptions ...................................................................................................... 1-1
1.2 Project Team ............................................................................................................................................ 1-1
1.3 Site Specific Test Plan & Notification ..................................................................................................... 1-1
2.0 Summary of Results ..................................................................................................................................... 2-1
3.0 Testing Methodology .................................................................................................................................... 3-1
3.1 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3A – Oxygen/Carbon Dioxide ........................................................... 3-1
3.2 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 7E – Nitrogen Oxides ........................................................................ 3-1
3.3 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 10 – Carbon Monoxide ...................................................................... 3-1
3.4 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 19 – Volumetric Flow Rate / Mass Emission Factors ....................... 3-1
3.5 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 205 – Gas Dilution System Certification ........................................... 3-2
3.6 Quality Assurance/Quality Control – U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 3A, 7E, and 10 ...................... 3-2
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1-1: Project Team ........................................................................................................................................... 1-1
Table 2-1: Summary of Results – Unit 1 – Solar Taurus 70 CoGen (Turbine Only) ............................................... 2-1
Table 2-2: Summary of Results – Unit 1 – Solar Taurus 70 CoGen (Turbine and WHRU Duct Burner) ................ 2-2
Table 2-3: Summary of Results – Unit 6 .................................................................................................................. 2-2
Table 2-4: Summary of Results – Unit 7 .................................................................................................................. 2-3
Table 2-5: Summary of Results – Gen 9 Boiler ........................................................................................................ 2-3
Table 3-1: Source Testing Methodology .................................................................................................................. 3-1
APPENDICES
Appendix A Sample Calculations
Appendix B Field Data
Appendix C Quality Assurance/Quality Control Data
Appendix D Process Operating/Control System Data
4 of 97
Introduction
5 of 97
Source Test Report
Introduction
AST-2024-0023 University of Utah – Salt Lake City, UT Page 1-1
1.0 Introduction
Alliance Technical Group, LLC (Alliance) was retained by University of Utah to conduct compliance testing at the
Salt Lake City, Utah facility. Portions of the facility are subject to 40 CFR 60, Subparts Dc and KKKK. The
facility operates under Utah Department of Environmental Quality (UDEQ) Title V Permit No. 3500063004.
Testing was conducted to determine the emission rates of nitrogen oxides (NOx) and carbon monoxide (CO) at the
exhausts of one (1) Solar Taurus 70 CoGen and one (1) Rentech Waste Heat Recovery Unit. Testing also included
determining the emission rate of NOx at the exhaust of the two (2) NSPS Boilers (Unit 6 and 7) and Gen 9 Boiler.
1.1 Process/Control System Descriptions
The High Temperature Water (HTW) Plant 303 produces electricity and heating water. The plant provides
electricity, heating water, and steam to multiple building on Campus.
One (1) natural gas fired Solar Taurus 70 T7800S (Solar's SoLoNox TM) turbine with one WHRU with duct burner
rated at 85 MMBtu/hr are operated at the HTW Plant 303. Natural gas turbine is site rated at 7.23 MW with heat
input of 72.78 MMBtu/hr. Gas turbine and duct burner are Subject to NSPS, 40 CFR, Part 60, Subpart KKKK.
The Superior boiler is a 72 MMBtu/hr boiler designed to burn natural gas only. It is located at the Central HTW
Plant, Building 303 on the Salt Lake City Campus
1.2 Project Team
Personnel involved in this project are identified in the following table.
Table 1-1: Project Team
University of Utah Personnel Bryan Cracroft
Alliance Personnel
Ryan Lyons
Supilani Mailei
Andrew Crosby
1.3 Site Specific Test Plan & Notification
Testing was conducted in accordance with the Site Specific Test Plan (SSTP) submitted to UDAQ by University of
Utah.
6 of 97
Summary of Results
7 of 97
Source Test Report
Summary of Results
AST-2024-0023 University of Utah – Salt Lake City, UT Page 2-1
2.0 Summary of Results
Alliance conducted compliance testing at the Salt Lake City, Utah facility on January 8 – 10, 2024. Testing
consisted of determining the emission rates of NOx and CO at the exhausts of one (1) Solar Taurus 70 CoGen and
one (1) Rentech Waste Heat Recovery Unit. Testing also included determining the emission rate of NOx at the
exhaust of the two (2) NSPS Boilers (Unit 6 and 7) and Gen 9 Boiler.
Tables 2-1 through 2-5 provide a summary of the emission testing results with comparisons to the applicable UDAQ
permit limits. Any difference between the summary results listed in the following tables and the detailed results
contained in appendices is due to rounding for presentation.
Table 2-1: Summary of Results – Unit 1 – Solar Taurus 70 CoGen (Turbine Only)
Run Number Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average
Date 1/9/24 1/9/24 1/9/24
Nitrogen Oxides Data
Concentration, ppmvd @ 15% O2 3.43 3.85 4.32 3.87
Permit Limit, ppmvd @ 15% O2 -- -- -- 9
Percent of Limit, % -- -- -- 43
Emission Rate, lb/hr 0.91 1.2 1.2 1.1
Permit Limit, lb/hr -- -- -- 2.65
Percent of Limit, % -- -- -- 41
Carbon Monoxide Data
Concentration, ppmvd @ 15% O2 1.05 0.99 1.02 1.02
Permit Limit, ppmvd @ 15% O2 -- -- -- 25
Percent of Limit, % -- -- -- 4
Emission Rate, lb/hr 0.17 0.18 0.17 0.17
Permit Limit, lb/hr -- -- -- 4.48
Percent of Limit, % -- -- -- 4
8 of 97

Source Test Report
Summary of Results

AST-2024-0023 University of Utah – Salt Lake City, UT Page 2-2

Table 2-2: Summary of Results – Unit 1 – Solar Taurus 70 CoGen (Turbine and WHRU Duct Burner)

Run Number Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average
Date 1/8/24 1/8/24 1/8/24
Nitrogen Oxides Data
Concentration, ppmvd @ 15% O2 7.51 7.70 7.73 7.65
Permit Limit, ppmvd @ 15% O2 -- -- -- 15
Percent of Limit, % -- -- -- 51
Emission Rate, lb/hr 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6
Permit Limit, lb/hr -- -- -- 8.97
Percent of Limit, % -- -- -- 29
Carbon Monoxide Data
Concentration, ppmvd @ 15% O2 8.71 8.65 8.82 8.73
Permit Limit, ppmvd @ 15% O2 -- -- -- 30
Percent of Limit, % -- -- -- 29
Emission Rate, lb/hr 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8
Permit Limit, lb/hr -- -- -- 10.84
Percent of Limit, % -- -- -- 17

Table 2-3: Summary of Results – Unit 6

Run Number Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average
Date 1/10/24 1/10/24 1/10/24
Nitrogen Oxides Data
Concentration, ppmvd @ 3% O2 8.30 8.42 7.63 8.12
Permit Limit, ppmvd @ 3% O2 -- -- -- 9
Percent of Limit, % -- -- -- 90
Emission Rate, lb/hr 0.20 0.18 0.19 0.19
Permit Limit, lb/hr -- -- -- 0.54
Percent of Limit, % -- -- -- 35

9 of 97

Source Test Report
Summary of Results

AST-2024-0023 University of Utah – Salt Lake City, UT Page 2-3

Table 2-4: Summary of Results – Unit 7

Run Number Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average
Date 1/10/24 1/10/24 1/10/24
Nitrogen Oxides Data
Concentration, ppmvd @ 3% O2 8.33 8.47 7.93 8.24
Permit Limit, ppmvd @ 3% O2 -- -- -- 9
Percent of Limit, % -- -- -- 92
Emission Rate, lb/hr 0.19 0.19 0.20 0.19
Permit Limit, lb/hr -- -- -- 0.54
Percent of Limit, % -- -- -- 36

Table 2-5: Summary of Results – Gen 9 Boiler

Run Number Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average
Date 1/9/24 1/9/24 1/9/24
Nitrogen Oxides Data
Concentration, ppmvd @ 3% O2 8.04 8.31 8.35 8.23
Permit Limit, ppmvd @ 3% O2 -- -- -- 9
Percent of Limit, % -- -- -- 91
Emission Rate, lb/hr 0.29 0.27 0.25 0.27
Permit Limit, lb/hr -- -- -- 0.79
Percent of Limit, % -- -- -- 34

10 of 97

Testing Methodology

11 of 97

Source Test Report
Testing Methodology

AST-2024-0023 University of Utah – Salt Lake City, UT Page 3-1

3.0 Testing Methodology
The emission testing program was conducted in accordance with the test methods listed in Table 3-1. Method
descriptions are provided below while quality assurance/quality control data is provided in Appendix C.

Table 3-1: Source Testing Methodology

Parameter U.S. EPA Reference
Test Methods Notes/Remarks
Oxygen 3A Instrumental Analysis
Nitrogen Oxides 7E Instrumental Analysis
Carbon Monoxide 10 Instrumental Analysis
Volumetric Flow Rate / Mass Emission Factors 19 Fuel Factors/Heat Inputs
Gas Dilution System Certification 205 --
3.1 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 3A – Oxygen/Carbon Dioxide
The oxygen (O2) and carbon dioxide (CO2) testing was conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test
Method 3A. Data was collected online and reported in one-minute averages. The sampling system consisted of a
stainless-steel probe, Teflon sample line(s), gas conditioning system and the identified gas analyzer. The gas
conditioning system was a non-contact condenser used to remove moisture from the stack gas. If an unheated
Teflon sample line was used, then a portable non-contact condenser was placed in the system directly after the
probe. Otherwise, a heated Teflon sample line was used. The quality control measures are described in Section 3.6.
3.2 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 7E – Nitrogen Oxides
The nitrogen oxides (NOx) testing was conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 7E. Data
was collected online and reported in one-minute averages. The sampling system consisted of a stainless-steel probe,
Teflon sample line(s), gas conditioning system and the identified gas analyzer. The gas conditioning system was a
non-contact condenser used to remove moisture from the stack gas. If an unheated Teflon sample line was used,
then a portable non-contact condenser was placed in the system directly after the probe. Otherwise, a heated Teflon
sample line was used. The quality control measures are described in Section 3.6.
3.3 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 10 – Carbon Monoxide
The carbon monoxide (CO) testing was conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 10. Data
was collected online and reported in one-minute averages. The sampling system consisted of a stainless-steel probe,
Teflon sample line(s), gas conditioning system, and the identified gas analyzer. The gas conditioning system was a
non-contact condenser used to remove moisture from the gas. If an unheated Teflon sample line was used, then a
portable non-contact condenser was placed in the system directly after the probe. Otherwise, a heated Teflon sample
line was used. The quality control measures are described in Section 3.6.
3.4 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 19 – Volumetric Flow Rate / Mass Emission Factors
The gas volumetric flow rate was determined in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 19 using the
measured oxygen concentration, the published fuel factor, a calibrated gas meter and the fuel heating value.

12 of 97

Source Test Report
Testing Methodology

AST-2024-0023 University of Utah – Salt Lake City, UT Page 3-2

The pollutant concentrations were converted to mass emission factors (lb/MMBtu) using procedures outlined in U.S.
EPA Reference Test Method 19. The published dry O2 based fuel factor (F-Factor) of 8,710 dscf/MMBtu for
natural gas was used in the calculations.
3.5 U.S. EPA Reference Test Method 205 – Gas Dilution System Certification
A calibration gas dilution system field check was conducted in accordance with U.S. EPA Reference Method 205.
Multiple dilution rates and total gas flow rates were utilized to force the dilution system to perform two dilutions on
each mass flow controller. The diluted calibration gases were sent directly to the analyzer, and the analyzer response
recorded in an electronic field data sheet. The analyzer response agreed within 2% of the actual diluted gas
concentration. A second Protocol 1 calibration gas, with a cylinder concentration within 10% of one of the gas
divider settings described above, was introduced directly to the analyzer, and the analyzer response recorded in an
electronic field data sheet. The cylinder concentration and the analyzer response agreed within 2%. These steps
were repeated three (3) times. Copies of the Method 205 data can be found in the Quality Assurance/Quality
Control Appendix.
3.6 Quality Assurance/Quality Control – U.S. EPA Reference Test Methods 3A, 7E, and 10
Cylinder calibration gases used met EPA Protocol 1 (+/- 2%) standards. Copies of all calibration gas certificates can
be found in the Quality Assurance/Quality Control Appendix.

Low Level gas was introduced directly to the analyzer. After adjusting the analyzer to the Low-Level gas
concentration and once the analyzer reading was stable, the analyzer value was recorded. This process was repeated
for the High-Level gas. For the Calibration Error Test, Low, Mid, and High Level calibration gases were
sequentially introduced directly to the analyzer. All values were within 2.0 percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5
ppmv/% absolute difference.

High or Mid Level gas (whichever was closer to the stack gas concentration) was introduced at the probe and the
time required for the analyzer reading to reach 95 percent or 0.5 ppmv/% (whichever was less restrictive) of the gas
concentration was recorded. The analyzer reading was observed until it reached a stable value, and this value was
recorded. Next, Low Level gas was introduced at the probe and the time required for the analyzer reading to
decrease to a value within 5.0 percent or 0.5 ppmv/% (whichever was less restrictive) was recorded. If the Low-
Level gas was zero gas, the response was 0.5 ppmv/% or 5.0 percent of the upscale gas concentration (whichever
was less restrictive). The analyzer reading was observed until it reached a stable value and this value was recorded.
The measurement system response time and initial system bias were determined from these data. The System Bias
was within 5.0 percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5 ppmv/% absolute difference.

High or Mid Level gas (whichever was closer to the stack gas concentration) was introduced at the probe. After the
analyzer response was stable, the value was recorded. Next, Low Level gas was introduced at the probe, and the
analyzer value recorded once it reached a stable response. The System Bias was within 5.0 percent of the
Calibration Span or 0.5 ppmv/% absolute difference or the data was invalidated and the Calibration Error Test and
System Bias were repeated.

Drift between pre- and post-run System Bias was within 3 percent of the Calibration Span or 0.5 ppmv/% absolute
difference. If the drift exceeded 3 percent or 0.5 ppmv/%, the Calibration Error Test and System Bias were repeated.

13 of 97

Source Test Report
Testing Methodology

AST-2024-0023 University of Utah – Salt Lake City, UT Page 3-3

To determine the number of sampling points, a gas stratification check was conducted prior to initiating testing. The
pollutant concentrations were measured at three and twelve traverse points (as described in Method 1). Each traverse
point was sampled for a minimum of twice the system response time.

If the pollutant concentration at each traverse point did not differ more than 5 percent or 0.5 ppmv/0.3% (whichever
was less restrictive) of the average pollutant concentration, then single point sampling was conducted during the test
runs. If the pollutant concentration did not meet these specifications but differed less than 10 percent or 1.0
ppmv/0.5% from the average concentration, then three (3) point sampling was conducted (stacks less than 7.8 feet in
diameter - 16.7, 50.0 and 83.3 percent of the measurement line; stacks greater than 7.8 feet in diameter – 0.4, 1.0,
and 2.0 meters from the stack wall). If the pollutant concentration differed by more than 10 percent or 1.0
ppmv/0.5% from the average concentration, then sampling was conducted at a minimum of twelve (12) traverse
points. Copies of stratification check data can be found in the Quality Assurance/Quality Control Appendix.

An NO2 – NO converter check was performed on the analyzer prior to initiating testing. An approximately 50 ppm
nitrogen dioxide cylinder gas was introduced directly to the NOx analyzer and the instrument response was recorded
in an electronic data sheet. The instrument response was within +/- 10 percent of the cylinder concentration.

A Data Acquisition System with battery backup was used to record the instrument response in one (1) minute
averages. The data was continuously stored as a *.CSV file in Excel format on the hard drive of a computer. At the
completion of testing, the data was also saved to the Alliance server. All data was reviewed by the Field Team
Leader before leaving the facility. Once arriving at Alliance’s office, all written and electronic data was
relinquished to the report coordinator and then a final review was performed by the Project Manager.

14 of 97

Appendix A

15 of 97
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
Run No. /Method
Stack Gas Volumetric Flow Rate (Qs), dscfm
20.9
20.9 - CO2
where,
HI 72.1 = Heat Input, MMBtu/hr
FFactor 8,710 = fuel factor, dscf/MMBtu
CO2 15.5 = oxygen concentration, %
Qs 40,241 = dscfm
O₂ - Outlet Concentration (C O₂), % dry
CMA
( CM - C0 )
where,
Cobs 15.47 = average analyzer value during test, % dry
Co 0.01 = average of pretest & posttest zero responses, % dry
CMA 10.00 = actual concentration of calibration gas, % dry
CM 10.01 = average of pretest & posttest calibration responses, % dry
CO₂15.46 = O₂ Concentration, % dry
University of Utah - Salt Lake City, UT
Unit 1 - Solar Taurus 70 CoGen (Turbine Only)
AST-2024-0023
Run 1 / Method 3A
HI x Fd x
Qs =
60
CO₂ = ( Cobs - C0 ) x

CO₂ - Outlet Concentration (C CO₂), % dry
C M A ( CM - C 0 )
where,
Cobs 3.18
Co 0.04
CMA 10.00
CM 9.93
CCO₂3.17
= average analyzer value during test, % dry
= average of pretest & posttest zero responses, % dry
= actual concentration of calibration gas, % dry
= average of pretest & posttest calibration responses, % dry
= CO₂ Concentration, % dry
CCO₂ = ( Cobs - C0 ) x
Example Calculations
16 of 97
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
Run No. /Method
CO - Outlet Concentration (C CO), ppmvd
CMA
( CM - C0 )
where,
Cobs 0.90 = average analyzer value during test, ppmvd
Co -0.07 = average of pretest & posttest zero responses, ppmvd
CMA 25.00 = actual concentration of calibration gas, ppmvd
CM 24.91 = average of pretest & posttest calibration responses, ppmvd
CCO 0.97 = CO Concentration, ppmvd
CO - Outlet Concentration (C COc15), ppmvd @ 15% O₂
20.9 - 15
20.9 - O₂
where,
CCO 0.97 = CO - Outlet Concentration, ppmvd
CO₂15.46 = oxygen concentration, %
CCOc15 1.05 = ppmvd @15% O₂
CO - Outlet Emission Rate (ERCO), lb/hr
where,
CCO 0.97 = CO - Outlet Concentration, ppmvd
MW 28.01 = CO molecular weight, g/g-mole
Qs 40,241 = stack gas volumetric flow rate at standard conditions, dscfm
ERCO 0.17 = lb/hr
CO - Outlet Emission Factor (EFCOHI), lb/MMBtu
ERCO
HI
where,
ERCO 0.17 = CO - Outlet Emission Rate, lb/hr
HI 72.10 = Heat Input, MMBtu/hr
EFCOHI 0.0024 = lb/MMBtu
University of Utah - Salt Lake City, UT
Unit 1 - Solar Taurus 70 CoGen (Turbine Only)
AST-2024-0023
Run 1 / Method 10
CCOc15 = CCO x
CCO = ( Cobs - C0 ) x
ERCO =CCO x MW x Qs x 60 x 28.32
24.04 x 1.0E06 x 453.592
EFCOHI =

𝑚𝑖𝑛
ℎ𝑟
𝐿
𝑓𝑡ଷ
𝐿
𝑔െ𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒
𝑔
𝑙𝑏
Example Calculations
17 of 97
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
Run No. /Method
NOx - Outlet Concentration (C NOx), ppmvd
CMA
( CM - C0 )
where,
Cobs 3.22 = average analyzer value during test, ppmvd
Co 0.06 = average of pretest & posttest zero responses, ppmvd
CMA 25.00 = actual concentration of calibration gas, ppmvd
CM 25.02 = average of pretest & posttest calibration responses, ppmvd
CNOx 3.16 = NOx Concentration, ppmvd
NOx - Outlet Concentration (C NOxc15), ppmvd @ 15% O₂
20.9 - 15
20.9 - O₂
where,
CNOx 3.16 = NOx - Outlet Concentration, ppmvd
CO₂15.46 = oxygen concentration, %
CNOxc15 3.43 = ppmvd @15% O₂
NOx - Outlet Emission Rate (ERNOx), lb/hr
where,
CNOx 3.16 = NOx - Outlet Concentration, ppmvd
MW 46.0055 = NOx molecular weight, g/g-mole
Qs 40,241 = stack gas volumetric flow rate at standard conditions, dscfm
ERNOx 0.91 = lb/hr
NOx - Outlet Emission Factor (EFNOxHI), lb/MMBtu
ERNOx
HI
where,
ERNOx 0.91 = NOx - Outlet Emission Rate, lb/hr
HI 72.10 = Heat Input, MMBtu/hr
EFNOxHI 0.013 = lb/MMBtu
University of Utah - Salt Lake City, UT
Unit 1 - Solar Taurus 70 CoGen (Turbine Only)
AST-2024-0023
Run 1 / Method 7E
CNOxc15 = CNOx x
CNOx = ( Cobs - C0 ) x
ERNOx =CNOx x MW x Qs x 60 x 28.32
24.04 x 1.0E06 x 453.592
EFNOxHI =

𝑚𝑖𝑛
ℎ𝑟
𝐿
𝑓𝑡ଷ
𝐿
𝑔െ𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒
𝑔
𝑙𝑏
Example Calculations
18 of 97
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
Run No. /Method
Stack Gas Volumetric Flow Rate (Qs), dscfm
20.9
20.9 - CO2
where,
HI 92.4 = Heat Input, MMBtu/hr
FFactor 8,710 = fuel factor, dscf/MMBtu
CO2 12.5 = oxygen concentration, %
Qs 33,184 = dscfm
O₂ - Outlet Concentration (C O₂), % dry
CMA
( CM - C0 )
where,
Cobs 12.53 = average analyzer value during test, % dry
Co 0.06 = average of pretest & posttest zero responses, % dry
CMA 10.00 = actual concentration of calibration gas, % dry
CM 10.08 = average of pretest & posttest calibration responses, % dry
CO₂12.45 = O₂ Concentration, % dry
University of Utah - Salt Lake City, UT
Unit 1 - Solar Taurus 70 CoGen (Turbine and WHRU Du
AST-2024-0023
Run 1 / Method 3A
HI x Fd x
Qs =
60
CO₂ = ( Cobs - C0 ) x

CO₂ - Outlet Concentration (C CO₂), % dry
C M A ( CM - C 0 )
where,
Cobs 4.88
Co 0.07
CMA 10.00
CM 9.96
CCO₂4.87
= average analyzer value during test, % dry
= average of pretest & posttest zero responses, % dry
= actual concentration of calibration gas, % dry
= average of pretest & posttest calibration responses, % dry
= CO₂ Concentration, % dry
CCO₂ = ( Cobs - C0 ) x
Example Calculations
19 of 97
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
Run No. /Method
CO - Outlet Concentration (C CO), ppmvd
CMA
( CM - C0 )
where,
Cobs 12.47 = average analyzer value during test, ppmvd
Co -0.25 = average of pretest & posttest zero responses, ppmvd
CMA 25.00 = actual concentration of calibration gas, ppmvd
CM 25.25 = average of pretest & posttest calibration responses, ppmvd
CCO 12.47 = CO Concentration, ppmvd
CO - Outlet Concentration (C COc15), ppmvd @ 15% O₂
20.9 - 15
20.9 - O₂
where,
CCO 12.47 = CO - Outlet Concentration, ppmvd
CO₂12.45 = oxygen concentration, %
CCOc15 8.71 = ppmvd @15% O₂
CO - Outlet Emission Rate (ERCO), lb/hr
where,
CCO 12.47 = CO - Outlet Concentration, ppmvd
MW 28.01 = CO molecular weight, g/g-mole
Qs 33,184 = stack gas volumetric flow rate at standard conditions, dscfm
ERCO 1.81 = lb/hr
CO - Outlet Emission Factor (EFCOHI), lb/MMBtu
ERCO
HI
where,
ERCO 1.81 = CO - Outlet Emission Rate, lb/hr
HI 92.42 = Heat Input, MMBtu/hr
EFCOHI 0.020 = lb/MMBtu
University of Utah - Salt Lake City, UT
Unit 1 - Solar Taurus 70 CoGen (Turbine and WHRU Du
AST-2024-0023
Run 1 / Method 10
CCOc15 = CCO x
CCO = ( Cobs - C0 ) x
ERCO =CCO x MW x Qs x 60 x 28.32
24.04 x 1.0E06 x 453.592
EFCOHI =

𝑚𝑖𝑛
ℎ𝑟
𝐿
𝑓𝑡ଷ
𝐿
𝑔െ𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒
𝑔
𝑙𝑏
Example Calculations
20 of 97
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
Run No. /Method
NOx - Outlet Concentration (C NOx), ppmvd
CMA
( CM - C0 )
where,
Cobs 10.85 = average analyzer value during test, ppmvd
Co 0.17 = average of pretest & posttest zero responses, ppmvd
CMA 25.00 = actual concentration of calibration gas, ppmvd
CM 25.02 = average of pretest & posttest calibration responses, ppmvd
CNOx 10.75 = NOx Concentration, ppmvd
NOx - Outlet Concentration (C NOxc15), ppmvd @ 15% O₂
20.9 - 15
20.9 - O₂
where,
CNOx 10.75 = NOx - Outlet Concentration, ppmvd
CO₂12.45 = oxygen concentration, %
CNOxc15 7.51 = ppmvd @15% O₂
NOx - Outlet Emission Rate (ERNOx), lb/hr
where,
CNOx 10.75 = NOx - Outlet Concentration, ppmvd
MW 46.0055 = NOx molecular weight, g/g-mole
Qs 33,184 = stack gas volumetric flow rate at standard conditions, dscfm
ERNOx 2.56 = lb/hr
NOx - Outlet Emission Factor (EFNOxHI), lb/MMBtu
ERNOx
HI
where,
ERNOx 2.56 = NOx - Outlet Emission Rate, lb/hr
HI 92.42 = Heat Input, MMBtu/hr
EFNOxHI 0.028 = lb/MMBtu
University of Utah - Salt Lake City, UT
Unit 1 - Solar Taurus 70 CoGen (Turbine and WHRU Du
AST-2024-0023
Run 1 / Method 7E
CNOxc15 = CNOx x
CNOx = ( Cobs - C0 ) x
ERNOx =CNOx x MW x Qs x 60 x 28.32
24.04 x 1.0E06 x 453.592
EFNOxHI =

𝑚𝑖𝑛
ℎ𝑟
𝐿
𝑓𝑡ଷ
𝐿
𝑔െ𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒
𝑔
𝑙𝑏
Example Calculations
21 of 97
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
Run No. /Method
Stack Gas Volumetric Flow Rate (Qs), dscfm
20.9
20.9 - CO2
where,
HI 20.1 = Heat Input, MMBtu/hr
FFactor 8,710 = fuel factor, dscf/MMBtu
CO2 12.5 = oxygen concentration, %
Qs 7,256 = dscfm
O₂ - Outlet Concentration (C O₂), % dry
CMA
( CM - C0 )
where,
Cobs 12.46 = average analyzer value during test, % dry
Co 0.01 = average of pretest & posttest zero responses, % dry
CMA 10.00 = actual concentration of calibration gas, % dry
CM 9.98 = average of pretest & posttest calibration responses, % dry
CO₂12.50 = O₂ Concentration, % dry
University of Utah - Salt Lake City, UT
Unit 6
AST-2024-0023
Run 1 / Method 3A
HI x Fd x
Qs =
60
CO₂ = ( Cobs - C0 ) x

CO₂ - Outlet Concentration (C CO₂), % dry
C M A ( CM - C 0 )
where,
Cobs 4.83
Co 0.03
CMA 10.00
CM 9.87
CCO₂4.88
= average analyzer value during test, % dry
= average of pretest & posttest zero responses, % dry
= actual concentration of calibration gas, % dry
= average of pretest & posttest calibration responses, % dry
= CO₂ Concentration, % dry
CCO₂ = ( Cobs - C0 ) x
Example Calculations
22 of 97
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
Run No. /Method
NOx - Outlet Concentration (C NOx), ppmvd
CMA
( CM - C0 )
where,
Cobs 3.93 = average analyzer value during test, ppmvd
Co 0.05 = average of pretest & posttest zero responses, ppmvd
CMA 15.00 = actual concentration of calibration gas, ppmvd
CM 15.01 = average of pretest & posttest calibration responses, ppmvd
CNOx 3.90 = NOx Concentration, ppmvd
NOx - Outlet Concentration (C NOxc3), ppmvd @ 3% O₂
20.9 - 3
20.9 - O₂
where,
CNOx 3.90 = NOx - Outlet Concentration, ppmvd
CO₂12.50 = oxygen concentration, %
CNOxc3 8.30 = ppmvd @3% O₂
NOx - Outlet Emission Rate (ERNOx), lb/hr
where,
CNOx 3.90 = NOx - Outlet Concentration, ppmvd
MW 46.0055 = NOx molecular weight, g/g-mole
Qs 7,256 = stack gas volumetric flow rate at standard conditions, dscfm
ERNOx 0.20 = lb/hr
NOx - Outlet Emission Factor (EFNOxHI), lb/MMBtu
ERNOx
HI
where,
ERNOx 0.20 = NOx - Outlet Emission Rate, lb/hr
HI 20 = Heat Input, MMBtu/hr
EFNOxHI 0.0101 = lb/MMBtu
University of Utah - Salt Lake City, UT
Unit 6
AST-2024-0023
Run 1 / Method 7E
CNOxc3 = CNOx x
CNOx = ( Cobs - C0 ) x
ERNOx =CNOx x MW x Qs x 60 x 28.32
24.04 x 1.0E06 x 453.592
EFNOxHI =

𝑚𝑖𝑛
ℎ𝑟
𝐿
𝑓𝑡ଷ
𝐿
𝑔െ𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒
𝑔
𝑙𝑏
Example Calculations
23 of 97
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
Run No. /Method
Stack Gas Volumetric Flow Rate (Qs), dscfm
20.9
20.9 - CO2
where,
HI 18.9 = Heat Input, MMBtu/hr
FFactor 8,710 = fuel factor, dscf/MMBtu
CO2 11.6 = oxygen concentration, %
Qs 6,176 = dscfm
O₂ - Outlet Concentration (C O₂), % dry
CMA
( CM - C0 )
where,
Cobs 11.62 = average analyzer value during test, % dry
Co 0.01 = average of pretest & posttest zero responses, % dry
CMA 10.00 = actual concentration of calibration gas, % dry
CM 10.01 = average of pretest & posttest calibration responses, % dry
CO₂11.62 = O₂ Concentration, % dry
University of Utah - Salt Lake City, UT
Unit 7
AST-2024-0023
Run 1 / Method 3A
HI x Fd x
Qs =
60
CO₂ = ( Cobs - C0 ) x

CO₂ - Outlet Concentration (C CO₂), % dry
C M A ( CM - C 0 )
where,
Cobs 5.32
Co 0.05
CMA 10.00
CM 9.93
CCO₂5.34
= average analyzer value during test, % dry
= average of pretest & posttest zero responses, % dry
= actual concentration of calibration gas, % dry
= average of pretest & posttest calibration responses, % dry
= CO₂ Concentration, % dry
CCO₂ = ( Cobs - C0 ) x
Example Calculations
24 of 97
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
Run No. /Method
NOx - Outlet Concentration (C NOx), ppmvd
CMA
( CM - C0 )
where,
Cobs 4.34 = average analyzer value during test, ppmvd
Co 0.03 = average of pretest & posttest zero responses, ppmvd
CMA 15.00 = actual concentration of calibration gas, ppmvd
CM 15.00 = average of pretest & posttest calibration responses, ppmvd
CNOx 4.32 = NOx Concentration, ppmvd
NOx - Outlet Concentration (C NOxc3), ppmvd @ 3% O₂
20.9 - 3
20.9 - O₂
where,
CNOx 4.32 = NOx - Outlet Concentration, ppmvd
CO₂11.62 = oxygen concentration, %
CNOxc3 8.33 = ppmvd @3% O₂
NOx - Outlet Emission Rate (ERNOx), lb/hr
where,
CNOx 4.32 = NOx - Outlet Concentration, ppmvd
MW 46.0055 = NOx molecular weight, g/g-mole
Qs 6,176 = stack gas volumetric flow rate at standard conditions, dscfm
ERNOx 0.19 = lb/hr
NOx - Outlet Emission Factor (EFNOxHI), lb/MMBtu
ERNOx
HI
where,
ERNOx 0.19 = NOx - Outlet Emission Rate, lb/hr
HI 19 = Heat Input, MMBtu/hr
EFNOxHI 0.0101 = lb/MMBtu
University of Utah - Salt Lake City, UT
Unit 7
AST-2024-0023
Run 1 / Method 7E
CNOxc3 = CNOx x
CNOx = ( Cobs - C0 ) x
ERNOx =CNOx x MW x Qs x 60 x 28.32
24.04 x 1.0E06 x 453.592
EFNOxHI =

𝑚𝑖𝑛
ℎ𝑟
𝐿
𝑓𝑡ଷ
𝐿
𝑔െ𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒
𝑔
𝑙𝑏
Example Calculations
25 of 97
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
Run No. /Method
Stack Gas Volumetric Flow Rate (Qs), dscfm
20.9
20.9 - CO2
where,
HI 29.54 = Heat Input, MMBtu/hr
FFactor 8,710 = fuel factor, dscf/MMBtu
CO2 11.8 = oxygen concentration, %
Qs 9,797 = dscfm
O₂ - Outlet Concentration (C O₂), % dry
CMA
( CM - C0 )
where,
Cobs 11.73 = average analyzer value during test, % dry
Co 0.00 = average of pretest & posttest zero responses, % dry
CMA 10.00 = actual concentration of calibration gas, % dry
CM 9.99 = average of pretest & posttest calibration responses, % dry
CO₂11.75 = O₂ Concentration, % dry
University of Utah - Salt Lake City, UT
Gen 9 Boiler
AST-2024-0023
Run 1 / Method 3A
HI x Fd x
Qs =
60
CO₂ = ( Cobs - C0 ) x

CO₂ - Outlet Concentration (C CO₂), % dry
C M A ( CM - C 0 )
where,
Cobs 5.32
Co 0.05
CMA 10.00
CM 9.93
CCO₂5.34
= average analyzer value during test, % dry
= average of pretest & posttest zero responses, % dry
= actual concentration of calibration gas, % dry
= average of pretest & posttest calibration responses, % dry
= CO₂ Concentration, % dry
CCO₂ = ( Cobs - C0 ) x
Example Calculations
26 of 97
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
Run No. /Method
NOx - Outlet Concentration (C NOx), ppmvd
CMA
( CM - C0 )
where,
Cobs 4.13 = average analyzer value during test, ppmvd
Co 0.01 = average of pretest & posttest zero responses, ppmvd
CMA 15.00 = actual concentration of calibration gas, ppmvd
CM 15.06 = average of pretest & posttest calibration responses, ppmvd
CNOx 4.11 = NOx Concentration, ppmvd
NOx - Outlet Concentration (C NOxc3), ppmvd @ 3% O₂
20.9 - 3
20.9 - O₂
where,
CNOx 4.11 = NOx - Outlet Concentration, ppmvd
CO₂11.75 = oxygen concentration, %
CNOxc3 8.04 = ppmvd @3% O₂
NOx - Outlet Emission Rate (ERNOx), lb/hr
where,
CNOx 4.11 = NOx - Outlet Concentration, ppmvd
MW 46.0055 = NOx molecular weight, g/g-mole
Qs 9,797 = stack gas volumetric flow rate at standard conditions, dscfm
ERNOx 0.29 = lb/hr
NOx - Outlet Emission Factor (EFNOxHI), lb/MMBtu
ERNOx
HI
where,
ERNOx 0.29 = NOx - Outlet Emission Rate, lb/hr
HI 30 = Heat Input, MMBtu/hr
EFNOxHI 0.0098 = lb/MMBtu
University of Utah - Salt Lake City, UT
Gen 9 Boiler
AST-2024-0023
Run 1 / Method 7E
CNOxc3 = CNOx x
CNOx = ( Cobs - C0 ) x
ERNOx =CNOx x MW x Qs x 60 x 28.32
24.04 x 1.0E06 x 453.592
EFNOxHI =

𝑚𝑖𝑛
ℎ𝑟
𝐿
𝑓𝑡ଷ
𝐿
𝑔െ𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒
𝑔
𝑙𝑏
Example Calculations
27 of 97
Appendix B
28 of 97
Solar Taurus 70 CoGen
29 of 97
Emissions Calculations
Location
Source
Project No.
Run Number Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average
Date 1/9/24 1/9/24 1/9/24 --
Start Time 8:44 9:58 11:09 --
Stop Time 9:44 10:58 12:09 --
Turbine Manufacturer
Turbine Model
Turbine Serial Number
Turbine Hour Meter Reading EMR
Fuel Factor (O2 dry), dscf/MMBtu Fd 8,710 8,710 8,710 8,710
Heat Input, MMBtu/hr HI 72.1 82.3 72.3 75.6
Ambient Temperature TAmb 24 25 27 25
Relative Humidity, % RH
62 62 62 62
Barometric Pressure, in. Hg Pb
25.12 25.12 25.15 25.13
Volumetric Flow Rate (M19), dscfm Qs 40,241 45,769 40,002 42,004
O₂ Concentration, % dry CO₂15.46 15.44 15.42 15.44
CO₂ Concentration, % dry CCO₂3.17 3.18 3.19 3.18
CO Concentration, ppmvd CCO 0.97 0.92 0.95 0.95
CO Concentration, ppmvd @ 15 % O₂CCOc15 1.05 0.99 1.02 1.02
CO Emission Rate, lb/hr ERCO 0.17 0.18 0.17 0.17
CO Emission Factor, lb/MMBtu (HI)EFCO HI 0.0024 0.0022 0.0023 0.0023
NOx Concentration, ppmvd CNOx 3.16 3.56 4.01 3.58
NOx Concentration, ppmvd @ 15 % O₂CNOxc15 3.43 3.85 4.32 3.87
NOx Emission Rate, lb/hr ERNOx 0.91 1.2 1.2 1.1
NOx Emission Factor, lb/MMBtu (HI)EFNOx HI 0.013 0.014 0.016 0.014
Turbine Data
--
Input Data - Outlet
Calculated Data - Outlet
University of Utah - Salt Lake City, UT
Unit 1 - Solar Taurus 70 CoGen (Turbine Only)
AST-2024-0023
Solar
Taurus 70 T7800S
8290
30 of 97
Method 1 Data
Location
Source
Project No.
Date:
Vertical
Circular
59.00 in
6.00 in
53.00 in
15.32 ft2
2
1
14.0 ft
3.2 (must be ≥ 0.5)
30.0 ft
6.8 (must be ≥ 2)
12
12
Measurer (Initial and Date):SPR 1/8/24
Reviewer (Initial and Date):RJL 1/8/24
23456789101112
1 14.6 -- 6.7 -- 4.4 -- 3.2 -- 2.6 -- 2.1 1 4.4 2.33 8.33
2 85.4 -- 25.0 -- 14.6 -- 10.5 -- 8.2 -- 6.7 2 14.6 7.74 13.74
3 -- -- 75.0 -- 29.6 -- 19.4 -- 14.6 -- 11.8 3 29.6 15.69 21.69
4 -- -- 93.3 -- 70.4 -- 32.3 -- 22.6 -- 17.7 4 70.4 37.31 43.31
5 -- -- -- -- 85.4 -- 67.7 -- 34.2 -- 25.0 5 85.4 45.26 51.26
6 -- -- -- -- 95.6 -- 80.6 -- 65.8 -- 35.6 6 95.6 50.67 56.67
7 -- -- -- -- -- -- 89.5 -- 77.4 -- 64.4 7 -- -- --
8 -- -- -- -- -- -- 96.8 -- 85.4 -- 75.0 8 -- -- --
9 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 91.8 -- 82.3 9 -- -- --
10 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 97.4 -- 88.2 10 -- -- --
11 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 93.3 11 -- -- --
12 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 97.9 12 -- -- --
*Percent of stack diameter from inside wall to traverse point.
A = 14 ft.
B = 30 ft.
Depth of Duct = 53 in.
Number of traverse points on a diameter
Stack Diagram
Cross Sectional Area
Distance
from
outside of
port
LOCATION OF TRAVERSE POINTS
Traverse
Point
% of
Diameter
Distance
from inside
wall
No. of Test Ports:
Number of Readings per Point:
Distance A:
Distance A Duct Diameters:
Distance B:
Distance B Duct Diameters:
Minimum Number of Traverse Points:
Actual Number of Traverse Points:
CIRCULAR DUCT
Cross Sectional Area of Duct:
University of Utah - Salt Lake City, UT
Unit 1 - Solar Taurus 70 CoGen (Turbine Only)
AST-2024-0023
01/09/24
Stack Parameters
Duct Orientation:
Duct Design:
Distance from Far Wall to Outside of Port:
Nipple Length:
Depth of Duct:
Upstream
Disturbance
Downstream
Disturbance
B
A
31 of 97
Run 1 - RM Data
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
Date:
Time O₂ - Outlet CO₂ - Outlet CO - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Unit % dry % dry ppmvd ppmvd
Status Valid Valid Valid Valid
Uncorrected Run Average (Cobs)15.47 3.18 0.90 3.22
Cal Gas Concentration (CMA)10.00 10.00 25.00 25.00
Pretest System Zero Response 0.00 0.04 -0.05 0.05
Posttest System Zero Response 0.01 0.04 -0.08 0.06
Average Zero Response (Co)0.01 0.04 -0.07 0.06
Pretest System Cal Response 10.00 9.93 24.98 25.03
Posttest System Cal Response 10.01 9.93 24.84 25.01
Average Cal Response (CM)10.01 9.93 24.91 25.02
Corrected Run Average (Corr)15.46 3.17 0.97 3.16
8:44 15.49 3.18 1.02 2.90
8:45 15.48 3.18 0.90 2.86
8:46 15.48 3.17 0.93 2.89
8:47 15.48 3.17 0.99 2.91
8:48 15.48 3.17 1.00 2.94
8:49 15.48 3.18 0.98 2.96
8:50 15.48 3.18 0.96 3.00
8:51 15.48 3.17 0.97 2.99
8:52 15.48 3.18 0.93 3.04
8:53 15.47 3.18 0.94 3.06
8:54 15.47 3.18 0.97 3.08
8:55 15.47 3.18 0.94 3.07
8:56 15.48 3.18 0.96 3.06
8:57 15.47 3.18 0.94 3.11
8:58 15.47 3.18 0.94 3.16
8:59 15.47 3.18 0.96 3.11
9:00 15.46 3.18 0.96 3.15
9:01 15.47 3.18 1.00 3.13
9:02 15.48 3.17 0.96 3.12
9:03 15.48 3.17 0.92 3.12
9:04 15.47 3.17 0.93 3.17
9:05 15.47 3.17 0.96 3.20
9:06 15.47 3.17 0.95 3.17
9:07 15.47 3.17 0.94 3.12
9:08 15.47 3.17 0.96 3.18
9:09 15.47 3.18 0.96 3.19
9:10 15.47 3.18 0.92 3.21
9:11 15.47 3.17 0.86 3.18
9:12 15.47 3.17 0.86 3.19
9:13 15.47 3.17 0.91 3.24
9:14 15.47 3.18 0.97 3.22
9:15 15.47 3.17 0.89 3.20
9:16 15.46 3.17 0.90 3.27
9:17 15.47 3.17 0.91 3.23
9:18 15.47 3.17 0.95 3.23
9:19 15.47 3.18 0.88 3.24
9:20 15.47 3.17 0.86 3.23
9:21 15.47 3.18 0.93 3.25
9:22 15.46 3.18 0.94 3.31
9:23 15.47 3.18 0.90 3.33
9:24 15.46 3.18 0.86 3.34
9:25 15.46 3.18 0.83 3.38
9:26 15.46 3.18 0.84 3.37
9:27 15.46 3.18 0.89 3.44
9:28 15.46 3.18 0.89 3.43
9:29 15.46 3.18 0.81 3.41
9:30 15.47 3.18 0.81 3.40
9:31 15.46 3.18 0.81 3.36
9:32 15.46 3.17 0.82 3.36
9:33 15.47 3.18 0.82 3.34
9:34 15.46 3.18 0.84 3.40
9:35 15.46 3.18 0.83 3.45
9:36 15.46 3.18 0.84 3.42
9:37 15.46 3.18 0.82 3.44
9:38 15.46 3.18 0.81 3.42
9:39 15.46 3.18 0.83 3.44
9:40 15.47 3.17 0.80 3.40
9:41 15.47 3.18 0.83 3.37
9:42 15.46 3.17 0.82 3.34
9:43 15.46 3.17 0.81 3.39
University of Utah - Salt Lake City, UT
Unit 1 - Solar Taurus 70 CoGen (Turbine Only)
AST-2024-0023
1/9/24
32 of 97
Run 2 - RM Data
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
Date:
Time O₂ - Outlet CO₂ - Outlet CO - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Unit % dry % dry ppmvd ppmvd
Status Valid Valid Valid Valid
Uncorrected Run Average (Cobs)15.45 3.18 0.81 3.60
Cal Gas Concentration (CMA)10.00 10.00 25.00 25.00
Pretest System Zero Response 0.01 0.04 -0.08 0.06
Posttest System Zero Response 0.02 0.05 -0.13 0.07
Average Zero Response (Co)0.02 0.05 -0.11 0.07
Pretest System Cal Response 10.01 9.93 24.84 25.01
Posttest System Cal Response 10.01 9.93 24.85 24.77
Average Cal Response (CM)10.01 9.93 24.85 24.89
Corrected Run Average (Corr)15.44 3.18 0.92 3.56
9:58 15.46 3.18 0.84 3.28
9:59 15.47 3.18 0.82 3.28
10:00 15.46 3.18 0.86 3.42
10:01 15.46 3.18 0.82 3.40
10:02 15.46 3.18 0.84 3.43
10:03 15.46 3.18 0.83 3.47
10:04 15.46 3.18 0.83 3.48
10:05 15.47 3.18 0.81 3.49
10:06 15.46 3.18 0.81 3.49
10:07 15.46 3.18 0.79 3.51
10:08 15.46 3.18 0.80 3.52
10:09 15.47 3.18 0.80 3.52
10:10 15.47 3.18 0.81 3.48
10:11 15.46 3.18 0.80 3.48
10:12 15.46 3.18 0.80 3.48
10:13 15.46 3.18 0.81 3.51
10:14 15.47 3.18 0.82 3.51
10:15 15.46 3.18 0.82 3.49
10:16 15.46 3.18 0.82 3.55
10:17 15.46 3.18 0.83 3.53
10:18 15.46 3.18 0.84 3.49
10:19 15.47 3.18 0.80 3.49
10:20 15.47 3.18 0.81 3.49
10:21 15.47 3.18 0.80 3.41
10:22 15.46 3.18 0.81 3.48
10:23 15.46 3.18 0.87 3.52
10:24 15.46 3.18 0.84 3.51
10:25 15.46 3.18 0.87 3.48
10:26 15.46 3.18 0.81 3.51
10:27 15.46 3.18 0.80 3.48
10:28 15.46 3.18 0.80 3.45
10:29 15.46 3.18 0.82 3.51
10:30 15.46 3.18 0.81 3.50
10:31 15.46 3.18 0.79 3.49
10:32 15.46 3.18 0.80 3.48
10:33 15.46 3.18 0.82 3.52
10:34 15.45 3.19 0.88 3.62
10:35 15.44 3.19 0.80 3.64
10:36 15.44 3.19 0.84 3.69
10:37 15.44 3.19 0.78 3.67
10:38 15.44 3.19 0.76 3.80
10:39 15.44 3.19 0.83 3.68
10:40 15.44 3.18 0.80 3.75
10:41 15.44 3.18 0.76 3.71
10:42 15.44 3.19 0.80 3.75
10:43 15.44 3.18 0.81 3.74
10:44 15.42 3.20 0.88 3.84
10:45 15.43 3.19 0.79 3.86
10:46 15.44 3.18 0.74 3.75
10:47 15.44 3.19 0.81 3.79
10:48 15.44 3.19 0.77 3.78
10:49 15.43 3.19 0.78 3.79
10:50 15.43 3.20 0.79 3.85
10:51 15.44 3.19 0.76 3.82
10:52 15.44 3.19 0.76 3.82
10:53 15.43 3.19 0.79 3.83
10:54 15.44 3.19 0.74 3.82
10:55 15.42 3.20 0.83 3.89
10:56 15.42 3.20 0.80 3.91
10:57 15.43 3.19 0.75 3.93
University of Utah - Salt Lake City, UT
Unit 1 - Solar Taurus 70 CoGen (Turbine Only)
AST-2024-0023
1/9/24
33 of 97
Run 3 - RM Data
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
Date:
Time O₂ - Outlet CO₂ - Outlet CO - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Unit % dry % dry ppmvd ppmvd
Status Valid Valid Valid Valid
Uncorrected Run Average (Cobs)15.41 3.18 0.80 4.05
Cal Gas Concentration (CMA)10.00 10.00 25.00 25.00
Pretest System Zero Response 0.02 0.05 -0.13 0.07
Posttest System Zero Response 0.03 0.03 -0.17 0.09
Average Zero Response (Co)0.03 0.04 -0.15 0.08
Pretest System Cal Response 10.01 9.93 24.85 24.77
Posttest System Cal Response 10.00 9.89 24.77 24.78
Average Cal Response (CM)10.01 9.91 24.81 24.78
Corrected Run Average (Corr)15.42 3.19 0.95 4.01
11:09 15.40 3.18 1.10 3.99
11:10 15.41 3.19 0.69 3.85
11:11 15.40 3.19 0.74 3.89
11:12 15.41 3.19 0.78 3.96
11:13 15.41 3.19 0.72 4.07
11:14 15.41 3.19 0.72 4.06
11:15 15.41 3.19 0.73 4.07
11:16 15.41 3.19 0.76 4.05
11:17 15.42 3.19 0.75 4.03
11:18 15.42 3.19 0.78 4.07
11:19 15.42 3.19 0.79 3.98
11:20 15.42 3.18 0.82 4.02
11:21 15.42 3.18 0.82 4.06
11:22 15.42 3.18 0.81 4.02
11:23 15.42 3.18 0.77 3.98
11:24 15.42 3.19 0.78 3.96
11:25 15.42 3.18 0.76 3.98
11:26 15.42 3.18 0.76 3.95
11:27 15.42 3.18 0.74 3.96
11:28 15.43 3.18 0.73 3.91
11:29 15.42 3.18 0.74 3.97
11:30 15.42 3.18 0.73 3.99
11:31 15.42 3.19 0.72 3.95
11:32 15.41 3.19 0.74 4.02
11:33 15.42 3.18 0.72 3.98
11:34 15.42 3.18 0.73 3.98
11:35 15.41 3.19 0.73 3.98
11:36 15.41 3.19 0.73 4.00
11:37 15.41 3.19 0.73 3.99
11:38 15.41 3.18 0.73 4.00
11:39 15.41 3.18 0.74 4.07
11:40 15.40 3.19 0.82 4.11
11:41 15.40 3.19 0.80 4.10
11:42 15.41 3.18 0.81 4.09
11:43 15.41 3.19 0.84 4.08
11:44 15.41 3.18 0.79 4.05
11:45 15.41 3.19 0.79 4.04
11:46 15.40 3.19 0.83 4.06
11:47 15.40 3.19 0.77 4.10
11:48 15.41 3.18 0.75 4.11
11:49 15.41 3.18 0.72 4.02
11:50 15.41 3.19 0.85 4.03
11:51 15.40 3.19 0.85 4.14
11:52 15.40 3.19 0.77 4.08
11:53 15.41 3.19 0.74 4.03
11:54 15.41 3.19 0.84 4.00
11:55 15.41 3.18 0.77 3.97
11:56 15.41 3.19 0.80 4.00
11:57 15.41 3.18 0.80 4.03
11:58 15.41 3.18 0.81 4.05
11:59 15.41 3.18 0.79 4.00
12:00 15.40 3.18 0.84 4.09
12:01 15.40 3.18 0.86 4.13
12:02 15.40 3.19 0.90 4.11
12:03 15.40 3.18 0.91 4.15
12:04 15.40 3.18 0.91 4.19
12:05 15.40 3.18 0.96 4.25
12:06 15.41 3.18 0.98 4.26
12:07 15.41 3.17 1.03 4.31
12:08 15.40 3.18 1.09 4.37
University of Utah - Salt Lake City, UT
Unit 1 - Solar Taurus 70 CoGen (Turbine Only)
AST-2024-0023
1/9/24
34 of 97
Rentech Waste Heat Recovery
35 of 97
Emissions Calculations
Location
Source
Project No.
Run Number Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average
Date 1/8/24 1/8/24 1/8/24 --
Start Time 12:48 14:03 15:14 --
Stop Time 13:48 15:03 16:14 --
Turbine Manufacturer
Turbine Model
Turbine Serial Number
Turbine Hour Meter Reading EMR
Fuel Factor (O2 dry), dscf/MMBtu Fd
8,710 8,710 8,710 8,710
Heat Input, MMBtu/hr HI 92.42 92.52 90.83 92
Ambient Temperature TAmb 28 30 31 30
Relative Humidity, % RH
62 62 62 62
Barometric Pressure, in. Hg Pb
25.14 25.14 25.15 25.14
Volumetric Flow Rate (M19), dscfm Qs 33,184 33,064 32,888 33,045
O₂ Concentration, % dry CO₂12.45 12.41 12.52 12.46
CO₂ Concentration, % dry CCO₂4.87 4.89 4.84 4.87
CO Concentration, ppmvd CCO 12.47 12.44 12.53 12.48
CO Concentration, ppmvd @ 15 % O₂CCOc15 8.71 8.65 8.82 8.73
CO Emission Rate, lb/hr ERCO 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8
CO Emission Factor, lb/MMBtu (HI)EFCO HI 0.020 0.019 0.020 0.020
NOx Concentration, ppmvd CNOx 10.75 11.09 10.99 10.94
NOx Concentration, ppmvd @ 15 % O₂CNOxc15 7.51 7.70 7.73 7.65
NOx Emission Rate, lb/hr ERNOx 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6
NOx Emission Factor, lb/MMBtu (HI)EFNOx HI 0.028 0.028 0.029 0.028
Turbine Data
3,133
Input Data - Outlet
Calculated Data - Outlet
University of Utah - Salt Lake City, UT
Unit 1 - Solar Taurus 70 CoGen (Turbine and WHRU Duct Burner)
AST-2024-0023
Solar
Taurus 70 T7800S
8290
36 of 97
Method 1 Data
Location
Source
Project No.
Date:
Vertical
Circular
59.00 in
6.00 in
53.00 in
15.32 ft2
2
1
14.0 ft
3.2 (must be ≥ 0.5)
30.0 ft
6.8 (must be ≥ 2)
12
12
Measurer (Initial and Date):SPR 1/8/24
Reviewer (Initial and Date):RJL 1/8/24
23456789101112
1 14.6 -- 6.7 -- 4.4 -- 3.2 -- 2.6 -- 2.1 1 4.4 2.33 8.33
2 85.4 -- 25.0 -- 14.6 -- 10.5 -- 8.2 -- 6.7 2 14.6 7.74 13.74
3 -- -- 75.0 -- 29.6 -- 19.4 -- 14.6 -- 11.8 3 29.6 15.69 21.69
4 -- -- 93.3 -- 70.4 -- 32.3 -- 22.6 -- 17.7 4 70.4 37.31 43.31
5 -- -- -- -- 85.4 -- 67.7 -- 34.2 -- 25.0 5 85.4 45.26 51.26
6 -- -- -- -- 95.6 -- 80.6 -- 65.8 -- 35.6 6 95.6 50.67 56.67
7 -- -- -- -- -- -- 89.5 -- 77.4 -- 64.4 7 -- -- --
8 -- -- -- -- -- -- 96.8 -- 85.4 -- 75.0 8 -- -- --
9 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 91.8 -- 82.3 9 -- -- --
10 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 97.4 -- 88.2 10 -- -- --
11 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 93.3 11 -- -- --
12 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 97.9 12 -- -- --
*Percent of stack diameter from inside wall to traverse point.
A = 14 ft.
B = 30 ft.
Depth of Duct = 53 in.
Number of traverse points on a diameter
Stack Diagram
Cross Sectional Area
Distance
from
outside of
port
LOCATION OF TRAVERSE POINTS
Traverse
Point
% of
Diameter
Distance
from inside
wall
No. of Test Ports:
Number of Readings per Point:
Distance A:
Distance A Duct Diameters:
Distance B:
Distance B Duct Diameters:
Minimum Number of Traverse Points:
Actual Number of Traverse Points:
CIRCULAR DUCT
Cross Sectional Area of Duct:
University of Utah - Salt Lake City, UT
Unit 1 - Solar Taurus 70 CoGen (Turbine and WHRU Duct Burner)
AST-2024-0023
01/08/24
Stack Parameters
Duct Orientation:
Duct Design:
Distance from Far Wall to Outside of Port:
Nipple Length:
Depth of Duct:
Upstream
Disturbance
Downstream
Disturbance
B
A
37 of 97
Run 1 - RM Data
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
Date:
Time O₂ - Outlet CO₂ - Outlet CO - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Unit % dry % dry ppmvd ppmvd
Status Valid Valid Valid Valid
Uncorrected Run Average (Cobs)12.53 4.88 12.47 10.85
Cal Gas Concentration (CMA)10.00 10.00 25.00 25.00
Pretest System Zero Response 0.03 0.05 -0.17 0.24
Posttest System Zero Response 0.08 0.09 -0.32 0.09
Average Zero Response (Co)0.06 0.07 -0.25 0.17
Pretest System Cal Response 10.05 9.94 25.52 25.05
Posttest System Cal Response 10.10 9.98 24.97 24.98
Average Cal Response (CM)10.08 9.96 25.25 25.02
Corrected Run Average (Corr)12.45 4.87 12.47 10.75
12:48 12.55 4.87 12.70 10.43
12:49 12.56 4.87 12.50 10.51
12:50 12.60 4.83 12.59 10.40
12:51 12.61 4.83 12.52 10.36
12:52 12.60 4.83 12.57 10.43
12:53 12.58 4.84 12.54 10.49
12:54 12.61 4.82 12.33 10.50
12:55 12.66 4.80 12.37 10.31
12:56 12.67 4.80 12.33 10.26
12:57 12.63 4.81 12.33 10.38
12:58 12.59 4.85 12.42 10.53
12:59 12.56 4.86 12.51 10.65
13:00 12.59 4.84 12.44 10.58
13:01 12.61 4.83 12.36 10.48
13:02 12.59 4.84 12.49 10.60
13:03 12.53 4.88 12.59 10.79
13:04 12.47 4.91 12.61 10.95
13:05 12.50 4.89 12.72 10.94
13:06 12.53 4.88 12.71 10.82
13:07 12.48 4.91 12.64 10.92
13:08 12.46 4.92 12.45 11.09
13:09 12.43 4.93 12.59 11.13
13:10 12.43 4.93 12.92 11.17
13:11 12.47 4.91 12.42 11.14
13:12 12.52 4.88 12.41 10.94
13:13 12.56 4.87 12.32 10.87
13:14 12.56 4.87 12.21 10.87
13:15 12.50 4.90 12.44 11.01
13:16 12.46 4.92 12.53 11.15
13:17 12.48 4.91 12.50 11.13
13:18 12.54 4.88 12.41 10.93
13:19 12.58 4.86 12.31 10.82
13:20 12.62 4.84 12.05 10.71
13:21 12.63 4.84 12.04 10.67
13:22 12.64 4.83 12.03 10.64
13:23 12.64 4.85 12.13 10.67
13:24 12.60 4.87 12.28 10.73
13:25 12.53 4.90 12.58 10.92
13:26 12.48 4.92 12.45 11.14
13:27 12.46 4.93 12.79 11.20
13:28 12.44 4.94 12.80 11.27
13:29 12.37 4.98 12.91 11.44
13:30 12.30 5.01 13.14 11.68
13:31 12.17 5.08 14.24 11.97
13:32 12.13 5.09 12.79 11.84
13:33 12.34 4.98 12.21 11.25
13:34 12.45 4.93 11.96 10.88
13:35 12.56 4.86 11.89 10.58
13:36 12.66 4.81 12.99 10.21
13:37 12.62 4.85 12.58 10.62
13:38 12.55 4.88 12.31 10.89
13:39 12.56 4.88 12.40 10.92
13:40 12.60 4.85 12.22 10.86
13:41 12.67 4.81 11.97 10.56
13:42 12.68 4.82 12.01 10.49
13:43 12.63 4.85 12.21 10.67
13:44 12.53 4.90 12.37 11.01
13:45 12.45 4.94 12.38 11.33
13:46 12.46 4.93 12.48 11.30
13:47 12.52 4.90 12.34 11.16
University of Utah - Salt Lake City, UT
Unit 1 - Solar Taurus 70 CoGen (Turbine and WHRU Duct Burner)
AST-2024-0023
1/8/24
38 of 97
Run 2 - RM Data
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
Date:
Time O₂ - Outlet CO₂ - Outlet CO - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Unit % dry % dry ppmvd ppmvd
Status Valid Valid Valid Valid
Uncorrected Run Average (Cobs)12.51 4.95 12.18 11.10
Cal Gas Concentration (CMA)10.00 10.00 25.00 25.00
Pretest System Zero Response 0.08 0.09 -0.32 0.09
Posttest System Zero Response 0.09 0.13 -0.41 0.08
Average Zero Response (Co)0.09 0.11 -0.37 0.09
Pretest System Cal Response 10.10 9.98 24.97 24.98
Posttest System Cal Response 10.09 10.03 24.71 24.89
Average Cal Response (CM)10.10 10.01 24.84 24.94
Corrected Run Average (Corr)12.41 4.89 12.44 11.09
14:03 12.31 5.02 11.94 11.20
14:04 12.36 5.00 11.83 11.05
14:05 12.33 5.01 11.79 11.11
14:06 12.28 5.04 11.84 11.33
14:07 12.30 5.03 11.72 11.39
14:08 12.43 4.96 11.78 10.99
14:09 12.57 4.89 11.69 10.57
14:10 12.60 4.88 11.62 10.44
14:11 12.57 4.90 11.53 10.60
14:12 12.54 4.91 11.63 10.69
14:13 12.60 4.88 11.48 10.58
14:14 12.66 4.85 11.53 10.37
14:15 12.69 4.84 12.12 10.34
14:16 12.65 4.86 12.85 10.62
14:17 12.61 4.88 12.19 10.89
14:18 12.65 4.86 11.98 10.83
14:19 12.63 4.87 11.96 10.79
14:20 12.55 4.91 12.23 11.00
14:21 12.48 4.95 12.53 11.29
14:22 12.47 4.96 12.56 11.41
14:23 12.47 4.96 12.51 11.38
14:24 12.41 4.99 12.50 11.46
14:25 12.33 5.04 12.84 11.83
14:26 12.28 5.06 12.88 11.98
14:27 12.29 5.05 13.15 11.97
14:28 12.28 5.06 13.04 12.01
14:29 12.22 5.09 13.31 12.07
14:30 12.13 5.13 12.95 12.09
14:31 12.40 4.99 11.99 11.32
14:32 12.65 4.86 12.19 10.51
14:33 12.65 4.87 13.31 10.64
14:34 12.56 4.92 12.41 11.03
14:35 12.55 4.92 12.41 11.21
14:36 12.60 4.89 12.23 10.98
14:37 12.68 4.85 12.13 10.73
14:38 12.71 4.84 11.98 10.61
14:39 12.71 4.83 11.87 10.63
14:40 12.72 4.83 11.77 10.58
14:41 12.69 4.85 11.88 10.58
14:42 12.64 4.88 11.97 10.82
14:43 12.60 4.90 12.28 10.92
14:44 12.64 4.88 11.96 10.93
14:45 12.74 4.83 11.76 10.69
14:46 12.81 4.79 11.54 10.44
14:47 12.78 4.82 11.58 10.44
14:48 12.67 4.89 11.81 10.77
14:49 12.56 4.94 12.06 11.05
14:50 12.53 4.96 12.41 11.24
14:51 12.60 4.92 12.14 11.01
14:52 12.64 4.90 11.97 10.87
14:53 12.61 4.92 12.07 10.89
14:54 12.51 4.97 12.16 11.24
14:55 12.44 5.01 12.42 11.50
14:56 12.41 5.02 12.35 11.50
14:57 12.34 5.07 12.86 11.76
14:58 12.17 5.16 13.64 12.26
14:59 12.07 5.20 12.43 12.32
15:00 12.28 5.09 11.84 11.82
15:01 12.40 5.04 11.71 11.40
15:02 12.41 5.03 11.70 11.30
University of Utah - Salt Lake City, UT
Unit 1 - Solar Taurus 70 CoGen (Turbine and WHRU Duct Burner)
AST-2024-0023
1/8/24
39 of 97
Run 3 - RM Data
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
Date:
Time O₂ - Outlet CO₂ - Outlet CO - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Unit % dry % dry ppmvd ppmvd
Status Valid Valid Valid Valid
Uncorrected Run Average (Cobs)12.61 4.96 12.15 11.01
Cal Gas Concentration (CMA)10.00 10.00 25.00 25.00
Pretest System Zero Response 0.09 0.13 -0.41 0.08
Posttest System Zero Response 0.10 0.18 -0.50 0.08
Average Zero Response (Co)0.10 0.16 -0.46 0.08
Pretest System Cal Response 10.09 10.03 24.71 24.89
Posttest System Cal Response 10.09 10.10 24.71 25.04
Average Cal Response (CM)10.09 10.07 24.71 24.97
Corrected Run Average (Corr)12.52 4.84 12.53 10.99
15:14 12.67 4.89 12.01 10.33
15:15 12.65 4.91 12.14 10.44
15:16 12.59 4.94 12.14 10.67
15:17 12.51 4.98 12.22 11.12
15:18 12.49 5.00 12.24 11.21
15:19 12.49 5.00 12.32 11.25
15:20 12.45 5.02 12.42 11.36
15:21 12.42 5.04 12.58 11.53
15:22 12.40 5.05 12.57 11.67
15:23 12.39 5.05 12.72 11.69
15:24 12.39 5.05 12.77 11.71
15:25 12.41 5.04 12.63 11.76
15:26 12.47 5.00 12.28 11.53
15:27 12.54 4.97 12.26 11.26
15:28 12.60 4.94 12.01 11.19
15:29 12.65 4.92 11.93 11.01
15:30 12.71 4.89 11.75 10.85
15:31 12.83 4.83 11.40 10.50
15:32 12.93 4.77 11.20 10.20
15:33 12.95 4.77 11.04 10.01
15:34 12.89 4.81 11.31 10.15
15:35 12.85 4.83 11.20 10.32
15:36 12.85 4.83 11.31 10.34
15:37 12.85 4.83 11.60 10.25
15:38 12.77 4.87 11.66 10.46
15:39 12.69 4.92 12.01 10.74
15:40 12.66 4.93 12.07 10.90
15:41 12.66 4.93 12.06 10.90
15:42 12.70 4.91 11.93 10.78
15:43 12.69 4.92 11.98 10.73
15:44 12.60 4.97 12.29 11.00
15:45 12.55 5.00 12.30 11.18
15:46 12.56 4.99 12.37 11.19
15:47 12.58 4.98 12.13 11.14
15:48 12.55 4.99 12.39 11.21
15:49 12.51 5.01 12.53 11.32
15:50 12.44 5.05 12.45 11.55
15:51 12.42 5.06 12.73 11.64
15:52 12.40 5.07 12.66 11.70
15:53 12.39 5.07 13.00 11.71
15:54 12.49 5.02 12.80 11.48
15:55 12.62 4.96 12.31 11.09
15:56 12.66 4.94 12.14 10.94
15:57 12.63 4.96 12.26 10.90
15:58 12.55 5.00 12.36 11.16
15:59 12.54 5.00 12.51 11.21
16:00 12.62 4.96 12.30 11.00
16:01 12.70 4.92 12.22 10.79
16:02 12.68 4.94 11.96 10.84
16:03 12.67 4.94 12.07 10.89
16:04 12.70 4.92 11.95 10.81
16:05 12.78 4.89 11.69 10.55
16:06 12.78 4.89 11.83 10.50
16:07 12.77 4.90 11.74 10.54
16:08 12.69 4.94 11.94 10.84
16:09 12.65 4.96 12.01 10.92
16:10 12.55 5.01 12.48 11.14
16:11 12.44 5.07 12.62 11.52
16:12 12.42 5.08 12.78 11.71
16:13 12.48 5.05 12.64 11.54
University of Utah - Salt Lake City, UT
Unit 1 - Solar Taurus 70 CoGen (Turbine and WHRU Duct Burner)
AST-2024-0023
1/8/24
40 of 97
Unit 6
41 of 97
Emissions Calculations
Location
Source
Project No.
Run Number Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average
Date 1/10/24 1/10/24 1/10/24 --
Start Time 12:13 13:26 14:37 --
Stop Time 13:13 14:26 15:37 --
Fuel Factor (O2 dry), dscf/MMBtu Fd 8,710 8,710 8,710 8,710
Heat Input, MMBtu/hr HI 20.1 17.5 20.0 19.2
Volumetric Flow Rate (M19), dscfm Qs 7,256 6,397 7,279 6,977
O₂ Concentration, % dry CO₂12.50 12.60 12.56 12.55
CO₂ Concentration, % dry CCO₂4.88 4.80 4.79 4.83
NOx Concentration, ppmvd CNOx 3.90 3.91 3.55 3.78
NOx Concentration, ppmvd @ 3 % O₂CNOxc3 8.30 8.42 7.63 8.12
NOx Emission Rate, lb/hr ERNOx 0.20 0.18 0.19 0.19
NOx Emission Factor, lb/MMBtu (HI)EFNOx HI 0.010 0.010 0.0093 0.0099
Source Data
Input Data - Outlet
Calculated Data - Outlet
University of Utah - Salt Lake City, UT
Unit 6
AST-2024-0023
42 of 97
Method 1 Data
Location
Source
Project No.
Date:
Vertical
Circular
36.00 in
4.00 in
32.00 in
5.59 ft2
2
1
13.0 ft
4.9 (must be ≥ 0.5)
28.0 ft
10.5 (must be ≥ 2)
12
3
Measurer (Initial and Date):AJC 1/10/24
Reviewer (Initial and Date):RJL 1/10/24
23456789101112
1 14.6 16.7 6.7 -- 4.4 -- 3.2 -- 2.6 -- 2.1 1 16.75.349.34
2 85.4 50.0 25.0 -- 14.6 -- 10.5 -- 8.2 -- 6.7 2 50.0 16.00 20.00
3 -- 83.3 75.0 -- 29.6 -- 19.4 -- 14.6 -- 11.8 3 83.3 26.66 30.66
4 -- -- 93.3 -- 70.4 -- 32.3 -- 22.6 -- 17.7 4 -- -- --
5 -- -- -- -- 85.4 -- 67.7 -- 34.2 -- 25.0 5 -- -- --
6 -- -- -- -- 95.6 -- 80.6 -- 65.8 -- 35.6 6 -- -- --
7 -- -- -- -- -- -- 89.5 -- 77.4 -- 64.4 7 -- -- --
8 -- -- -- -- -- -- 96.8 -- 85.4 -- 75.0 8 -- -- --
9 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 91.8 -- 82.3 9 -- -- --
10 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 97.4 -- 88.2 10 -- -- --
11 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 93.3 11 -- -- --
12 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 97.9 12 -- -- --
*Percent of stack diameter from inside wall to traverse point.
A = 13 ft.
B = 28 ft.
Depth of Duct = 32 in.
Cross Sectional Area of Duct:
University of Utah - Salt Lake City, UT
Unit 6
AST-2024-0023
01/10/24
Stack Parameters
Duct Orientation:
Duct Design:
Distance from Far Wall to Outside of Port:
Nipple Length:
Depth of Duct:
No. of Test Ports:
Number of Readings per Point:
Distance A:
Distance A Duct Diameters:
Distance B:
Distance B Duct Diameters:
Minimum Number of Traverse Points:
Actual Number of Traverse Points:
CIRCULAR DUCT
LOCATION OF TRAVERSE POINTS
Traverse
Point
% of
Diameter
Distance
from inside
wall
Number of traverse points on a diameter
Stack Diagram
Cross Sectional Area
Distance
from
outside of
port
Upstream
Disturbance
Downstream
Disturbance
B
A
43 of 97
Run 1 - RM Data
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
Date:
Time O₂ - Outlet CO₂ - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Unit % dry % dry ppmvd
Status Valid Valid Valid
Uncorrected Run Average (Cobs)12.46 4.83 3.93
Cal Gas Concentration (CMA)10.00 10.00 15.00
Pretest System Zero Response 0.00 0.03 0.05
Posttest System Zero Response 0.01 0.03 0.05
Average Zero Response (Co)0.01 0.03 0.05
Pretest System Cal Response 9.98 9.89 15.01
Posttest System Cal Response 9.97 9.85 15.00
Average Cal Response (CM)9.98 9.87 15.01
Corrected Run Average (Corr)12.50 4.88 3.90
12:13 11.82 5.17 4.22
12:14 11.97 5.10 4.21
12:15 12.09 5.05 4.23
12:16 12.11 5.03 4.26
12:17 12.19 4.99 4.22
12:18 12.17 5.00 4.22
12:19 12.32 4.92 4.24
12:20 12.29 4.93 4.23
12:21 12.29 4.94 4.14
12:22 12.28 4.95 4.19
12:23 12.28 4.95 4.21
12:24 12.28 4.94 4.15
12:25 12.31 4.93 4.15
12:26 12.32 4.92 4.18
12:27 12.31 4.92 4.15
12:28 12.30 4.92 4.12
12:29 12.33 4.91 4.07
12:30 12.34 4.90 4.07
12:31 12.42 4.86 3.94
12:32 12.44 4.85 3.95
12:33 12.46 4.83 3.94
12:34 12.48 4.83 3.94
12:35 12.48 4.82 3.94
12:36 12.48 4.82 3.97
12:37 12.51 4.81 3.85
12:38 12.46 4.84 3.90
12:39 12.50 4.81 3.91
12:40 12.51 4.81 3.96
12:41 12.51 4.81 3.97
12:42 12.54 4.79 3.98
12:43 12.57 4.79 3.95
12:44 12.65 4.73 3.83
12:45 12.65 4.73 3.88
12:46 12.66 4.73 3.91
12:47 12.61 4.75 3.83
12:48 12.62 4.75 3.87
12:49 12.60 4.76 3.85
12:50 12.60 4.76 3.79
12:51 12.62 4.74 3.75
12:52 12.61 4.75 3.83
12:53 12.60 4.75 3.79
12:54 12.62 4.74 3.71
12:55 12.62 4.75 3.75
12:56 12.61 4.75 3.73
12:57 12.62 4.74 3.69
12:58 12.63 4.74 3.64
12:59 12.60 4.76 3.71
13:00 12.57 4.77 3.72
13:01 12.58 4.77 3.74
13:02 12.57 4.77 3.81
13:03 12.57 4.78 3.76
13:04 12.56 4.79 3.82
13:05 12.56 4.78 3.79
13:06 12.55 4.79 3.70
13:07 12.57 4.77 3.68
13:08 12.60 4.75 3.67
13:09 12.58 4.77 3.77
13:10 12.62 4.75 3.78
13:11 12.59 4.77 3.90
13:12 12.60 4.75 3.84
University of Utah - Salt Lake City, UT
Unit 6
AST-2024-0023
1/10/24
44 of 97
Run 2 - RM Data
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
Date:
Time O₂ - Outlet CO₂ - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Unit % dry % dry ppmvd
Status Valid Valid Valid
Uncorrected Run Average (Cobs)12.55 4.76 3.94
Cal Gas Concentration (CMA)10.00 10.00 15.00
Pretest System Zero Response 0.01 0.03 0.05
Posttest System Zero Response 0.02 0.03 0.05
Average Zero Response (Co)0.02 0.03 0.05
Pretest System Cal Response 9.97 9.85 15.00
Posttest System Cal Response 9.95 9.93 15.00
Average Cal Response (CM)9.96 9.89 15.00
Corrected Run Average (Corr)12.60 4.80 3.91
13:26 12.47 4.80 3.74
13:27 12.57 4.75 3.69
13:28 12.60 4.73 3.73
13:29 12.63 4.72 3.73
13:30 12.64 4.73 3.70
13:31 12.64 4.72 3.77
13:32 12.68 4.70 3.76
13:33 12.66 4.71 3.81
13:34 12.67 4.70 3.76
13:35 12.70 4.69 3.81
13:36 12.67 4.71 3.81
13:37 12.66 4.71 3.78
13:38 12.66 4.72 3.78
13:39 12.68 4.70 3.78
13:40 12.66 4.71 3.79
13:41 12.67 4.71 3.79
13:42 12.67 4.70 3.77
13:43 12.68 4.69 3.72
13:44 12.68 4.69 3.74
13:45 12.67 4.70 3.76
13:46 12.69 4.70 3.74
13:47 12.72 4.67 3.87
13:48 12.67 4.70 4.08
13:49 12.52 4.78 4.26
13:50 12.43 4.82 3.99
13:51 12.47 4.80 3.90
13:52 12.54 4.76 3.99
13:53 12.46 4.81 4.09
13:54 12.41 4.84 4.12
13:55 12.40 4.84 4.11
13:56 12.39 4.85 4.09
13:57 12.40 4.84 4.14
13:58 12.44 4.82 4.11
13:59 12.42 4.84 4.14
14:00 12.38 4.85 4.15
14:01 12.40 4.83 4.09
14:02 12.45 4.81 4.11
14:03 12.44 4.81 4.11
14:04 12.45 4.81 4.05
14:05 12.47 4.80 4.06
14:06 12.47 4.79 4.05
14:07 12.49 4.79 4.04
14:08 12.49 4.79 4.09
14:09 12.49 4.80 4.07
14:10 12.50 4.78 3.99
14:11 12.50 4.78 4.03
14:12 12.46 4.80 4.00
14:13 12.47 4.79 4.00
14:14 12.48 4.79 4.06
14:15 12.50 4.78 3.99
14:16 12.52 4.76 3.99
14:17 12.52 4.77 4.03
14:18 12.52 4.77 3.98
14:19 12.52 4.76 4.02
14:20 12.54 4.76 3.94
14:21 12.54 4.76 3.94
14:22 12.55 4.75 3.93
14:23 12.56 4.75 3.96
14:24 12.55 4.76 4.02
14:25 12.54 4.76 4.01
University of Utah - Salt Lake City, UT
Unit 6
AST-2024-0023
1/10/24
45 of 97
Run 3 - RM Data
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
Date:
Time O₂ - Outlet CO₂ - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Unit % dry % dry ppmvd
Status Valid Valid Valid
Uncorrected Run Average (Cobs)12.50 4.78 3.59
Cal Gas Concentration (CMA)10.00 10.00 15.00
Pretest System Zero Response 0.02 0.03 0.05
Posttest System Zero Response 0.02 0.02 0.05
Average Zero Response (Co)0.02 0.03 0.05
Pretest System Cal Response 9.95 9.93 15.00
Posttest System Cal Response 9.95 9.97 15.02
Average Cal Response (CM)9.95 9.95 15.01
Corrected Run Average (Corr)12.56 4.79 3.55
14:37 12.35 4.85 3.83
14:38 12.48 4.79 3.73
14:39 12.45 4.81 3.78
14:40 12.48 4.79 3.77
14:41 12.49 4.78 3.81
14:42 12.48 4.79 3.81
14:43 12.46 4.79 3.77
14:44 12.53 4.77 3.65
14:45 12.54 4.76 3.71
14:46 12.57 4.75 3.61
14:47 12.58 4.73 3.50
14:48 12.54 4.76 3.56
14:49 12.48 4.79 3.53
14:50 12.44 4.81 3.58
14:51 12.40 4.83 3.57
14:52 12.42 4.83 3.55
14:53 12.42 4.83 3.52
14:54 12.43 4.82 3.50
14:55 12.43 4.83 3.52
14:56 12.45 4.81 3.52
14:57 12.46 4.81 3.49
14:58 12.61 4.72 3.49
14:59 12.60 4.74 3.47
15:00 12.53 4.77 3.48
15:01 12.49 4.79 3.48
15:02 12.47 4.80 3.50
15:03 12.49 4.79 3.51
15:04 12.45 4.81 3.59
15:05 12.46 4.81 3.57
15:06 12.51 4.78 3.59
15:07 12.48 4.80 3.59
15:08 12.49 4.79 3.55
15:09 12.48 4.80 3.58
15:10 12.53 4.77 3.58
15:11 12.57 4.74 3.57
15:12 12.55 4.75 3.58
15:13 12.55 4.75 3.54
15:14 12.54 4.75 3.59
15:15 12.53 4.77 3.63
15:16 12.50 4.78 3.58
15:17 12.50 4.78 3.60
15:18 12.51 4.78 3.62
15:19 12.50 4.78 3.68
15:20 12.50 4.77 3.61
15:21 12.53 4.76 3.51
15:22 12.51 4.77 3.63
15:23 12.52 4.77 3.60
15:24 12.53 4.77 3.59
15:25 12.53 4.77 3.58
15:26 12.58 4.73 3.53
15:27 12.54 4.76 3.60
15:28 12.46 4.80 3.60
15:29 12.49 4.77 3.56
15:30 12.51 4.77 3.59
15:31 12.53 4.76 3.58
15:32 12.48 4.79 3.56
15:33 12.45 4.80 3.61
15:34 12.44 4.81 3.60
15:35 12.45 4.80 3.61
15:36 12.50 4.78 3.50
University of Utah - Salt Lake City, UT
Unit 6
AST-2024-0023
1/10/24
46 of 97
Unit 7
47 of 97
Emissions Calculations
Location
Source
Project No.
Run Number Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average
Date 1/10/24 1/10/24 1/10/24 --
Start Time 8:31 9:44 11:01 --
Stop Time 9:31 10:44 12:01 --
Fuel Factor (O2 dry), dscf/MMBtu Fd 8,710 8,710 8,710 8,710
Heat Input, MMBtu/hr HI 18.9 18.4 20.5 19.3
Volumetric Flow Rate (M19), dscfm Qs 6,176 6,026 6,638 6,280
O₂ Concentration, % dry CO₂11.62 11.64 11.53 11.59
CO₂ Concentration, % dry CCO₂5.34 5.32 5.38 5.35
NOx Concentration, ppmvd CNOx 4.32 4.38 4.15 4.28
NOx Concentration, ppmvd @ 3 % O₂CNOxc3 8.33 8.47 7.93 8.24
NOx Emission Rate, lb/hr ERNOx 0.19 0.19 0.20 0.19
NOx Emission Factor, lb/MMBtu (HI)EFNOx HI 0.010 0.010 0.0096 0.010
Source Data
Input Data - Outlet
Calculated Data - Outlet
University of Utah - Salt Lake City, UT
Unit 7
AST-2024-0023
48 of 97
Method 1 Data
Location
Source
Project No.
Date:
Vertical
Circular
36.00 in
4.00 in
32.00 in
5.59 ft2
2
1
13.0 ft
4.9 (must be ≥ 0.5)
27.0 ft
10.1 (must be ≥ 2)
12
3
Measurer (Initial and Date):AJC 1/10/24
Reviewer (Initial and Date):RJL 1/10/24
23456789101112
1 14.6 16.7 6.7 -- 4.4 -- 3.2 -- 2.6 -- 2.1 1 16.75.349.34
2 85.4 50.0 25.0 -- 14.6 -- 10.5 -- 8.2 -- 6.7 2 50.0 16.00 20.00
3 -- 83.3 75.0 -- 29.6 -- 19.4 -- 14.6 -- 11.8 3 83.3 26.66 30.66
4 -- -- 93.3 -- 70.4 -- 32.3 -- 22.6 -- 17.7 4 -- -- --
5 -- -- -- -- 85.4 -- 67.7 -- 34.2 -- 25.0 5 -- -- --
6 -- -- -- -- 95.6 -- 80.6 -- 65.8 -- 35.6 6 -- -- --
7 -- -- -- -- -- -- 89.5 -- 77.4 -- 64.4 7 -- -- --
8 -- -- -- -- -- -- 96.8 -- 85.4 -- 75.0 8 -- -- --
9 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 91.8 -- 82.3 9 -- -- --
10 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 97.4 -- 88.2 10 -- -- --
11 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 93.3 11 -- -- --
12 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 97.9 12 -- -- --
*Percent of stack diameter from inside wall to traverse point.
A = 13 ft.
B = 27 ft.
Depth of Duct = 32 in.
Cross Sectional Area of Duct:
University of Utah - Salt Lake City, UT
Unit 7
AST-2024-0023
01/10/24
Stack Parameters
Duct Orientation:
Duct Design:
Distance from Far Wall to Outside of Port:
Nipple Length:
Depth of Duct:
No. of Test Ports:
Number of Readings per Point:
Distance A:
Distance A Duct Diameters:
Distance B:
Distance B Duct Diameters:
Minimum Number of Traverse Points:
Actual Number of Traverse Points:
CIRCULAR DUCT
LOCATION OF TRAVERSE POINTS
Traverse
Point
% of
Diameter
Distance
from inside
wall
Number of traverse points on a diameter
Stack Diagram
Cross Sectional Area
Distance
from
outside of
port
Upstream
Disturbance
Downstream
Disturbance
B
A
49 of 97
Run 1 - RM Data
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
Date:
Time O₂ - Outlet CO₂ - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Unit % dry % dry ppmvd
Status Valid Valid Valid
Uncorrected Run Average (Cobs)11.62 5.32 4.34
Cal Gas Concentration (CMA)10.00 10.00 15.00
Pretest System Zero Response 0.00 0.04 0.02
Posttest System Zero Response 0.01 0.05 0.04
Average Zero Response (Co)0.01 0.05 0.03
Pretest System Cal Response 9.99 9.92 14.98
Posttest System Cal Response 10.02 9.93 15.02
Average Cal Response (CM)10.01 9.93 15.00
Corrected Run Average (Corr)11.62 5.34 4.32
8:31 11.54 5.35 4.28
8:32 11.62 5.32 4.23
8:33 11.58 5.34 4.26
8:34 11.75 5.24 4.20
8:35 11.64 5.31 4.24
8:36 11.61 5.32 4.27
8:37 11.61 5.32 4.24
8:38 11.64 5.31 4.22
8:39 11.59 5.33 4.28
8:40 11.58 5.34 4.24
8:41 11.59 5.33 4.25
8:42 11.59 5.33 4.26
8:43 11.60 5.33 4.24
8:44 11.57 5.34 4.26
8:45 11.60 5.32 4.29
8:46 11.55 5.35 4.33
8:47 11.55 5.35 4.33
8:48 11.54 5.36 4.29
8:49 11.56 5.34 4.30
8:50 11.59 5.33 4.30
8:51 11.63 5.31 4.33
8:52 11.61 5.32 4.34
8:53 11.58 5.34 4.33
8:54 11.55 5.35 4.35
8:55 11.59 5.33 4.35
8:56 11.56 5.35 4.41
8:57 11.58 5.34 4.44
8:58 11.55 5.35 4.43
8:59 11.59 5.33 4.40
9:00 11.62 5.32 4.39
9:01 11.68 5.29 4.38
9:02 11.63 5.32 4.40
9:03 11.65 5.31 4.40
9:04 11.67 5.30 4.41
9:05 11.67 5.31 4.34
9:06 11.67 5.31 4.40
9:07 11.62 5.33 4.41
9:08 11.65 5.32 4.34
9:09 11.65 5.32 4.32
9:10 11.67 5.30 4.37
9:11 11.67 5.30 4.39
9:12 11.64 5.31 4.41
9:13 11.59 5.35 4.42
9:14 11.64 5.31 4.45
9:15 11.63 5.32 4.43
9:16 11.61 5.32 4.36
9:17 11.62 5.32 4.36
9:18 11.68 5.29 4.31
9:19 11.66 5.30 4.36
9:20 11.66 5.30 4.35
9:21 11.65 5.31 4.37
9:22 11.62 5.32 4.32
9:23 11.66 5.30 4.34
9:24 11.64 5.31 4.33
9:25 11.68 5.29 4.34
9:26 11.69 5.29 4.36
9:27 11.67 5.30 4.50
9:28 11.62 5.33 4.49
9:29 11.63 5.33 4.46
9:30 11.64 5.32 4.48
University of Utah - Salt Lake City, UT
Unit 7
AST-2024-0023
1/10/24
50 of 97
Run 2 - RM Data
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
Date:
Time O₂ - Outlet CO₂ - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Unit % dry % dry ppmvd
Status Valid Valid Valid
Uncorrected Run Average (Cobs)11.66 5.30 4.41
Cal Gas Concentration (CMA)10.00 10.00 15.00
Pretest System Zero Response 0.01 0.05 0.04
Posttest System Zero Response 0.01 0.04 0.05
Average Zero Response (Co)0.01 0.05 0.05
Pretest System Cal Response 10.02 9.93 15.02
Posttest System Cal Response 10.02 9.90 14.98
Average Cal Response (CM)10.02 9.92 15.00
Corrected Run Average (Corr)11.64 5.32 4.38
9:44 11.58 5.33 4.45
9:45 11.59 5.34 4.38
9:46 11.64 5.31 4.44
9:47 11.64 5.31 4.37
9:48 11.68 5.29 4.42
9:49 11.62 5.33 4.49
9:50 11.59 5.33 4.46
9:51 11.65 5.30 4.45
9:52 11.66 5.30 4.45
9:53 11.68 5.29 4.40
9:54 11.68 5.28 4.45
9:55 11.70 5.28 4.38
9:56 11.67 5.29 4.43
9:57 11.67 5.29 4.35
9:58 11.71 5.28 4.40
9:59 11.68 5.29 4.47
10:00 11.66 5.30 4.44
10:01 11.72 5.27 4.40
10:02 11.70 5.28 4.45
10:03 11.69 5.29 4.47
10:04 11.61 5.33 4.52
10:05 11.65 5.31 4.52
10:06 11.66 5.30 4.52
10:07 11.66 5.30 4.47
10:08 11.63 5.32 4.47
10:09 11.64 5.32 4.39
10:10 11.63 5.32 4.38
10:11 11.62 5.33 4.43
10:12 11.65 5.31 4.39
10:13 11.68 5.29 4.41
10:14 11.64 5.30 4.50
10:15 11.66 5.29 4.51
10:16 11.65 5.29 4.49
10:17 11.63 5.31 4.51
10:18 11.64 5.30 4.43
10:19 11.66 5.29 4.38
10:20 11.69 5.27 4.40
10:21 11.69 5.27 4.39
10:22 11.67 5.28 4.39
10:23 11.68 5.28 4.37
10:24 11.65 5.30 4.42
10:25 11.69 5.27 4.34
10:26 11.69 5.28 4.44
10:27 11.67 5.29 4.48
10:28 11.63 5.31 4.52
10:29 11.62 5.31 4.51
10:30 11.62 5.31 4.45
10:31 11.63 5.31 4.46
10:32 11.66 5.29 4.33
10:33 11.66 5.29 4.37
10:34 11.70 5.26 4.37
10:35 11.70 5.27 4.37
10:36 11.68 5.28 4.32
10:37 11.67 5.28 4.30
10:38 11.66 5.29 4.34
10:39 11.65 5.29 4.34
10:40 11.63 5.29 4.31
10:41 11.65 5.29 4.22
10:42 11.67 5.27 4.22
10:43 11.69 5.27 4.29
University of Utah - Salt Lake City, UT
Unit 7
AST-2024-0023
1/10/24
51 of 97
Run 3 - RM Data
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
Date:
Time O₂ - Outlet CO₂ - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Unit % dry % dry ppmvd
Status Valid Valid Valid
Uncorrected Run Average (Cobs)11.53 5.34 4.18
Cal Gas Concentration (CMA)10.00 10.00 15.00
Pretest System Zero Response 0.01 0.04 0.05
Posttest System Zero Response 0.00 0.03 0.05
Average Zero Response (Co)0.01 0.04 0.05
Pretest System Cal Response 10.02 9.90 14.98
Posttest System Cal Response 9.98 9.89 15.01
Average Cal Response (CM)10.00 9.90 15.00
Corrected Run Average (Corr)11.53 5.38 4.15
11:01 11.63 5.29 4.06
11:02 11.61 5.29 4.12
11:03 11.80 5.21 4.02
11:04 11.69 5.26 4.09
11:05 11.71 5.25 4.07
11:06 11.71 5.25 4.06
11:07 11.68 5.27 4.11
11:08 11.68 5.27 4.07
11:09 11.68 5.27 4.12
11:10 11.67 5.28 4.16
11:11 11.67 5.29 4.18
11:12 11.63 5.31 4.20
11:13 11.63 5.31 4.21
11:14 11.66 5.29 4.12
11:15 11.66 5.29 4.09
11:16 11.64 5.30 4.15
11:17 11.64 5.30 4.13
11:18 11.64 5.30 4.16
11:19 11.41 5.40 4.24
11:20 11.40 5.40 4.27
11:21 11.42 5.39 4.21
11:22 11.42 5.39 4.18
11:23 11.42 5.39 4.15
11:24 11.41 5.40 4.24
11:25 11.38 5.41 4.31
11:26 11.37 5.42 4.27
11:27 11.38 5.41 4.27
11:28 11.33 5.44 4.34
11:29 11.31 5.45 4.35
11:30 11.38 5.42 4.30
11:31 11.35 5.43 4.24
11:32 11.32 5.45 4.25
11:33 11.35 5.43 4.24
11:34 11.37 5.42 4.23
11:35 11.35 5.43 4.19
11:36 11.37 5.43 4.24
11:37 11.33 5.44 4.30
11:38 11.33 5.44 4.27
11:39 11.35 5.42 4.25
11:40 11.33 5.44 4.29
11:41 11.33 5.43 4.26
11:42 11.35 5.43 4.22
11:43 11.36 5.43 4.24
11:44 11.36 5.43 4.22
11:45 11.37 5.42 4.15
11:46 11.37 5.42 4.25
11:47 11.36 5.43 4.27
11:48 11.39 5.41 4.24
11:49 11.36 5.43 4.24
11:50 11.32 5.45 4.24
11:51 11.34 5.43 4.31
11:52 11.37 5.41 4.26
11:53 11.37 5.41 4.32
11:54 11.38 5.40 4.30
11:55 11.36 5.42 4.29
11:56 11.38 5.40 4.24
11:57 11.40 5.39 4.25
11:58 11.37 5.41 4.25
11:59 12.68 4.62 3.86
12:00 14.45 3.75 2.86
University of Utah - Salt Lake City, UT
Unit 7
AST-2024-0023
1/10/24
52 of 97
Gen 9 Boiler
53 of 97
Emissions Calculations
Location
Source
Project No.
Run Number Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average
Date 1/9/24 1/9/24 1/9/24 --
Start Time 12:50 14:02 15:13 --
Stop Time 13:50 15:02 16:13 --
Fuel Factor (O2 dry), dscf/MMBtu Fd 8,710 8,710 8,710 8,710
Heat Input, MMBtu/hr HI 29.54 26.66 24.96 27.05
Volumetric Flow Rate (M19), dscfm Qs 9,797 8,947 8,472 9,072
O₂ Concentration, % dry CO₂11.75 11.86 11.96 11.86
CO₂ Concentration, % dry CCO₂5.27 5.20 5.15 5.21
NOx Concentration, ppmvd CNOx 4.11 4.20 4.17 4.16
NOx Concentration, ppmvd @ 3 % O₂CNOxc3 8.04 8.31 8.35 8.23
NOx Emission Rate, lb/hr ERNOx 0.29 0.27 0.25 0.27
NOx Emission Factor, lb/MMBtu (HI)EFNOx HI 0.0098 0.010 0.010 0.010
Source Data
Input Data - Outlet
Calculated Data - Outlet
University of Utah - Salt Lake City, UT
Gen 9 Boiler
AST-2024-0023
54 of 97
Method 1 Data
Location
Source
Project No.
Date:
Vertical
Circular
42.00 in
7.00 in
35.00 in
6.68 ft2
2
1
12.5 ft
4.3 (must be ≥ 0.5)
25.0 ft
8.6 (must be ≥ 2)
12
3
Measurer (Initial and Date):AJC 1/9/24
Reviewer (Initial and Date):RJL 1/9/24
23456789101112
1 14.6 16.7 6.7 -- 4.4 -- 3.2 -- 2.6 -- 2.1 1 16.7 5.85 12.85
2 85.4 50.0 25.0 -- 14.6 -- 10.5 -- 8.2 -- 6.7 2 50.0 17.50 24.50
3 -- 83.3 75.0 -- 29.6 -- 19.4 -- 14.6 -- 11.8 3 83.3 29.16 36.16
4 -- -- 93.3 -- 70.4 -- 32.3 -- 22.6 -- 17.7 4 -- -- --
5 -- -- -- -- 85.4 -- 67.7 -- 34.2 -- 25.0 5 -- -- --
6 -- -- -- -- 95.6 -- 80.6 -- 65.8 -- 35.6 6 -- -- --
7 -- -- -- -- -- -- 89.5 -- 77.4 -- 64.4 7 -- -- --
8 -- -- -- -- -- -- 96.8 -- 85.4 -- 75.0 8 -- -- --
9 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 91.8 -- 82.3 9 -- -- --
10 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 97.4 -- 88.2 10 -- -- --
11 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 93.3 11 -- -- --
12 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 97.9 12 -- -- --
*Percent of stack diameter from inside wall to traverse point.
A = 12.5 ft.
B = 25 ft.
Depth of Duct = 35 in.
Cross Sectional Area of Duct:
University of Utah - Salt Lake City, UT
Gen 9 Boiler
AST-2024-0023
01/09/24
Stack Parameters
Duct Orientation:
Duct Design:
Distance from Far Wall to Outside of Port:
Nipple Length:
Depth of Duct:
No. of Test Ports:
Number of Readings per Point:
Distance A:
Distance A Duct Diameters:
Distance B:
Distance B Duct Diameters:
Minimum Number of Traverse Points:
Actual Number of Traverse Points:
CIRCULAR DUCT
LOCATION OF TRAVERSE POINTS
Traverse
Point
% of
Diameter
Distance
from inside
wall
Number of traverse points on a diameter
Stack Diagram
Cross Sectional Area
Distance
from
outside of
port
Upstream
Disturbance
Downstream
Disturbance
B
A
55 of 97
Run 1 - RM Data
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
Date:
Time O₂ - Outlet CO₂ - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Unit % dry % dry ppmvd
Status Valid Valid Valid
Uncorrected Run Average (Cobs)11.73 5.24 4.13
Cal Gas Concentration (CMA)10.00 10.00 15.00
Pretest System Zero Response 0.00 0.04 0.01
Posttest System Zero Response 0.00 0.05 0.00
Average Zero Response (Co)0.00 0.05 0.01
Pretest System Cal Response 9.99 9.90 15.08
Posttest System Cal Response 9.98 9.88 15.04
Average Cal Response (CM)9.99 9.89 15.06
Corrected Run Average (Corr)11.75 5.27 4.11
12:50 11.85 5.19 4.08
12:51 11.95 5.14 3.89
12:52 12.74 4.71 3.48
12:53 11.96 5.13 3.99
12:54 11.95 5.13 4.16
12:55 11.98 5.12 4.19
12:56 12.01 5.10 4.19
12:57 12.04 5.09 4.25
12:58 12.05 5.08 4.28
12:59 12.08 5.07 4.32
13:00 12.11 5.05 4.33
13:01 12.16 5.02 4.36
13:02 12.17 5.02 4.35
13:03 12.20 5.00 4.37
13:04 12.21 5.00 4.41
13:05 12.22 4.99 4.40
13:06 12.24 4.98 4.41
13:07 12.27 4.97 4.40
13:08 12.22 5.00 4.34
13:09 12.12 5.05 4.19
13:10 12.04 5.09 4.17
13:11 11.96 5.13 4.06
13:12 11.90 5.17 4.10
13:13 11.84 5.20 4.05
13:14 11.81 5.21 4.04
13:15 11.75 5.24 4.08
13:16 11.64 5.30 4.10
13:17 11.56 5.33 4.14
13:18 11.57 5.33 4.04
13:19 11.52 5.36 4.03
13:20 11.49 5.37 4.06
13:21 11.49 5.37 3.98
13:22 11.43 5.40 4.07
13:23 11.42 5.40 4.09
13:24 11.43 5.40 4.13
13:25 11.41 5.40 4.12
13:26 11.43 5.39 4.07
13:27 11.44 5.38 4.03
13:28 11.44 5.38 4.05
13:29 11.46 5.37 4.02
13:30 11.47 5.36 4.02
13:31 11.50 5.35 3.97
13:32 11.50 5.35 4.02
13:33 11.50 5.35 4.04
13:34 11.45 5.37 4.09
13:35 11.44 5.38 4.07
13:36 11.46 5.37 4.08
13:37 11.46 5.37 4.17
13:38 11.47 5.37 4.16
13:39 11.47 5.37 4.17
13:40 11.47 5.36 4.20
13:41 11.47 5.36 4.18
13:42 11.44 5.37 4.21
13:43 11.38 5.41 4.21
13:44 11.38 5.40 4.18
13:45 11.42 5.38 4.12
13:46 11.46 5.36 4.08
13:47 11.50 5.34 4.02
13:48 11.58 5.30 3.98
13:49 11.67 5.25 3.90
University of Utah - Salt Lake City, UT
Gen 9 Boiler
AST-2024-0023
1/9/24
56 of 97
Run 2 - RM Data
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
Date:
Time O₂ - Outlet CO₂ - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Unit % dry % dry ppmvd
Status Valid Valid Valid
Uncorrected Run Average (Cobs)11.83 5.16 4.21
Cal Gas Concentration (CMA)10.00 10.00 15.00
Pretest System Zero Response 0.00 0.05 0.00
Posttest System Zero Response 0.00 0.04 0.00
Average Zero Response (Co)0.00 0.05 0.00
Pretest System Cal Response 9.98 9.88 15.04
Posttest System Cal Response 9.97 9.87 15.04
Average Cal Response (CM)9.98 9.88 15.04
Corrected Run Average (Corr)11.86 5.20 4.20
14:02 12.19 4.97 4.23
14:03 12.25 4.94 4.25
14:04 12.26 4.94 4.21
14:05 12.19 4.98 4.24
14:06 12.11 5.02 4.23
14:07 12.00 5.08 4.26
14:08 11.93 5.12 4.23
14:09 11.84 5.16 4.22
14:10 11.80 5.18 4.18
14:11 11.75 5.21 4.22
14:12 11.72 5.22 4.18
14:13 11.63 5.26 4.16
14:14 11.62 5.27 4.10
14:15 11.63 5.26 4.10
14:16 11.62 5.28 4.18
14:17 11.57 5.29 4.16
14:18 11.58 5.29 4.17
14:19 11.62 5.27 4.18
14:20 11.61 5.28 4.27
14:21 11.64 5.26 4.22
14:22 11.65 5.25 4.19
14:23 11.66 5.25 4.20
14:24 11.66 5.25 4.19
14:25 11.65 5.25 4.23
14:26 11.62 5.27 4.24
14:27 11.63 5.27 4.25
14:28 11.65 5.25 4.25
14:29 11.65 5.25 4.19
14:30 11.61 5.27 4.18
14:31 11.59 5.28 4.20
14:32 11.60 5.27 4.23
14:33 11.59 5.28 4.27
14:34 11.58 5.28 4.32
14:35 11.61 5.27 4.39
14:36 11.55 5.30 4.37
14:37 11.60 5.27 4.27
14:38 11.64 5.25 4.26
14:39 11.62 5.26 4.34
14:40 11.67 5.24 4.27
14:41 11.64 5.25 4.28
14:42 11.59 5.28 4.37
14:43 11.60 5.27 4.29
14:44 11.69 5.23 4.21
14:45 11.82 5.16 4.08
14:46 11.87 5.14 4.13
14:47 11.95 5.10 4.10
14:48 11.99 5.07 4.10
14:49 12.07 5.03 4.11
14:50 12.12 5.01 4.18
14:51 12.17 4.98 4.13
14:52 12.18 4.98 4.19
14:53 12.19 4.97 4.19
14:54 12.24 4.94 4.24
14:55 12.30 4.91 4.22
14:56 12.31 4.91 4.21
14:57 12.27 4.93 4.19
14:58 12.20 4.97 4.19
14:59 12.14 5.00 4.19
15:00 12.07 5.03 4.13
15:01 12.01 5.07 4.05
University of Utah - Salt Lake City, UT
Gen 9 Boiler
AST-2024-0023
1/9/24
57 of 97
Run 3 - RM Data
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
Date:
Time O₂ - Outlet CO₂ - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Unit % dry % dry ppmvd
Status Valid Valid Valid
Uncorrected Run Average (Cobs)11.92 5.10 4.18
Cal Gas Concentration (CMA)10.00 10.00 15.00
Pretest System Zero Response 0.00 0.04 0.00
Posttest System Zero Response 0.01 0.04 0.01
Average Zero Response (Co)0.01 0.04 0.01
Pretest System Cal Response 9.97 9.87 15.04
Posttest System Cal Response 9.96 9.84 15.02
Average Cal Response (CM)9.97 9.86 15.03
Corrected Run Average (Corr)11.96 5.15 4.17
15:13 11.56 5.29 4.23
15:14 11.64 5.25 4.19
15:15 11.60 5.28 4.27
15:16 11.63 5.26 4.23
15:17 11.67 5.25 4.20
15:18 11.62 5.26 4.22
15:19 11.67 5.23 4.19
15:20 11.67 5.23 4.12
15:21 11.81 5.16 4.03
15:22 11.87 5.14 4.15
15:23 11.92 5.10 4.19
15:24 11.99 5.07 4.13
15:25 12.03 5.05 4.11
15:26 12.07 5.04 4.15
15:27 12.11 5.01 4.15
15:28 12.15 4.99 4.18
15:29 12.20 4.97 4.20
15:30 12.22 4.96 4.17
15:31 12.23 4.95 4.18
15:32 12.31 4.91 4.15
15:33 12.33 4.89 4.19
15:34 12.33 4.90 4.15
15:35 12.20 4.96 4.11
15:36 12.20 4.96 4.06
15:37 12.19 4.96 4.11
15:38 12.09 5.02 4.23
15:39 12.04 5.04 4.28
15:40 11.98 5.07 4.27
15:41 11.94 5.09 4.23
15:42 11.87 5.12 4.25
15:43 11.83 5.14 4.20
15:44 11.82 5.15 4.18
15:45 11.76 5.18 4.21
15:46 11.75 5.18 4.24
15:47 11.73 5.19 4.22
15:48 11.74 5.18 4.23
15:49 11.70 5.20 4.31
15:50 11.69 5.21 4.36
15:51 11.74 5.18 4.37
15:52 11.79 5.16 4.26
15:53 11.80 5.15 4.31
15:54 11.82 5.14 4.25
15:55 11.84 5.13 4.26
15:56 11.86 5.11 4.20
15:57 11.85 5.12 4.26
15:58 11.79 5.15 4.25
15:59 11.78 5.16 4.18
16:00 11.74 5.18 4.17
16:01 11.76 5.16 4.14
16:02 11.77 5.16 4.09
16:03 11.79 5.15 4.05
16:04 11.80 5.14 4.09
16:05 11.88 5.10 4.09
16:06 11.94 5.07 4.16
16:07 12.01 5.04 4.19
16:08 12.05 5.01 4.11
16:09 12.14 4.97 4.10
16:10 12.21 4.93 4.06
16:11 12.29 4.89 4.04
16:12 12.31 4.88 4.03
University of Utah - Salt Lake City, UT
Gen 9 Boiler
AST-2024-0023
1/9/24
58 of 97
Appendix C
59 of 97
QA Data
Location
Source
Project No.
O₂ - Outlet CO₂ - Outlet CO - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Make SERVOMEX SERVOMEX THERMO THERMO
Model 4900 4900 48i 42iQ
S/N 100269 100269 208845 123277305521
Operating Range 25 100 100 100
Cylinder ID
Zero NA NA NA NA
Low NA NA NA NA
Mid RR03384 RR03384 CC723464 CC723464
High RR03384 RR03384 CC723464 CC723464
Cylinder Certifed Values
Zero NA NA NA NA
Low NA NA NA NA
Mid 24 23.7 205.1 203
High 24 23.7 205.1 203
Cylinder Expiration Date
Zero NA NA NA NA
Low NA NA NA NA
Mid 10/19/29 10/19/29 5/17/29 5/17/29
High 10/19/29 10/19/29 5/17/29 5/17/29
Type of Sample Line Heated Sample Line
Parameter
University of Utah - Salt Lake City, UT
Unit 1 - Solar Taurus 70 CoGen (Turbine Only)
AST-2024-0023
60 of 97
Response Times
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
O₂ - Outlet CO₂ - Outlet CO - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Zero 35 35 40 43
Low NA NA NA NA
Mid 40 40 52 55
High --------
Average 37.5 37.5 46.0 49.0
University of Utah - Salt Lake City, UT
Unit 1 - Solar Taurus 70 CoGen (Turbine Only)
AST-2024-0023
Parameter
Response Times, seconds
61 of 97
Calibration Data
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
Date:
O₂ - Outlet CO₂ - Outlet CO - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Expected Average Concentration 10.00 10.00 20.00 20.00
Span Between
Low 10.00 10.00 20.00 20.00
High 50.00 50.00 100.00 100.00
Desired Span 24.00 23.70 50.00 50.00
Low Range Gas
Low NA NA NA NA
High NA NA NA NA
Mid Range Gas
Low 9.60 9.48 20.00 20.00
High 14.40 14.22 30.00 30.00
High Range Gas
Low NA NA NA NA
High NA NA NA NA
Actual Concentration (% or ppm)
Zero 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Low NA NA NA NA
Mid 10.00 10.00 25.00 25.00
High 24.00 23.70 50.00 50.00
Response Time (seconds)45.00 45.00 52.00 57.00
Upscale Calibration Gas (CMA)Mid Mid Mid Mid
Instrument Response (% or ppm)
Zero 0.00 0.04 -0.02 0.00
Low NA NA NA NA
Mid 10.10 10.04 25.01 24.99
High 24.03 23.75 50.02 50.01
Performance (% of Span or Cal. Gas Conc.)
Zero 0.00 0.17 0.04 0.00
Low NA NA NA NA
Mid 0.42 0.17 0.02 0.02
High 0.13 0.21 0.04 0.02
Status
Zero PASS PASS PASS PASS
Low NA NA NA NA
Mid PASS PASS PASS PASS
High PASS PASS PASS PASS
Unit 1 - Solar Taurus 70 CoGen (Turbine Only)
University of Utah - Salt Lake City, UT
Parameter
1/9/24
AST-2024-0023
62 of 97
Bias/Drift Determinations
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
O₂ - Outlet CO₂ - Outlet CO - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Run 1 Date 1/9/24
Span Value 24.00 23.70 50.00 50.00
Initial Instrument Zero Cal Response 0.00 0.04 -0.02 0.00
Initial Instrument Upscale Cal Response 10.10 10.04 25.01 24.99
Pretest System Zero Response 0.00 0.04 -0.05 0.05
Posttest System Zero Response 0.01 0.04 -0.08 0.06
Pretest System Upscale Response 10.00 9.93 24.98 25.03
Posttest System Upscale Response 10.01 9.93 24.84 25.01
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero 0.00 0.00 -0.06 0.10
Posttest Zero 0.04 0.00 -0.12 0.12
Pretest Span -0.42 -0.46 -0.06 0.08
Posttest Span -0.37 -0.46 -0.34 0.04
Drift (%)
Zero 0.04 0.00 -0.06 0.02
Mid 0.04 0.00 -0.28 -0.04
Run 2 Date 1/9/24
Span Value 24.00 23.70 50.00 50.00
Instrument Zero Cal Response 0.00 0.04 -0.02 0.00
Instrument Upscale Cal Response 10.10 10.04 25.01 24.99
Pretest System Zero Response 0.01 0.04 -0.08 0.06
Posttest System Zero Response 0.02 0.05 -0.13 0.07
Pretest System Upscale Response 10.01 9.93 24.84 25.01
Posttest System Upscale Response 10.01 9.93 24.85 24.77
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero 0.04 0.00 -0.12 0.12
Posttest Zero 0.08 0.04 -0.22 0.14
Pretest Span -0.37 -0.46 -0.34 0.04
Posttest Span -0.37 -0.46 -0.32 -0.44
Drift (%)
Zero 0.04 0.04 -0.10 0.02
Mid 0.00 0.00 0.02 -0.48
Run 3 Date 1/9/24
Span Value 24.00 23.70 50.00 50.00
Instrument Zero Cal Response 0.00 0.04 -0.02 0.00
Instrument Upscale Cal Response 10.10 10.04 25.01 24.99
Pretest System Zero Response 0.02 0.05 -0.13 0.07
Posttest System Zero Response 0.03 0.03 -0.17 0.09
Pretest System Upscale Response 10.01 9.93 24.85 24.77
Posttest System Upscale Response 10.00 9.89 24.77 24.78
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero 0.08 0.04 -0.22 0.14
Posttest Zero 0.13 -0.04 -0.30 0.18
Pretest Span -0.37 -0.46 -0.32 -0.44
Posttest Span -0.42 -0.63 -0.48 -0.42
Drift (%)
Zero 0.04 -0.08 -0.08 0.04
Mid -0.04 -0.17 -0.16 0.02
Parameter
University of Utah - Salt Lake City, UT
Unit 1 - Solar Taurus 70 CoGen (Turbine Only)
AST-2024-0023
63 of 97
QA Data
Location
Source
Project No.
O₂ - Outlet CO₂ - Outlet CO - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Make SERVOMEX SERVOMEX THERMO THERMO
Model 4900 4900 48i 42iQ
S/N 100269 100269 208845 123277305521
Operating Range 25 100 100 100
Cylinder ID
Zero NA NA NA NA
Low NA NA NA NA
Mid RR03384 RR03384 CC723464 CC723464
High RR03384 RR03384 CC723464 CC723464
Cylinder Certifed Values
Zero NA NA NA NA
Low NA NA NA NA
Mid 24 23.7 205.1 203
High 24 23.7 205.1 203
Cylinder Expiration Date
Zero NA NA NA NA
Low NA NA NA NA
Mid 10/19/29 10/19/29 5/17/29 5/17/29
High 10/19/29 10/19/29 5/17/29 5/17/29
Type of Sample Line Heated Sample Line
Parameter
University of Utah - Salt Lake City, UT
Unit 1 - Solar Taurus 70 CoGen (Turbine and WHRU Duct Burner)
AST-2024-0023
64 of 97
Response Times
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
O₂ - Outlet CO₂ - Outlet CO - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Zero 45 45 45 45
Low NA NA NA NA
Mid 40 40 55 60
High --------
Average 42.5 42.5 50.0 52.5
University of Utah - Salt Lake City, UT
Unit 1 - Solar Taurus 70 CoGen (Turbine and WHRU Duct Burner)
AST-2024-0023
Parameter
Response Times, seconds
65 of 97
Calibration Data
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
Date:
O₂ - Outlet CO₂ - Outlet CO - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Expected Average Concentration 12.00 10.00 20.00 20.00
Span Between
Low 12.00 10.00 20.00 20.00
High 60.00 50.00 100.00 100.00
Desired Span 24.00 23.70 50.00 50.00
Low Range Gas
Low NA NA NA NA
High NA NA NA NA
Mid Range Gas
Low 9.60 9.48 20.00 20.00
High 14.40 14.22 30.00 30.00
High Range Gas
Low NA NA NA NA
High NA NA NA NA
Actual Concentration (% or ppm)
Zero 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Low NA NA NA NA
Mid 10.00 10.00 25.00 25.00
High 24.00 23.70 50.00 50.00
Response Time (seconds)43.00 47.00 52.00 55.00
Upscale Calibration Gas (CMA)Mid Mid Mid Mid
Instrument Response (% or ppm)
Zero 0.00 0.03 -0.02 0.00
Low NA NA NA NA
Mid 10.12 10.03 25.02 24.99
High 24.01 23.74 50.05 49.76
Performance (% of Span or Cal. Gas Conc.)
Zero 0.00 0.13 0.04 0.00
Low NA NA NA NA
Mid 0.50 0.13 0.04 0.02
High 0.04 0.17 0.10 0.48
Status
Zero PASS PASS PASS PASS
Low NA NA NA NA
Mid PASS PASS PASS PASS
High PASS PASS PASS PASS
Unit 1 - Solar Taurus 70 CoGen (Turbine and WHRU Duct Burner)
University of Utah - Salt Lake City, UT
Parameter
1/8/24
AST-2024-0023
66 of 97
Bias/Drift Determinations
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
O₂ - Outlet CO₂ - Outlet CO - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Run 1 Date 1/8/24
Span Value 24.00 23.70 50.00 50.00
Initial Instrument Zero Cal Response 0.00 0.03 -0.02 0.00
Initial Instrument Upscale Cal Response 10.12 10.03 25.02 24.99
Pretest System Zero Response 0.03 0.05 -0.17 0.24
Posttest System Zero Response 0.08 0.09 -0.32 0.09
Pretest System Upscale Response 10.05 9.94 25.52 25.05
Posttest System Upscale Response 10.10 9.98 24.97 24.98
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero 0.13 0.08 -0.30 0.48
Posttest Zero 0.33 0.25 -0.60 0.18
Pretest Span -0.29 -0.38 1.00 0.12
Posttest Span -0.08 -0.21 -0.10 -0.02
Drift (%)
Zero 0.21 0.17 -0.30 -0.30
Mid 0.21 0.17 -1.10 -0.14
Run 2 Date 1/8/24
Span Value 24.00 23.70 50.00 50.00
Instrument Zero Cal Response 0.00 0.03 -0.02 0.00
Instrument Upscale Cal Response 10.12 10.03 25.02 24.99
Pretest System Zero Response 0.08 0.09 -0.32 0.09
Posttest System Zero Response 0.09 0.13 -0.41 0.08
Pretest System Upscale Response 10.10 9.98 24.97 24.98
Posttest System Upscale Response 10.09 10.03 24.71 24.89
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero 0.33 0.25 -0.60 0.18
Posttest Zero 0.38 0.42 -0.78 0.16
Pretest Span -0.08 -0.21 -0.10 -0.02
Posttest Span -0.12 0.00 -0.62 -0.20
Drift (%)
Zero 0.04 0.17 -0.18 -0.02
Mid -0.04 0.21 -0.52 -0.18
Run 3 Date 1/8/24
Span Value 24.00 23.70 50.00 50.00
Instrument Zero Cal Response 0.00 0.03 -0.02 0.00
Instrument Upscale Cal Response 10.12 10.03 25.02 24.99
Pretest System Zero Response 0.09 0.13 -0.41 0.08
Posttest System Zero Response 0.10 0.18 -0.50 0.08
Pretest System Upscale Response 10.09 10.03 24.71 24.89
Posttest System Upscale Response 10.09 10.10 24.71 25.04
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero 0.38 0.42 -0.78 0.16
Posttest Zero 0.42 0.63 -0.96 0.16
Pretest Span -0.12 0.00 -0.62 -0.20
Posttest Span -0.12 0.30 -0.62 0.10
Drift (%)
Zero 0.04 0.21 -0.18 0.00
Mid 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.30
Parameter
University of Utah - Salt Lake City, UT
Unit 1 - Solar Taurus 70 CoGen (Turbine and WHRU Duct Burner)
AST-2024-0023
67 of 97
QA Data
Location
Source
Project No.
O₂ - Outlet CO₂ - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Make SERVOMEX SERVOMEX THERMO
Model 4900 4900 42iQ
S/N 100269 100269 123277305521
Operating Range 25 100 100
Cylinder ID
Zero NA NA NA
Low NA NA NA
Mid RR03384 RR03384 CC723464
High RR03384 RR03384 CC723464
Cylinder Certifed Values
Zero NA NA NA
Low NA NA NA
Mid 24 23.7 203
High 24 23.7 203
Cylinder Expiration Date
Zero NA NA NA
Low NA NA NA
Mid 10/19/29 10/19/29 5/17/29
High 10/19/29 10/19/29 5/17/29
Type of Sample Line Heated Sample Line
Parameter
University of Utah - Salt Lake City, UT
Unit 6
AST-2024-0023
68 of 97
Response Times
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
O₂ - Outlet CO₂ - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Zero 35 35 35
Low NA NA NA
Mid 40 40 55
High 45 50 60
Average 40.0 41.7 50.0
University of Utah - Salt Lake City, UT
Unit 6
AST-2024-0023
Parameter
Response Times, seconds
69 of 97
Calibration Data
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
Date:
O₂ - Outlet CO₂ - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Expected Average Concentration 5.00 5.00 10.00
Span Between
Low 5.00 5.00 10.00
High 25.00 25.00 50.00
Desired Span 24.00 23.70 30.00
Low Range Gas
Low NA NA NA
High NA NA NA
Mid Range Gas
Low 9.60 9.48 12.00
High 14.40 14.22 18.00
High Range Gas
Low NA NA NA
High NA NA NA
Actual Concentration (% or ppm)
Zero 0.00 0.00 0.00
Low NA NA NA
Mid 10.00 10.00 15.00
High 24.00 23.70 30.00
Response Time (seconds)40.00 41.67 50.00
Upscale Calibration Gas (CMA)Mid Mid Mid
Instrument Response (% or ppm)
Zero 0.00 0.04 0.00
Low NA NA NA
Mid 10.10 10.04 15.01
High 24.00 23.73 29.98
Performance (% of Span or Cal. Gas Conc.)
Zero 0.00 0.17 0.00
Low NA NA NA
Mid 0.42 0.17 0.03
High 0.00 0.13 0.07
Status
Zero PASS PASS PASS
Low NA NA NA
Mid PASS PASS PASS
High PASS PASS PASS
Unit 6
University of Utah - Salt Lake City, UT
Parameter
1/10/24
AST-2024-0023
70 of 97
Bias/Drift Determinations
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
O₂ - Outlet CO₂ - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Run 1 Date 1/10/24
Span Value 24.00 23.70 30.00
Initial Instrument Zero Cal Response 0.00 0.04 0.00
Initial Instrument Upscale Cal Response 10.10 10.04 15.01
Pretest System Zero Response 0.00 0.03 0.05
Posttest System Zero Response 0.01 0.03 0.05
Pretest System Upscale Response 9.98 9.89 15.01
Posttest System Upscale Response 9.97 9.85 15.00
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero 0.00 -0.04 0.17
Posttest Zero 0.04 -0.04 0.17
Pretest Span -0.50 -0.63 0.00
Posttest Span -0.54 -0.80 -0.03
Drift (%)
Zero 0.04 0.00 0.00
Mid -0.04 -0.17 -0.03
Run 2 Date 1/10/24
Span Value 24.00 23.70 30.00
Instrument Zero Cal Response 0.00 0.04 0.00
Instrument Upscale Cal Response 10.10 10.04 15.01
Pretest System Zero Response 0.01 0.03 0.05
Posttest System Zero Response 0.02 0.03 0.05
Pretest System Upscale Response 9.97 9.85 15.00
Posttest System Upscale Response 9.95 9.93 15.00
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero 0.04 -0.04 0.17
Posttest Zero 0.08 -0.04 0.17
Pretest Span -0.54 -0.80 -0.03
Posttest Span -0.63 -0.46 -0.03
Drift (%)
Zero 0.04 0.00 0.00
Mid -0.08 0.34 0.00
Run 3 Date 1/10/24
Span Value 24.00 23.70 30.00
Instrument Zero Cal Response 0.00 0.04 0.00
Instrument Upscale Cal Response 10.10 10.04 15.01
Pretest System Zero Response 0.02 0.03 0.05
Posttest System Zero Response 0.02 0.02 0.05
Pretest System Upscale Response 9.95 9.93 15.00
Posttest System Upscale Response 9.95 9.97 15.02
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero 0.08 -0.04 0.17
Posttest Zero 0.08 -0.08 0.17
Pretest Span -0.63 -0.46 -0.03
Posttest Span -0.63 -0.30 0.03
Drift (%)
Zero 0.00 -0.04 0.00
Mid 0.00 0.17 0.07
Parameter
University of Utah - Salt Lake City, UT
Unit 6
AST-2024-0023
71 of 97
QA Data
Location
Source
Project No.
O₂ - Outlet CO₂ - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Make SERVOMEX SERVOMEX THERMO
Model 4900 4900 42iQ
S/N 100269 100269 123277305521
Operating Range 25 100 100
Cylinder ID
Zero NA NA NA
Low NA NA NA
Mid RR03384 RR03384 CC723464
High RR03384 RR03384 CC723464
Cylinder Certifed Values
Zero NA NA NA
Low NA NA NA
Mid 24 23.7 203
High 24 23.7 203
Cylinder Expiration Date
Zero NA NA NA
Low NA NA NA
Mid 10/19/29 10/19/29 5/17/29
High 10/19/29 10/19/29 5/17/29
Type of Sample Line Heated Sample Line
Parameter
University of Utah - Salt Lake City, UT
Unit 7
AST-2024-0023
72 of 97
Response Times
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
O₂ - Outlet CO₂ - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Zero 35 35 35
Low NA NA NA
Mid 40 40 55
High ------
Average 37.5 37.5 45.0
University of Utah - Salt Lake City, UT
Unit 7
AST-2024-0023
Parameter
Response Times, seconds
73 of 97
Calibration Data
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
Date:
O₂ - Outlet CO₂ - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Expected Average Concentration 5.00 5.00 10.00
Span Between
Low 5.00 5.00 10.00
High 25.00 25.00 50.00
Desired Span 24.00 23.70 30.00
Low Range Gas
Low NA NA NA
High NA NA NA
Mid Range Gas
Low 9.60 9.48 12.00
High 14.40 14.22 18.00
High Range Gas
Low NA NA NA
High NA NA NA
Actual Concentration (% or ppm)
Zero 0.00 0.00 0.00
Low NA NA NA
Mid 10.00 10.00 15.00
High 24.00 23.70 30.00
Response Time (seconds)40.00 41.00 61.00
Upscale Calibration Gas (CMA)Mid Mid Mid
Instrument Response (% or ppm)
Zero 0.00 0.04 0.00
Low NA NA NA
Mid 10.10 10.04 15.01
High 24.00 23.73 29.98
Performance (% of Span or Cal. Gas Conc.)
Zero 0.00 0.17 0.00
Low NA NA NA
Mid 0.42 0.17 0.03
High 0.00 0.13 0.07
Status
Zero PASS PASS PASS
Low NA NA NA
Mid PASS PASS PASS
High PASS PASS PASS
Unit 7
University of Utah - Salt Lake City, UT
Parameter
1/10/24
AST-2024-0023
74 of 97
Bias/Drift Determinations
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
O₂ - Outlet CO₂ - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Run 1 Date 1/10/24
Span Value 24.00 23.70 30.00
Initial Instrument Zero Cal Response 0.00 0.04 0.00
Initial Instrument Upscale Cal Response 10.10 10.04 15.01
Pretest System Zero Response 0.00 0.04 0.02
Posttest System Zero Response 0.01 0.05 0.04
Pretest System Upscale Response 9.99 9.92 14.98
Posttest System Upscale Response 10.02 9.93 15.02
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero 0.00 0.00 0.07
Posttest Zero 0.04 0.04 0.13
Pretest Span -0.46 -0.51 -0.10
Posttest Span -0.33 -0.46 0.03
Drift (%)
Zero 0.04 0.04 0.07
Mid 0.12 0.04 0.13
Run 2 Date 1/10/24
Span Value 24.00 23.70 30.00
Instrument Zero Cal Response 0.00 0.04 0.00
Instrument Upscale Cal Response 10.10 10.04 15.01
Pretest System Zero Response 0.01 0.05 0.04
Posttest System Zero Response 0.01 0.04 0.05
Pretest System Upscale Response 10.02 9.93 15.02
Posttest System Upscale Response 10.02 9.90 14.98
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero 0.04 0.04 0.13
Posttest Zero 0.04 0.00 0.17
Pretest Span -0.33 -0.46 0.03
Posttest Span -0.33 -0.59 -0.10
Drift (%)
Zero 0.00 -0.04 0.03
Mid 0.00 -0.13 -0.13
Run 3 Date 1/10/24
Span Value 24.00 23.70 30.00
Instrument Zero Cal Response 0.00 0.04 0.00
Instrument Upscale Cal Response 10.10 10.04 15.01
Pretest System Zero Response 0.01 0.04 0.05
Posttest System Zero Response 0.00 0.03 0.05
Pretest System Upscale Response 10.02 9.90 14.98
Posttest System Upscale Response 9.98 9.89 15.01
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero 0.04 0.00 0.17
Posttest Zero 0.00 -0.04 0.17
Pretest Span -0.33 -0.59 -0.10
Posttest Span -0.50 -0.63 0.00
Drift (%)
Zero -0.04 -0.04 0.00
Mid -0.17 -0.04 0.10
Parameter
University of Utah - Salt Lake City, UT
Unit 7
AST-2024-0023
75 of 97
QA Data
Location
Source
Project No.
O₂ - Outlet CO₂ - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Make SERVOMEX SERVOMEX THERMO
Model 4900 4900 42iQ
S/N 100269 100269 123277305521
Operating Range 25 100 100
Cylinder ID
Zero NA NA NA
Low NA NA NA
Mid RR03384 RR03384 CC723464
High RR03384 RR03384 CC723464
Cylinder Certifed Values
Zero NA NA NA
Low NA NA NA
Mid 24 23.7 203
High 24 23.7 203
Cylinder Expiration Date
Zero NA NA NA
Low NA NA NA
Mid 10/19/29 10/19/29 5/17/29
High 10/19/29 10/19/29 5/17/29
Type of Sample Line Heated Sample Line
Parameter
University of Utah - Salt Lake City, UT
Gen 9 Boiler
AST-2024-0023
76 of 97
Response Times
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
O₂ - Outlet CO₂ - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Zero 40 40 50
Low NA NA NA
Mid 45 44 62
High ------
Average 42.5 42.0 56.0
University of Utah - Salt Lake City, UT
Gen 9 Boiler
AST-2024-0023
Parameter
Response Times, seconds
77 of 97
Calibration Data
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
Date:
O₂ - Outlet CO₂ - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Expected Average Concentration 6.00 6.00 10.00
Span Between
Low 6.00 6.00 10.00
High 30.00 30.00 50.00
Desired Span 24.00 23.70 30.00
Low Range Gas
Low NA NA NA
High NA NA NA
Mid Range Gas
Low 9.60 9.48 12.00
High 14.40 14.22 18.00
High Range Gas
Low NA NA NA
High NA NA NA
Actual Concentration (% or ppm)
Zero 0.00 0.00 0.00
Low NA NA NA
Mid 10.00 10.00 15.00
High 24.00 23.70 30.00
Response Time (seconds)42.50 42.00 56.00
Upscale Calibration Gas (CMA)Mid Mid Mid
Instrument Response (% or ppm)
Zero 0.00 0.03 0.01
Low NA NA NA
Mid 10.10 10.05 15.03
High 24.02 23.75 30.20
Performance (% of Span or Cal. Gas Conc.)
Zero 0.00 0.13 0.03
Low NA NA NA
Mid 0.42 0.21 0.10
High 0.08 0.21 0.67
Status
Zero PASS PASS PASS
Low NA NA NA
Mid PASS PASS PASS
High PASS PASS PASS
Gen 9 Boiler
University of Utah - Salt Lake City, UT
Parameter
1/9/24
AST-2024-0023
78 of 97
Bias/Drift Determinations
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
O₂ - Outlet CO₂ - Outlet NOx - Outlet
Run 1 Date 1/9/24
Span Value 24.00 23.70 30.00
Initial Instrument Zero Cal Response 0.00 0.03 0.01
Initial Instrument Upscale Cal Response 10.10 10.05 15.03
Pretest System Zero Response 0.00 0.04 0.01
Posttest System Zero Response 0.00 0.05 0.00
Pretest System Upscale Response 9.99 9.90 15.08
Posttest System Upscale Response 9.98 9.88 15.04
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero 0.00 0.04 0.00
Posttest Zero 0.00 0.08 -0.03
Pretest Span -0.46 -0.63 0.17
Posttest Span -0.50 -0.72 0.03
Drift (%)
Zero 0.00 0.04 -0.03
Mid -0.04 -0.08 -0.13
Run 2 Date 1/9/24
Span Value 24.00 23.70 30.00
Instrument Zero Cal Response 0.00 0.03 0.01
Instrument Upscale Cal Response 10.10 10.05 15.03
Pretest System Zero Response 0.00 0.05 0.00
Posttest System Zero Response 0.00 0.04 0.00
Pretest System Upscale Response 9.98 9.88 15.04
Posttest System Upscale Response 9.97 9.87 15.04
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero 0.00 0.08 -0.03
Posttest Zero 0.00 0.04 -0.03
Pretest Span -0.50 -0.72 0.03
Posttest Span -0.54 -0.76 0.03
Drift (%)
Zero 0.00 -0.04 0.00
Mid -0.04 -0.04 0.00
Run 3 Date 1/9/24
Span Value 24.00 23.70 30.00
Instrument Zero Cal Response 0.00 0.03 0.01
Instrument Upscale Cal Response 10.10 10.05 15.03
Pretest System Zero Response 0.00 0.04 0.00
Posttest System Zero Response 0.01 0.04 0.01
Pretest System Upscale Response 9.97 9.87 15.04
Posttest System Upscale Response 9.96 9.84 15.02
Bias (%)
Pretest Zero 0.00 0.04 -0.03
Posttest Zero 0.04 0.04 0.00
Pretest Span -0.54 -0.76 0.03
Posttest Span -0.58 -0.89 -0.03
Drift (%)
Zero 0.04 0.00 0.03
Mid -0.04 -0.13 -0.07
Parameter
University of Utah - Salt Lake City, UT
Gen 9 Boiler
AST-2024-0023
79 of 97
Balance
Red Ball Technical Gas Service
555 Craig Kennedy Way
Shreveport, LA 71107
800-551-8150
Accreditation #62754 PGVP Vendor ID # G12021
EPA PROTOCOL GAS CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Cylinder Number:RR03384 Certification Date:10/21/2021
Product ID Number:127907 Expiration Date:10/19/2029
Cylinder Pressure:1900 PSIG MFG Facility: - Shreveport - LA
COA #RR03384.20211012-0 Lot Number:RR03384.20211012
Customer PO. NO.:Tracking Number:103923781
Customer:Previous Certification Dates:
This calibration standard has been certified per the May 2012 EPA Traceability Protocol, Document EPA-600/R-12/531,
using procedure G2.
Do Not Use This Cylinder Below 100 psig (0.7 Megapascal).
Certified Concentration(s)
Component Concentration Uncertainty Analytical Principle Assayed On
Carbon Dioxide 23.7 %±0.18 %NDIR 10/21/2021
Oxygen 24.0 %±0.13 %MPA 10/20/2021
Nitrogen
Analytical Measurement Data Available Online.
Reference Standard(s)
Serial Number Lot Expiration Type Balance Component Concentration Uncertainty(%)NIST Reference
CC727782 CC727782.20201022 04/06/2029 GMIS N2 O2 20.03 %0.115 SRM 2659a
EB0039149 EB0039149.20190610 11/24/2027 GMIS N2 CO2 24.75 %0.274 C1579010.02
EB0078072 EB0078072.20180504 07/21/2026 GMIS N2 O2 24 %0.497 071001
EB0100923 EB0100923.20201022 05/19/2029 GMIS N2 CO2 19.47 %0.171 C1847810.03
Analytical Instrumentation SMART-CERT
Component Principle Make MPC Date
O2 MPA Thermo 10/01/2021
CO2 NDIR Thermo 10/19/2021
Serial
1162980025
1162980025
This is to certify the gases referenced have been calibrated/tested, and verified to meet the defined specifications. This
calibration/test was performed using Gases or Scales that are traceable through National Institute of Standards and
Technology (NIST) to the International System of Units (SI). The basis of compliance stated is a comparison of the
measurement parameters to the specified or required calibration/testing process. The expanded uncertainties use a coverage
factor of k=2 to approximate the 95% confidence level of the measurement, unless otherwise noted. This calibration certificate
applies only to the item described and shall not be reproduced other than in full, without written approval from Red Ball
Technical Gas Services. If not included, the uncertainty of calibrations are available upon request and were taken into account
when determining pass or fail.
Brittany Johnson
Analytical Chemist
Assay Laboratory: Red Ball TGS
Version 02-J, Revised on 2018-09-17
Model
410i
410i
80 of 97
Balance
Red Ball Technical Gas Service
555 Craig Kennedy Way
Shreveport, LA 71107
800-551-8150
Accreditation #62754 PGVP Vendor ID # G12021
EPA PROTOCOL GAS CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Cylinder Number:CC723464 Certification Date:05/19/2021
Product ID Number:125724 Expiration Date:05/17/2029
Cylinder Pressure:1750 PSIG MFG Facility: - Shreveport - LA
COA #CC723464.20210430-0 Lot Number:CC723464.20210430
Customer PO. NO.:Tracking Number:098502019
Customer:Previous Certification Dates:
This calibration standard has been certified per the May 2012 EPA Traceability Protocol, Document EPA-600/R-12/531,
using procedure G1.
Do Not Use This Cylinder Below 100 psig (0.7 Megapascal).
Certified Concentration(s)
Component Concentration Uncertainty Analytical Principle Assayed On
Carbon Monoxide 205.1 PPM ±0.8 PPM FTIR 05/05/2021
Nitric Oxide 203 PPM ±1.5 PPM Chemiluminescence 05/12/2021, 05/19/2021
Sulfur Dioxide 199 PPM ±1.4 PPM NDIR 05/05/2021, 05/18/2021
Total Oxides of Nitrogen 204 PPM
Nitrogen
Analytical Measurement Data Available Online.
Reference Standard(s)
Serial Number Lot Expiration Type Balance Component Concentration Uncertainty(%)NIST Reference
AAL046966 AAL046966.20191115 04/22/2028 GMIS N2 NO 964 PPM 0.489 SRM 2630
CC712935 CC712935.20201221 04/27/2029 GMIS N2 NO 284 PPM 0.518 SRM 1687b
EB0003515 EB0003515.20191025 04/28/2028 GMIS N2 CO 346 PPM 0.345 SRM 1680b
EB0038537 EB0038537.20170428 09/06/2025 GMIS N2 SO2 299 PPM 0.502 1662a
EB0078147 EB0078147.20191115 04/21/2028 GMIS N2 NO 595 PPM 0.503 SRM 2630
EB0078766 EB0078766.20190205 04/28/2028 GMIS N2 CO 200.4 PPM 0.421 SRM 1680b
EB0081035 EB0081035.20170428 09/06/2025 GMIS N2 SO2 925 PPM 0.428 1662a
Analytical Instrumentation SMART-CERT
Component Principle Make MPC Date
CO FTIR MKS 04/21/2021
SO2 NDIR Horiba 04/23/2021
NO Chemiluminescence Thermo 04/23/2021
NO Chemiluminescence Thermo 04/26/20211192604297
SO2 FTIR MKS 05/10/2021017146467
Serial
017146467
G000G2A
1192604297
This is to certify the gases referenced have been calibrated/tested, and verified to meet the defined specifications. This
calibration/test was performed using Gases or Scales that are traceable through National Institute of Standards and
Technology (NIST) to the International System of Units (SI). The basis of compliance stated is a comparison of the
measurement parameters to the specified or required calibration/testing process. The expanded uncertainties use a coverage
factor of k=2 to approximate the 95% confidence level of the measurement, unless otherwise noted. This calibration certificate
applies only to the item described and shall not be reproduced other than in full, without written approval from Red Ball
Technical Gas Services. If not included, the uncertainty of calibrations are available upon request and were taken into account
when determining pass or fail.
Jasmine Godfrey
Analytical Chemist
Assay Laboratory: Red Ball TGS
Version 02-J, Revised on 2018-09-17
Model
MKS 2031DJG2EKVS13T
VIA-510 SO2
42iQ-HL
MKS 2031DJG2EKVS13T
42iQ-HL
81 of 97
Location:
Project No.:
Analyzer Make THERMO Pre-Test Date 1/8/24 Time 12:28
Analyzer Model 42iQ Pre-Test Concentration, ppm 43.08
Serial Number 1.233E+11 Pre-Test Efficiency, %90
Cylinder ID Number CC509482 Post-Test Date --Time --
Cylinder Exp. Date 3/20/26 Post-Test Concentration, ppm --
Cylinder Concentration, ppm 47.8 Post-Test Efficiency, %-
*Required Efficiency is ≥ 90 %.
University of Utah - Salt Lake City, UT
2024-0023
NO2 Converter Check - Outlet
82 of 97
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Grade of Product: EPA PROTOCOL STANDARD
Part Number: E03NI94E15W0005 Reference Number: 153-402667045-1
Cylinder Number: CC509482 Cylinder Volume: 145.0 CF
Laboratory: 124 - Tooele (SAP) - UT Cylinder Pressure: 2015 PSIG
PGVP Number: B72023 Valve Outlet: 660
Gas Code:NO2,O2,BALN Certification Date: Mar 20, 2023
Expiration Date:Mar 20, 2026
Certification performed in accordance with “EPA Traceability Protocol for Assay and Certification of Gaseous Calibration Standards (May 2012)” document EPA
600/R-12/531, using the assay procedures listed. Analytical Methodology does not require correction for analytical interference. This cylinder has a total analytical
uncertainty as stated below with a confidence level of 95%. There are no significant impurities which affect the use of this calibration mixture. All concentrations are on a
mole/mole basis unless otherwise noted. The results relate only to the items tested. The report shall not be reproduced except in full without approval of the laboratory. Do
Not Use This Cylinder below 100 psig, i.e. 0.7 megapascals.
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Component Requested Actual Protocol Total Relative Assay
Concentration Concentration Method Uncertainty Dates
NITROGEN DIOXIDE 50.00 PPM 47.80 PPM G1 +/- 2.0% NIST Traceable 03/13/2023, 03/20/2023
OXYGEN 5.000 %5.004 %G1 +/- 0.7% NIST Traceable 03/13/2023
NITROGEN Balance
CALIBRATION STANDARDS
Type Lot ID Cylinder No Concentration Uncertainty Expiration Date
GMIS 12397 CC511358 59.32 PPM NITROGEN DIOXIDE/NITROGEN +/- 1.4%Dec 17, 2024
NTRM 14060629 CC436987 4.794 % OXYGEN/NITROGEN 0.4%Oct 29, 2025
ANALYTICAL EQUIPMENT
Instrument/Make/Model Analytical Principle Last Multipoint Calibration
MKS FTIR NO2 018143349 FTIR Mar 09, 2023
Horiba MPA-510 W603MM58 O2 O2 Paramagnetic (Mason)Mar 09, 2023
Triad Data Available Upon Request
Airgas Specialty Gases
Airgas USA LLC
525 North Industrial Loop Road
Tooele, UT 84074
Airgas.com
Signature on file
Approved for Release Page 1 of 1
83 of 97
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
Date
EPA
O2
SERVOMEX
4900
100269
25.0
Cylinder Number ID
Zero NA
Mid RR03686
High RR03384
Cylinder Certified Values
Zero 0.0
Mid 10.98
High 24
Instrument Response (% or ppm)
Zero 0.0
Mid 11.0
High 23.9
Calibration Gas Selection (% of Span)
Mid 43.9
High 96.0
Calibration Error Performance (% of Span)
Zero 0.0
Mid 0.0
High -0.2
Linearity (% of Range)
0.1
(%) lpm (%)(%)(%)(%)(%)(%)(%)( ± 2 %)
10L/5L 80.0 5.0 19.2 19.2 19.3 19.3 19.1 19.23 0.03 0.1%
10L/5L 50.0 5.0 12.0 12.0 12.1 12.1 12.1 12.10 0.10 0.9%
10L/1L 20.0 4.0 4.8 4.8 4.9 4.8 4.8 4.84 0.04 0.9%
10L/1L 10.0 4.0 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.4 2.5 2.45 0.05 1.9%
(%)( ± 2 %)( ± 2 %)( ± 2 %)
19.23 0.2%0.3% -0.5%
12.10 0.1%0.3% -0.4%
4.84 1.0% -0.9% -0.1%
2.45 0.5% -0.7% 0.1%
Mid-Level Supply Gas Calibration Direct to Analyzer
Calibration Injection 1 Injection 2 Injection 3 Average
Gas Analyzer Analyzer Analyzer Analyzer
Concentration Concentration Concentration Concentration Concentration
(%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%)( ± 2 %)
10.98 11.0 11.0 11.0 10.99 0.01 0.1%
Analyzer Make: SERVOMEX
University of Utah - Salt Lake City, UT
Unit 1 - Solar Taurus 70 CoGen (Turbine and WHRU Duct Burner)
2024-0023
1/1/83
Parameter
Make
Model
S/N
Span
Method Criteria
Analyzer Model: 4900
Analyzer SN: 100269
Environics ID: 8027
Component/Balance Gas: O2/N2
Cylinder Gas ID (Dilution): RR03384
Cylinder Gas Concentration (Dilution), %: 24
*Not all AST Environics Units have 2-10L Mass Flow Controllers. For these units the 90% @ 7lpm and 80% @ 7lpm injections will not be conducted.
Cylinder Gas ID (Mid-Level): RR03686
Cylinder Gas Concentration (Mid-Level), %: 10.98
Target Mass Flow
Contollers
Target
Dilution
Target Flow
Rate
Target
Concentration
Actual
Concentration
Injection 1
Analyzer
Concentration
Injection 2
Analyzer
Concentration
Injection 3
Analyzer
Concentration
Average
Analyzer
Concentration Difference Average Error
Average
Analyzer
Concentration
Injection 1
Error
Injection 2
Error
Injection 3
Error
Difference
Average
Error
84 of 97
Issuing Department
Dilution System Make:
Dilution System Model:
Dilution System S/N:
Calibration Equipment Make:
Calibration Equipment Model:
Calibration Equipment S/N:
Flow Cell S/N:
Flow Cell S/N:
Calibration Gas:
Barometric Pressure, mmHg:
Ambient Temperature, °F:
Mass Flow Controller ID
Size, ccm:
Make:
Model:
S/N:
Set Flow True Flow Difference Set Flow True Flow Difference Set Flow True Flow Difference
cc/min cc/min cc/min cc/min cc/min cc/min
5%500 508 1.6%500 504 0.8%50 50 0.6%
10%1,000 1,024 2.4%1,000 1,020 2.0%100 101 0.7%
20%2,000 2,057 2.8%2,000 2,048 2.4%200 203 1.6%
30%3,000 3,079 2.6%3,000 3,073 2.4%300 305 1.8%
40%4,000 4,104 2.6%4,000 4,094 2.4%400 407 1.6%
50%5,000 5,113 2.3%5,000 5,107 2.1%500 507 1.4%
60%6,000 6,129 2.1%6,000 6,120 2.0%600 609 1.5%
70%7,000 7,136 1.9%7,000 7,134 1.9%700 711 1.6%
80%8,000 8,145 1.8%8,000 8,152 1.9%800 813 1.7%
90%9,000 9,162 1.8%9,000 9,171 1.9%900 917 1.9%
100%10,000 10,193 1.9%10,000 10,189 1.9%1,000 1,022 2.2%
Date:
Document ID
Revision
Effective Date
Page
620.009
22.0
12/16/22
1 of 1
Mass Flow Controller Calibration
Tech Services
8027
Alicat Scientific
M-10SLPD/5MM-D/5M, M-1SLPM-D/5M
127208/127206
127208
127206
Nitrogen
Calibration Performed By:RJL
3/31/2023
0455242007
Note: The mass flow controller's calibration values are used by the dilution system's operating software to improve accuracy. These calibrations are not necessarily
indicative of the systems overall performance. Performance is verified by conducting a Method 205 prior to each field use.
0455242008 0455238004
Environics
EFC 202
10,000
# 2 # 3
Environics
1,000
Environics
EFC 202 EFC 202
#1
10,000
Environics
25.76
66
4040
85 of 97
Balance
Red Ball Technical Gas Service
555 Craig Kennedy Way
Shreveport, LA 71107
800-551-8150
Accreditation #62754 PGVP Vendor ID # G12023
EPA PROTOCOL GAS CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Cylinder Number:RR03686 Certification Date:09/21/2023
Product ID Number:125371 Expiration Date:09/19/2031
Cylinder Pressure:1900 PSIG MFG Facility: - Shreveport - LA
COA #RR03686.20230831-0 Lot Number:RR03686.20230831
Customer PO. NO.:Tracking Number:107553544
Customer:Previous Certification Dates:
This calibration standard has been certified per the May 2012 EPA Traceability Protocol, Document EPA-600/R-12/531,
using procedure G1.
Do Not Use This Cylinder Below 100 psig (0.7 Megapascal).
Certified Concentration(s)
Component Concentration Uncertainty Analytical Principle Assayed On
Carbon Dioxide 10.9 %±0.11 %FTIR 09/21/2023
Oxygen 10.98 %±0.03 %MPA 09/18/2023
Nitrogen
Analytical Measurement Data Available Online.
Reference Standard(s)
Serial Number Lot Expiration Type Balance Component Concentration Uncertainty(%)NIST Reference
CC737012 CC737012.20230228 07/09/2031 GMIS N2 O2 20 %0.112 SRM 2659a
EB0022021 EB0022021.20180323 07/15/2026 GMIS N2 CO2 14.9 %0.777 101001
Analytical Instrumentation SMART-CERT
Component Principle Make MPC Date
O2 MPA Thermo 09/18/2023
CO2 FTIR MKS 09/21/2023
Serial
1162980025
017146467
This is to certify the gases referenced have been calibrated/tested, and verified to meet the defined specifications. This
calibration/test was performed using Gases or Scales that are traceable through National Institute of Standards and
Technology (NIST) to the International System of Units (SI). The basis of compliance stated is a comparison of the
measurement parameters to the specified or required calibration/testing process. The expanded uncertainties use a coverage
factor of k=2 to approximate the 95% confidence level of the measurement, unless otherwise noted. This calibration certificate
applies only to the item described and shall not be reproduced other than in full, without written approval from Red Ball
Technical Gas Services. If not included, the uncertainty of calibrations are available upon request and were taken into account
when determining pass or fail.
Jasmine Godfrey
Analytical Chemist
Assay Laboratory: Red Ball TGS
Version 02-J, Revised on 2018-09-17
Model
410i
MKS 2031DJG2EKVS13T
86 of 97
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
Date:
Time O2 CO2 CO NOx
(%) (%) (ppm) (ppm)
A-1 12:48 12.55 4.87 12.70 10.43
2 12:50 12.60 4.83 12.59 10.40
3 12:52 12.60 4.83 12.57 10.43
4 12:54 12.61 4.82 12.33 10.50
5 12:56 12.67 4.80 12.33 10.26
6 12:58 12.59 4.85 12.42 10.53
B-1 13:00 12.59 4.84 12.44 10.58
2 13:02 12.59 4.84 12.49 10.60
3 13:04 12.47 4.91 12.61 10.95
4 13:06 12.53 4.88 12.71 10.82
5 13:08 12.46 4.92 12.45 11.09
6 13:10 12.43 4.93 12.92 .11.17
12.6 4.9 12.5 10.6
Single Point Single Point Single Point Single Point
University of Utah - Salt Lake City, UT
Unit 1 - Solar Taurus 70 CoGen (Turbine and WHRU Duct Burner)
AST-2024-0023
1/8/2024
Average
Criteria Met
Traverse Point
87 of 97
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
Date:
Time O2 CO2 NOx
(%) (%) (ppm)
A-1 12:13 11.82 5.17 4.22
2 12:15 12.09 5.05 4.23
3 12:17 12.19 4.99 4.22
12.0 5.1 4.2
Single Point Single Point Single Point
University of Utah - Salt Lake City, UT
Unit 6
AST-2024-0023
1/10/2024
Average
Criteria Met
Traverse Point
88 of 97
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
Date:
Time O2 CO2 NOx
(%) (%) (ppm)
A-1 8:31 11.54 5.35 4.28
2 8:34 11.75 5.24 4.20
3 8:37 11.61 5.32 4.24
11.6 5.3 4.2
Single Point Single Point Single Point
University of Utah - Salt Lake City, UT
Unit 7
AST-2024-0023
1/10/2024
Average
Criteria Met
Traverse Point
89 of 97
Location:
Source:
Project No.:
Date:
Time O2 CO2 NOx
(%) (%) (ppm)
A-1 12:50 11.85 5.19 4.08
2 12:52 12.74 4.71 3.48
3 12:54 11.95 5.13 4.16
12.2 5.0 3.9
Single Point Single Point Single Point
University of Utah - Salt Lake City, UT
Gen 9 Boiler
AST-2024-0023
1/9/2024
Average
Criteria Met
Traverse Point
90 of 97

Appendix D

91 of 97
Attachment A University of Utah - High Temperature Water Plant
2024 Stack Testing Observation Data
Burns & McDonnell
Field Measurements - Monday January 8 2024
Time (hrs) Total (scf / hour) BTU/scf
Input
(MMBtu/hr) Total (scf / hour) BTU/scf
Input
(MMBtu/hr)
12:45 PM --68,756 1,045 72 14,383 1,042 15
1:00 PM 0.25 68,728 1,048 72 19,700 1,048 21
1:15 PM 0.25 66,402 1,044 69 19,632 1,047 21
1:30 PM 0.25 69,113 1,047 72 17,913 1,042 19
1:45 PM 0.25 69,072 1,043 72 28,487 1,044 30
2:00 PM 0.25 66,361 1,045 69 21,313 1,043 22
2:15 PM 0.25 68,921 1,042 72 19,440 1,043 20
2:30 PM 0.25 68,897 1,045 72 24,600 1,044 26
2:45 PM 0.25 68,865 1,042 72 15,700 1,041 16
3:00 PM 0.25 68,841 1,041 72 20,672 1,042 22
3:15 PM 0.25 68,964 1,044 72 18,838 1,046 20
3:30 PM 0.25 68,948 1,041 72 18,768 1,048 20
3:45 PM 0.25 68,980 1,040 72 18,754 1,043 20
4:00 PM 0.25 68,993 1,046 72 18,947 1,044 20
4:15 PM 0.25 68,725 1,041 72 15,697 1,047 16
Average Run Values - Turbine Average Run Values - Duct Burner
Summary
Average Fuel Use
(SCF/hr)
Average Fuel Use
(MMBtu)
Average Fuel Use
(SCF/hr)
Average Fuel Use
(MMBtu/hr)
Run 1 68414.2 71.5 1,044 20.92
Run 2 68376.9 71.3 20,345 21.22
Run 3 68922.0 71.8 1,046 19.03
Run 3 - 3:14 PM
Time
Duct Burner Meter Reading
Run 1 - 12:48 PM
Run 2 - 2:03 PM
92 of 97
Attachment A University of Utah - High Temperature Water Plant
2024 Stack Testing Observation Data
Burns & McDonnell
Field Measurements - Tuesday, January 9, 2024
Time (hrs) Total (scf/hour) BTU/scf
Input
(MMBtu/hr)
8:45 AM --66,437 1,047 69.56
9:00 AM 0.25 69,094 1,041 71.91
9:15 AM 0.25 69,045 1,044 72.08
9:30 AM 0.25 69,037 1,045 72.12
9:45 AM 0.25 69,036 1,044 72.09
10:00 AM 0.25 69,053 1,043 72.03
10:15 AM 0.25 69,028 1,045 72.13
10:30 AM 0.25 69,048 1,046 72.21
10:45 AM 0.25 69,035 1,047 72.26
11:00 AM 0.25 69,039 1,047 72.25
11:15 AM 0.25 69,040 1,047 72.26
11:30 AM 0.25 69,047 1,044 72.11
11:45 AM 0.25 69,054 1,046 72.24
12:00 PM 0.25 69,057 1,045 72.16
12:15 PM 0.25 68,998 1,048 72.31
Average Run Values
Summary
Average Fuel Use
(SCF/hour)
Average Fuel Use
(MMBtu/hr)
Run 1 68,530 72.1
Run 2 69,041 72.3
Run 3 69,039 72.3
Time
Run 1 - 8:44 AM
Run 2 - 9:58 PM
Run 3 - 11:09 AM
93 of 97
Attachment A University of Utah - High Temperature Water Plant
2024 Stack Testing Observation Data
Burns & McDonnell
Field Measurements - Tuesday, January 9, 2023
Use (lb/hr) USE (SCF/hr)
Heat Input
(MMBtu/hr)*Load (%) Load MMBtu/hr
12:50 PM 1,360 29,525 30.12 42.09 26.39
1:05 PM 1,331 28,900 29.48 39.95 24.94
1:20 PM 1,363 29,594 30.19 41.60 25.81
1:35 PM 1,345 29,204 29.79 40.90 24.25
1:55 PM 1,271 27,597 28.15 38.70 26.28
2:05 PM 1,299 28,205 28.77 39.40 24.51
2:20 PM 1,216 26,403 26.93 37.10 23.10
2:35 PM 1,144 24,839 25.34 34.90 21.74
2:50 PM 1,102 23,927 24.41 33.60 20.99
3:05 PM 1,190 25,838 26.35 36.40 21.74
3:20 PM 1,138 24,709 25.20 34.60 22.99
3:35 PM 1,118 24,275 24.76 33.80 20.84
3:50 PM 1,020 22,147 22.59 31.10 19.63
4:05 PM 1,105 23,993 24.47 33.80 20.01
4:15 PM 1,191 25,860 26.38 33.20 21.00
Average Run Values
Summary
Average Fuel Use
(lb/hr)
Average Fuel Use
(Scf/hr)
Average Heat
Input
(MMBtu/hr)*
Average Load
(%)
Average Load
(Btu)
Run 1 1,328 28,824 29.54 40.65 25.53
Run 2 1,190 25,843 26.66 36.68 23.06
Run 3 1,114 24,197 24.96 33.82 21.04
*Operators expressed uncertainty with system viewer values expressing they may not be reporting the correct fuel usageuse.
Time
Generator 9 Load
Run 1 - 12:50 PM
Run 2 - 2:02 PM
Run 3 - 2:403:13 PM
94 of 97
Attachment A University of Utah - High Temperature Water Plant
2024 Stack Testing Observation Data
Burns & McDonnell
Field Measurements - Wednesday, January 10, 2024
Use (scfh)Heat Input
(MMBtu/hr)Load (%) Load MMBtu/hr
8:30 AM 18,528 18.90 41.30 15.00
8:45 AM 18,682 19.06 41.40 14.61
9:00 AM 17,709 18.06 39.10 15.50
9:15 AM 18,321 18.69 40.40 15.56
9:30 AM 17,844 18.20 39.10 15.27
9:45 AM 18,249 18.61 39.80 15.22
10:00 AM 17,501 17.85 38.40 14.81
10:15 AM 18,065 18.43 39.80 15.02
10:30 AM 18,244 18.61 40.40 14.85
10:45 AM 19,184 19.57 42.40 16.40
11:00 AM 19,940 20.34 43.90 16.79
11:15 AM 20,769 21.18 45.90 17.25
11:30 AM 20,847 21.26 46.00 17.43
11:45 AM 20,914 21.33 46.10 17.96
12:00 AM 20,606 21.02 45.30 17.13
Average Run Values
Summary
Average Fuel Use
(SCF)
Average Heat
Input
(MMBtu/hr)
Average Load
(%)
Average Load
(Btu)
Run 1 18,217 18.9 41.30 15.00
Run 2 18,249 18.4 39.50 15.18
Run 3 20,615 20.5 44.29 16.83
Time
Boiler Unit 7 Load
Run 2 - 9:44 AM
Run 3 - 11:01 AM
Run 1 - 8:31 AM
95 of 97
Attachment A University of Utah - High Temperature Water Plant
2024 Stack Testing Observation Data
Burns & McDonnell
Field Measurements - Wednesday, January 10, 2023
Use (scfh)Heat Input
(MMBtu/hr)Load (%)Load
(MMBtu)
12:15 PM 17,897 18.3 38.60% 17.38
12:30 PM 18,008 28.0 38.60% 17.72
12:45 PM 17,790 18.1 38.40% 17.13
1:00 PM 18,314 18.7 39.50% 17.32
1:15 PM 17,620 18.0 37.90% 17.36
1:30 PM 17,150 17.5 37.00% 17.10
1:45 PM 17,368 17.7 37.50% 16.62
2:00 PM 17,232 17.6 37.20% 16.17
2:15 PM 17,295 17.6 37.00% 16.50
2:30 PM 15,399 15.7 33.10% 15.80
2:45 PM 18,595 19.0 40.60% 17.73
3:00 PM 20,283 20.7 43.70% 18.55
3:15 PM 19,206 19.6 41.30% 18.37
3:30 PM 19,259 19.6 41.50% 18.12
3:45 PM 20,611 21.0 45.10% 19.65
Average Run Values
Summary
Average Fuel Use
(SCF)
Average Heat
Input
(MMBtu/hr)
Average Load
(%)
Average Load
(Btu)
Run 1 17,926 20.1 38.28% 17.33
Run 2 16,889 17.5 37.08% 16.56
Run 3 19,591 20.0 42.44% 18.48
Time
Boiler Unit 6 Load
Run 1 - 12:13 PM
Run 2 - 1:26 PM
Run 3 - 2:37 PM
96 of 97
Last Page of Report
97 of 97
NOx & CO CoGen Combined 2024
Reference Methods 2, 3A, 6C, 7E, 10, & 19
Source Information
Company Name University of Utah
Company Contact:Bryan Cracroft
Contact Phone No.[phone]
Stack Designation:Solar Taurus 70 CoGen (Combined)
Test & Review Dates
Test Date:1/8/2024 &
Review Date: 2/29/2024
Observer:unobserved
Reviewer:Paul Morris
Emission Limits Emission Rates
SO2 NOX CO SO2 NOX CO
lbs./MMBtu
lbs./hr. 9.0 10.8 2.586 1.796
ppm 15.0 30.00 7.647 8.727
Percent
%O2 Correction as a whole #15.00 15.00
Test Information Heat Input
Stack I.D. inches As ft^2 Y Dl H @ Cp Pbar Pq (static)
fuel flow rate
(Btu/hr.)
Heat Input
(Btu/hr.)
53.00 15.321
Contractor Information
Contact: Charles Horton
Contracting Company: Alliance Technical Group, LLC
Address: 3683 W 2270 S, Suite E West Valley City, UT 84120
Phone No.: [phone]
Project No.:
8710

Division of Air Quality
Instrumental Reference Methods - Gaseous Measurements
Round
Method 19 - F factors for Coal, Oil, and Gas
Fd Fw Fc
scf/MMBtu scf/MMBtu scf/MMBtu
Diluent
F factor used
O2
CO2
Anthrocite 2
Bituminous 2
Lignite
Natural
Propane
Butane
10100
COAL
OIL
GAS
9780
9860
9190
8710
8710
8710
10540
10640
11950
320
10610
10200
10390
1970
1800
1910
1420
1040
1190
1250
Wet CEM
Correct For O2
CO2 Interference w/CO
Yes
Yes
Yes
NOx & CO CoGen Combined 2024
Division of Air Quality
NSPS Relative Accuracy Performance Specification Test - CEMS Certification
University of Utah
Solar Taurus 70 CoGen (Combined)
Average Emission
Dry SO2 NOX CO
lbs./MMbtu 0.028 0.020 Average % concentration
lbs./hr.2.59 1.80 CO2 O2
ppm corrected for %O2 7.65 8.73 4.87 12.46
Run 1 Enter O2 or CO2
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)2.77E-02 1.95E-02 E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 1.284E-06 9.067E-07
lbs./hr.2.55 1.80 4.86 12.45
ppm corrected for %O2 7.51 8.71 4.88 12.53
Run 2
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)2.84E-02 1.94E-02 E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 1.324E-06 9.047E-07
lbs./hr.2.62 1.79 4.89 12.41
ppm corrected for %O2 7.70 8.65 4.88 12.51 Raw Value
Run 3
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)2.85E-02 1.98E-02 E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 1.312E-06 9.105E-07
lbs./hr.2.58 1.79 4.85 12.52
ppm corrected for %O2 7.73 8.818 4.96 12.61 Raw Value
Run 4
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft
lbs./hr.
ppm corrected for %O2 Raw Value
Run 5
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft
lbs./hr.
ppm corrected for %O2 Raw Value
C For Cal Drift
Raw Value
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
O2
CO2
Clear
lbs./MMBTU
NOx & CO CoGen Combined 2024
Calibration Error Test
Test Date January 8, 2024 O2
CS - Cal. Span 24.00
Units %
Cylinder No. Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% Passed Cal.
RR03384 10/19/29 Mid-level 10.00 10.12 0.12 0.50% Passed Cal.
High-level 24.00 24.01 0.01 0.04% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of CS - Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 41.67%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date January 8, 2024 CO2
CS - Cal. Span 23.70
Units %
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.127% Passed Cal.
RR03384 10/19/29 Mid-level 10.00 10.03 0.03 0.127% Passed Cal.
High-level 23.70 23.74 0.04 0.169% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 42.19%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date SO2
CS - Cal. Span
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level
Mid-level
High-level
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level
100% of Cal. Span High-level
Test Date January 8, 2024 NOx
CS - Cal. Span 50.00
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% Passed Cal.
CC723464 05/17/29 Mid-level 25.00 24.99 0.01 0.020% Passed Cal.
High-level 50.00 49.76 0.24 0.480% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 50.00%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date January 8, 2024 CO
10.84 CS - Cal. Span 50.00
30 Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 -0.02 0.02 0.040% Passed Cal.
CC723464 05/17/29 Mid-level 25.00 25.02 0.02 0.040% Passed Cal.
High-level 50.00 50.05 0.05 0.100% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 50.00%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
NOx & CO CoGen Combined 2024
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review of
University of Utah
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 Solar Taurus 70 CoGen (Combined)
CS Calibration Span 50.00 50.00 23.70 24.00
Units ppm ppm ppm % % Unprotected
CV - Cylinder Value: SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 25.00 25.00 10.00 10.00
High-Level 50.00 50.00 23.70 24.00
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 50.0% 50.0% 42.2% 41.7%
100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CDir CMA 25.00 25.00 10.00 10.00
Calibration Error Test
Cs - Measured Concentration SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 -0.02 0.03 0.00
Mid-Level 24.99 25.02 10.03 10.12
High-Level 49.76 50.05 23.74 24.01
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 24.99 25.02 10.03 10.12
Low-Level 0.00% 0.04% 0.13% 0.00%
ppmdv Difference 0 0.02 0.03 0
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 0.02% 0.04% 0.13% 0.50%
ppmdv Difference 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.12
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 0.48% 0.10% 0.17% 0.04%
ppmdv Difference 0.24 0.05 0.04 0.01
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.24 -0.17 0.05 0.03 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.48% 0.30% 0.08% 0.13%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.24 0.15 0.02 0.03
Pass or Failed Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 25.05 25.52 9.94 10.05
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 0.12% 1.00% 0.38% 0.29%
Difference TRUE 0.06 0.50 0.09 0.07
Pass or Failed Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:1/8/2024 SO2
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX
10.9 12.47 4.9 12.5 CO
0.0% 21.7% 24.9% 20.6% 52.2% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.09 -0.32 0.09 0.08 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.18% 0.60% 0.25% 0.33%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.1
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 24.98 24.97 9.98 10.10
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 0.02% 0.10% 0.21% 0.08%
Difference TRUE 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift TRUE 0.30% 0.30% 0.17% 0.21% Drift
Difference TRUE 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.1 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift TRUE 0.10% 0.90% 0.17% 0.21%
Difference TRUE 0.1 0.6 0.0 0.0
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass
Solar Taurus 70 CoGen (Combined) Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
15.321 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.86 12.45 82.69 29.28 29.28
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws #NUM!
0.0000 #DIV/0! 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs
(ft/sec.)Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat Input
Btu/hr Low Mid High
92.2399996 Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final
Vf
Initial
Vi
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
CO Calibration Gas
Failed Bias Dialog
NOx & CO CoGen Combined 2024
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review of
University of Utah
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 Solar Taurus 70 CoGen (Combined)
CS Calibration Span 50.00 50.00 23.70 24.00
Units ppm ppm ppm % %
CV - Cylinder Value:SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 25.00 25.00 10.00 10.00
High-Level 50.00 50.00 23.70 24.00
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 50.0% 50.0% 42.2% 41.7%
100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CMA 25.00 25.00 10.00 10.00
Calibration Error Test
Measured Concentration SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 -0.02 0.03 0.00
Mid-Level 24.99 25.02 10.03 10.12
High-Level 49.76 50.05 23.74 24.01
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 24.99 25.02 10.03 10.12
Low-Level 0.00% 0.04% 0.13% 0.00%
ppmdv Difference 0 0.02 0.03 0
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 0.02% 0.04% 0.13% 0.50%
ppmdv Difference 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.12
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 0.48% 0.10% 0.17% 0.04%
ppmdv Difference 0.24 0.05 0.04 0.01
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.09 -0.32 0.09 0.08 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.18% 0.60% 0.25% 0.33%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.09 0.3 0.06 0.08
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 24.98 24.97 9.98 10.10
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 0.02% 0.10% 0.21% 0.08%
Difference TRUE 0.01 0.05 0.05 0.02
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:1/8/2024 SO2
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX
11.1 12.18 5.0 12.5 CO
0.0% 22.2% 24.4% 20.9% 52.1% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.08 -0.41 0.13 0.09 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.16% 0.78% 0.42% 0.38%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.1 0.4 0.1 0.1
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 24.89 24.71 10.03 10.09
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 0.20% 0.62% 0.00% 0.12%
Difference TRUE 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift TRUE 0.02% 0.18% 0.17% 0.04% Response Spec.
Difference TRUE 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift TRUE 0.18% 0.52% 0.21% 0.04%
Difference TRUE 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.0
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass
Solar Taurus 70 CoGen (Combined) Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
15.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.89 12.41 82.70 29.28 29.28
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws
0.0000 #DIV/0! 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat Input
Btu/hr Low Mid High
92.3594979 Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final
Vf
Initial
Vi
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
Failed Bias Dialog
NOx & CO CoGen Combined 2024
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review of
University of Utah
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 Solar Taurus 70 CoGen (Combined)
CS Calibration Span 50.00 50.00 23.70 24.00
Units ppm ppm ppm % %
CV - Cylinder Value:SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 25.00 25.00 10.00 10.00
High-Level 50.00 50.00 23.70 24.00
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 50.0% 50.0% 42.2% 41.7%
100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CMA 25.00 25.00 10.00 10.00
Calibration Error Test
Measured Concentration SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 -0.02 0.03 0.00
Mid-Level 24.99 25.02 10.03 10.12
High-Level 49.76 50.05 23.74 24.01
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 24.99 25.02 10.03 10.12
Low-Level 0.00% 0.04% 0.13% 0.00%
ppmv Difference 0 0.02 0.03 0
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 0.02% 0.04% 0.13% 0.50%
ppmv Difference 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.12
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 0.48% 0.10% 0.17% 0.04%
ppmv Difference 0.24 0.05 0.04 0.01
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.08 -0.41 0.13 0.09 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.16% 0.78% 0.42% 0.38%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.08 0.39 0.1 0.09
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 24.89 24.71 10.03 10.09
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 0.20% 0.62% 0.00% 0.12%
Difference TRUE 0.1 0.31 0 0.03
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:1/8/2024 SO2
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX
11.0 12.15 5.0 12.6 CO
0.0% 22.0% 24.3% 20.9% 52.5% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.08 -0.50 0.18 0.10 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.16% 0.96% 0.63% 0.42%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.1 0.5 0.2 0.1
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 25.04 24.71 10.10 10.09
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 0.10% 0.62% 0.30% 0.12%
Difference TRUE 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift TRUE 0.00% 0.18% 0.21% 0.04% Response Spec.
Difference TRUE 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift TRUE 0.10% 0.00% 0.30% 0.00%
Difference TRUE 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass
Solar Taurus 70 CoGen (Combined) Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
15.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.85 12.52 82.63 29.28 29.28
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws
0.0000 #DIV/0! 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat Input
Btu/hr Low Mid High
90.6948348 Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final
Vf
Initial
Vi
1
2
3
4
5
6 FT```
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Bias Dialog
NOx & CO CoGen Turbine 2024
Reference Methods 2, 3A, 6C, 7E, 10, & 19
Source Information
Company Name University of Utah
Company Contact:Bryan Cracroft
Contact Phone No.[phone]
Stack Designation:Solar Taurus 70 CoGen (Turbine only)
Test & Review Dates
Test Date:1/9/2024 &
Review Date: 2/28/2024
Observer:unobserved
Reviewer:Paul Morris
Emission Limits Emission Rates
SO2 NOX CO SO2 NOX CO
lbs./MMBtu
lbs./hr. 2.7 4.5 1.024 0.164
ppm 9.0 25.00 3.870 1.020
Percent
%O2 Correction as a whole #15.00 15.00
Test Information Heat Input
Stack I.D. inches As ft^2 Y Dl H @ Cp Pbar Pq (static)
fuel flow rate
(Btu/hr.)
Heat Input
(Btu/hr.)
53.00 15.321
Contractor Information
Contact: Charles Horton
Contracting Company: Alliance Technical Group, LLC
Address: 3683 W 2270 S, Suite E West Valley City, UT 84120
Phone No.: [phone]
Project No.:
8710

Division of Air Quality
Instrumental Reference Methods - Gaseous Measurements
Round
Method 19 - F factors for Coal, Oil, and Gas
Fd Fw Fc
scf/MMBtu scf/MMBtu scf/MMBtu
Diluent
F factor used
O2
CO2
Anthrocite 2
Bituminous 2
Lignite
Natural
Propane
Butane
10100
COAL
OIL
GAS
9780
9860
9190
8710
8710
8710
10540
10640
11950
320
10610
10200
10390
1970
1800
1910
1420
1040
1190
1250
Wet CEM
Correct For O2
CO2 Interference w/CO
Yes
Yes
Yes
NOx & CO CoGen Turbine 2024
Division of Air Quality
NSPS Relative Accuracy Performance Specification Test - CEMS Certification
University of Utah
Solar Taurus 70 CoGen (Turbine only)
Average Emission
Dry SO2 NOX CO
lbs./MMbtu 0.014 0.002 Average % concentration
lbs./hr.1.02 0.16 CO2 O2
ppm corrected for %O2 3.87 1.02 3.18 15.44
Run 1 Enter O2 or CO2
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)1.27E-02 2.35E-03 E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 3.785E-07 7.023E-08
lbs./hr.0.91 0.17 3.18 15.47
ppm corrected for %O2 3.44 1.05 3.18 15.47
Run 2
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)1.42E-02 2.22E-03 E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 4.252E-07 6.666E-08
lbs./hr.1.02 0.16 3.17 15.44
ppm corrected for %O2 3.85 0.99 3.18 15.45 Raw Value
Run 3
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)1.59E-02 2.30E-03 E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 4.801E-07 6.918E-08
lbs./hr.1.15 0.17 3.18 15.42
ppm corrected for %O2 4.32 1.024 3.18 15.41 Raw Value
Run 4
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft
lbs./hr.
ppm corrected for %O2 Raw Value
Run 5
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft
lbs./hr.
ppm corrected for %O2 Raw Value
C For Cal Drift
Raw Value
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
O2
CO2
Clear
lbs./MMBTU
NOx & CO CoGen Turbine 2024
Calibration Error Test
Test Date January 9, 2024 O2
CS - Cal. Span 24.00
Units %
Cylinder No. Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% Passed Cal.
RR03384 10/19/29 Mid-level 10.00 10.10 0.10 0.42% Passed Cal.
High-level 24.00 24.03 0.03 0.13% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of CS - Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 41.67%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date January 9, 2024 CO2
CS - Cal. Span 23.70
Units %
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.169% Passed Cal.
RR03384 10/19/29 Mid-level 10.00 10.04 0.04 0.169% Passed Cal.
High-level 23.70 23.75 0.05 0.211% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 42.19%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date SO2
CS - Cal. Span
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level
Mid-level
High-level
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level
100% of Cal. Span High-level
Test Date January 9, 2024 NOx
CS - Cal. Span 50.00
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% Passed Cal.
CC723464 05/17/29 Mid-level 25.00 24.99 0.01 0.020% Passed Cal.
High-level 50.00 50.01 0.01 0.020% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 50.00%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date January 9, 2024 CO
4.48 CS - Cal. Span 50.00
25 Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 -0.02 0.02 0.040% Passed Cal.
CC723464 05/17/29 Mid-level 25.00 25.01 0.01 0.020% Passed Cal.
High-level 50.00 50.02 0.02 0.040% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 50.00%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
NOx & CO CoGen Turbine 2024
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review of
University of Utah
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 Solar Taurus 70 CoGen (Turbine only)
CS Calibration Span 50.00 50.00 23.70 24.00
Units ppm ppm ppm % % Unprotected
CV - Cylinder Value: SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 25.00 25.00 10.00 10.00
High-Level 50.00 50.00 23.70 24.00
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 50.0% 50.0% 42.2% 41.7%
100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CDir CMA 25.00 25.00 10.00 10.00
Calibration Error Test
Cs - Measured Concentration SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 -0.02 0.04 0.00
Mid-Level 24.99 25.01 10.04 10.10
High-Level 50.01 50.02 23.75 24.03
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 24.99 25.01 10.04 10.10
Low-Level 0.00% 0.04% 0.17% 0.00%
ppmdv Difference 0 0.02 0.04 0
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 0.02% 0.02% 0.17% 0.42%
ppmdv Difference 0.01 0.01 0.04 0.1
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 0.02% 0.04% 0.21% 0.13%
ppmdv Difference 0.01 0.02 0.05 0.03
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.05 -0.05 0.04 0.00 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.10% 0.06% 0.00% 0.00%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.05 0.03 0 0
Pass or Failed Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 25.03 24.98 9.93 10.00
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 0.08% 0.06% 0.46% 0.42%
Difference TRUE 0.04 0.03 0.11 0.10
Pass or Failed Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:1/9/2024 SO2
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX
3.2 0.90 3.2 15.5 CO
0.0% 6.4% 1.8% 13.4% 64.5% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.06 -0.08 0.04 0.01 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.12% 0.12% 0.00% 0.04%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 25.01 24.84 9.93 10.01
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 0.04% 0.34% 0.46% 0.37%
Difference TRUE 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift TRUE 0.02% 0.06% 0.00% 0.04% Drift
Difference TRUE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift TRUE 0.04% 0.28% 0.00% 0.04%
Difference TRUE 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass
Solar Taurus 70 CoGen (Turbine only)Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
15.321 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.18 15.47 81.36 29.13 29.13
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws #NUM!
0.0000 #DIV/0! 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs
(ft/sec.)Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat Input
Btu/hr Low Mid High
71.47679 Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final
Vf
Initial
Vi
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
CO Calibration Gas
Failed Bias Dialog
NOx & CO CoGen Turbine 2024
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review of
University of Utah
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 Solar Taurus 70 CoGen (Turbine only)
CS Calibration Span 50.00 50.00 23.70 24.00
Units ppm ppm ppm % %
CV - Cylinder Value:SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 25.00 25.00 10.00 10.00
High-Level 50.00 50.00 23.70 24.00
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 50.0% 50.0% 42.2% 41.7%
100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CMA 25.00 25.00 10.00 10.00
Calibration Error Test
Measured Concentration SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 -0.02 0.04 0.00
Mid-Level 24.99 25.01 10.04 10.10
High-Level 50.01 50.02 23.75 24.03
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 24.99 25.01 10.04 10.10
Low-Level 0.00% 0.04% 0.17% 0.00%
ppmdv Difference 0 0.02 0.04 0
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 0.02% 0.02% 0.17% 0.42%
ppmdv Difference 0.01 0.01 0.04 0.1
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 0.02% 0.04% 0.21% 0.13%
ppmdv Difference 0.01 0.02 0.05 0.03
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.06 -0.08 0.04 0.01 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.12% 0.12% 0.00% 0.04%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.06 0.06 0 0.01
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 25.01 24.84 9.93 10.01
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 0.04% 0.34% 0.46% 0.37%
Difference TRUE 0.02 0.17 0.11 0.09
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:1/9/2024 SO2
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX
3.6 0.81 3.2 15.5 CO
0.0% 7.2% 1.6% 13.4% 64.4% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.07 -0.13 0.05 0.02 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.14% 0.22% 0.04% 0.08%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 24.77 24.85 9.93 10.01
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 0.44% 0.32% 0.46% 0.37%
Difference TRUE 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift TRUE 0.02% 0.10% 0.04% 0.04% Response Spec.
Difference TRUE 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift TRUE 0.40% 0.02% 0.00% 0.00%
Difference TRUE 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass
Solar Taurus 70 CoGen (Turbine only)Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
15.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.17 15.44 81.39 29.13 29.13
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws
0.0000 #DIV/0! 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat Input
Btu/hr Low Mid High
71.871681 Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final
Vf
Initial
Vi
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
Failed Bias Dialog
NOx & CO CoGen Turbine 2024
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review of
University of Utah
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 Solar Taurus 70 CoGen (Turbine only)
CS Calibration Span 50.00 50.00 23.70 24.00
Units ppm ppm ppm % %
CV - Cylinder Value:SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 25.00 25.00 10.00 10.00
High-Level 50.00 50.00 23.70 24.00
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 50.0% 50.0% 42.2% 41.7%
100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CMA 25.00 25.00 10.00 10.00
Calibration Error Test
Measured Concentration SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 -0.02 0.04 0.00
Mid-Level 24.99 25.01 10.04 10.10
High-Level 50.01 50.02 23.75 24.03
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 24.99 25.01 10.04 10.10
Low-Level 0.00% 0.04% 0.17% 0.00%
ppmv Difference 0 0.02 0.04 0
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 0.02% 0.02% 0.17% 0.42%
ppmv Difference 0.01 0.01 0.04 0.1
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 0.02% 0.04% 0.21% 0.13%
ppmv Difference 0.01 0.02 0.05 0.03
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.07 -0.13 0.05 0.02 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.14% 0.22% 0.04% 0.08%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.07 0.11 0.01 0.02
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 24.77 24.85 9.93 10.01
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 0.44% 0.32% 0.46% 0.37%
Difference TRUE 0.22 0.16 0.11 0.09
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:1/9/2024 SO2
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX
4.1 0.80 3.2 15.4 CO
0.0% 8.1% 1.6% 13.4% 64.2% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.09 -0.17 0.03 0.03 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.18% 0.30% 0.04% 0.13%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 24.78 24.77 9.89 10.00
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 0.42% 0.48% 0.63% 0.42%
Difference TRUE 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift TRUE 0.04% 0.08% 0.00% 0.04% Response Spec.
Difference TRUE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift TRUE 0.02% 0.16% 0.17% 0.04%
Difference TRUE 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass Pass
Solar Taurus 70 CoGen (Turbine only)Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
15.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.18 15.42 81.40 29.13 29.13
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws
0.0000 #DIV/0! 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat Input
Btu/hr Low Mid High
71.869599 Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final
Vf
Initial
Vi
1
2
3
4
5
6 FT```
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Bias Dialog
NOx Unit 6 2024
Reference Methods 2, 3A, 6C, 7E, 10, & 19
Source Information
Company Name University of Utah
Company Contact:Bryan Cracroft
Contact Phone No.[phone]
Stack Designation:Unit 6
Test & Review Dates
Test Date:1/10/2024 &
Review Date: 2/29/2024
Observer:Unobserved
Reviewer:Paul Morris
Emission Limits Emission Rates
SO2 NOX CO SO2 NOX CO
lbs./MMBtu
lbs./hr. 0.5 0.187
ppm 9.0 8.110
Percent
%O2 Correction as a whole #3.00
Test Information Heat Input
Stack I.D. inches As ft^2 Y Dl H @ Cp Pbar Pq (static)
fuel flow rate
(Btu/hr.)
Heat Input
(Btu/hr.)
32.00 5.585
Contractor Information
Contact: Charles Horton
Contracting Company: Alliance Technical Group, LLC
Address: 3683 W 2270 S, Suite E West Valley City, UT 84120
Phone No.: [phone]
Project No.:
8710

Division of Air Quality
Instrumental Reference Methods - Gaseous Measurements
Round
Method 19 - F factors for Coal, Oil, and Gas
Fd Fw Fc
scf/MMBtu scf/MMBtu scf/MMBtu
Diluent
F factor used
O2
CO2
Anthrocite 2
Bituminous 2
Lignite
Natural
Propane
Butane
10100
COAL
OIL
GAS
9780
9860
9190
8710
8710
8710
10540
10640
11950
320
10610
10200
10390
1970
1800
1910
1420
1040
1190
1250
Wet CEM
Correct For O2
CO2 Interference w/CO
Yes
Yes
Yes
NOx Unit 6 2024
Division of Air Quality
NSPS Relative Accuracy Performance Specification Test - CEMS Certification
University of Utah
Unit 6
Average Emission
Dry SO2 NOX CO
lbs./MMbtu 0.010 Average % concentration
lbs./hr.0.19 CO2 O2
ppm corrected for %O2 8.11 4.82 12.55
Run 1 Enter O2 or CO2
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)1.01E-02 E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 4.649E-07
lbs./hr.0.19 4.88 12.49
ppm corrected for %O2 8.29 4.83 12.46
Run 2
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)1.02E-02 E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 4.662E-07
lbs./hr.0.18 4.80 12.60
ppm corrected for %O2 8.42 4.83 12.55 Raw Value
Run 3
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)9.26E-03 E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 4.239E-07
lbs./hr.0.19 4.79 12.57
ppm corrected for %O2 7.62 4.78 12.50 Raw Value
Run 4
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft
lbs./hr.
ppm corrected for %O2 Raw Value
Run 5
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft
lbs./hr.
ppm corrected for %O2 Raw Value
C For Cal Drift
Raw Value
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
O2
CO2
Clear
lbs./MMBTU
NOx Unit 6 2024
Calibration Error Test
Test Date January 10, 2024 O2
CS - Cal. Span 24.00
Units %
Cylinder No. Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% Passed Cal.
RR03384 10/19/29 Mid-level 10.00 10.10 0.10 0.42% Passed Cal.
High-level 24.00 24.00 0.00 0.00% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of CS - Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 41.67%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date January 10, 2024 CO2
CS - Cal. Span 23.70
Units %
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.169% Passed Cal.
RR03384 10/19/29 Mid-level 10.00 10.04 0.04 0.169% Passed Cal.
High-level 23.70 23.73 0.03 0.127% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 42.19%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date SO2
CS - Cal. Span
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level
Mid-level
High-level
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level
100% of Cal. Span High-level
Test Date January 10, 2024 NOx
CS - Cal. Span 30.00
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% Passed Cal.
CC723464 05/17/29 Mid-level 15.00 15.01 0.01 0.033% Passed Cal.
High-level 30.00 29.98 0.02 0.067% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 50.00%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date CO
CS - Cal. Span
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level
Mid-level
High-level
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level
100% of Cal. Span High-level
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
NOx Unit 6 2024
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review of
University of Utah
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 Unit 6
CS Calibration Span 30.00 23.70 24.00
Units ppm ppm ppm % % Unprotected
CV - Cylinder Value: SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 15.00 10.00 10.00
High-Level 30.00 23.70 24.00
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 50.0% 42.2% 41.7%
100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CDir CMA 15.00 10.00 10.00
Calibration Error Test
Cs - Measured Concentration SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.04 0.00
Mid-Level 15.01 10.04 10.10
High-Level 29.98 23.73 24.00
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 15.01 10.04 10.10
Low-Level 0.00% 0.17% 0.00%
ppmdv Difference 0 0.04 0
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 0.03% 0.17% 0.42%
ppmdv Difference 0.01 0.04 0.1
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 0.07% 0.13% 0.00%
ppmdv Difference 0.02 0.03 0
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.05 0.03 0.00 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.17% TRUE 0.04% 0.00%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.05 TRUE 0.01 0
Pass or Failed Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 15.01 9.89 9.98
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 0.00% TRUE 0.63% 0.50%
Difference TRUE 0.00 TRUE 0.15 0.12
Pass or Failed Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:1/10/2024 SO2
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX
3.9 4.8 12.5 CO
0.0% 13.1% 0.0% 20.4% 51.9% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.05 0.03 0.01 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.17% TRUE 0.04% 0.04%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.1 TRUE 0.0 0.0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 15.00 9.85 9.97
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 0.03% TRUE 0.80% 0.54%
Difference TRUE 0.0 TRUE 0.2 0.1
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift TRUE 0.00% TRUE 0.00% 0.04% Drift
Difference TRUE 0.0 TRUE 0.0 0.0 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift TRUE 0.03% TRUE 0.17% 0.04%
Difference TRUE 0.0 TRUE 0.0 0.0
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass
Unit 6 Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
5.585 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.88 12.49 82.63 29.28 29.28
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws #NUM!
0.0000 #DIV/0! 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs
(ft/sec.)Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat Input
Btu/hr Low Mid High
18.8223 Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final
Vf
Initial
Vi
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
CO Calibration Gas
Failed Bias Dialog
NOx Unit 6 2024
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review of
University of Utah
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 Unit 6
CS Calibration Span 30.00 23.70 24.00
Units ppm ppm ppm % %
CV - Cylinder Value:SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 15.00 10.00 10.00
High-Level 30.00 23.70 24.00
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 50.0% 42.2% 41.7%
100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CMA 15.00 10.00 10.00
Calibration Error Test
Measured Concentration SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.04 0.00
Mid-Level 15.01 10.04 10.10
High-Level 29.98 23.73 24.00
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 15.01 10.04 10.10
Low-Level 0.00% 0.17% 0.00%
ppmdv Difference 0 0.04 0
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 0.03% 0.17% 0.42%
ppmdv Difference 0.01 0.04 0.1
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 0.07% 0.13% 0.00%
ppmdv Difference 0.02 0.03 0
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.05 0.03 0.01 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.17% TRUE 0.04% 0.04%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.05 TRUE 0.01 0.01
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 15.00 9.85 9.97
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 0.03% TRUE 0.80% 0.54%
Difference TRUE 0.01 TRUE 0.19 0.13
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:1/10/2024 SO2
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX
3.9 4.8 12.6 CO
0.0% 13.1% 0.0% 20.1% 52.3% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.05 0.03 0.02 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.17% TRUE 0.04% 0.08%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.1 TRUE 0.0 0.0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 15.00 9.93 9.95
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 0.03% TRUE 0.46% 0.63%
Difference TRUE 0.0 TRUE 0.1 0.2
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift TRUE 0.00% TRUE 0.00% 0.04% Response Spec.
Difference TRUE 0.0 TRUE 0.0 0.0 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift TRUE 0.00% TRUE 0.34% 0.08%
Difference TRUE 0.0 TRUE 0.1 0.0
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass
Unit 6 Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
5.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.80 12.60 82.60 29.27 29.27
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws
0.0000 #DIV/0! 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat Input
Btu/hr Low Mid High
17.73345 Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final
Vf
Initial
Vi
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
Failed Bias Dialog
NOx Unit 6 2024
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review of
University of Utah
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 Unit 6
CS Calibration Span 30.00 23.70 24.00
Units ppm ppm ppm % %
CV - Cylinder Value:SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 15.00 10.00 10.00
High-Level 30.00 23.70 24.00
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 50.0% 42.2% 41.7%
100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CMA 15.00 10.00 10.00
Calibration Error Test
Measured Concentration SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.04 0.00
Mid-Level 15.01 10.04 10.10
High-Level 29.98 23.73 24.00
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 15.01 10.04 10.10
Low-Level 0.00% 0.17% 0.00%
ppmv Difference 0 0.04 0
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 0.03% 0.17% 0.42%
ppmv Difference 0.01 0.04 0.1
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 0.07% 0.13% 0.00%
ppmv Difference 0.02 0.03 0
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.05 0.03 0.02 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.17% TRUE 0.04% 0.08%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.05 TRUE 0.01 0.02
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 15.00 9.93 9.95
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 0.03% TRUE 0.46% 0.63%
Difference TRUE 0.01 TRUE 0.11 0.15
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:1/10/2024 SO2
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX
3.6 4.8 12.5 CO
0.0% 12.0% 0.0% 20.2% 52.1% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.05 0.02 0.02 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.17% TRUE 0.08% 0.08%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.1 TRUE 0.0 0.0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 15.02 9.97 9.95
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 0.03% TRUE 0.30% 0.63%
Difference TRUE 0.0 TRUE 0.1 0.2
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift TRUE 0.00% TRUE 0.04% 0.00% Response Spec.
Difference TRUE 0.0 TRUE 0.0 0.0 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift TRUE 0.00% TRUE 0.17% 0.00%
Difference TRUE 0.0 TRUE 0.0 0.0
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass
Unit 6 Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
5.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.79 12.57 82.64 29.27 29.27
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws
0.0000 #DIV/0! 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat Input
Btu/hr Low Mid High
20.57055 Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final
Vf
Initial
Vi
1
2
3
4
5
6 FT```
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Bias Dialog
NOx Unit 7 2024
Reference Methods 2, 3A, 6C, 7E, 10, & 19
Source Information
Company Name University of Utah
Company Contact:Bryan Cracroft
Contact Phone No.[phone]
Stack Designation:Unit 7
Test & Review Dates
Test Date:1/10/2024 &
Review Date: 2/29/2024
Observer:Unobserved
Reviewer:Paul Morris
Emission Limits Emission Rates
SO2 NOX CO SO2 NOX CO
lbs./MMBtu
lbs./hr. 0.5 0.199
ppm 9.0 8.227
Percent
%O2 Correction as a whole #3.00
Test Information Heat Input
Stack I.D. inches As ft^2 Y Dl H @ Cp Pbar Pq (static)
fuel flow rate
(Btu/hr.)
Heat Input
(Btu/hr.)
32.00 5.585
Contractor Information
Contact: Charles Horton
Contracting Company: Alliance Technical Group, LLC
Address: 3683 W 2270 S, Suite E West Valley City, UT 84120
Phone No.: [phone]
Project No.:
8710

Division of Air Quality
Instrumental Reference Methods - Gaseous Measurements
Round
Method 19 - F factors for Coal, Oil, and Gas
Fd Fw Fc
scf/MMBtu scf/MMBtu scf/MMBtu
Diluent
F factor used
O2
CO2
Anthrocite 2
Bituminous 2
Lignite
Natural
Propane
Butane
10100
COAL
OIL
GAS
9780
9860
9190
8710
8710
8710
10540
10640
11950
320
10610
10200
10390
1970
1800
1910
1420
1040
1190
1250
Wet CEM
Correct For O2
CO2 Interference w/CO
Yes
Yes
Yes
NOx Unit 7 2024
Division of Air Quality
NSPS Relative Accuracy Performance Specification Test - CEMS Certification
University of Utah
Unit 7
Average Emission
Dry SO2 NOX CO
lbs./MMbtu 0.010 Average % concentration
lbs./hr.0.20 CO2 O2
ppm corrected for %O2 8.23 5.35 11.59
Run 1 Enter O2 or CO2
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)1.01E-02 E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 5.152E-07
lbs./hr.0.19 5.34 11.60
ppm corrected for %O2 8.30 5.32 11.62
Run 2
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)1.03E-02 E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 5.229E-07
lbs./hr.0.20 5.32 11.64
ppm corrected for %O2 8.46 5.32 11.66 Raw Value
Run 3
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)9.62E-03 E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 4.951E-07
lbs./hr.0.21 5.38 11.53
ppm corrected for %O2 7.92 5.34 11.53 Raw Value
Run 4
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft
lbs./hr.
ppm corrected for %O2 Raw Value
Run 5
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft
lbs./hr.
ppm corrected for %O2 Raw Value
C For Cal Drift
Raw Value
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
O2
CO2
Clear
lbs./MMBTU
NOx Unit 7 2024
Calibration Error Test
Test Date January 10, 2024 O2
CS - Cal. Span 24.00
Units %
Cylinder No. Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% Passed Cal.
RR03384 10/19/29 Mid-level 10.00 10.10 0.10 0.42% Passed Cal.
High-level 24.00 24.00 0.00 0.00% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of CS - Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 41.67%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date January 10, 2024 CO2
CS - Cal. Span 23.70
Units %
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.169% Passed Cal.
RR03384 10/19/29 Mid-level 10.00 10.04 0.04 0.169% Passed Cal.
High-level 23.70 23.73 0.03 0.127% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 42.19%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date SO2
CS - Cal. Span
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level
Mid-level
High-level
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level
100% of Cal. Span High-level
Test Date January 10, 2024 NOx
CS - Cal. Span 30.00
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000% Passed Cal.
CC723464 05/17/29 Mid-level 15.00 15.01 0.01 0.033% Passed Cal.
High-level 30.00 29.98 0.02 0.067% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 50.00%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date CO
CS - Cal. Span
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level
Mid-level
High-level
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level
100% of Cal. Span High-level
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
NOx Unit 7 2024
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review of
University of Utah
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 Unit 7
CS Calibration Span 30.00 23.70 24.00
Units ppm ppm ppm % % Unprotected
CV - Cylinder Value: SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 15.00 10.00 10.00
High-Level 30.00 23.70 24.00
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 50.0% 42.2% 41.7%
100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CDir CMA 15.00 10.00 10.00
Calibration Error Test
Cs - Measured Concentration SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.04 0.00
Mid-Level 15.01 10.04 10.10
High-Level 29.98 23.73 24.00
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 15.01 10.04 10.10
Low-Level 0.00% 0.17% 0.00%
ppmdv Difference 0 0.04 0
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 0.03% 0.17% 0.42%
ppmdv Difference 0.01 0.04 0.1
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 0.07% 0.13% 0.00%
ppmdv Difference 0.02 0.03 0
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.02 0.04 0.00 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.07% TRUE 0.00% 0.00%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.02 TRUE 0 0
Pass or Failed Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 15.02 9.93 10.02
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 0.03% TRUE 0.46% 0.33%
Difference TRUE 0.01 TRUE 0.11 0.08
Pass or Failed Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:1/10/2024 SO2
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX
4.3 5.3 11.6 CO
0.0% 14.5% 0.0% 22.4% 48.4% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.04 0.05 0.01 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.13% TRUE 0.04% 0.04%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.0 TRUE 0.0 0.0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 15.02 9.93 10.02
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 0.03% TRUE 0.46% 0.33%
Difference TRUE 0.0 TRUE 0.1 0.1
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift TRUE 0.07% TRUE 0.04% 0.04% Drift
Difference TRUE 0.0 TRUE 0.0 0.0 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift TRUE 0.00% TRUE 0.00% 0.00%
Difference TRUE 0.0 TRUE 0.0 0.0
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass
Unit 7 Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
5.585 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.34 11.60 83.07 29.32 29.32
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws #NUM!
0.0000 #DIV/0! 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs
(ft/sec.)Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat Input
Btu/hr Low Mid High
19.12785 Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final
Vf
Initial
Vi
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
CO Calibration Gas
Failed Bias Dialog
NOx Unit 7 2024
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review of
University of Utah
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 Unit 7
CS Calibration Span 30.00 23.70 24.00
Units ppm ppm ppm % %
CV - Cylinder Value:SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 15.00 10.00 10.00
High-Level 30.00 23.70 24.00
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 50.0% 42.2% 41.7%
100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CMA 15.00 10.00 10.00
Calibration Error Test
Measured Concentration SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.04 0.00
Mid-Level 15.01 10.04 10.10
High-Level 29.98 23.73 24.00
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 15.01 10.04 10.10
Low-Level 0.00% 0.17% 0.00%
ppmdv Difference 0 0.04 0
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 0.03% 0.17% 0.42%
ppmdv Difference 0.01 0.04 0.1
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 0.07% 0.13% 0.00%
ppmdv Difference 0.02 0.03 0
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.04 0.05 0.01 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.13% TRUE 0.04% 0.04%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.04 TRUE 0.01 0.01
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 15.02 9.93 10.02
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 0.03% TRUE 0.46% 0.33%
Difference TRUE 0.01 TRUE 0.11 0.08
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:1/10/2024 SO2
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX
4.4 5.3 11.7 CO
0.0% 14.7% 0.0% 22.4% 48.6% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.05 0.04 0.01 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.17% TRUE 0.00% 0.04%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.1 TRUE 0.0 0.0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 14.98 9.90 10.02
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 0.10% TRUE 0.59% 0.33%
Difference TRUE 0.0 TRUE 0.1 0.1
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift TRUE 0.03% TRUE 0.04% 0.00% Response Spec.
Difference TRUE 0.0 TRUE 0.0 0.0 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift TRUE 0.07% TRUE 0.13% 0.00%
Difference TRUE 0.0 TRUE 0.0 0.0
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass
Unit 7 Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
5.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.32 11.64 83.04 29.32 29.32
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws
0.0000 #DIV/0! 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat Input
Btu/hr Low Mid High
19.16145 Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final
Vf
Initial
Vi
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
Failed Bias Dialog
NOx Unit 7 2024
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review of
University of Utah
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 Unit 7
CS Calibration Span 30.00 23.70 24.00
Units ppm ppm ppm % %
CV - Cylinder Value:SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 15.00 10.00 10.00
High-Level 30.00 23.70 24.00
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 50.0% 42.2% 41.7%
100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CMA 15.00 10.00 10.00
Calibration Error Test
Measured Concentration SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.04 0.00
Mid-Level 15.01 10.04 10.10
High-Level 29.98 23.73 24.00
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 15.01 10.04 10.10
Low-Level 0.00% 0.17% 0.00%
ppmv Difference 0 0.04 0
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 0.03% 0.17% 0.42%
ppmv Difference 0.01 0.04 0.1
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 0.07% 0.13% 0.00%
ppmv Difference 0.02 0.03 0
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.05 0.04 0.01 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.17% TRUE 0.00% 0.04%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.05 TRUE 0 0.01
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 14.98 9.90 10.02
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 0.10% TRUE 0.59% 0.33%
Difference TRUE 0.03 TRUE 0.14 0.08
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:1/10/2024 SO2
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX
4.2 5.3 11.5 CO
0.0% 13.9% 0.0% 22.5% 48.0% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.05 0.03 0.00 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.17% TRUE 0.04% 0.00%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.1 TRUE 0.0 0.0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 15.01 9.89 9.98
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 0.00% TRUE 0.63% 0.50%
Difference TRUE 0.0 TRUE 0.1 0.1
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift TRUE 0.00% TRUE 0.04% 0.04% Response Spec.
Difference TRUE 0.0 TRUE 0.0 0.0 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift TRUE 0.10% TRUE 0.04% 0.17%
Difference TRUE 0.0 TRUE 0.0 0.0
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass
Unit 7 Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
5.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.38 11.53 83.09 29.32 29.32
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws
0.0000 #DIV/0! 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat Input
Btu/hr Low Mid High
21.64575 Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final
Vf
Initial
Vi
1
2
3
4
5
6 FT```
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Bias Dialog
NOx Gen 9 2024
Reference Methods 2, 3A, 6C, 7E, 10, & 19
Source Information
Company Name University of Utah
Company Contact:Bryan Cracroft
Contact Phone No.[phone]
Stack Designation:Boiler 9
Test & Review Dates
Test Date:1/9/2024 &
Review Date: 2/29/2024
Observer:Unobserved
Reviewer:Paul Morris
Emission Limits Emission Rates
SO2 NOX CO SO2 NOX CO
lbs./MMBtu
lbs./hr. 0.8 0.276
ppm 9.0 8.233
Percent
%O2 Correction as a whole #3.00
Test Information Heat Input
Stack I.D. inches As ft^2 Y Dl H @ Cp Pbar Pq (static)
fuel flow rate
(Btu/hr.)
Heat Input
(Btu/hr.)
35.00 6.681
Contractor Information
Contact: Charles Horton
Contracting Company: Alliance Technical Group, LLC
Address: 3683 W 2270 S, Suite E West Valley City, UT 84120
Phone No.: [phone]
Project No.:
8710

Round
Division of Air Quality
Instrumental Reference Methods - Gaseous Measurements
Method 19 - F factors for Coal, Oil, and Gas
Fd Fw Fc
scf/MMBtu scf/MMBtu scf/MMBtu
Diluent
F factor used
O2
CO2
Anthrocite 2
Bituminous 2
Lignite
Natural
Propane
Butane
10100
COAL
OIL
GAS
9780
9860
9190
8710
8710
8710
10540
10640
11950
320
10610
10200
10390
1970
1800
1910
1420
1040
1190
1250
Wet CEM
Correct For O2
CO2 Interference w/CO
Yes
Yes
Yes
NOx Gen 9 2024
Division of Air Quality
NSPS Relative Accuracy Performance Specification Test - CEMS Certification
University of Utah
Boiler 9
Average Emission
Dry SO2 NOX CO
lbs./MMbtu 0.010 Average % concentration
lbs./hr.0.28 CO2 O2
ppm corrected for %O2 8.23 5.21 11.86
Run 1 Enter O2 or CO2
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)9.77E-03 E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 4.909E-07
lbs./hr.0.30 5.28 11.75
ppm corrected for %O2 8.04 5.24 11.73
Run 2
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)1.01E-02 E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 5.016E-07
lbs./hr.0.27 5.20 11.86
ppm corrected for %O2 8.31 5.24 11.83 Raw Value
Run 3
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)1.01E-02 E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft 4.979E-07
lbs./hr.0.26 5.16 11.96
ppm corrected for %O2 8.35 5.10 11.92 Raw Value
Run 4
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft
lbs./hr.
ppm corrected for %O2 Raw Value
Run 5
Dry SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Atomic Weight 64 46 28
lbs./MMBtu (O2)E=Cd x Fd x (20.9/(20.9-%O2d))
lbs./MMBtu (CO2)E=Cd x Fc x (100 / % CO2d)
lbs./cu.ft
lbs./hr.
ppm corrected for %O2 Raw Value
C For Cal Drift
Raw Value
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
C For Cal Drift
O2
CO2
Clear
lbs./MMBTU
NOx Gen 9 2024
Calibration Error Test
Test Date January 9, 2024 O2
CS - Cal. Span 24.00
Units %
Cylinder No. Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% Passed Cal.
RR03384 10/19/29 Mid-level 10.00 10.10 0.10 0.42% Passed Cal.
High-level 24.00 24.02 0.02 0.08% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of CS - Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 41.67%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date January 9, 2024 CO2
CS - Cal. Span 23.70
Units %
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.127% Passed Cal.
RR03384 10/19/29 Mid-level 10.00 10.05 0.05 0.211% Passed Cal.
High-level 23.70 23.75 0.05 0.211% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 42.19%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date SO2
CS - Cal. Span
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level
Mid-level
High-level
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level
100% of Cal. Span High-level
Test Date January 9, 2024 NOx
CS - Cal. Span 30.00
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.033% Passed Cal.
CC723464 05/17/29 Mid-level 15.00 15.03 0.03 0.100% Passed Cal.
High-level 30.00 30.20 0.20 0.667% Passed Cal.
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level 50.00%
100% of Cal. Span High-level 100.00%
Test Date CO
CS - Cal. Span
Units ppm
Cylinder
No.
Expiration
Date Cal. Gas CV- Certified
Concentration
CDir or CS -
Measured
Concentration
Difference
ACE Eq. 7E-1
Analyzer Cal.
Error
Status
Low-level
Mid-level
High-level
% of Span Sec. 8.2.1 Cal Gas Verification
0 to 20% of Cal. Span Low-Level
40 to 60% of Cal. Span Mid-level
100% of Cal. Span High-level
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
Valid Cal Gas
NOx Gen 9 2024
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review of
University of Utah
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 Boiler 9
CS Calibration Span 30.00 23.70 24.00
Units ppm ppm ppm % % Unprotected
CV - Cylinder Value: SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 15.00 10.00 10.00
High-Level 30.00 23.70 24.00
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 50.0% 42.2% 41.7%
100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CDir CMA 15.00 10.00 10.00
Calibration Error Test
Cs - Measured Concentration SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.01 0.03 0.00
Mid-Level 15.03 10.05 10.10
High-Level 30.20 23.75 24.02
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 15.03 10.05 10.10
Low-Level 0.03% 0.13% 0.00%
ppmdv Difference 0.01 0.03 0
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 0.10% 0.21% 0.42%
ppmdv Difference 0.03 0.05 0.1
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 0.67% 0.21% 0.08%
ppmdv Difference 0.2 0.05 0.02
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.01 0.04 0.00 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.00% TRUE 0.04% 0.00%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0 TRUE 0.01 0
Pass or Failed Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 15.08 9.90 9.99
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 0.17% TRUE 0.63% 0.46%
Difference TRUE 0.05 TRUE 0.15 0.11
Pass or Failed Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:1/9/2024 SO2
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX
4.1 5.2 11.7 CO
0.0% 13.8% 0.0% 22.1% 48.9% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.00 0.05 0.00 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.03% TRUE 0.08% 0.00%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.0 TRUE 0.0 0.0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 15.04 9.88 9.98
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 0.03% TRUE 0.72% 0.50%
Difference TRUE 0.0 TRUE 0.2 0.1
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift TRUE 0.03% TRUE 0.04% 0.00% Drift
Difference TRUE 0.0 TRUE 0.0 0.0 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift TRUE 0.13% TRUE 0.08% 0.04%
Difference TRUE 0.0 TRUE 0.0 0.0
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass
Boiler 9 Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
6.681 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.28 11.75 82.98 29.31 29.31
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws #NUM!
0.0000 #DIV/0! 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs
(ft/sec.)Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat Input
Btu/hr Low Mid High
30.2652 Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final
Vf
Initial
Vi
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
CO Calibration Gas
Failed Bias Dialog
NOx Gen 9 2024
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review of
University of Utah
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 Boiler 9
CS Calibration Span 30.00 23.70 24.00
Units ppm ppm ppm % %
CV - Cylinder Value:SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 15.00 10.00 10.00
High-Level 30.00 23.70 24.00
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 50.0% 42.2% 41.7%
100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CMA 15.00 10.00 10.00
Calibration Error Test
Measured Concentration SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.01 0.03 0.00
Mid-Level 15.03 10.05 10.10
High-Level 30.20 23.75 24.02
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 15.03 10.05 10.10
Low-Level 0.03% 0.13% 0.00%
ppmdv Difference 0.01 0.03 0
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 0.10% 0.21% 0.42%
ppmdv Difference 0.03 0.05 0.1
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 0.67% 0.21% 0.08%
ppmdv Difference 0.2 0.05 0.02
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.00 0.05 0.00 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.03% TRUE 0.08% 0.00%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.01 TRUE 0.02 0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 15.04 9.88 9.98
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 0.03% TRUE 0.72% 0.50%
Difference TRUE 0.01 TRUE 0.17 0.12
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:1/9/2024 SO2
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX
4.2 5.2 11.8 CO
0.0% 14.0% 0.0% 21.8% 49.3% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.00 0.04 0.00 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.03% TRUE 0.04% 0.00%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.0 TRUE 0.0 0.0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 15.04 9.87 9.97
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 0.03% TRUE 0.76% 0.54%
Difference TRUE 0.0 TRUE 0.2 0.1
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift TRUE 0.00% TRUE 0.04% 0.00% Response Spec.
Difference TRUE 0.0 TRUE 0.0 0.0 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift TRUE 0.00% TRUE 0.04% 0.04%
Difference TRUE 0.0 TRUE 0.0 0.0
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass
Boiler 9 Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
6.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.20 11.86 82.94 29.31 29.31
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws
0.0000 #DIV/0! 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat Input
Btu/hr Low Mid High
27.13515 Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final
Vf
Initial
Vi
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
Failed Bias Dialog
NOx Gen 9 2024
Division of Air Quality Stack Test Review of
University of Utah
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 Boiler 9
CS Calibration Span 30.00 23.70 24.00
Units ppm ppm ppm % %
CV - Cylinder Value:SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Level 15.00 10.00 10.00
High-Level 30.00 23.70 24.00
0 to 20% of Cal. Span 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
40 to 60% of Cal. Span 50.0% 42.2% 41.7%
100% of Cal. Span 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cdir - Enter Actual Up-scale Cylinder Value Used To Correct Emission Concentration.
CMA 15.00 10.00 10.00
Calibration Error Test
Measured Concentration SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
Low-Level 0.01 0.03 0.00
Mid-Level 15.03 10.05 10.10
High-Level 30.20 23.75 24.02
Enter Up-scale Analyzer Response to be used during testing.
ACE Eq. 7E-1 15.03 10.05 10.10
Low-Level 0.03% 0.13% 0.00%
ppmv Difference 0.01 0.03 0
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Mid-Level 0.10% 0.21% 0.42%
ppmv Difference 0.03 0.05 0.1
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
High-Level 0.67% 0.21% 0.08%
ppmv Difference 0.2 0.05 0.02
Status Passed Cal. Passed Cal.Passed Cal.
Pre-Test Sampling System Bias
Initial Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.00 0.04 0.00 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.03% TRUE 0.04% 0.00%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.01 TRUE 0.01 0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 15.04 9.87 9.97
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 0.03% TRUE 0.76% 0.54%
Difference TRUE 0.01 TRUE 0.18 0.13
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Raw Test Data Time Start Stop
Test Date:1/9/2024 SO2
SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2 NOX
4.2 5.1 11.9 CO
0.0% 13.9% 0.0% 21.5% 49.7% CO2/O2
Post-Test System Bias 7E-2 SB=(Cs - Cdir)/CS x 100
Final Values SO2 NOX CO CO2 O2
CO - Low-Level 0.01 0.04 0.01 System Bias.
SBi - Zero Bias TRUE 0.00% TRUE 0.04% 0.04%± 5% of Span
Difference TRUE 0.0 TRUE 0.0 0.0
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
CM - Up-scale Gas 15.02 9.84 9.96
SBi - Up-Scale Bias TRUE 0.03% TRUE 0.89% 0.58%
Difference TRUE 0.0 TRUE 0.2 0.1
Pass or Invalid Run Passed Cal. Passed Cal. Passed Cal.
Calibration Drift % of Span - D=ABS(SBf - SBi)
Low-Level Drift TRUE 0.03% TRUE 0.00% 0.04% Response Spec.
Difference TRUE 0.0 TRUE 0.0 0.0 3% of Span
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass
Up-scale Gas Drift TRUE 0.00% TRUE 0.13% 0.04%
Difference TRUE 0.0 TRUE 0.0 0.0
Pass or Re-Calibrate Pass Pass Pass
Boiler 9 Flow & Moisture
As ft^2 Pbar Pq (static) Ps Avg Ts F CO2 - FCO2 O2 N2+C Md Ms
6.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.16 11.96 82.88 29.30 29.30
Y Cp Vm cf Vlc AVG Tm F Vm std Vw std Bws S Bws
0.0000 #DIV/0! 0.999
Load - Megawatts
Avg. √∆P's Vs Qsw scfh wet Qa acfm Qsd dscfh
Heat Input
Btu/hr Low Mid High
25.40685 Enert >
#1 - Times
Date
Point No.∆P √∆P ts F tm F (in) tm F (out)
Final
Vf
Initial
Vi
1
2
3
4
5
6 FT```
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Failed Bias Dialog
Failed Cal Error Dialog
Failed Drift Dialog
Failed Bias Dialog