DSHW-2024-005057

Deq submit <[e-mail]>
Revised Risk Evaluation for Woodbine Site
1 message
Dean, Daniel <[e-mail]>Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 3:01 PM
To: "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>
Cc: Paige Walton <[e-mail]>, Maximilian Coreth <[e-mail]>, "[e-mail]"
<[e-mail]>, "Austin, Amy B" <[e-mail]>
Paige,

The Risk Evaluation Report for the Woodbine site has been revised and attached per the Division’s comment
letter dated March 1, 2024.

Thanks,

Daniel Dean, PG
Investigation and Remediation Group Manager I Environmental Services

6952 S High Tech Dr, Suite B I Midvale, UT 84047
D 385.337.5971 I M 801.915.5541
[e-mail] I Terracon.com

Terracon provides environmental, facilities, geotechnical, and materials consulting engineering services delivered with responsiveness,
resourcefulness, and reliability.
Private and confidential as detailed here (www.terracon.com/disclaimer). If you cannot access the hyperlink, please e-mail sender.
61197179_Woodbine Risk Evaluation_Revision 4 FINAL - signed.pdf
2041K
Facilities | Environmental | Geotechnical | Materials 1
Cover Page
Risk Evaluation
Woodbine Site
534, 540, 545, 549, and 585 West 700
South Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County,
Utah
Revised March 1, 2024 | Terracon Project No. 61197179
Prepared for:
Woodbine Industries, LLC
Salt Lake City, Utah
6949 South High Tech Drive
Midvale, Utah 84047
P [phone]
Terracon.com
Facilities | Environmental | Geotechnical | Materials i
Cover Letter
March 1, 2024
Utah Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control
P.O. Box 144880
Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-4880
Attn: Doug Hansen
Division Director
E:[e-mail]
P: [phone]
Re:Revised Risk Evaluation
Woodbine Site
534, 540, 545, 549, and 585 West 700 South
Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah
Terracon Project No. 61197179
Dear Mr. Hansen:
On behalf of Woodbine Industries, LLC, Terracon is pleased to provide this Revised Risk
Evaluation report per the Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control’s (DWMRC)
comment letter dated March 1, 2024.
Please contact our office at [phone] if you have questions regarding this submittal.
Sincerely,
Terracon Consultants, Inc.
Daniel Dean, P.G.Amy Austin
Group Manager Authorized Project Reviewer
Amy Austin
Risk Evaluation
Woodbine Site | Salt Lake City, Utah
Revised March 1, 2024 | Terracon Project No. 61197179
Facilities | Environmental | Geotechnical | Materials ii
Table Of Contents
1.0 Introduction ................................................................................ 1
1.1 Site Description ..................................................................................... 1
1.2 Background Information .......................................................................... 1
1.3 Standard of Care .................................................................................... 4
1.4 Additional Scope Limitations .................................................................... 4
1.5 Reliance ................................................................................................ 4
2.0 Conceptual Site Model .................................................................. 5
2.1 Sources, Release Mechanisms, and Affected Media ..................................... 5
2.2 Contaminants of Potential Concern (COPC) ................................................ 6
3.0 Risk Calculations .......................................................................... 8
3.1 RSL Calculator Data Inputs ...................................................................... 9
3.2 VISL Calculator Data Inputs ................................................................... 10
3.3 Results of the Onsite Risk Evaluation ...................................................... 11
3.4 Soil-To-Groundwater Pathway Evaluation ................................................ 14
4.0 Ecological Risk Assessment.......................................................... 14
5.0 Conclusion................................................................................. 15
6.0 References ................................................................................ 15
Risk Evaluation
Woodbine Site | Salt Lake City, Utah
Revised March 1, 2024 | Terracon Project No. 61197179
Facilities | Environmental | Geotechnical | Materials iii
Appendices
Appendix A Exhibits
Exhibit 1 Site Topographic Map
Exhibit 2 Site Diagram
Exhibit 3 Conceptual Site Model
Appendix B Tables
Table 1 Soil Exposure Point Concentrations
Table 2 Groundwater Exposure Point Concentrations
Table 3 Soil Vapor Exposure Point Concentrations
Table 4 Resident Soil Target Organ Analysis
Table 5 Construction Worker Soil Target Organ Analysis
Appendix C RSL Calculator, VISL Calculator, VURAM Calculator, and ProUCL
Output Files
Appendix D Application For A Waiver Of An Ecological Risk Assessment
Risk Evaluation
Woodbine Site | Salt Lake City, Utah
Revised February 13, 2024 | Terracon Project No. 61197179
Facilities | Environmental | Geotechnical | Materials 1
1.0 Introduction
1.1 Site Description
The site is an approximately 5.11-acre parcel (APN 15121070010000) located at 534–549
and 585 West 700 South, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah. The site is improved with
industrial, office, and restaurant developments.
1.2 Background Information
The site was used as an industrial facility occupied by many tenants including machine
repair shops, steel forging companies, and other miscellaneous industrial-type clients from
the early-1900s through the present. Terracon performed a Limited Site Investigation (LSI)
for High Boy Ventures LLC (Terracon Project 61197025, dated March 21, 2019) and a
subsequent LSI for Alta Investments LLC (Terracon Project 61197179, dated July 15, 2019).
The results of both investigations are included in the Alta Investments LLC LSI (Terracon
Project 61197179, dated July 15, 2019). Twenty-six boreholes were advanced at the site at
depths of up to fifteen feet below ground surface (bgs) to evaluate on-site soil and
groundwater impacts from the long-term historical industrial uses of the site and the
potential for petroleum hydrocarbon and chlorinated solvent contamination from properties
near the site. Of the twenty-six boreholes, fourteen were located within the on-site buildings
and twelve boreholes were located outside of the buildings. Additionally, ten sub-slab soil
vapor points and one exterior soil vapor point were advanced to evaluate soil vapor impacts
from the same potential contaminant sources. Results of the investigation indicated on-site
impacts of several volatile organic compounds (VOCs), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
(PAHs), and metals above regulatory screening levels in the soil and groundwater of the
site. In addition, several chlorinated VOCs were detected in the soil vapor at concentrations
exceeding the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Residential and/or
Commercial Target Sub-Slab and Near-source Soil Gas Concentration (TSSNSGC) Vapor
Intrusion Screening Levels (VISLs). Based on the findings of the investigations, the source
of the impacts to the soils, groundwater, and soil vapor appears to be from the historical
use of the site.
1.2.1 Phase II Environmental Site Assessment
A Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (Phase II ESA) was conducted on the site in
August 2022 (Terracon Project 61217496) under the Salt Lake Brownfields Assessment
Grant to evaluate the environmental impacts from metals and VOCs reported in soil and
groundwater during previous site investigations. Seven monitoring wells were installed at
the site (MW-1 through MW-7) with three to four soil samples and one groundwater sample
collected at each monitoring well location. The monitoring wells were installed to depths of
30 feet bgs to evaluate whether the limited chlorinated VOC impacts identified in the LSI
Risk Evaluation
Woodbine Site | Salt Lake City, Utah
Revised March 1, 2024 | Terracon Project No. 61197179
Facilities | Environmental | Geotechnical | Materials 2
were indicative of more substantial at-depth impacts since these contaminants have
densities greater than water.
The results of the Phase II ESA investigation were as follows:
Soil Sample Results
Field observations during boring installation noted the presence of slag in fill soils
throughout the site. Analytical data for metals in fill soils is consistent with this
observation.
Lead in fill soils exceeded the EPA Residential Regional Screening Level (RSL) in
three samples and the Industrial RSL in two samples. Cadmium exceeded the
Residential RSL in one sample.
Arsenic concentrations exceeded the Industrial RSL in all soil samples from all seven
borings up to depths of twelve feet bgs. Only two soil samples exceeded 50 mg/kg
arsenic. Soil arsenic concentrations above 50 mg/kg were exclusively present in fill
material. The arsenic in soil results from this investigation closely resemble those
from the previous investigations.
Hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)] concentrations exceeded the Residential RSL in six
samples from four boring locations. Cr(VI) concentrations above the laboratory
Method Detection Limit (MDL) in soil ranged from 0.359 mg/kg to 0.938 mg/kg. Of
the six samples that exceeded the Residential RSL, two exceedances were present
in fill soils, three exceedances were present in shallow native soils, and one
exceedance was present in deep native soils. Both trivalent chromium and Cr(VI)
were evaluated during this investigation.
All samples, except one, reported zirconium concentrations that exceeded the EPA
Residential RSL of 6 mg/kg.
Groundwater Sample Results
All but one groundwater sample exceeded the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) for
dissolved arsenic (0.01 mg/L). One sample exceeded the Utah Ground Water Quality
Standard (UGWQS) (0.05 mg/L). Given the low permeability of the subsurface lithology
(primarily clays and silty clays with all monitoring wells purging dry during development)
and the large vertical distance from the bottom of fill soils to the top of the well screens (13
to 19 feet), the dissolved arsenic concentrations exceeding the MCL and/or UGWQS
reported in this investigation appear to be naturally-derived. Dissolved arsenic
concentrations reported in this investigation were similar to those reported in groundwater
present at 10–15 feet bgs in the LSI (Terracon 2019b). Thus, the results from this
investigation suggest that dissolved arsenic concentrations exceeding the MCL and/or
UGWQS reported in the LSI from 10–15 feet bgs are also naturally-derived.
All groundwater sample results were well below Tapwater RSLs, MCLs, Residential VISL
Target Groundwater Concentrations (TGCs), and/or laboratory MDLs for VOCs.
Risk Evaluation
Woodbine Site | Salt Lake City, Utah
Revised March 1, 2024 | Terracon Project No. 61197179
Facilities | Environmental | Geotechnical | Materials 3
1.2.2 Site Investigation Conclusions
Soil Contamination Evaluation
Arsenic in soil exceeds the Salt Lake County background concentration of 27 mg/kg
(DWMRC 2023) in shallow non-native fill material found in multiple locations at the
site. Additionally, lead in soil exceeds the Residential RSL and/or Industrial RSL in
shallow non-native fill material in multiple locations at the site. Non-native fill
material and native soil throughout the site contains concentrations of zirconium
that exceed the Residential RSL. However, the zirconium concentrations in native
soils appear to be naturally-derived and not the result of industrial contamination.
Calculated 95% Upper Confidence Limits (UCL95s) for arsenic, chromium, and
zirconium in shallow native soils and deep native soils indicate that native soils are
not impacted by leaching from fill soils. All fill soils are present above the
groundwater table, and the majority of the site is covered by buildings, pavement,
concrete, and other impervious surfaces which would limit infiltration of
precipitation.
Concentrations of Cr(VI) in soil exceed the Residential RSL at multiple locations. If
Cr(VI) exceeding the Residential RSL in native soils were derived from industrial
contamination, Cr(VI) exceedances would be expected to be more common in fill
soils than in native soils. This is not the case based on the results from the recent
Phase II ESA. Thus, soil sampling results do not definitively indicate that the
detected concentrations of Cr(VI) above the Residential RSL are derived from
industrial contamination.
Fill soils are impacted by multiple PAH compounds at multiple locations. Native soils
do not appear to be impacted by PAHs present in overlying fill soils.
Soil is not impacted by VOCs below 20 feet bgs. Above 20 feet bgs, soil is impacted
above the Residential RSL by one VOC (1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane) at one location.
Groundwater Contamination Evaluation
Groundwater throughout the site is impacted by arsenic above the MCL, but these
impacts appear to be naturally-derived and not the result of industrial
contamination. Groundwater is not impacted above MCLs by any other metals.
Groundwater is not impacted above MCLs by VOCs below 20 feet bgs. At shallower
depths, groundwater is impacted above the MCL by one VOC (Trichloroethene) at
one location. Widespread VOC contamination in groundwater is not present at the
site. Additionally, Groundwater is impacted above the MCL by one PAH compound
(benzo(a)pyrene) at one location.
Soil Vapor Contamination Evaluation
Soil gas is impacted by multiple VOCs at multiple locations above Residential and/or
Commercial VISLs. However, these soil gas impacts do not appear to be well-
Risk Evaluation
Woodbine Site | Salt Lake City, Utah
Revised March 1, 2024 | Terracon Project No. 61197179
Facilities | Environmental | Geotechnical | Materials 4
correlated with the location and/or magnitude of documented VOC impacts in soil or
groundwater.
1.3 Standard of Care
Terracon’s services were performed in a manner consistent with generally-accepted
practices of the profession undertaken in similar studies in the same geographical area
during the same time period. Terracon makes no warranties, either express or implied,
regarding the findings, conclusions, or recommendations. Please note that Terracon does
not warrant the work of laboratories, regulatory agencies, or other third parties supplying
information used in the preparation of the report.
1.4 Additional Scope Limitations
Findings, conclusions, and recommendations resulting from these services are based upon
information derived from the on-site activities and other services performed under this
Scope of Services; such information is subject to change over time. Certain indicators of the
presence of hazardous substances, petroleum products, or other constituents may have
been latent, inaccessible, unobservable, nondetectable, or not present during these
services, and we cannot represent that the site contains no hazardous substances, toxic
materials, petroleum products, or other latent conditions beyond those identified during the
Scopes of Work completed to date. Subsurface conditions may vary from those encountered
at specific borings or wells or during other surveys, tests, assessments, investigations, or
exploratory services; the data, interpretations, findings, and our recommendations are
based solely upon data obtained at the time and within the scope of these services.
1.5 Reliance
This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Woodbine Industries, LLC, who can
convey this report to an affiliate, related entity, subsidiary, lender, title insurer, regulatory
or municipal agency, and their agents. Use or reliance by any other third party other than
the Utah Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control (DWMRC) is prohibited
without the written authorization of Woodbine Industries, LLC and Terracon. Any
unauthorized distribution or reuse is at the client’s sole risk. Notwithstanding the foregoing,
reliance by authorized parties will be subject to the terms, conditions, and limitations stated
in the proposal and Terracon’s Terms and Conditions. The limitation of liability, defined in
the Terms and Conditions, is the aggregate limit of Terracon’s liability to the client and all
relying parties unless otherwise agreed in writing.
Risk Evaluation
Woodbine Site | Salt Lake City, Utah
Revised March 1, 2024 | Terracon Project No. 61197179
Facilities | Environmental | Geotechnical | Materials 5
2.0 Conceptual Site Model
The objective of the Risk Evaluation was to evaluate whether impacted soil, groundwater,
and soil vapor on-site is contaminated to the extent it poses a human health risk at levels
above target maximum risk levels and hazard indices. A Conceptual Site Model (CSM) was
developed to document the potential for exposure to contaminants at the site based on the
source(s) of contamination, the release mechanism(s), potential routes of exposure (ROE),
representative concentrations of contaminants of potential concern (COPC), and receptors
(i.e., property occupants) in order to evaluate site-specific risks associated with the COPCs
remaining. A graphical representation of the CSM is presented as Exhibit 3 (Appendix A).
Concentrations of COPCs in soils were first compared to the EPA’s RSL Generic Tables and
Dilution Attenuation Factor x 20 (DAF 20) soil screening level (SSL) concentrations as
requested by DWMRC. COPC concentrations in groundwater were compared to EPA’s
Maximum Contamination Levels (MCLs) for drinking water and TGC VISLs. COPC
concentrations in soil vapor were compared to EPA’s TSSNSGC VISLs. Concentrations of
individual COPCs in soils, groundwater, and soil vapor exceed these various screening levels
specific to those individual COPCs. In addition, Terracon utilized EPA’s RSL Calculator, EPA’s
VISL calculator, and the Virginia Unified Risk Assessment Model (VURAM) to evaluate
cumulative risk levels using a target excess carcinogenic risk of 1x10-6 and non-carcinogenic
Hazard Index (HI) of ≤1.
2.1 Sources, Release Mechanisms, and Affected Media
Based on a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (Terracon Project Number 61197179,
dated October 2019) conducted on the site, the site has been used industrially since the
early 1900s for machinery repair, steel product manufacturing forging, and large-scale
metal coating and painting. Historically, facilities of this nature have used various chemicals
including chlorinated solvents, petroleum hydrocarbons, acids, and heavy metals, for many
of the activities conducted at the site. Investigations conducted at the site (Phase II
Environmental Site Assessment, Terracon Project 61217496, Limited Site Investigation,
Terracon Project 61207025 dated March 21, 2019, and Supplemental Limited Site
Investigation, Terracon Project 61197179 dated July 15, 2019) found soils, groundwater,
and soil vapor impacted with metals, VOCs, and semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs).
Due to the long-term industrial history across the site, impacts were found in various areas
across the site, and were not contained to one specific source area. Receptors and Routes of
Exposure
The current and future use of the site is commercial with no significant renovations to the
current on-site buildings expected in the near future. No subsurface excavation,
construction, or demolition is currently planned for the site. Minor excavations and
landscaping have recently taken place on the site but are not currently planned in the near
future. Any recent excavations have been backfilled with clean fill material and a delineator
Risk Evaluation
Woodbine Site | Salt Lake City, Utah
Revised March 1, 2024 | Terracon Project No. 61197179
Facilities | Environmental | Geotechnical | Materials 6
fabric has been installed to indicate possible contaminated soil underneath the backfill. In
order to be conservative, this Risk Evaluation uses residential land use to represent the
potential residential receptors. The following routes of exposure were evaluated in this Risk
Evaluation.
Soil Routes of Exposure: Ingestion of soil, inhalation of vapor emissions and particulates,
dermal contact with soil, and leaching to groundwater are the routes of exposure considered
for soils in the Risk Evaluation. These exposure routes are likely to be incomplete pathways
for some receptors since the site is completely covered with concrete and/or asphalt, or
backfilled with clean soil in landscaped areas. However, to provide a conservative evaluation
regarding exposure risks, all routes were included in the Risk Evaluation.
Groundwater Routes of Exposure: Ingestion and dermal contact are the routes of
exposure considered for groundwater in the Risk Evaluation. These exposure routes are
likely to be incomplete pathways since most receptors will not have access to site
groundwater. A pathway for construction workers may be present in the event that future
excavations go below the groundwater table. However, to provide a conservative evaluation
regarding exposure risks, all routes were included in the Risk Evaluation.
Soil Vapor Routes of Exposure: Inhalation of vapor emissions is the source of exposure
considered for soil vapor in the Risk Evaluation.
2.2 Contaminants of Potential Concern (COPC)
Soil COPCs and Exposure Point Concentrations (EPCs) used for risk calculations are listed in
Table 1 (Appendix B). Groundwater COPCs and EPCs used for risk calculations are listed
in Table 2 (Appendix B). Soil Vapor COPCs and EPCs used for risk calculations are listed in
Table 3 (Appendix B). Due to the large number of COPCs present, for most COPCs the
maximum detected concentrations were used as the EPCs. However, for select COPCs with
the highest risk levels, EPA’s ProUCL software was used to calculate 95% upper confidence
limits (UCL95s) and the UCL95s were used as the EPCs. ProUCL was also used to run outlier
tests and outliers that exceeded a 5% significance level were excluded from the UCL95
calculations. Table 1 through Table 3 (Appendix B) indicates which EPCs are maximum
concentrations or UCL95s.
2.2.1 Soils
COPCs were identified as those compounds detected above laboratory detection limits.
Nineteen VOCs, 18 SVOCs, and 12 metals were reported above laboratory detection limits in
soil. The list of COPCs and EPCs for soil are presented in Table 1 (Appendix B).
Exceedances of the RSLs and DAF-20 screening levels are discussed below for the various
COPC types.
Risk Evaluation
Woodbine Site | Salt Lake City, Utah
Revised March 1, 2024 | Terracon Project No. 61197179
Facilities | Environmental | Geotechnical | Materials 7
VOCs
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane was detected in EB-5 at 12 feet bgs at a concentration of 2.18
mg/kg, exceeding the Residential RSL of 0.6 mg/kg and the DAF 20 SSL of 0.0006 mg/kg.
Tetrachloroethene was detected in X-4 at a depth of 2.5 bgs at a concentration of 0.0551
mg/kg, exceeding the DAF 20 SSL of 0.046 mg/kg. Trichloroethene was detected in IB-3 at
a depth of 3.0 bgs at a concentration of 0.0697 mg/kg, exceeding the DAF 20 SSL of 0.036
mg/kg. Naphthalene was detected in nine soil samples at varying depths at concentrations
exceeding the DAF 20 SSL of 0.0108 mg/kg.
SVOCs
Benzo(a)anthracene and benzo(b)fluoranthene are PAHs. They were both detected at
concentrations exceeding the Residential RSLs and the DAF 20 SSL in IB-2, EB-4, EB-6, X-
10, X-10, and X-2. Benzo(a)anthracene also exceeded the DAF 20 SSL in IB-4-1.5’ and X-6-
2.0’. Benzo(a)pyrene is a PAH detected at concentrations exceeding the Industrial RSL in
IB-2 and X-2 and above the Residential RSL in IB-4, EB-4, EB-6, X-10, and X-6.
Benzo(a)pyrene also exceeds the DAF 20 SSL in IB-2. Dibenz(a,h)anthracene is a PAH
detected at concentrations exceeding the Residential RSL in IB-2, EB-6, X-10, and X-2.
Indeno(1,2,3-CD)pyrene is a PAH detected at concentrations exceeding the residential RSL
in IB-2, EB-4, and X-2.
Metals
Lead was detected at a concentration of 688 mg/kg at a depth of 2.5 feet bgs in soil boring
EB-6 which exceeds the Residential RSL of 400 mg/kg. Lead was also detected at 639, 960,
and 921 mg/kg in samples MW-1 1’, MW-2 2’, and MW-6 1’, respectively during the 2022
investigation with the latter two exceeding the Industrial RSL of 800 mg/kg. These samples
also exceed the DAF 20 SSL of 280 mg/kg.
Arsenic was detected at concentrations exceeding the Industrial RSL in 54 of the 57 soil
samples during the previous investigations. DWMRC has established a background threshold
value for arsenic of 27 mg/kg in Salt Lake County (DWMRC 2023). Most of the reported
values for arsenic fall within the reported background range of up to 27 mg/kg from the
above referenced report, with a few samples slightly above this value. Samples collected
from shallow fill material from EB-6, IB-4, and MW-1 1’ reported concentrations of 171
mg/kg, 106 mg/kg, and 371 mg/kg, respectively, above the DWMRC background threshold.
Arsenic was retained as a soil COPC for risk evaluation purposes (Table 1).
Cr(VI) was analyzed in 20 soil samples during the 2022 investigation. Seven of these
samples exceeded the Residential RSL and the DAF 20 (but not the Industrial RSL), but
each of these was an estimated value (J value). Because the analytical laboratory cannot
currently provide reporting limits that are below the Residential RSL, J-flagged Cr(VI)
results were utilized in the risk calculations (Section 3.1;Table 1)
Risk Evaluation
Woodbine Site | Salt Lake City, Utah
Revised March 1, 2024 | Terracon Project No. 61197179
Facilities | Environmental | Geotechnical | Materials 8
Zirconium was analyzed in 44 soil samples and was detected at concentrations exceeding
the residential RSL of 6.3 mg/kg in 41 of those samples.
Selenium was analyzed in all soil samples and was detected at concentrations exceeding the
DAF 20 SSL of 5.2 mg/kg in EB-6, X-4, and MW-1 1’.
Silver was detected in MW-1 1’ at 17.8 mg/kg, exceeding the DAF 20 SSL of 16 mg/kg.
Mercury was detected in MW-1 1’ at maximum concentration of 2.12 mg/kg, which exceeds
the DAF 20 SSL of 2 mg/kg. However, the mercury EPC of 0.48 mg/kg (a calculated UCL95)
does not exceed the DAF 20 SSL.
2.2.2 Groundwater
Trichloroethene (TCE) was detected at concentrations exceeding the EPA MCL and TGC VISL
for Residential and Commercial sites in sample IB-3, and exceeding the EPA MCL and TGC
VISL for Residential sites in sample X-4. Benzo(a)pyrene, a PAH, was detected at
concentrations exceeding the EPA MCL in IB-2. Dissolved arsenic was detected at
concentrations exceeding the EPA MCL in fifteen of the twenty groundwater samples in
which dissolved RCRA 8 Metals analysis was performed.Table 2 (Appendix B) lists the
COPCs and EPCs for groundwater.
2.2.3 Soil Vapor
Benzene was detected at a concentration exceeding the residential EPA TSSNSGC VISL in X-
9-SSGP. Bromodichloromethane was detected at a concentration exceeding the residential
EPA TSSNSGC VISL in X-5-SSGP. Chloroform was detected at a concentration exceeding the
residential and commercial EPA TSSNSGC VISLs in X-5-SSGP, and at concentrations
exceeding the residential EPA TSSNSGC VISL in X-7-SSGP and X-9-SSGP. TCE was detected
at concentrations exceeding the residential and commercial EPA TSSNSGC VISLs in SSGP-3
and X-5-SSGP, and at a concentration exceeding the residential EPA TSSNSGC VISL in X-7-
SSGP. Table 3 (Appendix B) lists the COPCs and EPCs for soil vapor.
3.0 Risk Calculations
Terracon prepared this Risk Evaluation using the EPA’s online RSL calculator (https://epa-
prgs.ornl.gov/cgi-bin/chemicals/csl_search), EPA’s VISL calculator (https://epa-
visl.ornl.gov/cgi-bin/visl_search), and the VURAM to evaluate the cumulative risk posed by
COPCs at the site in soil, groundwater, and soil vapor.
Risk Evaluation
Woodbine Site | Salt Lake City, Utah
Revised March 1, 2024 | Terracon Project No. 61197179
Facilities | Environmental | Geotechnical | Materials 9
3.1 RSL Calculator Data Inputs
Parameter Input
Screening
Level Type
Regional Screening Levels (RSLs)
Hazard Index 1.0—was selected at the direction of Utah Department of Environmental
Quality (UDEQ) to evaluate cumulative the non-cancer risk posed by
COPCs at the site.
Target Risk 10-6 (i.e., one in one million)—was selected at the direction of UDEQ to
evaluate the cumulative cancer risk posed by COPCs at the site.
Scenario Resident—To be conservative, the Resident was initially selected as the
receptor (see Section 2.2). Other scenarios were also run for indoor
worker, outdoor worker, and construction worker.
Media The RSL calculator was run for soil and tap water media.
Screening
Level Choice
Site Specific inputs were selected, as required by the next choice “Risk
Output.” Within this parameter the option “Database Hierarchy Defaults”
was selected.
Risk Output Risk Output was affirmative as this directs the RSL Calculator to present
site-specific risk posed by each individual COPC and the cumulative risk.
RfD/RdC
Choice
Chronic
Chemicals Soils—the COPC EPCs identified for soil at the site were entered in this
section, as discussed in Section 2.3.1 and listed in Table 1 (Appendix
B).
Tapwater—the COPC EPCs identified for groundwater at the site were
entered in this section, as discussed in Section 2.3.2 and listed in Table
2 (Appendix B).
Risk Evaluation
Woodbine Site | Salt Lake City, Utah
Revised March 1, 2024 | Terracon Project No. 61197179
Facilities | Environmental | Geotechnical | Materials 10
Parameter Input
Particulate
Emission
Factor Wind
Driven
The calculator allows for the selection of selected site-specific
parameters, based on guidance from the updated Supplemental
Guidance for Developing Soil Screening Levels for Superfund Sites (EPA,
2002). For the City—Salt Lake City was selected as the Climatic Zone.
Volatilization
Factor and
Soil Saturation
The calculator allows for the selection of selected site-specific
parameters, based on guidance from the updated Supplemental
Guidance for Developing Soil Screening Levels for Superfund Sites (EPA,
2002). For the City—Salt Lake City was selected as the Climatic Zone.
Volatilization
Factor—Mass
Limit
As noted above, based on EPA guidance, and site-specific parameters
selected in this section (EPA 2002).
Average source depth (dS)– 1.5 meters (5 feet) was the average depth
of all samples collected from the site.
City—Salt Lake City was selected as the Climatic Zone.
Terracon also input the concentrations of all soil and tapwater COPCs. All other parameters
were default parameters associated with the options described above, except where
indicated.
3.2 VISL Calculator Data Inputs
Soil vapor risks were calculated using the EPA VISL Calculator following the parameters
listed below:
Parameter Input
Screening
Level Type
VISLs
Hazard
Quotient
1.0—was selected at the direction of Utah DEQ to evaluate cumulative
the non-cancer risk posed by COPCs at the site.
Risk Evaluation
Woodbine Site | Salt Lake City, Utah
Revised March 1, 2024 | Terracon Project No. 61197179
Facilities | Environmental | Geotechnical | Materials 11
Parameter Input
Target Risk 10-6 (i.e., one in one million)—was selected at the direction of UDEQ to
evaluate the cumulative cancer risk posed by COPCs at the site.
Scenario Resident—To be conservative, the Resident was initially selected as the
receptor (see Section 2.2). Another scenario was also run for
Commercial.
Media The calculator was run for Site Sub-slab or Near-source Soil Gas
Screening
Level Choice
Site Specific inputs was selected, as required by the next choice, “Risk
Output.” Within this parameter the option “Database Hierarchy Defaults”
was selected.
Risk Output Risk Output was affirmative as this directs the RSL Calculator to present
site-specific risk posed by each individual COPC and the cumulative risk.
RfD/RdC
Choice
Chronic
Chemicals Soil Vapor—The COPC EPCs identified for soil vapor at the site were
entered in this section, as discussed in Section 2.3.3 and listed in Table
3 (Appendix B).
Terracon also input the concentrations of all soil vapor COPCs. All other parameters were
default parameters associated with the options described above, except where indicated.
3.3 Results of the Onsite Risk Evaluation
The following table summarizes the results from the EPA’s software for the Resident
Scenario. All final risk results are reported as one significant figure per EPA guidelines.
Risk Evaluation
Woodbine Site | Salt Lake City, Utah
Revised March 1, 2024 | Terracon Project No. 61197179
Facilities | Environmental | Geotechnical | Materials 12
Carcinogenic Risk Non-Carcinogenic Hazard Index
Soil = 1 x 10-4 Soil (Adult) = 6 x 10-1 Soil (Child) = 6
Tapwater = 1 x 10-4 Tapwater (Adult) =
7 x 10-1
Tap water (Child) = 1
Soil Vapor (VISL) = 5 x 10-5 Soil Vapor (VISL) = 1 Not Applicable1
Sum of Soil, Tapwater,
Soil Vapor = 3 x 10-4
Sum of Soil, Tapwater,
Soil Vapor (Adult) = 2
Sum of Soil, Tapwater
(Child) = 7
The following table summarizes the results from the EPA’s software for the Indoor Worker
Scenario. All final risk results are reported as one significant figure per EPA guidelines.
Carcinogenic Risk Non-Carcinogenic Hazard Index
Soil = 8 x 10-6 Soil = 2 x 10-1
Soil Vapor = 1 x 10-5 Soil Vapor = 2 x 10-1
Sum of Soil, Soil Vapor = 2 x 10-5 Sum of Soil, Soil Vapor = 5 x 10-1
The following table summarizes the results from the EPA’s software for the Outdoor Worker
Scenario. All final risk results are reported as one significant figure per EPA guidelines.
1 US EPA VISL calculator does not provide child-specific non-carcinogenic Hazard Index calculations.
Risk Evaluation
Woodbine Site | Salt Lake City, Utah
Revised March 1, 2024 | Terracon Project No. 61197179
Facilities | Environmental | Geotechnical | Materials 13
Carcinogenic Risk Non-Carcinogenic Hazard Index
Soil = 2 x 10-5 Soil = 1
The following table summarizes the results from the EPA’s software and the VURAM for the
Construction Worker Scenario. All final risk results are reported as one significant figure per
EPA guidelines.
Carcinogenic Risk Non-Carcinogenic Hazard Index
Soil = 5 x 10-6 Soil (Adult) = 2
Soil Vapor = 7 x 10-8 Soil Vapor (Adult in Trench) = 1 x 10-1
Sum of Soil, Soil Vapor = 5 x 10-6 Sum of Soil, Soil Vapor = 2
Appendix C contains the input and output information from the EPA and VURAM software.
A target organ analysis was conducted for exposure scenarios where the cumulative non-
carcinogenic Hazard Index exceeded 1 (Resident, Construction Worker). The target organ
analysis results are presented in Table 4 through Table 5 (Appendix B). Due to the large
number of COPCs present, the target organ analysis excluded COPCs with a Hazard Index of
<0.1. Target organ analysis reduced the organ-specific Hazard Indexes to ≤1 for all COPCs
in both the Adult Resident and Construction Worker scenarios. In the Child Resident
scenarios, the target organ analysis reduced the organ-specific Hazard Indexes to ≤1 for all
COPCs except zirconium.
The scenarios listed above are for comparison and worst-case scenario purposes assuming
no controls are in place (i.e., complete exposure pathways for future residents with no
controls for exposure to impacted soil and groundwater). As such, this evaluation results in
highly conservative risk estimates.
Lead Risks
To evaluate risks from lead in soil at the site, the Integrated Exposure Uptake Biokinetic
Model for Lead in Children (IEUBK) was used to generate a site-specific preliminary
remediation goal (PRG). The IEUBK parameters used the calculate the PRG were the
following:
blood lead cutoff concentration of 10 micrograms per deciliter
Risk Evaluation
Woodbine Site | Salt Lake City, Utah
Revised March 1, 2024 | Terracon Project No. 61197179
Facilities | Environmental | Geotechnical | Materials 14
geometric standard deviation of 1.6
probability of exceeding the cutoff concentration of 5%
age group of 12 months to 72 months.
The calculated site-specific PRG is 611 mg/kg. The lead EPC (Table 1) exceeds the PRG by
5.2%. The lead EPC (Table 1) does not exceed the EPA Industrial RSL and is thus suitable
for a closure that restricts land use at the site to industrial uses.
3.4 Soil-To-Groundwater Pathway Evaluation
Thirteen of the soil COPCs exceeded DAF 20 groundwater protection SSLs. Multiple lines of
evidence indicate that soil contamination is unlikely to impact groundwater.
Soil contamination is exclusively present in shallow fill soils above the water table.
The vast majority of the site is covered by concrete and asphalt which serves to
limit infiltration.
Subsurface native soils consist of low-permeability clays and silty clays. All
monitoring wells purged dry during development.
Of the thirteen soil COPCs that exceed DAF 20 SSLs, only two exceeded MCLs in
groundwater (arsenic and benzo(a)pyrene) and none exceeded VISL TGCs.
Groundwater dissolved arsenic concentrations reported at 20–30 feet bgs were
similar to those reported in groundwater at 10–15 feet bgs. If arsenic was leaching
from shallow fill soils to groundwater it would be expected that arsenic
concentrations would be higher in the 10–15 feet bgs interval than the 20–30 feet
bgs interval. Further, dissolved arsenic concentrations reported in groundwater at
10–15 feet bgs appear to be naturally occurring.
Groundwater is not impacted above MCLs by any other metals.
Benzo(a)pyrene) exceeded the MCL at only one sampling location.
4.0 Ecological Risk Assessment
The site was fully developed with commercial and residential buildings as early as 1911. The
site is in a developed commercial area. No surface water bodies are located on the site or
adjoining properties. The current and future use of the site is commercial with no significant
renovations to the current on-site buildings expected in the near future. As such, the site is
not a viable habitat and cannot be used by potential ecological receptors as a habitat. Per
Utah Administrative Code R315-101.5.3(a)(8), an Application for a Waiver of an Ecological
Risk Assessment has been prepared and is included as Appendix D.
Risk Evaluation
Woodbine Site | Salt Lake City, Utah
Revised March 1, 2024 | Terracon Project No. 61197179
Facilities | Environmental | Geotechnical | Materials 15
5.0 Conclusion
Calculated site risks currently exceed R315-101 thresholds for residential use but not for
commercial or industrial use. Land use at the site is currently entirely commercial/industrial.
Residential development may occur in the future, but not for a minimum of 7–10 years. As
such, Woodbine Industries, LLC requests that DWMRC issue a “Corrective Action Complete
with Controls” (CACWC) closure for the site. Per the requirements of a CACWC closure, a
Site Management Plan will be developed to mitigate the residual risk in soils and
groundwater, and an Environmental Covenant will be recorded on the property title
restricting land use to commercial/industrial uses and providing appropriate controls and
Activity and Use Limitations to mitigate exposure to and use of groundwater at the site.
If and when residential development is contemplated at the site, a Corrective Action Plan
(CAP) will be prepared and submitted to DWMRC. The Environmental Covenant will remain
in effect until implementation of the CAP is complete and environmental risks at the site
have been reduced below R315-101 thresholds for residential land use.
6.0 References
Terracon 2019a. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Mixed Use Redevelopment, 534,
540, 545, 549, and 585 West 700 South, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah.
March 21.
Terracon 2019b. Limited Site Investigation, Mixed Use Redevelopment, 534, 540, 545, 549,
and 585 West 700 South, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah.June 24.
Terracon 2021. Limited Contamination Assessment Report, Ameritech Coatings, Inc. 534
West 800 South, Salt Lake City, Utah, Salt Lake County, Utah.January 14.
Terracon 2022. Phase II Environmental Site Assessment, Salt Lake Brownfields Assessment;
EPA Cooperative Agreement No. 95811800, Proposed Woodbine Mixed Use
Redevelopment, 545 West 700 South, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah,
November 22.
United States Environmental Protection Agency, Supplemental Guidance for Developing Soil
Screening Levels for Superfund Sites, 2002.
United States Environmental Protection Agency, Regional Screening Levels for Chemical
Contaminants at Superfund Sites;https://epa-prgs.ornl.gov/cgi-
bin/chemicals/csl_search.
Utah Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Waste Management and Radiation
Control (DWMRC), Technical Guide for Risk Assessments: Utah Administrative Code
R315-101, 2023.
Appendix A
Exhibits
Exhibit 1 Site Topographic Map
Exhibit 2 Site Diagram
Exhibit 3 Conceptual Site Model
TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
Woodbine Site
534, 540, 545, 549, and 585 West 700 South
Salt Lake City, UT
TOPOGRAPHIC MAP IMAGE COURTESY OF THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
QUADRANGLES INCLUDE: SALT LAKE CITY NORTH, UT (1/1/1998) and SALT LAKE CITY SOUTH, UT (1/1/1999).
6949 S High Tech Dr, Ste 100
Midvale, UT 84047-3707
61197179
Project Manager:
Drawn by:
Checked by:
Approved by:
AT
BBB
BBB
1”=2,000’
Ex 1 & 2
March 2021
Project No.
Scale:
File Name:
Date:
1
ExhibitAT
APPROXIMATE
SITE BOUNDARY
SITE DIAGRAM
Woodbine Site
545 West 900 South
Salt Lake City, UT
6952 S High Tech Dr, Ste B
Midvale, UT 84047-3772
DIAGRAM IS FOR GENERAL LOCATION ONLY, AND IS
NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES
61197179
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY PROVIDED
BY MICROSOFT BING MAPS
DD
AA
AA
AS SHOWN
Woodbine Site Map
2/15/2024
Scale:
2
ExhibitProject Manager:
Drawn by:
Checked by:
Approved by:
Project No.
File Name:
Date:
DD
Fill:
Metals: Arsenic, Cadmium,
Hexavalent Chromium, Lead
SVOCs
Soil Gas
Groundwater:
Arsenic
Trichloroethene
Benzo(A)Pyrene
Groundwater
Native Soil:
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Soil Gas:
Benzene
Bromodichloromethane
Chloroform
Trichloroethene
Construction
Worker
Dermal Contact
Ingestion
Inhalation
CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL
6949 S High Tech Drive
Midvale, Utah 84047
61197179
Employee Resident
Current Use/Future Use
Woodbine Site
534, 540, 545, 549, and 585 West 700 South
Salt Lake City, Utah
Project Manager:
Drawn by:
Checked by:
Approved by:
AST
AA
AA
DD
Exhibit3
June 2023
Scale:
Project No.
File Name:
Date:
none 3
Exhibit
RECEPTORS
Complete pathway
Incomplete pathway
Fill
Soil
Dermal Contact
SOURCE INTERACTION
Contamination
Exposure
Medium
Exposure
Route
Ingestion
Appendix B
Tables
Table 1 Soil Exposure Point Concentrations
Table 2 Groundwater Exposure Point Concentrations
Table 3 Soil Vapor Exposure Point Concentrations
Table 4 Resident Target Organ Analysis
Table 5 Construction Worker Target Organ Analysis
Contaminant of Potential Concern
(COPC)
EPA Residential RSL
(mg/kg)
EPA Industrial RSL
(mg/kg)
DAF 20 Groundwater
(mg/kg)
Arsenic 0.68 3 5.8 41.73
Barium 15000 220000 1640 600
Cadmium 7.1 100 7.6 1.656
Total Chromium NE NE 3600000 26.4
Chromium, Trivalent 120000 1800000 800000000 36.5
Hexavalent Chromium 0.3 6.3 0.0134 0.938
Copper 3100 47000 920 703
Lead 400 800 280 642.5
Selenium 390 5800 5.2 18.2
Silver 390 5800 16 17.8
Zinc 23000 350000 7400 343
Mercury 11 46 2 0.48
Zirconium 6.3 93 96 24.34
Acetone 61000 670000 58 0.0925
Benzene 1.2 5.1 0.052 0.0215
Tert-Butylbenzene 7800 120000 32 0.00784
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 2.6 11 0.072 0.00355
Ethylbenzene 5.8 25 15.6 0.0289
Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)1900 9900 14.8 0.00448
P-Isopropyltoluene NE NE NE 0.0252
2-Butalone (MEK)27000 190000 24 0.0317
Naphthalene 3.8 17 0.0108 0.124
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Exposure Point Concentration1
(mg/kg)
TABLE 1 - SOIL EXPOSURE POINT CONCENTRATIONS
Woodbine Site
Salt Lake City, Utah
Terracon Project No. 61197179
Metals
Contaminant of Potential Concern
(COPC)
EPA Residential RSL
(mg/kg)
EPA Industrial RSL
(mg/kg)
DAF 20 Groundwater
(mg/kg)
Exposure Point Concentration1
(mg/kg)
TABLE 1 - SOIL EXPOSURE POINT CONCENTRATIONS
Woodbine Site
Salt Lake City, Utah
Terracon Project No. 61197179
N-Propylbenzene 3800 24000 14.8 0.00431
1,1,2,2,-Tetrachloroethane 0.6 2.7 0.0006 2.18
Tetrachloroethene 24 100 0.046 0.0551
Toluene 4900 47000 13.8 0.136
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 24 110 4 0.00667
Trichloroethene 0.94 6 0.036 0.0697
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 300 1800 1.62 0.0434
1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene 340 2000 1.62 0.0408
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 270 1500 1.74 0.028
Total Xylenes 580 2500 198 0.148
Acenaphthene 3600 45000 110 3.12
Acenapthtylene NE NE NE 1.11
Anthracene 18000 230000 1160 2.99
Benzo(a)anthracene 1.1 21 0.22 6.79
Benzo(b)fluoranthene 1.1 21 6 6.69
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 11 210 58 2.42
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene NE NE NE 3.08
Benzo(a)pyrene 0.11 2.1 4.8 5.97
Chrysene 110 2100 180 6.93
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 0.11 2.1 1.92 0.786
Fluoranthene 2400 30000 1780 14.9
Fluorene 2400 30000 108 4.06
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 1.1 21 19.6 3.41
Naphthalene 3.8 17 0.0108 0.524
Semi Volatile Organic Compounds (SVOCs)
Contaminant of Potential Concern
(COPC)
EPA Residential RSL
(mg/kg)
EPA Industrial RSL
(mg/kg)
DAF 20 Groundwater
(mg/kg)
Exposure Point Concentration1
(mg/kg)
TABLE 1 - SOIL EXPOSURE POINT CONCENTRATIONS
Woodbine Site
Salt Lake City, Utah
Terracon Project No. 61197179
Phenanthrene NE NE NE 10.9
Dimethyl Phthalate NE NE NE 0.0181
Pyrene 1800 23000 260 14.6
Phenol 19000 250000 66 0.0971
1 - EPCs are 95% Upper Confidence Limits (UCL95) for As, Cd, Hg, Pb, and Zr. All other EPCs are the maximum detected concentrations
NE = screening level not established
EPA RSL THQ 1_0 Residential Soil
EPA RSL THQ 1_0 Industrial Soil
DAF 20 Groundwater Protection SSL
Contaminant of Potential Concern
(COPC)
EPA Residential VISL
(mg/L)
EPA Commercial VISL
(mg/L)
EPA MCL
(mg/L)
Arsenic NE NE 0.01 0.0411
Barium NE NE 2 0.33
Total Chromium NE NE 0.1 0.0014
Lead NE NE 0.015 0.00771
Selenium NE NE 0.05 0.0146
Benzene 0.00159 0.00693 0.005 0.000462
N-Butylbenzene NE NE NE 0.00103
Sec-Butylbenzene NE NE NE 0.00146
Tert-Butylbenzene NE NE NE 0.0014
1,1-Dichloroethane 0.00764 0.0334 NE 0.000469
Cis-1,2-Dichloroethene NE NE 0.07 0.00524
P-Isopropyltoluene NE NE NE 0.000521
Trans-1,2-Dichloroethene NE NE 0.1 0.00128
Toluene 19.2 80.7 1 0.000723
Trichloroethene 0.00119 0.00743 0.005 0.00124
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.0359 0.151 0.07 0.000415
1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene 0.351 1.47 NE 0.000764
Total Xylenes 0.385 1.62 10 0.00181
Acenaphthene NE NE NE 0.0104
Acenapthtylene NE NE NE 0.000342
Anthracene NE NE NE 0.00217
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCS)
Semi Volatile Organic Compounds (SVOCs)
Metals
TABLE 2 - GROUNDWATER EXPOSURE POINT CONCENTRATIONS
Woodbine Site
Salt Lake City, Utah
Terracon Project No. 61197179
Exposure Point Concentration1
(mg/L)
Contaminant of Potential Concern
(COPC)
EPA Residential VISL
(mg/L)
EPA Commercial VISL
(mg/L)
EPA MCL
(mg/L)
TABLE 2 - GROUNDWATER EXPOSURE POINT CONCENTRATIONS
Woodbine Site
Salt Lake City, Utah
Terracon Project No. 61197179
Exposure Point Concentration1
(mg/L)
Benz(a)anthracene 34.4 417 NE 0.00161
Benzo(b)fluoranthene NE NE NE 0.00172
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene NE NE NE 0.000928
Benzo(a)pyrene NE NE 0.0002 0.00145
Chrysene NE NE NE 0.00186
Fluoranthene NE NE NE 0.00298
Fluorene NE NE NE 0.0107
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene NE NE NE 0.000852
Naphthalene 0.00459 0.0201 NE 0.000499
Phenanthrene NE NE NE 0.00171
Di-n-Butyl-Phthalate NE NE NE 0.000302
Diethyl Phthalate NE NE NE 0.000282
Dimethyl Phthalate NE NE NE 0.00311
Pyrene NE NE NE 0.00323
Phenol NE NE NE 0.00442
1 - EPCs are 95% Upper Confidence Limits (UCL95) for As and TCE. All other EPCs are the maximum detected concentrations.
NE = screening level not established
EPA Residential VISL THQ 1_0
EPA Commercial VISL THQ 1_0
EPA RSL THP 1_0 MCL
Contaminant of Potential Concern
(COPC)
EPA Residential VISL
(µg/m3)
EPA Commercial VISL
(µg/m3)
ACETONE 1070000 4510000
BENZENE 12 52.4
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE 2.53 11
CARBON DISULFIDE 24300 102000
CHLOROFORM 4.07 17.8
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE 58.5 256
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE NE NE
TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 1390 5840
ETHANOL NE NE
ETHYLBENZENE 37.4 164
HEPTANE 13900 58400
N-HEXANE 24300 102000
METHYLENE CHLORIDE 3380 40900
2-BUTANONE (MEK)174000 730000
2-PROPANOL 6950 29200
PROPENE 104000 438000
STYRENE 34800 146000
TETRACHLOROETHENE 360 1570
TETRAHYDROFURAN 69500 292000
TOLUENE 174000 730000
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 174000 730000
TRICHLOROETHENE 15.9 99.7
1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 2090 8760
M&P-XYLENE 3480 14600
O-XYLENE 3480 14600
1 - EPCs are 95% Upper Confidence Limits (UCL95) for TCE. All other EPCs are the maximum detected concentrations.
NE = screening level not established
µg/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter
EPA Residential VISL THQ 1_0
EPA Industrial/Commercial VISL THQ 1_0
5.1
92.2
160
TABLE 3 - SOIL VAPOR EXPOSURE POINT CONCENTRATIONS
Woodbine Site
Salt Lake City, Utah
Terracon Project No. 61197179
Exposure Point Concentration1
(µg/m3)
45.3
15.4
9.72
6.5
178
36.6
46
8.0
4.35
5.13
7.23
20
21.9
4.7
3.91
7.42
5.96
800
52.82
5.51
31
7
Soil COPCs EPC2
(mg/kg)Target Organ Systems Non-Cancer RSL
(mg/kg)
Child Non-Cancer
Hazard Index3
Adult Non-Cancer
Hazard Index3
Arsenic 41.73 Cardiovascular, Dermal 35 1.19 0.121
Cadmium 1.656 Urinary 7.1 0.232 0.0232
Zirconium 24.34 Respiratory 6.3 3.89 0.365
0.146 0.146
Groundwater COPCs EPC2
(mg/L)Target Organ Systems
Non-Cancer
RSL/VISL
(mg/L)
Child Non-Cancer
Hazard Index3
Adult Non-Cancer
Hazard Index3
Benzo(a)pyrene 0.00145 Developmental, Immune 0.0002 0.145 0.145
Cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.00524 Urinary 0.07 0.151 0.151
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.000415 Endocrine 0.07 0.102 0.102
0.336 0.336
Soil Vapor COPCs EPC2
(µg/m3)Target Organ Systems VISL
(µg/m3)
Child Non-Cancer
Hazard Index3
Adult Non-Cancer
Hazard Index3
Trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 160 Immune 1390 0.115 0.115
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.000415 Endocrine 0.07 0.102 0.102
Trichloroethene (TCE)52.82 Developmental, Immune 15.9 0.76 0.76
0.063 0.063
Total Non-Cancer HI:7E+00 2E+00
Cardiovascular HI:1E+00 1E-01
Dermal HI:1E+00 1E-01
Developmental HI:9E-01 9E-01
Endocrine HI:1E-01 1E-01
Immune HI:1E+00 1E+00
Respiratory HI:4E+00 4E-01
Urinary HI:4E-01 2E-01
3 - See Appendix C for RSL and VISL Calculator Non-Cancer Hazard Index outputs.
4 - All final risk results are reported as one significant figure per EPA guidelines.
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
mg/L = milligrams per liter
µg/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter
USEPA Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) was consulted for target organ groups.
1 - All other COPCs have HIs <0.1. See Table 1 through Table 3 for complete list of COPCs and EPCs.
Other1
Other1
2 - EPCs are 95% Upper Confidence Limits (UCL95) for As, Cd, Zr and TCE. All other EPCs are the maximum detected concentrations.
TABLE 4 - RESIDENT TARGET ORGAN ANALYSIS
Woodbine Site
Salt Lake City, Utah
Terracon Project No. 61197179
Other1
Soil COPCs EPC2
(mg/kg)Target Organ Systems Non-Cancer RSL
(mg/kg)
Non-Cancer
Hazard Index3
Arsenic 41.73 Cardiovascular, Dermal 35 0.601
Zirconium 24.34 Respiratory 6.3 0.896
0.323
Soil Vapor COPCs EPC2
(µg/m3)Target Organ Systems
VISL (µg/m3)
Non-Cancer
Hazard Index3
Trichloroethene (TCE)52.82 Developmental, Immune 15.9 0.147
0.002
Total Non-Cancer HI:2E+00
Cardiovascular HI:6E-01
Dermal HI:6E-01
Developmental HI:1E-01
Immune HI:1E-01
Respiratory HI:9E-01
3 - See Appendix C for RSL, VISL, and VURAM Calculator Non-Cancer Hazard Index outputs.
4 - All final risk results are reported as one significant figure per EPA guidelines.
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
µg/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter
USEPA Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) was consulted for target organ groups.
Other1
1 - All other COPCs have HIs <0.1. See Table 1 through Table 3 for complete list of COPCs and EPCs.
2 - EPCs are 95% Upper Confidence Limits (UCL95) for As, Zr and TCE. All other EPCs are the maximum detected
concentrations.
TABLE 5 - CONSTRUCTION WORKER TARGET ORGAN ANALYSIS
Woodbine Site
Salt Lake City, Utah
Terracon Project No. 61197179
Other1
Appendix C
RSL Calculator, VISL Calculator, VURAM Calculator, and
ProUCL Output Files
Chemical
SFo(mg/kg-day)-
1
SFo
Ref
IUR
(ug/m3)-1
IUR
Ref
RfD
(mg/kg-day)
RfD
Ref
RfC
(mg/m3)
RfC
Ref GIABS ABS RBA
Soil
Saturation
Concentration
(mg/kg)
S
(mg/L)
Koc
(cm3/g)
Kd
(cm3/g)
HLC
(atm-m3/mole)
Henry's
Law
Constant
Used in Calcs
(unitless)
H` and HLC
Ref
Normal
Boiling
Point
BP
(K)
BP
Ref
Critical
Temperature
TC
(K)
TC
Ref
Chemical
Type
Dia
(cm2/s)
Diw
(cm2/s)
DA
(cm2/s)
Particulate
Emission
Factor
(m3/kg)
Volatilization
Factor
UnlimitedReservoir
(m3/kg)
Volatilization
Factor
Mass Limit
(m3/kg)
Volatilization
Factor
Selected
(m3/kg)
Concentration
(mg/kg)
Ingestion
Risk
Dermal
Risk
Inhalation
Risk
Carcinogenic
Risk
Ingestion
Child
HQ
Dermal
Child
HQ
Inhalation
Child
HQ
Noncarcinogenic
Child
HI
Ingestion
Adult
HQ
Dermal
Adult
HQ
Inhalation
Adult
HQ
Noncarcinogenic
Adult
HI
Arsenic, Inorganic 1.50E+00 I 4.30E-03 I 3.00E-04 I 1.50E-05 C 1.00E+00 3.00E-02 6.00E-01 ---2.90E+01 --8.88E+02 PHYSPROP 1.67E+03 CRC INORGANIC ---8.74E+09 ---4.17E+01 5.40E-05 7.60E-06 7.31E-09 6.16E-05 1.07E+00 1.27E-01 3.05E-04 1.19E+00 1.00E-01 2.11E-02 3.05E-04 1.21E-01
Cadmium (Diet)-1.80E-03 I 1.00E-04 A 1.00E-05 A 2.50E-02 1.00E-03 1.00E+00 ---7.50E+01 --1.04E+03 PHYSPROP 2.29E+03 YAWS INORGANIC ---8.74E+09 ---1.66E+00 --1.21E-10 1.21E-10 2.12E-01 2.01E-02 1.82E-05 2.32E-01 1.98E-02 3.35E-03 1.82E-05 2.32E-02
Mercury (elemental)---3.00E-04 I 1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 3.13E+00 6.00E-02 -5.20E+01 8.62E-03 3.52E-01 PHYSPROP VP/S 6.30E+02 PHYSPROP 1.76E+03 CRC INORGANIC 3.07E-02 6.30E-06 1.10E-05 8.74E+09 3.47E+04 0.00E+00 3.47E+04 4.80E-01 ------4.42E-02 4.42E-02 --4.42E-02 4.42E-02
Zirconium --8.00E-05 X -1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 ---3.00E+03 --4.68E+03 CRC 8.80E+03 YAWS INORGANIC ---8.74E+09 ---2.43E+01 ----3.89E+00 --3.89E+00 3.65E-01 --3.65E-01
Acenaphthene --6.00E-02 I -1.00E+00 1.30E-01 1.00E+00 -3.90E+00 5.03E+03 3.02E+01 1.84E-04 7.52E-03 PHYSPROP 5.52E+02 PHYSPROP 8.03E+02 YAWS PAH 5.06E-02 8.33E-06 6.72E-07 5.89E+09 1.12E+05 1.98E+04 1.12E+05 3.12E+00 ----6.65E-04 2.05E-04 -8.70E-04 6.23E-05 3.42E-05 -9.65E-05
Acenaphthylene ----1.00E+00 1.30E-01 1.00E+00 -1.61E+01 5.03E+03 3.02E+01 1.14E-04 4.66E-03 PHYSPROP 5.53E+02 PHYSPROP 7.92E+02 YAWS PAH 4.50E-02 6.98E-06 3.70E-07 5.89E+09 1.51E+05 1.98E+04 1.51E+05 1.11E+00 ------------
Acetone --9.00E-01 I -1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 1.14E+05 1.00E+06 2.36E+00 1.42E-02 3.50E-05 1.43E-03 PHYSPROP 3.29E+02 PHYSPROP 5.08E+02 CRC VOC 1.06E-01 1.15E-05 7.12E-05 5.89E+09 1.09E+04 1.98E+04 1.98E+04 9.25E-02 ----1.31E-06 --1.31E-06 1.23E-07 --1.23E-07
Anthracene --3.00E-01 I -1.00E+00 1.30E-01 1.00E+00 -4.34E-02 1.64E+04 9.82E+01 5.56E-05 2.27E-03 PHYSPROP 6.13E+02 PHYSPROP 8.73E+02 YAWS PAH 3.90E-02 7.85E-06 4.85E-08 5.89E+09 4.17E+05 1.98E+04 4.17E+05 2.99E+00 ----1.27E-04 3.93E-05 -1.67E-04 1.19E-05 6.56E-06 -1.85E-05
Barium --2.00E-01 I 5.00E-04 H 7.00E-02 -1.00E+00 ---4.10E+01 --1.87E+03 PHYSPROP 3.57E+03 YAWS INORGANIC ---5.89E+09 ---6.00E+02 ----3.84E-02 -1.96E-04 3.86E-02 3.60E-03 -1.96E-04 3.79E-03
Benz[a]anthracene 1.00E-01 E 6.00E-05 E --1.00E+00 1.30E-01 1.00E+00 -9.40E-03 1.77E+05 1.06E+03 1.20E-05 4.91E-04 PHYSPROP 7.11E+02 PHYSPROP 9.79E+02 YAWS PAH 2.61E-02 6.75E-06 6.83E-10 5.89E+09 3.51E+06 1.98E+04 3.51E+06 6.79E+00 4.43E-06 1.48E-06 1.14E-07 6.03E-06 --------
Benzene 5.50E-02 I 7.80E-06 I 4.00E-03 I 3.00E-02 I 1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 1.82E+03 1.79E+03 1.46E+02 8.75E-01 5.55E-03 2.27E-01 PHYSPROP 3.53E+02 PHYSPROP 5.62E+02 CRC VOC 8.95E-02 1.03E-05 1.06E-03 5.89E+09 2.82E+03 1.98E+04 1.98E+04 2.15E-02 1.70E-09 -3.02E-09 4.72E-09 6.87E-05 -3.47E-05 1.03E-04 6.44E-06 -3.47E-05 4.12E-05
Benzo[a]pyrene 1.00E+00 I 6.00E-04 I 3.00E-04 I 2.00E-06 I 1.00E+00 1.30E-01 1.00E+00 -1.62E-03 5.87E+05 -4.57E-07 1.87E-05 PHYSPROP 7.68E+02 PHYSPROP 9.69E+02
EPA 2001 Fact
Sheet PAH 2.55E-02 6.58E-06 -5.89E+09 ---5.97E+00 3.90E-05 1.30E-05 6.00E-10 5.20E-05 2.54E-01 7.85E-02 4.86E-04 3.33E-01 2.39E-02 1.31E-02 4.86E-04 3.74E-02
Benzo[b]fluoranthene 1.00E-01 E 6.00E-05 E --1.00E+00 1.30E-01 1.00E+00 -1.50E-03 5.99E+05 -6.57E-07 2.69E-05 PHYSPROP 7.16E+02 EPI 9.69E+02
EPA 2001 Fact
Sheet PAH 2.50E-02 6.43E-06 -5.89E+09 ---6.69E+00 4.37E-06 1.46E-06 6.73E-11 5.83E-06 --------
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene ----1.00E+00 1.30E-01 1.00E+00 -2.60E-04 1.95E+06 -3.31E-07 1.35E-05 PHYSPROP 7.59E+02 EPI 1.09E+03 Jobak Method PAH 2.39E-02 6.09E-06 -5.89E+09 ---3.08E+00 ------------
Benzo[k]fluoranthene 1.00E-02 E 6.00E-06 E --1.00E+00 1.30E-01 1.00E+00 -8.00E-04 5.87E+05 -5.84E-07 2.39E-05 PHYSPROP 7.53E+02 PHYSPROP 1.02E+03
EPA 2001 Fact
Sheet PAH 2.50E-02 6.43E-06 -5.89E+09 ---2.42E+00 1.58E-07 5.27E-08 2.43E-12 2.11E-07 --------
Butylbenzene, tert---1.00E-01 X -1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 1.83E+02 2.95E+01 1.00E+03 6.01E+00 1.32E-02 5.40E-01 EPI 4.42E+02 PHYSPROP 6.48E+02 CRC VOC 5.30E-02 7.37E-06 2.45E-04 5.89E+09 5.86E+03 1.98E+04 1.98E+04 7.84E-03 ----1.00E-06 --1.00E-06 9.40E-08 --9.40E-08
Chromium(III), Insoluble Salts --1.50E+00 I -1.30E-02 -1.00E+00 ---1.80E+06 ----INORGANIC ---5.89E+09 ---3.65E+01 ----3.11E-04 --3.11E-04 2.92E-05 --2.92E-05
Chromium(VI)5.00E-01 C 8.40E-02 G 3.00E-03 I 1.00E-04 I 2.50E-02 -1.00E+00 -1.69E+06 -1.90E+01 ----INORGANIC ---5.89E+09 ---9.38E-01 3.06E-06 -1.32E-08 3.08E-06 4.00E-03 -1.53E-06 4.00E-03 3.75E-04 -1.53E-06 3.76E-04
Chromium, Total ----1.30E-02 -1.00E+00 ---1.80E+06 --2.92E+03 PHYSPROP 8.56E+03 YAWS INORGANIC ---5.89E+09 ---2.64E+01 ------------
Chrysene 1.00E-03 E 6.00E-07 E --1.00E+00 1.30E-01 1.00E+00 -2.00E-03 1.81E+05 -5.23E-06 2.14E-04 PHYSPROP 7.21E+02 PHYSPROP 9.79E+02 YAWS PAH 2.61E-02 6.75E-06 -5.89E+09 ---6.93E+00 4.53E-08 1.51E-08 6.97E-13 6.04E-08 --------
Copper --4.00E-02 H -1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 ---3.50E+01 --2.87E+03 PHYSPROP 5.12E+03 YAWS INORGANIC ---5.89E+09 ---7.03E+02 ----2.25E-01 --2.25E-01 2.11E-02 --2.11E-02
Cumene --1.00E-01 I 4.00E-01 I 1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 2.68E+02 6.13E+01 6.98E+02 4.19E+00 1.15E-02 4.70E-01 PHYSPROP 4.26E+02 PHYSPROP 6.31E+02 CRC VOC 6.03E-02 7.86E-06 3.45E-04 5.89E+09 4.94E+03 1.98E+04 1.98E+04 4.48E-03 ----5.73E-07 -5.43E-07 1.12E-06 5.37E-08 -5.43E-07 5.96E-07
Dibenz[a,h]anthracene 1.00E+00 E 6.00E-04 E --1.00E+00 1.30E-01 1.00E+00 -2.49E-03 1.91E+06 -1.41E-07 5.76E-06 EPI 7.97E+02 PHYSPROP 9.90E+02
EPA 2001 Fact
Sheet PAH 2.36E-02 6.02E-06 -5.89E+09 ---7.86E-01 5.13E-06 1.71E-06 7.90E-11 6.85E-06 --------
Dichlorobenzene, 1,4-5.40E-03 C 1.10E-05 C 7.00E-02 A 8.00E-01 I 1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 -8.13E+01 3.75E+02 2.25E+00 2.41E-03 9.85E-02 PHYSPROP 4.47E+02 PHYSPROP 6.69E+02 CRC VOC 5.50E-02 8.68E-06 1.22E-04 5.89E+09 8.32E+03 1.98E+04 1.98E+04 3.55E-03 2.76E-11 -7.03E-10 7.30E-10 6.48E-07 -2.15E-07 8.63E-07 6.08E-08 -2.15E-07 2.76E-07
Dimethylphthalate ----1.00E+00 1.00E-01 1.00E+00 -4.00E+03 3.16E+01 -1.97E-07 8.05E-06 EPI 5.57E+02 PHYSPROP 7.72E+02 CRC SVOC 2.99E-02 7.14E-06 -5.89E+09 ---1.81E-02 ------------
Ethylbenzene 1.10E-02 C 2.50E-06 C 5.00E-02 P 1.00E+00 I 1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 4.80E+02 1.69E+02 4.46E+02 2.68E+00 7.88E-03 3.22E-01 PHYSPROP 4.09E+02 PHYSPROP 6.17E+02 CRC VOC 6.85E-02 8.46E-06 4.14E-04 5.89E+09 4.51E+03 1.98E+04 1.98E+04 2.89E-02 4.57E-10 -1.30E-09 1.76E-09 7.39E-06 -1.40E-06 8.79E-06 6.93E-07 -1.40E-06 2.09E-06
Fluoranthene --4.00E-02 I -1.00E+00 1.30E-01 1.00E+00 -2.60E-01 5.55E+04 -8.86E-06 3.62E-04 PHYSPROP 6.57E+02 PHYSPROP 9.05E+02 YAWS PAH 2.76E-02 7.18E-06 -5.89E+09 ---1.49E+01 ----4.76E-03 1.47E-03 -6.23E-03 4.46E-04 2.45E-04 -6.92E-04
Fluorene --4.00E-02 I -1.00E+00 1.30E-01 1.00E+00 -1.69E+00 9.16E+03 5.50E+01 9.62E-05 3.93E-03 PHYSPROP 5.68E+02 PHYSPROP 8.26E+02 YAWS PAH 4.40E-02 7.89E-06 1.68E-07 5.89E+09 2.24E+05 1.98E+04 2.24E+05 4.06E+00 ----1.30E-03 4.00E-04 -1.70E-03 1.22E-04 6.68E-05 -1.88E-04
Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 1.00E-01 E 6.00E-05 E --1.00E+00 1.30E-01 1.00E+00 -1.90E-04 1.95E+06 -3.48E-07 1.42E-05 PHYSPROP 8.09E+02 PHYSPROP 1.08E+03
EPA 2001 Fact
Sheet PAH 2.47E-02 6.37E-06 -5.89E+09 ---3.41E+00 2.23E-06 7.43E-07 3.43E-11 2.97E-06 --------
Isopropyltoluene, p-----1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 1.62E+02 2.34E+01 1.12E+03 6.72E+00 1.10E-02 4.50E-01 EPI 4.50E+02 PHYSPROP 6.54E+02 CRC VOC 5.27E-02 7.32E-06 1.83E-04 5.89E+09 6.79E+03 1.98E+04 1.98E+04 2.52E-02 ------------
Lead and Compounds ----1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 ---9.00E+02 --2.02E+03 CRC 5.40E+03 YAWS INORGANIC ---5.89E+09 ---9.60E+02 ------------
Methyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone)--6.00E-01 I 5.00E+00 I 1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 2.84E+04 2.23E+05 4.51E+00 2.71E-02 5.69E-05 2.33E-03 PHYSPROP 3.53E+02 PHYSPROP 5.37E+02 CRC VOC 9.14E-02 1.02E-05 8.94E-05 5.89E+09 9.71E+03 1.98E+04 1.98E+04 3.17E-02 ----6.75E-07 -3.07E-07 9.83E-07 6.33E-08 -3.07E-07 3.71E-07
Naphthalene 1.20E-01 C 3.40E-05 C 2.00E-02 I 3.00E-03 I 1.00E+00 1.30E-01 1.00E+00 -3.10E+01 1.54E+03 9.26E+00 4.40E-04 1.80E-02 PHYSPROP 4.91E+02 PHYSPROP 7.48E+02 CRC PAH 6.05E-02 8.38E-06 6.20E-06 5.89E+09 3.69E+04 1.98E+04 3.69E+04 1.24E-01 2.14E-08 7.83E-09 4.07E-08 6.99E-08 7.93E-05 2.45E-05 1.07E-03 1.18E-03 7.43E-06 4.08E-06 1.07E-03 1.09E-03
Phenanthrene ----1.00E+00 1.30E-01 1.00E+00 -1.15E+00 1.67E+04 1.00E+02 4.23E-05 1.73E-03 PHYSPROP 6.13E+02 PHYSPROP 8.69E+02 YAWS PAH 3.45E-02 6.69E-06 3.21E-08 5.89E+09 5.12E+05 1.98E+04 5.12E+05 1.09E+01 ------------
Phenol --3.00E-01 I 2.00E-01 C 1.00E+00 1.00E-01 1.00E+00 -8.28E+04 1.87E+02 -3.33E-07 1.36E-05 PHYSPROP 4.55E+02 PHYSPROP 6.94E+02 CRC SVOC 8.34E-02 1.03E-05 -5.89E+09 ---9.71E-02 ----4.14E-06 9.82E-07 7.91E-11 5.12E-06 3.88E-07 1.64E-07 7.91E-11 5.52E-07
Propyl benzene --1.00E-01 X 1.00E+00 X 1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 2.64E+02 5.22E+01 8.13E+02 4.88E+00 1.05E-02 4.29E-01 PHYSPROP 4.32E+02 PHYSPROP 6.38E+02 CRC VOC 6.02E-02 7.83E-06 2.72E-04 5.89E+09 5.57E+03 1.98E+04 1.98E+04 4.31E-03 ----5.51E-07 -2.09E-07 7.60E-07 5.17E-08 -2.09E-07 2.61E-07
Pyrene --3.00E-02 I -1.00E+00 1.30E-01 1.00E+00 -1.35E-01 5.43E+04 3.26E+02 1.19E-05 4.87E-04 PHYSPROP 6.77E+02 PHYSPROP 9.36E+02 YAWS PAH 2.78E-02 7.25E-06 2.35E-09 5.89E+09 1.89E+06 1.98E+04 1.89E+06 1.46E+01 ----6.22E-03 1.92E-03 -8.14E-03 5.83E-04 3.20E-04 -9.04E-04
Selenium --5.00E-03 I 2.00E-02 C 1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 ---5.00E+00 --9.58E+02 PHYSPROP 1.77E+03 CRC INORGANIC ---5.89E+09 ---1.82E+01 ----4.65E-02 -1.48E-07 4.65E-02 4.36E-03 -1.48E-07 4.36E-03
Silver --5.00E-03 I -4.00E-02 -1.00E+00 ---8.30E+00 --2.27E+03 PHYSPROP 6.41E+03 CRC INORGANIC ---5.89E+09 ---1.78E+01 ----4.55E-02 --4.55E-02 4.27E-03 --4.27E-03
Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2-2.00E-01 I 5.80E-05 C 2.00E-02 I -1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 1.90E+03 2.83E+03 9.49E+01 5.70E-01 3.67E-04 1.50E-02 PHYSPROP 4.20E+02 PHYSPROP 6.45E+02 YAWS VOC 4.89E-02 9.29E-06 5.82E-05 5.89E+09 1.20E+04 1.98E+04 1.98E+04 2.18E+00 6.27E-07 -2.28E-06 2.90E-06 1.39E-03 --1.39E-03 1.31E-04 --1.31E-04
Tetrachloroethylene 2.10E-03 I 2.60E-07 I 6.00E-03 I 4.00E-02 I 1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 1.66E+02 2.06E+02 9.49E+01 5.70E-01 1.77E-02 7.24E-01 PHYSPROP 3.94E+02 PHYSPROP 6.20E+02 YAWS VOC 5.05E-02 9.46E-06 2.41E-03 5.89E+09 1.87E+03 1.98E+04 1.98E+04 5.51E-02 1.66E-10 -2.58E-10 4.24E-10 1.17E-04 -6.68E-05 1.84E-04 1.10E-05 -6.68E-05 7.78E-05
Toluene --8.00E-02 I 5.00E+00 I 1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 8.18E+02 5.26E+02 2.34E+02 1.40E+00 6.64E-03 2.71E-01 PHYSPROP 3.84E+02 PHYSPROP 5.92E+02 CRC VOC 7.78E-02 9.20E-06 7.24E-04 5.89E+09 3.41E+03 1.98E+04 1.98E+04 1.36E-01 ----2.17E-05 -1.32E-06 2.31E-05 2.04E-06 -1.32E-06 3.36E-06
Trichlorobenzene, 1,2,4-2.90E-02 P -1.00E-02 I 2.00E-03 P 1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 4.04E+02 4.90E+01 1.36E+03 8.14E+00 1.42E-03 5.81E-02 PHYSPROP 4.87E+02 PHYSPROP 7.25E+02 YAWS VOC 3.96E-02 8.40E-06 1.49E-05 5.89E+09 2.38E+04 1.98E+04 2.38E+04 6.67E-03 2.78E-10 --2.78E-10 8.53E-06 -1.34E-04 1.43E-04 7.99E-07 -1.34E-04 1.35E-04
Trichloroethylene 4.60E-02 I 4.10E-06 I 5.00E-04 I 2.00E-03 I 1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 6.92E+02 1.28E+03 6.07E+01 3.64E-01 9.85E-03 4.03E-01 PHYSPROP 3.60E+02 PHYSPROP 5.71E+02 YAWS VOC 6.87E-02 1.02E-05 2.73E-03 5.89E+09 1.76E+03 1.98E+04 1.98E+04 6.97E-02 7.94E-09 -7.36E-09 1.53E-08 1.78E-03 -1.69E-03 3.47E-03 1.67E-04 -1.69E-03 1.86E-03
Trimethylbenzene, 1,2,3---1.00E-02 I 6.00E-02 I 1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 2.93E+02 7.52E+01 6.27E+02 3.76E+00 4.36E-03 1.78E-01 PHYSPROP 4.49E+02 PHYSPROP 6.64E+02 CRC VOC 6.13E-02 8.02E-06 1.49E-04 5.89E+09 7.52E+03 1.98E+04 1.98E+04 4.08E-02 ----5.22E-05 -3.30E-05 8.51E-05 4.89E-06 -3.30E-05 3.78E-05
Trimethylbenzene, 1,2,4---1.00E-02 I 6.00E-02 I 1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 2.19E+02 5.70E+01 6.14E+02 3.69E+00 6.16E-03 2.52E-01 PHYSPROP 4.42E+02 PHYSPROP 6.49E+02 CRC VOC 6.07E-02 7.92E-06 2.12E-04 5.89E+09 6.30E+03 1.98E+04 1.98E+04 4.34E-02 ----5.55E-05 -3.51E-05 9.05E-05 5.20E-06 -3.51E-05 4.03E-05
Trimethylbenzene, 1,3,5---1.00E-02 I 6.00E-02 I 1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 1.82E+02 4.82E+01 6.02E+02 3.61E+00 8.77E-03 3.59E-01 PHYSPROP 4.38E+02 PHYSPROP 6.37E+02 CRC VOC 6.02E-02 7.84E-06 3.04E-04 5.89E+09 5.26E+03 1.98E+04 1.98E+04 2.80E-02 ----3.58E-05 -2.26E-05 5.84E-05 3.36E-06 -2.26E-05 2.60E-05
Xylenes --2.00E-01 I 1.00E-01 I 1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 2.60E+02 1.06E+02 3.83E+02 2.30E+00 6.63E-03 2.71E-01 PHYSPROP 4.12E+02 PHYSPROP 6.20E+02 YAWS VOC 6.85E-02 8.46E-06 4.04E-04 5.89E+09 4.57E+03 1.98E+04 1.98E+04 1.48E-01 ----9.46E-06 -7.17E-05 8.12E-05 8.87E-07 -7.17E-05 7.26E-05
Zinc and Compounds --3.00E-01 I -1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 ---6.20E+01 --1.18E+03 PHYSPROP 3.17E+03 YAWS INORGANIC ---5.89E+09 ---3.43E+02 ----1.46E-02 --1.46E-02 1.37E-03 --1.37E-03
*Total Risk/HI -----------------------1.13E-04 2.61E-05 2.47E-06 1.42E-04 5.82E+00 2.30E-01 4.84E-02 6.09E+00 5.45E-01 3.82E-02 4.84E-02 6.32E-01
Site-specific
Resident Risk for Soil
Output generated 25JAN2024:16:04:32
Woodbine Site
Chemical SFo(mg/kg-day)-1
SFo
Ref
IUR
(ug/m3)-1
IUR
Ref
RfD
(mg/kg-day)
RfD
Ref
RfC
(mg/m3)
RfC
Ref GIABS
Kp
(cm/hr)MW
B
(unitless)t*(hr)
τevent(hr/even
t)
FA
(unitless) In EPD?DAevent (ca)DAevent (nc child)DAevent (nc adult)
MCL
(ug/L)
Concentration
(ug/L)
Ingestion
Risk
Dermal
Risk
Inhalation
Risk
Carcinogenic
Risk
Ingestion
Child
HQ
Dermal
Child
HQ
Inhalation
Child
HQ
Noncarcinogenic
Child
HI
Ingestion
Adult
HQ
Dermal
Adult
HQ
Inhalation
Adult
HQ
Noncarcinogenic
Adult
HI
Arsenic, Inorganic 1.50E+00 I 4.30E-03 I 3.00E-04 /Chr 1.50E-05 /Chr 1.00E+00 1.00E-03 7.49E+01 3.33E-03 6.63E-01 2.76E-01 1.00E+00 Yes 6.52E-06 7.37E-04 1.27E-03 1.00E+01 4.11E-02 7.91E-07 4.23E-09 -7.96E-07 6.83E-03 3.01E-05 -6.86E-03 4.11E-03 2.29E-05 -4.13E-03
Trichloroethylene 4.60E-02 I 4.10E-06 I 5.00E-04 /Sub 2.15E-03 /Sub 1.00E+00 1.16E-02 1.31E+02 5.11E-02 1.37E+00 5.72E-01 1.00E+00 Yes 1.48E-04 1.23E-03 2.12E-03 5.00E+00 1.24E-03 1.05E-09 1.66E-10 1.30E-09 2.51E-09 1.24E-04 1.80E-05 2.77E-04 4.18E-04 7.43E-05 1.19E-05 2.77E-04 3.63E-04
Acenaphthene --6.00E-02 I -1.00E+00 8.60E-02 1.54E+02 4.11E-01 1.84E+00 7.68E-01 1.00E+00 Yes -1.47E-01 2.55E-01 -1.04E+01 ----8.64E-03 1.08E-02 -1.94E-02 5.19E-03 7.17E-03 -1.24E-02
Acenaphthylene ----1.00E+00 9.11E-02 1.52E+02 4.32E-01 1.80E+00 7.48E-01 1.00E+00 Yes ----3.42E-01 ------------
Anthracene --3.00E-01 I -1.00E+00 1.42E-01 1.78E+02 7.29E-01 4.05E+00 1.05E+00 1.00E+00 Yes -7.37E-01 1.27E+00 -2.17E+00 ----3.61E-04 8.69E-04 -1.23E-03 2.17E-04 5.77E-04 -7.93E-04
Barium --2.00E-01 I 5.00E-04 H 7.00E-02 1.00E-03 1.37E+02 4.51E-03 1.48E+00 6.18E-01 1.00E+00 Yes -3.44E-02 5.94E-02 2.00E+03 3.30E+02 ----8.23E-02 5.18E-03 -8.75E-02 4.94E-02 3.94E-03 -5.34E-02
Benz[a]anthracene 1.00E-01 E 6.00E-05 E --1.00E+00 5.52E-01 2.28E+02 3.21E+00 8.48E+00 2.00E+00 1.00E+00 No ----1.61E+00 6.43E-06 -4.76E-05 5.41E-05 --------
Benzene 5.50E-02 I 7.80E-06 I 4.00E-03 I 3.00E-02 I 1.00E+00 1.49E-02 7.81E+01 5.07E-02 6.91E-01 2.88E-01 1.00E+00 Yes 1.78E-04 9.83E-03 1.70E-02 5.00E+00 4.62E-01 3.26E-07 4.70E-08 6.42E-07 1.01E-06 5.76E-03 7.63E-04 7.38E-03 1.39E-02 3.46E-03 5.19E-04 7.38E-03 1.14E-02
Benzo[a]pyrene 1.00E+00 I 6.00E-04 I 3.00E-04 I 2.00E-06 I 1.00E+00 7.13E-01 2.52E+02 4.36E+00 1.18E+01 2.72E+00 1.00E+00 No ---2.00E-01 1.45E+00 5.79E-05 --5.79E-05 2.41E-01 --2.41E-01 1.45E-01 --1.45E-01
Benzo[b]fluoranthene 1.00E-01 E 6.00E-05 E --1.00E+00 4.17E-01 2.52E+02 2.55E+00 1.13E+01 2.72E+00 1.00E+00 No ----1.72E+00 6.87E-06 --6.87E-06 --------
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene ----1.00E+00 1.12E+00 2.76E+02 7.16E+00 1.66E+01 3.71E+00 7.00E-01 No ----9.28E-01 ------------
Benzo[k]fluoranthene 1.00E-02 E 6.00E-06 E --1.00E+00 6.91E-01 2.52E+02 4.22E+00 1.18E+01 2.72E+00 9.00E-01 No -----------------
Butylbenzene, n---5.00E-02 P -1.00E+00 2.25E-01 1.34E+02 1.00E+00 2.29E+00 5.94E-01 1.00E+00 No ----1.03E+00 ----1.03E-03 --1.03E-03 6.17E-04 --6.17E-04
Butylbenzene, sec---1.00E-01 X -1.00E+00 3.01E-01 1.34E+02 1.34E+00 2.34E+00 5.94E-01 1.00E+00 No ----1.46E+00 ----7.28E-04 --7.28E-04 4.38E-04 --4.38E-04
Butylbenzene, tert---1.00E-01 X -1.00E+00 1.49E-01 1.34E+02 6.64E-01 2.33E+00 5.94E-01 1.00E+00 Yes -2.46E-01 4.25E-01 -1.40E+00 ----6.98E-04 1.33E-03 -2.03E-03 4.20E-04 8.82E-04 -1.30E-03
Chromium, Total ----1.30E-02 1.00E-03 5.20E+01 2.77E-03 4.93E-01 2.06E-01 1.00E+00 Yes ---1.00E+02 1.40E+00 ------------
Chrysene 1.00E-03 E 6.00E-07 E --1.00E+00 5.96E-01 2.28E+02 3.46E+00 8.53E+00 2.00E+00 1.00E+00 No ----1.86E+00 7.42E-08 --7.42E-08 --------
Dibutyl Phthalate --1.00E-01 I -1.00E+00 4.20E-02 2.78E+02 2.70E-01 9.14E+00 3.81E+00 9.00E-01 Yes -2.46E-01 4.25E-01 -3.02E-01 ----1.51E-04 1.84E-04 -3.35E-04 9.05E-05 1.22E-04 -2.13E-04
Dichloroethane, 1,1-5.70E-03 C 1.60E-06 C 2.00E-01 P -1.00E+00 6.75E-03 9.90E+01 2.58E-02 9.04E-01 3.77E-01 1.00E+00 Yes 1.72E-03 4.92E-01 8.49E-01 -4.69E-01 3.43E-08 2.56E-09 1.34E-07 1.71E-07 1.17E-04 8.03E-06 -1.25E-04 7.03E-05 5.33E-06 -7.56E-05
Dichloroethylene, cis-1,2---2.00E-03 I 4.00E-02 X 1.00E+00 1.10E-02 9.69E+01 4.17E-02 8.81E-01 3.67E-01 1.00E+00 Yes -4.92E-03 8.49E-03 7.00E+01 5.24E+00 ----1.31E-01 1.44E-02 6.28E-02 2.08E-01 7.85E-02 9.58E-03 6.28E-02 1.51E-01
Dichloroethylene, trans-1,2---2.00E-02 I 4.00E-02 X 1.00E+00 1.10E-02 9.69E+01 4.17E-02 8.81E-01 3.67E-01 1.00E+00 Yes -4.92E-02 8.49E-02 1.00E+02 1.28E+00 ----3.19E-03 3.52E-04 1.53E-02 1.89E-02 1.92E-03 2.34E-04 1.53E-02 1.75E-02
Diethyl Phthalate --8.00E-01 I -1.00E+00 3.60E-03 2.22E+02 2.06E-02 4.43E+00 1.85E+00 1.00E+00 Yes -1.97E+00 3.40E+00 -2.82E-01 ----1.76E-05 1.43E-06 -1.90E-05 1.06E-05 9.46E-07 -1.15E-05
Dimethylphthalate ----1.00E+00 1.47E-03 1.94E+02 7.88E-03 3.09E+00 1.29E+00 1.00E+00 Yes ----3.11E+00 ------------
Fluoranthene --4.00E-02 I -1.00E+00 3.08E-01 2.02E+02 1.68E+00 5.73E+00 1.43E+00 1.00E+00 No ----2.98E+00 ----3.71E-03 --3.71E-03 2.23E-03 --2.23E-03
Fluorene --4.00E-02 I -1.00E+00 1.10E-01 1.66E+02 5.45E-01 2.15E+00 8.97E-01 1.00E+00 Yes -9.83E-02 1.70E-01 -1.07E+01 ----1.33E-02 2.30E-02 -3.64E-02 8.02E-03 1.53E-02 -2.33E-02
Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 1.00E-01 E 6.00E-05 E --1.00E+00 1.24E+00 2.76E+02 7.93E+00 1.67E+01 3.71E+00 6.00E-01 No ----8.52E-01 3.40E-06 --3.40E-06 --------
Isopropyltoluene, p-----1.00E+00 1.47E-01 1.34E+02 6.55E-01 2.33E+00 5.94E-01 1.00E+00 Yes ----5.21E-01 ------------
Lead and Compounds ----1.00E+00 1.00E-04 2.07E+02 5.54E-04 3.65E+00 1.52E+00 1.00E+00 Yes ---1.50E+01 7.71E+00 ------------
Naphthalene 1.20E-01 C 3.40E-05 C 2.00E-02 I 3.00E-03 I 1.00E+00 4.66E-02 1.28E+02 2.03E-01 1.32E+00 5.49E-01 1.00E+00 Yes 8.16E-05 4.92E-02 8.49E-02 -4.99E-01 7.69E-07 4.78E-07 3.02E-06 4.27E-06 1.24E-03 7.12E-04 7.97E-02 8.17E-02 7.48E-04 4.73E-04 7.97E-02 8.10E-02
Phenanthrene ----1.00E+00 1.44E-01 1.78E+02 7.39E-01 4.05E+00 1.05E+00 1.00E+00 Yes ----1.71E+00 ------------
Phenol --3.00E-01 I 2.00E-01 C 1.00E+00 4.34E-03 9.41E+01 1.62E-02 8.49E-01 3.54E-01 1.00E+00 Yes -7.37E-01 1.27E+00 -4.42E+00 ----7.35E-04 3.14E-05 -7.66E-04 4.41E-04 2.09E-05 -4.62E-04
Pyrene --3.00E-02 I -1.00E+00 2.01E-01 2.02E+02 1.10E+00 5.54E+00 1.43E+00 1.00E+00 Yes -7.37E-02 1.27E-01 -3.23E+00 ----5.37E-03 2.14E-02 -2.67E-02 3.23E-03 1.42E-02 -1.74E-02
Selenium --5.00E-03 I 2.00E-02 C 1.00E+00 1.00E-03 7.90E+01 3.42E-03 6.99E-01 2.91E-01 1.00E+00 Yes -1.23E-02 2.12E-02 5.00E+01 1.46E+01 ----1.46E-01 6.42E-04 -1.46E-01 8.75E-02 4.88E-04 -8.80E-02
Toluene --8.00E-02 I 5.00E+00 I 1.00E+00 3.11E-02 9.21E+01 1.15E-01 8.28E-01 3.45E-01 1.00E+00 Yes -1.97E-01 3.40E-01 1.00E+03 7.23E-01 ----4.51E-04 1.36E-04 6.93E-05 6.56E-04 2.71E-04 9.06E-05 6.93E-05 4.31E-04
Trichlorobenzene, 1,2,4-2.90E-02 P -1.00E-02 I 2.00E-03 P 1.00E+00 7.05E-02 1.81E+02 3.65E-01 2.62E+00 1.09E+00 1.00E+00 Yes 3.37E-04 2.46E-02 4.25E-02 7.00E+01 4.15E-01 1.54E-07 2.05E-07 -3.59E-07 2.07E-03 2.53E-03 9.95E-02 1.04E-01 1.24E-03 1.68E-03 9.95E-02 1.02E-01
Trimethylbenzene, 1,2,3---1.00E-02 I 6.00E-02 I 1.00E+00 8.97E-02 1.20E+02 3.78E-01 1.19E+00 4.95E-01 1.00E+00 Yes -2.46E-02 4.25E-02 -7.64E-01 ----3.81E-03 3.99E-03 6.11E-03 1.39E-02 2.29E-03 2.65E-03 6.11E-03 1.10E-02
Xylenes --2.00E-01 I 1.00E-01 I 1.00E+00 5.00E-02 1.06E+02 1.98E-01 9.92E-01 4.13E-01 1.00E+00 Yes -4.92E-01 8.49E-01 1.00E+04 1.81E+00 ----4.51E-04 2.40E-04 8.68E-03 9.37E-03 2.71E-04 1.60E-04 8.68E-03 9.11E-03
*Total Risk/HI ----------------7.67E-05 7.37E-07 5.14E-05 1.29E-04 6.59E-01 8.66E-02 2.80E-01 1.02E+00 3.96E-01 5.81E-02 2.80E-01 7.34E-01
Site-specific
Resident Risk for Tap Water
Output generated 25JAN2024:16:59:37
Woodbine Site
Chemical CAS Number
Site
Sub-Slab and
Exterior SoilGas
Concentration
Csg
(µg/m3)
Site
Indoor Air
Concentration
Ci,a
(µg/m3)
VI
Carcinogenic
Risk
CDI
(µg/m3)
VI
Carcinogenic
Risk
CR
VI
Hazard
CDI
(mg/m3)
VI
Hazard
HQ
IUR
(ug/m3)-1
IUR
Ref
Chronic
RfC
(mg/m3)
RfC
Ref
Temperature (℃)
for Groundwater
Vapor
Concentration Mutagen?
Acetone 67-64-1 4.53E+01 -------1.50E+01 No
Benzene 71-43-2 1.54E+01 4.62E-01 1.65E-01 1.28E-06 4.43E-04 1.48E-02 7.80E-06 I 3.00E-02 IRIS 1.50E+01 No
Bromodichloromethane 75-27-4 9.72E+00 2.92E-01 1.04E-01 3.84E-06 2.80E-04 -3.70E-05 C -1.50E+01 No
Carbon Disulfide 75-15-0 6.50E+00 1.95E-01 6.95E-02 -1.87E-04 2.67E-04 -7.00E-01 IRIS 1.50E+01 No
Chloroform 67-66-3 1.75E+02 5.25E+00 1.87E+00 4.30E-05 5.03E-03 5.16E-02 2.30E-05 I 9.77E-02 ATSDR 1.50E+01 No
Dichloroethane, 1,1-75-34-3 5.10E+00 1.53E-01 5.45E-02 8.72E-08 1.47E-04 -1.60E-06 C -1.50E+01 No
Dichloroethylene, cis-1,2-156-59-2 9.22E+01 2.77E+00 9.85E-01 -2.65E-03 6.63E-02 -4.00E-02 SCREEN 1.50E+01 No
Dichloroethylene, trans-1,2-156-60-5 1.60E+02 4.80E+00 1.71E+00 -4.60E-03 1.15E-01 -4.00E-02 X 2.50E+01 No
Ethanol 64-17-5 4.60E+01 -------1.50E+01 No
Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 8.00E+00 2.40E-01 8.55E-02 2.14E-07 2.30E-04 2.30E-04 2.50E-06 C 1.00E+00 IRIS 1.50E+01 No
Heptane, N-142-82-5 4.35E+00 1.31E-01 4.65E-02 -1.25E-04 3.13E-04 -4.00E-01 PPRTV 1.50E+01 No
Hexane, N-110-54-3 5.13E+00 1.54E-01 5.48E-02 -1.48E-04 2.11E-04 -7.00E-01 IRIS 1.50E+01 No
Isopropanol 67-63-0 2.19E+01 6.57E-01 2.34E-01 -6.30E-04 3.15E-03 -2.00E-01 PPRTV 1.50E+01 No
Methyl Ethyl Ketone (2-
Butanone)78-93-3 2.00E+01 6.00E-01 2.14E-01 -5.75E-04 1.15E-04 -5.00E+00 IRIS 1.50E+01 No
Methylene Chloride 75-09-2 7.23E+00 2.17E-01 2.14E-01 2.14E-09 2.08E-04 3.47E-04 1.00E-08 I 6.00E-01 IRIS 1.50E+01 Mut
Propylene 115-07-1 4.70E+00 1.41E-01 5.02E-02 -1.35E-04 4.51E-05 -3.00E+00 CALEPA 1.50E+01 No
Styrene 100-42-5 3.91E+00 1.17E-01 4.18E-02 -1.12E-04 1.12E-04 -1.00E+00 IRIS 1.50E+01 No
Tetrachloroethylene 127-18-4 7.42E+00 2.23E-01 7.93E-02 2.06E-08 2.13E-04 5.34E-03 2.60E-07 I 4.00E-02 IRIS 1.50E+01 No
Tetrahydrofuran 109-99-9 5.96E+00 1.79E-01 6.37E-02 -1.71E-04 8.57E-05 -2.00E+00 IRIS 1.50E+01 No
Toluene 108-88-3 3.66E+01 1.10E+00 3.91E-01 -1.05E-03 2.11E-04 -5.00E+00 IRIS 1.50E+01 No
Trichloroethane, 1,1,1-71-55-6 8.00E+02 2.40E+01 8.55E+00 -2.30E-02 4.60E-03 -5.00E+00 IRIS 1.50E+01 No
Trichloroethylene 79-01-6 5.28E+01 1.58E+00 8.08E-01 3.31E-06 1.52E-03 7.60E-01 4.10E-06 I 2.00E-03 I 2.50E+01 Mut
Trimethylbenzene, 1,2,4-95-63-6 5.51E+00 1.65E-01 5.89E-02 -1.59E-04 2.64E-03 -6.00E-02 IRIS 1.50E+01 No
Xylene, m-108-38-3 3.10E+01 9.30E-01 3.31E-01 -8.92E-04 8.92E-03 -1.00E-01 SURROGATE 1.50E+01 No
Xylene, o-95-47-6 7.00E+00 2.10E-01 7.48E-02 -2.01E-04 2.01E-03 -1.00E-01 SURROGATE 1.50E+01 No
*Sum ---5.18E-05 -1.04E+00 ---
Resident Vapor Intrusion Risk
Output generated 25JAN2024:17:31:17
Woodbine Site
Chemical SFo(mg/kg-day)-1
SFoR
ef
IUR
(ug/m3)-1
IUR
Ref
RfD
(mg/kg-day)
RfD
Ref
RfC
(mg/m3)
RfC
Ref RBA
Soil
Saturation
Concentration
(mg/kg)
S
(mg/L)
Koc
(cm3/g)
Kd
(cm3/g)
HLC
(atm-m3/mole)
Henry's
Law
Constant
Used in Calcs
(unitless)
H` and HLC
Ref
Normal
Boiling
Point
BP
(K)
BP
Ref
Critical
Temperature
TC
(K)
TC
Ref
Chemical
Type
Dia
(cm2/s)
Diw
(cm2/s)
DA
(cm2/s)
Particulate
Emission
Factor
(m3/kg)
Volatilization
Factor
Unlimited Reservoir
(m3/kg)
Volatilization
Factor
Mass Limit
(m3/kg)
Volatilization
Factor
Selected
(m3/kg)
Concentration
(mg/kg)
Ingestion
Risk
Inhalation
Risk
Carcinogenic
Risk
Ingestion
HQ
Inhalation
HQ
Noncarcinogenic
HI
Arsenic, Inorganic 1.50E+00 I 4.30E-03 I 3.00E-04 I 1.50E-05 C 6.00E-01 ---2.90E+01 --8.88E+02 PHYSPROP 1.67E+03 CRC INORGANIC ---8.74E+09 ---4.17E+01 5.74E-06 1.67E-09 5.74E-06 3.57E-02 7.27E-05 3.58E-02
Cadmium (Diet)-1.80E-03 I 1.00E-04 A 1.00E-05 A 1.00E+00 ---7.50E+01 --1.04E+03 PHYSPROP 2.29E+03 YAWS INORGANIC ---8.74E+09 ---1.66E+00 -2.78E-11 2.78E-11 7.09E-03 4.33E-06 7.09E-03
Mercury (elemental)---3.00E-04 I 1.00E+00 3.13E+00 6.00E-02 -5.20E+01 8.62E-03 3.52E-01 PHYSPROP VP/S 6.30E+02 PHYSPROP 1.76E+03 CRC INORGANIC 3.07E-02 6.30E-06 1.10E-05 8.74E+09 4.11E+04 0.00E+00 4.11E+04 4.80E-01 ----8.90E-03 8.90E-03
Zirconium --8.00E-05 X -1.00E+00 ---3.00E+03 --4.68E+03 CRC 8.80E+03 YAWS INORGANIC ---8.74E+09 ---2.43E+01 ---1.30E-01 -1.30E-01
Acenaphthene --6.00E-02 I -1.00E+00 -3.90E+00 5.03E+03 3.02E+01 1.84E-04 7.52E-03 PHYSPROP 5.52E+02 PHYSPROP 8.03E+02 YAWS PAH 5.06E-02 8.33E-06 6.72E-07 5.89E+09 1.12E+05 1.98E+04 1.12E+05 3.12E+00 ---2.23E-05 -2.23E-05
Acenaphthylene ----1.00E+00 -1.61E+01 5.03E+03 3.02E+01 1.14E-04 4.66E-03 PHYSPROP 5.53E+02 PHYSPROP 7.92E+02 YAWS PAH 4.50E-02 6.98E-06 3.70E-07 5.89E+09 1.51E+05 1.98E+04 1.51E+05 1.11E+00 ------
Acetone --9.00E-01 I -1.00E+00 1.14E+05 1.00E+06 2.36E+00 1.42E-02 3.50E-05 1.43E-03 PHYSPROP 3.29E+02 PHYSPROP 5.08E+02 CRC VOC 1.06E-01 1.15E-05 7.12E-05 5.89E+09 1.09E+04 1.98E+04 1.98E+04 9.25E-01 ---4.40E-07 -4.40E-07
Anthracene --3.00E-01 I -1.00E+00 -4.34E-02 1.64E+04 9.82E+01 5.56E-05 2.27E-03 PHYSPROP 6.13E+02 PHYSPROP 8.73E+02 YAWS PAH 3.90E-02 7.85E-06 4.85E-08 5.89E+09 4.17E+05 1.98E+04 4.17E+05 2.99E+00 ---4.27E-06 -4.27E-06
Barium --2.00E-01 I 5.00E-04 H 1.00E+00 ---4.10E+01 --1.87E+03 PHYSPROP 3.57E+03 YAWS INORGANIC ---5.89E+09 ---6.00E+02 ---1.28E-03 4.66E-05 1.33E-03
Benz[a]anthracene 1.00E-01 E 6.00E-05 E --1.00E+00 -9.40E-03 1.77E+05 1.06E+03 1.20E-05 4.91E-04 PHYSPROP 7.11E+02 PHYSPROP 9.79E+02 YAWS PAH 2.61E-02 6.75E-06 6.83E-10 5.89E+09 3.51E+06 1.98E+04 3.51E+06 6.79E+00 1.04E-07 9.46E-09 1.13E-07 ---
Benzene 5.50E-02 I 7.80E-06 I 4.00E-03 I 3.00E-02 I 1.00E+00 1.82E+03 1.79E+03 1.46E+02 8.75E-01 5.55E-03 2.27E-01 PHYSPROP 3.53E+02 PHYSPROP 5.62E+02 CRC VOC 8.95E-02 1.03E-05 1.06E-03 5.89E+09 2.82E+03 1.98E+04 1.98E+04 2.15E-02 1.81E-10 6.91E-10 8.72E-10 2.30E-06 8.27E-06 1.06E-05
Benzo[a]pyrene 1.00E+00 I 6.00E-04 I 3.00E-04 I 2.00E-06 I 1.00E+00 -1.62E-03 5.87E+05 -4.57E-07 1.87E-05 PHYSPROP 7.68E+02 PHYSPROP 9.69E+02 EPA 2001 Fact Sheet PAH 2.55E-02 6.58E-06 -5.89E+09 ---5.97E+00 9.13E-07 4.96E-11 9.13E-07 8.52E-03 1.16E-04 8.63E-03
Benzo[b]fluoranthene 1.00E-01 E 6.00E-05 E --1.00E+00 -1.50E-03 5.99E+05 -6.57E-07 2.69E-05 PHYSPROP 7.16E+02 EPI 9.69E+02 EPA 2001 Fact Sheet PAH 2.50E-02 6.43E-06 -5.89E+09 ---6.69E+00 1.02E-07 5.56E-12 1.02E-07 ---
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene ----1.00E+00 -2.60E-04 1.95E+06 -3.31E-07 1.35E-05 PHYSPROP 7.59E+02 EPI 1.09E+03 Jobak Method PAH 2.39E-02 6.09E-06 -5.89E+09 ---3.08E+00 ------
Benzo[k]fluoranthene 1.00E-02 E 6.00E-06 E --1.00E+00 -8.00E-04 5.87E+05 -5.84E-07 2.39E-05 PHYSPROP 7.53E+02 PHYSPROP 1.02E+03 EPA 2001 Fact Sheet PAH 2.50E-02 6.43E-06 -5.89E+09 ---2.42E+00 3.70E-09 2.01E-13 3.70E-09 ---
Butylbenzene, tert---1.00E-01 X -1.00E+00 1.83E+02 2.95E+01 1.00E+03 6.01E+00 1.32E-02 5.40E-01 EPI 4.42E+02 PHYSPROP 6.48E+02 CRC VOC 5.30E-02 7.37E-06 2.45E-04 5.89E+09 5.86E+03 1.98E+04 1.98E+04 7.84E-03 ---3.36E-08 -3.36E-08
Chromium(III), Insoluble Salts --1.50E+00 I -1.00E+00 ---1.80E+06 ----INORGANIC ---5.89E+09 ---3.65E+01 ---1.04E-05 -1.04E-05
Chromium(VI)5.00E-01 C 8.40E-02 G 3.00E-03 I 1.00E-04 I 1.00E+00 -1.69E+06 -1.90E+01 ----INORGANIC ---5.89E+09 ---9.38E-01 7.17E-08 1.09E-09 7.28E-08 1.34E-04 3.64E-07 1.34E-04
Chromium, Total ----1.00E+00 ---1.80E+06 --2.92E+03 PHYSPROP 8.56E+03 YAWS INORGANIC ---5.89E+09 ---2.64E+01 ------
Chrysene 1.00E-03 E 6.00E-07 E --1.00E+00 -2.00E-03 1.81E+05 -5.23E-06 2.14E-04 PHYSPROP 7.21E+02 PHYSPROP 9.79E+02 YAWS PAH 2.61E-02 6.75E-06 -5.89E+09 ---6.93E+00 1.06E-09 5.76E-14 1.06E-09 ---
Copper --4.00E-02 H -1.00E+00 ---3.50E+01 --2.87E+03 PHYSPROP 5.12E+03 YAWS INORGANIC ---5.89E+09 ---7.03E+02 ---7.52E-03 -7.52E-03
Cumene --1.00E-01 I 4.00E-01 I 1.00E+00 2.68E+02 6.13E+01 6.98E+02 4.19E+00 1.15E-02 4.70E-01 PHYSPROP 4.26E+02 PHYSPROP 6.31E+02 CRC VOC 6.03E-02 7.86E-06 3.45E-04 5.89E+09 4.94E+03 1.98E+04 1.98E+04 4.48E-03 ---1.92E-08 1.29E-07 1.48E-07
Dibenz[a,h]anthracene 1.00E+00 E 6.00E-04 E --1.00E+00 -2.49E-03 1.91E+06 -1.41E-07 5.76E-06 EPI 7.97E+02 PHYSPROP 9.90E+02 EPA 2001 Fact Sheet PAH 2.36E-02 6.02E-06 -5.89E+09 ---7.86E-01 1.20E-07 6.53E-12 1.20E-07 ---
Dichlorobenzene, 1,4-5.40E-03 C 1.10E-05 C 7.00E-02 A 8.00E-01 I 1.00E+00 -8.13E+01 3.75E+02 2.25E+00 2.41E-03 9.85E-02 PHYSPROP 4.47E+02 PHYSPROP 6.69E+02 CRC VOC 5.50E-02 8.68E-06 1.22E-04 5.89E+09 8.32E+03 1.98E+04 1.98E+04 3.55E-03 2.93E-12 1.61E-10 1.64E-10 2.17E-08 5.12E-08 7.29E-08
Dimethylphthalate ----1.00E+00 -4.00E+03 3.16E+01 -1.97E-07 8.05E-06 EPI 5.57E+02 PHYSPROP 7.72E+02 CRC SVOC 2.99E-02 7.14E-06 -5.89E+09 ---1.81E-02 ------
Ethylbenzene 1.10E-02 C 2.50E-06 C 5.00E-02 P 1.00E+00 I 1.00E+00 4.80E+02 1.69E+02 4.46E+02 2.68E+00 7.88E-03 3.22E-01 PHYSPROP 4.09E+02 PHYSPROP 6.17E+02 CRC VOC 6.85E-02 8.46E-06 4.14E-04 5.89E+09 4.51E+03 1.98E+04 1.98E+04 2.89E-02 4.86E-11 2.98E-10 3.46E-10 2.47E-07 3.33E-07 5.81E-07
Fluoranthene --4.00E-02 I -1.00E+00 -2.60E-01 5.55E+04 -8.86E-06 3.62E-04 PHYSPROP 6.57E+02 PHYSPROP 9.05E+02 YAWS PAH 2.76E-02 7.18E-06 -5.89E+09 ---1.49E+01 ---1.59E-04 -1.59E-04
Fluorene --4.00E-02 I -1.00E+00 -1.69E+00 9.16E+03 5.50E+01 9.62E-05 3.93E-03 PHYSPROP 5.68E+02 PHYSPROP 8.26E+02 YAWS PAH 4.40E-02 7.89E-06 1.68E-07 5.89E+09 2.24E+05 1.98E+04 2.24E+05 4.06E+00 ---4.35E-05 -4.35E-05
Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 1.00E-01 E 6.00E-05 E --1.00E+00 -1.90E-04 1.95E+06 -3.48E-07 1.42E-05 PHYSPROP 8.09E+02 PHYSPROP 1.08E+03 EPA 2001 Fact Sheet PAH 2.47E-02 6.37E-06 -5.89E+09 ---3.41E+00 5.21E-08 2.83E-12 5.21E-08 ---
Isopropyltoluene, p-----1.00E+00 1.62E+02 2.34E+01 1.12E+03 6.72E+00 1.10E-02 4.50E-01 EPI 4.50E+02 PHYSPROP 6.54E+02 CRC VOC 5.27E-02 7.32E-06 1.83E-04 5.89E+09 6.79E+03 1.98E+04 1.98E+04 2.52E-02 ------
Lead and Compounds ----1.00E+00 ---9.00E+02 --2.02E+03 CRC 5.40E+03 YAWS INORGANIC ---5.89E+09 ---9.60E+02 ------
Methyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone)--6.00E-01 I 5.00E+00 I 1.00E+00 2.84E+04 2.23E+05 4.51E+00 2.71E-02 5.69E-05 2.33E-03 PHYSPROP 3.53E+02 PHYSPROP 5.37E+02 CRC VOC 9.14E-02 1.02E-05 8.94E-05 5.89E+09 9.71E+03 1.98E+04 1.98E+04 3.17E-02 ---2.26E-08 7.31E-08 9.58E-08
Naphthalene 1.20E-01 C 3.40E-05 C 2.00E-02 I 3.00E-03 I 1.00E+00 -3.10E+01 1.54E+03 9.26E+00 4.40E-04 1.80E-02 PHYSPROP 4.91E+02 PHYSPROP 7.48E+02 CRC PAH 6.05E-02 8.38E-06 6.20E-06 5.89E+09 3.69E+04 1.98E+04 3.69E+04 5.24E-01 9.61E-09 3.94E-08 4.90E-08 1.12E-05 1.08E-03 1.09E-03
Phenanthrene ----1.00E+00 -1.15E+00 1.67E+04 1.00E+02 4.23E-05 1.73E-03 PHYSPROP 6.13E+02 PHYSPROP 8.69E+02 YAWS PAH 3.45E-02 6.69E-06 3.21E-08 5.89E+09 5.12E+05 1.98E+04 5.12E+05 1.09E+01 ------
Phenol --3.00E-01 I 2.00E-01 C 1.00E+00 -8.28E+04 1.87E+02 -3.33E-07 1.36E-05 PHYSPROP 4.55E+02 PHYSPROP 6.94E+02 CRC SVOC 8.34E-02 1.03E-05 -5.89E+09 ---9.71E-02 ---1.39E-07 1.88E-11 1.39E-07
Propyl benzene --1.00E-01 X 1.00E+00 X 1.00E+00 2.64E+02 5.22E+01 8.13E+02 4.88E+00 1.05E-02 4.29E-01 PHYSPROP 4.32E+02 PHYSPROP 6.38E+02 CRC VOC 6.02E-02 7.83E-06 2.72E-04 5.89E+09 5.57E+03 1.98E+04 1.98E+04 4.31E-03 ---1.85E-08 4.97E-08 6.82E-08
Pyrene --3.00E-02 I -1.00E+00 -1.35E-01 5.43E+04 3.26E+02 1.19E-05 4.87E-04 PHYSPROP 6.77E+02 PHYSPROP 9.36E+02 YAWS PAH 2.78E-02 7.25E-06 2.35E-09 5.89E+09 1.89E+06 1.98E+04 1.89E+06 1.46E+01 ---2.08E-04 -2.08E-04
Selenium --5.00E-03 I 2.00E-02 C 1.00E+00 ---5.00E+00 --9.58E+02 PHYSPROP 1.77E+03 CRC INORGANIC ---5.89E+09 ---1.82E+01 ---1.56E-03 3.53E-08 1.56E-03
Silver --5.00E-03 I -1.00E+00 ---8.30E+00 --2.27E+03 PHYSPROP 6.41E+03 CRC INORGANIC ---5.89E+09 ---1.78E+01 ---1.52E-03 -1.52E-03
Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2-2.00E-01 I 5.80E-05 C 2.00E-02 I -1.00E+00 1.90E+03 2.83E+03 9.49E+01 5.70E-01 3.67E-04 1.50E-02 PHYSPROP 4.20E+02 PHYSPROP 6.45E+02 YAWS VOC 4.89E-02 9.29E-06 5.82E-05 5.89E+09 1.20E+04 1.98E+04 1.98E+04 2.18E+00 6.67E-08 5.21E-07 5.88E-07 4.67E-05 -4.67E-05
Tetrachloroethylene 2.10E-03 I 2.60E-07 I 6.00E-03 I 4.00E-02 I 1.00E+00 1.66E+02 2.06E+02 9.49E+01 5.70E-01 1.77E-02 7.24E-01 PHYSPROP 3.94E+02 PHYSPROP 6.20E+02 YAWS VOC 5.05E-02 9.46E-06 2.41E-03 5.89E+09 1.87E+03 1.98E+04 1.98E+04 5.51E-02 1.77E-11 5.90E-11 7.67E-11 3.93E-06 1.59E-05 1.98E-05
Toluene --8.00E-02 I 5.00E+00 I 1.00E+00 8.18E+02 5.26E+02 2.34E+02 1.40E+00 6.64E-03 2.71E-01 PHYSPROP 3.84E+02 PHYSPROP 5.92E+02 CRC VOC 7.78E-02 9.20E-06 7.24E-04 5.89E+09 3.41E+03 1.98E+04 1.98E+04 1.36E-01 ---7.28E-07 3.14E-07 1.04E-06
Trichlorobenzene, 1,2,4-2.90E-02 P -1.00E-02 I 2.00E-03 P 1.00E+00 4.04E+02 4.90E+01 1.36E+03 8.14E+00 1.42E-03 5.81E-02 PHYSPROP 4.87E+02 PHYSPROP 7.25E+02 YAWS VOC 3.96E-02 8.40E-06 1.49E-05 5.89E+09 2.38E+04 1.98E+04 2.38E+04 6.67E-03 2.96E-11 -2.96E-11 2.86E-07 3.20E-05 3.22E-05
Trichloroethylene 4.60E-02 I 4.10E-06 I 5.00E-04 I 2.00E-03 I 1.00E+00 6.92E+02 1.28E+03 6.07E+01 3.64E-01 9.85E-03 4.03E-01 PHYSPROP 3.60E+02 PHYSPROP 5.71E+02 YAWS VOC 6.87E-02 1.02E-05 2.73E-03 5.89E+09 1.76E+03 1.98E+04 1.98E+04 6.97E-02 4.90E-10 1.18E-09 1.67E-09 5.97E-05 4.02E-04 4.62E-04
Trimethylbenzene, 1,2,3---1.00E-02 I 6.00E-02 I 1.00E+00 2.93E+02 7.52E+01 6.27E+02 3.76E+00 4.36E-03 1.78E-01 PHYSPROP 4.49E+02 PHYSPROP 6.64E+02 CRC VOC 6.13E-02 8.02E-06 1.49E-04 5.89E+09 7.52E+03 1.98E+04 1.98E+04 4.08E-02 ---1.75E-06 7.85E-06 9.59E-06
Trimethylbenzene, 1,2,4---1.00E-02 I 6.00E-02 I 1.00E+00 2.19E+02 5.70E+01 6.14E+02 3.69E+00 6.16E-03 2.52E-01 PHYSPROP 4.42E+02 PHYSPROP 6.49E+02 CRC VOC 6.07E-02 7.92E-06 2.12E-04 5.89E+09 6.30E+03 1.98E+04 1.98E+04 4.34E-02 ---1.86E-06 8.35E-06 1.02E-05
Trimethylbenzene, 1,3,5---1.00E-02 I 6.00E-02 I 1.00E+00 1.82E+02 4.82E+01 6.02E+02 3.61E+00 8.77E-03 3.59E-01 PHYSPROP 4.38E+02 PHYSPROP 6.37E+02 CRC VOC 6.02E-02 7.84E-06 3.04E-04 5.89E+09 5.26E+03 1.98E+04 1.98E+04 2.80E-02 ---1.20E-06 5.38E-06 6.58E-06
Xylenes --2.00E-01 I 1.00E-01 I 1.00E+00 2.60E+02 1.06E+02 3.83E+02 2.30E+00 6.63E-03 2.71E-01 PHYSPROP 4.12E+02 PHYSPROP 6.20E+02 YAWS VOC 6.85E-02 8.46E-06 4.04E-04 5.89E+09 4.57E+03 1.98E+04 1.98E+04 1.48E-01 ---3.17E-07 1.71E-05 1.74E-05
Zinc and Compounds --3.00E-01 I -1.00E+00 ---6.20E+01 --1.18E+03 PHYSPROP 3.17E+03 YAWS INORGANIC ---5.89E+09 ---3.43E+02 ---4.89E-04 -4.89E-04
*Total Risk/HI ---------------------7.18E-06 5.75E-07 7.76E-06 1.94E-01 1.07E-02 2.05E-01
Site-specific
Indoor Worker Risk for Soil
Output generated 25JAN2024:16:38:51
Woodbine Site
Chemical SFo(mg/kg-day)-1
SFoR
ef
IUR
(ug/m3)-1
IUR
Ref
RfD
(mg/kg-day)
RfD
Ref
RfC
(mg/m3)
RfC
Ref GIABS ABS RBA
Soil
Saturation
Concentration
(mg/kg)
S
(mg/L)
Koc
(cm3/g)
Kd
(cm3/g)
HLC
(atm-m3/mole)
Henry's
Law
Constant
Used in Calcs
(unitless)
H` and HLC
Ref
Normal
Boiling
Point
BP
(K)
BP
Ref
Critical
Temperature
TC
(K)
TC
Ref
Chemical
Type
Dia
(cm2/s)
Diw
(cm2/s)
DA
(cm2/s)
Particulate
Emission
Factor
(m3/kg)
Volatilization
Factor
Unlimited Reservoir
(m3/kg)
Volatilization
Factor
Mass Limit
(m3/kg)
Volatilization
Factor
Selected
(m3/kg)
Concentration
(mg/kg)
Ingestion
Risk
Dermal
Risk
Inhalation
Risk
Carcinogenic
Risk
Ingestion
HQ
Dermal
HQ
Inhalation
HQ
Noncarcinogenic
HI
Arsenic, Inorganic 1.50E+00 I 4.30E-03 I 3.00E-04 I 1.50E-05 C 1.00E+00 3.00E-02 6.00E-01 ---2.90E+01 --8.88E+02 PHYSPROP 1.67E+03 CRC INORGANIC ---2.10E+06 ---4.17E+01 1.03E-05 2.19E-06 6.27E-06 1.88E-05 6.43E-02 1.36E-02 2.72E-01 3.50E-01
Cadmium (Diet)-1.80E-03 I 1.00E-04 A 1.00E-05 A 2.50E-02 1.00E-03 1.00E+00 ---7.50E+01 --1.04E+03 PHYSPROP 2.29E+03 YAWS INORGANIC ---2.10E+06 ---1.66E+00 --1.04E-07 1.04E-07 1.28E-02 2.16E-03 1.62E-02 3.11E-02
Zirconium --8.00E-05 X -1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 ---3.00E+03 --4.68E+03 CRC 8.80E+03 YAWS INORGANIC ---2.10E+06 ---2.43E+01 ----2.34E-01 --2.34E-01
Acenaphthene --6.00E-02 I -1.00E+00 1.30E-01 1.00E+00 -3.90E+00 5.03E+03 3.02E+01 1.84E-04 7.52E-03 PHYSPROP 5.52E+02 PHYSPROP 8.03E+02 YAWS PAH 5.06E-02 8.33E-06 6.72E-07 5.89E+09 1.12E+05 1.98E+04 1.12E+05 3.12E+00 ----4.01E-05 2.20E-05 -6.21E-05
Acenaphthylene ----1.00E+00 1.30E-01 1.00E+00 -1.61E+01 5.03E+03 3.02E+01 1.14E-04 4.66E-03 PHYSPROP 5.53E+02 PHYSPROP 7.92E+02 YAWS PAH 4.50E-02 6.98E-06 3.70E-07 5.89E+09 1.51E+05 1.98E+04 1.51E+05 1.11E+00 --------
Acetone --9.00E-01 I -1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 1.14E+05 1.00E+06 2.36E+00 1.42E-02 3.50E-05 1.43E-03 PHYSPROP 3.29E+02 PHYSPROP 5.08E+02 CRC VOC 1.06E-01 1.15E-05 7.12E-05 5.89E+09 1.09E+04 1.98E+04 1.98E+04 9.25E-02 ----7.92E-08 --7.92E-08
Anthracene --3.00E-01 I -1.00E+00 1.30E-01 1.00E+00 -4.34E-02 1.64E+04 9.82E+01 5.56E-05 2.27E-03 PHYSPROP 6.13E+02 PHYSPROP 8.73E+02 YAWS PAH 3.90E-02 7.85E-06 4.85E-08 5.89E+09 4.17E+05 1.98E+04 4.17E+05 2.99E+00 ----7.68E-06 4.23E-06 -1.19E-05
Barium --2.00E-01 I 5.00E-04 H 7.00E-02 -1.00E+00 ---4.10E+01 --1.87E+03 PHYSPROP 3.57E+03 YAWS INORGANIC ---5.89E+09 ---6.00E+02 ----2.31E-03 -4.19E-05 2.35E-03
Benz[a]anthracene 1.00E-01 E 6.00E-05 E --1.00E+00 1.30E-01 1.00E+00 -9.40E-03 1.77E+05 1.06E+03 1.20E-05 4.91E-04 PHYSPROP 7.11E+02 PHYSPROP 9.79E+02 YAWS PAH 2.61E-02 6.75E-06 6.83E-10 5.89E+09 3.51E+06 1.98E+04 3.51E+06 6.79E+00 1.87E-07 1.03E-07 8.51E-09 2.98E-07 ----
Benzene 5.50E-02 I 7.80E-06 I 4.00E-03 I 3.00E-02 I 1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 1.82E+03 1.79E+03 1.46E+02 8.75E-01 5.55E-03 2.27E-01 PHYSPROP 3.53E+02 PHYSPROP 5.62E+02 CRC VOC 8.95E-02 1.03E-05 1.06E-03 5.89E+09 2.82E+03 1.98E+04 1.98E+04 2.15E-02 3.25E-10 -6.22E-10 9.47E-10 4.14E-06 -7.44E-06 1.16E-05
Benzo[a]pyrene 1.00E+00 I 6.00E-04 I 3.00E-04 I 2.00E-06 I 1.00E+00 1.30E-01 1.00E+00 -1.62E-03 5.87E+05 -4.57E-07 1.87E-05 PHYSPROP 7.68E+02 PHYSPROP 9.69E+02 EPA 2001 Fact Sheet PAH 2.55E-02 6.58E-06 -5.89E+09 ---5.97E+00 1.64E-06 9.04E-07 4.47E-11 2.55E-06 1.53E-02 8.44E-03 1.04E-04 2.39E-02
Benzo[b]fluoranthene 1.00E-01 E 6.00E-05 E --1.00E+00 1.30E-01 1.00E+00 -1.50E-03 5.99E+05 -6.57E-07 2.69E-05 PHYSPROP 7.16E+02 EPI 9.69E+02 EPA 2001 Fact Sheet PAH 2.50E-02 6.43E-06 -5.89E+09 ---6.69E+00 1.84E-07 1.01E-07 5.01E-12 2.85E-07 ----
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene ----1.00E+00 1.30E-01 1.00E+00 -2.60E-04 1.95E+06 -3.31E-07 1.35E-05 PHYSPROP 7.59E+02 EPI 1.09E+03 Jobak Method PAH 2.39E-02 6.09E-06 -5.89E+09 ---3.08E+00 --------
Benzo[k]fluoranthene 1.00E-02 E 6.00E-06 E --1.00E+00 1.30E-01 1.00E+00 -8.00E-04 5.87E+05 -5.84E-07 2.39E-05 PHYSPROP 7.53E+02 PHYSPROP 1.02E+03 EPA 2001 Fact Sheet PAH 2.50E-02 6.43E-06 -5.89E+09 ---2.42E+00 6.66E-09 3.66E-09 1.81E-13 1.03E-08 ----
Butylbenzene, tert---1.00E-01 X -1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 1.83E+02 2.95E+01 1.00E+03 6.01E+00 1.32E-02 5.40E-01 EPI 4.42E+02 PHYSPROP 6.48E+02 CRC VOC 5.30E-02 7.37E-06 2.45E-04 5.89E+09 5.86E+03 1.98E+04 1.98E+04 7.84E-03 ----6.04E-08 --6.04E-08
Chromium(III), Insoluble Salts --1.50E+00 I -1.30E-02 -1.00E+00 ---1.80E+06 ----INORGANIC ---5.89E+09 ---3.65E+01 ----1.88E-05 --1.88E-05
Chromium(VI)5.00E-01 C 8.40E-02 G 3.00E-03 I 1.00E-04 I 2.50E-02 -1.00E+00 -1.69E+06 -1.90E+01 ----INORGANIC ---5.89E+09 ---9.38E-01 1.29E-07 -9.82E-10 1.30E-07 2.41E-04 -3.27E-07 2.41E-04
Chromium, Total ----1.30E-02 -1.00E+00 ---1.80E+06 --2.92E+03 PHYSPROP 8.56E+03 YAWS INORGANIC ---5.89E+09 ---2.64E+01 --------
Chrysene 1.00E-03 E 6.00E-07 E --1.00E+00 1.30E-01 1.00E+00 -2.00E-03 1.81E+05 -5.23E-06 2.14E-04 PHYSPROP 7.21E+02 PHYSPROP 9.79E+02 YAWS PAH 2.61E-02 6.75E-06 -5.89E+09 ---6.93E+00 1.91E-09 1.05E-09 5.18E-14 2.96E-09 ----
Copper --4.00E-02 H -1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 ---3.50E+01 --2.87E+03 PHYSPROP 5.12E+03 YAWS INORGANIC ---5.89E+09 ---7.03E+02 ----1.35E-02 --1.35E-02
Cumene --1.00E-01 I 4.00E-01 I 1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 2.68E+02 6.13E+01 6.98E+02 4.19E+00 1.15E-02 4.70E-01 PHYSPROP 4.26E+02 PHYSPROP 6.31E+02 CRC VOC 6.03E-02 7.86E-06 3.45E-04 5.89E+09 4.94E+03 1.98E+04 1.98E+04 4.48E-03 ----3.45E-08 -1.16E-07 1.51E-07
Dibenz[a,h]anthracene 1.00E+00 E 6.00E-04 E --1.00E+00 1.30E-01 1.00E+00 -2.49E-03 1.91E+06 -1.41E-07 5.76E-06 EPI 7.97E+02 PHYSPROP 9.90E+02 EPA 2001 Fact Sheet PAH 2.36E-02 6.02E-06 -5.89E+09 ---7.86E-01 2.16E-07 1.19E-07 5.88E-12 3.35E-07 ----
Dichlorobenzene, 1,4-5.40E-03 C 1.10E-05 C 7.00E-02 A 8.00E-01 I 1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 -8.13E+01 3.75E+02 2.25E+00 2.41E-03 9.85E-02 PHYSPROP 4.47E+02 PHYSPROP 6.69E+02 CRC VOC 5.50E-02 8.68E-06 1.22E-04 5.89E+09 8.32E+03 1.98E+04 1.98E+04 3.55E-03 5.28E-12 -1.45E-10 1.50E-10 3.91E-08 -4.61E-08 8.52E-08
Dimethylphthalate ----1.00E+00 1.00E-01 1.00E+00 -4.00E+03 3.16E+01 -1.97E-07 8.05E-06 EPI 5.57E+02 PHYSPROP 7.72E+02 CRC SVOC 2.99E-02 7.14E-06 -5.89E+09 ---1.81E-02 --------
Ethylbenzene 1.10E-02 C 2.50E-06 C 5.00E-02 P 1.00E+00 I 1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 4.80E+02 1.69E+02 4.46E+02 2.68E+00 7.88E-03 3.22E-01 PHYSPROP 4.09E+02 PHYSPROP 6.17E+02 CRC VOC 6.85E-02 8.46E-06 4.14E-04 5.89E+09 4.51E+03 1.98E+04 1.98E+04 2.89E-02 8.75E-11 -2.68E-10 3.55E-10 4.45E-07 -3.00E-07 7.45E-07
Fluoranthene --4.00E-02 I -1.00E+00 1.30E-01 1.00E+00 -2.60E-01 5.55E+04 -8.86E-06 3.62E-04 PHYSPROP 6.57E+02 PHYSPROP 9.05E+02 YAWS PAH 2.76E-02 7.18E-06 -5.89E+09 ---1.49E+01 ----2.87E-04 1.58E-04 -4.45E-04
Fluorene --4.00E-02 I -1.00E+00 1.30E-01 1.00E+00 -1.69E+00 9.16E+03 5.50E+01 9.62E-05 3.93E-03 PHYSPROP 5.68E+02 PHYSPROP 8.26E+02 YAWS PAH 4.40E-02 7.89E-06 1.68E-07 5.89E+09 2.24E+05 1.98E+04 2.24E+05 4.06E+00 ----7.82E-05 4.30E-05 -1.21E-04
Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 1.00E-01 E 6.00E-05 E --1.00E+00 1.30E-01 1.00E+00 -1.90E-04 1.95E+06 -3.48E-07 1.42E-05 PHYSPROP 8.09E+02 PHYSPROP 1.08E+03 EPA 2001 Fact Sheet PAH 2.47E-02 6.37E-06 -5.89E+09 ---3.41E+00 9.38E-08 5.16E-08 2.55E-12 1.45E-07 ----
Isopropyltoluene, p-----1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 1.62E+02 2.34E+01 1.12E+03 6.72E+00 1.10E-02 4.50E-01 EPI 4.50E+02 PHYSPROP 6.54E+02 CRC VOC 5.27E-02 7.32E-06 1.83E-04 5.89E+09 6.79E+03 1.98E+04 1.98E+04 2.52E-02 --------
Lead and Compounds ----1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 ---9.00E+02 --2.02E+03 CRC 5.40E+03 YAWS INORGANIC ---5.89E+09 ---9.60E+02 --------
Mercury (elemental)---3.00E-04 I 1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 3.13E+00 6.00E-02 -5.20E+01 8.62E-03 3.52E-01 PHYSPROP VP/S 6.30E+02 PHYSPROP 1.76E+03 CRC INORGANIC 3.07E-02 6.30E-06 1.10E-05 2.10E+06 3.47E+04 0.00E+00 3.47E+04 4.80E-01 ------9.63E-03 9.63E-03
Methyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone)--6.00E-01 I 5.00E+00 I 1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 2.84E+04 2.23E+05 4.51E+00 2.71E-02 5.69E-05 2.33E-03 PHYSPROP 3.53E+02 PHYSPROP 5.37E+02 CRC VOC 9.14E-02 1.02E-05 8.94E-05 5.89E+09 9.71E+03 1.98E+04 1.98E+04 3.17E-02 ----4.07E-08 -6.58E-08 1.07E-07
Naphthalene 1.20E-01 C 3.40E-05 C 2.00E-02 I 3.00E-03 I 1.00E+00 1.30E-01 1.00E+00 -3.10E+01 1.54E+03 9.26E+00 4.40E-04 1.80E-02 PHYSPROP 4.91E+02 PHYSPROP 7.48E+02 CRC PAH 6.05E-02 8.38E-06 6.20E-06 5.89E+09 3.69E+04 1.98E+04 3.69E+04 5.24E-01 1.73E-08 9.52E-09 3.54E-08 6.23E-08 2.02E-05 1.11E-05 9.73E-04 1.00E-03
Phenanthrene ----1.00E+00 1.30E-01 1.00E+00 -1.15E+00 1.67E+04 1.00E+02 4.23E-05 1.73E-03 PHYSPROP 6.13E+02 PHYSPROP 8.69E+02 YAWS PAH 3.45E-02 6.69E-06 3.21E-08 5.89E+09 5.12E+05 1.98E+04 5.12E+05 1.09E+01 --------
Phenol --3.00E-01 I 2.00E-01 C 1.00E+00 1.00E-01 1.00E+00 -8.28E+04 1.87E+02 -3.33E-07 1.36E-05 PHYSPROP 4.55E+02 PHYSPROP 6.94E+02 CRC SVOC 8.34E-02 1.03E-05 -5.89E+09 ---9.71E-02 ----2.49E-07 1.06E-07 1.70E-11 3.55E-07
Propyl benzene --1.00E-01 X 1.00E+00 X 1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 2.64E+02 5.22E+01 8.13E+02 4.88E+00 1.05E-02 4.29E-01 PHYSPROP 4.32E+02 PHYSPROP 6.38E+02 CRC VOC 6.02E-02 7.83E-06 2.72E-04 5.89E+09 5.57E+03 1.98E+04 1.98E+04 4.31E-03 ----3.32E-08 -4.48E-08 7.80E-08
Pyrene --3.00E-02 I -1.00E+00 1.30E-01 1.00E+00 -1.35E-01 5.43E+04 3.26E+02 1.19E-05 4.87E-04 PHYSPROP 6.77E+02 PHYSPROP 9.36E+02 YAWS PAH 2.78E-02 7.25E-06 2.35E-09 5.89E+09 1.89E+06 1.98E+04 1.89E+06 1.46E+01 ----3.75E-04 2.06E-04 -5.81E-04
Selenium --5.00E-03 I 2.00E-02 C 1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 ---5.00E+00 --9.58E+02 PHYSPROP 1.77E+03 CRC INORGANIC ---5.89E+09 ---1.82E+01 ----2.80E-03 -3.18E-08 2.80E-03
Silver --5.00E-03 I -4.00E-02 -1.00E+00 ---8.30E+00 --2.27E+03 PHYSPROP 6.41E+03 CRC INORGANIC ---5.89E+09 ---1.78E+01 ----2.74E-03 --2.74E-03
Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2-2.00E-01 I 5.80E-05 C 2.00E-02 I -1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 1.90E+03 2.83E+03 9.49E+01 5.70E-01 3.67E-04 1.50E-02 PHYSPROP 4.20E+02 PHYSPROP 6.45E+02 YAWS VOC 4.89E-02 9.29E-06 5.82E-05 5.89E+09 1.20E+04 1.98E+04 1.98E+04 2.18E+00 1.20E-07 -4.69E-07 5.89E-07 8.40E-05 --8.40E-05
Tetrachloroethylene 2.10E-03 I 2.60E-07 I 6.00E-03 I 4.00E-02 I 1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 1.66E+02 2.06E+02 9.49E+01 5.70E-01 1.77E-02 7.24E-01 PHYSPROP 3.94E+02 PHYSPROP 6.20E+02 YAWS VOC 5.05E-02 9.46E-06 2.41E-03 5.89E+09 1.87E+03 1.98E+04 1.98E+04 5.51E-02 3.18E-11 -5.31E-11 8.50E-11 7.08E-06 -1.43E-05 2.14E-05
Toluene --8.00E-02 I 5.00E+00 I 1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 8.18E+02 5.26E+02 2.34E+02 1.40E+00 6.64E-03 2.71E-01 PHYSPROP 3.84E+02 PHYSPROP 5.92E+02 CRC VOC 7.78E-02 9.20E-06 7.24E-04 5.89E+09 3.41E+03 1.98E+04 1.98E+04 1.36E-01 ----1.31E-06 -2.82E-07 1.59E-06
Trichlorobenzene, 1,2,4-2.90E-02 P -1.00E-02 I 2.00E-03 P 1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 4.04E+02 4.90E+01 1.36E+03 8.14E+00 1.42E-03 5.81E-02 PHYSPROP 4.87E+02 PHYSPROP 7.25E+02 YAWS VOC 3.96E-02 8.40E-06 1.49E-05 5.89E+09 2.38E+04 1.98E+04 2.38E+04 6.67E-03 5.32E-11 --5.32E-11 5.14E-07 -2.88E-05 2.93E-05
Trichloroethylene 4.60E-02 I 4.10E-06 I 5.00E-04 I 2.00E-03 I 1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 6.92E+02 1.28E+03 6.07E+01 3.64E-01 9.85E-03 4.03E-01 PHYSPROP 3.60E+02 PHYSPROP 5.71E+02 YAWS VOC 6.87E-02 1.02E-05 2.73E-03 5.89E+09 1.76E+03 1.98E+04 1.98E+04 6.97E-02 8.82E-10 -1.06E-09 1.94E-09 1.07E-04 -3.62E-04 4.69E-04
Trimethylbenzene, 1,2,3---1.00E-02 I 6.00E-02 I 1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 2.93E+02 7.52E+01 6.27E+02 3.76E+00 4.36E-03 1.78E-01 PHYSPROP 4.49E+02 PHYSPROP 6.64E+02 CRC VOC 6.13E-02 8.02E-06 1.49E-04 5.89E+09 7.52E+03 1.98E+04 1.98E+04 4.08E-02 ----3.14E-06 -7.06E-06 1.02E-05
Trimethylbenzene, 1,2,4---1.00E-02 I 6.00E-02 I 1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 2.19E+02 5.70E+01 6.14E+02 3.69E+00 6.16E-03 2.52E-01 PHYSPROP 4.42E+02 PHYSPROP 6.49E+02 CRC VOC 6.07E-02 7.92E-06 2.12E-04 5.89E+09 6.30E+03 1.98E+04 1.98E+04 4.34E-02 ----3.34E-06 -7.51E-06 1.09E-05
Trimethylbenzene, 1,3,5---1.00E-02 I 6.00E-02 I 1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 1.82E+02 4.82E+01 6.02E+02 3.61E+00 8.77E-03 3.59E-01 PHYSPROP 4.38E+02 PHYSPROP 6.37E+02 CRC VOC 6.02E-02 7.84E-06 3.04E-04 5.89E+09 5.26E+03 1.98E+04 1.98E+04 2.80E-02 ----2.16E-06 -4.85E-06 7.00E-06
Xylenes --2.00E-01 I 1.00E-01 I 1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 2.60E+02 1.06E+02 3.83E+02 2.30E+00 6.63E-03 2.71E-01 PHYSPROP 4.12E+02 PHYSPROP 6.20E+02 YAWS VOC 6.85E-02 8.46E-06 4.04E-04 5.89E+09 4.57E+03 1.98E+04 1.98E+04 1.48E-01 ----5.70E-07 -1.54E-05 1.59E-05
Zinc and Compounds --3.00E-01 I -1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 ---6.20E+01 --1.18E+03 PHYSPROP 3.17E+03 YAWS INORGANIC ---5.89E+09 ---3.43E+02 ----8.81E-04 --8.81E-04
*Total Risk/HI -----------------------1.29E-05 3.48E-06 6.89E-06 2.33E-05 3.50E-01 2.46E-02 2.99E-01 6.74E-01
Site-specific
Outdoor Worker Risk for Soil
Output generated 25JAN2024:16:22:56
Woodbine Site
Chemical
SFo(mg/kg-day)-
1
SFoR
ef
IUR
(ug/m3)-1
IUR
Ref
RfD
(mg/kg-day)
RfD
Ref
RfC
(mg/m3)
RfC
Ref GIABS ABS RBA
Soil
Saturation
Concentration
(mg/kg)
S
(mg/L)
Koc
(cm3/g)
Kd
(cm3/g)
HLC
(atm-m3/mole)
Henry's
Law
Constant
Used in Calcs
(unitless)
H` and HLC
Ref
Normal
Boiling
Point
BP
(K)
BP
Ref
Critical
Temperature
TC
(K)
TC
Ref
Chemical
Type
Dia
(cm2/s)
Diw
(cm2/s)
DA
(cm2/s)
Particulate
Emission
Factor
(m3/kg)
Volatilization
Factor
UnlimitedReservoir
(m3/kg)
Volatilization
Factor
Mass Limit
(m3/kg)
Volatilization
Factor
Selected
(m3/kg)
Concentration
(mg/kg)
Ingestion
Risk
Dermal
Risk
Inhalation
Risk
Carcinogenic
Risk
Ingestion
HQ
Dermal
HQ
Inhalation
HQ
Noncarcinogenic
HI
Arsenic, Inorganic 1.50E+00 I 4.30E-03 I 3.00E-04 I /Chronic 1.50E-05 C /Chronic 1.00E+00 3.00E-02 6.00E-01 ---2.90E+01 --8.88E+02 PHYSPROP 1.67E+03 CRC INORGANIC ---2.10E+06 ---4.17E+01 1.52E-06 2.43E-07 2.79E-07 2.04E-06 2.46E-01 3.94E-02 3.15E-01 6.01E-01
Cadmium (Diet)-1.80E-03 I 5.00E-04 A /Subchronic 1.00E-05 A /Chronic 2.50E-02 1.00E-03 1.00E+00 ---7.50E+01 --1.04E+03 PHYSPROP 2.29E+03 YAWS INORGANIC ---2.10E+06 ---1.66E+00 --4.63E-09 4.63E-09 9.76E-03 1.25E-03 1.88E-02 2.98E-02
Mercury (elemental)---3.00E-04 H /Subchronic 1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 3.13E+00 6.00E-02 -5.20E+01 8.62E-03 3.52E-01 PHYSPROP VP/S 6.30E+02 PHYSPROP 1.76E+03 CRC INORGANIC 3.07E-02 6.30E-06 1.10E-05 2.10E+06 7.53E+03 -7.53E+03 4.80E-01 ------5.08E-02 5.08E-02
Zirconium --8.00E-05 X /Subchronic -1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 ---3.00E+03 --4.68E+03 CRC 8.80E+03 YAWS INORGANIC ---2.10E+06 ---2.43E+01 ----8.96E-01 --8.96E-01
Acenaphthene --2.00E-01 P /Subchronic -1.00E+00 1.30E-01 1.00E+00 -3.90E+00 5.03E+03 3.02E+01 1.84E-04 7.52E-03 PHYSPROP 5.52E+02 PHYSPROP 8.03E+02 YAWS PAH 5.06E-02 8.33E-06 6.72E-07 4.16E+08 --6.80E+02 3.12E+00 ----4.60E-05 1.92E-05 -6.51E-05
Acenaphthylene ----1.00E+00 1.30E-01 1.00E+00 -1.61E+01 5.03E+03 3.02E+01 1.14E-04 4.66E-03 PHYSPROP 5.53E+02 PHYSPROP 7.92E+02 YAWS PAH 4.50E-02 6.98E-06 3.70E-07 4.16E+08 --6.80E+02 1.11E+00 --------
Acetone --6.00E-01 A /Subchronic -1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 1.14E+05 1.00E+06 2.36E+00 1.42E-02 3.50E-05 1.43E-03 PHYSPROP 3.29E+02 PHYSPROP 5.08E+02 CRC VOC 1.06E-01 1.15E-05 7.12E-05 4.16E+08 --6.80E+02 9.25E-02 ----4.54E-07 --4.54E-07
Anthracene --1.00E+00 P /Subchronic -1.00E+00 1.30E-01 1.00E+00 -4.34E-02 1.64E+04 9.82E+01 5.56E-05 2.27E-03 PHYSPROP 6.13E+02 PHYSPROP 8.73E+02 YAWS PAH 3.90E-02 7.85E-06 4.85E-08 4.16E+08 --6.80E+02 2.99E+00 ----8.81E-06 3.67E-06 -1.25E-05
Barium --2.00E-01 A /Subchronic 5.00E-03 H /Subchronic 7.00E-02 -1.00E+00 ---4.10E+01 --1.87E+03 PHYSPROP 3.57E+03 YAWS INORGANIC ---4.16E+08 ---6.00E+02 ----8.84E-03 -6.87E-05 8.91E-03
Benz[a]anthracene 1.00E-01 E 6.00E-05 E --1.00E+00 1.30E-01 1.00E+00 -9.40E-03 1.77E+05 1.06E+03 1.20E-05 4.91E-04 PHYSPROP 7.11E+02 PHYSPROP 9.79E+02 YAWS PAH 2.61E-02 6.75E-06 6.83E-10 4.16E+08 --6.80E+02 6.79E+00 2.74E-08 1.14E-08 1.95E-06 1.99E-06 ----
Benzene 5.50E-02 I 7.80E-06 I 1.00E-02 P /Subchronic 8.00E-02 P /Subchronic 1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 1.82E+03 1.79E+03 1.46E+02 8.75E-01 5.55E-03 2.27E-01 PHYSPROP 3.53E+02 PHYSPROP 5.62E+02 CRC VOC 8.95E-02 1.03E-05 1.06E-03 4.16E+08 --6.80E+02 2.15E-02 4.77E-11 -8.04E-10 8.52E-10 6.33E-06 -9.41E-05 1.00E-04
Benzo[a]pyrene 1.00E+00 I 6.00E-04 I 3.00E-04 I /Chronic 2.00E-06 I /Chronic 1.00E+00 1.30E-01 1.00E+00 -1.62E-03 5.87E+05 -4.57E-07 1.87E-05 PHYSPROP 7.68E+02 PHYSPROP 9.69E+02
EPA 2001 Fact
Sheet PAH 2.55E-02 6.58E-06 -4.16E+08 ---5.97E+00 2.41E-07 1.00E-07 2.81E-11 3.41E-07 5.86E-02 2.44E-02 1.71E-03 8.48E-02
Benzo[b]fluoranthene 1.00E-01 E 6.00E-05 E --1.00E+00 1.30E-01 1.00E+00 -1.50E-03 5.99E+05 -6.57E-07 2.69E-05 PHYSPROP 7.16E+02 EPI 9.69E+02
EPA 2001 Fact
Sheet PAH 2.50E-02 6.43E-06 -4.16E+08 ---6.69E+00 2.70E-08 1.13E-08 3.15E-12 3.83E-08 ----
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene ----1.00E+00 1.30E-01 1.00E+00 -2.60E-04 1.95E+06 -3.31E-07 1.35E-05 PHYSPROP 7.59E+02 EPI 1.09E+03 Jobak Method PAH 2.39E-02 6.09E-06 -4.16E+08 ---3.08E+00 --------
Benzo[k]fluoranthene 1.00E-02 E 6.00E-06 E --1.00E+00 1.30E-01 1.00E+00 -8.00E-04 5.87E+05 -5.84E-07 2.39E-05 PHYSPROP 7.53E+02 PHYSPROP 1.02E+03
EPA 2001 Fact
Sheet PAH 2.50E-02 6.43E-06 -4.16E+08 ---2.42E+00 9.77E-10 4.07E-10 1.14E-13 1.38E-09 ----
Butylbenzene, tert---1.00E-01 X /Subchronic -1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 1.83E+02 2.95E+01 1.00E+03 6.01E+00 1.32E-02 5.40E-01 EPI 4.42E+02 PHYSPROP 6.48E+02 CRC VOC 5.30E-02 7.37E-06 2.45E-04 4.16E+08 --6.80E+02 7.84E-03 ----2.31E-07 --2.31E-07
Chromium(III), Insoluble Salts --1.50E+00 H /Subchronic 5.00E-03 A /Subchronic 1.30E-02 -1.00E+00 ---1.80E+06 ----INORGANIC ---4.16E+08 ---3.65E+01 ----7.17E-05 -4.18E-06 7.59E-05
Chromium(VI)5.00E-01 C 8.40E-02 G 5.00E-03 A /Subchronic 3.00E-04 A /Subchronic 2.50E-02 -1.00E+00 -1.69E+06 -1.90E+01 ----INORGANIC ---4.16E+08 ---9.38E-01 1.89E-08 -6.18E-10 1.95E-08 5.53E-04 -1.79E-06 5.55E-04
Chromium, Total ----1.30E-02 -1.00E+00 ---1.80E+06 --2.92E+03 PHYSPROP 8.56E+03 YAWS INORGANIC ---4.16E+08 ---2.64E+01 --------
Chrysene 1.00E-03 E 6.00E-07 E --1.00E+00 1.30E-01 1.00E+00 -2.00E-03 1.81E+05 -5.23E-06 2.14E-04 PHYSPROP 7.21E+02 PHYSPROP 9.79E+02 YAWS PAH 2.61E-02 6.75E-06 -4.16E+08 ---6.93E+00 2.80E-10 1.17E-10 3.26E-14 3.96E-10 ----
Copper --4.00E-02 H /Subchronic -1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 ---3.50E+01 --2.87E+03 PHYSPROP 5.12E+03 YAWS INORGANIC ---4.16E+08 ---7.03E+02 ----5.18E-02 --5.18E-02
Cumene --4.00E-01 H /Subchronic 9.00E-02 H /Subchronic 1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 2.68E+02 6.13E+01 6.98E+02 4.19E+00 1.15E-02 4.70E-01 PHYSPROP 4.26E+02 PHYSPROP 6.31E+02 CRC VOC 6.03E-02 7.86E-06 3.45E-04 4.16E+08 --6.80E+02 4.48E-03 ----3.30E-08 -1.74E-05 1.75E-05
Dibenz[a,h]anthracene 1.00E+00 E 6.00E-04 E --1.00E+00 1.30E-01 1.00E+00 -2.49E-03 1.91E+06 -1.41E-07 5.76E-06 EPI 7.97E+02 PHYSPROP 9.90E+02
EPA 2001 Fact
Sheet PAH 2.36E-02 6.02E-06 -4.16E+08 ---7.86E-01 3.17E-08 1.32E-08 3.70E-12 4.50E-08 ----
Dichlorobenzene, 1,4-5.40E-03 C 1.10E-05 C 7.00E-02 A /Subchronic 1.20E+00 A /Subchronic 1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 -8.13E+01 3.75E+02 2.25E+00 2.41E-03 9.85E-02 PHYSPROP 4.47E+02 PHYSPROP 6.69E+02 CRC VOC 5.50E-02 8.68E-06 1.22E-04 4.16E+08 --6.80E+02 3.55E-03 7.74E-13 -1.87E-10 1.88E-10 1.49E-07 -1.03E-06 1.18E-06
Dimethylphthalate --1.00E-01 X /Subchronic -1.00E+00 1.00E-01 1.00E+00 -4.00E+03 3.16E+01 -1.97E-07 8.05E-06 EPI 5.57E+02 PHYSPROP 7.72E+02 CRC SVOC 2.99E-02 7.14E-06 -4.16E+08 ---1.81E-02 ----5.33E-07 1.71E-07 -7.04E-07
Ethylbenzene 1.10E-02 C 2.50E-06 C 5.00E-02 P /Subchronic 9.00E+00 P /Subchronic 1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 4.80E+02 1.69E+02 4.46E+02 2.68E+00 7.88E-03 3.22E-01 PHYSPROP 4.09E+02 PHYSPROP 6.17E+02 CRC VOC 6.85E-02 8.46E-06 4.14E-04 4.16E+08 --6.80E+02 2.89E-02 1.28E-11 -3.47E-10 3.59E-10 1.70E-06 -1.12E-06 2.83E-06
Fluoranthene --1.00E-01 P /Subchronic -1.00E+00 1.30E-01 1.00E+00 -2.60E-01 5.55E+04 -8.86E-06 3.62E-04 PHYSPROP 6.57E+02 PHYSPROP 9.05E+02 YAWS PAH 2.76E-02 7.18E-06 -4.16E+08 ---1.49E+01 ----4.39E-04 1.83E-04 -6.22E-04
Fluorene --4.00E-01 A /Subchronic -1.00E+00 1.30E-01 1.00E+00 -1.69E+00 9.16E+03 5.50E+01 9.62E-05 3.93E-03 PHYSPROP 5.68E+02 PHYSPROP 8.26E+02 YAWS PAH 4.40E-02 7.89E-06 1.68E-07 4.16E+08 --6.80E+02 4.06E+00 ----2.99E-05 1.25E-05 -4.24E-05
Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 1.00E-01 E 6.00E-05 E --1.00E+00 1.30E-01 1.00E+00 -1.90E-04 1.95E+06 -3.48E-07 1.42E-05 PHYSPROP 8.09E+02 PHYSPROP 1.08E+03
EPA 2001 Fact
Sheet PAH 2.47E-02 6.37E-06 -4.16E+08 ---3.41E+00 1.38E-08 5.74E-09 1.60E-12 1.95E-08 ----
Isopropyltoluene, p-----1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 1.62E+02 2.34E+01 1.12E+03 6.72E+00 1.10E-02 4.50E-01 EPI 4.50E+02 PHYSPROP 6.54E+02 CRC VOC 5.27E-02 7.32E-06 1.83E-04 4.16E+08 --6.80E+02 2.52E-02 --------
Lead and Compounds ----1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 ---9.00E+02 --2.02E+03 CRC 5.40E+03 YAWS INORGANIC ---4.16E+08 ---9.60E+02 --------
Methyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone)--2.00E+00 H /Subchronic 1.00E+00 H /Subchronic 1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 2.84E+04 2.23E+05 4.51E+00 2.71E-02 5.69E-05 2.33E-03 PHYSPROP 3.53E+02 PHYSPROP 5.37E+02 CRC VOC 9.14E-02 1.02E-05 8.94E-05 4.16E+08 --6.80E+02 3.17E-02 ----4.67E-08 -1.11E-05 1.11E-05
Naphthalene 1.20E-01 C 3.40E-05 C 6.00E-01 A /Subchronic 3.00E-03 I /Chronic 1.00E+00 1.30E-01 1.00E+00 -3.10E+01 1.54E+03 9.26E+00 4.40E-04 1.80E-02 PHYSPROP 4.91E+02 PHYSPROP 7.48E+02 CRC PAH 6.05E-02 8.38E-06 6.20E-06 4.16E+08 --6.80E+02 5.24E-01 2.54E-09 1.06E-09 8.55E-08 8.91E-08 2.57E-06 1.07E-06 6.12E-02 6.12E-02
Phenanthrene ----1.00E+00 1.30E-01 1.00E+00 -1.15E+00 1.67E+04 1.00E+02 4.23E-05 1.73E-03 PHYSPROP 6.13E+02 PHYSPROP 8.69E+02 YAWS PAH 3.45E-02 6.69E-06 3.21E-08 4.16E+08 --6.80E+02 1.09E+01 --------
Phenol --6.00E-01 H /Subchronic 2.00E-01 C /Chronic 1.00E+00 1.00E-01 1.00E+00 -8.28E+04 1.87E+02 -3.33E-07 1.36E-05 PHYSPROP 4.55E+02 PHYSPROP 6.94E+02 CRC SVOC 8.34E-02 1.03E-05 -4.16E+08 ---9.71E-02 ----4.77E-07 1.53E-07 2.78E-10 6.30E-07
Propyl benzene --1.00E-01 X /Subchronic 1.00E+00 X /Subchronic 1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 2.64E+02 5.22E+01 8.13E+02 4.88E+00 1.05E-02 4.29E-01 PHYSPROP 4.32E+02 PHYSPROP 6.38E+02 CRC VOC 6.02E-02 7.83E-06 2.72E-04 4.16E+08 --6.80E+02 4.31E-03 ----1.27E-07 -1.51E-06 1.64E-06
Pyrene --3.00E-01 P /Subchronic -1.00E+00 1.30E-01 1.00E+00 -1.35E-01 5.43E+04 3.26E+02 1.19E-05 4.87E-04 PHYSPROP 6.77E+02 PHYSPROP 9.36E+02 YAWS PAH 2.78E-02 7.25E-06 2.35E-09 4.16E+08 --6.80E+02 1.46E+01 ----1.43E-04 5.98E-05 -2.03E-04
Selenium --5.00E-03 H /Subchronic 2.00E-02 C /Chronic 1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 ---5.00E+00 --9.58E+02 PHYSPROP 1.77E+03 CRC INORGANIC ---4.16E+08 ---1.82E+01 ----1.07E-02 -5.21E-07 1.07E-02
Silver --5.00E-03 H /Subchronic -4.00E-02 -1.00E+00 ---8.30E+00 --2.27E+03 PHYSPROP 6.41E+03 CRC INORGANIC ---4.16E+08 ---1.78E+01 ----1.05E-02 --1.05E-02
Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2-2.00E-01 I 5.80E-05 C 5.00E-02 I /Subchronic -1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 1.90E+03 2.83E+03 9.49E+01 5.70E-01 3.67E-04 1.50E-02 PHYSPROP 4.20E+02 PHYSPROP 6.45E+02 YAWS VOC 4.89E-02 9.29E-06 5.82E-05 4.16E+08 --6.80E+02 2.18E+00 1.76E-08 -6.07E-07 6.24E-07 1.28E-04 --1.28E-04
Tetrachloroethylene 2.10E-03 I 2.60E-07 I 8.00E-03 A /Subchronic 4.07E-02 A /Subchronic 1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 1.66E+02 2.06E+02 9.49E+01 5.70E-01 1.77E-02 7.24E-01 PHYSPROP 3.94E+02 PHYSPROP 6.20E+02 YAWS VOC 5.05E-02 9.46E-06 2.41E-03 4.16E+08 --6.80E+02 5.51E-02 4.67E-12 -6.87E-11 7.34E-11 2.03E-05 -4.74E-04 4.95E-04
Toluene --8.00E-01 P /Subchronic 5.00E+00 P /Subchronic 1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 8.18E+02 5.26E+02 2.34E+02 1.40E+00 6.64E-03 2.71E-01 PHYSPROP 3.84E+02 PHYSPROP 5.92E+02 CRC VOC 7.78E-02 9.20E-06 7.24E-04 4.16E+08 --6.80E+02 1.36E-01 ----5.01E-07 -9.53E-06 1.00E-05
Trichlorobenzene, 1,2,4-2.90E-02 P -9.00E-02 P /Subchronic 2.00E-02 P /Subchronic 1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 4.04E+02 4.90E+01 1.36E+03 8.14E+00 1.42E-03 5.81E-02 PHYSPROP 4.87E+02 PHYSPROP 7.25E+02 YAWS VOC 3.96E-02 8.40E-06 1.49E-05 4.16E+08 --6.80E+02 6.67E-03 7.81E-12 --7.81E-12 2.18E-07 -1.17E-04 1.17E-04
Trichloroethylene 4.60E-02 I 4.10E-06 I 5.00E-04 A /Subchronic 2.15E-03 A /Subchronic 1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 6.92E+02 1.28E+03 6.07E+01 3.64E-01 9.85E-03 4.03E-01 PHYSPROP 3.60E+02 PHYSPROP 5.71E+02 YAWS VOC 6.87E-02 1.02E-05 2.73E-03 4.16E+08 --6.80E+02 6.97E-02 1.29E-10 -1.37E-09 1.50E-09 4.11E-04 -1.14E-02 1.18E-02
Trimethylbenzene, 1,2,3---4.00E-02 I /Subchronic 2.00E-01 I /Subchronic 1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 2.93E+02 7.52E+01 6.27E+02 3.76E+00 4.36E-03 1.78E-01 PHYSPROP 4.49E+02 PHYSPROP 6.64E+02 CRC VOC 6.13E-02 8.02E-06 1.49E-04 4.16E+08 --6.80E+02 4.08E-02 ----3.01E-06 -7.14E-05 7.44E-05
Trimethylbenzene, 1,2,4---4.00E-02 I /Subchronic 2.00E-01 I /Subchronic 1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 2.19E+02 5.70E+01 6.14E+02 3.69E+00 6.16E-03 2.52E-01 PHYSPROP 4.42E+02 PHYSPROP 6.49E+02 CRC VOC 6.07E-02 7.92E-06 2.12E-04 4.16E+08 --6.80E+02 4.34E-02 ----3.20E-06 -7.60E-05 7.92E-05
Trimethylbenzene, 1,3,5---4.00E-02 I /Subchronic 2.00E-01 I /Subchronic 1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 1.82E+02 4.82E+01 6.02E+02 3.61E+00 8.77E-03 3.59E-01 PHYSPROP 4.38E+02 PHYSPROP 6.37E+02 CRC VOC 6.02E-02 7.84E-06 3.04E-04 4.16E+08 --6.80E+02 2.80E-02 ----2.06E-06 -4.90E-05 5.11E-05
Xylenes --4.00E-01 P /Subchronic 4.00E-01 P /Subchronic 1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 2.60E+02 1.06E+02 3.83E+02 2.30E+00 6.63E-03 2.71E-01 PHYSPROP 4.12E+02 PHYSPROP 6.20E+02 YAWS VOC 6.85E-02 8.46E-06 4.04E-04 4.16E+08 --6.80E+02 1.48E-01 ----1.09E-06 -1.30E-04 1.31E-04
Zinc and Compounds --3.00E-01 A /Subchronic -1.00E+00 -1.00E+00 ---6.20E+01 --1.18E+03 PHYSPROP 3.17E+03 YAWS INORGANIC ---4.16E+08 ---3.43E+02 ----3.37E-03 --3.37E-03
*Total Risk/HI -----------------------1.90E-06 3.86E-07 2.93E-06 5.22E-06 1.30E+00 6.53E-02 4.60E-01 1.82E+00
Site-specific
Construction Worker Risk for Soil - Other Construction Activities
Output generated 25JAN2024:16:50:24
Woodbine Site
VERSION:
Construction Worker Quantitative Risk Assessment Report
VURAM
All Report Pages are Required for Risk Assessment Submission
Virginia Department of Environmental Quality
Site Name:Woodbine
Program:RCRA Corrective Action
F
By submitting this report to the Virginia DEQ, the user confirms that VURAM's default
exposure parameters have not been altered, unless a complete unaltered VURAM analysis is
provided and all modifications are detailed explicitly in an accompanying narrative or
documentation that shows DEQ's prior concurrence with specific changes.
Virginia Unified Risk Assessment Model
Chemical Specific Notes displayed as applicable
3.2.2
Tuesday, August 29, 2023 Page 1 of 14
RCRA Corrective Action
1.00E-06 1.00E-041
Risk Based Performance Criteria
Default Risk Individual Chemical Default Cumulative Risk-All ChemicalsDefault Hazard Index
WoodbineSite Name:
Program:
Construction
Air
µg/m3
0.00%0.00%
Concentration :4.53E+01
Mutagen:
RfDo:
RfCi:3.09E+01
SFO:
IUR:
Ingestion:
Dermal:
Inhalation:1.85E-06
Ingestion:
Dermal:
Inhalation:
Non-Cancer Adult Cancer
Total:0.00E+00Total:1.85E-06
% Contribution to Media Risk
Calculated Hazard/Risk
Analyte:Acetone
CAS:67-64-1
VOC:Y
µg/m3
0.14%2.35%
Concentration :1.54E+01
Mutagen:
RfDo:
RfCi:8.00E-02
SFO:
IUR:7.80E-06
Ingestion:
Dermal:
Inhalation:2.05E-04
Ingestion:
Dermal:
Inhalation:1.76E-09
Non-Cancer Adult Cancer
Total:1.76E-09Total:2.05E-04
% Contribution to Media Risk
Calculated Hazard/Risk
Analyte:Benzene
CAS:71-43-2
VOC:Y
µg/m3
0.22%4.43%
Concentration :9.72E+00
Mutagen:
RfDo:
RfCi:2.00E-02
SFO:
IUR:3.70E-05
Ingestion:
Dermal:
Inhalation:3.26E-04
Ingestion:
Dermal:
Inhalation:3.30E-09
Non-Cancer Adult Cancer
Total:3.30E-09Total:3.26E-04
% Contribution to Media Risk
Calculated Hazard/Risk
Analyte:Bromodichloromethane
CAS:75-27-4
VOC:Y
Tuesday, August 29, 2023 Page 2 of 14
RCRA Corrective Action
1.00E-06 1.00E-041
Risk Based Performance Criteria
Default Risk Individual Chemical Default Cumulative Risk-All ChemicalsDefault Hazard Index
WoodbineSite Name:
Program:
Construction
Air
µg/m3
0.01%0.00%
Concentration :6.50E+00
Mutagen:
RfDo:
RfCi:7.00E-01
SFO:
IUR:
Ingestion:
Dermal:
Inhalation:1.18E-05
Ingestion:
Dermal:
Inhalation:
Non-Cancer Adult Cancer
Total:0.00E+00Total:1.18E-05
% Contribution to Media Risk
Calculated Hazard/Risk
Analyte:Carbon Disulfide
CAS:75-15-0
VOC:Y
µg/m3
0.45%68.95%
Concentration :1.78E+02
Mutagen:
RfDo:
RfCi:2.44E-01
SFO:
IUR:2.30E-05
Ingestion:
Dermal:
Inhalation:6.69E-04
Ingestion:
Dermal:
Inhalation:5.14E-08
Non-Cancer Adult Cancer
Total:5.14E-08Total:6.69E-04
% Contribution to Media Risk
Calculated Hazard/Risk
Analyte:Chloroform
CAS:67-66-3
VOC:Y
µg/m3
0.00%0.15%
Concentration :5.10E+00
Mutagen:
RfDo:
RfCi:
SFO:
IUR:1.60E-06
Ingestion:
Dermal:
Inhalation:
Ingestion:
Dermal:
Inhalation:1.11E-10
Non-Cancer Adult Cancer
Total:1.11E-10Total:0.00E+00
% Contribution to Media Risk
Calculated Hazard/Risk
Analyte:Dichloroethane, 1,1-
CAS:75-34-3
VOC:Y
Tuesday, August 29, 2023 Page 3 of 14
RCRA Corrective Action
1.00E-06 1.00E-041
Risk Based Performance Criteria
Default Risk Individual Chemical Default Cumulative Risk-All ChemicalsDefault Hazard Index
WoodbineSite Name:
Program:
Construction
Air
µg/m3
0.16%0.00%
Concentration :9.22E+01
Mutagen:
RfDo:
RfCi:4.00E-01
SFO:
IUR:
Ingestion:
Dermal:
Inhalation:2.43E-04
Ingestion:
Dermal:
Inhalation:
Non-Cancer Adult Cancer
Total:0.00E+00Total:2.43E-04
% Contribution to Media Risk
Calculated Hazard/Risk
Analyte:Dichloroethylene, cis-1,2-
CAS:156-59-2
VOC:Y
µg/m3
0.14%0.00%
Concentration :1.60E+02
Mutagen:
RfDo:
RfCi:7.93E-01
SFO:
IUR:
Ingestion:
Dermal:
Inhalation:2.11E-04
Ingestion:
Dermal:
Inhalation:
Non-Cancer Adult Cancer
Total:0.00E+00Total:2.11E-04
% Contribution to Media Risk
Calculated Hazard/Risk
Analyte:Dichloroethylene, trans-1,2-
CAS:156-60-5
VOC:Y
µg/m3
0.00%0.30%
Concentration :8.00E+00
Mutagen:
RfDo:
RfCi:9.00E+00
SFO:
IUR:2.50E-06
Ingestion:
Dermal:
Inhalation:7.25E-07
Ingestion:
Dermal:
Inhalation:2.24E-10
Non-Cancer Adult Cancer
Total:2.24E-10Total:7.25E-07
% Contribution to Media Risk
Calculated Hazard/Risk
Analyte:Ethylbenzene
CAS:100-41-4
VOC:Y
Tuesday, August 29, 2023 Page 4 of 14
RCRA Corrective Action
1.00E-06 1.00E-041
Risk Based Performance Criteria
Default Risk Individual Chemical Default Cumulative Risk-All ChemicalsDefault Hazard Index
WoodbineSite Name:
Program:
Construction
Air
µg/m3
0.00%0.00%
Concentration :4.35E+00
Mutagen:
RfDo:
RfCi:4.00E+00
SFO:
IUR:
Ingestion:
Dermal:
Inhalation:8.42E-07
Ingestion:
Dermal:
Inhalation:
Non-Cancer Adult Cancer
Total:0.00E+00Total:8.42E-07
% Contribution to Media Risk
Calculated Hazard/Risk
Analyte:Heptane, N-
CAS:142-82-5
VOC:Y
µg/m3
0.00%0.00%
Concentration :5.13E+00
Mutagen:
RfDo:
RfCi:2.00E+00
SFO:
IUR:
Ingestion:
Dermal:
Inhalation:2.24E-06
Ingestion:
Dermal:
Inhalation:
Non-Cancer Adult Cancer
Total:0.00E+00Total:2.24E-06
% Contribution to Media Risk
Calculated Hazard/Risk
Analyte:Hexane, N-
CAS:110-54-3
VOC:Y
µg/m3
0.00%0.00%
Concentration :2.19E+01
Mutagen:
RfDo:
RfCi:7.00E+00
SFO:
IUR:
Ingestion:
Dermal:
Inhalation:3.85E-06
Ingestion:
Dermal:
Inhalation:
Non-Cancer Adult Cancer
Total:0.00E+00Total:3.85E-06
% Contribution to Media Risk
Calculated Hazard/Risk
Analyte:Isopropanol
CAS:67-63-0
VOC:Y
Tuesday, August 29, 2023 Page 5 of 14
RCRA Corrective Action
1.00E-06 1.00E-041
Risk Based Performance Criteria
Default Risk Individual Chemical Default Cumulative Risk-All ChemicalsDefault Hazard Index
WoodbineSite Name:
Program:
Construction
Air
µg/m3
0.01%0.00%
Concentration :2.00E+01
Mutagen:
RfDo:
RfCi:1.00E+00
SFO:
IUR:
Ingestion:
Dermal:
Inhalation:2.18E-05
Ingestion:
Dermal:
Inhalation:
Non-Cancer Adult Cancer
Total:0.00E+00Total:2.18E-05
% Contribution to Media Risk
Calculated Hazard/Risk
Analyte:Methyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone)
CAS:78-93-3
VOC:Y
µg/m3
0.01%0.00%
Concentration :7.23E+00
Mutagen:Y
RfDo:
RfCi:1.04E+00
SFO:
IUR:1.00E-08
Ingestion:
Dermal:
Inhalation:8.26E-06
Ingestion:
Dermal:
Inhalation:1.18E-12
Non-Cancer Adult Cancer
Total:1.18E-12Total:8.26E-06
% Contribution to Media Risk
Calculated Hazard/Risk
Analyte:Methylene Chloride
CAS:75-09-2
VOC:Y
µg/m3
0.00%0.00%
Concentration :4.70E+00
Mutagen:
RfDo:
RfCi:3.00E+00
SFO:
IUR:
Ingestion:
Dermal:
Inhalation:2.05E-06
Ingestion:
Dermal:
Inhalation:
Non-Cancer Adult Cancer
Total:0.00E+00Total:2.05E-06
% Contribution to Media Risk
Calculated Hazard/Risk
Analyte:Propylene
CAS:115-07-1
VOC:Y
Tuesday, August 29, 2023 Page 6 of 14
RCRA Corrective Action
1.00E-06 1.00E-041
Risk Based Performance Criteria
Default Risk Individual Chemical Default Cumulative Risk-All ChemicalsDefault Hazard Index
WoodbineSite Name:
Program:
Construction
Air
µg/m3
0.00%0.00%
Concentration :3.91E+00
Mutagen:
RfDo:
RfCi:3.00E+00
SFO:
IUR:
Ingestion:
Dermal:
Inhalation:1.10E-06
Ingestion:
Dermal:
Inhalation:
Non-Cancer Adult Cancer
Total:0.00E+00Total:1.10E-06
% Contribution to Media Risk
Calculated Hazard/Risk
Analyte:Styrene
CAS:100-42-5
VOC:Y
µg/m3
0.07%0.02%
Concentration :7.42E+00
Mutagen:
RfDo:
RfCi:4.07E-02
SFO:
IUR:2.60E-07
Ingestion:
Dermal:
Inhalation:1.10E-04
Ingestion:
Dermal:
Inhalation:1.59E-11
Non-Cancer Adult Cancer
Total:1.59E-11Total:1.10E-04
% Contribution to Media Risk
Calculated Hazard/Risk
Analyte:Tetrachloroethylene
CAS:127-18-4
VOC:Y
µg/m3
0.00%0.00%
Concentration :5.96E+00
Mutagen:
RfDo:
RfCi:2.00E+00
SFO:
IUR:
Ingestion:
Dermal:
Inhalation:3.53E-06
Ingestion:
Dermal:
Inhalation:
Non-Cancer Adult Cancer
Total:0.00E+00Total:3.53E-06
% Contribution to Media Risk
Calculated Hazard/Risk
Analyte:Tetrahydrofuran
CAS:109-99-9
VOC:Y
Tuesday, August 29, 2023 Page 7 of 14
RCRA Corrective Action
1.00E-06 1.00E-041
Risk Based Performance Criteria
Default Risk Individual Chemical Default Cumulative Risk-All ChemicalsDefault Hazard Index
WoodbineSite Name:
Program:
Construction
Air
µg/m3
0.00%0.00%
Concentration :3.66E+01
Mutagen:
RfDo:
RfCi:5.00E+00
SFO:
IUR:
Ingestion:
Dermal:
Inhalation:6.79E-06
Ingestion:
Dermal:
Inhalation:
Non-Cancer Adult Cancer
Total:0.00E+00Total:6.79E-06
% Contribution to Media Risk
Calculated Hazard/Risk
Analyte:Toluene
CAS:108-88-3
VOC:Y
µg/m3
0.08%0.00%
Concentration :8.00E+02
Mutagen:
RfDo:
RfCi:5.00E+00
SFO:
IUR:
Ingestion:
Dermal:
Inhalation:1.24E-04
Ingestion:
Dermal:
Inhalation:
Non-Cancer Adult Cancer
Total:0.00E+00Total:1.24E-04
% Contribution to Media Risk
Calculated Hazard/Risk
Analyte:Trichloroethane, 1,1,1-
CAS:71-55-6
VOC:Y
µg/m3
98.47%23.79%
Concentration :3.86E+02
Mutagen:Y
RfDo:
RfCi:2.15E-03
SFO:
IUR:4.10E-06
Ingestion:
Dermal:
Inhalation:1.47E-01
Ingestion:
Dermal:
Inhalation:1.77E-08
Non-Cancer Adult Cancer
Total:1.77E-08Total:1.47E-01
% Contribution to Media Risk
Calculated Hazard/Risk
Analyte:Trichloroethylene
CAS:79-01-6
VOC:Y
Tuesday, August 29, 2023 Page 8 of 14
RCRA Corrective Action
1.00E-06 1.00E-041
Risk Based Performance Criteria
Default Risk Individual Chemical Default Cumulative Risk-All ChemicalsDefault Hazard Index
WoodbineSite Name:
Program:
Construction
Air
µg/m3
0.01%0.00%
Concentration :5.51E+00
Mutagen:
RfDo:
RfCi:2.00E-01
SFO:
IUR:
Ingestion:
Dermal:
Inhalation:1.99E-05
Ingestion:
Dermal:
Inhalation:
Non-Cancer Adult Cancer
Total:0.00E+00Total:1.99E-05
% Contribution to Media Risk
Calculated Hazard/Risk
Analyte:Trimethylbenzene, 1,2,4-
CAS:95-63-6
VOC:Y
µg/m3
0.17%0.00%
Concentration :3.10E+01
Mutagen:
RfDo:
RfCi:1.00E-01
SFO:
IUR:
Ingestion:
Dermal:
Inhalation:2.53E-04
Ingestion:
Dermal:
Inhalation:
Non-Cancer Adult Cancer
Total:0.00E+00Total:2.53E-04
% Contribution to Media Risk
Calculated Hazard/Risk
Analyte:Xylene, m-
CAS:108-38-3
VOC:Y
µg/m3
0.04%0.00%
Concentration :7.00E+00
Mutagen:
RfDo:
RfCi:1.00E-01
SFO:
IUR:
Ingestion:
Dermal:
Inhalation:5.76E-05
Ingestion:
Dermal:
Inhalation:
Non-Cancer Adult Cancer
Total:0.00E+00Total:5.76E-05
% Contribution to Media Risk
Calculated Hazard/Risk
Analyte:Xylene, o-
CAS:95-47-6
VOC:Y
Tuesday, August 29, 2023 Page 9 of 14
RCRA Corrective Action
1.00E-06 1.00E-041
Risk Based Performance Criteria
Default Risk Individual Chemical Default Cumulative Risk-All ChemicalsDefault Hazard Index
WoodbineSite Name:
Program:
Construction
Air
Total Calculated Hazard Index/Risk for
Ingestion:0.00E+00
Dermal:0.00E+00
Inhalation:1.49E-01
Ingestion:0.00E+00
Dermal:0.00E+00
Inhalation:7.46E-08
Non-Cancer Adult Cancer
Total:1.49E-01 Total:7.46E-08
Air
Tuesday, August 29, 2023 Page 10 of 14
RCRA Corrective Action
1.00E-06 1.00E-041
Risk Based Performance Criteria
Default Risk Individual Chemical Default Cumulative Risk-All ChemicalsDefault Hazard Index
WoodbineSite Name:
Program:
Construction
Total Hazard Index/Risk for All Media
Report Summary
Hazard/risk values of zero (0.00+00) are reflective of non-calculated values. Hazard/risk for
zero value analytes must be evaluated outside of quantitative risk assessment.
Air
Hazard RiskCASAnalyte
Hazard/Risk Summary for
Acetone 67-64-1 0.00E+001.85E-06
Benzene 71-43-2 1.76E-092.05E-04
Bromodichloromethane 75-27-4 3.30E-093.26E-04
Carbon Disulfide 75-15-0 0.00E+001.18E-05
Chloroform 67-66-3 5.14E-086.69E-04
Dichloroethane, 1,1-75-34-3 1.11E-100.00E+00
Dichloroethylene, cis-1,2-156-59-2 0.00E+002.43E-04
Dichloroethylene, trans-1,2-156-60-5 0.00E+002.11E-04
Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 2.24E-107.25E-07
Heptane, N-142-82-5 0.00E+008.42E-07
Hexane, N-110-54-3 0.00E+002.24E-06
Isopropanol 67-63-0 0.00E+003.85E-06
Methyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone)78-93-3 0.00E+002.18E-05
Methylene Chloride 75-09-2 1.18E-128.26E-06
Propylene 115-07-1 0.00E+002.05E-06
Styrene 100-42-5 0.00E+001.10E-06
Tetrachloroethylene 127-18-4 1.59E-111.10E-04
Tetrahydrofuran 109-99-9 0.00E+003.53E-06
Toluene 108-88-3 0.00E+006.79E-06
Trichloroethane, 1,1,1-71-55-6 0.00E+001.24E-04
Trichloroethylene 79-01-6 1.77E-081.47E-01
Trimethylbenzene, 1,2,4-95-63-6 0.00E+001.99E-05
Xylene, m-108-38-3 0.00E+002.53E-04
Xylene, o-95-47-6 0.00E+005.76E-05
Tuesday, August 29, 2023 Page 11 of 14
RCRA Corrective Action
1.00E-06 1.00E-041
Risk Based Performance Criteria
Default Risk Individual Chemical Default Cumulative Risk-All ChemicalsDefault Hazard Index
WoodbineSite Name:
Program:
Construction
Ingestion:0.00E+00
Dermal:0.00E+00
Inhalation:1.49E-01
Ingestion:0.00E+00
Dermal:0.00E+00
Inhalation:7.46E-08
Non-Cancer Adult Cancer
Total:1.49E-01 Total:7.46E-08
does not exceed hazard index does not exceed cumulative risk
Construction Exposure Default Values
Description ValueSymbol Units
14.0111Construction Worker Soil Inhalation Dispersion Constant - PhiladelphiaA (unitless)
0.3Construction Worker Soil Adherence FactorAFcw (mg/cm2)
0.5Areal extent of the site or contaminationAs (acres)
25550Construction Worker Averaging Time: 365 x LTATcw (days)
365Construction Worker Averaging TimeATcw (days/yr)
350Construction Worker Averaging Time: EWcw x 7 x EDcwATcw-a (days)
19.6154Construction Worker Soil Inhalation Dispersion Constant - PhiladelphiaB (unitless)
80Construction Worker Body WeightBWcw (kg)
225.3397Construction Worker Soil Inhalation Dispersion Constant - PhiladelphiaC (unitless)
5Construction Worker Days WorkedDWcw (days/week)
1Construction Worker Exposure DurationEDcw (yrs)
250Construction Worker Exposure FrequencyEFcw (days/yrs)
250Construction Worker Air Exposure FrequencyEFcw-a (days/yr)
250Construction Worker Soil Exposure FrequencyEFcw-s (days/yr)
125Construction Worker Soil Exposure Frequency - VRP ONLY - Virginia DEQEFcw-vrp (days/yr)
8Construction Worker Exposure TimeETcw (hrs/day)
8Construction Worker Soil Exposure TimeETcw-s (hrs/day)
50Construction Worker Weeks WorkedEWcw (weeks/yr)
0.194Function Dependent on 0.886 × (Ut/Um)F(x)(unitless)
Tuesday, August 29, 2023 Page 12 of 14
RCRA Corrective Action
1.00E-06 1.00E-041
Risk Based Performance Criteria
Default Risk Individual Chemical Default Cumulative Risk-All ChemicalsDefault Hazard Index
WoodbineSite Name:
Program:
Construction
0.185Dispersion Correction FactorFd (unitless)
330Construction Worker Soil Ingestion RateIRcw (mg/day)
0.433962264150943Total soil porosity: 1-(ρb/ρs)n (unitless)
1266503136.97919Particulate Emission Factor Subchronic - Virginia DEQ calculatedPEFsc (m3/kg)
87.3689772162309Inverse of the ratio of the 1-h geometric mean concentration to the emission flux
along a straight road segment bisecting a square site - Virginia DEQ calculated
Q/C (g/m2-s per
kg/m)
3527Construction Worker Surface AreaSAcw (cm2/day)
30240000Total time over which construction occurs:
EDcw*EWcw*7days/wk*24hrs/day*3600s/hr
Tc (s)
2Trench Air Changes per Hour - Virginia DEQTR-ACH (h)-1
0.25Trench Advection Coefficient Groundwater greater than 15ft - Virginia DEQTR-ACvad (cm3/cm3)
0.001Trench Conversion Factor-1TR-CF1 (L/cm3)
10000Trench Conversion Factor-2TR-CF2 (cm2/m2)
3600Trench Conversion Factor-3TR-CF3 (s/hr)
1000000Trench Conversion Factor-4TR-CF4 (cm3/m3)
2.44Trench Depth - groundwater less Than 15ft - Virginia DEQTR-D-dir (m)
4.57Trench Depth - groundwater greater than 15ft - Virginia DEQTR-D-ind (m)
1Trench - Depth to soil gas vapor source - Virginia DEQTR-Dsg (cm)
125Trench Construction Worker Exposure Frequency - Virginia DEQTR-EFcw (days/yr)
4Trench Construction Worker Exposure Time - Virginia DEQTR-ETcw (hrs/day)
1Trench Construction Worker Events - Virginia DEQTR-EVcw (events/day)
1Trench Fraction of floor through which contaminant can enter - Virginia DEQTR-F (unitless)
30Trench Thickness of Vadose Zone - groundwater greater than 15 ft - Virginia DEQTR-HV (cm)
0.02Trench Construction Worker Groundwater Ingestion Rate - Virginia DEQTR-IRcw (L/day)
0.833Trench Gas-phase mass transfer coefficient of water vapor at 25deg C - Virginia
DEQ
TR-KGH2O (cm/s)
0.002Trench Liquid-phase mass transfer coefficient of oxygen at 25deg C - Virginia DEQTR-KLO2 (cm/s)
2.44Trench Length - Virginia DEQTR-L (m)
488Trench Depth to groundwater - Virginia DEQTR-Lgw (cm)
Tuesday, August 29, 2023 Page 13 of 14
RCRA Corrective Action
1.00E-06 1.00E-041
Risk Based Performance Criteria
Default Risk Individual Chemical Default Cumulative Risk-All ChemicalsDefault Hazard Index
WoodbineSite Name:
Program:
Construction
18Trench Molecular Weight of Water - Virginia DEQTR-MWH2O (unitless)
32Trench Molecular Weight of Oxygen - Virginia DEQTR-MWO2 (unitless)
0.44Trench Porosity in Vadose Zone - groundwater greater than 15ft - Virginia DEQTR-Porvad (cm3/cm3)
0.000082Trench Ideal Gas Constant - Virginia DEQTR-R (atm-m3/mol-K)
77Trench Temperature Fahrenheit - Virginia DEQTR-Temp-F (F)
298Trench Temperature - Virginia DEQTR-Temp-K (K)
0.91Trench Width - Virginia DEQTR-W (m)
0.38Trench Width to Depth Ratio - Virginia DEQTR-W/D (unitless)
4.69Mean Annual Wind SpeedUm (m/s)
11.32Equivalent Threshold Value of Wind Speed at 7mUt (m/s)
0.5V Fraction of Vegetative CoverV (unitless)
0.133962264150943Air filled soil porosity: n-ΘwΘa (unitless)
0.3Water filled soil porosityΘw (unitless)
1.5Dry soil bulk densityρb (kg/L)
2.65Soil particle densityρs (kg/L)
END OF REPORT
Tuesday, August 29, 2023 Page 14 of 14
Chemical CAS Number
Site
Sub-Slab and
Exterior SoilGas
Concentration
Csg
(µg/m3)
Site
Indoor Air
Concentration
Ci,a
(µg/m3)
VI
Carcinogenic
Risk
CDI
(µg/m3)
VI
Carcinogenic
Risk
CR
VI
Hazard
CDI
(mg/m3)
VI
Hazard
HQ
IUR
(ug/m3)-1
IUR
Ref
Chronic
RfC
(mg/m3)
RfC
Ref
Temperature (℃)
for Groundwater
Vapor
Concentration Mutagen?
Acetone 67-64-1 4.53E+01 -------1.50E+01 No
Benzene 71-43-2 1.54E+01 4.62E-01 3.77E-02 2.94E-07 1.05E-04 3.52E-03 7.80E-06 I 3.00E-02 IRIS 1.50E+01 No
Bromodichloromethane 75-27-4 9.72E+00 2.92E-01 2.38E-02 8.80E-07 6.66E-05 -3.70E-05 C -1.50E+01 No
Carbon Disulfide 75-15-0 6.50E+00 1.95E-01 1.59E-02 -4.45E-05 6.36E-05 -7.00E-01 IRIS 1.50E+01 No
Chloroform 67-66-3 1.78E+02 5.34E+00 4.35E-01 1.00E-05 1.22E-03 1.25E-02 2.30E-05 I 9.77E-02 ATSDR 1.50E+01 No
Dichloroethane, 1,1-75-34-3 5.10E+00 1.53E-01 1.25E-02 2.00E-08 3.49E-05 -1.60E-06 C -1.50E+01 No
Dichloroethylene, cis-1,2-156-59-2 9.22E+01 2.77E+00 2.26E-01 -6.32E-04 1.58E-02 -4.00E-02 SCREEN 1.50E+01 No
Dichloroethylene, trans-1,2-156-60-5 1.60E+02 4.80E+00 3.91E-01 -1.10E-03 2.74E-02 -4.00E-02 X 2.50E+01 No
Ethanol 64-17-5 4.60E+01 -------1.50E+01 No
Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 8.00E+00 2.40E-01 1.96E-02 4.89E-08 5.48E-05 5.48E-05 2.50E-06 C 1.00E+00 IRIS 1.50E+01 No
Heptane, N-142-82-5 4.35E+00 1.31E-01 1.06E-02 -2.98E-05 7.45E-05 -4.00E-01 PPRTV 1.50E+01 No
Hexane, N-110-54-3 5.13E+00 1.54E-01 1.25E-02 -3.51E-05 5.02E-05 -7.00E-01 IRIS 1.50E+01 No
Isopropanol 67-63-0 2.19E+01 6.57E-01 5.36E-02 -1.50E-04 7.50E-04 -2.00E-01 PPRTV 1.50E+01 No
Methyl Ethyl Ketone (2-
Butanone)78-93-3 2.00E+01 6.00E-01 4.89E-02 -1.37E-04 2.74E-05 -5.00E+00 IRIS 1.50E+01 No
Methylene Chloride 75-09-2 7.23E+00 2.17E-01 1.77E-02 1.77E-10 4.95E-05 8.25E-05 1.00E-08 I 6.00E-01 IRIS 1.50E+01 Mut
Propylene 115-07-1 2.19E+01 6.57E-01 5.36E-02 -1.50E-04 5.00E-05 -3.00E+00 CALEPA 1.50E+01 No
Styrene 100-42-5 3.91E+00 1.17E-01 9.56E-03 -2.68E-05 2.68E-05 -1.00E+00 IRIS 1.50E+01 No
Tetrachloroethylene 127-18-4 7.42E+00 2.23E-01 1.82E-02 4.72E-09 5.08E-05 1.27E-03 2.60E-07 I 4.00E-02 IRIS 1.50E+01 No
Tetrahydrofuran 109-99-9 5.96E+00 1.79E-01 1.46E-02 -4.08E-05 2.04E-05 -2.00E+00 IRIS 1.50E+01 No
Toluene 108-88-3 3.66E+01 1.10E+00 8.95E-02 -2.51E-04 5.01E-05 -5.00E+00 IRIS 1.50E+01 No
Trichloroethane, 1,1,1-71-55-6 8.00E+02 2.40E+01 1.96E+00 -5.48E-03 1.10E-03 -5.00E+00 IRIS 1.50E+01 No
Trichloroethylene 79-01-6 5.28E+01 1.58E+00 1.29E-01 5.30E-07 3.62E-04 1.81E-01 4.10E-06 I 2.00E-03 I 2.50E+01 Mut
Trimethylbenzene, 1,2,4-95-63-6 5.51E+00 1.65E-01 1.35E-02 -3.77E-05 6.29E-04 -6.00E-02 IRIS 1.50E+01 No
Xylene, m-108-38-3 3.10E+01 9.30E-01 7.58E-02 -2.12E-04 2.12E-03 -1.00E-01 SURROGATE 1.50E+01 No
Xylene, o-95-47-6 7.00E+00 2.10E-01 1.71E-02 -4.79E-05 4.79E-04 -1.00E-01 SURROGATE 1.50E+01 No
*Sum ---1.18E-05 -2.47E-01 ---
Commercial Vapor Intrusion Risk
Output generated 25JAN2024:17:35:34
Woodbine Site
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
A B C D E F G H I J K L
Rosner's Outlier Test for 1 Outliers in Hg (Soil)
Total N 26
Therefore, Observation 12.1 is a Potential Statistical Outlier
For 1% Significance Level, there is 1 Potential Outlier
4.305 2.84 3.16
For 5% Significance Level, there is 1 Potential Outlier
1 1.562 2.448 12.1 1
Critical
#Mean sd outlier Number value value (5%) value (1%)
NDs replaced with half value.
Potential Obs.Test Critical
SD with NDs=DL/2 2.496
Number of data 26
Number of suspected outliers 1
Number NDs 0
Number Detects 26
Mean with NDs=DL/2 1.562
Rosner's Outlier Test for 1 Outliers in Cd (Soil)
Total N 26
Therefore, Observation 371 is a Potential Statistical Outlier
For 1% Significance Level, there is 1 Potential Outlier
4.377 2.84 3.16
For 5% Significance Level, there is 1 Potential Outlier
1 40.18 75.58 371 1
Critical
#Mean sd outlier Number value value (5%) value (1%)
NDs replaced with half value.
Potential Obs.Test Critical
SD with NDs=DL/2 77.08
Number of data 26
Number of suspected outliers 1
Number NDs 0
Number Detects 26
Mean with NDs=DL/2 40.18
Rosner's Outlier Test for 1 Outliers in As (Soil)
Total N 26
From File Woodbine UCL95 Input Table - Full.xls
Full Precision OFF
Outlier Tests for Selected Variables replacing nondetects with 1/2 the Detection Limit
User Selected Options
Date/Time of Computation ProUCL 5.11/30/2024 8:33:39 AM
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
A B C D E F G H I J K L
1. Data Value 51.7 is a Potential Outlier (Upper Tail)?
Test Statistic: 0.459
For 10% significance level, 51.7 is an outlier.
10% critical value: 0.424
5% critical value: 0.475
1% critical value: 0.561
Note: NDs replaced by DL/2 in Outlier Test
Total N = 18
Number NDs = 0
Number Detects = 18
Number Data (n) = 18
For 1% Significance Level, there is no Potential Outlier
Dixon's Outlier Test for Zr (Soil)
2.679 2.84 3.16
For 5% Significance Level, there is no Potential Outlier
1 216.7 277.4 960 20
Critical
#Mean sd outlier Number value value (5%) value (1%)
NDs replaced with half value.
Potential Obs.Test Critical
SD with NDs=DL/2 282.9
Number of data 26
Number of suspected outliers 1
Number NDs 0
Number Detects 26
Mean with NDs=DL/2 216.7
Rosner's Outlier Test for 1 Outliers in Pb (Soil)
Total N 26
Therefore, Observation 2.12 is a Potential Statistical Outlier
For 1% Significance Level, there is 1 Potential Outlier
3.318 2.84 3.16
For 5% Significance Level, there is 1 Potential Outlier
1 0.355 0.532 2.12 1
Critical
#Mean sd outlier Number value value (5%) value (1%)
NDs replaced with half value.
Potential Obs.Test Critical
SD with NDs=DL/2 0.542
Number of data 26
Number of suspected outliers 1
Number NDs 0
Number Detects 26
Mean with NDs=DL/2 0.355
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
A B C D E F G H I J K L
4.628 2.82 3.141 6.9976E-4 0.00182 0.00911 1
Critical
#Mean sd outlier Number value value (5%) value (1%)
NDs replaced with half value.
Potential Obs.Test Critical
SD with NDs=DL/2 0.00185
Number of data 25
Number of suspected outliers 1
Number NDs 22
Number Detects 25
Mean with NDs=DL/2 6.9976E-4
Rosner's Outlier Test for 1 Outliers in TCE (GW)
Total N 25
For 10% significance level, 0.00325 is not an outlier.
For 5% significance level, 0.00325 is not an outlier.
For 1% significance level, 0.00325 is not an outlier.
2. Data Value 0.00325 is a Potential Outlier (Lower Tail)?
Test Statistic: 0.000
Test Statistic: 0.488
For 10% significance level, 0.13 is an outlier.
For 5% significance level, 0.13 is an outlier.
For 1% significance level, 0.13 is not an outlier.
1% critical value: 0.524
Note: NDs replaced by DL/2 in Outlier Test
1. Data Value 0.13 is a Potential Outlier (Upper Tail)?
Number NDs = 3
Number Detects = 18
Number Data (n) = 21
10% critical value: 0.391
5% critical value: 0.44
Dixon's Outlier Test for As (GW)
Total N = 21
Test Statistic: 0.074
For 10% significance level, 5.83 is not an outlier.
For 5% significance level, 5.83 is not an outlier.
For 1% significance level, 5.83 is not an outlier.
For 5% significance level, 51.7 is not an outlier.
For 1% significance level, 51.7 is not an outlier.
2. Data Value 5.83 is a Potential Outlier (Lower Tail)?
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
A B C D E F G H I J K L
For 1% significance level, 1.1 is not an outlier.
Test Statistic: 0.000
For 10% significance level, 1.1 is not an outlier.
For 5% significance level, 1.1 is not an outlier.
For 10% significance level, 386 is an outlier.
For 5% significance level, 386 is an outlier.
For 1% significance level, 386 is an outlier.
2. Data Value 1.1 is a Potential Outlier (Lower Tail)?
1. Data Value 386 is a Potential Outlier (Upper Tail)?
Test Statistic: 0.932
Number Data (n) = 11
10% critical value: 0.517
5% critical value: 0.576
1% critical value: 0.679
Note: NDs replaced by DL/2 in Outlier Test
Dixon's Outlier Test for TCE (Soil Vapor)
Total N = 11
Number NDs = 6
Number Detects = 5
Therefore, Observation 0.00911 is a Potential Statistical Outlier
For 1% Significance Level, there is 1 Potential Outlier
For 5% Significance Level, there is 1 Potential Outlier
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
A B C D E F G H I J K L
5% Lilliefors Critical Value 0.173 Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level
5% Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.918 Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level
Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.108 Lilliefors Lognormal GOF Test
Lognormal GOF Test
Shapiro Wilk Test Statistic 0.988 Shapiro Wilk Lognormal GOF Test
Assuming Gamma Distribution
95% Approximate Gamma UCL (use when n>=50) 40.56 95% Adjusted Gamma UCL (use when n<50) 41.73
Adjusted Level of Significance 0.0395 Adjusted Chi Square Value 26.12
MLE Mean (bias corrected) 26.95 MLE Sd (bias corrected) 29.96
Approximate Chi Square Value (0.05) 26.88
Theta hat (MLE) 30.31 Theta star (bias corrected MLE) 33.31
nu hat (MLE) 44.45 nu star (bias corrected) 40.45
Gamma Statistics
k hat (MLE) 0.889 k star (bias corrected MLE) 0.809
5% K-S Critical Value 0.18 Data Not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level
Detected data follow Appr. Gamma Distribution at 5% Significance Level
5% A-D Critical Value 0.778 Detected data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level
K-S Test Statistic 0.189 Kolmogorov-Smirnov Gamma GOF Test
Gamma GOF Test
A-D Test Statistic 0.718 Anderson-Darling Gamma GOF Test
95% Student's-t UCL 39.96 95% Adjusted-CLT UCL (Chen-1995) 44.04
95% Modified-t UCL (Johnson-1978) 40.67
Data Not Normal at 5% Significance Level
Assuming Normal Distribution
95% Normal UCL 95% UCLs (Adjusted for Skewness)
Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.312 Lilliefors GOF Test
5% Lilliefors Critical Value 0.173 Data Not Normal at 5% Significance Level
Normal GOF Test
Shapiro Wilk Test Statistic 0.635 Shapiro Wilk GOF Test
5% Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.918 Data Not Normal at 5% Significance Level
Coefficient of Variation 1.411 Skewness 2.819
Maximum 171 Median 15.1
SD 38.02 Std. Error of Mean 7.605
Number of Missing Observations 0
Minimum 1.15 Mean 26.95
General Statistics
Total Number of Observations 25 Number of Distinct Observations 23
Number of Bootstrap Operations 2000
As (Soil)
From File Woodbine UCL95 Input Table No Outliers.xls
Full Precision OFF
Confidence Coefficient 95%
UCL Statistics for Data Sets with Non-Detects
User Selected Options
Date/Time of Computation ProUCL 5.11/30/2024 8:37:00 AM
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
A B C D E F G H I J K L
95% Student's-t UCL 1.584 95% Adjusted-CLT UCL (Chen-1995) 1.686
95% Modified-t UCL (Johnson-1978) 1.602
Data Not Normal at 5% Significance Level
Assuming Normal Distribution
95% Normal UCL 95% UCLs (Adjusted for Skewness)
Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.235 Lilliefors GOF Test
5% Lilliefors Critical Value 0.173 Data Not Normal at 5% Significance Level
Normal GOF Test
Shapiro Wilk Test Statistic 0.719 Shapiro Wilk GOF Test
5% Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.918 Data Not Normal at 5% Significance Level
Coefficient of Variation 1.136 Skewness 2.165
Maximum 5.45 Median 0.599
SD 1.295 Std. Error of Mean 0.259
Number of Missing Observations 0
Minimum 0.162 Mean 1.14
Cd (Soil)
General Statistics
Total Number of Observations 25 Number of Distinct Observations 25
Recommendations are based upon data size, data distribution, and skewness.
These recommendations are based upon the results of the simulation studies summarized in Singh, Maichle, and Lee (2006).
However, simulations results will not cover all Real World data sets; for additional insight the user may want to consult a statistician.
When a data set follows an approximate (e.g., normal) distribution passing one of the GOF test
When applicable, it is suggested to use a UCL based upon a distribution (e.g., gamma) passing both GOF tests in ProUCL
Note: Suggestions regarding the selection of a 95% UCL are provided to help the user to select the most appropriate 95% UCL.
Suggested UCL to Use
95% Adjusted Gamma UCL 41.73
90% Chebyshev(Mean, Sd) UCL 49.76 95% Chebyshev(Mean, Sd) UCL 60.1
97.5% Chebyshev(Mean, Sd) UCL 74.44 99% Chebyshev(Mean, Sd) UCL 102.6
95% Hall's Bootstrap UCL 95.21 95% Percentile Bootstrap UCL 40.45
95% BCA Bootstrap UCL 45.01
95% CLT UCL 39.46 95% Jackknife UCL 39.96
95% Standard Bootstrap UCL 39.51 95% Bootstrap-t UCL 54.55
Nonparametric Distribution Free UCL Statistics
Data appear to follow a Discernible Distribution at 5% Significance Level
Nonparametric Distribution Free UCLs
95% Chebyshev (MVUE) UCL 57.55 97.5% Chebyshev (MVUE) UCL 71.06
99% Chebyshev (MVUE) UCL 97.61
Assuming Lognormal Distribution
95% H-UCL 52.25 90% Chebyshev (MVUE) UCL 47.81
Maximum of Logged Data 5.142 SD of logged Data 1.164
Lognormal Statistics
Minimum of Logged Data 0.14 Mean of logged Data 2.635
Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
A B C D E F G H I J K L
Recommendations are based upon data size, data distribution, and skewness.
These recommendations are based upon the results of the simulation studies summarized in Singh, Maichle, and Lee (2006).
When a data set follows an approximate (e.g., normal) distribution passing one of the GOF test
When applicable, it is suggested to use a UCL based upon a distribution (e.g., gamma) passing both GOF tests in ProUCL
Note: Suggestions regarding the selection of a 95% UCL are provided to help the user to select the most appropriate 95% UCL.
Suggested UCL to Use
95% Adjusted Gamma UCL 1.656
90% Chebyshev(Mean, Sd) UCL 1.918 95% Chebyshev(Mean, Sd) UCL 2.27
97.5% Chebyshev(Mean, Sd) UCL 2.758 99% Chebyshev(Mean, Sd) UCL 3.718
95% Hall's Bootstrap UCL 1.962 95% Percentile Bootstrap UCL 1.611
95% BCA Bootstrap UCL 1.654
95% CLT UCL 1.566 95% Jackknife UCL 1.584
95% Standard Bootstrap UCL 1.565 95% Bootstrap-t UCL 1.874
Nonparametric Distribution Free UCL Statistics
Data appear to follow a Discernible Distribution at 5% Significance Level
Nonparametric Distribution Free UCLs
95% Chebyshev (MVUE) UCL 2.149 97.5% Chebyshev (MVUE) UCL 2.602
99% Chebyshev (MVUE) UCL 3.492
Assuming Lognormal Distribution
95% H-UCL 1.833 90% Chebyshev (MVUE) UCL 1.822
Maximum of Logged Data 1.696 SD of logged Data 0.965
Lognormal Statistics
Minimum of Logged Data -1.82 Mean of logged Data -0.343
5% Lilliefors Critical Value 0.173 Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level
Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level
5% Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.918 Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level
Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.119 Lilliefors Lognormal GOF Test
Lognormal GOF Test
Shapiro Wilk Test Statistic 0.962 Shapiro Wilk Lognormal GOF Test
Assuming Gamma Distribution
95% Approximate Gamma UCL (use when n>=50) 1.616 95% Adjusted Gamma UCL (use when n<50) 1.656
Adjusted Level of Significance 0.0395 Adjusted Chi Square Value 37.07
MLE Mean (bias corrected) 1.14 MLE Sd (bias corrected) 1.099
Approximate Chi Square Value (0.05) 37.97
Theta hat (MLE) 0.956 Theta star (bias corrected MLE) 1.059
nu hat (MLE) 59.66 nu star (bias corrected) 53.83
Gamma Statistics
k hat (MLE) 1.193 k star (bias corrected MLE) 1.077
5% K-S Critical Value 0.179 Detected data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level
Detected data follow Appr. Gamma Distribution at 5% Significance Level
5% A-D Critical Value 0.769 Data Not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level
K-S Test Statistic 0.174 Kolmogorov-Smirnov Gamma GOF Test
Gamma GOF Test
A-D Test Statistic 0.775 Anderson-Darling Gamma GOF Test
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
A B C D E F G H I J K L
Assuming Lognormal Distribution
Maximum of Logged Data 0.419 SD of logged Data 1.484
Lognormal Statistics
Minimum of Logged Data -4.738 Mean of logged Data -2.22
5% Lilliefors Critical Value 0.173 Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level
Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level
5% Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.918 Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level
Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.14 Lilliefors Lognormal GOF Test
Lognormal GOF Test
Shapiro Wilk Test Statistic 0.945 Shapiro Wilk Lognormal GOF Test
Assuming Gamma Distribution
95% Approximate Gamma UCL (use when n>=50) 0.464 95% Adjusted Gamma UCL (use when n<50) 0.48
Adjusted Level of Significance 0.0395 Adjusted Chi Square Value 17.37
MLE Mean (bias corrected) 0.284 MLE Sd (bias corrected) 0.371
Approximate Chi Square Value (0.05) 17.97
Theta hat (MLE) 0.447 Theta star (bias corrected MLE) 0.484
nu hat (MLE) 31.83 nu star (bias corrected) 29.34
Gamma Statistics
k hat (MLE) 0.637 k star (bias corrected MLE) 0.587
5% K-S Critical Value 0.183 Detected data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level
Detected data follow Appr. Gamma Distribution at 5% Significance Level
5% A-D Critical Value 0.794 Data Not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level
K-S Test Statistic 0.152 Kolmogorov-Smirnov Gamma GOF Test
Gamma GOF Test
A-D Test Statistic 0.816 Anderson-Darling Gamma GOF Test
95% Student's-t UCL 0.426 95% Adjusted-CLT UCL (Chen-1995) 0.457
95% Modified-t UCL (Johnson-1978) 0.432
Data Not Normal at 5% Significance Level
Assuming Normal Distribution
95% Normal UCL 95% UCLs (Adjusted for Skewness)
Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.262 Lilliefors GOF Test
5% Lilliefors Critical Value 0.173 Data Not Normal at 5% Significance Level
Normal GOF Test
Shapiro Wilk Test Statistic 0.671 Shapiro Wilk GOF Test
5% Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.918 Data Not Normal at 5% Significance Level
Coefficient of Variation 1.457 Skewness 2.082
Maximum 1.52 Median 0.126
SD 0.414 Std. Error of Mean 0.0828
Number of Missing Observations 0
Minimum 0.00876 Mean 0.284
Hg (Soil)
General Statistics
Total Number of Observations 25 Number of Distinct Observations 25
However, simulations results will not cover all Real World data sets; for additional insight the user may want to consult a statistician.
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
A B C D E F G H I J K L
5% K-S Critical Value 0.179 Data Not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level
Data Not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level
5% A-D Critical Value 0.793 Data Not Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level
K-S Test Statistic 0.187 Kolmogorov-Smirnov Gamma GOF Test
Gamma GOF Test
A-D Test Statistic 1.064 Anderson-Darling Gamma GOF Test
95% Student's-t UCL 311.5 95% Adjusted-CLT UCL (Chen-1995) 326.9
95% Modified-t UCL (Johnson-1978) 314.4
Data Not Normal at 5% Significance Level
Assuming Normal Distribution
95% Normal UCL 95% UCLs (Adjusted for Skewness)
Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.241 Lilliefors GOF Test
5% Lilliefors Critical Value 0.17 Data Not Normal at 5% Significance Level
Normal GOF Test
Shapiro Wilk Test Statistic 0.735 Shapiro Wilk GOF Test
5% Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.92 Data Not Normal at 5% Significance Level
Coefficient of Variation 1.306 Skewness 1.63
Maximum 960 Median 59.45
SD 282.9 Std. Error of Mean 55.48
Number of Missing Observations 0
Minimum 12.1 Mean 216.7
Pb (Soil)
General Statistics
Total Number of Observations 26 Number of Distinct Observations 26
Recommendations are based upon data size, data distribution, and skewness.
These recommendations are based upon the results of the simulation studies summarized in Singh, Maichle, and Lee (2006).
However, simulations results will not cover all Real World data sets; for additional insight the user may want to consult a statistician.
When a data set follows an approximate (e.g., normal) distribution passing one of the GOF test
When applicable, it is suggested to use a UCL based upon a distribution (e.g., gamma) passing both GOF tests in ProUCL
Note: Suggestions regarding the selection of a 95% UCL are provided to help the user to select the most appropriate 95% UCL.
Suggested UCL to Use
95% Adjusted Gamma UCL 0.48
90% Chebyshev(Mean, Sd) UCL 0.533 95% Chebyshev(Mean, Sd) UCL 0.645
97.5% Chebyshev(Mean, Sd) UCL 0.802 99% Chebyshev(Mean, Sd) UCL 1.108
95% Hall's Bootstrap UCL 0.441 95% Percentile Bootstrap UCL 0.423
95% BCA Bootstrap UCL 0.451
95% CLT UCL 0.42 95% Jackknife UCL 0.426
95% Standard Bootstrap UCL 0.418 95% Bootstrap-t UCL 0.5
Nonparametric Distribution Free UCL Statistics
Data appear to follow a Discernible Distribution at 5% Significance Level
Nonparametric Distribution Free UCLs
95% Chebyshev (MVUE) UCL 0.779 97.5% Chebyshev (MVUE) UCL 0.986
99% Chebyshev (MVUE) UCL 1.392
95% H-UCL 0.853 90% Chebyshev (MVUE) UCL 0.63
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
A B C D E F G H I J K L
Zr (Soil)
ProUCL computes and outputs H-statistic based UCLs for historical reasons only.
H-statistic often results in unstable (both high and low) values of UCL95 as shown in examples in the Technical Guide.
It is therefore recommended to avoid the use of H-statistic based 95% UCLs.
Use of nonparametric methods are preferred to compute UCL95 for skewed data sets which do not follow a gamma distribution.
Note: Suggestions regarding the selection of a 95% UCL are provided to help the user to select the most appropriate 95% UCL.
Recommendations are based upon data size, data distribution, and skewness.
These recommendations are based upon the results of the simulation studies summarized in Singh, Maichle, and Lee (2006).
However, simulations results will not cover all Real World data sets; for additional insight the user may want to consult a statistician.
Suggested UCL to Use
95% H-UCL 642.5
90% Chebyshev(Mean, Sd) UCL 383.1 95% Chebyshev(Mean, Sd) UCL 458.5
97.5% Chebyshev(Mean, Sd) UCL 563.2 99% Chebyshev(Mean, Sd) UCL 768.7
95% Hall's Bootstrap UCL 327.8 95% Percentile Bootstrap UCL 310.3
95% BCA Bootstrap UCL 325.4
95% CLT UCL 308 95% Jackknife UCL 311.5
95% Standard Bootstrap UCL 305.6 95% Bootstrap-t UCL 340.9
Nonparametric Distribution Free UCL Statistics
Data appear to follow a Discernible Distribution at 5% Significance Level
Nonparametric Distribution Free UCLs
95% Chebyshev (MVUE) UCL 596.7 97.5% Chebyshev (MVUE) UCL 753.7
99% Chebyshev (MVUE) UCL 1062
Assuming Lognormal Distribution
95% H-UCL 642.5 90% Chebyshev (MVUE) UCL 483.6
Maximum of Logged Data 6.867 SD of logged Data 1.471
Lognormal Statistics
Minimum of Logged Data 2.493 Mean of logged Data 4.451
5% Lilliefors Critical Value 0.17 Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level
Data appear Approximate Lognormal at 5% Significance Level
5% Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.92 Data Not Lognormal at 5% Significance Level
Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.15 Lilliefors Lognormal GOF Test
Lognormal GOF Test
Shapiro Wilk Test Statistic 0.906 Shapiro Wilk Lognormal GOF Test
Assuming Gamma Distribution
95% Approximate Gamma UCL (use when n>=50)) 346.7 95% Adjusted Gamma UCL (use when n<50) 357.9
Adjusted Level of Significance 0.0398 Adjusted Chi Square Value 19.12
MLE Mean (bias corrected) 216.7 MLE Sd (bias corrected) 278.1
Approximate Chi Square Value (0.05) 19.74
Theta hat (MLE) 329.5 Theta star (bias corrected MLE) 356.8
nu hat (MLE) 34.2 nu star (bias corrected) 31.58
Gamma Statistics
k hat (MLE) 0.658 k star (bias corrected MLE) 0.607
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
A B C D E F G H I J K L
Nonparametric Distribution Free UCL Statistics
95% Chebyshev (MVUE) UCL 32.4 97.5% Chebyshev (MVUE) UCL 38.16
99% Chebyshev (MVUE) UCL 49.46
Assuming Lognormal Distribution
95% H-UCL 27.16 90% Chebyshev (MVUE) UCL 28.25
Maximum of Logged Data 3.945 SD of logged Data 0.643
Lognormal Statistics
Minimum of Logged Data 1.763 Mean of logged Data 2.756
5% Lilliefors Critical Value 0.202 Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level
Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level
5% Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.897 Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level
Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.176 Lilliefors Lognormal GOF Test
Lognormal GOF Test
Shapiro Wilk Test Statistic 0.948 Shapiro Wilk Lognormal GOF Test
Assuming Gamma Distribution
95% Approximate Gamma UCL (use when n>=50)) 25.25 95% Adjusted Gamma UCL (use when n<50) 25.94
Adjusted Level of Significance 0.0357 Adjusted Chi Square Value 60.86
MLE Mean (bias corrected) 19.15 MLE Sd (bias corrected) 12.65
Approximate Chi Square Value (0.05) 62.53
Theta hat (MLE) 7.081 Theta star (bias corrected MLE) 8.359
nu hat (MLE) 97.35 nu star (bias corrected) 82.45
Detected data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level
Gamma Statistics
k hat (MLE) 2.704 k star (bias corrected MLE) 2.29
K-S Test Statistic 0.185 Kolmogorov-Smirnov Gamma GOF Test
5% K-S Critical Value 0.205 Detected data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level
Gamma GOF Test
A-D Test Statistic 0.494 Anderson-Darling Gamma GOF Test
5% A-D Critical Value 0.748 Detected data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level
95% Modified-t UCL (Johnson-1978) 24.48
Assuming Normal Distribution
95% Normal UCL 95% UCLs (Adjusted for Skewness)
95% Student's-t UCL 24.34 95% Adjusted-CLT UCL (Chen-1995) 24.94
5% Lilliefors Critical Value 0.202 Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level
Data appear Approximate Normal at 5% Significance Level
5% Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.897 Data Not Normal at 5% Significance Level
Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.169 Lilliefors GOF Test
Normal GOF Test
Shapiro Wilk Test Statistic 0.875 Shapiro Wilk GOF Test
SD 12.67 Std. Error of Mean 2.986
Coefficient of Variation 0.662 Skewness 1.172
Minimum 5.83 Mean 19.15
Maximum 51.7 Median 15.1
Total Number of Observations 18 Number of Distinct Observations 18
Number of Missing Observations 0
General Statistics
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
A B C D E F G H I J K L
K-S Test Statistic 0.195 Kolmogorov-Smirnov GOF
5% K-S Critical Value 0.212 Detected data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level
Gamma GOF Tests on Detected Observations Only
A-D Test Statistic 0.54 Anderson-Darling GOF Test
5% A-D Critical Value 0.749 Detected data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level
97.5% KM Chebyshev UCL 0.0612 99% KM Chebyshev UCL 0.081
95% KM (z) UCL 0.0366 95% KM Bootstrap t UCL 0.0399
90% KM Chebyshev UCL 0.0438 95% KM Chebyshev UCL 0.0511
KM SD 0.0232 95% KM (BCA) UCL 0.0365
95% KM (t) UCL 0.037 95% KM (Percentile Bootstrap) UCL 0.0372
Detected Data Not Normal at 5% Significance Level
Kaplan-Meier (KM) Statistics using Normal Critical Values and other Nonparametric UCLs
KM Mean 0.0278 KM Standard Error of Mean 0.00535
Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.246 Lilliefors GOF Test
5% Lilliefors Critical Value 0.207 Detected Data Not Normal at 5% Significance Level
Normal GOF Test on Detects Only
Shapiro Wilk Test Statistic 0.835 Shapiro Wilk GOF Test
5% Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.892 Detected Data Not Normal at 5% Significance Level
Mean of Logged Detects -3.706 SD of Logged Detects 0.723
Median Detects 0.0208 CV Detects 0.76
Skewness Detects 1.259 Kurtosis Detects 0.625
Variance Detects 5.7352E-4 Percent Non-Detects 15%
Mean Detects 0.0315 SD Detects 0.0239
Minimum Detect 0.00766 Minimum Non-Detect 0.0065
Maximum Detect 0.0891 Maximum Non-Detect 0.0065
Number of Detects 17 Number of Non-Detects 3
Number of Distinct Detects 17 Number of Distinct Non-Detects 1
General Statistics
Total Number of Observations 20 Number of Distinct Observations 18
Recommendations are based upon data size, data distribution, and skewness.
These recommendations are based upon the results of the simulation studies summarized in Singh, Maichle, and Lee (2006).
However, simulations results will not cover all Real World data sets; for additional insight the user may want to consult a statistician.
As (GW)
When a data set follows an approximate (e.g., normal) distribution passing one of the GOF test
When applicable, it is suggested to use a UCL based upon a distribution (e.g., gamma) passing both GOF tests in ProUCL
Note: Suggestions regarding the selection of a 95% UCL are provided to help the user to select the most appropriate 95% UCL.
Suggested UCL to Use
95% Student's-t UCL 24.34
90% Chebyshev(Mean, Sd) UCL 28.11 95% Chebyshev(Mean, Sd) UCL 32.16
97.5% Chebyshev(Mean, Sd) UCL 37.8 99% Chebyshev(Mean, Sd) UCL 48.86
95% Hall's Bootstrap UCL 25.12 95% Percentile Bootstrap UCL 24.19
95% BCA Bootstrap UCL 25.19
95% CLT UCL 24.06 95% Jackknife UCL 24.34
95% Standard Bootstrap UCL 23.97 95% Bootstrap-t UCL 25.61
Data appear to follow a Discernible Distribution at 5% Significance Level
Nonparametric Distribution Free UCLs
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
A B C D E F G H I J K L
KM SD (logged) 0.802 95% Critical H Value (KM-Log) 2.362
KM Standard Error of Mean (logged) 0.185 95% H-UCL (KM -Log) 0.0429
Statistics using KM estimates on Logged Data and Assuming Lognormal Distribution
KM Mean (logged) -3.906 KM Geo Mean 0.0201
95% BCA Bootstrap UCL 0.037 95% Bootstrap t UCL 0.0394
95% H-UCL (Log ROS) 0.049
SD in Original Scale 0.0241 SD in Log Scale 0.915
95% t UCL (assumes normality of ROS data) 0.0368 95% Percentile Bootstrap UCL 0.0367
Detected Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level
Lognormal ROS Statistics Using Imputed Non-Detects
Mean in Original Scale 0.0275 Mean in Log Scale -3.961
Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.152 Lilliefors GOF Test
5% Lilliefors Critical Value 0.207 Detected Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level
Lognormal GOF Test on Detected Observations Only
Shapiro Wilk Test Statistic 0.957 Shapiro Wilk GOF Test
5% Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.892 Detected Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level
95% Gamma Approximate KM-UCL (use when n>=50) 0.0399 95% Gamma Adjusted KM-UCL (use when n<50) 0.0411
Gamma Kaplan-Meier (KM) Statistics
Approximate Chi Square Value (50.00, α) 34.77 Adjusted Chi Square Value (50.00, β) 33.76
80% gamma percentile (KM) 0.0438 90% gamma percentile (KM) 0.0605
95% gamma percentile (KM) 0.0769 99% gamma percentile (KM) 0.115
nu hat (KM) 57.26 nu star (KM) 50
theta hat (KM) 0.0194 theta star (KM) 0.0222
Variance (KM) 5.3864E-4 SE of Mean (KM) 0.00535
k hat (KM) 1.431 k star (KM) 1.25
Estimates of Gamma Parameters using KM Estimates
Mean (KM) 0.0278 SD (KM) 0.0232
Approximate Chi Square Value (68.08, α) 50.09 Adjusted Chi Square Value (68.08, β) 48.87
95% Gamma Approximate UCL (use when n>=50) 0.0385 95% Gamma Adjusted UCL (use when n<50) 0.0394
nu hat (MLE) 78.52 nu star (bias corrected) 68.08
Adjusted Level of Significance (β) 0.038
k hat (MLE) 1.963 k star (bias corrected MLE) 1.702
Theta hat (MLE) 0.0144 Theta star (bias corrected MLE) 0.0166
Maximum 0.0891 Median 0.0199
SD 0.0233 CV 0.825
For gamma distributed detected data, BTVs and UCLs may be computed using gamma distribution on KM estimates
Minimum 0.00766 Mean 0.0283
Gamma ROS Statistics using Imputed Non-Detects
GROS may not be used when data set has > 50% NDs with many tied observations at multiple DLs
GROS may not be used when kstar of detects is small such as <1.0, especially when the sample size is small (e.g., <15-20)
For such situations, GROS method may yield incorrect values of UCLs and BTVs
This is especially true when the sample size is small.
Mean (detects) 0.0315
Theta hat (MLE) 0.0146 Theta star (bias corrected MLE) 0.0173
nu hat (MLE) 73.44 nu star (bias corrected) 61.81
Detected data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level
Gamma Statistics on Detected Data Only
k hat (MLE) 2.16 k star (bias corrected MLE) 1.818
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
A B C D E F G H I J K L
Gamma GOF Tests on Detected Observations Only
Not Enough Data to Perform GOF Test
Gamma Statistics on Detected Data Only
k hat (MLE) 2.37 k star (bias corrected MLE) N/A
97.5% KM Chebyshev UCL 0.00155 99% KM Chebyshev UCL 0.00215
95% KM (z) UCL 7.9959E-4 95% KM Bootstrap t UCL N/A
90% KM Chebyshev UCL 0.00102 95% KM Chebyshev UCL 0.00124
KM SD 5.6408E-4 95% KM (BCA) UCL N/A
95% KM (t) UCL 8.1083E-4 95% KM (Percentile Bootstrap) UCL N/A
Not Enough Data to Perform GOF Test
Kaplan-Meier (KM) Statistics using Normal Critical Values and other Nonparametric UCLs
KM Mean 5.3175E-4 KM Standard Error of Mean 1.6284E-4
Warning: Data set has only 2 Detected Values.
This is not enough to compute meaningful or reliable statistics and estimates.
Normal GOF Test on Detects Only
Mean of Logged Detects -6.439 SD of Logged Detects 0.986
Median Detects 0.002 CV Detects 0.852
Skewness Detects N/A Kurtosis Detects N/A
Variance Detects 2.9137E-6 Percent Non-Detects 91.67%
Mean Detects 0.002 SD Detects 0.00171
Minimum Detect 7.9600E-4 Minimum Non-Detect 3.9800E-4
Maximum Detect 0.00321 Maximum Non-Detect 3.9800E-4
Number of Detects 2 Number of Non-Detects 22
Number of Distinct Detects 2 Number of Distinct Non-Detects 1
TCE (GW)
General Statistics
Total Number of Observations 24 Number of Distinct Observations 3
Note: Suggestions regarding the selection of a 95% UCL are provided to help the user to select the most appropriate 95% UCL.
Recommendations are based upon data size, data distribution, and skewness.
These recommendations are based upon the results of the simulation studies summarized in Singh, Maichle, and Lee (2006).
However, simulations results will not cover all Real World data sets; for additional insight the user may want to consult a statistician.
Suggested UCL to Use
95% KM Adjusted Gamma UCL 0.0411 95% GROS Adjusted Gamma UCL 0.0394
DL/2 is not a recommended method, provided for comparisons and historical reasons
Nonparametric Distribution Free UCL Statistics
Detected Data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level
SD in Original Scale 0.0243 SD in Log Scale 0.994
95% t UCL (Assumes normality) 0.0367 95% H-Stat UCL 0.0542
DL/2 Statistics
DL/2 Normal DL/2 Log-Transformed
Mean in Original Scale 0.0273 Mean in Log Scale -4.01
KM SD (logged) 0.802 95% Critical H Value (KM-Log) 2.362
KM Standard Error of Mean (logged) 0.185
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
A B C D E F G H I J K L
TCE (Soil Vapor)
Note: Suggestions regarding the selection of a 95% UCL are provided to help the user to select the most appropriate 95% UCL.
Recommendations are based upon data size, data distribution, and skewness.
These recommendations are based upon the results of the simulation studies summarized in Singh, Maichle, and Lee (2006).
However, simulations results will not cover all Real World data sets; for additional insight the user may want to consult a statistician.
Suggested UCL to Use
95% KM (Chebyshev) UCL 0.00124
DL/2 is not a recommended method, provided for comparisons and historical reasons
Nonparametric Distribution Free UCL Statistics
Data do not follow a Discernible Distribution at 5% Significance Level
SD in Original Scale 6.2136E-4 SD in Log Scale 0.623
95% t UCL (Assumes normality) 5.6671E-4 95% H-Stat UCL 3.7747E-4
DL/2 Statistics
DL/2 Normal DL/2 Log-Transformed
Mean in Original Scale 3.4933E-4 Mean in Log Scale -8.349
KM SD (logged) 0.434 95% Critical H Value (KM-Log) 1.924
KM Standard Error of Mean (logged) 0.125
KM SD (logged) 0.434 95% Critical H Value (KM-Log) 1.924
KM Standard Error of Mean (logged) 0.125 95% H-UCL (KM -Log) 5.8432E-4
Statistics using KM estimates on Logged Data and Assuming Lognormal Distribution
KM Mean (logged) -7.713 KM Geo Mean 4.4689E-4
95% H-UCL (Log ROS) 1.808
95% t UCL (assumes normality of ROS data) 4.1026E-4 95% Percentile Bootstrap UCL 4.3756E-4
95% BCA Bootstrap UCL 5.8164E-4 95% Bootstrap t UCL 0.00469
Mean in Original Scale 1.7725E-4 Mean in Log Scale -14.01
SD in Original Scale 6.6603E-4 SD in Log Scale 4.034
Lognormal GOF Test on Detected Observations Only
Not Enough Data to Perform GOF Test
Lognormal ROS Statistics Using Imputed Non-Detects
Approximate Chi Square Value (38.66, α) 25.42 Adjusted Chi Square Value (38.66, β) 24.66
95% Gamma Approximate KM-UCL (use when n>=50) 8.0875E-4 95% Gamma Adjusted KM-UCL (use when n<50) 8.3352E-4
Gamma Kaplan-Meier (KM) Statistics
Adjusted Level of Significance (β) 0.0392
80% gamma percentile (KM) 8.6868E-4 90% gamma percentile (KM) 0.00129
95% gamma percentile (KM) 0.00172 99% gamma percentile (KM) 0.00274
nu hat (KM) 42.66 nu star (KM) 38.66
theta hat (KM) 5.9837E-4 theta star (KM) 6.6027E-4
Variance (KM) 3.1818E-7 SE of Mean (KM) 1.6284E-4
k hat (KM) 0.889 k star (KM) 0.805
Estimates of Gamma Parameters using KM Estimates
Mean (KM) 5.3175E-4 SD (KM) 5.6408E-4
Mean (detects) 0.002
Theta hat (MLE) 8.4524E-4 Theta star (bias corrected MLE) N/A
nu hat (MLE) 9.479 nu star (bias corrected) N/A
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
A B C D E F G H I J K L
Approximate Chi Square Value (3.67, α) 0.595 Adjusted Chi Square Value (3.67, β) 0.42
95% Gamma Approximate UCL (use when n>=50) 124.6 95% Gamma Adjusted UCL (use when n<50) N/A
nu hat (MLE) 3.334 nu star (bias corrected) 3.667
Adjusted Level of Significance (β) 0.0267
k hat (MLE) 0.167 k star (bias corrected MLE) 0.183
Theta hat (MLE) 121.3 Theta star (bias corrected MLE) 110.2
Maximum 160 Median 0.01
SD 49.86 CV 2.466
For gamma distributed detected data, BTVs and UCLs may be computed using gamma distribution on KM estimates
Minimum 0.01 Mean 20.21
Gamma ROS Statistics using Imputed Non-Detects
GROS may not be used when data set has > 50% NDs with many tied observations at multiple DLs
GROS may not be used when kstar of detects is small such as <1.0, especially when the sample size is small (e.g., <15-20)
For such situations, GROS method may yield incorrect values of UCLs and BTVs
This is especially true when the sample size is small.
Mean (detects) 50.52
Theta hat (MLE) 70.93 Theta star (bias corrected MLE) 146.5
nu hat (MLE) 5.698 nu star (bias corrected) 2.758
Detected data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level
Gamma Statistics on Detected Data Only
k hat (MLE) 0.712 k star (bias corrected MLE) 0.345
K-S Test Statistic 0.275 Kolmogorov-Smirnov GOF
5% K-S Critical Value 0.406 Detected data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level
Gamma GOF Tests on Detected Observations Only
A-D Test Statistic 0.389 Anderson-Darling GOF Test
5% A-D Critical Value 0.672 Detected data appear Gamma Distributed at 5% Significance Level
97.5% KM Chebyshev UCL 128.1 99% KM Chebyshev UCL 191.4
95% KM (z) UCL 49.6 95% KM Bootstrap t UCL N/A
90% KM Chebyshev UCL 72.74 95% KM Chebyshev UCL 95.93
KM SD 46.75 95% KM (BCA) UCL N/A
95% KM (t) UCL 52.82 95% KM (Percentile Bootstrap) UCL N/A
Detected Data appear Approximate Normal at 5% Significance Level
Kaplan-Meier (KM) Statistics using Normal Critical Values and other Nonparametric UCLs
KM Mean 21.53 KM Standard Error of Mean 17.07
Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.375 Lilliefors GOF Test
5% Lilliefors Critical Value 0.375 Detected Data appear Normal at 5% Significance Level
Normal GOF Test on Detects Only
Shapiro Wilk Test Statistic 0.735 Shapiro Wilk GOF Test
5% Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.748 Detected Data Not Normal at 5% Significance Level
Mean of Logged Detects 3.076 SD of Logged Detects 1.496
Median Detects 18.44 CV Detects 1.457
Skewness Detects 1.905 Kurtosis Detects 3.652
Variance Detects 5416 Percent Non-Detects 60%
Mean Detects 50.52 SD Detects 73.59
Minimum Detect 5.2 Minimum Non-Detect 2.2
Maximum Detect 160 Maximum Non-Detect 2.2
Number of Detects 4 Number of Non-Detects 6
Number of Distinct Detects 4 Number of Distinct Non-Detects 1
General Statistics
Total Number of Observations 10 Number of Distinct Observations 5
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
A B C D E F G H I J K L
Recommendations are based upon data size, data distribution, and skewness.
These recommendations are based upon the results of the simulation studies summarized in Singh, Maichle, and Lee (2006).
However, simulations results will not cover all Real World data sets; for additional insight the user may want to consult a statistician.
When a data set follows an approximate (e.g., normal) distribution passing one of the GOF test
When applicable, it is suggested to use a UCL based upon a distribution (e.g., gamma) passing both GOF tests in ProUCL
Note: Suggestions regarding the selection of a 95% UCL are provided to help the user to select the most appropriate 95% UCL.
Suggested UCL to Use
95% KM (t) UCL 52.82
DL/2 is not a recommended method, provided for comparisons and historical reasons
Nonparametric Distribution Free UCL Statistics
Detected Data appear Approximate Normal Distributed at 5% Significance Level
SD in Original Scale 49.56 SD in Log Scale 1.765
95% t UCL (Assumes normality) 49.6 95% H-Stat UCL 295.2
DL/2 Statistics
DL/2 Normal DL/2 Log-Transformed
Mean in Original Scale 20.87 Mean in Log Scale 1.288
KM SD (logged) 1.388 95% Critical H Value (KM-Log) 3.949
KM Standard Error of Mean (logged) 0.507
KM SD (logged) 1.388 95% Critical H Value (KM-Log) 3.949
KM Standard Error of Mean (logged) 0.507 95% H-UCL (KM -Log) 89.56
Statistics using KM estimates on Logged Data and Assuming Lognormal Distribution
KM Mean (logged) 1.703 KM Geo Mean 5.493
95% BCA Bootstrap UCL 65.61 95% Bootstrap t UCL 305.2
95% H-UCL (Log ROS) 1946411
SD in Original Scale 49.79 SD in Log Scale 3.273
95% t UCL (assumes normality of ROS data) 49.23 95% Percentile Bootstrap UCL 50.82
Detected Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level
Lognormal ROS Statistics Using Imputed Non-Detects
Mean in Original Scale 20.37 Mean in Log Scale -0.201
Lilliefors Test Statistic 0.203 Lilliefors GOF Test
5% Lilliefors Critical Value 0.375 Detected Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level
Lognormal GOF Test on Detected Observations Only
Shapiro Wilk Test Statistic 0.95 Shapiro Wilk GOF Test
5% Shapiro Wilk Critical Value 0.748 Detected Data appear Lognormal at 5% Significance Level
95% Gamma Approximate KM-UCL (use when n>=50) 109.6 95% Gamma Adjusted KM-UCL (use when n<50) 150.3
Gamma Kaplan-Meier (KM) Statistics
Approximate Chi Square Value (4.30, α) 0.845 Adjusted Chi Square Value (4.30, β) 0.616
80% gamma percentile (KM) 29.41 90% gamma percentile (KM) 65.07
95% gamma percentile (KM) 108.8 99% gamma percentile (KM) 227.7
nu hat (KM) 4.242 nu star (KM) 4.303
theta hat (KM) 101.5 theta star (KM) 100.1
Variance (KM) 2185 SE of Mean (KM) 17.07
k hat (KM) 0.212 k star (KM) 0.215
Estimates of Gamma Parameters using KM Estimates
Mean (KM) 21.53 SD (KM) 46.75
Appendix D
Application For A Waiver Of An Ecological Risk
Assessment
Application for a Waiver of an Ecological Risk Assessment
Woodbine Site, 534, 540, 545, 549, and 585 West 700 South
Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah
This application is being submitted to request a waiver for performing an ecological risk
assessment at the Woodbine Site, located at 534, 540, 549, and 585 West 700 South, Salt
Lake City, Utah.
In accordance with the Utah Administrative Code (UAC) R315-101, site investigations must
include an evaluation of human health and ecological risk to support risk-based closure. An
ecological risk assessment is warranted when it has been determined that exposure
pathways are potentially complete for ecological receptors. A complete pathway consists of:
1) a source, 2) a mechanism of contaminant release, 3) a receiving or contact medium, 4) a
potential receptor population, and 5) exposure route. Of these five criteria, the most
fundamental is the fourth criterion. In order for a potential receptor population to exist, a
site must contain open areas that would allow plant growth and suitable habitat for wildlife.
Pathways are incomplete for ecological receptors at sites that are completely filled-in with
buildings, concrete, or pavement. For these areas, an ecological risk assessment cannot be
completed.
The Woodbine Site property is nearly completely paved and/or covered in structures. No
significant areas of vegetation are present, and the site is devoid of suitable habitat for
wildlife. Additionally, the immediate vicinity of the site is industrial/commercial, consisting of
paved/concrete lots and industrial-use buildings. The surrounding area does contain limited
trees and grass (mostly in parking strips/sidewalk areas). However, no wildlife at the
property has been observed using the property for permanent habitat or food. Although it is
possible that some species could casually be present (such as birds resting in nearby trees
or crossing the property), it is not plausible that any receptor would forage, nest, or den on
the Woodbine Site property itself due to a lack of vegetation.
As any potentially contaminated soil is located beneath concrete, structures, pavement, or
transported fill material, all potential areas of habitat are unavailable to ecological
receptors. Since there is no complete exposure pathway, an ecological risk assessment is
not deemed required at this facility and a waiver for conducting a quantitative ecological risk
assessment per R315-101.5.3(a)(8) is requested.