DERR-2024-006606

Voluntary Cleanup Program Application June 5, 2023
Lonestar Properties LLC

Former Anderson Auto Wrecking
2890 S. State St., Spanish Fork, UT 84660

Parcel 27:010:0139 (2.02 acres)
Legal Description: COM N 1228.58 FT & E 2014.42 FT FR W 1/4 COR. SEC. 17, T8S, R3E, SLB&M.; S 0
DEG 10' 30" E 174.72 FT; S 89 DEG 40' 30" E 142 FT; S 85 DEG 19' 26" E 239.99 FT; S 34 DEG 33'
15" W 190.65 FT; S 89 DEG 28' 15" W 360.76 FT; N 0 DEG 10' 30" W 298.67 FT; S 89 DEG 28' 35" W
.75 FT; N 0 DEG 10' 27" W 45.12 FT; N 0 DEG 10' 25" W 11.92 FT; S 89 DEG 50' 9" E 8.13 FT; S 89
DEG 50' 13" E 80.87 FT TO BEG. AREA 2.024 AC
_______
Parcel 27:010:0140 (1.87 acres)
Legal Description: COM N 1228.58 FT & E 2014.49 FT FR W 1/4 COR. SEC. 17, T8S, R3E, SLB&M.; S
89 DEG 50' 13" E 499.66 FT; S 34 DEG 35' 29" W 16.42 FT; S 89 DEG 40' 24" E 15.37 FT; S 34 DEG
33' 13" W 218.59 FT; N 85 DEG 19' 25" W 240 FT; N 89 DEG 40' 30" W 142 FT; N 0 DEG 10' 30" W
174.68 FT TO BEG. AREA 1.875 AC.

Phase II Environmental Site Assessment
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking
2890 South State Street and 1215 North SR 51
Spanish Fork City, Utah County, Utah
EPA Cooperative Agreement No. #95811900
ACRES IDs# 253429, 253471, 253533, and 253534
January 6, 2023
Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.3
Prepared for:
Spanish Fork City
Spanish Fork, Utah
Prepared by:
Terracon Consultants, Inc
Midvale, Utah
Terracon Consultants, Inc. 6949 South High Tech Drive Midvale, Utah 84047
P [801] 545-8500 F [801] 545-8600 terracon.com
January 6, 2023
Spanish Fork City
40 South Main Street
P.O. Box 358
Spanish Fork, Utah 84660
Attn: Brandon Snyder
P: [phone]
E:[e-mail]
Re: Former Anderson Auto Wrecking
2890 South State Street and 1215 North SR 51
Spanish Fork City, Utah County, Utah
Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.3
EPA Cooperative Agreement #95811900
EPA ACRES Property ID #’s 253429, 253471, 253533, and 253534
Spanish Fork City Community-wide Brownfield Assessment Grant
Dear Mr. Snyder:
Terracon Consultants, Inc. (Terracon) is pleased to submit our report for Phase II Site Investigation
activities completed at the above-referenced site. The report presents data from field activities that
included the collection of soil, groundwater, and soil gas samples. This investigation was approved
by EPA under Cooperative Agreement #95811900 for Hazardous Substances commingled with
Petroleum. The assessment was guided by a Sampling and Analysis Plan reviewed and approved
by EPA (November 8, 2022).
Quality of data was guided by the EPA-approved Community-Wide Quality Assurance Project
Plan Spanish Fork City Brownfields Assessments (Terracon 2022a).
Terracon appreciates this opportunity to provide environmental support services to Salt Lake
County. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to
contact our office.
Sincerely,
Terracon Consultants, Inc.
Daniel Dean Amy Austin
Senior Project Manager Authorized Project Reviewer
Environmental Services
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 0
1.1 Brownfields Setting ..............................................................................................0
1.2 Site Description and Background .........................................................................1
1.3 Standard of Care..................................................................................................2
1.4 Additional Scope Limitations ................................................................................2
1.5 Reliance ...............................................................................................................3
2.0 PHASE II SITE INVESTIGATION ........................................................................ 3
2.1 Scope ..................................................................................................................3
2.2 Sampling Process Design ....................................................................................3
2.3 Field Data Collection ............................................................................................5
2.4 Soil Sampling .......................................................................................................6
2.5 Groundwater Sampling ........................................................................................6
2.6 Soil Gas Sampling ...............................................................................................6
2.7 Field QA/QC Samples ..........................................................................................7
2.8 Equipment Decontamination ................................................................................7
2.9 Site Restoration ...................................................................................................7
3.0 LABORATORY ANALYTICAL METHODS.......................................................... 8
4.0 SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS............................................................ 8
4.1 Soil Data Summary ..............................................................................................9
4.2 Groundwater Data Summary..............................................................................10
4.3 Soil Gas Data Summary.....................................................................................11
5.0 DATA QUALITY ASSESSMENT ....................................................................... 11
5.1 Precision ............................................................................................................12
5.2 Bias and Accuracy .............................................................................................15
5.3 Representativeness ...........................................................................................18
5.4 Comparability .....................................................................................................19
5.5 Completeness ....................................................................................................20
5.6 Sensitivity...........................................................................................................21
6.0 DATA EVALUATION ......................................................................................... 22
6.1 Soil Sample Results ...........................................................................................22
6.2 Groundwater Sample Results ............................................................................24
6.3 Soil Gas Sample Results ...................................................................................25
7.0 CONCLUSION ................................................................................................... 26
8.0 REFERENCES ................................................................................................... 29
ii
APPENDICES
Appendix A Exhibits
Exhibit 1 Topographic Site Overview
Exhibit 2 Sample and Trenching Location Map
Exhibit 3 Metals Exceedances in Soil
Exhibit 4 Petroleum Hydrocarbon Exceedances in Soil
Exhibit 5 Metals Exceedances in Groundwater
Exhibit 6 Petroleum Hydrocarbon Exceedances in Groundwater
Exhibit 7 VOC Exceedances in Soil Gas
Appendix B Soil Boring Logs
Appendix C Data Summary Tables
Table C1 Metals in Soil
Table C2 VOCs and Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soil
Table C3 Metals in Groundwater
Table C4 VOCs and Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Groundwater
Table C5 VOCs and Explosive Gases in Soil Gas
Table C6.1 Duplicate Pairs–Metals in Soil
Table C6.2 Duplicate Pair–VOCs and Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soil
Table C6.3 Duplicate Pair–Metals in Groundwater
Table C6.4 Duplicate Pair–VOCs and Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Groundwater
Appendix D Chain of Custody and Laboratory Data Sheets
Terracon Consultants, Inc. 6949 South High Tech Drive Midvale, Utah 84047
P [801] 545-8500 F [801] 545-8600 terracon.com
PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Spanish Fork City Brownfields Assessment
EPA Cooperative Agreement No. 95811900
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking
2890 South State Street and 1215 North SR 51
Spanish Fork City, Utah County, Utah
ACRES ID #’s 253429, 253471, 253533, and 253534
Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.3
January 6, 2023
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Terracon Consultants, Inc. (Terracon) has completed a Phase II Environmental Site Assessment
(Site Investigation) at the Former Anderson Auto Wrecking Brownfields Assessment Project
(Anderson Auto) site located at 2890 South State Street and 1215 North SR 51, Spanish Fork,
Utah (Exhibit 1). This Phase II Site Investigation was completed with funding from the Spanish
Fork City Brownfields Assessment Grant following the approved Sampling and Analysis Plan
(SAP), dated November 8, 2022.
The Anderson Auto site is identified in EPA’s online Assessment, Cleanup, and Redevelopment
Exchange System (ACRES) as Numbers 253429, 253471, 253533, and 253534. This property
was originally approved for assessment by EPA under a Site Eligibility Determination Outline
(EPA Region 8, June 14, 2022). A table showing the specific addresses and parcel numbers
associated with this site is presented below.
Address APN Acres ACRES ID Use
2890 South State Street 27:010:0019 0.9999 253429 Vacant
2890 South State Street 27:010:0140 1.8754 253533 Vacant
1215 North SR 51 27:010:0139 2.0241 253534 Residence/Vacant
2890 South State Street 27:010:0028 0.5003 253471 Vacant
1.1 Brownfields Setting
Spanish Fork City (the Grantee) is a recipient of an EPA Brownfields Assessment Grant to
inventory, characterize, assess, and conduct cleanup planning along with public outreach
activities for eligible Brownfield sites located within Spanish Fork City boundaries.
Terracon conducted an initial Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) on the site in 2022
(Terracon 2022b). The Phase I ESA was compliant with Brownfields All Appropriate Inquiry and
was performed in conformance with the scope and limitations of American Society for Testing and
Phase II Environmental Site Assessment
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking Spanish Fork, Utah
Terracon Project 61227186 Task 3.3 January 6, 2023
1
Materials (ASTM) Practice E1527-13 for the parcels located at the above addresses in Spanish
Fork City, Utah County, Utah. The purpose of the Phase I ESA was to identify any Recognized
Environmental Conditions (RECs) in connection with the site. The Phase I ESA identified multiple
Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs) associated with current and historical uses of the
site and adjoining properties. Environmental impacts associated with current and historical uses
of the site have been confirmed by several previous investigations (DERR 2021; IHI 2007a; IHI
2007b). This Phase II investigation was conducted to further evaluate the identified environmental
impacts.
This Phase II Site Investigation was guided by a Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP) dated
November 8, 2022 (Terracon 2022c) reviewed and approved by EPA and DERR. Quality of
assessment data was guided by the SAP and EPA-approved Community-Wide Quality Assurance
Project Plan Spanish Fork City Brownfields Assessments dated May 9, 2022 (Terracon, 2022a).
1.2 Site Description and Background
The site is comprised of four parcels totaling approximately 5.4 acres of land currently owned by
multiple landowners and located at 2890 South State Street and 1215 North SR 51, Spanish Fork
City, Utah County, Utah. The site was formerly occupied by the Anderson Auto Wrecking facility,
which historically operated as an automotive salvage yard from approximately 1977 to the mid-
2010s. The Anderson Auto Wrecking facility formerly stored large numbers of scrapped vehicles,
trailers, tires, engines, scrap-metal, and other vehicle parts. Storage sheds at the wrecking yard
stored car batteries, gasoline cans, engine wastes, scrap metal, asphaltic tar, paint, as well as
miscellaneous debris. A crushing station, used to crush cars and other metallic debris, was
located on the southern portion of the yard behind a single-family home.
The western portion of the site has been identified within the Spanish Fork Landfill facility. The
Spanish Fork Landfill historically operated as a dump for municipal wastes and includes the
Spanish Fork Landfill, the Springville Landfill, and the Utah County Landfill. The landfills
encompass approximately 143 acres and operated from the 1940s until 1988. The landfills
operated prior to RCRA regulations and waste accepted into these landfills was uncontrolled. It
is not known if hazardous materials could be present or if industrial wastes were included.
Heavy metals and petroleum hydrocarbons have been documented at the site above applicable
regulatory screening levels. A Phase II ESA investigation conducted in July 2007 (IHI 2007a)
identified significant volumes of landfill materials, petroleum hydrocarbons, and benzene in soil
and groundwater. Lead (530 mg/kg) and benzene (2.3 mg/kg) were detected in soil samples
above U.S. EPA residential soil Regional Screening Levels (RSLs). Arsenic (78 µg/L) and
benzene (22 µg/L) were detected in groundwater above U.S. EPA Maximum Contaminant Levels
(MCLs). Additionally, several test pits dug during the investigation uncovered municipal trash and
debris along the western boundary of the site where historical landfill activity may have extended
onto the property. A supplemental Phase II ESA investigation was conducted in October 2007
(IHI 2007b) to further define the impacts from the Anderson Auto Wrecking operations. The
Phase II Environmental Site Assessment
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking Spanish Fork, Utah
Terracon Project 61227186 Task 3.3 January 6, 2023
2
October 2007 investigation identified benzene at concentrations above Utah Groundwater Quality
Standards (UGWQS) at the site, and methane was present in subsurface soils.
The Utah Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Environmental Response and
Remediation (DERR) performed a Site Inspection on and in the vicinity of the site (DERR 2021).
The DERR Site Inspection sampled a limited number of locations at the site. Elevated levels of
metals, including arsenic, chromium, cobalt, iron, and lead, were detected in DERR groundwater
samples and elevated concentrations of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) were detected
in groundwater near the tar storage area. Benzene and lead were not detected in subsurface soil
samples at elevated levels during the DERR investigation. Arsenic and chromium were detected
at slightly elevated levels. DERR concluded that the absence of benzene contamination in soil
and groundwater was likely due to biodegradation and volatilization since the 2007 IHI
investigations. DERR also reported that surface stains present during the prior IHI investigations
were no longer visible because the top two feet of soil had been tilled. The DERR Site Inspection
also identified significantly elevated concentrations of arsenic, chromium, and lead in groundwater
upgradient of the site.
This Phase II ESA was conducted to evaluate portions of the site that were not accessible during
the previous investigations and to document current conditions in select portions of the site that
were sampled during the previous investigations. Sampling of surface soil, subsurface soil,
groundwater, and soil gas was conducted to fully evaluate environmental risks to future users of
the site.
Additionally, geotechnical sampling was conducted at the site and limited portions of the site were
surveyed for asbestos-containing materials, lead-based paint, and Universal Hazardous Waste
materials. These findings will be reported separately from the soil, groundwater, and soil gas
sample results.
1.3 Standard of Care
Terracon’s services were performed in a manner consistent with generally accepted practices of
the profession undertaken in similar studies in the same geographical area during the same time.
Terracon makes no warranties, either express or implied, regarding the findings, conclusions, or
recommendations. Please note that Terracon does not warrant the work of laboratories,
regulatory agencies, or other third parties supplying information used in the preparation of the
report. These Phase II services were performed in accordance with the scope of work agreed with
you, our client, as reflected in our proposal and consistent with ASTM E1903-19,Standard
Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase II Environmental Site Assessment.
1.4 Additional Scope Limitations
Findings, conclusions, and recommendations resulting from these services are based upon
information derived from the on-site activities and other services performed under this scope of
Phase II Environmental Site Assessment
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking Spanish Fork, Utah
Terracon Project 61227186 Task 3.3 January 6, 2023
3
work; such information is subject to change over time. Certain indicators of the presence of
hazardous substances, petroleum products, or other constituents may have been latent,
inaccessible, unobservable, non-detectable, or not present during these services. We cannot
represent that the site contains no hazardous substances, toxic materials, petroleum products, or
other latent conditions beyond those identified during this Phase II investigation. Subsurface
conditions may vary from those encountered at specific borings or wells or during other surveys,
tests, assessments, investigations, or exploratory services. The data, interpretations, findings,
and our recommendations are based solely upon data obtained at the time and within the scope
of these services.
1.5 Reliance
This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Spanish Fork City. Any authorization for
use or reliance by any other party (except a governmental entity having jurisdiction over the site)
is prohibited without the express written authorization of Spanish Fork City and Terracon.
Reliance by authorized parties will be subject to the terms, conditions, and limitations stated in
the underlying contract between Spanish Fork City and Terracon. The limitation of liability defined
in the terms and conditions is the aggregate limit of Terracon’s liability to all relying parties unless
otherwise agreed in writing.
2.0 PHASE II SITE INVESTIGATION
2.1 Scope
The proposed Phase II scope of work described in the SAP was intended to gather the data
requested by the Utah Department of Environmental Quality (UDEQ). These activities were
conducted in accordance with a site-specific SAP that was prepared and approved by EPA and
UDEQ for this site. The SAP established specific site objectives, sampling process design, and
details regarding site-specific sampling and analyses and was used in conjunction with the EPA-
approved QAPP.
2.2 Sampling Process Design
The sampling strategy for soil, groundwater, and soil gas was designed to gather the necessary
data to further evaluate the environmental impacts reported by the previous site investigations.
Exhibit 2 (Appendix A) shows the soil, groundwater, and soil gas sampling locations.
The exact location of each sampling location was dictated by drilling equipment access
constraints and safety. Sixteen soil borings were advanced to depths of approximately 10 feet
bgs to 25 feet bgs, as necessary, to fully intercept the shallow groundwater table. Additionally,
two 50-foot long trenches were excavated on the west end of the site to further evaluate the nature
and extent of landfill debris.
Phase II Environmental Site Assessment
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking Spanish Fork, Utah
Terracon Project 61227186 Task 3.3 January 6, 2023
4
Groundwater samples were collected from the soil borings using temporary well points. Terracon
attempted to collect a groundwater sample from an artesian well that was reported to exist at the
site. However, the well could not be located in the field and was presumed to have been destroyed
during prior removal of scrapped vehicles and other debris from the site.
The following soil samples were collected from each soil boring and each trench:
Petroleum Hydrocarbons: Two soil samples were collected for analysis of
petroleum hydrocarbons. One soil sample was collected from the surface and
one soil sample was collected from the most impacted subsurface depth
interval (field-determined based on PID readings, staining, odors, and/or
presence of landfill debris). Petroleum hydrocarbon analyses included methyl
tert-butyl ether (MTBE), benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, total xylenes, and
naphthalene (BTEXN), Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons–Gasoline Range
Organics (TPH-GRO), Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons–Diesel Range
Organics (TPH-DRO), and Total Recoverable Petroleum Hydrocarbons
(TRPH).
VOCs: Two soil samples were collected for analysis of volatile organic
compounds (VOCs). One soil sample was collected from the surface and one
soil sample was collected from the most impacted subsurface depth interval
(field-determined based on PID readings, staining, odors, and/or presence of
landfill debris).
Metals: Two soil samples were collected for analysis of metals. One soil
sample was collected from the surface and one soil sample was collected
from the most impacted subsurface depth interval (field-determined based
on PID readings, staining, odors, and/or presence of landfill debris). Soil
metals analyses included RCRA D-list metals (RCRA 8 metals) and
hexavalent chromium.
The following groundwater samples were collected from each soil boring:
Petroleum Hydrocarbons: One groundwater sample was collected for
analysis of MTBE, BTEXN, TPH-GRO, TPH-DRO, and TRPH.
VOCs: One groundwater sample was collected for analysis of VOCs.
Metals: One groundwater sample was collected for analysis of RCRA 8
metals and hexavalent chromium.
Ten soil gas probes were installed for the collection of soil gas samples. The soil gas probes were
installed at depths of 3 to 5 feet bgs, as needed to keep the probes above the groundwater table.
The following soil gas samples were collected from each soil gas probe:
VOCs: One soil gas sample was collected for analysis of VOCs.
Explosive gases: One soil gas sample was collected for analysis of
explosive gases (methane, ethane, and ethene).
Phase II Environmental Site Assessment
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking Spanish Fork, Utah
Terracon Project 61227186 Task 3.3 January 6, 2023
5
Hydrogen sulfide: Each soil gas probe was field-analyzed for hydrogen
sulfide.1
Table C1 through C5 present the results of the soil, groundwater, and soil gas sampling.
Samples were delivered to the analytical laboratory within holding times for all analytical methods
to generate definitive analytical data which are critical to this assessment.Table 1 below provides
a summary description of the sample locations, sample types, sample naming convention,
laboratory analyses, and sampling rationale.
TABLE 1
SUMMARY OF SAMPLING LOCATIONS
Rationale Samples
Collected
Sample
Matrix
Analytes
Soil and
Groundwater
Borings,
Trenches
Delineate impacts to surface
soil, subsurface soil, and
groundwater from historical
site activities
B-1, B-2, B-4, B-
5, B-6, B-7, B-8,
B-9, B-10, B-11,
B-12, B-13, B-14,
B-15, B-16
East Trench (ET)
and West Trench
(WT)
Surface Soil,
Subsurface
Soil, and
Groundwater
MTBE, BTEXN, TPH-
GRO, TPH-DRO, TRPH,
VOCs, RCRA 8 Metals,
Hexavalent Chromium
Soil Gas
Probes
Delineate potential presence
of VOCs, explosive gases,
and hydrogen sulfide in soil
gas from historical landfill
materials
SG-1, SG-2, SG-
3, SG-4, SG-6,
SG-7, SG-8, SG-9
Soil Gas
VOCs,
Methane/Ethane/Ethene,
H2S
2.3 Field Data Collection
Following SAP approval, the public utility location service (Blue Stakes of Utah) was notified at
least 48 hours prior to commencing drilling activities. A private utility location service was used to
locate potential utilities and other subsurface obstacles in the immediate vicinity of each soil
boring, trench, and soil gas probe location.
Terracon conducted the soil and groundwater sampling on November 9–11, 2022. Soil gas
sampling was conducted on November 10–11, 2022. The trenches were excavated and sampled
on November 15, 2022. The mechanized drilling and excavation services were performed by
Utah-licensed well driller Direct Push Services; Terracon environmental personnel directed and
1 Due to the reactivity and instability of hydrogen sulfide, field analysis was considered as reliable or more
reliable than laboratory analysis. Field instrument detection limits were at least one order of magnitude
below applicable screening levels.
Phase II Environmental Site Assessment
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking Spanish Fork, Utah
Terracon Project 61227186 Task 3.3 January 6, 2023
6
supervised the drilling and trenching activities, logged the soil borings and trenches, and collected
field samples.
During advancement of the soil borings, soils were continuously cored in approximate 5-foot
intervals and observed to document subsurface soil types, color, relative moisture content, PID
readings, and sensory evidence of environmental impacts. The trenches were visually observed
to document subsurface soil types, color, relative moisture content, PID readings, and sensory
evidence of environmental impacts.
Detailed lithological descriptions are included on the soil boring logs provided in Appendix B. The
extent of landfill debris ranged from approximately 0 to >4 feet bgs. The trenches were excavated
to approximately 4-5 feet bgs due to the presence of shallow groundwater that was rapidly
infiltrating the excavations. Native soils consisted of clay, silty clay, silt, poorly-graded sand, and
gravel. Depth to groundwater ranged from approximately 1 foot bgs to 22 feet bgs. Depth to
groundwater was shallower on the western portion of the site and deeper on the eastern portion
of the site which was expected based on the previous investigations and site topography which
slopes east-to-west.
2.4 Soil Sampling
Soil samples were collected from direct-push borings following the procedures detailed in
Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) 5, Geoprobe Sampling, provided in Appendix B of the EPA-
approved QAPP. During advancement of the borings, soils were logged as detailed in SOP 1,
Soil Sampling and Logging,provided in Appendix B of the EPA-approved QAPP. Soil samples
were collected from trenches following the procedures detailed in SOP 4, Test Pit/Excavation Soil
Sampling, which is provided in Appendix B of the EPA-approved QAPP.
2.5 Groundwater Sampling
Groundwater samples were collected from each of the borings following the procedures detailed
in SOP 5,Geoprobe Sampling,provided in Appendix B of the EPA-approved QAPP. Boring B-3
yielded no water so a groundwater sample was not collected from this boring.
2.6 Soil Gas Sampling
Soil gas samples were collected following the procedures detailed in Terracon SOP 9,Soil-
gas/Vacuum Probe Installation, and Terracon SOP 9A,Soil Gas Sampling, provided in Appendix
C of the SAP. Two of the soil gas samples collected (SG-5 and SG-10) could not be analyzed
because highly-impermeable clay soils yielded insufficient sample volume for analysis.
Phase II Environmental Site Assessment
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking Spanish Fork, Utah
Terracon Project 61227186 Task 3.3 January 6, 2023
7
2.7 Field QA/QC Samples
Field duplicates were collected at rate of 10 percent with one trip blank (laboratory-supplied blank)
per sample shipment. One trip blank, four duplicate soil samples, and two duplicate groundwater
samples were collected.
The original sample and corresponding duplicate samples are provided below:
Soil Samples
Sample ID Duplicate ID Analytes
B-14 @ surface B-140 @ surface
MTBE, BTEXN, TPH-GRO, TPH-
DRO, TRPH, VOCs, RCRA 8
Metals, hexavalent chromium
B-14 @ 10'B-140 @ 10'
MTBE, BTEXN, TPH-GRO, TPH-
DRO, TRPH, VOCs, RCRA 8
Metals, hexavalent chromium
B-8 @ surface B-80 @ surface
MTBE, BTEXN, TPH-GRO, TPH-
DRO, TRPH, VOCs, RCRA 8
Metals, hexavalent chromium
B-8 @ 3'B-80 @ 3'
MTBE, BTEXN, TPH-GRO, TPH-
DRO, TRPH, VOCs, RCRA 8
Metals, hexavalent chromium
Groundwater Samples
Sample ID Duplicate ID Analytes
B-14 B-140
MTBE, BTEXN, TPH-GRO, TPH-
DRO, TRPH, VOCs, RCRA 8
Metals (dissolved), hexavalent
chromium (dissolved)
B-5 B-50
MTBE, BTEXN, TPH-GRO, TPH-
DRO, TRPH, VOCs, RCRA 8
Metals (dissolved), hexavalent
chromium (dissolved)
2.8 Equipment Decontamination
Clean disposable, single-use sampling equipment was used to conduct the soil, groundwater, and
soil gas sampling and was properly disposed of after each use. Drilling equipment was cleaned
using a high-pressure washer prior to beginning the project and between boring locations.
2.9 Site Restoration
Site restoration was conducted by backfilling the borings and soil gas probes with bentonite chips.
Trenches were backfilled with excavated material and compacted to the degree practicable.
Phase II Environmental Site Assessment
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking Spanish Fork, Utah
Terracon Project 61227186 Task 3.3 January 6, 2023
8
3.0 LABORATORY ANALYTICAL METHODS
Soil and groundwater samples (including field duplicates and trip blanks) were placed in iced
coolers and shipped under chain-of-custody protocols via overnight courier to Pace Analytical
Laboratories in Mt. Juliet, Tennessee (a Utah-Certified Laboratory). Soil gas samples were
appropriately packaged and shipped under chain-of-custody protocols via overnight courier to
Pace Analytical Laboratories in Mt. Juliet, Tennessee (a Utah-Certified Laboratory).
Samples were analyzed using the following methods:
TABLE 2 ANALYTICAL METHOD SUMMARY
Parameter Matrix
(Solid/Liquid)Analytical Method No. of
Samples1
TPH-DRO Soil SW-846 8015 40
TRPH Soil SW-846 9071B 40
VOCs, TPH-GRO Soil SW-846 8260 40
RCRA 8 metals Soil SW-846 6010B, 7471 40
Hexavalent Chromium Soil SW-846 3060A/7199 40
TPH-DRO Groundwater SW-846 3511/8015 17
TRPH Groundwater SW-846 1664A 17
VOCs, TPH-GRO Groundwater SW-846 8260B 17
RCRA 8 metals*Groundwater SW-846 6020, 7470A 17
Hexavalent Chromium*Groundwater SW-846 7199 17
VOCs Soil Gas TO-15 8
Methane/Ethane/Ethene Soil Gas 8015M 8
1Includes field duplicate samples.
*Groundwater samples collected for metals analysis were filtered in the field using a 0.45-micron filter.
4.0 SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS
The following sections summarize analytical results. A summary of the analytical results is
provided in Table C1 through C5 (Appendix C). Copies of the analytical reports and sample
chain-of-custody records are provided in Appendix D.
Constituent concentrations in soil were compared to the following screening levels:
Utah Department of Environmental Quality (UDEQ); Division of Environmental Response
and Remediation (DERR) Initial Screening Levels (ISLs) and Tier 1 Screening Levels (Tier
1) for petroleum hydrocarbons in soil
EPA RSLs for Residential and Industrial use scenarios
Phase II Environmental Site Assessment
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking Spanish Fork, Utah
Terracon Project 61227186 Task 3.3 January 6, 2023
9
Constituent concentrations in groundwater were compared to the following screening levels:
UDEQ DERR ISLs and Tier 1 criteria for petroleum hydrocarbons in groundwater
EPA Tapwater Regional Screening Levels (RSLs)
EPA Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs)
Utah Ground Water Quality Protection Standards (UGWQS; UAC-R317-6-2.1)
EPA Target Groundwater Concentrations (TGC) Vapor Intrusion Screening Levels
(VISLs) for residential and commercial use scenarios
Constituent concentrations in soil gas were compared to following screening levels:
EPA Target Sub-Slab and Near-source Soil Gas Concentration (TSSNSGC) VISLs for
Residential and Commercial use scenarios
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) definition of hazardous
atmosphere for combustible gases and vapors (10% of the Lower Explosive Limit [LEL]
for methane, ethane, ethene, and hydrogen sulfide
OSHA Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) for hydrogen sulfide
4.1 Soil Data Summary
Thirty-six soil samples and four field duplicates were analyzed for MTBE, BTEXN, TPH-GRO,
TPH-DRO, TRPH, VOCs, RCRA 8 metals, and hexavalent chromium. Soil samples that exceeded
one or more applicable screening levels are detailed below.
Metals: The following soil samples exceeded a screening level for one or more RCRA 8 metals
and/or hexavalent chromium (Table C1). All samples reported arsenic concentrations exceeding
the EPA Residential RSL of 0.68 mg/kg and 25 samples reported arsenic concentrations
exceeding the Industrial RSL of 3 mg/kg, but the highest reported soil arsenic result was 11.3
mg/kg, so no soil arsenic results are included in the table.
Sample Depth Interval Analyte Exceedance
B-6 @ SURFACE Surface Hexavalent Chromium Residential RSL
B-9 @ SURFACE Surface Hexavalent Chromium Residential RSL
B-9 @ 2’2 feet bgs Hexavalent Chromium Residential RSL
B-12 @ SURFACE Surface Lead Residential RSL
B-15 @ SURFACE Surface Hexavalent Chromium Residential RSL
Phase II Environmental Site Assessment
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking Spanish Fork, Utah
Terracon Project 61227186 Task 3.3 January 6, 2023
10
Petroleum Hydrocarbons: The following soil samples exceeded a screening level for petroleum
hydrocarbons (Table C2). MDLs were below screening values for all petroleum hydrocarbons.
Sample Depth Interval Analyte Exceedance
B-6 @ SURFACE Surface TPH-DRO Utah ISL
B-6 @ SURFACE Surface TRPH Utah Tier 1
B-11 @ SURFACE Surface TRPH Utah ISL
B-11 @ 4’4 feet bgs TPH-DRO, TRPH Utah ISL
B-12 @ SURFACE Surface TPH-DRO, TRPH Utah ISL
B-16 @ 1’1 foot bgs TRPH Utah ISL
VOCs: No soil samples exceeded a screening level for VOCs (Table C2).
4.2 Groundwater Data Summary
Fifteen groundwater samples and two field duplicates were analyzed for MTBE, BTEXN, TPH-
GRO, TPH-DRO, TRPH, VOCs, dissolved RCRA 8 metals, and dissolved hexavalent chromium.
Groundwater samples that exceeded one or more applicable screening levels are detailed below.
Metals: The following groundwater samples exceeded a screening level for one or more RCRA
8 metals and/or hexavalent chromium (Table C3). Laboratory Method Detection Limits (MDLs)
exceeded the EPA Tapwater RSL for arsenic, but all samples had detectable concentrations of
arsenic above the MDL.
Sample Analyte Exceedance
B-2 Arsenic MCL
B-4 Arsenic MCL
B-5 Arsenic MCL
B-6 Arsenic MCL
B-9 Arsenic MCL
B-11 Arsenic MCL
B-12 Arsenic MCL
B-13 Hexavalent Chromium Tapwater RSL
B-14 Arsenic UGWQS
B-15 Arsenic MCL
B-140 Arsenic UGQWS
B-50 Arsenic MCL
Petroleum Hydrocarbons: The following groundwater samples exceeded a screening level for
petroleum hydrocarbons (Table C4). MDLs were below screening values for all petroleum
hydrocarbons.
Phase II Environmental Site Assessment
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking Spanish Fork, Utah
Terracon Project 61227186 Task 3.3 January 6, 2023
11
Sample Analyte Exceedance
B-16 TPH-DRO Utah ISL
VOCs: The following groundwater samples exceeded a screening level for VOCs (Table C4).
Sample Analyte Exceedance
B-16 Vinyl chloride Residential TGC VISL
4.3 Soil Gas Data Summary
Two of the ten soil gas samples collected (SG-5 and SG-10) could not be analyzed because
highly impermeable clay soils yielded insufficient sample volume for analysis. The remaining eight
soil gas samples were analyzed for VOCs, explosive gases, and hydrogen sulfide. Soil gas
samples that exceeded one or more applicable screening levels are detailed below.
VOCs: The following soil gas samples exceeded the Residential TSSNSGC VISL for benzene
(Table C5). RDLs exceeded screening levels for the VOCs 1,2-Dibromoethane, Hexachloro-1,3-
Butadiene, and naphthalene (Table C5).
Sample Analyte Exceedance
SG-2 Benzene Residential TSSNSGC VISL
SG-3 Benzene Residential TSSNSGC VISL
SG-4 Benzene Residential TSSNSGC VISL
SG-8 Benzene Residential TSSNSGC VISL
SG-9 Benzene Residential TSSNSGC VISL
Explosive Gases: Detectable concentrations of methane that were well below 10% of the LEL
were present in samples SG-3, SG-4, SG-7, and SG-8 (Table C5). The remaining soil gas sample
results were below detection limits for methane and all soil gas sample results were below
detection limits for ethane and ethene. MDLs were well below screening values for methane,
ethane, and ethene.
Hydrogen Sulfide: Hydrogen sulfide was not detected in any of the soil gas probes. The field
instrument detection limit was approximately one order of magnitude below the OSHA the PEL
and over two orders of magnitude below 10% of the LEL.
5.0 DATA QUALITY ASSESSMENT
All laboratory analytical data were subject to internal reduction and validation prior to external
release of the data, as detailed in the laboratory’s Quality Assurance Manual. Following receipt
Phase II Environmental Site Assessment
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking Spanish Fork, Utah
Terracon Project 61227186 Task 3.3 January 6, 2023
12
of the laboratory analytical results by Terracon, the data were reviewed to evaluate compliance
with Data Quality Indicators (DQIs) outlined in Sections D1, D2, and D3 of the QAPP.
Documentation provided with the laboratory analytical results reports included case narratives;
analytical data with minimum method detection limits (MDLs) and reported detection limits (RDLs)
reporting limits listed for all analyses; surrogate recoveries for GC/MS analyses with laboratory
control limits; chain-of-custody records; a quality control summary including method blanks, matrix
spike/matrix spike duplicates (MS/MSD) with control limits, laboratory control samples, and
duplicates (LCS/LCSD) with control limits; and application of data qualifiers where warranted.
Assessment of the DQIs for Precision, Bias and Accuracy, Representativeness, Comparability,
Completeness, and Sensitivity are presented in the following subsections. The laboratory results
are assumed to be in control and the data is useable as presented unless specifically described
below.
5.1 Precision
Precision was evaluated on the basis of relative percent difference (RPD) as a measure of
reproducibility between LCS/LCSD pairs and MS/MSD pairs (analytical precision) and between
field samples and field duplicate samples (field precision).
The RPD is calculated to evaluate precision using the following equation.
RPD =Where X1 and X2 are the reported concentrations of the samples
being evaluated.
5.1.1 Analytical Precision
A summary of the Quality Control assessment for analytical precision is presented below.
Laboratory Set L1558026 (Soil and Groundwater Samples):
The RPDs for the MSD (Laboratory Batch WG1961069) associated with
hexavalent chromium and the MSD (Laboratory Batch WG1961441) associated
with acrylonitrile and TPH-GRO (Laboratory Batch WG1961441) were outside the
laboratory’s control limits. Additionally, the laboratory duplicate (Batch
WG1964002) for TRPH was also outside the laboratory control limits. As a result,
a J3 flag was used to qualify this data. The affected hexavalent chromium samples
had detection limits above regulatory reporting limits or had estimated
concentrations above the Residential RSL. Acrylonitrile and TPH-GRO were either
not detected or detected well below regulatory screening levels. Several TRPH
samples were well above the ISL where it is unlikely that this precision issue had
a significant effect. Additionally, other DQIs were in control. It is not anticipated the
Phase II Environmental Site Assessment
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking Spanish Fork, Utah
Terracon Project 61227186 Task 3.3 January 6, 2023
13
analytical precision issue will affect the conclusions of this report with the possible
exception of hexavalent chromium.
The LCSD for 19 VOC analytes (Laboratory Batch WG1962274) was outside the
established quality control range for precision. A J3 flag was used to qualify this
data. The affected sample was the Trip Blank. It is not anticipated the analytical
precision issue will affect the conclusions of this report.
The laboratory case narrative stated that the “RPD value is not applicable for the
sample concentrations less than five times the reporting limit” (Batch WG1962789)
for the TRPH samples and its laboratory duplicate. One of the affected samples
(B-6@Surface) had a detection of TRPH above the Tier 1 reporting limit. However,
other non-affected samples were also detected above the ISL. This is not
anticipated to affect the usability of the data.
Based on the results of the RPD analyses of the MS/MSD and LCS samples and the evaluation
provided above,analytical precision is considered within control for Laboratory Sets
L1558026, L1559319, and L1557924 (soil gas, no analytical precision issues) with the exceptions
listed above.
5.1.2 Field Precision
Four field duplicate soil samples and two field duplicate groundwater samples for TPH-GRO,
TPH-DRO, TRPH, VOCs, RCRA 8 metals (dissolved for groundwater), and hexavalent chromium
(dissolved for groundwater) were collected and analyzed. Collection of field duplicates does not
apply to soil gas sampling. A summary of the Quality Control assessment for field precision is
presented below.
Per the QAPP, analytical results for original samples and field duplicate pairs that are less than
five times the laboratory’s Reported Detection Limit (RDL) in the analytical reports, were
considered within control if the difference between the sample concentration and its duplicate was
less than two times the RDL. When analytical results for the original sample and the field duplicate
pairs are greater than five times the RDL, the duplicate pair was considered within control when
the RPDs for the field duplicate pairs were within the QAPP’s control limits (50% for soil samples,
25% for groundwater samples).
Laboratory Set L1558026 (Soil and Groundwater Samples): Four duplicate soil
sample pairs were run for RCRA 8 metals, hexavalent chromium, VOCs, and
petroleum hydrocarbons.
RCRA 8 Metals and Hexavalent Chromium in Soil (Table C6.1)
Phase II Environmental Site Assessment
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking Spanish Fork, Utah
Terracon Project 61227186 Task 3.3 January 6, 2023
14
Arsenic in soil for Duplicate pair B-14@10’ /B-140@10’ were both less than 5 X
RDL but had a difference greater than 2 X RDL. They are not considered within
control. All arsenic samples were above the Residential RSL with most above the
Industrial RSL. All other duplicate pairs were also in control. This is not expected
to affect the usability of this data or the conclusions of this report.
VOCs and Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soil (Table C6.2)
The calculated RPD for 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane (53.9%) for duplicate pair B-
8@Surface/B-80@Surface was slightly above the QAPP limit of 50%. This analyte
is considered not in control. Additionally, the original results for chloroethane and
n-propylbenzene in the same duplicate pair were less than 5 x RDL but the
duplicate was greater than 5 X RDL where their difference was greater than 2 X
RDL. These analytes are considered not in control. The calculated RPD for cis-
1,3-dichloropropene in this pair was 53.5% and not considered within control.
Finally, both the original and duplicate for total xylenes were less than 5 X RDL but
their difference was slightly greater than 2 X RDL. This is not considered within
control.
The calculated RPD for 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane (76.4%) for duplicate pair B-
8@3’/B-80@3’ was above the QAPP limit of 50%. This analyte is considered not
in control. Additionally, the original results for n-propylbenzene in the same
duplicate pair were less than 5 x RDL but the duplicate was greater than 5 X RDL
where their difference was greater than 2 X RDL. This analyte is considered not in
control. Finally, both the original and duplicate for total xylenes were less than 5 X
RDL but their difference was slightly greater than 2 X RDL. This is not considered
within control.
The calculated RPD for 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane (80.4%) for duplicate pair B-
14@Surface/B-140@Surface was above the QAPP limit of 50%. This analyte is
considered not in control. Additionally, the original results for TRPH, 1,1,1,2-
tetrachloroethane, and cis-1,3-dichloropropene in the same duplicate pair were
greater than 5 x RDL but the duplicate was less than 5 X RDL where their
difference was greater than 2 X RDL. These analytes are considered not in control.
The affected VOCs listed above had concentrations well below regulatory
screening levels with the exception of TRPH. Several concentrations of TRPH
were well above one or more screening levels. Additionally, all of the duplicate
pairs had concentrations below regulatory screening levels regardless of whether
they were in control. As a result, this is not expected to affect the usability of this
data or the conclusions of this report.
Phase II Environmental Site Assessment
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking Spanish Fork, Utah
Terracon Project 61227186 Task 3.3 January 6, 2023
15
Laboratory Set L1558026 (Groundwater Samples): Two duplicate groundwater
sample pairs were run for dissolved RCRA 8 metals, dissolved hexavalent chromium,
VOCs, and petroleum hydrocarbons.
Dissolved RCRA 8 Metals and Dissolved Hexavalent Chromium in Groundwater
(Table C6.3)
Reported concentrations for metals and hexavalent chromium in groundwater
were all in control.
VOCs and Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Groundwater (Table C6.4)
Reported concentrations for VOCs and petroleum hydrocarbons in groundwater
were all in control.
Based on the results of the RPD analyses of the field duplicate sample pairs and the evaluation
provided above,field precision is considered within control for Laboratory Set L1558026, with
minor exceptions described above. Duplicate samples were not collected for the trench samples.
5.2 Bias and Accuracy
Bias and Accuracy were evaluated through a review of the method blanks, trip blanks, percent
recoveries for LCS/LCSD, and percent recoveries for MS/MSD summaries provided by the
laboratory. Method blanks and trip blanks were considered within control (i.e.,accuracy) if the
constituents analyzed were less than the analytical method reporting limits. LCS/LCSD and
MS/MSD analyses were considered within control if the percent recoveries were within the
laboratory’s established limits (i.e.,bias). A summary of the Quality Control assessment for Bias
and Accuracy is presented below.
Laboratory Set L1558026 (Soil and Groundwater Samples):
Accuracy–Method and Laboratory Blank: All analytes in the method blanks
were less than the laboratory RDLs with the exception of an estimated
concentration (J value) in the method blank for methylene chloride (Batches
WG1961441, WG1964315, and WG1964463) and TPH-DRO (Batch
WG1961746). A B flag was applied to this data. Methylene chloride was detected
orders of magnitude below regulatory screening levels within the affected samples.
TPH-DRO was detected well below regulatory screening levels in the affected
groundwater samples. It is not anticipated that the accuracy issue will affect the
conclusions of this report.
Accuracy–Trip Blank: All analytes in the trip blank were less than the laboratory
RDLs.
Phase II Environmental Site Assessment
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking Spanish Fork, Utah
Terracon Project 61227186 Task 3.3 January 6, 2023
16
Surrogate Recoveries: The laboratory noted that surrogate recovery limits for one
surrogate (Toluene-d8, Batch WG196415) were exceeded resulting in a J1 flag.
Other surrogates were in control as were other DQIs. This is not expected to affect
the usability of the data.
The laboratory noted that the internal standard exhibited poor recovery due to
sample matrix interference for numerous analytes in several laboratory batches.
As a result, the results will be biased high. None of the affected samples were
above regulatory screening levels. This is not expected to affect the usability of the
data
The laboratory noted that surrogate recovery of o-terphenyl in Batches
WG1961365 and WG1962621 cannot be used for control limit evaluation due to
dilution. A J7 value was assigned to this data. Other surrogates were in control,
and the affected VOCs were below regulatory screening levels for the affected
samples. This is not expected to affect the usability of the data.
The laboratory noted that the sample concentration in TPH-DRO (Batch
WG1962621) in the MS/MSD is too high to evaluate accurate spike recoveries. A
V value was assigned to this data. Two affected soil samples from this batch were
above the ISL. However, one non-affected sample from a different batch was also
above the ISL, and other non-affected petroleum hydrocarbons (TRPH) exceeded
at least one regulatory screening level. Additionally, other DQIs were considered
acceptable. This is not expected to affect the usability of the data or alter the
conclusions of this report.
Bias–LCS/LCSD Percent Recoveries:The LCS and/or LCSD for multiple VOCs
(Batch WG1962274) were above the established quality control range for
accuracy. A J4 value was assigned to this data. The only affected sample was the
trip blank. This is not expected to affect the usability of the data.
Bias–MS/MSD Percent Recoveries:The percent recovery for the MS/MSD for
hexavalent chromium (Batches WG1961029 and WG1961069), the MS/MSD for
TRPH (Batch WG1964002), the MS/MSD for lead (Batch WG1960907), and the
MS/MSD for acrylonitrile (Batch 1961441) interfered with the ability to make any
accurate determination causing a low spike value. A J6 qualifier was applied to this
data. The affected hexavalent chromium samples had estimated results above the
Residential RSL or had non-detect results where the RDL was greater than the
RSL. Several affected TRPH soil samples were well above the ISL, and one non-
affected sample was above Tier 1 reporting limits. This is not expected to affect
the usability of this data. Affected lead samples were well below regulatory
screening levels, and acrylonitrile was not detected in any of the affected samples.
As a result, this is not expected to affect the usability of the data or conclusions of
this report.
Phase II Environmental Site Assessment
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking Spanish Fork, Utah
Terracon Project 61227186 Task 3.3 January 6, 2023
17
The MS/MSD for multiple VOCs (Batch WG1961441) interfered with the ability to
make any accurate determination, causing a high spike value. A J5 qualifier was
applied to this data. The affected samples were either non-detect or detected well
below regulatory screening levels. This is not expected to affect the usability of the
data
As a result, these accuracy and bias issues are not anticipated to affect the usability of the data
with the possible exception of hexavalent chromium.
Laboratory Set L1559319 (Soil - Trench Samples):
Accuracy–Method Blank: Methylene chloride was detected at an estimated (J
value) concentration in the Method Blank (Batch WG1964463). A B flag was
assigned to this data. The affected sample was well below regulatory screening
levels. This is not expected to affect the usability of the data.
Accuracy–Trip Blank: A Trip Blank was not collected for the trench samples as
no water samples were collected for VOCs per the approved QAPP.
Surrogate Recoveries: The laboratory noted that surrogate recovery of o-
terphenyl in Batch WG1963441 cannot be used for control limit evaluation due to
dilution. A J7 value was assigned to this data. Other surrogates were in control,
and the affected VOCs were below regulatory screening levels for the affected
sample. This is not expected to affect the usability of the data.
The laboratory noted that the sample concentration in TPH-DRO (Batch
WG1963441) in the MSD is too high to evaluate accurate spike recoveries. A V
value was assigned to this data. The affected soil sample was well below
regulatory reporting limits. Additionally, other DQIs were considered acceptable.
This is not expected to affect the usability of the data or alter the conclusions of
this report.
Bias–LCS/LCSD Percent Recoveries:The percent recoveries for the LCS/LCSD
samples were in control.
Bias–MS/MSD Percent Recoveries:The percent recovery for the MSD for
hexavalent chromium (Batch WG1962223), the MS/MSD for several VOCs (Batch
WG1965194), and the MSD for TPH-DRO (Batch WG1963441) interfered with the
ability to make any accurate determination causing a low spike value. A J6 qualifier
was applied to this data. The affected hexavalent chromium samples had non-
detect results where the RDL was greater than the RSL. It is unknown how much
affect this bias issue may have on the usability of this data. The VOCs were not
detected in any of the affected samples. Additionally, the affected TPH-DRO soil
Phase II Environmental Site Assessment
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking Spanish Fork, Utah
Terracon Project 61227186 Task 3.3 January 6, 2023
18
sample was well below regulatory reporting limits. Other than potentially
hexavalent chromium, these bias issues are not expected to affect the usability of
the data or conclusions of this report.
The MS associated with multiple barium (Batch WG1963058) and toluene (Batch
WG1965194) analyses interfered with the ability to make any accurate
determination, causing a high spike value. A J5 qualifier was applied to this data.
The affected samples were detected well below regulatory screening levels. This
is not expected to affect the usability of the data
Laboratory Set L1557924 (Soil Gas Samples):
Accuracy–Method Blank: Methylene chloride was detected at an estimated (J
value) concentration in the Method Blank (Batch WG1961340). A B flag was
assigned to this data. The affected samples were well below regulatory screening
levels. This is not expected the affect the usability of the data. There were no other
bias or accuracy issues with the soil gas samples.
Bias and Accuracy are considered within control for Laboratory Sets L1558026, L1559319,
and L1557924 with the minor exceptions listed above and the possible exception of hexavalent
chromium in soil.
5.3 Representativeness
Representativeness is a qualitative parameter most concerned with proper design and execution
of the sampling program to produce data that accurately and precisely represent environmental
conditions. Selection of analytical methods, sampling methods, and locations representative of
the media sampled were set forth in the SAP.Representativeness in the field was achieved by
implementing the approved SAP and using appropriate sampling methods, sample containers,
sample handling, and preservation methods.Representativeness in the laboratory was achieved
by using the proper analytical procedures, meeting sample holding times, and analyzing and
assessing laboratory QA/QC samples.
Field Representativeness
Sampling was conducted in general accordance with the SAP and associated Standard Operating
Procedures. The following deviations from the SAP occurred during the sampling event.
One soil boring yielded no water (B-3) so a groundwater sample could not be collected.
It is unlikely that the inability to collect this samples had a significant effect on data
quality.
Two of the ten soil gas samples collected (SG-5 and SG-10) could not be analyzed
because highly impermeable clay soils yielded insufficient sample volume for analysis.
Phase II Environmental Site Assessment
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking Spanish Fork, Utah
Terracon Project 61227186 Task 3.3 January 6, 2023
19
It is unlikely that the inability to collect these samples had a significant effect on data
quality.
A few borings and soil gas probes were moved slightly to accommodate drill rig access
or avoid identified utilities. It is unlikely that small changes in the locations of these
borings and soil gas probes had a significant effect on data quality.
Laboratory Representativeness
Sample analyses followed the analytical methods listed in the SAP or equivalent EPA-approved
variations of the listed methods.
Sample analyses followed the analytical methods listed in the SAP or equivalent EPA-
approved methods or variations of the listed methods; and were analyzed within
method-specified holding times.
The laboratory noted that the pH for TPH-DRO (Batches WG1961746) and VOCs
(Batch WG1961848) in groundwater were outside of the method requirement. The
sample containers were laboratory preserved prior to sample collection. All affected
analytes were well below regulatory screening levels.
The laboratory noted that several of the groundwater samples run for TRPH were from
an unpreserved, insufficiently, or inadequately preserved sample. The sampling
containers were preserved by the laboratory prior to sample collection. All affected
TRPH results were well below regulatory screening levels.
Representativeness is considered within control with the minor exceptions listed above.
5.4 Comparability
Comparability is a qualitative term expressing the confidence with which one data set can be
compared to another. The comparability goal was achieved using standardized sampling
procedures in accordance with the SAP and QAPP, use of standardized and approved laboratory
analytical methods, and reporting the analytical results in appropriate and consistent units.
Sampling was conducted in general accordance with the Sampling and Analysis Plan
(SAP) and associated Standard Operating Procedures. Deviations from the SAP
occurred during the sampling event and are discussed in Section 5.3.
Sample analyses followed the analytical methods listed in the SAP, equivalent
approved methods, or variations of the listed methods.
Phase II Environmental Site Assessment
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking Spanish Fork, Utah
Terracon Project 61227186 Task 3.3 January 6, 2023
20
The units of measure reported by the laboratory were consistent with the units of
measure used by the regulatory screening levels.
The number of field duplicates specified in the approved SAP was at least 10% of the
field samples for soil and groundwater. Collection of field duplicates does not apply to
soil gas sampling.
Soil Samples: Four field soil duplicates for thirty-six soil samples or 11.1%,
which exceeds the 10% goal.
Groundwater Samples: Two field groundwater duplicate for sixteen
groundwater samples or 12.5%, which exceeds the 10% goal.
Comparability is considered within control.
5.5 Completeness
Completeness is the ratio of valid measurements to the number of planned measurements,
expressed as a percentage, and the completeness goal for the project is 90%. The sampling
program is deemed to meet the DQIs for valid measurements. The samples collected were
submitted and analyzed by the laboratory according to the chain-of-custody. Additionally, the data
collection followed the procedures and requirements as described in the approved QAPP and
SAP. The data are considered usable as qualified. The analytical completeness for this sampling
event was 100%.
The SAP detailed forty soil samples, nineteen groundwater samples, and ten soil gas
samples (including field duplicates), all of which except one groundwater sample and
two soil gas samples were properly collected and analyzed by the laboratory;
therefore, the sample completeness score is 96%, exceeding the 90% project goal.
There were multiple DQI issues with hexavalent chromium in soil. This analyte had
analytical precision issues, laboratory bias/accuracy issues, and sensitivity issues
(described below). As a result, hexavalent chromium results are considered qualified
and may need to be further evaluated in order to determine possible impact to the
conclusions of this report.
With acknowledgement of qualified results for the analytes listed above, the analytical data
are acceptable for their intended use to evaluate constituent concentrations compared to
applicable regulatory screening levels.
Phase II Environmental Site Assessment
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking Spanish Fork, Utah
Terracon Project 61227186 Task 3.3 January 6, 2023
21
5.6 Sensitivity
Sensitivity refers to the capability of a method or instrument to discriminate between measurement
responses representing different levels of the variable of interest. The sensitivity goal is for RDLs
to be below comparative screening levels, which vary considerably by analyte and in value and
applicability. Overall, the level of sensitivity was sufficient to allow the identification of soil,
groundwater, and soil gas constituents above applicable regulatory screening levels.
Laboratory Sets L1558026 and L1559319 (Soil Samples):
RCRA 8 Metals and Hexavalent Chromium (Table C1): The RDLs were all less
than the EPA Residential RSLs for analytes reported as less than the RDL, with
the exception of hexavalent chromium where the RDL exceeded the Residential
RSL.
VOCs (Table C2): The RDLs were all less than the Utah ISLs, Utah Tier 1
screening levels, and EPA Residential RSLs, as applicable, for analytes reported
as less than the RDL. The only exception to this was 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane
that had RDLs that exceeded the EPA Residential RSL for most samples. This
constituent was not reported in any of the samples above their RDLs or MDLs and
is not considered a contaminant of concern for this investigation. As a result, this
is not anticipated to affect the conclusions of this report.
Petroleum Hydrocarbons (Table C2): The RDLs were all less than the Utah ISLs,
Utah Tier 1 screening levels, and EPA Residential RSLs, as applicable, for
analytes reported as less than the RDL.
Laboratory Set L1558026 (Groundwater Samples):
Dissolved RCRA 8 Metals and Hexavalent Chromium (Table C3): The RDLs
were all less than UGWQS, EPA MCLs, and EPA Tapwater RSLs, as applicable,
for analytes reported as less than the RDL, with the exception of hexavalent
chromium where the RDL exceeded the Tapwater RSL.
VOCs (Table C4): The RDLs were all less than Utah ISLs, Utah Tier 1 screening
levels, UGWQS, EPA MCLs, EPA VISLs and EPA Tapwater RSLs, as applicable,
for analytes reported as less than the RDL. The only exceptions to this were
acrolein, acrylonitrile, bromodichloromethane, carbon tetrachloride, chloroform,
1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane, 1,2-dibromoethane, hexachloro-1,2-butadiene,
naphthalene, and vinyl chloride which exceeded at least one of these screening
levels in at least one sample. None of the groundwater samples had detections of
these analytes above RDLs nor are these analytes considered contaminants of
Phase II Environmental Site Assessment
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking Spanish Fork, Utah
Terracon Project 61227186 Task 3.3 January 6, 2023
22
concern for this site. Hence, this sensitivity issue for groundwater samples is not
anticipated to affect the conclusions of this report.
Petroleum Hydrocarbons (Table C4): The RDLs were all less than the Utah ISLs,
Utah Tier 1 screening levels, UGWQS, and EPA MCLs as applicable, for analytes
reported as less than the RDL.
Laboratory Set L1557924 (Soil Gas Samples):
The RDLs were all less than the EPA VISLs for analytes reported as less than the
RDL. The only exceptions to this were 1,2-dibromoethane, 1,3-butadiene,
hexachloro-1,3-butadiene, and naphthalene which exceeded at least one VISL.
None of the soil gas samples had detections of these analytes above RDLs nor
are these analytes considered contaminants of concern for this site. Hence, this
sensitivity issue for soil gas samples is not anticipated to affect the conclusions of
this report.
The DQIs for Comparability were achieved. As such,Comparability was deemed acceptable.
6.0 DATA EVALUATION
Following is an overview of the contaminants identified in soil, groundwater, and soil gas by the
current Phase II ESA.
6.1 Soil Sample Results
Field Observations
Field observations during soil sampling noted the presence of landfill debris in soils throughout
the western portion of the site. Landfill debris materials included assorted metal, fabric, and plastic
materials that were otherwise difficult to distinguish. The vertical extent of landfill debris on the
western portion of the site could not be fully determined due to the presence of shallow
groundwater (1-2 feet bgs) which limited excavation depths.
Metals
All samples reported arsenic concentrations exceeding the EPA Residential RSL of 0.68
mg/kg and 25 samples reported arsenic concentrations exceeding the Industrial RSL of 3
mg/kg. The highest reported soil arsenic concentration was 11.3 mg/kg which is well within
the range of expected background concentrations for the Wasatch Front area.
Lead in soil exceeded the Residential RSL in one sample. The next-highest reported soil
lead concentration was approximately half of the Residential RSL. Of the 40 total soil
Phase II Environmental Site Assessment
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking Spanish Fork, Utah
Terracon Project 61227186 Task 3.3 January 6, 2023
23
samples, four samples had lead concentrations above 100 mg/kg, and seven samples
had lead concentrations above 50 mg/kg. The sample that exceeded the Residential RSL
for lead was collected from near the former car crusher (Exhibit 2) which is approximately
the same location as samples from previous investigations (IHI 2007a; IHI 2007b) where
lead concentrations exceeded the Residential RSL.
Hexavalent chromium concentrations exceeded the Residential RSL in four samples from
three boring locations. Hexavalent chromium concentrations above the MDL in soil ranged
from 0.356 mg/kg to 1.52 mg/kg. Of the four samples that exceeded the Residential RSL,
three exceedances were present in surface soils and one exceedance was present at 2
feet bgs in a boring where the surface soil sample also exceeded the Residential RSL
(location B-9).
Metals exceedances in soil are presented in Exhibit 3. Complete soil metals results are presented
in Table C1.
Petroleum Hydrocarbons
No soil samples exceeded the ISL for TPH-GRO.
Three samples exceeded the ISL for TPH-DRO.
Four samples exceeded the ISL for TRPH and one sample exceeded the Tier 1 screening
level for TRPH.
Only one sample that exceeded an ISL or Tier 1 screening level for TPH-DRO and TRPH
was from a depth interval deeper than 1 foot bgs.
Detectable concentrations of TPH-GRO, TPH-DRO, and/or TRPH that were below ISLs
were present in almost all other soil samples.
No soil samples exceeded the ISL for MTBE or BTEXN.
Detectable concentrations of MTBE that were below the ISL were present in one
soil sample.
Detectable concentrations of benzene that were below the ISL were present in all
soil samples.
Detectable concentrations of toluene that were below the ISL were present in all
soil samples.
Detectable concentrations of ethylbenzene that were below the ISL were present
in all soil samples.
Detectable concentrations of xylenes that were below the ISL were present in all
soil samples.
Phase II Environmental Site Assessment
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking Spanish Fork, Utah
Terracon Project 61227186 Task 3.3 January 6, 2023
24
Detectable concentrations of naphthalene that were below the ISL were present in
one soil sample.
Petroleum hydrocarbon exceedances in soil are presented in Exhibit 4. Complete soil petroleum
hydrocarbon results are presented in Table C2.
VOCs
No soil samples exceeded Residential or Industrial RSLs for any VOC. Complete soil VOC results
are presented in Table C2.
6.2 Groundwater Sample Results
Metals
One groundwater sample exceeded the Tapwater RSL for hexavalent chromium (boring
B-13). Soil samples from boring B-13 did not contain detectable concentrations of
hexavalent chromium. The reported concentration of total chromium in the B-13
groundwater sample was below detection limits (<0.002 mg/L).
The majority of groundwater samples exceeded the MCL for dissolved arsenic (0.01 mg/L)
and two samples exceeded the UGWQS (0.05 mg/L). Given the low concentrations of
arsenic observed in soil samples the dissolved arsenic concentrations exceeding MCLs
and/or UGWQS reported in this investigation appear to be naturally-derived.
No other metal exceeded an MCL or Tapwater RSL.
Metals exceedances in groundwater are presented in Exhibit 5. Complete groundwater metals
results are presented in Table C3.
Petroleum Hydrocarbons
TPH-GRO was not detected in any groundwater sample.
Detectable concentrations of TPH-DRO were present in all groundwater samples. One
groundwater sample slightly exceeded the DERR ISL for TPH-DRO and all other samples
were below the DERR ISL. The sample that exceeded the TPH-DRO ISL was located in
an area with landfill debris and could possibly be associated with non-petroleum oils that
can report in the diesel range.
Detectable concentrations of TRPH that were below the DERR ISL were present in almost
all groundwater samples. TRPH did not exceed the ISL in any groundwater sample.
Phase II Environmental Site Assessment
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking Spanish Fork, Utah
Terracon Project 61227186 Task 3.3 January 6, 2023
25
No groundwater samples exceeded the ISL for MTBE or BTEXN.
Detectable concentrations of MTBE that were below the ISL were present in one
groundwater sample.
Detectable concentrations of benzene that were below the ISL were present in
almost all groundwater samples.
Detectable concentrations of toluene that were below the ISL were present in the
majority groundwater samples.
Detectable concentrations of ethylbenzene that were below the ISL were present
in seven groundwater samples.
Detectable concentrations of xylenes that were below the ISL were present in the
majority groundwater samples.
Detectable concentrations of naphthalene were not present in any groundwater
sample.
Petroleum hydrocarbon exceedances in groundwater are presented in Exhibit 6. Complete
groundwater petroleum hydrocarbon results are presented in Table C4.
VOCs
One groundwater sample exceeded the Residential TGC VISL for vinyl chloride. The
reported vinyl chloride concentration was a J-flagged estimated value approximately one
order of magnitude below the MCL.
No other groundwater sample exceeded a screening level for any VOC.
Complete groundwater VOC results are presented in Table C4.
6.3 Soil Gas Sample Results
Explosive Gases and Hydrogen Sulfide
All soil gas samples were well below 10% of OSHA LELs for methane, ethane, and ethene.
Soil gas field analysis results did not detect hydrogen sulfide at a detection limit that was
approximately one order of magnitude below the OSHA the PEL and three orders of
magnitude below the LEL.
VOCs
Five soil gas samples exceeded the Residential TSSNSGC VISL for benzene.
Phase II Environmental Site Assessment
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking Spanish Fork, Utah
Terracon Project 61227186 Task 3.3 January 6, 2023
26
No other soil gas sample exceeded a Residential or Industrial TSSNSGC VISL for any
VOC.
VOC exceedances in soil gas are presented in Exhibit 7. Complete soil gas results are presented
in Table C5.
7.0 CONCLUSION
Based on the combined results of this investigation and the previous investigations, the nature
and extent of metals, petroleum hydrocarbon, and VOC contamination in soil, dissolved metals,
petroleum hydrocarbons, and VOC contamination in groundwater, and explosive gases and VOC
contamination in soil gas at the site have been fully characterized and defined. Findings from
previous investigations and this investigation are fully detailed in Section 1.2, Section 4, and
Section 6. Recommendations for remedial action described below are based on the proposed
residential land use at the site.
Soil
Landfill debris is present in soils throughout the western portion of the site. The full
vertical extent of landfill debris could not be determined by the current investigation
due to the presence of shallow groundwater, but previous investigations have reported
landfill debris at depths of up to 11 feet bgs. Excavation and off-site disposal of landfill
debris may be required prior to redevelopment of the site. The shallow groundwater
table in the portion of the site containing landfill debris would likely necessitate
dewatering concurrent with landfill debris excavation.
Lead in soil exceeded the Residential RSL in surface soil at one location at the site
located near the former car crusher (Exhibit 2 and Exhibit 3). Previous investigations
also documented exceedances of the Residential RSL for lead at this location. Lead
contamination at the site appears to occupy a limited area near the former car crusher
and could be addressed through a focused and limited remedial action to excavate the
impacted soils.
Arsenic in soil exceeds the Residential and/or Industrial RSL throughout the site.
However, the maximum observed soil arsenic concentration was 11.3 mg/kg which is
consistent with naturally occurring concentrations of arsenic in soil in the Wasatch
Front area. Remedial action to address arsenic in soil does not appear to be
warranted.
Concentrations of hexavalent chromium in soil exceed the Residential RSL in surface
and near-surface soils at three locations. Hexavalent chromium contamination at the
site does not appear to be widespread and could be addressed through a focused and
Phase II Environmental Site Assessment
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking Spanish Fork, Utah
Terracon Project 61227186 Task 3.3 January 6, 2023
27
limited remedial action to excavate the impacted soils. Further, because hexavalent
chromium data in soil is frequently inconsistent, re-sampling the locations that
exceeded the Residential RSL for should be considered prior to undertaking a
remedial action to address hexavalent chromium in soil.
Low concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons are present in surface and near-
surface soils throughout the site at concentrations below ISLs that do not warrant
remedial action. Petroleum hydrocarbons are present in soils that exceed Tier 1
screening levels at one location and ISLs at three additional locations. Petroleum
hydrocarbon contamination at these select locations that exceed screening levels
could be addressed through a focused and limited remedial action to excavate the
impacted soils.
Soil is not impacted by VOCs.
Groundwater
Previous investigations have documented that groundwater flow is to the west-
northwest.
Groundwater throughout the site is impacted by arsenic above the MCL, but these
impacts appear to be naturally-derived and remedial action should not be required to
address arsenic in groundwater.
Hexavalent chromium is present in groundwater above the Tapwater RSL at one
location (Exhibit 5). However, the hexavalent chromium concentration at this location
was slightly above laboratory detection limits and could be an anomalous value.
Because of the low concentrations present, limited extent (one sample location), and
that groundwater at this site will not be developed as a drinking water source, remedial
action should not be required to address hexavalent chromium in groundwater. If
remedial action is contemplated, the location that exceeded the Tapwater RSL for
hexavalent chromium in groundwater should be re-sampled prior to undertaking a
remedial action.
Groundwater does not appear to be impacted above MCLs by any other metals.
Previous investigations have indicated that metals impacts may be present in
groundwater upgradient of the site, but no evidence of this was observed in the current
investigation.
Petroleum hydrocarbons are present in groundwater throughout the site at
concentrations below ISLs. One groundwater sample slightly exceeded the DERR ISL
for TPH-DRO, but this sample was located in an area with landfill debris and could
possibly be associated with non-petroleum oils that can report in the diesel range.
Phase II Environmental Site Assessment
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking Spanish Fork, Utah
Terracon Project 61227186 Task 3.3 January 6, 2023
28
Benzene is present in groundwater throughout the site at concentrations that are below
the ISL, MCL, and the Residential TGC VISL. However, while these concentrations of
benzene are below all groundwater screening levels, they appear to be creating
benzene impacts in soil gas above the Residential TSSNSGC VISL. Remedial action
to address benzene in groundwater may be warranted to address benzene impacts in
soil gas but may not be economical compared to installation of vapor mitigation
systems (VMS) in the proposed structures.
Vinyl chloride was detected at one location above the Residential TGC VISL but below
the MCL. Vinyl chloride was not detected at any other sample location and no other
related chlorinated solvents (e.g., tetrachloroethene, trichloroethene, or cis-1,2-
dichloroethene) were detected in any groundwater sample. Given the low
concentration (a J-flagged estimated concentration one order of magnitude below the
MCL), and that vinyl chloride was not detected in any other groundwater sample or in
soil gas, remedial action to address vinyl chloride in groundwater does not appear to
be warranted.
Soil Gas
Soil gas is not impacted by hydrogen sulfide, methane, ethane, or ethene at
concentrations that are likely to create an explosion hazard in future on-site buildings.
Excavation and off-site disposal of landfill debris would further reduce this potential
hazard. Other than excavation of landfill debris, remedial action to address hydrogen
sulfide, methane, ethane, or ethene in soil gas is not warranted.
Soil gas is impacted by benzene at multiple locations above the Residential TSSNSGC
VISL. This is consistent with the benzene groundwater results as described above.
Mitigation (i.e., VMS) may be a more economical method to address benzene impacts
in soil gas than remediation of benzene in groundwater and will be assessed in the
Analysis of Brownfields Cleanup Alternatives (ABCA).
Phase II Environmental Site Assessment
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking Spanish Fork, Utah
Terracon Project 61227186 Task 3.3 January 6, 2023
29
8.0 REFERENCES
IHI Environmental (IHI) 2007a. PHASE II SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION REPORT, Anderson
Auto Wrecking, 2890 South State Street, Springville, Utah. July 31, 2007.
IHI Environmental (IHI) 2007b. PHASE II SUPPLEMENTAL SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION
REPORT, Anderson Auto Wrecking, 2890 South State Street, Springville, Utah.October 24,
2007.
Terracon 2022a. Community-Wide Quality Assurance Project Plan, Spanish Fork City Brownfields
Assessments, EPA Cooperative Agreement No. 95811800, Spanish Fork City, Utah.May 9, 2022.
Terracon 2022b. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Former Anderson Auto Wrecking
2890 South State Street Spanish Fork City, Utah County, Utah.July 22, 2022.
Terracon 2022c. Sampling and Analysis Plan, Former Anderson Auto Wrecking, 2890 South State
Street and 1215 North SR 51, Spanish Fork City, Utah County, Utah.November 8, 2022.
Utah Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Environmental Response and
Remediation (DERR) 2021.SITE INSPECTION ANALYTICAL RESULTS REPORT, Anderson
Auto Wrecking Company, Utah County, Utah, UTN000802773. November 2021.
APPENDIX A
Exhibits
APPENDIX B
Soil Boring Logs
APPENDIX C
Data Summary Tables
Ta
b
l
e

C
1

-

M
e
t
a
l
s

i
n

S
o
i
l
Fo
r
m
e
r

A
n
d
e
r
s
o
n

A
u
t
o

W
r
e
c
k
i
n
g

-

2
8
9
0

S
o
u
t
h

S
t
a
t
e

S
t
r
e
e
t

a
n
d

1
2
1
5

N
o
r
t
h

S
R

5
1
,

S
p
a
n
i
s
h

F
o
r
k

C
i
t
y
,

U
t
a
h

C
o
u
n
t
y
,

U
t
a
h
Te
r
r
a
c
o
n

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
o
.

6
1
2
2
7
1
8
6

T
a
s
k

3
.
3
An
a
l
y
t
e
CA
S
Me
t
h
o
d

U
n
i
t
s
RS
L
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
RS
L
In
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
Re
s
u
l
t

Q
MD
L
RD
L

R
e
s
u
l
t

Q
MD
L
RD
L
Re
s
u
l
t

Q

M
D
L
RD
L
Re
s
u
l
t

Q
MD
L
RD
L
AR
S
E
N
I
C
74
4
0
-
3
8
-
2

6
0
1
0
B

m
g
/
k
g
0.
7
3
1.
9
4
J
0.
6
1
8
2.
3
9
1.
8
8
J
0.
7
7
2.
9
7
4.
4
1
0.
7
0
8
2.
7
3
2.
6
5
0.
6
5
2
2.
5
2
BA
R
I
U
M
74
4
0
-
3
9
-
3

6
0
1
0
B

m
g
/
k
g
15
,
0
0
0
22
0
,
0
0
0
10
7
0.
1
0
2

0
.
5
9
7
27
3
0.
1
2
7
0.
7
4
3
21
7
0.
1
1
6

0
.
6
8
3
29
9
0.
1
0
7

0
.
6
2
9
CA
D
M
I
U
M
74
4
0
-
4
3
-
9

6
0
1
0
B

m
g
/
k
g
7.
1
11
1
0.
5
6
J

0
.
0
5
6
2

0
.
5
9
7
0.
4
5
3
J
0.
0
7
0.
7
4
3
3.
6
6
0.
0
6
4
3

0
.
6
8
3
0.
4
6
J

0
.
0
5
9
3

0
.
6
2
9
CH
R
O
M
I
U
M
74
4
0
-
4
7
-
3

6
0
1
0
B

m
g
/
k
g
NE
NE
11
.
3
0.
1
5
9
1.
1
9
22
.
3
0.
1
9
8
1.
4
9
29
.
7
0.
1
8
2
1.
3
7
17
.
4
0.
1
6
7
1.
2
6
HE
X
A
V
A
L
E
N
T

C
H
R
O
M
I
U
M
18
5
4
0
-
2
9
-
9

7
1
9
9

m
g
/
k
g
0.
3
6.
3
<1
.
1
9
0.
3
0
4
1.
1
9
<1
.
4
9
0.
3
7
9
1.
4
9
<1
.
3
7
0.
3
4
8
1.
3
7
<1
.
2
6
0.
3
2
1
1.
2
6
LE
A
D
74
3
9
-
9
2
-
1

6
0
1
0
B

m
g
/
k
g
40
0
80
0
17
.
4
0.
2
4
8

0
.
5
9
7
23
.
4
0.
3
0
9
0.
7
4
3
10
6
0.
2
8
4

0
.
6
8
3
6.
5
2
0.
2
6
2

0
.
6
2
9
ME
R
C
U
R
Y
74
3
9
-
9
7
-
6

7
4
7
1
A

m
g
/
k
g
11
46
<0
.
0
4
7
7
0.
0
2
1
5

0
.
0
4
7
7

<
0
.
0
5
9
4
0.
0
2
6
7

0
.
0
5
9
4
0.
0
3
9
6
J

0
.
0
2
4
6

0
.
0
5
4
6

<
0
.
0
5
0
3
0.
0
2
2
7

0
.
0
5
0
3
SE
L
E
N
I
U
M
77
8
2
-
4
9
-
2

6
0
1
0
B

m
g
/
k
g
39
0
5,
8
0
0
<2
.
3
9
0.
9
1
2
2.
3
9
<2
.
9
7
1.
1
3
2.
9
7

<
2
.
7
3
1.
0
4
2.
7
3
<2
.
5
2
0.
9
6
2
2.
5
2
SI
L
V
E
R
74
4
0
-
2
2
-
4

6
0
1
0
B

m
g
/
k
g
39
0
5,
8
0
0
<1
.
1
9
0.
1
5
2
1.
1
9
<1
.
4
9
0.
1
8
9
1.
4
9
0.
1
9
3
J

0
.
1
7
3
1.
3
7
<1
.
2
6
0.
1
6
1.
2
6
Qu
a
l
i
f
i
e
r
s

(
Q
)
:
mg
/
k
g
:
Mi
l
l
i
g
r
a
m
s

p
e
r

k
i
l
o
g
r
a
m
.
<
:
L
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
e
p
o
r
t
e
d

D
e
t
e
c
t
i
o
n

L
i
m
i
t

(
R
D
L
)
.
Bo
l
d
v
a
l
u
e

e
x
c
e
e
d
s

M
e
t
h
o
d

D
e
t
e
c
t
i
o
n

L
i
m
i
t

(
M
D
L
)
.
N
E
-

N
o
t

E
s
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
e
d
Co
l
o
r

s
h
a
d
e
d

v
a
l
u
e

e
x
c
e
e
d
s

s
c
r
e
e
n
i
n
g

l
e
v
e
l
.
J -

T
h
e

i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n

o
f

t
h
e

a
n
a
l
y
t
e

i
s

a
c
c
e
p
t
a
b
l
e
;

t
h
e

r
e
p
o
r
t
e
d

v
a
l
u
e

i
s

a
n

e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
.
J3
:

T
h
e

a
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
d

b
a
t
c
h

Q
C

w
a
s

o
u
t
s
i
d
e

t
h
e

e
s
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
e
d

q
u
a
l
i
t
y

c
o
n
t
r
o
l

r
a
n
g
e

f
o
r
pr
e
c
i
s
i
o
n
.
J6
-

T
h
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

m
a
t
r
i
x

i
n
t
e
r
f
e
r
e
d

w
i
t
h

t
h
e

a
b
i
l
i
t
y

t
o

m
a
k
e

a
n
y

a
c
c
u
r
a
t
e
de
t
e
r
m
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
;

s
p
i
k
e

v
a
l
u
e

i
s

l
o
w
.
O1
-

T
h
e

a
n
a
l
y
t
e

f
a
i
l
e
d

t
h
e

m
e
t
h
o
d

r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d

s
e
r
i
a
l

d
i
l
u
t
i
o
n

t
e
s
t

a
n
d
/
o
r

s
u
b
s
e
q
u
e
n
t
po
s
t
-
s
p
i
k
e

c
r
i
t
e
r
i
a
.

T
h
e
s
e

f
a
i
l
u
r
e
s

i
n
d
i
c
a
t
e

m
a
t
r
i
x

i
n
t
e
r
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
.
Bl
u
e

i
t
a
l
i
c
i
z
e
d

n
o
n
-
d
e
t
e
c
t

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

(
e
.
g
.
,
<0
.
0
1
0
0
)
e
x
c
e
e
d

o
n
e

o
r

m
o
r
e

o
f

t
h
e
sc
r
e
e
n
i
n
g

l
e
v
e
l
s
.
La
b

S
a
m
p
l
e

I
D
Cl
i
e
n
t

S
a
m
p
l
e

I
D
Da
t
e

C
o
l
l
e
c
t
e
d
L1
5
5
8
0
2
6
-
0
1
11
/
1
1
/
2
0
2
2
11
/
1
0
/
2
0
2
2
L1
5
5
8
0
2
6
-
0
4
B-
1

@

S
U
R
F
A
C
E
B-
1

@

5
'
B-
2

@

S
U
R
F
A
C
E
B-
2

@

5
'
L1
5
5
8
0
2
6
-
0
3
11
/
1
1
/
2
0
2
2
11
/
1
0
/
2
0
2
2
EP
A

R
S
L
:
En
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l

P
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n

A
g
e
n
c
y

R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l

S
c
r
e
e
n
i
n
g

L
e
v
e
l
s

f
o
r

s
o
i
l

a
t
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l

(
R
e
s
.
)

a
n
d

i
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l

(
I
n
d
.
)

p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s

(
M
a
y

2
0
2
2
;

T
R
=
1
E
-
0
6
;

T
H
Q
=
1
.
0
)
.
L1
5
5
8
0
2
6
-
0
2
Pa
g
e

1

o
f

1
0
Table C1 - Metals in Soil
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking - 2890 South State Street and 1215 North SR 51, Spanish Fork City, Utah County, Utah
Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.3
Analyte CAS Method Units
RSL
Residential
RSL
Industrial
ARSENIC 7440-38-2 6010B mg/kg 0.7 3
BARIUM 7440-39-3 6010B mg/kg 15,000 220,000
CADMIUM 7440-43-9 6010B mg/kg 7.1 111
CHROMIUM 7440-47-3 6010B mg/kg NE NE
HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM18540-29-9 7199 mg/kg 0.3 6.3
LEAD 7439-92-1 6010B mg/kg 400 800
MERCURY 7439-97-6 7471A mg/kg 11 46
SELENIUM 7782-49-2 6010B mg/kg 390 5,800
SILVER 7440-22-4 6010B mg/kg 390 5,800
Qualifiers (Q):
mg/kg:Milligrams per kilogram. <: Less than Reported Detection Limit (RDL).
Bold value exceeds Method Detection Limit (MDL). NE - Not Established
Color shaded value exceeds screening level.
J - The identification of the analyte is acceptable; the reported value is an estimate.
J3: The associated batch QC was outside the established quality control range for
precision.
J6 - The sample matrix interfered with the ability to make any accurate
determination; spike value is low.
O1 - The analyte failed the method required serial dilution test and/or subsequent
post-spike criteria. These failures indicate matrix interference.
Blue italicized non-detect results (e.g.,<0.0100 ) exceed one or more of the
screening levels.
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
Date Collected
EPA RSL:Environmental Protection Agency Regional Screening Levels for soil at
residential (Res.) and industrial (Ind.) properties (May 2022; TR=1E-06; THQ=1.0).
Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL
2.84 0.673 2.6 6.75 0.588 2.27 2.99 0.639 2.47 5.27 0.578 2.23
184 0.111 0.649 247 0.0968 0.568 245 0.105 0.617 163 0.0951 0.558
1.2 0.0612 0.649 0.426 J 0.0535 0.568 1.37 0.0581 0.617 0.525 J 0.0526 0.558
22.1 O1 0.173 1.3 15.5 0.151 1.14 27.5 0.164 1.23 19.2 0.148 1.12
<1.30 J6 0.331 1.3 <1.14 0.29 1.14 <1.23 0.315 1.23 <1.12 0.285 1.12
54.9 0.27 0.649 6.28 0.236 0.568 102 0.257 0.617 8.11 0.232 0.558
0.0397 J 0.0234 0.0519 <0.0454 0.0204 0.0454 <0.0494 0.0222 0.0494 <0.0446 0.0201 0.0446
<2.60 0.992 2.6 1.39 J 0.868 2.27 1.43 J 0.943 2.47 0.97 J 0.853 2.23
<1.30 0.165 1.3 <1.14 0.144 1.14 <1.23 0.157 1.23 <1.12 0.142 1.12
B-4 @ 3'
11/11/2022 11/11/2022 11/10/2022
L1558026-08
11/10/2022
L1558026-05 L1558026-06 L1558026-07
B-3 @ SURFACE B-3 @ 4'B-4 @ SURFACE
Page 2 of 10
Table C1 - Metals in Soil
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking - 2890 South State Street and 1215 North SR 51, Spanish Fork City, Utah County, Utah
Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.3
Analyte CAS Method Units
RSL
Residential
RSL
Industrial
ARSENIC 7440-38-2 6010B mg/kg 0.7 3
BARIUM 7440-39-3 6010B mg/kg 15,000 220,000
CADMIUM 7440-43-9 6010B mg/kg 7.1 111
CHROMIUM 7440-47-3 6010B mg/kg NE NE
HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM18540-29-9 7199 mg/kg 0.3 6.3
LEAD 7439-92-1 6010B mg/kg 400 800
MERCURY 7439-97-6 7471A mg/kg 11 46
SELENIUM 7782-49-2 6010B mg/kg 390 5,800
SILVER 7440-22-4 6010B mg/kg 390 5,800
Qualifiers (Q):
mg/kg:Milligrams per kilogram. <: Less than Reported Detection Limit (RDL).
Bold value exceeds Method Detection Limit (MDL). NE - Not Established
Color shaded value exceeds screening level.
J - The identification of the analyte is acceptable; the reported value is an estimate.
J3: The associated batch QC was outside the established quality control range for
precision.
J6 - The sample matrix interfered with the ability to make any accurate
determination; spike value is low.
O1 - The analyte failed the method required serial dilution test and/or subsequent
post-spike criteria. These failures indicate matrix interference.
Blue italicized non-detect results (e.g.,<0.0100 ) exceed one or more of the
screening levels.
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
Date Collected
EPA RSL:Environmental Protection Agency Regional Screening Levels for soil at
residential (Res.) and industrial (Ind.) properties (May 2022; TR=1E-06; THQ=1.0).
Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL
4.36 0.664 2.56 4.55 0.668 2.58 3.11 0.537 2.07 3.74 0.656 2.53
252 0.109 0.641 249 0.11 0.645 38.6 0.0884 0.519 144 0.108 0.633
0.68 0.0604 0.641 0.795 0.0607 0.645 0.304 J 0.0489 0.519 0.522 J 0.0596 0.633
17.2 0.17 1.28 19.4 0.171 1.29 6.78 0.138 1.04 22.6 0.168 1.27
<1.28 0.327 1.28 <1.29 0.329 1.29 0.43 J 0.265 1.04 <1.27 0.323 1.27
31.3 0.267 0.641 26.3 0.268 0.645 9.05 0.216 0.519 10.2 0.263 0.633
<0.0513 0.0231 0.0513 <0.0516 0.0232 0.0516 <0.0415 0.0187 0.0415 <0.0506 0.0228 0.0506
<2.56 0.979 2.56 <2.58 0.985 2.58 1.54 J 0.793 2.07 <2.53 0.967 2.53
<1.28 0.163 1.28 <1.29 0.164 1.29 <1.04 0.132 1.04 <1.27 0.161 1.27
L1558026-11 L1558026-12
11/09/2022 11/09/2022
L1558026-09 L1558026-10
B-5 @ 3'B-5 @ SURFACE B-6 @ SURFACE B-6 @ 19'
11/10/2022 11/10/2022
Page 3 of 10
Table C1 - Metals in Soil
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking - 2890 South State Street and 1215 North SR 51, Spanish Fork City, Utah County, Utah
Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.3
Analyte CAS Method Units
RSL
Residential
RSL
Industrial
ARSENIC 7440-38-2 6010B mg/kg 0.7 3
BARIUM 7440-39-3 6010B mg/kg 15,000 220,000
CADMIUM 7440-43-9 6010B mg/kg 7.1 111
CHROMIUM 7440-47-3 6010B mg/kg NE NE
HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM18540-29-9 7199 mg/kg 0.3 6.3
LEAD 7439-92-1 6010B mg/kg 400 800
MERCURY 7439-97-6 7471A mg/kg 11 46
SELENIUM 7782-49-2 6010B mg/kg 390 5,800
SILVER 7440-22-4 6010B mg/kg 390 5,800
Qualifiers (Q):
mg/kg:Milligrams per kilogram. <: Less than Reported Detection Limit (RDL).
Bold value exceeds Method Detection Limit (MDL). NE - Not Established
Color shaded value exceeds screening level.
J - The identification of the analyte is acceptable; the reported value is an estimate.
J3: The associated batch QC was outside the established quality control range for
precision.
J6 - The sample matrix interfered with the ability to make any accurate
determination; spike value is low.
O1 - The analyte failed the method required serial dilution test and/or subsequent
post-spike criteria. These failures indicate matrix interference.
Blue italicized non-detect results (e.g.,<0.0100 ) exceed one or more of the
screening levels.
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
Date Collected
EPA RSL:Environmental Protection Agency Regional Screening Levels for soil at
residential (Res.) and industrial (Ind.) properties (May 2022; TR=1E-06; THQ=1.0).
Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL
2.95 0.645 2.49 13.8 0.629 2.43 2.35 J 0.649 2.51 2.31 J 0.663 2.56
409 0.106 0.623 243 0.103 0.607 243 0.107 0.626 265 0.109 0.64
0.669 0.0586 0.623 0.582 J 0.0572 0.607 0.684 0.059 0.626 0.544 J 0.0603 0.64
20.2 0.166 1.25 21.3 0.162 1.21 18.6 0.167 1.25 18.5 0.17 1.28
<1.25 0.318 1.25 <1.21 0.31 1.21 <1.25 0.32 1.25 <1.28 0.326 1.28
30.4 0.259 0.623 7.04 0.253 0.607 57.1 0.261 0.626 12.9 0.266 0.64
<0.0498 0.0224 0.0498 <0.0486 0.0219 0.0486 <0.0501 0.0226 0.0501 <0.0512 0.023 0.0512
1.29 J 0.951 2.49 <2.43 0.928 2.43 1.19 J 0.957 2.51 1.81 J 0.977 2.56
<1.25 0.158 1.25 <1.21 0.154 1.21 <1.25 0.159 1.25 <1.28 0.162 1.28
L1558026-16
B-8 @ 3'
11/10/2022
B-7 @ 7'B-8 @ SURFACE
11/11/2022
L1558026-14 L1558026-15
11/11/2022 11/10/2022
L1558026-13
B-7 @ SURFACE
Page 4 of 10
Table C1 - Metals in Soil
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking - 2890 South State Street and 1215 North SR 51, Spanish Fork City, Utah County, Utah
Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.3
Analyte CAS Method Units
RSL
Residential
RSL
Industrial
ARSENIC 7440-38-2 6010B mg/kg 0.7 3
BARIUM 7440-39-3 6010B mg/kg 15,000 220,000
CADMIUM 7440-43-9 6010B mg/kg 7.1 111
CHROMIUM 7440-47-3 6010B mg/kg NE NE
HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM18540-29-9 7199 mg/kg 0.3 6.3
LEAD 7439-92-1 6010B mg/kg 400 800
MERCURY 7439-97-6 7471A mg/kg 11 46
SELENIUM 7782-49-2 6010B mg/kg 390 5,800
SILVER 7440-22-4 6010B mg/kg 390 5,800
Qualifiers (Q):
mg/kg:Milligrams per kilogram. <: Less than Reported Detection Limit (RDL).
Bold value exceeds Method Detection Limit (MDL). NE - Not Established
Color shaded value exceeds screening level.
J - The identification of the analyte is acceptable; the reported value is an estimate.
J3: The associated batch QC was outside the established quality control range for
precision.
J6 - The sample matrix interfered with the ability to make any accurate
determination; spike value is low.
O1 - The analyte failed the method required serial dilution test and/or subsequent
post-spike criteria. These failures indicate matrix interference.
Blue italicized non-detect results (e.g.,<0.0100 ) exceed one or more of the
screening levels.
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
Date Collected
EPA RSL:Environmental Protection Agency Regional Screening Levels for soil at
residential (Res.) and industrial (Ind.) properties (May 2022; TR=1E-06; THQ=1.0).
Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL
3.1 0.582 2.25 2.81 0.593 2.29 2.53 J 0.7 2.7 6.9 0.689 2.66
114 0.0958 0.562 95.1 0.0976 0.573 281 0.115 0.675 288 0.113 0.665
0.514 J 0.053 0.562 0.445 J 0.0539 0.573 1.09 0.0636 0.675 0.756 0.0626 0.665
16.1 0.15 1.12 13.5 0.152 1.15 19.6 0.18 1.35 23.7 0.177 1.33
0.356 J 0.287 1.12 0.472 J 0.292 1.15 <1.35 0.344 1.35 <1.33 0.339 1.33
15.2 0.234 0.562 13 0.238 0.573 17.4 0.281 0.675 16 0.277 0.665
<0.0450 0.0202 0.045 <0.0458 0.0206 0.0458 <0.0540 0.0243 0.054 0.0244 J 0.0239 0.0532
<2.25 0.859 2.25 <2.29 0.875 2.29 1.12 J 1.03 2.7 1.63 J 1.02 2.66
<1.12 0.143 1.12 <1.15 0.145 1.15 <1.35 0.172 1.35 <1.33 0.169 1.33
L1558026-19
B-9 @ 2'B-10 @ SURFACE
L1558026-17
B-9 @ SURFACE
L1558026-18
11/09/2022 11/09/2022 11/11/2022
L1558026-20
B-10 @ 5'
11/11/2022
Page 5 of 10
Table C1 - Metals in Soil
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking - 2890 South State Street and 1215 North SR 51, Spanish Fork City, Utah County, Utah
Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.3
Analyte CAS Method Units
RSL
Residential
RSL
Industrial
ARSENIC 7440-38-2 6010B mg/kg 0.7 3
BARIUM 7440-39-3 6010B mg/kg 15,000 220,000
CADMIUM 7440-43-9 6010B mg/kg 7.1 111
CHROMIUM 7440-47-3 6010B mg/kg NE NE
HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM18540-29-9 7199 mg/kg 0.3 6.3
LEAD 7439-92-1 6010B mg/kg 400 800
MERCURY 7439-97-6 7471A mg/kg 11 46
SELENIUM 7782-49-2 6010B mg/kg 390 5,800
SILVER 7440-22-4 6010B mg/kg 390 5,800
Qualifiers (Q):
mg/kg:Milligrams per kilogram. <: Less than Reported Detection Limit (RDL).
Bold value exceeds Method Detection Limit (MDL). NE - Not Established
Color shaded value exceeds screening level.
J - The identification of the analyte is acceptable; the reported value is an estimate.
J3: The associated batch QC was outside the established quality control range for
precision.
J6 - The sample matrix interfered with the ability to make any accurate
determination; spike value is low.
O1 - The analyte failed the method required serial dilution test and/or subsequent
post-spike criteria. These failures indicate matrix interference.
Blue italicized non-detect results (e.g.,<0.0100 ) exceed one or more of the
screening levels.
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
Date Collected
EPA RSL:Environmental Protection Agency Regional Screening Levels for soil at
residential (Res.) and industrial (Ind.) properties (May 2022; TR=1E-06; THQ=1.0).
Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL
2.43 J 0.634 2.45 7.95 0.637 2.46 4.61 0.688 2.66 10.2 0.63 2.43
184 0.104 0.612 350 0.105 0.615 486 0.113 0.665 216 0.104 0.608
3.79 0.0576 0.612 0.212 J 0.0579 0.615 5.35 0.0626 0.665 0.492 J 0.0572 0.608
62.2 0.163 1.22 9.21 0.164 1.23 55.2 0.177 1.33 21.7 0.162 1.22
<1.22 0.312 1.22 <1.23 0.314 1.23 <1.33 0.339 1.33 <1.22 0.31 1.22
205 0.254 0.612 4.34 0.256 0.615 542 0.276 0.665 10.9 0.253 0.608
0.0658 0.022 0.0489 <0.0492 0.0221 0.0492 0.0959 0.0239 0.0532 <0.0486 0.0219 0.0486
<2.45 0.935 2.45 <2.46 0.939 2.46 <2.66 1.02 2.66 <2.43 0.929 2.43
0.532 J 0.155 1.22 <1.23 0.156 1.23 8.55 0.169 1.33 <1.22 0.154 1.22
11/11/2022 11/11/2022
B-12 @ SURFACE B-12 @ 1'
L1558026-40 L1558026-41L1558026-22
B-11 @ 6'
11/11/2022
L1558026-21
B-11 @ SURFACE
11/11/2022
Page 6 of 10
Table C1 - Metals in Soil
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking - 2890 South State Street and 1215 North SR 51, Spanish Fork City, Utah County, Utah
Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.3
Analyte CAS Method Units
RSL
Residential
RSL
Industrial
ARSENIC 7440-38-2 6010B mg/kg 0.7 3
BARIUM 7440-39-3 6010B mg/kg 15,000 220,000
CADMIUM 7440-43-9 6010B mg/kg 7.1 111
CHROMIUM 7440-47-3 6010B mg/kg NE NE
HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM18540-29-9 7199 mg/kg 0.3 6.3
LEAD 7439-92-1 6010B mg/kg 400 800
MERCURY 7439-97-6 7471A mg/kg 11 46
SELENIUM 7782-49-2 6010B mg/kg 390 5,800
SILVER 7440-22-4 6010B mg/kg 390 5,800
Qualifiers (Q):
mg/kg:Milligrams per kilogram. <: Less than Reported Detection Limit (RDL).
Bold value exceeds Method Detection Limit (MDL). NE - Not Established
Color shaded value exceeds screening level.
J - The identification of the analyte is acceptable; the reported value is an estimate.
J3: The associated batch QC was outside the established quality control range for
precision.
J6 - The sample matrix interfered with the ability to make any accurate
determination; spike value is low.
O1 - The analyte failed the method required serial dilution test and/or subsequent
post-spike criteria. These failures indicate matrix interference.
Blue italicized non-detect results (e.g.,<0.0100 ) exceed one or more of the
screening levels.
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
Date Collected
EPA RSL:Environmental Protection Agency Regional Screening Levels for soil at
residential (Res.) and industrial (Ind.) properties (May 2022; TR=1E-06; THQ=1.0).
Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL
4.05 0.606 2.34 4.84 0.592 2.29 7.42 0.679 2.62 11.3 0.635 2.45
241 0.0997 0.585 233 0.0974 0.572 435 0.112 0.655 168 0.104 0.613
0.612 0.0551 0.585 0.463 J 0.0539 0.572 0.259 J 0.0617 0.655 0.496 J 0.0577 0.613
17.7 0.156 1.17 21.5 0.152 1.14 18.2 0.174 1.31 22.5 0.163 1.23
<1.17 0.298 1.17 <1.14 0.292 1.14 <1.31 0.334 1.31 <1.23 0.312 1.23
45 0.243 0.585 14.7 0.238 0.572 7.7 0.272 0.655 11 0.255 0.613
0.0351 J 0.0211 0.0468 <0.0457 0.0206 0.0457 <0.0524 0.0236 0.0524 <0.0490 0.0221 0.049
<2.34 0.894 2.34 <2.29 0.874 2.29 <2.62 1 2.62 <2.45 0.936 2.45
<1.17 0.149 1.17 <1.14 0.145 1.14 <1.31 0.166 1.31 <1.23 0.156 1.23
B-14 @ 10'
L1558026-45
11/11/2022 11/11/2022 11/09/2022
B-13 @ SURFACE B-13 @ 3'B-14 @ SURFACE
L1558026-42 L1558026-43 L1558026-44
11/09/2022
Page 7 of 10
Table C1 - Metals in Soil
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking - 2890 South State Street and 1215 North SR 51, Spanish Fork City, Utah County, Utah
Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.3
Analyte CAS Method Units
RSL
Residential
RSL
Industrial
ARSENIC 7440-38-2 6010B mg/kg 0.7 3
BARIUM 7440-39-3 6010B mg/kg 15,000 220,000
CADMIUM 7440-43-9 6010B mg/kg 7.1 111
CHROMIUM 7440-47-3 6010B mg/kg NE NE
HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM18540-29-9 7199 mg/kg 0.3 6.3
LEAD 7439-92-1 6010B mg/kg 400 800
MERCURY 7439-97-6 7471A mg/kg 11 46
SELENIUM 7782-49-2 6010B mg/kg 390 5,800
SILVER 7440-22-4 6010B mg/kg 390 5,800
Qualifiers (Q):
mg/kg:Milligrams per kilogram. <: Less than Reported Detection Limit (RDL).
Bold value exceeds Method Detection Limit (MDL). NE - Not Established
Color shaded value exceeds screening level.
J - The identification of the analyte is acceptable; the reported value is an estimate.
J3: The associated batch QC was outside the established quality control range for
precision.
J6 - The sample matrix interfered with the ability to make any accurate
determination; spike value is low.
O1 - The analyte failed the method required serial dilution test and/or subsequent
post-spike criteria. These failures indicate matrix interference.
Blue italicized non-detect results (e.g.,<0.0100 ) exceed one or more of the
screening levels.
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
Date Collected
EPA RSL:Environmental Protection Agency Regional Screening Levels for soil at
residential (Res.) and industrial (Ind.) properties (May 2022; TR=1E-06; THQ=1.0).
Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL
3.97 0.625 2.41 1.88 J 0.649 2.51 6.49 0.624 2.41 4.94 0.581 2.24
219 0.103 0.603 171 0.107 0.626 223 0.103 0.602 182 0.0956 0.561
0.686 0.0568 0.603 0.505 J 0.059 0.626 1.16 0.0567 0.602 0.334 J 0.0528 0.561
122 0.16 1.21 24.8 0.167 1.25 21.3 0.16 1.2 14.2 0.149 1.12
1.52 0.308 1.21 <1.25 0.319 1.25 <1.20 0.307 1.2 <1.12 0.286 1.12
44.4 0.251 0.603 11.6 0.261 0.626 36.9 0.251 0.602 8.16 0.233 0.561
0.0232 J 0.0217 0.0482 <0.0501 0.0226 0.0501 <0.0482 0.0217 0.0482 <0.0449 0.0202 0.0449
<2.41 0.922 2.41 <2.51 0.957 2.51 <2.41 0.92 2.41 <2.24 0.857 2.24
0.265 J 0.153 1.21 <1.25 0.159 1.25 <1.20 0.153 1.2 <1.12 0.142 1.12
11/11/2022
B-15 @ SURFACE B-15 @ 12'B-16 @ SURFACE B-16 @ 1'
11/09/2022 11/11/2022
L1558026-46 L1558026-47 L1558026-48 L1558026-49
11/09/2022
Page 8 of 10
Table C1 - Metals in Soil
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking - 2890 South State Street and 1215 North SR 51, Spanish Fork City, Utah County, Utah
Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.3
Analyte CAS Method Units
RSL
Residential
RSL
Industrial
ARSENIC 7440-38-2 6010B mg/kg 0.7 3
BARIUM 7440-39-3 6010B mg/kg 15,000 220,000
CADMIUM 7440-43-9 6010B mg/kg 7.1 111
CHROMIUM 7440-47-3 6010B mg/kg NE NE
HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM18540-29-9 7199 mg/kg 0.3 6.3
LEAD 7439-92-1 6010B mg/kg 400 800
MERCURY 7439-97-6 7471A mg/kg 11 46
SELENIUM 7782-49-2 6010B mg/kg 390 5,800
SILVER 7440-22-4 6010B mg/kg 390 5,800
Qualifiers (Q):
mg/kg:Milligrams per kilogram. <: Less than Reported Detection Limit (RDL).
Bold value exceeds Method Detection Limit (MDL). NE - Not Established
Color shaded value exceeds screening level.
J - The identification of the analyte is acceptable; the reported value is an estimate.
J3: The associated batch QC was outside the established quality control range for
precision.
J6 - The sample matrix interfered with the ability to make any accurate
determination; spike value is low.
O1 - The analyte failed the method required serial dilution test and/or subsequent
post-spike criteria. These failures indicate matrix interference.
Blue italicized non-detect results (e.g.,<0.0100 ) exceed one or more of the
screening levels.
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
Date Collected
EPA RSL:Environmental Protection Agency Regional Screening Levels for soil at
residential (Res.) and industrial (Ind.) properties (May 2022; TR=1E-06; THQ=1.0).
Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL
5.85 0.683 2.64 1.88 J 0.634 2.45 3.23 0.652 2.52 3.08 0.661 2.55
610 0.112 0.659 146 0.104 0.612 273 0.107 0.629 316 0.109 0.638
0.154 J 0.0621 0.659 0.471 J 0.0577 0.612 0.756 0.0593 0.629 0.399 J 0.0601 0.638
14.9 0.175 1.32 19.3 0.163 1.22 21 0.167 1.26 17.4 0.17 1.28
<1.32 0.336 1.32 <1.22 0.312 1.22 <1.26 0.321 1.26 <1.28 0.325 1.28
6.6 0.274 0.659 10.3 0.255 0.612 41.5 0.262 0.629 14.5 0.265 0.638
<0.0527 0.0237 0.0527 <0.0490 0.022 0.049 <0.0503 0.0227 0.0503 <0.0510 0.023 0.051
<2.64 1.01 2.64 <2.45 0.935 2.45 <2.52 0.962 2.52 <2.55 0.975 2.55
<1.32 0.167 1.32 <1.22 0.155 1.22 <1.26 0.16 1.26 <1.28 0.162 1.28
L1558026-50 L1558026-51 L1558026-52 L1558026-53
B-140 @ SURFACE B-140 @ 10'B-80 @ SURFACE B-80 @ 3'
11/09/2022 11/09/2022 11/10/2022 11/10/2022
Page 9 of 10
Table C1 - Metals in Soil
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking - 2890 South State Street and 1215 North SR 51, Spanish Fork City, Utah County, Utah
Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.3
Analyte CAS Method Units
RSL
Residential
RSL
Industrial
ARSENIC 7440-38-2 6010B mg/kg 0.7 3
BARIUM 7440-39-3 6010B mg/kg 15,000 220,000
CADMIUM 7440-43-9 6010B mg/kg 7.1 111
CHROMIUM 7440-47-3 6010B mg/kg NE NE
HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM18540-29-9 7199 mg/kg 0.3 6.3
LEAD 7439-92-1 6010B mg/kg 400 800
MERCURY 7439-97-6 7471A mg/kg 11 46
SELENIUM 7782-49-2 6010B mg/kg 390 5,800
SILVER 7440-22-4 6010B mg/kg 390 5,800
Qualifiers (Q):
mg/kg:Milligrams per kilogram. <: Less than Reported Detection Limit (RDL).
Bold value exceeds Method Detection Limit (MDL). NE - Not Established
Color shaded value exceeds screening level.
J - The identification of the analyte is acceptable; the reported value is an estimate.
J3: The associated batch QC was outside the established quality control range for
precision.
J6 - The sample matrix interfered with the ability to make any accurate
determination; spike value is low.
O1 - The analyte failed the method required serial dilution test and/or subsequent
post-spike criteria. These failures indicate matrix interference.
Blue italicized non-detect results (e.g.,<0.0100 ) exceed one or more of the
screening levels.
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
Date Collected
EPA RSL:Environmental Protection Agency Regional Screening Levels for soil at
residential (Res.) and industrial (Ind.) properties (May 2022; TR=1E-06; THQ=1.0).
Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL
1.78 J 0.698 2.7 9.69 0.64 2.47 5.62 0.631 2.44 1.95 J 0.708 2.73
236 0.115 0.674 279 0.105 0.618 168 0.104 0.61 269 0.116 0.683
1.48 0.0635 0.674 0.387 J 0.0582 0.618 1.23 0.0574 0.61 0.461 J 0.0644 0.683
18.2 0.179 1.35 19.4 0.164 1.24 16 0.162 1.22 15.7 0.182 1.37
<1.35 J3 J6 0.344 1.35 <1.24 0.315 1.24 <1.22 0.311 1.22 <1.37 0.348 1.37
38.9 0.28 0.674 10.3 0.257 0.618 29.8 0.254 0.61 31.3 0.284 0.683
0.0312 J 0.0243 0.0539 <0.0494 0.0222 0.0494 <0.0488 0.0219 0.0488 0.0512 J 0.0246 0.0547
<2.70 1.03 2.7 <2.47 0.944 2.47 <2.44 0.931 2.44 <2.73 1.04 2.73
<1.35 0.171 1.35 <1.24 0.157 1.24 <1.22 0.155 1.22 <1.37 0.174 1.37
L1559319-01
ET @ SURFACE
11/15/2022 11/15/2022 11/15/2022 11/15/2022
ET @ 4'WT @ SURFACE WT @ 3'
L1559319-02 L1559319-03 L1559319-04
Page 10 of 10
Table C2 - VOCs and Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soil
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking - 2890 South State Street and 1215 North SR 51, Spanish Fork City, Utah County, Utah
Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.3
Analyte CAS Method Units RSL
Residential
RSL
Industrial ISL Tier 1 Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL
TPH-GRO 8006-61-9 8260B mg/kg NE NE 150 1500 0.282 J 0.218 0.597 1.05 0.272 0.743 0.391 J 0.25 0.683 0.284 J 0.23 0.629 0.636 J J3 0.238 0.649
TPH-DRO 68334-30-5 8015 mg/kg NE NE 500 5000 21.4 0.918 4.77 57.8 1.14 5.94 75.7 1.05 5.46 <5.03 0.968 5.03 54 0.999 5.19
TRPH NE 9071B mg/kg NE NE 1000 10000 80.7 J 39.4 119 147 J 49 149 296 45.1 137 <126 41.5 126 <130 P1 42.9 130
ACETONE 67-64-1 8260B mg/kg 61000 670000 NE NE 0.0747 0.0247 0.0597 0.257 0.0308 0.0743 0.109 0.0283 0.0683 <0.0629 0.0261 0.0629 0.142 J5 0.0269 0.0649
ACRYLONITRILE 107-13-1 8260B mg/kg 0.25 1.1 NE NE <0.0119 0.00241 0.0119 <0.0149 0.003 0.0149 <0.0137 0.00276 0.0137 <0.0126 0.00254 0.0126 <0.0130 J3 J6 0.00262 0.013
BENZENE 71-43-2 8260B mg/kg 1.2 5.1 0.2 0.9 0.00668 0.00045 0.0012 0.0244 0.00056 0.0015 0.0139 0.00051 0.0014 0.0059 0.00047 0.0013 0.024 0.00049 0.0013
BROMOBENZENE 108-86-1 8260B mg/kg 290 1800 NE NE <0.00119 0.00033 0.0012 <0.00149 0.00041 0.0015 <0.00137 0.00038 0.0014 <0.00126 0.00035 0.0013 <0.00130 0.00036 0.0013
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE 75-27-4 8260B mg/kg 0.29 1.3 NE NE <0.00119 0.00087 0.0012 <0.00149 0.00108 0.0015 <0.00137 0.00099 0.0014 <0.00126 0.00091 0.0013 <0.00130 0.00094 0.0013
BROMOFORM 75-25-2 8260B mg/kg 19 86 NE NE <0.00119 0.00051 0.0012 <0.00149 0.00063 0.0015 <0.00137 0.00058 0.0014 <0.00126 0.00053 0.0013 <0.00130 0.00055 0.0013
BROMOMETHANE 74-83-9 8260B mg/kg 6.8 30 NE NE <0.00597 0.0014 0.006 <0.00743 0.00174 0.0074 <0.00683 0.0016 0.0068 <0.00629 0.00147 0.0063 <0.00649 0.00152 0.0065
N-BUTYLBENZENE 104-51-8 8260B mg/kg 3900 58000 NE NE <0.00119 0.00031 0.0012 0.00123 J 0.00038 0.0015 <0.00137 0.00035 0.0014 <0.00126 0.00033 0.0013 0.000343 J V3 0.00034 0.0013
SEC-BUTYLBENZENE 135-98-8 8260B mg/kg 7800 120000 NE NE <0.00119 0.00024 0.0012 0.00135 J 0.0003 0.0015 <0.00137 0.00028 0.0014 <0.00126 0.00025 0.0013 <0.00130 0.00026 0.0013
TERT-BUTYLBENZENE 98-06-6 8260B mg/kg 7800 120000 NE NE <0.00119 0.00025 0.0012 <0.00149 0.00031 0.0015 <0.00137 0.00028 0.0014 <0.00126 0.00026 0.0013 <0.00130 0.00027 0.0013
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 56-23-5 8260B mg/kg 0.65 2.9 NE NE <0.00119 0.0003 0.0012 <0.00149 0.00037 0.0015 <0.00137 0.00034 0.0014 <0.00126 0.00031 0.0013 <0.00130 J5 0.00032 0.0013
CHLOROBENZENE 108-90-7 8260B mg/kg 280 1300 NE NE <0.00119 0.00023 0.0012 <0.00149 0.00029 0.0015 <0.00137 0.00026 0.0014 <0.00126 0.00024 0.0013 <0.00130 0.00025 0.0013
CHLORODIBROMOMETHANE 124-48-1 8260B mg/kg 8.3 39 NE NE <0.00119 0.00027 0.0012 <0.00149 0.00033 0.0015 <0.00137 0.00031 0.0014 <0.00126 0.00028 0.0013 <0.00130 0.00029 0.0013
CHLOROETHANE 75-00-3 8260B mg/kg 14000 57000 NE NE <0.00597 0.00119 0.006 <0.00743 0.00149 0.0074 <0.00683 0.00137 0.0068 <0.00629 0.00126 0.0063 <0.00649 0.0013 0.0065
CHLOROFORM 67-66-3 8260B mg/kg 0.32 1.4 NE NE <0.00597 0.00123 0.006 <0.00743 0.00153 0.0074 <0.00683 0.00141 0.0068 <0.00629 0.0013 0.0063 <0.00649 0.00134 0.0065
CHLOROMETHANE 74-87-3 8260B mg/kg 110 460 NE NE <0.00298 0.00078 0.003 <0.00371 0.00097 0.0037 <0.00342 0.00089 0.0034 <0.00315 0.00082 0.0032 <0.00325 0.00084 0.0033
2-CHLOROTOLUENE 95-49-8 8260B mg/kg 1600 23000 NE NE <0.00119 0.00027 0.0012 <0.00149 0.00033 0.0015 <0.00137 0.00031 0.0014 <0.00126 0.00028 0.0013 <0.00130 0.00029 0.0013
4-CHLOROTOLUENE 106-43-4 8260B mg/kg 1600 23000 NE NE <0.00119 0.00083 0.0012 <0.00149 0.00103 0.0015 <0.00137 0.00094 0.0014 <0.00126 0.00087 0.0013 <0.00130 0.0009 0.0013
1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE 96-12-8 8260B mg/kg 0.0053 0.064 NE NE <0.00597 0.00227 0.006 <0.00743 0.00282 0.0074 <0.00683 0.0026 0.0068 <0.00629 0.00239 0.0063 <0.00649 J5 0.00247 0.0065
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE 106-93-4 8260B mg/kg 0.036 0.16 NE NE <0.00119 0.0003 0.0012 <0.00149 0.00037 0.0015 <0.00137 0.00034 0.0014 <0.00126 0.00032 0.0013 <0.00130 0.00033 0.0013
DIBROMOMETHANE 74-95-3 8260B mg/kg 24 99 NE NE <0.00119 0.00042 0.0012 <0.00149 0.00052 0.0015 <0.00137 0.00048 0.0014 <0.00126 0.00044 0.0013 <0.00130 0.00046 0.0013
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 95-50-1 8260B mg/kg 1800 9300 NE NE <0.00119 0.00051 0.0012 0.00145 J 0.00063 0.0015 <0.00137 0.00058 0.0014 <0.00126 0.00054 0.0013 <0.00130 0.00055 0.0013
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 541-73-1 8260B mg/kg NE NE NE NE <0.00119 0.00072 0.0012 <0.00149 0.00089 0.0015 <0.00137 0.00082 0.0014 <0.00126 0.00076 0.0013 <0.00130 0.00078 0.0013
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 106-46-7 8260B mg/kg 2.6 11 NE NE <0.00119 0.00099 0.0012 0.00721 0.00123 0.0015 <0.00137 0.00113 0.0014 <0.00126 0.00104 0.0013 <0.00130 0.00108 0.0013
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE 75-71-8 8260B mg/kg 87 370 NE NE <0.00597 0.00034 0.006 <0.00743 0.00043 0.0074 <0.00683 0.00039 0.0068 <0.00629 0.00036 0.0063 <0.00649 J5 0.00037 0.0065
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE 75-34-3 8260B mg/kg 3.6 16 NE NE <0.00119 0.00032 0.0012 <0.00149 0.0004 0.0015 <0.00137 0.00037 0.0014 <0.00126 0.00034 0.0013 <0.00130 J5 0.00035 0.0013
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE 107-06-2 8260B mg/kg 0.46 2 NE NE <0.00119 0.00054 0.0012 <0.00149 0.00067 0.0015 <0.00137 0.00062 0.0014 <0.00126 0.00057 0.0013 <0.00130 0.00058 0.0013
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE 75-35-4 8260B mg/kg 230 1000 NE NE <0.00119 0.00042 0.0012 <0.00149 0.00053 0.0015 <0.00137 0.00049 0.0014 <0.00126 0.00045 0.0013 <0.00130 0.00046 0.0013
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 156-59-2 8260B mg/kg 160 2300 NE NE <0.00119 0.00057 0.0012 <0.00149 0.00071 0.0015 <0.00137 0.00065 0.0014 <0.00126 0.0006 0.0013 <0.00130 0.00062 0.0013
TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 156-60-5 8260B mg/kg 70 300 NE NE <0.00119 0.0006 0.0012 <0.00149 0.00074 0.0015 <0.00137 0.00068 0.0014 <0.00126 0.00063 0.0013 <0.00130 0.00065 0.0013
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 78-87-5 8260B mg/kg 2.5 11 NE NE <0.00119 0.0002 0.0012 <0.00149 0.00024 0.0015 <0.00137 0.00022 0.0014 <0.00126 0.00021 0.0013 <0.00130 0.00021 0.0013
1,1-DICHLOROPROPENE 563-58-6 8260B mg/kg NE NE NE NE <0.00119 0.00045 0.0012 <0.00149 0.00056 0.0015 <0.00137 0.00051 0.0014 <0.00126 0.00047 0.0013 <0.00130 0.00049 0.0013
1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE 142-28-9 8260B mg/kg 1600 23000 NE NE <0.00119 0.00027 0.0012 <0.00149 0.00033 0.0015 <0.00137 0.00031 0.0014 <0.00126 0.00028 0.0013 <0.00130 0.00029 0.0013
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 10061-01-5 8260B mg/kg NE NE NE NE <0.00119 0.00051 0.0012 <0.00149 0.00063 0.0015 <0.00137 0.00058 0.0014 <0.00126 0.00054 0.0013 <0.00130 0.00055 0.0013
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 10061-02-6 8260B mg/kg NE NE NE NE <0.00119 0.00081 0.0012 <0.00149 0.001 0.0015 <0.00137 0.00092 0.0014 <0.00126 0.00085 0.0013 <0.00130 0.00088 0.0013
2,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 594-20-7 8260B mg/kg NE NE NE NE <0.00119 0.00045 0.0012 <0.00149 0.00056 0.0015 <0.00137 0.00051 0.0014 <0.00126 0.00047 0.0013 <0.00130 J5 0.00049 0.0013
DI-ISOPROPYL ETHER 108-20-3 8260B mg/kg 2200 9400 NE NE <0.00119 0.00026 0.0012 <0.00149 0.00033 0.0015 <0.00137 0.0003 0.0014 <0.00126 0.00028 0.0013 <0.00130 J5 0.00029 0.0013
ETHYLBENZENE 100-41-4 8260B mg/kg 5.8 25 5 23 0.0035 0.00036 0.0012 0.0104 0.00045 0.0015 0.00456 0.00041 0.0014 0.00376 0.00038 0.0013 0.0121 V3 0.00039 0.0013
HEXACHLORO-1,3-BUTADIENE 87-68-3 8260B mg/kg 1.2 5.3 NE NE <0.00119 0.00041 0.0012 <0.00149 0.00051 0.0015 <0.00137 0.00047 0.0014 <0.00126 0.00043 0.0013 <0.00130 0.00044 0.0013
ISOPROPYLBENZENE 98-82-8 8260B mg/kg 1900 9900 NE NE <0.00119 0.00051 0.0012 0.0174 0.00063 0.0015 <0.00137 0.00058 0.0014 <0.00126 0.00054 0.0013 0.000747 J V3 0.00055 0.0013
P-ISOPROPYLTOLUENE 99-87-6 8260B mg/kg NE NE NE NE <0.00119 0.00024 0.0012 0.00452 0.0003 0.0015 <0.00137 0.00028 0.0014 <0.00126 0.00026 0.0013 <0.00130 0.00027 0.0013
2-BUTANONE (MEK)78-93-3 8260B mg/kg 27000 190000 NE NE 0.0159 0.00558 0.0119 0.0581 0.00695 0.0149 0.0137 J 0.00639 0.0137 <0.0126 0.00589 0.0126 0.0291 J5 0.00608 0.013
METHYLENE CHLORIDE 75-09-2 8260B mg/kg 57 1000 NE NE 0.00247B J 0.00119 0.006 0.00334B J 0.00149 0.0074 0.00277 B J 0.00137 0.0068 0.0016 B J 0.00126 0.0063 0.00286 B J 0.0013 0.0065
4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE (MIBK)108-10-1 8260B mg/kg 33000 140000 NE NE 0.0028 J 0.00113 0.0119 <0.0149 0.00141 0.0149 <0.0137 0.0013 0.0137 <0.0126 0.0012 0.0126 <0.0130 J5 0.00123 0.013
METHYL TERT-BUTYL ETHER 1634-04-4 8260B mg/kg 47 210 0.3 0.3 <0.00119 0.00042 0.0012 <0.00149 0.00052 0.0015 <0.00137 0.00048 0.0014 <0.00126 0.00044 0.0013 <0.00130 J5 0.00046 0.0013
NAPHTHALENE 91-20-3 8260B mg/kg 2 8.6 51 51 <0.00597 0.00594 0.006 <0.00743 0.0074 0.0074 <0.00683 0.0068 0.0068 <0.00629 0.00627 0.0063 <0.00649 0.00647 0.0065
N-PROPYLBENZENE 103-65-1 8260B mg/kg 3800 24000 NE NE <0.00119 0.00025 0.0012 0.00676 0.00031 0.0015 0.000477 J V3 0.00028 0.0014 0.0005 J 0.00026 0.0013 0.00122 J V3 0.00027 0.0013
STYRENE 100-42-5 8260B mg/kg 6000 35000 NE NE <0.00119 0.00027 0.0012 <0.00149 0.00033 0.0015 <0.00137 0.00031 0.0014 <0.00126 0.00028 0.0013 <0.00130 0.00029 0.0013
1,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 630-20-6 8260B mg/kg 2 8.8 NE NE <0.00119 0.00035 0.0012 <0.00149 0.00044 0.0015 <0.00137 0.0004 0.0014 <0.00126 0.00037 0.0013 <0.00130 0.00038 0.0013
1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 79-34-5 8260B mg/kg 0.6 2.7 NE NE <0.00119 0.00028 0.0012 <0.00149 0.00034 0.0015 <0.00137 0.00032 0.0014 <0.00126 0.00029 0.0013 <0.00130 0.0003 0.0013
1,1,2-TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE76-13-1 8260B mg/kg 6700 28000 NE NE <0.00119 0.00051 0.0012 <0.00149 0.00063 0.0015 <0.00137 0.00058 0.0014 <0.00126 0.00054 0.0013 <0.00130 J5 0.00055 0.0013
TETRACHLOROETHENE 127-18-4 8260B mg/kg 24 100 NE NE 0.00039 J 0.00039 0.0012 0.000615 J 0.00048 0.0015 <0.00137 0.00044 0.0014 <0.00126 0.00041 0.0013 <0.00130 J5 0.00042 0.0013
TOLUENE 108-88-3 8260B mg/kg 4900 47000 9 25 0.01 0.00147 0.006 0.0337 0.00183 0.0074 0.0154 0.00168 0.0068 0.00947 0.00155 0.0063 0.0266 V3 0.0016 0.0065
1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE 87-61-6 8260B mg/kg 63 930 NE NE <0.00119 0.00037 0.0012 <0.00149 0.00046 0.0015 <0.00137 0.00042 0.0014 <0.00126 0.00039 0.0013 <0.00130 0.0004 0.0013
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 120-82-1 8260B mg/kg 24 110 NE NE <0.00119 0.00046 0.0012 <0.00149 0.00058 0.0015 <0.00137 0.00053 0.0014 <0.00126 0.00049 0.0013 <0.00130 0.0005 0.0013
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 71-55-6 8260B mg/kg 8100 36000 NE NE <0.00119 0.00044 0.0012 <0.00149 0.00055 0.0015 <0.00137 0.00051 0.0014 <0.00126 0.00047 0.0013 <0.00130 J5 0.00048 0.0013
Date Collected 11/11/2022 11/11/2022 11/10/2022 11/10/2022 11/11/2022
B-3 @ SURFACE
L1558026-05
Client Sample ID B-1 @ SURFACE B-1 @ 5'B-2 @ SURFACE B-2 @ 5'
Lab Sample ID L1558026-01 L1558026-02 L1558026-03 L1558026-04
Page 1 of 18
Table C2 - VOCs and Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soil
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking - 2890 South State Street and 1215 North SR 51, Spanish Fork City, Utah County, Utah
Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.3
Analyte CAS Method Units RSL
Residential
RSL
Industrial ISL Tier 1 Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL
Date Collected 11/11/2022 11/11/2022 11/10/2022 11/10/2022 11/11/2022
B-3 @ SURFACE
L1558026-05
Client Sample ID B-1 @ SURFACE B-1 @ 5'B-2 @ SURFACE B-2 @ 5'
Lab Sample ID L1558026-01 L1558026-02 L1558026-03 L1558026-04
1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE 79-00-5 8260B mg/kg 1.1 5 NE NE <0.00119 0.00051 0.0012 <0.00149 0.00063 0.0015 <0.00137 0.00058 0.0014 <0.00126 0.00054 0.0013 <0.00130 0.00055 0.0013
TRICHLOROETHENE 79-01-6 8260B mg/kg 0.94 6 NE NE <0.00119 0.00024 0.0012 <0.00149 0.0003 0.0015 <0.00137 0.00027 0.0014 <0.00126 0.00025 0.0013 <0.00130 0.00026 0.0013
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE 75-69-4 8260B mg/kg 23000 350000 NE NE <0.00597 0.00043 0.006 <0.00743 0.00053 0.0074 <0.00683 0.00049 0.0068 <0.00629 0.00045 0.0063 <0.00649 0.00046 0.0065
1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE 96-18-4 8260B mg/kg 0.0051 0.11 NE NE <0.00298 0.00029 0.003 <0.00371 0.00036 0.0037 <0.00342 0.00033 0.0034 <0.00315 0.00031 0.0032 <0.00325 0.00032 0.0033
1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 95-63-6 8260B mg/kg 300 1800 NE NE <0.00119 0.00025 0.0012 0.00371 0.00031 0.0015 0.0012 J V3 0.00029 0.0014 0.00108 J 0.00027 0.0013 0.00244 V3 0.00027 0.0013
1,2,3-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 526-73-8 8260B mg/kg 340 2000 NE NE <0.00119 0.00034 0.0012 0.00172 0.00043 0.0015 0.000488 J V3 0.00039 0.0014 <0.00126 0.00036 0.0013 0.000878 J V3 0.00037 0.0013
1,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 108-67-8 8260B mg/kg 270 1500 NE NE <0.00119 0.00032 0.0012 0.00133 J 0.0004 0.0015 0.000426 J V3 0.00036 0.0014 0.00041 J 0.00034 0.0013 0.000905 J V3 0.00035 0.0013
VINYL CHLORIDE 75-01-4 8260B mg/kg 0.059 1.7 NE NE <0.00119 0.00027 0.0012 <0.00149 0.00034 0.0015 <0.00137 0.00031 0.0014 <0.00126 0.00028 0.0013 <0.00130 0.00029 0.0013
XYLENES, TOTAL 1330-20-7 8260B mg/kg 580 2500 142 142 0.00464 0.0006 0.0036 0.0267 0.00074 0.0045 0.00701 0.00068 0.0041 0.00419 0.00063 0.0038 0.0312 V3 0.00065 0.0039
Qualifiers (Q):
NE:Not Established.<:Less than Reported Detection Limit (RDL).
mg/kg:Milligrams per kilogram.
Blue italicized non-detect results (e.g.,<0.0100 ) exceed one or more of the screening levels.
Color shaded value exceeds screening level.
B:The same analyte is found in the associated blank.J:The identification of the analyte
is acceptable; the reported value is an estimate.J3:The associated batch QC was
outside the established quality control range for precision.J5:The sample matrix
interfered with the ability to make any accurate determination; spike value is high.
J6:The sample matrix interfered with the ability to make any accurate determination;
spike value is low. P1:RPD value not applicable for sample concentrations less than 5
times the reporting limit. V:The sample concentration is too high to evaluate accurate
spike recoveries. V3:The internal standard exhibited poor recovery due to sample matrix
interference. The analytical results will be biased high. BDL results will be unaffected.
EPA RSL: Environmental Protection Agency Regional Screening Levels for soil at residential (Res.) and industrial
(Ind.) properties (May 2022; TR=1E-06; THQ=1.0).
Utah's Initial Screening Levels (ISLs) and risk-based Tier 1 Screening Levels (Tier 1) for petroleum releases at
leaking underground storage tank sites
Bold value exceeds Method Detection Limit (MDL).
Page 2 of 18
Table C2 - VOCs and Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soil
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking - 2890 South State Street and 1215 North SR 51, Spanish Fork City, Utah County, Utah
Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.3
Analyte CAS Method Units RSL
Residential
RSL
Industrial ISL Tier 1
TPH-GRO 8006-61-9 8260B mg/kg NE NE 150 1500
TPH-DRO 68334-30-5 8015 mg/kg NE NE 500 5000
TRPH NE 9071B mg/kg NE NE 1000 10000
ACETONE 67-64-1 8260B mg/kg 61000 670000 NE NE
ACRYLONITRILE 107-13-1 8260B mg/kg 0.25 1.1 NE NE
BENZENE 71-43-2 8260B mg/kg 1.2 5.1 0.2 0.9
BROMOBENZENE 108-86-1 8260B mg/kg 290 1800 NE NE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE 75-27-4 8260B mg/kg 0.29 1.3 NE NE
BROMOFORM 75-25-2 8260B mg/kg 19 86 NE NE
BROMOMETHANE 74-83-9 8260B mg/kg 6.8 30 NE NE
N-BUTYLBENZENE 104-51-8 8260B mg/kg 3900 58000 NE NE
SEC-BUTYLBENZENE 135-98-8 8260B mg/kg 7800 120000 NE NE
TERT-BUTYLBENZENE 98-06-6 8260B mg/kg 7800 120000 NE NE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 56-23-5 8260B mg/kg 0.65 2.9 NE NE
CHLOROBENZENE 108-90-7 8260B mg/kg 280 1300 NE NE
CHLORODIBROMOMETHANE 124-48-1 8260B mg/kg 8.3 39 NE NE
CHLOROETHANE 75-00-3 8260B mg/kg 14000 57000 NE NE
CHLOROFORM 67-66-3 8260B mg/kg 0.32 1.4 NE NE
CHLOROMETHANE 74-87-3 8260B mg/kg 110 460 NE NE
2-CHLOROTOLUENE 95-49-8 8260B mg/kg 1600 23000 NE NE
4-CHLOROTOLUENE 106-43-4 8260B mg/kg 1600 23000 NE NE
1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE 96-12-8 8260B mg/kg 0.0053 0.064 NE NE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE 106-93-4 8260B mg/kg 0.036 0.16 NE NE
DIBROMOMETHANE 74-95-3 8260B mg/kg 24 99 NE NE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 95-50-1 8260B mg/kg 1800 9300 NE NE
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 541-73-1 8260B mg/kg NE NE NE NE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 106-46-7 8260B mg/kg 2.6 11 NE NE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE 75-71-8 8260B mg/kg 87 370 NE NE
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE 75-34-3 8260B mg/kg 3.6 16 NE NE
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE 107-06-2 8260B mg/kg 0.46 2 NE NE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE 75-35-4 8260B mg/kg 230 1000 NE NE
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 156-59-2 8260B mg/kg 160 2300 NE NE
TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 156-60-5 8260B mg/kg 70 300 NE NE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 78-87-5 8260B mg/kg 2.5 11 NE NE
1,1-DICHLOROPROPENE 563-58-6 8260B mg/kg NE NE NE NE
1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE 142-28-9 8260B mg/kg 1600 23000 NE NE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 10061-01-5 8260B mg/kg NE NE NE NE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 10061-02-6 8260B mg/kg NE NE NE NE
2,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 594-20-7 8260B mg/kg NE NE NE NE
DI-ISOPROPYL ETHER 108-20-3 8260B mg/kg 2200 9400 NE NE
ETHYLBENZENE 100-41-4 8260B mg/kg 5.8 25 5 23
HEXACHLORO-1,3-BUTADIENE 87-68-3 8260B mg/kg 1.2 5.3 NE NE
ISOPROPYLBENZENE 98-82-8 8260B mg/kg 1900 9900 NE NE
P-ISOPROPYLTOLUENE 99-87-6 8260B mg/kg NE NE NE NE
2-BUTANONE (MEK)78-93-3 8260B mg/kg 27000 190000 NE NE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE 75-09-2 8260B mg/kg 57 1000 NE NE
4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE (MIBK)108-10-1 8260B mg/kg 33000 140000 NE NE
METHYL TERT-BUTYL ETHER 1634-04-4 8260B mg/kg 47 210 0.3 0.3
NAPHTHALENE 91-20-3 8260B mg/kg 2 8.6 51 51
N-PROPYLBENZENE 103-65-1 8260B mg/kg 3800 24000 NE NE
STYRENE 100-42-5 8260B mg/kg 6000 35000 NE NE
1,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 630-20-6 8260B mg/kg 2 8.8 NE NE
1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 79-34-5 8260B mg/kg 0.6 2.7 NE NE
1,1,2-TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE76-13-1 8260B mg/kg 6700 28000 NE NE
TETRACHLOROETHENE 127-18-4 8260B mg/kg 24 100 NE NE
TOLUENE 108-88-3 8260B mg/kg 4900 47000 9 25
1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE 87-61-6 8260B mg/kg 63 930 NE NE
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 120-82-1 8260B mg/kg 24 110 NE NE
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 71-55-6 8260B mg/kg 8100 36000 NE NE
Date Collected
Client Sample ID
Lab Sample ID
Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL
0.227 J 0.208 0.568 0.359 J 0.226 0.617 0.405 J 0.204 0.558 0.46 J 0.235 0.641 0.455 J 0.236 0.645
4.97 0.873 4.54 88 9.49 49.4 <4.46 0.858 4.46 4.57 J 0.985 5.13 8.43 0.992 5.16
100 J 37.5 114 849 40.7 123 43.9 J 36.8 112 151 42.3 128 <129 42.5 129
<0.0568 0.0235 0.0568 0.0764 0.0256 0.0617 <0.0558 0.0231 0.0558 0.093 0.0265 0.0641 0.0673 0.0267 0.0645
<0.0114 0.0023 0.0114 <0.0123 0.00249 0.0123 <0.0112 0.00225 0.0112 <0.0128 0.00259 0.0128 <0.0129 0.0026 0.0129
0.00262 0.0004 0.0011 0.0102 0.00046 0.0012 0.0111 0.00042 0.0011 0.0146 0.000481 0.00128 0.0161 0.000484 0.00129
<0.00114 0.0003 0.0011 <0.00123 0.00034 0.0012 <0.00112 0.00031 0.0011 <0.00128 0.000352 0.00128 <0.00129 0.000355 0.00129
<0.00114 0.0008 0.0011 <0.00123 0.0009 0.0012 <0.00112 0.00081 0.0011 <0.00128 0.000929 0.00128 <0.00129 0.000935 0.00129
<0.00114 0.0005 0.0011 <0.00123 0.00052 0.0012 <0.00112 0.00047 0.0011 <0.00128 0.000543 0.00128 <0.00129 0.000547 0.00129
<0.00568 0.0013 0.0057 <0.00617 0.00144 0.0062 <0.00558 0.00131 0.0056 <0.00641 0.0015 0.00641 <0.00645 0.00151 0.00645
<0.00114 0.0003 0.0011 <0.00123 0.00032 0.0012 0.00048 J 0.00029 0.0011 <0.00128 0.000331 0.00128 <0.00129 0.000333 0.00129
<0.00114 0.0002 0.0011 <0.00123 0.00025 0.0012 <0.00112 0.00022 0.0011 <0.00128 0.000258 0.00128 <0.00129 0.000259 0.00129
<0.00114 0.0002 0.0011 <0.00123 0.00025 0.0012 <0.00112 0.00023 0.0011 <0.00128 0.000264 0.00128 <0.00129 0.000266 0.00129
<0.00114 0.0003 0.0011 <0.00123 0.00031 0.0012 <0.00112 0.00028 0.0011 <0.00128 0.000318 0.00128 <0.00129 0.00032 0.00129
<0.00114 0.0002 0.0011 <0.00123 0.00024 0.0012 <0.00112 0.00021 0.0011 <0.00128 0.000246 0.00128 <0.00129 0.000248 0.00129
<0.00114 0.0003 0.0011 <0.00123 0.00028 0.0012 <0.00112 0.00025 0.0011 <0.00128 0.000287 0.00128 <0.00129 0.000289 0.00129
<0.00568 0.0011 0.0057 <0.00617 0.00123 0.0062 <0.00558 0.00112 0.0056 <0.00641 0.00128 0.00641 <0.00645 0.00129 0.00645
<0.00568 0.0012 0.0057 <0.00617 0.00127 0.0062 <0.00558 0.00115 0.0056 <0.00641 0.00132 0.00641 <0.00645 0.00133 0.00645
<0.00284 0.0007 0.0028 <0.00309 0.0008 0.0031 <0.00279 0.00073 0.0028 <0.00320 0.000833 0.0032 <0.00322 0.000838 0.00322
<0.00114 0.0003 0.0011 <0.00123 0.00028 0.0012 <0.00112 0.00025 0.0011 <0.00128 0.000288 0.00128 <0.00129 0.00029 0.00129
<0.00114 0.0008 0.0011 <0.00123 0.00085 0.0012 <0.00112 0.00077 0.0011 <0.00128 0.000886 0.00128 <0.00129 0.000891 0.00129
<0.00568 0.0022 0.0057 <0.00617 0.00235 0.0062 <0.00558 0.00212 0.0056 <0.00641 0.00243 0.00641 <0.00645 0.00245 0.00645
<0.00114 0.0003 0.0011 <0.00123 0.00031 0.0012 <0.00112 0.00028 0.0011 <0.00128 0.00032 0.00128 <0.00129 0.000322 0.00129
<0.00114 0.0004 0.0011 <0.00123 0.00043 0.0012 <0.00112 0.00039 0.0011 <0.00128 0.000449 0.00128 <0.00129 0.000451 0.00129
<0.00114 0.0005 0.0011 <0.00123 0.00053 0.0012 <0.00112 0.00047 0.0011 <0.00128 0.000545 0.00128 <0.00129 0.000548 0.00129
<0.00114 0.0007 0.0011 <0.00123 0.00074 0.0012 <0.00112 0.00067 0.0011 <0.00128 0.000769 0.00128 <0.00129 0.000774 0.00129
<0.00114 0.0009 0.0011 <0.00123 0.00102 0.0012 <0.00112 0.00093 0.0011 <0.00128 0.00106 0.00128 <0.00129 0.00107 0.00129
<0.00568 0.0003 0.0057 <0.00617 0.00035 0.0062 <0.00558 0.00032 0.0056 <0.00641 0.000368 0.00641 <0.00645 0.00037 0.00645
<0.00114 0.0003 0.0011 <0.00123 0.00033 0.0012 <0.00112 0.0003 0.0011 <0.00128 0.000343 0.00128 <0.00129 0.000346 0.00129
<0.00114 0.0005 0.0011 <0.00123 0.00056 0.0012 <0.00112 0.0005 0.0011 <0.00128 0.000577 0.00128 <0.00129 0.00058 0.00129
<0.00114 0.0004 0.0011 <0.00123 0.00044 0.0012 <0.00112 0.0004 0.0011 <0.00128 0.000455 0.00128 <0.00129 0.000458 0.00129
<0.00114 0.0005 0.0011 <0.00123 0.00059 0.0012 <0.00112 0.00053 0.0011 <0.00128 0.000609 0.00128 <0.00129 0.000612 0.00129
<0.00114 0.0006 0.0011 <0.00123 0.00062 0.0012 <0.00112 0.00056 0.0011 <0.00128 0.000641 0.00128 <0.00129 0.000645 0.00129
<0.00114 0.0002 0.0011 <0.00123 0.0002 0.0012 <0.00112 0.00018 0.0011 <0.00128 0.00021 0.00128 <0.00129 0.000211 0.00129
<0.00114 0.0004 0.0011 <0.00123 0.00046 0.0012 <0.00112 0.00042 0.0011 <0.00128 0.000481 0.00128 <0.00129 0.000484 0.00129
<0.00114 0.0003 0.0011 <0.00123 0.00028 0.0012 <0.00112 0.00025 0.0011 <0.00128 0.000288 0.00128 <0.00129 0.00029 0.00129
<0.00114 0.0005 0.0011 <0.00123 0.00053 0.0012 <0.00112 0.00047 0.0011 <0.00128 0.000545 0.00128 <0.00129 0.000548 0.00129
<0.00114 0.0008 0.0011 <0.00123 0.00083 0.0012 <0.00112 0.00075 0.0011 <0.00128 0.000865 0.00128 <0.00129 0.00087 0.00129
<0.00114 0.0004 0.0011 <0.00123 0.00046 0.0012 <0.00112 0.00042 0.0011 <0.00128 0.000481 0.00128 <0.00129 0.000484 0.00129
<0.00114 0.0003 0.0011 <0.00123 0.00027 0.0012 <0.00112 0.00025 0.0011 <0.00128 0.000283 0.00128 <0.00129 0.000285 0.00129
0.0025 0.0003 0.0011 0.00349 0.00037 0.0012 0.00884 0.00034 0.0011 0.00443 0.000384 0.00128 0.00435 0.000387 0.00129
<0.00114 0.0004 0.0011 <0.00123 0.00042 0.0012 <0.00112 0.00038 0.0011 <0.00128 0.000438 0.00128 <0.00129 0.000441 0.00129
<0.00114 0.0005 0.0011 <0.00123 0.00053 0.0012 0.00055 J 0.00047 0.0011 <0.00128 0.000545 0.00128 <0.00129 0.000548 0.00129
<0.00114 0.0002 0.0011 <0.00123 0.00025 0.0012 <0.00112 0.00023 0.0011 <0.00128 0.000261 0.00128 <0.00129 0.000263 0.00129
<0.0114 0.0053 0.0114 0.0199 0.00578 0.0123 <0.0112 0.00522 0.0112 0.026 0.006 0.0128 0.0201 0.00603 0.0129
0.0012 B J 0.0011 0.0057 0.00211 B J 0.00123 0.0062 0.00167 B J 0.00112 0.0056 0.00277 B J 0.00128 0.00641 0.00271 B J 0.00129 0.00645
<0.0114 0.0011 0.0114 0.00257 J 0.00117 0.0123 <0.0112 0.00106 0.0112 <0.0128 0.00122 0.0128 <0.0129 0.00122 0.0129
<0.00114 0.0004 0.0011 <0.00123 0.00043 0.0012 <0.00112 0.00039 0.0011 <0.00128 0.000449 0.00128 <0.00129 0.000451 0.00129
<0.00568 0.0057 0.0057 <0.00617 0.00615 0.0062 <0.00558 0.00556 0.0056 <0.00641 0.00638 0.00641 <0.00645 0.00642 0.00645
0.00038 J 0.0002 0.0011 0.000443 J 0.00025 0.0012 0.0011 J 0.00023 0.0011 0.00049 J 0.000264 0.00128 0.000552 J 0.000266 0.00129
<0.00114 0.0003 0.0011 <0.00123 0.00028 0.0012 <0.00112 0.00025 0.0011 <0.00128 0.000286 0.00128 <0.00129 0.000288 0.00129
<0.00114 0.0003 0.0011 <0.00123 0.00037 0.0012 <0.00112 0.00033 0.0011 <0.00128 0.000379 0.00128 <0.00129 0.000382 0.00129
<0.00114 0.0003 0.0011 <0.00123 0.00029 0.0012 <0.00112 0.00026 0.0011 <0.00128 0.000296 0.00128 <0.00129 0.000298 0.00129
<0.00114 0.0005 0.0011 <0.00123 0.00053 0.0012 <0.00112 0.00048 0.0011 <0.00128 0.000546 0.00128 <0.00129 0.000549 0.00129
<0.00114 0.0004 0.0011 <0.00123 0.0004 0.0012 <0.00112 0.00036 0.0011 <0.00128 0.000416 0.00128 <0.00129 0.000419 0.00129
0.00501 J 0.0014 0.0057 0.012 0.00152 0.0062 0.0172 0.00137 0.0056 0.015 0.00158 0.00641 0.0161 0.00159 0.00645
<0.00114 0.0003 0.0011 <0.00123 0.00038 0.0012 <0.00112 0.00034 0.0011 <0.00128 0.000392 0.00128 <0.00129 0.000395 0.00129
<0.00114 0.0004 0.0011 <0.00123 0.00048 0.0012 <0.00112 0.00043 0.0011 <0.00128 0.000497 0.00128 <0.00129 0.0005 0.00129
<0.00114 0.0004 0.0011 <0.00123 0.00046 0.0012 <0.00112 0.00041 0.0011 <0.00128 0.000474 0.00128 <0.00129 0.000477 0.00129
B-4 @ SURFACE
11/11/2022 11/10/2022
B-3 @ 4'
L1558026-08
B-4 @ 3'
11/10/2022
L1558026-06 L1558026-07 L1558026-09 L1558026-10
11/10/2022 11/10/2022
B-5 @ SURFACE B-5 @ 3'
Page 3 of 18
Table C2 - VOCs and Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soil
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking - 2890 South State Street and 1215 North SR 51, Spanish Fork City, Utah County, Utah
Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.3
Analyte CAS Method Units RSL
Residential
RSL
Industrial ISL Tier 1
TPH-GRO 8006-61-9 8260B mg/kg NE NE 150 1500
Date Collected
Client Sample ID
Lab Sample ID
1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE 79-00-5 8260B mg/kg 1.1 5 NE NE
TRICHLOROETHENE 79-01-6 8260B mg/kg 0.94 6 NE NE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE 75-69-4 8260B mg/kg 23000 350000 NE NE
1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE 96-18-4 8260B mg/kg 0.0051 0.11 NE NE
1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 95-63-6 8260B mg/kg 300 1800 NE NE
1,2,3-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 526-73-8 8260B mg/kg 340 2000 NE NE
1,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 108-67-8 8260B mg/kg 270 1500 NE NE
VINYL CHLORIDE 75-01-4 8260B mg/kg 0.059 1.7 NE NE
XYLENES, TOTAL 1330-20-7 8260B mg/kg 580 2500 142 142
Qualifiers (Q):
NE:Not Established.<:Less than Reported Detection Limit (RDL).
mg/kg:Milligrams per kilogram.
Blue italicized non-detect results (e.g.,<0.0100 ) exceed one or more of the screening levels.
Color shaded value exceeds screening level.
B:The same analyte is found in the associated blank.J:The identification of the analyte
is acceptable; the reported value is an estimate.J3:The associated batch QC was
outside the established quality control range for precision.J5:The sample matrix
interfered with the ability to make any accurate determination; spike value is high.
J6:The sample matrix interfered with the ability to make any accurate determination;
spike value is low. P1:RPD value not applicable for sample concentrations less than 5
times the reporting limit. V:The sample concentration is too high to evaluate accurate
spike recoveries. V3:The internal standard exhibited poor recovery due to sample matrix
interference. The analytical results will be biased high. BDL results will be unaffected.
EPA RSL: Environmental Protection Agency Regional Screening Levels for soil at residential (Res.) and industrial
(Ind.) properties (May 2022; TR=1E-06; THQ=1.0).
Utah's Initial Screening Levels (ISLs) and risk-based Tier 1 Screening Levels (Tier 1) for petroleum releases at
leaking underground storage tank sites
Bold value exceeds Method Detection Limit (MDL).
Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL
B-4 @ SURFACE
11/11/2022 11/10/2022
B-3 @ 4'
L1558026-08
B-4 @ 3'
11/10/2022
L1558026-06 L1558026-07 L1558026-09 L1558026-10
11/10/2022 11/10/2022
B-5 @ SURFACE B-5 @ 3'
<0.00114 0.0005 0.0011 <0.00123 0.00053 0.0012 <0.00112 0.00047 0.0011 <0.00128 0.000545 0.00128 <0.00129 0.000548 0.00129
<0.00114 0.0002 0.0011 <0.00123 0.00025 0.0012 <0.00112 0.00022 0.0011 <0.00128 0.000256 0.00128 <0.00129 0.000258 0.00129
<0.00568 0.0004 0.0057 <0.00617 0.00044 0.0062 <0.00558 0.0004 0.0056 <0.00641 0.000456 0.00641 <0.00645 0.000459 0.00645
<0.00284 0.0003 0.0028 <0.00309 0.0003 0.0031 <0.00279 0.00027 0.0028 <0.00320 0.000313 0.0032 <0.00322 0.000315 0.00322
0.00069 J 0.0002 0.0011 0.000989 J 0.00026 0.0012 0.00167 0.00024 0.0011 0.00086 J 0.00027 0.00128 0.00108 J 0.000272 0.00129
<0.00114 0.0003 0.0011 <0.00123 0.00035 0.0012 0.00047 J 0.00032 0.0011 <0.00128 0.000368 0.00128 0.000375 J 0.00037 0.00129
<0.00114 0.0003 0.0011 0.000416 J 0.00033 0.0012 0.00067 J 0.0003 0.0011 0.0004 J 0.000341 0.00128 0.00052 J 0.000343 0.00129
<0.00114 0.0003 0.0011 <0.00123 0.00028 0.0012 <0.00112 0.00025 0.0011 <0.00128 0.00029 0.00128 <0.00129 0.000291 0.00129
0.00268 J 0.0006 0.0034 0.00451 0.00062 0.0037 0.00648 0.00056 0.0034 0.00492 0.000641 0.00384 0.00594 0.000645 0.00387
Page 4 of 18
Table C2 - VOCs and Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soil
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking - 2890 South State Street and 1215 North SR 51, Spanish Fork City, Utah County, Utah
Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.3
Analyte CAS Method Units RSL
Residential
RSL
Industrial ISL Tier 1
TPH-GRO 8006-61-9 8260B mg/kg NE NE 150 1500
TPH-DRO 68334-30-5 8015 mg/kg NE NE 500 5000
TRPH NE 9071B mg/kg NE NE 1000 10000
ACETONE 67-64-1 8260B mg/kg 61000 670000 NE NE
ACRYLONITRILE 107-13-1 8260B mg/kg 0.25 1.1 NE NE
BENZENE 71-43-2 8260B mg/kg 1.2 5.1 0.2 0.9
BROMOBENZENE 108-86-1 8260B mg/kg 290 1800 NE NE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE 75-27-4 8260B mg/kg 0.29 1.3 NE NE
BROMOFORM 75-25-2 8260B mg/kg 19 86 NE NE
BROMOMETHANE 74-83-9 8260B mg/kg 6.8 30 NE NE
N-BUTYLBENZENE 104-51-8 8260B mg/kg 3900 58000 NE NE
SEC-BUTYLBENZENE 135-98-8 8260B mg/kg 7800 120000 NE NE
TERT-BUTYLBENZENE 98-06-6 8260B mg/kg 7800 120000 NE NE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 56-23-5 8260B mg/kg 0.65 2.9 NE NE
CHLOROBENZENE 108-90-7 8260B mg/kg 280 1300 NE NE
CHLORODIBROMOMETHANE 124-48-1 8260B mg/kg 8.3 39 NE NE
CHLOROETHANE 75-00-3 8260B mg/kg 14000 57000 NE NE
CHLOROFORM 67-66-3 8260B mg/kg 0.32 1.4 NE NE
CHLOROMETHANE 74-87-3 8260B mg/kg 110 460 NE NE
2-CHLOROTOLUENE 95-49-8 8260B mg/kg 1600 23000 NE NE
4-CHLOROTOLUENE 106-43-4 8260B mg/kg 1600 23000 NE NE
1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE 96-12-8 8260B mg/kg 0.0053 0.064 NE NE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE 106-93-4 8260B mg/kg 0.036 0.16 NE NE
DIBROMOMETHANE 74-95-3 8260B mg/kg 24 99 NE NE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 95-50-1 8260B mg/kg 1800 9300 NE NE
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 541-73-1 8260B mg/kg NE NE NE NE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 106-46-7 8260B mg/kg 2.6 11 NE NE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE 75-71-8 8260B mg/kg 87 370 NE NE
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE 75-34-3 8260B mg/kg 3.6 16 NE NE
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE 107-06-2 8260B mg/kg 0.46 2 NE NE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE 75-35-4 8260B mg/kg 230 1000 NE NE
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 156-59-2 8260B mg/kg 160 2300 NE NE
TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 156-60-5 8260B mg/kg 70 300 NE NE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 78-87-5 8260B mg/kg 2.5 11 NE NE
1,1-DICHLOROPROPENE 563-58-6 8260B mg/kg NE NE NE NE
1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE 142-28-9 8260B mg/kg 1600 23000 NE NE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 10061-01-5 8260B mg/kg NE NE NE NE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 10061-02-6 8260B mg/kg NE NE NE NE
2,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 594-20-7 8260B mg/kg NE NE NE NE
DI-ISOPROPYL ETHER 108-20-3 8260B mg/kg 2200 9400 NE NE
ETHYLBENZENE 100-41-4 8260B mg/kg 5.8 25 5 23
HEXACHLORO-1,3-BUTADIENE 87-68-3 8260B mg/kg 1.2 5.3 NE NE
ISOPROPYLBENZENE 98-82-8 8260B mg/kg 1900 9900 NE NE
P-ISOPROPYLTOLUENE 99-87-6 8260B mg/kg NE NE NE NE
2-BUTANONE (MEK)78-93-3 8260B mg/kg 27000 190000 NE NE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE 75-09-2 8260B mg/kg 57 1000 NE NE
4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE (MIBK)108-10-1 8260B mg/kg 33000 140000 NE NE
METHYL TERT-BUTYL ETHER 1634-04-4 8260B mg/kg 47 210 0.3 0.3
NAPHTHALENE 91-20-3 8260B mg/kg 2 8.6 51 51
N-PROPYLBENZENE 103-65-1 8260B mg/kg 3800 24000 NE NE
STYRENE 100-42-5 8260B mg/kg 6000 35000 NE NE
1,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 630-20-6 8260B mg/kg 2 8.8 NE NE
1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 79-34-5 8260B mg/kg 0.6 2.7 NE NE
1,1,2-TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE76-13-1 8260B mg/kg 6700 28000 NE NE
TETRACHLOROETHENE 127-18-4 8260B mg/kg 24 100 NE NE
TOLUENE 108-88-3 8260B mg/kg 4900 47000 9 25
1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE 87-61-6 8260B mg/kg 63 930 NE NE
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 120-82-1 8260B mg/kg 24 110 NE NE
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 71-55-6 8260B mg/kg 8100 36000 NE NE
Date Collected
Client Sample ID
Lab Sample ID
Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL
0.257 J 0.19 0.519 0.489 J 0.232 0.633 0.254 J 0.228 0.623 0.401 J 0.222 0.607 0.444 J 0.229 0.626
555 J 399 2070 4.81 J 0.974 5.06 22.8 0.958 4.98 <4.86 0.934 4.86 7.07 0.964 5.01
12500 34.2 104 <127 41.8 127 <125 41.1 125 <121 40.1 121 630 J3 J6 41.3 125
0.0756 0.0215 0.0519 0.0619 J 0.0262 0.0633 <0.0623 0.0258 0.0623 <0.0607 0.0251 0.0607 0.594 0.0259 0.0626
<0.0104 0.0021 0.0104 <0.0127 0.00256 0.0127 <0.0125 0.00252 0.0125 <0.0121 0.00245 0.0121 <0.0125 0.00253 0.0125
0.0103 0.000389 0.00104 0.0102 0.000475 0.00127 0.00557 0.000467 0.00125 0.00831 0.000456 0.00121 0.0187 0.00047 0.00125
<0.00104 0.000285 0.00104 <0.00127 0.000348 0.00127 <0.00125 0.000342 0.00125 <0.00121 0.000334 0.00121 <0.00125 0.000345 0.00125
<0.00104 0.000752 0.00104 <0.00127 0.000918 0.00127 <0.00125 0.000903 0.00125 <0.00121 0.000881 0.00121 <0.00125 0.000908 0.00125
<0.00104 0.00044 0.00104 <0.00127 0.000537 0.00127 <0.00125 0.000528 0.00125 <0.00121 0.000515 0.00121 <0.00125 0.000531 0.00125
<0.00519 0.00121 0.00519 <0.00633 0.00148 0.00633 <0.00623 0.00146 0.00623 <0.00607 0.00142 0.00607 <0.00626 0.00147 0.00626
<0.00104 0.000268 0.00104 0.000544 J 0.000327 0.00127 <0.00125 0.000321 0.00125 0.000317 J 0.000313 0.00121 <0.00125 0.000323 0.00125
0.00024 J V3 0.000209 0.00104 <0.00127 0.000254 0.00127 <0.00125 0.00025 0.00125 <0.00121 0.000244 0.00121 <0.00125 0.000252 0.00125
<0.00104 0.000214 0.00104 <0.00127 0.000261 0.00127 <0.00125 0.000256 0.00125 <0.00121 0.00025 0.00121 <0.00125 0.000258 0.00125
<0.00104 0.000257 0.00104 <0.00127 0.000314 0.00127 <0.00125 0.000309 0.00125 <0.00121 0.000301 0.00121 <0.00125 0.000311 0.00125
<0.00104 0.000199 0.00104 <0.00127 0.000243 0.00127 <0.00125 0.000239 0.00125 <0.00121 0.000233 0.00121 <0.00125 0.000241 0.00125
<0.00104 0.000232 0.00104 <0.00127 0.000284 0.00127 <0.00125 0.000279 0.00125 <0.00121 0.000272 0.00121 <0.00125 0.000281 0.00125
<0.00519 0.00104 0.00519 <0.00633 0.00127 0.00633 <0.00623 0.00125 0.00623 <0.00607 0.00121 0.00607 <0.00626 0.00125 0.00626
<0.00519 0.00107 0.00519 <0.00633 0.0013 0.00633 <0.00623 0.00128 0.00623 <0.00607 0.00125 0.00607 <0.00626 0.00129 0.00626
<0.00259 0.000674 0.00259 <0.00316 0.000823 0.00316 <0.00311 0.000809 0.00311 <0.00304 0.00079 0.00304 <0.00313 0.000814 0.00313
<0.00104 0.000233 0.00104 <0.00127 0.000285 0.00127 <0.00125 0.00028 0.00125 <0.00121 0.000273 0.00121 <0.00125 0.000282 0.00125
<0.00104 0.000717 0.00104 <0.00127 0.000875 0.00127 <0.00125 0.00086 0.00125 <0.00121 0.000839 0.00121 <0.00125 0.000866 0.00125
<0.00519 0.00197 0.00519 <0.00633 0.00241 0.00633 <0.00623 0.00237 0.00623 <0.00607 0.00231 0.00607 <0.00626 0.00238 0.00626
<0.00104 0.000259 0.00104 <0.00127 0.000316 0.00127 <0.00125 0.000311 0.00125 <0.00121 0.000304 0.00121 <0.00125 0.000313 0.00125
<0.00104 0.000363 0.00104 <0.00127 0.000443 0.00127 <0.00125 0.000436 0.00125 <0.00121 0.000425 0.00121 <0.00125 0.000439 0.00125
<0.00104 0.000441 0.00104 <0.00127 0.000538 0.00127 <0.00125 0.000529 0.00125 <0.00121 0.000516 0.00121 <0.00125 0.000533 0.00125
<0.00104 0.000622 0.00104 <0.00127 0.00076 0.00127 <0.00125 0.000747 0.00125 <0.00121 0.000729 0.00121 <0.00125 0.000752 0.00125
<0.00104 0.000861 0.00104 <0.00127 0.00105 0.00127 <0.00125 0.00103 0.00125 <0.00121 0.00101 0.00121 <0.00125 0.00104 0.00125
<0.00519 0.000298 0.00519 <0.00633 0.000363 0.00633 <0.00623 0.000357 0.00623 <0.00607 0.000349 0.00607 <0.00626 0.00036 0.00626
<0.00104 0.000278 0.00104 <0.00127 0.000339 0.00127 <0.00125 0.000334 0.00125 <0.00121 0.000326 0.00121 <0.00125 0.000336 0.00125
<0.00104 0.000467 0.00104 <0.00127 0.00057 0.00127 <0.00125 0.00056 0.00125 <0.00121 0.000547 0.00121 <0.00125 0.000564 0.00125
<0.00104 0.000368 0.00104 <0.00127 0.000449 0.00127 <0.00125 0.000442 0.00125 <0.00121 0.000431 0.00121 <0.00125 0.000445 0.00125
<0.00104 0.000493 0.00104 <0.00127 0.000601 0.00127 <0.00125 0.000591 0.00125 <0.00121 0.000577 0.00121 <0.00125 0.000595 0.00125
<0.00104 0.000519 0.00104 <0.00127 0.000633 0.00127 <0.00125 0.000623 0.00125 <0.00121 0.000607 0.00121 <0.00125 0.000626 0.00125
<0.00104 0.00017 0.00104 <0.00127 0.000208 0.00127 <0.00125 0.000204 0.00125 <0.00121 0.000199 0.00121 <0.00125 0.000205 0.00125
<0.00104 0.000389 0.00104 <0.00127 0.000475 0.00127 <0.00125 0.000467 0.00125 <0.00121 0.000456 0.00121 <0.00125 0.00047 0.00125
<0.00104 0.000233 0.00104 <0.00127 0.000285 0.00127 <0.00125 0.00028 0.00125 <0.00121 0.000273 0.00121 <0.00125 0.000282 0.00125
<0.00104 0.000441 0.00104 <0.00127 0.000538 0.00127 <0.00125 0.000529 0.00125 <0.00121 0.000516 0.00121 <0.00125 0.000533 0.00125
<0.00104 0.0007 0.00104 <0.00127 0.000855 0.00127 <0.00125 0.00084 0.00125 <0.00121 0.00082 0.00121 <0.00125 0.000846 0.00125
<0.00104 0.000389 0.00104 <0.00127 0.000475 0.00127 <0.00125 0.000467 0.00125 <0.00121 0.000456 0.00121 <0.00125 0.00047 0.00125
<0.00104 0.000229 0.00104 <0.00127 0.00028 0.00127 <0.00125 0.000275 0.00125 <0.00121 0.000268 0.00121 <0.00125 0.000277 0.00125
0.00513 0.000311 0.00104 0.00851 0.00038 0.00127 0.0027 0.000374 0.00125 0.00675 0.000364 0.00121 0.00578 0.000376 0.00125
<0.00104 0.000355 0.00104 <0.00127 0.000433 0.00127 <0.00125 0.000426 0.00125 <0.00121 0.000415 0.00121 <0.00125 0.000429 0.00125
<0.00104 0.000441 0.00104 0.00056 J 0.000538 0.00127 <0.00125 0.000529 0.00125 <0.00121 0.000516 0.00121 <0.00125 0.000533 0.00125
<0.00104 0.000212 0.00104 <0.00127 0.000258 0.00127 <0.00125 0.000254 0.00125 <0.00121 0.000248 0.00121 <0.00125 0.000256 0.00125
0.028 0.00485 0.0104 0.0133 0.00592 0.0127 <0.0125 0.00583 0.0125 <0.0121 0.00568 0.0121 0.0751 0.00586 0.0125
0.00165 B J 0.00104 0.00519 0.00157 B J 0.00127 0.00633 0.00128 B J 0.00125 0.00623 <0.00607 0.00121 0.00607 0.00187 B J 0.00125 0.00626
0.00252 J 0.000985 0.0104 0.00206 J 0.0012 0.0127 <0.0125 0.00118 0.0125 <0.0121 0.00115 0.0121 0.00395 J 0.00119 0.0125
<0.00104 0.000363 0.00104 <0.00127 0.000443 0.00127 <0.00125 0.000436 0.00125 <0.00121 0.000425 0.00121 <0.00125 0.000439 0.00125
<0.00519 0.00517 0.00519 <0.00633 0.0063 0.00633 <0.00623 0.0062 0.00623 <0.00607 0.00605 0.00607 <0.00626 0.00624 0.00626
0.000742 J V3 0.000214 0.00104 0.00104 J 0.000261 0.00127 0.000371 J 0.000256 0.00125 0.000921 J 0.00025 0.00121 0.000738 J 0.000258 0.00125
<0.00104 0.000231 0.00104 <0.00127 0.000282 0.00127 <0.00125 0.000278 0.00125 <0.00121 0.000271 0.00121 <0.00125 0.000279 0.00125
<0.00104 0.000307 0.00104 <0.00127 0.000375 0.00127 <0.00125 0.000369 0.00125 <0.00121 0.00036 0.00121 <0.00125 0.000371 0.00125
<0.00104 0.00024 0.00104 <0.00127 0.000292 0.00127 <0.00125 0.000288 0.00125 <0.00121 0.000281 0.00121 <0.00125 0.000289 0.00125
<0.00104 0.000442 0.00104 <0.00127 0.000539 0.00127 <0.00125 0.00053 0.00125 <0.00121 0.000517 0.00121 <0.00125 0.000534 0.00125
0.000492 J 0.000337 0.00104 <0.00127 0.000411 0.00127 <0.00125 0.000405 0.00125 <0.00121 0.000395 0.00121 <0.00125 0.000407 0.00125
0.0209 0.00128 0.00519 0.017 0.00156 0.00633 0.00737 0.00153 0.00623 0.0136 0.00149 0.00607 0.0219 0.00154 0.00626
<0.00104 0.000317 0.00104 <0.00127 0.000387 0.00127 <0.00125 0.000381 0.00125 <0.00121 0.000372 0.00121 <0.00125 0.000383 0.00125
<0.00104 0.000402 0.00104 <0.00127 0.000491 0.00127 <0.00125 0.000483 0.00125 <0.00121 0.000471 0.00121 <0.00125 0.000486 0.00125
<0.00104 0.000384 0.00104 <0.00127 0.000468 0.00127 <0.00125 0.000461 0.00125 <0.00121 0.000449 0.00121 <0.00125 0.000464 0.00125
L1558026-13 L1558026-14 L1558026-15
B-7 @ SURFACE B-7 @ 7'B-8 @ SURFACE
11/11/2022 11/11/2022 11/10/2022
L1558026-11 L1558026-12
11/09/2022 11/09/2022
B-6 @ SURFACE B-6 @ 19'
Page 5 of 18
Table C2 - VOCs and Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soil
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking - 2890 South State Street and 1215 North SR 51, Spanish Fork City, Utah County, Utah
Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.3
Analyte CAS Method Units RSL
Residential
RSL
Industrial ISL Tier 1
TPH-GRO 8006-61-9 8260B mg/kg NE NE 150 1500
Date Collected
Client Sample ID
Lab Sample ID
1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE 79-00-5 8260B mg/kg 1.1 5 NE NE
TRICHLOROETHENE 79-01-6 8260B mg/kg 0.94 6 NE NE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE 75-69-4 8260B mg/kg 23000 350000 NE NE
1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE 96-18-4 8260B mg/kg 0.0051 0.11 NE NE
1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 95-63-6 8260B mg/kg 300 1800 NE NE
1,2,3-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 526-73-8 8260B mg/kg 340 2000 NE NE
1,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 108-67-8 8260B mg/kg 270 1500 NE NE
VINYL CHLORIDE 75-01-4 8260B mg/kg 0.059 1.7 NE NE
XYLENES, TOTAL 1330-20-7 8260B mg/kg 580 2500 142 142
Qualifiers (Q):
NE:Not Established.<:Less than Reported Detection Limit (RDL).
mg/kg:Milligrams per kilogram.
Blue italicized non-detect results (e.g.,<0.0100 ) exceed one or more of the screening levels.
Color shaded value exceeds screening level.
B:The same analyte is found in the associated blank.J:The identification of the analyte
is acceptable; the reported value is an estimate.J3:The associated batch QC was
outside the established quality control range for precision.J5:The sample matrix
interfered with the ability to make any accurate determination; spike value is high.
J6:The sample matrix interfered with the ability to make any accurate determination;
spike value is low. P1:RPD value not applicable for sample concentrations less than 5
times the reporting limit. V:The sample concentration is too high to evaluate accurate
spike recoveries. V3:The internal standard exhibited poor recovery due to sample matrix
interference. The analytical results will be biased high. BDL results will be unaffected.
EPA RSL: Environmental Protection Agency Regional Screening Levels for soil at residential (Res.) and industrial
(Ind.) properties (May 2022; TR=1E-06; THQ=1.0).
Utah's Initial Screening Levels (ISLs) and risk-based Tier 1 Screening Levels (Tier 1) for petroleum releases at
leaking underground storage tank sites
Bold value exceeds Method Detection Limit (MDL).
Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL
L1558026-13 L1558026-14 L1558026-15
B-7 @ SURFACE B-7 @ 7'B-8 @ SURFACE
11/11/2022 11/11/2022 11/10/2022
L1558026-11 L1558026-12
11/09/2022 11/09/2022
B-6 @ SURFACE B-6 @ 19'
<0.00104 0.000441 0.00104 <0.00127 0.000538 0.00127 <0.00125 0.000529 0.00125 <0.00121 0.000516 0.00121 <0.00125 0.000533 0.00125
<0.00104 0.000207 0.00104 <0.00127 0.000253 0.00127 <0.00125 0.000249 0.00125 <0.00121 0.000243 0.00121 <0.00125 0.000251 0.00125
<0.00519 0.000369 0.00519 <0.00633 0.000451 0.00633 <0.00623 0.000443 0.00623 <0.00607 0.000432 0.00607 <0.00626 0.000446 0.00626
<0.00259 0.000253 0.00259 <0.00316 0.000309 0.00316 <0.00311 0.000304 0.00311 <0.00304 0.000296 0.00304 <0.00313 0.000306 0.00313
0.00317 V3 0.000219 0.00104 0.00195 0.000267 0.00127 0.000773 J 0.000263 0.00125 0.00168 0.000256 0.00121 0.00129 0.000264 0.00125
0.0014 V3 0.000298 0.00104 0.000689 J 0.000363 0.00127 <0.00125 0.000357 0.00125 0.000527 J 0.000349 0.00121 0.000527 J 0.00036 0.00125
0.00145 V3 0.000276 0.00104 0.000733 J 0.000337 0.00127 <0.00125 0.000331 0.00125 0.000673 J 0.000323 0.00121 0.000595 J 0.000333 0.00125
<0.00104 0.000234 0.00104 <0.00127 0.000286 0.00127 <0.00125 0.000281 0.00125 <0.00121 0.000275 0.00121 <0.00125 0.000283 0.00125
0.0142 0.000519 0.00311 0.00689 0.000633 0.0038 0.00324 J 0.000623 0.00374 0.00553 0.000607 0.00364 0.00804 0.000626 0.00376
Page 6 of 18
Table C2 - VOCs and Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soil
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking - 2890 South State Street and 1215 North SR 51, Spanish Fork City, Utah County, Utah
Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.3
Analyte CAS Method Units RSL
Residential
RSL
Industrial ISL Tier 1
TPH-GRO 8006-61-9 8260B mg/kg NE NE 150 1500
TPH-DRO 68334-30-5 8015 mg/kg NE NE 500 5000
TRPH NE 9071B mg/kg NE NE 1000 10000
ACETONE 67-64-1 8260B mg/kg 61000 670000 NE NE
ACRYLONITRILE 107-13-1 8260B mg/kg 0.25 1.1 NE NE
BENZENE 71-43-2 8260B mg/kg 1.2 5.1 0.2 0.9
BROMOBENZENE 108-86-1 8260B mg/kg 290 1800 NE NE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE 75-27-4 8260B mg/kg 0.29 1.3 NE NE
BROMOFORM 75-25-2 8260B mg/kg 19 86 NE NE
BROMOMETHANE 74-83-9 8260B mg/kg 6.8 30 NE NE
N-BUTYLBENZENE 104-51-8 8260B mg/kg 3900 58000 NE NE
SEC-BUTYLBENZENE 135-98-8 8260B mg/kg 7800 120000 NE NE
TERT-BUTYLBENZENE 98-06-6 8260B mg/kg 7800 120000 NE NE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 56-23-5 8260B mg/kg 0.65 2.9 NE NE
CHLOROBENZENE 108-90-7 8260B mg/kg 280 1300 NE NE
CHLORODIBROMOMETHANE 124-48-1 8260B mg/kg 8.3 39 NE NE
CHLOROETHANE 75-00-3 8260B mg/kg 14000 57000 NE NE
CHLOROFORM 67-66-3 8260B mg/kg 0.32 1.4 NE NE
CHLOROMETHANE 74-87-3 8260B mg/kg 110 460 NE NE
2-CHLOROTOLUENE 95-49-8 8260B mg/kg 1600 23000 NE NE
4-CHLOROTOLUENE 106-43-4 8260B mg/kg 1600 23000 NE NE
1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE 96-12-8 8260B mg/kg 0.0053 0.064 NE NE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE 106-93-4 8260B mg/kg 0.036 0.16 NE NE
DIBROMOMETHANE 74-95-3 8260B mg/kg 24 99 NE NE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 95-50-1 8260B mg/kg 1800 9300 NE NE
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 541-73-1 8260B mg/kg NE NE NE NE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 106-46-7 8260B mg/kg 2.6 11 NE NE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE 75-71-8 8260B mg/kg 87 370 NE NE
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE 75-34-3 8260B mg/kg 3.6 16 NE NE
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE 107-06-2 8260B mg/kg 0.46 2 NE NE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE 75-35-4 8260B mg/kg 230 1000 NE NE
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 156-59-2 8260B mg/kg 160 2300 NE NE
TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 156-60-5 8260B mg/kg 70 300 NE NE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 78-87-5 8260B mg/kg 2.5 11 NE NE
1,1-DICHLOROPROPENE 563-58-6 8260B mg/kg NE NE NE NE
1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE 142-28-9 8260B mg/kg 1600 23000 NE NE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 10061-01-5 8260B mg/kg NE NE NE NE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 10061-02-6 8260B mg/kg NE NE NE NE
2,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 594-20-7 8260B mg/kg NE NE NE NE
DI-ISOPROPYL ETHER 108-20-3 8260B mg/kg 2200 9400 NE NE
ETHYLBENZENE 100-41-4 8260B mg/kg 5.8 25 5 23
HEXACHLORO-1,3-BUTADIENE 87-68-3 8260B mg/kg 1.2 5.3 NE NE
ISOPROPYLBENZENE 98-82-8 8260B mg/kg 1900 9900 NE NE
P-ISOPROPYLTOLUENE 99-87-6 8260B mg/kg NE NE NE NE
2-BUTANONE (MEK)78-93-3 8260B mg/kg 27000 190000 NE NE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE 75-09-2 8260B mg/kg 57 1000 NE NE
4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE (MIBK)108-10-1 8260B mg/kg 33000 140000 NE NE
METHYL TERT-BUTYL ETHER 1634-04-4 8260B mg/kg 47 210 0.3 0.3
NAPHTHALENE 91-20-3 8260B mg/kg 2 8.6 51 51
N-PROPYLBENZENE 103-65-1 8260B mg/kg 3800 24000 NE NE
STYRENE 100-42-5 8260B mg/kg 6000 35000 NE NE
1,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 630-20-6 8260B mg/kg 2 8.8 NE NE
1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 79-34-5 8260B mg/kg 0.6 2.7 NE NE
1,1,2-TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE76-13-1 8260B mg/kg 6700 28000 NE NE
TETRACHLOROETHENE 127-18-4 8260B mg/kg 24 100 NE NE
TOLUENE 108-88-3 8260B mg/kg 4900 47000 9 25
1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE 87-61-6 8260B mg/kg 63 930 NE NE
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 120-82-1 8260B mg/kg 24 110 NE NE
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 71-55-6 8260B mg/kg 8100 36000 NE NE
Date Collected
Client Sample ID
Lab Sample ID
Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL
0.416 J 0.234 0.64 0.283 J 0.206 0.562 0.362 J 0.21 0.573 0.273 J 0.247 0.675 0.34 J 0.243 0.665
4.46 J 0.984 5.12 4.4 J 0.865 4.5 4.58 J 0.881 4.58 14.6 1.04 5.4 23.9 1.02 5.32
112 J 42.2 128 318 37.1 112 88.2 J 37.8 115 67 J 44.6 135 302 43.9 133
0.164 0.0265 0.064 0.107 0.0233 0.0562 0.0617 0.0237 0.0573 <0.0675 0.028 0.0675 0.0796 0.0275 0.0665
<0.0128 0.00258 0.0128 <0.0112 0.00227 0.0112 <0.0115 0.00231 0.0115 <0.0135 0.00273 0.0135 <0.0133 0.00269 0.0133
0.017 0.00048 0.0013 0.00455 0.000422 0.00112 0.00569 0.00043 0.00115 0.00477 0.000507 0.00135 0.00802 0.000499 0.00133
<0.00128 0.000352 0.0013 <0.00112 0.000309 0.00112 <0.00115 0.000315 0.00115 <0.00135 0.000371 0.00135 <0.00133 0.000366 0.00133
<0.00128 0.000927 0.0013 <0.00112 0.000815 0.00112 <0.00115 0.00083 0.00115 <0.00135 0.000979 0.00135 <0.00133 0.000964 0.00133
<0.00128 0.000542 0.0013 <0.00112 0.000477 0.00112 <0.00115 0.000486 0.00115 <0.00135 0.000573 0.00135 <0.00133 0.000564 0.00133
<0.00640 0.0015 0.0064 <0.00562 0.00132 0.00562 <0.00573 0.00134 0.00573 <0.00675 0.00158 0.00675 <0.00665 0.00156 0.00665
<0.00128 0.00033 0.0013 <0.00112 0.00029 0.00112 <0.00115 0.000296 0.00115 <0.00135 0.000349 0.00135 <0.00133 0.000343 0.00133
<0.00128 0.000257 0.0013 <0.00112 0.000226 0.00112 <0.00115 0.00023 0.00115 <0.00135 0.000272 0.00135 <0.00133 0.000267 0.00133
<0.00128 0.000264 0.0013 <0.00112 0.000232 0.00112 <0.00115 0.000236 0.00115 <0.00135 0.000278 0.00135 <0.00133 0.000274 0.00133
<0.00128 0.000317 0.0013 <0.00112 0.000279 0.00112 <0.00115 0.000284 0.00115 <0.00135 0.000335 0.00135 <0.00133 0.00033 0.00133
<0.00128 0.000246 0.0013 <0.00112 0.000216 0.00112 <0.00115 0.00022 0.00115 <0.00135 0.000259 0.00135 <0.00133 0.000255 0.00133
<0.00128 0.000287 0.0013 <0.00112 0.000252 0.00112 <0.00115 0.000257 0.00115 <0.00135 0.000303 0.00135 <0.00133 0.000298 0.00133
<0.00640 0.00128 0.0064 <0.00562 0.00112 0.00562 <0.00573 0.00115 0.00573 <0.00675 0.00135 0.00675 <0.00665 0.00133 0.00665
<0.00640 0.00132 0.0064 <0.00562 0.00116 0.00562 <0.00573 0.00118 0.00573 <0.00675 0.00139 0.00675 <0.00665 0.00137 0.00665
<0.00320 0.000832 0.0032 <0.00281 0.000731 0.00281 <0.00286 0.000745 0.00286 <0.00338 0.000878 0.00338 <0.00332 0.000864 0.00332
<0.00128 0.000288 0.0013 <0.00112 0.000253 0.00112 <0.00115 0.000258 0.00115 <0.00135 0.000304 0.00135 <0.00133 0.000299 0.00133
<0.00128 0.000884 0.0013 <0.00112 0.000777 0.00112 <0.00115 0.000791 0.00115 <0.00135 0.000933 0.00135 <0.00133 0.000919 0.00133
<0.00640 0.00243 0.0064 <0.00562 0.00214 0.00562 <0.00573 0.00218 0.00573 <0.00675 0.00257 0.00675 <0.00665 0.00253 0.00665
<0.00128 0.00032 0.0013 <0.00112 0.000281 0.00112 <0.00115 0.000286 0.00115 <0.00135 0.000338 0.00135 <0.00133 0.000332 0.00133
<0.00128 0.000448 0.0013 <0.00112 0.000394 0.00112 <0.00115 0.000401 0.00115 <0.00135 0.000473 0.00135 <0.00133 0.000465 0.00133
<0.00128 0.000544 0.0013 <0.00112 0.000478 0.00112 <0.00115 0.000487 0.00115 <0.00135 0.000574 0.00135 <0.00133 0.000565 0.00133
<0.00128 0.000768 0.0013 <0.00112 0.000675 0.00112 <0.00115 0.000687 0.00115 <0.00135 0.00081 0.00135 <0.00133 0.000798 0.00133
<0.00128 0.00106 0.0013 <0.00112 0.000933 0.00112 <0.00115 0.000951 0.00115 <0.00135 0.00112 0.00135 <0.00133 0.0011 0.00133
<0.00640 0.000367 0.0064 <0.00562 0.000323 0.00562 <0.00573 0.000329 0.00573 <0.00675 0.000388 0.00675 <0.00665 0.000382 0.00665
<0.00128 0.000343 0.0013 <0.00112 0.000301 0.00112 <0.00115 0.000307 0.00115 <0.00135 0.000362 0.00135 <0.00133 0.000356 0.00133
<0.00128 0.000576 0.0013 <0.00112 0.000506 0.00112 <0.00115 0.000515 0.00115 <0.00135 0.000608 0.00135 <0.00133 0.000598 0.00133
<0.00128 0.000454 0.0013 <0.00112 0.000399 0.00112 <0.00115 0.000407 0.00115 <0.00135 0.00048 0.00135 <0.00133 0.000472 0.00133
<0.00128 0.000608 0.0013 <0.00112 0.000534 0.00112 <0.00115 0.000544 0.00115 <0.00135 0.000642 0.00135 0.000879 J 0.000632 0.00133
<0.00128 0.00064 0.0013 <0.00112 0.000562 0.00112 <0.00115 0.000573 0.00115 <0.00135 0.000675 0.00135 <0.00133 0.000665 0.00133
<0.00128 0.00021 0.0013 <0.00112 0.000184 0.00112 <0.00115 0.000188 0.00115 <0.00135 0.000222 0.00135 <0.00133 0.000218 0.00133
<0.00128 0.00048 0.0013 <0.00112 0.000422 0.00112 <0.00115 0.00043 0.00115 <0.00135 0.000507 0.00135 <0.00133 0.000499 0.00133
<0.00128 0.000288 0.0013 <0.00112 0.000253 0.00112 <0.00115 0.000258 0.00115 <0.00135 0.000304 0.00135 <0.00133 0.000299 0.00133
<0.00128 0.000544 0.0013 <0.00112 0.000478 0.00112 <0.00115 0.000487 0.00115 <0.00135 0.000574 0.00135 <0.00133 0.000565 0.00133
<0.00128 0.000864 0.0013 <0.00112 0.000759 0.00112 <0.00115 0.000773 0.00115 <0.00135 0.000912 0.00135 <0.00133 0.000897 0.00133
<0.00128 0.00048 0.0013 <0.00112 0.000422 0.00112 <0.00115 0.00043 0.00115 <0.00135 0.000507 0.00135 <0.00133 0.000499 0.00133
<0.00128 0.000283 0.0013 <0.00112 0.000249 0.00112 <0.00115 0.000253 0.00115 <0.00135 0.000299 0.00135 <0.00133 0.000294 0.00133
0.00481 0.000384 0.0013 0.00245 0.000337 0.00112 0.0034 0.000344 0.00115 0.0027 0.000405 0.00135 0.00322 0.000399 0.00133
<0.00128 0.000438 0.0013 <0.00112 0.000385 0.00112 <0.00115 0.000392 0.00115 <0.00135 0.000462 0.00135 <0.00133 0.000455 0.00133
<0.00128 0.000544 0.0013 <0.00112 0.000478 0.00112 <0.00115 0.000487 0.00115 <0.00135 0.000574 0.00135 <0.00133 0.000565 0.00133
<0.00128 0.000261 0.0013 <0.00112 0.000229 0.00112 <0.00115 0.000234 0.00115 <0.00135 0.000276 0.00135 0.000685 J 0.000271 0.00133
0.0345 0.00599 0.0128 0.0271 0.00526 0.0112 0.0162 0.00536 0.0115 <0.0135 0.00632 0.0135 0.0229 0.00622 0.0133
0.00188 B J 0.00128 0.0064 0.00116 B J 0.00112 0.00562 0.0014 B J 0.00115 0.00573 <0.00675 0.00135 0.00675 <0.00665 0.00133 0.00665
0.00193 J 0.00122 0.0128 0.00145 J 0.00107 0.0112 0.00186 J 0.00109 0.0115 <0.0135 0.00128 0.0135 0.00128 J 0.00126 0.0133
<0.00128 0.000448 0.0013 <0.00112 0.000394 0.00112 <0.00115 0.000401 0.00115 <0.00135 0.000473 0.00135 <0.00133 0.000465 0.00133
<0.00640 0.00637 0.0064 <0.00562 0.0056 0.00562 <0.00573 0.0057 0.00573 <0.00675 0.00673 0.00675 <0.00665 0.00662 0.00665
0.000659 J 0.000264 0.0013 0.000362 J 0.000232 0.00112 0.000443 J 0.000236 0.00115 0.000417 J 0.000278 0.00135 <0.00133 0.000274 0.00133
<0.00128 0.000285 0.0013 <0.00112 0.000251 0.00112 <0.00115 0.000255 0.00115 <0.00135 0.000301 0.00135 <0.00133 0.000296 0.00133
<0.00128 0.000379 0.0013 <0.00112 0.000333 0.00112 <0.00115 0.000339 0.00115 <0.00135 0.0004 0.00135 <0.00133 0.000394 0.00133
<0.00128 0.000296 0.0013 <0.00112 0.00026 0.00112 <0.00115 0.000265 0.00115 <0.00135 0.000312 0.00135 <0.00133 0.000307 0.00133
<0.00128 0.000545 0.0013 <0.00112 0.000479 0.00112 <0.00115 0.000488 0.00115 <0.00135 0.000575 0.00135 <0.00133 0.000566 0.00133
<0.00128 0.000416 0.0013 <0.00112 0.000365 0.00112 <0.00115 0.000372 0.00115 <0.00135 0.000439 0.00135 <0.00133 0.000432 0.00133
0.0184 0.00157 0.0064 0.00648 0.00138 0.00562 0.00929 0.00141 0.00573 0.00635 J 0.00166 0.00675 0.0101 0.00164 0.00665
<0.00128 0.000391 0.0013 <0.00112 0.000344 0.00112 <0.00115 0.00035 0.00115 <0.00135 0.000413 0.00135 <0.00133 0.000407 0.00133
<0.00128 0.000496 0.0013 <0.00112 0.000436 0.00112 <0.00115 0.000444 0.00115 <0.00135 0.000524 0.00135 <0.00133 0.000516 0.00133
<0.00128 0.000473 0.0013 <0.00112 0.000416 0.00112 <0.00115 0.000424 0.00115 <0.00135 0.0005 0.00135 <0.00133 0.000492 0.00133
L1558026-16
B-9 @ SURFACE B-9 @ 2'B-10 @ SURFACE B-10 @ 5'
L1558026-17 L1558026-18 L1558026-19 L1558026-20
11/09/2022 11/09/2022 11/11/2022 11/11/2022
B-8 @ 3'
11/10/2022
Page 7 of 18
Table C2 - VOCs and Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soil
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking - 2890 South State Street and 1215 North SR 51, Spanish Fork City, Utah County, Utah
Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.3
Analyte CAS Method Units RSL
Residential
RSL
Industrial ISL Tier 1
TPH-GRO 8006-61-9 8260B mg/kg NE NE 150 1500
Date Collected
Client Sample ID
Lab Sample ID
1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE 79-00-5 8260B mg/kg 1.1 5 NE NE
TRICHLOROETHENE 79-01-6 8260B mg/kg 0.94 6 NE NE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE 75-69-4 8260B mg/kg 23000 350000 NE NE
1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE 96-18-4 8260B mg/kg 0.0051 0.11 NE NE
1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 95-63-6 8260B mg/kg 300 1800 NE NE
1,2,3-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 526-73-8 8260B mg/kg 340 2000 NE NE
1,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 108-67-8 8260B mg/kg 270 1500 NE NE
VINYL CHLORIDE 75-01-4 8260B mg/kg 0.059 1.7 NE NE
XYLENES, TOTAL 1330-20-7 8260B mg/kg 580 2500 142 142
Qualifiers (Q):
NE:Not Established.<:Less than Reported Detection Limit (RDL).
mg/kg:Milligrams per kilogram.
Blue italicized non-detect results (e.g.,<0.0100 ) exceed one or more of the screening levels.
Color shaded value exceeds screening level.
B:The same analyte is found in the associated blank.J:The identification of the analyte
is acceptable; the reported value is an estimate.J3:The associated batch QC was
outside the established quality control range for precision.J5:The sample matrix
interfered with the ability to make any accurate determination; spike value is high.
J6:The sample matrix interfered with the ability to make any accurate determination;
spike value is low. P1:RPD value not applicable for sample concentrations less than 5
times the reporting limit. V:The sample concentration is too high to evaluate accurate
spike recoveries. V3:The internal standard exhibited poor recovery due to sample matrix
interference. The analytical results will be biased high. BDL results will be unaffected.
EPA RSL: Environmental Protection Agency Regional Screening Levels for soil at residential (Res.) and industrial
(Ind.) properties (May 2022; TR=1E-06; THQ=1.0).
Utah's Initial Screening Levels (ISLs) and risk-based Tier 1 Screening Levels (Tier 1) for petroleum releases at
leaking underground storage tank sites
Bold value exceeds Method Detection Limit (MDL).
Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL
L1558026-16
B-9 @ SURFACE B-9 @ 2'B-10 @ SURFACE B-10 @ 5'
L1558026-17 L1558026-18 L1558026-19 L1558026-20
11/09/2022 11/09/2022 11/11/2022 11/11/2022
B-8 @ 3'
11/10/2022
<0.00128 0.000544 0.0013 <0.00112 0.000478 0.00112 <0.00115 0.000487 0.00115 <0.00135 0.000574 0.00135 <0.00133 0.000565 0.00133
<0.00128 0.000256 0.0013 <0.00112 0.000225 0.00112 <0.00115 0.000229 0.00115 <0.00135 0.00027 0.00135 <0.00133 0.000266 0.00133
<0.00640 0.000455 0.0064 <0.00562 0.0004 0.00562 <0.00573 0.000408 0.00573 <0.00675 0.000481 0.00675 <0.00665 0.000473 0.00665
<0.00320 0.000312 0.0032 <0.00281 0.000274 0.00281 <0.00286 0.000279 0.00286 <0.00338 0.00033 0.00338 <0.00332 0.000324 0.00332
0.00112 J 0.00027 0.0013 0.00134 0.000237 0.00112 0.00141 0.000242 0.00115 0.00126 J 0.000285 0.00135 0.00179 0.000281 0.00133
0.000439 J 0.000367 0.0013 0.000404 J 0.000323 0.00112 0.000407 J 0.000329 0.00115 0.000393 J 0.000388 0.00135 0.000532 J 0.000382 0.00133
0.000496 J 0.00034 0.0013 0.000569 J 0.000299 0.00112 0.000605 J 0.000305 0.00115 0.00054 J 0.000359 0.00135 0.000921 J 0.000354 0.00133
<0.00128 0.000289 0.0013 <0.00112 0.000254 0.00112 <0.00115 0.000259 0.00115 <0.00135 0.000305 0.00135 <0.00133 0.0003 0.00133
0.00651 0.00064 0.0038 0.00358 0.000562 0.00337 0.00425 0.000573 0.00344 0.00357 J 0.000675 0.00405 0.00513 0.000665 0.00399
Page 8 of 18
Table C2 - VOCs and Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soil
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking - 2890 South State Street and 1215 North SR 51, Spanish Fork City, Utah County, Utah
Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.3
Analyte CAS Method Units RSL
Residential
RSL
Industrial ISL Tier 1
TPH-GRO 8006-61-9 8260B mg/kg NE NE 150 1500
TPH-DRO 68334-30-5 8015 mg/kg NE NE 500 5000
TRPH NE 9071B mg/kg NE NE 1000 10000
ACETONE 67-64-1 8260B mg/kg 61000 670000 NE NE
ACRYLONITRILE 107-13-1 8260B mg/kg 0.25 1.1 NE NE
BENZENE 71-43-2 8260B mg/kg 1.2 5.1 0.2 0.9
BROMOBENZENE 108-86-1 8260B mg/kg 290 1800 NE NE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE 75-27-4 8260B mg/kg 0.29 1.3 NE NE
BROMOFORM 75-25-2 8260B mg/kg 19 86 NE NE
BROMOMETHANE 74-83-9 8260B mg/kg 6.8 30 NE NE
N-BUTYLBENZENE 104-51-8 8260B mg/kg 3900 58000 NE NE
SEC-BUTYLBENZENE 135-98-8 8260B mg/kg 7800 120000 NE NE
TERT-BUTYLBENZENE 98-06-6 8260B mg/kg 7800 120000 NE NE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 56-23-5 8260B mg/kg 0.65 2.9 NE NE
CHLOROBENZENE 108-90-7 8260B mg/kg 280 1300 NE NE
CHLORODIBROMOMETHANE 124-48-1 8260B mg/kg 8.3 39 NE NE
CHLOROETHANE 75-00-3 8260B mg/kg 14000 57000 NE NE
CHLOROFORM 67-66-3 8260B mg/kg 0.32 1.4 NE NE
CHLOROMETHANE 74-87-3 8260B mg/kg 110 460 NE NE
2-CHLOROTOLUENE 95-49-8 8260B mg/kg 1600 23000 NE NE
4-CHLOROTOLUENE 106-43-4 8260B mg/kg 1600 23000 NE NE
1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE 96-12-8 8260B mg/kg 0.0053 0.064 NE NE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE 106-93-4 8260B mg/kg 0.036 0.16 NE NE
DIBROMOMETHANE 74-95-3 8260B mg/kg 24 99 NE NE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 95-50-1 8260B mg/kg 1800 9300 NE NE
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 541-73-1 8260B mg/kg NE NE NE NE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 106-46-7 8260B mg/kg 2.6 11 NE NE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE 75-71-8 8260B mg/kg 87 370 NE NE
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE 75-34-3 8260B mg/kg 3.6 16 NE NE
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE 107-06-2 8260B mg/kg 0.46 2 NE NE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE 75-35-4 8260B mg/kg 230 1000 NE NE
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 156-59-2 8260B mg/kg 160 2300 NE NE
TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 156-60-5 8260B mg/kg 70 300 NE NE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 78-87-5 8260B mg/kg 2.5 11 NE NE
1,1-DICHLOROPROPENE 563-58-6 8260B mg/kg NE NE NE NE
1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE 142-28-9 8260B mg/kg 1600 23000 NE NE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 10061-01-5 8260B mg/kg NE NE NE NE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 10061-02-6 8260B mg/kg NE NE NE NE
2,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 594-20-7 8260B mg/kg NE NE NE NE
DI-ISOPROPYL ETHER 108-20-3 8260B mg/kg 2200 9400 NE NE
ETHYLBENZENE 100-41-4 8260B mg/kg 5.8 25 5 23
HEXACHLORO-1,3-BUTADIENE 87-68-3 8260B mg/kg 1.2 5.3 NE NE
ISOPROPYLBENZENE 98-82-8 8260B mg/kg 1900 9900 NE NE
P-ISOPROPYLTOLUENE 99-87-6 8260B mg/kg NE NE NE NE
2-BUTANONE (MEK)78-93-3 8260B mg/kg 27000 190000 NE NE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE 75-09-2 8260B mg/kg 57 1000 NE NE
4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE (MIBK)108-10-1 8260B mg/kg 33000 140000 NE NE
METHYL TERT-BUTYL ETHER 1634-04-4 8260B mg/kg 47 210 0.3 0.3
NAPHTHALENE 91-20-3 8260B mg/kg 2 8.6 51 51
N-PROPYLBENZENE 103-65-1 8260B mg/kg 3800 24000 NE NE
STYRENE 100-42-5 8260B mg/kg 6000 35000 NE NE
1,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 630-20-6 8260B mg/kg 2 8.8 NE NE
1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 79-34-5 8260B mg/kg 0.6 2.7 NE NE
1,1,2-TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE76-13-1 8260B mg/kg 6700 28000 NE NE
TETRACHLOROETHENE 127-18-4 8260B mg/kg 24 100 NE NE
TOLUENE 108-88-3 8260B mg/kg 4900 47000 9 25
1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE 87-61-6 8260B mg/kg 63 930 NE NE
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 120-82-1 8260B mg/kg 24 110 NE NE
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 71-55-6 8260B mg/kg 8100 36000 NE NE
Date Collected
Client Sample ID
Lab Sample ID
Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL
0.292 J 0.224 0.612 0.464 J 0.225 0.615 0.32 J 0.243 0.665 13.9 0.222 0.608 0.406 J 0.214 0.585
280 9.41 48.9 1.4 J 0.945 4.92 894 V 20.5 106 1320 4.68 24.3 9.4 0.899 4.68
1130 40.4 122 82.8 J 40.6 123 1830 43.9 133 2230 40.1 122 116 J 38.6 117
0.105 0.0253 0.0612 0.0333 J 0.0255 0.0615 0.152 0.0275 0.0665 0.194 0.0252 0.0608 0.0519 J 0.0242 0.0585
<0.0122 0.00247 0.0122 <0.0123 0.00248 0.0123 <0.0133 0.00268 0.0133 <0.0122 0.00245 0.0122 <0.0117 0.00236 0.0117
0.00796 0.000459 0.00122 0.0272 0.000461 0.00123 0.0121 0.000498 0.00133 0.0113 0.000456 0.00122 0.00897 0.000439 0.00117
<0.00122 0.000336 0.00122 <0.00123 0.000338 0.00123 <0.00133 0.000366 0.00133 <0.00122 0.000334 0.00122 <0.00117 0.000322 0.00117
<0.00122 0.000887 0.00122 <0.00123 0.000891 0.00123 <0.00133 0.000964 0.00133 <0.00122 0.000881 0.00122 <0.00117 0.000848 0.00117
<0.00122 0.000519 0.00122 <0.00123 0.000521 0.00123 <0.00133 0.000564 0.00133 <0.00122 0.000515 0.00122 <0.00117 0.000496 0.00117
<0.00612 0.00143 0.00612 <0.00615 0.00144 0.00615 <0.00665 0.00156 0.00665 <0.00608 0.00142 0.00608 <0.00585 0.00137 0.00585
<0.00122 0.000316 0.00122 0.00039 J 0.000317 0.00123 <0.00133 0.000343 0.00133 0.0916 0.000314 0.00122 <0.00117 0.000302 0.00117
<0.00122 0.000246 0.00122 <0.00123 0.000247 0.00123 <0.00133 0.000267 0.00133 0.0367 0.000244 0.00122 <0.00117 0.000235 0.00117
<0.00122 0.000252 0.00122 <0.00123 0.000253 0.00123 <0.00133 0.000274 0.00133 <0.00122 0.00025 0.00122 <0.00117 0.000241 0.00117
<0.00122 0.000303 0.00122 <0.00123 0.000305 0.00123 <0.00133 0.00033 0.00133 <0.00122 0.000301 0.00122 <0.00117 0.00029 0.00117
<0.00122 0.000235 0.00122 <0.00123 0.000236 0.00123 <0.00133 0.000255 0.00133 <0.00122 0.000233 0.00122 <0.00117 0.000225 0.00117
<0.00122 0.000274 0.00122 <0.00123 0.000275 0.00123 <0.00133 0.000298 0.00133 <0.00122 0.000272 0.00122 <0.00117 0.000262 0.00117
<0.00612 0.00122 0.00612 <0.00615 0.00123 0.00615 <0.00665 0.00133 0.00665 <0.00608 0.00122 0.00608 <0.00585 0.00117 0.00585
<0.00612 0.00126 0.00612 <0.00615 0.00127 0.00615 <0.00665 0.00137 0.00665 <0.00608 0.00125 0.00608 <0.00585 0.0012 0.00585
<0.00306 0.000795 0.00306 <0.00307 0.000799 0.00307 <0.00332 0.000864 0.00332 <0.00304 0.00079 0.00304 <0.00292 0.00076 0.00292
<0.00122 0.000275 0.00122 <0.00123 0.000277 0.00123 <0.00133 0.000299 0.00133 <0.00122 0.000273 0.00122 <0.00117 0.000263 0.00117
<0.00122 0.000845 0.00122 <0.00123 0.00085 0.00123 <0.00133 0.000918 0.00133 <0.00122 0.00084 0.00122 <0.00117 0.000808 0.00117
<0.00612 0.00232 0.00612 <0.00615 0.00234 0.00615 <0.00665 0.00253 0.00665 <0.00608 0.00231 0.00608 <0.00585 0.00222 0.00585
<0.00122 0.000306 0.00122 <0.00123 0.000307 0.00123 <0.00133 0.000332 0.00133 <0.00122 0.000304 0.00122 <0.00117 0.000292 0.00117
<0.00122 0.000428 0.00122 <0.00123 0.00043 0.00123 <0.00133 0.000465 0.00133 <0.00122 0.000425 0.00122 <0.00117 0.000409 0.00117
<0.00122 0.00052 0.00122 <0.00123 0.000523 0.00123 <0.00133 0.000565 0.00133 <0.00122 0.000517 0.00122 <0.00117 0.000497 0.00117
<0.00122 0.000734 0.00122 <0.00123 0.000738 0.00123 <0.00133 0.000797 0.00133 <0.00122 0.000729 0.00122 <0.00117 0.000702 0.00117
<0.00122 0.00102 0.00122 <0.00123 0.00102 0.00123 <0.00133 0.0011 0.00133 <0.00122 0.00101 0.00122 <0.00117 0.000971 0.00117
<0.00612 0.000351 0.00612 <0.00615 0.000353 0.00615 <0.00665 0.000381 0.00665 <0.00608 0.000349 0.00608 <0.00585 0.000336 0.00585
<0.00122 0.000328 0.00122 <0.00123 0.000329 0.00123 <0.00133 0.000356 0.00133 <0.00122 0.000326 0.00122 <0.00117 0.000313 0.00117
<0.00122 0.000551 0.00122 <0.00123 0.000553 0.00123 <0.00133 0.000598 0.00133 <0.00122 0.000547 0.00122 <0.00117 0.000526 0.00117
<0.00122 0.000434 0.00122 <0.00123 0.000436 0.00123 <0.00133 0.000472 0.00133 <0.00122 0.000431 0.00122 <0.00117 0.000415 0.00117
<0.00122 0.000581 0.00122 <0.00123 0.000584 0.00123 <0.00133 0.000631 0.00133 <0.00122 0.000577 0.00122 <0.00117 0.000556 0.00117
<0.00122 0.000612 0.00122 <0.00123 0.000615 0.00123 <0.00133 0.000665 0.00133 <0.00122 0.000608 0.00122 <0.00117 0.000585 0.00117
<0.00122 0.000201 0.00122 <0.00123 0.000202 0.00123 <0.00133 0.000218 0.00133 <0.00122 0.000199 0.00122 <0.00117 0.000192 0.00117
<0.00122 0.000459 0.00122 <0.00123 0.000461 0.00123 <0.00133 0.000498 0.00133 <0.00122 0.000456 0.00122 <0.00117 0.000439 0.00117
<0.00122 0.000275 0.00122 <0.00123 0.000277 0.00123 <0.00133 0.000299 0.00133 <0.00122 0.000273 0.00122 <0.00117 0.000263 0.00117
<0.00122 0.00052 0.00122 <0.00123 0.000523 0.00123 <0.00133 0.000565 0.00133 <0.00122 0.000517 0.00122 <0.00117 0.000497 0.00117
<0.00122 0.000826 0.00122 <0.00123 0.00083 0.00123 <0.00133 0.000897 0.00133 <0.00122 0.00082 0.00122 <0.00117 0.00079 0.00117
<0.00122 0.000459 0.00122 <0.00123 0.000461 0.00123 <0.00133 0.000498 0.00133 <0.00122 0.000456 0.00122 <0.00117 0.000439 0.00117
<0.00122 0.00027 0.00122 <0.00123 0.000272 0.00123 <0.00133 0.000294 0.00133 <0.00122 0.000269 0.00122 <0.00117 0.000259 0.00117
0.00489 0.000367 0.00122 0.0105 0.000369 0.00123 0.0036 0.000399 0.00133 2.47 0.0217 0.0722 0.00474 0.000351 0.00117
<0.00122 0.000418 0.00122 <0.00123 0.00042 0.00123 <0.00133 0.000455 0.00133 <0.00122 0.000416 0.00122 <0.00117 0.0004 0.00117
<0.00122 0.00052 0.00122 0.00074 J 0.000523 0.00123 <0.00133 0.000565 0.00133 0.0664 0.000517 0.00122 <0.00117 0.000497 0.00117
<0.00122 0.00025 0.00122 <0.00123 0.000251 0.00123 <0.00133 0.000271 0.00133 0.00954 0.000248 0.00122 <0.00117 0.000239 0.00117
0.0273 0.00573 0.0122 0.0114 J 0.00575 0.0123 0.0225 0.00622 0.0133 0.0723 0.00569 0.0122 0.0123 0.00547 0.0117
0.00122 J 0.00122 0.00612 0.00127 B J 0.00123 0.00615 0.00153 B J 0.00133 0.00665 <0.00608 0.00122 0.00608 0.00122 B J 0.00117 0.00585
0.00615 J 0.00116 0.0122 0.00189 J 0.00117 0.0123 0.0126 J 0.00126 0.0133 <0.0122 0.00115 0.0122 <0.0117 0.00111 0.0117
<0.00122 0.000428 0.00122 <0.00123 0.00043 0.00123 <0.00133 0.000465 0.00133 0.00715 0.000425 0.00122 <0.00117 0.000409 0.00117
<0.00612 0.00609 0.00612 <0.00615 0.00612 0.00615 <0.00665 0.00662 0.00665 1.86 0.359 0.362 <0.00585 0.00583 0.00585
0.00086 J 0.000252 0.00122 0.00138 0.000253 0.00123 0.00061 J 0.000274 0.00133 1.9 0.0149 0.0722 0.00109 J V3 0.000241 0.00117
0.00219 0.000273 0.00122 <0.00123 0.000274 0.00123 <0.00133 0.000296 0.00133 <0.00122 0.000271 0.00122 <0.00117 0.000261 0.00117
<0.00122 0.000362 0.00122 <0.00123 0.000364 0.00123 <0.00133 0.000393 0.00133 <0.00122 0.00036 0.00122 <0.00117 0.000346 0.00117
<0.00122 0.000283 0.00122 <0.00123 0.000284 0.00123 <0.00133 0.000307 0.00133 <0.00122 0.000281 0.00122 <0.00117 0.00027 0.00117
<0.00122 0.000521 0.00122 <0.00123 0.000524 0.00123 <0.00133 0.000566 0.00133 <0.00122 0.000518 0.00122 <0.00117 0.000498 0.00117
<0.00122 0.000398 0.00122 <0.00123 0.0004 0.00123 <0.00133 0.000432 0.00133 <0.00122 0.000395 0.00122 <0.00117 0.00038 0.00117
0.0126 0.0015 0.00612 0.032 0.00151 0.00615 0.0136 0.00163 0.00665 0.00914 0.00149 0.00608 0.00974 0.00144 0.00585
<0.00122 0.000374 0.00122 <0.00123 0.000376 0.00123 <0.00133 0.000407 0.00133 <0.00122 0.000372 0.00122 <0.00117 0.000358 0.00117
<0.00122 0.000475 0.00122 <0.00123 0.000477 0.00123 <0.00133 0.000516 0.00133 <0.00122 0.000472 0.00122 <0.00117 0.000454 0.00117
<0.00122 0.000453 0.00122 <0.00123 0.000455 0.00123 <0.00133 0.000492 0.00133 <0.00122 0.00045 0.00122 <0.00117 0.000433 0.00117
11/11/2022 11/11/2022 11/11/2022 11/11/2022
B-13 @ SURFACE
L1558026-42L1558026-22 L1558026-40 L1558026-41
B-11 @ SURFACE B-11 @ 6'B-12 @ SURFACE B-12 @ 4'
L1558026-21
11/11/2022
Page 9 of 18
Table C2 - VOCs and Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soil
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking - 2890 South State Street and 1215 North SR 51, Spanish Fork City, Utah County, Utah
Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.3
Analyte CAS Method Units RSL
Residential
RSL
Industrial ISL Tier 1
TPH-GRO 8006-61-9 8260B mg/kg NE NE 150 1500
Date Collected
Client Sample ID
Lab Sample ID
1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE 79-00-5 8260B mg/kg 1.1 5 NE NE
TRICHLOROETHENE 79-01-6 8260B mg/kg 0.94 6 NE NE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE 75-69-4 8260B mg/kg 23000 350000 NE NE
1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE 96-18-4 8260B mg/kg 0.0051 0.11 NE NE
1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 95-63-6 8260B mg/kg 300 1800 NE NE
1,2,3-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 526-73-8 8260B mg/kg 340 2000 NE NE
1,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 108-67-8 8260B mg/kg 270 1500 NE NE
VINYL CHLORIDE 75-01-4 8260B mg/kg 0.059 1.7 NE NE
XYLENES, TOTAL 1330-20-7 8260B mg/kg 580 2500 142 142
Qualifiers (Q):
NE:Not Established.<:Less than Reported Detection Limit (RDL).
mg/kg:Milligrams per kilogram.
Blue italicized non-detect results (e.g.,<0.0100 ) exceed one or more of the screening levels.
Color shaded value exceeds screening level.
B:The same analyte is found in the associated blank.J:The identification of the analyte
is acceptable; the reported value is an estimate.J3:The associated batch QC was
outside the established quality control range for precision.J5:The sample matrix
interfered with the ability to make any accurate determination; spike value is high.
J6:The sample matrix interfered with the ability to make any accurate determination;
spike value is low. P1:RPD value not applicable for sample concentrations less than 5
times the reporting limit. V:The sample concentration is too high to evaluate accurate
spike recoveries. V3:The internal standard exhibited poor recovery due to sample matrix
interference. The analytical results will be biased high. BDL results will be unaffected.
EPA RSL: Environmental Protection Agency Regional Screening Levels for soil at residential (Res.) and industrial
(Ind.) properties (May 2022; TR=1E-06; THQ=1.0).
Utah's Initial Screening Levels (ISLs) and risk-based Tier 1 Screening Levels (Tier 1) for petroleum releases at
leaking underground storage tank sites
Bold value exceeds Method Detection Limit (MDL).
Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL
11/11/2022 11/11/2022 11/11/2022 11/11/2022
B-13 @ SURFACE
L1558026-42L1558026-22 L1558026-40 L1558026-41
B-11 @ SURFACE B-11 @ 6'B-12 @ SURFACE B-12 @ 4'
L1558026-21
11/11/2022
<0.00122 0.00052 0.00122 <0.00123 0.000523 0.00123 <0.00133 0.000565 0.00133 <0.00122 0.000517 0.00122 <0.00117 0.000497 0.00117
<0.00122 0.000245 0.00122 <0.00123 0.000246 0.00123 <0.00133 0.000266 0.00133 <0.00122 0.000243 0.00122 <0.00117 0.000234 0.00117
<0.00612 0.000436 0.00612 0.00102 J 0.000438 0.00615 <0.00665 0.000473 0.00665 <0.00608 0.000433 0.00608 <0.00585 0.000416 0.00585
<0.00306 0.000298 0.00306 <0.00307 0.0003 0.00307 <0.00332 0.000324 0.00332 <0.00304 0.000297 0.00304 <0.00292 0.000285 0.00292
0.00248 0.000258 0.00122 0.00318 0.000259 0.00123 0.00237 0.00028 0.00133 16.2 E 0.0153 0.0722 0.00366 V3 0.000247 0.00117
0.00077 J 0.000351 0.00122 0.00105 J 0.000353 0.00123 0.00088 J 0.000381 0.00133 3.62 0.0207 0.0722 0.00124 V3 0.000336 0.00117
0.00096 J 0.000325 0.00122 0.00116 J 0.000327 0.00123 0.0012 J 0.000354 0.00133 4.9 0.0192 0.0722 0.00143 V3 0.000311 0.00117
<0.00122 0.000276 0.00122 <0.00123 0.000278 0.00123 <0.00133 0.0003 0.00133 <0.00122 0.000275 0.00122 <0.00117 0.000264 0.00117
0.00712 0.000612 0.00367 0.0128 0.000615 0.00369 0.0113 0.000665 0.00399 13.1 0.0362 0.217 0.00907 0.000585 0.00351
Page 10 of 18
Table C2 - VOCs and Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soil
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking - 2890 South State Street and 1215 North SR 51, Spanish Fork City, Utah County, Utah
Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.3
Analyte CAS Method Units RSL
Residential
RSL
Industrial ISL Tier 1
TPH-GRO 8006-61-9 8260B mg/kg NE NE 150 1500
TPH-DRO 68334-30-5 8015 mg/kg NE NE 500 5000
TRPH NE 9071B mg/kg NE NE 1000 10000
ACETONE 67-64-1 8260B mg/kg 61000 670000 NE NE
ACRYLONITRILE 107-13-1 8260B mg/kg 0.25 1.1 NE NE
BENZENE 71-43-2 8260B mg/kg 1.2 5.1 0.2 0.9
BROMOBENZENE 108-86-1 8260B mg/kg 290 1800 NE NE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE 75-27-4 8260B mg/kg 0.29 1.3 NE NE
BROMOFORM 75-25-2 8260B mg/kg 19 86 NE NE
BROMOMETHANE 74-83-9 8260B mg/kg 6.8 30 NE NE
N-BUTYLBENZENE 104-51-8 8260B mg/kg 3900 58000 NE NE
SEC-BUTYLBENZENE 135-98-8 8260B mg/kg 7800 120000 NE NE
TERT-BUTYLBENZENE 98-06-6 8260B mg/kg 7800 120000 NE NE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 56-23-5 8260B mg/kg 0.65 2.9 NE NE
CHLOROBENZENE 108-90-7 8260B mg/kg 280 1300 NE NE
CHLORODIBROMOMETHANE 124-48-1 8260B mg/kg 8.3 39 NE NE
CHLOROETHANE 75-00-3 8260B mg/kg 14000 57000 NE NE
CHLOROFORM 67-66-3 8260B mg/kg 0.32 1.4 NE NE
CHLOROMETHANE 74-87-3 8260B mg/kg 110 460 NE NE
2-CHLOROTOLUENE 95-49-8 8260B mg/kg 1600 23000 NE NE
4-CHLOROTOLUENE 106-43-4 8260B mg/kg 1600 23000 NE NE
1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE 96-12-8 8260B mg/kg 0.0053 0.064 NE NE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE 106-93-4 8260B mg/kg 0.036 0.16 NE NE
DIBROMOMETHANE 74-95-3 8260B mg/kg 24 99 NE NE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 95-50-1 8260B mg/kg 1800 9300 NE NE
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 541-73-1 8260B mg/kg NE NE NE NE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 106-46-7 8260B mg/kg 2.6 11 NE NE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE 75-71-8 8260B mg/kg 87 370 NE NE
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE 75-34-3 8260B mg/kg 3.6 16 NE NE
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE 107-06-2 8260B mg/kg 0.46 2 NE NE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE 75-35-4 8260B mg/kg 230 1000 NE NE
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 156-59-2 8260B mg/kg 160 2300 NE NE
TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 156-60-5 8260B mg/kg 70 300 NE NE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 78-87-5 8260B mg/kg 2.5 11 NE NE
1,1-DICHLOROPROPENE 563-58-6 8260B mg/kg NE NE NE NE
1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE 142-28-9 8260B mg/kg 1600 23000 NE NE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 10061-01-5 8260B mg/kg NE NE NE NE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 10061-02-6 8260B mg/kg NE NE NE NE
2,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 594-20-7 8260B mg/kg NE NE NE NE
DI-ISOPROPYL ETHER 108-20-3 8260B mg/kg 2200 9400 NE NE
ETHYLBENZENE 100-41-4 8260B mg/kg 5.8 25 5 23
HEXACHLORO-1,3-BUTADIENE 87-68-3 8260B mg/kg 1.2 5.3 NE NE
ISOPROPYLBENZENE 98-82-8 8260B mg/kg 1900 9900 NE NE
P-ISOPROPYLTOLUENE 99-87-6 8260B mg/kg NE NE NE NE
2-BUTANONE (MEK)78-93-3 8260B mg/kg 27000 190000 NE NE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE 75-09-2 8260B mg/kg 57 1000 NE NE
4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE (MIBK)108-10-1 8260B mg/kg 33000 140000 NE NE
METHYL TERT-BUTYL ETHER 1634-04-4 8260B mg/kg 47 210 0.3 0.3
NAPHTHALENE 91-20-3 8260B mg/kg 2 8.6 51 51
N-PROPYLBENZENE 103-65-1 8260B mg/kg 3800 24000 NE NE
STYRENE 100-42-5 8260B mg/kg 6000 35000 NE NE
1,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 630-20-6 8260B mg/kg 2 8.8 NE NE
1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 79-34-5 8260B mg/kg 0.6 2.7 NE NE
1,1,2-TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE76-13-1 8260B mg/kg 6700 28000 NE NE
TETRACHLOROETHENE 127-18-4 8260B mg/kg 24 100 NE NE
TOLUENE 108-88-3 8260B mg/kg 4900 47000 9 25
1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE 87-61-6 8260B mg/kg 63 930 NE NE
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 120-82-1 8260B mg/kg 24 110 NE NE
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 71-55-6 8260B mg/kg 8100 36000 NE NE
Date Collected
Client Sample ID
Lab Sample ID
Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL
0.345 J 0.209 0.572 0.252 J 0.24 0.655 0.964 V3 0.224 0.613 0.363 J 0.221 0.603
5.68 0.879 4.57 1.98 J 1.01 5.24 3.64 J 0.942 4.9 68.5 4.64 24.1
87.3 J 37.7 114 78.3 J 43.2 131 71.1 J 40.4 123 409 39.8 121
0.0493 J 0.0237 0.0572 0.0393 J 0.0271 0.0655 0.0807 V3 0.0254 0.0613 0.0967 0.025 0.0603
<0.0114 0.00231 0.0114 <0.0131 0.00265 0.0131 <0.0123 0.00248 0.0123 <0.0121 0.00244 0.0121
0.0138 0.000429 0.00114 0.00464 0.00049 0.00131 0.0274 V3 0.00046 0.00123 0.0177 0.000452 0.00121
<0.00114 0.000314 0.00114 <0.00131 0.00036 0.00131 <0.00123 0.00034 0.00123 <0.00121 0.000332 0.00121
<0.00114 0.000829 0.00114 <0.00131 0.00095 0.00131 <0.00123 0.00089 0.00123 <0.00121 0.000874 0.00121
<0.00114 0.000485 0.00114 <0.00131 0.00056 0.00131 <0.00123 0.00052 0.00123 <0.00121 0.000511 0.00121
<0.00572 0.00134 0.00572 <0.00655 0.00153 0.00655 <0.00613 0.00143 0.00613 <0.00603 0.00141 0.00603
<0.00114 0.000295 0.00114 <0.00131 0.00034 0.00131 0.000902 J V3 0.00032 0.00123 <0.00121 0.000311 0.00121
<0.00114 0.00023 0.00114 <0.00131 0.00026 0.00131 0.000458 J V3 0.00025 0.00123 <0.00121 0.000242 0.00121
<0.00114 0.000236 0.00114 <0.00131 0.00027 0.00131 <0.00123 0.00025 0.00123 <0.00121 0.000248 0.00121
<0.00114 0.000284 0.00114 <0.00131 0.00033 0.00131 <0.00123 0.0003 0.00123 <0.00121 0.000299 0.00121
<0.00114 0.00022 0.00114 <0.00131 0.00025 0.00131 <0.00123 0.00024 0.00123 <0.00121 0.000232 0.00121
<0.00114 0.000256 0.00114 <0.00131 0.00029 0.00131 <0.00123 0.00027 0.00123 <0.00121 0.00027 0.00121
<0.00572 0.00114 0.00572 <0.00655 0.00131 0.00655 <0.00613 0.00123 0.00613 <0.00603 0.00121 0.00603
<0.00572 0.00118 0.00572 <0.00655 0.00135 0.00655 <0.00613 0.00126 0.00613 <0.00603 0.00124 0.00603
<0.00286 0.000743 0.00286 <0.00328 0.00085 0.00328 <0.00306 0.0008 0.00306 <0.00302 0.000784 0.00302
<0.00114 0.000257 0.00114 <0.00131 0.0003 0.00131 <0.00123 0.00028 0.00123 <0.00121 0.000271 0.00121
<0.00114 0.00079 0.00114 <0.00131 0.00091 0.00131 <0.00123 0.00085 0.00123 <0.00121 0.000833 0.00121
<0.00572 0.00217 0.00572 <0.00655 0.00249 0.00655 <0.00613 0.00233 0.00613 <0.00603 0.00229 0.00603
<0.00114 0.000286 0.00114 <0.00131 0.00033 0.00131 <0.00123 0.00031 0.00123 <0.00121 0.000302 0.00121
<0.00114 0.0004 0.00114 <0.00131 0.00046 0.00131 <0.00123 0.00043 0.00123 <0.00121 0.000422 0.00121
<0.00114 0.000486 0.00114 <0.00131 0.00056 0.00131 <0.00123 0.00052 0.00123 <0.00121 0.000513 0.00121
<0.00114 0.000686 0.00114 <0.00131 0.00079 0.00131 <0.00123 0.00074 0.00123 <0.00121 0.000724 0.00121
<0.00114 0.000949 0.00114 <0.00131 0.00109 0.00131 <0.00123 0.00102 0.00123 <0.00121 0.001 0.00121
<0.00572 0.000328 0.00572 <0.00655 0.00038 0.00655 <0.00613 0.00035 0.00613 <0.00603 0.000346 0.00603
<0.00114 0.000306 0.00114 <0.00131 0.00035 0.00131 <0.00123 0.00033 0.00123 <0.00121 0.000323 0.00121
<0.00114 0.000515 0.00114 <0.00131 0.00059 0.00131 <0.00123 0.00055 0.00123 <0.00121 0.000543 0.00121
<0.00114 0.000406 0.00114 <0.00131 0.00047 0.00131 <0.00123 0.00044 0.00123 <0.00121 0.000428 0.00121
<0.00114 0.000543 0.00114 <0.00131 0.00062 0.00131 <0.00123 0.00058 0.00123 <0.00121 0.000573 0.00121
<0.00114 0.000572 0.00114 <0.00131 0.00066 0.00131 <0.00123 0.00061 0.00123 <0.00121 0.000603 0.00121
<0.00114 0.000188 0.00114 <0.00131 0.00022 0.00131 <0.00123 0.0002 0.00123 <0.00121 0.000198 0.00121
<0.00114 0.000429 0.00114 <0.00131 0.00049 0.00131 <0.00123 0.00046 0.00123 <0.00121 0.000452 0.00121
<0.00114 0.000257 0.00114 <0.00131 0.0003 0.00131 <0.00123 0.00028 0.00123 <0.00121 0.000271 0.00121
<0.00114 0.000486 0.00114 <0.00131 0.00056 0.00131 <0.00123 0.00052 0.00123 <0.00121 0.000513 0.00121
<0.00114 0.000772 0.00114 <0.00131 0.00088 0.00131 <0.00123 0.00083 0.00123 <0.00121 0.000814 0.00121
<0.00114 0.000429 0.00114 <0.00131 0.00049 0.00131 <0.00123 0.00046 0.00123 <0.00121 0.000452 0.00121
<0.00114 0.000253 0.00114 <0.00131 0.00029 0.00131 <0.00123 0.00027 0.00123 <0.00121 0.000267 0.00121
0.00535 0.000343 0.00114 0.00305 0.00039 0.00131 0.0232 V3 0.00037 0.00123 0.00422 0.000362 0.00121
<0.00114 0.000391 0.00114 <0.00131 0.00045 0.00131 <0.00123 0.00042 0.00123 <0.00121 0.000413 0.00121
<0.00114 0.000486 0.00114 <0.00131 0.00056 0.00131 0.00134 V3 0.00052 0.00123 <0.00121 0.000513 0.00121
<0.00114 0.000233 0.00114 <0.00131 0.00027 0.00131 <0.00123 0.00025 0.00123 <0.00121 0.000246 0.00121
0.0183 0.00535 0.0114 0.00893 J 0.00613 0.0131 <0.0123 0.00573 0.0123 0.0265 0.00564 0.0121
0.00124 B J 0.00114 0.00572 0.00143 B J 0.00131 0.00655 0.00368B J V3 0.00123 0.00613 0.00236 B J 0.00121 0.00603
<0.0114 0.00109 0.0114 <0.0131 0.00124 0.0131 <0.0123 0.00116 0.0123 0.00151 J 0.00115 0.0121
<0.00114 0.0004 0.00114 <0.00131 0.00046 0.00131 <0.00123 0.00043 0.00123 <0.00121 0.000422 0.00121
<0.00572 0.0057 0.00572 <0.00655 0.00652 0.00655 <0.00613 0.0061 0.00613 <0.00603 0.00601 0.00603
0.0008 J V3 0.000236 0.00114 0.000453 J 0.00027 0.00131 0.00252 V3 0.00025 0.00123 0.000499 J 0.000248 0.00121
<0.00114 0.000255 0.00114 <0.00131 0.00029 0.00131 <0.00123 0.00027 0.00123 <0.00121 0.000269 0.00121
<0.00114 0.000339 0.00114 <0.00131 0.00039 0.00131 <0.00123 0.00036 0.00123 <0.00121 0.000357 0.00121
<0.00114 0.000264 0.00114 <0.00131 0.0003 0.00131 <0.00123 0.00028 0.00123 <0.00121 0.000279 0.00121
<0.00114 0.000487 0.00114 <0.00131 0.00056 0.00131 <0.00123 0.00052 0.00123 <0.00121 0.000514 0.00121
<0.00114 0.000372 0.00114 <0.00131 0.00043 0.00131 <0.00123 0.0004 0.00123 <0.00121 0.000392 0.00121
0.0154 0.00141 0.00572 0.00835 0.00161 0.00655 0.0483 V3 0.00151 0.00613 0.0206 0.00148 0.00603
<0.00114 0.00035 0.00114 <0.00131 0.0004 0.00131 <0.00123 0.00038 0.00123 <0.00121 0.000369 0.00121
<0.00114 0.000444 0.00114 <0.00131 0.00051 0.00131 <0.00123 0.00048 0.00123 <0.00121 0.000468 0.00121
<0.00114 0.000423 0.00114 <0.00131 0.00049 0.00131 <0.00123 0.00045 0.00123 <0.00121 0.000446 0.00121
11/11/2022 11/09/2022
B-13 @ 3'B-14 @ SURFACE B-14 @ 10'B-15 @ SURFACE
L1558026-43 L1558026-44 L1558026-45 L1558026-46
11/09/2022 11/09/2022
Page 11 of 18
Table C2 - VOCs and Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soil
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking - 2890 South State Street and 1215 North SR 51, Spanish Fork City, Utah County, Utah
Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.3
Analyte CAS Method Units RSL
Residential
RSL
Industrial ISL Tier 1
TPH-GRO 8006-61-9 8260B mg/kg NE NE 150 1500
Date Collected
Client Sample ID
Lab Sample ID
1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE 79-00-5 8260B mg/kg 1.1 5 NE NE
TRICHLOROETHENE 79-01-6 8260B mg/kg 0.94 6 NE NE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE 75-69-4 8260B mg/kg 23000 350000 NE NE
1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE 96-18-4 8260B mg/kg 0.0051 0.11 NE NE
1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 95-63-6 8260B mg/kg 300 1800 NE NE
1,2,3-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 526-73-8 8260B mg/kg 340 2000 NE NE
1,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 108-67-8 8260B mg/kg 270 1500 NE NE
VINYL CHLORIDE 75-01-4 8260B mg/kg 0.059 1.7 NE NE
XYLENES, TOTAL 1330-20-7 8260B mg/kg 580 2500 142 142
Qualifiers (Q):
NE:Not Established.<:Less than Reported Detection Limit (RDL).
mg/kg:Milligrams per kilogram.
Blue italicized non-detect results (e.g.,<0.0100 ) exceed one or more of the screening levels.
Color shaded value exceeds screening level.
B:The same analyte is found in the associated blank.J:The identification of the analyte
is acceptable; the reported value is an estimate.J3:The associated batch QC was
outside the established quality control range for precision.J5:The sample matrix
interfered with the ability to make any accurate determination; spike value is high.
J6:The sample matrix interfered with the ability to make any accurate determination;
spike value is low. P1:RPD value not applicable for sample concentrations less than 5
times the reporting limit. V:The sample concentration is too high to evaluate accurate
spike recoveries. V3:The internal standard exhibited poor recovery due to sample matrix
interference. The analytical results will be biased high. BDL results will be unaffected.
EPA RSL: Environmental Protection Agency Regional Screening Levels for soil at residential (Res.) and industrial
(Ind.) properties (May 2022; TR=1E-06; THQ=1.0).
Utah's Initial Screening Levels (ISLs) and risk-based Tier 1 Screening Levels (Tier 1) for petroleum releases at
leaking underground storage tank sites
Bold value exceeds Method Detection Limit (MDL).
Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL
11/11/2022 11/09/2022
B-13 @ 3'B-14 @ SURFACE B-14 @ 10'B-15 @ SURFACE
L1558026-43 L1558026-44 L1558026-45 L1558026-46
11/09/2022 11/09/2022
<0.00114 0.000486 0.00114 <0.00131 0.00056 0.00131 <0.00123 0.00052 0.00123 <0.00121 0.000513 0.00121
<0.00114 0.000229 0.00114 <0.00131 0.00026 0.00131 <0.00123 0.00025 0.00123 <0.00121 0.000241 0.00121
<0.00572 0.000407 0.00572 <0.00655 0.00047 0.00655 <0.00613 0.00044 0.00613 <0.00603 0.000429 0.00603
<0.00286 0.000279 0.00286 <0.00328 0.00032 0.00328 <0.00306 0.0003 0.00306 <0.00302 0.000294 0.00302
0.00368 0.000241 0.00114 0.000924 J 0.00028 0.00131 0.0043 V3 0.00026 0.00123 0.000896 J 0.000255 0.00121
0.00067 J V3 0.000328 0.00114 <0.00131 0.00038 0.00131 0.00118 J V3 0.00035 0.00123 <0.00121 0.000346 0.00121
0.00072 J V3 0.000304 0.00114 <0.00131 0.00035 0.00131 0.00164 V3 0.00033 0.00123 0.000449 J 0.000321 0.00121
<0.00114 0.000258 0.00114 <0.00131 0.0003 0.00131 <0.00123 0.00028 0.00123 <0.00121 0.000273 0.00121
0.00822 0.000572 0.00343 0.00393 J 0.00066 0.00393 0.018 V3 0.00061 0.00368 0.00755 0.000603 0.00362
Page 12 of 18
Table C2 - VOCs and Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soil
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking - 2890 South State Street and 1215 North SR 51, Spanish Fork City, Utah County, Utah
Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.3
Analyte CAS Method Units RSL
Residential
RSL
Industrial ISL Tier 1
TPH-GRO 8006-61-9 8260B mg/kg NE NE 150 1500
TPH-DRO 68334-30-5 8015 mg/kg NE NE 500 5000
TRPH NE 9071B mg/kg NE NE 1000 10000
ACETONE 67-64-1 8260B mg/kg 61000 670000 NE NE
ACRYLONITRILE 107-13-1 8260B mg/kg 0.25 1.1 NE NE
BENZENE 71-43-2 8260B mg/kg 1.2 5.1 0.2 0.9
BROMOBENZENE 108-86-1 8260B mg/kg 290 1800 NE NE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE 75-27-4 8260B mg/kg 0.29 1.3 NE NE
BROMOFORM 75-25-2 8260B mg/kg 19 86 NE NE
BROMOMETHANE 74-83-9 8260B mg/kg 6.8 30 NE NE
N-BUTYLBENZENE 104-51-8 8260B mg/kg 3900 58000 NE NE
SEC-BUTYLBENZENE 135-98-8 8260B mg/kg 7800 120000 NE NE
TERT-BUTYLBENZENE 98-06-6 8260B mg/kg 7800 120000 NE NE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 56-23-5 8260B mg/kg 0.65 2.9 NE NE
CHLOROBENZENE 108-90-7 8260B mg/kg 280 1300 NE NE
CHLORODIBROMOMETHANE 124-48-1 8260B mg/kg 8.3 39 NE NE
CHLOROETHANE 75-00-3 8260B mg/kg 14000 57000 NE NE
CHLOROFORM 67-66-3 8260B mg/kg 0.32 1.4 NE NE
CHLOROMETHANE 74-87-3 8260B mg/kg 110 460 NE NE
2-CHLOROTOLUENE 95-49-8 8260B mg/kg 1600 23000 NE NE
4-CHLOROTOLUENE 106-43-4 8260B mg/kg 1600 23000 NE NE
1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE 96-12-8 8260B mg/kg 0.0053 0.064 NE NE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE 106-93-4 8260B mg/kg 0.036 0.16 NE NE
DIBROMOMETHANE 74-95-3 8260B mg/kg 24 99 NE NE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 95-50-1 8260B mg/kg 1800 9300 NE NE
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 541-73-1 8260B mg/kg NE NE NE NE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 106-46-7 8260B mg/kg 2.6 11 NE NE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE 75-71-8 8260B mg/kg 87 370 NE NE
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE 75-34-3 8260B mg/kg 3.6 16 NE NE
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE 107-06-2 8260B mg/kg 0.46 2 NE NE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE 75-35-4 8260B mg/kg 230 1000 NE NE
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 156-59-2 8260B mg/kg 160 2300 NE NE
TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 156-60-5 8260B mg/kg 70 300 NE NE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 78-87-5 8260B mg/kg 2.5 11 NE NE
1,1-DICHLOROPROPENE 563-58-6 8260B mg/kg NE NE NE NE
1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE 142-28-9 8260B mg/kg 1600 23000 NE NE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 10061-01-5 8260B mg/kg NE NE NE NE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 10061-02-6 8260B mg/kg NE NE NE NE
2,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 594-20-7 8260B mg/kg NE NE NE NE
DI-ISOPROPYL ETHER 108-20-3 8260B mg/kg 2200 9400 NE NE
ETHYLBENZENE 100-41-4 8260B mg/kg 5.8 25 5 23
HEXACHLORO-1,3-BUTADIENE 87-68-3 8260B mg/kg 1.2 5.3 NE NE
ISOPROPYLBENZENE 98-82-8 8260B mg/kg 1900 9900 NE NE
P-ISOPROPYLTOLUENE 99-87-6 8260B mg/kg NE NE NE NE
2-BUTANONE (MEK)78-93-3 8260B mg/kg 27000 190000 NE NE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE 75-09-2 8260B mg/kg 57 1000 NE NE
4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE (MIBK)108-10-1 8260B mg/kg 33000 140000 NE NE
METHYL TERT-BUTYL ETHER 1634-04-4 8260B mg/kg 47 210 0.3 0.3
NAPHTHALENE 91-20-3 8260B mg/kg 2 8.6 51 51
N-PROPYLBENZENE 103-65-1 8260B mg/kg 3800 24000 NE NE
STYRENE 100-42-5 8260B mg/kg 6000 35000 NE NE
1,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 630-20-6 8260B mg/kg 2 8.8 NE NE
1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 79-34-5 8260B mg/kg 0.6 2.7 NE NE
1,1,2-TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE76-13-1 8260B mg/kg 6700 28000 NE NE
TETRACHLOROETHENE 127-18-4 8260B mg/kg 24 100 NE NE
TOLUENE 108-88-3 8260B mg/kg 4900 47000 9 25
1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE 87-61-6 8260B mg/kg 63 930 NE NE
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 120-82-1 8260B mg/kg 24 110 NE NE
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 71-55-6 8260B mg/kg 8100 36000 NE NE
Date Collected
Client Sample ID
Lab Sample ID
Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL
1.14 V3 0.229 0.626 0.236 J 0.22 0.602 0.285 J 0.208 0.566 0.315 J 0.241 0.659 1.06 V3 0.226 0.618
1.65 J 0.963 5.01 79.6 0.926 4.82 211 J 86.3 449 <5.27 1.01 5.27 2.52 J 0.941 4.9
122 J 41.3 125 395 39.7 120 2410 37 112 115 J 43.5 132 83.4 J 40.4 122
0.129 V3 0.0259 0.0626 <0.0602 0.0249 0.0602 0.0261 J 0.0234 0.0566 0.0622 J 0.0273 0.0659 0.12 V3 0.0256 0.0618
<0.0125 0.00253 0.0125 <0.0120 0.00243 0.012 <0.0113 0.00229 0.0113 <0.0132 0.00266 0.0132 <0.0124 0.0025 0.0124
0.033 V3 0.00047 0.00125 0.00532 0.000452 0.0012 0.00902 0.000425 0.00113 0.00798 0.000494 0.00132 0.0323 V3 0.00046 0.00124
<0.00125 0.000345 0.00125 <0.00120 0.000331 0.0012 <0.00113 0.000312 0.00113 <0.00132 0.000363 0.00132 <0.00124 0.00034 0.00124
<0.00125 0.000908 0.00125 <0.00120 0.000873 0.0012 <0.00113 0.000821 0.00113 <0.00132 0.000956 0.00132 <0.00124 0.0009 0.00124
<0.00125 0.000531 0.00125 <0.00120 0.000511 0.0012 <0.00113 0.00048 0.00113 <0.00132 0.000559 0.00132 <0.00124 0.00052 0.00124
<0.00626 0.00147 0.00626 <0.00602 0.00141 0.00602 <0.00566 0.00132 0.00566 <0.00659 0.00154 0.00659 <0.00618 0.00144 0.00618
0.000842 J V3 0.000323 0.00125 <0.00120 0.000311 0.0012 <0.00113 0.000293 0.00113 <0.00132 0.00034 0.00132 0.000886 J V3 0.00032 0.00124
0.000447 J V3 0.000252 0.00125 <0.00120 0.000242 0.0012 <0.00113 0.000228 0.00113 <0.00132 0.000265 0.00132 0.000521 J V3 0.00025 0.00124
<0.00125 0.000258 0.00125 <0.00120 0.000248 0.0012 <0.00113 0.000233 0.00113 <0.00132 0.000272 0.00132 <0.00124 0.00026 0.00124
<0.00125 0.000311 0.00125 <0.00120 0.000299 0.0012 <0.00113 0.00028 0.00113 <0.00132 0.000327 0.00132 <0.00124 0.00031 0.00124
<0.00125 0.000241 0.00125 <0.00120 0.000231 0.0012 <0.00113 0.000218 0.00113 <0.00132 0.000253 0.00132 <0.00124 0.00024 0.00124
<0.00125 0.000281 0.00125 <0.00120 0.00027 0.0012 <0.00113 0.000254 0.00113 <0.00132 0.000295 0.00132 <0.00124 0.00028 0.00124
<0.00626 0.00125 0.00626 <0.00602 0.0012 0.00602 <0.00566 0.00113 0.00566 <0.00659 0.00132 0.00659 <0.00618 0.00124 0.00618
<0.00626 0.00129 0.00626 <0.00602 0.00124 0.00602 <0.00566 0.00117 0.00566 <0.00659 0.00136 0.00659 <0.00618 0.00127 0.00618
<0.00313 0.000814 0.00313 <0.00301 0.000783 0.00301 <0.00284 0.000736 0.00284 <0.00330 0.000857 0.0033 <0.00310 0.0008 0.0031
<0.00125 0.000282 0.00125 <0.00120 0.000271 0.0012 <0.00113 0.000255 0.00113 <0.00132 0.000297 0.00132 <0.00124 0.00028 0.00124
<0.00125 0.000866 0.00125 <0.00120 0.000832 0.0012 <0.00113 0.000783 0.00113 <0.00132 0.000911 0.00132 <0.00124 0.00085 0.00124
<0.00626 0.00238 0.00626 <0.00602 0.00229 0.00602 <0.00566 0.00215 0.00566 <0.00659 0.00251 0.00659 <0.00618 0.00235 0.00618
<0.00125 0.000313 0.00125 <0.00120 0.000301 0.0012 <0.00113 0.000284 0.00113 <0.00132 0.00033 0.00132 <0.00124 0.00031 0.00124
<0.00125 0.000439 0.00125 <0.00120 0.000422 0.0012 <0.00113 0.000396 0.00113 <0.00132 0.000461 0.00132 <0.00124 0.00043 0.00124
<0.00125 0.000532 0.00125 <0.00120 0.000512 0.0012 <0.00113 0.000481 0.00113 <0.00132 0.00056 0.00132 <0.00124 0.00053 0.00124
<0.00125 0.000752 0.00125 <0.00120 0.000723 0.0012 <0.00113 0.00068 0.00113 <0.00132 0.000791 0.00132 <0.00124 0.00074 0.00124
<0.00125 0.00104 0.00125 <0.00120 0.001 0.0012 <0.00113 0.00094 0.00113 <0.00132 0.00109 0.00132 <0.00124 0.00103 0.00124
<0.00626 0.00036 0.00626 <0.00602 0.000346 0.00602 <0.00566 0.000325 0.00566 <0.00659 0.000378 0.00659 <0.00618 0.00036 0.00618
<0.00125 0.000336 0.00125 <0.00120 0.000323 0.0012 <0.00113 0.000304 0.00113 <0.00132 0.000353 0.00132 <0.00124 0.00033 0.00124
<0.00125 0.000564 0.00125 <0.00120 0.000542 0.0012 <0.00113 0.00051 0.00113 <0.00132 0.000593 0.00132 <0.00124 0.00056 0.00124
<0.00125 0.000445 0.00125 <0.00120 0.000428 0.0012 <0.00113 0.000403 0.00113 <0.00132 0.000468 0.00132 <0.00124 0.00044 0.00124
<0.00125 0.000595 0.00125 <0.00120 0.000572 0.0012 <0.00113 0.000538 0.00113 <0.00132 0.000626 0.00132 <0.00124 0.00059 0.00124
<0.00125 0.000626 0.00125 <0.00120 0.000602 0.0012 <0.00113 0.000566 0.00113 <0.00132 0.000659 0.00132 <0.00124 0.00062 0.00124
<0.00125 0.000205 0.00125 <0.00120 0.000198 0.0012 <0.00113 0.000186 0.00113 <0.00132 0.000216 0.00132 <0.00124 0.0002 0.00124
<0.00125 0.00047 0.00125 <0.00120 0.000452 0.0012 <0.00113 0.000425 0.00113 <0.00132 0.000494 0.00132 <0.00124 0.00046 0.00124
<0.00125 0.000282 0.00125 <0.00120 0.000271 0.0012 <0.00113 0.000255 0.00113 <0.00132 0.000297 0.00132 <0.00124 0.00028 0.00124
<0.00125 0.000532 0.00125 <0.00120 0.000512 0.0012 <0.00113 0.000481 0.00113 <0.00132 0.00056 0.00132 <0.00124 0.00053 0.00124
<0.00125 0.000846 0.00125 <0.00120 0.000813 0.0012 <0.00113 0.000765 0.00113 <0.00132 0.00089 0.00132 <0.00124 0.00084 0.00124
<0.00125 0.00047 0.00125 <0.00120 0.000452 0.0012 <0.00113 0.000425 0.00113 <0.00132 0.000494 0.00132 <0.00124 0.00046 0.00124
<0.00125 0.000277 0.00125 <0.00120 0.000266 0.0012 <0.00113 0.00025 0.00113 <0.00132 0.000291 0.00132 <0.00124 0.00027 0.00124
0.0243 V3 0.000376 0.00125 0.0021 0.000361 0.0012 0.00408 0.00034 0.00113 0.00521 0.000396 0.00132 0.0259 V3 0.00037 0.00124
<0.00125 0.000428 0.00125 <0.00120 0.000412 0.0012 <0.00113 0.000387 0.00113 <0.00132 0.000451 0.00132 <0.00124 0.00042 0.00124
0.00137 V3 0.000532 0.00125 <0.00120 0.000512 0.0012 <0.00113 0.000481 0.00113 <0.00132 0.00056 0.00132 0.00148 V3 0.00053 0.00124
<0.00125 0.000256 0.00125 <0.00120 0.000246 0.0012 <0.00113 0.000231 0.00113 <0.00132 0.000269 0.00132 <0.00124 0.00025 0.00124
<0.0125 0.00586 0.0125 <0.0120 0.00564 0.012 0.0102 J 0.00531 0.0113 0.0128 J 0.00617 0.0132 <0.0124 0.00579 0.0124
0.00456B J V3 0.00125 0.00626 0.00129 B J 0.0012 0.00602 0.00123 B J 0.00113 0.00566 0.00245 B J 0.00132 0.00659 0.00561 B J V3 0.00124 0.00618
0.0041 J V3 0.00119 0.0125 <0.0120 0.00114 0.012 <0.0113 0.00108 0.0113 <0.0132 0.00125 0.0132 <0.0124 0.00117 0.0124
<0.00125 0.000439 0.00125 <0.00120 0.000422 0.0012 <0.00113 0.000396 0.00113 <0.00132 0.000461 0.00132 <0.00124 0.00043 0.00124
<0.00626 0.00624 0.00626 <0.00602 0.006 0.00602 <0.00566 0.00564 0.00566 <0.00659 0.00657 0.00659 <0.00618 0.00616 0.00618
0.00258 V3 0.000258 0.00125 <0.00120 0.000248 0.0012 0.00055 J 0.000233 0.00113 0.000694 J 0.000272 0.00132 0.00296 V3 0.00026 0.00124
<0.00125 0.000279 0.00125 <0.00120 0.000269 0.0012 <0.00113 0.000252 0.00113 <0.00132 0.000294 0.00132 <0.00124 0.00028 0.00124
<0.00125 0.000371 0.00125 <0.00120 0.000357 0.0012 <0.00113 0.000335 0.00113 <0.00132 0.00039 0.00132 <0.00124 0.00037 0.00124
<0.00125 0.000289 0.00125 <0.00120 0.000278 0.0012 <0.00113 0.000261 0.00113 <0.00132 0.000305 0.00132 <0.00124 0.00029 0.00124
<0.00125 0.000534 0.00125 <0.00120 0.000513 0.0012 <0.00113 0.000482 0.00113 <0.00132 0.000562 0.00132 <0.00124 0.00053 0.00124
<0.00125 0.000407 0.00125 <0.00120 0.000391 0.0012 <0.00113 0.000368 0.00113 <0.00132 0.000429 0.00132 <0.00124 0.0004 0.00124
0.052 V3 0.00154 0.00626 0.00662 0.00148 0.00602 0.0144 0.00139 0.00566 0.014 0.00162 0.00659 0.0529 V3 0.00152 0.00618
<0.00125 0.000383 0.00125 <0.00120 0.000369 0.0012 <0.00113 0.000347 0.00113 <0.00132 0.000403 0.00132 <0.00124 0.00038 0.00124
<0.00125 0.000486 0.00125 <0.00120 0.000467 0.0012 <0.00113 0.00044 0.00113 <0.00132 0.000512 0.00132 <0.00124 0.00048 0.00124
<0.00125 0.000464 0.00125 <0.00120 0.000446 0.0012 <0.00113 0.00042 0.00113 <0.00132 0.000488 0.00132 <0.00124 0.00046 0.00124
11/11/2022 11/11/2022 11/09/2022 11/09/2022
L1558026-48 L1558026-49 L1558026-50 L1558026-51
B-15 @ 12'B-16 @ SURFACE B-16 @ 1'B-140 @ SURFACE B-140 @ 10'
L1558026-47
11/09/2022
Page 13 of 18
Table C2 - VOCs and Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soil
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking - 2890 South State Street and 1215 North SR 51, Spanish Fork City, Utah County, Utah
Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.3
Analyte CAS Method Units RSL
Residential
RSL
Industrial ISL Tier 1
TPH-GRO 8006-61-9 8260B mg/kg NE NE 150 1500
Date Collected
Client Sample ID
Lab Sample ID
1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE 79-00-5 8260B mg/kg 1.1 5 NE NE
TRICHLOROETHENE 79-01-6 8260B mg/kg 0.94 6 NE NE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE 75-69-4 8260B mg/kg 23000 350000 NE NE
1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE 96-18-4 8260B mg/kg 0.0051 0.11 NE NE
1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 95-63-6 8260B mg/kg 300 1800 NE NE
1,2,3-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 526-73-8 8260B mg/kg 340 2000 NE NE
1,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 108-67-8 8260B mg/kg 270 1500 NE NE
VINYL CHLORIDE 75-01-4 8260B mg/kg 0.059 1.7 NE NE
XYLENES, TOTAL 1330-20-7 8260B mg/kg 580 2500 142 142
Qualifiers (Q):
NE:Not Established.<:Less than Reported Detection Limit (RDL).
mg/kg:Milligrams per kilogram.
Blue italicized non-detect results (e.g.,<0.0100 ) exceed one or more of the screening levels.
Color shaded value exceeds screening level.
B:The same analyte is found in the associated blank.J:The identification of the analyte
is acceptable; the reported value is an estimate.J3:The associated batch QC was
outside the established quality control range for precision.J5:The sample matrix
interfered with the ability to make any accurate determination; spike value is high.
J6:The sample matrix interfered with the ability to make any accurate determination;
spike value is low. P1:RPD value not applicable for sample concentrations less than 5
times the reporting limit. V:The sample concentration is too high to evaluate accurate
spike recoveries. V3:The internal standard exhibited poor recovery due to sample matrix
interference. The analytical results will be biased high. BDL results will be unaffected.
EPA RSL: Environmental Protection Agency Regional Screening Levels for soil at residential (Res.) and industrial
(Ind.) properties (May 2022; TR=1E-06; THQ=1.0).
Utah's Initial Screening Levels (ISLs) and risk-based Tier 1 Screening Levels (Tier 1) for petroleum releases at
leaking underground storage tank sites
Bold value exceeds Method Detection Limit (MDL).
Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL
11/11/2022 11/11/2022 11/09/2022 11/09/2022
L1558026-48 L1558026-49 L1558026-50 L1558026-51
B-15 @ 12'B-16 @ SURFACE B-16 @ 1'B-140 @ SURFACE B-140 @ 10'
L1558026-47
11/09/2022
<0.00125 0.000532 0.00125 <0.00120 0.000512 0.0012 <0.00113 0.000481 0.00113 <0.00132 0.00056 0.00132 <0.00124 0.00053 0.00124
<0.00125 0.000251 0.00125 <0.00120 0.000241 0.0012 <0.00113 0.000227 0.00113 <0.00132 0.000264 0.00132 <0.00124 0.00025 0.00124
<0.00626 0.000446 0.00626 <0.00602 0.000429 0.00602 <0.00566 0.000404 0.00566 <0.00659 0.000469 0.00659 <0.00618 0.00044 0.00618
<0.00313 0.000306 0.00313 <0.00301 0.000294 0.00301 <0.00284 0.000276 0.00284 <0.00330 0.000322 0.0033 <0.00310 0.0003 0.0031
0.00418 V3 0.000264 0.00125 0.00052 J 0.000254 0.0012 0.00179 0.000239 0.00113 0.00129 J 0.000278 0.00132 0.00514 V3 0.00026 0.00124
0.00127 V3 0.00036 0.00125 <0.00120 0.000346 0.0012 0.000575 J 0.000325 0.00113 0.000413 J 0.000378 0.00132 0.0014 V3 0.00036 0.00124
0.00164 V3 0.000333 0.00125 <0.00120 0.00032 0.0012 0.000512 J 0.000302 0.00113 0.000517 J 0.000351 0.00132 0.00197 V3 0.00033 0.00124
<0.00125 0.000283 0.00125 <0.00120 0.000272 0.0012 <0.00113 0.000256 0.00113 <0.00132 0.000298 0.00132 <0.00124 0.00028 0.00124
0.0184 V3 0.000626 0.00376 0.00287 J 0.000602 0.00361 0.00607 0.000566 0.0034 0.00624 0.000659 0.00396 0.0234 V3 0.00062 0.00371
Page 14 of 18
Table C2 - VOCs and Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soil
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking - 2890 South State Street and 1215 North SR 51, Spanish Fork City, Utah County, Utah
Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.3
Analyte CAS Method Units RSL
Residential
RSL
Industrial ISL Tier 1
TPH-GRO 8006-61-9 8260B mg/kg NE NE 150 1500
TPH-DRO 68334-30-5 8015 mg/kg NE NE 500 5000
TRPH NE 9071B mg/kg NE NE 1000 10000
ACETONE 67-64-1 8260B mg/kg 61000 670000 NE NE
ACRYLONITRILE 107-13-1 8260B mg/kg 0.25 1.1 NE NE
BENZENE 71-43-2 8260B mg/kg 1.2 5.1 0.2 0.9
BROMOBENZENE 108-86-1 8260B mg/kg 290 1800 NE NE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE 75-27-4 8260B mg/kg 0.29 1.3 NE NE
BROMOFORM 75-25-2 8260B mg/kg 19 86 NE NE
BROMOMETHANE 74-83-9 8260B mg/kg 6.8 30 NE NE
N-BUTYLBENZENE 104-51-8 8260B mg/kg 3900 58000 NE NE
SEC-BUTYLBENZENE 135-98-8 8260B mg/kg 7800 120000 NE NE
TERT-BUTYLBENZENE 98-06-6 8260B mg/kg 7800 120000 NE NE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 56-23-5 8260B mg/kg 0.65 2.9 NE NE
CHLOROBENZENE 108-90-7 8260B mg/kg 280 1300 NE NE
CHLORODIBROMOMETHANE 124-48-1 8260B mg/kg 8.3 39 NE NE
CHLOROETHANE 75-00-3 8260B mg/kg 14000 57000 NE NE
CHLOROFORM 67-66-3 8260B mg/kg 0.32 1.4 NE NE
CHLOROMETHANE 74-87-3 8260B mg/kg 110 460 NE NE
2-CHLOROTOLUENE 95-49-8 8260B mg/kg 1600 23000 NE NE
4-CHLOROTOLUENE 106-43-4 8260B mg/kg 1600 23000 NE NE
1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE 96-12-8 8260B mg/kg 0.0053 0.064 NE NE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE 106-93-4 8260B mg/kg 0.036 0.16 NE NE
DIBROMOMETHANE 74-95-3 8260B mg/kg 24 99 NE NE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 95-50-1 8260B mg/kg 1800 9300 NE NE
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 541-73-1 8260B mg/kg NE NE NE NE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 106-46-7 8260B mg/kg 2.6 11 NE NE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE 75-71-8 8260B mg/kg 87 370 NE NE
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE 75-34-3 8260B mg/kg 3.6 16 NE NE
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE 107-06-2 8260B mg/kg 0.46 2 NE NE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE 75-35-4 8260B mg/kg 230 1000 NE NE
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 156-59-2 8260B mg/kg 160 2300 NE NE
TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 156-60-5 8260B mg/kg 70 300 NE NE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 78-87-5 8260B mg/kg 2.5 11 NE NE
1,1-DICHLOROPROPENE 563-58-6 8260B mg/kg NE NE NE NE
1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE 142-28-9 8260B mg/kg 1600 23000 NE NE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 10061-01-5 8260B mg/kg NE NE NE NE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 10061-02-6 8260B mg/kg NE NE NE NE
2,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 594-20-7 8260B mg/kg NE NE NE NE
DI-ISOPROPYL ETHER 108-20-3 8260B mg/kg 2200 9400 NE NE
ETHYLBENZENE 100-41-4 8260B mg/kg 5.8 25 5 23
HEXACHLORO-1,3-BUTADIENE 87-68-3 8260B mg/kg 1.2 5.3 NE NE
ISOPROPYLBENZENE 98-82-8 8260B mg/kg 1900 9900 NE NE
P-ISOPROPYLTOLUENE 99-87-6 8260B mg/kg NE NE NE NE
2-BUTANONE (MEK)78-93-3 8260B mg/kg 27000 190000 NE NE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE 75-09-2 8260B mg/kg 57 1000 NE NE
4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE (MIBK)108-10-1 8260B mg/kg 33000 140000 NE NE
METHYL TERT-BUTYL ETHER 1634-04-4 8260B mg/kg 47 210 0.3 0.3
NAPHTHALENE 91-20-3 8260B mg/kg 2 8.6 51 51
N-PROPYLBENZENE 103-65-1 8260B mg/kg 3800 24000 NE NE
STYRENE 100-42-5 8260B mg/kg 6000 35000 NE NE
1,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 630-20-6 8260B mg/kg 2 8.8 NE NE
1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 79-34-5 8260B mg/kg 0.6 2.7 NE NE
1,1,2-TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE76-13-1 8260B mg/kg 6700 28000 NE NE
TETRACHLOROETHENE 127-18-4 8260B mg/kg 24 100 NE NE
TOLUENE 108-88-3 8260B mg/kg 4900 47000 9 25
1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE 87-61-6 8260B mg/kg 63 930 NE NE
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 120-82-1 8260B mg/kg 24 110 NE NE
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 71-55-6 8260B mg/kg 8100 36000 NE NE
Date Collected
Client Sample ID
Lab Sample ID
Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL
0.626 J V3 0.23 0.629 0.729 V3 0.234 0.638 <0.674 0.247 0.674 <0.618 0.226 0.618 <0.610 0.223 0.61
14.5 0.968 5.03 2.13 J 0.981 5.1 270 J3 J6 V 1.04 5.39 1.84 J 0.95 4.94 8.45 0.937 4.88
790 41.5 126 124 J 42.1 128 308 44.5 135 85.7 J 40.8 124 <122 40.2 122
0.59 V3 0.0261 0.0629 0.205 V3 0.0264 0.064 0.0282 J 0.0279 0.0674 <0.0618 0.0256 0.062 <0.0610 0.0252 0.061
<0.0126 0.00254 0.0126 <0.0128 0.00258 0.013 <0.0135 J3 J6 0.00272 0.0135 <0.0124 0.0025 0.012 <0.0122 0.00246 0.0122
0.0325 V3 0.000472 0.00126 0.038 V3 0.000479 0.001 0.0041 0.000506 0.00135 0.00718 0.000463 0.001 0.00488 0.000457 0.00122
<0.00126 0.000346 0.00126 <0.00128 0.000351 0.001 <0.00135 0.000371 0.00135 <0.00124 0.00034 0.001 <0.00122 0.000335 0.00122
<0.00126 0.000913 0.00126 <0.00128 0.000925 0.001 <0.00135 0.000977 0.00135 <0.00124 0.000896 0.001 <0.00122 0.000884 0.00122
<0.00126 0.000534 0.00126 <0.00128 0.000541 0.001 <0.00135 0.000572 0.00135 <0.00124 0.000524 0.001 <0.00122 0.000517 0.00122
<0.00629 0.00147 0.00629 <0.00638 0.00149 0.006 <0.00674 0.00158 0.00674 <0.00618 0.00145 0.006 <0.00610 0.00143 0.0061
0.000357 J V3 0.000325 0.00126 0.000343 J V3 0.000329 0.001 <0.00135 0.000348 0.00135 0.000424 J 0.000319 0.001 <0.00122 0.000315 0.00122
<0.00126 0.000253 0.00126 <0.00128 0.000257 0.001 <0.00135 0.000271 0.00135 <0.00124 0.000248 0.001 <0.00122 0.000245 0.00122
<0.00126 0.000259 0.00126 <0.00128 0.000263 0.001 <0.00135 0.000278 0.00135 <0.00124 0.000255 0.001 <0.00122 0.000251 0.00122
<0.00126 0.000312 0.00126 <0.00128 0.000316 0.001 <0.00135 0.000334 0.00135 <0.00124 0.000306 0.001 <0.00122 0.000302 0.00122
<0.00126 0.000242 0.00126 <0.00128 0.000245 0.001 <0.00135 0.000259 0.00135 <0.00124 0.000237 0.001 <0.00122 0.000234 0.00122
<0.00126 0.000282 0.00126 <0.00128 0.000286 0.001 <0.00135 0.000302 0.00135 <0.00124 0.000277 0.001 <0.00122 0.000273 0.00122
<0.00629 0.00126 0.00629 <0.00638 0.00128 0.006 <0.00674 0.00135 0.00674 <0.00618 0.00124 0.006 <0.00610 0.00122 0.0061
<0.00629 0.0013 0.00629 <0.00638 0.00131 0.006 <0.00674 0.00139 0.00674 <0.00618 0.00127 0.006 <0.00610 0.00126 0.0061
<0.00315 0.000818 0.00315 <0.00319 0.000829 0.003 <0.00337 0.000876 0.00337 <0.00309 0.000803 0.003 <0.00305 0.000792 0.00305
<0.00126 0.000283 0.00126 <0.00128 0.000287 0.001 <0.00135 0.000303 0.00135 <0.00124 0.000278 0.001 <0.00122 0.000274 0.00122
<0.00126 0.00087 0.00126 <0.00128 0.000882 0.001 <0.00135 0.000932 0.00135 <0.00124 0.000854 0.001 <0.00122 0.000842 0.00122
<0.00629 0.00239 0.00629 <0.00638 0.00242 0.006 <0.00674 0.00256 0.00674 <0.00618 0.00235 0.006 <0.00610 0.00232 0.0061
<0.00126 0.000315 0.00126 <0.00128 0.000319 0.001 <0.00135 0.000337 0.00135 <0.00124 0.000309 0.001 <0.00122 0.000305 0.00122
<0.00126 0.000441 0.00126 <0.00128 0.000447 0.001 <0.00135 0.000472 0.00135 <0.00124 0.000432 0.001 <0.00122 0.000427 0.00122
<0.00126 0.000535 0.00126 <0.00128 0.000542 0.001 <0.00135 J3 0.000573 0.00135 <0.00124 0.000525 0.001 <0.00122 0.000518 0.00122
<0.00126 0.000755 0.00126 <0.00128 0.000766 0.001 <0.00135 J3 0.000809 0.00135 <0.00124 0.000741 0.001 <0.00122 0.000731 0.00122
<0.00126 0.00104 0.00126 <0.00128 0.00106 0.001 <0.00135 0.00112 0.00135 <0.00124 0.00103 0.001 <0.00122 0.00101 0.00122
<0.00629 0.000361 0.00629 <0.00638 0.000366 0.006 <0.00674 0.000387 0.00674 <0.00618 0.000355 0.006 <0.00610 0.00035 0.0061
<0.00126 0.000337 0.00126 <0.00128 0.000342 0.001 <0.00135 0.000361 0.00135 <0.00124 0.000331 0.001 <0.00122 0.000327 0.00122
<0.00126 0.000566 0.00126 <0.00128 0.000574 0.001 <0.00135 0.000607 0.00135 <0.00124 0.000556 0.001 <0.00122 0.000549 0.00122
<0.00126 0.000447 0.00126 <0.00128 0.000453 0.001 <0.00135 0.000479 0.00135 <0.00124 0.000439 0.001 <0.00122 0.000433 0.00122
<0.00126 0.000598 0.00126 <0.00128 0.000606 0.001 <0.00135 0.00064 0.00135 <0.00124 0.000587 0.001 <0.00122 0.000579 0.00122
<0.00126 0.000629 0.00126 <0.00128 0.000638 0.001 <0.00135 0.000674 0.00135 <0.00124 0.000618 0.001 <0.00122 0.00061 0.00122
<0.00126 0.000206 0.00126 <0.00128 0.000209 0.001 <0.00135 0.000221 0.00135 <0.00124 0.000203 0.001 <0.00122 0.0002 0.00122
<0.00126 0.000472 0.00126 <0.00128 0.000479 0.001 <0.00135 0.000506 0.00135 <0.00124 0.000463 0.001 <0.00122 0.000457 0.00122
<0.00126 0.000283 0.00126 <0.00128 0.000287 0.001 <0.00135 0.000303 0.00135 <0.00124 0.000278 0.001 <0.00122 0.000274 0.00122
<0.00126 0.000535 0.00126 <0.00128 0.000542 0.001 <0.00135 0.000573 0.00135 <0.00124 0.000525 0.001 <0.00122 0.000518 0.00122
<0.00126 0.00085 0.00126 <0.00128 0.000861 0.001 <0.00135 0.00091 0.00135 <0.00124 0.000834 0.001 <0.00122 0.000823 0.00122
<0.00126 0.000472 0.00126 <0.00128 0.000479 0.001 <0.00135 0.000506 0.00135 <0.00124 0.000463 0.001 <0.00122 0.000457 0.00122
<0.00126 0.000278 0.00126 <0.00128 0.000282 0.001 <0.00135 0.000298 0.00135 <0.00124 0.000273 0.001 <0.00122 0.000269 0.00122
0.0105 V3 0.000378 0.00126 0.0122 V3 0.000383 0.001 0.00147 0.000404 0.00135 0.00565 0.000371 0.001 0.00221 0.000366 0.00122
<0.00126 0.00043 0.00126 <0.00128 0.000436 0.001 <0.00135 J6 0.000461 0.00135 <0.00124 0.000423 0.001 <0.00122 0.000417 0.00122
0.00075 J V3 0.000535 0.00126 0.000879 J V3 0.000542 0.001 <0.00135 0.000573 0.00135 <0.00124 0.000525 0.001 <0.00122 0.000518 0.00122
<0.00126 0.000257 0.00126 <0.00128 0.00026 0.001 <0.00135 0.000275 0.00135 <0.00124 0.000252 0.001 <0.00122 0.000249 0.00122
0.13 V3 0.00589 0.0126 0.0479 V3 0.00597 0.013 0.00665 J 0.00631 0.0135 <0.0124 0.00578 0.012 <0.0122 0.00571 0.0122
0.00579 B J V3 0.00126 0.00629 0.00577B J V3 0.00128 0.006 <0.00674 0.00135 0.00674 0.00147 B J 0.00124 0.006 <0.00610 0.00122 0.0061
0.0073 J V3 0.0012 0.0126 0.00389 J V3 0.00121 0.013 <0.0135 0.00128 0.0135 <0.0124 0.00117 0.012 <0.0122 0.00116 0.0122
<0.00126 0.000441 0.00126 <0.00128 0.000447 0.001 <0.00135 0.000472 0.00135 <0.00124 0.000432 0.001 <0.00122 0.000427 0.00122
<0.00629 0.00627 0.00629 <0.00638 0.00636 0.006 <0.00674 0.00671 0.00674 <0.00618 0.00615 0.006 <0.00610 0.00607 0.0061
0.0012 J V3 0.000259 0.00126 0.00144 V3 0.000263 0.001 0.000408 J 0.000278 0.00135 0.000749 J 0.000255 0.001 0.000388 J 0.000251 0.00122
<0.00126 0.000281 0.00126 <0.00128 0.000285 0.001 <0.00135 0.000301 0.00135 <0.00124 0.000276 0.001 <0.00122 0.000272 0.00122
<0.00126 0.000373 0.00126 <0.00128 0.000378 0.001 <0.00135 0.000399 0.00135 <0.00124 0.000366 0.001 <0.00122 0.000361 0.00122
<0.00126 0.000291 0.00126 <0.00128 0.000295 0.001 <0.00135 0.000311 0.00135 <0.00124 0.000285 0.001 <0.00122 0.000282 0.00122
<0.00126 0.000536 0.00126 <0.00128 0.000544 0.001 <0.00135 0.000574 0.00135 <0.00124 0.000526 0.001 <0.00122 0.000519 0.00122
<0.00126 0.000409 0.00126 <0.00128 0.000415 0.001 <0.00135 0.000438 0.00135 <0.00124 0.000402 0.001 <0.00122 0.000396 0.00122
0.0427 V3 0.00155 0.00629 0.0463 V3 0.00157 0.006 0.00493 J J5 0.00166 0.00674 0.0112 0.00152 0.006 0.00669 0.0015 0.0061
<0.00126 0.000385 0.00126 <0.00128 0.00039 0.001 <0.00135 J3 J6 0.000413 0.00135 <0.00124 0.000378 0.001 <0.00122 0.000373 0.00122
<0.00126 0.000488 0.00126 <0.00128 0.000495 0.001 <0.00135 J3 J6 0.000523 0.00135 <0.00124 0.000479 0.001 <0.00122 0.000473 0.00122
<0.00126 0.000466 0.00126 <0.00128 0.000472 0.001 <0.00135 0.000499 0.00135 <0.00124 0.000457 0.001 <0.00122 0.000451 0.00122
L1559319-01 L1559319-02
ET @ SURFACE ET @ 4'
11/15/2022 11/15/2022
L1558026-52 L1558026-53
B-80 @ SURFACE B-80 @ 3'
11/10/2022 11/10/2022 11/15/2022
L1559319-03
WT @ SURFACE
Page 15 of 18
Table C2 - VOCs and Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soil
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking - 2890 South State Street and 1215 North SR 51, Spanish Fork City, Utah County, Utah
Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.3
Analyte CAS Method Units RSL
Residential
RSL
Industrial ISL Tier 1
TPH-GRO 8006-61-9 8260B mg/kg NE NE 150 1500
Date Collected
Client Sample ID
Lab Sample ID
1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE 79-00-5 8260B mg/kg 1.1 5 NE NE
TRICHLOROETHENE 79-01-6 8260B mg/kg 0.94 6 NE NE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE 75-69-4 8260B mg/kg 23000 350000 NE NE
1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE 96-18-4 8260B mg/kg 0.0051 0.11 NE NE
1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 95-63-6 8260B mg/kg 300 1800 NE NE
1,2,3-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 526-73-8 8260B mg/kg 340 2000 NE NE
1,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 108-67-8 8260B mg/kg 270 1500 NE NE
VINYL CHLORIDE 75-01-4 8260B mg/kg 0.059 1.7 NE NE
XYLENES, TOTAL 1330-20-7 8260B mg/kg 580 2500 142 142
Qualifiers (Q):
NE:Not Established.<:Less than Reported Detection Limit (RDL).
mg/kg:Milligrams per kilogram.
Blue italicized non-detect results (e.g.,<0.0100 ) exceed one or more of the screening levels.
Color shaded value exceeds screening level.
B:The same analyte is found in the associated blank.J:The identification of the analyte
is acceptable; the reported value is an estimate.J3:The associated batch QC was
outside the established quality control range for precision.J5:The sample matrix
interfered with the ability to make any accurate determination; spike value is high.
J6:The sample matrix interfered with the ability to make any accurate determination;
spike value is low. P1:RPD value not applicable for sample concentrations less than 5
times the reporting limit. V:The sample concentration is too high to evaluate accurate
spike recoveries. V3:The internal standard exhibited poor recovery due to sample matrix
interference. The analytical results will be biased high. BDL results will be unaffected.
EPA RSL: Environmental Protection Agency Regional Screening Levels for soil at residential (Res.) and industrial
(Ind.) properties (May 2022; TR=1E-06; THQ=1.0).
Utah's Initial Screening Levels (ISLs) and risk-based Tier 1 Screening Levels (Tier 1) for petroleum releases at
leaking underground storage tank sites
Bold value exceeds Method Detection Limit (MDL).
Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL
L1559319-01 L1559319-02
ET @ SURFACE ET @ 4'
11/15/2022 11/15/2022
L1558026-52 L1558026-53
B-80 @ SURFACE B-80 @ 3'
11/10/2022 11/10/2022 11/15/2022
L1559319-03
WT @ SURFACE
<0.00126 0.000535 0.00126 <0.00128 0.000542 0.001 <0.00135 0.000573 0.00135 <0.00124 0.000525 0.001 <0.00122 0.000518 0.00122
<0.00126 0.000252 0.00126 <0.00128 0.000255 0.001 <0.00135 0.00027 0.00135 <0.00124 0.000247 0.001 <0.00122 0.000244 0.00122
<0.00629 0.000448 0.00629 <0.00638 0.000454 0.006 <0.00674 0.00048 0.00674 <0.00618 0.00044 0.006 <0.00610 0.000434 0.0061
<0.00315 0.000307 0.00315 <0.00319 0.000311 0.003 <0.00337 0.000329 0.00337 <0.00309 0.000301 0.003 <0.00305 0.000297 0.00305
0.00247 V3 0.000266 0.00126 0.00221 V3 0.000269 0.001 0.00058 J 0.000284 0.00135 0.00151 0.000261 0.001 0.000689 J 0.000257 0.00122
0.000936 J V3 0.000361 0.00126 0.000758 J V3 0.000366 0.001 <0.00135 0.000387 0.00135 0.000535 J 0.000355 0.001 <0.00122 0.00035 0.00122
0.00106 J V3 0.000335 0.00126 0.000957 J V3 0.000339 0.001 <0.00135 0.000359 0.00135 0.000519 J 0.000329 0.001 <0.00122 0.000324 0.00122
<0.00126 0.000284 0.00126 <0.00128 0.000288 0.001 <0.00135 0.000305 0.00135 <0.00124 0.000279 0.001 <0.00122 0.000276 0.00122
0.0157 V3 0.000629 0.00378 0.0162 V3 0.000638 0.004 0.00221 J 0.000674 0.00404 0.00429 0.000618 0.004 0.00266 J 0.00061 0.00366
Page 16 of 18
Table C2 - VOCs and Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soil
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking - 2890 South State Street and 1215 North SR 51, Spanish Fork City, Utah County, Utah
Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.3
Analyte CAS Method Units RSL
Residential
RSL
Industrial ISL Tier 1
TPH-GRO 8006-61-9 8260B mg/kg NE NE 150 1500
TPH-DRO 68334-30-5 8015 mg/kg NE NE 500 5000
TRPH NE 9071B mg/kg NE NE 1000 10000
ACETONE 67-64-1 8260B mg/kg 61000 670000 NE NE
ACRYLONITRILE 107-13-1 8260B mg/kg 0.25 1.1 NE NE
BENZENE 71-43-2 8260B mg/kg 1.2 5.1 0.2 0.9
BROMOBENZENE 108-86-1 8260B mg/kg 290 1800 NE NE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE 75-27-4 8260B mg/kg 0.29 1.3 NE NE
BROMOFORM 75-25-2 8260B mg/kg 19 86 NE NE
BROMOMETHANE 74-83-9 8260B mg/kg 6.8 30 NE NE
N-BUTYLBENZENE 104-51-8 8260B mg/kg 3900 58000 NE NE
SEC-BUTYLBENZENE 135-98-8 8260B mg/kg 7800 120000 NE NE
TERT-BUTYLBENZENE 98-06-6 8260B mg/kg 7800 120000 NE NE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 56-23-5 8260B mg/kg 0.65 2.9 NE NE
CHLOROBENZENE 108-90-7 8260B mg/kg 280 1300 NE NE
CHLORODIBROMOMETHANE 124-48-1 8260B mg/kg 8.3 39 NE NE
CHLOROETHANE 75-00-3 8260B mg/kg 14000 57000 NE NE
CHLOROFORM 67-66-3 8260B mg/kg 0.32 1.4 NE NE
CHLOROMETHANE 74-87-3 8260B mg/kg 110 460 NE NE
2-CHLOROTOLUENE 95-49-8 8260B mg/kg 1600 23000 NE NE
4-CHLOROTOLUENE 106-43-4 8260B mg/kg 1600 23000 NE NE
1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE 96-12-8 8260B mg/kg 0.0053 0.064 NE NE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE 106-93-4 8260B mg/kg 0.036 0.16 NE NE
DIBROMOMETHANE 74-95-3 8260B mg/kg 24 99 NE NE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 95-50-1 8260B mg/kg 1800 9300 NE NE
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 541-73-1 8260B mg/kg NE NE NE NE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 106-46-7 8260B mg/kg 2.6 11 NE NE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE 75-71-8 8260B mg/kg 87 370 NE NE
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE 75-34-3 8260B mg/kg 3.6 16 NE NE
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE 107-06-2 8260B mg/kg 0.46 2 NE NE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE 75-35-4 8260B mg/kg 230 1000 NE NE
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 156-59-2 8260B mg/kg 160 2300 NE NE
TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 156-60-5 8260B mg/kg 70 300 NE NE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 78-87-5 8260B mg/kg 2.5 11 NE NE
1,1-DICHLOROPROPENE 563-58-6 8260B mg/kg NE NE NE NE
1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE 142-28-9 8260B mg/kg 1600 23000 NE NE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 10061-01-5 8260B mg/kg NE NE NE NE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 10061-02-6 8260B mg/kg NE NE NE NE
2,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 594-20-7 8260B mg/kg NE NE NE NE
DI-ISOPROPYL ETHER 108-20-3 8260B mg/kg 2200 9400 NE NE
ETHYLBENZENE 100-41-4 8260B mg/kg 5.8 25 5 23
HEXACHLORO-1,3-BUTADIENE 87-68-3 8260B mg/kg 1.2 5.3 NE NE
ISOPROPYLBENZENE 98-82-8 8260B mg/kg 1900 9900 NE NE
P-ISOPROPYLTOLUENE 99-87-6 8260B mg/kg NE NE NE NE
2-BUTANONE (MEK)78-93-3 8260B mg/kg 27000 190000 NE NE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE 75-09-2 8260B mg/kg 57 1000 NE NE
4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE (MIBK)108-10-1 8260B mg/kg 33000 140000 NE NE
METHYL TERT-BUTYL ETHER 1634-04-4 8260B mg/kg 47 210 0.3 0.3
NAPHTHALENE 91-20-3 8260B mg/kg 2 8.6 51 51
N-PROPYLBENZENE 103-65-1 8260B mg/kg 3800 24000 NE NE
STYRENE 100-42-5 8260B mg/kg 6000 35000 NE NE
1,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 630-20-6 8260B mg/kg 2 8.8 NE NE
1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 79-34-5 8260B mg/kg 0.6 2.7 NE NE
1,1,2-TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE76-13-1 8260B mg/kg 6700 28000 NE NE
TETRACHLOROETHENE 127-18-4 8260B mg/kg 24 100 NE NE
TOLUENE 108-88-3 8260B mg/kg 4900 47000 9 25
1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE 87-61-6 8260B mg/kg 63 930 NE NE
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 120-82-1 8260B mg/kg 24 110 NE NE
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 71-55-6 8260B mg/kg 8100 36000 NE NE
Date Collected
Client Sample ID
Lab Sample ID
Result Q MDL RDL
<0.690 0.253 0.69
146 26.2 137
389 45.1 137
0.204 0.0286 0.069
<0.0138 0.00279 0.014
0.00652 0.000518 0.001
<0.00138 0.00038 0.001
<0.00138 0.001 0.001
<0.00138 0.000585 0.001
<0.00690 0.00161 0.007
0.000859 J 0.000357 0.001
0.00114 J 0.000277 0.001
<0.00138 0.000284 0.001
<0.00138 0.000342 0.001
<0.00138 0.000265 0.001
<0.00138 0.000309 0.001
<0.00690 0.00138 0.007
<0.00690 0.00142 0.007
<0.00346 0.000896 0.003
<0.00138 0.00031 0.001
<0.00138 0.000954 0.001
<0.00690 0.00262 0.007
<0.00138 0.000346 0.001
<0.00138 0.000482 0.001
<0.00138 0.000586 0.001
<0.00138 0.000828 0.001
<0.00138 0.00115 0.001
<0.00690 0.000396 0.007
<0.00138 0.00037 0.001
<0.00138 0.000622 0.001
<0.00138 0.000491 0.001
<0.00138 0.000656 0.001
<0.00138 0.00069 0.001
<0.00138 0.000227 0.001
<0.00138 0.000518 0.001
<0.00138 0.00031 0.001
<0.00138 0.000586 0.001
<0.00138 0.000932 0.001
<0.00138 0.000518 0.001
<0.00138 0.000305 0.001
0.00258 0.000414 0.001
<0.00138 0.000471 0.001
0.00234 0.000586 0.001
0.000642 J 0.000281 0.001
0.0476 0.00646 0.014
<0.00690 0.00138 0.007
0.00307 J 0.00131 0.014
<0.00138 0.000482 0.001
<0.00690 0.00687 0.007
0.00142 0.000284 0.001
<0.00138 0.000307 0.001
<0.00138 0.000409 0.001
<0.00138 0.000318 0.001
<0.00138 0.000588 0.001
<0.00138 0.000448 0.001
0.00771 0.00169 0.007
<0.00138 0.000422 0.001
<0.00138 0.000536 0.001
<0.00138 0.000511 0.001
11/15/2022
L1559319-04
WT @ 3'
Page 17 of 18
Table C2 - VOCs and Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soil
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking - 2890 South State Street and 1215 North SR 51, Spanish Fork City, Utah County, Utah
Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.3
Analyte CAS Method Units RSL
Residential
RSL
Industrial ISL Tier 1
TPH-GRO 8006-61-9 8260B mg/kg NE NE 150 1500
Date Collected
Client Sample ID
Lab Sample ID
1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE 79-00-5 8260B mg/kg 1.1 5 NE NE
TRICHLOROETHENE 79-01-6 8260B mg/kg 0.94 6 NE NE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE 75-69-4 8260B mg/kg 23000 350000 NE NE
1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE 96-18-4 8260B mg/kg 0.0051 0.11 NE NE
1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 95-63-6 8260B mg/kg 300 1800 NE NE
1,2,3-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 526-73-8 8260B mg/kg 340 2000 NE NE
1,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 108-67-8 8260B mg/kg 270 1500 NE NE
VINYL CHLORIDE 75-01-4 8260B mg/kg 0.059 1.7 NE NE
XYLENES, TOTAL 1330-20-7 8260B mg/kg 580 2500 142 142
Qualifiers (Q):
NE:Not Established.<:Less than Reported Detection Limit (RDL).
mg/kg:Milligrams per kilogram.
Blue italicized non-detect results (e.g.,<0.0100 ) exceed one or more of the screening levels.
Color shaded value exceeds screening level.
B:The same analyte is found in the associated blank.J:The identification of the analyte
is acceptable; the reported value is an estimate.J3:The associated batch QC was
outside the established quality control range for precision.J5:The sample matrix
interfered with the ability to make any accurate determination; spike value is high.
J6:The sample matrix interfered with the ability to make any accurate determination;
spike value is low. P1:RPD value not applicable for sample concentrations less than 5
times the reporting limit. V:The sample concentration is too high to evaluate accurate
spike recoveries. V3:The internal standard exhibited poor recovery due to sample matrix
interference. The analytical results will be biased high. BDL results will be unaffected.
EPA RSL: Environmental Protection Agency Regional Screening Levels for soil at residential (Res.) and industrial
(Ind.) properties (May 2022; TR=1E-06; THQ=1.0).
Utah's Initial Screening Levels (ISLs) and risk-based Tier 1 Screening Levels (Tier 1) for petroleum releases at
leaking underground storage tank sites
Bold value exceeds Method Detection Limit (MDL).
Result Q MDL RDL
11/15/2022
L1559319-04
WT @ 3'
<0.00138 0.000586 0.001
<0.00138 0.000276 0.001
<0.00690 0.000492 0.007
<0.00346 0.000336 0.003
0.00152 0.000291 0.001
0.00134 J 0.000396 0.001
0.000776 J 0.000368 0.001
<0.00138 0.000312 0.001
0.00361 J 0.00069 0.004
Page 18 of 18
Table C3 - Dissolved Metals in Groundwater
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking - 2890 South State Street and 1215 North SR 51, Spanish Fork City, Utah County, Utah
Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.3
Analyte CAS Method Units
RSL
Tapwater MCL UGWQS Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL
ARSENIC 7440-38-2 6010B mg/l 0.000052 0.01 0.05 0.00107 J 0.00018 0.002 0.0215 0.00018 0.002 0.0136 0.00018 0.002 0.0205 0.00018 0.002 0.028 0.00018 0.002
BARIUM 7440-39-3 6010B mg/l 3.8 2 2 0.176 0.000381 0.002 0.145 0.000381 0.002 0.119 0.000381 0.002 0.16 0.000381 0.002 0.245 0.000381 0.002
CADMIUM 7440-43-9 6010B mg/l 0.0092 0.005 0.005 <0.00100 0.00015 0.001 <0.00100 0.00015 0.001 <0.00100 0.00015 0.001 <0.00100 0.00015 0.001 <0.00100 0.00015 0.001
CHROMIUM 7440-47-3 6010B mg/l NE 0.1 0.1 0.00127 J 0.00124 0.002 0.00467 0.00124 0.002 <0.00200 0.00124 0.002 <0.00200 0.00124 0.002 0.0016 J 0.00124 0.002
HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM 18540-29-9 7199 mg/l 0.000035 NE NE <0.000500 0.00015 0.0005 <0.000500 0.00015 0.0005 <0.000500 0.00015 0.0005 <0.000500 0.00015 0.0005 <0.000500 0.00015 0.0005
LEAD 7439-92-1 6010B mg/l 0.015 0.015 0.015 0.000958 J 0.000849 0.002 <0.00200 0.000849 0.002 <0.00200 0.000849 0.002 <0.00200 0.000849 0.002 <0.00200 0.000849 0.002
MERCURY 7439-97-6 7470 mg/l 0.00063 0.002 0.002 <0.000200 0.0001 0.0002 <0.000200 0.0001 0.0002 <0.000200 0.0001 0.0002 <0.000200 0.0001 0.0002 <0.000200 0.0001 0.0002
SELENIUM 7782-49-2 6010B mg/l 0.1 0.05 0.05 0.000661 J 0.0003 0.002 0.00441 0.0003 0.002 0.000514 J 0.0003 0.002 0.00693 0.0003 0.002 <0.00200 0.0003 0.002
SILVER 7440-22-4 6010B mg/l 0.094 NE 0.1 <0.00200 0.00007 0.002 <0.00200 0.00007 0.002 <0.00200 0.00007 0.002 <0.00200 0.00007 0.002 <0.00200 0.00007 0.002
Blue italicized non-detect results (e.g.,<0.0100 ) exceed one or more of the screening levels.
B-6
L1558026-23 L1558026-24 L1558026-25 L1558026-26 L1558026-27
11/11/2022 11/10/2022 11/10/2022 11/10/2022 11/09/2022
Lab Sample ID
Bold value exceeds Method Detection Limit (MDL). Color shaded value exceeds screening level.
NE:Not Established.<:Less than Reported Detection Limit (RDL).mg/l:Milligrams per liter.
UGWQS:Utah Ground Water Quality Standards.
EPA Tapwater RSL: Environmental Protection Agency Regional Screening level for drinking
water (April 2022).
Client Sample ID
Date Collected
UDEQ: Utah Department of Environmental Quality's Initial Screening Levels (ISLs) and risk-
based Tier 1 Screening Levels (Tier 1) for petroleum hydrocarbons in groundwater at
underground storage tank sites.
Qualifiers (Q):
EPA MCL: Environmental Protection Agency Maximum Contaminant Level for drinking water
(May 2022).
J:The identification of the analyte is acceptable; the reported value is an estimate.
B-1 B-2 B-4 B-5
Page 1 of 4
Table C3 - Dissolved Metals in Groundwater
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking - 2890 South State Street and 1215 North SR 51, Spanish Fork City, Utah County, Utah
Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.3
Analyte CAS Method Units
RSL
Tapwater MCL UGWQS
ARSENIC 7440-38-2 6010B mg/l 0.000052 0.01 0.05
BARIUM 7440-39-3 6010B mg/l 3.8 2 2
CADMIUM 7440-43-9 6010B mg/l 0.0092 0.005 0.005
CHROMIUM 7440-47-3 6010B mg/l NE 0.1 0.1
HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM 18540-29-9 7199 mg/l 0.000035 NE NE
LEAD 7439-92-1 6010B mg/l 0.015 0.015 0.015
MERCURY 7439-97-6 7470 mg/l 0.00063 0.002 0.002
SELENIUM 7782-49-2 6010B mg/l 0.1 0.05 0.05
SILVER 7440-22-4 6010B mg/l 0.094 NE 0.1
Blue italicized non-detect results (e.g.,<0.0100 ) exceed one or more of the screening levels.
Lab Sample ID
Bold value exceeds Method Detection Limit (MDL). Color shaded value exceeds screening level.
NE:Not Established.<:Less than Reported Detection Limit (RDL).mg/l:Milligrams per liter.
UGWQS:Utah Ground Water Quality Standards.
EPA Tapwater RSL: Environmental Protection Agency Regional Screening level for drinking
water (April 2022).
Client Sample ID
Date Collected
UDEQ: Utah Department of Environmental Quality's Initial Screening Levels (ISLs) and risk-
based Tier 1 Screening Levels (Tier 1) for petroleum hydrocarbons in groundwater at
underground storage tank sites.
Qualifiers (Q):
EPA MCL: Environmental Protection Agency Maximum Contaminant Level for drinking water
(May 2022).
J:The identification of the analyte is acceptable; the reported value is an estimate.
Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL
0.00578 0.00018 0.002 0.00858 0.00018 0.002 0.0114 0.00018 0.002 0.00895 0.00018 0.002 0.0116 0.00018 0.002
0.0858 0.000381 0.002 0.293 0.000381 0.002 0.308 0.000381 0.002 0.0998 0.000381 0.002 0.0821 0.000381 0.002
<0.00100 0.00015 0.001 <0.00100 0.00015 0.001 <0.00100 0.00015 0.001 <0.00100 0.00015 0.001 <0.00100 0.00015 0.001
0.00237 0.00124 0.002 <0.00200 0.00124 0.002 <0.00200 0.00124 0.002 <0.00200 0.00124 0.002 <0.00200 0.00124 0.002
<0.000500 0.00015 0.0005 <0.000500 0.00015 0.0005 <0.000500 0.00015 0.0005 <0.000500 0.00015 0.0005 <0.000500 0.00015 0.0005
<0.00200 0.000849 0.002 <0.00200 0.000849 0.002 <0.00200 0.000849 0.002 <0.00200 0.000849 0.002 <0.00200 0.000849 0.002
<0.000200 0.0001 0.0002 <0.000200 0.0001 0.0002 <0.000200 0.0001 0.0002 <0.000200 0.0001 0.0002 <0.000200 0.0001 0.0002
0.00199 J 0.0003 0.002 0.00053 J 0.0003 0.002 0.000369 J 0.0003 0.002 <0.00200 0.0003 0.002 0.00209 0.0003 0.002
<0.00200 0.00007 0.002 <0.00200 0.00007 0.002 <0.00200 0.00007 0.002 <0.00200 0.00007 0.002 <0.00200 0.00007 0.002
B-7 B-8 B-9
L1558026-28 L1558026-29 L1558026-30 L1558026-31 L1558026-32
B-10
11/11/2022 11/09/2022 11/09/2022 11/11/2022 11/11/2022
B-11
Page 2 of 4
Table C3 - Dissolved Metals in Groundwater
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking - 2890 South State Street and 1215 North SR 51, Spanish Fork City, Utah County, Utah
Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.3
Analyte CAS Method Units
RSL
Tapwater MCL UGWQS
ARSENIC 7440-38-2 6010B mg/l 0.000052 0.01 0.05
BARIUM 7440-39-3 6010B mg/l 3.8 2 2
CADMIUM 7440-43-9 6010B mg/l 0.0092 0.005 0.005
CHROMIUM 7440-47-3 6010B mg/l NE 0.1 0.1
HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM 18540-29-9 7199 mg/l 0.000035 NE NE
LEAD 7439-92-1 6010B mg/l 0.015 0.015 0.015
MERCURY 7439-97-6 7470 mg/l 0.00063 0.002 0.002
SELENIUM 7782-49-2 6010B mg/l 0.1 0.05 0.05
SILVER 7440-22-4 6010B mg/l 0.094 NE 0.1
Blue italicized non-detect results (e.g.,<0.0100 ) exceed one or more of the screening levels.
Lab Sample ID
Bold value exceeds Method Detection Limit (MDL). Color shaded value exceeds screening level.
NE:Not Established.<:Less than Reported Detection Limit (RDL).mg/l:Milligrams per liter.
UGWQS:Utah Ground Water Quality Standards.
EPA Tapwater RSL: Environmental Protection Agency Regional Screening level for drinking
water (April 2022).
Client Sample ID
Date Collected
UDEQ: Utah Department of Environmental Quality's Initial Screening Levels (ISLs) and risk-
based Tier 1 Screening Levels (Tier 1) for petroleum hydrocarbons in groundwater at
underground storage tank sites.
Qualifiers (Q):
EPA MCL: Environmental Protection Agency Maximum Contaminant Level for drinking water
(May 2022).
J:The identification of the analyte is acceptable; the reported value is an estimate.
Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL
0.0103 0.00018 0.002 0.00493 0.00018 0.002 0.0529 0.00018 0.002 0.0346 0.00018 0.002 0.00122 J 0.00018 0.002
0.101 0.000381 0.002 0.18 0.000381 0.002 0.205 0.000381 0.002 0.244 0.000381 0.002 0.332 0.000381 0.002
<0.00100 0.00015 0.001 <0.00100 0.00015 0.001 <0.00100 0.00015 0.001 <0.00100 0.00015 0.001 <0.00100 0.00015 0.001
<0.00200 0.00124 0.002 <0.00200 0.00124 0.002 <0.00200 0.00124 0.002 <0.00200 0.00124 0.002 0.0015 J 0.00124 0.002
<0.000500 0.00015 0.0005 0.000203 J 0.00015 0.0005 <0.000500 0.00015 0.0005 <0.000500 0.00015 0.0005 <0.000500 0.00015 0.0005
<0.00200 0.000849 0.002 <0.00200 0.000849 0.002 <0.00200 0.000849 0.002 <0.00200 0.000849 0.002 <0.00200 0.000849 0.002
<0.000200 0.0001 0.0002 <0.000200 0.0001 0.0002 <0.000200 0.0001 0.0002 <0.000200 0.0001 0.0002 <0.000200 0.0001 0.0002
0.0017 J 0.0003 0.002 0.00188 J 0.0003 0.002 0.000375 J 0.0003 0.002 <0.00200 0.0003 0.002 <0.00200 0.0003 0.002
<0.00200 0.00007 0.002 <0.00200 0.00007 0.002 <0.00200 0.00007 0.002 <0.00200 0.00007 0.002 <0.00200 0.00007 0.002
B-13 B-14 B-15
L1558026-36L1558026-33
B-16
11/11/2022
B-12
11/11/2022 11/09/2022 11/09/2022 11/11/2022
L1558026-37L1558026-34 L1558026-35
Page 3 of 4
Table C3 - Dissolved Metals in Groundwater
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking - 2890 South State Street and 1215 North SR 51, Spanish Fork City, Utah County, Utah
Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.3
Analyte CAS Method Units
RSL
Tapwater MCL UGWQS
ARSENIC 7440-38-2 6010B mg/l 0.000052 0.01 0.05
BARIUM 7440-39-3 6010B mg/l 3.8 2 2
CADMIUM 7440-43-9 6010B mg/l 0.0092 0.005 0.005
CHROMIUM 7440-47-3 6010B mg/l NE 0.1 0.1
HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM 18540-29-9 7199 mg/l 0.000035 NE NE
LEAD 7439-92-1 6010B mg/l 0.015 0.015 0.015
MERCURY 7439-97-6 7470 mg/l 0.00063 0.002 0.002
SELENIUM 7782-49-2 6010B mg/l 0.1 0.05 0.05
SILVER 7440-22-4 6010B mg/l 0.094 NE 0.1
Blue italicized non-detect results (e.g.,<0.0100 ) exceed one or more of the screening levels.
Lab Sample ID
Bold value exceeds Method Detection Limit (MDL). Color shaded value exceeds screening level.
NE:Not Established.<:Less than Reported Detection Limit (RDL).mg/l:Milligrams per liter.
UGWQS:Utah Ground Water Quality Standards.
EPA Tapwater RSL: Environmental Protection Agency Regional Screening level for drinking
water (April 2022).
Client Sample ID
Date Collected
UDEQ: Utah Department of Environmental Quality's Initial Screening Levels (ISLs) and risk-
based Tier 1 Screening Levels (Tier 1) for petroleum hydrocarbons in groundwater at
underground storage tank sites.
Qualifiers (Q):
EPA MCL: Environmental Protection Agency Maximum Contaminant Level for drinking water
(May 2022).
J:The identification of the analyte is acceptable; the reported value is an estimate.
Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL
0.0552 0.00018 0.002 0.0209 0.00018 0.002
0.188 0.000381 0.002 0.157 0.000381 0.002
<0.00100 0.00015 0.001 <0.00100 0.00015 0.001
<0.00200 0.00124 0.002 <0.00200 0.00124 0.002
<0.000500 0.00015 0.0005 <0.000500 0.00015 0.0005
<0.00200 0.000849 0.002 <0.00200 0.000849 0.002
<0.000200 0.0001 0.0002 <0.000200 0.0001 0.0002
<0.00200 0.0003 0.002 0.00716 0.0003 0.002
<0.00200 0.00007 0.002 <0.00200 0.00007 0.002
B-140 B-50
11/10/2022
L1558026-38 L1558026-39
11/09/2022
Page 4 of 4
Table C4 - VOCs and Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Groundwater
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking - 2890 South State Street and 1215 North SR 51, Spanish Fork City, Utah County, Utah
Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.3
Analyte CAS Method Units MCL VISL
Residential
VISL
Commercial ISL Tier 1 UGWQS Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL
TPH-GRO 8006-61-9 8260B mg/l NE NE NE 1 10 NE <0.500 0.108 0.5 <0.500 0.108 0.5 <0.500 0.108 0.5
TPH-DRO 68334-30-5 8015 mg/l NE NE NE 1 10 NE 0.932 0.0247 0.1 0.0617 B J 0.0247 0.1 0.141 B 0.0247 0.1
TRPH NE 9071B mg/l NE NE NE 10 10 NE <5.88 0.853 5.88 2.12 J 0.853 5.88 <6.25 0.906 6.25
ACETONE 67-64-1 8260B mg/l NE 22500 94500 NE NE NE <0.0500 0.0113 0.05 <0.0500 0.0113 0.05 <0.0500 0.0113 0.05
ACROLEIN 107-02-8 8260B mg/l NE 0.00418 0.0176 NE NE NE <0.0500 0.00254 0.05 <0.0500 0.00254 0.05 <0.0500 0.00254 0.05
ACRYLONITRILE 107-13-1 8260B mg/l NE 0.00732 0.032 NE NE NE <0.0100 0.000671 0.01 <0.0100 0.000671 0.01 <0.0100 0.000671 0.01
BENZENE 71-43-2 8260B mg/l 0.005 0.00159 0.00693 0.005 0.3 0.005 0.000746 J 0.0000941 0.001 0.00042 J 0.0000941 0.001 0.000137 J 0.0000941 0.001
BROMOBENZENE 108-86-1 8260B mg/l NE 0.62 2.6 NE NE NE <0.00100 0.000118 0.001 <0.00100 0.000118 0.001 <0.00100 0.000118 0.001
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE 75-27-4 8260B mg/l 0.08 0.000876 0.00382 NE NE NE <0.00100 0.000136 0.001 <0.00100 0.000136 0.001 <0.00100 0.000136 0.001
BROMOFORM 75-25-2 8260B mg/l 0.08 0.117 0.51 NE NE NE <0.00100 0.000129 0.001 <0.00100 0.000129 0.001 <0.00100 0.000129 0.001
BROMOMETHANE 74-83-9 8260B mg/l NE 0.0174 0.073 NE NE NE <0.00500 0.000605 0.005 <0.00500 0.000605 0.005 <0.00500 0.000605 0.005
N-BUTYLBENZENE 104-51-8 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE <0.00100 0.000157 0.001 <0.00100 0.000157 0.001 <0.00100 0.000157 0.001
SEC-BUTYLBENZENE 135-98-8 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE <0.00100 0.000125 0.001 <0.00100 0.000125 0.001 <0.00100 0.000125 0.001
TERT-BUTYLBENZENE 98-06-6 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE <0.00100 0.000127 0.001 <0.00100 0.000127 0.001 <0.00100 0.000127 0.001
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 56-23-5 8260B mg/l 0.005 0.000415 0.00181 NE NE 0.005 <0.00100 0.000128 0.001 <0.00100 0.000128 0.001 <0.00100 0.000128 0.001
CHLOROBENZENE 108-90-7 8260B mg/l 0.1 0.41 1.72 NE NE 0.1 <0.00100 0.000116 0.001 <0.00100 0.000116 0.001 <0.00100 0.000116 0.001
CHLORODIBROMOMETHANE 124-48-1 8260B mg/l 0.08 NE NE NE NE NE <0.00100 0.00014 0.001 <0.00100 0.00014 0.001 <0.00100 0.00014 0.001
CHLOROETHANE 75-00-3 8260B mg/l NE 23 96.5 NE NE NE <0.00500 0.000192 0.005 <0.00500 0.000192 0.005 <0.00500 0.000192 0.005
CHLOROFORM 67-66-3 8260B mg/l 0.08 0.000814 0.00355 NE NE NE <0.00500 0.000111 0.005 <0.00500 0.000111 0.005 <0.00500 0.000111 0.005
CHLOROMETHANE 74-87-3 8260B mg/l NE 0.26 1.09 NE NE NE <0.00250 0.00096 0.003 <0.00250 0.00096 0.003 <0.00250 0.00096 0.0025
2-CHLOROTOLUENE 95-49-8 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE <0.00100 0.000106 0.001 <0.00100 0.000106 0.001 <0.00100 0.000106 0.001
4-CHLOROTOLUENE 106-43-4 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE <0.00100 0.000114 0.001 <0.00100 0.000114 0.001 <0.00100 0.000114 0.001
1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE 96-12-8 8260B mg/l 0.0002 0.0000281 0.00034 NE NE 0.0002 <0.00500 0.000276 0.005 <0.00500 0.000276 0.005 <0.00500 0.000276 0.005
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE 106-93-4 8260B mg/l 5E-05 0.000176 0.000769 NE NE 0.00005 <0.00100 0.000126 0.001 <0.00100 0.000126 0.001 <0.00100 0.000126 0.001
DIBROMOMETHANE 74-95-3 8260B mg/l NE 0.124 0.521 NE NE NE <0.00100 0.000122 0.001 <0.00100 0.000122 0.001 <0.00100 0.000122 0.001
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 95-50-1 8260B mg/l 0.6 2.66 11.2 NE NE 0.6 0.00017 J 0.000107 0.001 <0.00100 0.000107 0.001 <0.00100 0.000107 0.001
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 541-73-1 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE <0.00100 0.00011 0.001 <0.00100 0.00011 0.001 <0.00100 0.00011 0.001
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 106-46-7 8260B mg/l 0.075 0.00259 0.0113 NE NE 0.075 0.000893 J 0.00012 0.001 <0.00100 0.00012 0.001 <0.00100 0.00012 0.001
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE 75-71-8 8260B mg/l NE 0.00744 0.0312 NE NE NE <0.00500 0.000374 0.005 <0.00500 0.000374 0.005 <0.00500 0.000374 0.005
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE 75-34-3 8260B mg/l NE 0.00764 0.0334 NE NE NE <0.00100 0.0001 0.001 <0.00100 0.0001 0.001 <0.00100 0.0001 0.001
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE 107-06-2 8260B mg/l 0.005 0.00224 0.00978 NE NE 0.005 <0.00100 0.0000819 0.001 <0.00100 0.0000819 0.001 <0.00100 0.0000819 0.001
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE 75-35-4 8260B mg/l 0.007 0.195 0.821 NE NE 0.007 <0.00100 0.000188 0.001 <0.00100 0.000188 0.001 <0.00100 0.000188 0.001
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 156-59-2 8260B mg/l 0.07 NE NE NE NE 0.07 <0.00100 0.000126 0.001 <0.00100 0.000126 0.001 <0.00100 0.000126 0.001
TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 156-60-5 8260B mg/l 0.1 0.109 0.457 NE NE 0.1 <0.00100 0.000149 0.001 <0.00100 0.000149 0.001 <0.00100 0.000149 0.001
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 78-87-5 8260B mg/l 0.005 0.00658 0.0287 NE NE 0.005 <0.00100 0.000149 0.001 <0.00100 0.000149 0.001 <0.00100 0.000149 0.001
1,1-DICHLOROPROPENE 563-58-6 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE <0.00100 0.000142 0.001 <0.00100 0.000142 0.001 <0.00100 0.000142 0.001
1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE 142-28-9 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE <0.00100 0.00011 0.001 <0.00100 0.00011 0.001 <0.00100 0.00011 0.001
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 10061-01-5 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE <0.00100 0.000111 0.001 <0.00100 0.000111 0.001 <0.00100 0.000111 0.001
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 10061-02-6 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE <0.00100 0.000118 0.001 <0.00100 0.000118 0.001 <0.00100 0.000118 0.001
2,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 594-20-7 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE <0.00100 0.000161 0.001 <0.00100 0.000161 0.001 <0.00100 0.000161 0.001
DI-ISOPROPYL ETHER 108-20-3 8260B mg/l NE 6.97 29.3 NE NE NE <0.00100 0.000105 0.001 <0.00100 0.000105 0.001 <0.00100 0.000105 0.001
ETHYLBENZENE 100-41-4 8260B mg/l 0.7 0.00349 0.0152 0.7 4 0.7 <0.00100 0.000137 0.001 <0.00100 0.000137 0.001 <0.00100 0.000137 0.001
HEXACHLORO-1,3-BUTADIENE 87-68-3 8260B mg/l NE 0.000303 0.00132 NE NE NE <0.00100 0.000337 0.001 <0.00100 0.000337 0.001 <0.00100 0.000337 0.001
L1558026-23 L1558026-24 L1558026-25
11/11/2022 11/10/2022 11/10/2022
B-1 B-2 B-4
Date Collected
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
Page 1 of 12
Table C4 - VOCs and Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Groundwater
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking - 2890 South State Street and 1215 North SR 51, Spanish Fork City, Utah County, Utah
Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.3
Analyte CAS Method Units MCL VISL
Residential
VISL
Commercial ISL Tier 1 UGWQS Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL
L1558026-23 L1558026-24 L1558026-25
11/11/2022 11/10/2022 11/10/2022
B-1 B-2 B-4
Date Collected
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
ISOPROPYLBENZENE 98-82-8 8260B mg/l NE 0.887 3.73 NE NE NE 0.00441 0.000105 0.001 <0.00100 0.000105 0.001 <0.00100 0.000105 0.001
P-ISOPROPYLTOLUENE 99-87-6 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE 0.000136 J 0.00012 0.001 <0.00100 0.00012 0.001 <0.00100 0.00012 0.001
2-BUTANONE (MEK)78-93-3 8260B mg/l NE 2240 9410 NE NE NE <0.0100 0.00119 0.01 <0.0100 0.00119 0.01 <0.0100 0.00119 0.01
METHYLENE CHLORIDE 75-09-2 8260B mg/l 0.005 0.763 9.23 NE NE 0.005 <0.00500 0.00043 0.005 <0.00500 0.00043 0.005 <0.00500 0.00043 0.005
4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE (MIBK)108-10-1 8260B mg/l NE 555 2330 NE NE NE <0.0100 0.000478 0.01 <0.0100 0.000478 0.01 <0.0100 0.000478 0.01
METHYL TERT-BUTYL ETHER 1634-04-4 8260B mg/l NE 0.45 1.97 0.2 0.2 NE <0.00100 0.000101 0.001 <0.00100 0.000101 0.001 <0.00100 0.000101 0.001
NAPHTHALENE 91-20-3 8260B mg/l NE 0.00459 0.0201 0.7 0.7 NE <0.00500 0.001 0.005 <0.00500 0.001 0.005 <0.00500 0.001 0.005
N-PROPYLBENZENE 103-65-1 8260B mg/l NE 2.43 10.2 NE NE NE 0.000466 J 0.0000993 0.001 <0.00100 0.0000993 0.001 <0.00100 0.0000993 0.001
STYRENE 100-42-5 8260B mg/l 0.1 9.28 39 NE NE 0.1 <0.00100 0.000118 0.001 <0.00100 0.000118 0.001 <0.00100 0.000118 0.001
1,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 630-20-6 8260B mg/l NE 0.00371 0.0162 NE NE NE <0.00100 0.000147 0.001 <0.00100 0.000147 0.001 <0.00100 0.000147 0.001
1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 79-34-5 8260B mg/l NE 0.00323 0.0141 NE NE NE <0.00100 0.000133 0.001 <0.00100 0.000133 0.001 <0.00100 0.000133 0.001
1,1,2-TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE 76-13-1 8260B mg/l NE 0.242 1.02 NE NE NE <0.00100 0.00018 0.001 <0.00100 0.00018 0.001 <0.00100 0.00018 0.001
TETRACHLOROETHENE 127-18-4 8260B mg/l 0.005 0.0149 0.0652 NE NE 0.005 <0.00100 0.0003 0.001 <0.00100 0.0003 0.001 <0.00100 0.0003 0.001
TOLUENE 108-88-3 8260B mg/l 1 19.2 80.7 1 3 1 0.000357 J 0.000278 0.001 0.00051 J 0.000278 0.001 0.000311 J 0.000278 0.001
1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE 87-61-6 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE <0.00100 0.00023 0.001 <0.00100 0.00023 0.001 <0.00100 0.00023 0.001
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 120-82-1 8260B mg/l 0.07 0.0359 0.151 NE NE 0.07 <0.00100 0.000481 0.001 <0.00100 0.000481 0.001 <0.00100 0.000481 0.001
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 71-55-6 8260B mg/l 0.2 7.42 31.1 NE NE 0.2 <0.00100 0.000149 0.001 <0.00100 0.000149 0.001 <0.00100 0.000149 0.001
TRICHLOROETHENE 79-01-6 8260B mg/l 0.005 0.00119 0.00743 NE NE 0.005 <0.00100 0.00019 0.001 <0.00100 0.00019 0.001 <0.00100 0.00019 0.001
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE 75-69-4 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE <0.00500 0.00016 0.005 <0.00500 0.00016 0.005 <0.00500 0.00016 0.005
1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE 96-18-4 8260B mg/l NE 0.0223 0.0937 NE NE NE <0.00250 0.000237 0.003 <0.00250 0.000237 0.003 <0.00250 0.000237 0.0025
1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 95-63-6 8260B mg/l NE 0.248 1.04 NE NE NE <0.00100 0.000322 0.001 <0.00100 0.000322 0.001 <0.00100 0.000322 0.001
1,2,3-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 526-73-8 8260B mg/l NE 0.351 1.47 NE NE NE <0.00100 0.000104 0.001 <0.00100 0.000104 0.001 <0.00100 0.000104 0.001
1,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 108-67-8 8260B mg/l NE 0.175 0.733 NE NE NE <0.00100 0.000104 0.001 <0.00100 0.000104 0.001 <0.00100 0.000104 0.001
VINYL CHLORIDE 75-01-4 8260B mg/l 0.002 0.000147 0.00245 NE NE 0.002 <0.00100 0.000234 0.001 <0.00100 0.000234 0.001 <0.00100 0.000234 0.001
XYLENES, TOTAL 1330-20-7 8260B mg/l 10 0.385 1.62 10 10 10 0.00562 0.000174 0.003 <0.00300 0.000174 0.003 <0.00300 0.000174 0.003
2-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHER 111-75-8 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE <0.0500 0.000575 0.05 <0.0500 0.000575 0.05 <0.0500 0.000575 0.05
B:The same analyte is found in the associated blank.
J:The identification of the analyte is acceptable; the reported value is an estimate.
Blue italicized non-detect results (e.g.,<0.0100 ) exceed one or more of the screening levels.
NE:Not Established.<:Less than Reported Detection Limit (RDL).mg/l:Milligrams per liter.
Bold value exceeds Method Detection Limit (MDL). Color shaded value exceeds screening level.
EPA VISL: Target Groundwater Concentration (TGC) Vapor Intrusion Screening Level (VISL); April 2022.
Qualifiers (Q):
EPA RSL: Environmental Protection Agency Regional Screening level for drinking water (April 2022).
EPA MCL: Environmental Protection Agency Maximum Contaminant Level for drinking water (May 2022).
UDEQ: Utah Department of Environmental Quality's Initial Screening Levels (ISLs) and risk-based Tier 1 Screening Levels (Tier 1) for
petroleum hydrocarbons in groundwater at underground storage tank sites.
UGWQS:Utah Ground Water Quality Standards.
Page 2 of 12
Table C4 - VOCs and Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Groundwater
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking - 2890 South State Street and 1215 North SR 51, Spanish Fork City, Utah County, Utah
Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.3
Analyte CAS Method Units MCL VISL
Residential
VISL
Commercial ISL Tier 1 UGWQS
TPH-GRO 8006-61-9 8260B mg/l NE NE NE 1 10 NE
TPH-DRO 68334-30-5 8015 mg/l NE NE NE 1 10 NE
TRPH NE 9071B mg/l NE NE NE 10 10 NE
ACETONE 67-64-1 8260B mg/l NE 22500 94500 NE NE NE
ACROLEIN 107-02-8 8260B mg/l NE 0.00418 0.0176 NE NE NE
ACRYLONITRILE 107-13-1 8260B mg/l NE 0.00732 0.032 NE NE NE
BENZENE 71-43-2 8260B mg/l 0.005 0.00159 0.00693 0.005 0.3 0.005
BROMOBENZENE 108-86-1 8260B mg/l NE 0.62 2.6 NE NE NE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE 75-27-4 8260B mg/l 0.08 0.000876 0.00382 NE NE NE
BROMOFORM 75-25-2 8260B mg/l 0.08 0.117 0.51 NE NE NE
BROMOMETHANE 74-83-9 8260B mg/l NE 0.0174 0.073 NE NE NE
N-BUTYLBENZENE 104-51-8 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
SEC-BUTYLBENZENE 135-98-8 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
TERT-BUTYLBENZENE 98-06-6 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 56-23-5 8260B mg/l 0.005 0.000415 0.00181 NE NE 0.005
CHLOROBENZENE 108-90-7 8260B mg/l 0.1 0.41 1.72 NE NE 0.1
CHLORODIBROMOMETHANE 124-48-1 8260B mg/l 0.08 NE NE NE NE NE
CHLOROETHANE 75-00-3 8260B mg/l NE 23 96.5 NE NE NE
CHLOROFORM 67-66-3 8260B mg/l 0.08 0.000814 0.00355 NE NE NE
CHLOROMETHANE 74-87-3 8260B mg/l NE 0.26 1.09 NE NE NE
2-CHLOROTOLUENE 95-49-8 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
4-CHLOROTOLUENE 106-43-4 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE 96-12-8 8260B mg/l 0.0002 0.0000281 0.00034 NE NE 0.0002
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE 106-93-4 8260B mg/l 5E-05 0.000176 0.000769 NE NE 0.00005
DIBROMOMETHANE 74-95-3 8260B mg/l NE 0.124 0.521 NE NE NE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 95-50-1 8260B mg/l 0.6 2.66 11.2 NE NE 0.6
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 541-73-1 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 106-46-7 8260B mg/l 0.075 0.00259 0.0113 NE NE 0.075
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE 75-71-8 8260B mg/l NE 0.00744 0.0312 NE NE NE
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE 75-34-3 8260B mg/l NE 0.00764 0.0334 NE NE NE
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE 107-06-2 8260B mg/l 0.005 0.00224 0.00978 NE NE 0.005
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE 75-35-4 8260B mg/l 0.007 0.195 0.821 NE NE 0.007
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 156-59-2 8260B mg/l 0.07 NE NE NE NE 0.07
TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 156-60-5 8260B mg/l 0.1 0.109 0.457 NE NE 0.1
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 78-87-5 8260B mg/l 0.005 0.00658 0.0287 NE NE 0.005
1,1-DICHLOROPROPENE 563-58-6 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE 142-28-9 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 10061-01-5 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 10061-02-6 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
2,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 594-20-7 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
DI-ISOPROPYL ETHER 108-20-3 8260B mg/l NE 6.97 29.3 NE NE NE
ETHYLBENZENE 100-41-4 8260B mg/l 0.7 0.00349 0.0152 0.7 4 0.7
HEXACHLORO-1,3-BUTADIENE 87-68-3 8260B mg/l NE 0.000303 0.00132 NE NE NE
Date Collected
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL
<0.500 0.108 0.5 <0.500 0.108 0.5 <0.500 0.108 0.5
0.135 B 0.0247 0.1 0.163 B 0.0247 0.1 0.13 B 0.0247 0.1
3.41 J 0.853 5.88 1.57 J 1.04 7.14 <6.25 0.906 6.25
<0.0500 0.0113 0.05 <0.0500 0.0113 0.05 <0.0500 0.0113 0.05
<0.0500 0.00254 0.05 <0.0500 0.00254 0.05 <0.0500 0.00254 0.05
<0.0100 0.000671 0.01 <0.0100 0.000671 0.01 <0.0100 0.000671 0.01
0.000127 J 0.0000941 0.001 0.000181 J 9.41E-05 0.001 0.000147 J 0.0000941 0.001
<0.00100 0.000118 0.001 <0.00100 0.000118 0.001 <0.00100 0.000118 0.001
<0.00100 0.000136 0.001 <0.00100 0.000136 0.001 <0.00100 0.000136 0.001
<0.00100 0.000129 0.001 <0.00100 0.000129 0.001 <0.00100 0.000129 0.001
<0.00500 0.000605 0.005 <0.00500 0.000605 0.005 <0.00500 0.000605 0.005
<0.00100 0.000157 0.001 <0.00100 0.000157 0.001 <0.00100 0.000157 0.001
<0.00100 0.000125 0.001 <0.00100 0.000125 0.001 <0.00100 0.000125 0.001
<0.00100 0.000127 0.001 <0.00100 0.000127 0.001 <0.00100 0.000127 0.001
<0.00100 0.000128 0.001 <0.00100 0.000128 0.001 <0.00100 0.000128 0.001
<0.00100 0.000116 0.001 <0.00100 0.000116 0.001 <0.00100 0.000116 0.001
<0.00100 0.00014 0.001 <0.00100 0.00014 0.001 <0.00100 0.00014 0.001
<0.00500 0.000192 0.005 <0.00500 0.000192 0.005 <0.00500 0.000192 0.005
<0.00500 0.000111 0.005 <0.00500 0.000111 0.005 <0.00500 0.000111 0.005
<0.00250 0.00096 0.003 <0.00250 0.00096 0.0025 <0.00250 0.00096 0.003
<0.00100 0.000106 0.001 <0.00100 0.000106 0.001 <0.00100 0.000106 0.001
<0.00100 0.000114 0.001 <0.00100 0.000114 0.001 <0.00100 0.000114 0.001
<0.00500 0.000276 0.005 <0.00500 0.000276 0.005 <0.00500 0.000276 0.005
<0.00100 0.000126 0.001 <0.00100 0.000126 0.001 <0.00100 0.000126 0.001
<0.00100 0.000122 0.001 <0.00100 0.000122 0.001 <0.00100 0.000122 0.001
<0.00100 0.000107 0.001 <0.00100 0.000107 0.001 <0.00100 0.000107 0.001
<0.00100 0.00011 0.001 <0.00100 0.00011 0.001 <0.00100 0.00011 0.001
<0.00100 0.00012 0.001 <0.00100 0.00012 0.001 <0.00100 0.00012 0.001
<0.00500 0.000374 0.005 <0.00500 0.000374 0.005 <0.00500 0.000374 0.005
<0.00100 0.0001 0.001 <0.00100 0.0001 0.001 <0.00100 0.0001 0.001
<0.00100 0.0000819 0.001 <0.00100 8.19E-05 0.001 <0.00100 0.0000819 0.001
<0.00100 0.000188 0.001 <0.00100 0.000188 0.001 <0.00100 0.000188 0.001
<0.00100 0.000126 0.001 <0.00100 0.000126 0.001 <0.00100 0.000126 0.001
<0.00100 0.000149 0.001 <0.00100 0.000149 0.001 <0.00100 0.000149 0.001
<0.00100 0.000149 0.001 <0.00100 0.000149 0.001 <0.00100 0.000149 0.001
<0.00100 0.000142 0.001 <0.00100 0.000142 0.001 <0.00100 0.000142 0.001
<0.00100 0.00011 0.001 <0.00100 0.00011 0.001 <0.00100 0.00011 0.001
<0.00100 0.000111 0.001 <0.00100 0.000111 0.001 <0.00100 0.000111 0.001
<0.00100 0.000118 0.001 <0.00100 0.000118 0.001 <0.00100 0.000118 0.001
<0.00100 0.000161 0.001 <0.00100 0.000161 0.001 <0.00100 0.000161 0.001
<0.00100 0.000105 0.001 <0.00100 0.000105 0.001 <0.00100 0.000105 0.001
<0.00100 0.000137 0.001 0.00019 J 0.000137 0.001 0.000163 J 0.000137 0.001
<0.00100 0.000337 0.001 <0.00100 0.000337 0.001 <0.00100 0.000337 0.001
L1558026-26 L1558026-27 L1558026-28
11/10/2022 11/09/2022
B-6 B-7B-5
11/11/2022
Page 3 of 12
Table C4 - VOCs and Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Groundwater
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking - 2890 South State Street and 1215 North SR 51, Spanish Fork City, Utah County, Utah
Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.3
Analyte CAS Method Units MCL VISL
Residential
VISL
Commercial ISL Tier 1 UGWQS
TPH-GRO 8006-61-9 8260B mg/l NE NE NE 1 10 NE
Date Collected
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
ISOPROPYLBENZENE 98-82-8 8260B mg/l NE 0.887 3.73 NE NE NE
P-ISOPROPYLTOLUENE 99-87-6 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
2-BUTANONE (MEK)78-93-3 8260B mg/l NE 2240 9410 NE NE NE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE 75-09-2 8260B mg/l 0.005 0.763 9.23 NE NE 0.005
4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE (MIBK)108-10-1 8260B mg/l NE 555 2330 NE NE NE
METHYL TERT-BUTYL ETHER 1634-04-4 8260B mg/l NE 0.45 1.97 0.2 0.2 NE
NAPHTHALENE 91-20-3 8260B mg/l NE 0.00459 0.0201 0.7 0.7 NE
N-PROPYLBENZENE 103-65-1 8260B mg/l NE 2.43 10.2 NE NE NE
STYRENE 100-42-5 8260B mg/l 0.1 9.28 39 NE NE 0.1
1,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 630-20-6 8260B mg/l NE 0.00371 0.0162 NE NE NE
1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 79-34-5 8260B mg/l NE 0.00323 0.0141 NE NE NE
1,1,2-TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE 76-13-1 8260B mg/l NE 0.242 1.02 NE NE NE
TETRACHLOROETHENE 127-18-4 8260B mg/l 0.005 0.0149 0.0652 NE NE 0.005
TOLUENE 108-88-3 8260B mg/l 1 19.2 80.7 1 3 1
1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE 87-61-6 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 120-82-1 8260B mg/l 0.07 0.0359 0.151 NE NE 0.07
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 71-55-6 8260B mg/l 0.2 7.42 31.1 NE NE 0.2
TRICHLOROETHENE 79-01-6 8260B mg/l 0.005 0.00119 0.00743 NE NE 0.005
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE 75-69-4 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE 96-18-4 8260B mg/l NE 0.0223 0.0937 NE NE NE
1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 95-63-6 8260B mg/l NE 0.248 1.04 NE NE NE
1,2,3-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 526-73-8 8260B mg/l NE 0.351 1.47 NE NE NE
1,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 108-67-8 8260B mg/l NE 0.175 0.733 NE NE NE
VINYL CHLORIDE 75-01-4 8260B mg/l 0.002 0.000147 0.00245 NE NE 0.002
XYLENES, TOTAL 1330-20-7 8260B mg/l 10 0.385 1.62 10 10 10
2-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHER 111-75-8 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
B:The same analyte is found in the associated blank.
J:The identification of the analyte is acceptable; the reported value is an estimate.
Blue italicized non-detect results (e.g.,<0.0100 ) exceed one or more of the screening levels.
NE:Not Established.<:Less than Reported Detection Limit (RDL).mg/l:Milligrams per liter.
Bold value exceeds Method Detection Limit (MDL). Color shaded value exceeds screening level.
EPA VISL: Target Groundwater Concentration (TGC) Vapor Intrusion Screening Level (VISL); April 2022.
Qualifiers (Q):
EPA RSL: Environmental Protection Agency Regional Screening level for drinking water (April 2022).
EPA MCL: Environmental Protection Agency Maximum Contaminant Level for drinking water (May 2022).
UDEQ: Utah Department of Environmental Quality's Initial Screening Levels (ISLs) and risk-based Tier 1 Screening Levels (Tier 1) for
petroleum hydrocarbons in groundwater at underground storage tank sites.
UGWQS:Utah Ground Water Quality Standards.
Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL
L1558026-26 L1558026-27 L1558026-28
11/10/2022 11/09/2022
B-6 B-7B-5
11/11/2022
<0.00100 0.000105 0.001 <0.00100 0.000105 0.001 <0.00100 0.000105 0.001
<0.00100 0.00012 0.001 <0.00100 0.00012 0.001 <0.00100 0.00012 0.001
<0.0100 0.00119 0.01 <0.0100 0.00119 0.01 <0.0100 0.00119 0.01
<0.00500 0.00043 0.005 <0.00500 0.00043 0.005 <0.00500 0.00043 0.005
<0.0100 0.000478 0.01 <0.0100 0.000478 0.01 <0.0100 0.000478 0.01
<0.00100 0.000101 0.001 <0.00100 0.000101 0.001 <0.00100 0.000101 0.001
<0.00500 0.001 0.005 <0.00500 0.001 0.005 <0.00500 0.001 0.005
<0.00100 0.0000993 0.001 <0.00100 9.93E-05 0.001 <0.00100 0.0000993 0.001
<0.00100 0.000118 0.001 <0.00100 0.000118 0.001 <0.00100 0.000118 0.001
<0.00100 0.000147 0.001 <0.00100 0.000147 0.001 <0.00100 0.000147 0.001
<0.00100 0.000133 0.001 <0.00100 0.000133 0.001 <0.00100 0.000133 0.001
<0.00100 0.00018 0.001 <0.00100 0.00018 0.001 <0.00100 0.00018 0.001
<0.00100 0.0003 0.001 <0.00100 0.0003 0.001 <0.00100 0.0003 0.001
<0.00100 0.000278 0.001 0.000373 J 0.000278 0.001 0.000337 J 0.000278 0.001
<0.00100 0.00023 0.001 <0.00100 0.00023 0.001 <0.00100 0.00023 0.001
<0.00100 0.000481 0.001 <0.00100 0.000481 0.001 <0.00100 0.000481 0.001
<0.00100 0.000149 0.001 <0.00100 0.000149 0.001 <0.00100 0.000149 0.001
<0.00100 0.00019 0.001 <0.00100 0.00019 0.001 <0.00100 0.00019 0.001
<0.00500 0.00016 0.005 <0.00500 0.00016 0.005 <0.00500 0.00016 0.005
<0.00250 0.000237 0.003 <0.00250 0.000237 0.0025 <0.00250 0.000237 0.003
<0.00100 0.000322 0.001 <0.00100 0.000322 0.001 <0.00100 0.000322 0.001
<0.00100 0.000104 0.001 <0.00100 0.000104 0.001 <0.00100 0.000104 0.001
<0.00100 0.000104 0.001 <0.00100 0.000104 0.001 <0.00100 0.000104 0.001
<0.00100 0.000234 0.001 <0.00100 0.000234 0.001 <0.00100 0.000234 0.001
0.000243 J 0.000174 0.003 0.000227 J 0.000174 0.003 <0.00300 0.000174 0.003
<0.0500 0.000575 0.05 <0.0500 0.000575 0.05 <0.0500 0.000575 0.05
Page 4 of 12
Table C4 - VOCs and Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Groundwater
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking - 2890 South State Street and 1215 North SR 51, Spanish Fork City, Utah County, Utah
Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.3
Analyte CAS Method Units MCL VISL
Residential
VISL
Commercial ISL Tier 1 UGWQS
TPH-GRO 8006-61-9 8260B mg/l NE NE NE 1 10 NE
TPH-DRO 68334-30-5 8015 mg/l NE NE NE 1 10 NE
TRPH NE 9071B mg/l NE NE NE 10 10 NE
ACETONE 67-64-1 8260B mg/l NE 22500 94500 NE NE NE
ACROLEIN 107-02-8 8260B mg/l NE 0.00418 0.0176 NE NE NE
ACRYLONITRILE 107-13-1 8260B mg/l NE 0.00732 0.032 NE NE NE
BENZENE 71-43-2 8260B mg/l 0.005 0.00159 0.00693 0.005 0.3 0.005
BROMOBENZENE 108-86-1 8260B mg/l NE 0.62 2.6 NE NE NE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE 75-27-4 8260B mg/l 0.08 0.000876 0.00382 NE NE NE
BROMOFORM 75-25-2 8260B mg/l 0.08 0.117 0.51 NE NE NE
BROMOMETHANE 74-83-9 8260B mg/l NE 0.0174 0.073 NE NE NE
N-BUTYLBENZENE 104-51-8 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
SEC-BUTYLBENZENE 135-98-8 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
TERT-BUTYLBENZENE 98-06-6 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 56-23-5 8260B mg/l 0.005 0.000415 0.00181 NE NE 0.005
CHLOROBENZENE 108-90-7 8260B mg/l 0.1 0.41 1.72 NE NE 0.1
CHLORODIBROMOMETHANE 124-48-1 8260B mg/l 0.08 NE NE NE NE NE
CHLOROETHANE 75-00-3 8260B mg/l NE 23 96.5 NE NE NE
CHLOROFORM 67-66-3 8260B mg/l 0.08 0.000814 0.00355 NE NE NE
CHLOROMETHANE 74-87-3 8260B mg/l NE 0.26 1.09 NE NE NE
2-CHLOROTOLUENE 95-49-8 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
4-CHLOROTOLUENE 106-43-4 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE 96-12-8 8260B mg/l 0.0002 0.0000281 0.00034 NE NE 0.0002
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE 106-93-4 8260B mg/l 5E-05 0.000176 0.000769 NE NE 0.00005
DIBROMOMETHANE 74-95-3 8260B mg/l NE 0.124 0.521 NE NE NE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 95-50-1 8260B mg/l 0.6 2.66 11.2 NE NE 0.6
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 541-73-1 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 106-46-7 8260B mg/l 0.075 0.00259 0.0113 NE NE 0.075
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE 75-71-8 8260B mg/l NE 0.00744 0.0312 NE NE NE
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE 75-34-3 8260B mg/l NE 0.00764 0.0334 NE NE NE
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE 107-06-2 8260B mg/l 0.005 0.00224 0.00978 NE NE 0.005
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE 75-35-4 8260B mg/l 0.007 0.195 0.821 NE NE 0.007
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 156-59-2 8260B mg/l 0.07 NE NE NE NE 0.07
TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 156-60-5 8260B mg/l 0.1 0.109 0.457 NE NE 0.1
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 78-87-5 8260B mg/l 0.005 0.00658 0.0287 NE NE 0.005
1,1-DICHLOROPROPENE 563-58-6 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE 142-28-9 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 10061-01-5 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 10061-02-6 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
2,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 594-20-7 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
DI-ISOPROPYL ETHER 108-20-3 8260B mg/l NE 6.97 29.3 NE NE NE
ETHYLBENZENE 100-41-4 8260B mg/l 0.7 0.00349 0.0152 0.7 4 0.7
HEXACHLORO-1,3-BUTADIENE 87-68-3 8260B mg/l NE 0.000303 0.00132 NE NE NE
Date Collected
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL
<0.500 0.108 0.5 <0.500 0.108 0.5 <0.500 0.108 0.5
0.555 B 0.0247 0.1 0.122 0.0247 0.1 0.0717 J 0.0247 0.1
4.47 J 0.853 5.88 5.58 J 0.879 6.06 1.06 J 0.853 5.88
0.0451 J 0.0113 0.05 <0.0500 0.0113 0.05 <0.0500 0.0113 0.05
<0.0500 0.00254 0.05 <0.0500 0.00254 0.05 <0.0500 0.00254 0.05
<0.0100 0.000671 0.01 <0.0100 0.000671 0.01 <0.0100 0.000671 0.01
0.00013 J 0.0000941 0.001 0.000116 J 0.0000941 0.001 <0.00100 0.0000941 0.001
<0.00100 0.000118 0.001 <0.00100 0.000118 0.001 <0.00100 0.000118 0.001
<0.00100 0.000136 0.001 <0.00100 0.000136 0.001 <0.00100 0.000136 0.001
<0.00100 0.000129 0.001 <0.00100 0.000129 0.001 <0.00100 0.000129 0.001
<0.00500 0.000605 0.005 <0.00500 0.000605 0.005 <0.00500 0.000605 0.005
<0.00100 0.000157 0.001 <0.00100 0.000157 0.001 <0.00100 0.000157 0.001
<0.00100 0.000125 0.001 <0.00100 0.000125 0.001 <0.00100 0.000125 0.001
<0.00100 0.000127 0.001 <0.00100 0.000127 0.001 <0.00100 0.000127 0.001
<0.00100 0.000128 0.001 <0.00100 0.000128 0.001 <0.00100 0.000128 0.001
<0.00100 0.000116 0.001 <0.00100 0.000116 0.001 <0.00100 0.000116 0.001
<0.00100 0.00014 0.001 <0.00100 0.00014 0.001 <0.00100 0.00014 0.001
<0.00500 0.000192 0.005 <0.00500 0.000192 0.005 <0.00500 0.000192 0.005
<0.00500 0.000111 0.005 <0.00500 0.000111 0.005 <0.00500 0.000111 0.005
<0.00250 0.00096 0.0025 <0.00250 0.00096 0.0025 <0.00250 0.00096 0.0025
<0.00100 0.000106 0.001 <0.00100 0.000106 0.001 <0.00100 0.000106 0.001
<0.00100 0.000114 0.001 <0.00100 0.000114 0.001 <0.00100 0.000114 0.001
<0.00500 0.000276 0.005 <0.00500 0.000276 0.005 <0.00500 0.000276 0.005
<0.00100 0.000126 0.001 <0.00100 0.000126 0.001 <0.00100 0.000126 0.001
<0.00100 0.000122 0.001 <0.00100 0.000122 0.001 <0.00100 0.000122 0.001
<0.00100 0.000107 0.001 <0.00100 0.000107 0.001 <0.00100 0.000107 0.001
<0.00100 0.00011 0.001 <0.00100 0.00011 0.001 <0.00100 0.00011 0.001
<0.00100 0.00012 0.001 <0.00100 0.00012 0.001 <0.00100 0.00012 0.001
<0.00500 0.000374 0.005 <0.00500 0.000374 0.005 <0.00500 0.000374 0.005
<0.00100 0.0001 0.001 <0.00100 0.0001 0.001 <0.00100 0.0001 0.001
<0.00100 0.0000819 0.001 <0.00100 0.0000819 0.001 <0.00100 0.0000819 0.001
<0.00100 0.000188 0.001 <0.00100 0.000188 0.001 <0.00100 0.000188 0.001
<0.00100 0.000126 0.001 <0.00100 0.000126 0.001 <0.00100 0.000126 0.001
<0.00100 0.000149 0.001 <0.00100 0.000149 0.001 <0.00100 0.000149 0.001
<0.00100 0.000149 0.001 <0.00100 0.000149 0.001 <0.00100 0.000149 0.001
<0.00100 0.000142 0.001 <0.00100 0.000142 0.001 <0.00100 0.000142 0.001
<0.00100 0.00011 0.001 <0.00100 0.00011 0.001 <0.00100 0.00011 0.001
<0.00100 0.000111 0.001 <0.00100 0.000111 0.001 <0.00100 0.000111 0.001
<0.00100 0.000118 0.001 <0.00100 0.000118 0.001 <0.00100 0.000118 0.001
<0.00100 0.000161 0.001 <0.00100 0.000161 0.001 <0.00100 0.000161 0.001
<0.00100 0.000105 0.001 <0.00100 0.000105 0.001 <0.00100 0.000105 0.001
<0.00100 0.000137 0.001 <0.00100 0.000137 0.001 <0.00100 0.000137 0.001
<0.00100 0.000337 0.001 <0.00100 0.000337 0.001 <0.00100 0.000337 0.001
L1558026-29 L1558026-30 L1558026-31
11/09/2022 11/11/2022
B-8 B-9 B-10
11/09/2022
Page 5 of 12
Table C4 - VOCs and Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Groundwater
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking - 2890 South State Street and 1215 North SR 51, Spanish Fork City, Utah County, Utah
Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.3
Analyte CAS Method Units MCL VISL
Residential
VISL
Commercial ISL Tier 1 UGWQS
TPH-GRO 8006-61-9 8260B mg/l NE NE NE 1 10 NE
Date Collected
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
ISOPROPYLBENZENE 98-82-8 8260B mg/l NE 0.887 3.73 NE NE NE
P-ISOPROPYLTOLUENE 99-87-6 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
2-BUTANONE (MEK)78-93-3 8260B mg/l NE 2240 9410 NE NE NE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE 75-09-2 8260B mg/l 0.005 0.763 9.23 NE NE 0.005
4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE (MIBK)108-10-1 8260B mg/l NE 555 2330 NE NE NE
METHYL TERT-BUTYL ETHER 1634-04-4 8260B mg/l NE 0.45 1.97 0.2 0.2 NE
NAPHTHALENE 91-20-3 8260B mg/l NE 0.00459 0.0201 0.7 0.7 NE
N-PROPYLBENZENE 103-65-1 8260B mg/l NE 2.43 10.2 NE NE NE
STYRENE 100-42-5 8260B mg/l 0.1 9.28 39 NE NE 0.1
1,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 630-20-6 8260B mg/l NE 0.00371 0.0162 NE NE NE
1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 79-34-5 8260B mg/l NE 0.00323 0.0141 NE NE NE
1,1,2-TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE 76-13-1 8260B mg/l NE 0.242 1.02 NE NE NE
TETRACHLOROETHENE 127-18-4 8260B mg/l 0.005 0.0149 0.0652 NE NE 0.005
TOLUENE 108-88-3 8260B mg/l 1 19.2 80.7 1 3 1
1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE 87-61-6 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 120-82-1 8260B mg/l 0.07 0.0359 0.151 NE NE 0.07
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 71-55-6 8260B mg/l 0.2 7.42 31.1 NE NE 0.2
TRICHLOROETHENE 79-01-6 8260B mg/l 0.005 0.00119 0.00743 NE NE 0.005
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE 75-69-4 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE 96-18-4 8260B mg/l NE 0.0223 0.0937 NE NE NE
1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 95-63-6 8260B mg/l NE 0.248 1.04 NE NE NE
1,2,3-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 526-73-8 8260B mg/l NE 0.351 1.47 NE NE NE
1,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 108-67-8 8260B mg/l NE 0.175 0.733 NE NE NE
VINYL CHLORIDE 75-01-4 8260B mg/l 0.002 0.000147 0.00245 NE NE 0.002
XYLENES, TOTAL 1330-20-7 8260B mg/l 10 0.385 1.62 10 10 10
2-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHER 111-75-8 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
B:The same analyte is found in the associated blank.
J:The identification of the analyte is acceptable; the reported value is an estimate.
Blue italicized non-detect results (e.g.,<0.0100 ) exceed one or more of the screening levels.
NE:Not Established.<:Less than Reported Detection Limit (RDL).mg/l:Milligrams per liter.
Bold value exceeds Method Detection Limit (MDL). Color shaded value exceeds screening level.
EPA VISL: Target Groundwater Concentration (TGC) Vapor Intrusion Screening Level (VISL); April 2022.
Qualifiers (Q):
EPA RSL: Environmental Protection Agency Regional Screening level for drinking water (April 2022).
EPA MCL: Environmental Protection Agency Maximum Contaminant Level for drinking water (May 2022).
UDEQ: Utah Department of Environmental Quality's Initial Screening Levels (ISLs) and risk-based Tier 1 Screening Levels (Tier 1) for
petroleum hydrocarbons in groundwater at underground storage tank sites.
UGWQS:Utah Ground Water Quality Standards.
Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL
L1558026-29 L1558026-30 L1558026-31
11/09/2022 11/11/2022
B-8 B-9 B-10
11/09/2022
<0.00100 0.000105 0.001 <0.00100 0.000105 0.001 <0.00100 0.000105 0.001
<0.00100 0.00012 0.001 <0.00100 0.00012 0.001 <0.00100 0.00012 0.001
0.00847 J 0.00119 0.01 <0.0100 0.00119 0.01 <0.0100 0.00119 0.01
<0.00500 0.00043 0.005 <0.00500 0.00043 0.005 <0.00500 0.00043 0.005
<0.0100 0.000478 0.01 <0.0100 0.000478 0.01 <0.0100 0.000478 0.01
<0.00100 0.000101 0.001 <0.00100 0.000101 0.001 <0.00100 0.000101 0.001
<0.00500 0.001 0.005 <0.00500 0.001 0.005 <0.00500 0.001 0.005
<0.00100 0.0000993 0.001 <0.00100 0.0000993 0.001 <0.00100 0.0000993 0.001
<0.00100 0.000118 0.001 <0.00100 0.000118 0.001 <0.00100 0.000118 0.001
<0.00100 0.000147 0.001 <0.00100 0.000147 0.001 <0.00100 0.000147 0.001
<0.00100 0.000133 0.001 <0.00100 0.000133 0.001 <0.00100 0.000133 0.001
<0.00100 0.00018 0.001 <0.00100 0.00018 0.001 <0.00100 0.00018 0.001
<0.00100 0.0003 0.001 <0.00100 0.0003 0.001 <0.00100 0.0003 0.001
<0.00100 0.000278 0.001 <0.00100 0.000278 0.001 <0.00100 0.000278 0.001
<0.00100 0.00023 0.001 <0.00100 0.00023 0.001 <0.00100 0.00023 0.001
<0.00100 0.000481 0.001 <0.00100 0.000481 0.001 <0.00100 0.000481 0.001
<0.00100 0.000149 0.001 <0.00100 0.000149 0.001 <0.00100 0.000149 0.001
<0.00100 0.00019 0.001 <0.00100 0.00019 0.001 <0.00100 0.00019 0.001
<0.00500 0.00016 0.005 <0.00500 0.00016 0.005 <0.00500 0.00016 0.005
<0.00250 0.000237 0.0025 <0.00250 0.000237 0.0025 <0.00250 0.000237 0.0025
<0.00100 0.000322 0.001 <0.00100 0.000322 0.001 <0.00100 0.000322 0.001
<0.00100 0.000104 0.001 <0.00100 0.000104 0.001 <0.00100 0.000104 0.001
<0.00100 0.000104 0.001 <0.00100 0.000104 0.001 <0.00100 0.000104 0.001
<0.00100 0.000234 0.001 <0.00100 0.000234 0.001 <0.00100 0.000234 0.001
0.000408 J 0.000174 0.003 0.000225 J 0.000174 0.003 <0.00300 0.000174 0.003
<0.0500 0.000575 0.05 <0.0500 0.000575 0.05 <0.0500 0.000575 0.05
Page 6 of 12
Table C4 - VOCs and Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Groundwater
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking - 2890 South State Street and 1215 North SR 51, Spanish Fork City, Utah County, Utah
Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.3
Analyte CAS Method Units MCL VISL
Residential
VISL
Commercial ISL Tier 1 UGWQS
TPH-GRO 8006-61-9 8260B mg/l NE NE NE 1 10 NE
TPH-DRO 68334-30-5 8015 mg/l NE NE NE 1 10 NE
TRPH NE 9071B mg/l NE NE NE 10 10 NE
ACETONE 67-64-1 8260B mg/l NE 22500 94500 NE NE NE
ACROLEIN 107-02-8 8260B mg/l NE 0.00418 0.0176 NE NE NE
ACRYLONITRILE 107-13-1 8260B mg/l NE 0.00732 0.032 NE NE NE
BENZENE 71-43-2 8260B mg/l 0.005 0.00159 0.00693 0.005 0.3 0.005
BROMOBENZENE 108-86-1 8260B mg/l NE 0.62 2.6 NE NE NE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE 75-27-4 8260B mg/l 0.08 0.000876 0.00382 NE NE NE
BROMOFORM 75-25-2 8260B mg/l 0.08 0.117 0.51 NE NE NE
BROMOMETHANE 74-83-9 8260B mg/l NE 0.0174 0.073 NE NE NE
N-BUTYLBENZENE 104-51-8 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
SEC-BUTYLBENZENE 135-98-8 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
TERT-BUTYLBENZENE 98-06-6 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 56-23-5 8260B mg/l 0.005 0.000415 0.00181 NE NE 0.005
CHLOROBENZENE 108-90-7 8260B mg/l 0.1 0.41 1.72 NE NE 0.1
CHLORODIBROMOMETHANE 124-48-1 8260B mg/l 0.08 NE NE NE NE NE
CHLOROETHANE 75-00-3 8260B mg/l NE 23 96.5 NE NE NE
CHLOROFORM 67-66-3 8260B mg/l 0.08 0.000814 0.00355 NE NE NE
CHLOROMETHANE 74-87-3 8260B mg/l NE 0.26 1.09 NE NE NE
2-CHLOROTOLUENE 95-49-8 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
4-CHLOROTOLUENE 106-43-4 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE 96-12-8 8260B mg/l 0.0002 0.0000281 0.00034 NE NE 0.0002
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE 106-93-4 8260B mg/l 5E-05 0.000176 0.000769 NE NE 0.00005
DIBROMOMETHANE 74-95-3 8260B mg/l NE 0.124 0.521 NE NE NE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 95-50-1 8260B mg/l 0.6 2.66 11.2 NE NE 0.6
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 541-73-1 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 106-46-7 8260B mg/l 0.075 0.00259 0.0113 NE NE 0.075
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE 75-71-8 8260B mg/l NE 0.00744 0.0312 NE NE NE
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE 75-34-3 8260B mg/l NE 0.00764 0.0334 NE NE NE
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE 107-06-2 8260B mg/l 0.005 0.00224 0.00978 NE NE 0.005
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE 75-35-4 8260B mg/l 0.007 0.195 0.821 NE NE 0.007
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 156-59-2 8260B mg/l 0.07 NE NE NE NE 0.07
TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 156-60-5 8260B mg/l 0.1 0.109 0.457 NE NE 0.1
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 78-87-5 8260B mg/l 0.005 0.00658 0.0287 NE NE 0.005
1,1-DICHLOROPROPENE 563-58-6 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE 142-28-9 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 10061-01-5 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 10061-02-6 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
2,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 594-20-7 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
DI-ISOPROPYL ETHER 108-20-3 8260B mg/l NE 6.97 29.3 NE NE NE
ETHYLBENZENE 100-41-4 8260B mg/l 0.7 0.00349 0.0152 0.7 4 0.7
HEXACHLORO-1,3-BUTADIENE 87-68-3 8260B mg/l NE 0.000303 0.00132 NE NE NE
Date Collected
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL
<0.500 0.108 0.5 <0.500 0.108 0.5 <0.500 0.108 0.5
0.0355 J 0.0247 0.1 0.271 0.0247 0.1 0.704 0.0247 0.1
0.86 J 0.784 5.41 2.63 J 0.906 6.25 6.4 J 5.8 40
<0.0500 0.0113 0.05 <0.0500 0.0113 0.05 0.0228 J 0.0113 0.05
<0.0500 0.00254 0.05 <0.0500 0.00254 0.05 <0.0500 0.00254 0.05
<0.0100 0.000671 0.01 <0.0100 0.000671 0.01 <0.0100 0.000671 0.01
0.000276 J 0.0000941 0.001 0.000487 J 0.0000941 0.001 0.000228 J 0.0000941 0.001
<0.00100 0.000118 0.001 <0.00100 0.000118 0.001 <0.00100 0.000118 0.001
<0.00100 0.000136 0.001 <0.00100 0.000136 0.001 <0.00100 0.000136 0.001
<0.00100 0.000129 0.001 <0.00100 0.000129 0.001 <0.00100 0.000129 0.001
<0.00500 0.000605 0.005 <0.00500 0.000605 0.005 <0.00500 0.000605 0.005
<0.00100 0.000157 0.001 <0.00100 0.000157 0.001 <0.00100 0.000157 0.001
<0.00100 0.000125 0.001 <0.00100 0.000125 0.001 <0.00100 0.000125 0.001
<0.00100 0.000127 0.001 <0.00100 0.000127 0.001 <0.00100 0.000127 0.001
<0.00100 0.000128 0.001 <0.00100 0.000128 0.001 <0.00100 0.000128 0.001
<0.00100 0.000116 0.001 <0.00100 0.000116 0.001 <0.00100 0.000116 0.001
<0.00100 0.00014 0.001 <0.00100 0.00014 0.001 <0.00100 0.00014 0.001
<0.00500 0.000192 0.005 <0.00500 0.000192 0.005 <0.00500 0.000192 0.005
<0.00500 0.000111 0.005 <0.00500 0.000111 0.005 <0.00500 0.000111 0.005
<0.00250 0.00096 0.0025 <0.00250 0.00096 0.0025 <0.00250 0.00096 0.0025
<0.00100 0.000106 0.001 <0.00100 0.000106 0.001 <0.00100 0.000106 0.001
<0.00100 0.000114 0.001 <0.00100 0.000114 0.001 <0.00100 0.000114 0.001
<0.00500 0.000276 0.005 <0.00500 0.000276 0.005 <0.00500 0.000276 0.005
<0.00100 0.000126 0.001 <0.00100 0.000126 0.001 <0.00100 0.000126 0.001
<0.00100 0.000122 0.001 <0.00100 0.000122 0.001 <0.00100 0.000122 0.001
<0.00100 0.000107 0.001 <0.00100 0.000107 0.001 <0.00100 0.000107 0.001
<0.00100 0.00011 0.001 <0.00100 0.00011 0.001 <0.00100 0.00011 0.001
<0.00100 0.00012 0.001 <0.00100 0.00012 0.001 <0.00100 0.00012 0.001
<0.00500 0.000374 0.005 <0.00500 0.000374 0.005 <0.00500 0.000374 0.005
<0.00100 0.0001 0.001 <0.00100 0.0001 0.001 <0.00100 0.0001 0.001
<0.00100 0.0000819 0.001 <0.00100 0.0000819 0.001 <0.00100 0.0000819 0.001
<0.00100 0.000188 0.001 <0.00100 0.000188 0.001 <0.00100 0.000188 0.001
<0.00100 0.000126 0.001 <0.00100 0.000126 0.001 <0.00100 0.000126 0.001
<0.00100 0.000149 0.001 <0.00100 0.000149 0.001 <0.00100 0.000149 0.001
<0.00100 0.000149 0.001 <0.00100 0.000149 0.001 <0.00100 0.000149 0.001
<0.00100 0.000142 0.001 <0.00100 0.000142 0.001 <0.00100 0.000142 0.001
<0.00100 0.00011 0.001 <0.00100 0.00011 0.001 <0.00100 0.00011 0.001
<0.00100 0.000111 0.001 <0.00100 0.000111 0.001 <0.00100 0.000111 0.001
<0.00100 0.000118 0.001 <0.00100 0.000118 0.001 <0.00100 0.000118 0.001
<0.00100 0.000161 0.001 <0.00100 0.000161 0.001 <0.00100 0.000161 0.001
<0.00100 0.000105 0.001 <0.00100 0.000105 0.001 <0.00100 0.000105 0.001
<0.00100 0.000137 0.001 0.00186 0.000137 0.001 0.000162 J 0.000137 0.001
<0.00100 0.000337 0.001 <0.00100 0.000337 0.001 <0.00100 0.000337 0.001
L1558026-34L1558026-32
11/11/2022 11/11/2022 11/11/2022
B-13
L1558026-33
B-11 B-12
Page 7 of 12
Table C4 - VOCs and Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Groundwater
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking - 2890 South State Street and 1215 North SR 51, Spanish Fork City, Utah County, Utah
Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.3
Analyte CAS Method Units MCL VISL
Residential
VISL
Commercial ISL Tier 1 UGWQS
TPH-GRO 8006-61-9 8260B mg/l NE NE NE 1 10 NE
Date Collected
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
ISOPROPYLBENZENE 98-82-8 8260B mg/l NE 0.887 3.73 NE NE NE
P-ISOPROPYLTOLUENE 99-87-6 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
2-BUTANONE (MEK)78-93-3 8260B mg/l NE 2240 9410 NE NE NE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE 75-09-2 8260B mg/l 0.005 0.763 9.23 NE NE 0.005
4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE (MIBK)108-10-1 8260B mg/l NE 555 2330 NE NE NE
METHYL TERT-BUTYL ETHER 1634-04-4 8260B mg/l NE 0.45 1.97 0.2 0.2 NE
NAPHTHALENE 91-20-3 8260B mg/l NE 0.00459 0.0201 0.7 0.7 NE
N-PROPYLBENZENE 103-65-1 8260B mg/l NE 2.43 10.2 NE NE NE
STYRENE 100-42-5 8260B mg/l 0.1 9.28 39 NE NE 0.1
1,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 630-20-6 8260B mg/l NE 0.00371 0.0162 NE NE NE
1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 79-34-5 8260B mg/l NE 0.00323 0.0141 NE NE NE
1,1,2-TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE 76-13-1 8260B mg/l NE 0.242 1.02 NE NE NE
TETRACHLOROETHENE 127-18-4 8260B mg/l 0.005 0.0149 0.0652 NE NE 0.005
TOLUENE 108-88-3 8260B mg/l 1 19.2 80.7 1 3 1
1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE 87-61-6 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 120-82-1 8260B mg/l 0.07 0.0359 0.151 NE NE 0.07
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 71-55-6 8260B mg/l 0.2 7.42 31.1 NE NE 0.2
TRICHLOROETHENE 79-01-6 8260B mg/l 0.005 0.00119 0.00743 NE NE 0.005
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE 75-69-4 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE 96-18-4 8260B mg/l NE 0.0223 0.0937 NE NE NE
1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 95-63-6 8260B mg/l NE 0.248 1.04 NE NE NE
1,2,3-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 526-73-8 8260B mg/l NE 0.351 1.47 NE NE NE
1,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 108-67-8 8260B mg/l NE 0.175 0.733 NE NE NE
VINYL CHLORIDE 75-01-4 8260B mg/l 0.002 0.000147 0.00245 NE NE 0.002
XYLENES, TOTAL 1330-20-7 8260B mg/l 10 0.385 1.62 10 10 10
2-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHER 111-75-8 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
B:The same analyte is found in the associated blank.
J:The identification of the analyte is acceptable; the reported value is an estimate.
Blue italicized non-detect results (e.g.,<0.0100 ) exceed one or more of the screening levels.
NE:Not Established.<:Less than Reported Detection Limit (RDL).mg/l:Milligrams per liter.
Bold value exceeds Method Detection Limit (MDL). Color shaded value exceeds screening level.
EPA VISL: Target Groundwater Concentration (TGC) Vapor Intrusion Screening Level (VISL); April 2022.
Qualifiers (Q):
EPA RSL: Environmental Protection Agency Regional Screening level for drinking water (April 2022).
EPA MCL: Environmental Protection Agency Maximum Contaminant Level for drinking water (May 2022).
UDEQ: Utah Department of Environmental Quality's Initial Screening Levels (ISLs) and risk-based Tier 1 Screening Levels (Tier 1) for
petroleum hydrocarbons in groundwater at underground storage tank sites.
UGWQS:Utah Ground Water Quality Standards.
Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL
L1558026-34L1558026-32
11/11/2022 11/11/2022 11/11/2022
B-13
L1558026-33
B-11 B-12
<0.00100 0.000105 0.001 0.000131 J 0.000105 0.001 <0.00100 0.000105 0.001
<0.00100 0.00012 0.001 <0.00100 0.00012 0.001 <0.00100 0.00012 0.001
<0.0100 0.00119 0.01 <0.0100 0.00119 0.01 0.00503 J 0.00119 0.01
<0.00500 0.00043 0.005 <0.00500 0.00043 0.005 <0.00500 0.00043 0.005
<0.0100 0.000478 0.01 <0.0100 0.000478 0.01 <0.0100 0.000478 0.01
<0.00100 0.000101 0.001 0.000108 J 0.000101 0.001 <0.00100 0.000101 0.001
<0.00500 0.001 0.005 <0.00500 0.001 0.005 <0.00500 0.001 0.005
<0.00100 0.0000993 0.001 0.000532 J 0.0000993 0.001 <0.00100 0.0000993 0.001
<0.00100 0.000118 0.001 <0.00100 0.000118 0.001 <0.00100 0.000118 0.001
<0.00100 0.000147 0.001 <0.00100 0.000147 0.001 <0.00100 0.000147 0.001
<0.00100 0.000133 0.001 <0.00100 0.000133 0.001 <0.00100 0.000133 0.001
<0.00100 0.00018 0.001 <0.00100 0.00018 0.001 <0.00100 0.00018 0.001
<0.00100 0.0003 0.001 <0.00100 0.0003 0.001 <0.00100 0.0003 0.001
0.000366 J 0.000278 0.001 0.000432 J 0.000278 0.001 0.000337 J 0.000278 0.001
<0.00100 0.00023 0.001 <0.00100 0.00023 0.001 <0.00100 0.00023 0.001
<0.00100 0.000481 0.001 <0.00100 0.000481 0.001 <0.00100 0.000481 0.001
<0.00100 0.000149 0.001 <0.00100 0.000149 0.001 <0.00100 0.000149 0.001
<0.00100 0.00019 0.001 <0.00100 0.00019 0.001 <0.00100 0.00019 0.001
0.00793 0.00016 0.005 <0.00500 0.00016 0.005 <0.00500 0.00016 0.005
<0.00250 0.000237 0.0025 <0.00250 0.000237 0.0025 <0.00250 0.000237 0.0025
<0.00100 0.000322 0.001 0.00419 0.000322 0.001 <0.00100 0.000322 0.001
<0.00100 0.000104 0.001 0.000804 J 0.000104 0.001 <0.00100 0.000104 0.001
<0.00100 0.000104 0.001 0.000565 J 0.000104 0.001 <0.00100 0.000104 0.001
<0.00100 0.000234 0.001 <0.00100 0.000234 0.001 <0.00100 0.000234 0.001
<0.00300 0.000174 0.003 0.00302 0.000174 0.003 <0.00300 0.000174 0.003
<0.0500 0.000575 0.05 <0.0500 0.000575 0.05 <0.0500 0.000575 0.05
Page 8 of 12
Table C4 - VOCs and Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Groundwater
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking - 2890 South State Street and 1215 North SR 51, Spanish Fork City, Utah County, Utah
Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.3
Analyte CAS Method Units MCL VISL
Residential
VISL
Commercial ISL Tier 1 UGWQS
TPH-GRO 8006-61-9 8260B mg/l NE NE NE 1 10 NE
TPH-DRO 68334-30-5 8015 mg/l NE NE NE 1 10 NE
TRPH NE 9071B mg/l NE NE NE 10 10 NE
ACETONE 67-64-1 8260B mg/l NE 22500 94500 NE NE NE
ACROLEIN 107-02-8 8260B mg/l NE 0.00418 0.0176 NE NE NE
ACRYLONITRILE 107-13-1 8260B mg/l NE 0.00732 0.032 NE NE NE
BENZENE 71-43-2 8260B mg/l 0.005 0.00159 0.00693 0.005 0.3 0.005
BROMOBENZENE 108-86-1 8260B mg/l NE 0.62 2.6 NE NE NE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE 75-27-4 8260B mg/l 0.08 0.000876 0.00382 NE NE NE
BROMOFORM 75-25-2 8260B mg/l 0.08 0.117 0.51 NE NE NE
BROMOMETHANE 74-83-9 8260B mg/l NE 0.0174 0.073 NE NE NE
N-BUTYLBENZENE 104-51-8 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
SEC-BUTYLBENZENE 135-98-8 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
TERT-BUTYLBENZENE 98-06-6 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 56-23-5 8260B mg/l 0.005 0.000415 0.00181 NE NE 0.005
CHLOROBENZENE 108-90-7 8260B mg/l 0.1 0.41 1.72 NE NE 0.1
CHLORODIBROMOMETHANE 124-48-1 8260B mg/l 0.08 NE NE NE NE NE
CHLOROETHANE 75-00-3 8260B mg/l NE 23 96.5 NE NE NE
CHLOROFORM 67-66-3 8260B mg/l 0.08 0.000814 0.00355 NE NE NE
CHLOROMETHANE 74-87-3 8260B mg/l NE 0.26 1.09 NE NE NE
2-CHLOROTOLUENE 95-49-8 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
4-CHLOROTOLUENE 106-43-4 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE 96-12-8 8260B mg/l 0.0002 0.0000281 0.00034 NE NE 0.0002
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE 106-93-4 8260B mg/l 5E-05 0.000176 0.000769 NE NE 0.00005
DIBROMOMETHANE 74-95-3 8260B mg/l NE 0.124 0.521 NE NE NE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 95-50-1 8260B mg/l 0.6 2.66 11.2 NE NE 0.6
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 541-73-1 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 106-46-7 8260B mg/l 0.075 0.00259 0.0113 NE NE 0.075
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE 75-71-8 8260B mg/l NE 0.00744 0.0312 NE NE NE
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE 75-34-3 8260B mg/l NE 0.00764 0.0334 NE NE NE
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE 107-06-2 8260B mg/l 0.005 0.00224 0.00978 NE NE 0.005
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE 75-35-4 8260B mg/l 0.007 0.195 0.821 NE NE 0.007
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 156-59-2 8260B mg/l 0.07 NE NE NE NE 0.07
TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 156-60-5 8260B mg/l 0.1 0.109 0.457 NE NE 0.1
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 78-87-5 8260B mg/l 0.005 0.00658 0.0287 NE NE 0.005
1,1-DICHLOROPROPENE 563-58-6 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE 142-28-9 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 10061-01-5 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 10061-02-6 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
2,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 594-20-7 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
DI-ISOPROPYL ETHER 108-20-3 8260B mg/l NE 6.97 29.3 NE NE NE
ETHYLBENZENE 100-41-4 8260B mg/l 0.7 0.00349 0.0152 0.7 4 0.7
HEXACHLORO-1,3-BUTADIENE 87-68-3 8260B mg/l NE 0.000303 0.00132 NE NE NE
Date Collected
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL
<0.500 0.108 0.5 <0.500 0.108 0.5 <0.500 0.108 0.5
0.0643 J 0.0247 0.1 0.0567 J 0.0247 0.1 1.32 0.247 1
1.44 J 0.806 5.56 1 J 0.906 6.25 3.48 J 0.935 6.45
<0.0500 0.0113 0.05 <0.0500 0.0113 0.05 <0.0500 0.0113 0.05
<0.0500 0.00254 0.05 <0.0500 0.00254 0.05 <0.0500 0.00254 0.05
<0.0100 0.000671 0.01 <0.0100 0.000671 0.01 <0.0100 0.000671 0.01
0.000172 J 0.0000941 0.001 0.000152 J 0.0000941 0.001 0.00102 0.0000941 0.001
<0.00100 0.000118 0.001 <0.00100 0.000118 0.001 <0.00100 0.000118 0.001
<0.00100 0.000136 0.001 <0.00100 0.000136 0.001 <0.00100 0.000136 0.001
<0.00100 0.000129 0.001 <0.00100 0.000129 0.001 <0.00100 0.000129 0.001
<0.00500 0.000605 0.005 <0.00500 0.000605 0.005 <0.00500 0.000605 0.005
<0.00100 0.000157 0.001 <0.00100 0.000157 0.001 <0.00100 0.000157 0.001
<0.00100 0.000125 0.001 <0.00100 0.000125 0.001 <0.00100 0.000125 0.001
<0.00100 0.000127 0.001 <0.00100 0.000127 0.001 <0.00100 0.000127 0.001
<0.00100 0.000128 0.001 <0.00100 0.000128 0.001 <0.00100 0.000128 0.001
<0.00100 0.000116 0.001 <0.00100 0.000116 0.001 0.0031 0.000116 0.001
<0.00100 0.00014 0.001 <0.00100 0.00014 0.001 <0.00100 0.00014 0.001
<0.00500 0.000192 0.005 <0.00500 0.000192 0.005 <0.00500 0.000192 0.005
<0.00500 0.000111 0.005 <0.00500 0.000111 0.005 <0.00500 0.000111 0.005
<0.00250 0.00096 0.0025 <0.00250 0.00096 0.0025 <0.00250 0.00096 0.0025
<0.00100 0.000106 0.001 <0.00100 0.000106 0.001 <0.00100 0.000106 0.001
<0.00100 0.000114 0.001 <0.00100 0.000114 0.001 <0.00100 0.000114 0.001
<0.00500 0.000276 0.005 <0.00500 0.000276 0.005 <0.00500 0.000276 0.005
<0.00100 0.000126 0.001 <0.00100 0.000126 0.001 <0.00100 0.000126 0.001
<0.00100 0.000122 0.001 <0.00100 0.000122 0.001 <0.00100 0.000122 0.001
<0.00100 0.000107 0.001 <0.00100 0.000107 0.001 <0.00100 0.000107 0.001
<0.00100 0.00011 0.001 <0.00100 0.00011 0.001 <0.00100 0.00011 0.001
<0.00100 0.00012 0.001 <0.00100 0.00012 0.001 0.00103 0.00012 0.001
<0.00500 0.000374 0.005 <0.00500 0.000374 0.005 0.000502 J 0.000374 0.005
<0.00100 0.0001 0.001 <0.00100 0.0001 0.001 <0.00100 0.0001 0.001
<0.00100 0.0000819 0.001 <0.00100 0.0000819 0.001 <0.00100 0.0000819 0.001
<0.00100 0.000188 0.001 <0.00100 0.000188 0.001 <0.00100 0.000188 0.001
<0.00100 0.000126 0.001 <0.00100 0.000126 0.001 <0.00100 0.000126 0.001
<0.00100 0.000149 0.001 <0.00100 0.000149 0.001 <0.00100 0.000149 0.001
<0.00100 0.000149 0.001 <0.00100 0.000149 0.001 <0.00100 0.000149 0.001
<0.00100 0.000142 0.001 <0.00100 0.000142 0.001 <0.00100 0.000142 0.001
<0.00100 0.00011 0.001 <0.00100 0.00011 0.001 <0.00100 0.00011 0.001
<0.00100 0.000111 0.001 <0.00100 0.000111 0.001 <0.00100 0.000111 0.001
<0.00100 0.000118 0.001 <0.00100 0.000118 0.001 <0.00100 0.000118 0.001
<0.00100 0.000161 0.001 <0.00100 0.000161 0.001 <0.00100 0.000161 0.001
<0.00100 0.000105 0.001 <0.00100 0.000105 0.001 <0.00100 0.000105 0.001
0.000227 J 0.000137 0.001 0.000166 J 0.000137 0.001 <0.00100 0.000137 0.001
<0.00100 0.000337 0.001 <0.00100 0.000337 0.001 <0.00100 0.000337 0.001
L1558026-36 L1558026-37L1558026-35
11/09/2022 11/09/2022 11/11/2022
B-15 B-16B-14
Page 9 of 12
Table C4 - VOCs and Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Groundwater
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking - 2890 South State Street and 1215 North SR 51, Spanish Fork City, Utah County, Utah
Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.3
Analyte CAS Method Units MCL VISL
Residential
VISL
Commercial ISL Tier 1 UGWQS
TPH-GRO 8006-61-9 8260B mg/l NE NE NE 1 10 NE
Date Collected
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
ISOPROPYLBENZENE 98-82-8 8260B mg/l NE 0.887 3.73 NE NE NE
P-ISOPROPYLTOLUENE 99-87-6 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
2-BUTANONE (MEK)78-93-3 8260B mg/l NE 2240 9410 NE NE NE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE 75-09-2 8260B mg/l 0.005 0.763 9.23 NE NE 0.005
4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE (MIBK)108-10-1 8260B mg/l NE 555 2330 NE NE NE
METHYL TERT-BUTYL ETHER 1634-04-4 8260B mg/l NE 0.45 1.97 0.2 0.2 NE
NAPHTHALENE 91-20-3 8260B mg/l NE 0.00459 0.0201 0.7 0.7 NE
N-PROPYLBENZENE 103-65-1 8260B mg/l NE 2.43 10.2 NE NE NE
STYRENE 100-42-5 8260B mg/l 0.1 9.28 39 NE NE 0.1
1,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 630-20-6 8260B mg/l NE 0.00371 0.0162 NE NE NE
1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 79-34-5 8260B mg/l NE 0.00323 0.0141 NE NE NE
1,1,2-TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE 76-13-1 8260B mg/l NE 0.242 1.02 NE NE NE
TETRACHLOROETHENE 127-18-4 8260B mg/l 0.005 0.0149 0.0652 NE NE 0.005
TOLUENE 108-88-3 8260B mg/l 1 19.2 80.7 1 3 1
1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE 87-61-6 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 120-82-1 8260B mg/l 0.07 0.0359 0.151 NE NE 0.07
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 71-55-6 8260B mg/l 0.2 7.42 31.1 NE NE 0.2
TRICHLOROETHENE 79-01-6 8260B mg/l 0.005 0.00119 0.00743 NE NE 0.005
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE 75-69-4 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE 96-18-4 8260B mg/l NE 0.0223 0.0937 NE NE NE
1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 95-63-6 8260B mg/l NE 0.248 1.04 NE NE NE
1,2,3-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 526-73-8 8260B mg/l NE 0.351 1.47 NE NE NE
1,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 108-67-8 8260B mg/l NE 0.175 0.733 NE NE NE
VINYL CHLORIDE 75-01-4 8260B mg/l 0.002 0.000147 0.00245 NE NE 0.002
XYLENES, TOTAL 1330-20-7 8260B mg/l 10 0.385 1.62 10 10 10
2-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHER 111-75-8 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
B:The same analyte is found in the associated blank.
J:The identification of the analyte is acceptable; the reported value is an estimate.
Blue italicized non-detect results (e.g.,<0.0100 ) exceed one or more of the screening levels.
NE:Not Established.<:Less than Reported Detection Limit (RDL).mg/l:Milligrams per liter.
Bold value exceeds Method Detection Limit (MDL). Color shaded value exceeds screening level.
EPA VISL: Target Groundwater Concentration (TGC) Vapor Intrusion Screening Level (VISL); April 2022.
Qualifiers (Q):
EPA RSL: Environmental Protection Agency Regional Screening level for drinking water (April 2022).
EPA MCL: Environmental Protection Agency Maximum Contaminant Level for drinking water (May 2022).
UDEQ: Utah Department of Environmental Quality's Initial Screening Levels (ISLs) and risk-based Tier 1 Screening Levels (Tier 1) for
petroleum hydrocarbons in groundwater at underground storage tank sites.
UGWQS:Utah Ground Water Quality Standards.
Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL
L1558026-36 L1558026-37L1558026-35
11/09/2022 11/09/2022 11/11/2022
B-15 B-16B-14
<0.00100 0.000105 0.001 <0.00100 0.000105 0.001 0.000206 J 0.000105 0.001
<0.00100 0.00012 0.001 <0.00100 0.00012 0.001 0.00029 J 0.00012 0.001
<0.0100 0.00119 0.01 <0.0100 0.00119 0.01 <0.0100 0.00119 0.01
<0.00500 0.00043 0.005 <0.00500 0.00043 0.005 <0.00500 0.00043 0.005
<0.0100 0.000478 0.01 <0.0100 0.000478 0.01 <0.0100 0.000478 0.01
<0.00100 0.000101 0.001 <0.00100 0.000101 0.001 <0.00100 0.000101 0.001
<0.00500 0.001 0.005 <0.00500 0.001 0.005 <0.00500 0.001 0.005
<0.00100 0.0000993 0.001 <0.00100 0.0000993 0.001 <0.00100 0.0000993 0.001
<0.00100 0.000118 0.001 <0.00100 0.000118 0.001 <0.00100 0.000118 0.001
<0.00100 0.000147 0.001 <0.00100 0.000147 0.001 <0.00100 0.000147 0.001
<0.00100 0.000133 0.001 <0.00100 0.000133 0.001 <0.00100 0.000133 0.001
<0.00100 0.00018 0.001 <0.00100 0.00018 0.001 <0.00100 0.00018 0.001
<0.00100 0.0003 0.001 <0.00100 0.0003 0.001 <0.00100 0.0003 0.001
0.000365 J 0.000278 0.001 0.000356 J 0.000278 0.001 0.00189 0.000278 0.001
<0.00100 0.00023 0.001 <0.00100 0.00023 0.001 <0.00100 0.00023 0.001
<0.00100 0.000481 0.001 <0.00100 0.000481 0.001 <0.00100 0.000481 0.001
<0.00100 0.000149 0.001 <0.00100 0.000149 0.001 <0.00100 0.000149 0.001
<0.00100 0.00019 0.001 <0.00100 0.00019 0.001 <0.00100 0.00019 0.001
<0.00500 0.00016 0.005 <0.00500 0.00016 0.005 0.136 0.00016 0.005
<0.00250 0.000237 0.0025 <0.00250 0.000237 0.0025 <0.00250 0.000237 0.0025
<0.00100 0.000322 0.001 <0.00100 0.000322 0.001 <0.00100 0.000322 0.001
<0.00100 0.000104 0.001 <0.00100 0.000104 0.001 <0.00100 0.000104 0.001
<0.00100 0.000104 0.001 <0.00100 0.000104 0.001 <0.00100 0.000104 0.001
<0.00100 0.000234 0.001 <0.00100 0.000234 0.001 0.000296 J 0.000234 0.001
0.000459 J 0.000174 0.003 <0.00300 0.000174 0.003 0.000385 J 0.000174 0.003
<0.0500 0.000575 0.05 <0.0500 0.000575 0.05 <0.0500 0.000575 0.05
Page 10 of 12
Table C4 - VOCs and Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Groundwater
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking - 2890 South State Street and 1215 North SR 51, Spanish Fork City, Utah County, Utah
Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.3
Analyte CAS Method Units MCL VISL
Residential
VISL
Commercial ISL Tier 1 UGWQS
TPH-GRO 8006-61-9 8260B mg/l NE NE NE 1 10 NE
TPH-DRO 68334-30-5 8015 mg/l NE NE NE 1 10 NE
TRPH NE 9071B mg/l NE NE NE 10 10 NE
ACETONE 67-64-1 8260B mg/l NE 22500 94500 NE NE NE
ACROLEIN 107-02-8 8260B mg/l NE 0.00418 0.0176 NE NE NE
ACRYLONITRILE 107-13-1 8260B mg/l NE 0.00732 0.032 NE NE NE
BENZENE 71-43-2 8260B mg/l 0.005 0.00159 0.00693 0.005 0.3 0.005
BROMOBENZENE 108-86-1 8260B mg/l NE 0.62 2.6 NE NE NE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE 75-27-4 8260B mg/l 0.08 0.000876 0.00382 NE NE NE
BROMOFORM 75-25-2 8260B mg/l 0.08 0.117 0.51 NE NE NE
BROMOMETHANE 74-83-9 8260B mg/l NE 0.0174 0.073 NE NE NE
N-BUTYLBENZENE 104-51-8 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
SEC-BUTYLBENZENE 135-98-8 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
TERT-BUTYLBENZENE 98-06-6 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 56-23-5 8260B mg/l 0.005 0.000415 0.00181 NE NE 0.005
CHLOROBENZENE 108-90-7 8260B mg/l 0.1 0.41 1.72 NE NE 0.1
CHLORODIBROMOMETHANE 124-48-1 8260B mg/l 0.08 NE NE NE NE NE
CHLOROETHANE 75-00-3 8260B mg/l NE 23 96.5 NE NE NE
CHLOROFORM 67-66-3 8260B mg/l 0.08 0.000814 0.00355 NE NE NE
CHLOROMETHANE 74-87-3 8260B mg/l NE 0.26 1.09 NE NE NE
2-CHLOROTOLUENE 95-49-8 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
4-CHLOROTOLUENE 106-43-4 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE 96-12-8 8260B mg/l 0.0002 0.0000281 0.00034 NE NE 0.0002
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE 106-93-4 8260B mg/l 5E-05 0.000176 0.000769 NE NE 0.00005
DIBROMOMETHANE 74-95-3 8260B mg/l NE 0.124 0.521 NE NE NE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 95-50-1 8260B mg/l 0.6 2.66 11.2 NE NE 0.6
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 541-73-1 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 106-46-7 8260B mg/l 0.075 0.00259 0.0113 NE NE 0.075
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE 75-71-8 8260B mg/l NE 0.00744 0.0312 NE NE NE
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE 75-34-3 8260B mg/l NE 0.00764 0.0334 NE NE NE
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE 107-06-2 8260B mg/l 0.005 0.00224 0.00978 NE NE 0.005
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE 75-35-4 8260B mg/l 0.007 0.195 0.821 NE NE 0.007
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 156-59-2 8260B mg/l 0.07 NE NE NE NE 0.07
TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 156-60-5 8260B mg/l 0.1 0.109 0.457 NE NE 0.1
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 78-87-5 8260B mg/l 0.005 0.00658 0.0287 NE NE 0.005
1,1-DICHLOROPROPENE 563-58-6 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE 142-28-9 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 10061-01-5 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 10061-02-6 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
2,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 594-20-7 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
DI-ISOPROPYL ETHER 108-20-3 8260B mg/l NE 6.97 29.3 NE NE NE
ETHYLBENZENE 100-41-4 8260B mg/l 0.7 0.00349 0.0152 0.7 4 0.7
HEXACHLORO-1,3-BUTADIENE 87-68-3 8260B mg/l NE 0.000303 0.00132 NE NE NE
Date Collected
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL
<0.500 0.108 0.5 <0.500 0.108 0.5
0.0577 J 0.0247 0.1 0.0683 J 0.0247 0.1
1.11 J 0.806 5.56 2.91 J 0.879 6.06
<0.0500 0.0113 0.05 <0.0500 0.0113 0.05
<0.0500 0.00254 0.05 <0.0500 0.00254 0.05
<0.0100 0.000671 0.01 <0.0100 0.000671 0.01
0.000164 J 0.0000941 0.001 0.000104 J 0.0000941 0.001
<0.00100 0.000118 0.001 <0.00100 0.000118 0.001
<0.00100 0.000136 0.001 <0.00100 0.000136 0.001
<0.00100 0.000129 0.001 <0.00100 0.000129 0.001
<0.00500 0.000605 0.005 <0.00500 0.000605 0.005
<0.00100 0.000157 0.001 <0.00100 0.000157 0.001
<0.00100 0.000125 0.001 <0.00100 0.000125 0.001
<0.00100 0.000127 0.001 <0.00100 0.000127 0.001
<0.00100 0.000128 0.001 <0.00100 0.000128 0.001
<0.00100 0.000116 0.001 <0.00100 0.000116 0.001
<0.00100 0.00014 0.001 <0.00100 0.00014 0.001
<0.00500 0.000192 0.005 <0.00500 0.000192 0.005
<0.00500 0.000111 0.005 <0.00500 0.000111 0.005
<0.00250 0.00096 0.0025 <0.00250 0.00096 0.0025
<0.00100 0.000106 0.001 <0.00100 0.000106 0.001
<0.00100 0.000114 0.001 <0.00100 0.000114 0.001
<0.00500 0.000276 0.005 <0.00500 0.000276 0.005
<0.00100 0.000126 0.001 <0.00100 0.000126 0.001
<0.00100 0.000122 0.001 <0.00100 0.000122 0.001
<0.00100 0.000107 0.001 <0.00100 0.000107 0.001
<0.00100 0.00011 0.001 <0.00100 0.00011 0.001
<0.00100 0.00012 0.001 <0.00100 0.00012 0.001
<0.00500 0.000374 0.005 <0.00500 0.000374 0.005
<0.00100 0.0001 0.001 <0.00100 0.0001 0.001
<0.00100 0.0000819 0.001 <0.00100 0.0000819 0.001
<0.00100 0.000188 0.001 <0.00100 0.000188 0.001
<0.00100 0.000126 0.001 <0.00100 0.000126 0.001
<0.00100 0.000149 0.001 <0.00100 0.000149 0.001
<0.00100 0.000149 0.001 <0.00100 0.000149 0.001
<0.00100 0.000142 0.001 <0.00100 0.000142 0.001
<0.00100 0.00011 0.001 <0.00100 0.00011 0.001
<0.00100 0.000111 0.001 <0.00100 0.000111 0.001
<0.00100 0.000118 0.001 <0.00100 0.000118 0.001
<0.00100 0.000161 0.001 <0.00100 0.000161 0.001
<0.00100 0.000105 0.001 <0.00100 0.000105 0.001
0.000197 J 0.000137 0.001 <0.00100 0.000137 0.001
<0.00100 0.000337 0.001 <0.00100 0.000337 0.001
L1558026-38 L1558026-39
11/09/2022 11/10/2022
B-140 B-50
Page 11 of 12
Table C4 - VOCs and Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Groundwater
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking - 2890 South State Street and 1215 North SR 51, Spanish Fork City, Utah County, Utah
Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.3
Analyte CAS Method Units MCL VISL
Residential
VISL
Commercial ISL Tier 1 UGWQS
TPH-GRO 8006-61-9 8260B mg/l NE NE NE 1 10 NE
Date Collected
Lab Sample ID
Client Sample ID
ISOPROPYLBENZENE 98-82-8 8260B mg/l NE 0.887 3.73 NE NE NE
P-ISOPROPYLTOLUENE 99-87-6 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
2-BUTANONE (MEK)78-93-3 8260B mg/l NE 2240 9410 NE NE NE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE 75-09-2 8260B mg/l 0.005 0.763 9.23 NE NE 0.005
4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE (MIBK)108-10-1 8260B mg/l NE 555 2330 NE NE NE
METHYL TERT-BUTYL ETHER 1634-04-4 8260B mg/l NE 0.45 1.97 0.2 0.2 NE
NAPHTHALENE 91-20-3 8260B mg/l NE 0.00459 0.0201 0.7 0.7 NE
N-PROPYLBENZENE 103-65-1 8260B mg/l NE 2.43 10.2 NE NE NE
STYRENE 100-42-5 8260B mg/l 0.1 9.28 39 NE NE 0.1
1,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 630-20-6 8260B mg/l NE 0.00371 0.0162 NE NE NE
1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 79-34-5 8260B mg/l NE 0.00323 0.0141 NE NE NE
1,1,2-TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE 76-13-1 8260B mg/l NE 0.242 1.02 NE NE NE
TETRACHLOROETHENE 127-18-4 8260B mg/l 0.005 0.0149 0.0652 NE NE 0.005
TOLUENE 108-88-3 8260B mg/l 1 19.2 80.7 1 3 1
1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE 87-61-6 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 120-82-1 8260B mg/l 0.07 0.0359 0.151 NE NE 0.07
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 71-55-6 8260B mg/l 0.2 7.42 31.1 NE NE 0.2
TRICHLOROETHENE 79-01-6 8260B mg/l 0.005 0.00119 0.00743 NE NE 0.005
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE 75-69-4 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE 96-18-4 8260B mg/l NE 0.0223 0.0937 NE NE NE
1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 95-63-6 8260B mg/l NE 0.248 1.04 NE NE NE
1,2,3-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 526-73-8 8260B mg/l NE 0.351 1.47 NE NE NE
1,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 108-67-8 8260B mg/l NE 0.175 0.733 NE NE NE
VINYL CHLORIDE 75-01-4 8260B mg/l 0.002 0.000147 0.00245 NE NE 0.002
XYLENES, TOTAL 1330-20-7 8260B mg/l 10 0.385 1.62 10 10 10
2-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHER 111-75-8 8260B mg/l NE NE NE NE NE NE
B:The same analyte is found in the associated blank.
J:The identification of the analyte is acceptable; the reported value is an estimate.
Blue italicized non-detect results (e.g.,<0.0100 ) exceed one or more of the screening levels.
NE:Not Established.<:Less than Reported Detection Limit (RDL).mg/l:Milligrams per liter.
Bold value exceeds Method Detection Limit (MDL). Color shaded value exceeds screening level.
EPA VISL: Target Groundwater Concentration (TGC) Vapor Intrusion Screening Level (VISL); April 2022.
Qualifiers (Q):
EPA RSL: Environmental Protection Agency Regional Screening level for drinking water (April 2022).
EPA MCL: Environmental Protection Agency Maximum Contaminant Level for drinking water (May 2022).
UDEQ: Utah Department of Environmental Quality's Initial Screening Levels (ISLs) and risk-based Tier 1 Screening Levels (Tier 1) for
petroleum hydrocarbons in groundwater at underground storage tank sites.
UGWQS:Utah Ground Water Quality Standards.
Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL
L1558026-38 L1558026-39
11/09/2022 11/10/2022
B-140 B-50
<0.00100 0.000105 0.001 <0.00100 0.000105 0.001
<0.00100 0.00012 0.001 <0.00100 0.00012 0.001
<0.0100 0.00119 0.01 <0.0100 0.00119 0.01
<0.00500 0.00043 0.005 <0.00500 0.00043 0.005
<0.0100 0.000478 0.01 <0.0100 0.000478 0.01
<0.00100 0.000101 0.001 <0.00100 0.000101 0.001
<0.00500 0.001 0.005 <0.00500 0.001 0.005
<0.00100 0.0000993 0.001 <0.00100 0.0000993 0.001
<0.00100 0.000118 0.001 <0.00100 0.000118 0.001
<0.00100 0.000147 0.001 <0.00100 0.000147 0.001
<0.00100 0.000133 0.001 <0.00100 0.000133 0.001
<0.00100 0.00018 0.001 <0.00100 0.00018 0.001
<0.00100 0.0003 0.001 <0.00100 0.0003 0.001
0.000385 J 0.000278 0.001 <0.00100 0.000278 0.001
<0.00100 0.00023 0.001 <0.00100 0.00023 0.001
<0.00100 0.000481 0.001 <0.00100 0.000481 0.001
<0.00100 0.000149 0.001 <0.00100 0.000149 0.001
<0.00100 0.00019 0.001 <0.00100 0.00019 0.001
<0.00500 0.00016 0.005 <0.00500 0.00016 0.005
<0.00250 0.000237 0.0025 <0.00250 0.000237 0.0025
<0.00100 0.000322 0.001 <0.00100 0.000322 0.001
<0.00100 0.000104 0.001 <0.00100 0.000104 0.001
<0.00100 0.000104 0.001 <0.00100 0.000104 0.001
<0.00100 0.000234 0.001 <0.00100 0.000234 0.001
0.00044 J 0.000174 0.003 <0.00300 0.000174 0.003
<0.0500 0.000575 0.05 <0.0500 0.000575 0.05
Page 12 of 12
Table C5 - VOCs and Explosive Gases in Soil Gas
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking - 2890 South State Street and 1215 North SR 51, Spanish Fork City, Utah County, Utah
Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.3
Analyte CAS Method Units
VISL
Residential
VISL
Commercial
10% of
OSHA
LEL
Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL Result Q MDL RDL
METHANE 74-82-8 8015M ppmv NE NE 5000 <10.0 6.98 10.0 <10.0 6.98 10 14.6 6.98 10.0
ETHANE 74-84-0 8015M ppmv NE NE 3000 <10.0 3.86 10.0 <10.0 3.86 10 <10.0 3.86 10.0
ETHENE 74-85-1 8015M ppmv NE NE 2700 <10.0 3.61 10.0 <10.0 3.61 10 <10.0 3.61 10.0
ACETONE 67-64-1 TO-15 µg/m3 1070000 4510000 NA 6.32 1.39 2.97 74.9 1.39 2.97 76 1.39 2.97
ALLYL CHLORIDE 107-05-1 TO-15 µg/m3 15.6 68.1 NA <0.626 0.357 0.626 <0.626 0.357 0.626 <0.626 0.357 0.626
BENZENE 71-43-2 TO-15 µg/m3 12 52.4 NA 9.55 0.228 0.639 12.6 0.228 0.639 16.5 0.228 0.639
BENZYL CHLORIDE 100-44-7 TO-15 µg/m3 1.91 8.34 NA <1.04 0.311 1.04 <1.04 0.311 1.04 <1.04 0.311 1.04
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE 75-27-4 TO-15 µg/m3 2.53 11 NA <1.34 0.471 1.34 2.5 0.471 1.34 <1.34 0.471 1.34
BROMOFORM 75-25-2 TO-15 µg/m3 85.1 372 NA <6.21 0.757 6.21 <6.21 0.757 6.21 <6.21 0.757 6.21
BROMOMETHANE 74-83-9 TO-15 µg/m3 174 730 NA <0.776 0.381 0.776 <0.776 0.381 0.776 <0.776 0.381 0.776
1,3-BUTADIENE 106-99-0 TO-15 µg/m3 3.12 13.6 NA <4.43 0.23 4.43 <4.43 0.23 4.43 <4.43 0.23 4.43
CARBON DISULFIDE 75-15-0 TO-15 µg/m3 24300 102000 NA 3.8 0.317 0.622 1.59 0.317 0.622 2.99 0.317 0.622
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 56-23-5 TO-15 µg/m3 15.6 68.1 NA <1.26 0.461 1.26 <1.26 0.461 1.26 <1.26 0.461 1.26
CHLOROBENZENE 108-90-7 TO-15 µg/m3 1740 7300 NA <0.924 0.385 0.924 <0.924 0.385 0.924 <0.924 0.385 0.924
CHLOROETHANE 75-00-3 TO-15 µg/m3 348000 1460000 NA <0.528 0.263 0.528 <0.528 0.263 0.528 <0.528 0.263 0.528
CHLOROFORM 67-66-3 TO-15 µg/m3 4.07 17.8 NA <0.973 0.349 0.973 <0.973 0.349 0.973 <0.973 0.349 0.973
CHLOROMETHANE 74-87-3 TO-15 µg/m3 3130 13100 NA <0.413 0.213 0.413 <0.413 0.213 0.413 <0.413 0.213 0.413
2-CHLOROTOLUENE 95-49-8 TO-15 µg/m3 NE NE NA <1.03 0.427 1.03 <1.03 0.427 1.03 <1.03 0.427 1.03
CYCLOHEXANE 110-82-7 TO-15 µg/m3 209000 876000 NA <0.689 0.259 0.689 2.49 0.259 0.689 0.778 0.259 0.689
CHLORODIBROMOMETHANE 124-48-1 TO-15 µg/m3 NE NE NA <1.70 0.618 1.7 <1.70 0.618 1.7 <1.70 0.618 1.7
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE 106-93-4 TO-15 µg/m3 0.156 0.681 NA <1.54 0.554 1.54 <1.54 0.554 1.54 <1.54 0.554 1.54
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 95-50-1 TO-15 µg/m3 6950 29200 NA <1.20 0.77 1.2 <1.20 0.77 1.2 <1.20 0.77 1.2
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 541-73-1 TO-15 µg/m3 NE NE NA <1.20 1.09 1.2 <1.20 1.09 1.2 <1.20 1.09 1.2
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 106-46-7 TO-15 µg/m3 8.51 37.2 NA <1.20 0.335 1.2 <1.20 0.335 1.2 <1.20 0.335 1.2
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE 107-06-2 TO-15 µg/m3 3.6 15.7 NA <0.810 0.283 0.81 <0.810 0.283 0.81 <0.810 0.283 0.81
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE 75-34-3 TO-15 µg/m3 58.5 256 NA <0.802 0.29 0.802 <0.802 0.29 0.802 <0.802 0.29 0.802
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE 75-35-4 TO-15 µg/m3 6950 29200 NA <0.793 0.302 0.793 <0.793 0.302 0.793 <0.793 0.302 0.793
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 156-59-2 TO-15 µg/m3 NE NE NA <0.793 0.311 0.793 <0.793 0.311 0.793 <0.793 0.311 0.793
TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 156-60-5 TO-15 µg/m3 NE NE NA <0.793 0.267 0.793 <0.793 0.267 0.793 <0.793 0.267 0.793
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 78-87-5 TO-15 µg/m3 25.3 110 NA <0.924 0.351 0.924 <0.924 0.351 0.924 <0.924 0.351 0.924
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 10061-01-5 TO-15 µg/m3 NE NE NA <0.908 0.313 0.908 <0.908 0.313 0.908 <0.908 0.313 0.908
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 10061-02-6 TO-15 µg/m3 NE NE NA <0.908 0.331 0.908 <0.908 0.331 0.908 <0.908 0.331 0.908
1,4-DIOXANE 123-91-1 TO-15 µg/m3 18.7 81.8 NA <0.721 0.3 0.721 <0.721 0.3 0.721 <0.721 0.3 0.721
ETHANOL 64-17-5 TO-15 µg/m3 NE NE NA 9.09 0.5 2.36 14.4 0.5 2.36 71.6 0.5 2.36
ETHYLBENZENE 100-41-4 TO-15 µg/m3 37.4 164 NA 7.24 0.362 0.867 6.81 0.362 0.867 16.9 0.362 0.867
4-ETHYLTOLUENE 622-96-8 TO-15 µg/m3 NE NE NA 2.06 0.384 0.982 4.91 0.384 0.982 7.71 0.384 0.982
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE 75-69-4 TO-15 µg/m3 NE NE NA 35.1 0.46 1.12 1.55 0.46 1.12 1.35 0.46 1.12
Date Collected 11/11/2022 11/11/2022 11/11/2022
Client Sample ID SG-1 SG-2 SG-3
Lab Sample ID L1557924-01 L1557924-02 L1557924-03
Page 1 of 6
Ta
b
l
e

C
5

-

V
O
C
s

a
n
d

E
x
p
l
o
s
i
v
e

G
a
s
e
s

i
n

S
o
i
l

G
a
s
Fo
r
m
e
r

A
n
d
e
r
s
o
n

A
u
t
o

W
r
e
c
k
i
n
g

-

2
8
9
0

S
o
u
t
h

S
t
a
t
e

S
t
r
e
e
t

a
n
d

1
2
1
5

N
o
r
t
h

S
R

5
1
,

S
p
a
n
i
s
h

F
o
r
k

C
i
t
y
,

U
t
a
h

C
o
u
n
t
y
,

U
t
a
h
Te
r
r
a
c
o
n

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
o
.

6
1
2
2
7
1
8
6

T
a
s
k

3
.
3
An
a
l
y
t
e
CA
S
Me
t
h
o
d

U
n
i
t
s
VI
S
L
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
VI
S
L
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
10
%

o
f
OS
H
A
LE
L
Re
s
u
l
t

Q
MD
L
RD
L
Re
s
u
l
t

Q
MD
L
RD
L
Re
s
u
l
t

Q
MD
L
RD
L
Da
t
e

C
o
l
l
e
c
t
e
d
11
/
1
1
/
2
0
2
2
11
/
1
1
/
2
0
2
2
11
/
1
1
/
2
0
2
2
Cl
i
e
n
t

S
a
m
p
l
e

I
D
SG
-
1
SG
-
2
SG
-
3
La
b

S
a
m
p
l
e

I
D
L1
5
5
7
9
2
4
-
0
1
L1
5
5
7
9
2
4
-
0
2
L1
5
5
7
9
2
4
-
0
3
DI
C
H
L
O
R
O
D
I
F
L
U
O
R
O
M
E
T
H
A
N
E
75
-
7
1
-
8
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
34
8
0
14
6
0
0
NA
4.
8
6
0.
6
7
8

0
.
9
8
9
1.
9
2
0.
6
7
8

0
.
9
8
9
1.
8
6
0.
6
7
8

0
.
9
8
9
1,
1
,
2
-
T
R
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
T
R
I
F
L
U
O
R
O
E
T
H
A
N
E

7
6
-
1
3
-
1
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
17
4
0
0
0
73
0
0
0
0
NA
<1
.
5
3
0.
6
0
8
1.
5
3
<1
.
5
3
0.
6
0
8
1.
5
3
<1
.
5
3
0.
6
0
8
1.
5
3
1,
2
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
T
E
T
R
A
F
L
U
O
R
O
E
T
H
A
N
E

7
6
-
1
4
-
2
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
NE
NE
NA
31
.
5
0.
6
2
2
1.
4
<1
.
4
0
0.
6
2
2
1.
4
<1
.
4
0
0.
6
2
2
1.
4
HE
P
T
A
N
E
14
2
-
8
2
-
5
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
13
9
0
0
58
4
0
0
NA
14
4
0.
4
2
5

0
.
8
1
8
13
.
6
0.
4
2
5

0
.
8
1
8
13
.
9
0.
4
2
5

0
.
8
1
8
HE
X
A
C
H
L
O
R
O
-
1
,
3
-
B
U
T
A
D
I
E
N
E
87
-
6
8
-
3
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
4.
2
5
18
.
6
NA
<6
.
7
3
1.
1
2
6.
7
3
<6
.
7
3
1.
1
2
6.
7
3
<6
.
7
3
1.
1
2
6.
7
3
N-
H
E
X
A
N
E
11
0
-
5
4
-
3
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
24
3
0
0
10
2
0
0
0
NA
16
4
0.
7
2
6
2.
2
2
8.
2
1
0.
7
2
6
2.
2
2
4.
3
4
0.
7
2
6
2.
2
2
IS
O
P
R
O
P
Y
L
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
98
-
8
2
-
8
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
13
9
0
0
58
4
0
0
NA
<0
.
9
8
3
0.
3
8
2

0
.
9
8
3

<
0
.
9
8
3
0.
3
8
2

0
.
9
8
3

<
0
.
9
8
3
0.
3
8
2

0
.
9
8
3
ME
T
H
Y
L
E
N
E

C
H
L
O
R
I
D
E
75
-
0
9
-
2
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
33
8
0
40
9
0
0
NA
0.
9
6
9
B
0.
3
4

0
.
6
9
4
1.
4
5
B
0.
3
4

0
.
6
9
4
1.
5
2
B
0.
3
4

0
.
6
9
4
ME
T
H
Y
L

B
U
T
Y
L

K
E
T
O
N
E
59
1
-
7
8
-
6
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
10
4
0
43
8
0
NA
<5
.
1
1
0.
5
4
4
5.
1
1
<5
.
1
1
0.
5
4
4
5.
1
1
<5
.
1
1
0.
5
4
4
5.
1
1
2-
B
U
T
A
N
O
N
E

(
M
E
K
)
78
-
9
3
-
3
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
17
4
0
0
0
73
0
0
0
0
NA
<3
.
6
9
0.
2
4
3.
6
9
10
.
4
0.
2
4
3.
6
9
10
.
3
0.
2
4
3.
6
9
4-
M
E
T
H
Y
L
-
2
-
P
E
N
T
A
N
O
N
E

(
M
I
B
K
)
10
8
-
1
0
-
1
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
10
4
0
0
0
43
8
0
0
0
NA
<5
.
1
2
0.
3
1
3
5.
1
2
<5
.
1
2
0.
3
1
3
5.
1
2
<5
.
1
2
0.
3
1
3
5.
1
2
ME
T
H
Y
L

M
E
T
H
A
C
R
Y
L
A
T
E
80
-
6
2
-
6
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
24
3
0
0
10
2
0
0
0
NA
<0
.
8
1
9
0.
3
5
9

0
.
8
1
9

<
0
.
8
1
9
0.
3
5
9

0
.
8
1
9

<
0
.
8
1
9
0.
3
5
9

0
.
8
1
9
ME
T
H
Y
L

T
E
R
T
-
B
U
T
Y
L

E
T
H
E
R
16
3
4
-
0
4
-
4
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
36
0
15
7
0
NA
<0
.
7
2
1
0.
2
3
3

0
.
7
2
1

<
0
.
7
2
1
0.
2
3
3

0
.
7
2
1

<
0
.
7
2
1
0.
2
3
3

0
.
7
2
1
NA
P
H
T
H
A
L
E
N
E
91
-
2
0
-
3
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
2.
7
5
12
NA
<3
.
3
0
1.
8
3
3.
3
<3
.
3
0
1.
8
3
3.
3
<3
.
3
0
1.
8
3
3.
3
2-
P
R
O
P
A
N
O
L
67
-
6
3
-
0
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
69
5
0
29
2
0
0
NA
3.
4
2
0.
6
4
9
3.
0
7
3.
8
6
0.
6
4
9
3.
0
7
4.
8
9
0.
6
4
9
3.
0
7
PR
O
P
E
N
E
11
5
-
0
7
-
1
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
10
4
0
0
0
43
8
0
0
0
NA
<2
.
1
5
0.
1
6
2.
1
5
18
.
4
0.
1
6
2.
1
5
5.
4
6
0.
1
6
2.
1
5
ST
Y
R
E
N
E
10
0
-
4
2
-
5
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
34
8
0
0
14
6
0
0
0
NA
<0
.
8
5
1
0.
3
3
5

0
.
8
5
1

<
0
.
8
5
1
0.
3
3
5

0
.
8
5
1

<
0
.
8
5
1
0.
3
3
5

0
.
8
5
1
1,
1
,
2
,
2
-
T
E
T
R
A
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
A
N
E
79
-
3
4
-
5
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
1.
6
1
7.
0
5
NA
<1
.
3
7
0.
5
1
1
1.
3
7
<1
.
3
7
0.
5
1
1
1.
3
7
<1
.
3
7
0.
5
1
1
1.
3
7
TE
T
R
A
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
E
N
E
12
7
-
1
8
-
4
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
36
0
15
7
0
NA
10
9
0.
5
5
3
1.
3
6
15
5
0.
5
5
3
1.
3
6
29
7
0.
5
5
3
1.
3
6
TE
T
R
A
H
Y
D
R
O
F
U
R
A
N
10
9
-
9
9
-
9
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
69
5
0
0
29
2
0
0
0
NA
<0
.
5
9
0
0.
2
1
6
0.
5
9

<
0
.
5
9
0
0.
2
1
6
0.
5
9

<
0
.
5
9
0
0.
2
1
6
0.
5
9
TO
L
U
E
N
E
10
8
-
8
8
-
3
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
17
4
0
0
0
73
0
0
0
0
NA
30
.
8
0.
3
2
8
1.
8
8
42
.
6
0.
3
2
8
1.
8
8
77
.
2
0.
3
2
8
1.
8
8
1,
2
,
4
-
T
R
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
12
0
-
8
2
-
1
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
69
.
5
29
2
NA
<4
.
6
6
1.
1
4.
6
6
<4
.
6
6
1.
1
4.
6
6
<4
.
6
6
1.
1
4.
6
6
1,
1
,
1
-
T
R
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
A
N
E
71
-
5
5
-
6
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
17
4
0
0
0
73
0
0
0
0
NA
<1
.
0
9
0.
4
1.
0
9
<1
.
0
9
0.
4
1.
0
9
<1
.
0
9
0.
4
1.
0
9
1,
1
,
2
-
T
R
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
A
N
E
79
-
0
0
-
5
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
5.
8
5
25
.
6
NA
<1
.
0
9
0.
4
2
2
1.
0
9
<1
.
0
9
0.
4
2
2
1.
0
9
<1
.
0
9
0.
4
2
2
1.
0
9
TR
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
E
N
E
79
-
0
1
-
6
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
15
.
9
99
.
7
NA
<1
.
0
7
0.
3
6
4
1.
0
7
<1
.
0
7
0.
3
6
4
1.
0
7
<1
.
0
7
0.
3
6
4
1.
0
7
1,
2
,
4
-
T
R
I
M
E
T
H
Y
L
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
95
-
6
3
-
6
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
20
9
0
87
6
0
NA
1.
7
7
0.
3
7
5

0
.
9
8
2
6.
8
7
0.
3
7
5

0
.
9
8
2
10
.
3
0.
3
7
5

0
.
9
8
2
1,
3
,
5
-
T
R
I
M
E
T
H
Y
L
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
10
8
-
6
7
-
8
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
20
9
0
87
6
0
NA
1.
2
1
0.
3
8
2

0
.
9
8
2
4.
4
8
0.
3
8
2

0
.
9
8
2
6.
7
7
0.
3
8
2

0
.
9
8
2
2,
2
,
4
-
T
R
I
M
E
T
H
Y
L
P
E
N
T
A
N
E
54
0
-
8
4
-
1
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
NE
NE
NA
49
.
5
0.
6
2
1

0
.
9
3
4
5.
4
7
0.
6
2
1

0
.
9
3
4
7.
7
5
0.
6
2
1

0
.
9
3
4
VI
N
Y
L

C
H
L
O
R
I
D
E
75
-
0
1
-
4
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
5.
5
9
92
.
9
NA
<0
.
5
1
1
0.
2
4
3

0
.
5
1
1

<
0
.
5
1
1
0.
2
4
3

0
.
5
1
1

<
0
.
5
1
1
0.
2
4
3

0
.
5
1
1
VI
N
Y
L

B
R
O
M
I
D
E
59
3
-
6
0
-
2
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
2.
9
2
12
.
8
NA
<0
.
8
7
5
0.
3
7
3

0
.
8
7
5

<
0
.
8
7
5
0.
3
7
3

0
.
8
7
5

<
0
.
8
7
5
0.
3
7
3

0
.
8
7
5
VI
N
Y
L

A
C
E
T
A
T
E
10
8
-
0
5
-
4
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
69
5
0
29
2
0
0
NA
<0
.
7
0
4
0.
4
0
8

0
.
7
0
4

<
0
.
7
0
4
0.
4
0
8

0
.
7
0
4

<
0
.
7
0
4
0.
4
0
8

0
.
7
0
4
XY
L
E
N
E
S
,

T
O
T
A
L
13
3
0
-
2
0
-
7
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
34
8
0
14
6
0
0
NA
34
0.
5
8
6
2.
6
1
37
.
2
0.
5
8
6
2.
6
1
88
.
1
0.
5
8
6
2.
6
1
M&
P
-
X
Y
L
E
N
E
13
3
0
-
2
0
-
7
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
34
8
0
14
6
0
0
NA
26
.
1
0.
5
8
5
1.
7
3
29
0.
5
8
5
1.
7
3
69
.
4
0.
5
8
5
1.
7
3
O-
X
Y
L
E
N
E
95
-
4
7
-
6
TO
-
1
5
µg
/
m
3
34
8
0
14
6
0
0
NA
7.
8
5
0.
3
5
9

0
.
8
6
7
8.
1
1
0.
3
5
9

0
.
8
6
7
18
.
6
0.
3
5
9

0
.
8
6
7
B:
Th
e

s
a
m
e

a
n
a
l
y
t
e

i
s

f
o
u
n
d

i
n

t
h
e

a
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
d

b
l
a
n
k
.
Bl
u
e

i
t
a
l
i
c
i
z
e
d

n
o
n
-
d
e
t
e
c
t

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

(
e
.
g
.
,
<0
.
0
1
0
0
)
e
x
c
e
e
d

o
n
e

o
r

m
o
r
e

o
f

t
h
e

s
c
r
e
e
n
i
n
g

l
e
v
e
l
s
.
Bo
l
d

v
a
l
u
e
ex
c
e
e
d
s

M
e
t
h
o
d

D
e
t
e
c
t
i
o
n

L
i
m
i
t

(
M
D
L
)
.

C
o
l
o
r

s
h
a
d
e
d

v
a
l
u
e

e
x
c
e
e
d
s

s
c
r
e
e
n
i
n
g

l
e
v
e
l
.
Qu
a
l
i
f
i
e
r
s

(
Q
)
:
EP
A

V
I
S
L
:
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l

P
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n

A
g
e
n
c
y

T
a
r
g
e
t

S
u
b
-
S
l
a
b

a
n
d

N
e
a
r
-
s
o
u
r
c
e

S
o
i
l

G
a
s

C
o
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
OS
H
A

L
E
L
:
O
c
c
u
p
a
t
i
o
n
a
l

S
a
f
e
t
y

a
n
d

H
e
a
l
t
h

A
d
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
o
n

L
o
w
e
r

E
x
p
l
o
s
i
v
e

L
i
m
i
t

(
L
E
L
)
.

L
i
s
t
e
d

s
c
r
e
e
n
i
n
g

l
e
v
e
l
s

a
r
e
10
%

o
f

a
c
t
u
a
l

L
E
L
.
NA
:
N
o
t

A
p
p
l
i
c
a
b
l
e
.
NE
:
No
t

E
s
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
e
d
.
<:
Le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
e
p
o
r
t
e
d

D
e
t
e
c
t
i
o
n

L
i
m
i
t

(
R
D
L
)
.
µg
/
m
3:
mi
c
r
o
g
r
a
m
s

p
e
r
cu
b
i
c

m
e
t
e
r
.
pp
m
v
:
p
a
r
t
s

p
e
r

m
i
l
l
i
o
n

v
o
l
u
m
e
Pa
g
e

2

o
f

6
Ta
b
l
e

C
5

-

V
O
C
s

a
n
d

E
x
p
l
o
s
i
v
e

G
a
s
e
s

i
n

S
o
i
l

G
a
s
Fo
r
m
e
r

A
n
d
e
r
s
o
n

A
u
t
o

W
r
e
c
k
i
n
g

-

2
8
9
0

S
o
u
t
h

S
t
a
t
e

S
t
r
e
e
t

a
n
d

1
2
1
5

N
o
r
t
h

S
R

5
1
,

S
p
a
n
i
s
h

F
o
r
k

C
i
t
y
,

U
t
a
h

C
o
u
n
t
y
,

U
t
a
h
Te
r
r
a
c
o
n

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
o
.

6
1
2
2
7
1
8
6

T
a
s
k

3
.
3
An
a
l
y
t
e
CA
S
Me
t
h
o
d

U
n
i
t
s
VI
S
L
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
VI
S
L
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
10
%

o
f
OS
H
A
LE
L
ME
T
H
A
N
E
74
-
8
2
-
8
80
1
5
M
pp
m
v
NE
NE
50
0
0
ET
H
A
N
E
74
-
8
4
-
0
80
1
5
M
pp
m
v
NE
NE
30
0
0
ET
H
E
N
E
74
-
8
5
-
1
80
1
5
M
pp
m
v
NE
NE
27
0
0
AC
E
T
O
N
E
67
-
6
4
-
1
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
10
7
0
0
0
0
45
1
0
0
0
0
NA
AL
L
Y
L

C
H
L
O
R
I
D
E
10
7
-
0
5
-
1
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
15
.
6
68
.
1
NA
BE
N
Z
E
N
E
71
-
4
3
-
2
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
12
52
.
4
NA
BE
N
Z
Y
L

C
H
L
O
R
I
D
E
10
0
-
4
4
-
7
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
1.
9
1
8.
3
4
NA
BR
O
M
O
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
M
E
T
H
A
N
E
75
-
2
7
-
4
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
2.
5
3
11
NA
BR
O
M
O
F
O
R
M
75
-
2
5
-
2
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
85
.
1
37
2
NA
BR
O
M
O
M
E
T
H
A
N
E
74
-
8
3
-
9
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
17
4
73
0
NA
1,
3
-
B
U
T
A
D
I
E
N
E
10
6
-
9
9
-
0
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
3.
1
2
13
.
6
NA
CA
R
B
O
N

D
I
S
U
L
F
I
D
E
75
-
1
5
-
0
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
24
3
0
0
10
2
0
0
0
NA
CA
R
B
O
N

T
E
T
R
A
C
H
L
O
R
I
D
E
56
-
2
3
-
5
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
15
.
6
68
.
1
NA
CH
L
O
R
O
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
10
8
-
9
0
-
7
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
17
4
0
73
0
0
NA
CH
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
A
N
E
75
-
0
0
-
3
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
34
8
0
0
0
14
6
0
0
0
0
NA
CH
L
O
R
O
F
O
R
M
67
-
6
6
-
3
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
4.
0
7
17
.
8
NA
CH
L
O
R
O
M
E
T
H
A
N
E
74
-
8
7
-
3
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
31
3
0
13
1
0
0
NA
2-
C
H
L
O
R
O
T
O
L
U
E
N
E
95
-
4
9
-
8
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
NE
NE
NA
CY
C
L
O
H
E
X
A
N
E
11
0
-
8
2
-
7
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
20
9
0
0
0
87
6
0
0
0
NA
CH
L
O
R
O
D
I
B
R
O
M
O
M
E
T
H
A
N
E
12
4
-
4
8
-
1
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
NE
NE
NA
1,
2
-
D
I
B
R
O
M
O
E
T
H
A
N
E
10
6
-
9
3
-
4
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
0.
1
5
6
0.
6
8
1
NA
1,
2
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
95
-
5
0
-
1
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
69
5
0
29
2
0
0
NA
1,
3
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
54
1
-
7
3
-
1
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
NE
NE
NA
1,
4
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
10
6
-
4
6
-
7
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
8.
5
1
37
.
2
NA
1,
2
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
A
N
E
10
7
-
0
6
-
2
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
3.
6
15
.
7
NA
1,
1
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
A
N
E
75
-
3
4
-
3
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
58
.
5
25
6
NA
1,
1
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
E
N
E
75
-
3
5
-
4
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
69
5
0
29
2
0
0
NA
CI
S
-
1
,
2
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
E
N
E
15
6
-
5
9
-
2
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
NE
NE
NA
TR
A
N
S
-
1
,
2
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
E
N
E
15
6
-
6
0
-
5
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
NE
NE
NA
1,
2
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
P
R
O
P
A
N
E
78
-
8
7
-
5
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
25
.
3
11
0
NA
CI
S
-
1
,
3
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
P
R
O
P
E
N
E
10
0
6
1
-
0
1
-
5
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
NE
NE
NA
TR
A
N
S
-
1
,
3
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
P
R
O
P
E
N
E
10
0
6
1
-
0
2
-
6
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
NE
NE
NA
1,
4
-
D
I
O
X
A
N
E
12
3
-
9
1
-
1
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
18
.
7
81
.
8
NA
ET
H
A
N
O
L
64
-
1
7
-
5
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
NE
NE
NA
ET
H
Y
L
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
10
0
-
4
1
-
4
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
37
.
4
16
4
NA
4-
E
T
H
Y
L
T
O
L
U
E
N
E
62
2
-
9
6
-
8
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
NE
NE
NA
TR
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
F
L
U
O
R
O
M
E
T
H
A
N
E
75
-
6
9
-
4
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
NE
NE
NA
Da
t
e

C
o
l
l
e
c
t
e
d
Cl
i
e
n
t

S
a
m
p
l
e

I
D
La
b

S
a
m
p
l
e

I
D
Re
s
u
l
t

Q
MD
L
RD
L
Re
s
u
l
t

Q
MD
L
RD
L
Re
s
u
l
t

Q
MD
L
RD
L
50
2
6.
9
8
10
.
0
<1
0
.
0
6.
9
8
10
.
0
13
3
6.
9
8
10
.
0
<1
0
.
0
3.
8
6
10
.
0
<1
0
.
0
3.
8
6
10
.
0
<1
0
.
0
3.
8
6
10
.
0
<1
0
.
0
3.
6
1
10
.
0
<1
0
.
0
3.
6
1
10
.
0
<1
0
.
0
3.
6
1
10
.
0
74
.
6
1.
3
9
2.
9
7
20
2
1.
3
9
2.
9
7
32
.
8
1.
3
9
2.
9
7
<0
.
6
2
6
0.
3
5
7
0.
6
2
6
<0
.
6
2
6
0.
3
5
7

0
.
6
2
6
<0
.
6
2
6
0.
3
5
7

0
.
6
2
6
21
.
2
0.
2
2
8
0.
6
3
9
10
0.
2
2
8

0
.
6
3
9
9.
8
1
0.
2
2
8

0
.
6
3
9
<1
.
0
4
0.
3
1
1
1.
0
4
<1
.
0
4
0.
3
1
1
1.
0
4
<1
.
0
4
0.
3
1
1
1.
0
4
<1
.
3
4
0.
4
7
1
1.
3
4
<1
.
3
4
0.
4
7
1
1.
3
4
1.
5
3
0.
4
7
1
1.
3
4
<6
.
2
1
0.
7
5
7
6.
2
1
<6
.
2
1
0.
7
5
7
6.
2
1
<6
.
2
1
0.
7
5
7
6.
2
1
<0
.
7
7
6
0.
3
8
1
0.
7
7
6
<0
.
7
7
6
0.
3
8
1

0
.
7
7
6
<0
.
7
7
6
0.
3
8
1

0
.
7
7
6
<4
.
4
3
0.
2
3
4.
4
3
<4
.
4
3
0.
2
3
4.
4
3
<4
.
4
3
0.
2
3
4.
4
3
57
0.
3
1
7
0.
6
2
2
20
.
4
0.
3
1
7

0
.
6
2
2
0.
7
7
5
0.
3
1
7

0
.
6
2
2
<1
.
2
6
0.
4
6
1
1.
2
6
<1
.
2
6
0.
4
6
1
1.
2
6
<1
.
2
6
0.
4
6
1
1.
2
6
<0
.
9
2
4
0.
3
8
5
0.
9
2
4
<0
.
9
2
4
0.
3
8
5

0
.
9
2
4
<0
.
9
2
4
0.
3
8
5

0
.
9
2
4
<0
.
5
2
8
0.
2
6
3
0.
5
2
8
<0
.
5
2
8
0.
2
6
3

0
.
5
2
8
<0
.
5
2
8
0.
2
6
3

0
.
5
2
8
<0
.
9
7
3
0.
3
4
9
0.
9
7
3
<0
.
9
7
3
0.
3
4
9

0
.
9
7
3
<0
.
9
7
3
0.
3
4
9

0
.
9
7
3
<0
.
4
1
3
0.
2
1
3
0.
4
1
3
<0
.
4
1
3
0.
2
1
3

0
.
4
1
3
<0
.
4
1
3
0.
2
1
3

0
.
4
1
3
<1
.
0
3
0.
4
2
7
1.
0
3
<1
.
0
3
0.
4
2
7
1.
0
3
<1
.
0
3
0.
4
2
7
1.
0
3
33
7
5.
2
13
.
8
14
.
5
0.
2
5
9

0
.
6
8
9
<0
.
6
8
9
0.
2
5
9

0
.
6
8
9
<1
.
7
0
0.
6
1
8
1.
7
<1
.
7
0
0.
6
1
8
1.
7
<1
.
7
0
0.
6
1
8
1.
7
<1
.
5
4
0.
5
5
4
1.
5
4
<1
.
5
4
0.
5
5
4
1.
5
4
<1
.
5
4
0.
5
5
4
1.
5
4
<1
.
2
0
0.
7
7
1.
2
<1
.
2
0
0.
7
7
1.
2
<1
.
2
0
0.
7
7
1.
2
<1
.
2
0
1.
0
9
1.
2
<1
.
2
0
1.
0
9
1.
2
<1
.
2
0
1.
0
9
1.
2
<1
.
2
0
0.
3
3
5
1.
2
<1
.
2
0
0.
3
3
5
1.
2
<1
.
2
0
0.
3
3
5
1.
2
<0
.
8
1
0
0.
2
8
3
0.
8
1
<0
.
8
1
0
0.
2
8
3
0.
8
1
<0
.
8
1
0
0.
2
8
3
0.
8
1
<0
.
8
0
2
0.
2
9
0.
8
0
2
<0
.
8
0
2
0.
2
9

0
.
8
0
2
<0
.
8
0
2
0.
2
9

0
.
8
0
2
<0
.
7
9
3
0.
3
0
2
0.
7
9
3
<0
.
7
9
3
0.
3
0
2

0
.
7
9
3
<0
.
7
9
3
0.
3
0
2

0
.
7
9
3
<0
.
7
9
3
0.
3
1
1
0.
7
9
3
<0
.
7
9
3
0.
3
1
1

0
.
7
9
3
<0
.
7
9
3
0.
3
1
1

0
.
7
9
3
<0
.
7
9
3
0.
2
6
7
0.
7
9
3
<0
.
7
9
3
0.
2
6
7

0
.
7
9
3
<0
.
7
9
3
0.
2
6
7

0
.
7
9
3
<0
.
9
2
4
0.
3
5
1
0.
9
2
4
<0
.
9
2
4
0.
3
5
1

0
.
9
2
4
<0
.
9
2
4
0.
3
5
1

0
.
9
2
4
<0
.
9
0
8
0.
3
1
3
0.
9
0
8
<0
.
9
0
8
0.
3
1
3

0
.
9
0
8
<0
.
9
0
8
0.
3
1
3

0
.
9
0
8
<0
.
9
0
8
0.
3
3
1
0.
9
0
8
<0
.
9
0
8
0.
3
3
1

0
.
9
0
8
<0
.
9
0
8
0.
3
3
1

0
.
9
0
8
<0
.
7
2
1
0.
3
0.
7
2
1
<0
.
7
2
1
0.
3

0
.
7
2
1
<0
.
7
2
1
0.
3

0
.
7
2
1
10
.
1
0.
5
2.
3
6
89
.
7
0.
5
2.
3
6
28
.
1
0.
5
2.
3
6
10
.
5
0.
3
6
2
0.
8
6
7
1.
1
8
0.
3
6
2

0
.
8
6
7
5.
7
7
0.
3
6
2

0
.
8
6
7
7.
7
1
0.
3
8
4
0.
9
8
2
<0
.
9
8
2
0.
3
8
4

0
.
9
8
2
3.
4
7
0.
3
8
4

0
.
9
8
2
<1
.
1
2
0.
4
6
1.
1
2
2.
4
2
0.
4
6
1.
1
2
1.
7
3
0.
4
6
1.
1
2
11
/
1
1
/
2
0
2
2
11
/
1
1
/
2
0
2
2
11
/
1
1
/
2
0
2
2
L1
5
5
7
9
2
4
-
0
6
SG
-
4
SG
-
6
SG
-
7
L1
5
5
7
9
2
4
-
0
4
L1
5
5
7
9
2
4
-
0
5
Pa
g
e

3

o
f

6
Ta
b
l
e

C
5

-

V
O
C
s

a
n
d

E
x
p
l
o
s
i
v
e

G
a
s
e
s

i
n

S
o
i
l

G
a
s
Fo
r
m
e
r

A
n
d
e
r
s
o
n

A
u
t
o

W
r
e
c
k
i
n
g

-

2
8
9
0

S
o
u
t
h

S
t
a
t
e

S
t
r
e
e
t

a
n
d

1
2
1
5

N
o
r
t
h

S
R

5
1
,

S
p
a
n
i
s
h

F
o
r
k

C
i
t
y
,

U
t
a
h

C
o
u
n
t
y
,

U
t
a
h
Te
r
r
a
c
o
n

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
o
.

6
1
2
2
7
1
8
6

T
a
s
k

3
.
3
An
a
l
y
t
e
CA
S
Me
t
h
o
d

U
n
i
t
s
VI
S
L
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
VI
S
L
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
10
%

o
f
OS
H
A
LE
L
NE
NE
50
0
0
Da
t
e

C
o
l
l
e
c
t
e
d
Cl
i
e
n
t

S
a
m
p
l
e

I
D
La
b

S
a
m
p
l
e

I
D
DI
C
H
L
O
R
O
D
I
F
L
U
O
R
O
M
E
T
H
A
N
E
75
-
7
1
-
8
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
34
8
0
14
6
0
0
NA
1,
1
,
2
-
T
R
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
T
R
I
F
L
U
O
R
O
E
T
H
A
N
E

7
6
-
1
3
-
1
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
17
4
0
0
0
73
0
0
0
0
NA
1,
2
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
T
E
T
R
A
F
L
U
O
R
O
E
T
H
A
N
E

7
6
-
1
4
-
2
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
NE
NE
NA
HE
P
T
A
N
E
14
2
-
8
2
-
5
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
13
9
0
0
58
4
0
0
NA
HE
X
A
C
H
L
O
R
O
-
1
,
3
-
B
U
T
A
D
I
E
N
E
87
-
6
8
-
3
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
4.
2
5
18
.
6
NA
N-
H
E
X
A
N
E
11
0
-
5
4
-
3
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
24
3
0
0
10
2
0
0
0
NA
IS
O
P
R
O
P
Y
L
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
98
-
8
2
-
8
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
13
9
0
0
58
4
0
0
NA
ME
T
H
Y
L
E
N
E

C
H
L
O
R
I
D
E
75
-
0
9
-
2
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
33
8
0
40
9
0
0
NA
ME
T
H
Y
L

B
U
T
Y
L

K
E
T
O
N
E
59
1
-
7
8
-
6
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
10
4
0
43
8
0
NA
2-
B
U
T
A
N
O
N
E

(
M
E
K
)
78
-
9
3
-
3
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
17
4
0
0
0
73
0
0
0
0
NA
4-
M
E
T
H
Y
L
-
2
-
P
E
N
T
A
N
O
N
E

(
M
I
B
K
)
10
8
-
1
0
-
1
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
10
4
0
0
0
43
8
0
0
0
NA
ME
T
H
Y
L

M
E
T
H
A
C
R
Y
L
A
T
E
80
-
6
2
-
6
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
24
3
0
0
10
2
0
0
0
NA
ME
T
H
Y
L

T
E
R
T
-
B
U
T
Y
L

E
T
H
E
R
16
3
4
-
0
4
-
4
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
36
0
15
7
0
NA
NA
P
H
T
H
A
L
E
N
E
91
-
2
0
-
3
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
2.
7
5
12
NA
2-
P
R
O
P
A
N
O
L
67
-
6
3
-
0
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
69
5
0
29
2
0
0
NA
PR
O
P
E
N
E
11
5
-
0
7
-
1
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
10
4
0
0
0
43
8
0
0
0
NA
ST
Y
R
E
N
E
10
0
-
4
2
-
5
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
34
8
0
0
14
6
0
0
0
NA
1,
1
,
2
,
2
-
T
E
T
R
A
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
A
N
E
79
-
3
4
-
5
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
1.
6
1
7.
0
5
NA
TE
T
R
A
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
E
N
E
12
7
-
1
8
-
4
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
36
0
15
7
0
NA
TE
T
R
A
H
Y
D
R
O
F
U
R
A
N
10
9
-
9
9
-
9
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
69
5
0
0
29
2
0
0
0
NA
TO
L
U
E
N
E
10
8
-
8
8
-
3
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
17
4
0
0
0
73
0
0
0
0
NA
1,
2
,
4
-
T
R
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
12
0
-
8
2
-
1
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
69
.
5
29
2
NA
1,
1
,
1
-
T
R
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
A
N
E
71
-
5
5
-
6
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
17
4
0
0
0
73
0
0
0
0
NA
1,
1
,
2
-
T
R
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
A
N
E
79
-
0
0
-
5
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
5.
8
5
25
.
6
NA
TR
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
E
N
E
79
-
0
1
-
6
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
15
.
9
99
.
7
NA
1,
2
,
4
-
T
R
I
M
E
T
H
Y
L
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
95
-
6
3
-
6
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
20
9
0
87
6
0
NA
1,
3
,
5
-
T
R
I
M
E
T
H
Y
L
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
10
8
-
6
7
-
8
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
20
9
0
87
6
0
NA
2,
2
,
4
-
T
R
I
M
E
T
H
Y
L
P
E
N
T
A
N
E
54
0
-
8
4
-
1
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
NE
NE
NA
VI
N
Y
L

C
H
L
O
R
I
D
E
75
-
0
1
-
4
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
5.
5
9
92
.
9
NA
VI
N
Y
L

B
R
O
M
I
D
E
59
3
-
6
0
-
2
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
2.
9
2
12
.
8
NA
VI
N
Y
L

A
C
E
T
A
T
E
10
8
-
0
5
-
4
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
69
5
0
29
2
0
0
NA
XY
L
E
N
E
S
,

T
O
T
A
L
13
3
0
-
2
0
-
7
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
34
8
0
14
6
0
0
NA
M&
P
-
X
Y
L
E
N
E
13
3
0
-
2
0
-
7
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
34
8
0
14
6
0
0
NA
O-
X
Y
L
E
N
E
95
-
4
7
-
6
TO
-
1
5
µg
/
m
3
34
8
0
14
6
0
0
NA
B:
Th
e

s
a
m
e

a
n
a
l
y
t
e

i
s

f
o
u
n
d

i
n

t
h
e

a
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
d

b
l
a
n
k
.
Bl
u
e

i
t
a
l
i
c
i
z
e
d

n
o
n
-
d
e
t
e
c
t

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

(
e
.
g
.
,
<0
.
0
1
0
0
)
e
x
c
e
e
d

o
n
e

o
r

m
o
r
e

o
f

t
h
e

s
c
r
e
e
n
i
n
g

l
e
v
e
l
s
.
Bo
l
d

v
a
l
u
e
ex
c
e
e
d
s

M
e
t
h
o
d

D
e
t
e
c
t
i
o
n

L
i
m
i
t

(
M
D
L
)
.

C
o
l
o
r

s
h
a
d
e
d

v
a
l
u
e

e
x
c
e
e
d
s

s
c
r
e
e
n
i
n
g

l
e
v
e
l
.
Qu
a
l
i
f
i
e
r
s

(
Q
)
:
EP
A

V
I
S
L
:
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l

P
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n

A
g
e
n
c
y

T
a
r
g
e
t

S
u
b
-
S
l
a
b

a
n
d

N
e
a
r
-
s
o
u
r
c
e

S
o
i
l

G
a
s

C
o
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
OS
H
A

L
E
L
:
O
c
c
u
p
a
t
i
o
n
a
l

S
a
f
e
t
y

a
n
d

H
e
a
l
t
h

A
d
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
o
n

L
o
w
e
r

E
x
p
l
o
s
i
v
e

L
i
m
i
t

(
L
E
L
)
.

L
i
s
t
e
d

s
c
r
e
e
n
i
n
g

l
e
v
e
l
s

a
r
e
10
%

o
f

a
c
t
u
a
l

L
E
L
.
NA
:
N
o
t

A
p
p
l
i
c
a
b
l
e
.
NE
:
No
t

E
s
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
e
d
.
<:
Le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
e
p
o
r
t
e
d

D
e
t
e
c
t
i
o
n

L
i
m
i
t

(
R
D
L
)
.
µg
/
m
3:
mi
c
r
o
g
r
a
m
s

p
e
r
cu
b
i
c

m
e
t
e
r
.
pp
m
v
:
p
a
r
t
s

p
e
r

m
i
l
l
i
o
n

v
o
l
u
m
e
Re
s
u
l
t

Q
MD
L
RD
L
Re
s
u
l
t

Q
MD
L
RD
L
Re
s
u
l
t

Q
MD
L
RD
L
11
/
1
1
/
2
0
2
2
11
/
1
1
/
2
0
2
2
11
/
1
1
/
2
0
2
2
L1
5
5
7
9
2
4
-
0
6
SG
-
4
SG
-
6
SG
-
7
L1
5
5
7
9
2
4
-
0
4
L1
5
5
7
9
2
4
-
0
5
1.
1
3
0.
6
7
8
0.
9
8
9
1.
2
3
0.
6
7
8

0
.
9
8
9
2.
8
7
0.
6
7
8

0
.
9
8
9
<1
.
5
3
0.
6
0
8
1.
5
3
<1
.
5
3
0.
6
0
8
1.
5
3
<1
.
5
3
0.
6
0
8
1.
5
3
<1
.
4
0
0.
6
2
2
1.
4
<1
.
4
0
0.
6
2
2
1.
4
18
.
2
0.
6
2
2
1.
4
26
3
0.
4
2
5
0.
8
1
8
21
0.
4
2
5

0
.
8
1
8
8.
3
8
0.
4
2
5

0
.
8
1
8
<6
.
7
3
1.
1
2
6.
7
3
<6
.
7
3
1.
1
2
6.
7
3
<6
.
7
3
1.
1
2
6.
7
3
29
3
0.
7
2
6
2.
2
2
46
.
9
0.
7
2
6
2.
2
2
2.
3
7
0.
7
2
6
2.
2
2
3.
9
6
0.
3
8
2
0.
9
8
3
<0
.
9
8
3
0.
3
8
2

0
.
9
8
3
<0
.
9
8
3
0.
3
8
2

0
.
9
8
3
<0
.
6
9
4
0.
3
4
0.
6
9
4
5.
6
6
0.
3
4

0
.
6
9
4
2.
4
8
B
0.
3
4

0
.
6
9
4
<5
.
1
1
0.
5
4
4
5.
1
1
<5
.
1
1
0.
5
4
4
5.
1
1
<5
.
1
1
0.
5
4
4
5.
1
1
18
0.
2
4
3.
6
9
35
.
4
0.
2
4
3.
6
9
5.
4
8
0.
2
4
3.
6
9
<5
.
1
2
0.
3
1
3
5.
1
2
<5
.
1
2
0.
3
1
3
5.
1
2
<5
.
1
2
0.
3
1
3
5.
1
2
<0
.
8
1
9
0.
3
5
9
0.
8
1
9
<0
.
8
1
9
0.
3
5
9

0
.
8
1
9
<0
.
8
1
9
0.
3
5
9

0
.
8
1
9
<0
.
7
2
1
0.
2
3
3
0.
7
2
1
<0
.
7
2
1
0.
2
3
3

0
.
7
2
1
<0
.
7
2
1
0.
2
3
3

0
.
7
2
1
<3
.
3
0
1.
8
3
3.
3
<3
.
3
0
1.
8
3
3.
3
<3
.
3
0
1.
8
3
3.
3
<3
.
0
7
0.
6
4
9
3.
0
7
<3
.
0
7
0.
6
4
9
3.
0
7
5.
1
1
0.
6
4
9
3.
0
7
44
1
3.
2
43
<2
.
1
5
0.
1
6
2.
1
5
<2
.
1
5
0.
1
6
2.
1
5
<0
.
8
5
1
0.
3
3
5
0.
8
5
1
<0
.
8
5
1
0.
3
3
5

0
.
8
5
1
<0
.
8
5
1
0.
3
3
5

0
.
8
5
1
<1
.
3
7
0.
5
1
1
1.
3
7
<1
.
3
7
0.
5
1
1
1.
3
7
<1
.
3
7
0.
5
1
1
1.
3
7
1.
7
0.
5
5
3
1.
3
6
13
.
5
0.
5
5
3
1.
3
6
14
1
0.
5
5
3
1.
3
6
<0
.
5
9
0
0.
2
1
6
0.
5
9
<0
.
5
9
0
0.
2
1
6
0.
5
9
<0
.
5
9
0
0.
2
1
6
0.
5
9
13
7
0.
3
2
8
1.
8
8
13
.
8
0.
3
2
8
1.
8
8
38
0.
3
2
8
1.
8
8
<4
.
6
6
1.
1
4.
6
6
<4
.
6
6
1.
1
4.
6
6
<4
.
6
6
1.
1
4.
6
6
<1
.
0
9
0.
4
1.
0
9
<1
.
0
9
0.
4
1.
0
9
<1
.
0
9
0.
4
1.
0
9
<1
.
0
9
0.
4
2
2
1.
0
9
<1
.
0
9
0.
4
2
2
1.
0
9
<1
.
0
9
0.
4
2
2
1.
0
9
<1
.
0
7
0.
3
6
4
1.
0
7
<1
.
0
7
0.
3
6
4
1.
0
7
<1
.
0
7
0.
3
6
4
1.
0
7
6.
7
7
0.
3
7
5
0.
9
8
2
<0
.
9
8
2
0.
3
7
5

0
.
9
8
2
4.
6
4
0.
3
7
5

0
.
9
8
2
7.
2
6
0.
3
8
2
0.
9
8
2
<0
.
9
8
2
0.
3
8
2

0
.
9
8
2
2.
5
3
0.
3
8
2

0
.
9
8
2
<0
.
9
3
4
0.
6
2
1
0.
9
3
4
3.
9
2
0.
6
2
1

0
.
9
3
4
3.
9
5
0.
6
2
1

0
.
9
3
4
<0
.
5
1
1
0.
2
4
3
0.
5
1
1
<0
.
5
1
1
0.
2
4
3

0
.
5
1
1
<0
.
5
1
1
0.
2
4
3

0
.
5
1
1
<0
.
8
7
5
0.
3
7
3
0.
8
7
5
<0
.
8
7
5
0.
3
7
3

0
.
8
7
5
<0
.
8
7
5
0.
3
7
3

0
.
8
7
5
<0
.
7
0
4
0.
4
0
8
0.
7
0
4
<0
.
7
0
4
0.
4
0
8

0
.
7
0
4
<0
.
7
0
4
0.
4
0
8

0
.
7
0
4
71
.
2
0.
5
8
6
2.
6
1
5.
2
5
0.
5
8
6
2.
6
1
30
0.
5
8
6
2.
6
1
46
0.
5
8
5
1.
7
3
4.
0
1
0.
5
8
5
1.
7
3
23
.
7
0.
5
8
5
1.
7
3
25
.
3
0.
3
5
9
0.
8
6
7
1.
2
4
0.
3
5
9

0
.
8
6
7
6.
2
9
0.
3
5
9

0
.
8
6
7
Pa
g
e

4

o
f

6
Ta
b
l
e

C
5

-

V
O
C
s

a
n
d

E
x
p
l
o
s
i
v
e

G
a
s
e
s

i
n

S
o
i
l

G
a
s
Fo
r
m
e
r

A
n
d
e
r
s
o
n

A
u
t
o

W
r
e
c
k
i
n
g

-

2
8
9
0

S
o
u
t
h

S
t
a
t
e

S
t
r
e
e
t

a
n
d

1
2
1
5

N
o
r
t
h

S
R

5
1
,

S
p
a
n
i
s
h

F
o
r
k

C
i
t
y
,

U
t
a
h

C
o
u
n
t
y
,

U
t
a
h
Te
r
r
a
c
o
n

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
o
.

6
1
2
2
7
1
8
6

T
a
s
k

3
.
3
An
a
l
y
t
e
CA
S
Me
t
h
o
d

U
n
i
t
s
VI
S
L
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
VI
S
L
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
10
%

o
f
OS
H
A
LE
L
ME
T
H
A
N
E
74
-
8
2
-
8
80
1
5
M
pp
m
v
NE
NE
50
0
0
ET
H
A
N
E
74
-
8
4
-
0
80
1
5
M
pp
m
v
NE
NE
30
0
0
ET
H
E
N
E
74
-
8
5
-
1
80
1
5
M
pp
m
v
NE
NE
27
0
0
AC
E
T
O
N
E
67
-
6
4
-
1
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
10
7
0
0
0
0
45
1
0
0
0
0
NA
AL
L
Y
L

C
H
L
O
R
I
D
E
10
7
-
0
5
-
1
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
15
.
6
68
.
1
NA
BE
N
Z
E
N
E
71
-
4
3
-
2
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
12
52
.
4
NA
BE
N
Z
Y
L

C
H
L
O
R
I
D
E
10
0
-
4
4
-
7
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
1.
9
1
8.
3
4
NA
BR
O
M
O
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
M
E
T
H
A
N
E
75
-
2
7
-
4
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
2.
5
3
11
NA
BR
O
M
O
F
O
R
M
75
-
2
5
-
2
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
85
.
1
37
2
NA
BR
O
M
O
M
E
T
H
A
N
E
74
-
8
3
-
9
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
17
4
73
0
NA
1,
3
-
B
U
T
A
D
I
E
N
E
10
6
-
9
9
-
0
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
3.
1
2
13
.
6
NA
CA
R
B
O
N

D
I
S
U
L
F
I
D
E
75
-
1
5
-
0
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
24
3
0
0
10
2
0
0
0
NA
CA
R
B
O
N

T
E
T
R
A
C
H
L
O
R
I
D
E
56
-
2
3
-
5
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
15
.
6
68
.
1
NA
CH
L
O
R
O
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
10
8
-
9
0
-
7
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
17
4
0
73
0
0
NA
CH
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
A
N
E
75
-
0
0
-
3
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
34
8
0
0
0
14
6
0
0
0
0
NA
CH
L
O
R
O
F
O
R
M
67
-
6
6
-
3
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
4.
0
7
17
.
8
NA
CH
L
O
R
O
M
E
T
H
A
N
E
74
-
8
7
-
3
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
31
3
0
13
1
0
0
NA
2-
C
H
L
O
R
O
T
O
L
U
E
N
E
95
-
4
9
-
8
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
NE
NE
NA
CY
C
L
O
H
E
X
A
N
E
11
0
-
8
2
-
7
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
20
9
0
0
0
87
6
0
0
0
NA
CH
L
O
R
O
D
I
B
R
O
M
O
M
E
T
H
A
N
E
12
4
-
4
8
-
1
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
NE
NE
NA
1,
2
-
D
I
B
R
O
M
O
E
T
H
A
N
E
10
6
-
9
3
-
4
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
0.
1
5
6
0.
6
8
1
NA
1,
2
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
95
-
5
0
-
1
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
69
5
0
29
2
0
0
NA
1,
3
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
54
1
-
7
3
-
1
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
NE
NE
NA
1,
4
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
10
6
-
4
6
-
7
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
8.
5
1
37
.
2
NA
1,
2
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
A
N
E
10
7
-
0
6
-
2
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
3.
6
15
.
7
NA
1,
1
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
A
N
E
75
-
3
4
-
3
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
58
.
5
25
6
NA
1,
1
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
E
N
E
75
-
3
5
-
4
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
69
5
0
29
2
0
0
NA
CI
S
-
1
,
2
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
E
N
E
15
6
-
5
9
-
2
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
NE
NE
NA
TR
A
N
S
-
1
,
2
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
E
N
E
15
6
-
6
0
-
5
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
NE
NE
NA
1,
2
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
P
R
O
P
A
N
E
78
-
8
7
-
5
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
25
.
3
11
0
NA
CI
S
-
1
,
3
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
P
R
O
P
E
N
E
10
0
6
1
-
0
1
-
5
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
NE
NE
NA
TR
A
N
S
-
1
,
3
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
P
R
O
P
E
N
E
10
0
6
1
-
0
2
-
6
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
NE
NE
NA
1,
4
-
D
I
O
X
A
N
E
12
3
-
9
1
-
1
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
18
.
7
81
.
8
NA
ET
H
A
N
O
L
64
-
1
7
-
5
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
NE
NE
NA
ET
H
Y
L
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
10
0
-
4
1
-
4
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
37
.
4
16
4
NA
4-
E
T
H
Y
L
T
O
L
U
E
N
E
62
2
-
9
6
-
8
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
NE
NE
NA
TR
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
F
L
U
O
R
O
M
E
T
H
A
N
E
75
-
6
9
-
4
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
NE
NE
NA
Da
t
e

C
o
l
l
e
c
t
e
d
Cl
i
e
n
t

S
a
m
p
l
e

I
D
La
b

S
a
m
p
l
e

I
D
Re
s
u
l
t

Q
MD
L
RD
L
Re
s
u
l
t

Q

M
D
L
RD
L
31
.
8
6.
9
8
10
.
0
<1
0
.
0
6.
9
8
10
.
0
<1
0
.
0
3.
8
6
10
.
0
<1
0
.
0
3.
8
6
10
.
0
<1
0
.
0
3.
6
1
10
.
0
<1
0
.
0
3.
6
1
10
.
0
15
.
7
1.
3
9
2.
9
7
40
.
4
1.
3
9
2.
9
7
<0
.
6
2
6
0.
3
5
7

0
.
6
2
6

<
0
.
6
2
6
0.
3
5
7

0
.
6
2
6
13
.
3
0.
2
2
8

0
.
6
3
9
14
.
9
0.
2
2
8

0
.
6
3
9
<1
.
0
4
0.
3
1
1
1.
0
4
<1
.
0
4
0.
3
1
1
1.
0
4
<1
.
3
4
0.
4
7
1
1.
3
4
<1
.
3
4
0.
4
7
1
1.
3
4
<6
.
2
1
0.
7
5
7
6.
2
1
<6
.
2
1
0.
7
5
7
6.
2
1
<0
.
7
7
6
0.
3
8
1

0
.
7
7
6

<
0
.
7
7
6
0.
3
8
1

0
.
7
7
6
<4
.
4
3
0.
2
3
4.
4
3
<4
.
4
3
0.
2
3
4.
4
3
5.
7
0.
3
1
7

0
.
6
2
2
1.
5
2
0.
3
1
7

0
.
6
2
2
<1
.
2
6
0.
4
6
1
1.
2
6
<1
.
2
6
0.
4
6
1
1.
2
6
<0
.
9
2
4
0.
3
8
5

0
.
9
2
4

<
0
.
9
2
4
0.
3
8
5

0
.
9
2
4
<0
.
5
2
8
0.
2
6
3

0
.
5
2
8

<
0
.
5
2
8
0.
2
6
3

0
.
5
2
8
<0
.
9
7
3
0.
3
4
9

0
.
9
7
3

<
0
.
9
7
3
0.
3
4
9

0
.
9
7
3
<0
.
4
1
3
0.
2
1
3

0
.
4
1
3

<
0
.
4
1
3
0.
2
1
3

0
.
4
1
3
<1
.
0
3
0.
4
2
7
1.
0
3
<1
.
0
3
0.
4
2
7
1.
0
3
<0
.
6
8
9
0.
2
5
9

0
.
6
8
9
0.
9
7
1
0.
2
5
9

0
.
6
8
9
<1
.
7
0
0.
6
1
8
1.
7
<1
.
7
0
0.
6
1
8
1.
7
<1
.
5
4
0.
5
5
4
1.
5
4
<1
.
5
4
0.
5
5
4
1.
5
4
<1
.
2
0
0.
7
7
1.
2
<1
.
2
0
0.
7
7
1.
2
<1
.
2
0
1.
0
9
1.
2
<1
.
2
0
1.
0
9
1.
2
<1
.
2
0
0.
3
3
5
1.
2
<1
.
2
0
0.
3
3
5
1.
2
<0
.
8
1
0
0.
2
8
3
0.
8
1

<
0
.
8
1
0
0.
2
8
3
0.
8
1
<0
.
8
0
2
0.
2
9

0
.
8
0
2

<
0
.
8
0
2
0.
2
9

0
.
8
0
2
<0
.
7
9
3
0.
3
0
2

0
.
7
9
3

<
0
.
7
9
3
0.
3
0
2

0
.
7
9
3
<0
.
7
9
3
0.
3
1
1

0
.
7
9
3

<
0
.
7
9
3
0.
3
1
1

0
.
7
9
3
<0
.
7
9
3
0.
2
6
7

0
.
7
9
3

<
0
.
7
9
3
0.
2
6
7

0
.
7
9
3
<0
.
9
2
4
0.
3
5
1

0
.
9
2
4

<
0
.
9
2
4
0.
3
5
1

0
.
9
2
4
<0
.
9
0
8
0.
3
1
3

0
.
9
0
8

<
0
.
9
0
8
0.
3
1
3

0
.
9
0
8
<0
.
9
0
8
0.
3
3
1

0
.
9
0
8

<
0
.
9
0
8
0.
3
3
1

0
.
9
0
8
0.
8
7
2
0.
3

0
.
7
2
1

<
0
.
7
2
1
0.
3

0
.
7
2
1
26
.
4
0.
5
2.
3
6
17
.
2
0.
5
2.
3
6
7.
3
3
0.
3
6
2

0
.
8
6
7
14
.
7
0.
3
6
2

0
.
8
6
7
4.
5
9
0.
3
8
4

0
.
9
8
2
8.
0
5
0.
3
8
4

0
.
9
8
2
1.
4
4
0.
4
6
1.
1
2
15
.
1
0.
4
6
1.
1
2
11
/
1
1
/
2
0
2
2
SG
-
8
SG
-
9
11
/
1
1
/
2
0
2
2
L1
5
5
7
9
2
4
-
0
7
L1
5
5
7
9
2
4
-
0
8
Pa
g
e

5

o
f

6
Ta
b
l
e

C
5

-

V
O
C
s

a
n
d

E
x
p
l
o
s
i
v
e

G
a
s
e
s

i
n

S
o
i
l

G
a
s
Fo
r
m
e
r

A
n
d
e
r
s
o
n

A
u
t
o

W
r
e
c
k
i
n
g

-

2
8
9
0

S
o
u
t
h

S
t
a
t
e

S
t
r
e
e
t

a
n
d

1
2
1
5

N
o
r
t
h

S
R

5
1
,

S
p
a
n
i
s
h

F
o
r
k

C
i
t
y
,

U
t
a
h

C
o
u
n
t
y
,

U
t
a
h
Te
r
r
a
c
o
n

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
o
.

6
1
2
2
7
1
8
6

T
a
s
k

3
.
3
An
a
l
y
t
e
CA
S
Me
t
h
o
d

U
n
i
t
s
VI
S
L
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
VI
S
L
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
10
%

o
f
OS
H
A
LE
L
NE
NE
50
0
0
Da
t
e

C
o
l
l
e
c
t
e
d
Cl
i
e
n
t

S
a
m
p
l
e

I
D
La
b

S
a
m
p
l
e

I
D
DI
C
H
L
O
R
O
D
I
F
L
U
O
R
O
M
E
T
H
A
N
E
75
-
7
1
-
8
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
34
8
0
14
6
0
0
NA
1,
1
,
2
-
T
R
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
T
R
I
F
L
U
O
R
O
E
T
H
A
N
E

7
6
-
1
3
-
1
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
17
4
0
0
0
73
0
0
0
0
NA
1,
2
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
T
E
T
R
A
F
L
U
O
R
O
E
T
H
A
N
E

7
6
-
1
4
-
2
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
NE
NE
NA
HE
P
T
A
N
E
14
2
-
8
2
-
5
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
13
9
0
0
58
4
0
0
NA
HE
X
A
C
H
L
O
R
O
-
1
,
3
-
B
U
T
A
D
I
E
N
E
87
-
6
8
-
3
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
4.
2
5
18
.
6
NA
N-
H
E
X
A
N
E
11
0
-
5
4
-
3
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
24
3
0
0
10
2
0
0
0
NA
IS
O
P
R
O
P
Y
L
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
98
-
8
2
-
8
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
13
9
0
0
58
4
0
0
NA
ME
T
H
Y
L
E
N
E

C
H
L
O
R
I
D
E
75
-
0
9
-
2
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
33
8
0
40
9
0
0
NA
ME
T
H
Y
L

B
U
T
Y
L

K
E
T
O
N
E
59
1
-
7
8
-
6
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
10
4
0
43
8
0
NA
2-
B
U
T
A
N
O
N
E

(
M
E
K
)
78
-
9
3
-
3
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
17
4
0
0
0
73
0
0
0
0
NA
4-
M
E
T
H
Y
L
-
2
-
P
E
N
T
A
N
O
N
E

(
M
I
B
K
)
10
8
-
1
0
-
1
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
10
4
0
0
0
43
8
0
0
0
NA
ME
T
H
Y
L

M
E
T
H
A
C
R
Y
L
A
T
E
80
-
6
2
-
6
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
24
3
0
0
10
2
0
0
0
NA
ME
T
H
Y
L

T
E
R
T
-
B
U
T
Y
L

E
T
H
E
R
16
3
4
-
0
4
-
4
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
36
0
15
7
0
NA
NA
P
H
T
H
A
L
E
N
E
91
-
2
0
-
3
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
2.
7
5
12
NA
2-
P
R
O
P
A
N
O
L
67
-
6
3
-
0
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
69
5
0
29
2
0
0
NA
PR
O
P
E
N
E
11
5
-
0
7
-
1
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
10
4
0
0
0
43
8
0
0
0
NA
ST
Y
R
E
N
E
10
0
-
4
2
-
5
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
34
8
0
0
14
6
0
0
0
NA
1,
1
,
2
,
2
-
T
E
T
R
A
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
A
N
E
79
-
3
4
-
5
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
1.
6
1
7.
0
5
NA
TE
T
R
A
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
E
N
E
12
7
-
1
8
-
4
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
36
0
15
7
0
NA
TE
T
R
A
H
Y
D
R
O
F
U
R
A
N
10
9
-
9
9
-
9
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
69
5
0
0
29
2
0
0
0
NA
TO
L
U
E
N
E
10
8
-
8
8
-
3
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
17
4
0
0
0
73
0
0
0
0
NA
1,
2
,
4
-
T
R
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
12
0
-
8
2
-
1
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
69
.
5
29
2
NA
1,
1
,
1
-
T
R
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
A
N
E
71
-
5
5
-
6
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
17
4
0
0
0
73
0
0
0
0
NA
1,
1
,
2
-
T
R
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
A
N
E
79
-
0
0
-
5
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
5.
8
5
25
.
6
NA
TR
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
E
N
E
79
-
0
1
-
6
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
15
.
9
99
.
7
NA
1,
2
,
4
-
T
R
I
M
E
T
H
Y
L
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
95
-
6
3
-
6
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
20
9
0
87
6
0
NA
1,
3
,
5
-
T
R
I
M
E
T
H
Y
L
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
10
8
-
6
7
-
8
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
20
9
0
87
6
0
NA
2,
2
,
4
-
T
R
I
M
E
T
H
Y
L
P
E
N
T
A
N
E
54
0
-
8
4
-
1
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
NE
NE
NA
VI
N
Y
L

C
H
L
O
R
I
D
E
75
-
0
1
-
4
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
5.
5
9
92
.
9
NA
VI
N
Y
L

B
R
O
M
I
D
E
59
3
-
6
0
-
2
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
2.
9
2
12
.
8
NA
VI
N
Y
L

A
C
E
T
A
T
E
10
8
-
0
5
-
4
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
69
5
0
29
2
0
0
NA
XY
L
E
N
E
S
,

T
O
T
A
L
13
3
0
-
2
0
-
7
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
34
8
0
14
6
0
0
NA
M&
P
-
X
Y
L
E
N
E
13
3
0
-
2
0
-
7
TO
-
1
5
µg/
m
3
34
8
0
14
6
0
0
NA
O-
X
Y
L
E
N
E
95
-
4
7
-
6
TO
-
1
5
µg
/
m
3
34
8
0
14
6
0
0
NA
B:
Th
e

s
a
m
e

a
n
a
l
y
t
e

i
s

f
o
u
n
d

i
n

t
h
e

a
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
d

b
l
a
n
k
.
Bl
u
e

i
t
a
l
i
c
i
z
e
d

n
o
n
-
d
e
t
e
c
t

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

(
e
.
g
.
,
<0
.
0
1
0
0
)
e
x
c
e
e
d

o
n
e

o
r

m
o
r
e

o
f

t
h
e

s
c
r
e
e
n
i
n
g

l
e
v
e
l
s
.
Bo
l
d

v
a
l
u
e
ex
c
e
e
d
s

M
e
t
h
o
d

D
e
t
e
c
t
i
o
n

L
i
m
i
t

(
M
D
L
)
.

C
o
l
o
r

s
h
a
d
e
d

v
a
l
u
e

e
x
c
e
e
d
s

s
c
r
e
e
n
i
n
g

l
e
v
e
l
.
Qu
a
l
i
f
i
e
r
s

(
Q
)
:
EP
A

V
I
S
L
:
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l

P
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n

A
g
e
n
c
y

T
a
r
g
e
t

S
u
b
-
S
l
a
b

a
n
d

N
e
a
r
-
s
o
u
r
c
e

S
o
i
l

G
a
s

C
o
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
OS
H
A

L
E
L
:
O
c
c
u
p
a
t
i
o
n
a
l

S
a
f
e
t
y

a
n
d

H
e
a
l
t
h

A
d
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
o
n

L
o
w
e
r

E
x
p
l
o
s
i
v
e

L
i
m
i
t

(
L
E
L
)
.

L
i
s
t
e
d

s
c
r
e
e
n
i
n
g

l
e
v
e
l
s

a
r
e
10
%

o
f

a
c
t
u
a
l

L
E
L
.
NA
:
N
o
t

A
p
p
l
i
c
a
b
l
e
.
NE
:
No
t

E
s
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
e
d
.
<:
Le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
e
p
o
r
t
e
d

D
e
t
e
c
t
i
o
n

L
i
m
i
t

(
R
D
L
)
.
µg
/
m
3:
mi
c
r
o
g
r
a
m
s

p
e
r
cu
b
i
c

m
e
t
e
r
.
pp
m
v
:
p
a
r
t
s

p
e
r

m
i
l
l
i
o
n

v
o
l
u
m
e
Re
s
u
l
t

Q
MD
L
RD
L
Re
s
u
l
t

Q

M
D
L
RD
L
11
/
1
1
/
2
0
2
2
SG
-
8
SG
-
9
11
/
1
1
/
2
0
2
2
L1
5
5
7
9
2
4
-
0
7
L1
5
5
7
9
2
4
-
0
8
1.
9
2
0.
6
7
8

0
.
9
8
9
3.
5
7
0.
6
7
8

0
.
9
8
9
<1
.
5
3
0.
6
0
8
1.
5
3
<1
.
5
3
0.
6
0
8
1.
5
3
<1
.
4
0
0.
6
2
2
1.
4
<1
.
4
0
0.
6
2
2
1.
4
12
.
6
0.
4
2
5

0
.
8
1
8
9.
3
3
0.
4
2
5

0
.
8
1
8
<6
.
7
3
1.
1
2
6.
7
3
<6
.
7
3
1.
1
2
6.
7
3
3.
2
2
0.
7
2
6
2.
2
2
3.
0
7
0.
7
2
6
2.
2
2
<0
.
9
8
3
0.
3
8
2

0
.
9
8
3

<
0
.
9
8
3
0.
3
8
2

0
.
9
8
3
1.
2
1
B
0.
3
4

0
.
6
9
4
0.
9
4
8
B
0.
3
4

0
.
6
9
4
<5
.
1
1
0.
5
4
4
5.
1
1
<5
.
1
1
0.
5
4
4
5.
1
1
<3
.
6
9
0.
2
4
3.
6
9
8.
4
0.
2
4
3.
6
9
<5
.
1
2
0.
3
1
3
5.
1
2
<5
.
1
2
0.
3
1
3
5.
1
2
<0
.
8
1
9
0.
3
5
9

0
.
8
1
9

<
0
.
8
1
9
0.
3
5
9

0
.
8
1
9
<0
.
7
2
1
0.
2
3
3

0
.
7
2
1

<
0
.
7
2
1
0.
2
3
3

0
.
7
2
1
<3
.
3
0
1.
8
3
3.
3
<3
.
3
0
1.
8
3
3.
3
5.
9
2
0.
6
4
9
3.
0
7
5.
0
9
0.
6
4
9
3.
0
7
<2
.
1
5
0.
1
6
2.
1
5
<2
.
1
5
0.
1
6
2.
1
5
<0
.
8
5
1
0.
3
3
5

0
.
8
5
1

<
0
.
8
5
1
0.
3
3
5

0
.
8
5
1
<1
.
3
7
0.
5
1
1
1.
3
7
<1
.
3
7
0.
5
1
1
1.
3
7
19
2
0.
5
5
3
1.
3
6
32
7
0.
5
5
3
1.
3
6
<0
.
5
9
0
0.
2
1
6
0.
5
9

<
0
.
5
9
0
0.
2
1
6
0.
5
9
51
.
2
0.
3
2
8
1.
8
8
75
.
7
0.
3
2
8
1.
8
8
<4
.
6
6
1.
1
4.
6
6
<4
.
6
6
1.
1
4.
6
6
<1
.
0
9
0.
4
1.
0
9
<1
.
0
9
0.
4
1.
0
9
<1
.
0
9
0.
4
2
2
1.
0
9
<1
.
0
9
0.
4
2
2
1.
0
9
1.
7
3
0.
3
6
4
1.
0
7
<1
.
0
7
0.
3
6
4
1.
0
7
5.
7
9
0.
3
7
5

0
.
9
8
2
9.
0
3
0.
3
7
5

0
.
9
8
2
3.
9
4
0.
3
8
2

0
.
9
8
2
5.
5
0.
3
8
2

0
.
9
8
2
8.
0
8
0.
6
2
1

0
.
9
3
4
4.
9
1
0.
6
2
1

0
.
9
3
4
<0
.
5
1
1
0.
2
4
3

0
.
5
1
1

<
0
.
5
1
1
0.
2
4
3

0
.
5
1
1
<0
.
8
7
5
0.
3
7
3

0
.
8
7
5

<
0
.
8
7
5
0.
3
7
3

0
.
8
7
5
<0
.
7
0
4
0.
4
0
8

0
.
7
0
4

<
0
.
7
0
4
0.
4
0
8

0
.
7
0
4
39
.
9
0.
5
8
6
2.
6
1
78
.
2
0.
5
8
6
2.
6
1
31
0.
5
8
5
1.
7
3
62
0.
5
8
5
1.
7
3
8.
7
6
0.
3
5
9

0
.
8
6
7
16
0.
3
5
9

0
.
8
6
7
Pa
g
e

6

o
f

6
Ta
b
l
e

C
6
.
1

-

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

P
a
i
r
–
M
e
t
a
l
s

i
n

S
o
i
l
Fo
r
m
e
r

A
n
d
e
r
s
o
n

A
u
t
o

W
r
e
c
k
i
n
g

-

2
8
9
0

S
o
u
t
h

S
t
a
t
e

S
t
r
e
e
t

a
n
d

1
2
1
5

N
o
r
t
h

S
R

5
1
,

S
p
a
n
i
s
h

F
o
r
k

C
i
t
y
,

U
t
a
h

C
o
u
n
t
y
,

U
t
a
h
Te
r
r
a
c
o
n

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
o
.

6
1
2
2
7
1
8
6

T
a
s
k

3
.
3
An
a
l
y
t
e
Me
t
h
o
d

U
n
i
t
s

R
e
s
u
l
t

Q
Hi
g
h
Li
m
i
t
Hi
g
h
Li
m
i
t
Ty
p
e
Di
l
u
t
i
o
n
Fa
c
t
o
r
Re
s
u
l
t

Q
Hi
g
h
Li
m
i
t
Hi
g
h
Li
m
i
t
Ty
p
e
Di
l
u
t
i
o
n
Fa
c
t
o
r
Re
s
u
l
t
s
5

x

R
D
L
?
RP
D
RP
D

W
i
t
h
i
n
+/
-

5
0
%
fo
r

S
o
i
l
?
AR
S
E
N
I
C
60
1
0
B

m
g
/
k
g
2.
3
5

J
2.
5
1

R
D
L
1
3.
2
3
2.
5
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r
wi
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s
wa
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
BA
R
I
U
M
60
1
0
B

m
g
/
k
g
24
3
0.
6
2
6

R
D
L
1
27
3
0.
6
2
9

R
D
L
1
Ye
s
,

R
P
D

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
11
.
6
%
Ye
s
CA
D
M
I
U
M
60
1
0
B

m
g
/
k
g
0.
6
8
4
0.
6
2
6

R
D
L
1
0.
7
5
6
0.
6
2
9

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r
wi
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s
wa
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
CH
R
O
M
I
U
M
60
1
0
B

m
g
/
k
g
18
.
6
1.
2
5

R
D
L
1
21
1.
2
6

R
D
L
1
Ye
s
,

R
P
D

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
12
.
1
%
Ye
s
HE
X
A
V
A
L
E
N
T

C
H
R
O
M
I
U
M
71
9
9

m
g
/
k
g
ND
1.
2
5

R
D
L
1
ND
1.
2
6

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e
di
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
LE
A
D
60
1
0
B

m
g
/
k
g
57
.
1
0.
6
2
6

R
D
L
1
41
.
5
0.
6
2
9

R
D
L
1
Ye
s
,

R
P
D

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
31
.
6
%
Ye
s
ME
R
C
U
R
Y
74
7
1
A

m
g
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
5
0
1

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
5
0
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e
di
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
SE
L
E
N
I
U
M
60
1
0
B

m
g
/
k
g
1.
1
9

J
2.
5
1

R
D
L
1
ND
2.
5
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L

b
u
t

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

d
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e
s

r
e
s
u
l
t
s
(u
s
i
n
g

1
/
2

t
h
e

R
D
L

a
s

a

c
o
n
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
v
e

e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e

f
o
r

N
D
)

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
SI
L
V
E
R
60
1
0
B

m
g
/
k
g
ND
1.
2
5

R
D
L
1
ND
1.
2
6

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e
di
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
11
/
1
0
/
2
0
2
2
B-
8
0

@

S
U
R
F
A
C
E
L1
5
5
8
0
2
6
-
5
2
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

S
a
m
p
l
e
Da
t
e

C
o
l
l
e
c
t
e
d
Or
i
g
i
n
a
l

S
a
m
p
l
e
L1
5
5
8
0
2
6
-
1
5
B-
8

@

S
U
R
F
A
C
E
11
/
1
0
/
2
0
2
2
La
b

S
a
m
p
l
e

I
D
Cl
i
e
n
t

S
a
m
p
l
e

I
D
Pa
g
e

1

o
f

4
Ta
b
l
e

C
6
.
1

-

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

P
a
i
r
–
M
e
t
a
l
s

i
n

S
o
i
l
Fo
r
m
e
r

A
n
d
e
r
s
o
n

A
u
t
o

W
r
e
c
k
i
n
g

-

2
8
9
0

S
o
u
t
h

S
t
a
t
e

S
t
r
e
e
t

a
n
d

1
2
1
5

N
o
r
t
h

S
R

5
1
,

S
p
a
n
i
s
h

F
o
r
k

C
i
t
y
,

U
t
a
h

C
o
u
n
t
y
,

U
t
a
h
Te
r
r
a
c
o
n

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
o
.

6
1
2
2
7
1
8
6

T
a
s
k

3
.
3
An
a
l
y
t
e
Me
t
h
o
d

U
n
i
t
s

R
e
s
u
l
t

Q
Hi
g
h
Li
m
i
t
Hi
g
h
Li
m
i
t
Ty
p
e
Di
l
u
t
i
o
n
Fa
c
t
o
r
Re
s
u
l
t

Q
Hi
g
h
Li
m
i
t
Hi
g
h
Li
m
i
t
Ty
p
e
Di
l
u
t
i
o
n
Fa
c
t
o
r
Re
s
u
l
t
s
5

x

R
D
L
?
RP
D
RP
D

W
i
t
h
i
n
+/
-

5
0
%
fo
r

S
o
i
l
?
AR
S
E
N
I
C
60
1
0
B

m
g
/
k
g
2.
3
1

J
2.
5
6

R
D
L
1
3.
0
8
2.
5
5

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r
wi
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s
wa
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
BA
R
I
U
M
60
1
0
B

m
g
/
k
g
26
5
0.
6
4

R
D
L
1
31
6
0.
6
3
8

R
D
L
1
Ye
s
,

R
P
D

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
17
.
6
%
Ye
s
CA
D
M
I
U
M
60
1
0
B

m
g
/
k
g
0.
5
4
4

J
0.
6
4

R
D
L
1
0.
3
9
9

J

0
.
6
3
8

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r
wi
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s
wa
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
CH
R
O
M
I
U
M
60
1
0
B

m
g
/
k
g
18
.
5
1.
2
8

R
D
L
1
17
.
4
1.
2
8

R
D
L
1
Ye
s
,

R
P
D

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
6.
1
%
Ye
s
HE
X
A
V
A
L
E
N
T

C
H
R
O
M
I
U
M
71
9
9

m
g
/
k
g
ND
1.
2
8

R
D
L
1
ND
1.
2
8

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e
di
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
LE
A
D
60
1
0
B

m
g
/
k
g
12
.
9
0.
6
4

R
D
L
1
14
.
5
0.
6
3
8

R
D
L
1
Ye
s
,

R
P
D

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
11
.
7
%
Ye
s
ME
R
C
U
R
Y
74
7
1
A

m
g
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
5
1
2

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
5
1

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e
di
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
SE
L
E
N
I
U
M
60
1
0
B

m
g
/
k
g
1.
8
1

J
2.
5
6

R
D
L
1
ND
2.
5
5

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L

b
u
t

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

d
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e
s

r
e
s
u
l
t
s
(u
s
i
n
g

1
/
2

t
h
e

R
D
L

a
s

a

c
o
n
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
v
e

e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e

f
o
r

N
D
)

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
SI
L
V
E
R
60
1
0
B

m
g
/
k
g
ND
1.
2
8

R
D
L
1
ND
1.
2
8

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e
di
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
Or
i
g
i
n
a
l

S
a
m
p
l
e
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

S
a
m
p
l
e
La
b

S
a
m
p
l
e

I
D
L1
5
5
8
0
2
6
-
1
6
L1
5
5
8
0
2
6
-
5
3
Cl
i
e
n
t

S
a
m
p
l
e

I
D
B-
8

@

3
'
B-
8
0

@

3
'
Da
t
e

C
o
l
l
e
c
t
e
d
11
/
1
0
/
2
0
2
2
11
/
1
0
/
2
0
2
2
Pa
g
e

2

o
f

4
Ta
b
l
e

C
6
.
1

-

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

P
a
i
r
–
M
e
t
a
l
s

i
n

S
o
i
l
Fo
r
m
e
r

A
n
d
e
r
s
o
n

A
u
t
o

W
r
e
c
k
i
n
g

-

2
8
9
0

S
o
u
t
h

S
t
a
t
e

S
t
r
e
e
t

a
n
d

1
2
1
5

N
o
r
t
h

S
R

5
1
,

S
p
a
n
i
s
h

F
o
r
k

C
i
t
y
,

U
t
a
h

C
o
u
n
t
y
,

U
t
a
h
Te
r
r
a
c
o
n

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
o
.

6
1
2
2
7
1
8
6

T
a
s
k

3
.
3
An
a
l
y
t
e
Me
t
h
o
d

U
n
i
t
s

R
e
s
u
l
t

Q
Hi
g
h
Li
m
i
t
Hi
g
h
Li
m
i
t
Ty
p
e
Di
l
u
t
i
o
n
Fa
c
t
o
r
Re
s
u
l
t

Q
Hi
g
h
Li
m
i
t
Hi
g
h
Li
m
i
t
Ty
p
e
Di
l
u
t
i
o
n
Fa
c
t
o
r
Re
s
u
l
t
s
5

x

R
D
L
?
RP
D
RP
D

W
i
t
h
i
n
+/
-

5
0
%
fo
r

S
o
i
l
?
AR
S
E
N
I
C
60
1
0
B

m
g
/
k
g
7.
4
2
2.
6
2

R
D
L
1
5.
8
5
2.
6
4

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r
wi
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s
wa
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
BA
R
I
U
M
60
1
0
B

m
g
/
k
g
43
5
0.
6
5
5

R
D
L
1
61
0
0.
6
5
9

R
D
L
1
Ye
s
,

R
P
D

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
33
.
5
%
Ye
s
CA
D
M
I
U
M
60
1
0
B

m
g
/
k
g
0.
2
5
9

J

0
.
6
5
5

R
D
L
1
0.
1
5
4

J

0
.
6
5
9

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r
wi
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s
wa
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
CH
R
O
M
I
U
M
60
1
0
B

m
g
/
k
g
18
.
2
1.
3
1

R
D
L
1
14
.
9
1.
3
2

R
D
L
1
Ye
s
,

R
P
D

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
19
.
9
%
Ye
s
HE
X
A
V
A
L
E
N
T

C
H
R
O
M
I
U
M
71
9
9

m
g
/
k
g
ND
1.
3
1

R
D
L
1
ND
1.
3
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e
di
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
LE
A
D
60
1
0
B

m
g
/
k
g
7.
7
0.
6
5
5

R
D
L
1
6.
6
0.
6
5
9

R
D
L
1
Ye
s
,

R
P
D

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
15
.
4
%
Ye
s
ME
R
C
U
R
Y
74
7
1
A

m
g
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
5
2
4

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
5
2
7

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e
di
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
SE
L
E
N
I
U
M
60
1
0
B

m
g
/
k
g
ND
2.
6
2

R
D
L
1
ND
2.
6
4

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e
di
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
SI
L
V
E
R
60
1
0
B

m
g
/
k
g
ND
1.
3
1

R
D
L
1
ND
1.
3
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e
di
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
Da
t
e

C
o
l
l
e
c
t
e
d
11
/
0
9
/
2
0
2
2
11
/
0
9
/
2
0
2
2
Or
i
g
i
n
a
l

S
a
m
p
l
e
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

S
a
m
p
l
e
La
b

S
a
m
p
l
e

I
D
L1
5
5
8
0
2
6
-
4
4
L1
5
5
8
0
2
6
-
5
0
Cl
i
e
n
t

S
a
m
p
l
e

I
D
B-
1
4

@

S
U
R
F
A
C
E
B-
1
4
0

@

S
U
R
F
A
C
E
Pa
g
e

3

o
f

4
Ta
b
l
e

C
6
.
1

-

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

P
a
i
r
–
M
e
t
a
l
s

i
n

S
o
i
l
Fo
r
m
e
r

A
n
d
e
r
s
o
n

A
u
t
o

W
r
e
c
k
i
n
g

-

2
8
9
0

S
o
u
t
h

S
t
a
t
e

S
t
r
e
e
t

a
n
d

1
2
1
5

N
o
r
t
h

S
R

5
1
,

S
p
a
n
i
s
h

F
o
r
k

C
i
t
y
,

U
t
a
h

C
o
u
n
t
y
,

U
t
a
h
Te
r
r
a
c
o
n

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
o
.

6
1
2
2
7
1
8
6

T
a
s
k

3
.
3
An
a
l
y
t
e
Me
t
h
o
d

U
n
i
t
s

R
e
s
u
l
t

Q
Hi
g
h
Li
m
i
t
Hi
g
h
Li
m
i
t
Ty
p
e
Di
l
u
t
i
o
n
Fa
c
t
o
r
Re
s
u
l
t

Q
Hi
g
h
Li
m
i
t
Hi
g
h
Li
m
i
t
Ty
p
e
Di
l
u
t
i
o
n
Fa
c
t
o
r
Re
s
u
l
t
s
5

x

R
D
L
?
RP
D
RP
D

W
i
t
h
i
n
+/
-

5
0
%
fo
r

S
o
i
l
?
AR
S
E
N
I
C
60
1
0
B

m
g
/
k
g
11
.
3
2.
4
5

R
D
L
1
1.
8
8

J
2.
4
5

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r
no
t

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e
re
s
u
l
t
s

w
a
s

g
r
e
a
t
e
r

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
BA
R
I
U
M
60
1
0
B

m
g
/
k
g
16
8
0.
6
1
3

R
D
L
1
14
6
0.
6
1
2

R
D
L
1
Ye
s
,

R
P
D

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
14
.
0
%
Ye
s
CA
D
M
I
U
M
60
1
0
B

m
g
/
k
g
0.
4
9
6

J

0
.
6
1
3

R
D
L
1
0.
4
7
1

J

0
.
6
1
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r
wi
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s
wa
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
CH
R
O
M
I
U
M
60
1
0
B

m
g
/
k
g
22
.
5
1.
2
3

R
D
L
1
19
.
3
1.
2
2

R
D
L
1
Ye
s
,

R
P
D

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
15
.
3
%
Ye
s
HE
X
A
V
A
L
E
N
T

C
H
R
O
M
I
U
M
71
9
9

m
g
/
k
g
ND
1.
2
3

R
D
L
1
ND
1.
2
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e
di
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
LE
A
D
60
1
0
B

m
g
/
k
g
11
0.
6
1
3

R
D
L
1
10
.
3
0.
6
1
2

R
D
L
1
Ye
s
,

R
P
D

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
6.
6
%
Ye
s
ME
R
C
U
R
Y
74
7
1
A

m
g
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
4
9

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
4
9

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e
di
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
SE
L
E
N
I
U
M
60
1
0
B

m
g
/
k
g
ND
2.
4
5

R
D
L
1
ND
2.
4
5

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e
di
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
SI
L
V
E
R
60
1
0
B

m
g
/
k
g
ND
1.
2
3

R
D
L
1
ND
1.
2
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e
di
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
Qu
a
l
i
f
i
e
r
s

(
Q
)
:
J
-
T
h
e

i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n

o
f

t
h
e

a
n
a
l
y
t
e

i
s

a
c
c
e
p
t
a
b
l
e
;

t
h
e

r
e
p
o
r
t
e
d

v
a
l
u
e

i
s

a
n

e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
.
mg
/
k
g
:
Mi
l
l
i
g
r
a
m
s

p
e
r

k
i
l
o
g
r
a
m
.
RD
L

-

L
a
b
o
r
a
t
o
r
y

r
e
p
o
r
t
e
d

d
e
t
e
c
t
i
o
n

l
i
m
i
t
.
RP
D

-

R
e
l
a
t
i
v
e

P
e
r
c
e
n
t

D
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

w
a
s

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d

w
h
e
n

a
n
a
l
y
t
e

c
o
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
s

a
r
e

g
r
e
a
t
e
r

t
h
a
n

o
r

e
q
u
a
l

t
o

f
i
v
e

t
i
m
e
s

t
h
e

R
D
L
.

Q
A
/
Q
C

R
P
D

G
o
a
l

i
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

5
0
%

f
o
r

s
o
l
i
d

s
a
m
p
l
e
s
.
Fo
r

a
n
a
l
y
t
e
s

r
e
p
o
r
t
e
d

a
t

c
o
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

f
i
v
e

t
i
m
e
s

t
h
e

R
D
L
,

t
h
e

Q
A
/
Q
C

G
o
a
l

i
s

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

a
n
d

i
t
s

d
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

i
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

t
w
o

t
i
m
e
s

t
h
e

R
D
L

f
o
r

s
o
l
i
d

s
a
m
p
l
e
s
.
Cl
i
e
n
t

S
a
m
p
l
e

I
D
B-
1
4

@

1
0
'
B-
1
4
0

@

1
0
'
Da
t
e

C
o
l
l
e
c
t
e
d
11
/
0
9
/
2
0
2
2
11
/
0
9
/
2
0
2
2
Or
i
g
i
n
a
l

S
a
m
p
l
e
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

S
a
m
p
l
e
La
b

S
a
m
p
l
e

I
D
L1
5
5
8
0
2
6
-
4
5
L1
5
5
8
0
2
6
-
5
1
Bo
l
d

v
a
l
u
e
ex
c
e
e
d
s

M
e
t
h
o
d

D
e
t
e
c
t
i
o
n

L
i
m
i
t

(
M
D
L
)
.

C
o
l
o
r

s
h
a
d
e
d

v
a
l
u
e

e
x
c
e
e
d
s

s
c
r
e
e
n
i
n
g

l
e
v
e
l
.
Pa
g
e

4

o
f

4
Ta
b
l
e

C
6
.
2

-

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

P
a
i
r
–
V
O
C
s

a
n
d

P
e
t
r
o
l
e
u
m

H
y
d
r
o
c
a
r
b
o
n
s

i
n

S
o
i
l
s
Fo
r
m
e
r

A
n
d
e
r
s
o
n

A
u
t
o

W
r
e
c
k
i
n
g

-

2
8
9
0

S
o
u
t
h

S
t
a
t
e

S
t
r
e
e
t

a
n
d

1
2
1
5

N
o
r
t
h

S
R

5
1
,

S
p
a
n
i
s
h

F
o
r
k

C
i
t
y
,

U
t
a
h

C
o
u
n
t
y
,

U
t
a
h
Te
r
r
a
c
o
n

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
o
.

6
1
2
2
7
1
8
6

T
a
s
k

3
.
3
An
a
l
y
t
e
Me
t
h
o
d

U
n
i
t
s

R
e
s
u
l
t
Q
Hi
g
h
Li
m
i
t
Hi
g
h
Li
m
i
t
Ty
p
e
Di
l
u
t
i
o
n
Fa
c
t
o
r
Re
s
u
l
t

Q
Hi
g
h
Li
m
i
t
Hi
g
h
Li
m
i
t
Ty
p
e
Di
l
u
t
i
o
n
Fa
c
t
o
r
Re
s
u
l
t
s
5

x

R
D
L
?
RP
D
RP
D

W
i
t
h
i
n
+/
-

5
0
%
fo
r

S
o
i
l
?
TP
H
-
G
R
O
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
0.
4
4
4
J
0.
6
2
6

R
D
L
1
0.
6
2
6

J

V
3
0.
6
2
9

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
TP
H
-
D
R
O
80
1
5
mg
/
k
g
7.
0
7
5.
0
1

R
D
L
1
14
.
5
5.
0
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
TR
P
H
90
7
1
B
mg
/
k
g
63
0
J3

J
6
12
5
RD
L
1
79
0
12
6
RD
L
1
Ye
s
,

R
P
D

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
22
.
5
%
Ye
s
1,
1
,
1
,
2
-
T
E
T
R
A
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
0.
5
9
4
0.
0
6
2
6
RD
L
1
0.
5
9
V3
0.
0
6
2
9
RD
L
1
Ye
s
,

R
P
D

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
0.
7
%
Ye
s
1,
1
,
1
-
T
R
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
1
2
5

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
1
2
6

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
1
,
2
,
2
-
T
E
T
R
A
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
0.
0
1
8
7
0.
0
0
1
3
RD
L
1
0.
0
3
2
5
V3
0.
0
0
1
3
RD
L
1
Ye
s
,

R
P
D

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
53
.
9
%
NO
1,
1
,
2
-
T
R
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
1
,
2
-
T
R
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
T
R
I
F
L
U
O
R
O
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
1
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
1
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
6
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
6
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
1
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
P
R
O
P
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
0.
0
0
0
4

J

V
3

0
.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

R
D
L

b
u
t

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e
pa
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

d
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e
sa
m
p
l
e
s

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

(
u
s
i
n
g

1
/
2

t
h
e

R
D
L

a
s

a

c
o
n
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
v
e

e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e

f
o
r

N
D
)

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
1,
2
,
3
-
T
R
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
2
,
3
-
T
R
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
P
R
O
P
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
2
,
3
-
T
R
I
M
E
T
H
Y
L
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
2
,
4
-
T
R
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
2
,
4
-
T
R
I
M
E
T
H
Y
L
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
2
-
D
I
B
R
O
M
O
-
3
-
C
H
L
O
R
O
P
R
O
P
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
6
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
6
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
Or
i
g
i
n
a
l

S
a
m
p
l
e
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

S
a
m
p
l
e
Cl
i
e
n
t

S
a
m
p
l
e

I
D
B-
8

@

S
U
R
F
A
C
E
B-
8
0

@

S
U
R
F
A
C
E
Da
t
e

C
o
l
l
e
c
t
e
d
11
/
1
0
/
2
0
2
2
11
/
1
0
/
2
0
2
2
La
b

S
a
m
p
l
e

I
D
L1
5
5
8
0
2
6
-
1
5
L1
5
5
8
0
2
6
-
5
2
Pa
g
e

1

o
f

1
6
Ta
b
l
e

C
6
.
2

-

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

P
a
i
r
–
V
O
C
s

a
n
d

P
e
t
r
o
l
e
u
m

H
y
d
r
o
c
a
r
b
o
n
s

i
n

S
o
i
l
s
Fo
r
m
e
r

A
n
d
e
r
s
o
n

A
u
t
o

W
r
e
c
k
i
n
g

-

2
8
9
0

S
o
u
t
h

S
t
a
t
e

S
t
r
e
e
t

a
n
d

1
2
1
5

N
o
r
t
h

S
R

5
1
,

S
p
a
n
i
s
h

F
o
r
k

C
i
t
y
,

U
t
a
h

C
o
u
n
t
y
,

U
t
a
h
Te
r
r
a
c
o
n

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
o
.

6
1
2
2
7
1
8
6

T
a
s
k

3
.
3
1,
2
-
D
I
B
R
O
M
O
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
6
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
6
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
2
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
3
1

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
3
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
2
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
2
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
P
R
O
P
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
3
,
5
-
T
R
I
M
E
T
H
Y
L
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
6
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
6
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
3
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
3
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
P
R
O
P
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
4
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
2,
2
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
P
R
O
P
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
2-
B
U
T
A
N
O
N
E

(
M
E
K
)
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
2-
C
H
L
O
R
O
T
O
L
U
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
6
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
6
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
4-
C
H
L
O
R
O
T
O
L
U
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
4-
M
E
T
H
Y
L
-
2
-
P
E
N
T
A
N
O
N
E

(
M
I
B
K
)
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
AC
E
T
O
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
AC
R
Y
L
O
N
I
T
R
I
L
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
BE
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
BR
O
M
O
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
BR
O
M
O
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
M
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
Pa
g
e

2

o
f

1
6
Ta
b
l
e

C
6
.
2

-

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

P
a
i
r
–
V
O
C
s

a
n
d

P
e
t
r
o
l
e
u
m

H
y
d
r
o
c
a
r
b
o
n
s

i
n

S
o
i
l
s
Fo
r
m
e
r

A
n
d
e
r
s
o
n

A
u
t
o

W
r
e
c
k
i
n
g

-

2
8
9
0

S
o
u
t
h

S
t
a
t
e

S
t
r
e
e
t

a
n
d

1
2
1
5

N
o
r
t
h

S
R

5
1
,

S
p
a
n
i
s
h

F
o
r
k

C
i
t
y
,

U
t
a
h

C
o
u
n
t
y
,

U
t
a
h
Te
r
r
a
c
o
n

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
o
.

6
1
2
2
7
1
8
6

T
a
s
k

3
.
3
BR
O
M
O
F
O
R
M
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
BR
O
M
O
M
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
CA
R
B
O
N

T
E
T
R
A
C
H
L
O
R
I
D
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
CH
L
O
R
O
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
CH
L
O
R
O
D
I
B
R
O
M
O
M
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
CH
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g

0
.
0
0
5
7
8
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
0.
0
1
0
5

V
3

0
.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

>

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t
ca
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

n
o
t

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
be
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

w
a
s

g
r
e
a
t
e
r

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
CH
L
O
R
O
F
O
R
M
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
CH
L
O
R
O
M
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
0.
0
0
0
8

J

V
3

0
.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

R
D
L

b
u
t

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e
pa
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

d
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e
sa
m
p
l
e
s

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

(
u
s
i
n
g

1
/
2

t
h
e

R
D
L

a
s

a

c
o
n
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
v
e

e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e

f
o
r

N
D
)

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
CI
S
-
1
,
2
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
CI
S
-
1
,
3
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
P
R
O
P
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
0.
0
7
5
1
0.
0
1
2
5
RD
L
1
0.
1
3
V3
0.
0
1
2
6
RD
L
1
Ye
s
,

R
P
D

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
53
.
5
%
NO
DI
B
R
O
M
O
M
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g

0
.
0
0
1
8
7

B

J

0
.
0
0
6
3

R
D
L
1
0.
0
0
5
8
B
J

V
3
0.
0
0
6
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
DI
C
H
L
O
R
O
D
I
F
L
U
O
R
O
M
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g

0
.
0
0
3
9
5
J

0
.
0
1
2
5

R
D
L
1
0.
0
0
7
3

J

V
3

0
.
0
1
2
6

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
DI
-
I
S
O
P
R
O
P
Y
L

E
T
H
E
R
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
ET
H
Y
L
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
6
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
6
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
HE
X
A
C
H
L
O
R
O
-
1
,
3
-
B
U
T
A
D
I
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g

0
.
0
0
0
7
4
J

0
.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
0.
0
0
1
2

J

V
3

0
.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
Pa
g
e

3

o
f

1
6
Ta
b
l
e

C
6
.
2

-

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

P
a
i
r
–
V
O
C
s

a
n
d

P
e
t
r
o
l
e
u
m

H
y
d
r
o
c
a
r
b
o
n
s

i
n

S
o
i
l
s
Fo
r
m
e
r

A
n
d
e
r
s
o
n

A
u
t
o

W
r
e
c
k
i
n
g

-

2
8
9
0

S
o
u
t
h

S
t
a
t
e

S
t
r
e
e
t

a
n
d

1
2
1
5

N
o
r
t
h

S
R

5
1
,

S
p
a
n
i
s
h

F
o
r
k

C
i
t
y
,

U
t
a
h

C
o
u
n
t
y
,

U
t
a
h
Te
r
r
a
c
o
n

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
o
.

6
1
2
2
7
1
8
6

T
a
s
k

3
.
3
IS
O
P
R
O
P
Y
L
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
ME
T
H
Y
L

T
E
R
T
-
B
U
T
Y
L

E
T
H
E
R
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
ME
T
H
Y
L
E
N
E

C
H
L
O
R
I
D
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
NA
P
H
T
H
A
L
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
N-
B
U
T
Y
L
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
N-
P
R
O
P
Y
L
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
0.
0
2
1
9
0.
0
0
6
3

R
D
L
1
0.
0
4
2
7

V
3

0
.
0
0
6
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

>

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t
ca
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

n
o
t

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
be
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

w
a
s

g
r
e
a
t
e
r

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
P-
I
S
O
P
R
O
P
Y
L
T
O
L
U
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
SE
C
-
B
U
T
Y
L
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
ST
Y
R
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
TE
R
T
-
B
U
T
Y
L
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
TE
T
R
A
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
TO
L
U
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
6
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
6
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
TR
A
N
S
-
1
,
2
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
3
1

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
3
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
TR
A
N
S
-
1
,
3
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
P
R
O
P
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g

0
.
0
0
1
2
9
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
0.
0
0
2
5

V
3

0
.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
TR
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g

0
.
0
0
0
5
3
J

0
.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
0.
0
0
0
9

J

V
3

0
.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
TR
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
F
L
U
O
R
O
M
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
0.
0
0
0
6
J

0
.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
0.
0
0
1
1

J

V
3

0
.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
VI
N
Y
L

C
H
L
O
R
I
D
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
XY
L
E
N
E
S
,

T
O
T
A
L
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g

0
.
0
0
8
0
4
0.
0
0
3
8

R
D
L
1
0.
0
1
5
7

V
3

0
.
0
0
3
8

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

n
o
t

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l
an
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

w
a
s

g
r
e
a
t
e
r

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
Pa
g
e

4

o
f

1
6
Ta
b
l
e

C
6
.
2

-

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

P
a
i
r
–
V
O
C
s

a
n
d

P
e
t
r
o
l
e
u
m

H
y
d
r
o
c
a
r
b
o
n
s

i
n

S
o
i
l
s
Fo
r
m
e
r

A
n
d
e
r
s
o
n

A
u
t
o

W
r
e
c
k
i
n
g

-

2
8
9
0

S
o
u
t
h

S
t
a
t
e

S
t
r
e
e
t

a
n
d

1
2
1
5

N
o
r
t
h

S
R

5
1
,

S
p
a
n
i
s
h

F
o
r
k

C
i
t
y
,

U
t
a
h

C
o
u
n
t
y
,

U
t
a
h
Te
r
r
a
c
o
n

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
o
.

6
1
2
2
7
1
8
6

T
a
s
k

3
.
3
An
a
l
y
t
e
Me
t
h
o
d

U
n
i
t
s

R
e
s
u
l
t
Q
Hi
g
h
Li
m
i
t
Hi
g
h
Li
m
i
t
Ty
p
e
Di
l
u
t
i
o
n
Fa
c
t
o
r
Re
s
u
l
t

Q
Hi
g
h
Li
m
i
t
Hi
g
h
Li
m
i
t
Ty
p
e
Di
l
u
t
i
o
n
Fa
c
t
o
r
Re
s
u
l
t
s
5

x

R
D
L
?
RP
D
RP
D

W
i
t
h
i
n
+/
-

5
0
%
fo
r

S
o
i
l
?
TP
H
-
G
R
O
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
0.
4
1
6
J
0.
6
4

R
D
L
1
0.
7
2
9

V
3
0.
6
3
8

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
TP
H
-
D
R
O
80
1
5
mg
/
k
g
4.
4
6
J
5.
1
2

R
D
L
1
2.
1
3
J
5.
1

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
TR
P
H
90
7
1
B
mg
/
k
g
11
2
J
12
8

R
D
L
1
12
4
J
128
R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
1
,
1
,
2
-
T
E
T
R
A
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
0.
1
6
4
0.
0
6
4

R
D
L
1
0.
2
0
5

V
3

0
.
0
6
3
8

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
1
,
1
-
T
R
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
1
2
8

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
1
2
8

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
1
,
2
,
2
-
T
E
T
R
A
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
0.
0
1
7
0.
0
0
1
3
RD
L
1
0.
0
3
8
V3
0.
0
0
1
3
RD
L
1
Ye
s
,

R
P
D

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
76
.
4
%
NO
1,
1
,
2
-
T
R
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
1
,
2
-
T
R
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
T
R
I
F
L
U
O
R
O
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
1
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
1
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
6
4

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
6
4

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
1
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
P
R
O
P
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
0.
0
0
0
3

J

V
3

0
.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

R
D
L

b
u
t

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e
pa
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

d
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e
sa
m
p
l
e
s

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

(
u
s
i
n
g

1
/
2

t
h
e

R
D
L

a
s

a

c
o
n
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
v
e

e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e

f
o
r

N
D
)

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
1,
2
,
3
-
T
R
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
2
,
3
-
T
R
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
P
R
O
P
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
2
,
3
-
T
R
I
M
E
T
H
Y
L
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
2
,
4
-
T
R
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
2
,
4
-
T
R
I
M
E
T
H
Y
L
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
Da
t
e

C
o
l
l
e
c
t
e
d
11
/
1
0
/
2
0
2
2
11
/
1
0
/
2
0
2
2
La
b

S
a
m
p
l
e

I
D
L1
5
5
8
0
2
6
-
1
6
L1
5
5
8
0
2
6
-
5
3
Cl
i
e
n
t

S
a
m
p
l
e

I
D
B-
8

@

3
'
B-
8
0

@

3
'
Or
i
g
i
n
a
l

S
a
m
p
l
e
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

S
a
m
p
l
e
Pa
g
e

5

o
f

1
6
Ta
b
l
e

C
6
.
2

-

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

P
a
i
r
–
V
O
C
s

a
n
d

P
e
t
r
o
l
e
u
m

H
y
d
r
o
c
a
r
b
o
n
s

i
n

S
o
i
l
s
Fo
r
m
e
r

A
n
d
e
r
s
o
n

A
u
t
o

W
r
e
c
k
i
n
g

-

2
8
9
0

S
o
u
t
h

S
t
a
t
e

S
t
r
e
e
t

a
n
d

1
2
1
5

N
o
r
t
h

S
R

5
1
,

S
p
a
n
i
s
h

F
o
r
k

C
i
t
y
,

U
t
a
h

C
o
u
n
t
y
,

U
t
a
h
Te
r
r
a
c
o
n

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
o
.

6
1
2
2
7
1
8
6

T
a
s
k

3
.
3
1,
2
-
D
I
B
R
O
M
O
-
3
-
C
H
L
O
R
O
P
R
O
P
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
6
4

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
6
4

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
2
-
D
I
B
R
O
M
O
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
6
4

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
6
4

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
2
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
3
2

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
3
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
2
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
2
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
P
R
O
P
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
3
,
5
-
T
R
I
M
E
T
H
Y
L
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
6
4

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
6
4

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
3
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
3
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
P
R
O
P
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
4
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
2,
2
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
P
R
O
P
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
2-
B
U
T
A
N
O
N
E

(
M
E
K
)
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
2-
C
H
L
O
R
O
T
O
L
U
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
6
4

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
6
4

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
4-
C
H
L
O
R
O
T
O
L
U
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
4-
M
E
T
H
Y
L
-
2
-
P
E
N
T
A
N
O
N
E

(
M
I
B
K
)
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
AC
E
T
O
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
AC
R
Y
L
O
N
I
T
R
I
L
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
BE
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
BR
O
M
O
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
Pa
g
e

6

o
f

1
6
Ta
b
l
e

C
6
.
2

-

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

P
a
i
r
–
V
O
C
s

a
n
d

P
e
t
r
o
l
e
u
m

H
y
d
r
o
c
a
r
b
o
n
s

i
n

S
o
i
l
s
Fo
r
m
e
r

A
n
d
e
r
s
o
n

A
u
t
o

W
r
e
c
k
i
n
g

-

2
8
9
0

S
o
u
t
h

S
t
a
t
e

S
t
r
e
e
t

a
n
d

1
2
1
5

N
o
r
t
h

S
R

5
1
,

S
p
a
n
i
s
h

F
o
r
k

C
i
t
y
,

U
t
a
h

C
o
u
n
t
y
,

U
t
a
h
Te
r
r
a
c
o
n

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
o
.

6
1
2
2
7
1
8
6

T
a
s
k

3
.
3
BR
O
M
O
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
M
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
BR
O
M
O
F
O
R
M
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
BR
O
M
O
M
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
CA
R
B
O
N

T
E
T
R
A
C
H
L
O
R
I
D
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
CH
L
O
R
O
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
CH
L
O
R
O
D
I
B
R
O
M
O
M
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
CH
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g

0
.
0
0
4
8
1
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND

V
3

0
.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
CH
L
O
R
O
F
O
R
M
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
CH
L
O
R
O
M
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
0.
0
0
0
9

J

V
3

0
.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

R
D
L

b
u
t

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e
pa
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

d
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e
sa
m
p
l
e
s

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

(
u
s
i
n
g

1
/
2

t
h
e

R
D
L

a
s

a

c
o
n
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
v
e

e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e

f
o
r

N
D
)

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
CI
S
-
1
,
2
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
CI
S
-
1
,
3
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
P
R
O
P
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
0.
0
3
4
5
0.
0
1
2
8

R
D
L
1
0.
0
4
7
9

V
3

0
.
0
1
2
8

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
DI
B
R
O
M
O
M
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g

0
.
0
0
1
8
8

B

J

0
.
0
0
6
4

R
D
L
1
0.
0
0
5
8
B
J

V
3
0.
0
0
6
4

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
DI
C
H
L
O
R
O
D
I
F
L
U
O
R
O
M
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g

0
.
0
0
1
9
3
J

0
.
0
1
2
8

R
D
L
1
0.
0
0
3
9

J

V
3

0
.
0
1
2
8

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
DI
-
I
S
O
P
R
O
P
Y
L

E
T
H
E
R
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
ET
H
Y
L
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
6
4

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
6
4

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
HE
X
A
C
H
L
O
R
O
-
1
,
3
-
B
U
T
A
D
I
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g

0
.
0
0
0
6
6
J

0
.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
0.
0
0
1
4

V
3

0
.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
IS
O
P
R
O
P
Y
L
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
ME
T
H
Y
L

T
E
R
T
-
B
U
T
Y
L

E
T
H
E
R
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
Pa
g
e

7

o
f

1
6
Ta
b
l
e

C
6
.
2

-

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

P
a
i
r
–
V
O
C
s

a
n
d

P
e
t
r
o
l
e
u
m

H
y
d
r
o
c
a
r
b
o
n
s

i
n

S
o
i
l
s
Fo
r
m
e
r

A
n
d
e
r
s
o
n

A
u
t
o

W
r
e
c
k
i
n
g

-

2
8
9
0

S
o
u
t
h

S
t
a
t
e

S
t
r
e
e
t

a
n
d

1
2
1
5

N
o
r
t
h

S
R

5
1
,

S
p
a
n
i
s
h

F
o
r
k

C
i
t
y
,

U
t
a
h

C
o
u
n
t
y
,

U
t
a
h
Te
r
r
a
c
o
n

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
o
.

6
1
2
2
7
1
8
6

T
a
s
k

3
.
3
ME
T
H
Y
L
E
N
E

C
H
L
O
R
I
D
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
NA
P
H
T
H
A
L
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
N-
B
U
T
Y
L
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
N-
P
R
O
P
Y
L
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
0.
0
1
8
4
0.
0
0
6
4

R
D
L
1
0.
0
4
6
3

V
3

0
.
0
0
6
4

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

>

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t
ca
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

n
o
t

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
be
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

w
a
s

g
r
e
a
t
e
r

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
P-
I
S
O
P
R
O
P
Y
L
T
O
L
U
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
SE
C
-
B
U
T
Y
L
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
ST
Y
R
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
TE
R
T
-
B
U
T
Y
L
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
TE
T
R
A
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
TO
L
U
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
6
4

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
6
4

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
TR
A
N
S
-
1
,
2
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
3
2

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
3
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
TR
A
N
S
-
1
,
3
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
P
R
O
P
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g

0
.
0
0
1
1
2
J

0
.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
0.
0
0
2
2

V
3

0
.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
TR
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g

0
.
0
0
0
4
4
J

0
.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
0.
0
0
0
8

J

V
3

0
.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
TR
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
F
L
U
O
R
O
M
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
0.
0
0
0
5
J

0
.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
0.
0
0
1

J

V
3

0
.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
VI
N
Y
L

C
H
L
O
R
I
D
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
XY
L
E
N
E
S
,

T
O
T
A
L
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g

0
.
0
0
6
5
1
0.
0
0
3
8

R
D
L
1
0.
0
1
6
2

V
3

0
.
0
0
3
8

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

n
o
t

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l
an
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

w
a
s

g
r
e
a
t
e
r

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
Pa
g
e

8

o
f

1
6
Ta
b
l
e

C
6
.
2

-

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

P
a
i
r
–
V
O
C
s

a
n
d

P
e
t
r
o
l
e
u
m

H
y
d
r
o
c
a
r
b
o
n
s

i
n

S
o
i
l
s
Fo
r
m
e
r

A
n
d
e
r
s
o
n

A
u
t
o

W
r
e
c
k
i
n
g

-

2
8
9
0

S
o
u
t
h

S
t
a
t
e

S
t
r
e
e
t

a
n
d

1
2
1
5

N
o
r
t
h

S
R

5
1
,

S
p
a
n
i
s
h

F
o
r
k

C
i
t
y
,

U
t
a
h

C
o
u
n
t
y
,

U
t
a
h
Te
r
r
a
c
o
n

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
o
.

6
1
2
2
7
1
8
6

T
a
s
k

3
.
3
An
a
l
y
t
e
Me
t
h
o
d

U
n
i
t
s

R
e
s
u
l
t
Q
Hi
g
h
Li
m
i
t
Hi
g
h
Li
m
i
t
Ty
p
e
Di
l
u
t
i
o
n
Fa
c
t
o
r
Re
s
u
l
t

Q
Hi
g
h
Li
m
i
t
Hi
g
h
Li
m
i
t
Ty
p
e
Di
l
u
t
i
o
n
Fa
c
t
o
r
Re
s
u
l
t
s
5

x

R
D
L
?
RP
D
RP
D

W
i
t
h
i
n
+/
-

5
0
%
fo
r

S
o
i
l
?
TP
H
-
G
R
O
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
0.
4
4
4
J
0.
6
2
6

R
D
L
1
0.
3
1
5
J
0.
6
5
9

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
TP
H
-
D
R
O
80
1
5
mg
/
k
g
7.
0
7
5.
0
1

R
D
L
1
ND
5.
2
7

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L

b
u
t

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e
pa
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

d
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e
sa
m
p
l
e
s

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

(
u
s
i
n
g

1
/
2

t
h
e

R
D
L

a
s

a

c
o
n
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
v
e

e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e

f
o
r

N
D
)

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
TR
P
H
90
7
1
B
mg
/
k
g
63
0

J
3

J
6
12
5

R
D
L
1
11
5
J
132
R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

>

5

x

R
D
L

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t
ca
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

n
o
t

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
be
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

w
a
s

g
r
e
a
t
e
r

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
1
,
1
,
2
-
T
E
T
R
A
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
0.
5
9
4
0.
0
6
2
6

R
D
L
1
0.
0
6
2
2
J

0
.
0
6
5
9

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

>

5

x

R
D
L

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t
ca
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

n
o
t

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
be
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

w
a
s

g
r
e
a
t
e
r

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
1
,
1
-
T
R
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
1
2
5

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
1
3
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
1
,
2
,
2
-
T
E
T
R
A
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
0.
0
1
8
7
0.
0
0
1
3
RD
L
1
0.
0
0
8
0.
0
0
1
3
RD
L
1
Ye
s
,

R
P
D

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
80
.
4
%
NO
1,
1
,
2
-
T
R
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
1
,
2
-
T
R
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
T
R
I
F
L
U
O
R
O
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
1
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
1
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
6
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
6
6

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
1
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
P
R
O
P
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
2
,
3
-
T
R
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
2
,
3
-
T
R
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
P
R
O
P
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
2
,
3
-
T
R
I
M
E
T
H
Y
L
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
2
,
4
-
T
R
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
Da
t
e

C
o
l
l
e
c
t
e
d
11
/
0
9
/
2
0
2
2
11
/
0
9
/
2
0
2
2
La
b

S
a
m
p
l
e

I
D
L1
5
5
8
0
2
6
-
4
4
L1
5
5
8
0
2
6
-
5
0
Cl
i
e
n
t

S
a
m
p
l
e

I
D
B-
1
4

@

S
U
R
F
A
C
E
B-
1
4
0

@

S
U
R
F
A
C
E
Or
i
g
i
n
a
l

S
a
m
p
l
e
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

S
a
m
p
l
e
Pa
g
e

9

o
f

1
6
Ta
b
l
e

C
6
.
2

-

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

P
a
i
r
–
V
O
C
s

a
n
d

P
e
t
r
o
l
e
u
m

H
y
d
r
o
c
a
r
b
o
n
s

i
n

S
o
i
l
s
Fo
r
m
e
r

A
n
d
e
r
s
o
n

A
u
t
o

W
r
e
c
k
i
n
g

-

2
8
9
0

S
o
u
t
h

S
t
a
t
e

S
t
r
e
e
t

a
n
d

1
2
1
5

N
o
r
t
h

S
R

5
1
,

S
p
a
n
i
s
h

F
o
r
k

C
i
t
y
,

U
t
a
h

C
o
u
n
t
y
,

U
t
a
h
Te
r
r
a
c
o
n

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
o
.

6
1
2
2
7
1
8
6

T
a
s
k

3
.
3
1,
2
,
4
-
T
R
I
M
E
T
H
Y
L
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
2
-
D
I
B
R
O
M
O
-
3
-
C
H
L
O
R
O
P
R
O
P
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
6
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
6
6

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
2
-
D
I
B
R
O
M
O
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
6
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
6
6

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
2
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
3
1

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
3
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
2
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
2
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
P
R
O
P
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
3
,
5
-
T
R
I
M
E
T
H
Y
L
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
6
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
6
6

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
3
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
3
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
P
R
O
P
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
4
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
2,
2
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
P
R
O
P
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
2-
B
U
T
A
N
O
N
E

(
M
E
K
)
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
2-
C
H
L
O
R
O
T
O
L
U
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
6
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
6
6

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
4-
C
H
L
O
R
O
T
O
L
U
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
4-
M
E
T
H
Y
L
-
2
-
P
E
N
T
A
N
O
N
E

(
M
I
B
K
)
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
AC
E
T
O
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
AC
R
Y
L
O
N
I
T
R
I
L
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
BE
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
Pa
g
e

1
0

o
f

1
6
Ta
b
l
e

C
6
.
2

-

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

P
a
i
r
–
V
O
C
s

a
n
d

P
e
t
r
o
l
e
u
m

H
y
d
r
o
c
a
r
b
o
n
s

i
n

S
o
i
l
s
Fo
r
m
e
r

A
n
d
e
r
s
o
n

A
u
t
o

W
r
e
c
k
i
n
g

-

2
8
9
0

S
o
u
t
h

S
t
a
t
e

S
t
r
e
e
t

a
n
d

1
2
1
5

N
o
r
t
h

S
R

5
1
,

S
p
a
n
i
s
h

F
o
r
k

C
i
t
y
,

U
t
a
h

C
o
u
n
t
y
,

U
t
a
h
Te
r
r
a
c
o
n

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
o
.

6
1
2
2
7
1
8
6

T
a
s
k

3
.
3
BR
O
M
O
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
BR
O
M
O
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
M
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
BR
O
M
O
F
O
R
M
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
BR
O
M
O
M
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
CA
R
B
O
N

T
E
T
R
A
C
H
L
O
R
I
D
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
CH
L
O
R
O
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
CH
L
O
R
O
D
I
B
R
O
M
O
M
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
CH
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g

0
.
0
0
5
7
8
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
0.
0
0
5
2
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
CH
L
O
R
O
F
O
R
M
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
CH
L
O
R
O
M
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
CI
S
-
1
,
2
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
CI
S
-
1
,
3
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
P
R
O
P
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
0.
0
7
5
1
0.
0
1
2
5

R
D
L
1
0.
0
1
2
8
J

0
.
0
1
3
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

>

5

x

R
D
L

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t
ca
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

n
o
t

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
be
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

w
a
s

g
r
e
a
t
e
r

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
DI
B
R
O
M
O
M
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g

0
.
0
0
1
8
7

B

J

0
.
0
0
6
3

R
D
L
1
0.
0
0
2
5

B

J

0
.
0
0
6
6

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
DI
C
H
L
O
R
O
D
I
F
L
U
O
R
O
M
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g

0
.
0
0
3
9
5
J

0
.
0
1
2
5

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
1
3
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L

b
u
t

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e
pa
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

d
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e
sa
m
p
l
e
s

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

(
u
s
i
n
g

1
/
2

t
h
e

R
D
L

a
s

a

c
o
n
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
v
e

e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e

f
o
r

N
D
)

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
DI
-
I
S
O
P
R
O
P
Y
L

E
T
H
E
R
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
ET
H
Y
L
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
6
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
6
6

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
HE
X
A
C
H
L
O
R
O
-
1
,
3
-
B
U
T
A
D
I
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g

0
.
0
0
0
7
4
J

0
.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
0.
0
0
0
7
J

0
.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
Pa
g
e

1
1

o
f

1
6
Ta
b
l
e

C
6
.
2

-

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

P
a
i
r
–
V
O
C
s

a
n
d

P
e
t
r
o
l
e
u
m

H
y
d
r
o
c
a
r
b
o
n
s

i
n

S
o
i
l
s
Fo
r
m
e
r

A
n
d
e
r
s
o
n

A
u
t
o

W
r
e
c
k
i
n
g

-

2
8
9
0

S
o
u
t
h

S
t
a
t
e

S
t
r
e
e
t

a
n
d

1
2
1
5

N
o
r
t
h

S
R

5
1
,

S
p
a
n
i
s
h

F
o
r
k

C
i
t
y
,

U
t
a
h

C
o
u
n
t
y
,

U
t
a
h
Te
r
r
a
c
o
n

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
o
.

6
1
2
2
7
1
8
6

T
a
s
k

3
.
3
IS
O
P
R
O
P
Y
L
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
ME
T
H
Y
L

T
E
R
T
-
B
U
T
Y
L

E
T
H
E
R
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
ME
T
H
Y
L
E
N
E

C
H
L
O
R
I
D
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
NA
P
H
T
H
A
L
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
N-
B
U
T
Y
L
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
N-
P
R
O
P
Y
L
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
0.
0
2
1
9
0.
0
0
6
3

R
D
L
1
0.
0
1
4
0.
0
0
6
6

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
P-
I
S
O
P
R
O
P
Y
L
T
O
L
U
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
SE
C
-
B
U
T
Y
L
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
ST
Y
R
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
TE
R
T
-
B
U
T
Y
L
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
TE
T
R
A
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
TO
L
U
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
6
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
6
6

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
TR
A
N
S
-
1
,
2
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
3
1

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
3
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
TR
A
N
S
-
1
,
3
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
P
R
O
P
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g

0
.
0
0
1
2
9
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
0.
0
0
1
3
J

0
.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
TR
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g

0
.
0
0
0
5
3
J

0
.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
0.
0
0
0
4
J

0
.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
TR
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
F
L
U
O
R
O
M
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
0.
0
0
0
6
J

0
.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
0.
0
0
0
5
J

0
.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
VI
N
Y
L

C
H
L
O
R
I
D
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
3

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
XY
L
E
N
E
S
,

T
O
T
A
L
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g

0
.
0
0
8
0
4
0.
0
0
3
8

R
D
L
1
0.
0
0
6
2
0.
0
0
4

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
Pa
g
e

1
2

o
f

1
6
Ta
b
l
e

C
6
.
2

-

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

P
a
i
r
–
V
O
C
s

a
n
d

P
e
t
r
o
l
e
u
m

H
y
d
r
o
c
a
r
b
o
n
s

i
n

S
o
i
l
s
Fo
r
m
e
r

A
n
d
e
r
s
o
n

A
u
t
o

W
r
e
c
k
i
n
g

-

2
8
9
0

S
o
u
t
h

S
t
a
t
e

S
t
r
e
e
t

a
n
d

1
2
1
5

N
o
r
t
h

S
R

5
1
,

S
p
a
n
i
s
h

F
o
r
k

C
i
t
y
,

U
t
a
h

C
o
u
n
t
y
,

U
t
a
h
Te
r
r
a
c
o
n

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
o
.

6
1
2
2
7
1
8
6

T
a
s
k

3
.
3
An
a
l
y
t
e
Me
t
h
o
d

U
n
i
t
s

R
e
s
u
l
t
Q
Hi
g
h
Li
m
i
t
Hi
g
h
Li
m
i
t
Ty
p
e
Di
l
u
t
i
o
n
Fa
c
t
o
r
Re
s
u
l
t

Q
Hi
g
h
Li
m
i
t
Hi
g
h
Li
m
i
t
Ty
p
e
Di
l
u
t
i
o
n
Fa
c
t
o
r
Re
s
u
l
t
s
5

x

R
D
L
?
RP
D
RP
D

W
i
t
h
i
n
+/
-

5
0
%
fo
r

S
o
i
l
?
TP
H
-
G
R
O
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
0.
9
6
4
V3
0.
6
1
3

R
D
L
1
1.
0
6

V
3
0.
6
1
8

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
TP
H
-
D
R
O
80
1
5
mg
/
k
g
3.
6
4
J
4.
9

R
D
L
1
2.
5
2
J
4.
9

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
TR
P
H
90
7
1
B
mg
/
k
g
71
.
1
J
12
3

R
D
L
1
83
.
4
J
122
R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
1
,
1
,
2
-
T
E
T
R
A
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
0.
0
8
0
7
V3

0
.
0
6
1
3

R
D
L
1
0.
1
2

V
3

0
.
0
6
1
8

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
1
,
1
-
T
R
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
1
2
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
1
2
4

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
1
,
2
,
2
-
T
E
T
R
A
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
0.
0
2
7
4
V3
0.
0
0
1
2
RD
L
1
0.
0
3
2
3
V3
0.
0
0
1
2
RD
L
1
Ye
s
,

R
P
D

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
16
.
4
%
Ye
s
1,
1
,
2
-
T
R
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
1
,
2
-
T
R
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
T
R
I
F
L
U
O
R
O
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
1
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
1
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
6
1

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
6
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
1
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
P
R
O
P
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
0.
0
0
0
9

J

V
3

0
.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
0.
0
0
0
9

J

V
3

0
.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
2
,
3
-
T
R
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g

0
.
0
0
0
4
6

J

V
3

0
.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
0.
0
0
0
5

J

V
3

0
.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
2
,
3
-
T
R
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
P
R
O
P
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
2
,
3
-
T
R
I
M
E
T
H
Y
L
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
2
,
4
-
T
R
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
2
,
4
-
T
R
I
M
E
T
H
Y
L
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
Da
t
e

C
o
l
l
e
c
t
e
d
11
/
0
9
/
2
0
2
2
11
/
0
9
/
2
0
2
2
La
b

S
a
m
p
l
e

I
D
L1
5
5
8
0
2
6
-
4
5
L1
5
5
8
0
2
6
-
5
1
Cl
i
e
n
t

S
a
m
p
l
e

I
D
B-
1
4

@

1
0
'
B-
1
4
0

@

1
0
'
Or
i
g
i
n
a
l

S
a
m
p
l
e
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

S
a
m
p
l
e
Pa
g
e

1
3

o
f

1
6
Ta
b
l
e

C
6
.
2

-

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

P
a
i
r
–
V
O
C
s

a
n
d

P
e
t
r
o
l
e
u
m

H
y
d
r
o
c
a
r
b
o
n
s

i
n

S
o
i
l
s
Fo
r
m
e
r

A
n
d
e
r
s
o
n

A
u
t
o

W
r
e
c
k
i
n
g

-

2
8
9
0

S
o
u
t
h

S
t
a
t
e

S
t
r
e
e
t

a
n
d

1
2
1
5

N
o
r
t
h

S
R

5
1
,

S
p
a
n
i
s
h

F
o
r
k

C
i
t
y
,

U
t
a
h

C
o
u
n
t
y
,

U
t
a
h
Te
r
r
a
c
o
n

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
o
.

6
1
2
2
7
1
8
6

T
a
s
k

3
.
3
1,
2
-
D
I
B
R
O
M
O
-
3
-
C
H
L
O
R
O
P
R
O
P
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
6
1

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
6
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
2
-
D
I
B
R
O
M
O
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
6
1

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
6
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
2
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
3
1

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
3
1

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
2
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
2
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
P
R
O
P
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
3
,
5
-
T
R
I
M
E
T
H
Y
L
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
6
1

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
6
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
3
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
3
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
P
R
O
P
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
4
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
2,
2
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
P
R
O
P
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
2-
B
U
T
A
N
O
N
E

(
M
E
K
)
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
2-
C
H
L
O
R
O
T
O
L
U
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
6
1

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
6
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
4-
C
H
L
O
R
O
T
O
L
U
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
4-
M
E
T
H
Y
L
-
2
-
P
E
N
T
A
N
O
N
E

(
M
I
B
K
)
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
AC
E
T
O
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
AC
R
Y
L
O
N
I
T
R
I
L
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
BE
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
BR
O
M
O
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
Pa
g
e

1
4

o
f

1
6
Ta
b
l
e

C
6
.
2

-

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

P
a
i
r
–
V
O
C
s

a
n
d

P
e
t
r
o
l
e
u
m

H
y
d
r
o
c
a
r
b
o
n
s

i
n

S
o
i
l
s
Fo
r
m
e
r

A
n
d
e
r
s
o
n

A
u
t
o

W
r
e
c
k
i
n
g

-

2
8
9
0

S
o
u
t
h

S
t
a
t
e

S
t
r
e
e
t

a
n
d

1
2
1
5

N
o
r
t
h

S
R

5
1
,

S
p
a
n
i
s
h

F
o
r
k

C
i
t
y
,

U
t
a
h

C
o
u
n
t
y
,

U
t
a
h
Te
r
r
a
c
o
n

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
o
.

6
1
2
2
7
1
8
6

T
a
s
k

3
.
3
BR
O
M
O
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
M
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
BR
O
M
O
F
O
R
M
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
BR
O
M
O
M
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
CA
R
B
O
N

T
E
T
R
A
C
H
L
O
R
I
D
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
CH
L
O
R
O
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
CH
L
O
R
O
D
I
B
R
O
M
O
M
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
CH
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
0.
0
2
3
2
V3
0.
0
0
1
2
RD
L
1
0.
0
2
5
9
V3
0.
0
0
1
2
RD
L
1
Ye
s
,

R
P
D

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
11
.
0
%
Ye
s
CH
L
O
R
O
F
O
R
M
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
CH
L
O
R
O
M
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g

0
.
0
0
1
3
4
V3

0
.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
0.
0
0
1
5

V
3

0
.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
CI
S
-
1
,
2
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
CI
S
-
1
,
3
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
P
R
O
P
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
1
2
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
1
2
4

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
DI
B
R
O
M
O
M
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g

0
.
0
0
3
6
8
B
J

V
3
0.
0
0
6
1

R
D
L
1
0.
0
0
5
6
B
J

V
3
0.
0
0
6
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
DI
C
H
L
O
R
O
D
I
F
L
U
O
R
O
M
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
1
2
3

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
1
2
4

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
DI
-
I
S
O
P
R
O
P
Y
L

E
T
H
E
R
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
ET
H
Y
L
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
6
1

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
6
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
HE
X
A
C
H
L
O
R
O
-
1
,
3
-
B
U
T
A
D
I
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g

0
.
0
0
2
5
2
V3

0
.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
0.
0
0
3

V
3

0
.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
IS
O
P
R
O
P
Y
L
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
ME
T
H
Y
L

T
E
R
T
-
B
U
T
Y
L

E
T
H
E
R
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
ME
T
H
Y
L
E
N
E

C
H
L
O
R
I
D
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
Pa
g
e

1
5

o
f

1
6
Ta
b
l
e

C
6
.
2

-

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

P
a
i
r
–
V
O
C
s

a
n
d

P
e
t
r
o
l
e
u
m

H
y
d
r
o
c
a
r
b
o
n
s

i
n

S
o
i
l
s
Fo
r
m
e
r

A
n
d
e
r
s
o
n

A
u
t
o

W
r
e
c
k
i
n
g

-

2
8
9
0

S
o
u
t
h

S
t
a
t
e

S
t
r
e
e
t

a
n
d

1
2
1
5

N
o
r
t
h

S
R

5
1
,

S
p
a
n
i
s
h

F
o
r
k

C
i
t
y
,

U
t
a
h

C
o
u
n
t
y
,

U
t
a
h
Te
r
r
a
c
o
n

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
o
.

6
1
2
2
7
1
8
6

T
a
s
k

3
.
3
NA
P
H
T
H
A
L
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
N-
B
U
T
Y
L
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
N-
P
R
O
P
Y
L
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
0.
0
4
8
3
V3
0.
0
0
6
1
RD
L
1
0.
0
5
2
9
V3
0.
0
0
6
2
RD
L
1
Ye
s
,

R
P
D

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
9.
1
%
Ye
s
P-
I
S
O
P
R
O
P
Y
L
T
O
L
U
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
SE
C
-
B
U
T
Y
L
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
ST
Y
R
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
TE
R
T
-
B
U
T
Y
L
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
TE
T
R
A
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
TO
L
U
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
6
1

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
6
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
TR
A
N
S
-
1
,
2
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
3
1

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
3
1

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
TR
A
N
S
-
1
,
3
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
P
R
O
P
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
0.
0
0
4
3
V3

0
.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
0.
0
0
5
1

V
3

0
.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
TR
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
E
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g

0
.
0
0
1
1
8

J

V
3

0
.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
0.
0
0
1
4

V
3

0
.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
TR
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
F
L
U
O
R
O
M
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g

0
.
0
0
1
6
4
V3

0
.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
0.
0
0
2

V
3

0
.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
VI
N
Y
L

C
H
L
O
R
I
D
E
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
XY
L
E
N
E
S
,

T
O
T
A
L
82
6
0
B
mg
/
k
g
0.
0
1
8
V3

0
.
0
0
3
7

R
D
L
1
0.
0
2
3
4

V
3

0
.
0
0
3
7

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

>

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t
ca
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
F
i
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n
th
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
Qu
a
l
i
f
i
e
r
s

(
Q
)
:
B:
Th
e

s
a
m
e

a
n
a
l
y
t
e

i
s

f
o
u
n
d

i
n

t
h
e

a
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
d

b
l
a
n
k
.
J:
Th
e

i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n

o
f

t
h
e

a
n
a
l
y
t
e

i
s

a
c
c
e
p
t
a
b
l
e
;

t
h
e

r
e
p
o
r
t
e
d

v
a
l
u
e

i
s

a
n

e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
.
V3
:
Th
e

i
n
t
e
r
n
a
l

s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d

e
x
h
i
b
i
t
e
d

p
o
o
r

r
e
c
o
v
e
r
y

d
u
e

t
o

s
a
m
p
l
e

m
a
t
r
i
x

i
n
t
e
r
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
.

T
h
e

a
n
a
l
y
t
i
c
a
l

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

w
i
l
l

b
e

b
i
a
s
e
d

h
i
g
h
.

B
D
L

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

w
i
l
l

b
e

u
n
a
f
f
e
c
t
e
d
.
mg
/
k
g
:
Mi
l
l
i
g
r
a
m
s

p
e
r

k
i
l
o
g
r
a
m
.
RD
L

-

L
a
b
o
r
a
t
o
r
y

r
e
p
o
r
t
e
d

d
e
t
e
c
t
i
o
n

l
i
m
i
t
.
TP
H
-
G
R
O

-

T
o
t
a
l

P
e
t
r
o
l
e
u
m

H
y
d
r
o
c
a
r
b
o
n
s

G
a
s
o
l
i
n
e

R
a
n
g
e

O
r
g
a
n
i
c
s
TP
H
-
D
R
O

-

T
o
t
a
l

P
e
t
r
o
l
e
u
m

H
y
d
r
o
c
a
r
b
o
n
s

D
i
e
s
e
l

R
a
n
g
e

O
r
g
a
n
i
c
s
TR
P
H

-

T
o
t
a
l

R
e
c
o
v
e
r
a
b
l
e

P
e
t
r
o
l
e
u
m

H
y
d
r
o
c
a
r
b
o
n
s
RP
D

-

R
e
l
a
t
i
v
e

P
e
r
c
e
n
t

D
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

w
a
s

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d

w
h
e
n

a
n
a
l
y
t
e

c
o
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
s

a
r
e

g
r
e
a
t
e
r

t
h
a
n

o
r

e
q
u
a
l

t
o

f
i
v
e

t
i
m
e
s

t
h
e

R
D
L
.

Q
A
/
Q
C

R
P
D

G
o
a
l

i
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

5
0
%

f
o
r

s
o
l
i
d

s
a
m
p
l
e
s
.
Fo
r

a
n
a
l
y
t
e
s

r
e
p
o
r
t
e
d

a
t

c
o
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

f
i
v
e

t
i
m
e
s

t
h
e

R
D
L
,

t
h
e

Q
A
/
Q
C

G
o
a
l

i
s

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

a
n
d

i
t
s

d
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

i
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

t
w
o

t
i
m
e
s

t
h
e

R
D
L

f
o
r

s
o
l
i
d

s
a
m
p
l
e
s
.
Bo
l
d

v
a
l
u
e
ex
c
e
e
d
s

M
e
t
h
o
d

D
e
t
e
c
t
i
o
n

L
i
m
i
t

(
M
D
L
)
.

C
o
l
o
r

s
h
a
d
e
d

v
a
l
u
e

e
x
c
e
e
d
s

s
c
r
e
e
n
i
n
g

l
e
v
e
l
.
Pa
g
e

1
6

o
f

1
6
Ta
b
l
e

C
6
.
3

-

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

P
a
i
r
s
–
D
i
s
s
o
l
v
e
d

M
e
t
a
l
s

i
n

G
r
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r
Fo
r
m
e
r

A
n
d
e
r
s
o
n

A
u
t
o

W
r
e
c
k
i
n
g

-

2
8
9
0

S
o
u
t
h

S
t
a
t
e

S
t
r
e
e
t

a
n
d

1
2
1
5

N
o
r
t
h

S
R

5
1
,

S
p
a
n
i
s
h

F
o
r
k

C
i
t
y
,

U
t
a
h

C
o
u
n
t
y
,

U
t
a
h
Te
r
r
a
c
o
n

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
o
.

6
1
2
2
7
1
8
6

T
a
s
k

3
.
3
An
a
l
y
t
e
Me
t
h
o
d

U
n
i
t
s

R
e
s
u
l
t

Q
Hi
g
h
Li
m
i
t
Hi
g
h
Li
m
i
t
Ty
p
e
Di
l
u
t
i
o
n
Fa
c
t
o
r
Re
s
u
l
t

Q
Hi
g
h
Li
m
i
t
Hi
g
h
Li
m
i
t
Ty
p
e
Di
l
u
t
i
o
n
Fa
c
t
o
r
Re
s
u
l
t
s
5

x

R
D
L
?
RP
D
RP
D

W
i
t
h
i
n
+/
-

2
5
%
fo
r
Gr
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r
?
AR
S
E
N
I
C
60
1
0
B

m
g
/
l

0
.
0
5
2
9
0.
0
0
2

R
D
L
1
0.
0
5
5
2
0.
0
0
2

R
D
L
1
Ye
s
,

R
P
D

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
4.
3
%
Ye
s
BA
R
I
U
M
60
1
0
B

m
g
/
l
0.
2
0
5
0.
0
0
2

R
D
L
1
0.
1
8
8
0.
0
0
2

R
D
L
1
Ye
s
,

R
P
D

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
8.
7
%
Ye
s
CA
D
M
I
U
M
60
1
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e
di
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
CH
R
O
M
I
U
M
60
1
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
2

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e
di
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
HE
X
A
V
A
L
E
N
T

C
H
R
O
M
I
U
M
71
9
9
mg
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
0
5

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
0
5

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e
di
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
LE
A
D
60
1
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
2

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e
di
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
ME
R
C
U
R
Y
74
7
0
mg
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
0
2

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
0
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e
di
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
SE
L
E
N
I
U
M
60
1
0
B

m
g
/
l

0
.
0
0
0
3
8
J

0
.
0
0
2

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L

b
u
t

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

R
D
L
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e
di
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

d
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e
s

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

(
u
s
i
n
g

1
/
2

t
h
e

R
D
L

a
s

a

c
o
n
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
v
e
es
t
i
m
a
t
e

f
o
r

N
D
)

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
SI
L
V
E
R
60
1
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
2

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
Or
i
g
i
n
a
l

S
a
m
p
l
e
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

S
a
m
p
l
e
Da
t
e

C
o
l
l
e
c
t
e
d
11
/
0
9
/
2
0
2
2
11
/
0
9
/
2
0
2
2
La
b

S
a
m
p
l
e

I
D
L1
5
5
8
0
2
6
-
3
5
L1
5
5
8
0
2
6
-
3
8
Cl
i
e
n
t

S
a
m
p
l
e

I
D
B-
1
4
B-
1
4
0
Pa
g
e

1

o
f

2
Ta
b
l
e

C
6
.
3

-

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

P
a
i
r
s
–
D
i
s
s
o
l
v
e
d

M
e
t
a
l
s

i
n

G
r
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r
Fo
r
m
e
r

A
n
d
e
r
s
o
n

A
u
t
o

W
r
e
c
k
i
n
g

-

2
8
9
0

S
o
u
t
h

S
t
a
t
e

S
t
r
e
e
t

a
n
d

1
2
1
5

N
o
r
t
h

S
R

5
1
,

S
p
a
n
i
s
h

F
o
r
k

C
i
t
y
,

U
t
a
h

C
o
u
n
t
y
,

U
t
a
h
Te
r
r
a
c
o
n

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
o
.

6
1
2
2
7
1
8
6

T
a
s
k

3
.
3
An
a
l
y
t
e
Me
t
h
o
d

U
n
i
t
s

R
e
s
u
l
t

Q
Hi
g
h
Li
m
i
t
Hi
g
h
Li
m
i
t
Ty
p
e
Di
l
u
t
i
o
n
Fa
c
t
o
r
Re
s
u
l
t

Q
Hi
g
h
Li
m
i
t
Hi
g
h
Li
m
i
t
Ty
p
e
Di
l
u
t
i
o
n
Fa
c
t
o
r
Re
s
u
l
t
s
5

x

R
D
L
?
RP
D
RP
D

W
i
t
h
i
n
+/
-

2
5
%
fo
r
Gr
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r
?
AR
S
E
N
I
C
60
1
0
B

m
g
/
l

0
.
0
2
0
5
0.
0
0
2

R
D
L
1
0.
0
2
0
9
0.
0
0
2

R
D
L
1
Ye
s
,

R
P
D

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
1.
9
%
Ye
s
BA
R
I
U
M
60
1
0
B

m
g
/
l
0.
1
6
0.
0
0
2

R
D
L
1
0.
1
5
7
0.
0
0
2

R
D
L
1
Ye
s
,

R
P
D

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
1.
9
%
Ye
s
CA
D
M
I
U
M
60
1
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
CH
R
O
M
I
U
M
60
1
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
2

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
HE
X
A
V
A
L
E
N
T

C
H
R
O
M
I
U
M
71
9
9
mg
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
0
5

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
0
5

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
LE
A
D
60
1
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
2

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
ME
R
C
U
R
Y
74
7
0
mg
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
0
2

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
0
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
SE
L
E
N
I
U
M
60
1
0
B

m
g
/
l

0
.
0
0
6
9
3
0.
0
0
2

R
D
L
1
0.
0
0
7
2
0.
0
0
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
SI
L
V
E
R
60
1
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
2

R
D
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
2

R
D
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
be
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
Qu
a
l
i
f
i
e
r
s

(
Q
)
:
mg
/
l
:
Mi
l
l
i
g
r
a
m
s

p
e
r

l
i
t
e
r
.
Bo
l
d

v
a
l
u
e
ex
c
e
e
d
s

M
e
t
h
o
d

D
e
t
e
c
t
i
o
n

L
i
m
i
t

(
M
D
L
)
.

C
o
l
o
r

s
h
a
d
e
d

v
a
l
u
e

e
x
c
e
e
d
s

s
c
r
e
e
n
i
n
g

l
e
v
e
l
.
RD
L

-

L
a
b
o
r
a
t
o
r
y

r
e
p
o
r
t
e
d

d
e
t
e
c
t
i
o
n

l
i
m
i
t
.
RP
D

-

R
e
l
a
t
i
v
e

P
e
r
c
e
n
t

D
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

w
a
s

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d

w
h
e
n

a
n
a
l
y
t
e

c
o
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
s

a
r
e

g
r
e
a
t
e
r

t
h
a
n

o
r

e
q
u
a
l

t
o

f
i
v
e

t
i
m
e
s

t
h
e

R
D
L
.

Q
A
/
Q
C

R
P
D

G
o
a
l

i
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2
5
%

f
o
r

g
r
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r

s
a
m
p
l
e
s
.
Fo
r

a
n
a
l
y
t
e
s

r
e
p
o
r
t
e
d

a
t

c
o
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

f
i
v
e

t
i
m
e
s

t
h
e

R
D
L
,

t
h
e

Q
A
/
Q
C

G
o
a
l

i
s

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

a
n
d

i
t
s

d
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

i
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L

f
o
r

g
r
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r

s
a
m
p
l
e
s
.
J:
Th
e

i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n

o
f

t
h
e

a
n
a
l
y
t
e

i
s

a
c
c
e
p
t
a
b
l
e
;

t
h
e

r
e
p
o
r
t
e
d

v
a
l
u
e

i
s

a
n

e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
.
Cl
i
e
n
t

S
a
m
p
l
e

I
D
B-
5
B-
5
0
Da
t
e

C
o
l
l
e
c
t
e
d
11
/
1
0
/
2
0
2
2
11
/
1
0
/
2
0
2
2
Or
i
g
i
n
a
l

S
a
m
p
l
e
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

S
a
m
p
l
e
La
b

S
a
m
p
l
e

I
D
L1
5
5
8
0
2
6
-
2
6
L1
5
5
8
0
2
6
-
3
9
Pa
g
e

2

o
f

2
Ta
b
l
e

C
6
.
4

-

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

P
a
i
r
–
V
O
C
s

a
n
d

P
e
t
r
o
l
e
u
m

H
y
d
r
o
c
a
r
b
o
n
s

i
n

G
r
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r
Fo
r
m
e
r

A
n
d
e
r
s
o
n

A
u
t
o

W
r
e
c
k
i
n
g

-

2
8
9
0

S
o
u
t
h

S
t
a
t
e

S
t
r
e
e
t

a
n
d

1
2
1
5

N
o
r
t
h

S
R

5
1
,

S
p
a
n
i
s
h

F
o
r
k

C
i
t
y
,

U
t
a
h

C
o
u
n
t
y
,

U
t
a
h
Te
r
r
a
c
o
n

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
o
.

6
1
2
2
7
1
8
6

T
a
s
k

3
.
3
An
a
l
y
t
e
Me
t
h
o
d

U
n
i
t
s

R
e
s
u
l
t

Q
Hi
g
h
Li
m
i
t
Hi
g
h
Li
m
i
t
Ty
p
e
Di
l
u
t
i
o
n
Fa
c
t
o
r
Re
s
u
l
t
Q
Hi
g
h
Li
m
i
t
Hi
g
h
Li
m
i
t
Ty
p
e
Di
l
u
t
i
o
n
Fa
c
t
o
r
Re
s
u
l
t
s
5

x

R
D
L
?
RP
D
RP
D

W
i
t
h
i
n
+/
-

2
5
%
fo
r

G
r
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r
?
TP
H
-
G
R
O
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
0.
0
6
4
3

J
0.
1
RD
L
1
0.
0
5
7
7

J
0.
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r
wi
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e
re
s
u
l
t
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
TP
H
-
D
R
O
80
1
5

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
5
RD
L
1
ND
0.
5
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
TR
P
H
90
7
1
B

m
g
/
l
1.
4
4

J
5.
5
6
RD
L
1
1.
1
1

J
5.
5
6
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r
wi
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e
re
s
u
l
t
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
AC
E
T
O
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
5
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
5
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
AC
R
O
L
E
I
N
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
5
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
5
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
AC
R
Y
L
O
N
I
T
R
I
L
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
BE
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
0.
0
0
0
1
7
2

J
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
0.
0
0
0
1
6
4

J
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r
wi
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e
re
s
u
l
t
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
BR
O
M
O
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
BR
O
M
O
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
M
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
BR
O
M
O
F
O
R
M
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
BR
O
M
O
M
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
5
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
5
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
N-
B
U
T
Y
L
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
SE
C
-
B
U
T
Y
L
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
TE
R
T
-
B
U
T
Y
L
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
CA
R
B
O
N

T
E
T
R
A
C
H
L
O
R
I
D
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
Or
i
g
i
n
a
l

S
a
m
p
l
e
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

S
a
m
p
l
e
Da
t
e

C
o
l
l
e
c
t
e
d
11
/
0
9
/
2
0
2
2
11
/
0
9
/
2
0
2
2
La
b

S
a
m
p
l
e

I
D
L1
5
5
8
0
2
6
-
3
5
L1
5
5
8
0
2
6
-
3
8
Cl
i
e
n
t

S
a
m
p
l
e

I
D
B-
1
4
B-
1
4
0
Pa
g
e

1

o
f

9
Ta
b
l
e

C
6
.
4

-

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

P
a
i
r
–
V
O
C
s

a
n
d

P
e
t
r
o
l
e
u
m

H
y
d
r
o
c
a
r
b
o
n
s

i
n

G
r
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r
Fo
r
m
e
r

A
n
d
e
r
s
o
n

A
u
t
o

W
r
e
c
k
i
n
g

-

2
8
9
0

S
o
u
t
h

S
t
a
t
e

S
t
r
e
e
t

a
n
d

1
2
1
5

N
o
r
t
h

S
R

5
1
,

S
p
a
n
i
s
h

F
o
r
k

C
i
t
y
,

U
t
a
h

C
o
u
n
t
y
,

U
t
a
h
Te
r
r
a
c
o
n

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
o
.

6
1
2
2
7
1
8
6

T
a
s
k

3
.
3
CH
L
O
R
O
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
CH
L
O
R
O
D
I
B
R
O
M
O
M
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
CH
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
5
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
5
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
CH
L
O
R
O
F
O
R
M
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
5
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
5
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
CH
L
O
R
O
M
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
2
5
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
2
5
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
2-
C
H
L
O
R
O
T
O
L
U
E
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
4-
C
H
L
O
R
O
T
O
L
U
E
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
1,
2
-
D
I
B
R
O
M
O
-
3
-
C
H
L
O
R
O
P
R
O
P
A
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
5
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
5
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
1,
2
-
D
I
B
R
O
M
O
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
DI
B
R
O
M
O
M
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
1,
2
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
1,
3
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
1,
4
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
DI
C
H
L
O
R
O
D
I
F
L
U
O
R
O
M
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
5
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
5
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
1,
1
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
1,
2
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
1,
1
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
E
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
CI
S
-
1
,
2
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
E
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
Pa
g
e

2

o
f

9
Ta
b
l
e

C
6
.
4

-

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

P
a
i
r
–
V
O
C
s

a
n
d

P
e
t
r
o
l
e
u
m

H
y
d
r
o
c
a
r
b
o
n
s

i
n

G
r
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r
Fo
r
m
e
r

A
n
d
e
r
s
o
n

A
u
t
o

W
r
e
c
k
i
n
g

-

2
8
9
0

S
o
u
t
h

S
t
a
t
e

S
t
r
e
e
t

a
n
d

1
2
1
5

N
o
r
t
h

S
R

5
1
,

S
p
a
n
i
s
h

F
o
r
k

C
i
t
y
,

U
t
a
h

C
o
u
n
t
y
,

U
t
a
h
Te
r
r
a
c
o
n

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
o
.

6
1
2
2
7
1
8
6

T
a
s
k

3
.
3
TR
A
N
S
-
1
,
2
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
E
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
1,
2
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
P
R
O
P
A
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
1,
1
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
P
R
O
P
E
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
1,
3
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
P
R
O
P
A
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
CI
S
-
1
,
3
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
P
R
O
P
E
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
TR
A
N
S
-
1
,
3
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
P
R
O
P
E
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
2,
2
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
P
R
O
P
A
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
DI
-
I
S
O
P
R
O
P
Y
L

E
T
H
E
R
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
ET
H
Y
L
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
0.
0
0
0
2
2
7

J
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
0.
0
0
0
1
9
7

J
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r
wi
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e
re
s
u
l
t
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
HE
X
A
C
H
L
O
R
O
-
1
,
3
-
B
U
T
A
D
I
E
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
IS
O
P
R
O
P
Y
L
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
P-
I
S
O
P
R
O
P
Y
L
T
O
L
U
E
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
2-
B
U
T
A
N
O
N
E

(
M
E
K
)
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
ME
T
H
Y
L
E
N
E

C
H
L
O
R
I
D
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
5
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
5
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
4-
M
E
T
H
Y
L
-
2
-
P
E
N
T
A
N
O
N
E

(
M
I
B
K
)
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
ME
T
H
Y
L

T
E
R
T
-
B
U
T
Y
L

E
T
H
E
R
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
NA
P
H
T
H
A
L
E
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
5
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
5
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
N-
P
R
O
P
Y
L
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
Pa
g
e

3

o
f

9
Ta
b
l
e

C
6
.
4

-

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

P
a
i
r
–
V
O
C
s

a
n
d

P
e
t
r
o
l
e
u
m

H
y
d
r
o
c
a
r
b
o
n
s

i
n

G
r
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r
Fo
r
m
e
r

A
n
d
e
r
s
o
n

A
u
t
o

W
r
e
c
k
i
n
g

-

2
8
9
0

S
o
u
t
h

S
t
a
t
e

S
t
r
e
e
t

a
n
d

1
2
1
5

N
o
r
t
h

S
R

5
1
,

S
p
a
n
i
s
h

F
o
r
k

C
i
t
y
,

U
t
a
h

C
o
u
n
t
y
,

U
t
a
h
Te
r
r
a
c
o
n

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
o
.

6
1
2
2
7
1
8
6

T
a
s
k

3
.
3
ST
Y
R
E
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
1,
1
,
1
,
2
-
T
E
T
R
A
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
1,
1
,
2
,
2
-
T
E
T
R
A
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
1,
1
,
2
-
T
R
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
T
R
I
F
L
U
O
R
O
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
TE
T
R
A
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
E
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
TO
L
U
E
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
0.
0
0
0
3
6
5

J
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
0.
0
0
0
3
8
5

J
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r
wi
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e
re
s
u
l
t
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
1,
2
,
3
-
T
R
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
1,
2
,
4
-
T
R
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
1,
1
,
1
-
T
R
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
TR
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
E
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
TR
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
F
L
U
O
R
O
M
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
5
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
5
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
1,
2
,
3
-
T
R
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
P
R
O
P
A
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
2
5
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
2
5
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
1,
2
,
4
-
T
R
I
M
E
T
H
Y
L
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
1,
2
,
3
-
T
R
I
M
E
T
H
Y
L
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
1,
3
,
5
-
T
R
I
M
E
T
H
Y
L
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
VI
N
Y
L

C
H
L
O
R
I
D
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
XY
L
E
N
E
S
,

T
O
T
A
L
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
0.
0
0
0
4
5
9

J
0.
0
0
3
RD
L
1
0.
0
0
0
4
4

J
0.
0
0
3
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r
wi
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e
re
s
u
l
t
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
2-
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
Y
L

V
I
N
Y
L

E
T
H
E
R
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
5
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
5
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
Pa
g
e

4

o
f

9
Ta
b
l
e

C
6
.
4

-

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

P
a
i
r
–
V
O
C
s

a
n
d

P
e
t
r
o
l
e
u
m

H
y
d
r
o
c
a
r
b
o
n
s

i
n

G
r
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r
Fo
r
m
e
r

A
n
d
e
r
s
o
n

A
u
t
o

W
r
e
c
k
i
n
g

-

2
8
9
0

S
o
u
t
h

S
t
a
t
e

S
t
r
e
e
t

a
n
d

1
2
1
5

N
o
r
t
h

S
R

5
1
,

S
p
a
n
i
s
h

F
o
r
k

C
i
t
y
,

U
t
a
h

C
o
u
n
t
y
,

U
t
a
h
Te
r
r
a
c
o
n

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
o
.

6
1
2
2
7
1
8
6

T
a
s
k

3
.
3
An
a
l
y
t
e
Me
t
h
o
d

U
n
i
t
s

R
e
s
u
l
t

Q
Hi
g
h
Li
m
i
t
Hi
g
h
Li
m
i
t
Ty
p
e
Di
l
u
t
i
o
n
Fa
c
t
o
r
Re
s
u
l
t
Q
Hi
g
h
Li
m
i
t
Hi
g
h
Li
m
i
t
Ty
p
e
Di
l
u
t
i
o
n
Fa
c
t
o
r
Re
s
u
l
t
s
5

x

R
D
L
?
RP
D
RP
D

W
i
t
h
i
n
+/
-

2
5
%
fo
r

G
r
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r
?
TP
H
-
G
R
O
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
0.
1
3
5

B
0.
1
RD
L
1
0.
0
6
8
3

J
0.
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r
wi
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e
re
s
u
l
t
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
TP
H
-
D
R
O
80
1
5

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
5
RD
L
1
ND
0.
5
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
TR
P
H
90
7
1
B

m
g
/
l
3.
4
1

J
5.
8
8
RD
L
1
2.
9
1

J
6.
0
6
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r
wi
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e
re
s
u
l
t
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
AC
E
T
O
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
5
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
5
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
AC
R
O
L
E
I
N
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
5
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
5
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
AC
R
Y
L
O
N
I
T
R
I
L
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
BE
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
0.
0
0
0
1
2
7

J
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
0.
0
0
0
1
0
4

J
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

r
e
s
u
l
t
s

<

5

x

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r
wi
t
h
i
n

c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e
re
s
u
l
t
s

w
a
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2

x

R
D
L
.
BR
O
M
O
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
BR
O
M
O
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
M
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
BR
O
M
O
F
O
R
M
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
BR
O
M
O
M
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
5
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
5
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
N-
B
U
T
Y
L
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
SE
C
-
B
U
T
Y
L
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
TE
R
T
-
B
U
T
Y
L
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
CA
R
B
O
N

T
E
T
R
A
C
H
L
O
R
I
D
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
Cl
i
e
n
t

S
a
m
p
l
e

I
D
B-
5
B-
5
0
Da
t
e

C
o
l
l
e
c
t
e
d
11
/
1
0
/
2
0
2
2
11
/
1
0
/
2
0
2
2
Or
i
g
i
n
a
l

S
a
m
p
l
e
Du
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

S
a
m
p
l
e
La
b

S
a
m
p
l
e

I
D
L1
5
5
8
0
2
6
-
2
6
L1
5
5
8
0
2
6
-
3
9
Pa
g
e

5

o
f

9
Ta
b
l
e

C
6
.
4

-

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

P
a
i
r
–
V
O
C
s

a
n
d

P
e
t
r
o
l
e
u
m

H
y
d
r
o
c
a
r
b
o
n
s

i
n

G
r
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r
Fo
r
m
e
r

A
n
d
e
r
s
o
n

A
u
t
o

W
r
e
c
k
i
n
g

-

2
8
9
0

S
o
u
t
h

S
t
a
t
e

S
t
r
e
e
t

a
n
d

1
2
1
5

N
o
r
t
h

S
R

5
1
,

S
p
a
n
i
s
h

F
o
r
k

C
i
t
y
,

U
t
a
h

C
o
u
n
t
y
,

U
t
a
h
Te
r
r
a
c
o
n

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
o
.

6
1
2
2
7
1
8
6

T
a
s
k

3
.
3
CH
L
O
R
O
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
CH
L
O
R
O
D
I
B
R
O
M
O
M
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
CH
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
5
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
5
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
CH
L
O
R
O
F
O
R
M
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
5
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
5
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
CH
L
O
R
O
M
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
2
5
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
2
5
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
2-
C
H
L
O
R
O
T
O
L
U
E
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
4-
C
H
L
O
R
O
T
O
L
U
E
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
1,
2
-
D
I
B
R
O
M
O
-
3
-
C
H
L
O
R
O
P
R
O
P
A
N
E

8
2
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
5
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
5
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
1,
2
-
D
I
B
R
O
M
O
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
DI
B
R
O
M
O
M
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
1,
2
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
1,
3
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
1,
4
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
DI
C
H
L
O
R
O
D
I
F
L
U
O
R
O
M
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
5
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
5
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
1,
1
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
1,
2
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
1,
1
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
E
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
CI
S
-
1
,
2
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
E
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
Pa
g
e

6

o
f

9
Ta
b
l
e

C
6
.
4

-

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

P
a
i
r
–
V
O
C
s

a
n
d

P
e
t
r
o
l
e
u
m

H
y
d
r
o
c
a
r
b
o
n
s

i
n

G
r
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r
Fo
r
m
e
r

A
n
d
e
r
s
o
n

A
u
t
o

W
r
e
c
k
i
n
g

-

2
8
9
0

S
o
u
t
h

S
t
a
t
e

S
t
r
e
e
t

a
n
d

1
2
1
5

N
o
r
t
h

S
R

5
1
,

S
p
a
n
i
s
h

F
o
r
k

C
i
t
y
,

U
t
a
h

C
o
u
n
t
y
,

U
t
a
h
Te
r
r
a
c
o
n

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
o
.

6
1
2
2
7
1
8
6

T
a
s
k

3
.
3
TR
A
N
S
-
1
,
2
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
E
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
1,
2
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
P
R
O
P
A
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
1,
1
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
P
R
O
P
E
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
1,
3
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
P
R
O
P
A
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
CI
S
-
1
,
3
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
P
R
O
P
E
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
TR
A
N
S
-
1
,
3
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
P
R
O
P
E
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
2,
2
-
D
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
P
R
O
P
A
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
DI
-
I
S
O
P
R
O
P
Y
L

E
T
H
E
R
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
ET
H
Y
L
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
HE
X
A
C
H
L
O
R
O
-
1
,
3
-
B
U
T
A
D
I
E
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
IS
O
P
R
O
P
Y
L
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
P-
I
S
O
P
R
O
P
Y
L
T
O
L
U
E
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
2-
B
U
T
A
N
O
N
E

(
M
E
K
)
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
ME
T
H
Y
L
E
N
E

C
H
L
O
R
I
D
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
5
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
5
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
4-
M
E
T
H
Y
L
-
2
-
P
E
N
T
A
N
O
N
E

(
M
I
B
K
)
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
ME
T
H
Y
L

T
E
R
T
-
B
U
T
Y
L

E
T
H
E
R
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
NA
P
H
T
H
A
L
E
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
5
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
5
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
N-
P
R
O
P
Y
L
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
Pa
g
e

7

o
f

9
Ta
b
l
e

C
6
.
4

-

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

P
a
i
r
–
V
O
C
s

a
n
d

P
e
t
r
o
l
e
u
m

H
y
d
r
o
c
a
r
b
o
n
s

i
n

G
r
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r
Fo
r
m
e
r

A
n
d
e
r
s
o
n

A
u
t
o

W
r
e
c
k
i
n
g

-

2
8
9
0

S
o
u
t
h

S
t
a
t
e

S
t
r
e
e
t

a
n
d

1
2
1
5

N
o
r
t
h

S
R

5
1
,

S
p
a
n
i
s
h

F
o
r
k

C
i
t
y
,

U
t
a
h

C
o
u
n
t
y
,

U
t
a
h
Te
r
r
a
c
o
n

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
o
.

6
1
2
2
7
1
8
6

T
a
s
k

3
.
3
ST
Y
R
E
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
1,
1
,
1
,
2
-
T
E
T
R
A
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
1,
1
,
2
,
2
-
T
E
T
R
A
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
1,
1
,
2
-
T
R
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
T
R
I
F
L
U
O
R
O
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
TE
T
R
A
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
E
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
TO
L
U
E
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
1,
2
,
3
-
T
R
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
1,
2
,
4
-
T
R
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
1,
1
,
1
-
T
R
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
TR
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
E
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
TR
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
F
L
U
O
R
O
M
E
T
H
A
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
5
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
5
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
1,
2
,
3
-
T
R
I
C
H
L
O
R
O
P
R
O
P
A
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
2
5
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
2
5
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
1,
2
,
4
-
T
R
I
M
E
T
H
Y
L
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
1,
2
,
3
-
T
R
I
M
E
T
H
Y
L
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
1,
3
,
5
-
T
R
I
M
E
T
H
Y
L
B
E
N
Z
E
N
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
VI
N
Y
L

C
H
L
O
R
I
D
E
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
1
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
XY
L
E
N
E
S
,

T
O
T
A
L
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
0.
0
0
0
2
4
3

J
0.
0
0
3
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
0
3
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
2-
C
H
L
O
R
O
E
T
H
Y
L

V
I
N
Y
L

E
T
H
E
R
82
6
0
B

m
g
/
l
ND
0.
0
5
RD
L
1
ND
0.
0
5
RD
L
1
No
,

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

b
o
t
h

<

R
D
L
,

R
P
D

n
o
t

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
.
Fi
e
l
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

p
a
i
r

w
i
t
h
i
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
b
e
c
a
u
s
e

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l

a
n
d

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

R
D
L
s

w
a
s
le
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L
.
Pa
g
e

8

o
f

9
Ta
b
l
e

C
6
.
4

-

D
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

P
a
i
r
–
V
O
C
s

a
n
d

P
e
t
r
o
l
e
u
m

H
y
d
r
o
c
a
r
b
o
n
s

i
n

G
r
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r
Fo
r
m
e
r

A
n
d
e
r
s
o
n

A
u
t
o

W
r
e
c
k
i
n
g

-

2
8
9
0

S
o
u
t
h

S
t
a
t
e

S
t
r
e
e
t

a
n
d

1
2
1
5

N
o
r
t
h

S
R

5
1
,

S
p
a
n
i
s
h

F
o
r
k

C
i
t
y
,

U
t
a
h

C
o
u
n
t
y
,

U
t
a
h
Te
r
r
a
c
o
n

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
o
.

6
1
2
2
7
1
8
6

T
a
s
k

3
.
3
Qu
a
l
i
f
i
e
r
s

(
Q
)
:
B:
Th
e

s
a
m
e

a
n
a
l
y
t
e

i
s

f
o
u
n
d

i
n

t
h
e

a
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
d

b
l
a
n
k
.
J:
Th
e

i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n

o
f

t
h
e

a
n
a
l
y
t
e

i
s

a
c
c
e
p
t
a
b
l
e
;

t
h
e

r
e
p
o
r
t
e
d

v
a
l
u
e

i
s

a
n

e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
.
mg
/
l
:
Mi
l
l
i
g
r
a
m
s

p
e
r

l
i
t
e
r
.
RD
L

-

L
a
b
o
r
a
t
o
r
y

r
e
p
o
r
t
e
d

d
e
t
e
c
t
i
o
n

l
i
m
i
t
.
TP
H
-
G
R
O

-

T
o
t
a
l

P
e
t
r
o
l
e
u
m

H
y
d
r
o
c
a
r
b
o
n
s

G
a
s
o
l
i
n
e

R
a
n
g
e

O
r
g
a
n
i
c
s
TP
H
-
D
R
O

-

T
o
t
a
l

P
e
t
r
o
l
e
u
m

H
y
d
r
o
c
a
r
b
o
n
s

D
i
e
s
e
l

R
a
n
g
e

O
r
g
a
n
i
c
s
TR
P
H

-

T
o
t
a
l

R
e
c
o
v
e
r
a
b
l
e

P
e
t
r
o
l
e
u
m

H
y
d
r
o
c
a
r
b
o
n
s
RP
D

-

R
e
l
a
t
i
v
e

P
e
r
c
e
n
t

D
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

w
a
s

c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d

w
h
e
n

a
n
a
l
y
t
e

c
o
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
s

a
r
e

g
r
e
a
t
e
r

t
h
a
n

o
r

e
q
u
a
l

t
o

f
i
v
e

t
i
m
e
s

t
h
e

R
D
L
.

Q
A
/
Q
C

R
P
D

G
o
a
l

i
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

2
5
%

f
o
r

g
r
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r

s
a
m
p
l
e
s
.
Fo
r

a
n
a
l
y
t
e
s

r
e
p
o
r
t
e
d

a
t

c
o
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

f
i
v
e

t
i
m
e
s

t
h
e

R
D
L
,

t
h
e

Q
A
/
Q
C

G
o
a
l

i
s

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

t
h
e

s
a
m
p
l
e

a
n
d

i
t
s

d
u
p
l
i
c
a
t
e

i
s

l
e
s
s

t
h
a
n

R
D
L

f
o
r

g
r
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r

s
a
m
p
l
e
s
.
Pa
g
e

9

o
f

9
APPENDIX D
Chain of Custody and Laboratory Data Sheets
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking
2890 South State Street
Spanish Fork City, Utah County,Utah
September 7, 2022
Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.2
EPA Cooperative Agreement #95811900
EPA ACRES Property ID #253429 and 253471
Spanish Fork City Community-wide Brownfield Assessment Grant
Prepared for:
Spanish Fork City
Spanish Fork, Utah
Prepared by:
Terracon Consultants, Inc.
Midvale, Utah
Terracon Consultants Inc. 6949 S High Tech Dr Ste 100 Midvale, UT 84047-3707
P 801-545-8500 F 801-545-8600 terracon.com
September 7, 2022
Spanish Fork City
40 South Main Street
P.O. Box 358
Spanish Fork, Utah 84660
Attn: Brandon Snyder
P: [phone]
E: [e-mail]
Re: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking
2890 South State Street
Spanish Fork City, Utah County, Utah
Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.2
EPA Cooperative Agreement #95811900
EPA ACRES Property ID #253429 and 253471
Spanish Fork City Community-wide Brownfield Assessment Grant
Dear Mr. Snyder:
Terracon Consultants, Inc. (Terracon) is pleased to submit the enclosed Phase I Environmental Site
Assessment (ESA) report for the above-referenced site. This assessment was performed in
accordance with the Agreement between Terracon and Spanish Fork City, dated April 18, 2022. This
assessment was conducted under EPA Cooperative Agreement #95811900 dated August 24, 2021
for the Spanish Fork City Community-wide Brownfield Assessment Grant.
We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. In addition to Phase I services,
our professionals provide geotechnical, environmental, construction materials, and facilities services
on a wide variety of projects locally, regionally, and nationally. For more detailed information on all of
Terracon’s services please visit our website at www.terracon.com. If there are any questions
regarding this report or if we may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
Terracon Consultants, Inc.
Kate Ballard Tina Cheney
Project Manager ESA Group Manager
Attachments
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page No.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................... i
Findings and Opinions ................................................................................................................. i
Significant Data Gaps .................................................................................................................iv
Conclusions ................................................................................................................................iv
Recommendations ......................................................................................................................iv
1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 1
1.1 Site Description .............................................................................................................. 1
1.2 Scope of Services........................................................................................................... 1
1.3 Standard of Care ............................................................................................................ 2
1.4 Additional Scope Limitations, ASTM Deviations, and Data Gaps ..................................... 2
1.5 Reliance ......................................................................................................................... 3
1.6 Client Provided Information ............................................................................................. 3
2.0 PHYSICAL SETTING ................................................................................................................. 5
3.0 HISTORICAL USE INFORMATION ............................................................................................ 6
3.1 Historical Topographic Maps, Aerial Photographs, and Sanborn Maps ............................ 6
3.2 Historical City Directories ................................................................................................ 7
3.3 Site Ownership ............................................................................................................... 8
3.4 Title Search .................................................................................................................... 8
3.5 Environmental Liens and Activity and Use Limitations ..................................................... 8
3.6 Interviews Regarding Current and Historical Site Uses.................................................... 8
3.7 Prior Report Review ....................................................................................................... 9
4.0 RECORDS REVIEW ................................................................................................................... 9
4.1 Federal and State/Tribal Databases ................................................................................ 9
4.2 Local Agency Inquiries .................................................................................................. 14
5.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE ....................................................................................................... 14
5.1 General Site Information ............................................................................................... 14
5.2 Overview of Current Site Occupants ............................................................................. 15
5.3 Overview of Current Site Operations ............................................................................. 15
5.4 Site Observations ......................................................................................................... 15
6.0 ADJOINING PROPERTY RECONNAISSANCE ........................................................................ 17
7.0 ADDITIONAL SERVICES ......................................................................................................... 18
8.0 DECLARATION ........................................................................................................................ 18
TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A Exhibit 1–Topographic Map, Exhibit 2–Site Diagram
APPENDIX B Site Photographs
APPENDIX C Historical Documentation and User Questionnaire
APPENDIX D Environmental Database Information
APPENDIX E Credentials
APPENDIX F Description of Terms and Acronyms
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking ■ Spanish Fork City, Utah
September 7, 2022 ■ Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.2
Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable i
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) was performed in accordance with the
Spanish Fork City Brownfields Assessments Scope of Work–EPA Cooperative Agreement
Award #95811900, dated August 24, 2021 and Agreement between Terracon and Spanish Fork
City, dated April 18, 2022, and was conducted consistent with the procedures included in ASTM
E1527-13,Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site
Assessment Process. The ESA was conducted under the supervision or responsible charge of
Kate Ballard, Environmental Professional, who performed the site reconnaissance on June 27,
2022.
The Spanish Fork City Community-wide Brownfields Assessments Grant is funded with the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 8 (EPA) Brownfields Cooperative Agreement
#95811900.
Findings and Opinions
A summary of findings is provided below. It should be recognized that details were not included
or fully developed in this section, and the report must be read in its entirety for a comprehensive
understanding of the items contained herein.
Site Description and Use
The site consists of approximately 1.50 acres of vacant land located at 2890 South State Street,
Spanish Fork, Utah County, Utah (Utah County Parcel Numbers 27-010-0019 and 27-010-
0028).
Historical Information
Parcel 27:010:0019: The site was undeveloped and/or agricultural land from at least the late
1940s. Grading and disturbance was observed in the mid-1960s and by 1975 disturbance
typical of a landfill operation was observed in the western portion of the site. The site operated
as an automobile salvage yard from approximately the early 1980s to the mid-2010s and has
been vacant since.
Parcel 27:010:0028:The site was undeveloped and/or agricultural land from at least the late
1940s to 1972. By the mid-1970s disturbance typical of a landfill operation was observed in the
western portion of the site. The site operated as an automobile salvage yard from approximately
the early 1980s to the mid-2010s and has been vacant since.
Surrounding properties to the north, east, and west were undeveloped land from at least the late
1940s. Grading and disturbance typical to landfill operations was observed to the north, west,
and south by the mid-1970s until the 1980s. The east-adjoining property was residential from
the early 1970s to 1980s when it became an automobile salvage yard until the late 2010s. The
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking ■ Spanish Fork City, Utah
September 7, 2022 ■ Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.2
Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable ii
north-adjoining property was operated as an auto-salvage yard by the early 1990s until the
2010s. The long-term use of the site and adjoining properties as a landfill and auto-salvage yard
contributes to an area-wide historical industrial use Recognized Environmental Condition (REC).
Records Review
Selected federal and state environmental regulatory databases were reviewed. The site falls
within the boundaries of the Anderson Auto Wrecking EPA State Voluntary Cleanup Programs
(VCP), Superfund Enterprise Management System (SEMS), and Comprehensive Environmental
Response Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) facility. Additionally, the site falls within
the Spanish Fork Landfill SEMS Archived Site (SEMS-ARCHIVE) facility boundaries.
The Anderson Auto Wrecking facility was historically operated as an auto-salvage yard from
approximately 1977 to the mid-2010s. As described in regulatory documents on the Utah
Department of Environmental Quality (UDEQ) website for the VCP, a Phase I ESA conducted in
May 2006 identified RECs for the facility. A Phase II Investigation conducted in July 2007
identified significant volumes of landfill materials, petroleum hydrocarbons, and Benzene in soil
and groundwater. A supplemental Phase II investigation was conducted in October 2007 to
further define the impacts from the salvage yard operations. It identified Benzene at
concentrations above Utah Groundwater Quality Standards (GWQS) at the site, and methane
was present in subsurface soils. The VCP application was terminated on April 18, 2008 by DEQ
due to lack of progress at the site. DEQ felt that further investigation was necessary to assess
potential threats to human health and the environment related to this release and requested the
site to be added to the CERCLIS database, in a letter dated March 25, 2009.
The UDEQ Division of Environmental Response and Remediation (DERR) performed a Site
Inspection on a 10-acre parcel referred to as the “Anderson Auto” site in May 2018 and
presented in the Site Inspection Analytical Results report dated November 2021, conducted by
DEQ Division of Environmental Response and Remediation (DERR). Slightly elevated
concentrations of metals were present in soils and groundwater on the site and surrounding
area in 2018. DERR recommend the facility as “No Further Remedial Action Planned,” based on
the exposure potential being low, as the site was fenced, and bordered by the historical landfill,
open fields, small industrial facilities and the state highway.
There is the potential for landfill materials to be present in subsurface soils beneath the site.
Based on the location of the site within the Anderson Auto Wrecking facility boundaries, the
contaminants identified at the site, and the proposed residential use, the Anderson Auto
Wrecking facility represents a REC to the site.
SEMS-ARCHIVE is a database that incorporates facilities that were previously regulated as
CERCLIS facilities. EPA has designated the Spanish Fork Landfill CERCLIS site as “No Further
Remedial Action Planned.” The western portion of the site has been identified within the
Spanish Fork Landfill facility. The Spanish Fork Landfill historically operated as a dump for
municipal wastes and includes the Spanish Fork Landfill, the Springville Landfill, and the Utah
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking ■ Spanish Fork City, Utah
September 7, 2022 ■ Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.2
Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable iii
County landfill. The landfills encompass approximately 143 surface areas and operated from the
1940s until 1988 and closed in 1991. As described in regulatory records obtained from the Utah
DEQ website, the facility was investigated by regulatory agencies and private entities from 1988
through 1999.
The landfills operated prior to RCRA regulations. Waste accepted into these landfills was
uncontrolled. It is not known if hazardous materials could be present or if industrial wastes were
included. Groundwater flow direction for the area is expected to be northwesterly. The
Expressway Lane Plume Preliminary Assessment (PA) sampling showed that the three former
landfills have impacted the groundwater underneath them, but little contamination appears to
have migrated from the landfill areas. A letter from the DEQ dated August 6, 2019 stated that
“any solid waste that is removed or excavated from within an old landfill is required to be placed
within the boundaries of the existing landfill or be disposed of in a permitted solid waste landfill.”
Based on the western portion of the site being identified within the landfill boundary, the
significant volume of waste excavated on the site, the limited sampling data for the site, and the
proposed residential use of the site, the landfill represents a REC to the site.
Site Reconnaissance
The site was vacant land at the time of the site reconnaissance. Terracon observed an
approximate 550 square feet area of stressed vegetation that appears to be from grading or
disturbance. The stressed vegetation likely does not constitute a REC to the site.
Trash, debris, and waste materials were observed at, and partially below the ground surface
throughout the site. The materials did not appear to be hazardous in nature; however, based on
the history of the site as a landfill and auto-salvage yard, the materials partially below the
ground surface throughout the site are considered a REC.
A disposal area was observed along the southern portion of the site including automobile tires,
an abandoned backhoe, a portion of a salvaged vehicle, empty 55-gallon drums, and an open-
top container of approximately 5 gallons of waste oil. Based on the materials observed and the
amount of waste oil observed, the disposal area is not considered a REC to the site.
Approximately 80 cubic yards of dumped fill dirt was observed near the southwest portion of the
site during the site reconnaissance. Based on the past use of the site as a landfill and auto-
salvage yard, the fill dirt is considered a REC to the site.
Adjoining Properties
The site is adjoined to the north, east, and west by vacant land. A disposal pile that appeared to
consist of construction debris was observed on the east-adjoining vacant land. The north, east,
and west-adjoining properties are discussed further in Section 4.1. The south-adjoining PM
Repairs facility was bordered by a corrugated steel fence, limiting visual reconnaissance. Based
on the use of the south-adjoining site as an apparent diesel repair facility for potentially 25
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking ■ Spanish Fork City, Utah
September 7, 2022 ■ Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.2
Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable iv
years, the presence of a strong petroleum odor suggests there could be a release at the site
boundary and represents a REC. The current uses of the remaining properties do not represent
a REC.
Significant Data Gaps
No significant data gaps were identified.
Conclusions
We have performed a Phase I ESA consistent with the procedures included in ASTM Practice
E 1527-13 at 2890 South State Street, Spanish Fork City, Utah County, Utah, the site. The
following RECs or Controlled RECs (CRECs) were identified in connection with the site:
Area-wide historical industrial use of site and adjoining properties:The
site and north- and east-adjoining properties were historically operated as the
Anderson Automobile Wrecking VCP, SEMS, and CERCLA facility. Additionally,
the site and adjoining properties were historically operated as the Spanish Fork
Landfill SEMS-ARCHIVE facility. Based on the Benzene identified at
concentrations above Utah Groundwater Quality Standards at the site in 2007,
with limited sampling since that time, and the proposed residential use of the
site, the Anderson Automobile Wrecking facility and Landfill represent a REC to
the site.
The south-adjoining property, PM Repairs, has been an apparent repair facility
for potentially 25 years, the presence of strong petroleum odors suggests there
could be a release at the site boundary and represents a REC to the site.
Recommendations
Based on the scope of services, limitations, and conclusions of this assessment, Terracon
recommends the following additional actions.
Additional Investigation:Terracon recommends conducting additional
investigation to evaluate subsurface conditions associated with the identified
RECs.
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking ■ Spanish Fork City, Utah
September 7, 2022 ■ Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.2
Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 1
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Site Description
Site Name Former Anderson Auto Wrecking
Site Location/Address 2890 South State Street, Spanish Fork City, Utah County, Utah
Land Area Approximately 1.5 acres
Site Improvements Vacant land
Anticipated Future Site Use Redevelopment for multi-family residences
Reason for the ESA Brownfields Assessment
Address Parcel Acres ACRES ID Use
2890 South State Street 27-010-0019 0.9999 253429 Vacant
Not listed 27-010-0028 0.5003 253471 Vacant
The location of the site is depicted on Exhibit 1 of Appendix A, which was reproduced from a
portion of the USGS 7.5-minute series topographic map. The site and adjoining properties are
depicted on the Site Diagram, which is included as Exhibit 2 of Appendix A. Acronyms and
terms used in this report are described in Appendix F.
1.2 Scope of Services
This Phase I ESA was performed in accordance with the Spanish Fork City Brownfields
Assessment Grant Bid Award #95811900, dated August 24, 2021, and Agreement between
Terracon and Spanish Fork City, dated April 18, 2022, and was conducted consistent with the
procedures included in ASTM E1527-13,Standard Practice for Environmental Site
Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process. The purpose of this ESA was
to assist the client in developing information to identify RECs in connection with the site as
reflected by the scope of this report. This purpose was undertaken through user-provided
information, a regulatory database review, historical and physical records review, interviews,
including local government inquiries, as applicable, and a visual noninvasive reconnaissance of
the site and adjoining properties. Limitations, ASTM deviations, and significant data gaps (if
identified) are noted in the applicable sections of the report.
ASTM E1527-13 contains a new definition of "migrate/migration," which refers to “the movement
of hazardous substances or petroleum products in any form, including, for example, solid and
liquid at the surface or subsurface, and vapor in the subsurface.” By including this explicit
reference to migration in ASTM E1527-13, the Standard clarifies that the potential for vapor
migration should be addressed as part of a Phase I ESA. This Phase I ESA has considered
vapor migration in evaluation of RECs associated with the site.
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking ■ Spanish Fork City, Utah
September 7, 2022 ■ Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.2
Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 2
1.3 Standard of Care
This ESA was performed in accordance with generally accepted practices of this profession,
undertaken in similar studies at the same time and in the same geographical area. We have
endeavored to meet this standard of care, but may be limited by conditions encountered during
performance, a client-driven scope of work, or inability to review information not received by the
report date. Where appropriate, these limitations are discussed in the text of the report, and an
evaluation of their significance with respect to our findings has been conducted.
Phase I ESAs, such as the one performed at this site, are of limited scope, are noninvasive, and
cannot eliminate the potential that hazardous, toxic, or petroleum substances are present or
have been released at the site beyond what is identified by the limited scope of this ESA. In
conducting the limited scope of services described herein, certain sources of information and
public records were not reviewed. It should be recognized that environmental concerns may be
documented in public records that were not reviewed. No ESA can wholly eliminate uncertainty
regarding the potential for RECs in connection with a property. Performance of this practice is
intended to reduce, but not eliminate, uncertainty regarding the potential for RECs. No
warranties, express or implied, are intended or made. The limitations herein must be considered
when the user of this report formulates opinions as to risks associated with the site or otherwise
uses the report for any other purpose. These risks may be further evaluated—but not
eliminated—through additional research or assessment. We will, upon request, advise you of
additional research or assessment options that may be available and associated costs.
1.4 Additional Scope Limitations, ASTM Deviations, and Data Gaps
Based upon the agreed-on scope of services, this ESA did not include subsurface or other
invasive assessments, vapor intrusion assessments or indoor air quality assessments (i.e.,
evaluation of the presence of vapors within a building structure), business environmental risk
evaluations, or other services not particularly identified and discussed herein. Credentials of the
company (Statement of Qualifications) have not been included in this report but are available
upon request. Pertinent documents are referred to in the text of this report, and a separate
reference section has not been included. Reasonable attempts were made to obtain information
within the scope and time constraints set forth by the client; however, in some instances,
information requested is not, or was not, received by the issuance date of the report. Information
obtained for this ESA was received from several sources that we believe to be reliable;
nonetheless, the authenticity or reliability of these sources cannot and is not warranted
hereunder. This ESA was further limited by the following:
Historical use of the site and surrounding area could not be determined back to
first developed use. The earliest historical resource, a 1947 aerial photograph,
showed the site and surrounding properties used for agricultural and rural
residential purposes. Based on the rural nature of the site and surrounding area
in the 1950s, it is unlikely suspect uses (e.g., industrial facilities) were located on
the site or adjoining properties prior to the 1950s. As such, this data failure is
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking ■ Spanish Fork City, Utah
September 7, 2022 ■ Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.2
Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 3
unlikely to affect the conclusions of this report and is not considered a significant
data gap.
An evaluation of the significance of limitations and missing information with respect to our
findings has been conducted, and where appropriate, significant data gaps are identified and
discussed in the text of the report. However, it should be recognized that an evaluation of
significant data gaps is based on the information available at the time of report issuance, and an
evaluation of information received after the report issuance date may result in an alteration of
our conclusions, recommendations, or opinions. We have no obligation to provide information
obtained or discovered by us after the issuance date of the report, or to perform any additional
services, regardless of whether the information would affect any conclusions, recommendations,
or opinions in the report. This disclaimer specifically applies to any information that has not been
provided by the client.
This report represents our service to you as of the report date and constitutes our final
document; its text may not be altered after final issuance. Findings in this report are based upon
the site’s current utilization, information derived from the most recent reconnaissance, and from
other activities described herein; such information is subject to change. Certain indicators of the
presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products may have been latent, inaccessible,
unobservable, or not present during the most recent reconnaissance and may subsequently
become observable (such as after site renovation or development). Further, these services are
not to be construed as legal interpretation or advice.
1.5 Reliance
This ESA report is prepared for the exclusive use and reliance of Spanish Fork City. Use or
reliance by any other party is prohibited without the written authorization of Spanish Fork City
and Terracon Consultants, Inc. (Terracon).
Reliance on the ESA by the client and all authorized parties will be subject to the terms,
conditions, and limitations stated in the proposal, ESA report, and Terracon’s Agreement for
Services. The limitation of liability defined in the Agreement for Services is the aggregate limit of
Terracon’s liability to the client and all relying parties.
Continued viability of this report is subject to ASTM E1527-13 Sections 4.6 and 4.8. If the ESA
will be used by a different user (third party) than the user for whom the ESA was originally
prepared, the third party must also satisfy the user’s responsibilities in Section 6 of ASTM
E1527-13.
1.6 Client Provided Information
Prior to the site visit, Mr. Brandon Snyder, client’s representative, was asked to provide the
following user questionnaire information as described in ASTM E1527-13 Section 6.
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking ■ Spanish Fork City, Utah
September 7, 2022 ■ Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.2
Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 4
Client Questionnaire Responses
Client Questionnaire Item Client Did Not
Respond
Client’s
Response
Yes No
Specialized Knowledge or Experience that is material to a REC in
connection with the site.
X
Actual Knowledge of Environmental Liens or Activity Use
Limitations (AULs) that may encumber the site.
X
Actual Knowledge of a Lower Purchase Price because
contamination is known or believed to be present at the site.
X
Commonly Known or Reasonably Ascertainable Information that is
material to a REC in connection with the site.
X
Obvious Indicators of Contamination at the site.X
Terracon’s consideration of the client provided information did identify RECs. The RECs are
discussed further in Section 4.1. Mr. Brandon Snyder of Spanish Fork City stated that he was
aware of a Phase I ESA conducted by IHI Environmental in May 2006 and a Phase II conducted
by IHI Environmental in July 2007 that included the site boundaries. Mr. Snyder stated that his
knowledge of environmental concerns associated with the site are based upon the 2006 and
2007 investigations. A copy of the questionnaire is included in Appendix C.
Mr. Joseph Earnest of Lone Star Builders, the potential buyer representative, answered the
questions below by email, stating that he had little knowledge of the site.
Client Questionnaire Item Client Did Not
Respond
Client’s
Response
Yes No
Specialized Knowledge or Experience that is material to a REC in
connection with the site.
X
Actual Knowledge of Environmental Liens or Activity Use
Limitations (AULs) that may encumber the site.
X
Actual Knowledge of a Lower Purchase Price because
contamination is known or believed to be present at the site.
X
Commonly Known or Reasonably Ascertainable Information that is
material to a REC in connection with the site.
X
Obvious Indicators of Contamination at the site.X*
*Mr. Earnest stated he was not aware of obvious indicators of contamination at the site.
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking ■ Spanish Fork City, Utah
September 7, 2022 ■ Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.2
Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 5
2.0 PHYSICAL SETTING
Physical Setting Information Source
Topography
Site Elevation Approximately 4,600 feet above sea level
USGS Topographic Map,
Provo Quadrangle, 2020
Topographic Gradient Sloping towards the northwest
Closest Surface Water Ponds approximately 1,800 to 2,400 feet
southwest of the site.
Soil Characteristics
Soil Type Holdaway (Hr), Payson (PEE)
Utah County, UT USDA-
NRCS Web Soil Survey
issued June 22, 2022Description
Holdaway Silt Loam (Hr) is located on lake
terraces that consist of lacustrine deposits
derived from mixed sources. Hr is a poorly
drained, nonsaline to very slightly saline hydric
soil with very low to moderately low capacity to
transmit water. Payson-terrace escarpments
complex (PEE) is located on an escarpment that
consists of lacustrine deposits derived from
limestone and shale. PEE is a moderately
drained, moderately saline to strongly saline soil
with a very low to moderately low capacity to
transmit water.
Geology/Hydrogeology
Formation Qlf
Utah Geological Survey
website,
https://geology.utah.gov,
June 22, 2022
Description
Fine-grained lacustrine deposits (upper
Pleistocene) consisting of silt and clay with
some fine-grained sand; weathers to unstratified
appearance but typically laminated; grades
upslope into sandier and gravelly lacustrine and
deltaic deposits
Estimated Depth to
First Occurrence of
Groundwater
Approximately 8 to 15 feet below ground
surface
IHI Environmental Reports
July and October 2007
*Hydrogeologic
Gradient
Not known–may be inferred to be parallel to topographic gradient (primarily to
the northwest).
* The groundwater flow direction and the depth to shallow, unconfined groundwater, if present, would likely vary depending upon
seasonal variations in rainfall and other hydrogeological features. Without the benefit of on-site groundwater monitoring wells
surveyed to a datum, groundwater depth and flow direction beneath the site cannot be directly ascertained.
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking ■ Spanish Fork City, Utah
September 7, 2022 ■ Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.2
Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 6
3.0 HISTORICAL USE INFORMATION
Terracon reviewed the following historical sources to develop a history of the previous uses of
the site and surrounding area, in order to help identify RECs associated with past uses. Copies
of selected historical documents are included in Appendix C.
3.1 Historical Topographic Maps, Aerial Photographs, and Sanborn Maps
Readily available historical USGS topographic maps, selected historical aerial photographs (at
approximately 10- to 15- year intervals), and historical fire insurance maps produced by the
Sanborn Map Company were reviewed to evaluate land development and obtain information
concerning the history of development on and near the site. Reviewed historical topographic
maps, aerial photographs, and Sanborn maps are summarized below.
Historical fire insurance maps produced by the Sanborn Map Company were requested from
EDR to evaluate past uses and relevant characteristics of the site and surrounding properties.
Based upon inquiries to the above-listed Sanborn provider, Sanborn maps were not available
for the site.
Topographic maps:Provo, Utah, published in 1948, 1949, 1950, 1951, 1969,
1975, 1993, 1994, 1998, 2014, 2017,and 2020 (1:24,000). Adjoining properties
are included on Springville, Spanish Fork Peak, and Spanish Fork quadrangles.
Aerial photographs:1947, 1954, 1958, 1965, 1969, 1072, 1975, 1981, 1983,
1993, 1994, 1997, 2006, 2011,and 2016 (1” =500’)
Historical Maps and Aerial Photographs
Direction Description
Site
Parcel 27-
010-0019
Undeveloped and/or agricultural land (1947); undeveloped and/or agricultural land
transected by an apparent ditch (1954–1958); grading and disturbance (1965–1972);
grading and disturbance typical of a landfill in the western portion (1975–1981); vacant
land and apparent scattered abandoned vehicle storage typical to an automobile salvage
yard (1983); apparent salvage yard transected by graded road (1993–2006); reduction of
salvage yard materials storage (2011); vacant land transected by an apparent road,
remaining scrap vehicle storage along eastern boundary (2016–2020)
Site
Parcel 27-
010-0028
Undeveloped and/or agricultural land (1947); undeveloped and/or agricultural land
transected by an apparent ditch (1954–1972); grading and disturbance typical of a landfill
in the western portion (1975–1981); vacant land and apparent scattered abandoned
vehicle storage typical to an automobile salvage yard (1983); apparent salvage yard
transected by graded road (1993–2006); reduction of salvage yard materials storage
(2011); vacant land transected by an apparent road, remaining scrap vehicle storage
along eastern boundary (2016–2020)
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking ■ Spanish Fork City, Utah
September 7, 2022 ■ Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.2
Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 7
Direction Description
North
Undeveloped land, grading and disturbance observed (1947); undeveloped land
transected by an apparent ditch (1954–1958); undeveloped and/or agricultural land
(1965–1972); undeveloped land, grading and disturbance typical of a landfill (1975–1983);
apparent abandoned vehicle storage typical to an automobile salvage yard transected by
apparent graded roads, appears to be associated with site operations (1993–2011);
vacant land transected by apparent graded roads (2016–2020)
East
Undeveloped and/or agricultural land transected by an apparent ditch followed by an
apparent residence (1947–1969); undeveloped and/or agricultural land transected by
apparent ditches followed by a man-made pond; apparent residential structures (1972–
1983); apparent abandoned vehicle storage typical to an automobile salvage yard
transected by an apparent graded road, appears to be associated with the site operations
(1993–2011); apparent reduction of abandoned vehicle storage (2016–2020)
South
Undeveloped land (1947); undeveloped and/or agricultural land transected by an apparent
ditch (1954–1969); undeveloped and/or agricultural land transected by an apparent ditch
followed by apparent grading, disturbance, and fill piles (1972); undeveloped land, grading
and disturbance that appears to be associated with a landfill operation (1975–1983);
development of several building structures, apparent vehicle storage typical to an
automotive repair shop (1993–2020)
West
Undeveloped land (1947–1972); grading and disturbance that appears to be a landfill
operation (1975); development of road followed by grading and disturbance typical to
landfill operations (1981–1997); road followed by apparent fill piles (2006–2020)
The landfill and automotive yards observed on and adjoining the site are discussed in Section
4.1.
3.2 Historical City Directories
City directories used in this study were made available through EDR (selected years reviewed:
1967-2017) and were reviewed at approximate five-year intervals, if readily available. Street
listings not available prior to 1992. The current street address for the site was identified as 2890
South State Street.
Historical City Directories
Direction Description
Site
2890 South State Street: No listing (1967–2000); Aldon S Anderson, Andersons Auto
Wrecking Inc (2005); Aldon S Andersen (2010); Occupant unknown (2014); No listing
(2017)
North No address identified
East 1215 North SR-51: No listing (1967–2010); residential (2014); No listing (2017)
South 1155 North SR-51: No listing (1967–2010); Horvath Hot Rods (2014–2017)
1205 North SR-51: No listing (1967–2017)
West No address identified
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking ■ Spanish Fork City, Utah
September 7, 2022 ■ Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.2
Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 8
3.3 Site Ownership
Based on a review of information obtained from the Utah County assessor’s records, the current
site owner is John and Shannon Anderson.
3.4 Title Search
At the direction of the client, title searches were included as part of the scope of services.
County deed records were reviewed by Texas Environmental Research of Rockwall, Texas, to
obtain a chain-of-title for the site. Ownership records were reviewed back to 1932 and are
included in Appendix C.
Based on a review of the title provider’s research, the current site owner is John R. Anderson
and Spouse, Shannon Anderson, who obtained title in June 2010 from Alton Anderson and
Spouse, Carolyn Anderson. Prior to that it was owned by Andersons Auto Wrecking
Corporation. Obvious suspect owners were not identified in the warranty deed data reviewed.
3.5 Environmental Liens and Activity and Use Limitations
At the direction of the client, performance of a review of environmental liens and activity and use
limitations was included as part of the scope of services for which Terracon engaged Texas
Environmental Research, Rockwall, Texas. Based on a review of the title provider’s research,
environmental liens or activity and use limitations were not identified. In addition, the EDR
regulatory database report included a review of both Federal and State Engineering Control
(EC) and Institutional Control (IC) databases. Based on a review of the database report, the site
was not listed on the EC or IC databases.
3.6 Interviews Regarding Current and Historical Site Uses
The following individual was interviewed regarding the current and historical use of the site.
Interview
Interviewer Name / Phone #Title Date
Kate Ballard Shannon Anderson /
[phone] Owner representative June 27, 2022
Terracon interviewed Ms. Shannon Anderson, owner, by questionnaire. Ms. Anderson indicated
that they have been familiar with the site for thirty years. Ms. Anderson noted that the site has
been vacant since the 2000s and was historically used as a wrecking yard from as early as the
1980s. Ms. Anderson stated the site has potential environmental conditions including waste
storage and disposal; and equipment use, storage, or abandonment. Terracon’s consideration
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking ■ Spanish Fork City, Utah
September 7, 2022 ■ Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.2
Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 9
of the owner-provided information did identify RECs. The historical uses of the site are further
discussed in Section 4.1. A copy of the questionnaire is included in Appendix C.
3.7 Prior Report Review
Terracon requested the client provide any previous environmental reports they are aware of for
the site. Previous reports were provided by the client to Terracon for review and are discussed
in Section 4.1.
4.0 RECORDS REVIEW
Regulatory database information was provided by EDR, a contract information services
company. The purpose of the records review was to identify RECs in connection with the site.
Information in this section is subject to the accuracy of the data provided by the information
services company and the date at which the information is updated. The scope herein did not
include confirmation of facilities listed as "unmappable" by regulatory databases.
In some of the following subsections, the words up-gradient, cross-gradient, and down-gradient
refer to the topographic gradient in relation to the site. As stated previously, the groundwater
flow direction and the depth to shallow groundwater, if present, would likely vary depending
upon seasonal variations in rainfall and the depth to the soil/bedrock interface. Without the
benefit of on-site groundwater monitoring wells surveyed to a datum, groundwater depth and
flow direction beneath the site cannot be directly ascertained.
4.1 Federal and State/Tribal Databases
Listed below are the facility listings identified on federal and state/tribal databases within the
ASTM-required search distances from the approximate site boundaries. Database definition,
descriptions, and the database search report are included in Appendix D.
Federal Databases
Database Description Distance
(miles)
Listing
s
SEMS
(CERCLIS)
Superfund Enterprise Management System /
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation,
& Liability Information System
0.5 1
SEMS-ARCHIVE
(CERCLIS /
NFRAP)
Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive /
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation,
& Liability Information System/No Further Remedial Action
Planned
0.5 2
ERNS Emergency Response Notification System Site 0
IC / EC Institutional Control/Engineering Control Site 0
NPL National Priorities List 1 0
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking ■ Spanish Fork City, Utah
September 7, 2022 ■ Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.2
Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 10
Database Description Distance
(miles)
Listing
s
NPL (Delisted)National Priorities Delisted List 0.5 0
RCRA
CORRACTS/ TSD
RCRA Corrective Action Activity 1 0
RCRA Generators Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Site and
adjoining
propertie
s
0
RCRA Non-
CORRACTS/ TSD
RCRA Non-Corrective Action Activity 0.5 0
State/Tribal Databases
Database Description Distance
(miles)Listings
Brownfields Brownfields Assessment Sites 0.5 0
IC Institutional Controls Sites Site 0
LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks 0.5 0
SHWS State Hazardous Waste Sites 0.5 0
SWF/LF Solid Waste Facilities/Landfills 0.5 0
UST Underground Storage Tanks Site and
adjoining
properties
0
VCP Voluntary Cleanup Program 0.5 1
In addition to the above ASTM-required listings, Terracon reviewed other federal, state, local,
and proprietary databases provided by the database firm. A list of the additional reviewed
databases is included in the regulatory database report in Appendix D.
The following table summarizes the site-specific information provided by the database and/or
gathered by this office for identified facilities.Facilities are listed in order of proximity to the site.
Additional discussion for selected facilities follows the summary table.
Listed Facilities
Facility Name and
Location
Estimated Distance /
Direction/Gradient
Database
Listings
Is a REC, CREC, or
HREC to the Site
Anderson Auto Wrecking
2890 South State Street Site
VCP, SEMS,
CERCLA, Lead
Smelters
REC, based on file
review discussed
below
Spanish Fork Landfill
1029 North 1110 East
Site / west-adjoining / cross-
gradient SEMS-ARCHIVE
REC, based on file
review discussed
below
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking ■ Spanish Fork City, Utah
September 7, 2022 ■ Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.2
Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 11
Facility Name and
Location
Estimated Distance /
Direction/Gradient
Database
Listings
Is a REC, CREC, or
HREC to the Site
Expressway Lane Plume
1200 East Expressway
Lane
1,300 feet southwest / cross
to down-gradient SEMS-ARCHIVE
No, based on file
review discussed
below
Anderson Auto Wrecking
The site is located within the Anderson Auto Wrecking facility boundaries, which was identified
on the VCP, SEMS, and CERCLA databases. EDR also identified Anderson Auto Wrecking as a
Lead Smelters facility on a non-ASTM database. The EDR database listed the facility in the
category of batteries/scrap metals/secondary smelting and is likely associated with the wrecking
yard. According to the Utah DEQ, there is no record of a lead smelter within the site boundary
or surrounding area, and evidence of a smelter was not identified during the historical review.
The property historically operated as an auto-salvage yard from approximately 1977 to the early
2010s. According to Utah DEQ records, a Phase I ESA was conducted on the site by IHI
Environmental in May 2006. The investigation concluded that the facility had been used
primarily for salvage operations and RECs were identified. According to the Utah DEQ, a Phase
II Investigation was conducted in July 2007 (IHI, July 2007). The investigation identified
significant volumes of landfill materials, and petroleum hydrocarbons in soil and groundwater.
Halogenated volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were not detected in the groundwater
samples. Benzene was detected at 0.007 milligrams per liter (mg/L), above Utah Ground Water
Quality Standard (GWQS) of 0.005 mg/L at a groundwater sample location (GW-4) at the site,
and below Tier 1 screening levels of 0.3 mg/L.
Further investigation was recommended, and a Supplemental Phase II Investigation was
conducted in October 2007 to further define the impacts from the salvage-yard operations (IHI,
October 2007). The investigation identified low levels of petroleum hydrocarbon impacts near
the western boundary of the site and within the vicinity of the former automobile crusher,
adjoining the site to the east. Groundwater samples taken at the site (MW-2, MW-3) identified
petroleum hydrocarbons below GWQS. Benzene was detected on the site at concentrations of
0.011 and 0.022 mg/L, above Utah’s GWQS, other constituents analyzed were below the
GWQS. Seven subsurface soil gas probes were installed on the property and allowed to
equilibrate for one week. A soil gas probe (SG-1) was installed on the site and but could not be
located the following week and was not sampled; however, the initial measurement during
installation was 360 ppm. Methane gas was detected in the remaining 6 soil gas probes
sampled within the facility boundaries. Although the methane concentrations observed on the
site are below the concentrations OSHA would consider hazardous to workers, IHI stated the
potential exists for the methane gas to accumulate in enclosed spaces to potentially dangerous
(i.e., explosive) levels. The VCP application was terminated on April 18, 2008 by DEQ due to
lack of progress at the site. DEQ felt that further investigation was necessary to assess potential
threats to human health and the environment related to this release and requested the site to be
added to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information
System (CERCLIS) database, in a letter dated March 25, 2009.
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking ■ Spanish Fork City, Utah
September 7, 2022 ■ Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.2
Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 12
The UDEQ Division of Environmental Response and Remediation (DERR) performed a Site
Inspection on the entire 10-acre parcel referred to as the “Anderson Auto” site in May 2018 as
part of the CERCLIS/SEMS case. The intent of the Site Inspection was to evaluate the
source(s) of the impacts identified in subsurface investigations conducted in 2007. The Site
Inspection Analytical Results Report (UDEQ, DERR; November 2021) detailed the results of the
sampling program and included background samples collected upgradient and downgradient of
the Anderson Auto facility. The Site Inspection sampling program included one soil and
groundwater boring on the site (AAWC-SB-06).
The results of the soil sample collected on the site did not report volatile organic chemicals
(VOCs), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and pesticides above the laboratory detection limit.
Low concentrations of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) were reported; however, the
concentrations were below screening levels. Results of analyses for total metals reported a
concentration of arsenic (9.9 mg/kg) that exceeded background screening levels. This
concentration exceeds the EPA Regional Screening Level (RSL) for arsenic in residential and
industrial soils but is not considered highly elevated when compared to naturally occurring
concentrations of arsenic in Utah soils.
The results of the groundwater samples collected on the site did not report VOCs, PAHs,
pesticides, or PCBs above laboratory detection limits. The concentration of arsenic and
chromium in groundwater did exceed the EPA MCLs, and Superfund Chemical Data Matrix
(SCDM) benchmark values but did not exceed the background concentrations.
The conclusion of the UDEQ Site Inspection report stated exposure to elevated concentrations
of metals in soils was unlikely unless the site was excavated in the southern portion, near the
former auto crushing activities, and that human exposure to contaminants in groundwater was
unlikely. Based on the exposure potential being low, as the site was fenced, and bordered by
the historical landfill, open fields, small industrial facilities, and the state highway, DERR
recommended No Further Remedial Action Planned (NFRAP) for the Anderson Auto facility.
The DERR reports have been included in Appendix C. Based on the past use of the site, the
previous benzene concentrations identified, with limited sampling since 2007, the Anderson
Auto Wrecking facility represents a REC to the site.
Spanish Fork Landfill (Facility ID UTN009962138)
The western portion of the site and west-adjoining property is located within the Spanish Fork
Landfill SEMS-ARCHIVE facility. The facility has been identified as an historical dump for
municipal wastes and includes the old Spanish Fork Landfill, the Springville Landfill, and the
Utah County Landfill. The landfills encompass approximately 143 surface acres and were
operated from the 1940s until 1988 and closed in 1991. The facility was investigated by
regulatory agencies and private entities from 1988 through 1999. Although the scope of the
various investigations has been limited, no significant concentrations of contaminants (metals,
VOCs, semi-VOCs, pesticides, or PCBs) have been detected, with the exception of metals in
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking ■ Spanish Fork City, Utah
September 7, 2022 ■ Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.2
Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 13
groundwater. The discovery of lead, chromium, and arsenic above EPA’s Maximum
Contaminant Levels (MCLs) in a location thought to be up-gradient led to the investigation of the
Expressway Lane Plume, discussed later in this report. A map of the landfills is attached in
Appendix C.
The landfills operated prior to RCRA regulations. Waste accepted into these landfills was
uncontrolled. It is not known if hazardous materials could be present or if industrial wastes were
included. However, a previous investigation of a section of the Utah County Landfill that
involved trenching did not encounter drums or containers suspected of holding hazardous
waste. The groundwater in the area is very shallow and is known to be in contact with landfill
contents. Groundwater flow direction for the area is expected to be northwesterly. The
Expressway Lane Plume Preliminary Assessment (PA) sampling showed that the three former
landfills have impacted the groundwater underneath them, but little contamination appears to
have migrated from the landfill areas. According to the Utah DEQ, significant volumes of
municipal garbage, construction debris, automobile tires, and other unidentified trash materials
were excavated in the western portion of the site as part of the investigation (IHI, July 2007).
The extent of the landfill materials has not been clearly defined; however, based on the
excavation it appears to extend deeper than 11 feet bgs. According to the Utah DEQ, a
supplemental investigation conducted on the Anderson Wrecking facility included methane gas
sampling (IHI, October 2007), and discussed above. There was a letter from the DEQ dated
August 6, 2019 stating that “any solid waste that is removed or excavated from within an old
landfill is required to be placed within the boundaries of the existing landfill or be disposed of in
a permitted solid waste landfill.”
Based on the western portion of the site being identified within the landfill boundary, the
significant volume of waste excavated on the site, and limited sampling, the facility represents a
REC to the site.
Expressway Lane Plume (Facility ID UT0009134958)
The Expressway Lane Plume is located approximately 1,300 feet southwest of the site and is
identified on the SEMS-ARCHIVE database. The facility was discovered by CERCLIS in 1999,
when a groundwater sample collected for the Spanish Fork Landfill Innovative Assessment,
thought to be up-gradient of the landfills, was found to contain concentrations of heavy metals
that exceeded MCLs. However, the boundaries of the dissolved metals groundwater plume had
not been determined. The Expressway Lane Plume PA concluded that the impacts documented
in sample SFL-GW-03 originated from the historical landfills. The report speculated on possible
suspect activities associated with salvage and wrecking yards—such as battery-cracking—but
no inspection or investigation of whether these types of activities occurred was conducted. The
PA identified the Ainge and Anderson Auto Wrecking operations as a potential source of the
metals but then concluded these properties were at a lower elevation than the location of the
sample that exceeded MCLs and therefore not likely to have been the sources.
Based on the sampling conducted at the site in 2007, as discussed above, this listing is not
considered a REC to the site.
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking ■ Spanish Fork City, Utah
September 7, 2022 ■ Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.2
Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 14
Unmapped facilities are those that do not contain sufficient address or location information to
evaluate the facility listing locations relative to the site. The report did not list facilities in the
unmapped section.
4.2 Local Agency Inquiries
Agency Contacted/
Contact Method Response
Utah County Health Department
/[e-mail] /
[e-mail]
Ms. Julie Harris of the Health Department responded to Terracon
request for records on July 18, 2022. No record of hazardous
materials or incidents have been reported for the site.
Spanish Police Fire Department
/[e-mail]
The Spanish Fork Police Department responded on June 23, 2022 to
Terracon request for records made to the fire department. No
hazardous materials or hazardous materials incidents have been
reported for the site.
Utah Department of
Environmental Quality, Utah
Environmental Interactive Map /
https://enviro.deq.utah.gov/
According to the Utah DEQ, the site was listed as a VCP and
CERCLA facility. The site is discussed further in Section 4.1
5.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE
5.1 General Site Information
Information contained in this section is based on a visual reconnaissance conducted while
walking through the site and the accessible interior areas of structures, if any, located on the
site. The site and adjoining properties are depicted on the Site Diagram, which is included in
Exhibit 2 of Appendix A. Photo documentation of the site at the time of the visual
reconnaissance is provided in Appendix B. Credentials of the individuals planning and
conducting the site visit are included in Appendix E.
General Site Information
Site Reconnaissance
Field Personnel Kate Ballard
Reconnaissance Date June 27, 2022
Weather Conditions Sunny, 85 degrees Fahrenheit
Site Contact/Title Terracon not accompanied during site inspection
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking ■ Spanish Fork City, Utah
September 7, 2022 ■ Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.2
Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 15
5.2 Overview of Current Site Occupants
At the time of the site reconnaissance, the site was generally vacant land with remnants of trash
and debris.
5.3 Overview of Current Site Operations
At the time of the site reconnaissance, the site was vacant, with no current operations.
5.4 Site Observations
The following table summarizes site observations and interviews. Affirmative responses
(designated by an “X”) are discussed in more detail following the table.
Site Characteristics
Category Item or Feature Observed or
Identified
Site Operations,
Processes, and
Equipment
Emergency generators
Elevators
Air compressors
Hydraulic lifts
Dry cleaning
Photo processing
Ventilation hoods and/or incinerators
Waste treatment systems and/or water treatment systems
Heating and/or cooling systems
Paint booths
Sub-grade mechanic pits
Wash-down areas or carwashes
Pesticide/herbicide production or storage
Printing operations
Metal finishing (electroplating, chrome plating, galvanizing,
etc.)
Salvage operations
Oil, gas, or mineral production
Other processes or equipment
Aboveground
Chemical or Waste
Storage
Aboveground storage tanks
Drums, barrels and/or containers  5 gallons
MSDS or SDS
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking ■ Spanish Fork City, Utah
September 7, 2022 ■ Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.2
Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 16
Category Item or Feature Observed or
Identified
Underground
Chemical or Waste
Storage, Drainage
or Collection
Systems
Underground storage tanks or ancillary UST equipment
Sumps, cisterns, French drains, catch basins and/or dry wells
Grease traps
Septic tanks and/or leach fields
Oil/water separators, clarifiers, sand traps, triple traps,
interceptors
Pipeline markers
Interior floor drains
Electrical
Transformers/
PCBs
Transformers and/or capacitors
Other equipment
Releases or
Potential Releases
Stressed vegetation X
Stained soil
Stained pavement or similar surface
Leachate and/or waste seeps
Trash, debris, and/or other waste materials X
Dumping or disposal areas X
Construction/demolition debris and/or dumped fill dirt X
Surface water discoloration, odor, sheen, and/or free-floating
product
Strong, pungent, or noxious odors
Exterior pipe discharges and/or other effluent discharges
Other Notable Site
Features
Surface water bodies
Quarries or pits
Wastewater lagoons
Wells
Releases or Potential Releases
Stressed vegetation
Stressed vegetation was observed in the eastern portion of the property during the site
reconnaissance see Appendix B photo 2. The area was approximately 500 square feet area.
The potential cause of this stressed vegetation is unknown but appears to be from grading or
disturbance. Based upon the history of the site and the backhoe observed nearby, this stressed
vegetation does not constitute a REC to the site.
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking ■ Spanish Fork City, Utah
September 7, 2022 ■ Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.2
Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 17
Trash, debris and/or other waste materials
Trash, debris, and waste materials were observed at the ground surface and partially exposed
beneath the surface throughout the site during the site reconnaissance. Based on visual
observation the debris consisted of wood, metal, cardboard, glass bottles, plastics, PVC pipe,
concrete, two empty plastic 55-gallon drums, and various unidentified materials. Additionally,
one 55-gallon drum containing less than 5 gallons of apparent waste oil was observed and is
further discussed below. Leakage, spills, or other releases from these materials were not
observed during the visual reconnaissance. The materials did not appear to be hazardous in
nature; however, based on the history of the site as a landfill and auto-salvage yard, the
materials are considered a REC to the site.
Dumping or disposal areas
A disposal area was observed along the southern portion of the site and included approximately
15 automobile tires, an abandoned backhoe, a portion of a salvaged vehicle, and three empty
55-gallon drums. One 55-gallon drum was observed along the southern property boundary with
an open container containing approximately 5 gallons of apparent waste oil. Based on the
materials observed and the amount of waste oil observed, the disposal area is not considered a
REC to the site.
Construction/demolition debris and/or dumped fill dirt
Dumped fill dirt was observed near the southwest portion of the site during the site
reconnaissance. The amount of dirt was approximately 80 cubic yards. Based upon visual
observation of surface materials only, the fill appears to consist of soil, trash, and construction
materials. No notable odors were apparent from this area at the time of the site reconnaissance,
however, based on the past use of the site as a landfill and auto-salvage yard, the fill dirt is
considered a REC to the site.
6.0 ADJOINING PROPERTY RECONNAISSANCE
Visual observations of adjoining properties (from site boundaries) are summarized below.
Adjoining Properties
Direction Description
North Vacant land
East Vacant land, disposal pile that appeared to consist of construction debris observed
South PM Repairs, staining on paved and unpaved surfaces, diesel truck and parts
storage, corrugated steel fence, and strong petroleum odors along boundary
observed
West Vacant land
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Former Anderson Auto Wrecking ■ Spanish Fork City, Utah
September 7, 2022 ■ Terracon Project No. 61227186 Task 3.2
Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable 18
The north, east, and west-adjoining properties are discussed further in Section 4.1. The south-
adjoining PM Repairs facility was bordered by a corrugated steel fence, limiting visual
reconnaissance. Based on the use of the south-adjoining site as an apparent diesel repair
facility for potentially 25 years, the presence of a strong petroleum odor suggests there could be
a release at the site boundary and represents a REC. The current uses of the remaining
properties do not represent a REC.
7.0 ADDITIONAL SERVICES
Per the agreed scope of services specified in the proposal, additional services (asbestos
sampling, lead-based paint sampling, wetlands evaluation, lead in drinking water testing, radon
testing, vapor encroachment screening, etc.) were not conducted.
8.0 DECLARATION
I, Kate Ballard, declare that, to the best of my professional knowledge and belief, I meet the
definition of Environmental Professional as defined in Section 312.10 of 40 CFR 312; and I have
the specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess a property of
the nature, history, and setting of the site. I have developed and performed the All Appropriate
Inquiries in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312.
__________________________
Kate Ballard
Project Manager
APPENDIX A
EXHIBIT 1–TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
EXHIBIT 2–SITE DIAGRAM

TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
Anderson Auto Wrecking
2890 South State Street
Spanish Fork City, UT
TOPOGRAPHIC MAP IMAGE COURTESY OF THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
QUADRANGLES INCLUDE: PROVO, UT (1/1/1998), SPRINGVILLE, UT (1/1/1998), SPANISH FORK, UT (1/1/1998) and SPANISH FORK PEAK, UT (1/1/1998).
6949 S High Tech Dr Ste 100
Midvale, UT 84047-3707
61227186
Project Manager:
Drawn by:
Checked by:
Approved by:
KB
TC
TC
1”=2,000’
Ex. 1
July 2022
Project No.
Scale:
File Name:
Date: 1
Exhibit KB
APPROXIMATE
SITE BOUNDARY

U.S. Street Rods & Collision
1155 N. State Road 51
New Concept Louvers
1185 N. State Road 51
SITE DIAGRAM
Anderson Auto Wrecking
2890 South State Street
Spanish Fork City, UT
6949 S High Tech Dr Ste 100
Midvale, UT 84047-3707
DIAGRAM IS FOR GENERAL LOCATION ONLY, AND IS
NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES
61227186
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY PROVIDED
BY MICROSOFT BING MAPS
PM Repairs
1205 State Road 51
KB
TC
TC
AS SHOWN
Ex. 2
July 2022
Scale:
2
Exhibit
Abandoned Home
1205 N. State Road 51
Project Manager:
Drawn by:
Checked by:
Approved by:
Project No.
File Name:
Date:
KB
APPROXIMATE
SITE BOUNDARY Vacant Land
Paved Lane
Vacant Land
Vacant Land
Fill Pile
Abandoned
automotive
equipment
27:010:0019
27:010:0028
GW-4
GW-5
MW-2
MW-3
Benzene
GW-4 0.007
GW-5 <0.001
MW-2 0.011
MW-3 0.022
2007 Sampling on Site
(mg/L)
APPENDIX B
SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
Site Photographs
Former Anderson Wrecking ■Spanish Fork, Utah
Date Photos were taken: June 28, 2022 ■Terracon Project No. 61227186
Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable
Photo #1 Looking west from southeastern
corner boundary.
Photo #2 Looking north from southeastern
corner boundary.
Photo #3 Typical exposed waste observed
throughout site.
Photo #4 Looking south from northwestern
corner boundary.
Photo #5 Fill pile in southwestern portion of site.Photo #6 Abandoned tires and drum containing
waste oil along western boundary.
Site Photographs
Former Anderson Wrecking ■Spanish Fork, Utah
Date Photos were taken: June 28, 2022 ■Terracon Project No. 61227186
Responsive ■Resourceful ■Reliable
Photo #7 Abandoned tires and motorized
equipment.
Photo #8 South-adjoining PM Repairs facility.
Photo #9 East-adjoining vacant land and debris
piles followed by abandoned house.
Photo #10 North-adjoining vacant land.
Photo #11 West-adjoining vacant land.
APPENDIX C
HISTORICAL DOCUMENTATION AND USER QUESTIONNAIRE
Client/User Required Questionnaire
Responsive n Resourceful n Reliable
Person Completing Questionnaire Name:
Company:
Phone:
Email:
Site Name
Site Address
Point of Contact for Access Name:
Company:
Phone:
Email:
Access Restrictions or Special Site
Requirements?
___No ___Yes (If yes, please explain)
Confidentiality Requirements?___No ___Yes (If yes, please explain)
Current Site Owner Name:
Company:
Phone:
Email:
Current Site Operator Name:
Company:
Phone:
Email:
Reasons for ESA
(e.g., financing, acquisition, lease, etc.)
Anticipated Future Site Use
Relevant Documents?Please provide Terracon copies of prior Phase I or II ESAs, Asbestos Surveys,
Environmental Permits or Audit documents, Underground Storage Tank documents,
Geotechnical Investigations, Site Surveys, Diagrams or Maps, or other relevant reports
or documents.
ASTM User Questionnaire
In order to qualify for one of the Landowner Liability Protections (LLPs) offered by the Small Business Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act of
2001 (the “Brownfields Amendments”), the user must respond to the following questions. Failure to provide this information to the environmental
professional may result in significant data gaps, which may limit our ability to identify recognized environmental conditions resulting in a
determination that “all appropriate inquiry” is not complete. This form represents a type of interview and as such, the user has an obligation to
answer all questions in good faith, to the extent of their actual knowledge.
1) Did a search of recorded land title records (or judicial records where appropriate) identify any environmental liens filed or
recorded against the property under federal, tribal, state, or local law (40 CFR 312.25)?
___No ___Yes ___Title search not completed (If yes, explain below and send Terracon a copy of the Chain of Title report.)
2) Did a search of recorded land title records (or judicial records where appropriate) identify any activity and use limitations
(AULs), such as engineering controls, land use restrictions, or institutional controls that are in place at the property and/or have
been filed or recorded against the property under federal, tribal, state, or local law (40 CFR 312.26)?
___No ___Yes ___Title search not completed (If yes, explain below and send Terracon a copy of the Chain of Title report.)
3) Do you have any specialized knowledge or experience related to the site or nearby properties? For example, are you involved
in the same line of business as the current or former occupants of the site or an adjoining property so that you would have
specialized knowledge of the chemicals and processes used by this type of business (40 CFR 312-28)?
___No ___Yes (If yes, explain below)
4) Do you have actual knowledge of a lower purchase price because contamination is known or believed to be present at the site
(40 CFR 312.29)?
___No ___Yes ___Not applicable (If yes, explain below)
5) Are you aware of commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information about the site that would help the environmental
professional to identify conditions indicative of releases or threatened releases (40 CFR 312.30)?
___No ___Yes (If yes, explain below)
6) Based on your knowledge and experience related to the site, are there any obvious indicators that point to the presence or
likely presence of contamination at the site (40 CFR 312.31)?
___No ___Yes (If yes, explain below)
Comments or explanations:
Brandon Snyder [phone]
Spanish Fork City [e-mail]
Former Anderson Wrecking
2890 South State Street/SR-51, Spanish Fork, Utah
identify RECs
Redevelopment for Residential Use
x
x
x
x
x
x
Phase I ESA conducted by IHI Environmental, May 18, 2006; Phase II conducted by IHI, July 31,
2007
Certified Sanborn® Map Report
Inquiry Number:
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com
Former Anderson Wrecking
2890 South State Street
Springville, UT 84663
June 21, 2022
7025843.3
Certified Sanborn® Map Report
Certified Sanborn Results:
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein
are the property of their respective owners.
page-
The Sanborn Library includes more than 1.2 million
fire insurance maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris &
Browne, Hopkins, Barlow and others which track
historical property usage in approximately 12,000
American cities and towns. Collections searched:
Library of Congress
University Publications of America
EDR Private Collection
The Sanborn Library LLC Since 1866™
Limited Permission To Make Copies
Sanborn® Library search results
Contact:EDR Inquiry #
Site Name: Client Name:
Certification #
PO #
Project
06/21/22
2890 South State Street
Former Anderson Wrecking Terracon
6949 South High Tech Drive
Springville, UT 84663
7025843.3
Midvale, UT 84047
Kate Ballard
The Sanborn Library has been searched by EDR and maps covering the target property location as provided by Terracon were identified for
the years listed below. The Sanborn Library is the largest, most complete collection of fire insurance maps. The collection includes maps
from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris & Browne, Hopkins, Barlow, and others. Only Environmental Data Resources Inc. (EDR) is authorized to
grant rights for commercial reproduction of maps by the Sanborn Library LLC, the copyright holder for the collection. Results can be
authenticated by visiting www.edrnet.com/sanborn.
The Sanborn Library is continually enhanced with newly identified map archives. This report accesses all maps in the collection as of the
day this report was generated.
D67E-47CB-A542
NA
UNMAPPED PROPERTY
61227186
This report certifies that the complete holdings of the Sanborn Library,
LLC collection have been searched based on client supplied target
property information, and fire insurance maps covering the target property
were not found.
Certification #: D67E-47CB-A542
Terracon (the client) is permitted to make up to FIVE photocopies of this Sanborn Map transmittal and each fire insurance map accompanying this report solely for the
limited use of its customer. No one other than the client is authorized to make copies. Upon request made directly to an EDR Account Executive, the client may be
permitted to make a limited number of additional photocopies. This permission is conditioned upon compliance by the client, its customer and their agents with EDR's
copyright policy; a copy of which is available upon request.
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot
be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY
EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY
DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE
OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE,
WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING,
WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL
DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any
analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to
provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property.
Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2022 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of
Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
7025843 3 2
EDR Historical Topo Map Report
Inquiry Number:
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com
with QuadMatch™
Former Anderson Wrecking
2890 South State Street
Springville, UT 84663
June 21, 2022
EDR Historical Topo Map Report
EDR Inquiry #
Search Results:
P.O.#
Project:
Maps Provided:
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein
are the property of their respective owners.
page-
Coordinates:
Latitude:
Longitude:
UTM Zone:
UTM X Meters:
UTM Y Meters:
Elevation:
Contact:
Site Name: Client Name:
2020
2017
2014
1998
1993, 1994
1975
1969
1950, 1951
1949
1948, 1949
06/21/22
Former Anderson Wrecking Terracon
2890 South State Street 6949 South High Tech Drive
Springville, UT 84663 Midvale, UT 84047
7025843.4 Kate Ballard
EDR Topographic Map Library has been searched by EDR and maps covering the target property location as provided by
Terracon were identified for the years listed below. EDR’s Historical Topo Map Report is designed to assist professionals in
evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDRs Historical Topo Map Report includes a
search of a collection of public and private color historical topographic maps, dating back to the late 1800s.
NA 40.125571 40° 7' 32" North
61227186 -111.6295 -111° 37' 46" West
Zone 12 North
446364.44
4441884.41
4598.57' above sea level
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot
be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY
EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY
DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE
OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE,
WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING,
WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL
DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any
analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to
provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property.
Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2022 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of
Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
7025843 4 2
page
Topo Sheet Key
This EDR Topo Map Report is based upon the following USGS topographic map sheets.
-
2020 Source Sheets
2020
Provo
7.5-minute, 24000
2020
Spanish Fork
7.5-minute, 24000
2020
Springville
7.5-minute, 24000
2020
Spanish Fork Peak
7.5-minute, 24000
2017 Source Sheets
2017
Provo
7.5-minute, 24000
2017
Spanish Fork
7.5-minute, 24000
2017
Springville
7.5-minute, 24000
2017
Spanish Fork Peak
7.5-minute, 24000
2014 Source Sheets
2014
Provo
7.5-minute, 24000
2014
Spanish Fork
7.5-minute, 24000
2014
Springville
7.5-minute, 24000
2014
Spanish Fork Peak
7.5-minute, 24000
1998 Source Sheets
1998
Springville
7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1993
1998
Provo
7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1993
1998
Spanish Fork
7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1993
1998
Spanish Fork Peak
7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1997
7025843 4 3
page
Topo Sheet Key
This EDR Topo Map Report is based upon the following USGS topographic map sheets.
-
1993, 1994 Source Sheets
1993
Provo
7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1975
1993
Springville
7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1987
1994
Spanish Fork
7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1987
1994
Spanish Fork Peak
7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1987
1975 Source Sheets
1975
Springville
7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1975
1975
Provo
7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1975
1975
Spanish Fork Peak
7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1975
1975
Spanish Fork
7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1975
1969 Source Sheets
1969
Springville
7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1969
1969
Spanish Fork
7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1969
1969
Provo
7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1969
1969
Spanish Fork Peak
7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1969
1950, 1951 Source Sheets
1950
Springville
7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1946
1950
Provo
7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1946
1950
Spanish Fork
7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1946
1951
Spanish Fork Peak
7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1946
7025843 4 4
page
Topo Sheet Key
This EDR Topo Map Report is based upon the following USGS topographic map sheets.
-
1949 Source Sheets
1949
Provo
15-minute, 62500
Aerial Photo Revised 1946
1948, 1949 Source Sheets
1948
Springville
7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1946
1948
Spanish Fork
7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1946
1948
Provo
7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1946
1949
Spanish Fork Peak
7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1946
7025843 4 5
Project Manager: Project No.
Drawn by: Scale:
Checked by: File Name:
Approved by: Date:
Topographic Map
page-
TP, Provo, 2020, 7.5-minute
NE, Springville, 2020, 7.5-minute
SE, Spanish Fork Peak, 2020, 7.5-minute
SW, Spanish Fork, 2020, 7.5-minute 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5
2020 TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
2020
2020
7025843 4 6
Project Manager: Project No.
Drawn by: Scale:
Checked by: File Name:
Approved by: Date:
Topographic Map
page-
TP, Provo, 2017, 7.5-minute
NE, Springville, 2017, 7.5-minute
SE, Spanish Fork Peak, 2017, 7.5-minute
SW, Spanish Fork, 2017, 7.5-minute 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5
2017 TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
2017
2017
7025843 4 7
Project Manager: Project No.
Drawn by: Scale:
Checked by: File Name:
Approved by: Date:
Topographic Map
page-
TP, Provo, 2014, 7.5-minute
NE, Springville, 2014, 7.5-minute
SE, Spanish Fork Peak, 2014, 7.5-minute
SW, Spanish Fork, 2014, 7.5-minute 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5
2014 TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
2014
2014
7025843 4 8
Project Manager: Project No.
Drawn by: Scale:
Checked by: File Name:
Approved by: Date:
Topographic Map
page-
TP, Provo, 1998, 7.5-minute
NE, Springville, 1998, 7.5-minute
SE, Spanish Fork Peak, 1998, 7.5-minute
SW, Spanish Fork, 1998, 7.5-minute 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5
1998 TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
1998
1998
7025843 4 9
Project Manager: Project No.
Drawn by: Scale:
Checked by: File Name:
Approved by: Date:
Topographic Map
page-
TP, Provo, 1993, 7.5-minute
NE, Springville, 1993, 7.5-minute
SE, Spanish Fork Peak, 1994, 7.5-minute
SW, Spanish Fork, 1994, 7.5-minute 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5
1993, 1994 TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
1993, 1994
1993, 1994
7025843 4 10
Project Manager: Project No.
Drawn by: Scale:
Checked by: File Name:
Approved by: Date:
Topographic Map
page-
TP, Provo, 1975, 7.5-minute
NE, Springville, 1975, 7.5-minute
SE, Spanish Fork Peak, 1975, 7.5-minute
SW, Spanish Fork, 1975, 7.5-minute 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5
1975 TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
1975
1975
7025843 4 11
Project Manager: Project No.
Drawn by: Scale:
Checked by: File Name:
Approved by: Date:
Topographic Map
page-
TP, Provo, 1969, 7.5-minute
NE, Springville, 1969, 7.5-minute
SE, Spanish Fork Peak, 1969, 7.5-minute
SW, Spanish Fork, 1969, 7.5-minute 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5
1969 TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
1969
1969
7025843 4 12
Project Manager: Project No.
Drawn by: Scale:
Checked by: File Name:
Approved by: Date:
Topographic Map
page-
TP, Provo, 1950, 7.5-minute
NE, Springville, 1950, 7.5-minute
SE, Spanish Fork Peak, 1951, 7.5-minute
SW, Spanish Fork, 1950, 7.5-minute 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5
1950, 1951 TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
1950, 1951
1950, 1951
7025843 4 13
Project Manager: Project No.
Drawn by: Scale:
Checked by: File Name:
Approved by: Date:
Topographic Map
page-
TP, Provo, 1949, 15-minute
0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5
1949 TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
1949
1949
7025843 4 14
Project Manager: Project No.
Drawn by: Scale:
Checked by: File Name:
Approved by: Date:
Topographic Map
page-
TP, Provo, 1948, 7.5-minute
NE, Springville, 1948, 7.5-minute
SE, Spanish Fork Peak, 1949, 7.5-minute
SW, Spanish Fork, 1948, 7.5-minute 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5
1948, 1949 TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
1948, 1949
1948, 1949
7025843 4 15
The EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package
䙯牭敲⁁湤敲獯渠坲散歩湧
2016 1"=500'Flight Year: 2016 USDA/NAIP
2011 1"=500'Flight Year: 2011 USDA/NAIP
2006 1"=500'Flight Year: 2006 USDA/NAIP
1997 1"=500'Acquisition Date: January 01, 1997 USGS/DOQQ
1994 1"=500'Flight Date: August 17, 1994 USGS
1993 1"=500'Acquisition Date: January 01, 1993 USGS/DOQQ
1983 1"=500'Flight Date: September 05, 1983 USDA
1981 1"=500'Flight Date: August 04, 1981 USDA
1975 1"=500'Flight Date: August 02, 1975 USGS
1972 1"=500'Flight Date: July 15, 1972 USDA
1969 1"=500'Flight Date: October 23, 1969 USGS
1965 1"=500'Flight Date: July 28, 1965 USDA
1958 1"=500'Flight Date: June 09, 1958 USDA
1954 1"=500'Flight Date: August 27, 1954 USGS
1947 1"=500'Flight Date: September 20, 1947 USGS
EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package 06/22/22
Former Anderson Wrecking
Site Name:Client Name:
Terracon
2890 South State Street 6949 South High Tech Drive
Springville, UT 84663 Midvale, UT 84047
EDR Inquiry #7025843.8 Contact:Kate Ballard
Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) Aerial Photo Decade Package is a screening tool designed to assist
environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDR’s
professional researchers provide digitally reproduced historical aerial photographs, and when available, provide one photo
per decade.
Search Results:
Year Scale Details Source
When delivered electronically by EDR, the aerial photo images included with this report are for ONE TIME USE
ONLY. Further reproduction of these aerial photo images is prohibited without permission from EDR. For more
information contact your EDR Account Executive.
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot
be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY
EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY
DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE
OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE,
WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING,
WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL
DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any
analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to
provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property.
Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2022 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of
Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are
the property of their respective owners.
7025843 8-page 2
Aerial Photograph
0 Feet 500 1000 2000
Project Manager:Project No:
Drawn By:Scale:
2016 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
Checked By:File Name:
Date:Approved By:
2016
7025843 8 page 3
2016
Aerial Photograph
0 Feet 500 1000 2000
Project Manager:Project No:
Drawn By:Scale:
2011 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
Checked By:File Name:
Date:Approved By:
2011
7025843 8 page 4
2011
Aerial Photograph
0 Feet 500 1000 2000
Project Manager:Project No:
Drawn By:Scale:
2006 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
Checked By:File Name:
Date:Approved By:
2006
7025843 8 page 5
2006
Aerial Photograph
0 Feet 500 1000 2000
Project Manager:Project No:
Drawn By:Scale:
1997 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
Checked By:File Name:
Date:Approved By:
1997
7025843 8 page 6
1997
Aerial Photograph
0 Feet 500 1000 2000
Project Manager:Project No:
Drawn By:Scale:
1994 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
Checked By:File Name:
Date:Approved By:
1994
7025843 8 page 7
1994
Aerial Photograph
0 Feet 500 1000 2000
Project Manager:Project No:
Drawn By:Scale:
1993 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
Checked By:File Name:
Date:Approved By:
1993
7025843 8 page 8
1993
Aerial Photograph
0 Feet 500 1000 2000
Project Manager:Project No:
Drawn By:Scale:
1983 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
Checked By:File Name:
Date:Approved By:
1983
7025843 8 page 9
1983
Aerial Photograph
0 Feet 500 1000 2000
Project Manager:Project No:
Drawn By:Scale:
1981 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
Checked By:File Name:
Date:Approved By:
1981
7025843 8 page 10
1981
Aerial Photograph
0 Feet 500 1000 2000
Project Manager:Project No:
Drawn By:Scale:
1975 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
Checked By:File Name:
Date:Approved By:
1975
7025843 8 page 11
1975
Aerial Photograph
0 Feet 500 1000 2000
Project Manager:Project No:
Drawn By:Scale:
1972 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
Checked By:File Name:
Date:Approved By:
1972
7025843 8 page 12
1972
Aerial Photograph
0 Feet 500 1000 2000
Project Manager:Project No:
Drawn By:Scale:
1969 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
Checked By:File Name:
Date:Approved By:
1969
7025843 8 page 13
1969
Aerial Photograph
0 Feet 500 1000 2000
Project Manager:Project No:
Drawn By:Scale:
1965 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
Checked By:File Name:
Date:Approved By:
1965
7025843 8 page 14
1965
Aerial Photograph
0 Feet 500 1000 2000
Project Manager:Project No:
Drawn By:Scale:
1958 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
Checked By:File Name:
Date:Approved By:
1958
7025843 8 page 15
1958
Aerial Photograph
0 Feet 500 1000 2000
Project Manager:Project No:
Drawn By:Scale:
1954 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
Checked By:File Name:
Date:Approved By:
1954
7025843 8 page 16
1954
Aerial Photograph
0 Feet 500 1000 2000
Project Manager:Project No:
Drawn By:Scale:
1947 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
Checked By:File Name:
Date:Approved By:
1947
7025843 8 page 17
1947
Former Anderson Wrecking
2890 South State Street
Springville, UT 84663
Inquiry Number: 7025843.5
June 22, 2022
The EDR-City Directory Image Report
6 Armstrong Road
Shelton, CT 06484
800.352.0050
www.edrnet.comEnvironmental Data Resources IncEnvironmental Data Resources IncEnvironmental Data Resources IncEnvironmental Data Resources Inc
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION
Executive Summary
Findings
City Directory Images
Thank you for your business.
Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to
Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and
surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER
IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING
OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC.
BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER
CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR
EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY
LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses,
estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and
are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction orforecast of, any
environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional
can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is
not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2020 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in
part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates.
All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
DESCRIPTION
Environmental Data Resources, Inc.’s (EDR) City Directory Report is a screening tool designed to assist
environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities.
EDR’s City Directory Report includes a search of available city directory data at 5 year intervals.
RECORD SOURCES
EDR's Digital Archive combines historical directory listings from sources such as Cole Information and Dun
& Bradstreet. These standard sources of property information complement and enhance each other to
provide a more comprehensive report.
EDR is licensed to reproduce certain City Directory works by the copyright holders of those works. The
purchaser of this EDR City Directory Report may include it in report(s) delivered to a customer. Reproduction
of City Directories without permission of the publisher or licensed vendor may be a violation of copyright.
RESEARCH SUMMARY
The following research sources were consulted in the preparation of this report. A check mark indicates
where information was identified in the source and provided in this report.
Year Target Street Cross Street Source
2017 þ þ EDR Digital Archive
2014 þ þ EDR Digital Archive
2010 þ þ EDR Digital Archive
2005 þ þ EDR Digital Archive
2000 þ ¨EDR Digital Archive
1995 þ ¨EDR Digital Archive
1992 þ ¨EDR Digital Archive
1985 ¨¨Polk's City Directory
1980 ¨¨Polk's City Directory
1975 ¨¨Polk's City Directory
1971 ¨¨Polk's City Directory
1967 ¨¨Polk's City Directory
7025843-5 Page 1
FINDINGS
TARGET PROPERTY STREET
2890 South State Street
Springville, UT 84663
Year CD Image Source
S STATE ST
2017 pg A3 EDR Digital Archive
2014 pg A5 EDR Digital Archive
2010 pg A7 EDR Digital Archive
2005 pg A9 EDR Digital Archive
2000 pg A11 EDR Digital Archive
1995 pg A12 EDR Digital Archive
1992 pg A13 EDR Digital Archive
1985 -Polk's City Directory Street not listed in Source
1980 -Polk's City Directory Street not listed in Source
1975 -Polk's City Directory Street not listed in Source
1971 -Polk's City Directory Street not listed in Source
1967 -Polk's City Directory Street not listed in Source
7025843-5 Page 2
FINDINGS
CROSS STREETS
Year CD Image Source
E 1310 N
2017 -EDR Digital Archive Street not listed in Source
2014 -EDR Digital Archive Street not listed in Source
2010 -EDR Digital Archive Street not listed in Source
2005 -EDR Digital Archive Street not listed in Source
2000 -EDR Digital Archive Street not listed in Source
1995 -EDR Digital Archive Street not listed in Source
1992 -EDR Digital Archive Street not listed in Source
1985 -Polk's City Directory Street not listed in Source
1980 -Polk's City Directory Street not listed in Source
1975 -Polk's City Directory Street not listed in Source
1971 -Polk's City Directory Street not listed in Source
1967 -Polk's City Directory Street not listed in Source
N CANYON CREEK PKWY
2017 pg. A1 EDR Digital Archive
2014 -EDR Digital Archive Street not listed in Source
2010 -EDR Digital Archive Street not listed in Source
2005 -EDR Digital Archive Street not listed in Source
2000 -EDR Digital Archive Street not listed in Source
1995 -EDR Digital Archive Street not listed in Source
1992 -EDR Digital Archive Street not listed in Source
1985 -Polk's City Directory Street not listed in Source
1980 -Polk's City Directory Street not listed in Source
1975 -Polk's City Directory Street not listed in Source
1971 -Polk's City Directory Street not listed in Source
1967 -Polk's City Directory Street not listed in Source
7025843-5 Page 3
Year Uses Source
FINDINGS
Year CD Image Source
N STATE ROAD 51
2017 pg. A2 EDR Digital Archive
2014 pg. A4 EDR Digital Archive
2010 pg. A6 EDR Digital Archive
2005 pg. A8 EDR Digital Archive
2000 -EDR Digital Archive Street not listed in Source
1995 -EDR Digital Archive Street not listed in Source
1992 -EDR Digital Archive Street not listed in Source
1985 -Polk's City Directory Street not listed in Source
1980 -Polk's City Directory Street not listed in Source
1975 -Polk's City Directory Street not listed in Source
1971 -Polk's City Directory Street not listed in Source
1967 -Polk's City Directory Street not listed in Source
N STATE ST
2017 -EDR Digital Archive Street not listed in Source
2014 -EDR Digital Archive Street not listed in Source
2010 -EDR Digital Archive Street not listed in Source
2005 -EDR Digital Archive Street not listed in Source
2000 -EDR Digital Archive Street not listed in Source
1995 -EDR Digital Archive Street not listed in Source
1992 -EDR Digital Archive Street not listed in Source
1985 -Polk's City Directory Street not listed in Source
1980 -Polk's City Directory Street not listed in Source
1975 -Polk's City Directory Street not listed in Source
1971 -Polk's City Directory Street not listed in Source
1967 -Polk's City Directory Street not listed in Source
7025843-5 Page 4
City Directory Images
-
N CANYON CREEK PKWY
EDR Digital Archive
7025843.5 Page: A1
SourceTarget Street Cross Street
2017
1082 BURGER KING
1085 GANDOLFOS
STRIKE 3 LLC
1137 DESERET FIRST CREDIT UNION
1141 DESERET BOOK
1185 STATE OF UTAH
1206 SMARTSTYLE
SUBWAY
WALMART
WALMART PHARMACY
WALMART VISION CENTER
-
N STATE ROAD 51
EDR Digital Archive
7025843.5 Page: A2
SourceTarget Street Cross Street
2017
704 EXTENDED FAMILY INC
706 PINCOCK, JANNETT
1155 HORVATH HOT RODS
-
S STATE ST
EDR Digital Archive
7025843.5 Page: A3
SourceTarget Street Cross Street
2017
1040 JAMISON, BRANDEN L
1695 TBONE RESTAURANT
1700 SIMS, CHRIS
1785 NUSINK, BRANDON P
1790 MOUNTAIN VIEW SELF STORAGE
1799 LEON, PATRICIA
1825 ADAMS, JAMES A
1838 CHIDESTER, JESSE L
1875 BANKS, LYNN M
1935 BIRD, RANDALL G
1940 FULL CIRCLE STORAGE
1945 ADAMSON, TAMMY
1990 INTERMOUNTAIN LIFT INC
1991 ARCHITECTURAL COALITION
1995 WILEY, RONALD G
2010 CHIDESTER, BRANDI L
2030 MARICHI, JOSE A
2035 HOLDAWAY, RICHARD H
2045 LEWIS, JAMES E
2047 SUNDQUIST, GUY C
2050 DEMON DIESEL
2085 MADSEN, JIM B
2310 FROTIER RV STORAGE
HENDERSON, CHRIS J
PARKER, TIM M
2375 MORGAN, JOHN T
2395 ASHBY, WADE D
2435 ROBBINS, WADE S
2445 BILLS, AMBER N
2485 HARWARD, CAITLIN B
2490 CLAYSON, EDWARD R
2500 COUNTRY AUTO
2546 BRADSHAW, BRUCE K
3448 ANDERSONS AUTO WRECKING
-
N STATE ROAD 51
EDR Digital Archive
7025843.5 Page: A4
SourceTarget Street Cross Street
2014
704 ENGMAN, GABRIEL I
EXTENDED FAMILY INC
706 ROBINSON, PEGGY P
1155 HORVATH HOT RODS
1215 JEWETT, JESSICA
1422 FORBUSH, TAZIMIN
1571 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
-
S STATE ST
EDR Digital Archive
7025843.5 Page: A5
SourceTarget Street Cross Street
2014
1040 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
1620 MINER, JIM
1695 TBONE RESTAURANT
1700 HARDY, LESTER V
1785 NUSINK, BRANDON P
1790 MOUNTAIN VIEW SELF STORAGE
1799 ORMOND, BRITNEY L
1825 ADAMS, JAMES A
1838 CHIDESTER, JESSE L
1845 BUNCE, JOE C
1875 BANKS, LYNN M
1925 LEES, MATT
TOONE, JEFFREY M
1935 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
1940 EDDIE, LEON S
FULL CIRCLE STORAGE
1945 ADAMSON, TAMMY
1990 INTERMOUNTAIN LIFT INC
1991 ARCHITECTURAL COALITION
1995 WILEY, RONALD G
2010 STALLINGS, LARRY
2020 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
2030 MARICHI, JOSE A
2035 HOLDAWAY, RICHARD H
2040 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
2045 LEWIS, JAMES E
2047 SUNDQUIST, GUY C
2050 DEMON DIESEL
2085 MADSEN, JIM B
2100 PALFREYMAN, CLAY D
2310 FRONTIER RV STORAGE
HENDERSON, CHRIS J
PARKER, TIM M
2375 MITCHELL, WILLIAM L
2395 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
2410 MARKHAM, ROSEMARY
2435 FRENCH, WILLIAM L
2445 BILLS, AMBER N
2485 HICKS, WAYNE L
2490 CLAYSON, EDWARD R
2500 COUNTRY AUTO
2546 BRADSHAW, BRUCE K
2595 POMEROY, DAVID C
2890 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN,
2940 NEW CONCEPT LOUVERS
3028 INC OMINEX
-
N STATE ROAD 51
EDR Digital Archive
7025843.5 Page: A6
SourceTarget Street Cross Street
2010
704 ELHALTA, SAM N
EXTENDED FAMILY INC
1422 FORBUSH, SHARON K
-
S STATE ST
EDR Digital Archive
7025843.5 Page: A7
SourceTarget Street Cross Street
2010
1040 CRANDALL, WESLEY
1680 MINER, LEE
1700 HARDY, OWEN L
1785 NUSINK, BRAD D
1799 TENORIO, DIMAS L
1825 ADAMS, VERA D
1838 CHIDESTER, JESSE L
1845 BUNCE, JOE C
1875 BANKS, LYNN M
1910 ENGLE, CLEMEN
1925 HALL, MARGARETT M
1935 BIRD, RANDALL G
1945 ADAMSON, TONYA P
1950 MINER, PATRICIA R
1990 INTERMOUNTAIN LIFT INC
1991 ARCHITECTURAL COALITION
1995 WILEY, RONALD G
2010 CHIDESTER, JENNICA
STALLINGS, LARRY
2020 CARTER, JUSTIN B
2030 RIMROCK FURNITURE CO
2035 HOLDAWAY, RICHARD H
2045 LEWIS, JAMES E
2047 SUNDQUIST, GUY C
2050 ALPINE AUTOMATION
2085 MADSEN, JIM B
2100 PALFREYMAN, CLAY D
2180 BIRD, SCOTT
2260 A BUY ESTATES
2310 FRONTIER RV STORAGE
PARKER, TIM M
2325 PHIL HANSEN UPHOLSTERING
2335 MITCHELL, WILLIAM
2375 MITCHELL, LEE W
2435 FRENCH, WILLIAM L
2445 BILLS, AMBER N
2485 HICKS, WAYNE L
2490 DINKELMAN, KARLEE
WOODWARD RANCH
2500 D & D AUTO SVC
2546 BRADSHAW, BRUCE K
2595 POMEROY, DAVID C
2755 VALDEZ, DARRELL M
2890 ANDERSEN, ALDON S
-
N STATE ROAD 51
EDR Digital Archive
7025843.5 Page: A8
SourceTarget Street Cross Street
2005
704 EXTENDED FAMILY INC
WIEDERHOLD, T
-
S STATE ST
EDR Digital Archive
7025843.5 Page: A9
SourceTarget Street Cross Street
2005
1040 COLEMAN, KEVIN L
1680 MINER, LEE
1689 VALDOVINOS BODY SHOP
1700 HARDY, OWEN L
1785 NUSINK, BRAD D
1790 SACCATO, JAMES
1799 BUNDY, DORIAN A
1825 ADAMS, VERA D
1838 DIAMOND, PHILLIP C
1845 BUNCE, JOE C
1875 BANKS, LYNN M
CHRISTIES TIRE
CLB ENTERPRISES INC
1925 HALL, MARGARETT M
MARGARETT M HALL INVESTMENTS L
1940 ACE TRANSMISSIONS
CORNWELL, MELINDA
JENSEN, DARRELL
TSOSIE, ROSALINDA O
1945 ADAMSON, TONYA P
1950 MINER, PATRICIA R
1990 INTERMOUNTAIN LIFT INC
1991 ARCHITECTURAL COALITION
1995 WILEY, RONALD G
WILEYS COYOTE CANDLES
2010 CHIDESTER, LARRY
2020 FRANKE, ANDREA
2030 WOODEN THINGS
2035 SCHARDINE, REX A
2045 LEWIS, JAMES E
2047 SUNDQUIST, GUY C
2180 BIRD, SCOTT
WOODEN THINGS
2220 FIBERLIGHT COMMUNICATIONS
2260 FRONTIER RV STORAGE
2310 PARKER, TIM M
2325 HANSEN UPHOLSTERING CO
2375 MITCHELL, LEE W
2395 ASHBY, KENNETH D
2410 CATHEDRAL CONSULTING
CATHERALL, THOMAS S
2435 FRENCH, WILLIAM L
2445 VALDEZ, TAMMY
2485 HICKS, WAYNE L
2490 WOODWARD RANCH
2546 BRADSHAW, BRUCE K
2595 POMEROY, DAVID C
2751 FORBUSH, MAURICE D
2800 D & D SERVICE
EVANS GRADER & PAVING
(Cont'd)
-
S STATE ST
EDR Digital Archive
7025843.5 Page: A10
SourceTarget Street Cross Street
2005
2890 ANDERSON, ALDON S
ANDERSONS AUTO WRECKING INC
2940 NEW CONCEPT LOUVERS INC
3432 ANDERSON, JAMES S
3448 ANDERSEN, ALDON
ANDERSONS AUTO WRECKING
-
S STATE ST
EDR Digital Archive
7025843.5 Page: A11
SourceTarget Street Cross Street
2000
1040 CRANDALL, CALVIN
1680 MINER, LEE
1695 T BONE RESTAURANT
1700 HARDY, LESTER V
1785 NUSINK, BRAD
1790 CLARK, G
1825 ADAMS, PERRY C
1845 BUNCE, JOE
1875 BANKS LYNN
BANKS, LYNN
1925 MARCHBANKS, ADAM J
1940 DAVIS, JOHN
FULLMER, ANDREW
LOWES CUSTOM WELDING
1945 PICKERING, MACK
1950 MINER, P R
1990 INTERMOUNTAIN LIFT INCORPORATED
1995 WILEY, RONALD G
2020 BROOKS, L
2035 SCHARDINE, REX A
2045 LEWIS, JAMES E
2047 SUNDQUIST, GUY
2260 COMMERCIAL ACCOUNTING SPECIALISTS
INTERSTATE ASPHALT
2262 ROCKY MONTAIN SEALCOATING
2310 PARKER, TIM
T C ANTIQUES
2375 MITCHELL, LEE
2410 CATHERALL, THOMAS
2435 FRENCHIES GROOMERY
2485 HICKS, WAYNE L
2490 WOODWARD, JON K
2500 4 STAR TRUCK & AUTO
2546 STRONG, FRED J
2660 FORBUSH, DON
2751 FORBUSH, MAURICE D
2940 NEW CONCEPT LOUVERS INCORPORATED
3448 ANDERSONS AUTO WRECKING
-
S STATE ST
EDR Digital Archive
7025843.5 Page: A12
SourceTarget Street Cross Street
1995
1040 CRANDALL, CALVIN
1680 MINER, LEE
1695 T BONE RESTAURANT
1700 OCCUPANT UNKNOWNN
1780 OCCUPANT UNKNOWNN
1785 NUSINK, BRAD
1790 OCCUPANT UNKNOWNN
1825 ADAMS, PERRY C
1838 DIAMOND, PHILLIP C
1875 BANKS, LYNN
1885 OCCUPANT UNKNOWNN
1940 BIRD, STEVEN
1945 PICKERING, MACK
1950 MINER, P R
1975 OCCUPANT UNKNOWNN
1990 INTERMOUNTAIN LIFT INC
1995 WILEY, RONALD G
2010 OCCUPANT UNKNOWNN
2015 OCCUPANT UNKNOWNN
2020 JOHNSON, HEBER
2045 LEWIS, JAMES E
2047 CANTO, DOMONIC
2081 OCCUPANT UNKNOWNN
2085 OCCUPANT UNKNOWNN
2094 OCCUPANT UNKNOWNN
2172 OCCUPANT UNKNOWNN
2200 STILLSON, SCOTT G
2260 INTERSTATE ASPHALT
2307 OCCUPANT UNKNOWNN
2310 PARKER AUCTIONEERING
T C ANTIQUES
2375 MITCHELL, LEE
2395 ASHBY, KENNETH D
2410 CATHERALL, THOMAS
2445 ASHBY, WADE
2500 4 STAR TRUCK & AUTO
2546 STRONG, FRED J
2595 TURNER, JON W
2660 FORBUSH, DON
2711 OCCUPANT UNKNOWNN
2733 OCCUPANT UNKNOWNN
2751 FORBUSH, MAURICE D
2755 ASHBY, WADE
2950 C & D SALVAGE
3432 MCBRIDE, KIM
3448 ANDERSONS AUTO WRECKING
-
S STATE ST
EDR Digital Archive
7025843.5 Page: A13
SourceTarget Street Cross Street
1992
1680 MINER, LEE
1700 HARDY, LESTER V
1785 MINER, CLYDE B
1825 ADAMS, PERRY C
1875 BANKS, LYNN
1940 BIRD, STEVEN
KUCHAR, PARI
NELSON, JOSEPH B
TRACYS HGH CNT TXD
1945 PICKERING, MACK
1950 MINER, P R
1995 WILEY, RONALD G
2020 JOHNSON, W H
2045 LEWIS, JAMES E
2047 CANTO, DOMONIC
2120 INTERMOUNTAIN LIFT
2200 STILLSON, SCOTT G
2310 PARKER, T C
2395 ASHBY, KENNETH D
2485 HICKS, WAYNE L
2546 STRONG, FRED J
2595 VANCE, DON
2660 FORBUSH, DON
2755 PRUE, L D
2835 HICKS, E L
2858 4 STAR TRUCK&AUTO
2955 LONG, JAMES W
3432 MCBRIDE, KIM
3448 ANDERSEN, ALDON
ANDERSONS AUTO WRC
3476 BRAILSFORD IND
Spanish Fork Landfill
Location of Landfills
Legend
WM Old Utah County LandfiU A/ USffighway
IH Spanish Folk Landfill /V County Road
i Springville Landfill /V City Street
Springville Property A/ Qtrt^Qmc
Interstate
.•Approximate Scale
1" =0.48 Miles
SCANNED
UDEQ
Division of Environmental
Response and Remediation
file: spfoiklfills2 created by: mzucker on 04/09/98
Unspecified
Unspsdfled
LBC 40.12292 Long: 111
Utan County, UT.
nils computer reprecentaVon has been coinplled by the U.S.
Enviranmental Prolaction Agency (EPA) from sources which have
supplied data or inlormation that has not aeen verified by the
Ihe EPA. TNs data Is ollersd here as a general representation
only, and ia not to be used for commercial purposes without
vsrltcatlan by an inaependant prolesslanal qualllled to veriry
suph data or Infofmatbn. The EPA does not guarantee Ihe
accuracy, completsness, or timeliness ol the Inlormation shown,
and shall not be liable lor any loss or Injury resulting fnxn
reliance upon the Information shown.
LEGEND
(Fmm 1N6 GNiS nmM ila)
School
(Fram 1 HI QNIS nanoe lie)
(Fran IMS QNIS nmecile)
zv
1 Boundary
SCatilcgiJntt
7] County Bai«idary
1990 Population Density Per Sq Mi
I Under 10 [ : • ~" j 3.000 - 6.000
^10-100 I 6.000 -10,000
I I 100-1,000 pill 10,000 - 20.000
I ~| 1,000 - 3,000 O»«20/)0D
OS 1.5
Albers Pnjlecllon
OS. Environminlal Pratedlon AflsHGy
PrtNtjcM M«cn aa, taoa
Bysn£Wjus(Hwi«eBasB)
Unspecified
Unspecified
Ut: 40.12291666666 Ijjng: 111.6333333333
Utah County, UT.
This computer representation has been complied by the U.S.
Environmental Prolaction Agency (EPA) from sources whicfi liave
supplied data or informaton that has not been verified by the
the EPA. This data is ollered here as a general representation
only, and is not to be used for commercial purposes without
verification by an independant professionai qualified to verify
such data or information. The EPA does not guarantee the
accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the inlormation shown,
and shall not be liable for any loss or injury resulting from
retiance upon the information shown.
LEGEND
Note: Faciity labeljngturned OFFIt mors than 260 polnlB.
Some facllliee vrflhout good addraBtes may pbt at zip Dode carAroldt.
OERCLie NPL Site
CEFtCUS Nl^Site
(Propoaed}
CEFtCLIS Deteled From
NPL Final Site
CERCUS Pait of
NPL Final Sts
CERCLIS Non-NPL Sile
Mabe located bvy zipcodel
ArcNved tram CERCLIS
RCRATSOorLCXS Site
RCRA SenoialADthet Ste
Public Water Supply
EPASDWISSyetiMn
County Boundary
a 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.G 0.7 0.0 0.9 1
Miles
Abers Projection
U.S. Envt-onrnenial Prolectlon Ajariey
Produced Marcn 28. 1999
By SITEPLUS (Beg >*3520l
http://www.epa.gOv/rlOearth/pickup/national/mar29/s43520.t;
It may not be the best location!
4. Locational accuracy currently varies greatly for this database as
EPA is in the process of improving it. Some facilities may still
be located at zip code centroids or even have wrong lat/longs
putting a facility in a wrong state!
Your Specific Requested Options:
RCRIS Facilities: Selected
PCS (NPDES) Facilities: Not Selected - Screened Out
AIRS/AFS Facilities: Not Selected - Screened Out
CERCLA Facilities: Selected
TRI Facilities: Not Selected - Screened Out
T
Facility)
TSD or LQG Facility)
Letter in column indicates record instance for:
r RCRIS Program System database ("General
R RCRIS Program System database ("Major"
P . . . . PCS Program System database
. A . . . AIRS/AFS Program System database
CERCLIC (Superfund) Program System database
TRI (Toxics Release Inventory) Program System database
other Program Database 0
Fac UIN
Facility Name
Facility Address
Latitude Longitude
(Decimal Degrees)
UT0001839976 KLUNE INTERNATIONAL, INC. 40.132585 -111.
R 1800 NORTH 300 WEST, SPANISH FORK, UT. 84550
UTD033513631 TELEFLEX DEFENSE SYSTEMS 40.132585 -111
R . A . . .
UTD037785664 MILLERS DRYCLEANING
1800 NORTH 300 WEST, SPANISH FORK, UT. 84660-9576
40.112406 -111.
40 WEST 200 NORTH, SPANISH FORK, UT. 84660
UTD057201006 FRITZI OF UTAH, INC. 40.091966 -111
r 7650 CALPAC DR, SPANISH FORK, UT. 84660
UTD094677259 CRESSONA ALUMINUM CO. 40.125233 -111
r . A . T 0 1550 NORTH KIRBY LANE, SPANISH FORK, UT. 84660-0000
UTD139753578 GLASS HOSPITAL THE 40.115346 -111
r 415 NORTH MAIN ST, SPANISH FORK, UT. 84124
UTD980959431 TELEFLEX PRECISION CASTING 40.126576 -111
R . A . T .
UTD9825873 62 MOUNTAIN COUNTRY FOODS INC
609 W. 1900 N., SPANISH FORK, UT. 84660
40.126576 -111.
1600 NORTH 185 EAST, SPANISH FORK, UT. 84660
UTD982647737 BARBER BROS CHRYSLER 40.100055 -111
701 SOUTH MAIN ST, SPANISH FORK, UT. 84660
UTD988 078176 DESERET MEAT 40.122908 -111
1050 NORTH 200 EAST, SPANISH FORK, UT. 84660
UTD988078663 BUSHMAN PRESS 40.138988 -111
659223
659223
654938
656788
643749
654267
660417
660417
654495
649967
656121
2600 NORTH MAIN, SPANISH FORK, UT. 84660
Envfacts Facility Report completed.
***********************
*** End of Report ***
2 of 2 3/29/1999 11:01 AM
http://www.epa.gOv/rl0earth/pickup/national/mar29/s43520.t;
EPA GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION QUERY SYSTEM (Version 97.1.8) March 29, 1999
Title : Unspecified
Sub-Title: Unspecified
Utah County, UT.
Location, in Lat/Long: 40 7 22.5 111 38 0 (DMS)
US Albers: X= -1314719 Y= 2009132 (Meters)
Map Scale: Auto Fit to 15 x 11
Notes:
Read Notes on accuracy and extent of all GIS database coverages!!!
Note Version Id on top line as we are continuously upgrading data layers,
quality, and calculation methods for this report and associated graphics.
Disclaimer:
This computer representation has been compiled by the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) from sources which have supplied data or
information that has not been verified by the EPA. This data is
offered here as a general representation only, and is not to be used
for commercial purposes without verification by an independant
professional qualified to verify such data or information. The EPA
does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the
information shown, and shall not be liable for any loss or injury
resulting from reliance upon the information shown.
*** End of Notes ***
***********************************
** Regulated Facility Report **
***********************************
EPA Envirofacts Facility Databases Information
Note: 04/10/97 - Using National Envirofacts .EF Data Layer
Envirofacts: 28 facility record instances within this search request.
Of these, we are interested in the following Program Facilities:
11 RCRIS instances (All - "General" and "Major")
( 3 of these are "major" TSD or LQG facilities)
1 PCS instances
11 AFS/AIRS instances
0 CERCLIS instances
3 TRIS instances
Important Notes:
1. For information about the various EPA Facility Program databases
and their environmental/regulatory aspects, see the Envirofacts
WWW home page at http://www.epa.gov/enviro/html/ef_home.html
2. We have excluded FINDS database record instances from this listing.
3. The latitude/longitude is from the 1st program instance record only.
lof 2 3/29/1999 11:01 AM
DATE : 6-22-2022
TINA CHENEY
TERRACON
6949 S. HIGH TECH DRIVE, SUITE 100
MIDVALE, UTAH 84047
61227186
TEXAS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH
126 SCEPTRE DRIVE TEL: (972) 772-4283
ROCKWALL, TEXAS 75032 FAX: (972) 772-4283
ENVIRONMENTAL AND OTHER ACTIVITY AND USE LIMITATION
(AUL) SEARCH
THE ATTACHED REPORT IS BEING PROVIDED TO APPLICANT SOLELY FOR THE
PURPOSE OF FACILITATING LANDOWNER OR PURCHASE DEFENSES WHICH MAY
BE AVAILABLE UNDER THE LIABILITY ACT OF 1980, AS AMENDED. IT IS
PROVIDED FOR THE SOLE USE AND BENEFIT OF APPLICANT AND MAY NOT BE
USED OR RELIED UPON BY ANY OTHER PARTY FOR ANY REASON.
NOTE: THIS SEARCH REPRESENTS SURFACE CONVEYANCES ONLY.
TOTAL LIABILITY OF TEXAS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH COMPANY
IS LIMITED TO THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT.
THIS REPORT WAS PREPARED FOR THE PURPOSE OF ASSISTING IN AN
ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARD INSPECTION OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED
PROPERTY.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL: 270100028 AND 270100019, 2809 SOUTH STATE
STREET, UTAH COUNTY, SPANISH FORK, UTAH.
CURRENT OWNER: JOHN R. ANDERSON AND SPOUSE, SHANNON ANDERSON.
DATE : JUNE 23, 2010
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : ALTON ANDERSON AND SPOUSE, CAROLYN ANDERSON
GRANTEE : JOHN R. ANDERSON AND SPOUSE, SHANNON ANDERSON
FILE NO. : 101435
DATE : APRIL 27, 2006
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : ANDERSONS AUTO WRECKING CORPORATION
GRANTEE : ALTON ANDERSON AND SPOUSE, CAROLYN ANDERSON
FILE NO. : 0657202
DATE : JULY 9, 1994
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : ALTON ANDERSON AND SPOUSE, CAROLYN ANDERSON, ET AL
GRANTEE : ANDERSONS AUTO WRECKING CORPORATION
FILE NO. : 752684
61227186 (1)
DATE : APRIL 8, 1991
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : ALLEN AINGE AND SPOUSE, DARLENE AINGE
GRANTEE : ALTON ANDERSON AND SPOUSE, CAROLYN ANDERSON, ET AL
FILE NO. : 2771798
DATE : OCTOBER 2, 1969
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : MELVIN HOLLOW AND SPOUSE, MARCIA HOLLOW
GRANTEE : ALLEN AINGE AND SPOUSE, DARLENE AINGE
FILE NO. : 416039
DATE : JULY 5, 1952
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : WILLIAM THOMAS AND SPOUSE, SARAH THOMAS
GRANTEE : MELVIN HOLLOW AND SPOUSE, MARCIA HOLLOW
FILE NO. : 632918
DATE : DECEMBER 9, 1944
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : OSCAR BRANAGAN
GRANTEE : WILLIAM THOMAS AND SPOUSE, SARAH THOMAS
FILE NO. : 411327
61227186 (2)
DATE : JULY 26, 1932
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : JACKSON TRIPP AND SPOUSE, EDITH TRIPP
GRANTEE : OSCAR BRANAGAN
FILE NO. : 825964
EASEMENTS : UTILITY EASEMENT.
Prepared by Texas Environmental Research on 6-22-2022.
61227186 (3)
ENVIRONMENTAL LIEN AND OTHER ACTIVITY AND USE
LIMITATIONS SEARCH
AFTER COMPLETING AN ENVIRONMENTAL LIEN AND OTHER
ACTIVITY AND USE LIMITATIONS SEARCH A FINDING THAT NO
ENVIRONMENTAL LIENS OR AUL’S HAVE BEEN FILED OF PUBLIC
RECORD AND THAT IT HAS BEEN DETERMINED THAT THE
PROPERTY RESEARCHED IN THIS REPORT COMPLIES WITH ASTM E
1527-21-SEC. 8.3.4.9 AND SECTION 6.2
THIS REPORT MEETS OR EXCEEDS A.S.T.M. E 1527-21.
PHASE II
SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION REPORT
Anderson Auto Wrecking
2890 South State Street
Springville, Utah
July 31,2007
SCANNED
^^^^^loojisonu
Prepared for:
Development First
10000 South 45 West, Suite 207
Sandy, Utah
Prepared by:
IHI Environmental
640 East Wilmington Avenue
Salt Lake City, Utah 84106
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
PHASE II
SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION REPORT
Anderson Auto Wrecking
2890 South State Street
Springville, Utah
Prepared by:
\)^JJJ^h^'^^-^
Amy Findley
Project Manager
Reviewed by:
413:^^
Craig D. Eaton, P.G.
Manager, Environmental Services
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Background 1
1.2 Objective 1
2.0 METHODOLOGY 2
2.1 Pothole Investigation 2
2.1.1 Pothole Sample Analyses 2
2.2 Crusher Investigation 3
2.2.1 Crusher Sample Analyses 3
2.3 Groundwater Investigation 4
2.2.1 Groundwater Sample Analyses 4
3.0 RESULTS 4
3.1 Site Lithology 4
3.2 Observations 5
3.3 Soil Sample Results 6
3.3.1 Petroleum Hydrocarbons 6
3.3.2 Solvents and PCBs 7
3.3.3 Total Metals 8
3.4 Groundwater Sample Results 9
3.4.1 Petroleum Hydrocarbons 9
3.4.2 Dissolved Metals 10
3.4.2 Glycols 11
3.5 Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) 11
4.0 DISCUSSION 12
5.0 CONCLUSIONS 12
6.0 PROJECT LIMITATIONS 13
Development First - Anderson Auto TOC IHI Environmental
Phase II Subsurface Investigation Report Project No. 07E-7156
FIGURES
Figure 1:
Figure 2:
Site Map with Approximate Test Pit and Groundwater Sampling Locations
Auto Crusher Area - Approximate Borehole Locations
TABLES
Table 1
Table 2
Table 3
Table 4
Table 5:
Table 6:
Soil Sample Results - Petroleum Hydrocarbons
Soil Sample Results - Solvents and PCBs
Surface Soil Results - Total Metals
Groundwater Sample Results - Petroleum Hydrocarbons
Groundwater Sample Results - Dissolved Metals
Groundwater Sample Results - Glycols
APPENDICES
Appendix 1: Site Photographs
Appendix 2: Laboratory Analytical Reports
Development First - Anderson Auto
Phase II Subsurface Investigation Report
TOC IHI Environmental
Project No. 07E-7156
1.0 INTRODUCTION
On June 21, 2007, Development First retained IHI Environmental (IHI) to conduct a limited
Phase II Subsurface Investigation at the Anderson Auto Wrecking facility, located at 2890
South State Street, Springville, Utah. The investigation was conducted as part of a potential
property transaction and property re-development project.
1.1 Background
In May of 2006, IHI completed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of the
Anderson Auto property. Historical records indicated the subject property was agricultural
land until the 1960s. By the early 1970s, it appears some dumping or landfilling was
occurring on the west and northwest sections of the property. Records indicate that the dump
"officially" operated fi-om 1943 to 1979. The subject property began being used for the
operations of an auto-salvage yard in 1979 and continues to operate as such.
The Phase I ESA concluded that portions of the subject property were part of the historic city
and county landfills identified in the area. Due to the unknown nature of materials received
at the landfills, IHI recommended excavating test pits (a.k.a. potholes) at the site to evaluate
the presence of landflll debris and collecting samples to determine if impacts associated with
the debris are present.
The Phase I ESA also recommended collecting subsurface soil and groimdwater samples in
the vicinity of the crusher and collecting groundwater samples fiom various locations across
the site. The purpose of the subsurface soil and groundwater sampling was to evaluate the
site for impacts associated with its operation as an automobile salvage yard.
1.2 Objective
The investigation was designed to meet the following objective:
> Determine if significant environmental impacts are present that may be associated
with the historical use of the property.
Development First - Anderson Auto 1 IHI Environmental
Phase II Subsurface Investigation Report Project No. 07E-7156
2.0 METHODOLOGY
Ms. Amy Findley, IHI's Project Manager, and Mr. Ammon McDonald and Ms. Jamie
Spencer, IHI's Project Geologists, conducted the field investigation on July 2 and 3, 2007.
Spackman Enterprises provided a backhoe and operator to excavate the potholes in the
suspected landfill areas. Clement Drilling & Geophysical, Inc. provided a direct-push drill
rig and operator to advance borings at the site to collect subsurface soil and grotmdwater
samples. All sampling was conducted following IHI's standard operating procedures
(SOPs).
2.1 Pothole Investigation
Five potholes, designated PH-1 through PH-5, were excavated at the site between 6 to 11 feet
below the ground surface (bgs), using a rubber-tire backhoe. Each backhoe bucket of soil
was screened for the presence of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) with an organic vapor
monitor photoionization detector (PID) and logged by a qualified environmental scientist.
The potholes were visually inspected for the presence of landfill materials. The pothole
locations are shown on Figure 1.
Three soil samples, labeled with the pothole numbers (PH-1, PH-2, and PH-3) and sample
depth (e.g., @ 5'), were collected from the potholes from areas suspected to be impacted
based on field observations (e.g., staining, odor, positive PID readings, etc.). Soil samples
selected for laboratory analyses were collected from the backhoe bucket, taking care to avoid
sloughed material. New sampling gloves were used for each sample. Samples were packed
in laboratory-supplied containers so that no headspace was present, placed in an iced cooler,
and transported under proper chain-of-custody documentation to American West Analytical
Laboratories (AWAL) for analyses. Following completion of the potholes, the excavated
materials were returned to the pothole and were field compacted using the backhoe bucket.
2.1.1 Pothole Sample Analyses
Soil samples collected from the potholes were analyzed for total recoverable petroleum
hydrocarbons (TRPH), using EPA Method 1664, and halogenated volatile organic
Development First - Anderson Auto 2 IHI Environmental
Phase II Subsurface Investigation Report Project No. 07E-7156
compounds (VOX), benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, total xylenes, and naphthalene
(BTEXN), using EPA Method 8260B.
2.2 Crusher Investigation
Six borings were advanced to depths ranging from approximately 12-24 feet bgs in the
vicinity of the crusher to collect subsurface soil and groundwater samples. In each of the
drilling locations, soil was collected continuously from the ground surface to the total depth
of the boring, screened for the presence of VOCs using a PID, and logged by a qualified
environmental scientist. The boring locations are shown on Figure 2.
Eight soil samples were collected in the area of the crusher, six from the boreholes at depths
suspected to be impacted based on field observations (e.g., staining, odor, positive PID
readings, etc.), and two from the surface of borings. New sampling gloves were used for
each sample. Samples were packed in laboratory-supplied containers so that no headspace
was present, placed in an iced cooler, and transported under proper chain-of-custody
documentation to AWAL for analyses. Following completion of the borings, the borings
were backfilled with sand up to approximately 1-1.5 feet bgs, then bentonite from the sand to
the ground surface.
Groundwater was not encountered in any of the borings located near the crusher. As such, no
groimdwater samples were collected.
2.2.1 Crusher Sample Analyses
All of the subsurface soil samples collected from the borings in the area of the crusher were
analyzed for total recoverable pefroleum hydrocarbons (TRPH), using EPA Method 1664.
The two soil samples that appeared to be the most impacted based on field observations (e.g.,
staining, odor, positive PID readings, etc.) were also analyzed for VOX and BTEXN, using
EPA Method 8260B, and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), using EPA Method 8081. The
two surface soil samples were analyzed for total lead and mercury, using EPA Methods
601 OB and 7471 A, respectively.
Development First - Anderson Auto 3 IHI Environmental
Phase II Subsurface Investigation Report Project No. 07E-7156
2.3 Groundwater Investigation
Five borings, designated GW-1 through GW-5, were advanced between 8 to 12 feet bgs on
the westem half of the site to collect groundwater samples. Boring locations were selected to
distribute groundwater sample coverage across the site. The boring locations are shown on
Figure 1.
Groundwater samples were collected using new temporary well points for each boring, which
consisted of 1 -inch diameter, machine-slotted, PVC piping. A peristaltic pump and new
polyethylene tubing were used to obtain the groimdwater samples, which were collected in
laboratory-supplied, pre-preserved sample containers, making sure no headspace was present,
placed in an iced cooler, and fransported under proper chain-of-custody documentation to
AWAL for analyses. Groundwater samples for metals analyses were filtered using a 0.45-
micron inline filter. Following completion of the borings, the borings were backfilled with
sand up to approximately 1-1.5 feet bgs, then bentonite from the sand to the ground surface.
2.2.1 Groundwater Sample Analyses
All five of the groundwater samples were analyzed for VOX, BTEXN, and total purgeable
petroleum hydrocarbons (TPPH), using EPA Method 8260B, and for dissolved lead, arsenic,
cadmium, and mercury, using EPA Methods 6020 (arsenic, cadmium, and lead) and 7470A
(mercury).
The groundwater sample collected from GW-1 was also analyzed for ethylene and propylene
glycol, using EPA Method 8015MOD. GW-1 was selected based on observations made in
the nearby pothole PH-1, which appeared to have impacts to both soil and groundwater.
3.0 RESULTS
3.1 Site Lithology
Based on the borings advanced in the vicinity of the crusher, subsurface soils consisted of
sandy gravels in the top 1-2 feet, followed by silty sands to depths ranging from 5-14 feet
Development First - Anderson Auto 4 IHI Environmental
Phase II Subsurface Investigation Report Project No. 07E-7156
bgs, then dense, stiff silty clays to the total depth of the borings, which ranged from 12-24
feet bgs. Groundwater was not encountered in any of the borings located near the crusher.
Based on the potholes excavated on the westem half of the site, sands with finer-grained
sediments are present in the top 7 feet, the maximum depth excavated. Landfill materials
were observed in all five of the potholes and consisted of constmction debris, municipal
garbage, and some organic materials. Details of the landfill materials observed are
summarized in Section 3.2. Oily residues and odors were observed in potholes PH-1, PH-2,
and PH-3. Groundwater in the potholes was generally encountered between 4-6 feet bgs.
Depth to groundwater ranged from approximately 4 feet bgs on the westem portion of the
site, to greater than 24 feet bgs on the eastem portion. In general, the groundwater samples
that were collected were from the 4-12 foot bgs interval on the westem half of the site. The
dense stiff clays formed a relatively uniform layer that was consistently 10 to 15 feet thick
across the site. The maximum depth drilled at the site was 24 feet bgs.
3.2 Observations
During the excavations of the potholes large quantities of municipal garbage, constmction
debris and other unidentified frash materials were observed (Appendix 1). At pothole PH-1,
large amounts of municipal frash, including bottles, household reftise, and automobile tires
were observed. Below 4 feet bgs in pothole PH-1, soils were stained with a blackish color
and an oily residue was observed on the groundwater surface that had a pefroleum odor. PH-
1 was excavated to a depth of 11 feet bgs, where municipal trash was still encountered.
Potholes PH-2, PH-3, and PH-4 contained constmction debris such as wood, rebar, and
cement. Potholes PH-2 and PH-3 contained stained soils with a pefroleum odor as well.
Pothole PH-5 exhibited the same types of municipal frash as encountered in pothole PH-1,
but did not produce odorous soils and groundwater. In addition to the pothole observations,
large concrete blocks and other constmction debris were observed, along with numerous
portions of animal remains, in drilling location GW-3.
Positive PID readmgs (90.4 ppm, 218 ppm, 1,266 ppm, and 66 ppm) and pefroleum odors
that may be related to soil contamination were observed from 2 feet to 6 feet bgs in the
Development First - Anderson Auto 5 IHI Environmental
Phase II Subsurface Investigation Report Project No. 07E-7156
I
I
borings locations C-2, C-3, C-4, and C-5, in the area of the cmsher. Soil staining was also
observed in the top six to eight inches of the soils at the boring locations.
3.3 Soil Sample Results
3.3.1 Petroleum Hydrocarbons
Table 1 summarizes the soil sample analytical results for petroleum hydrocarbons. Utah's
Initial Screening Levels (ISLs) for soil are included in Table 1 for reference. The ISLs are
used by the Utah Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), Division of Environmental
Response and Remediation (DERR), to evaluate releases of pefroleum hydrocarbons from
underground storage tanks (USTs). In general, DERR does not require ftirther action when
concentrations are below the ISLs, regardless of fiiture land use. However, concenfrations
greater than the ISLs may require additional actions. Although not directly applicable to
non-UST releases, the ISLs provide guidance to the level of risk presented by concenfrations
of pefroleum hydrocarbons detected in soil. Copies of the laboratory analytical reports are
presented in Appendix 2.
Development First - Anderson Auto 6 IHI Environmental
Phase II Subsurface Investigation Report Project No. 07E-7156
Table 1
Soil Sample Results - Petroleum Hydrocarbons
(Results in parts per million - ppm)
Sample ID
C-l@3'
C-2 @ 3.5'
^^/v.^>/C-3@4-6'
'ci-rMiCA (^2.5-3.5'
C-5 @ 5.5'
C-6 @ 4'
PH-1 @ 5'
^^^sMPH-2@5'
PH-3 @ 4.5'
•^*ISLSf*.r-
Benzene
NA
NA
0.29
2.3
NA
NA
0.0071
0.034
0.033
'3..my:.-
Toluene
NA
NA
<0.12
56
NA
NA
<0.0027
0.1
0.079
=9\,y--[,,3
Ethyl-
benzene
NA
NA
4.1
19
NA
NA
<0.0027
0.0063
0.0058
y- :.,^K-:
Total
Xylenes
NA
NA
18
130
NA
NA
<0.0027
0.028
0.027
., i<a7y''
Naph-
thalene
NA
NA
2.3
4.7
NA
NA
<0.0027
0.0082
0.0048
,A:.-^ A:-
TRPH
<180
<180
<180
4,100
210
<180
<200
1,800
<210
1,000
BTEXN analyzed using EPA Method 8260B. TRPH analyzed using EPA Method 1664. * ISLs - Utah's Initial
Screening Levels (ISLs) for soils. NA -Not Analyzed. Bold values exceed the ISLs.
As shown in Table 1, petroleum hydrocarbons were detected in three of the samples
collected from the cmsher area and in all three of the pothole samples collected from the
westem half of the property. Two of the three cmsher samples, C-3 @ 4-6' and C-4 @ 2.5-
3.5', and one of the pothole samples, PH-2 @ 5', had petroleum constituents at
concentrations that exceed Utah's ISLs for soil.
3.3.2 Solvents and PCBs
Table 2 summarizes the soil sample analytical results for solvents and PCBs. EPA Region
9's Preliminary Remedial Goals (PRGs) for residential soil are included in Table 2 for
reference. The PRGs are risk-based screening levels used by the EPA to evaluate
contaminant concentrations in residential exposure scenarios. In general, the EPA does not
require further action when concenfrations are below the PRGs. However, concenfrations
greater than the PRGs may require additional actions. Although Utah is in EPA Region 8
and the PRGs are not directly applicable, the PRGs provide guidance to the level of risk
presented by concenfrations of contaminants detected in soil. Copies of the laboratory
analytical reports are presented in Appendix 2.
Development First - Anderson Auto
Phase II Subsurface Investigation Report
IHI Environmental
Project No. 07E-7156
Table 2
Soil Sample Results - Solvents and PCBs
(Results are in parts per million - ppm)
Sample
ID
C-3 @ 4-6'
C-4 @ 2.5-3.5'
PH-1 @ 5'
PH-2 @ 5'
PH-3 @ 4.5'
PRGs* ^
Halogenated Volatile Organic Compounds (VOX^
1,4-Dichloro- trans 1,4-Dichloro-
benzene 2-butene
<0.120 <0.120
<0.120 <0.120
<0.0027 <0.0027
0.0044 0.0036
0.0046 <0.0029
•••• 73^33 ,.-33y:y-mr79 • :7
o-Chloro-
toluene
<0.120
<0.120
<0.0027
0.0056
<0.0029
160
PCBs
ND
ND
NA
NA
NA
"" :,AA-
vox analyzed using EPA Method 8260B. Only VOX compounds detected above the method reporting limit
are included in the table. For the full VOX report, see Appendix 1. PCBs analyzed using EPA Method 8081.
* EPA Region 9 Preliminary Remediation Goals (PRGs) for residential soil. ND - None of the PCBs analyzed
were detected above the laboratory method reporting limits. NA- Not Analyzed.
As shown in Table 2, PCBs were not detected above laboratory method reporting limits in
any of the three soil samples analyzed. Concentrations of solvents reported above the
analytical method reporting limits are below the EPA Region 9 PRGs for residential soil.
However, the laboratory had to dilute some of the samples, which resulted in reporting limits
that are higher than the PRGs, so impacts that exceed the PRGs may still be present at the
site.
3.3.3 Total Metals
Table 3 summarizes the surface soil sample analytical results for lead and mercury from two
soil samples collected adjacent to the cmsher. Typical background (i.e., naturally occurring)
concenfrations for lead and mercury in soil in the Salt Lake Valley are included in Table 2
for reference. Although the subject property is located in Utah County, the geologic setting
and soil types are generally similar to the Salt Lake Valley. Copies of the laboratory
analj^ical reports are presented in Appendix 2.
Development First - Anderson Auto
Phase II Subsurface Investigation Report
IHI Environmental
Project No. 07E-7156
0.07
0.17
<0.05-0.3
410
530
.:.-.... 17-32'?^^ -^^
Table 3
Surface Soil Sample Results - Total Metals
(Results are in parts per million - ppm)
Sample ID Mercury Lead
SS @ C-2
SS @ c-4
Background'
Lead-EPA Method 601 OB. Mercury -EPA Method 747 IA. a^DERR
"Draft" Background Soil Data in the Sah Lake City Area, May 21, 1991.
As shown in Table 3, concenfrations of lead in both soil samples obtained in the cmsher area
were slightly elevated compared to background lead soil concentrations. Mercury
concentrations were within naturally occurring background concenfrations.
3.4 Groundwater Sample Results
3.4.1 Petroleum Hydrocarbons
Table 4 summarizes the groundwater sample analytical results for pefroleum hydrocarbons.
Utah's Initial Screening Levels (ISLs) for groundwater are included in Table 4 for reference.
As mentioned in Section 3.3.1, although not directly applicable to non-UST releases, the
ISLs provide guidance to the level of risk presented by concenfrations of pefroleum
hydrocarbons detected in groundwater. Copies of the laboratory analytical reports are
presented in Appendix 2.
Table 4
Groundwater Sample Results - Petroleum Hydrocarbons
(Results are in parts per million - ppm)
Sample ID
GW-1
GW-2
GW-3A
GW-4
GW-5
ISLs*i'':i--*-
Benzene
0.006
<0.001
<0.001
0.007
<0.001
.,r'.:.:o.oos^A
Toluene
<0.002
<0.002
0.023
<0.002
<0.002
^ .;-i•...--:-
Ethyl-
benzene
0.0034
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
:. ..:0.7- ....
Total
Xylenes
<0.002
<0.002
0.021
<0.002
<0.002
••.,:.wy- -
Naph-
thalene
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
0.0039
<0.002
••••:••• \.•0.f"•#
TPH-
DRO
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
0.083
<0.02
.•3:-t-y7
TPH-
GRO
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
3- \:t3y
BTEXN and TPH-GRO analyzed by EPA Method 8260B. TPH-DRO analyzed by EPA Method 8015B.
* Utah's Initial Screening Levels for groundwater. Bold values exceed ISLs.
Development First - Anderson Auto • 9 IHI Environmental
Phase II Subsurface Investigation Report Project No. 07E-7156
As shown in Table 4, benzene was detected above its ISL in groundwater samples GW-1 and
GW-4. Although several other petroleum hydrocarbon constituents were detected above the
laboratory reporting limits, none exceeded their ISLs.
No halogenated volatile organic compounds (i.e., VOX) were detected in any of the
groundwater samples.
3.4.2 Dissolved Metals
Table 5 summarizes the groundwater sample analytical results for dissolved metals. Utah's
Groundwater Quality Standards for protection of subsurface waters of the State are included
in Table 5 for reference. Copies of the laboratory analytical reports are presented in
Appendix 2.
Table 5
Groundwater Sample Results - Dissolved Metals
(Results in parts per million - ppm)
Sample ID
GW-1
GW-2
GW-3A
GW-4
GW-5
IJGQS*
Arsenic
0.0074
0.078
0.020
<0.0050
0.048
0.05
Cadmium
<0.0040
<0.0040
<0.0040
<0.0040
<0.0040
OJOOS
Lead
<0.0050
<0.0050
<0.0050
<0.0050
<0.0050
0.015
Mercury
<0.00020
<0.00020
<0.00020
<0.00020
<0.00020
0.002;?
Arsenic, cadmium, and lead analyzed by EPA Method 6020. Mercury analyzed by EPA Method 7470A.
* Utah's Groundwater Quality Standards (Utah Administrative Code R317-6-2.1).
As shown in Table 5, the concenfration of dissolved arsenic in groundwater sample GW-2
slightly exceeded Utah's Groundwater Quality Standard for arsenic. None of the other
metals exceeded their standards. Arsenic concenfrations reported for the groimdwater
samples were generally below Utah's Ground Water Quality Standards (GWQS). However,
slightly elevated concentrations of arsenic were detected in the sample GW-2. While slightly
above the Utah Groundwater Quality Standard, IHI believes it is typical of arsenic
concenfrations in the area and represents naturally occurring conditions rather than reflecting
impacts.
Development First - Anderson Auto 10 IHI Environmental
Phase II Subsurface Investigation Report Project No. 07E-7156
3.4.2 Glycols
Table 6 summarizes the groundwater sample analytical results for ethylene and propylene
glycol. EPA Region 9's Preliminary Remedial Goals (PRGs) for tap water are included in
Table 6 for reference. The tap water PRGs are risk-based screening levels used by the EPA
to evaluate contaminant concenfrations in drinking water. In general, the EPA does not
require further action when concenfrations are below the PRGs. However, concenfrations
greater than the PRGs may require additional actions.
Because the shallow unconfined aquifer is generally not used as a drinking water source due
to its poor quality, and because Utah is in EPA Region 8, the PRGs are not directly
applicable. However, the PRGs provide guidance to the level of risk presented by
concenfrations of contaminants detected in groundwater. Copies of the laboratory analytical
reports are presented in Appendix 2.
Table 6
Groundwater Sample Results - Glycols
(Results are in parts per million - ppm)
Ethylene Propylene
Sample ID Glycol Glycol
GW-1 21 <10
PRGs*,:/ ,,-• ::' :,:,.•. ,•• 73.733-'^-r . "^ • 18
Glycols analyzed using EPA Method 8015MOD. *EPA Region 9
Preliminary Remediation Goals (PRGs) for tap water.
As shown in Table 6, ethylene glycol was detected above the laboratory reporting limit, but
at a concenfration that is less than EPA Region 9's PRG ethylene glycol in tap water.
3.5 Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC)
All samples were collected using standardized sample collection and handling methods.
Pertinent field information and chain-of-custody records were logged. All samples were
analyzed by AWAL, a Utah-certified laboratory. AWAL is also certified by the National
Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (NELAP) to perfonn analyses associated
with the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, the Clean Water Act, and the Safe
Development First - Anderson Auto 11 IHI Environmental
Phase II Subsurface Investigation Report Project No. 07E-7156
Drinking Water Act. AWAL adheres to the QA/QC criteria outlined in SW846 and other
methods as stated on their analytical reports.
4.0 DISCUSSION
Degradation of landfill materials can generate methane gas in the subsurface. The potential
exists for the methane gas to accumulate to potentially dangerous (e.g. explosive) levels.
Methane concenfrations were not investigated as part of this investigation.
In addition, IHI believes that the concentrations of benzene detected in the groundwater
constitute a reportable release. It is the responsibility of the person or persons who caused
the release to report the release to the State.
5.0 CONCLUSIONS
Significant volumes of landflll materials were observed in all of the potholes excavated on
the westem half of the property. In general, the materials consisted of municipal frash and
constmction debris. However, some impacts were observed that may be from improperly
disposed chemical wastes (e.g., pefroleum hydrocarbons and solvents). The extent of the
landflll materials has not been fully defined, but it appears to underlay a significant portion of
the westem half of the property and extends deeper than 11 feet bgs. The presence of landfill
materials may generate methane vapors that can travel in the subsurface. Any designs for
buildings or subgrade features such as utilities, in the area should be designed to mitigate
potential methane accumulation. Furthermore, constmction activities should be continually
monitored to ensure the protection of workers.
Petroleum hydrocarbon impacts are present in the vicinity of the automobile cmsher. Based
on our observations and the analytical results, the impacts appear to extend from the ground
surface to at least six feet bgs in the impacted area. Concenfrations of pefroleum
hydrocarbons exceed typical cleanup standards. Slightiy elevated concentrations of lead
were also detected in the surface soil samples collected near the cmsher. The cmsher may be
the source of the elevated concenfrations of benzene in groundwater observed in the westem
Development First - Anderson Auto 12 IHI Environmental
Phase II Subsurface Investigation Report Project No. 07E-7156
portion of the site, although frirther investigations would be necessary to definitively
determine the source.
Petroleum hydrocarbons were also detected on the westem half of the subject property in the
potholes and in the groundwater sample locations. One of the pothole samples and two of
the groundwater samples had concenfrations of pefroleum hydrocarbons that exceed typical
cleanup standards. A slightly elevated concentration of arsenic was also detected in one of
the groundwater samples.
The extents of soil and groundwater impacts at this site have not been fiilly defined. IHI
believes that the groundwater impacts at the site constitute a reportable release. If brought
under regulatory oversight, additional investigation would be required to fiilly define the
extents of impacts at the site. Remedial actions would also likely be required to address
impacts that exceed typical cleanup standards.
6.0 PROJECT LIMITATIONS
This Project was performed using, as a minimum, practices consistent with standards
acceptable within the industry at this time, and a level of diligence typically exercised by
environmental consultants performing similar services.
The procedures used attempt to establish a balance between the competing goals of limiting
investigative and reporting costs and time, and reducing the uncertainty about unknown
conditions. Therefore, because the findings of this report were derived from the scope, costs,
time and other limitations, the conclusions should not be constmed as a guarantee that all
environmental liabilities have been identified and fully evaluated. Where sample collection
and testing have been performed, IHI's professional opinions are based in part on the
interpretation of data from discrete sampling locations that may not represent conditions at
non-sampled locations. IHI assumes no responsibility for omissions or errors resulting from
inaccurate information, or data, provided by sources outside of IHI or from omissions or
errors in public records.
Development First - Anderson Auto 13 IHI Environmental
Phase II Subsurface Investigation Report Project No. 07E-7156
Furthermore, it is emphasized that the final decision on how much risk to accept always
remains with the client since IHI is not in a position to fiilly understand all of the client's
needs. Clients with a greater aversion to risk may want to take additional actions while
others, with less aversion to risk, may want to take no further action.
Development First - Anderson Auto 14 IHI Environmental
Phase II Subsurface Investigation Report Project No. 07E-7156
APPENDIX 1
Site Photographs
Photograph 1
Debris observed in a test pit.
•*v'^^'^^
Photograph 2
Debris observed in a test pit.
Groundwater and stained soil observed in a test
pit.
Photograph 4
Debris observed in a test pit.
' Jj%
* ... *
Photograph 5
'••-Ai. •
A^,m
Photograph 6
Groundwater and debris observed in a test pit. Stained soil observed in a test pit.
APPENDIX 2
Laboratory Reports
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
July 20, 2007
Amy Findley
Industrial Health Incorporated
640 East Wilmington Avenue
Salt Lake City, UT 84106
TEL: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
RE: Anderson Auto / 07E-7156
Dear Amy Findley:
Lab Set ID: L78685
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
American West Analytical Labs received 16 samples on 7/5/2007 for the analyses presented in
the following report.
All analyses were performed in accordance to National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation
Program (NELAP) protocols unless noted otherwise. If you have any questions or concerns
regarding this report please feel free to call. The abbreviation "Surr" found in organic reports
indicates a surrogate compound that is intentionally added by the laboratory to determine sample
injection, extraction and/or purging efficiency. ^
Thank you.
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
I
I
I
Approved by:
Kyle F.
Gross
Digitally signed by Kyle
F. Gross
DN; cn=Kyle F. Gross,
o=AWAL, ou=AWAL,
c=US
Date; 2007.07.20
10:49:03-06'00'
Laboratory Director or designee
Report Date: 7/20/2007 Page 1 of 49
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC This report is provided for the exclusive use of the
addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection
with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on coi^lact. This company accepts no icsponsibility except for the due peiformaitce of inspection and/or anaWsia in good faith
and according to the rules of the trade and of science.
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
Client: Industrial Health Incorporated
Project ID: Anderson Auto / 07E-7156
Lab Sample ID: L78685-07A
Field Sample ID: SS @ C-4
Collected: 7/2/2007 2:35:00 PM
Received: 7/5/2007
INORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
Contact: Amy Findley
TOTAL METALS
Analytical Results Units
Date Method
Analyzed Used
Reporting
Limit
Analytical
Results A?; L-
Lead
Mercury
tng/kg-dry
mg/kg-dry
7/11/2007 1-.09-.00PM
7/10/2007 7:25:24 AM
601 OB
7471A
5.0
0.040
410
0.17
sr /
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director '
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Report Date: 7/20/2007 Page 2 of 49
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA arc perfomied in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the anached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges
of subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or pttjcess, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for
any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of the n^de and of science.
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
Client: Industrial Health Incorporated
Project ID: Anderson Auto / 07E-7156
Lab Sample ID: L78685-16A
Field Sample ID: SS (® C-2
CoUected: 7/3/2007 2:30:00 PM
Received: 7/5/2007
INORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
Contact: Amy Findley
TOTAL METALS
Analytical Results Units
Date Method
Analyzed Used
Reporting
Limit
Analytical
Results
Lead
Mercury
mg/kg-dry
mg/kg-dry
7/11/2007 1:13:00 PM
7/10/2007 7:33:03 AM
601 OB
7471A
5.1
0.040
530
0.070
A^
~)yi^^
lb
2^
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Report Date: 7/20/2007 Page 3 of 49
All analyses applicable to Ihe CWA. SDWA. and RCRA are perfomied in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of Ihe addressee Privileges
of subsequent use of Ihe name of this company or any member of us staff, or reproduction of this report in comieetion with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in comieetion with the re-publication of this report for
any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contaci. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due perfoimancc of inspection and/or analysis in good faith ind according to Ihc nilCS Of the tndc: anil Of SCiCIlCC
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
Ghent: Industrial Health Incorporated
Project ID: Anderson Auto / 07E-7156
Lab Sample ID: L78685-11B
Field Sample ID: GW-1
CoUected: 7/3/2007 10:05:00 AM
Received: 7/5/2007
INORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
Contact: Amy Findley
DISSOLVED METALS
Analytical Results Units
Date Method Reporting Analytical
Analyzed Used Limit Results
Arsenic
Cadmium
Lead
Mercury
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
7/12/2007 7:17:29 PM
7/12/2007 7:17:29 PM
7/12/2007 7:17:29 PM
7/10/2007 12:45:31 PM
6020 0.0050 0.0074 _
6020 0.0040 < 0.0040
6020 0.0050 < 0.0050
7470A 0.00020 < 0.00020
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Report Date: 7/20/2007 Page 4 of 49
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in acconlance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the atmched COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges
of subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for
any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the mles of the trade and of science.
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
INORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
Client: Industrial Health Incorporated
Project ID: Anderson Auto / 07E-7156
Lab Sample ID: L78685-12B
Field Sair^le ID: GW-2
Collected: 7/3/2007 10:42:00 AM
Received: 7/5/2007
Contact: Amy Findley
DISSOLVED METALS
Analytical Results Units
Date Method Reporting Analytical
Analyzed Used Limit Results
Arsenic
Cadmium
Lead
Mercury
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
7/12/2007 7:55:19 PM
7/12/2007 7:55:19 PM
7/12/2007 7:55:19 PM
7/10/2007 12:55:38 PM
6020 0.0050 0.078 -
6020 0.0040 < 0.0040
6020 0.0050 < 0.0050
0.00020 < 0.00020 IM^K
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
I
I
Report Date: 7/20/2007 Page 5 of 49
All analyses applicable to Ihe CWA. SDWA. and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertineni sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee Privileges
of subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with Ihe advertisemem, promolion or sale of any product or process, or in connection wilh the re-publication of this report for
any purpose other than for the addressee will be gmnted only on contaci. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due perfonnance of inspection and/or analysis in good filith and according to the nilts of tht trade and of SCiniK
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
Client: Industrial Health Incorporated
Project ID: Anderson Auto / 07E-7156
Lab Sample ID: L78685-13B
Field Sample ID: GW-3A
Collected: 7/3/2007 1:35:00 PM
Received: 7/5/2007
INORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
Contact: Amy Findley
I
I
DISSOLVED METALS
Analytical Results Units
Date Method Reporting Analytical
Analyzed Used Limit Results
Arsenic
Cadmium
Lead
Mercury
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
7/12/2007 8:00:44 PM
7/12/2007 8:00:44 PM
7/12/2007 8:00:44 PM
7/10/2007 12:58:12 PM
6020 0.0050 0.020 .
6020 0.0040 < 0.0040
6020 0.0050 < 0.0050
^4™A 0.00020 < 0.00020
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Report Date: 7/20/2007 Page 6 of 49
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the anached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges
of subsequent use of the name of diis company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for
any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contaci. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due perfonnance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of the tiade and of science.
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
INORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
Client: Industrial Health Incorporated
Project ID: Anderson Auto / 07E-7156
Lab Sample ID: L78685-14B
Field Sample ID: GW-4
CoUected: 7/3/2007 2:11:00 PM
Received: 7/5/2007
Contact: Amy Findley
DISSOLVED METALS
Analytical Results Units
Date Method Reporting Analytical
Analyzed Used Limit Results
Arsenic
Cadmium
Lead
Mercury
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
7/12/2007 8:06:09 PM
7/12/2007 8:06:09 PM
7/12/2007 8:06:09 PM
7/10/2007 1:05:50 PM
6020 0.0050 < 0.0050
6020 0.0040 < 0.0040
6020 0.0050 < 0.0050
0.00020 < 0.00020 7470A
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Report Date: 7/20/2007 Page 7 of 49
.•vll analyses applicable lo Ihe CWA. SDWA. and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertineni sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for die exclusive use of the addressee Privileges
of subsequenl use of rhe name of this company or any member of Us staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with Ihe advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication oflhis report for
any pun,ose olher than for the addressee will be gnnted only on comae.. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due perfortnance of inspeclion and/or analysis in good foilh Uld BCCOrdinS 10 the lUlCJ OfltlC XML fflld Of JCiCnCC.
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
Client: Industrial Health Incorporated
Project ID: Anderson Auto / 07E-7I56
Lab Sample ID: L78685-15B
Field Sample ID: GW-5
CoUected: 7/3/2007 2:45:00 PM
Received: 7/5/2007
INORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
Contact: AmyFiadley
DISSOLVED METALS
Analytical Results Units
Date Method Reporting Analytical
Analyzed Used Limit Results
Arsenic
Cadmium
Lead
Mercury
mg/L
rngfL
mg/L
mg/L
7/12/2007 8:11:34 PM
7/12/2007 8:11:34 PM
7/12/2007 8:11:34 PM
7/10/2007 1:08:21 PM
6020 0.0050 0.048 .
6020 0.0040 < 0.0040
6020 0.0050 < 0.0050
""•^OA 0.00020 < 0.00020
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Report Date: 7/20/2007 Page 8 of 49
All analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges
of subsequent useofdienameofthis company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in coimection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for
any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of the trade and of science.
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
Client: Industrial Health Incorporated
Project ID: Anderson Auto / 07E-7156
Lab Sample ID: L78685-01
Field Sample ID: C-l(^ 3'
CoUected: 7/2/2007 10:50:00 AM
Received: 7/5/2007
INORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
Contact: Amy Findley
Analytical Results Units
Date Method Reporting Analytical
Analyzed Used Limit Result
Total Recoverable
Petroleum Hydrocarbons
mg/kg-dry 7/16/2007 1:00:00 PM 1664-SGT 180 <180
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Report Date: 7/20/2007 Page 9 of 49
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA. and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the anached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of ihc addressee Privileges
of subsequenl use of Ihe name oflhis company or any member of us staff, or reproduction oflhis report in connection wilh the advertisemem, promotion or sale of any produci or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for
any puipose other than for the addressee will be panted only on contaci. This company accepts no responsibility except for Ihe due perfomiance of inspection and/or analysis in food feith and OCMrdinE to the niloj of the tindc Und Of SCimCC
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
INORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
Ghent: Industrial Health Incorporated
Project ID: Anderson Auto / 07E-7156
Lab Sample ID: L78685-02
Field Sample ID: C-2 (g 3.5'
CoUected: 7/2/2007 11:32:00 AM
Received: 7/5/2007
Contact: Amy Findley
Analytical Results Units
Date
Analyzed
Method Reporting Analytical
Used Limit Result
Total Recoverable
Petroleum Hydrocarbons
mg/kg-dry 7/16/2007 1:00:0OPM 1664-SGT 180 <180
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Report Date: 7/20/2007 Page 10 of 49
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges
of subsequent use of the name oflhis company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication oflhis report for
any puipose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the mles of the trade and of science.
I
I
I
I
I
I
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
INORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
CUent: Industrial Health Incorporated
Project ID: Anderson Auto / 07E-7156
Lab Sample ID: L78685-03
Field Sample ID: C-3 (g 4-6'
CoUected: 7/2/2007 1:03:00 PM
Received: 7/5/2007
Contact: Amy Findley
Analytical Results Units
Date
Analyzed
Method Reporting Analytical
Used Limit Result
Total Recoverable
Petroleum Hydrocarbons
mg/kg-dry 7/16/2007 1:00:00 PM 1664-SGT 180 <180
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Report Date: 7/20/2007 Page 11 of 49
All analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA. and RCRA are perfomied in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertineni sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges
of subsequent use of the name oflhis company or any member of its staff, or reproduction oflhis report in connection with Ihe advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication oflhis report for
any puipose odier than for the addressee will be granted only on contaci. This company accepts no responsibility except for Ihe due perfonnance of inspection and/or analysis in good failh and accordinj 10 the rulcs Of IhC trade and Of science.
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
Chent:, Industrial Health Incorporated
Project ID: Anderson Auto / 07E-7156
Lab Sample ID: L78685-04
Field Sample ID: C-4 @ 2.5-3.5'
CoUected: 7/2/2007 3:05:00 PM
Received: 7/5/2007
INORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
Contact: Amy Findley
Analytical Results Units
Date Method Reporting Analytical
Analyzed Used Limit Result
Total Recoverable
Petroleum Hydrocarbons
mg/kg-dry 7/16/2007 1:00:00 PM 1664-SGT 180 4100
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F, Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Report Date: 7/20/2007 Page 12 of 49
All analyses applicable lo die CWA. SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in acconlance to NELAC protocols. Pettinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges
of subsequent use of the name oflhis company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with Ihe advertiteineni, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in conneaioo with the re-publication of this report for
any purpose other than for die addressee will be granted only on contaci. This company accepts no rcsponsibUity except for Ihe due perfonnance ofinspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the mles of the trade and of science.
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
INORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
Chent: Industrial Health Incorporated
Project ID: Anderson Auto / 07E-7156
Lab Sample ID: L78685-05
Field Sample ID: C-5 @ 5.5'
CoUected: 7/2/2007 3:45:00 PM
Received: 7/5/2007
Contact: Amy Findley
Analytical Results Units
Date
Analyzed
Method Reporting Analytical
Used Limit Result
Total Recoverable
Petroleum Hydrocarboiis
mg/kg-dry 7/i6/2O071:00:00 PM ] 664-SGT 180 210
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Report Date: 7/20/2007 Page 13 of 49
All analyses applicable lo the CWA, SDWA. and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee Privileges
of subsequenl use of the name oflhis company or any member of its staff or reproduction oflhis report in connection with Ihe advertisemem. promolion or sale of any produci or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for
any puipose other Ihan for Ihe addressee will be granled only on conlact. This company accepu no responsibility except for Ihc due pcrfomiancc of inspection and/OF analysis ill JOOd faith and according to ihc IlllcS Ofthe trade Slid OfSCienCe
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
Client: Industrial Health Incorporated
Project ID: Anderson Auto / 07E-7156
Lab Sample ID: L78685-06
Field Sample ID: C-6 (g 4'
CoUected: 7/2/2007 4:11:00 PM
Received: 7/5/2007
INORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
Contact: Amy Findley
Analytical Results Units
Date Method Reporting Analytical
Analyzed Used Limit Result
Total Recoverable
Petroletmi Hydrocarbons
mg/kg-dry 7/16/2007 1:00:00 PM 1664-SGT 180 <180
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Report Date: 7/20/2007 Page 14 of 49
All analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertineni sampling infoimation is located on the attached COC. TTiis teport is provided for the exclusive use of Ihe addressee. Privileges
of subsequenl use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproducrion oflhis report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication oflhis report for
any purpose other Ihan for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance ofinspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of Ihe trade and of science.
I
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
INORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
Chent: Industrial Health Incorporated
Project ID: Anderson Auto / 07E-7156
Lab Sample ID: L78685-08
Field Sanple ID: PH-1 @ 5'
CoUected: 7/2/2007 11:10:00 AM
Received: 7/5/2007
Contact: Amy Findley
Analytical Results Units
Date
Analyzed
Method Reporting Analytical
Used Limit Resuh
Total Recoverable
Petroleum Hydrocarbons
mg/kg-dry 7/16/2007 1:00:00 PM 1664-SGT 200 <200
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Report Date: 7/20/2007 Page 15 of 49
All analyses applicable to ihe CWA, SDWA. and RCRA are perforaied in accordance to NELAC prolocols. Pertineni sampling infonnalion is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee Privileges
of subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promolion or sale of any produci or process, or in conneaion with the re-publicalion of this report for
any purpose other than for the addressee will be granled only on contaci. This company acecpis no responsibiliiy except for Ihe due pcrforaiance of inspeclion and/or analysis in gOOd failh and according 10 ItlC lUlCS Of the Hade and OfSCience
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
INORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
CUent: Industrial Health Incorporated
Project ID: Anderson Auto / 07E-7156
Lab Sample ID: L78685-09
Field Sample ID: PH-2 @5'
CoUected: 7/2/2007 12:02:00 PM
Received: 7/5/2007
Contact: Amy Findley
Analytical Results Units
Date
Analyzed
Method Reporting Analytical
Used Limit Result .
Total Recoverable
Petrolemn Hydrocarbons
mg/kg-dry 7/I6/2007I:OO:OOPM 1664-SGT 200 1800
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: awal@awal-labs,com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Report Date: 7/20/2007 Page 16 of 49
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of Ihe addressee. Privileges
of subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with Ihe advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in eormection with the re-puhlication of this report for
any purpose other than for die addressee will be granled only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance ofinspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of the Hade and of science.
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
ORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
CUent: Industrial Health incorporated
Project ID: Anderson Auto / 07E-7156
Lab Sample ID: L78685-04C
Field Sample ID: C-4 (^ 2.5-3.5'
CoUected: 7/2/2007 3:05:00 PM
Received: 7/5/2007
Analysis Requested: 8082/3545
Analytical Results
Contact: Amy Findley
Extracted: 7/9/2007
Analyzed: 7/19/2007 3:31:03 PM
PCBs bv 8082/3545
Units = |ig/kg-dry
Dilution Factor = 1
Compound
Aroclor 1016
Aroclor 1221
Aroclor 1232
Aroclor 1242
Aroclor 1248
Aroclor 1254
Aroclor 1260
Stirr: Decachlorobiphenyl
Surr: Tetrachloro-m-xylene
Reporting Limit
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
10-180
10-135
% Moisture
Analytical
Result
<30
<30
<30
<30
<30
<30
<30
7.60 S
66.5
18
Outlying QC recoveries were associated with this sample. The method is in control as indicated by the LCS.
S - Surrogate outside recovery limits. Minimum method criterion of one surrogate within established recovery
limits was met.
Report Date: 7/20/2007 Page 19 of 49
All analyses applicable lo Ihe CWA. SDWA. and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC prolocols. Pertineni sampling mfortnalion is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of die addressee Privileges
of subsequenl use of Ihe name of this company or any member of us staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promolion or sale of any produci or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for
any purpose oiher Ihan for Ihe addressee will be granled only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due perfonnance ofinspection and/or analysis in gOOd faith and aCCOrdinS 10 Itie nlleS Of tllC trade and Of SOiince
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
ORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Client: Industrial Health Incorporated
Project ID: Anderson Auto / 07E-7156
Lab Sample ID: L78685-03B
Field Sample ID: C-3 (a), 4-6'
CoUected: 7/2/2007 1:03:00 PM
Received: 7/5/2007
Analysis Requested: 8260B/5030B
Analytical Results
Contact: Amy Findley
Analyzed: 7/6/2007 7:32:00 AM
Halogenated VOCs + MBTEXN bv 8260B
Units = jig/kg-dry
DUution Factor = 50
Compound
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1,1 -Dichloro-1 -propene
1,1 -Dichloroethane
1,1 -Dichloroethene
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
1,2,3 -Trichloropropane
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
1,2-Dibromoethane
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloropropane
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,3 -Dichloropropane
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
2,2-Dichloropropane
2-Chloroethylvinylether
Allyl chloride
Benzene
Benzyl chloride
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
Bromobenzene
Bromochloromethane
Bromodichloromethane
Reporting Limit
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
310
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
310
310
61
310
310
120
120
120
% Moisture
Analytical
Resuh
<120
<120
<120
<120
<120
<120
<120
<120
<120
<120
<120
<310
<120
<120
<120
<120
<120
<120
<120
<120
<310
<310
290
<310
<310
<120
<120
<120
i^y L
.c.
18
£^S
0-5^
Report Date: 7/20/2007 Page 20 of 49
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA. and RCRA arc perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertineni sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges
ofsubscquentuseof the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection wiih the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with there-publication of this report for
any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance ofinspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of the trade and of science.
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email; [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Lab Sample ID: L78685-03B
Field Sample ID: C-3 (% 4-6'
CoUected: 7/2/2007 1:03:00 PM
Received: 7/5/2007
Analysis Requested: 8260B/5030B
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 7/6/2007 7:32:00 AM
Haloaenated VOCs + MBTEXN bv 8260B
Units = |a,g/kg-dry
DUution Factor = 50
Compoimd
Bromoform
Bromomethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Chloroprene
cis 1,2-Dichloroethene
cis 1,3-Dichloropropene
Dibromochloromethane
Dibromomethane
Dichlorodifiuoromethane
Ethylbenzene
lodomethane
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
o-Chlorotokiene
p-Chlorotoluene
Pentachloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
trans 1,2-Dichloroethene
trans 1,3-Dichloropropene
trans l,4-Dichloro-2-butene
Xylenes, Total
Trichlorofiuoromethane
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
Surr: l,2-Dicliloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Reporting Limit
120
310
120
120
120
120
310
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
310
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
61
72-135
71-144
73-126
% Moisture:
Analytical
Result
<I20
<310
<120
<I20
<120
<120
<310
<120
<120
<120
<I20
<120
<120
4100
<120
<310
2300
<I20
<I20
<120
<120
<120
<120
<120
<120
18000
<120
<120
<61
97.5
98.7
94.5
18
rhc3 \ f-^^
lOO
/ -7. o<-^
$ P>
\^^^
o >'3
TU
Report Date: lIlQIimi Page 21 of 49
All analyses applicable to Ihe CWA. SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pettinent sampling infoimation is located on Ihe anached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileees
of subsequcol use of Ihe name oflhis company or any member of ils slaff or reproduction oflhis report in connection with ihe advertisement, promolion or sale of any product or process, or in connection widi die re-publication oflhis report for
any puipose other than for the addressee will be panted only on contaci. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due perfoimancc ofinspection and/or analysis in good failtl and according 10 ttlC tUlCS Of IhC tiadC and OfSCiCIlCC
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
Lab Sample ID: L78685-03B
Field Sample ID: C-3 (^ 4-6'
CoUected: 7/2/2007 1:03:00 PM
Received: 7/5/2007
Analysis Requested: 8260B/5030B
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 7/6/2007 7:32:00 AM
Halogenated VOCs + MBTEXN bv 8260B
Units = iig/kg-dry
DUution Factor =
Compound
% Moisture: 18
50
Reporting Limit
Analytical
Result
Surr: Toluene-d8 72-129 102
Sample required a methanol extraction that was performed by method 503 5A (an improved version of the Utah
certified method 5035).
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Report Date: 7/20/2007 Page 22 of 49
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infoimation is located on the attached COC. This repoit is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Pnvileges
of subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any produci or process, or in connection with the re-publieation of this report for
any puipose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contaci. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due pcrfoimance ofinspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of the trade and of science.
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
ORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
CUent: Industrial Health Incorporated
Project ID: Anderson Auto / 07E-7156
Lab Sample ID: L78685-04B
Field Sample ID: C-4 (fli 2.5-3.5'
CoUected: 7/2/2007 3:05:00 PM
Received: 7/5/2007
Analysis Requested: 8260B/5030B
Analytical Results
Contact: Amy Findley
Analyzed: 7/6/2007 7:51:00 AM
Halogenated VOCs + MBTEXN bv 8260B
Units = |ig/kg-dry
DUution Factor = 50
Compound
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane
-1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1,1 -Dichloro-1 -propene
1,1 -Dichloroethane
1,1 -Dichloroethene
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,4-Triclilorobenzene
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
1,2-Dibromoethane
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloropropane
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichloropropane
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
2,2-Dichloropropane
2-Chloroethylvinylether
AUyl chloride
Benzene
Benzyl chloride
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
Bromobenzene
Bromochloromethane
Bromodichloromethane
Reporting Limit
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
300
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
300
300
61
300
300
120
120
120
% Moisture
Analytical
Result /
<120
<120
<120
<120
<120
<120
<120
< 120
< 120
<120
<120
<300
< 120
<120
<120
<I20
<120
<120
<120
<120
<300
<300
2300 -5
<300
<300
<120
<120
<120
18
Ag IfM-
o.if
Report Date: lllOlldQl Page 23 of 49
All analyses applicable lo the CWA. SDWA. and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infoimation is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for die exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges
of subsequenl use of the name of this company or any member of lis staff, or reproduction of Ihis report in connection with the advenisement. promotion or sale of any product or process, or in comieetion wiUl Ihe re-publication of this repoit for
any puipose other than for the addressee will be granted only on coniacl. This company .ccepis no responsibility except for Ihe due performance of inspeclion and/or analysis in good faith and acCOtding 10 the nilcs of Ihc tlndc Mid of DCitJlCC
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Lab Sample ID: L78685-04B
Field Sample ID: C-4 (^ 2.5-3.5'
CoUected: 7/2/2007 3:05:00 PM
Received: 7/5/2007
Analysis Requested: 8260B/5030B
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 7/6/2007 7:51:00 AM
Halosenated VOCs + MBTEXN bv 8260B
Units = p,g/kg-dry
DUution Factor = 50
Compoimd
% Moisture: 18
Reporting Limit
Analytical
Result f'M'
Bromoform
Bromomethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Chloroprene
cis 1,2-Dichloroethene
cis 1,3-Dichloropropene
Dibromochloromethane
Dibromomethane
Dichlorodifiuoromethane
Ethylbenzene
lodomethane
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
o-Chlorotoluene
p-Chlorotoluene
Pentachloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
trans 1,2-Dichloroethene
trans 1,3-Dichloropropene
trans l,4-Dichloro-2-butene
Xylenes, Total
Trichlorofiuoromethane
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
Surr: l,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
120
300
120
120
120
120
300
120
120
120
120
120
120
1200
120
300
120
120
120
120
120
1200
120
120
120
1200
120
120
61
72-135
71-144
73-126
* l-7>'^
<120
<300
<120
<120
<120
<120
<300
<120
<120
<120
<120
<120
<120
19000
<120
<300
4700
<120
<120
<120
<120
56000
<120
<120
<120
130000
<120
<120
<61
88.7
101
79.6
Report Date: 1I20I2Q01 Page 24 of 49
\^:3D
* IVXOJ <,:f
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges
of subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, ov reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, protnotion or sale of any product or process, or ia connection with the re-publication of this report for
any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the mles of the ttade and of science. I
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
Chent: Industrial Health Incorporated
Project ID: Anderson Auto / 07E-7156
Lab Sample ID: L78685-10
Field Sample ID: PH-3 (@ 4.5'
CoUected: 7/2/2007 12:30:00 PM
Received: 7/5/2007
INORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
Contact: Amy Findley
Analytical Results Units
Date Method Reporting Analytical
Analyzed Used Limit Result
Total Recoverable
Petroleum Hydrocarbons
mg/kg-dry 7/16/2007 1:00:00PM 1664-SGT 210 <210
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Report Date: 7/20/2007 Page 17 of 49
I Al I analyses applicable Io die CWA, SDWA. and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC prolocols. Peninem sampling information is localed on the attached COC. This report is provided for Ihe exclusive use of Ihe addressee Privileges
of subsequnit use of Ihe name of this company or any member of us staff, or reproduction of this repoit in connection with the advertisement, promolion or sale of any produci or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for
any puipose other Ihan for die addressee will he granled only on conlact. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due perfotmaiKC of inspcoion !md/0I OmlyBis in food ftlilh Blltl nccoidillS 10 IhC tUltS Of IhC IlJdC and Of Science
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATOWES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
ORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
CUent: Industrial Health Incorporated
Project ID: Anderson Auto / 07E-7156
Lab Sample ID: L78685-03C
Field Sample ID: C-3 (% 4-6'
CoUected: 7/2/2007 1:03:00 PM
Received: 7/5/2007
Analysis Requested: 8082/3545
Analytical Results
Contact: Amy Findley
Units = ^ig/kg-dry
DUution Factor = 1
Compoimd
Aroclor 1016
Aroclor 1221
Aroclor 1232
Aroclor 1242
Aroclor 1248
Aroclor 1254
Aroclor 1260
Surr: Decachlorobiphenyl
Surr: Tetrachloro-m-xylene
Extracted: 7/9/2007
Analyzed: 7/19/2007 4:37:24 PM
PCBs bv 8082/3545
Reporting Limit
31
31
31
31
31
31
31
10-180
10-135
% Moisture
Analytical
Result
<31
<31
<31
<31
<31
<31
<31
7.60 S
72.2
18
S - Surrogate outside recovery limits. Minimum method criterion of one surrogate within established recovery
limits was met.
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Report Date: 1120/2001 Page 18 of 49
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA. and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC prolocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges
of subsequenl use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for
any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contaci. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance ofinspection and/or analysis in good faith and accoiding to the rales of the trade and of science. I
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
Lab Sample ID: L78685-04B
Field Sample ID: C-4 (% 2.5-3.5'
CoUected: 7/2/2007 3:05:00 PM
Received: 7/5/2007
Analysis Requested: 8260B/5030B
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 7/6/2007 7:51:00 AM
Halogenated VOCs + MBTEXN bv 8260B
Units = |Ag/k.g-dry
Dilution Factor = 50
Compound
% Moisture: 18
Reporting Limit
Analytical
Resuh
Surr: Toluene-d8 72-129 98.1
* These analytes were obtained from a 1:500 dilution.
The MS & MSD for this batch were performed on this sample. Outliers were observed and attributed to matrix.
The LCS exhibited method control.
Sample required a methanol extraction that was performed by method 503 5A (an improved version of the Utah
certified method 5035).
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Report Date: 7/20/2007 Page 25 of 49
All analyses appUcable to the CWA. SDWA. and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is localed on Ihe anached COC. This report is provided for Ihe exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges
of subsequenl use of the name oflhis company or any member of ils staff, or reproduction oflhis report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connechon with Ihe re-publicalion oflhis report for
any purpose other ihan for Ihc addressee will be granted only on conlacl. This company accepts no responsibility except for Ihe due perfoimancc ofinspection an*or analysis ill gOOb failh and aCCOfding tO ItlC tUlCS Of Ille trade 9nd Of SCleMe.
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
ORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
CUent: Industrial Health Incorporated
Project ID: Anderson Auto / 07E-7156
Lab Sample ID: L78685-08B
Field Sample ID: PH-1 (% 5'
CoUected: 7/2/2007 11:10:00 AM
Received: 7/5/2007
Analysis Requested: 8260B/5030B
Analytical Results
Contact: Amy Findley
Analyzed: 7/9/2007 7:39:00 AM
Halogenated VOCs + MBTEXN bv 8260B
Units = ng/kg-dry
DUution Factor = 1
Compound
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1,1 -Dichloro-1 -propene
1,1 -Dichloroethane
1,1 -Dichloroethene
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
1,2-Dibromoethane
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloropropane
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichloropropane
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
2,2-Dichloropropane
2-Chloroethylvinylether
AUyl chloride
Benzene
Benzyl chloride
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
Bromobenzene
Bromochloromethane
Bromodichloromethane
Reportmg Limit
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
6.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
6.7
6.7
1.3
6.7
6.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
% Moisture
Analytical
Resuh
<2.7
<2.7
<2.7
<2.7
<2.7
<2.7
<2.7
<2.7
<2.7
<2.7
<2.7
<6.7
<2.7
<2.7
<2.7
<2.7
<2.7
<2.7
<2.7
<2.7
<6.7
<6.7
7.1
<6.7
<6.7
<2.7
<2.7
<2.7
)W(\
5 c
26
^.i^-
0-3^
Report Date: 1I2QI2001 Page 26 of 49
All analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA. and RCRA arc performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges
of subsequent use of the name of this cQm.pany or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for
any purpose other thati for the addressee will be granled only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due perfonnance ofinspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of ihe trade and of science.
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email; [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Lab Sample ID: L78685-08B
Field Sample ID: PH-1 (% 5'
CoUected: 7/2/2007 11:10:00 AM
Received: 7/5/2007
Analysis Requested: 8260B/5030B
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 7/9/2007 7:39:00 AM
Haloeenated VOCs + MBTEXN bv 8260B
Units = ^g/kg-dry
DUution Factor = 1
Compound
Bromoform
Bromomethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Chloroprene
cis 1,2-Dichloroethene
cis 1,3-Dichloropropene
Dibromochloromethane
Dibromomethane
Dichlorodifiuoromethane
Ethylbenzene
lodomethane
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
o-Chlorotoluene
p-Chlorotoluene
Pentachloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
trans 1,2-Dichloroethene
trans 1,3-Dichloropropene
trans l,4-Dichloro-2-butene
Xylenes, Total
Trichlorofiuoromethane
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Reporting Limit
2.7
6.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
6.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
6.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
1.3
72-135
71-144
73-126
% Moisture
Analytical
Result
<2.7.
<6.7
<2.7
<2.7
<2.7
<2.7
<6.7
<2.7
<2.7
<2.7
<2.7
<2.7
<2.7
<2.7
<2.7
<6.7
<2.7
<2.7
<2.7
<2.7
<2.7
<2.7
<2.7
<2.7
<2.7
<2.7
<2.7
<2.7
<1.3
98.7 ^ 0
97.0
95.1
26
0\Z-
Report Date: 7/20/2007 Page 27 of 49
All analyses applicable lo the CWA. SDWA. and RCRA are performed in accordance Io NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infoimation is located on Ihe attached COC. This report is provided for Ihe exclusive use of the addressee Privileges
ofsubsequenl use of Ihe name oflhis company or any member of its staff, or reproduction oflhis report in eonneelion with Ihe advertisemem. promotion or sale of any produci or process, or in connection with the rc-publicalion oflhis report for
any pun>ose other ihan for Ihe addressee will be granled only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for Ihe due perfonnance of inspection and/or analysis in good failll and according 10 the IdlCS of UlC trade aod of SCienCC.
^^\.
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
Lab Sample ID: L78685-08B
Field Sample ID: PH-1 (^ 5'
CoUected: 7/2/2007 11:10:00 AM
Received: 7/5/2007
Analysis Requested: 8260B/5030B
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 7/9/2007 7:39:00 AM
Halogenated VOCs + MBTEXN bv 8260B
Units = ^g/kg-dry
DUution Factor = 1
Compoimd
% Moisture: 26
Analytical
Reportmg Limit Resuh
Surr: Toluene-d8 72-129 104
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Report Date: 7/20/2007 Page 28 of 49
All analyses appiicable to the CWA. SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges
ofsubsequenl use of the name oflhis company or any member of its staff, or reproducrion oflhis report in connection with the advertisement, promolion or sale of any produci or process, or in connection with the re-publicarion oflhis report for
any puipose other Ihan for the addressee will be granled only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rulcs of the trade and of science.
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
ORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
I
I
Chent: Industrial Health Incorporated
Project ID: Anderson Auto / 07E-7156
Lab Sample ID: L78685-09B
Field Sample ID: PH-2 (®,5'
CoUected: 7/2/2007 12:02:00 PM
Received: 7/5/2007
Contact: Amy Findley
Analysis Requested:
Analytical Results
8260B/5030B
Analyzed: 7/9/2007 7:19:00 AM
Halosenated VOCs + MBTEXN bv 8260B
Units = |j,g/kg-dry
DUution Factor =
Compound
% Moisture: 26
1
Reporting Limit
Analytical
Result
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1,1 -Dichloro-1 -propene
1,1 -Dichloroethane
1,1 -Dichloroethene
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
1,2-Dibromoethane
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dicliloropropane
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichloropropane
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
2,2-Dichloropropane
2-Chloroethylvinylether
Allyl chloride
Benzene
Benzyl chloride
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
Bromobenzene
Bromochloromethane
Bromodichloromethane
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
6.8
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
6.8
6.8
1.4
6.8
6.8
2.7
2.7
2.7
<2.7
<2.7.
<2.7
<2.7
<2.7
<2.7
<2.7
<2.7
<2.7
<2.7
<2.7
<6.8
<2.7
<2.7
<2.7
<2.7
<2.7
<2.7
4.4
<2.7
<6.8
<6.8
34
<6.8
<6.8
<2.7
<2.7
<2.7
Report Date: 7/20/2007 Page 29 of 49
5 O'^'i
All analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA. and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnalion is localed on the anached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges
ofsubsequenl use of the name of this company or any member of its suiff. or reproduction oflhis report in connection widi the advenisement. promolion or sale of any produci or process, or in conneerion with the re-publication of this report for
any purpose other than for Ihe addressee wil I be granled only on comacl. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due perfonnance of inspection and/or tnolytis in food failh and actoJdinE 'O *« ™1" of AlC »!!<: and of JCimc
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
Lab Sample ID: L78685-09B
Field Sample ID: PH-2 {%5'
CoUected: 7/2/2007 12:02:00 PM
Received: 7/5/2007
Analysis Requested: 8260B/5030B
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 7/9/2007 7:19:00 AM
Halogenated VOCs + MBTEXN bv 8260B
Units = |ig/kg-dry
DUution Factor = 1
Compound
Bromoform
Bromomethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Chloroprene
cis 1,2-Dichloroethene
cis 1,3-Dichloropropene
Dibromochloromethane
Dibromomethane
Dichlorodifiuoromethane
Ethylbenzene
lodomethane
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
o-Chlorotoluene
p-Chlorotoluene
Pentachloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
trans 1,2-Dichloroethene
trans 1,3-Dichloropropene
trans l,4-Dichloro-2-butene
Xylenes, Total
Trichlorofiuoromethane
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
SIUT: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Report Date: 7/20/2007 Page 30 of 49
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA. and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infoimalion is localed on die attached COC. This report is provided for Ihe exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges
ofsubsequenl use of the name oflhis company or any member of its staff, or reproduction oflhis report in connection with the advenisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for
any puipose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for die due perfonnance ofinspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of the trade and of science.
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
KyleF. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Reporting Limit
2.7
6.8
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
6.8
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
6.8
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
1.4
72-135
71-144
73-126
% Moisture
Analytical
Result
<2.7
<6.8
<2.7
<2.7
<2.7
<2.7
<6.8
<2.7
<2.7
<2.7
<2.7
<2.7
<2.7
6.3
<2.7
<6.8
8.2
5.6
<2.7
<2.7
<2.7
100 '
<2.7
<2.7
3.6
28—
<2.7
<2.7
<1.4
99.8
111
95.1
/l^.r^
"'?
^—
'-1
5 0
^
,
26
A3-
2_
I
I
I
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
Lab Sample ID: L78685-09B
Field Sample ID: PH-2 (^5'
CoUected: 7/2/2007 12:02:00 PM
Received: 7/5/2007
Analysis Requested: 8260B/5030B
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 7/9/2007 7:19:00 AM
Halogenated VOCs + MBTEXN bv 8260B
Units = |ig/kg-dry
DUution Factor = 1
Compound Reporting Limit
% Moisture: 26
Analytical
Result
Surr: Toluene-d8 72-129 107 n
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Report Date: 7/20/2007 Page 31 of 49
All analyses applicable lo the CWA. SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance lo NELAC protocols. Peninem sampling infonnalion is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee Pnvileges
ofsubsequenl use of the name oflhis company or any member of us suff. or reproduction oflhis report in connection wilh the advertisemem. promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publicarion of diis report for
any puroose other than for the addressee will be gramed only on conlact This company aeeepts no responsibility except for the due perforaiancc of inspection and/Or analysis in gOOd failh and aCCOrdlOg 10 thC njlCS Ofllie rtade and Of SCimOe
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
ORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Chent: Industrial Health Incorporated
Project ID: Anderson Auto / 07E-7156
Lab Sample ID: L78685-10B
Field Sample ID: PH-3 @ 4.5'
CoUected: 7/2/2007 12:30:00 PM
Received: 7/5/2007
Analysis Requested: 8260B/5030B
Analytical Results
Contact: Amy Findley
Analyzed: 7/9/2007 6:19:00 AM
Halogenated VOCs + MBTEXN bv 8260B
Units = ^g/kg-dry
DUution Factor = 1
Compound
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1,1 -Dichloro-1 -propene
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,1 -Dichloroethene
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
1,2-Dibromoethane
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloropropane
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichloropropane
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
2,2-Dichloropropane
2-ChloroethyIvinylether
AUyl chloride
Benzene
Benzyl chloride
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
Bromobenzene
Bromochloromethane
Bromodichloromethane
Reporting Limit
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.9
7.1
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.9
7.1
7.1
1.4
7.1
7.1
2.9
2.9
2.9
Resuh
<2.9
<2.9
<2.9
<2.9
<2.9
<2.9
<2.9
<2.9
<2.9
<2.9
<2.9
<7.1
<2.9
<2.9
<2.9
<2.9
<2.9
<2.9
4.6
<2.9
<7.1
<7.1
33
<7.1
<7.1
<2.9
<2.9
<2.9
% Moisture: 30
Analytical
Resuh ^^l U^.^C
3 0 3V
Report Date: lllQlimi Page 32 of 49
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the cjictusive use of the addressee. Privileges
ofsubsequenluaeofthenameofthiscompany or any member ofits staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection wi^^ report for
any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance ofinspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of the trade and of science. I
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Lab Sample ID: L78685-10B
Field Sample ID: PH-3 (% 4.5'
CoUected: 7/2/2007 12:30:00 PM
Received: 7/5/2007
Analysis Requested: 8260B/5030B
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 7/9/2007 6:19:00 AM
Halogenated VOCs + MBTEXN bv 8260B
Units = n-g/kg-dry
DUution Factor = 1
Compound
Bromoform
Bromomethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Chloroprene
cis 1,2-Dichloroethene
cis 1,3-Dichloropropene
Dibromochloromethane
Dibromomethane
Dichlorodifiuoromethane
Ethylbenzene
lodomethane
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
o-Chlorotoluene
p-Chlorotoluene
Pentachloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
trans 1,2-Dichloroethene
trans 1,3-Dichloropropene
trans 1,4-Dichloro-2-butene
Xylenes, Total
Trichlorofiuoromethane
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
Surr: 1,2-Dicliloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Reporting Limit
2.9
7.1
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.9
7.1
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.9
7.1
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.9
1.4
72-135
71-144
73-126
% Moisture
Analytical
Resuh
<2.9
<7.1
<2.9
<2.9
<2.9
<2.9
<7.I
<2.9
<2.9
<2.9
<2.9
<2.9
<2.9
5.8 —
<2.9
<7.1
4.8 -".
<2.9
<2.9
< 2.9
<2.9
79 _
<2.9
<2.9
<2.9
27 -
<2.9
<2.9
<1.4
96.4-)
106
95.4
30
Report Date: 7/20/2007 Page 33 of 49
«,, ..lalyses applicable lo the CWA, SDWA. and RCRA are performed in accordance Io NELAC protocols. Pertineni sampling informarion is localed on the anached COC. This repon is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee Privileees
ot subsequenl use of the name oflhis company or any member of irs staff, or reproduction of Ihis repoit in conneerion with Ihc adveirisemenl. promolion or sale of any product or process, or in conneerion with Ihc re-publicalion of this report for
any purpose olher dian for Ihe addressee will be p-anled only on contact. This company accepis no responsibility exeepi for Ihe due perfomiance ofinspection and/or analysis in good failh and according to the nilCS Of thC trade and OfsCiOlCC
All anal)
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
Lab Sample ID: L78685-10B
Field Sample ID: PH-3 @ 4.5'
CoUected: 7/2/2007 12:30:00 PM
Received: 7/5/2007
Analysis Requested: 8260B/5030B
Analytical Results
I
Analyzed: 7/9/2007 6:19:00 AM
Haloeenated VOCs + MBTEXN bv 8260B
Units = |ig/kg-dry
DUution Factor =
Compoimd
% Moisture: 30
1 Analytical
Reportmg Limit Resuh
Surr: Toluene-d8 72-129 105
a^., nr •, ^^^ o , Thc MS & MSD for thls batch Were performed On tMs sumplc. Outliers were observed and attributed to matrix. 463 West 3600 South T, j ^r, ,.,.3 _^, , ^3 The LCS exhibited method control.
Salt Lake City, UT Multiple analyses of this sample at different levels indicated a non-homogeneous matrix. The analysis reported
84115 yielded the lowest PQLs.
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Report Date: 7/20/2007 Page 34 of 49
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA arc performed in acconiance to NELAC prolocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the anached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges
ofsubsequenl use of the name oflhis company or any member of its staff, ot reproduction oflhis report in conneerion with the advertisement, promorion or sale of any produci or process, or in coimection with the re-publication oflhis report for
any purpose other than for Ihe addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due perfonnance of inspecrion and/or analysis in good faith and accoiding to the rules of the nade and of science.
r\
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
ORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
I
I
CUent: Industrial Heahh Incorporated
Project ID: Anderson Auto / 07E-7156
Lab Sample ID: L78685-11A
Field Sample ID: GW-1
CoUected: 7/3/2007 10:05:00 AM
Received: 7/5/2007
Analysis Requested: 8260B/5030B
Analytical Results
Contact: Amy Findley
Analyzed: 7/6/2007 4:10:00 PM
Halogenated VOCs + MBTEXN/TPH r8260B^
Units = |ig/L
DUution Factor = 1
Con^oimd
Analytical
Reportmg Limit Resuh
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1,1 -Dichloro-1 -propene
1,1 -Dichloroethane
1,1 -Dichloroethene
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
1,2-Dibromoethane
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloropropane
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichloropropane
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
2,2-Dichloropropane
2-Chloroethylvinylether
Allyl chloride
Benzene
Benzyl chloride
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
Bromobenzene
Bromochloromethane
Bromodichloromethane
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
5.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
5.0
5.0
1.0
5.0
5.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<5.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<5.0
<5.0
6.0
<5.0
<5.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
5 0-3'
Report Date: 7/20/2007 Page 35 of 49
All analyses applicable lo the CWA. SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in acconiance to NELAC prorocols. Pertineni sampling infonnalion is located on Ihe attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of Ihc addressee Privileees
of subsequenl use of the name oflhis company or any member of its slaff. or reproducrion of this report in connection with Ihe advertisement, promolion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication oflhis report for
any puipose olher Ihan for Ihe addressee will be pamed only on eonuict. This company accept no responsibility except for Ihc due perfomiance of inspecrion and/or analysis in good faith and iSSOrding 10 thC lulcs of IhC millc and Of UCimCC
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Lab Sample ID: L78685-11A
Field Sample ID: GW-1
CoUected: 7/3/2007 10:05:00 AM
Received: 7/5/2007
Analysis Requested: 8260B/5030B
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 7/6/2007 4:10:00 PM
Haloeenated VOCs -^ MBTEXN/TPH (82606)
Units = ug/L
DUution Factor = l
Confound
Bromoform
Bromomethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Chloroprene
cis 1,2-Dichloroethene
cis 1,3-Dichloropropene
Dibromochloromethane
Dibromomethane
Dichlorodifiuoromethane
Ethylbenzene
lodomethane
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
o-Chlorotoluene
p-Chlorotoluene
Pentachloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
trans 1,2-Dichloroethene
trans 1,3-Dichloropropene
trans I,4-Dichloro-2-butene
Xylenes, Total
Trichlorofiuoromethane
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
TPHC6toC10(GRO)
TPHClltoC15(DRO)
Surr: l,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Reporting Limit
2.0
5.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
3.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
5.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
1.0
20
20
81-143
Analytical
Resuh
<2.0
<5.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<3.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
3.4 —
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<5.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<1.0
<20
<20
99.6
Report Date: 7/20/2007 Page 36 of 49
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in Bccordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges
of subsequent use of The name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any produci or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for
any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due perfonnance of inspeaion and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of the trade and of science.
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
Lab Sample ID: L78685-1 IA
Field Sample ID: GW-1
CoUected: 7/3/2007 10:05:00 AM
Received: 7/5/2007
Analysis Requested: 8260B/5030B
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 7/6/2007 4:10:00 PM
Haloeenated VOCs + MBTEXN/TPH r8260B)
Units = ug/L
DUution Factor =
Compound
I
Reporting Limit
Analytical
Resuh
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
85-115
80-124
88-120
102
94.1
106
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: awallgjawal-labs.com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Report Date: 7/20/2007 Page 37 of 49
All analyses applicable Io ihe CWA. SDWA. and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC prolocols. Pertinent sampling infonnalion is located on Ihe attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee Privileees
ofsubsequenl use of ihc name oflhis company or any member of us staff, or reproduction oflhis report in connection with the advertisemem. promorion or sale of any product or process, or in conneerion with the rc-publicalion oflhis report for
any purpose other Ihan for Ihe addressee will be gmnled only on eonlacl. This company accepi, no responsibiliiy except for the due perfonnance of inspecrion «nd/or analysis in gOOd failh and according 10 tllC lUleS OfltlC HadC and Of SCienCC
#^
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
ORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: awal@awal-labs,com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Client: Industrial Heahh Incorporated
Project ID: Anderson Auto / 07E-7156
Lab Sample ID: L78685-12A
Field Sample ID: GW-2
CoUected: 7/3/2007 10:42:00 AM
Received: 7/5/2007
Analysis Requested: 8260B/5030B
Contact: Amy Findley
Analyzed: 7/6/2007 4:35:00 PM
Analytical Results Haloeenated VOCs + MBTEXN/TPH r8260B)
Units = \igfL
DUution Factor = 1
Compoimd
Analytical
Reportmg Limit Resuh
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1,1 -Dichloro-1 -propene
1,1 -Dichloroethane
1,1 -Dichloroethene
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
1,2,3 -Trichloropropane
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
1,2-Dibromoethane
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloropropane
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichloropropane
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
2,2-Dichloropropane
2-Cliloroethylvinylether
AUyl chloride
Benzene
Benzyl chloride
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
Bromobenzene
Bromochloromethane
Bromodichloromethane
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
5.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
5.0
5.0
1.0
5.0
5.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<5.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<5.0
<5.0
<1.0
<5.0
<5.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
Report Date: 7/20/2007 Page 38 of 49
All analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges
ofsubsequenl use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for
any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due perfonnance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rulcs of the trade and ofscience.
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Lab Sample ID: L78685-12A
Field Sample ID: GW-2
CoUected: 7/3/2007 10:42:00 AM
Received: 7/5/2007
Analysis Requested: 8260B/5030B
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 7/6/2007 4:35:00 PM
Halogenated VOCs + MBTEXN/TPH (8260B)
Units = |ig/L
DUution Factor =
Coirpoimd
Bromoform
Bromomethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Chloroprene
cis 1,2-Dichloroethene
cis 1,3-Dichloropropene
Dibromochloromethane
Dibromomethane
Dichlorodifiuoromethane
Ethylbenzene
lodomethane
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
o-Chlorotoluene
p-Chlorotoluene
Pentachloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
trans 1,2-Dichloroethene
trans 1,3-Dichloropropene
trans 1,4-Dichloro-2-butene
Xylenes, Total
Trichloro fluoromethane
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
TPHC6toC10(GRO)
TPHClltoC15(DRO)
Surr: I,2-Dichloroethane-d4
,
Reporting Limit
2.0
5.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
3.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
5.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
1.0
20
20
81-143
Analytical
Resuh
<2.0
<5.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<3.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<5.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<1.0
<20
<20
100
Report Date; 7/20/2007 Page 39 of 49
All analyses applicable lo the CWA. SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertineni sampling infomiarion is localed on Ihc attached COC. This report is provided for Ihe exclusive use of the addressee PrivUeges
ofsubsequenl use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproducrion of Ihis report in conneerion with Ihe advertisement, promolion or sale of any produci or process, or in connection widi Ihe le-publicarion of this report for
'. any puipose other Ihan for Ihe addressee will be granted only on contact. This company aeeepls no responsibility except fo, ihc due perfonnance of inspeclion and/oi analysis in good faith »nd atcordiuf 10 the lulcs Of the ttadc aol) Of SCiCIlCe
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
Lab Sample ID: L78685-12A
Field Sample ID: GW-2
CoUected: 7/3/2007 10:42:00 AM
Received: 7/5/2007
Analysis Requested: 8260B/5030B
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 7/6/2007 4:35:00 PM
Halogenated VOCs + MBTEXN/TPH f8260B)
Units = |ig/L
DUution Factor = 1
Compound Reporting Limit
Analytical
Resuh
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
85-115
80-124
88-120
101
93.6
106
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Report Date; 7/20/2007 Page 40 of 49
All analyses applicable to Ihe CWA. SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC prolocols. Pertinent sampling infonnarion is localed on Ihe attached COC. This report is provided for die exclusive use of the addressee. Privilege.*
of subsequent use of the name of ihis company or any member of its staff, or reproducrion of Ihis report in connection with the advertisement, promotion oi sale of any product or process, or in connection with the le-publication of this report for
any puipose other dian for the addressee will be granled only on contaci. This company accepis no responsibility except for the due performance ofinspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of the ttade and ofscience.
1
I
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
ORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Chent: Industrial Heahh Incorporated
Project ID: Anderson Auto / 07E-7156
Lab Sample ID: L78685-13A
Field Sample ID: GW-3A
CoUected: 7/3/2007 1:35:00 PM
Received: 7/5/2007
Analysis Requested: 8260B/5030B
Analytical Results
Contact: Amy Findley
Analyzed: 7/6/2007 3:20:00 PM
Halogenated VOCs + MBTEXN/TPH (8260B)
Utiits = ug/L
DUution Factor = 10
Compound
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1,1 -Dichloro-1 -propene
1,1 -Dichloroethane
1,1 -Dichloroethene
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
1,2-Dibromoethane
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloropropane
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichloropropane
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
2,2-Dichloropropane
2-Chloroethylvinylether
AUyl chloride
Benzene
Benzyl chloride
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
Bromobenzene
Bromochloromethane
Bromodichloromethane
Reporting Limit
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
50
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
50
50
10
50
50
20
20
20
Analytical
Result
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<50
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<50
<50
<10
<50
<50
<20
<20
<20
Report Date: 7/20/2007 Page 41 of 49
.Ml analyses applicable lo the CWA. SDWA. and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC prolocols. Pertinent sampling infonnarion is located on Ihe attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee Privileees
of subsequem use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or nrproducrion of this report in connection with die advertisement, promotion or sale of any produci or process, or in connection wilh the le-publicarion oflhis report for
any pun,ose other than for Ihe addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepui no responsibility except for Ihe due perfonnance ofinspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rulcs of the trade and of aclmc"
JF\.
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Lab Sample ID: L78685-13A
Field Sample ID: GW-3A
CoUected: 7/3/2007 1:35:00 PM
Received: 7/5/2007
-Analysis Requested: 8260B/5030B
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 7/6/2007 3:20:00 PM
Halogenated VOCs + MBTEXN/TPH r8260B)
I
I
I
Units = jig/L
DUution Factor =
Compound
10
Bromoform
Bromomethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Chloroprene
cis 1,2-Dichloroethene
cis 1,3-Dichloropropene
Dibromochloromethane
Dibromomethane
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Ethylbenzene
lodomethane
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
o-Chlorotoluene
p-Chlorotoluene
Pentachloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
trans 1,2-Dichloroethene
trans 1,3-Dichloropropene
trans 1,4-Dichloro-2-butene
Xylenes, Total
Trichlorofluoromethane
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
TPH C6 to CIO (GRO)
TPHClltoC15(DRO)
Surr: l,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Reporting Limit
20
50
20
20
20
20
30
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
50
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
10
200
200
81-143
Analytical
Resuh
<20
<50
<20
<20
<20
<20
<30
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<50
<20
23"^
<20
<20
<20
21 —
<20
<20
<10
<200
<200
101 -^
Report Date: 7/20/2007 Page 42 of 49
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA arc performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC. This report is pro\'ided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges
of subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of Its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any produci or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this repoit for
any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility e:tccpt for the due performance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of the trade and ofscience.
I
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
Lab Sample ID: L78685-13A
Field Sample ID: GW-3A
CoUected: 7/3/2007 1:35:00 PM
Received: 7/5/2007
Analysis Requested: 8260B/5030B
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 7/6/2007 3:20:00 PM-
Halogenated VOCs + MBTEXN/TPH (8260B)
Units = ^ig/L
DUution Factor = 10
Compound Reporting Limit
Analytical
Resuh
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
85-115
80-124
88-120
101
93.6
106
The reporting limits were raised lOx due to sample matrix interference.
The pH of the sample was >2. Analysis was performed within 7 day holding time.
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Report Date; 7/20/2007 Page 43 of 49
All analyses applicable lo Ihe CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are perfomied in accordance to NELAC prolocols. Pertineni sampling infomiarion is located on Ihe attached COC. This report is provided for Ihe exclusive use of the addressee PrivileEes
ofsubsequenl use of the name oflhis company or any member of us slaff. or reproducrion oflhis report in conneerion with ihe advertisement, promorion or sale of any product or process, or in connection wilh Ihe re-publicarion oflhis report for
any purpose olher Ihan for ihc addressee will be panled only on oonuel. This company accepts no responsibility excepl foi Ihc dut pclfoiTIimCC Of iliSpCClion allll/Ot BMlysiS in gOOd failtl and aCCOItlmg 10 IhC IlllCS Ofllie mOe lUlll Of SCienCe
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
ORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
CUent: Industrial Health Incorporated
Project ID: Anderson Auto / 07E-7156
Lab Sample ID: L78685-14A
Field Sample ID: GW-4
CoUected: 7/3/2007 2:11:00 PM
Received: 7/5/2007
Analysis Requested: 8260B/5030B
Analytical Results
Contact: Amy Findley
Analyzed: 7/6/2007 3:45:00 PM
Halogenated VOCs + MBTEXN/TPH r8260B)
Units = [igfL
DUution Factor = 1
Compound
, 1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
,1,1 -Trichloroethane
, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
, 1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trtfluoroethane
, 1,2-Trichloroethane
, 1 -Dichloro-1 -propene
, l-Dichloroethane
, 1 -Dichloroethene
,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
,2,3 -Trichloropropane
,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
,2-Dibromo-3 -chloropropane
,2-Dibromoethane
,2-Dichlorobenzene
,2-Dichloroethane
,2-Dichloropropane
,3-Dichlorobenzene
,3-Dichloropropane
,4-Dichlorobenzene
2,2-Dichloropropane
2-Chloroethylvinylether
AUyl chloride
Benzene
Benzyl chloride
Bis(2-chIoroisopropyl)ether
Bromobenzene
Bromochloromethane
Bromodichloromethane
Reporting Limit
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
5.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
5.0
5.0
1.0
5.0
5.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
Analytical
Resuh /\ ^. I
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<5.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<5.0
<5.0
7.1 5
<5.0
<5.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
0.3'
Report Date: 7/20/2007 Page 44 of 49
All analyses applicable to the CWA SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC prolocols. Pertineni sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges
ofsubsequenl use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for
any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due perfonnance ofinspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of rhe trade and ofscience.
I
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Lab Sample ID: L78685-14A
Field Sample ID: GW-4
CoUected: 7/3/2007 2:11:00 PM
Received: 7/5/2007
Analysis Requested: 8260B/5030B
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 7/6/2007 3:45:00 PM
Halogenated VOCs -h MBTEXN/TPH f8260B)
Units = ^.g/L
DUution Factor =
Compound
Bromoform
Bromomethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Chloroprene
cis 1,2-Dichloroethene
cis 1,3-Dichloropropene
Dibromochloromethane
Dibromomethane
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Ethylbenzene
lodomethane
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
o-Chlorotoluene
p-Chlorotoluene
Pentachloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
trans 1,2-Dichloroethene
trans 1,3-Dichloropropene
trans l,4-Dichloro-2-butene
Xylenes, Total
Trichlorofluoromethane
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
TPH C6 to CIO (GRO)
TPHClltoC15(DRO)
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Reporting Limit
2.0
5.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
3.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
5.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
1.0
20
20
81-143
Analytical
Resuh
<2.0
<5.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<3.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
3.9
<2.0
<2.0
<5.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<1.0
83
<20
100
-!• o
O
Report Date: 112012001 Page 45 of 49
All analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA. and RCRA are perfomied in accordance to NELAC prolocols. Pertineni sampling infonnalion is located on Ihe attached COC. This report is provided for Ihe exclusive uSe of Ihe addressee PiivileBCS
of subsequenl use of the name oflhis company or any member of us Slaff. or reproducrion oflhis report in conneerion with the advertisemem. promorion or sale of any produci or process, or in connection with the re-publicauon of Ulis reoort for
any purpose other than for Ihe addressee will be granled only on conucl. This company accepis no responsibility except for die due performance of inspecrion and/or analysis iu food faith and accoidins 10 tht rules of the tradt KA of StioiM
M'^
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
Lab Sample ID: L78685-14A
Field Sample ID: GW-4
CoUected: 7/3/2007 2:11:00 PM
Received: 7/5/2007
Analysis Requested: 8260B/5030B
Analytical Results
I
Analyzed: 7/6/2007 3:45:00 PM
Halogenated VOCs + MBTEXN/TPH r8260B)
Units = \ygfL
DUution Factor =
Compound
1
Reporting Limit
Analytical
Resuh
Smr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
85-115
80-124
88-120
99.5
93.3
105
The pH of the sample was >2. Analysis was performed within 7 day holding time.
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: awal@awal-labs,com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Report Date: 7/20/2007 Page 46 of 49
All analyses applicable lo the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed io accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling, information is located on the atuiched COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges
of subsequem use of the name oflhis company or any member of its sraff, or reproducrion oflhis report in connection with the advertisement, promorion or sale of any produci or process, or in connection with the re-publication oflhis report for
any puipose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contaci. This company accepts no responsibility except for Ihe due perfoimancc of inspecrion and/or analysis in good fiiidi and accorduig to the rules of the trade and ofscience.
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
ORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Chent: Industrial Heahh Incorporated
Project ID: Anderson Auto / 07E-7156
Lab Sample ID: L78685-15A
Field Sample ID: GW-5
CoUected: 7/3/2007 2:45:00 PM
Received: 7/5/2007
Analysis Requested: 8260B/5030B
Analytical Results
Contact: Amy Findley
Analyzed: 7/6/2007 2:55:00 PM
Halogenated VOCs + MBTEXN/TPH f8260B)
Units = (ig/L
Dilution Factor •
Compound
10
,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
,1,1 -Trichloroethane
, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
, 1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane
, 1,2-Trichloroethane
, I -Dichloro-1 -propene
, 1 -Dichloroethane
,1-Dichloroethene
,2,3 -Tr ichlorobenzene
,2,3-Trichloropropane
,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
,2-Dibromoethane
,2-Dichlorobenzene
,2-Dichloroethane
,2-Dichloropropane
,3-Dichlorobenzene
,3-Dichloropropane
,4-Dichlorobenzene
2,2-Dichloropropane
2-Chloroethylvinylether
AUyl chloride
Benzene
Benzyl chloride
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
Bromobenzene
Bromochloromethane
Bromodichloromethane
Reporting Limit
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
50
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
50
50
10
50
50
20
20
20
Analytical
Resuh
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
• < 20
<50
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<50
<50
<10
<50
<50
<20
<20
<20
Report Date: 7/20/2007 Page 47 of 49
All analyses applicable lo the CWA. SDWA. and RCRA are perfonned in accordance 10 NELAC prolocols. Pertinent samplinj infonnalion is localed on the anached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee Privileges
ofsubsequenl use of Ihe name of this company or any member of its staff, or rcproduaion oflhis report in connection widi the advertisement, promorion or sale of any produci or process, or in conneerion with the rc-publicalion oflhis report for
any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due perfonnance of inspeclion and/or analysis in good faith and aecotdinf to the nilc! of Ihc mdc anil of lici(;ncc
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Lab Sample ID: L78685-15A
Field Sample ID: GW-5
CoUected: 7/3/2007 2:45:00 PM
Received: 7/5/2007
Analysis Requested: 8260B/5030B
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 7/6/2007 2:55:00 PM
Halogenated VOCs + MBTEXN/TPH (8260B)
Units = \igfL
DUution Factor = 10
Compound
Bromoform
Bromomethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Chloroprene
cis 1,2-Dichloroethene
cis 1,3-Dichloropropene
Dibromochloromethane
Dibromomethane
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Ethylbenzene
lodomethane
Methyl tert-butyl ether
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
o-Chlorotohiene
p-Chlorotoluene
Pentachloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
trans 1,2-Dichloroethene
trans 1,3-Dichloropropene
trans l,4-Dichloro-2-butene
Xylenes, Total
Trichlorofluoromethane
Trichloroethene
Vmyl chloride
TPH C6 to CIO (GRO)
TPHClltoC15(DRO)
Reportmg Limit
20
50
20
20
20
20
30
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
50
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
10
200
200
Analytical
Resuh
<20
<50
<20
<20
<20
<20
<30
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<50
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<20
<10
<200
<200
Report Date: 7/20/2007 Page 48 of 49
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertment sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges
ofsubsequenl use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the ic-publicaiion of this report for
any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of the trade and ofscience.
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
Lab Sample ID: L78685-15A
Field Sample ID: GW-5
CoUected: 7/3/2007 2:45:00 PM
Received: 7/5/2007
Analysis Requested: 8260B/5030B
Analytical Results
Analyzed: 7/6/2007 2:55:00 PM
Haloeenated VOCs + MBTEXN/TPH (8260B)
Units = ug/L
DUution Factor =
Compound
10
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: Toluene-d8
Reportmg Limit
81-143
85-115
80-124
88-120
Analytical
Resuh
99.2
100
93.2
106
n
The reporting limits were raised lOx due to sample matrix interference.
ThepH of the sample was >2. Analysis was performed within 7 day holding time.
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Report Date: 7/20/2007 Page 49 of 49
All analyses applicable to Ihe CWA. SDWA, and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertineni sampling infoimation is localed on Ihe anached COC. This report is provided for Ihe exclusive use of Ihe addressee. Privileges
ofsubsequenl use of the name oflhis company or any member of its staff, or reproducrion of rills report in connection widi Ihe advertisement, promorion or sale of any produci or process, or in connection with the re-publicalion of diis report for
any puipose other Ihan for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due perfonnance ofinspection and'or analysis in good faith and according 10 ihc mlCS Of ihC IradC and Of SCiCIlCe.
3
ts
C5
•5
tr-i
oo
VO 00
•J
V
u
O
e
a.
D
O o o o
(1.
So
•a •n
O
o
3
O
O
B
B
fc 8
c o U
^
&5
o
5
u
B
«3 u
e
Cf)
pO
08
H^
mmt
c<s u
•*-»
>%
es S
W5
^
s
es
IM
s
^
>>
h
C3
s s 9
c^ N
2
o
m^
o
s$^
o
o
^,
&
•4-*
5
C
vo
Ul
s-ti p-o
o
3 <
o
1)
<
£ cu
—
^
?
C
is
s
« E
E o U
u
e C!
2
I
o
CO
u
tw [i. O O
§
a
Ci o
u
S <
CO
to
®
I
in
oo
oo
u
•s
- ?
.J. J<l
t? in
^ O
fe-
<
c o U
O
>• .2
l-l u
^3
o o
I—I
v£)
»o 1—1
t~-
(i r-o -.._ o
3
<
s o yi
te
»—1
O
cy
v > IU
" i
£ (3
o
to
tN< '^ ":*- v-i
I
re Ol o p
Environmental Laboratories, Inc.
Thursday, July 12, 2007
Attn: Mr. Kyle Gross
American West Analytical
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Client ID: ANDERSON AUTO/07E-7156
Sample ID#s: AJ29562
This laboratory is in compliance with the QA/QC procedure outlined in EPA 600/4-79-
019, IHandbook for Analytical Quality in Water and Waste Water, March 1979, and
SW846 QA/QC requirements of procedures used.
if you have any questions concerning this testing, please do not hesitate to contact
Phoenix Client Services at ext. 200.
Sincerely yours,
Phyllis Shiiler
Laboratory Director
CT Lab Registration #PH-0618
MA Lab Registration #MA-CT-007
NY Lab Registration #11301
Rl Lab Registration #63
NH Lab Registration #213693-A,B
ME Lab Registration #CT-007
NJ Lab Registration #CT-003
PA Lab Registration #68-03530
587 East Middle Turnpike, RO. Box 370, Manchester, CT 06040
Telephone [phone] • Fax [phone]
Environmental Laboratories, Inc.
687 East Middle Turnpike, P.O.Box 870, Manchester, CT 06040
Tel. [phone] Fax [phone]
Analysis Report
July 12,2007
\«_AC£o^,
POR: Attn: Mr. Kyle Gross
American West Analytical
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84115
NY#11301
I
I
Sample Information Custody Information
Matrix: WASTE WATER CoUected by:
Location Code: AMERWEST Received by: LB
Rush Request: Analyzed by: see "By" below
P.0.#: 78685
Laboratory Data
Client ID: ANDERSON AUTO/07E-7156 GW-1
Parameter Result RL Units Date Time By Reference
Glycols
Ethylene glycol
Propylene glycol
Date
07/03/07
07/06/07
SDGLD.:
Phoenix I.D.:
Time
10:05
14:00
GAJ29562
AJ29562
21
ND
10
10
jng/L
mg/L
07A1/07
07/11/07
JH
JH
8015MOD
8015MOD
Conunents;
Tf there are any questions regarding this data, please call Phoenix Client Services at extension 200.
ND=Not detected BDL=Below Detection Limit BL=Beporting Limit
Phyllis/Shiller, Laboratory Director
July 12,2007
Page 1 of 1
PHASE ONE
ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Anderson Auto Wrecking
2890 South State
Springville, Utah
May 18,2006
Prepared for:
Desert Point
45 West 10000 South, Suite 201
Sandy, Utah 84070
Prepared by:
IHI Environmental
640 East Wilmington Avenue
Salt Lake City, Utah 84106
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Project #06E-7101
3C^H^HD
DE^^
PHASE ONE
ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Anderson Auto Wrecking
2890 South State
Springville, Utah
Prepared by:
Alysia M. Watanabe, R.E.A.
Senior Environmental Assessor
Reviewed by:
Kent Wheeler
Manager, Environmental Services
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) was conducted on the Anderson Auto
Wrecking property located at 2890 South State, Springville, Utah. IHI Environmental (IHI)
conducted this ESA at the request of Desert Point, Sandy, Utah. The Phase I ESA is
designed to meet the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard E 1527-
00 for Phase I ESAs.
As part of the Phase I ESA, IHI evaluated the subject property for the known or suspect
environmental conditions. Environmental conditions and Recognized Envirorunental
Conditions associated with the site are presented in Section 8 and summarized below:
Environmental Conditions
Environmental Conditions
Regulatory Issues
Regulatory Issues Identified on Adjoining Properties
Regulatory Issues Identified In Surrounding Area
Compliance Issues
Identified
with Site
Y
Y
Y
Discussed
in Section
5.2
5.3
4.4
Identified as
De Minimis
X
X
Historical Issues
Historic Use as Landfill
Historic Use as Salvage Yard
Y
Y
6.3
6.3
Site Inspection Issues
Suspect Land Use / Solid Waste Disposal Issues
Monitoring Wells / Domestic Water Wells
Quantities of Hazardous Substances (products)
Drums/Containers Containing Suspect Materials
Hazardous Waste Storage - Used Oil
Surface Staining
Wastewater - Septic, Sumps, Floor Drains, etc.
Above Ground Storage Tanks (ASTs)
Hydraulic Equipment
Regulated Building Materials
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
7.2
7.2
7.3
7.3
7.3
7.4
3.5.1 & 7.6
7.8
7.11
7.12
X
Recognized Environmental Conditions
This assessment has revealed no evidence of Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs)
in connection with this property, except the following.
1. Auto Wrecking Yard and Salvage Activity
The investigation indicates the facility has been, and continues to operate as, an auto-salvage
yard. The investigation suggests that the facility has been used primarily for automobile
salvage operations but other materials have generally been accepted. There is widespread
evidence of staining and releases of petroleum hydrocarbons, and possibly lead, mercury, and
potentially chlorinated solvents. Twenty-nine years of use has left countless small oil, fuel
Desert Point - Anderson Auto Executive Summary IHI Environmental
Phase I ESA Project #06E-7101
spills, and other vehicle fluid leaks throughout the lO-acre property. Significant staining is
present only around the crusher where cars were compressed without removal of any fluids.
Given the extensive staining, soil impacts are clearly present and groundwater impacts are
likely in this area.
2. Staining Associated with AST
The site has one active AST. This tank did not have secondary containment. Staining was
noted below the dispenser during the inspection. Impacted soils were present; however, the
extent of the impacts was not apparent and it could not be determined if groundwater was
impacted.
3. Storage of Hazardous Materials or Petroleum Products
Poor housekeeping practices were evident with regards to the storage of drums and buckets
of unknown wastes and used oil. These poor practices included the lack of secondary
containment, storage of hazardous material on bare ground, and the widespread evidence of
spills and staining. Due to the presence of stacked damaged vehicles, an accurate estimate of
quantity and contents was not possible.
Historic Recognized Environmental Conditions
This assessment has revealed no evidence of Historic Recognized Environmental Conditions
(HRECs) in coimection with this property, except the following.
1. Historic Landfill
Based on aerial photos and interviews, it appears that the uncontrolled dumping/landfilling
common to the area extended onto the northwest comer of the subject property. These
landfills were described as unregulated, and it is unknown whether any hazardous materials
entered the landfill over the history of their use. A limited investigation, part of the
CERCLIS investigation, fotmd levels of lead, arsenic, and chrome that exceeded established
drinking water standards; however, the site has been designated as "No Further Remedial
Action." While the sampling in the area has not identified significant impacts, it should be
noted that the area has not been sampled extensively. In addition former landfill areas can
generate dangerous levels of methane in the subsurface. Methane concentrations were not
investigated as part of the CERCLIS investigation. Given the limited data, IHI cannot
provide an opinion on the likelihood of impacts fi-om these activities.
Other Environmental Issues
Several other potential issues were identified that in IHI's opinion may represent business
environmental risks.
1. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP)
The current use of the subject property requires a Stormwater permit and a SPPP. The State
has no record of a permit. The owner was unaware of this requirement.
Desert Point - Anderson Auto Executive Summary IHI Environmental
Phase I ESA Project #06E-7101
2. Water WeUs
There appear to be two wells located on the subject property. The wells should be closed if
they are not being used for their intended purpose.
3. Regulated Building Materials
Mercury thermometer switches, mercury-containing fluorescent light tubes, and PCB-
containing light ballasts may be present. These materials may require special handling and
disposal, if the building is renovated or demolished.
While IHI's site inspection did not reveal any obvious friable asbestos-containing building
materials (ACBM), based on the construction date of the original subject property buildings,
asbestos-containing materials may be present. According to State and local demolition and
disposal regulations, an asbestos survey may be required to identify ACBM that requires
special handling and disposal before renovation or demolition.
Limiting Conditions
The following limiting conditions were encountered:
1. Obscured Surface, Inaccessible Trailers
The subject property contains an extensive amount of damaged autos, tires, engines, scrap
metal, and parts storage. The large amount of storage made it difficult to view all areas and
observe the ground surfaces for staining. Two trailers containing storage could not be
entered safely, and the interiors of other portable containers were not examined.
Desert Point - Anderson Auto Executive Summary IHI Environmental
Phase I ESA Project #06E-7101
I
I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Purpose 1
1.2 Detailed Scope-of-Services 1
1.3 User Provided Information 2
1.4 Significant Assumptions 2
1.5 Owner, Property Manager, and Occupant Information 3
1.6 IHI Personnel 3
1.7 Reason for Performing Phase I ESA 3
2.0 LIMITATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS 3
2.1 User ReHance 4
3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION 4
3.1 Location and Legal Description 4
3.2 Site and Vicinity General Characteristics 4
3.3 Physical Setting 5
3.3.1 Local Geology and Hydrogeology 5
3.4 Current Use of the Property 6
3.5 Descriptions of Structures and Improvements 6
3.5.1 Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal 6
3.6 Current Uses of the Adjoining Properties 7
4.0 INTERVIEWS 7
4.1 Interview with Owner 7
4.2 Interview with Key Site Manager ...8
4.3 Interviews with Occupants 8
4.4 Interviews with Local Government Officials 8
4.5 Interviews with Others 9
5.0 REGULATORY REVIEW 10
5.1 Subject Property Findings 10
5.2 Adjoining Property Findings 10
5.3 Surrounding Area Findings 12
6.0 HISTORICAL RECORDS REVIEW 12
6.1 Standard Historical Record Sources 12
6.2 Additional Historical Record Sources 13
6.3 Historical Use Information 13
6.4 Historical Environmental Conditions 14
7.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE 14
7.1 Methodology 14
7.2 General Observations 15
7.3 Hazardous Substances and Wastes 15
Desert Point- Anderson Auto TOC-1 IHI Environmental
Phase I ESA Project #06E-7101
8.0
9.0
7.4 Surface Stains 16
7.5 Surface Water Impoundments 16
7.6 Sumps, Drains, and Industrial Wastewater Systems 16
7.7 Underground Storage Tanks 17
7.8 Aboveground Storage Tanks 17
7.9 Excavations, Soil Stockpiles, and Suspect Fill 17
7.10 Possible PCB-containing Electrical Equipment 17
7.11 Hydrauhc Equipment 17
7.12 Regulated Building Materials 18
FINDINGS AND OPINIONS 19
8.1 Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs) 19
8.2 Historic Recognized Environmental Conditions 20
8.3 Other Environmental Issues 21
8.4 Limiting Conditions 21
CONTACTS AND REFERENCES 22
9.1 Contacts 22
9.2 References 22
FIGURES
Figure I:
Figure 2:
Figure 3:
Figure 4:
General Location Map (Appendix I)
Detailed Property Location Map (Appendix 1)
USGS Topographical Map (Appendix 1)
Parcel Map (Appendix I)
APPENDICES
Appendix 1
Appendix 2
Appendix 3
Appendix 4
Appendix 5
Appendix 6
Location Maps
Site Photographs
Environmental Database Report
Personnel Qualifications
Glossary of Terms
Previous Reports and Other Relevant Information
Desert Point- Anderson Auto
Phase I ESA
TOC-2 IHI Environmental
Project #06E-7101
1.0 INTRODUCTION
On April 21, 2006, Desert Point retained IHI Environmental (IHI) to perform a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of the Anderson Auto Wrecking property located at
2890 South State, Spanish Fork, Utah. Aldon and Carolyn Anderson Eire the recorded owners
of the property.
1.1 Purpose
This Phase I was prepared in accordance with the American Society for Testing and
Materials (ASTM) Standard for Phase I ESAs (E 1527-00). The purpose of this assessment
was to identify environmental issues or conditions associated with the subject property,
which may be characterized as "Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs)" or
"historical RECs" or may otherwise represent business environmental risks.
ASTM defines a REC as the presence or likely presence of hazardous substances or
petroleum products on a property under conditions that indicate an existing release, a past
release, or a material threat of a release into structures, ground, groundwater or surface water
on the subject property, even in full compliance with existing laws. Historical RECs are
conditions that previously may have been a REC, but may or may not presently be a REC.
1.2 Detailed Scope-of-Services
Elements of the Phase I ESA of the Anderson Auto Wrecking yard (also referred to as the
subject property) included the following:
1. Site Reconnaissance
Visual reconnaissance of the subject property to investigate the presence of
environmental conditions including, but not limited to:
a) presence and or use of hazardous substances or petroleum;
b) housekeeping and waste handling practices;
c) the presence of spills or releases of hazardous substances or petroleum;
d) presence of potential PCB-containing transformers, and hydraulic equipment;
e) suspect use areas, including: drum storage areas, undergroxmd storage tanks (USTs)
and above ground storage tanks (ASTs), maintenance areas, etc.
f) industrial wastewater systems
Desert Point - Anderson Auto 1 IHI Environmental
Phase I ESA Project #06E-7101
2. Historical Review
A historical review of the subject property and adjoining areas designed to identify past
land uses that may have impacted the subject property. If information is available, the
review will go back to 1940 or property development.
3. Regulatory Review
Review of federal, state and county agency records to identify regulatory-listed sites
within the prescribed ASTM minimum search distances; and reviews of specific
regulatory agency records to collect pertinent information on regulated sites of concern in
the vicinity of the subject property, where deemed necessary by IHI.
4. Interview(s)
Interviews with selected individuals associated with the subject property and regulatory
officials familiar with potential issues identified on the subject and adjoining properties.
5. Written Report
A summary of informational resources used for the project is presented in Section 9 of this
report. A glossary of terms used in this report is presented in Appendix 5.
1.3 User Provided Information
The client or lender provided the following information about the subject property.
User Provided Information
Information
Potential Information Provided
Source Yes / No Location of Information
Title Records N
Environmental Liens N
Activity or Use Limitations N
Price Reduction for Enviro Issues N
Previous Environmental Studies N
Specialized Knowledge N
Special Terms / Conditions N_
1.4 Significant Assumptions
No significant assumptions were made by IHI during the performance of this Phase I ESA.
Desert Point - Anderson Auto 2 IHI Environmental
Phase I ESA Project #06E-7101
1.5 Owner, Property Manager, and Occupant Information
Aldon and Carolyn Anderson own the subject property. Anderson Auto Wrecking Company
has operated an auto-recycling operation at the site for 29 years; Mrs. Anderson and her son,
John, manage the company and have an office on the subject property. Mrs. Anderson also
lives in the residence on the subject property.
1.6 IHI Personnel
IHI persoimel involved in this Phase I ESA included the following:
Kent Wheeler Manager, Environmental Services Technical Oversight
Alysia Watanabe Environmental Assessor Assessment/Report
Ammon McDonald Environmental Assessor Inspection
The qualifications for these individuals are presented in Appendix 4.
1.7 Reason for Performing Phase I ESA
This ESA was performed for Desert Point to assist in a potential property transaction.
2.0 LIMITATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS
This ESA was performed using, as a minimum, the practices of investigation specified in
ASTM E 1527-00, and a level of diligence typically exercised by environmental consultants
performing similar services. The ASTM standard recognizes that "no environmental site
assessment can wholly eliminate uncertainty regarding the potential for RECs in connection
with a property." Accordingly, IHI's level of diligence and investigative procedure are
intended to reduce, but not eliminate, potential uncertainty regarding environmental
conditions and RECs at the site.
The ASTM standard attempts to establish a balance between the competmg goals of limiting
investigative costs and time and reducing the uncertainty about unknown conditions.
Therefore, because the conclusions in this report were derived within project scope, cost,
time, and other limitations, the conclusions should not be construed as a guarantee that all
environmental liabilities associated with the property have been identified. Furthermore, IHI
Desert Point - Anderson Auto 3 IHI Environmental
Phase I ESA Project #06E-7101
assumes no responsibility for omissions or errors resulting fi-om inaccurate information
provided by sources outside of IHI or from omissions or errors in public records.
2.1 User Reliance
IHI believes that Desert Point and their lending institution can rely on the information
contained in this report. This information was obtained using procedures and protocols as
defined in ASTM Standard E 1527-00 and that the information presented in the report
represents the conditions of the subject property at the time the Phase I ESA was performed.
Section 4.5 of the ASTM Standard outlines the principals on which this reliance is based.
This reliance is subject to the terms, conditions, and limitations of the original contract tmder
which the report was prepared.
3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION
3.1 Location and Legal Description
The Client provided a parcel map of the subject property (Appendix 1: Figure 4). The
subject property consists of five parcels located at 2890 South State (Springville), Utah
County, Utah. According to information obtained firom the County Assessor's website, the
total acreage of the subject property parcels is 9.94 acres. Access to the property is from
State Street (Highway 51). The subject property is located five miles southwest of
downtown Springville and is being considered for annexation into Spanish Fork city limits.
Location maps are presented in Appendix 1. Photographs of the subject and adjoining
properties are presented in Appendix 2.
3.2 Site and Vicinity General Characteristics
The subject property is located in a mixed agricultural/warehouse area between the towns of
Spanish Fork and Springville, Utah. Surrounding properties include a self-storage lot,
equipment storage yards, and warehouses. A new residential subdivision is east, across the
street, of the subject property.
Desert Point - Anderson Auto 4 IHI Environmental
Phase I ESA Project #06E-7101
3.3 Physical Setting
Surface topography of the subject property slopes gently to the west, northwest. The
elevation is approximately 4,600 feet above sea level (USGS Topographic Map, Spanish
Fork, Utah Quadrangle; Appendix 1).
3.3.1 Local Geology and Hydrogeology
The site is located in the Utah Lake Valley. Groundwater in the Utah Lake Valley occurs in
Tertiary and Quaternary basin fill sediments that consist primarily of unconsolidated
lacustrine, alluvial fan and fluvial deposits. Coarse-grained sediments (sands, gravels,
cobbles) are typically found along the margins of the valley and along river channels. Fine
grained, well-sorted sands, silts and clays are found in the center of the valley (Appel and
Clark, 1982; Subitzky, 1962).
There are two primary aquifer systems in the Utah Lake Valley: 1) the principal aquifer that
consists of three hydraulically connected deep confined aquifers and a deep unconfined
(water table) aquifer located beneath the valley margins, and 2) a shallow unconfined water
table aquifer system that includes a perched aquifer in the Lake Bonneville sediments of the
Highland/Provo area. The principal aquifer typically occurs at depths greater than 75 feet
below ground surface (bgs) in the valley center, with a maximum aquifer thickness in excess
of 1,000 feet (Clark and Appel, 1985). The deep water table aquifer is present at depths
below 150 feet bgs on the margins of the valley where it is the first groundwater encountered.
The shallow water table aquifer typically occurs between five and twenty feet bgs (Subitzky,
1962).
Groundwater flow in the water table aquifer is generally toward the discharge areas of Utah
Lake, the Provo River, and other surface water canals. Groundwater flow in the deep
confined aquifers is towards the valley center from the mountains. There is no evidence that
indicates a hydraulic comieetion between the shallow water table aquifers and the principal
aquifer (Clark and Appel, 1985).
Recharge of the principal aquifer occurs from infiltration of precipitation in the Wasatch
Mountains and from mountain drainage streams. Recharge of the shallow water table
Desert Point - Anderson Auto 5 IHI Environmental
Phase I ESA Project #06E-7101
aquifers occurs from surface infilfration. Very little recharge occurs on the west side of Utah
Lake (Clark and Appel, 1985). Municipal water supply wells are generally completed uito
the deeper confined aquifers that readily yield large quantities of high-quality water (Clark
and Appel, 1985).
The inferred direction of groundwater flow is northwest, toward Utah Lake.
3.4 Current Use of the Property
The facility is currently used as an extensive storage yard for old vehicles, trailers, tires,
engines, scrap metal, and vehicle parts. A crushing station is located on the east portion of
the yard where cars and other metallic debris are crushed.
3.5 Descriptions of Structures and Improvements
Three permanent building structures are located on the subject property (Appendix 2:
Photographs 1 and 2): the small wood-frame office (square footage not listed on the
Assessor's web site) and a 1,722-square-foot wood-frame residence with a 246-square-foot
basement. There was also a 750-square-foot detached garage containing. According to
County Assessor information, the residence was constructed in 1911. Mrs. Anderson said the
interior has been renovated. The home is heated with a natural-gas flimace and has electric
air conditioning.
The large storage yard is L-shaped, extending north in the longest direction. The yard is
unpaved, fenced, and sloped toward the west. There are two trailers used for storage, a
concrete pad, and a wooden shelf of parts north of the residential garage (Appendix 2:
Photograph 3). There is also a concrete pad associated with the crushing operation.
3.5.1 Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal
Information regarding the potable water supply and the wastewater disposal at the subject
property is presented below.
Desert Point - Anderson Auto 6 IHI Environmental
Phase I ESA Project #06E-7101
Potable Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal
Utility
Drinking Water Supply
Sanitary Wastewater Disposal
Industrial / Process Wastewater
Disposal
Provider
Private well
Septic system
None
Environmental
Issue
N
N
N
According to Mr. John Anderson, the septic tank is located west of the house (east of the
crusher). This area is currently covered with vehicles waiting to be crushed. A search of
water rights on the Division of Water Resources (DWR) web site revealed four water rights
associated with groundwater on the property, all listed in the name of Leatha Henrikson.
While only two wells were identified, it could not be determined if the water rights were for
additional wells or just for additional rights from the same well. A copy of the DWR search
is attached in Appendix 6).
3.6 Current Uses of the Adjoining Properties
Adjoining properties are defined as any property or properties the border of which is
contiguous or partially contiguous with that of the subject property, or that would be
contiguous or partially contiguous with that of the property but for a street, road, or other
public thoroughfare separating them. The adjoining properties are described below.
Adjoining Properties
North Abandoned house and sheep corral are located on the northeast side; undeveloped land with
debris and pond are located on the northwest side (Appendix 2: Photographs 6 and 7).
South Retail store/warehouse; unmarked warehouses (Appendix 2: Photograph 8).
East State Street; across the street is a new residential subdivision (Appendix 2: Photograph 9).
West Former Spanish Fork Landfill (Appendix 2: Photograph 10).
4.0 INTERVIEWS
4.1 Interview with Owner
Mrs. Carolyn Anderson completed an environmental questionnaire on May I, 2006
(Attached in Appendix 6). She and her husband, Aldon, have owned the property for 29
Desert Point - Anderson Auto 7 IHI Environmental
Phase I ESA Project #06E-7101
years. In the questionnaire, she stated that she was not aware of any pending, threatened, or
past litigation, administrative proceedings, or notices from any governmental entity relating
to hazardous substances, pefroleum products, or other environmental issues associated with
the property.
In addition Mr. Aldon Anderson was interviewed conceming the previous operation of the
subject property business. He stated no other material was routinely accepted, other than old
vehicles. According to Mr. Anderson, to his knowledge, no battery-cracking has been
conducted at the site. Additionally, no drums or fransformers have been routinely accepted.
However, several old drums were found scattered through the property (See Section 7.0).
Furthermore, Mr. Anderson said approximately 100 square feet of the northwest comer of the
subject property was part of the old landfill. He has not noticed any problems with settling,
smells, or rising stains from that area.
4.2 Interview with Key Site Manager
Mrs. Anderson and her son, John Anderson, identified themselves as the Site Managers.
4.3 Interviews with Occupants
Mrs. Anderson also resides on the subject property.
4.4 Interviews with Local Government Officials
For local agency information on the subject property, IHI contacted the Spanish Fork City
Fire Department to determine if the fire department had responded to any environmental
incidents near the subject property. According to Fire Marshal Bill Whitney, Spanish Fork
City Fire Department, the fire department has not responded to any envirorunental issues at
the subject property.
IHI also contacted Mr. Boyd Stringham, Utah County Bureau of Environmental Health
Department. He had no knowledge of any environmental issues eissociated with the subject
property. Mr. Stringham did note that the old Spanish Fork Landfill was located in the
subject property area and there had been problems with a residential development that was
located on the landfill site. This site is also a CERCLIS site and is discussed in Section 5.2.
Desert Point - Anderson Auto 8 IHI Environmental
Phase I ESA Project #06E-7101
The subject property is currently used as a salvage operation of auto parts and metal. This
type of use requires that a Stormwater permit that includes a Stormwater Pollution
Prevention Plan be obtained from the State Division of Water Quality. IHI contacted Mr.
Tom Rushing, Division of Water Quality, and there is no permit on record for Anderson
Auto Wrecking.
IHI also contacted persons in the Division of Solid and Hazardous Waste (DSHW) for any
rules applicable to an auto-salvage yard. Mr. Pat Sheehan, DSHW Used Oil Section, said
there were no specific regulations for auto salvage yards. His experience is that there are
usually widespread small stains. A reportable stain of used oil is 25 gallons or more, or a
spill that threatens a waterway, including storm drains. Mr. Sheehan would recommend that
small stains seen visually be cleaned up and placed in a collection container and then
sampled to determine appropriate disposal.
IHI also contacted Mr. Rob Powers, DSHW Hazardous Waste Management Section, for any
applicable regulations regarding auto-salvage operations. He said a law was passed
prohibiting recycling vehicles for steel by disposing of them in electric arc furnaces without
removing hazardous materials, such as electric switches containing mercury and lead
batteries. Regulations are being developed and should go into effect in 2007.
Mr. Neil Taylor, Division of Environmental Response and Remediation, was contacted
conceming the Spanish Fork Landfill CERCLIS site (See Section 5.2).
IHI attempted to contact Mr. Richard Heap, Spanish Fork City, for any information
conceming the investigation of the Spanish Fork Landfill. As of the date of this report, he
had not responded to any of the phone messages left.
4.5 Interviews with Others
No other interviews were obtained.
Desert Point - Anderson Auto 9 IHI Envirormiental
Phase I ESA Project #06E-7101
5.0 REGULATORY REVIEW
A search report of environmental regulatory lists was obtained from Environmental
FirstSearch, Inc., (EFS) and reviewed by IHI to identify regulated facihties in the area. A
copy of the EFS report is included in Appendix 3. A summary of the EFS report is provided
below.
Regulatory Database Results
Regulatory Database
Federal NPL List / Proposed NPL Sites (Superfund)
CERCLIS / CERCLIS NFRAP Sites
CORRACTS (RCRA Corrective Action) Sites
RCRA TSD Sites
RCRA Generator Sites
ERNS Sites
Search Radius
1 mile
0.5 / 0.25 miles
1 mile
0.5 mile
subject & adjoining
subject
# of Sites
Listed
0
2
1
0
0
0
State NPL Equivalent Sites
CERCLIS Equivalent Sites
Landfill/SoUd Waste Disposal Site List
Leaking Underground Storage Tank List
Underground Storage Tank List
1 mile
0.5 mile
0.5 mile
0.5 mile
subject & adjoining
0
0
3
0
0
Additional regulatory research was conducted for selected sites that were considered by IHI
to be potential sources of contamination for the subject property. In general, additional
review was considered warranted due to: 1) close proximity of the site to the subject
property; 2) location hydrologically up gradient from the subject property; or 3) facility
status reports in the database (such as violations or groundwater impacts), indicating a
potential for extensive environmental impacts. Findings from any additional research are
discussed in Sections 5.1 through 5.3.
5.1 Subject Property Findings
No regulated sites were identified on the subject property.
5.2 Adjoining Property Findings
The surrounding area has been used historically as the dump for municipal wastes in this area
of Utah County. The adjacent Spanish Fork Landfill CERCLIS site (Facility Identification
# UTN00962138) includes the old Spanish Fork Landfill, the Springville Landfill, and the
Desert Point - Anderson Auto 10 IHI Environmental
Phase I ESA Project #06E-7101
Utah County Landfill, and there is evidence of promiscuous dumping. The landfills
encompass approximately 143 surface acres and operated from the 1940s until 1991. A map
of the landfills is attached in Appendix 6 as part of the Expressway Lane Plume (#
UT0009134958) Preliminary Assessment Report (PA). The map showed the Springville
Landfill west of the north yard of the subject property (incorrectly designated "Ainge
Salvage Yard." Mr. Anderson said the Ainge business once owned one acre of the subject
property storage yard.
The conclusion of the Innovative Assessment (Appendix 6: DERR, 1999) that included three
groundwater samples and one soil sample and information on previous studies of the landfill
areas was that no detections of volatile organic compounds, semi-volatile organic
compounds, pesticides, or PCBs in the groundwater were found. Some total metals above
Superfund Chemical Data Matrix (SCDM) Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) were
found but were present in an up gradient site south of the Utah Coimty Landfill location at
Expressway Lane. The presence of lead, chromium, and arsenic above MCLs in the up
gradient location led to the investigation of the Expressway Lane Plume. The Expressway
PA (Appendix 6: DERR, 2005) concluded that the impacts originated from the historic
landfills. The report speculates on possible suspect activities associated with salvage and
wrecking yards, such as battery-cracking, but no inspection or investigation of whether these
types of activities occurred was conducted by these businesses. The PA identifies the Ainge
and Anderson Auto Wreaking operations as a potential source but then concludes these
properties were at a lower elevation than the location of the sample that exceeded MCLs.
The landfills operated prior to RCRA policy. Waste accepted into these landfills was
unconfrolled. It is not known if hazardous materials could be present or if industrial wastes
were included. However, a previous investigation on a section of the Utah County Landfill
that involved trenching did not encounter drums or containers suspected of holding
hazardous waste. The groundwater in the area is very shallow and known to be in contact
with landfill contents. The Expressway Lane Plume PA included siiTpmary fables of previous
sampling studies conducted in the landfill area. Previous sampling showed that the three
former landfills have impacted the groundwater undemeath them; but little contamination
Desert Point - Anderson Auto 11 IHI Environmental
Phase I ESA Project #06E-7101
I
I
appears to have migrated from the landfill areas (DERR, 2005). EPA has designated the
Spanish Fork Landfill CERCLIS site as "No Further Remedial Action Planned."
According to Mr. Neil Taylor, DERR, no further investigation is planned by the State for the
Spanish Fork Landfill CERCLIS site.
5.3 Surrounding Area Findings
One site, Reilly Industries, Inc., a RCRA Corrective Action site, was found 0.9 miles
northwest of the subject property. Based on the distance and down gradient direction of this
site, IHI believes that this site is unlikely to impact the subject property.
No other regulated sites were foimd within the ASTM recommended search radii by the
database search.
The CERCLIS investigation of the potential Expressway Lane Plume (DERR, 2005) showed
the Spanish Fork Landfill (closed in 1988), the Springville Landfill (closed 1991), and the
Utah County Landfill (closed 1979) within 0.5 miles of the subject property. These landfills
have been investigated as the Spanish Fork Landfill CERCLIS and were discussed
previously.
6.0 HISTORICAL RECORDS REVIEW
6.1 Standard Historical Record Sources
Historical aerial photographs for the years 1966,1974, 1983, and 1995 were reviewed at the
Olympus Aerial Photo Office, Salt Lake City, Utah. A 1997 aerial photograph was also
viewed online at the Terraserver website.
IHI attempted to review R. L. Polk City Directories and Sanbom Fire Insurance Maps at the
Utah Historical Society Library, Salt Lake City, Utah. These resources did not provide
coverage for the subject property.
Desert Point - Anderson Auto 12 IHI Environmental
Phase I ESA Project #06E-7101
6.2 Additional Historical Record Sources
Historical information was also utihzed from governmental reports of the adjoining landfill
sites: Preliminary Assessment Report, Expressway Land Plume (DERR, 2005); and.
Innovative Assessment, Spanish Fork Landfill (DERR, 1999).
6.3 Historical Use Information
Presented below is a detailed chronological sununary of the subject, adjoining, and area land
uses.
Historical Summary
1910s-1950s According to the County Assessor records, the subject property residence was built in
1911. The Utah County landfill, located 200 yards south of the subject property, operated
from 1943 to 1979 (DERR, 1999). This was an unregulated landfill where waste was burned
periodically. As an unregulated landfill, boundaries were not set.
1960s A 1966 historic aerial photograph showed the subject property, and the north- and south-
adjoining properties appeared to be agricultural fields. The subject property appeared to be
L-shaped. The landfill activities presumably associated with the Spanish Fork Landfill area
were directly west and extended south of the subject property. Based on the appearance in
the photographs, the dumping did not appear to be well regulated, and with disturbed surfaces
and dirt roads were present in a wide area.
1970s A 1974 historic aerial photograph showed the subject property as primarily an agricultural
field. The northwest comer showed landfill activity encroaching over the subject property
boundaries. The west-adjoining property showed berming or trenching directly west of the
subject property (copy in Appendix 6). The Andersons acquired the subject property in 1979.
The Utah County Landfill closed in 1979 (DERR, 1999).
1980s A 1983 historic aerial photograph showed the subject property with a small amoimt of
storage. Landfill activity was present on the northeast direction and directly west of the
subject property. The Spanish Fork Landfill operated from 1982 to 1988. No liner was
installed but a clay cap covered the landfill as part of the closure procedures. A 1988
engineering study was conducted to review compliance costs with RCRA guidelines. Surface
and groundwater samples collected for this study revealed no organic or inorganic
contaminants. Total dissolved solids in the down gradient samples exceeded groundwater
protection levels.
1990s 1995 and 1997 historic aerial photographs showed the subject property with extensive storage
on the east, west and northwest areas of the subject property. In 1995 an Environmental Site
Assessment investigated surface and subsurface conditions of the adjoining landfill areas.
Seventeen test pits were dug and five soil borings were drilled for soil analysis. No evidence
of industrial waste was found. One sample found 252 mg/kg of lead. No other volatile or
semi-volatile organic compoimds, pesticides, or PCB levels were found. A down gradient
monitoring well also found no levels exceeding MCLs. In 1999, DERR conducted an
Desert Point - Anderson Auto 13 IHI Environmental
Phase I ESA Project #06E-7101
Innovative Assessment referred to as the Spanish Fork Landfill but also included the Utah
County Landfill site. Details are included in Section 5.2. Cadmium, chromium, and arsenic
levels exceeding regulatory amounts were found in groundwater.
2000s A 2003 historical aerial photograph shows the subject property and surrounding area as it
appeared at the time of the site inspection.
Summary The subject property is located in an area that has been used historically for dumping
of mumcipal wastes from southem Utah County. The exact location and time frame is not
clear, but several landfills/dumps have been identified in the surrounding area. In addition, it
appears that a portion of the property overlies old dump areas. The earliest historical records
indicate the facility was agricultural land until the 1960s; by the early 1970s, it appears some
dumping or landfilling was occurring on the west and northwest section of the subject
property. The subject property began operation as an auto-salvage yard in 1979 and
continues to operate as such until the present.
6.4 Historical Environmental Conditions
Two historical activities were identified on the subject property or in the surrounding area
that would be considered environmental conditions:
1. Part of historic landflll
Because of the umregulated and uncontrolled conditions of the historic landfill that adjoined
the subject property and which included part of the subject property, it is possible that this
historic use may have impacted on the subject property.
2. Historic industrial use
Continual oil, fiiel, and vehicle fluid spills during the operation of the auto salvage yard may
have impacted the subject property.
7.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE
Ms. Alysia Watanabe, Senior Environmental Assessor and Mr. Ammon McDonald,
Envirorunental Assessor, both of IHI, conducted a visual inspection of the subject property
on May 3, 2006. Mrs. Anderson provided access to the property.
7.1 Methodology
The subject property parcels form a L-shaped property containing storage areeis of old
vehicles and parts. The crushing operation is located west of the residence. The office and
residence of the business owner is on the southeast section of the subject property on State
Highway 51. The subject property boundaries were also observed. The northwest-adjoining
Desert Point - Anderson Auto 14 IHI Environmental
Phase I ESA Project #06E-7101
property had truck trailer parking and there were several drums (Appendix 2: Photograph 7).
The west-adjoining property had a pile of tires (Appendix 2: Photograph 10).
All environmental conditions that were observed in the inspection are noted below.
7.2 General Observations
A drinking water well is located northeast of the office building in the parking area west of
the highway (Appendix 2: Photograph 4). There is also a flowing artesian well on the north
side of the east storage yard (Appendix 2: Photograph 5). The presence of water wells does
not represent a significant environmental condition, but improperly abandoned wells can
provide a conduit for the fransport of hazardous substances from the surface to the
subsurface.
At the time of the site inspection, the subject property was developed as a storage yard of old
vehicles and parts. The majority of the storage yard is occupied with damaged cars and
trucks, sometimes stacked in two layers (Appendix 2: Photograph 11). According to Mr.
Anderson, when the engines are pulled to salvage parts, the vehicle is turned on its side.
The storage was predominanfly vehicles (Appendix 2: Photograph 12), although some
construction debris was also present. A few drums were scattered around the property
(Appendix 2: Photograph 13) but appeared empty. Numerous five-gallon cans were also
observed amongst the vehicles (Appendix 2: Photograph 14); in general these appeared
empty, but some appeared to contain small amounts of petroleum hydrocarbons. Engines
were segregated and stored in piles or in truck beds (Appendix 2: Photograph 15). Piles of
tires were also noted (Appendix 2: Photograph 16).
7.3 Hazardous Substances and Wastes
One storage frailer located north of the crusher contained approximately 15 five-gallon
plastic buckets of material. IHI did not enter the frailer because it appeared imsafe.
According to Mr. Anderson, these buckets contained hydraulic oil.
Next to the crushing operation there was one clearly marked 55-gallon drum of used oil
(Appendix 2: Photograph 17). There were also many other drums and buckets in that area
Desert Point - Anderson Auto 15 IHI Environmental
Phase I ESA Project #06E-7101
(Appendix 2: Photograph 18), some of which appeared to contain wastes and some which
appeared to have been spilled. Housekeeping practices in this area were very poor. No
storage of solvents or evidence of a parts-cleaning station was observed.
A few auto batteries were observed scattered around the subject property. According to Mr.
Aldon Anderson, batteries are removed from the vehicles and are sent to Westem Metals.
7.4 Surface Stains
Countless oil stains were observed throughout the storage yard (Appendix 2: Photograph 19),
particularly where the engines of the cars has been removed. One collection of engines has a
larger stain present (Appendix 2: Photograph 20).
The most significant stain was associated with the crusher (Appendix 2: Photograph 21).
According to Mr. John Anderson, after the engines have been removed, the vehicles are
crushed and sent to Westem Metal. The concrete pads where the vehicles are crushed have a
slight central depression that collects fluids and drains to a five-gallon bucket (Appendix 2:
Photograph 21). Mr. Anderson says the bucket of material is then dumped into the next car
to be crushed. As noted in Section 4.4, modem ears contain a wide variety of hazardous
materials, including heavy metals and pefroleum hydrocarbons, which may be released
during the crushing operations.
7.5 Surface Water Impoundments
No ponds, lagoons or other impoundments that would receive potentially impacted water
were observed.
7.6 Sumps, Drains, and Industrial Wastewater Systems
The subject property garage building is the automobile and boat garage for the residence. No
floor drains were observed and it did not appear to be used for auto or equipment repair. No
sumps, drains, or other evidence of an industrial waste water system were observed.
As noted in Section 3.5.1, a septic tank and leach field is located west of the house (east of
the crusher). There did not appear to be any industrial use of this system, and no significant
impacts are anticipated.
Desert Point - Anderson Auto 16 IHI Environmental
Phase I ESA Project #06E-7101
7.7 Underground Storage Tanks
No USTs or any evidence indicating the presence of USTs were observed.
7.8 Aboveground Storage Tanks
One approximately 500-gallon AST that appeared to store fuel was located on the east
section of the storage yard (Appendix 2: Photograph 22). It did not have secondary
containment and had slight staining below the dispensing pump.
Two tanks on trailers that appeared to be empty were located on the northwest comer of the
property (Appendix 2: Photograph 23). Additionally, one tank was perched on top of a
storage trailer (Appendix 2: Photograph 24). Mr. Aldon Anderson says this tank was not
used.
There were a few fuel tanks from vehicles present (Appendix 2: Photograph 25), as well as
some associated staining. According to Mr. John Anderson, the fuel from incoming cars is
normally drained and used in company vehicles (Appendix 2: Photograph 26).
7.9 Excavations, Soil Stockpiles, and Suspect Fill
No suspect fill, soil stockpiles or excavations were observed on the subject property.
7.10 Possible PCB-containing Electrical Equipment
Two pole-mounted fransformers were located on the east boundary of the subject property.
No staining was noted under either transformer and they appeared to be in good condition.
Both had a blue seal on the exterior, indicating that the fransformers are non-PCB-containing.
Springville City owns the fransformers. Any release would be the responsibility of the City.
There was also a pad-mounted fransformer next to the crusher. A seal on the case indicated
less than 1 ppm PCBs.
7.11 Hydraulic Equipment
The auto crusher is hydraulic. Significant staining was present in the area of the crusher;
however, the source was not clearly discemable. Historically, PCB-containing oils have
been used occasionally in hydraulic equipment
Desert Point - Anderson Auto 17 IHI Environmental
Phase I ESA Project #06E-7101
7.12 Regulated Building Materials |KRW371
Based on the age of the subject property buildings, regulated building materials may be
present. These materials may include asbestos-containing building materials, mercury
thermometer switches, mercury-containing fluorescent lights, PCB-containing light ballasts,
and lead-based paint. These materials may require special handling and disposal, if the
building is renovated or demolished .
Desert Point - Anderson Auto 18 IHI Environmental
Phase I ESA Project #06E-7101
8.0 FINDINGS AND OPINIONS
As part of the Phase I ESA, IHI evaluated the subject property for the known or suspect
enviroiunental conditions identified below. Environmental conditions identified by IHI are
presented in the following table.
Environmental Conditions
Environmental Conditions
Regulatory Issues
Regulatory Issues Identified on Subject Property
Regulatory Issues Identified on Adjoining Properties
Regulatory Issues Identified In Surrounding Area
Compliance Issues
Identified
with Site
N
Y
Y
Y
Discussed
in Section
5.1
5.2
5.3
4.4
Identified as
De Minimis
X
X
Historical Issues
Historic Use as Landfill
Historic Use as Salvage Yard
Y
Y
6.3
6.3
Site Inspection Issues
Suspect Land Use / SoUd Waste Disposal Issues
Surface Impacts from Adjoining Properties
Monitoring WeUs / Domestic Water Wells
Quantities of Hazardous Substances (products)
Dmms/Containers Containing Suspect Materials
Cleaning and Maintenance Items (small quantities)
Hazardous Waste Storage - Used Oil
Surface Staining
Ponds / Lagoons
Wastewater - Septic, Sumps, Floor Drains, etc.
Underground Storage Tanks (USTs)
Above Ground Storage Tanks (ASTs)
Large Excavations / Suspect Fill or Stockpiles
Suspect PCB Containing Equipment
Hydraulic Equipment
Regulated Building Materials
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
Y
Y
7.2
7.2
7.2
7.3
7.3
7.3
7.3
7.4
7.5
3.5.1 & 7.6
7.7
7.8
7.9
7.10
7.11
7.12
X
8.1 Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs) IKRW40]
IHI has performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, in conformance with the scope
and limitations of ASTM Practice E 1527-00, of the Anderson Auto Wrecking facility
located at 2890 South State, Utah County, Utah. Any exceptions to or deletions from this
practice are described in Section 1.4, and limiting conditions are described in Section 8.4 of
Desert Point - Anderson Auto
Phase I ESA
19 IHI Environmental
Project #06E-7101
I
this report. This assessment has revealed no evidence of Recognized Environmental
Conditions (RECs) in connection with this property, except the following.
1. Auto Wrecking Yard and Salvage Activity
The investigation indicates the facility has been, and continues to operate as, an auto-salvage
yard. The investigation suggests that the facility has been used primarily for automobile
salvage operations and other materials have generally been accepted. There is widespread
evidence of staining and releases of pefroleum hydrocarbons, and possibly lead, mercury, and
potentially chlorinated solvents. Twenty-nine years of use has left countless small oil, fiiel
spills, and other vehicle fluid leaks throughout the 10-acre property. Significant staining is
present only arovmd the crusher where cars were compressed without removal of any fluids.
Given the extensive staining, soil impacts are clearly present and groundwater impacts are
likely in this area.
2. Staining Associated with AST
The site has one active AST. This tank did not have secondary containment. Staining was
noted below the dispenser during the inspection. Impacted soils were present; however, the
extent of the impacts was not apparent and it could not be determined if groimdwater was
impacted.
3. Storage of Hazardous Materials or Petroleum Products
Poor housekeeping practices were evident with regards to the storage of drums and buckets
of unknown wastes and used oil. These poor practices included the lack of secondary
containment, storage of hazardous material on bare ground, and the widespread evidence of
spills and staining. Due to the presence of stacked damaged vehicles, an accurate estimate of
quantity and contents was not possible.
8.2 Historic Recognized Environmental Conditions
Historic Recognized Envfronmental Conditions (HRECs) are conditions that historically
would have been RECs, but the use or practice is no longer evident, and as such, an REC
may or may not be present. This assessment has revealed no evidence of Historic
Recognized Environmental Conditions (HRECs) in connection with this property, except the
following.
1. Historic Landfill
Based on aerial photos and interviews, it appears that the unconfrolled dumping/landfilling
common to the area extended onto the subject property. These landfills were described as
imregulated, and it is unknown whether any hazardous materials entered the landfill over the
history of their use. A limited investigation, part of the CERCLIS investigation, found levels
of lead, arsenic, and chrome that exceeded established drinking water standards; however,
the site has been designated for "No Further Remedial Action." While the sampling in the
Desert Point - Anderson Auto 20 IHI Environmental
Phase I ESA Project #06E-7101
area has not identified significant impacts, it should be noted that the area has not been
sampled extensively. In addition, former landfill areas can generate dangerous levels of
methane in the subsurface. Methane concentrations were not investigated as part of the
CERCLIS investigation. Given the limited data, IHI cannot provide an opinion on the
likelihood of impacts from these activities.
8.3 Other Environmental Issues [KRW41]
Several other environmental issues were identified with the subject property that in IHI's
opinion may represent business environmental risks.
1. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP)
The current use of the subject property requires a Stormwater permit and a SPPP. The State
has no record of a permit. The owner was imaware of this requirement.
2. Water WeUs
There appear to be two wells located on the subject property. The wells should be closed if
they are not being used for their intended purpose.
3. Regulated Building Materials
Mercury thermometer switches, mercury-containing fluorescent light tubes, and PCB-
containing light ballasts may be present. These materials may require special handling and
disposal, if the building is renovated or demolished.
While IHI's site inspection did not reveal any obvious fiiable asbestos-containing building
materials (ACBM), based on the construction date of the original subject property buildings,
asbestos-containing materials may be present. According to State and local demolition and
disposal regulations, an asbestos survey may be required to identify ACBM that requires
special handling and disposal before renovation or demolition.
8.4 Limiting Conditions
The following limiting condition was encountered during this Phase I ESA.
1. Obscured Surface, Inaccessible Trailers
The subject property contains an extensive amount of damaged autos, tires, engines, scrap
metal, and parts storage. The large amount of storage made it difficult to view all areas and
observe the ground surfaces for staining. Two trailers containing storage could not be
entered safely, and the interiors of other portable containers were not examined.
Desert Point - Anderson Auto 21 IHI Environmental
Phase I ESA Project #06E-7101
9.0 CONTACTS AND REFERENCES
9.1 Contacts
Anderson, Aldon, Carolyn, John, Subject Property Owners/Manager; [phone].
Heap, Richard, Spanish Fork City; [phone].
Powers, Rob, DSHW; [phone].
Rushing, Tom, Division of Water Quality; [phone].
Sheehan, Pat, DSHW; [phone].
Stringham, Boyd, Utah County Healtii Dept. Div. of Environmental Health; [phone].
Taylor, Neil, DERR; [phone].
Whitiiey, Bill, Spanish Fork Fire Department; [phone].
9.2 References
Appel, C.L., D.W. Clark, and P.E. Fairbanks; 1982. Selected Hydrologic Data for Northern
Utah Valley, Utah, 1935-1982. USGS Open File Report 82-1023.
Clark, D.W. and CL. Appel; 1985. Groundwater Resources of the Northern Utah Valley,
Utah. Utah Department of Natural Resources-Technical Publication No. 80.
Environmental FirstSearch, San Diego, California; [phone].
Olympus Aerial Surveys, Inc., 30 W. 2950 South, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Terraserver aerial photograph website; www.terraserver-usa.com.
Utah Historical Society, Special Collections Department, Polk City Directory and Sanbom
Fire Insurance Map Collections, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Utah Department of Environmental Quality, Division of environmental Response and
Remediation, 1950 West North Temple, Salt Lake City, Utah; [phone];
http ://environmentalresponse.utah. gov.
Desert Point - Anderson Auto 22 IHI Environmental
Phase I ESA Project #06E-7101
Utah Department of Natural Resources, Water Rights Division; 1636 West North Temple,
Sah Lake City, Utah; [phone]; http://nrwrtl.nr.state.ut.us.
Desert Point - Anderson Auto 23 IHI Environmental
Phase I ESA Project #06E-7101
APPENDIX 1
Location Maps
u e
IS
1
w
Oil
Si «
^ & ^
o « ^
•O
fl
a
O
fi
o
CD
3 <X>
C O
QJ ;v-
> -^
c .£ CM
o <S CSl
X ^ c: _ CD
CD
Ol
z S "* ^=i-LU ^
C3 to
T CO
CO
o
Q
CD
^ 03
- m .
'"•'..,.
• ia:mB!upqQO.
c
•5,
^
w
. 1
^
tn
a
"
? 1^
m
s
CN
IU
'•'-•.
•*,,
"^
s
KJ
S
An
d
e
r
s
o
n A
u
t
o W

28
9
0 S
o
u
t
h S
t
a
t
e
Sp
r
i
n
g
v
i
l
l
e
, U
t
a
h
»•
'^, ^.
%
•N-4-100-E
CD ^ (3
UJ -^ tu ,
" UJ
^
0X1
fl i
V
IM
fl
<
fl
o
Vl
13 fl
.fl
.*M P ^
.- O
0£
DM
C/3
a
fl
o
\
\
Chappel Dr
V «
o o
(/3
OJ 13 CO £= O
< < 00 „
C C -C CNI
z o iS CNJ LU •S.i:; CNI ci>:
c , CO
CO _j
CP CD
•^ CO
CO
w 111 • ;«• M 7W'
N 4Ir 9 1 E97
06E-?101
N «!)• 6' n S43
WllT 38- »3?5"
'J'.'. *t.-jitu .V;^[i:.M. 0*t.iii 1 U.^^mHc LH M gird rcne IJ
•^i. .-T f-iyiu....'cj Pril LIT
N 40- (T 3C 3S6-
W1lr3PS.377-
•fiRF-^mi in'
06£-7iei. Map DatMl 199Jt
i
IHI
ENVIRONMENTAL
640 East Wilmington Avenue
Salt Lake City, Utah 84106
[phone]
Anderson Auto Wrecking
Springville, Utah
06E-7101
Figure 3
Topographic
Map
APPENDIX 2
Site Photographs
Photograph 1
Subject property residence.
Photograph 2
Subject property office building.
Piiotograpli 3
Concrete pad with storage, east of
residential garage.
"•^Stmu-i-rt T ii+s**Sl«»-'»" 's'^ 'r%! i
Photograph 4
Culinary well located northeast of
office building in the parking area
along Highway 51.
Photograph 5
Artesian well on the north side of
the east storage yard.
Photograph 6
North-adjoining house and corral.
Photograph 7
Northwest-adjoining debris
including drums.
Photograph 8
South-adjoining warehouses.
Photograph 9
East-adjoining new subdivision.
Photograph 10
West-adjoining vacant land and
former landfill area.
Photograph 11
Typical auto storage in subject
property yard.
Photograph 12
Other debris noted in storage yard.
\^jO^/Ct ^ •* „ ** ^iCS»
.•*it—
Photograph 13
Drums that appeared to be empty
were scattered in various locations
of the storage yard.
Photograph 14
Five-gallon cans also observed in
the storage yard.
Photograph 15
Engines collected at two or three
locations.
Photograph 16
Piles of tires were also observed in
more than one location in the
storage yard.
Photograph 17
Drum of used oil near crusher.
Photograph 18
Other containers around crusher.
Photograph 19
Typical oil stains found
throughout the storage yard.
Photograph 20
Larger staining around collection
of engines and parts.
Photograph 21
Collection of oil and fluids from
crushed cars.
Photograph 22
Fuel AST located east of a storage
trailer in the east storage yard.
Photograph 23
Two tanks located in the northwest
scrap metal area.
Photograph 24
Tank on top of trailer with
dispensing tube.
Photograph 25
Gasoline tanks from vehicles.
i^'t'-''.-"-
'*l*a*»
Photograph 26
Evidence of fiiel being siphoned
from vehicle tank.
APPENDIX 3
Environmental Database Report
InfoMap
Technologies Incorporated
Environmental FirstSearch Report
TARGET PROPERTY:
2890 S STATE ST
SPRINGVILLE UT 84606
Job Number: 06E-7101
PREPARED FOR:
IHI Environmental, Inc
Alysia Watanabe
04-27-06
Envirunment:
FIRST;
Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone]
I
Environmental FirstSearch is a registered trademark of FirstSearch Technology Corporation. All rights reserved.
Environmental FirstSearch
Search Summary Report
Target Site: 2890 S STATE ST
SPRINGVILLE UT 84606
Database
NPL
CERCLIS
NFRAP
RCRA TSD
RCRA COR
RCRA GEN
RCRA NLR
ERNS
NPDES
FINDS
State Sites
Spills-1990
SWL
REG UST/AST
Leaking UST
- TOTALS -
Sel
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Updated
01-13-06
03-08-06
03-08-06
02-16-06
02-16-06
02-16-06
02-16-06
12-31-05
03-26-06
09-12-05
02-11-04
NA
05-01-03
04-15-05
04-15-05
FirstSearch Summary
Radius
1.00
0.50
0.50
0.50
1.00
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
1.00
0.25
0.50
0.25
0.50
Site
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1/8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
2
1/4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
1
0
3
1/2
0
0
0
0
0
-
-
-
-
1
0
-
0
1
0
2
l/2>
0
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
0
-
-
-
-
1
ZIP
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TOTALS
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
5
0
0
0
2
0
8
Notice of Disclaimer
Due to the limitations, constraints, inaccuracies and incompleteness of government information and computer mapping data currently available to
InfoMap Technologies, certain conventions have been utilized in preparing the locations of all federal, state and local agency sites residing in
InfoMap Technologies's databases. All EPA NPL and state landflll sites are depicted by a rectangle approximating their location and size. The
boimdaries of the rectangles represent the eastern and westem most longitudes; the northern and southem most latitudes. As such, the mapped areas
may exceed the actual areas and do not represent the actual boundaries of these properties. All other sites are depicted by a point representing their
approximate address location and make no attempt to represent the actual areas of the associated property. Actual boundaries and locations of
individual properties can be found in the files residing at the agency responsible for such information.
Waiver of Liability
Although InfoMap Technologies uses its best efforts to research the actual location of each site, InfoMap Technologies does nol and
can not warrant the accuracy of these sites with regard to exact location and size. All authorized users of InfoMap Technologies's services
proceeding are signifying an understanding of InfoMap Technologies's searching and mapping conventions, and agree to waive any and all
liability claims associated with search and map results showing incomplete and or inaccurate site locations.
I
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Information Report
Request Date:
Requestor Name;
Standard:
04-27-06
IHI Environmental
IHI
Search Type:
Job Number:
COORD
06E-7101
Filtered Report
TARGET ADDRESS: 2890 S STATE ST
SPRINGVILLE UT 84606
Demographics
Sites: 8
Radon: NA
Non-Geocoded: 0 Population: NA
Longitude:
Latitude:
Degrees (Decimal)
-111.617984
40.198432
Site Location
Degrees fMin/Sec)
-111:37:5
40:11:54
Easting:
Northing:
Zone:
UTMs
447400.521
4449754.275
12
Comment
Comment: ANDERSON AUTO RECYCLER
Additional Requests/Services
Adjacent ZIP Codes:
ZIP
Code Citv Name
0 Mile(s) Services:
ST Dist/Dlr Sel
Sanboms
Aerial Photographs
Historical Topes
City Directories
Title Search
Municipal Reports
Online Topos
Requested?
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Date
Environmental FirstSearch
Sites Summary Report
TARGET SITE: 2890 S STATE ST
SPRINGVILLE UT 84606
JOB: 06E-7101
AlsfDERSON AUTO RECYCLER
TOTAL; 8 GEOCODED: JVON GEOCODED: 0 SELECTED:
Page No. DBType Site Name/iD/Status Address Dist/Dir Map ID
FINDS UTAH COUNTY ROAD DEPARTMENT
U0002301679/FRS
FINDS COMMUNICATIONS BUILDING
I10OO22SI9O4/FRS
FINDS UTAH COUNTY FUEL STATION
110002301642/FRS
FINDS UTAH COUNTY MOTOR POOL
110002301660/FRS
UST UTAH COUNT!' MOTOR POOL
1000489
FINDS CITY AUTO SALES
110OO227S473/FRS
UST CITY AUTO SALES
1000253
RCRA COR REILL Y INDUSTRIES, INC.
UTD0099S7644/CA
2855 SOUTH STATE STREET
PROVO UTH4606
28S5 S STATE ST
PROVO UT 84606
2835 SSTATE ST
PROVO UT 84606
2801 S STATE ST
PROVO UT 84606
2801S STATE ST
PROVO UT84601
2315 S STATE ST
PROVO UT84606
2315 S STATE ST
PROVO UT 84601
0.08 NW
0.08 N»'
0.13 NM'
0.17 NW
0.17NW
0.29 NW
0.29 NW
2555 SOUTH INDUSTRIAL PARKW 0.90 NW
PROVO UT 84606
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
TARGET SITE: 2890 S STATE ST
SPRINGVILLE UT 84606
JOB: 06E-7101
ANDERSON AUTO RECYCLER
FINDS SITE
SEARCH ID: 8 DIST/DIR: 0.08 NW MAP ID:
NAME: UTAH COUNT'i' ROAD DEPARTMENT
ADDRESS: 2855 SOUTH STATE STREET
PROVO UT 84606
UTAH
CONTACT:
FA CILin • REGISTRA TION INFORM A TION:
PROGRAM:
PROGRAM ID:
AGENCY INTERESTED:
INTEREST ENDED:
SOURCE OF DATA:
LAST EXTRACTED:
REG PROGRAM:
PROGRAM:
PROGRAM m:
AGENCY INTERESTED:
INTEREST ENDED:
SOURCE OF DATA:
LAST EXTRACTED:
REG PROGRAM:
SITE TYPE:
INTEREST STATUS:
DATA QUALITY:
LOCATION DESC:
ADDRESS T^TE:
LAST REPORTED:
POSTED TO DATABASE:
DATA UPDATED:
ENTERED PERSON/METHOD:
PARENT REG ID:
CONFIDENCE IN ADDR:
CIM
490000007607 I
-"
I
CfM
12/27/2004 8:19:52 AM
STATE MASTER -
FRS
110002301679
FRS
FACILITY-
STATIONARY
ACTIVE
V
UNDERGROb-ND STORAGE TANK
REGLILAR URBAN
3/1/2000
4/20/2001 10:21:32 AM
FUGEN
MEDIUM
REV:
IDl:
ID2:
STATUS:
PHONE:
9/12/05
110002301679
FRS
PROVmED BY:
AGENCY INT QUAL:
INT END QUAL:
LAST REPORTED:
ENFORCEMENT ACT:
PROVIDED BY:
.\GENCY INT QUAL:
INT END QUAL:
LAST REPORTED:
ENFORCEMENT ACT:
STATE AGENCY
FEDERAL AGENCY
ENFORCEMENT SENSITLVE:
REQ MANUAL REVIEW:
REASON MAN REVIEW:
SMALL BUS POLICY:
ENFORCEMENT ACTION:
DATA PUB ACCESS:
INTERNAL SYS ID:
YES
FEDERAL FACILITY:
FEDERAL AGENCY:
TRIBAL LAND:
TRIBAL LAND NAME:
CONGRESSIONAL DIST:
LEGISLATIVE DIST:
HYDROLOGICAL UNTIS:
EPA REGION:
AIRSHED:
CENSUS BLOCK:
NO
03
64
16020202
08
Site Details Page - J
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
TARGET SITE: 2890 S STATE ST
SPRINGVILLE UT 84606
JOB: 06E-7101
ANDERSON AUTO RECYCLER
FINDS SITE
SEARCH ID: DIST/DIR: 0.08 NW MAP ID:
NAME: COMMUNICATIONS BUILDING
ADDRESS: 2855 S STATE ST
PROVO UT 84606
UTAH
CONTACT:
REV:
IDl:
ID2:
STATUS:
PHONE:
9/12/05
110002281904
FRS
FACILITY REGISTRATION INFORMATION:
PROGRAM:
PROGRAM ID:
AGENCY INTERESTED:
INTEREST ENDED:
SOURCE OF DATA:
LAST EXTRACTED:
REG PROGRAM:
PROGRAM:
PROGRAM ID:
AGENCY INTERESTED:
INTEREST ENDED:
SOURCE OF DATA:
LAST EXTRACTED:
REG PROGRAM:
SITE TVPE:
INTEREST STATUS:
DATA QUALITY:
LOCATION DESC:
ADDRESS TYPE:
LAST REPORTED:
POSTED TO DATABASE:
DATA UPDATED:
ENTERED PERSON/METHOD:
PARENT REG ID:
CONFIDENCE IN ADDR:
CIM
490000003082
CIM
12/27/2004 8:05:29 AM
STATE MASTER -
FRS
110002281904
FRS
FACILITY -
STATIONARY
ACTIVE
V
PROVIDED BV:
AGENCY INT QUAL;
INT END QUAL:
LAST REPORTED:
ENFORCEMENT ACT:
PROVIDED BY:
AGENCY INT QUAL:
INT END QUAL:
LAST REPORTED:
ENFORCEMENT ACT:
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK
REGULAR URBAN
3/1/2000
3/14/2001 4:51:53 PM
FRS
MEDIUM
STATE AGENCY
FEDERAL AGENCY
ENFORCEMENT SENSITIVE:
REQ MANUAL REVIEW:
REASON MAN REVIEW:
SMALL BUS POLICY:
ENFORCEMENT ACTION:
DATA PUB ACCESS:
INTERNAL SYS ID:
FEDERAL FACILITY:
FEDERAL AGENCY:
TRIBAL LAND:
TRIBAL LAND NAME:
CONGRESSIONAL DIST:
LEGISLATIVE DIST:
HYDROLOGICAL UNTIS:
EPA REGION:
AIRSHED:
CENSUS BLOCK:
YES
NO
03
64
16020202
08
Site Details Page - 2
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
TARGET SITE: 2890 S STATE ST
SPRINGVILLE UT 84606
JOB: 06E-7101
ANDERSON AUTO RECYCLER
FINDS SITE
SEARCH ID: DIST/DIR: O.L^ NW MAP ID:
NAME;
.ADDRESS:
CONTACT:
UTAH COUNTS' FUEL STATION
2835 S STATE ST
PROVO UT 84606
UTAH
REV:
IDl:
ID2:
STATUS:
PHONE:
9/12/05
11000230164
FRS
FACILITY REGISTRA TION INFORM A TION;
PROGRAM:
PROGRAM ID:
AGENCY INTERESTED:
INTEREST ENDED:
SOURCE OF DATA:
LAST EXTRACTED:
REG PROGRAM:
CIM
490000007604
CIM
12/27/2004 8:21:26 AM
STATE MASTER -
PRO\aDED BY:
AGENO' INT QUAL:
INT END QUAL:
LAST REPORTED:
ENFORCEMENT ACT:
STATE AGENCY
PROGRAM:
PROGRAM TD:
AGENC\' INTERESTED:
INTEREST ENDED:
SOURCE OF DATA:
LAST EXTRACTED:
REG PROGRAM:
FRS
110002301642
FRS
FACILITY -
PRO\aDED B^ :
AGENCY INT QUAL:
INT END QUAL:
LAST REPORTED:
ENFORCEMENT ACT:
FEDERAL AGENCY
SITE TYPE:
INTEREST STATUS:
DATA QUALITY:
LOCATION DESC:
ADDRESS TYPE:
LAST REPORTED:
POSTED TO DATABASE:
DATA UPDATED:
ENTERED PERSON/METHOD:
PARENT REG ID:
CONFIDENCE IN ADDR:
ENFORCEMENT SENSITFVE:
REQ MANUAL REVIEW:
REASON MAN REVIEW:
SMALL BUS POLICY:
ENFORCEMENT ACTION:
DATA PUB ACCESS:
INTERNAL SYS ID:
STATIONARY
ACTIVE
V
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK
REGULAR URBAN
3/1/2000
4/20/2001 10:18:53
FUGEN
MEDIUM
AM
YES,
FEDERAI. FACILITY':
FEDERAL AGENCY:
TRIBAL LAND:
TRIBAL LAND NAME:
CONGRESSIONAL DIST:
LEGISLATIVE DIST:
HYDROLOGICAL UNTIS:
EPA REGION:
AIRSHED:
CENSUS BLOCK:
NO
03
64
16020202
08
Site Details Page - 3
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
I
I
TARGET SITE: 2890 S STATE ST
SPRINGVILLE UT 84606
JOB: 06E-7101
ANDERSON AUTO RECYCLER
FINDS SITE
SEARCH ID: DlST/DlR: 0.17 NW MAP ID:
NAME: UTAH COUNTY MOTOR POOL
ADDRESS: 2801 S STATE ST
PROVO UT 84606
UTAH
CONTACT:
REV:
IDl:
ID2:
STATUS:
PHONE:
9/12/05
110002301660
FRS
FACILITY REGISTRA TION INFORMA TION:
PROGRAM:
PROGRAM ID:
AGENCY INTERESTED:
INTEREST ENDED:
SOURCE OF DATA:
LAST EXTRACTED:
REG PROGRAM:
CIM
490000007606
CIM
12/27/2004 8:19:51 AM
STATE MASTER -
PROVIDED BY:
AGENCY' INT QUAL:
INT END QUAL:
LAST REPORTED:
ENFORCEMENT ACT:
STATE AGENCY
PROGRAM:
PROGRAM ID:
AGENCY INTERESTED:
INTEREST ENDED:
SOURCE OF DATA:
LAST EXTRACTED:
REG PROGRAM:
SITE TYPE:
INTEREST STATUS:
DATA QUALITY:
LOCATION DESC:
ADDRESS TVPE:
LAST REPORTED:
POSTED TO DATABASE:
DATA UPDATED:
ENTERED PERSON/METHOD:
PARENT REG ID:
CONFIDENCE IN ADDR:
ENTORCEMENT SENSITIVE:
REQ MANUAL REVIEW:
REASON MAN REVIEW:
SMALL BUS POLICY:
ENFORCEMENT ACTION:
DATA PUB ACCESS:
INTERNAL SYS ID:
FEDERAL FACILITY':
FEDERAL AGENCY:
TRIBAL LAND:
TRIBAL LAND NAME:
CONGRESSIONAL DIST:
LEGISLATFVE DIST:
HYDROLOGICAL UNTIS:
EPA REGION:
AIRSHED:
CENSUS BLOCK:
FRS
110002301660
FRS
FACILITY -
PROVIDED BY:
AGENCY INT QUAL:
INT END QUAL:
LAST REPORTED:
ENFORCEMENT ACT:
FEDERAL AGENCY
STATIONARY
ACTIVE
V
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK
REGULAR URBAN
3/1/2000
4/20/2001 10:19:02 AM
FUGEN
MEDIUM
^TS
NO
03
64
16020202
08
Site Details Page - 4
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
TARGET SITE: 2890 S STATE ST JOB: 06E-7101
SPRINGVILLE UT 84606 ANDERSON AUTO RECYCLER
REGISTERED UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS
SEARCH ID: 5
NAME: UTAH COUNTY MOTOR POOL
ADDRESS: 2801 S STATE ST
PROVO UT 84601
CONTACT;
OWNER INFORMATION
OWNER NAME:
OWNER ADDRESS:
OWNER PHONE:
TANK INFORMATION:
TOTAL NUMBER OF TANKS:
TOTAL NUMBER OF CLOSED TANKS:
DIST/DIR:
UTAH COUNTY
2855 S STATE
PROVO.UT 84606
[phone]
L
1
0.17 NW MAP ID:
REV: 04/05/05
IDl: 1000489
ID2:
STATUS:
PHONE:
3
Site Details Page - 5
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
I
TARGET SITE: 2890 S STATE ST
SPRINGVILLE UT 84606
JOB: 06E-7101
ANDERSON AUTO RECYCLER
FINDS SITE
SEARCH ID: 2 DIST/DIR: 0.29 NW MAP ID:
NAME: CITY AUTO SALES
ADDRESS: 2315 S STATE ST
PROVO UT 84606
UTAH
CONTACT:
REV:
IDl:
roz:
STATUS:
PHONE:
9/12/05
110002278473
FRS
FA CILITY REGISTRA TION INFORMA TION:
PROGRAM:
PROGRAM ID:
AGENCY INTERESTED:
INTEREST ENDED:
SOURCE OF DATA:
LAST EXTRACTED:
REG PROGRAM:
CIM
490000002409
CIM
12/27/2004 7:24:50 AM
STATE MASTER -
PROVIDED BY:
AGENCY INT QUAL:
INT END QUAL:
LAST REPORTED:
ENFORCEMENT ACT:
STATE AGENCY
PROGRAM:
PROGRAM ID:
AGENCY INTERESTED:
INTEREST ENDED:
SOURCE OF DATA:
LAST EXTRACTED:
REG PROGRAM:
FRS
110002278473
FRS
FACILITY •
PROVIDED BY:
. AGENCY INT QUAL:
INT END QUAL:
LAST REPORTED:
ENFORCEMENT ACT:
FEDERAL AGENCY
SITE TYPE:
INTEREST STATUS:
DATA QUALITY:
LOCATION DESC:
ADDRESS TYPE:
LAST REPORTED:
POSTED TO DATABASE:
DATA UPDATED:
ENTERED PERSON/METHOD:
PARENT REG ID:
CONFIDENCE IN ADDR:
ENFORCEMENT SENSITIVE:
REQ MANUAL REVIEW:
REASON MAN REVIEW:
SMALL BUS POLICY:
ENFORCEMENT ACTION:
DATA PUB ACCESS:
INTERN.AL SYS ID:
FEDERAL FACILITY:
FEDERAL AGENCY:
TRIBAL LAND:
TRIBAL LAND NAME:
CONGRESSIONAL DIST:
LEGISLATfVE DIST:
HYDROLOGICAL UNTIS:
EPA REGION:
AIRSHED:
CENSUS BLOCK:
STATIONARY
ACTIVE
V
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK
REGULAR URBAN
3/1/2000
3/14/2001 4:45:30 PM
FRS
MEDIUM
YES
NO
03
64
16020203
08
Site Details Page - 6 I
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
TARGET SITE: 2890 S STATE ST
SPRINGVILLE UT 84606
JOB: 06E-710I
ANDERSON AUTO RECYCLER
r • -— • 1
REGISTERED UNDERGROUND STOR.^GE TANKS
SEARCH ID: 4
NAME: CITY AUTO SALES
ADDRESS: 2315 S STATE ST
PROVO UT 84601
CONTACT:
OWNER INFORMATION
OWNER NAME:
OWNER ADDRESS:
OWNER PHONE:
DIST/DIR:
D & H AUTO BODY
ATTN DAN HAYES -2255
PROVO.UT 84606
[phone]
TANK INFORMATION:
TOTAL NUMBER OF TANKS: 3
TOTAL NUMBER OF CLOSED TANKS: 3
0.29 NW MAP ID:
REV: 04/05/05
IDl: 1000253
ID2:
STATUS:
PHONE:
S STATE
4
Site Details Page - 7
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
TARGET SITE: 2890 S STATE ST
SPRINGVILLE UT 84606
JOB: 06E-7101
ANDERSON AUTO RECYCLER
RCRA COR SITE
SEARCH ID: 1 DIST/DIR: 0.90 NW MAP ID:
NAME: REILLY INDUSTRIES. INC.
ADDRESS: 2555 SOUTH INDUSTRIAL PARKWAY
PROVO UT 84605
CONTACT: PATRICK J AUSTIN
REV:
IDl:
ID2:
STATUS:
PHONE:
2/6/06
UTD009087644
CA
3172486473
SITE INFORMATION
CONTACT INFORMATION:
PHONE:
D CORNELL
L PLANT MGR
PO BOX 50086
PROVO UT 84601
8013735670
D CORNELL
L PLANT MGR
?0 BOX 50086
PROVO UT 846050086
8013735501
CONTACT INFORMATION:
PHONE:
UNIVERSE NAME:
SUBJECT TO CORRECTIVE ACTION
TSDS SUBJECT TO CORRECTIVE ACT
DF: LAND DISPOSAL FACILITY
SUBJECT TO CEl
INCINERATOR
ST: STORAGE AND TREATMENT
2865 - MANUFACTURING - CYCLIC CRUDES AND INTERMEDIATES
2911 - MANUFACTURING - PETROLEUM REFINING
AGENCY:
TYPE:
AGENCY:
TYPE:
AGENCY:
TYPE:
AGENCY:
TYPE:
AGENCY:
TYPE:
AGENCY:
S - STATE DATE:
120 - WRITTEN INFORMAL
S - STATE DATE:
120 - WRITTEN INFORMAL
S - STATE DATE:
120 - WRITTEN INFORMAL
S - STATE DATE:
310 - FINAL 3008(A) COMPLIANCE ORDER
S - STATE DATE:
210 - INITIAL 3008(A) COMPLIANCE ORDER
03-FEB-95
03-SEP-85
21-AUG-96
22-JAN-91
S- STATE DATE:
20-APR-90
^?-f few'"" "^'P^s^ •
Site Details Page - 8 I
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
TARGET SITE: 2890 S STATE ST
SPRINGVILLE UT 84606
JOB: 06E-7101
ANDERSON AUTO RECYCLER
RCRA COR SITE
SEARCH ID: 1 DIST/DIR: 0.90 NW MAP ID:
NAME: REILLY INDUSTRIES. INC.
ADDRESS: 2555 SOUTH INDUSTRIAL PARKWAY
PROVO UT 84605
CONTACT: PATRICK J AUSTIN
RE^':
IDl:
ID2:
STATUS:
PHONE:
2/6/06
UTD009087644
CA
3172486473
T\TE: 120 - WRITTEN INFORMAL
AGENCY:
TYPE:
AGENCY:
T^TE:
AGENCY:
T\TE:
S-STATE DATE: 16-MAV-85
120 - WRITTEN INFORMAL
S - STATE DATE: 20-APR-9O
210 - INITIAL 3008(A) COMPLIANCE ORDER
S - STATE DATE: OS-MAR-99
210 - INITIAL 3008(A) COMPLIANCE ORDER
VIOLATION INFORMATION:
VIOLATION NUMBER:
DETERMINED:
CITATION:
TYPE:
\T0LATI0N NUMBER:
DETERMINED:
CITATION:
YYVE.:
VIOLATION NUMBER:
DETERMINED:
CITATION:
TYPE:
VIOLATION NUMBER:
DETERMINED:
CITATION:
TYPE:
VIOLATION NUMBER:
DETERMINED:
CITATION:
TYPE:
\TOLATION NUMBER:
DETERMINED:
CITATION:
TYPE:
\T0LATI0N NUMBER:
DETERMINED:
CITATION:
TYPE:
\TOLATION NUMBER:
DETERMINED:
CITATION:
TYPE:
0001 RESPONSIBLE: S - STATE
26-MAR-85 DETERMINED BY: S - STATE
RESOL\^D: 31-MAY.85
DOT - TSD OTHER REQUIREMENTS (OVERSIGHT LEVEL)
0002 RESPONSIBLE: S - STATE
26-MAR-85 DETERMINED BY: S - STATE
RESOLVED: 31-MAY-85
DOT - TSD OTHER REQUIREMENTS (OVERSIGHT LEVEL)
0003 RESPONSIBLE: S - STATE
25-JUL-85 DETERMINED BY: S - STATE
RESOLVED: 27-SEP-85
DOT - TSD OTHER REQUIREMENTS (OVERSIGHT LEVEL)
0004 RESPONSIBLE: S - STATE
31-MAY-88 DETERMINED BY: S - STATE
RESOLVED: 12-AUG-88
DOT - TSD OTHER REQUIREMENTS (OVERSIGHT LEVEL)
0005 RESPONSIBLE: S - STATE
07-DEC-89 DETERMINED BY: S - STATE
RESOLVED: 22-JAN-91
DOT - TSD OTHER REQUIREMENTS (OVERSIGHT LEVEL)
0006 RESPONSIBLE: S - STATE
07-DEC-89 DETERMINED BY: S - STATE
RESOLVED: 22-JAN-91
DOT - TSD OTHER REQUIREMENTS (OVERSIGHT LEVEL)
0007 RESPONSIBLE:
20-APR-90 DETERMINED BY:
RESOLVED:
DOS - TSD GENERAL STANDARDS
0008 RESPONSIBLE:
20-APR-90 DETERMINED BY:
S - STATE
S- STATE
lO-MAY-90
S- STATE
S - STATE
RESOLVED:
DGS - TSD GENERAL STANDARDS
^'MMi^il on next page •
Site Details Page - 9
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
TARGET SITE: 2890 S STATE ST
SPRINGVILLE UT 84606
JOB: 06E-7101
ANDERSON AUTO RECYCLER
RCRA COR SITE
SEARCH ID: 1 DIST/DIR: 0.90 NW MAP ID:
NAME: REILLY INDUSTRIES. INC.
ADDRESS: 2555 SOUTH INDUSTRIAL PARKWAY
PROVO UT 84605
CONTACT: PATRICK J AUSTIN
REV:
IDl:
ID2:
STATUS:
PHONE:
2/6/06
UTD009087644
CA
3172486473
VIOLATION NUMBER:
DETERMINED:
CITATION:
TYPE:
0009 RESPONSIBLE: S - STATE
20-APR-90 DETERMINED BY: S - STATE
RESOLVED: lO-MAY-90
GPT - GENERATOR PRE-TRANSPORT REQUIREMENTS
VIOLATION NUMBER:
DETERMINED:
CITATION:
TYPE:
0010 RESPONSIBLE: S - STATE
20-APR-90 DETERMINED BY: S - STATE
RESOLVED: lO-MAY-90
GPT - GENERATOR PRE-TRANSPORT REQUIREMENTS
VIOLATION NUMBER:
DETERMINED:
CITATION:
TVPE:
VIOLATION NUMBER:
DETERMINED:
CITATION:
TYPE:
VIOLATION NUMBER:
DETERMINED:
CITATION:
TYPE:
VIOLATION NinviBER:
DETERMINED:
CITATION:
TYPE:
0011 RESPONSIBLE:
20-APR-90 DETERMINED BY:
RESOLVED:
DMC - TSD CONTAINERS REQUIREMENTS
0012 RESPONSIBLE:
20-APR-90 DETERMINED BY:
RESOLVED:
DMC - TSD CONTAINERS REQUIREMENTS
0013 RESPONSIBLE:
20-APR-90 DETERMINED BY:
RESOLVED:
DMC - TSD CONTAINERS REQUIREMENTS
0014 RESPONSIBLE:
20-APR-90 DETERMINED BY:
RESOLVED:
DGS-TSD GENERAL STANDARDS
S - STATE
S- STATE
tO-MAY-90
S- STATE
S- STATE
lO-MAY-90
S- STATE
S- STATE
lO-MAY-90
S- STATE
S - ST.^TE
lO-MAY-90
VIOLATION NUMBER:
DETEIRMINED:
CITATION:
TYPE:
VIOLATION NUMBER:
DETERMINED:
CITATION:
TYPE:
VIOLATION NUMBER:
DETERMINED:
CITATION:
TYPE:
VIOLATION NUMBER:
DETERMINED:
CITATION:
TYPE:
VIOLATION NUMBER:
DETERMINED:
S- STATE
S- STATE
IO-MAY-90
S- STATE
S- STATE
lO-MAY-90
GRR - GENERATOR RECORD KEEPING REQUIREMENTS
0017 RESPONSIBLE: S - STATE
20-APR-90 DETERMINED BY: S - STATE
RESOLVED: IO-MAY-90
GPT - GENERATOR PRE-TRANSPORT REQUIREMF.NTS
0015
20-APR-90
DGS
0016
RESPONSIBLE:
DETERMINED BY
RESOLX-ED:
TSD GENERAL STANDARDS
20-APR-90
RESPONSIBLE:
DETERMINED BY
RESOLVED:
0018 RESPONSIBLE:
20-APR-90 DETERMINED BY:
RESOLVED:
GGR - GENERATOR GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
S- STATE
S- STATE
IO-MAY-90
0019
20-APR-90
RESPONSIBLE:
DETERMINED BY: id on next page •
Site Details Page -10
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
TARGET SITE: 2890 S STATE ST
SPRINGVILLE UT 84606
JOB: 06E-7101
ANDERSON AUTO RECYCLER
RCRA COR SITE
SEARCH ID: DIST/DIR: 0.90 NW MAP ID:
NAME: REILLY INDUSTRIES. INC.
ADDRESS: 2555 SOUTH INDUSTRIAL PARKWAY
PROVO UT 84605
CONTACT: PATRICK J AUSTIN
REV:
IDl:
ID2:
STATUS:
PHONE:
2/6/06
UTD009087644
CA
3172486473
CITATION:
nTE:
VIOLATION NUMBER:
DETERMINED:
CITATION:
TYPE:
GPT
RESOLVED: IO-MAY-90
• GENERATOR PRE-TRANSPORT REQUIREMENTS
0(12(1 RESPONSIBLE:
20-APR-90 DETERMINED BY:
RESOLNTD:
DGS-TSD GENERAL STANDARDS
S - STATE
S- STATE
IO-MAY-90
VIOLATION NUMBER:
DETERMINED:
CITATION:
TYPE:
^^OLATION NUMBER:
DETERMINED:
CITATION:
TYPE:
V10L.A.TI0N NUMBER:
DETERMINED:
CITATION:
TYPE:
VIOLATION NUMBER:
DETERMINED:
CITATION:
TYPE:
VIOLATION NUMBER:
DETERMINED:
CITATION:
TYPE:
VIOLATION NUMBER:
DETERMINED:
CITATION:
TYPE:
VIOLATION NUMBER:
DETERMINED:
CITATION:
TYPE:
VIOLATION NUMBER:
DETERMINED:
CITATION:
TYPE:
VIOLATION NUMBER:
DETERMINED;
CITATION:
TYPE:
0021 RESPONSIBLE:
03-FEB-95 DETERMINED R\:
r315-5-2 RESOLVTD:
GER - GENERATOR ALL REQUIREMENTS
0022 RESPONSIBLE:
03-FEB-95 DETERMINED BY:
1315-5-10 RESOLVED:
GER - GENERATOR ALL REQUIREMENTS
0023 RESPONSIBLE:
03-FEB-95 DETERMINED BY:
r315-5-10 RESOLVXD:
GER - GENERATOR ALL REQUIREMENTS
0024 RESPONSIBLE:
03-FEB-95 DETERMINED BY:
r315-5-10 RESOLVED:
GER - GE>JERATOR ALL REQUIREMENTS
0025 FtESPONSIBLE:
21-AUG-96 DETERMINED BY:
r315-5-2 RESOLVED:
GER - GENERATOR ALL REQUIREMENTS
0026 RESPONSIBLE:
21 -AUG-96 DETERMINED BY:
r31.5-8-4.7(h),(i)and(j)
GER - GENERATOR ALL REQUIREMENTS
0027 RESPONSIBLE:
08-MAR-99 DETERMINED BY:
r315-5-4 RESOLVED:
GMR - GENERATOR MANIFEST REQUIREMENTS
0028 RESPONSIBLE:
08-MAR-99 DETERMINED BY:
r315-5-10(a) RESOLVED:
GGR - GENERATOR GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
0029 RESPONSIBLE:
08-MAR-99 DETERMINED BY:
r315-3-1 (a) RESOLVED:
GGR - GENERATOR GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
S- STATE
S- STATE
08-MAR-95
S- STATE
S- STATE
08-MAR-95
S- STATE
S- STATE
08-MAR-95
S- STATE
S- STATE
08-MAR-95
S- STATE
S - STATE
20-SEP-96
S- STATE
S- STATE
RESOLVED:
• STATE
• STATE
STATE
STATE
STATE
STATE
20-SEP-96
Continued on next page •
Site Details Page - ] 1
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
TARGET SITE: 2890 S STATE ST
SPRINGVILLE UT 84606
JOB: 06E-7I01
ANDERSON AUTO RECYCLER
RCRA COR SITE
SEARCH ID: 1 DIST/DIR: 0.90 NW MAP ID:
NAME: REILLY INDUSTRIES, INC.
ADDRESS: 2555 SOITH INDUSTRIAL PARKWAY
PROVO UT 84605
CONTACT: PATRICK J AUSTIN
REV:
IDl:
ID2:
STATUS:
PHONE:
2/6/06
UTD009087644
CA
3172486473
VIOLATION NUMBER:
DETERMINED:
CITATION:
TYPE:
VIOLATION NUMBER:
DETERMINED:
CITATION:
TYPE:
VIOLATION NUMBER:
DETERMINED:
CITATION:
TYPE:
0030 RESPONSIBLE:
08-MAR-99 DETERMINED BY:
r315-5-10(a) RESOLVED:
GGR - GENERATOR GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
0031 RESPONSIBLE:
08-MAR-99 DETERMINED BY:
r315-5-10 RESOLVED:
GGR - GENERATOR GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
0032 RESPONSIBLE:
08-MAR-99 DETERMINED BY:
r315-5-10 RESOLVED:
GER - GENERATOR ALL REQUIREMENTS
STATE
STATE
STATE
STATE
S- STATE
S - STATE
Site Details Page -12
Environmental FirstSearch Database Descriptions
NPL: EPA NATIONAL PRIORITY LIST - Database of confirmed, proposed or deleted Superfund sites.
CERCLIS: EPA COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE COMPENSATION AND
LIABILITY INFORMATION SYSTEM - Database of current and potential Superfund sites currently or
previously under investigation.
NFRAP: EPA COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE COMPENSATION AND
LIABILITY INFORMATION SYSTEM ARCHIVED SITES - database of Archive designated CERCLA sites
that, to the best of EPA's knowledge, assessment has been completed and has determined no fiirther steps will
be taken to list this site on the National Priorities List (NPL). This decision does not necessarily mean that there
is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that, based upon available information, the location is
not judged to be a potential NPL site.
RCRA TSD: EPA RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY INFORMATION SYSTEM
TREATMENT, STORAGE, and DISPOSAL FACILITIES. - Database of facilities licensed to store, treat and
dispose of hazardous waste materials.
RCRA COR: EPA RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY INFORMATION SYSTEM SITES
- Database of RCRA facilities with reported violations and subject to corrective actions.
RCRA GEN: EPA RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY INFORMATION SYSTEM SITES
- Database of facilities that generate or transport hazardous waste or meet other RCRA requirements.LGN -
Large Quantity GeneratorsSGN - Small Quantity GeneratorsVGN - Conditionally Exempt Generator. Included
are RAATS (RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System) and CMEL (Compliance Monitoring &
Enforcement List) facilities.
RCRA NLR: EPA RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY INFORMATION SYSTEM SITES
- Database of facilities not currently classified by the EPA but are still included in the RCRIS database.
Reasons for non classificationiFailure to report in a timely matter.No longer in business.No longer in business
at the listed address.No longer generating hazardous waste materials in quantities whichrequire reporting.
ERNS: EPA/NRC EMERGENCY RESPONSE NOTIFICATION SYSTEM - Database of emergency
response actions. Data since January 2001 has been received from the National Response System database as
the EPA no longer maintains this data.
NPDES: EPA THE NATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM - Database of
permitted facilities receiving and discharging effluents to and from a natural source where treatment of the
effluent is monitored.
FINDS: EPA FACILITY INDEX SYSTEM(FINDS)/FAC1L1TY REGISTRY SYSTEM(FRS) - The index of
identification numbers associated with a property or facility' which the EPA has investigated or has been made
aware of in conjunction with various regulatory programs. Each record indicates the EPA office that may have
files on the site or facility. A Facility- Registry System site has an FRS in the status field.
STATE SITES: DERR VOLUNTARY CLEANUP PROGRAM - The Utah Voluntary Cleanup Program
(VCP) was created to promote the voluntary cleanup of contaminated sites
SWL: DSHW UTAH SOLID WASTE FACILITY INVENTORY - The Division of Solid and Hazardous
Wa.ste maintains the landfill list.
REG UST/AST: DERR LUST LIST - Sites with leaking underground storage tanks in Utah
LEAKING UST: DERR UST LIST - Sites with underground storage tanks in Utah
RADON: NTIS NATIONAL RADON DATABASE - EPA radon data from 1990-1991 national radon
project collected for a variety of zip codes across the United States.
Environmental FirstSearch
Street Name Report for Streets within .25 Mile(s) of Target Property
I
TARGET SITE:
Street Name
Arkansas Ave
Dakota Ave
Hindenburg Pky
S State St
SOUTH State St
Tennessee Ave
Texas Ave
2890 S STATE ST
SPRINGVILLE UT 84606
Dist/Dir
0.24 NW
0.19NW
0.21 NW
0.01 NE
0.01 NE
0.17 NW
0.17 NW
JOB: 06E-7101
ANDERSON AUTO RECYCLER
Street Name Dist/Dlr
±
^•'
Environmental FirstSearch
1 Mile Radius
ASTM Map: NPL, RCRACOR, STATE Sites
2890 S STATE ST, SPRINGVILLE UT 84606
Envirumiitmta]
FIRSTS
Source: 2002 U.S. Census TIGER Files
Target Site (Latitude: 40.198432 Longitude;-111.61798'!) -^
Identified Site, Multiple Sites, Receptor ^
NPL, Brownfield, Solid Waste Landfill (SWL) or Hazardous Waste [gi^Jj
Railroads
Black Rings Represent ]/4 Mile Radius; iied Kin;: Repre^eiii-, 500 li Kadius
Environmental FirstSearch
.5 Mile Radius
ASTM Map: CERCLIS, RCRATSD, LUST, SWL
2890 S STATE ST, SPRINGVILLE UT 84606
FIRST:
I
I
I
Source: 2002 U.S Census TIGER Files
Target Site (Latitude: 40.198432 Longitude;-111.617984) -^
identified Site, Multiple Sites, Receptor Q|
NPL, Brownfield, Solid Waste Landfill (SWL) or Hazardous Waste j^^^^
Railroads
Blaclc Rings Represent 1/4 Mile Radius; Red Ring Represents .500 ft. Radius
,1.
l^'l
$
Environmental FirstSearch
.25 Mile Radius
ASTM Map: RCRAGEN, ERNS, UST
2890 S STATE ST, SPRINGVILLE UT 84606
tirv ixuuzKitriitii l^
FIRST
Source: 2002 U.S Census TIGER Files
Target Site (Latimdc: 40.198432 Longitude:-111.617984) -A-
Identified Site, Multiple Sites. Receptor ^
NPL, Brownfield. Solid Waste Landfill (SWL) or Hazardous Waste
Railroads —
Black Rings Represent 1/4 Mile Radius; Red Rin;; Represents .500 ft. Radii
APPENDIX 4
Personnel Qualifications
I
ALYSIA M. WATANABE. REA Proiect Staff
EDUCATION
University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah: Bachelor of University Studies, Environmental Science
1975
SUPPLEMENTAL EDUCATION
University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah: 40 Hours Graduate Credit, Masters Engineering
Administration
REGISTRATIONS
Registered Environmental Assessor, California, No. 07911
ACCREDITATIONS
AHERA:
-Building Inspector
Salt Lake County Health Department, Registered Pre-demolition Building Inspector, No. PBI-076
SUMMARY OF WORK EXPERIENCE
2003-Present Environmental Assessor, IHI Envirormiental, Salt Lake City, Utah. Provides
environmental consulting for a variety of clients throughout the west. Current work includes conducting
Phase I Environmental Site Assessments (ESAs) and regulatory compliance.
1989-2003 Environmental Analyst, Granite Environmental (Formerly SITEX), Salt Lake City, Utah.
Performed Phase I Environmental Site Assessments in conformance with current ASTM standards;
researched and analyzed infonnation in LUST, CERCLIS, and NPL reports to determine potential
impacts on nearby properties. Assisted manufacturing clients with environmental reporting: Bieimial
reports, Toxic Release Form R, Utah Air Emissions Inventory. Prepared SPCC Plans; prepared Notices
of Intent for Utah air quality permits.
1980-1982 Research Associate, Environmental Law Institute, Washington, D.C. Analyzed
regulations, statutes and potential revisions of the Clean Air Act. Analyzed enforcement and
implementation issues associated with continuous compliance of stationary air pollution sources;
analyzed existing state operating permit programs. Followed and analyzed major Superfiind legislative
proposals; analyzed implementation problems of EPA's regulatory reform programs.
1975-1979 Envirormiental Health Specialist, State of Utah, Department of Environmental Quality,
Salt Lake City, Utah. Represented the state pollution control agencies at schools; assisted in preparation
of program reports; initiated, organized and chaired the Utah Interagency and Community Council on
Environmental Education.
KENT R. WHEELER Senior Proiect Staff
EDUCATION
Colorado State University, Ft. Collins, Colorado: M.S., Watershed Sciences, 1987
Westem State College, Gunnison, Colorado: B.S., Geology, 1983
CERTIFICATIONS
Certified Professional Geologist, Utah, No. 5274992-2250
ACCREDITATIONS
Certified Soil and Groundwater Sampler, State of Utah, No. GS-0074
OSHA, 40-hour Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response (29 CFR 1910.120)
OSHA, Raihoad Workplace Safety, Roadway Worker Protection "Initial Training" (49 CFR 214)
National Ground Water Association, Estimating Times of Remediation Associated with Monitored
Natural Attenuation and Contaminant Source Removal, #157
SUPPLEMENTAL EDUCATION
USGS Finite Difference Groundwater Modeling; OSMRE Advanced Hydrology and Cumulative
Hydrologic Impacts; State of Utah ASTM LUST Risk-Based Corrective Action
AFFILIATIONS
National Association of Environmental Professionals
Association of Groundwater Scientists and Engineers
SUMMARY OF WORK EXPERIENCE
1989-Present Manager, Environmental Services and Senior Hydrogeologist, IHI Environmental,
Salt Lake City, Utah. Responsibilities include providing environmental-related consulting services
encompassing a wide range of projects, from Superfund Liability associated with property
transactions and hazardous waste cleanups to groundwater and soil contaminant investigations. Mr.
Wheeler specializes in the collection, compilation and evaluation of subsurface soil and groundwater
information, synthesizing the data with potential release scenarios and developing integrated
management strategies. The development of innovative risk-based remedial strategies have provided
substantial savings to a diverse group of cUents, including prospective sellers and purchasers of real
estate, industrial, and commercial clients with CERCLA, RCRA and LUST issues. Mr. Wheeler
interacts closely with clients, lawyers, and regulatory personnel on a routine basis, managing many
large projects, including CERCLA regulated Engineering Evaluations/Cost Analysis (EE/CA) and
Removal Actions and Post Removal Monitoring, RCRA Facility Investigations and Remedial
Actions, mine reclamation projects, and LUST Corrective Action Plans. In addition, Mr. Wheeler
has provided expert witness services on a variety of cases, including mine reclamation, snow
hydrology, underground storage tank issues, and geology.
1988-1989 Senior Hydrogeologist, EnviroSearch, Inc., Salt Lake City, Utah. As Project Manager,
supervised one to seven employees. Responsible for preparing proposals and cost estimates and
managing the resulting projects, including the field investigation, QA/QC, data analysis and report
preparation.
1987-1988 Reclamation Hydrologist, Division of Oil, Gas and Mining, State of Utah, Salt Lake
City, Utah. Determined completeness and technical adequacy of mine permits, and advised on
reclamation problems, including the following:
• Water yields and runoff
• Sediment control practices
• Sediment pond design
• Channel reclamation
Summer 1986 JBR Consultants Group, Sandy, Utah. Gathered baseline hydrologic data permitting
of underground coal operation. Helped design and emplace a monitoring system to determine
sediment yield and peak flows in ephemeral drainages.
PUBLICATIONS
Available upon request.
Kent R. Wheeler 2 IHI Environmental
I
I
APPENDIX 5
Glossary of Terms
ACM - Asbestos-containing material, defined as any material or product which contains greater than
1 % asbestos fibers by volume. In California, the threshold of greater than 0.1% asbestos fibers is
used to define ACM.
Adjoining property - defmed as any property or properties the border of which is contiguous or
partially contiguous with that of the subject property, or that would be contiguous or partially
contiguous with that of the property but for a street, road, or other pubhc thoroughfare separating
them (Section 3.3.2, Standard E 1527).
BGS - Below the ground surface.
Business Environmental Risk - A risk which can have a materials environmental or
environmentally -driven impact on the business associated with the current or planned use of a
parcel of commercial real estate.
CERCLA - The Comprehensive Emergency Response, Compensation and LiabiUty Act of 1980, as
amended by the Superfund Amendment and Reauthorization Act of 1986, collectively known as
Superfund. CERCLA is the federal regulation concemed with the identification, investigation
and cleanup of abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous waste sites.
CERCLIS - The Comprehensive Emergency Response, Compensation and Liability Information
System. CERCLIS is the list of sites compiled by the EPA which have been investigated or are
currently under investigation for potential hazardous substance contamination and possible
inclusion on the National Priorities List.
Construction debris - Any materials which have been stored or dumped on the subject property in
the course of property development including, but not limited to, concrete, brick, asphalt, wood,
metal and other materials which are commonly considered "non-hazardous".
CORRACTS List - List of RCRA Facilities subject to corrective action.
de minimis - Conditions that generally do not represent a material risk of harm to pubhc health or the
environment, and that generally would not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought to
the attention of the appropriate governmental agency.
EPCRA - The Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act.
ERNS List - The Emergency Response Notification System List of reported CERCLA hazardous
substance releases or spills in quantities greater than the Reportable Quantity for each particular
substance.
Hazardous substance - A substance defined as a hazardous substance under Section 101(14) of
CERCLA which includes all RCRA hazardous wastes, hazardous air pollutants under the Clean
Air Act, and toxic pollutants under the Clean Water Act. For the purposes of this Phase I ESA
and in accordance with ASTM Standard E 1527, this definition includes petroleum products
whose improper storage or on-site disposal may represent a "Recognized Environmental
Condition."
Historical Recognized Environmental Condition (HREC) - an environmental condition which in
the past would have been considered a Recognized Environmental Condition (see definition
below), but which may or may not be considered a REC currently.
NFRAP - No further remedial action planned.
NPL - National Priorities List. The federal list of designated "Superfund" sites that can receive
federal monies for investigation and cleanup. Sites on the NPL have received a Hazard Ranking
Score of greater than 28.5 for eUgibility on the Ust.
Obvious - that which is plain or evident; a condition or fact that could not be overlooked or ignored
by a reasonable observer while visually or physically observing the property.
OilAVater separator - a vault like stmcture which intercepts wastewater and removed free phase
petroleum (fiiels, oils, greases) from the surface of the water. Dissolved products are not treated
in an oil/water separator.
RBCA - Risk-Based Corrective Action.
RCRA - The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976. The federal regulation which
governs the identification, management, transportation, and disposal of hazardous wastes from
"cradle to grave."
RCRA Generator - Facilities that generate regulated amounts of hazardous waste, as defined by
RCRA.
RCRA TSD Facility - A permitted Treatment, Storage or Disposal facility for hazardous wastes.
Generally these facilities handle large volumes of hazardous wastes.
Recognized Environmental Condition (REC) - the presence or likely presence of hazardous
substances or petroleum products on a property under conditions that indicate an existing release,
a past release, or a material threat of a release into stmctures, ground, groundwater or surface
water on the subject property. The term includes hazardous substances or petroleum products
even under conditions in compliance with laws.
Septic system - A wastewater system normally used to collect sanitary sewerage. Generally there are
two tj^es: 1) a self contained system which is routinely pumped to removed sewerage, and 2) a
leachfield tvoe which discharges the sewerase to the subsurface. Lwo types: ija sen coniameu system wmcn is rouimeiy pumpcu
leachfield type which discharges the sewerage to the subsurface
Sump - A man-made structure designed to collect and contain liquid runoff from a facility. Sumps
are commonly one of three types: 1) self-contained, 2) an open sump which discharges to the
subsurface, 3) or a plumbed system, which is connected to a sewer system.
Underground storage tank - any tank, including undergroimd piping connected to the tank, that is or
has been used to contain petroleum products or hazardous substances and the volume of which is
10% or more beneath the ground surface.
Wastewater - Wastewater generated by a facility's activities (e.g., electroplating, laundry, etc.) which
may be treated prior to discharge into the municipal sewer system. Industrial facilities often have
wastewater discharge permits with discharge limits for specific hazardous substances and petroleum
products.
I
APPENDIX 6
Previous Reports and Other Relevant Information
historic, pre-RCRA, unregulated landfills were operated from as early as the 1940's. The
results of the sampling conducted for the IA did not indicate any significant amount of
comamination present in or around the landfills which the exception of lead, arsenic, and
chromium present in the groundwater above MCLs. Oddly, the supposed background
location for the IA sampling contained the highest levels of dissolved metals in the
groundwater. At the time, it was thought that an upgradient source, independent of the
landfills must be contributing to the contamination in the area. .An auto salvage yard and
.auto wrecldng business were known to operate in the vicinity of the landfills. Based on
historical practices at other salvage and wrecking businesses, these salvage and wrecking
yards were suspected as potential sources of the background contamination. The ELP
site was "Discovered" on November 1, 1999 in an attempt to assess tiie potential sources
of the background contamination.
During the research used to assemble this PA report, several facts were brought to fight
that cast suspicion on the likelihood of an additional source contributing to the
contamination in the vicinity of the IA background sample, namely:
• The realization that part of the historic landfill operations extended to an
area upgradient of the IA background sample location;
• Anecdotal evidence in the engineering studies of the landfills that states
landfilling operations extended south beyond Expressway Lane, the
originally presumed southem border of the landfill, raising the possibihty
that the background sample was taken from an area that was utilized for
landfilling;
• The two businesses that were considered potential sources of the
background contamination actually sit cross-gradient from the backgroimd
sample location;
• A historical business search did not reveal any facihties anywhere near the
site that could potentially be responsible for the background
contamination;
• The land upgradient of the background sample location has either been
used for agricultural or residential purposes; no industrial use can be seen
in historical aerial photographs. i
For these reasons, it is likely that the elevated levels of metals in the background
groundwater sample were the result of historical landflll activities and not from an
unknown upgradient source. Unfortunately, there is not any analytical data to verify this
assertion and the true source of the elevated contaminants in the background sample
cannot be determined until such data is collected. It should also be noted that although it
is unlikely that the auto salvage and wrecking businesses are contributing to the elevated
levels of contaminants in the background sample location, this is not to say they are not
contributing contaminants elsewhere at the site. Beyond the metals contamination of
concern at the ELP site, these businesses may also be potential sources of orgaific
contaminants like ethylene glycol, different solvents, and various hydrocarbons. No
analytical data has been gathered from the area near these businesses.
Preliminary Assessment Report Utali DEQ-DERR
Expressway Lane Plume 16 UT0009134958
<:r,
if
While lead, arsenic, and chromium have been documented at levels above the MCL at the
site, the levels were only moderately elevated. While the analytical data from the IA
indicates groundwater contaminants have moved beyond the boundaries of the old
landfills, the area beyond the landfills is undeveloped and presents a low exposure risk.
If the source of the contamination remains solely attributable to the landfills and their
buried contents, then the EPA has aheady judged the potential risks at this site to be
minimal by issuing a "No Further Remedial Action Planned" designation for the Spaiush
Fork Landfills IA site. If a source of contamination exists upgradient of the landfills, the
risks the site poses could change, as such contamination would pass under residences and
may influence additional water rights PODs and include a larger number of people within
the area of influence of the contamination. However, there are no additional municipal
wells in the area upgradient of the site and the number of targets potentially exposed to
the groundwater contamination would be unlikely to change significantly. In either case,
conclusively determining the sources, nature, and extent of the groundwater
contamination at the site will require additional analytical data.
Preliminary Assessment Report Utah DEQ-DERR
Expressway Lane Plume 17 UT0009134958
—'^- • •• -III r— "^'' 'T»n- • jn»imf^
Legend
Site Boundary
Source: USGS ResamDJed DOQ Image
+
ri
UTAH DEPARTMENT OF.ENyiRONMENTAL QUALHT
DIVISION OF ENVlR0NMENtAL..BESp6NSEAND REMEDIATION
:sS'
Aerial f^t>o|^|f;S^te
..t^S. JI.'LI^J;*^
Expnuway Lah* Plume
0 . 45 90- 180 270 360 Yards.
Legend
I I Srus Boundary
1988 Landfill Study Samples
'* Encountsrs Landfill Contents
i- No Landfill Contents
1995 Phase I Samples
* Boring vf/ Landfiil Conlenls
*• Boring, No Landfill Contents
> Tsst PR w/ Lendnil Conlsnts
• Test Pit. No Landfni ContsnU
Other Samples
* The Ranchas* Investigation Samples
• lA Samples
Walftrways
^f^ Natural Water Courus
^•0^ Pipe/Culverl
Roads
••—'•• Din Tsssf MBin City
— Side City r*^ State Site Location
UTAH DEPARTMENT^ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMHN™iB4s^^E.AND REMEDIATION
Previous^Br^^MiiUpcations
I
Table 1
Summary of Total Metals in Groundwater
Analytical Results from April 27,1988 (RG&B, 1988) in ppb
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium -Hexavalent
Chromium - Total
Copper
Iron - Total
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Zinc
Drill Hole 2
0.012
0.13
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
0.01
0.975
<0.01
0.103
<0.0002
<0.01
0.0021
<0.01
<0.01
South Ditch Drill Hole 15 North Ditch
<0.01
0.29
<0.01
<0.01
0.014
0.18
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
0.625
<0.01
0.05
<0.0002
<0.01
0.0024
<0.01
0.033
<0.01
0.04
1.13
<0.01
0.163
<0.0002
<0.025
<0.002
<0.01
0.085
0.022
0.24
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
3,47
<0.01
0.08
<0.0002
<0.01
0.0028
<0.01
0.053
:^M£Jjm
:i»v-0.05-*#*
mp.pps^
^OMI
mM
• 0.015:
0.002
ro^
mom i'l
Table 2
Summary of Organics in Groundwater
Analytical Results from April 27,1988 (RG&B, 1988
VOCs
SVOCs
Pesticides
Drill Hole 2
ND
ND
ND
South Ditch
ND
ND
ND
Drill Hole 15
ND
ND
ND
) in ppb*
North Ditch
ND
ND
ND
' Detection limits vary by compound
Table 3
HI I
Summary of Groundwater Parameters
Analytical Results from April 27,1988 (RG&B, 1988) in ppm
Drill Hole 2 South Ditch Drill Hole 15 North Ditch
Alkalinity 466 1145 563 1135
Ammonia 1.41 1.55 <0.1 0.35
Bicarbonate 554 1396 686 1364
Chloride 42.9 273 110 169
Conductivity 1025 2680 1320 1940
Fluoride <0.1 0.12 0.6
Nitrate 0.018 1.52 0.54
<0.1
0.051
mi^%
mm
Nitrite <.005 1.29 0.018 0.005
Sulfate 130 240 60 212 Wsoo
Total Dissolved Solids 709 1950 875 1400
pH (results in pH units) 7.43 8.38 7.51 8.63
For all Tables, Red and Shaded results exceed the regulatory limit
Preliminary Assessment Report
Expressway Lane Plume
Utah DEQ-DERR
UT0009134958
Table 4
Summary of Total Metals in Soil
Analytical Results from January 4,1995 (RB&G.1995) in ppm
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Lead
Mercury
Selenium
Silver
Drill Hole 5
125
<0.5
14.8
52.8
0,073
<1
<0.5
Drill Hole 9
4.4
SGDM
97.6
0,97
20.2
252
0.185
<1
<0,5
13903
kAOOm
WM mm
1390
Benzene
Table 6
Summary of VOCs in Soil
Analytical Results from January 4,1995 (RB&G,1995) in ppm
Toluene
p-Isopropyltoluene
Xylenes
Drill Hole 5
<0.02
<0.1
14
0.189
Drill Hole 9
0.021
0.12
<0.10
0.102
Acenaphthylene
Acenaphthene
Fluorene
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Fluoranthene
Pyrene
*RCL is Utah Tier 1 RBCA Screening Level
Table 8
Summary of SVOCs in Soil
Analytical Results from January 4,1995 (RB&G,1995) in ppm
Benzo(a)anthracene
Chrysene
Ben20(b)fluorapthene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrepe
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Benzo(g,hJ)peryIene
2-methyInaplithalene
Dibenzofuran
Drill Hole 5
1,15
0.14
3.2
14.2
3.63
12.2
10.3
4.98
4.62
3.32
1.8
3.53
1.64
0.56
1.63
0.24
1.2
Drill Hole 9
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.5
<0.5
<0.2
<0.5
S
^1
^0
0!08^
WTsm
t088l
~ SCDM Cancer Reference Dose
Table 5
Summary of Total Metals in Groundwater
Analytical Results from January 4,1995 (RB&G,1995) in ppm
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Lead
Mercury
Selenium
Silver
Drill Hole 16
0.038
0,627
<0,005
0,055
0.039
0.0003
<0.02
<0,005
MCil
iolosi
ta^
0.005:*
W^M
lO'Olsl
:o:oo2»
.|0:0^
:^SI
Table 7
Summary of VOCs in Groundwater
Analytical Results from January 4,1995 (RB&G,1995) in ppm
Benzene
Toluene
p-Isopropyltoluene
Xylenes
Drill Hole 16
<2
<10
<10
<5
Table 9
Summary of SVOCs in Groundwater
Analytical Results from January 4,1995 (RB&G,1995) in ppm
Acenaphthylene
Acenaphthene
Fluorene
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Fluoranthene
Pyrene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Chrysene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(k)fluoranthepe
Benzo(a)pyrene
Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Drill Hole 16
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<5
Benzo(g,hJ)perylepe
2-methylnaphthalene
Dibenzofuran
<5
<2
<5
I
I
P
I
I
1
For All Tables, Red and Shaded results exceed regulatory limit
Preliminary Assessment Report
Expressway Lane Plume
Utah DEQ-DERR
UT0009134958
ili:
PA Worksheet
Page 6
for nietals, pesticides, SVOCs, and VOCs. Only lead, arsenic, and chromJ-uTn were
detected above the MCL in the groundwater. Independent labs performed the sample
analyses and the methods and detection limits appear adequate. The location of
background samples and the number of total samples is insufficient to characterize
site this size. Furthermore, questions about the appropriateness - of one location used
for background has called into question whether other sources, which are currently
unknown and not readily apparent, are contributing contamination at the site.
Source of information: Spanish Fork engineering reports, Spanish Fork Landfill IA, DWQ
analytical results from The Ranches. Investigation.
WASTE CONTAINMENT/HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE IDENTIFICATION
11. FOR EACH iSOURCE AT THE SITE, SUMMARIZE ON TABLE 1 (attached) : 1) Methods of hazardous
substance disposal,. storage or handling; 2) size/volume/area of all features/
structures that might contain hazardous waste; 3) conditioii/integrity of each storage
disposal feature or structure; 4) types of hazardous stibstances handled. The sources
at the site are unclear, however, the most likely sources are the historic landfills.
The aerial extent of the site is over 160 acres, with the landfills occupying most of
that. Hazardous materials could have been deposited all over this area and at unknown
depth. The landfills were unregulated and could have a nuniber of unknown
contaminants, however only lead, arsenic, and chromium have been detected in the
groundwater above their MCLs.
12. BRIEFLY EXPLAIN HOW WASTE QUANTITY WAS ESTIMATED (e.g., historical records or
manifests, permit applications, air photo measurements, etc.): Historical manifest of
municipal waste volumes for Spanish Fork Landfill, soil profiles from test trenches.
Source of information: Spanish Fork Landfill engineering reports .(1988,1995).
13. DESCRIBE ANY RESTRICTIONS OR BARRIERS ON ACCESSIBILITY TO ONSITE WASTE MATERIALS:
Waste materials are buried and ground surface provides an access barrier. In many
locations the ground surface has eroded and refuse is present at the surface.
Source of Information: DERR site visit October 28, 2003.
GROUND WATER CHARACTERISTICS
14 . IS THERE ANY POSITIVE OR CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE OF A RELEASE TO GROIMD WATER?
13 YES n NO
Describe: Groundwater samples have contained lead, arsenic, chromium, and total
dissolved solids elevated above background and above the MCLs.
Source of information: Analytical results from the IA at the Spanish Fork Landfill and
analytical results from The Ranches investigation.
15. ON TABLE 2 (attached), GIVE NAMES, DESCRIPTIONS, AND CHARACTERISTICS OR GEOLOGIC/
HYDROGEOLOGIC UNITS UNDERLYING THE SITE.
16. NET PRECIPITATION: n^-
Source of information: HRS Final Rule, Friday December 14, 1990
I
I
P
i
p
1
PA Worksheet
Page 5
NAME OF SITE OPERATOR: Aldon Anderson (i^jaderson Wrecking)
Address: 2890 South State Street
City: Springville County; Utah
State: UT Zip: B4663 Dates: From unknown To present
Phone: B01-4B9-3729
BACKGROUND/OPERATING HISTORY
Source of information: DERR Site Visit, Spanish Fork Landfill engineering reports
(1988,1995), Personal communication with Utah County Health Department
DESCRIBE THE NATURE OF SITE OPERATIONS (property size, manufacturing, waste disposal,
storage, etc.) : The landfills have been permanently closed and are currently open
space although they are slated for development as an industrial park. The Spanish
Fork Landfill still accepts green waste (grass clippings, branches) for composting.
The auto wrecking and salvage yards are still active.
Source of information: DERR site visit, October 28, 2003
B. DESCRIBE ANY EMERGENCY OR REMEDIAL ACTIONS THAT HAVE OCCURRED AT THE SITE: No
emergency or remedial actions have been taken in response to the metals conta^mination
': in the groundwater at the site.
Source of information: DERR site files
9. ARE THERE RECORDS OR KNOWLEDGE OF ACCIDENTS OR SPILLS INVOLVING SITE WASTES''
n YES ^ NO
Describe:
Source of information:
10. DISCUSS EXISTING SAMPLING DATA AND BRIEFLY SUMMARIZE DATA QUALITY (e.g., sample
,- objective, age/comparability, analytical methods, detections limits and'QA/QC) : A few
' groundwater samples have been collected at the site. Groundwater has been screened—
DESCRIBE OPERATING HISTORY OF SITE: There are three landfills at the site: Utah County
Landfill, Spanish Fork Landfill, and Springville Landfill. These landfills have
operated at various times since the 1940's and were investigated as the Spanish Fork
Landfill IA, The IA showed the greatest contamination in the background sample where
lead, arsenic, and chromium were all detected at concentrations higher than their
respective MCLs. The ELP site was "Discovered" in late 1999 to further assess this
"background" contamination. Two businesses operating near the landfills, Ainge
Salvage and Anderson Auto Wrecking were suspected as potential sources of the
contamination because of the historical practices at other salvage/wrecking
operations. The salvage and wrecking yards have been in operation since sometime in
the 1970's (specific dates where not available) by various owners. These facilities
accept old automobiles. They remove, clean, and recycle salvageable parts from"the
vehicles and separate and crush the rest of the vehicles for further reprocessing as
scrap metal. During the site visit for this PA, the wrecking facilities appeared to
be cross-gradient from the IA background sample. This and other facts discovered :i
during the PA seem to indicate the background sample was likely influenced by landfill ji
contents and not an unknown source. Without further analytical data, however, this
conclusion is not definitive.
Table 13
Summary of Organics in Groundwater
"The Ranches" Investigation Analytical Results from December 19, 2000 (DWQ, 2000) in ppb^
VOCs
SVOCs
Pesticides
Landfill Leachate
NA
ND
ND
South Wetland
NA
ND
ND
•Detection limits vary by compound
Spring Water
NA
ND
ND
Table 14
Summary of Groundwater Parameters
'The Ranches" Investigation Analytical Results from December 19, 2000 (DWQ, 2000) in ppm
Alkalinity
Ammonia
Bicarbonate
Chloride
Conductivity
Hardness
Nutrients (N02+N03)
Phosphate
Sulfate
Total Dissolved Solids
Turbidity
pH
Landfill Leachate
1145
4.31
1396
450
3665
391.2
8.14
0.315
1693.2
2780
246
8.28
South Wetland
487
0,108
594
58
1015
494.4
2.97
0,173
82.6
696
128
8.28
Spring Water
369
<0.05
450
54
933
408.4
4.77
<0.02
72.3
592
•1.64
8.02
MCJl
^
^
^M
WM
,§^
^^
^M
IM
'•|5o3l
io^
For all Tables, Red and Shaded results exceed the regulatory limit
I it
Preliminary Assessment Report
Expressway Lane Plume
Utah DEQ-DERR
UT0009134958
Table 10
Summarj' of Total Metals in Surface and Ground Water
IA Analytical Results from July 14,1999 (DERR, 1999) in ppm
SFL-GW-04ISFL-SW-011 • SFL-GW-01 SFL-GW-02 SFL-GW-03 men
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Selenium
Zinc
o
—1 ><
CD
CD
O
cn
03
3
CD
n
o_
c5" o
S"
CL
148
193
<1
84
34
135
80
73500
325
<0,2
34
320
180 80
3500 210
10 <7
130 100
74 62
210 120
180 110
243000 342000
8350 6200
0.464 0.539
<4.0 30
590 455
<20
420
<1
<30
NR
<12
<10
295000
420
<0.2
<2
<70
•^'Som
;2000l
i5;S^
%;iodl
^•1-3i
iii
Table 11
Summary of Organics in Surface and Ground Water
IA Analytical Results from July 14,1999 (DERR, 1999) in ppb*
VOCs
SVOCs
Pesticides
SFL-GW-01
Dry Boring-
No Sample
Collected
SFL-GW-02
ND
ND
ND
SFL-GW-03
ND
ND
ND
SFL-GW-04
ND
ND
ND
SFL-SW-01
ND
NA
NA
•Detection limits vary by compound
Table 12
Summary of Total Metals in Groundwater
"The Ranches" Investigation Analytical Results from December 19, 2000 (DWQ, 2000) in ppb
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium - Total
Copper
Iron - Total
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Selenium
Silver
Zinc
Landfill Leachate
21.3
161
<1
41
17.2
245
<3
91.6
<0,2
<2
<30
South Wetland
9.8
107
<1
18.7
<12
1006
4,2
94.3
<0.2
<2
<30
Spring Water
(Bacl<ground)
<5
82
<1
11.3
<12
32.9
<3
<5
<0.2
<2
<30
m i2000l
mm
Wzm
FSOv
wmm wm.
For all Tables, Red and Shaded results exceed the regulatory limit
Preliminary Assessment Report
Expressway Lane Plume
Utah DEQ-DERR
UT0009134958
PA Worksheet
Page 7
URFACE WATER CHARACTERISTICS
ARE THERE SURFACE WATER BODIES WITHIN 2 MILES OF THE SITE?
^ Ditches Q Lakes Q Pond Q Creeks Q Rivers
^ Other (Describe) Intermittent creeks
DISCUSS THE PROBABLE SURFACE RUNOFF PATTERNS FROM THE SITE TO SURFACE WATERS: Runoff.
at the site flows to the northwest as dictated by topography. This runoff eventually
enters man-made and natural drainage pathways which flow into Dry Creek, an
intermittent creek. Dry Creek flows into Utah Lake.
y. PROVIDE A SIMPLIFIED SKETCH OF SURFACE RUNOFF AND SURFACE WATER FLOW SYSTEM FOR 15
DOWNSTREAM MILES (see item #35) . Preliminary Assessment Figure 4. ii
0. IS THERE AMY POSITIVE OR CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE OF SURFACE WATER CONTAMINATION?
n YES gl NO
' Describe: One surface water sample collected during the IA did not detect any
contaminants. However, marshes around and on the site indicate groundwater maybe
surfacing there. If that groundwater is impacted, it may be carrying contaminants to
the surface water bodies.
Source of information: Spanish Fork Landfill engineering reports.
:.. ESTIMATE THE SIZE OF THE UPGRADIENT DRAINAGE AREA FROM THE SITE: 640-1- acres
Source of information: USGS 7.5 minute Quad Maps: Spanish Fork, Spanish Fork Peak,
Springville.
.:. DETERMINE THE AVERAGE ANNUAL STREAM FLOW OF DOWNSTREAM SURFACE WATERS
Water Body: intermittent streams only Flow: variable cfs
M. IS THE SITE OR PORTIONS THEREOF LOCATED IN SURFACE WATER? • YES ^ NO
Describe: The site is not located in surface water. Parts of the site are
intermittently marshy.
4.. IS THE SITE LOCATED IN A FLOODPLAIN Q YES ^ NO (indicate flood frequency)?
5. IDENTIFY AND LOCATE (see item #35) ANY SURFACE WATER RECREATION AREA WITHIN 15
DOWNSTREAM MILES OF THE SITE: Utah Lake is used for recreations fishing, wading,
swimming, and boating.
6. TWO YEAR 24-HOUR RAINFALL: 2.87", July 1974
Source of information: Utah's Comprehensive Weather Almanac, 1987, C. Brough et al,
12./22/89 WED 07:59 F.-a [gjQQ-,
Innovative Assessment
Spanish Fork Landfill
Spanish Fork, Utah
UTAH DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
Division of Environmental Response and Remediation
Prepaxed by : Ed Hickey ^^^ TAlcr ^^
Draft: Date: 11/Q5/99 Initials A/'/^r —— -—7
Revision: Date: Initials '^7*;, Co^/^-/v He-.hf^
Final: Date: /jejp^h^ Initials^ .>:^. (j.p.n^c^^
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Under authority of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
of 1980 (CERCLA) as amended, and in accordance with applicable provisions of the National Oil
and Hazardous Substance Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP), the Utah Department of Environmen-
tal Quality, Division of Environmental Response and Remediation (DERR) are conducting an
Innovative Assessment (IA) of the Spanish Fork Landfill site in Spanish Fork, Utah. These
activities were conducted under a cooperative agreement with the United States Environmental
Protection Agency, Region VIU (EPA).
2.0 OBJECTIVES
The scope of this IA includes an on-site sampling program, an identification and evaluation of
exposure routes, a target survey summary, and the collection of three groundwater samples and one
surface water sample. The purpose of the sampling event was to determine if hazardous materials
are present, if they are migrating off-site, and if these materials are having an impact to the
environment. The Environmental Protection Agency Preliminary Assessment Worksheet Form and
thePotentialHazardous Waste Site Preliminary Assessment Form are included as Appendix A and I- i;|
c. "I '•
Themajorpathwaysof concern are identified in this report. The IA Analytical Results Report can ; lij
be found in Appendix J. I
3.0 SITE LOCATION, DESCRIPTION AND fflSTORY
3.1 Site Location
The Spanish Fork Landfill, referred to in this report as the SFL site, is located northeast of the City
of Spanish Fork, Utah County, Utah. The SFL site is situated between the Interstate-15 corridor and
US 91/State Route 156. The City of Springville is several miles northeast of the site. Utah Lake is
northwest of the site. This area is situated on the western slope of the Wasatch Range, approxi-
mately 55 miles south of Salt Lake City. To reach the site, travel south of Salt Lake City on 1-15
to the Spanish Fork exit. Travel south on US 6 to the intersection of US 91. Turn left on US 91
toward Springville. After approximately one mile, turn north on a county dirt road that leads to the
SFL site. The landfill is located on the west side of US 91. The entrance to the subject property is
located at approximately 1200 East Expressway Lane, Spanish Fork, Utah.
The geographic coordinates for the site are 40° 07' 22" North Latitude and 111° 38' 07" West
Longitude (Appendix E). It is located in the southwest quarter comer of Section 8 and northwest
quarter of Section 17, Township 8 South, Range 3 East, Salt Lake Base and Meridian.
Innovative Assessment Utah DEQ/DERR
Spanish Fork Landfill 1
i lil!
I
3.2 Site Description
The SFL site is comprised of two adjacent areas used as landfills by the cities of Spanish Fork and
Springville: Utah County Landfill and Spanish Fork Landfill. Both areas have a combined surface
area of approximately 143 acres (Spanish Fork, 1998). The site is easily accessible, as minimal
fencing limits access to the site. Although both landfill areas are officially closed, unauthorized
dumping of debris and household waste sometimes occurs there (UDEQ/DERR, 1998).
The average elevation of the SFL site is 4570 feet amsl. The slope of the ground is toward the
northwest, with a drop in elevation of approximately 50 feet in both a north-south direction and east-
west direction. There are numerous surface drainage ditches on and surrounding the property, and
many that flow toward the landfill (RB&G, 1988), Presently, a commercial auto wrecking yard is
east of the site.
Nearby population centers include the cities of Spanish Fork (Imile southwest) and Springville (2
miles northeast). Nearby sensitive environments include the Wasatch-Cache National Forest (4
miles east) and Utah Lake (4 miles northwest). Recreation opportunities in the forest area include
hiking, cycling, running, hunting, and auto access. Utah Lake is used for boating, water recreation
sports, and fishing.
3.3 Site History
Utah Count}' Landfill
The Utah County Landfill (Figure 2) operated as an active landfill from approximately 1943 until
closure in 1979 (Heap, 1998). This landfill was approximately 54 acres in size. Prior to 1969,
municipal waste was placed using area methods beginning in the southwest corner of the property
and working in a northeasterly direction. In 1969, trenching methods were begun in which cells
were excavated for disposal of debris. These cells were approximately 100 feet wide, 300 to 500 feet
long, and 10 to 15 feet in depth, extending to the water table. Waste material was placed in the cells
and mixed with the dredged soils (RB&G, 1995). This was an unregulated landfill and the waste
was burned at regular intervals of time (Heap, 1998).
B ased on engineering investigations and a geologic report prepared by Earthtec Engineering, the site
has two subsurface profiles: one having several feet of miscellaneous trash and the other being
predominantly a silty clay or clayey silt (Earthtec, 1997). Some of the landfill cells contained water
as of August 26, 1997, and it is likely that methane gas is being generated by decomposition of the
landfill materials (Earthtec, 1997). There is not a liner underneath landfill contents, but a clay cap
was installed during closure (RB&G, 1988).
An Ownership Survey conducted as part of a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (RB&G, 1995)
indicates that this land has been sold and subdivided into eight parcels of private ownership since
the landfill was closed in 1979. The Utah County Landfill site was promoted by a developer that
intends to build a modular housing development on the closed landfill. Site investigations were
completed in anticipation of development, and these documents provide most of the subsurface and
Innovative .Assessment Utah DEQ/DERR
Spanish Fork Landfill 2
analytical information contained in this report. Excavation for underground utilities and sewers for : p
the housing development began in November 1998 (Nielson, 1999). ''
In addition, a citizens complaint (Jarvis, 1998) was submitted to the U.S. Environmental Protection i ]•
Agency, Region VIII, contending that the old Utah County Landflll was a site of uncontrolled '_
dumping of hazardous waste, along with household garbage, throughout it's operating life. The fact I
that the landfill was essentially uncontrolled and may have had hazardous or toxic waste placed into [ j
it during it's operating history is acknowledged by the engineering consultant and parties involved ^
in subsequent commercial development (RB&G, 1997). A few soil, surface water, and groundwater I
samples were collected during two limited Phase II investigations to determine if hazardous j j;
substances exist at the site.
Spanish Fork Landfill
This 89 acre municipal landfill, north of the Utah County Landfill and separated by a tract of land
(Figure 2), operated from 1982 until 1988. It was officially closed in 1991 following a 1988
engineering study that reviewed cost of compliance with Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
(RCRA) Subtitle D guidelines. This landfill is on record with the Utah Department of Environmen-
tal Quality/ Division of Sohd and Hazardous Waste (Bohn, 1998). The site still accepts some yard
waste which is composted for use in parks and landscaping. There is not a liner undemeath landflll
contents, but a clay cap was installed during closure.
3.4 Previous Investigations
Two site investigations have been conducted on the area of the landfill. A Spanish Fork-Springville
Landfill Study was conducted for the cities of Spanish Fork and Springville in 1988 to evaluate
operational changes to the Spanish Fork landfill to comply with RCRA guidelines (RB&G, 1988).
Sixteen soil borings averaguig 30 foot depths were drilled to determine subsurface soil characteris-
tics and locate the water table. Piezometers were installed in all of the holes to monitor the
groundwater level across the site. A limited number of surface and groundwater samples were
collected. Water samples were collected from two soil borings converted to temporary piezometers,
one each in an upgradient and downgradient location. The piezometers were developed by air
methods to remove all drilling fluids. No information conceming purge volumes, sample collection,
and sample handling methods were given. Water samples were analyzed for nutrients, inorganic
metals, volatile organic compounds, and pesticides. No organic or inorganic contaminants of
concern were reported in subsurface water samples. No organic or inorganic contaminants of
concern were reported in surface water samples collected from surface drainages on the site. Total
dissolved solids in groundwater downgradient of the landfill exceeded Utah groundwater protection
levels for Class II protection levels (greater than 1.25 times background).
The Utah County Landfill, whose 54 acres of land was sold following closure in 1979, was proposed
as a modular home subdivision on several occasions. A 1995 Environmental Site Assessment
entitled Larson/Keller Properties (RB&G, 1995) investigated surface and subsurface conditions
expected in dealing with an old landfill, such as compaction and methane gas generation. This area
was included in the 1988 investigation of the whole landfill and previous results were used in this
Innovative Assessment Utah DEQ/DERR
Spanish Fork Landfill 3
I
il;
!• li
evaluation. In addition, 17 test pits were dug with a back hoe and 5 soil borings were drilled to
determine thickness of landfill contents and depth to the clay soil under the landfill. The waste
material observed during investigation consisted of municipal waste, no evidence of hazardous waste
of toxic materials was observed in any of the test pits or test borings (RB&G, 1995). Waste samples
submitted for laboratory analyses were below regulatory levels for toxic contaminants for metals,
volatile organic compounds, semi-volatile organic compounds, pesticides, and PCBs, with the
exception of elevated lead in one sample (RB&G, 1995). Drill Hole 9 contained 252 mg/kg lead in
a sample of landfill contents. Downgradient monitoring well #16 was tested for metals, volatile
organic compounds, semi-volatile organic compounds, pesticides, and PCBs, but did not show any
toxicity above regulatory levels (RB&G, 1995).
4.0 FIELD ACTIVITIES
4.1 Sample Collection
Samples were collected on July 14, 1999. One surface water sample and 3 groundwater samples
were collected and analyzed as part of the sampling event. The field team consisted of:
Ed Hickey
Neil Taylor
Project Manager/Environmental Scientist
Environmental Scientist
Sampling activities were recorded with photographs (see Appendix J). All water samples were
placed into appropriate containers. Containers were labeled in accordance with the CERCLA
Quality Assurance Project Plan (UDEQ, 1999c) and transported under chain-of-custody procedures
to the Utah Department of Health Laboratory for total metals, volatile organic compounds (VOC),
semi-volatile organics (SVOC), and pesticide analysis. Figure 3 shows the location of collected
samples. Sampling locations were recorded with a global position system (GPS) and the coordinates
are listed in Table 2.
Table 2 Sample Location Coordinates
SAMPLE ID
SFL-SW-01
SFL-GW-02
SFL-GW-03
SFL-GW-04
LATITUDE
40° 07' 35" N
40° 07' 28" N
40° 07' 23" N
40° 07' 52" N
LONGITUDE
111°37'58"W
111°38'10"W
lir37'59"W
lir38'09"W
Groundwater samples were collected from Geoprobe borings. Four 1 -inch diameter geoprobe holes
were pushed to a depth of 30' and tubing perforated from 29'-30' was inserted into the boring.
Innovative Assessment
Spanish Fork Landflll
Utah DEQ/DERR
Groundwater was pumped from the tubing by a peristaltic pump. Due to the limited inflow of
groundwater into boring SFL-GW-04, the full suite of samples was not collected. Geoprobe boring
SFL-GW-01 was dry at 30' and the decision was made to not probe deeper.
4.2 Deviations from the Sampling Plan (Appendix I)
® SFL-GW-01 Groundwater was not encountered in the geoprobe boring and a sample was
not collected.
• SFL-SW-01 Semi-volatile and pesticide samples were not collected due to insufficient
water volume in surface flow.
• SFL-SE-01 A co-located sediment sample was not collected.
• SFL-GW-04 Semi-volatile and pesticide samples were not collected due to insufficient
water volume in geoprobe boring.
Table 3 lists the samples collected at each location.
Table 3 Sample Analyses
Sample ID
SFL-SW-01
SFL-SW-02
SFL-GW-02
SFL-GW-03
SFL-GW-04
Type
SW
TB
GW
GW
GW
P
H
X
X
X
Cond
X
X
X
Tern
P
X
X.
X
Total
Metals
X
X
X
•
X
X
VOC
X
X
X
X
SVO
C
X
•
X
Pesti-
cide
X
X
5.0 WASTE/SOURCE CHARACTERISTICS
5.1 Waste/Source Characterization
The two landfill areas were active prior to implementation of Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA) policy, and it is assumed that there was msufficient control of types of waste materials
brought to the site. Many landfills received materials in the past which are now recogruzed as
hazardous, and constmction and operation of these facilities failed to provide even minimal
protection for the prevention of migration of the contents (Devinney et.al., 1990). Hazardous
materials in unknown amounts could have been included in the waste stream. It is unknown if large-
Innovative Assessment
Spanish Fork Landfill
Utah DEQ/DERR
scale industrial users that utilized the SFL site for waste disposal. During previous investigations,
there were no barrels, cans or dmms observed on the site which might store toxic materials (RB&G,
1995). It may be more likely that household waste comprised the bulk of the landflll volume.
5.2 Sample Locations
Source soil or groundwater samples were not collected in this field program. Previous field
investigations conducted by RB&G Engineering in 1988 and 1995 sampled the soil, groundwater,
and surface water in the landfill proper.
5.3 Analytical Results
Two soil borings were sampled in the 1995 field investigation performed by RB&G Engineering.
DH-9 is in the approximate center of the Utah County landfill and DH-5 is in the southeast comer.
Soil samples were evaluated for 8 RCRA metals, volatile organic compounds, semi-volatile
organics, pesticides, and PCBs. DH-9 contained 252 mg/kg lead (RB&G, 1988). There is currently
no Superfund Chemical Data Matrix (SCDM) soil reference dose for lead (USEPA, 1996). Several
semi-volatile organic compounds were detected in DH-5 but were far below SCDM soil reference
dose levels. These samples are randomly located and may not represent the actual presence/non-
presence of hazardous materials that may have been placed in the landflll. However, groundwater
is in contact with landfill contents and may be more representative of presence/absence of hazardous
material available for leaching or transport.
Groundwater samples from the landfill source were collected from shallow piezometers. Analytical
results from 1988 and 1995 are contained in Appendix J. There were no detections of inorganic
metals, volatile organic compounds, semi-volatile orgaruc compounds, pesticides, or PCBs in
groundwater.
5.4 Conclusions
Previous sampling results do not indicate the presence of any hazardous source materials affecting
soil or groundwater in the landflll at the time of sampling.
6.0 Groundwater Pathway
6.1 Hydrogeologic Setting
The SFL site lies in what has been defined as the Utah Valley area of the Wasatch Front. This area
encompasses Utah Lake and is bounded by mountains on all sides. The area has been divided into
three subareas: Northern Utah Valley, Southern Utah Valley, and Goshen Valley. The SFL site lies-
in the Southern Utah Valley subarea, in the Spanish Fork recharge area (Anderson, 1994).
There are four aquifers in the basin-fill deposits of northern Utah Valley: a shallow unconfined
Innovative Assessment Utah DEQ/DERR
Spanish Fork Landfill 6
aquifer; a shallow artesian aquifer and a deep artesian aquifer in Pleistocene deposits; and an artesian
aquifer in deposits of early Quaternary or Tertiary age (Hunt, 1953). The four aquifers are difficult
to distinguish in Southern Utah Valley (Anderson, 1994).. The principal aquifer for Utah Valley
includes all of the confined basin-fill aquifers in the valley and the laterally equivalent unconfined
basin-fill aquifers near the mountains. Aquifer tests in southem Utah Valley indicate the confined
aquifers are leaky, which is indicative of discontinuous confining layers (Anderson, 1994).
I
I
I
I
I
I
The primary recharge area in Utah Valley is located along the perimeter of the valley adjacent to the
Wasatch Mountain Front, including the area of Spanish Fork. There are two recharge areas near I
Spanish Fork: a small area at the mouth of Spanish Fork Canyon and an alluvial fan southwest of '•
town. Recharge comes from subsurface inflow from consolidated rock near the mountain front and
infiltration of precipitation on the ground surface (Anderson, 1994). I
Depth to groundwater measured in piezometers at the SFL site is 4 to 11 feet below ground surface
in most areas, and at the surface in others (RB&G, 1995). DERR found it necessary to probe •
depths of 30 deep feet to gather a sufficient volume of water. The water table level is inconsistent
across the landfill and the investigating contractor believes that this is due to stratigraphy and
artesian water flow from a confined aquifer (RB&G, 1988). It has been documented that the shallow
groundwater infiltrates into the landfill and is in contact with the contents of the landfill (RB&G,
1988,1995). Groundwater movement is inferred to be northwesterly toward the center of the valley
and Utah Lake (Anderson, 1994). There are no liners or leachate collection systems, thus any
hazardous substances entrained in the groundwater may be subject to offsite migration.
6.2 Groundwater Targets
Within 4 miles of the site, 17 municipal wells have been identified (Appendix G). These 17 wells
contribute water to 5 different municipal and non-community systems which serve a combined
population of 28,676 (UDEQ/DERR, 1999b). Source protection plans have been submitted to the
Utah Division of Drinking Water by all of the municipal systems involved. These plans are under
current review and most have not been approved yet. Only one public water supply source well
operated by Spanish Fork City would be considered downgradient of the SFL site. This is the "Ed
Clark" well which is located about 0.72 miles west of the site. This artisian well is only used during
periods of peak demand (Heap).
In addition, 1430 privately owned water rights were identified within 4 miles of the site. These
water rights are not listed in diis report but are available in the GIS system (UDEQ/DERR, 1999a).
6.3 Sample Locations
Figure 3 shows the location of the 3 groundwater samples collected by DERR in July 1999. With
the exception of upgradient sample SFL-GW-03, these locations were selected as being down-
gradient of each landfill and representative of groundwater that has passed through landfill contents.
Innovative Assessment Utah DEQ/DERR
Spanish Fork Landfill 7
i!!;!
Comparison of water quahty indicators (pH and conductivity) confimi that the landfills have
impacted the groundwater quality to some extent.
Table 4 Water Quality Field Parameters
Sample ID
SFL-GW-02
SFL-GW-03
SFL-GW-04
SFL-SW-01
pH
8.64
7.42
8.47
NR
Conductivity
6,110 ^S
1,178 f2S
16,000 //S
NR
Temperature
°C
14
14
14
NR
TDS ppm
3,050
603
8,200
NR
NR = not recorded
Four 1-inch diameter geoprobe holes were pushed to a depth of 30' and tubing perforated from 29'-
30'was inserted into the boring. Groundwater was pumped from the tubing by a peristaltic pump.
Due to the limited inflow of groundwater into boring SFL-GW-04, the fuU suite of samples was not
collected. SFL-GW-01 was dry at 30' and the decision was made to not probe deeper.
6.4 Analytical Results
There were no detections of volatile organic compounds, semi-volatile organic compounds, or
pesticides in groundwater. Elevated levels of arsenic, chromium, and lead were detected in all three
groundwater samples, including SFL-GW-03 which was intended as an upgradient sample.
Conductivity values indicate that SFL-GW-03 is not impacted by landflll contents, but the metals
levels are elevated similar to downgradient samples SFL-GW-02 and SFL-GW-04. Appendix J
contains the laboratory analytical results and a summary table for total metals,
6.5 Conclusions
Groundwater downgradient of the landfills may be threatened by elevated metals. Several total
metals above SCDM MCLs were detected, both upgradient and downgradient of tht landfills. The
analyses were very similar, and did not seem to reflect any local variations caused by different
landfill contents at different locations. It could be that these are natural levels for shallow
groundwater in this area or indicate a separate, upgradient source . Depending on local variations
in the flow path of groundwater in the area, one Spanish Fork City drinking water well 0.72 miles
west (#1880, Appendix G) might be a cause for concern.
Innovative Assessment
Spanish Fork Landfill
Utah DEQ/DERR
I
I
in general, the most frequent prevaihng winds are from south to north during the warmer months and
from north to south during the colder months. •
9.2 Air Targets
At the present time, both landfill areas are capped with soil and have some natural vegetation that •
may hinder the entrainment of fine dust particles into the air. Targets for airborne contamination at
the site may include workers mixing landscape mulch at the Spanish Fork Landfill area. The I
movement of vehicles, construction, or grading operations at the housing development site (Utah "
County Landfill) could temporarily create dust that could be entrained into the atmosphere.
According to 1990 U.S. Census, there are 15 people living within Vi mile of the site, and 28,676 I
people living within 4 miles of the site, who potentially could become targets for exposure to any
contamination released from the site (UDEQ/DERR, 1999b).
9.3 Sample Locations
Due to the low number of targets and the cap material over both landfills, no air samples were
collected. Methane gas generation is a concern and has been addressed at the modular home site on
the former Utah County Landfill.
10.0 CONCLUSION
The Utah County Landfill site actively operated from 1943 until closure in 1979. It received
municipal solid wastes from the communities of Springville and Spanish Fork, as well as
unincorporated areas in southern Utah County. Prior to 1969, municipal waste was placed using area
methods beginning in the southvvest corner of the property and working in a northeasterly direction.
In 1969, trenching methods were begun in which cells were excavated for containing debris. Waste
material was placed in the cells and mixed with the dredged soils. This was an unregulated landflll
and the waste was burned at regular intervals of time. Groundwater is very shallow and is in contact
with the landfill contents.
The Utah County landfill was active prior to implementation of Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act (RCRA) policy, and it is assumed that there was insufficient control of types of waste
materials brought to the site. Hazardous materials in unknown amounts could have been included
in the waste stream. There were no known large-scale industrial users that utilized the site for waste
disposal; it is more likely that household waste comprise the bulk of the landfill volume. The
Spanish Fork Landfill replaced the Utah County Landflll in 1982 and operated until 1988.
Surface water, groundwater, and soil samples have been collected during two limited Phase I and
n investigations conducted for Spanish Fork City and private investors. These were evaluated for
a suite of contaminants, including inorganic, volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds,
pesticides, and PCBs, Drill Hole 9 contained 252 mg/kg lead in soil and municipal waste. There
is cunently no SCDM soil reference dose for lead. Several semi-volatile organics were detected in
soU in Drill Hole 5 but were far below SCDM soil reference dose levels, Semi-volatiles were not
Innovative Assessment Utah DEQ/DERR
Spanish Fork Landfill 12
I
1
I
I
detected in soil in Drill Hole 9. These soil samples are randomly located and may not represent the
actual presence/non-presence of hazardous materials that may have been placed in the landfill.
However, groundwater is in contact with landfill contents and may be more representative of
presence/absence of hazardous material available for leaching or transport. There is not a liner or
leachate collection system, thus any hazardous substances entrained in the groundwater may be
subject to offsite migration.
There were no detections of volatile organic compounds, semi-volatile organic compounds,
pesticides, or PCBs in groundwater. Several total metals above SCDM MCLs were detected, both
upgradient and downgradient of the landfills. The analyses were very similar, and did not seem to
reflect any local variations caused by different landfill contents at different locations. It could be that
these are natural levels for shallow groundwater in this area or indicate a separate upgradient source.
Depending on local variations in the flow path of groundwater in the area, one Spanish Fork City
drinking water well 0.75 miles west (#1880, Appendix G) might be a cause for concern.
Potential future developments that could impact this site include urban sprawl and the proposed
construction of a modular home housing tract. Applicable building permits have been granted by
Spanish Fork City and engineering feasibility studies have been conducted. Excavation of
underground utilities and sewers began in November 1998. This construction could result in at least
partial removal of the clay cap, and possibly landfill contents, to engmeer and build systems for
methane gas and groundwater removal. The issues of concern are 1) causing the spread of any
contaminated soil, groundwater, or landfill contents during excavation; and 2) increasing the
potential for target exposure to any contaminated soil, water, or air originating from the site.
1,1
'••!
11
Innovative Assessment Utah DEQ/DERR
Spanish Fork Landfill 13
Aerial photo source; U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Digital Orthophoto
Quadrangles from the Microsoft® TerraServer site: Spanish Fork, Utah
1993
Sample locations are under the symbol
• surface water sample
O groundwater sample
FIGURE 3
Sample Locations July 14,1999
Spanish Fork Landfill
Utah County, Utah
By: Scale:
EPH 07/15/99 None
O groundwater sample
A surface water sample
• sediment sample
UTAH DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE AND REMEDIATION
SAMPLING PLAN FIGURE 1
SITE SAMPLE LOCATIONS
Spanish Fork Landfill
Utah County, Utah
By:
EPH
Date:
03/30/99
Scale:
None
LATITUDE/LONGITUDE DOCUMENT RECORD FORM
SITE NAME: Spanish Fork Landfill NUMBER: none
MAP NAME: Spanish Fork Peak, UT SCALE: 1:24,0 00 DATUM: 1948
COORDINATES OF LOWER RIGHT HAND CORNER OF 2.5 MINUTE GRID
LATITUDE 40° 06' 21" LONGITUDE 111° 37' 00"
APPENDIX 6
Owner Questionnaire
ConditionB
12. Underground Storage Tanks CUSTs) / Above ground StoniEe Tanks (AST$> —
UST / ASTS present or removed - If yes, please specify material stored: gasolin^^^^^eseU
fuel oil, used oil, and indicate capacity.
Yes No
v
13. Asbestos Issues
Asbestos Survey k Inspection, Operation and Management Plans, Abatement Reports 1
14. Septic Tanks and Leichftelds
Currently used or abandoned
15. Utlttty Corridors
Oil or Gas Pipelines, Right-of-ways, Easements X
16. Regulatory Compliance
Stormv/ater Plans, Spill Prevention Plans, Air Pennits, Wastewater Discharge Permits,
UST Permits, 404 Wetlands Pennit. If yes, specify whiph Plan or Pcnnit.
17. Natural Resource Issues
Wetlands and Riparian Areas. Critical Habitat, Threatened and Endangered Species,
Historic or Cultural Resources
18. Legal or Regulatory Actions
Are you aware of any governmental enforcement actions or environmental liens with
regards to the property, or pending lawsuits or administrative proceedings concerning a
release or threatened release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products,
involving the property against the owner or any tenant of the property?
(npleted the above questionnaire to I have completed the above questionr^ire tp the best of my knowledge.
Signature:'^<jt/^€C:^-\'f^ ^^y^^yPOpy}A^<... Dateo.^ -/ '— ^
Printed name:. (/^r,^^//^ /h^r/r ^ '^-C^OA _Conqfflny:^
170 "d J7!7:6 9002 82 J^b 9T96-99t?-T08-T:XBJ TdiNawNoairiNa IHI
IHI
ENVIRONMENTAL
PHONE 801-4S6'2 2 2 3
FAXe01-466-0ei6
SITE ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE
Please return by Fax or email to Alysia Watanabe watanaheiatihi-env.coro
Property Name / Address:, Anderson Auto Wrecking, 2890 S. State, Springville, UT Project #;06E-7101.
Form Completed Bv: / kfr/y Jj^.'^A^^^'^^^ Phone; .<?^''/ 4^f^f ".Wtef .^- /- ^r'
Your relationship to the property (Owner, Owner Representative, Property Manager, Tenant,
Btc.V r\,)/\-e^ \ •_
How long have you been associated with, or had knowledge o^ the property? .-^ 7 /A^4y^
Section 1 Current and Historical Uses of Property
1. Name(s) of current and any previous occupant(6).or provide a toiant list.
2. Please describe the current use(s) of the property or indicate uses on the tenant list.
3, Please describe the past (historic) uses of the property, with approximate dates.
J^fit^\\ \ no 7
4. Has a previous Phase I ESA or other Environmental Investigation been done on the property?
Please provide a copy of these previous studies, /i/0
640 East Wilmington Avenue I Phone: 80 ] -466-^23
Salt Lake City, UTS4106 Fax: [phone]
vctl005.12.05
20-d 1717:6 9002 82 ^dy 9T96-99l7-T08-T:XBi 1biN3l*JDaiAN3 IHI
Section 2 Potential Environmental Conditions
If you are aware of any of the conditions identified, please answer yes, so that we can clarify all
past and pnsent environmental conditions.
Conditions 1
i. Industrial Uses of Subject or AdJ^dng Properties
Industrial uses including but not liimt^to: gas/service stations, auto repair or painting,
printing, dry cleaners, photo piocessing, or chrome plating, smelting petroleum refining
and/or other chemical manufacturing
2. Agricultural / SUvaeulture / Aqnieulture Uses
Crop production, concentrated animal feeding (poutoy, cattle, fish, etc.)
\i. Waste Storage or Disposal ^
Junkyard, recycling facility, battery storage, landfill, dump, wastewater lagoon
4. EqiUgment l)^^ Storage, or Abandonment
Prociiwtioii lines, hydnuilic equipment, vehicles, heavy equipment
1 5. Hazardous Materials (greater than S-gallon containers or 2S-lb bags)
Pesticides, paints, solvents, acids, bases, andfixeze, other regulated materials
6. Petroleum Hydrocarbons (greater than 5 gallon containers)
Gasoline, diesel. lubricating oil, waste oil, fuel oil. heating oil or bunker oil, kerosene,
benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene xylene, aviation or jet fuel
7. Spills or Releases of Petroleum Hydrocarbons or Hazardous Materials
Stained soil, dead vegetation or any other evidence of a petroleum or chemical spill
S. PCBs
Transformers, hydraulic equipment
9. Surface Water Issues
Pits, ponds, or lagoons associated with wastewater storage
10. Groundwater Issues
Monitoring or drinking water wells, injection wells or drains that go directly into the
ground
11. Wastewater Issues
Floor drains and trenches, sumps, oil water separators on die site
Yes j
X
y
V
r
No 1
y
xj
.V
1^
jA
V
1 ^
£0'd 1717:6 9002 82 Jcid 9196-9917-108-1 :XPi 1UiN3W«yi/>Q IHI
APPENDIX 6
Water Rights Search
STATE OF UTAH, DIVISION OF WATER RIGHTS Page 1 of2
Search Ut!
n
LJ
n
Li
n
G
^i$A,ii B!\^rs iSbW'o^^^
WRPLAT Program Output Listing
Version: 2004.12.30.00 Rundate: 05/11/2006 02:25 PM
State Map Search with selection criteria: wrtypes=W,C,E podtypes=all status=U,A,P usetypes=all
130 260 390 520 ft
U
n http://utstnrwrt6.watenights.utah.gov/cgi-bin/mapserv.exe 5/11/2006
oi/vijiur ui/Ul,JLFi:VlMUiN ur WAiJiK.JKICrJtlTb rage / 01 z
Water Rights
WR Diversion
Number Type/Location
51-1592 Underground
S1211E22N4 17 8S
3ESL
S2177ET750NW17
8S 3E SL
Underground
S1200E50N417 8S
3ESL
Underground
S1700W3960ME17
8S 3E SL
Undeiground
S1765E2347NW17
8S 3E SL
Underground
S1790W3500NE17
8S 3E SL
Underground
S1485W3078NE17
8S 3E SL
Underground
S1635W293QNE17
8S 3E SL
Underground
S1150W2900NE17
8S 3E SL
Underground
S1660W2760NE17
8S 3E SL
WeU
Log
p
p
1
rn
i
n
_j
n
1 I
—!
i
n • i
.J ••
•—1
J
n
1
u
P
51-2078
51T2713
51-2920
51-2921
51-2922
51-2923
51-2923
51-2923
51-2923
Status Priority Uses CFS ACFT Owner ]
P 19610912 IS 0.560 0.000 GLENNB. ORTON
160 EAST 200 NOR!
P isooooocDS 0.01,0.000 ;^^^,^^
SPANISH FORK UT
P 19080000 DIS 0.015 0.000 GLENN B. ORTON
BOX 166
P 191900001 O.OI 10.000 Q. I. & VIOLA L HA
1355 1ST WEST
P 19190000 IS 0.0110.000 LEATHA J. HENRJK
P.O. BOX 373
P 19190000 IS 0.018 0.000 LEATHA J. HENRIK
P.O. BOX 373
P 19190000 DIS 0.0910.000 LEATHA J. HENRIK
P.O. BOX 373
P 19190000 DIS 0.0910.000 LEATEIA J. HENRIK
P.O. BOX 373
P 19190000 DIS 0.0910.000 LEATHA J. HENRIK
P.O. BOX 373
P 19190000 DIS 0.0910.000 LEAIHA J. HENRK
P.O. BOX 373
Natural Resources | Contact | Disclaimer 1 Privacy Policy I Accessibllttv Policy
G
u
http://utstnrwrt6.watenights.utali.gov/cgi-bin/mapserv.exe 5/11/2006
APPENDIX 6
DERR Reports on Adjoining Landfills
State of Utah
Department of
aronmental Quality
Dianne R. Nielson, Ph.D.
Executive Director
;iON OF ENVIRONMENTAL
ONSE AND REMEDIATION
Brad T Johnson
Director
JON M. HUNTSMAN, JR.
Governor
GARY HERBERT
Lieutenant Governor
FILECOPY
ERRC-249-05
October 5, 2005
Luke Chavez
Site Assessment Manager
U.S. EPA, Region VIII
999 IS^'Sueet, Suite 300
Denver, Colorado 80202-2466
Dear Luke:
Enclosed is the Draft Preliminary Assessment Report (PA) for the Expressway Lane Plume
Site, UT0009134958, located in Spanish Fork, Utah County, Utah. The general site area was
originally investigated as the Spanish Fork Landfill Innovative Assessment (LA). The presumed
background samples of the IA contained the highest metals concentrations in groundwater suggesting
additional upgradient contamination.
Work done for this PA did not elucidate any readily apparent sources that might be
contributing to the contaminant levels of the background samples. A review of business directories
and aerial photographs back to 1952 did not indicate any land use other than residential and
agricultural in the areas immediately upgradient of the site. A windshield survey of the area during the
site visit similarly failed to identify any businesses in the upgradient area that would be likely to be
causing metals contamination of the groundwater. The automotive salvage and wrecking yards
adjacent to the site appear to be cross-gradient fi-om and topographically lower than the IA background
sample, suggesting these businesses are unlikely to have caused elevated metals concentrations at the
site. Furthermore, the Utah County Landfill extended south past Expressway Lane so it is possible
that the IA background sample was collected either in or downgradient from buried refixse.
For the reasons noted above, the Division of Environmental Response and Remediation
(DERR) believes that the background sample was collected in, or downgradient from, an area formerly
used for landfilling and that those landfill contents are responsible for the elevated metals
concentradons detected in the LA. background sample. At this time, the DERR believes that
Expressway Lane Plume site is not significantly different from the Spanish Fork Landfill site (i.e. all
the contamination in the area is believed to be the result of the historical,landfilling operations at the
site). Given the low concentrations of the metals contamination and the low risk of exposure
downgradient and beyond the landfills, the DERR recommends that this site not be evaluated further
under the CERCLA program.
.*u I ncn \\!^f, . on n„v \AAUO. (JaU 1 jkc Citv. UT 84114-4840 • phone [phone] OO • fax [phone]
Page 2
Please feel free to contact Joseph Katz, the Project Manager for this site, if you have any
questions or require additional information. His telephone number is [phone].
// J. Stev/n Thiriot, Manager
Site Assessment Section
CERCLA Branch
JST/JHK/eds
Enclosure
cc: Terry Beebe, Director of Environmental Health, Utah County Health Department
I
I
I
/19/2005 12;41 FAX [phone] EPA PAEE 1^002
Preliminary Assessment Report
Expressway Lane Plume
Utah County, Utah
UT0009134958
Utah Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Environmental Response and Remediation
Prepared by: Joseph Katz
Draft: JK Initials \0''S~OC
Revision:_^ Initials ..^.^.
Final: /^/^gy6.5Tnitial§.,xV'^^^ -
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Under authority of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act (CERCLA) as amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization
Act (SARA) and in accordance with applicable provisions of the National Contingency
Plan, the Utah Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Environmental
Response and Remediation (DERR) has prepared this report as part of Preliminary
Assessment (PA) activities at the Expressway Lane Plume, UT0009134958, herein
referred to as the ELP site, in Spanish Fork, Utah County, Utah. This PA was prepared
under a cooperative agreement between the DERR and the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region VIII (EPA). This PA addresses the waste characteristics of
potential contaminants at the site as well as the probability for migration of and exposure
to those contaminants via various exposure pathways.
The DERR completed an Innovative Assessment (IA) on part of the ELP site (the
Spanish Fork Landfill) in July 1999. Sampling results fi:om the LA. indicated a wider
assessment of the areas surrounding the original site was necessary. Based on the IA
sampling results, the area surrounding the Spanish Fork Landfill was designated the
Expressway Lane Plume and was "Discovered" on CERCLIS on November 1,1999.
Infonnation used to prepare this report was obtained fi-om the IA as well as other sources
including: CERCLA files at the DERR office, publications of the U.S. Geological
Survey and the Utah Division of Natural Resources, various correspondence, and other
sources. References are cited throughout this document.
2.0 OBJECTIVES
The purpose of this PA is to provide a fi-amework for evaluating the potential historic and
current impacts at the site from hazardous substances and to determine whether these
impacts pose a threat to human health and the environment, currently or in the fiiture.
Specifically, this PA will determine whether historical landfilling and salvaging
operations at the site have caused the release of hazardous substances that pose a threat to
human health or the enviromnent significant enough to pursue additional investigation
and "discovery" of the site on the EPA's National Priority List, or cleanup of the site
under another program or authority.
The obj ects of this PA are to:
• Determine the historic and current uses of the site;
• Determine the potential for selected media at the site to be contaminated;
• Assess the potential contamination characteristics;
• Assess the routes for potential contaminant exposure;
• Identify potential targets that may be affected by either on-site contaminants or
migration of those contaminants off-site via the main exposure pathways.
Preliminary Assessment Report Utah DEQ-DERR
Expressway Lane Plume 1 UT0009134958
3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION
3.1 Site Location
• The ELP site is located a half mile northeast of Spanish Fork, Utah County, Utah.
Springville, Utah is a few miles northeast of the site. Utah Lake is northwest of the site.
This area is situated on the westem slope of the Wasatch Range, approximately 55 miles
south of Salt Lake City. The ELP site can roughly be described as the land enclosed by I-
15 to the north, 1100 East Street on the West, State Route 51 on the east, and Expressway
Lane on the South. Because the extent of the plume has not been defined, the maximum
probable extent of the site may be specifically described as the area containing the former
Spanish Fork, Springville, and Utah County Landfills as well as Ainge Salvage Yard and
Anderson Auto Wrecking adjacent to the landfills (Figure 2).
To reach the site from the DERR offices, proceed eastbound on North Temple Street.
Turn right and proceed southbound on Redwood Road. Tumleft onto the 1-80 eastbound
on-ramp. Proceed on 1-80 for approximately 2 miles and merge on to 1-15 southbound.
Remain on southbound 1-15 for approximately 55 miles, then exit the fireeway at Exit
#261 (US-6 to Price/Manti). Turn left onto southbound US-6. Proceed approximately % y
a mile on southbound US-6 to 800 North Street. Turn left and proceed eastbound on 800 ;.
North. 800 North Street becomes Expressway Lane. Travel east until reaching 1100 East
Street. The intersection of 1100 East and Expressway Lane is the southwestern comer of!
the site.
The geographic coordinates for the site are 40°07'22" North Latitiide and 11TS 8'07"
West Longitude (Appendix E). It is located in the southwest quarter comer of Section 8
and northwest quarter of Section 17, Township 8 South, Range 3 East, Salt Lake Base '
and Meridian.
3.2 Site Description
The ELP is a plume of dissolved metals underlying an area near Expressway Lane in
Spanish Fork, Utah. The plume potentially extends under three former landfills, an auto
salvage yard, and an auto wrecking facility. Due to limited sampling data, the exact size,
extent, and nature of the plume are not known. The source of the plume is not known
with any certainty. Given the limited analytical data available, the possibility of multiple
distinct plumes (with distinct sources) cannot be ruled out. The plume was discovered in
November 1999 after an Innovative Assessment (IA) was conducted at the Spanish Fork
Landfill site. Of the four groundwater samples collected during the IA, the background
sample (sample SFL-GW-03) contained the highest levels of metals (including lead and
arsenic among others) of all the samples at the site. These elevated background levels led
to the original assumption that a source separate firom the landfills studied in the IA was
contributing to the metals contamiaation in the groundwater.
Preliminary Assessment Report Utah DEQ-DERR
Expressway Lane Plume 2 UT0009134958
I
Based on the information collected to produce this report, it appears that the elevated
metals levels in the vicinity of the IA background sample are likely fi-om landfill contents
and not an independent source for the following reasons:
• The southem portion of the Utah County Landfill extends south of
Expressway Lane. Contents of the landfill in this area would be
upgradient of the IA background sample and thus have the potential to
impact the background sample location (Figure 3).
• Expressway Lane was built in the early 1990's. It was not a historical
barrier for landfilling activities. Anecdotal evidence indicates landfilling
activities extended south beyond Expressway Lane. This suggests the
possibility that either the background sample was collected within or near
landfill contents or that additional landfill contents lie directly upgradient
of the background sample location (RB&G, 1988).
• The auto salvage and wrecking businesses that were suspected to be
possible sources of the background sample contamination are actually
cross-gradient fi-om the backgroimd sample location and are unlikely to be
impacting groundwater at the point where the backgroimd sample was
collected (Appendix D).
• A review of historical aerial photographs and Polk directories do not
indicate any current or historical businesses or activities directly
upgradient firom the background sample location that would be likely to
result in metals contamination of groundwater . The upgradient areas
around the ELP site have been faimland until the past 20 years when a
large push toward residential development began. Currently, the
upgradient areas are ahnost exclusively residential (Appendix D).
While the elevated metals of the background sample are most likely caused by the
leaching of landfill contents, the cross-gradient auto wrecking and salvage yard may also
be contributing contaminants to groimdwater as a separate plume firom the one impacting
the IA background sample location. There is no analytical data to verify this, however it
is a reasonable supposition based on the typical and historical practices that have
occurred at many other salvage and wrecking yards in the past (i.e. parts cleaning, battery
cracking, disposal of various fluids, etc.). In fact, contamination at the salvage and
wrecking yards may include organic contaminates as well as metals. Plumes emanating
from these facilities would travel downgradient, under the landfills, where they would co-
mingle with contaminants leaching fi'omthe landfill contents.
Previous sampling has shown that the three former landfills are impacting the
groundwater beneath them; however, Uttle of the contamination has migrated beyond the
borders of the landfills. At the conclusion of the IA, the EPA designated the three
landfills "No Further Remedial Action Plaimed."
Physically, the ELP site is 4570 feet above sea level and is relatively flat with a modest
slope toward the northwest (elevation drops approximately 50 feet in both the north-south
and east-west directions). There are numerous surface drainages on and surrounding the
Preliminary Assessment Report Utah DEQ-DERR
Expressway Lane Plume . 3 UT0009134958
landfills. There is a large marshy area just south of Expressway Lane and several areas
on the landfills appear to support "marshy" type vegetation although no surface water
was apparent at the landfills during the site visit (Appendix D).
Currently no one hves at the ELP site. From 1999 through 2001, a mobile home park .
was developed on the southwest comer of the site. After complaints about odors and
illnesses, the mobile homes were ordered removed by the Utah County Health
Department in 2001 and all the residents left (although they are still represented in the
2000 Census data in Appendix F). By 2004, most of the ELP site had been slated for
development as an industrial park, however, no constmction has taken place yet and most
of the site, with the exception of the auto salvaging and wrecking businesses, remains
open space with minimal fencing and is easily accessible. Commercial development to
the west and residential development to the south and east is less than a quarter-mile fi-om
the site and will continue to encroach on it in the future (Appendix D). Sensitive
environments near the site include the Wasatch-Cache National Forest (4 miles east) and
Utah Lake (4 miles northwest). Utah Lake is used for boating, recreation, and fishing,
and is the only known natural habitat of the endangered June Sucker fish. June Sucker
fish have been transplanted to several other water bodies across Utah as part of a
managed recovery program, and eventually adult fish are reintroduced to Utah Lake
(DNR, 2003).
3.3 Site History
Based on information gathered for this report, it is likely that the ELP site contains some
of the same sources (namely the landfills) that were investigated during the Spanish Fork
Landfill IA. Because the landfills may be a potential source of the ELP, a brief
discussion of the Spanish Fork Landfills has been included in this report:
Utah Countv Landfill
The Utah County Landfill (Figure 2) operated as an active landfill fi-om approximately
1943 until closure in 1979 (Heap, 1998), although anecdotal evidence suggests the site
may have been used as an unofficial dumping ground since the 1920s. This unregulated
landfill was approximately 54 acres in size. Prior to 1969, municipal waste was placed
using area methods beginning in the southwest comer of the property and working in a
northeasterly direction. The landfill may have been routinely burned during this time
period (Heap, 1998). In 1969, trenching methods were begun in which cells and mixed
with the dredged soils (RB&G, 1995). Some engineering documents suggest that the
landfill cells extend south under Expressway Lane. Because the landflll was unregulated,
the landfill does not have liners, dewatering or leachate collection systems, or run-on/run-
off controls.
A developer attempted to build a mobile home park on the landfill in the early 1980's.
Also during the late 1980's, Spanish Fork and Springville needed to gather information
about the Utah County Landfill to estimate the costs of bringing their landfills into
compliance with the new Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) regulations.
Because of these events, several engineering and geological investigations were
Preliminary Assessment Report Utah DEQ-DERR
Expressway Lane Plume 4 UT0009134958
conducted across all three landfills. In regard to the Utah County Landfill, these
investigations indicate that the landfill has two subsurface profiles: one consists of
several feet of miscellaneous trash and the other is predominately silty clay or clayey silt
(Earthtec, 1997). These studies also indicate groundwater has infiltrated the landfill cells
which likely is accelerating the decomposition of the landfill contents and the production
of methane gas (Earthtec, 1997). A few samples were collected however, no hazardous
chemicals were found (Tables 1-3).
In the Febmary 1995, a combined Phase I /Phase II investigation was performed at the
landfill. Limited sampling during this investigation indicated a minor amount of lead in
one groundwater sample, and low levels of polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in one
soil sample, perhaps confirming the landfill had been burned during its early operating
life (Tables 4-9). No other heizardous materials were found.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I In 1997, a developer took the initial steps to begin constmction of the Ranches mobile
home park. Upon hearing about the development, a citizen lodged a complaint to the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region Vin alleging that hazardous waste had .
been deposited in the landfill throughout its operating life (Jarvis, 1998). The I
consultants and developers of the mobile home park acknowledged this possibility but i:
continued to develop the site (RB&G, 1997). '_
By 1998, constmction at the mobile home park had begun. Constmction was completed • |
by 1999 and residents began to move in by early 2000 (Neilson, 1999). After a few
months several residents began to complain about odors and trash surfacing iu there
yards. Other residents complained that they felt ill. Many said they felt nauseated and
fatigued. Some developed headaches and skin rashes. One anecdotal account claims
children and pets developed sores, or chemical bums, after playing in a marshy seep
north of the mobile homes.
Spurred by these complaints, the Utah County Health Department and the Utah Division
of Solid and Hazardous Waste in conjunction with the U.S. EPA conducted separate
investigations at the mobile home park. A total of 33 soil borings were collected to
mvestigate the clay cap on the landfill. In more than half the borings, the cap was less
than 2 feet thick. In many, the cap was less than 6 inched thick. Water samples
(including samples fi-om the marshy area), soil samples, and air samples were also
collected. Beyond elevated levels of methane gas, none of the investigations uncovered
anything specific that would account for the residents' aliments. Asbestos containing
material was discovered at the site and is most likely the result of illegal dumping and not
the surfacing of landfill contents (DERR, 2003). Newspaper stories about the Ranches
indicate benzene was discovered in the marshy areas and in some landfill leachate. The
DERR was not able to locate or review any analytical data supporting this claim.
In 2001, the Utah County Health Department mled the site was unfit for human
habitation and the residents sued the developer of the mobile home park. The residents
and their homes were subsequently removed from the site. Also during this year, the
Preliminary Assessment Report Utah DEQ-DERR
Expressway Lane Plume 5 UT0009134958
asbestos containing waste was buried on-site and capped. Currentiy, portions of site are
being prepared to become an industrial park (DERR, 2003).
Spanish Fork Landflll
This landfill covers 82 acres and ties north of the Utah County Landfill. The two
landfills are separated by the Springville Landfill (Figure 2). The Spanish Fork Landfill
operated from 1982 until 1988 and was originally opened in response to the closure of the
Utah County Landflll. The landflll probably accepted around 7400 tons of waste
annually (RB&G, 1988) and was officially closed in 1988 after determining it would be
uneconomical to continue operations in compliance with the RCRA Subtitle D
guidelines. This landfill is listed with the Utah Division of Sohd and Hazardous Waste
(Bohn, 1998), however it was unregulated during all of its operating Ufe. This landfill
also had a clay cap installed during closure. It is not certain whether the cap at this
landfill is in better condition than the cap at the Utah County Landfill.
During its six year operating life, only the southem third of the property was used to
dispose waste (this has not been verified by sampling). Samples collected in 1988 do
indicate the presence of refiise in the southem portion of the site. No chemical analyses
were performed on these samples (Figure 3). Currently, the landfill is semi-active. Plant
wastes (i.e. grass clippings, branches, etc.) are accepted for composting. The resulting
mulch is used in city parks and city landscaping. Because this landfill is still semi-active,
no development or other uses of the property have occurred since 1988. Prior to 1982,
the use of the landfill is not known, however, it is possible the property was used as an
unofficial or secondary landflll. fllegal dumping remains a concem at the landfill.
Springville Landfill
This 20-acre parcel of property ties between the former Utah County and Spanish Fork
landfills. It is not known when the property was brought into service as a landfill but it
was likely after the closure of the Utah County Landfill in 1979. Like the two other
landfills, this landfill was unregulated as it was operated before the adoption of RCRA
Subtitie D regulations. A single soil boring collected in 1988 coirfirms refuse is buried at
the property (the sample was not analyzed for hazardous materials). Records uidicate the
landfill received about 8,550 tons of trash in 1986. This figure is probably representative
of the annual tonnage received at the landfill for each year of its operating life (RB&G,
1988). The tonnage received at the landflll tapered off between 1988 and 1991 when the •
landfill was officially closed and covered. Like the Spanish Fork Landfill, the current
integrity of the cap at the Springville Landfill is not known. Because the property is
undeveloped and located between two former umegulated landfills, the possibility of
illegal dumping, in the past and currently, is high.
Run-off, and possibly leachate seepage, from the Utah County Landfill is diverted under
the Springville Landfill, and part way under the Spanish Fork Landfill, by means of a
culvert and concrete piping. The current condition of the piping is unknown, but it is
Preliminary Assessment Report Utah DEQ-DERR
Expressway Lane Plume 6 UT0009134958
possible that the piping may serve as a conduit for the migration of contaminants firom all
three landfills.
Ainge Salvage and Anderson Auto Wrecking
These two businesses are located directly east of the Utah County Landfill. It is not
known when salvage and wrecking operations began at the site, but the current owners
were not the first people to use the property for salvage and wrecking purposes. Ainge
Salvage collects damaged and otherwise unusable automobiles and removes parts for
reconditioning and resale or material recycling. Anderson Auto Wrecking compacts the
bodies and frames of the discarded automobiles for resale as scrap metal. The two
businesses share a jimkyard where old cars and parts are stored. The junkyard is
surrounded by a six-foot blue sheet metal fence topped with barbed wire and is the only
secure area within the site.
Historically, auto salvage operations have "cracked" automobile batteries to recover the
metals in the electric cells. Improper disposal of the battery acid, which is laden with
dissolved lead and other metals, can contamuiant aquifers underlying the site. The low
pH of the acid may also increase the mobility of metals from other sources at the site..
Additionally, improper collection and disposal of other automotive fluids could also
potentially contaminant site soils and groundwater with a variety of contaminants
including: ethylene glycol, motor oil, or other hydrocarbons. Furthermore, solvents,
including chlorinated solvents, may be employed at the site to clean and degrease
salvaged parts. Since these two businesses were not visited during the site visit, the
condition of these properties has not been determined. While these two businesses have
to potential to contribute metals contamination at the site, these businesses are cross-
gradient from the IA background sample that contained elevated levels of lead, arsenic,
and other metals and are therefore unlikely sources of the metals contamination found in
that sample. These busuiesses may be contributing contaminants to groundwater at other
portions of the site though.
3.4 Previous Investigations
Numerous geologic and engineering studies as well as two site investigations have been
conducted at the landfills at the site. No investigations have been conducted to
specifically evaluate the nature and sources of dissolved metals that have been detected in
groundwater at the site.
A Spanish Fork-Springville Landfill Study was conducted in 1988 to evaluate the cost of
RCRA comphance at the Spanish Fork landfill (RB&G, 1988). During that investigation,
sixteen soil borings, averaging 30-foot depths, were drilled to determine subsurface soil
characteristics and locate the water table. Piezometers were installed in all of the holes to
monitor the groundwater level across the site which varied from near or above ground
surface to 5 to 10 feet below ground surface. Groundwater samples were collected from
two of the piezometers, one upgradient and one downgradient of the landfill. The sample
PrelimiQary Assessment Report Utah DEQ-DERR
Expressway Lane Plume 7 UT0009134958
The ELP site lies in the Utah Valley area of the Wasatch Front. This area is surrounded
by mountains and encompasses Utah Lake at its center. The valley has been divided into
three subareas: Northem Utah Valley, Southem Utah Valley, and Goshen Valley. The
ELP site is in the Spanish Fork recharge area of the Southem Utah Valley subarea.
There are four aquifers in the basin-fill deposits of the Northem Utah Valley subarea: a
shallow unconfmed aquifer; a shallow artesian aquifer and a deep artesian aquifer in
Pleistocene deposits; and an artesian aquifer in deposits of early Quatemary or Tertiary
age. The four aquifers systems extend to the Southem Utah Valley subarea but become
difficult to distinguish. The deep artesian aquifers are the principal use aquifers for Utah
Valley. Aquifer tests in southem Utah Valley indicate the confined aquifers are leaky,
which is indicative of discontinuous confining layers. The primary recharge area in Utah
Valley is located along the perimeter of the valley adjacent to the Wasatch Mountain
Front, including the area of Spanish Fork. There are two recharge areas near Spanish
Fork: a small area at the mouth of Spanish Fork Canyon and an alluvial fan southwest of
town. Recharge comes from subsurface inflow from consolidated rock near the mountain
front and infiltration of precipitation on the ground surface (Anderson, 1994).
Groundwater is inferred to flow to the northwest toward the center of the valley and Utah
Lake. Depth to groundwater is not consistent across the site. In most piezometers
installed at the ELP site, groundwater was 4 to 11 feet bgs. However, the water table was
found at or above the ground surface in other piezometers (RB&G, 1995). During the IA,
samples were collected at 30 feet bgs to obtain sufficient volumes of water for sampling.
Even at 30 feet, one boring was dry. The inconsistency of the water table may be the
result of localized perched aquifers or artesian flow from deeper confmed aquifers
(RB&G, 1988). Regardless, in many areas across the site, groundwater has been shown
to have infiltrated the landfills and come into contact with the landfill contents. (RB&G
Preliminary Assessment Report Utah DEQ-DERR
Expressway Lane Plume 10 UT0009134958
1' i-
IM'
agent and extend the hfe of plates. Cadmium is another common agent found in lead
battery plates to increase corrosion resistance and enhance the electrical properties of the
plate. All of these metals are toxic in and of themselves. In the acidic environment of a
battery, all these metals can go into solution and become highly mobile when released to
the environment. All three metals are toxic to the lung tissue when inhaled, and may be
fatal if the dose is large enough. Chronic inhalation exposure to the three metals can
damage the Iddneys and lung tissue. Chronic ingestion of these metals may also cause
kidney and liver damage as well as neurological disease. Ingestion of these metals can
cause gastrointestinal.damage and can be fatal. Dermal exposure to arsenic or antimony
can cause severe skin and throat irritation. Arsenic is considered a known human
carcinogen, regardless of the route of exposure. Cadmium is a probable human
carcinogen when inhaled. Antimony has not been classified with respect to its I
carcinogenic potential. These three metals may also be present at the site in wastes in the
landfill and not solely because of operations at the auto wrecking and salvage facilities
(ATSDR, 1992,1999,2000).
4.2 Groundwater Pathway
4.2.1 Hydrogeologic Setting
I ij;;
i -y:
iiii'
1988,1995). There are no liners or leachate collection systems, thus any hazardous
substances entrained in the groundwater may be subject to offsite migration.
4.2.2 Groundwater Targets
Within 4 miles of the site, 22 municipal wells have been identified. These wells
contribute water to 5 different municipal and non-community systems which serve a
combined population of 52,548 (Appendix G). Only one municipal system well, the "Ed
Clark" well, could be considered downgradient of the site, depending on the magnitude
of seasonal gradient variations. The "Ed Clark" well (operated by Spanish Fork City) is
located about 0.72 miles west of the site and is only used during the sununer to irrigate
the city park (Heap, 1998). In addition to the wells, 1487 privately owned groundwater
water rights were identified within 4 miles of the site. These water rights are listed in
Appendix G.
4.2.3 Likelihood of Release
Several investigations have been conducted at the ELP site in the past. A few
groundwater samples have been collected during these investigations (Tables 1-14).
Samples have been analyzed for metals, VOCs, SVOCs, pesticides, and PCBs. Only lead,
arsenic and chromium have been detected in the groundwater at the site. These metals
have been detected above MCLs. The analysis of conductivity, total dissolved solids,
pH, and other inorganic parameters from samples collected both up and downgradient of
the landfills also shown that the site is impacting the water quality of the groundwater in
the area.
The source of the metallic contaminants in the groundwater is not well understood. The
background sample collected during the IA (SFL-GW-03) has the highest results for
metals of any sample collected at the site. The nearest potential sources of the metals
(excluding the landfills) are the Ainge Salvage and Anderson auto wrecking businesses.
These businesses are cross-gradient from sample SFL-GW-03 and are therefore unlikely
to be contributing contaminants to that location. It may be possible that an upgradient
source is contributing to the contamination at the site. However, based on historical
research including review of aerial photos that date back to 1952 and a windshield survey
of the area during the site visit, there have been no businesses or industries upgradient of
this sample location that could be potential sources of the contamination. Based on the
location of this sample, immediately south of Expressway Lane, it is more hkely that this
sample is being influenced by the Utah County Landfill either by being downgradient of
the southeastem tip of the landfill or by being in contact with refuse. The cells of the old
landfill are rumored to extend under Expressway Lane and this sample may have been
collected from an area where groundwater is in contact with refuse. Additional sampling
would be necessary to determine the exact source of the metals contamination and to
determine whether Ainge Salvage or the former landfills are conhributing contaminants
unrelated to the metals contamination detected in the IA background sample.
Preliminary Assessment Report Utah DEQ-DERR
Expressway Lane Plume 11 UT0009134958
I
I
jilHi
While there are no municipal wells immediately downgradient of the site, water right
points of diversion (PODs) do exist downgradient. Some of these PODs access
groundwater for culinary purposes (Appendix G). Utah Lake and associated marsh lands
around the shore are also downgradient of the site and would be impacted if contaminated
groundwater surfaced there. At this time, based on the limited sampling data available, it
does appears that some groundwater contamination has migrated beyond the boundaries
of the old landfills. However, due to the distance and relatively sparse density of culinary
PODs downgradient, migration of groundwater contamination off-site may pose a low
risk of exposure. Continued development in the area may increase that risk in the fiiture.
4.3 Surface Water Pathway
4.3.1 Hydrologic Setting
The Utah Valley is a nearly closed system where precipitation collects in the mountains
surrounding the valley and drains towards Utah Lake in the center of the valley. Utah
Lake has only one outlet, the Jordan River, at its northem end.
The ELP site itself is relatively flat with a slope to the northwest. An open ditch used to
flow directly over the Utah County Landfill until the topography was regraded during the
constmction of the mobile home park. The ditch channel still exists on the northem part
of the Utah County Landfill. The channel intersects a marshy area on the northem
boundary of the landfill. At this point, the surface water, when present, is diverted into a
culvert and underground piping. This piping emerges in the center of the Spanish Fork
Landfill where it intersects with another unnamed drauiage (Figure 3). This drainage
channel flows north for ahnost a mile and terminates in Dry Creek. Dry Creek flows to
the northwest for approximately three more miles before reaching Utah Lake (Figure 4).
Based on aerial photos, it appears several small drainage areas ring the eastern side of the
site and there are several different flow channels across the site (Figure 2). With the
exception of Dr}^ Creek, all the watercourses discussed above are ephemeral. The ELP
site is not within the 100-year or 500-year flood plain of Utah County (FEMA, 1982).
In addition to the drainages around the site, there are several marshy areas around and on
the site including on the northem edge of the Utah County Landfill, immediately south of
Expressway Lane, and several areas to the north and east of the landfills and the salvage
yard (Appendix D). Based on the shallow water table and marshy areas, it is hkely
groundwater is surfacing in the vicinity of the site. Once the groundwater surfaces, it
could migrate downstream via the drainages at the site. It is also possible that site
groundwater surfaces further downgradient near Utah Lake.
4.3.2 Surface Water Targets
There are no surface drinking water intakes located within the 15-mile downstream
pathway (Appendix G). There are seasonal wetiands on the northem end of the Spanish
Fork Landfill which are classified as Palustrine, Emergent, Seasonally Flooded (USFW,
1990). There are no significant wetlands along the uimamed drainage or Dry Creek. Dry
Preliminary Assessment Report Utah DEQ-DERR
Expressway Lane Plume 12 UT0009134958
Creek is not large enough to support recreation and is not used as a fishery. Utah Lake is
used for recreation, including swimming, boating, and water sports. Utah Lake is also a
fishery for various species of trout, carp, and catfish. Utah Lake is also the only known
natural habitat of the endangered June Sucker fish.
4.3.3 Likelihood of Release
Samples have been collected near the culvert on the northem boundary of the Utah
County Landfill and from the unnamed drainage near the northem boundary of the
Spanish Fork Landflll. These samples were analyzed for metals only and no hazardous
compounds were detected above regulatory levels. A sample from the wetland area to
the south of the site did not contain hazardous materials above regulatory levels. A
sample of landfill leachate surfacing in the Utah County Landfill contained elevated
sulfates and dissolved solids, but was below regulatory levels for hazardous substances
(Tables 12-14).
Based on the shallow water table and numerous marshes near and on the site, it is likely
that groundwater surfaces near the site. The groundwater at the site has been shown to
contain metals contamination above MCLs. The unregulated and unconfrolled nature of
the landfills as well as the unknown nature of the source of the metals contamination
raises the possibility that other contaminants and greater concenfrations of metals than
previously detected are impacting groundwater at the site. If this contaminated
groundwater does surface, the dissolved contaminants it contains would also surface and
have the potential to impact the marsh areas and the downsfream watercourses.
While surfacing groundwater may promote the downsfream migration of contaminants
via surface water, it appears there would be few targets. Surface water along the 15-miIe
downsfream influence pathway is not utilized for any purpose until reaching Utah Lake.
4.4 Soil Exposure Pathway
4.4.1 Soil Conditions
The Utah Valley area is characterized by a basin-fill sfratigraphy consisting of
interbedded alluvium and lacustrine deposits of Tertiary and Quatemary age. The fill
materials vary from coarse gravel, prevalent along the mountain fronts, through fine-
grained silts and clays more common further from the mountains.
Soil boring logs from investigations at the landfills indicate a silty-clay is predominant
across the site. This silty-clay has lenses of silty-sand spread non-uniformly throughout
(RB&G, 1988). A soil survey identified\he soil profile in the site area as a sfrongly
alkaline silt loam to silty-clay of the Payson-Terrace escarpments complex. These soils
form on 1 to 20 percent slopes that are moderately well-drained and slowly permeable.
Vegetation on these soils is a sparse growth of salt-tolerant plants (Swenson, 1972). In
the landfills, the depth at which refuse is encountered varies between 3 -9 feet bgs. In
many places across the site, the refuse has surfaced.
Preliminary Assessment Report Utah DEQ-DERR
Expressway Lane Plume 13 UT0009134958
4.4.2 Soil Exposure Targets).
Based on the 2000 Census data, 77 people five within a quarter mile of the site and
47,688 people live within 4 miles (Appendix F). The nearest residents live to the east of
the site in a subdivision on the east side of State Road 51. This subdivision is
approximately 300 feet from the site boundary. It is not certain how far these residences
are from any potential hazardous substances at the site. Although the 2000 census data
indicates people live on the site, these residents where removed in 2001. Currently no
one hves at the site.
.AJthough no one lives on the site, people visit the site on a fransient basis. The salvage
and wrecking businesses have six employees who are consistently on-site. Customers of
these businesses may also be on-site from time to time. In addition, the Spanish Fork
landfill is still semi-active (accepting plant waste) so people and city employees may visit
the site on occasion. Additionally, access to most of the site is unrestricted, with the
exception being the auto salvage and wrecking yards. Evidence of illegal dumping, and
hence illegal access to the site, is prevalent.
4.4.3 Likelihood of Release
Over the operating life of the landfills, refuse has been infroduced and mixed with the
soil. Based on the unregulated nature of these landfills and the lack of proper engineering
confrols, it is hkely that hazardous substances have been infroduced to the soil from
direct contact with this refiise and from illegal dumping activities. Prior groundwater
sampling has shown that the groundwater quality has been impafred after passing through
the landfill soils/refiise. It is hkely that the refuse in the landfill soils is an on-going
source of the dissolved metals contamination detected at the ELP site. The soils that
contain refuse may be contributing other contaminants to the groundwater as well.
Although waste has surfaced at the landfills, and waste-containing soils are exposed at
the site and may present direct exposure risks to those on-site who come into contact with
the soil, the EPA deemed the landfill soils (as part of the Spanish Fork LandfiU IA) "No
Further Remedial Action Planned" in December 1999. Because the ELP site is primarily
focused on the plume of metals contamination in the groundwater, the dfrect exposure to
site soils is not as significant concem as the on-going contribution of contaminants from
the soil to the groundwater. Therefore, the targets and risks of the soil exposure pathway
become similar to those of the groundwater pathway. While there has been a release to
groundwater, there are relatively few downstream targets that are currently affected by
that release. In the fumre that risk may increase.
Preliminary Assessment Report Utah DEQ-DERR
Expressway Lane Plume 14 UT0009I34958
4.5 Air Pathway
4.5.1 Meteorology/Site Conditions
The Spanish Fork area experiences moderate winters and hot summers. The average
daily high temperature is 64.1 °F and die average low is 38.7 °F (Ashcroft, 1992). The
Spanish Fork area, like much of Utah, is semi-arid. The average annual precipitation is
16.47 inches. Most of this precipitation occurs in March and April. July and August are
typically the driest months of the year. The highest intensity rainfall recorded in Spanish
Fork, occurred in July 1974 when 2.87 inches feU in a 24-hour period (Brough, 1987).
Pan evaporation in the Spanish Fork area averages 48.62 inches per year. Wind
conditions vary depending on the time of year and direction of storm fronts, however
prevailing winds in die Utah Valley area blow from the south to the north. The site is a
few miles away from the mouth of Spanish Fork Canyon, and may experience the effects
of canyon winds. For a few hours in morning, winds from the valley blow up the canyon
to the south. In the evening, winds blow out of the canyon in a northem direction. The
intensity of these winds varies, and their effect at the site may be negligible.
4.5.2 Air Exposure Targets
The targets for the air pathway are similar to those for the soil exposure pathway.
Residents of the mobile home site were removed in 2001 and no one lives at the site
currently (confrary to the census data in Appendix F). The two businesses located on the
site employ about six people, and may have customers visit their property fi-om time to
time. The Spanish Fork Landfill is semi-active, so city workers and visitors dropping off
plant waste at the landfill could be exposed to afrbome contairdnants at the site. The
nearest residences are approximately 300 feet east of the site on the east side of State
Road 51. A total of 77 people live within a quarter mile of the site and 47,688 people
live within 4 miles of the site (Appendix F).
4.5.3 Likelihood of Release
Again, the air exposure pathway was declared "No Further Remedial Action Planned" by
the EPA Ul December 1999 as part of the Spanish Fork Landfill LA. The ELP site is
focused on the dissolved metals groundwater contamination underlying the landfills. In
this respect, there is very little likelihood of release to the air because the primary
contaminants of concem are not volatile and they are dissolved in groundwater several
feet below the ground surface. It is possible that other compounds have been infroduced
to the groundwater. It is also likely that impacted groundwater is surfacing near or on the
site. If contaminant groundwater does surface and it contains volatile contaminants, the
possibility of a release to the air would be significantly increased.
5.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
In 1999, the DERR conducted an Innovative Assessment at the Spanish Fork Landfill.
The IA investigated a large area northeast of the city of Spanish Fork, Utah where three
Preliminary Assessment Report Utah DEQ-DERR
Expressway Lane Plume 15 UT0009134958
I
I
I
I
I
i
collection procedures were not documented in the report but the samples were analyzed
for nutrients, metals, volatile organic compounds, and pesticides. No organic or
inorganic contaminants of concem were reported in the samples. Total dissolved solids
(TDS) downgradient of the landflll exceeded Utah groundwater protection levels for
Class n protection levels (greater than 1.25 times background) indicating a possible
impact to groundwater from the landfill contents. Two surface water samples were also
collected from the unnamed drainage that flows across the landfills. No contaminants of
concem were detected in those samples (Tables 1-3).
Several proposals to build at the Utah County LandfiU were put forward before the
mobile home park was constmcted there. A 1995 combined Phase I/Phase II
Envfronmental Site Assessment entitied Larson/Keller Properties (RB&G, 1995)
investigated surface and subsurface conditions to determine the feasibility of placing a
residential development on the landfill. Ten test pits were dug with a backhoe and five
soil borings were drilled to determine the thickness of landfill contents and depth to the
natural clay soils under the landfill. The waste material observed during the investigation
consisted of municipal waste; no evidence of hazardous waste or toxic materials was
found during the investigation (RB&G, 1995). Two soil samples submitted for
laboratory analyses did not contain contaminants above regulatory levels for volatile
organic compounds, pesticides, or PCBs. Sample Drill Hole 5 contained amounts of
PAHs at levels above the Superfund Chemical Data Matrix (SCDM) Cancer Screening
Reference Dose. Sample Drill Hole 9 contained 252 mg/kg of lead (Tables 4 and 8)
which is elevated with respect to background levels in the area, but below regulatory
action levels. Downgradient monitoring well #16 was tested for metals. Volatile organic
compounds, semi-volatile organic compounds, pesticides, and PCBs. Only lead was
detected at levels above the MCL (Table 5).
to 1999, the DERR conducted an IA at the Spanish Fork Landfill site. Three
groundwater samples and a surface water sample were collected. No compounds of
concem were detected in the surface water sample. Lead and arsenic were detected in all
three groundwater samples above the MCLs. Chromium was detected above the MCL in
samples SFL-GW-03 and SFL-GW-04. Of these groundwater samples, sample SFL-
GW-03, which was supposed to serve as the background sample for the IA, contained the
highest levels of metal contaminants (Tables 10 and 11).
4.0 WASTE/SOURCE CHARACTERISTICS
4.1 Waste/Source Characterization
Because the three known landfills were operated before the implementation of the
Resource Conversation and Recovery Act (RCRA), there was tittle confrol over the types
of waste disposed or the documentation of that disposal. Furthermore, the constmction
and operational practices of these pre-RCRA landfills provide only minimal protection
against the migration of thefr contents (Devinney, 1990). While dissolved metals have
already been detected in the groundwater at the site, a variety of unknown hazardous •
materials could have been placed in the landfills. A citizen's compliant submitted to the
Preliminary Assessment Report Utah DEQ-DERR
Expressway Lane Plume 8 UT000913495g
I
EPA claims first hand knowledge of the disposal of heavy metals, solvents, pesticides, m
and used oils among other things at the site (Javis, 1998). During previous 1 .
investigations, there were no barrels, cans or dmms observed or uncovered at the
landfills, but groundwater has been shown to be in contact with refuse in the landfill cells
(RB&G, 1995).
Specific sources at the auto wrecking and salvage yards have not been determined
because these sites were not visited during the site visit. Any areas where batteries are
opened or cars are dismantled and the various fluids are drained are subject to
contamination. Areas where parts are cleaned might also be subject to contamination.
The contaminants could include anything from metals laden battery acid to various
organic compounds found in oil, radiator fluid, and gasoline to pure chlorinated solvents.
Areas where fluids and solvents are stored may also be impacted. Impacts may not be
limited to the soils where they were spilled. Many of the potential contaminants can
migrate downward and become dissolved in the groundwater.
Based on the historic uses of the site, the contaminants presented below are or may be
present at the site. Since the landfills at the site were unregulated, and a variety of
chemicals not discussed below may also be affecting groundwater at the site. The health
effects listed in each subsection are derived from the Agency for Toxic Substance and
Disease Regisfry Public Health Statements, unless othenvise noted.
4.1.1 Lead
Lead is an element that occurs naturally in the earth's crust. Lead is also the principle
component of the plates used in lead-acid automobile batteries. In the acidic envfromneUt
of the battery, lead is easily dissolved and in this dissolved state it is very mobile when
released into the envfronment. Lead cannot be broken dov^m, just changed into different
chemical forms. When absorbed onto soil, lead exposure can occur through inhalation of
lead containing particles. Inhaled lead immediately enters the bloodsfream and is
cfrculated throughout the body. Lead can also be ingested by ingesting lead containing
particles or fluids. Adults tend to absorb very little ingested lead into thefr bloodstreams,
however, in children a much higher percentage of the ingested lead can be absorbed and
spread through the body. For this reason, children tend to be much more susceptible to
lead poisoning. Once in the bloodstream, lead can affect many bodily systems, but its
most significant impact is on the nervous and cfrculatory systems. Exposure to high
amounts of lead can cause brain and kidney damage and can impafr nervous system
development in children. Exposure to lead may also cause reproductive problems and
birth defects. The carcinogenic potential of lead has not been estabhshed (ATSDR,
1997b).
4.1.2 Other Toxic Metals
While lead is the chief component of the lead plates in lead-acid batteries, certain other
toxic metals are often added to the lead (ui significant concenfrations) to change the
properties of the plates. Antimony is commonly added to the lead plates to increase thefr
strength. Many times, arsenic is also added to the battery lead to act as an anti-corrosive
Preliminary Assessment Report Utah DEQ-DERR
Expressway Lane Plume 9 UT0009134958
i
,1
I
ll
iP
lli
ill
PHASE II
SUPPLEMENTAL SLTBSURFACE IN\TSTIGATION REPORT
Anderson Auto Wrecking
2890 South State Street
Springville, Utah
October 24, 2007
RECFIVED
NOV 0 1 2007
c . CJEQ
E^^^rcin^ert,. Response 6 Remed-arion
Prepared for:
Vidar Investment Group
10000 South 45 West, Suite 207
Sandy, Utah
SCANNED
Prepared by: UEm::2mlzMm±
im Environmental
640 East Wilmington Avenue
Salt Lake City, Utah 84106
Phone:[phone]
Fax:[phone]
PHASE II
SUPPLEMENTAL SUBSURFACE ImTSiTGAiioN REPORT
Anderson Auto Wrecking
2890 South State Street
Springville, Utah
Prepared by:
Amy F ind ley
Project Manager
Reviewed by:
£3^^iy -i^/- ^1^:^*5^^
C^gD.Eaton, P.G.
Manager, Environmental Serv'ices
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION l
1.1 Background 1
1.2 Objectives 1
2.0 METHODOLOGY 2
2.1 Crusher Area Investigation 2
2.2 PH-2 Area Investigation 3
2.3 Groundwater Investigation 4
2.4 Methane Investigation 5
3.0 RESULTS 6
3.1 Observations 6
3.2 Soil Sample Results 7
3.3 Groundwater Sample Results 9
3.4 Methane Gas Investigation Results 10
3.5 Quality Assurance/Quality Control (OA./QC) 11
4.0 CONCLUSIONS ll
5.0 PROJECT LIMITATIONS 12
FIGURES
Figure \: Auto Crusher Area - Approximate Borehole Locations
Figure 2: Site Map with Approximate Sample and Monitoring Well Locations
TABLES
Table 1
Table 2
Table 3
Soil Sample Results - Petroleum Hydrocarbons
Groundwater Sample Results - Petroleum Hydrocarbons
Soil Gas Probe Monitoring Results
APPENDICES
Appendix 1; Laborator>' Analytical Reports
Vidar Investment Group - Anderson Auto TOC IHI Environmental
Phas6 TT Supplemental SI Report Project No. 07E-7179
1.0 INTRODUCTION
On August 16, 2007, Vidar Investment Group, LLC, retained IHI Enviromnental (IHI) to
assist them with entering into Utah's Voluntary Cleanup Program to address environmental
issues at the Anderson Auto Wrecking facility, located at 2890 South State Street,
Springville, Utah ("subject property"). This report documents the results of supplemental
subsurface investigation activities conducted at the site in August and September of 2007,
designed to further characterize the site.
1.1 Background
In May of 2006, IHI completed a Phase I Enviromnental Site Assessment (ESA) of the
Anderson Auto Wrecking property ((HI; May 18, 2006). Historical records indicated
portions of the subject property might have been used as a landfill from approximately 1943
to 1979. The subject property began being used for the operations of an auto-salvage yard in
1979 and continues to operate as such.
The Phase I ESA recommended collecting soil and groundwater samples in the vicimty of the
cmsher and collecting groundwater samples fi-om various locations across the site to
determine if significant environmental impacts were present. A limited Phase II Subsurface
Investigation was conducted in July of 2007 (IHI; Phase 71 Subsurface Investigation Report,
July 31, 2007). The investigation identified buried landfill materials, impacted soils, and
impacted groundwater at the site and determined that further characterization of the site was
required.
This supplemental Phase II Subsurface Investigation was conducted to further define impacts
that were identified in the original Phase II investigation.
1.2 Objectives
The investigation was designed to meet the following objectives:
>^ Further define impacted areas identified in the initial limited subsurface investigation.
^ Determine if methane gas is present in soils beneath the site.
Vidar Investment Group ~ Anderson Auto 1 IHI Environmental
Phase II Supplemental SI Report Project No. 07E-7179
2.0 METHODOLOGY
Ms. Amy Findley and Mr. Bill Howard, IHI, conducted the field investigation on August 28-
30, September 6, and September 17. 2007. EarthProbe Environmental Field Services
provided a direct-push drill rig and operator to advance borings at the site to collect
subsurface soil samples and install groundwater monitoring wells and methane monitors (i.e.,
soil gas probes). All sampling was conducted following IHI's standard operating procedures
(SOPs). Sample locations are shown on Figiire 1 (Auto Crusher Area - Approximate
Borehole Locations) and Figure 2 (Site Map with Approximate Sample and Monitoring Well
Locatioiis).
2.1 Crusher Area Investigation
The previous Pliase U investigation (IHI; July 31, 2007) identified petroleum hydrocarbon
impacts in soils around the vehicle crusher. Elevated concentrations of total recoverable
petroleum hydrocarbons (TRPH) and benzene were detected in the soils, as well as low
concentrations of toluene, ethylbenzene, total xylenes, and naphthalene. Samples analyzed for
solvents and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) did not detect halogenated volatile organic
compounds (VOX) or PCB constituents above laboratory' method reporting umits. Analysis for
total lead and mercur>' concentrations detected lead at concentrations that are elevated compared
to typical background concentrations for the area. Additional investigation was recommended to
fiirther define the extent and degree of petroleum impacts in this area. The previous Phase II
investigation analytical results have been included in the tables in the results section of this
report.
Four borings were advanced to depths ranging from 15 to 25 feet below the ground surface (bgs)
in the vicinity of the crusher during this supplemental investigation. Soil was collected
continuously from the borings, screened for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) using an organic
vapor meter with a photoionization detector (PID), and logged by a qualified environmental
scientist. TTie boring locations are shown on Figure 1.
Six soil samples were submitted to the analytical laborator\' for analysis of the petroleum
constituents methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE), benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, total xylenes,
and naphthalene (BTEXN), using EPA Melhod 8260B, and TRPH, using EPA Method 1664.
Vidar Investniem Group - .Ajiderson Auto 2 IHI Environmeutat
Phase II Supplemental Sl Report Project No. 07E-7179
Soil sample locations were selected based on field observations (i.e., staining, odors, or positive
PID readings). New sampling gloves were used for each sample. Samples were packed
tightly in lab oratory-sup plied containers, placed in an iced cooler, and transported under
proper chain-of-custody documentafion to American West Analytical Laboratories (AWAL),
a Utah-certified analytical laboratory, for analyses.
Additionally, one of the borings was drilled to 25 feet bgs and converted into a monitoring well.
Tiie well was constructed using a 15-foot section of 2~inch diameter, Schedule 40, machine-
slotted PVC screen and enough blank riser pipe to bring the well to approximately 6 inches
below grade. A slip cap was placed on the top of the blank PVC pipe, a sand pack was placed
around the well fi-om the total depth of the boring up to one foot above the screen, and bentonite
was placed on top of the sand pack up to approximately 1-1.5 feet below grade. A traffic-rated,
flush-mount surface completion was cemented in-place.
2.2 PH-2 Area Investigation
The previous Phase II investigation (IHI; July 31, 2007) identified petrolemn hydrocarbon
impacts in soils during test pit excavation activities. At the time of the initial investigation, tliree
test pit soil samples were analyzed for BTEXN, TPJ*H, and VOX. One of the soil samples,
collected from test pit PH-2, detected an elevated concentration of TRPH. BTEXN and several
VOX compounds were also detected, but at low concentrations. PCBs were not detected above
laborator\' method detection limits in any of the samples analyzed. Additional investigation was
recommended to fiirther define the extent and degree of petroleum impacts in the vicinity of test
pit PH-2. The previous Phase II investigation's analyiical resuUs have been included in the tables
in the Results Section of tliis report.
Three borings were advanced to approximately 12 feet bgs in the vicinity of PH-2 during this
supplemental investigation. Soil was collected continuously from the borings, screened for
VOCs using a PID, and logged by a qualified enviromnental scientist. The boring locations are
shown on Figure 2.
Three soil samples were submitted to the analytical laboratory for analysis of the petroleum
constiments MTBE and BTEXN, using EPA Method 8260B, and TRPH, using EPA Method
1664. Soi! satnple locations were selected based on field obser\'ations (i.e., staining, odors, or
Vidar Investment Group ~ .^ildereon Auto 3 IHI Environmental
Phase II Supplemental SI Report Project No. 07E-7179
positive PID readings). New sampling gloves were used for each sample. Samples were
packed tightly in laboratory-supplied containers, placed in an iced cooler, and transported
under proper chain-of-custody documentation to AWAL for analyses.
AdditionaUy, one of the borings was converted into a monitoring well. The well was
comtructed using a 10-foot section of 2-inch diameter, Schedule 40, machine-slotted PVC screen
and enough blank riser pipe to bring the well to approximately 6 inches below grade. A slip cap
was placed on the top of the blank PVC pipe, a sand pack was placed around the well fi-om the
total depth of the boring up to one foot above the screen, and bentonite was placed on top of the
sand pack up to approximately 1-1.5 feet below grade. A traffic-rated, tlush-mount surface
completion was cemented in-place.
2.3 Groundwater Investigation
The previous Phase II investigation (IHI; July 31, 2007) identified slightly elevated benzene
concentrations in groundwater in tvv'O of the borings located along the westem portion of the site
(GW-1 and GW-4). Several other BTEXN constituents were detected, but at low concentrations.
Arsenic was detected in four of the five groundwater samples, but at concentrations fairly typical
of arsenic in the Utah Vallev area. One groundwater sample was analyzed for glycols, but did
nol detect glycols above the laboratory method reporting limits. Additional investigation was
recommended to further define the extent and degree of petroleum-impacted groundwater in
these areas. The previous Phase 11 investigation anal>lical results have been included in the
tables in the results section of this report.
In addition to the two wells installed for the crusher and PH-2 investigation areas, three
additional borings were advanced to depths ranging fi-om 12 to 20 feet bgs to install monitoring
wells across the site. Well locations were selected to provide additional groundwater information
downgradient of the crusher and to provide information for the eastem portion of the site. Soil
was collected continuously from the borings, screened for VOCs using a PID, and logged by a
qualified enviromnental scientist. The monitoring well locations are shown on Figure 2.
The borings were converted into monitoring wells by installing a 10-foot section of 2-inch
diameter, Schedule 40, machine-slotted PVC screen and enough blank riser pipe to bring the well
to approximately 6 inches below grade. A slip cap was placed on the top of the blank PVC pipe,
Vidar Investment Group - Anderson .\uto 4 IHl Environmental
Phase II Supplemental Sl Report Project No. 07E-7179
a sand pack was placed around the well from the total depth of the boring up to one foot above
the screen, and bentonite was placed on lop of the sand pack up to approximately 1-1.5 feet
below grade. A traffic-rated, flush-mount surface completion was cemented in-place. Cole
Sur\'eying surveyed tlie location and elevation of each of the wells using a reference mark that
was placed on the lop of the well's PVC casing.
All five of the wells were developed following IHI's SOPs for monitoring well installation and
development. Prior to groundwater sampling, water levels were measured in all five wells using
a single-phase electronic water-level indicator. Following the water level survey, a peristaltic
pump was used to purge and sample each of the five wells. Field parameters of pH, temperamre,
specific conductance, dissolved oxygen, and oxidation/reduction potential were measured during
purging and a groundwater sample was collected when the parameters had stabilized (three
consecutive readings for each parameter that are withhi 10% of each other).
Five groundwater samples were collecled in new laboratorj'-supplied sample containers, taking
care to ensure headspace was not present in the volatile organic compound sample containers,
placed in an iced cooler, and transported under proper chain-of-custody documentation to
AWAL for analyses. New sampling gloves were used for each saiuple. The samples were
analyzed for BTEXN, using EPA Method 8260B, and TRPH, using EPA Method 1664.
2,4 Methane Investigation
The previous Phase II investigation (IHI; July 31, 2007) identified buried landfill debris in the
westem portion of the propert>'. Because degradation of buried landfill debris can generate
methane, additional investigation was recommended to determine whether methane gas might be
present.
Seven subsurface gas probes were set to approximately 3 feet bgs, using direct-push
methods. The probes were constructed of 6-inch GeoProbe stainless-steel screens, with V4-
inch (outer diameter) polyethylene mbing connected to the probe that extended to the ground
surface. A sand pack was placed around the probe from the total deptli of the boring to
approximately 1 foot above the probe. The remaining borehole was sealed with hydrated
bentonite.
Vidar Investment Group - Anderson Auto 5 IHl Environmental
Phase II Supplemental SI Report Project No. 07E-7I79
Following installation, which took place on August 30, 2007, the soil gas probes were
allowed to equilibrate for a period of one week, until September 6, 2007, at which point IHI
returned to the site and field measured volatile organic vapors in each of the gas probes. IHI
returned to the site on September 17, 2007, and measured the vapors in the gas probes again.
IHI used a photoionization detector (PID) equipped with a 10.6 eV lamp (Environmental
Instruments 580B PID or MiniRAE 2000 PID) and a GasTech GT308 multiple-gas monitor,
equipped with a cataK-tic compensated combustible sensor (#61-0123). The lamps in the
PIDs are capable of measuring VOCs, but methane is outside the range of measurable
compounds. Alternatively, the GasTech's combustible sensor is capable of measuring
VOCs, including methane, and, in fact, is calibrated using a 2.5% methane span gas. As a
conservative estimate of the potential concentrations of methane present in subsurface soils,
the PID readings were subtracted fi-om the GasTech readings and the difference was assumed
to be entirely methane.
3.0 RESULTS
3.1 Observations
There is an elevation difference between the eastem and westem portions of the site. Along
the westem half of the property, in the vicinity of test pits PH-1 and PH-2, the elevafion is
approximately 4,588 feet above mean sea level. In the vicinity of the crusher, tlie elevation is
approximately 4,610 feet above mean sea level. In general, the property slopes down toward
the northwest. This topographic difference is tlie reason the borings near the crusher were
advanced deeper than borings on the westem portion of the property. The topographic
elevafion isocontours are shown on Figure 2.
Subsurface soils consisted of sandy gravels in the top 1-2 feet, followed by silty sands to
depths ranging fi-om 5-14 feet bgs, then dense, sfiff silty clays to the total depth of the
borings, which ranged fi-om 12-25 feet bgs. The maximum depth drilled at the site was 25
feet bgs.
Vidar Investment Group - .Anderson Auto 6 IHI Environmeniai
Phase II Supplemental Sl Report Project No. 07E-7179
The first occurrence of groundwater on the westem portion of the site ranged fi'om
approximately 3-4.5 feet bgs. Near the crusher, in monitoring well MW-5, a ver>' slow
ground water-producing lens appeared to be present at approximately 9 feet bgs, but
groundwater did not infiltrate the borehole until it was advanced to approximately 24 feet
bgs. However, the groundwater was vertically restricted, as groundwater came up to
approximately 5 feet bgs in the completed well. Further east, in monitoring well MW-1,
groundwater came up to approximately 16.5 feet bgs.
3.2 Soil Sample Results
Table 1 summarizes the soil sample analyiical results for petroleum hydrocarbons, from both
the previous Phase II investigation (IHI; July 31, 2007) and the current Phase II supplemental
investigation. Copies of the laboratory analytical reports from the current investigation are
presented in Appendix 1.
EPA Region 9's Preliminary Remediation Goals (PRGs) for soil are included in Table 1 for
reference. The PRGs are risk-based screening levels used by EPA Region 9 to evaluate
impacted sites and determine if further evaluation is warranted. The PRGs were developed
using direct contact pathways (i.e., ingestion of impacted soil, dermal contact with impacted
soil, and outdoor inhalation of vapors from impacted soil). The PRGs do not consider the
effect of impacted soil on groundwater that could be ingested or the potential effect of vapors
from the impacted soil on indoor air. Akhough Utah is in EPA Region 8, the PRGs provide
guidance to the level of risk presented by contaminants detected at the site for the proposed
future residential land use.
Vidar Investment Group - Anderson Auto 7 IHI Enviroimienlal
Phase TI Supplemental SI Report Project No. 07E-7179
Table 1
Soil Sample Results - Petroleum Hydrocarbons
(Results in parts per million - ppm)
Sample ID
Phase U Subsu
C-l@3'
C-2 @ 3.5'
C-3 @ 4-6'
C-4 @ 2.5-3.5"
C-5 @ 5.5'
C-6 @ 4'
PH-1 (gi5'
PH-2 @ 5'
PH-3 @ 4.5'
MTBE Benzene Toluene
face Investigation (WW; July 31, 2007)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Phase fl Supplemental Sub.
C-l @ 1-2'
C-2@ 1-2^
C-2(g; 15-16'
C-3 @ 1-2'
C-4@. 1-2'
C-4 ^ 6-7*
PH-SSl @4-5'
PH-SS2@4-5'
PH-SS3@4-5'
PRGs*
<0.0062
<0.0061
<0.0063
<0.0061
0.33
0.26
<0.0064
<0.0064
<0.0062
•. 3r '•
NA
NA
0.29
2.3
NA
NA
0.0071
0.034
0.033
NA
NA
<0.12
56
NA
NA
<0.0027
0.1
0.0U79
^urface Investigation
0.0058
0.0035
<0.0031
<0.003]
2,2
041
0.0086
0.0032
0.0031
0.64
0.02
<0.0061
<0.0063
<0.0061
6.5
0.98
<0.0064
0.016
0.013
520
Ethyl-
benzene
NA
NA
4.1
19
NA
NA
<0.0027
0.0063
0.0058
0.025
<0.0061
<0.0063
<0.0061
14
4.9
<0.0064
<0.0064
<0.0062
395
Total
Xylenes
NA
NA
18
130
NA
NA
<0.0027
0.028
0.027
0.12
<0.0061
<0.0063
<0.0061
120
36
0.0088
0.017
0.014
270
Naph-
thalene
NA
NA
2.3
4.7
NA
NA
<0.0027
0.0082
0.0048
<0.0062
<0.0061
<0.0063
<0.0061
6.5
2.9
0.0096
<0.0064
<0.0062
56
TRPH
<180
<180
<180
4,100
210
<180
<200
1,800
<210
<180
<180
<190
190
5,100
2,100
<190
<190
330
ne
MTBE and BTEXN analv-zed using EPA Method 8260B. TRPH analyzed using EPA Method 1664. NA-not
analyzed. * - EPA Region 9 Preliminarv- Remediation Goals for residential soil, ne - not established. Bold values
exceed the PRC]s.
Samples designated as C-# were collected from borings in the cmsher area and are shown on
Figure 1. Samples designated as PH-# were collected from test pits during the first
investigation and samples designated as PH-SS# were collected from borings around test pit
PH-2. Both the PH-# and PH-SS# sample locations are shown on Figure 2.
As shown in Table 1, petroleum hydrocarbons were detected in three of the six borings
advanced around the crusher in the first investigation and in all four of the borings advanced
around the crusher during the supplemental invesfigation. Concentrations of all the
petroleum hydrocarbons were generally low, but benzene exceeded the PRGs for residential
soil in two of the near surface soil samples collected immediately west (C-4 @ 2.5-3.5' from
Vidar Investment Group - Anderson Auto
Phase II Supplemental SI Report
IHl Environmental
Project No. 07E-7I79
the first investigation) and immediately north (C-4 @ 1-2' fi-om the current investigation) of
the cmsher.
Although generally low concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons were detected in all three
of the test pit samples and in all three of the borings located around test pit PH-2, none of the
concentrations observed exceed the PRGs for residential soil.
3.3 Groundwater Sample Results
Table 2 summarizes; the groundwater sample analyiical results for petroleum hydrocarbons,
from both the previous Phase II investigation (IHI; July 31, 2007) and the current Phase II
supplemental investigation. Copies of the laboratory' analytical reports from the current
invesfigafion are presented in Appendix 1.
Utah's Groundwater Quality Standards (GWQSs) are included in Table 2 for reference. The
Utah Division of Water Quality (DWQ) uses the GWQSs as screening levels for protection
of subsurface waters of the State.
Table 2
Groundwater Sample Results - Petroleum Hydrocarbons
(Results are in parts per million - ppm)
Sample ID MTBE Benzene
Phase TI Subsurface Investigation (IHi:
GW-1
GW-2
GW-3A
GW-4
GW-5
Phase II Suppi
MW-I
MW-2
MW-3
M\V-4
MW-5
GWQSs*
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.006
<0.001
<0.001
0.007
<0.001
Toluene
Ethyl-
benzene
; July 31, 2007)
<n.oo2
<0.002
0.023
<0.002
<0.002
lemental Subsurface Investigation
<0.0020
<0.0020
<0.0020
0.0073
<0.0020
ne
<0.0010
0.011
0.022
0.013
<0.0010
: 0.005
<0.0020
<0.0020
<0.0020
<0.0020
<0.0020
1
0.0034
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.0020
<0.0020
<0.0020
<0.0020
<0.0020
0.7
Total
Xylenes
<0.002
<0.002
0.021
<0.002
<0.002
<0.0020
<0.0020
<0.0020
<0.0020
<0.0020
10
Naph-
thalene
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
0.0039
<0.002
<0.0020
<0.0020
<0.0020
<0.0020
<0.0020
. ^ne-:;
IRPH
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
3.8
3.5
3.3
3.5
6.7
ne
MTBE and BTEXN analyzed by EPA Method 8260B. TRPH analyzed by EPA Method 1664. NA-not
analyzed. *-Utah's Ground Water Qualit>-Standards (GWQSs). Bold values exceed the GWQSs. ne - not
establislied.
Vidar Investment Group - Anderson Auto 9 IHI Environmental
Phase TI Supplemental SI Report Project No. 07E-7I79
As shown in Table 2, benzene was detected above its Ground Water Quality Standard in two
of the groundwater grab sample locations from the previous Phase II investigation and in
three of the wells from the supplemental investigation. All of the groundwater samples that
contained benxene concentrations in excess of its GWQS were collected on the westem half
of the property. Although other petroleum hydrocarbon constituents were detected above
their laboratory reporting limits, none exceeded their GWQSs. However, not all of the
constituents analyzed had established GWQSs.
3.4 Methane Gas Investigation Results
Table 3 sununaiizes the results of tlie methane gas investigation. Methane gas can ignite in
the presence of an ignition source at concentrations in air between 5% (lower explosive lunit
- LEL) and 15% (upper explosive limit - UEL). The Occupafional Health and Safety
Administrafion (OSHA) generally uses 10% of the LEL as a guideline for worker protection,
which equates to 0.5% or 5.000 parts per million (ppm) methane. Both the OSHA standard
and the LEL are included in Table 3 for reference.
Table 3
Soil Gas Probe Monitoring Results
Sample
Septem
SG-1
SG-2
SG-3
SG-4
SG-5
SG-6
SG-7
ID
ber 6, 2007
September 17, 2007
SG-I
SG-2
SG-3
SG-t
SG-5
SG-6
SG-7
Standards
Total VOCs (ppm)
GasTech PID
360 13.9
580 0.6
400 3.3
460 3.6
180 1.9
220 59.6
560 1.6
CNL CNL
800 0.6
820 151
820 8
540 1.9
340 1.9 • •
740 0.6
Methane
ppm
346.1
579.4
396.7
396.4
178.1
1604
5584
-
799.4
669
812
538.1
338.1
739.4
S,OflO
i
%LKL''
0.7
1.2
0.8
0.8
0.4
0.3
1.1
-
1.6
1.3
1.6
1.1
0.7
1.5
100 : ,
a - The methane concentration is a conser\'ative estimate based on subtracting the PID
reading from the Ga.sTech reading, assuming the difference is entirely methane, b - Lower
Explosive Limil. CNL - Could not locale probe.
Vidar Investment Group - Anderson Auto
Phase II Supplemental SI Report
10 IHI Environmental
Project No. 07E-7179
As shown in Table 3, methane gas was detected in all of the soil gas probes. The
concentrations of methane ranged from 160 to 800 ppm. The percentage of methane's LEL
represented by these concentrations is relatively low, ranging from approximately 0.3% to
1.6%.
3.5 Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC)
All samples were collected using standardized sample coUection and handling methods.
Pertinent field information and chain-of-custody records were logged. All samples were
analyzed by AWAL, a Utah-certifred laboratory. AWAL is also certified by the National
Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (NELAP) to perform analyses associated
w'ith the Resource Conservafion and Recovery Act, the Clean Water Act, and the Safe
Drinking Water Act. AWAL adheres to the QA/QC criteria outlined in SW846 and other
mediods as stated on their analytical reports.
4.0 CONCLUSIONS
Petroleum hydrocarbon impacts are present in the vicimty of the automobile crusher. Based
on our observations and the analjlical results, the impacts appear to extend from the ground
surface to at least seven feet bgs in the impacted area; however, concentrations are relatively
low and impacts only exceed the PRGs in a limited area. Petroleum hydrocarbons were also
detected in several locations near the westem property boundary, but at relatively low
concentrations that are below the PRGs.
Petroleum hydrocarbons were also detected in most of the groundwater samples; however,
benzene was the only constituent detected above Utah's GWQSs, from samples collected on
the westem portion of the site.
Although the methane concentrations observed on the site are below the concentrations
OSHA would consider hazardous to workers, IHI believes the potential exists for the
methane gas to accumulate in enclosed spaces to potentially dangerous (i.e., explosive)
levels. Also, the presence of methane could potentially displace oxygen in enclosed spaces,
which could cause adverse health effects (e.g., asphj'xia).
Vidar Investment Group - Anderson Auto 11 IHI Environmental
Phase II Supplemental SI Report Project No. 07E-7179
5.0 PROJECT LIMITATIONS
This Project was perfonned using, as a minimum, practices consistent with standards
acceptable within the industry at this time, and a level of diligence typically exercised by
environmental consultants perfonning similar services.
The procedures used attempt to establish a balance between the competing goals of limiting
invesfigative and reporting costs and time, and reducing the uncertainty about unknown
conditions. Therefore, because the findings of this report were derived from the scope, costs,
time and other limitations, the conclusions should not be construed as a guarantee that all
environmental liabilities have been identified and fully evaluated. "W^ere sample collection
and testing have been performed, IHI's professional opinions are based in part on the
interpretation of data from discrete sampling locations that may not represent conditions at
non-sampled locations. IHI assumes no responsibility for omissions or errors resulting from
inaccurate information, or data, provided by sources outside of IHl or from omissions or
errors in public records.
Furthennore, it is emphasized that the final decision on how much risk to accept always
remains with the client since IHI is not in a posifion to fully understand all of the client's
needs. Clients with a greater aversion to risk may want to take additional actions while
others, witli less aversion to risk, may want to take no further action.
Vidar Invesunent Group - Anderson Auto 12 IKI Environmental
Phase II Supplemental SI Report ProJectNo. 07E-7179
(0
c q
1 •
CO
o
_l
O CM
•S 6^
e B
o
r
+ C
-
4
"•-•
CD
IE
"x
o L_
< CO
6 CQ
<
1 •
? O C
^-
o
1 ^^
3
<
• •
-
3
ij_
0)
ZJ
1 ^
^*
1
o
in i
•4
0
3
6
•
^^ 1
o +
CO
6 +
/^
< 1 ^\i^^ ^
^-5>
r~-
LJ
^-
6
z:
o
yy
o Q;
Q-
g
LU
f^
O
d
z
s o
m
O
>
flO
5
< Q:
Q
s ""
ui
1—
< Q
„j
•<
r'
.ii^ '3
X o
iz
>
Q
CO
> OJ
a:
lli
^ Q
0)
01
C/3
CO ^
2
<
•) +.
n m
!^^-
< JZ >
§ §f m CO Q. 1
UJ
3
o 1
;s fe ^ 1
o "^ 2,
CM 00 05
CO .^ <
>» cn c
3 S to
^ « 8
'.^-1 '•*-!
CO CO 0} o o > o o >
-1 -1 CD
CD CD .E
O O o
sz .c a
o o o m CQ ^
CD cu 0)
+-< ^-' +."
CO CO CO
E E E
XXX
2 2 2 Q. Ci Q.
CL CL Q.
C
o +3
CO
c
JO Q.
X
UJ
< < <
=•1= ^ 1
o o ^ * + <
suoijeooi ||8M Buuojiuoi/M pue 8|duues ajeaijxojddv ^'^\'^ dei/^ ajis -Z QJnBy
I
I
APPENDIX 1
Laboratory Analytical Reports
AMERICAN
__ WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
September 11,2007
Amy Findley
Industrial Health Incorporated
640 East Wilmington Avenue
Salt Lake City, UT 84106
TEL: [phone]
FAX [phone]
RE: .\nderson Auto / 07E-7179
Dear Amy Findley:
Lab Set ID: L79669
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
j email: [e-mail]:
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
American West Analytical Labs received 9 samples on 8/30/2007 for the analyses presented in
the following report.
All analyses were performed in accordance to National Envirorunental Laboratory Accreditation
Program (NELAP) protocols unless noted otherwise. If you have any questions or concerns
regarding this report please feel free to call. The abbreviation "Surr" found in organic reports
indicates a surrogate compound that is intentionally added by the laboratory to determine sample
injection, extraction and/or purging efficiency.
Thank you.
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Approved by:
Laboratory Director or designee
Report Date: 9/11/2007 Page 1 of 19
All analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA, and RCRA arc performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the
addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in cotmection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection
with the re-publication of this repon for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith
and according to the rules of the trade and ofscience.
AMERICAN:
WEST
ANALYTICAL^
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT;
84115:
INORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
Client: IndustriaHealthlncorporated
ProjectID: Anderson Auto/07E-7179
LabSamplelD: L79669-01
FieldSamplelD: C-2 (§ 1-2'
Collected: 8/28/20073:10:00PM
Received: 8/30/2007
Contact: AmyFindley
Analytical Results Units
Date
Analyzed
Method Reporting Analytical
Used Limit Result
TotalRecoverable
PetroleumHydrocarbons
mg/kg-dry 9/5/2007 ii:35:oo AM 1664-SGT 180 <I80
[phone]!
Toll Free [phone];
Fax [phone]:
I email: [e-mail];
Kyle F. Gross i
[ Laboratory Director ••
Peggy McNicol;
QA Officer;
Report Date: 9/11/2007 Page 2 of 19
All analyses appUcable to the CWA, SDWA, aad RCRA arc performed in acconlance to NELAC proiocoLs. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges
of subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this repon in connection with the advenisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for
any puipose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This corapaay accepts no responsibility except for the due perfonnance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of the trade and of science.
INORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
AMERICAN
WEST^
ANALYTICAL
Client: IndustriaWealthlncorporated
ProjectID: AndersonAuto/07E-7179
LabSamplelD: L79669-02
Field Sample ID: C-2 @ 15-16'
Collected: 8/28/2007 3:45:00 PM
Received: 8/30/2007
Contact: AmyFindley
LABORATORIES
Analytical Results Units
Date
Analyzed
Method Reporting Analytical
Used Limit Result
463 West 3600 South
TotalRecoverable
PetroleumHydrocarbons
mg/kg-dry 9/5/2007 ii:35:oo AM 1664-SGT 190 <190
SaltLakeCity, UT:
84115
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]^
i email: [e-mail]:
I ,.
Kvle F. Gro.ss'.
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Report Date: 9/11 /2007 Page 3 of 19
All analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA. and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges
of subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or rrpttjduction of this report in connection with the advenisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for
any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance of inspection and/Or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of the ttade and ofscience.
INORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
Client: IndustriaHealthlncorporated
ProjectID: Anderson Auto/07E-7179
LabSamplelD: L79669-03
Contact: AmyFindley
I
I
AMERICANS FieldSamplelD: C-3 @ 1-2'
CoUected: 8/29/200712:30:00 PM
Received: 8/30/2007
WEST
ANALYTICAL!
[ LABORATORIESJ
Analytical Results Units
Date
Analyzed
Method Reporting Analytical
Used Limit Result
TotalRecoverable mg/kg-dry 9/5/2007 ii:35:00 AM 1664-SGT 180 190
463^esn600 South' PetroleumHydrocarbons
Salt Lake City, UT 1
841151
[phone]:
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]:
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director;
Peggy McNicol •
QA Officer;
Report Date: 9/11/2007 Page 4 of 19
All analyses applicable lo the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for
the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion
or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no
responsibJli5'except_for^the^uej)erfo .„«.^™_ ..-
INORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
AMERICAN
I. „. WEST
ANALYTICAL.
Client: IndustrialHealthlncorporated
ProjectID: Anderson Auto/07E-7179
LabSamplelD: L79669-04
FieldSamplelD: C-4 @ 1-2'
Collected: 8/29/20071:25:00PM
Received: 8/30/2007
Contact: AmyFindley
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT'
84115. c
Analytical Results Units
Date
Analyzed
Method Reporting Analytical
Used Limit Result
TotalRecoverable
PetroleumHydrocarbons
mg/kg-dry 9/5/2007 ii:35:00 AM 1664-SGT 180 5100
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]^
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol -•
QA Officer
Report Date: 9/11/2007 Page 5 of 19
I All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for
I the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges ofsubsequenl use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion
or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report ibr any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepis no
j responsibility except for the due performance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and_according to the rules of the trade and of science. _ ^^ _^ _ _ _ ^ ^ ^ , ._
AMERICAN
WEST^
ANALYTICAL'
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South:
Salt Lake City, UT i
84115;
[phone]
Toll Free (888) 263^8686;
Fax [phone];
email: [e-mail]',
I
INORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
Client: IndustrialHealthlncorporated
ProjectID: AndersonAuto/07E-7179
LabSamplelD: L79669-05
FieldSamplelD: C-4 @ 6-7'
Collected: 8/29/20071:20:00 PM
Received: 8/30/2007
Contact: AmyFindley
Analytical Results Units
Date
Analyzed
Method Reporting Analytical
Used Limit Result
TotalRecoverable
PetroleumHydrocarbons
mg/kg-dry 9/5/2007 ii:35:Oo AM 1664-SGT 180 2100
Kyle F. Gross:
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol •
QA Officer'
Retiort Date: 9/11/2007 Page 6 of 19
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC This report is provided for
the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion
or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no
rcspottsibility except for the due performance ofinspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of the tradb_^dj)f sd«ic^.^_^^^^ ^^ ^ ^
AMERICAN
WEST-
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
[phone]
Toll Free [phone],
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
K^^le F. Gross:
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
INORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
Client: IndustriaHealthlncorporated
ProjectID: Anderson Auto/07E-7179
LabSamplelD: L79669-06
FieldSamplelD: C-l (@ 1-2'
CoUected: 8/29/20071:45:00 PM
Received: 8/30/2007
Contact: AmyFindley
Analytical Results Units
Date
Analyzed
Method Reporting Analytical
Used Limit Result
TotalRecoverable
PetroleumHydrocarbons
mg/kg-dry 9/5/2007 ii;35:00 AM .1664-SGT 180 <180
Report Date: 9/11/2007 Page 7 of 19
AU analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA. and RCRA arc performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pemnent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Pnvileges
of subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promolion or sale of any product or process, or in connection wilh tbe rr-publication of this report for
any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance ofinspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of the trade and ofscience.
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
INORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
Client: IndustrialHealthlncorporated
ProjectID: Anderson Auto/07E-7179
LabSamplelD: L79669-07
FieldSamplelD: PH-SS#l@4-5'
CoUected: 8/29,'2007 2:30:00 PM
Received: 8/30/2007
Contact: AmyFindley
Analytical Results Units
Date
Analyzed
Method Reporting Analytical
Used Limit Result
TotalRecoverable
PetroleumHydrocarbons
mg/kg-dry 9/5/2007 II;35:OO.'LM 1664-SGT 190 <190
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Report Date: 9/11/2007 Page 8 of 19
All analyses applicable to tbe CWA, SDWA, and RCRA arc perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges
of subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisemem, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for
any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance ofinspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of the trade and ofscience.
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
INORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
Client: IndustrialHealthlncorporated
ProjectID: AndersonAuto/07E-7179
LabSamplelD: L79669-08
FieldSamplelD: PH-SS#2 (g 4.5'
CoUected: 8/29/2007 3:30:00 PM
Received: 8/30/2007
Contact: AmyFindley
Analytical Results Units
Date
Analyzed
Method Reporting Analytical
Used Limit Result
TotalRecoverable
PetroleumHydrocarbons
mg/kg-dry 9/5/2007 ii:35;oo AM 1664-SGT 190 <190
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
I
I
Report Date: 9/11/2007 Page 9 of 19
Al! analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA. and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infomiation is located on the attached COC. Tnis repon is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Pnvileges
ofsubscquentuseof the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advenisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or m connection with the rc-publication of this report for
any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance ofinspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of the trade and ofscience.
INORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
CHent: IndustrialHealthlncorporated
ProjectID: AndersonAuto/07E-7179
LabSamplelD: L79669-09
Field SamplelD: PH-SS#3 @ 4.5'
CoUected: 8/29/2007 3:50:00 PM
Received: 8/30/2007
Contact: AmyFindley
Analytical Results Units
Date
Analyzed
Method Reporting Analytical
Used Limit Result
TotalRecoverable
PetroleumHydrocarbons
mg-lig-dry 9/5/2007 ii:35:00 AM 1664-SGT 180 330
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Report Date: 9/11/2007 Page 10 of 19
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, atid RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Penineat sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges
of subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction ofthisreportin connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any pixjduct or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this Teport for
any puipose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due perfonnance of inspection and/or analysis m good faith and according to the rules of the trade and ofscience.
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
ORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
CUent: IndustrialHealthlncorporated
ProjectID: Anderson Auto/07E-7179
LabSamplelD: L79669-01A
FieldSamplelD: C-2 (g 1-2'
CoUected: 8/28/20073:10:00PM
Received: 8/30/2007
AnalysisRequested: SW8260B/5030A
Analytical Results
Contact: AmyFindley
Units = mg/kg-dry
DilutionFactor= 2.5
Compound
Methyltert-butylether
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylenes,Total
Naphthalene
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr:4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr:Dibromo fluoromethane
Surr:Toluene-d8
Analyzed: 8/31/2007 7:41:00 AM
8260-S-MBTEXN
ReportingLimit
0.0061
0.0031
0.0061
0.0061
0.0061
0.0061
72-135
71-144
73-126
72-129
% Moisture
Analytical
Result
< 0.0061
0.0035
< 0.0061
< 0.0061
< 0.0061
< 0.0061
92.5
106
90.0
108
18
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Report Date: 9/11/2007 Page 11 of 19
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA. and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols Pertinent sampling information is localed on the attached COC. This report is provided for die exclusive use of the addressee. Pnvileges
ofsubscquentuseof the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advenisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the le-publication of this teport for
any purpose other than for the addressee wil] be granted only on contact. This company accepis no responsibility except for the due perfonnance ofinspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the mles of the trade and ofscience.
ORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: awal@awal-labs,com
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
CUent: IndustrialHealthlncorporated
ProjectID: Anderson Auto/07E-7179
LabSamplelD: L79669-02A
FieldSamplelD: C-2 @ 15-16'
CoUected: 8/28/20073:45:00PM
Received: 8/30/2007
AnalysisRequested: SW8260B/5030A
Analytical Results
Contact: AmyFindley
Units = mg/kg-dry
DilutionFactor= 2.51
Compound
Methyltert-butylether
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylenes,Total
Naphthalene
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr:4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr:Dibromofluoromethane
Surr:Toluene-d8
Analyzed: 8/31/2007 9:02:00 AM
8260-S-MBTEXN
ReportingLimit
0.0063
0.0031
0.0063
0.0063
0.0063
0.0063
72-135
71-144
73-126
72-129
% Moisture
Analytical
Result
< 0.0063
< 0.0031
< 0.0063
< 0.0063
< 0.0063
< 0.0063
99.3
97.8
92.8
100
20
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Report Date: 9/11/2007 Page 12 of 19
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on tbe attached COC. This trport is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges
of subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this teport for
any puipose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of the trade and ofscience.
ORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
lir\7lp F rrrncc
Laboratorv Director
CUent: IndustrialHealthlncorporated
ProjectID: AndersonAuto/07E-7179
LabSamplelD: L79669-03A
FieldSamplelD: C-3 @ 1-2'
CoUected: 8/29/2007 12:30:00 PM
Received: 8/30/2007
AnalysisRequested: SW8260B/5030A
Analytical Results
Contact: AmyFindley
Units = mg/kg-dry
DilutionFactor= 2.5
Compound
Methyltert-butylether
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylenes,Total
Naphthalene
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr;4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr:Dibromo fluoromethane
Surr:Toluene-d8
Analyzed: 8/31/2007 9:22:00 AM
8260-S-MBTEXN
ReportingLimit
0.0061
0.0031
0.0061
0.0061
0.0061
0.0061
72-135
71-144
73-126
72-129
% Moisture
Analytical
Result
< 0.0061
< 0.0031
< 0.0061
< 0.0061
< 0.0061
< 0.0061
93.6
104
91.4
104
18
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Report Date: 9/11/2007 Page 13 of 19
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA. and RCRA are perfonned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pettinent sampling information is located on the anached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges
ofsubsequenl use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this repon in coimection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication oflhis report for
any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contaci. This company accepts no lesponsibility except for the due perfonnance ofinspection and/or analysis in good faith and accordmg to the rules of the trade and ofscience.
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
ORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Client: IndustrialHealthlncorporated
ProjectID: Anderson Auto / 07E-7179
LabSamplelD: L79669-04A
FieldSamplelD: C-4 (g 1-2'
CoUected: 8/29/2007 1:25:00PM
Received: 8/30/2007
AnalysisRequested: SW8260B/5030A
Analytical Results
Contact: AmyFindley
Analyzed: 8/31/2007 10:22:00 A
8260-S-MBTEXN
Units = mg-Tcg-dry
DilutionFactor= 50
Compound
Methyltert-butylether
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylenes,Total
Naphthalene
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr:4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr:Dibromo fluoromethane
Surr:Toluene-d8
ReportingLimit
0.12
0.060
0.12
0.12
1.2
0.12
72-135
71-144
73-126
72-129
% Moisture:
Analytical
Result
0.33
2.2
6.5
14
120
6.5
87.7
99.0
84.4
98.8
17
* These analytes were obtained from a 1:500 dilution.
The MS & MSD for this batch were performed on this sample. Outliers were observed and attributed to matrix.
The LCS exhibited method control.
Sample required a methanol extraction that was performed by method 5035A (an improved version of the Utah
certified method 5035).
Report Date: 9/11/2007 Page 14 of 19
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA arc performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infomiation ts located on the attached COC. This repon is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges
of subsequem use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or m connection with the re-publication of this report for
any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for tbe due perfomiance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of the trade and ofscience.
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
ORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
CUent: IndustrialHealthlncorporated
ProjectID: Anderson Auto/07E-7179
LabSamplelD: L79669-05A
Field SamplelD: C-4 @ 6-7'
CoUected: 8/29/2007 1:20:00PM
Received: 8/30/2007
AnalysisRequested: SW8260B/5030A
Analytical Results
Contact: AmyFindley
Analyzed: 8/31/2007 12:22:00P
8260-S-MBTEXN
Units = mg/kg-dry
DilutionFactor= 50
Compound
Methyltert-butylether
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylenes,Total
Naphthalene
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr:4-Bromofiuorobenzene
Surr:Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: To luene-d8
ReportingLimit
0.12
0.061
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.12
72-135
71-144
73-126
72-129
% Moisture
Analytical
Result
0.26
0.41
0.98
4.9
36
2.9
80.8
97.5
79.3
102
18
Sample required a methanol extraction that was performed by method 5035A (an improved version of the Utah
certified method 5035).
Report Date: 9/11/2007 Page 15 of 19
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Pnvileges
of subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in coimection with the advenisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication oflhis report for
any purpose other than for the addressee *ill be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according lo the rules of the trade and ofscience.
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
ORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
CUent: IndustrialHealthlncorporated
ProjectID: Anderson Auto/07E-7179
LabSamplelD: L79669-06A
FieldSamplelD: C-l (g 1-2'
CoUected: 8/29/2007 1:45:00 PM
Received: 8/30/2007
AnalysisRequested: SW8260B/5030A
Analytical Results
Contact: AmyFindley
Units = mg/kg-dry
DilutionFactor= 2.51
Compound
Methyltert-butylether
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylenes,Total
Naphthalene
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr:4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr:Dibromofluoromethane
Surr:Toluene-d8
Analyzed: 8/31/20079:42:00AM
8260-S-MBTEXN
ReportingLimit
0.0062
0.0031
0.0062
0.0062
0.0062
0.0062
72-135
71-144
73-126
72-129
% Moisture:
Analytical
Result
< 0.0062
0.0058
0.020
0.025
0.12
< 0.0062
95.8
105
91.7
105
19
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Report Date: 9/11/2007 Page 16 of 19
All analyses applicable to die CWA. SDWA, and RCRA arc performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges
ofsubsequenl use of the name oflhis company or any member of ils staff, or reproduction oflhis report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publicalion oflhis repon for
any purpose other than for the addressee will be gramed only on contaci. This company accepis no responsibility except for the due performance of inspection and/or analysis in good failh and according to the rules of the trade and of science.
I
I
ORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
CUent: IndustrialHealthlncorporated
ProjectID: Anderson Auto / 07E-7179
LabSamplelD: L79669-07A
FieldSamplelD: PH-SS#1 (% 4-5'
CoUected: 8/29/2007 2:30:00PM
Received: 8/30/2007
AnalysisRequested: SW8260B/5030A
Analytical Results
Contact: AmyFindley
Units = mg/kg-dry
DilutionFactor= 2.51
Compound
Methyltert-butylether
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylenes,Total
Naphthalene
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr:4-Bromofl.uorobenzene
Surr:Dibromo fluoromethane
Surr:Toluene-d8
Analysed: 8/31/2007 10:02:00 A
8260-S-MBTEXN
ReportingLimit
0.0064
0.0032
0.0064
0.0064
0.0064
0.0064
72-135
71-144
73-126
72-129
% Moisture
Analytical
Result
< 0.0064
0.0086
< 0.0064
< 0.0064
0.0088
0.0096
94.7
106
93.8
102
21
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Report Date: 9/11/2007 Pagel7ofl9
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA. and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges
ofsubsequenl use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for
any purpose other than for the addressee will be gramed only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and accoiding to the mlcs of Ibc trade and ofscience.
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
ORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
CUent: IndustriaHealthlncorporated
ProjectID: AndersonAuto/07E-7179
LabSamplelD: L79669-08A
FieldSamplelD: PH-SS#2 (g 4.5'
CoUected: 8/29/2007 3:30:00PM
Received: 8/30/2007
AnalysisRequested: SW8260B/5030A
Analytical Results
Contact: AmyFindley
Units = mg/kg-dry
DilutionFactor= 2.5
Compound
Methyltert-butylether
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylenes,Total
Naphthalene
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr:4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr:Dibromofluoromethane
Surr:Toluene-d8
Analyzed: 9/4/2007 8:41:00PM
8260-S-MBTEXN
ReportingLimit
0.0064
0.0032
0.0064
0.0064
0.0064
0.0064
72-135
71-144
73-126
72-129
% Moisture
Analytical
Result
< 0.0064
0.0032
0.016
< 0.0064
0.017
< 0.0064
94.2
104
97.5
104
21
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Report Date: 9/11/2007 Page 18 ofl 9
All analyses applicable lo the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed m accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges
of subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in cotmection with the re-publicationof this report for
any purpose oilier than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of the trade and ofscience.
ORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Sah Lake City, UT
84115
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
CUent: IndustrialHealthlncorporated
ProjectID: Anderson Auto/07E-7179
LabSamplelD: L79669-09A
FieldSamplelD: PH-SS#3 (g 4.5'
CoUected: 8/29/2007 3:50:00 PM
Received: 8/30/2007
AnalysisRequested: SW8260B/5030A
Analytical Results
Contact: AmyFindley
Units = mg/kg-dry
DilutionFactor= 2.5
Compoimd
Methyltert-butylether
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylenes,Total
Naphthalene
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr:4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr:Dibromofluoromethane
Sun':Toluene-d8
Analyzed: 9/4/2007 10:19:00 PM
8260-S-MBTEXN
ReportingLimit
0.0062
0.0031
0.0062
0.0062
0.0062
0.0062
72-135
71-144
73-126
72-129
% Moisture
Analytical
Result
< 0.0062
< 0.0031
0.013
< 0.0062
0.014
< 0.0062
96.5
99.3
94.4
102
19
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Report Date: 9/11/2007 Page 19 ofl9
All analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infonnation is localed on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges
of subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this repon in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for
any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for tbe due performance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of the trade and of science.
J
i)o
c:
E
E p
o o
^
o
^ <
o
IU
<
ae
5
o
a,
B
JJ
F
Vi
1
U
o
e
S
PH
o
o
m
^ OJ
" i a
fc
o
O
©
o
O
O
O
O
e." D
O
©
H
CO
S
o ti o o
o
S
C!
Ci C! C!
ON
<
ON
I
I
II
CM *^
O
CM
I3N
ON
t^
<u
s o
tl!
<
©
O
li: o o o o
O O
o s
I
I
I
I i
I
o
I §
" CJ
C!
o o
C!
I
i
I
>1
a
B
E
n t/)
O
^j
Ow
o
o o
.—t
3
Q i—(
c
.2i
U
n\
t-
[13
o
q
b <
g
tl
-Z^ u
u
0-
^^ C)
cy
"^
15
u cy
IA
c
a>
s
o
U
©
\7''' r^-N
c^
I
i
*
1
f
1 I
I
I
I
o
10
00
^
i
I
I
A
AMERICAN
_WEST;
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES:
463 West 3600 South!
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
September 10, 2007
Amy Findley
Industrial HeaUh Incorporated
640 East Wilmington Avenue
Salt Lake City, UT 84106
TEL: [phone]
FAX [phone]
RE: Anderson Auto / 07E-7179
Dear Amy Findley:
Lab Set ID: L79670
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
j email: [e-mail];
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
American West Analytical Labs received 5 samples on 8/30/2007 for the analyses presented in
the following report.
All analyses were performed in accordance to National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation
Program (NELAP) protocols unless noted otherwise. If you have any questions or concerns
regarding this report please feel free to caU. The abbreviation "Surr" found in organic reports
indicates a surrogate compound that is intentionally added by the laboratory to determine sample
injection, extraction and/or purging efficiency.
Thank you.
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Approved by:
Laboratory Director or designee
Report Date: 9/10/2007 Page 1 of 11
.Wl analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA arc performed in acconiance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling rnformation is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the
addressee. Privileges of subsequent use of the name of this company orany member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection
with the re-publication of this report for any purpose other than for the adtiressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith
and according to the rules of the trade and ofscience.
AMERICAN
WEST;
ANALYTICAL;
LABORATORIES".
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT:
84115
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone];
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer^
INORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
CUent: IndustrialHealthlncorporated
ProjectID: AndersonAuto/07E-7179
LabSamplelD: L79670-01
FieldSamplelD: MW-1
CoUected: 8/30/200712:40:00 PM
Received: 8/30/2007
Contact: AmyFindley
Analytical Results Units
Date
Analyzed
Method
Used
Reporting
Limit
Analytical
Result
TotalRecoverable
PetroleumHydrocarbons
mg/L 8/31/2007 10:35:00 AM 1664ASGT 3.0 3.8
Report Date: 9110/2007 Page 2 of 11
All analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA. and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertment sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges
of subsequent use of the name of thii; company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publicanon of this repon for
any purpose other than for the addressee wilt be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance ofinspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the mles of the trade and ofscience.
INORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
CUent: IndustrialHealthlncorporated
ProjectID: Anderson Auto/07E-7179
Contact: AmyFindley
LabSamplelD: L79670-02
AMERICAN
WEST;
[ ANALYTICAL;
[ LABORATORIES i
, 463 West 3600 South •
i Salt Lake City, UTi
1 84115;
FieldSamplelD: MW-2
CoUected: 8/29/2007 2:20:00 PM
Received: 8/30/2007
Analytical Results Units
TotalRecoverable
PetroleumHydrocarbons
mg/L
Date
Analyzed
9/4/2007 3:05:00 PM
Method
Used
1664ASGT
Reporting
Limit
3.0
Analytical
Result
3.5
[phone]?
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director |
Peggy McNicol:
QA Officer;
Report Date: 9/10/2007 Page 3 of 11
All analyses applicable to the CWA SDWA, and RCRA arc performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges
ofsubsequenl use of the name of this company orany member of irs staff, or reproduction of this report in coimection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or piDcess, or in cotmection with the re-publication of this report for
any puipose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due perfonnance of inspection and/or analysis in good feith and according to the rules of the trade and ofscience.
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
[phone]^
Toll Free [phone]^
j Fax [phone]^
email: [e-mail]
Kvle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
INORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
CUent: IndustrialHealthlncorporated
ProjectID: AndersonAuto/07E-7179
LabSamplelD: L79670-03
FieldSamplelD: MW-3
CoUected: 8/29/2007 2:44:00 PM
Received: 8/30/2007
Contact: AmyFindley
Analytical Results Units
Date
Analyzed
Method Reporting Analytical
Used Litrdt Result
TotalRecoverable
PetroleumHydrocarbons
mg/L 9/4/2007 3:05:00 PM 1664ASGT 3.0 3.3
QA Officer
Report Date: 9/10/2007 Page 4 of 11
Ail analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC piotocols. Penincnt sampling infoimation is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges
of subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this repoit in connection with the advenisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication oflhis report for
any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no lesponsibility except for the due performance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the mles of the ttade and of science.
A
AMERICAN
WEST:
ANALYTICAL i
LABORATORIES:
463 West 3600 South:
SaltLakeCity, UT;
84115;
[phone]j
Toll Free (888) 263-86861
Fax [phone];
email: [e-mail] '
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director;
INORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
CUent: IndustrialHealthlncorporated
ProjectID: AndersonAuto/07E-7179
LabSamplelD: L79670-04
FieldSamplelD: MW^
CoUected: 8/30/2007 11:45:00 AM
Received: 8/30/2007
Contact: AmyFindley
I
I
Analytical Results Units
Date
Analyzed
Method Reporting Analytical
Used Limit Result
TotalRecoverable
PetroleumHydrocarbons
mg/L 9/4/2007 3:05:00 PM 1664ASGT 3.0 3.5
Peggy McNicoF
QA Officer;
Report Date: 9/10/2007 Page 5 of 11
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are perfomned in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges
of subsequent use of the name of this company orany member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in cotmection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for
any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due perfomiaiue of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of the trade and ofscience.
CUent: IndustrialHealthlncorporated
ProjectID: Anderson Auto/07E-7179
LabSamplelD: L79670-05
INORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
Contact: AmyFindley
AMERICAN FieldSamplelD: MW-5
WEST CoUected: 8/'30/200711:08:00 AM
ANALYTICAL; Received: 8/30/2007
LABORATORIES
Analytical Results Units
Date Method Reporting Analytical
Analyzed Used Limit Result
TotalRecoverable
463 West 3600 South PetroleumHydrocarbons
mg/L 9/4/2007 3:05:00 PM 1664ASGT 3.0 6.7
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
1 [phone]
I Toll Free [phone]
j Fax [phone]:
1 email: [e-mail]
1 Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Report Date: 9/10/2007 Page 6 of 11
All analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA. and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling infomiation is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges
ofsubsequenl use of the name of this company or any memba of its staff, or reproduction of this report in catuicction wiih the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in cotmection with the re-publication of this report for
any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance of inspeclion and/or analysis in good faith and accordmg to the rules of the trade and of science.
Jr"%.
ORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
AMERICAN:
WEST^
ANALYTICAL,
LABORATORIES:
CUent: IndustrialHealthlncorporated
ProjectID: Anderson Auto/07E-7179
LabSamplelD: L79670-01A
FieldSamplelD: MW-1
CoUected: 8/30/2007 12:40:00PM
Received: 8/30/2007
AnalysisRequested: SW8260B/5030B
Analytical Results
Contact: AmyFindley
463 West 3600 South;
Units = mg/L
DilutionFactor= 1
Salt Lake City, UT • Compound
84115-
[phone];
Toll Free [phone];
Fax [phone];
email: [e-mail]'
Kyle F. Gross,
[^ Laboratory Director
Methyltert-butylether
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylenes,Total
Naphthalene
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr:4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr; Dibromofluoromethane
Surr:Toluene-d8
Analysed: 8/31/20077:05:00AM
8260-W-MBTEXN
ReportingLimit
0.0020
0.0010
0.0020
0.0020
0.0020
0.0020
81-143
85-115
80-124
88-120
Analytical
Result
< 0.0020
< 0.0010
< 0.0020
< 0.0020
< 0.0020
< 0.0020
102
97.3
96.4
98.5
Peggy McNicol •
QA Officer:
Report Date: 9/10/2007 Page 7 of H
All analyses applicable to the CWA SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pemnent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges
of subsequent use of the name of this company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this repon in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any produci or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for
any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due perfonnance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the mles of the trade and of science.
ORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
CUent: IndustrialHealthlncorporated
ProjectID: AndersonAuto/07E-7179
LabSamplelD: L79670-02A
FieldSamplelD: MW-2
CoUected: 8/29/2007 2:20:00PM
Received: 8/30/2007
AnalysisRequested: SW8260B/5030B
Analytical Results
Contact: AmyFindley
Units = mg/L
DLlutionFactor= 1
Compound
Methyltert-butylether
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylenes,Total
Naphthalene
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr:4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surt:Dibromofluoromethane
Surr:Toluene-d8
Analyzed: 8/31/2007 7:26:00 AM
8260-W-MBTEXN
ReportingLimit
0.0020
0.0010
0.0020
0.0020
0.0020
0.0020
81-143
85-115
80-124
88-190
Analytical
Result
< 0.0020
0.011
< 0.0020
< 0.0020
< 0.0020
< 0.0020
104
95.7
97.6
96.5
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Report Date: 9/10/2007 Page 8 of 11
All analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA. and RCRA are performed m accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges
of subsequent use of the name of this company orany member of Us staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any producT oi process, or in connctuon with there-publication of this repon for
any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of the trade and of science.
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
ORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
CUent: IndustrialHealthlncorporated
ProjectID: Anderson Auto/07E-7179
LabSamplelD: L79670-03A
FieldSamplelD: MW-3
CoUected: 8/29/2007 2:44:00PM
Received: 8/30/2007
AnalysisRequested: SW8260B/5030B
Analytical Results
Contact: AmyFindley
Analyzed: 8/31/2007 7:46:00 AM
8260-W-MBTEXN
Units = mg/L
DilutionFactor= 1
Compound
Methyltert-butylether
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
XyleneSjTotal
Naphthalene
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr:4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr:Dibromo fluoromethane
Surr:Toluene-d8
ReportingLimit
0.0020
0.0010
0.0020
0.0020
0.0020
0.0020
81-143
85-115
80-124
88-120
Analytical
Result
< 0.0020
0.022
< 0.0020
< 0.0020
< 0.0020
< 0.0020
104
94.3
95.5
96.4
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Report Date: 9/10/2007 Page 9 of 11
All analyses applicable to the CWA. SDWA. and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent samplmg information is located on the attached COC This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges
of subsequent use ofthe name of this company orany memberof its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-pubhcation of this report for
any purpose other than for tbe addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance of inspection and/or analysis in good feith and according to tbe rules of the trade and of science.
ORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
CUent: IndustrialHealthlncorporated
ProjectID: AndersonAuto/07E-7179
LabSamplelD: L79670-04A
FieldSamplelD: MW-4
CoUected: 8/30/2007 11:45:00 AM
Received: 8/30/2007
AnalysisRequested: SW8260B/5030B
Analytical Results
Contact: AmyFindley
Units = mg/L
DilutionFactor= 1
Compound
Methyltert-butylether
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
XyleneSjTotal
Naphthalene
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr:4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr:Dibromofluoromethane
Surt:Toluene-d8
Anal^^ed: 8/31/2007 8:06:00AM
8260-W-MBTEXN
ReportingLimit
0.0020
0.0010
0.0020
0.0020
0.0020
0.0020
81-143
85-115
80-124
88-120
Analytical
Result
0.0073
0.013
< 0.0020
< 0.0020
< 0.0020
< 0.0020
105
96.2
96.8
96.6
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Report Date: 9/10/2007 Page 10 of 11
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA. and RCRA are performed in accordance lo NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges
ofsubsequent useofihenameofthis company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advertisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with the re-publication of this report for
any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contaci. This company accepts no respoiuibility except for the due performance of inspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of the trade and ofscience.
A
AMERICAN
WEST
ANALYTICAL
LABORATORIES
463 West 3600 South
Salt Lake City, UT
84115
ORGANIC ANALYSIS REPORT
[phone]
Toll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
email: [e-mail]
Kyle F. Gross
Laboratory Director
CUent: IndustrialHealthlncorporated
ProjectID: Anderson Auto/07E-7179
LabSamplelD: L79670-05A
FieldSamplelD: MW-5
CoUected: 8/30/2007 11:08:00AM
Received: 8/30/2007
AnalysisRequested: SW8260B/5030B
Analytical Results
Contact: AmyFindley
Anal>^ed: 8/31/2007 8:26:00 AM
8260-W-MBTEXN
Units = mg/L
DilutionFactor= 1
Confound
Methyltert-butylether
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylenes,Total
Naphthalene
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Surr:4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr:Dibromo fluoromethane
Surr:Toluene-d8
ReportingLimit
0.0020
0.0010
0.0020
0.0020
0.0020
0.0020
81-143
85-115
80-124
88-120
Analytical
Result
< 0.0020
< 0.0010
< 0.0020
< 0.0020
< 0.0020
< 0.0020
105
95.8
96.5
96.2
Peggy McNicol
QA Officer
Report Date: 9/10/2007 Page 11 of 11
All analyses applicable to the CWA, SDWA, and RCRA are performed in accordance to NELAC protocols. Pertinent sampling information is located on the attached COC. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. Privileges
of subsequent use of Che name of tMs company or any member of its staff, or reproduction of this report in connection with the advenisement, promotion or sale of any product or process, or in connection with Ihe rc-publica
any purpose other than for the addressee will be granted only on contact. This company accepts no responsibility except for the due performance of mspection and/or analysis in good faith and according to the rules of the trade and ofscience.
I
I
I
I
O
t--Mi •
Ch
t>-
1-^
I.
u '2 o
I
w
•3 c
^ 5 c o U H
O O' o o o
H
oa
S
CO
IS
CQ CQ
s
H
CQ
2
o o o. o § o o
[I. D O
I
1
I
0
CJ Q
I
lj
I
I
I
I
I
I
e o
a^
on-
s
(Zl
d
o
< C
i I
.9 <
4-> u a
<" o" 6
U fe u
o
£3
g
g
g
e
a.
e a cc
?
2
a <
I—1
•9
m CQ CQ
CL
,-1 UJ LJ :J
I
J
i IK
01
Cfl
a
A^
§ ^
(D -O
a in
CJ
•^ >.
en rt
i ^ H "
"O »-
c x: i ?
j_:
i3
o
a
u
(/}
ca
s
CQ
: I • '
u
g
m
;z$«—
PH
PH X
PW
o
CO
\
•g
o
tv
o
r<i( *^
o ^
n.
c
CO
o.,;g
S3: L^ = 0,0
Q. C3lS E £ o §2X1
" ni 0) '
.i-.S
J2 •« w
H H
SO > IU
.tj T3 ra
IO CQ .
(0 CO O
3 3*; 000 Q. Q. Q
m :3 o -S
°-r o "•
• E T5S5 S
H) i. ro .2.
OS t^ t/3 -O
£••= te «
"•=1 E 'J OJ tt
w J5 J5 cff
±: LL. 0. 03
1- CM « TC Ul (O r~

Professional Engineering Services ~ Geotechnical Engineering ~ Geologic Studies ~ Code Inspections ~ Special Inspection / Testing ~ Non-Destructive Examination ~ Failure Analysis

1497 West 40 South
Lindon, Utah - 84042
Phone [phone]

840 West 1700 South, #10
Salt Lake City, Utah - 84104
Phone [phone]

1596 W. 2650 S. #108
Ogden, Utah - 84401
Phone [phone]

SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION REVIEW
ANDERSON AUTO WRECKING PROPERTY
1215 NORTH STATE STREET (SR-51)
SPANISH FORK, UTAH

Project No. 208290

February 4, 2021

Prepared For:

Lonestar Builders
P.O. Box 887
Springville, UT 84663

Prepared By:

EARTHTEC ENGINEERING
Lindon Office

1497 West 40 South
Lindon, Utah - 84042
Phone [phone]

840 West 1700 South #10
Salt Lake City, Utah - 84104
Phone [phone]

1596 W. 2650 S. #108
Ogden, Utah - 84401
Phone [phone]

Professional Engineering Services ~ Geotechnical Engineering ~ Geologic Studies ~ Code Inspections ~ Special Inspection / Testing ~ Non-Destructive Examination ~ Failure Analysis

February 4, 2021

Lonestar Builders
Attention: Mr. Joseph Earnest
P.O. Box 887
Springville, UT 84663

Re: Subsurface Investigation Review
Anderson Auto Wrecking Property
1215 North State Street (SR-51)
Spanish Fork, UT
Job No.: 208290

INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this letter is to summarize a review of data from a subsurface investigation of soil
and groundwater conducted by the Utah Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), Division of
Environmental Response and Remediation (DERR) on the subject property in Spanish Fork,
Utah.

BACKROUND
The subject property, Anderson Auto Wrecking Company (Anderson) property is a
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) site located
in Spanish Fork, Utah. The site is managed by the Federal Superfund Enterprise Management
System (SEMS). The Anderson site operated as an auto-salvage yard from 1979 to 2018.
Historical site investigations raised environmental concerns with surface staining associated with
a car crushing area, a petroleum product above ground storage tank (AST), stockpiles of engine
parts and batteries, and unlabeled drums of unknown wastes and fluids. Several subsurface
investigations have been conducted at the site, including soil and groundwater sampling. The
most recent sampling event at the Anderson site, based on a 2015 Site Investigation Work Plan,
was conducted in 2018. The DERR is currently in the process of reviewing the analytical data
from the samples and releasing an investigation report. Contacts at the division have not
committed to a release date of that report. However, the DERR released the raw analytical data
to Earthtec Engineering for review purposes only. The division explicitly stated that the released
data had not been reviewed by them and thus they offer no opinions or conclusions concerning
the application of the data. In addition, the DERR provided a map of sampling locations associated
with the investigation.
Subsurface Investigation Review Page 2
Anderson Auto Wrecking Property
1215 North State Street (SR-51), Spanish Fork, UT
February 4, 2021
Job No: 208290
Professional Engineering Services ~ Geotechnical Engineering ~ Geologic Studies ~ Code Inspections ~ Special Inspection / Testing ~ Non-Destructive Examination ~ Failure Analysis
SAMPLING
Information provided by the DERR indicates both soil (SB) and groundwater (GW) samples were
collected at nine locations during the event (designated as 01 and 03 through 10), with 01 located
off-site to provide “background” levels. The samples were analyzed for the following.
•Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
•Semi-volatile Organic Compounds (SVOCs)
•Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
•Pesticides
•Metals – U.S. EPA Target Analyte List (TAL) metals (with the exception of Mercury)
making 22 in total.
Aluminum, Antimony, Arsenic, Barium, Beryllium, Cadmium, Calcium, Chromium,
Cobalt, Copper, Iron, Lead, Magnesium, Manganese, Mercury, Nickel, Potassium,
Selenium, Silver, Sodium, Thallium, Zinc
Information provided by the DERR shows that sampling location AAWC-04 (with the designations
of SB-04 for soil and GW-04 for groundwater) was located on the southwestern area of the
subject property on the southern property boundary (see the attached map).
REVIEW AND CONCLUSIONS
The analytical levels reported were compared to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Regional Screening Levels (RSL) for residential soils, Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCL) for
drinking water standards, and Reference Dose Screening Concentration (RDSC) for water
(values taking from the Superfund Chemical Data Matrix, August 2017).
I) AAWC-SB-04 (soil): Analytical results indicate the following.
No VOCs, PCBs or common pesticides were detected above regulatory limits or
background levels in the soil at the sampling location.
One SVOC, dimethyl phthalate, was detected at a level of 450 mg/kg. The EPA has not
established an RSL for this substance, classifying it as a Group D, not classifiable as to
human carcinogenicity. The background level for in the area is 290 µg/kg, which is below
the reported level at SB-04. One possible use of dimethyl phthalate on the subject property
Subsurface Investigation Review Page 3
Anderson Auto Wrecking Property
1215 North State Street (SR-51), Spanish Fork, UT
February 4, 2021
Job No: 208290

Professional Engineering Services ~ Geotechnical Engineering ~ Geologic Studies ~ Code Inspections ~ Special Inspection / Testing ~ Non-Destructive Examination ~ Failure Analysis

would have been as an insect repellant (e.g. flies, mosquitoes). The level at SB-04 is the
lowest of all the sampled levels during the Utah DERR investigation (the highest being
750 mg/kg at AAWC-SB-03, which is located to the north and downgradient from SB-04).

One TAL metal, arsenic, was detected at a level of 2.6 mg/kg, which is above the RSL of
0.68 mg/kg. However, due to deposits from ancient Lake Bonneville, the EPA and Utah
DEQ recognize that in general, natural occurring background levels of metals in Utah
exceed the EPA RSLs. Thus, the EPA and DEQ have adjusted (raised) the regulated
levels accordingly. Background levels of arsenic in Utah have been documented as high
as 30 mg/kg, which is well above the analytical results of SB-04. Although the level of
arsenic at SB-04 is below the adjusted regulatory level, the metal still poses a threat to
human health and should be addressed with an activity and use limitation (see
Recommendations section of this report).

II) AAWC GW-04 (groundwater): Analytical results indicate the following.

No VOCs, SVOCs, PCBs, or pesticides were detected above regulatory limits or
background levels in the groundwater at the sampling location.

Four TAL metals were detected at above background levels for the area: Calcium, Cobalt,
Magnesium, and Manganese. In each case, the EPA has not established an MCL for that
metal, and only two of the four have established RDSCs.

Calcium (no MCL or RDSC have been established)
Analytical result: 7.84E+04 g/L
Background level: 6.96E+04 g/L

Cobalt (no MCL)
Result: 7.7 g/L
Background: 3.6 g/L
RDSC: 4.0 g/L

Subsurface Investigation Review Page 4
Anderson Auto Wrecking Property
1215 North State Street (SR-51), Spanish Fork, UT
February 4, 2021
Job No: 208290

Professional Engineering Services ~ Geotechnical Engineering ~ Geologic Studies ~ Code Inspections ~ Special Inspection / Testing ~ Non-Destructive Examination ~ Failure Analysis

Magnesium (no MCL or RDSC)
Result: 1.63E+04 g/L
Background: 1.44E+04 g/L

Manganese (no MCL)
Result: 2.72E+03 g/L
Background: 1.27E+02 g/L
RDSC: 2.10E+03 g/L

Conclusion: As stated above, it should be noted that due to deposits from ancient Lake
Bonneville, the U.S. EPA and Utah DEQ recognize that in general, natural occurring levels
of metals in Utah exceed the MCLs. Thus, the EPA and DEQ have adjusted (raised) the
regulated levels accordingly with respect to background levels. Furthermore, in general,
elevated levels of metals in the groundwater can coincide with the elevated levels in the
soil at corresponding depths. Thus, elevated levels in the sampled groundwater are
expected. Without established MCLs for the four TAL metals listed above, it is difficult to
evaluate a level of environmental concern for the groundwater at AAWC GW-04. Concern
can be put in perspective by understanding that the EPA established the MCLs to protect
the public against consumption of drinking water contaminants that present a risk to
human health. It is our understanding that residents living in proposed structures on the
subject property will be connected to municipal water and will thus not be consuming the
groundwater.

RECOMMENDATIONS
Although below U.S. EPA and Utah DEQ adjusted regulated levels, high level of metals are
present in the soils and groundwater in the area (see background levels above) and thus most
likely on the subject property. In order to reduce, to the extent possible, health risks to humans
through access to the soil and/or groundwater, it is recommended that activity and land use
limitations be adopted, initiated, documented, and communicated for the property. For example,
restrictions could be placed on gardens planted in native soil, playgrounds constructed on native
soil, the construction of basements, and consumption of the groundwater. Preventative steps
could include covering the surface of the property with concrete and asphalt, importing topsoil in
Subsurface Investigation Review Page 5
Anderson Auto Wrecking Property
1215 North State Street (SR-51), Spanish Fork, UT
February 4, 2021
Job No: 208290

Professional Engineering Services ~ Geotechnical Engineering ~ Geologic Studies ~ Code Inspections ~ Special Inspection / Testing ~ Non-Destructive Examination ~ Failure Analysis

any landscaping areas, and prohibiting the installation of culinary water wells.

LIMITATIONS AND EXCLUSIONS OF WARRANTY
This review was performed using procedures and a level of diligence exercised by professional
consultants performing similar services in this area at this time. This report presents Earthtec
Engineering’s professional determinations, which are dependent upon information obtained
during performance of consulting service. Earthtec Engineering assumes no responsibility for
omissions or errors resulting from inaccurate information provided by outside sources. No
warranty or guarantee, expressed or implied, is made regarding the findings, conclusions, or
recommendations contained in this report. The limitations presented above supersede the
requirements or provisions of all other contracts or scopes of work, implied or otherwise, except
those stated or acknowledged herein.

We appreciate the opportunity to provide you with our services. We would be happy to provide
additional services or consultation as required. If you have any questions, please contact us at
your convenience [phone].

Respectfully,
EARTHTEC ENGINEERING

Chad Maughan Timothy A. Mitchell
Environmental Specialist Project Engineer
Utah Department of
Environmental Quality
Division of Environmental
Response and Remediation
Figure 5
Anderson Auto Wrecking Company
Proposed Sample Locations:
Groundwater, Soil, Surface Water and
Sediment
l2l5 North State Road 51, Spanish Fork,
State of Utah
Department of
Environmental Quality
Amanda Smith
Executive Director
GARY R. HERBERT
Governor
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL
RESPONSE AND REMEDIATION
SPENCER J. COX
Lieutenant Governor
Brent H. Everett
Director
ERRC-009-15
January 16, 2015
Mr. Ryan Dunham
U.S. EPA Region 8, 8EPR-AR
1595 Wynkoop Street
Denver, Colorado 80202-1129
RE: Final Site Investigation Work Plan for Anderson Auto Wrecking Company
Dear Mr. Dunham:
Enclosed for your review is the Final Site Investigation Work Plan for the Anderson Auto
Wrecking Company site located in Spanish Fork, Utah County, Utah. This final version
incorporates your requested edits based on the original draft work plan submitted in August, 2014.
If you have any questions or comments concerning the contents of the Work Plan, please contact
Christian M. Martin at [phone].
cc: Bryce Larsen, Division Director, Environmental Health, Utah County Health Department
(w/o enclosures)
Sincerely,
Dale T. Urban, P.G.
Site Assessment Section Manager
Division of Environmental Response and Remediation
DTU/CMM/ab
Enclosure
195 North 1950 West • Salt Lake City, UT
Mailing Address: P.O.Box 144840 • Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4840
Telephone [phone] • Fax [phone] • T.D.D. [phone]
www.deq.utah.gov
Printed on 100% recycled paper
SITE INVESTIGATION WORK PLAN
Anderson Auto Wrecking Company
Utah County, Utah
uTN000802773
Utah Department of Environmentat euality
Division of Environmental Response and Remediation
Prepared by: Christian M. Martin
SITE INVESTIGATION WORK PLAN
Anderson Auto Wrecking Company
Spanish Fork, Utah
uTN000802773
Prepared by: Christian M. Martin
Utah Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Environmental Response and Remediation
Date: *il,g
Approved: f 0, 1i 0&- Date: lll/,s
Dale T. Urban, UDEQ Site Assessment Sec.tion Manager
Date:,{7//}11/5
Christian M. Martin, UDEQ Project Manager
Ryan Dunham, Site Assessment Manager, EpA Region g
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.O
.......,............7
6.1 SOURCE SAMPLES ...,,.,,,,,,,,,..7
6,2 GROUNDWATER AND SOIL SAMP1ES............ ,,,,,,...,..7
6.3 SURFACE WATER AND SEDIMENT SAMP1ES........... ...................8
FIELD METHODS AND PROCEDURES .................8
7.1 SAMPLING METHODS
7.1.1 Groundwater and Soil Sample Collection ............9
7 .1.2 Surface Water and Sediment................ ...............9
7.1.3 Municipal and Private Drinking Water Well Samples...............................10
7,2 FIELD QUALITY CONTROL AND ASSURANCE PROCEDURES ..................... 1 O
7.2.1 Sample Numbering Procedures/Rationale .............10
5.0
6.0
7.0
Site lnvestigation Work Plan
Anderson Auto Wrecking Company
Utah DEQDERR
urN000802773
TABLE OF CONTENTS (continuedl
7.2.4 Analytical Parameters .'..'...........""' 11
7.3 INVESTIGATION DERIVED WASTE AND DECONTAMINATION............,,,......11
8.0 CONCEPT OF OPERATIONS ,,..,,..,,,,11
8.1 SCHEDULE ..........11
8.2 SAFETY ...........'.'.11
8.3 SITE ACCESS AND LOGISTICS ,....,..,.,,,,,12
9.0 DATA REDUCTION, VALIDATION, AND REPORTING............... ,,,,..,........12
1o.o REFERENCES.............. ......................12
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
LIST OF FIGURES
Site Location Map
Site Map
Site Map with Previous Sample Locations
Site Conceptual Modelfor Sampling Effort
Proposed Sample Locations: Groundwater, Soil, Surface Water and Sediment
Proposed Sample Locations: Municipal and Private Drinking Water Wells
LIST OF TABLES
Data Quality Objectives
Anderson Auto Wrecking Company Analytical Results for BTEXN
Anderson Auto Wrecking Company Analytical Results for Metals
Groundwater Sample Locations, Descriptions and Rationale
Soil Sample Locations, Descriptions and Rationale
Surface Water Sample Locations, Descriptions and Rationale
Sediment Sample Locations, Descriptions and Rationale
Sample Analyses Checklist
Table 1
Table 2
Table 3
Table 4a
Table 4b
Table 4c
Table 4d
Table 5
Appendix A Site Photograph Log
Appendix B Equipment List
LIST OF APPENDICES
Site lnvestigation Work Plan
Anderson Auto Wrecking Company
Utah DEQDERR
uTN000802773
TABLE OF GONTENTS (continued)
Appendix C Site Health and Safety Plan
Appendix D Consent for Access to Property Form
AAWC
ARR
AST
bgs
Bs
CERCLA
CLP
CRQL
CSM
DDW
DERR
DQO
DWR
EPA
ft2
Hr
IDW
MCL
mg/kg
mg/L
PA
PCB
PEE
PID
POD
LIST OF ACRONYMS
Anderson Auto Wrecking Company
Analytical Results Report
aboveground storage tank
below ground surface
Bramwell silty clay loam
Comprehensive Environmental Response, compensation, and Liability Act
Contract Laboratory Prog ram
Contract Required Quantitation Limit
ConceptualSite Model
Division of Drinking Water
Division of Environmental Response and Remediation
Data Quality Objectives
Division of Water Rights
U nited States E nvironmenta! Protection Agency
square feet
Holdaway silt loam
I nvestigation Derived Waste
Maximum Contaminant Level
milligrams per kilogram
milligrams per liter
Preliminary Assessment
poly-chlorinated biphenyl
Payson-Terrace escarpments complex
Photoionization Detector
Point of Diversion
Site lnvestigation Work Plan
Anderson Auto Wrecking Company
iii Utah DEQDERR
uTN000802773
TABLE QF CONTENTS (continued)
PPE prcbable point of entry
QAPP Quality Assurance Project Plan
QA/OC Quality Assurance/Quality Control
RAS routine analyticalservice
SARA Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act
SCDM Superfund Ghemical Data Matrix
Sl Site lnvestigation
UDEQ Utah Department of Environmental Quality
UDNR Utah Department of Natural Resources
USGS United States GeologicalSurvey
VCP Voluntary Gleanup Program
VOC Volatile Organic Compound
Site lnvestigation Work Plan
Anderson Auto Wred<ing Company
tv Utah DEQDERR
uTN000802773
1.0 INTRODUGTION
Under authority of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability
Act (CERCLA), as amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA),
and in accordance with applicable provisions of the National Contingency Plan, the Utah
Department of Environmental Quality (UDEO), Division of Environmental Response and
Remediation (DERR) has prepared this Work Plan as part of Site lnvestigation (Sl) activities at
the Anderson Auto Wrecking Company, UTN000802773, (herein referred to as the Site) located
in Spanish Fork, Utah County, Utah. This Sl was prepared under a cooperative agreement
between DERR and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8. The sampling
described in this Sl Work Plan will evaluate soil and groundwater contamination as well as
delineate possible exposure pathways and targets.
The DERR completed a Preliminary Assessment (PA) report for the Anderson Auto Wrecking
Company (UDEQ/DERR, 2011). lnformation used to prepare this Work Plan was obtained from
the PA report as well as from additional sources cited in Section 10.0.
2.0 OBJECTIVES
This Work Plan will provide a framework for data collection and sampling activities at the Site to
assess if historical activities caused a release of hazardous substances that pose a potential
threat to human health and the environment. Soil, groundwater, surface water and sediment
samples will be collected from both on-site and off-site locations to assess the presence of
volatile organic compounds (VOCs), ethylene glycol, metals (i.e. lead, arsenic, mercury), poly-
chlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and pesticides, if observed at the Site.
The objectives of this Sl are to:
. ldentiff potential source(s) of contamination.
o Determine the presence of contamination in selected media;
o Assess the potential contamination characteristics;
. Assess the potential routes for contaminant migration;
o Assess the suspected exposure pathways;
. ldentiff potential targets that may be affected by on-site contamination as well as other
targets that may be impacted by the contaminant migration via the suspected exposure
pathways; and
o Determine if continued assessment under CERCLA is warranted.
3.0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION
The following is a discussion of the Site location, history, and physical conditions at the Site.
Site lnvestigation Work Plan
Anderson Auto Wrecking Company
Utah DEQ/DERR
uTN000802773
3.1 SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
The Site is located al 1215 North State Road 51, Spanish Fork, Utah (Figure 1). The
geographical coordinates for the Site ate 40" 07'36" North Latitude and 111" 37' 33" West
Longitude. The Site is located in the west quarter of Section '17, Township 8N, Range 3E,
Springville Quadrangle (USGS, 1 999).
The Site consists of approximately 10 acres of land in an L-shape along State Road 51. The
Site is currently a salvage yard for old vehicles, trailers, tires, engines, scrap-metal and vehicle
parts. The current owner and operator lives in a residence on the Site, and salvage operations
occur on the back portion of the Site (Figure 2). A large wall located on the eastern portion of
the Site generally blocks views of the salvage operations for motorist traveling along State Road
51. The Site has significant debris including several drums scattered across the Site during the
DERR 2007, 2OOg and 2013 site visits. The owner purchased the drums empty. Engine parts
are stored in some of the drums. The Site has storage sheds containing gasoline cans, engine
wastes, and paint, as well as miscellaneous debris.
A car crushing station used to crush cars and other metallic debris is located on the southern
portion of the yard. A small wood frame office is located near the crusher. An artesian well is
located on the northeastern portion of the Site. The well discharges water into a drainage ditch,
which runs along the northern and eastern Site boundary. Two aboveground storage tanks
(ASTs) located on the eastern portion of the Site in 2007 were not present during the 2009 site
visit. Other historic areas of operation, such as engine breaking areas and storage areas for
batteries, radiators, and engine blocks were also reported to have existed on the Site, although
the locations were unclear (lHl Environmental, 2007a). Batteries and engine blocks located on
the ground scattered across the Site were also present during the DERR's 2007 site visit.
Stained soil located on the southern and northern portions of the Site were present during all of
the visits (Figure 3).
Surrounding properties include a self-storage lot, equipment storage yards, historic landfills and
warehouses. A portion of the former Springville Landfill is located under the northwest comer of
the Site. Open fields are located to the immediate northwest of the Site (Figure 2). Residences
are located along State Road 51 and across the street from the Site. Elevation at the Site is
approximately 4,600 feet above mean sea level, and surface topography of the Site slopes to
the west and northwest (lHl Environmenlal, 2007a). The Site is generally fenced around the
perimeter, but much of the fence is in disrepair potentially allowing access to the Site. There
are 4,982 residents living within one mile of the Site and 47,688 residents within four miles of
the Site.
3.2 SITE HISTORY AND PREVIOUS WORK
A residential home built in 1911 is located on the south portion of the Site. Historical use of the
Site prior to that time is unknown, but was likely for agricultural purposes based on the location.
ln 1979, Aldon Anderson acquired the Site, which was at that time undeveloped (lHl
Environmenlal, 2007a). The auto-salvage yard commenced operations within a year of the
propefi purchase and has continued to the present. Anderson Auto Salvage currently operates
under a three-year business license (Anderson, 2009). The northern five acres of the Site were
sold to Granite Bail Bonds in 2009 (Anderson, 2009). lt is important to note that a number of
landfills have operated near the Site, including the Spanish Fork Landfill, Springville Landfill and
the Utah County Landfi!!. These three landfills comprise the Spanish Fork Landfill CERCLIS Site
(UTN00962138), with the Springville Landfill property adjacent to the west side of the Anderson
Site lnvestigation Work Plan
Anderson Auto Wrecking Company
Utah DEQ/DERR
uTN000802773
Auto property. Landfill activity in the area continued until 1991. Based on all available
information, no liners were installed, although the landfills were covered with a clay cap (lHl
E nvi ro n me n tal, 20Ol a).
3.3 PHYSICAL GONDITIONS
The following is a discussion of the Site hydrogeology, hydrology, geology, and meteorology.
3.3.1 Hydrogeology
The Site is located in Utah Valley with Utah Lake is at its center surrounded by mountains. The
valley has three subareas: Northern Utah Valley, Southern Utah Valley, and Goshen Valley.
The Site is located in the center of the Southern Utah Valley. There are four aquifers in the
basin-fill deposits of the Southern Utah Valley sub area: a shallow unconfined aquifer; a shallow
artesian aquifer; a deep artesian aquifer in Pleistocene deposits; and an artesian aquifer in
deposits of early Quaternary or Tertiary age. The aquifer system extends to the Southern Utah
Valley sub area but becomes difficult to distinguish. The deep artesian aquifers are the principal
use aquifers for Utah Valley. Aquifer tests in southern Utah Valley indicate the confined
aquifers are leaky, which is indicative of discontinuous confining layers. The primary recharge
area for the confined aquifer is near the mountain fronts. There are no substantial layers of clay
and fine-grained deposits near the mountain fronts to inhibit the downward movement of water.
The secondary recharge areas exist between the primary recharge and discharge areas where
there is leakage from the shallow unconfined groundwater aquifer. The leakage occurs where
there is a downward vertical hydraulic gradient and thin and/or discontinuous layers of confining
material. The Site is located within the secondary recharge area (Anderson et al., 1994).
Based on topography, groundwater is inferred to flow to the northwest toward the center of the
valley and Utah Lake. Depth to groundwater is not consistent across the Site based on
observations and measurements completed as part of the Phase ll Supplemental Subsurface
lnvestigation. The depth to groundwater increases from 3 to 4.5 feet on the western portion of
the site to about 16.5 feet bgs on the eastern portion of the Site near MW-1. ln monitoring well
MW-s, near the crusher, a water-producing lens was observed at about 9 feet bgs; however, the
boring was advanced to 24 feet bgs before groundwater fully infiltrated. Later, groundwater was
measured at 5 feet bgs within the casing indicating the potential presence of a confining layer
(lHl Environmental, 2007c). The inconsistency of the water table depth may be the result of
localized perched aquifers or artesian flow from deeper confined aquifers (RB&G Engineering,
lnc., 1988). This would be consistent with the fact that the Site has a flowing well with water
right 51-2923.
3.3.2 Hydrology
Utah Valley is a nearly closed system where precipitation collects in the mountains surrounding
the valley and drains towards Utah Lake in the center of the valley. Utah Lake has only one
outlet, the Jordan River, at its northern end (FEMA, 1982).
The Site itself is relatively flat with a slope to the northwest. There are two drainage ditches on
the east and west boundary of the northern portion of the Site. The east ditch drains run-off
from an artesian well on the Site (lHl Environmental, 2O07a). The drainage ditch on the west
side of the Site was dry during the October 2013 site visit, but due to the northwest slope of
ground surface at the Site likely drains surface run-off during storms. A Site photograph log is
presented in Appendix A. Based on aerial photographs, it appears the east drainage ditch cuts
Site lnvestigation Work Plan
Anderson Auto Wrecking Company
Utah DEQ/DERR
uTN000802773
over to merge with the west drainage ditch to the north of the Site (Figure 2). lt is likely the
combined drainage flows to an intermittent stream of Dry Creek eventually reaching Dry Creek,
which is approximately 1.2-mile downgradient of the Site. Dry Creek flows to the northwest for
approximately three miles before reaching Utah Lake (UDEQ/DERR, 2011). Utah Lake is 5
miles downstream from the Site. The Site is not within the Utah County 100-year or 500-year
flood plain (FEMA, 1982).
There are freshwater emergent wetlands located north and west of the Site (Figure 1). lt is
possible groundwater is surfacing near the Site based on the shallow water table and nearby
wetlands.
3.3.3 Geology and Site Soils
Utah Valley is characterized by basin-fill stratigraphy consisting of interbedded alluvium and
lacustrine deposits of Tertiary and Quaternary age. The fill materials vary from coarse gravel,
prevalent along the mountain fronts, through fine-grained silts and clays more common further
from the mountains, toward Utah Lake (Clark and Appel, 1985).
Native soils at the Site are classified as Bramwell silty clay loam (Bs), Holdaway silt loam (Hr),
and Payson-Terrace escarpments complex (PEE) (NRCS, 2013).
o Bs soils are classified as somewhat poorly drained with slopes of 0 to 2 percent. Soils tend
to be very slightly to moderately saline with a depth to the restrictive feature more than 80
inches deep.
. Hr soils are classified as poorly drained with slopes of 0 to 3 percent. Soils are non-saline
with a depth to the restrictive feature such as a petrocalcic soil horizon ranging from 20 to 40
inches bgs.
. PEE soils are classified as moderately well drained with slopes of 1 to 3 percent. Soils are
slightly saline to moderately saline with the depth to the restrictive feature more than 80
inches bgs.
3.3.4 Meteorology
The Spanish Fork area experiences moderate winters and hot summers. The average daily
high temperature is 64.1o F and the average low is 38.7o F (Ashcroft et a!., 1992). The area, like
much of Utah, is semi-arid. The average annual precipitation is 16.47 inches. Most of this
precipitation occurs in March and April. July and August are typically the driest months of the
year. The highest intensity rainfall recorded in Spanish Fork occurred in July 1974 when 2.87
inches fell in a 24-hour period. Pan evaporation in the area averages 48.62 inches per year.
Wind conditions vary depending on the time of year and direction of storm fronts; however,
prevailing winds in the Utah Valley area blow from south to north (Brough et al., 1987). The Site
is a few miles away from the mouth of Spanish Fork Canyon, and may experience the effects of
canyon winds. Winds from the valley blow up the canyon to the south for a few hours in the
morning. Winds blow out of the canyon in a northem direction in the evening. The intensity of
these winds varies, and their effect at the Site may be negligible.
Site lnvestigation Work Plan
Anderson Auto Wrecking Company
Utah DEQ/DERR
uTN000802773
4.0 PRELIMINARY PATHWAY ANALYSIS
The following is a discussion of the Site waste source characterization and pathway analysis.
A Conceptual Site Model illustrated on Figure 4 shows the basis for sampling various media.
4.1 CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN
Contamination was first detected at the Site in July 2007 as part of a Phase ll Environmental
Assessment (lHl Environmental, 2007 b). Sample locations are shown on Figure 3. Lead and
benzene were detected in soil samples and arsenic and benzene were detected in groundwater
samples above screening levels. Lead concentrations reported in the soil ranged from 410
mg/kg to 520 mg/kg which is slightly above the EPA Regional Screening Level (RSL) for lead in
residential soils. Benzene was reported in soil at concentrations ranging from 0.0071 mg/kg to
2.3 mg/kg. The EPA RSL for benzene in residential soil is 1.1 mg/kg. Benzene reported in
groundwater samples ranged from 5.0 ug/L to 7.0 ug/L. A Supplemental Subsurface
lnvestigation Report noted benzene between 6.0 ug/L to 22.0 ugll in groundwater (lHl
Environmental, 2007 c). The EPA Superfund Chemical Data Matrix (SCDM) Drinking Water
Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) for benzene is 5.0 ug/L. Arsenic reported in groundwater
samples ranged from 7 .4 ug/L to 78 ug/L compared to an MCL of 10 ug/L. Historical analytical
results for contaminants are shown on Tables 2 and 3.
Soil staining and historic activity suggests contamination likely originated on the Site through
automotive salvage operations. Potential source areas could include the car crushing area,
engine block storage areas, known surface stains, the former AST areas, and battery storage
areas where battery acid could facilitate metals leaching into groundwater. lt is also possible
that the portion of the Site that contains historic landfill debris could also be a source.
Potential contaminants of concern include benzene, lead, and arsenic. Based on the history of
the Site, other contaminants are possible and could include oil and grease, mercury from the
possible storage of mercury switches, other metals, PCBs and pesticides.
4.2 SOIL PATHWAY ANALYSIS
There are approximately 47,688 people residing within 4 miles of the Site. The population
within one quarter of a mile of the Site is 77 based on the demographic analysis presented in
the Preliminary Assessment. The closest residential property is located on the Site. There is a
residential neighborhood with \Mispering Willows Park located east of the Site and commercial
properties adjoining the Site to the south. Rees Elementary School is located upgradient about
2,700leet south of the Site. The population in this area does not fluctuate substantially
throughout the day. The population of the cities, Spanish Fork and Springville, will increase
annually at an average rate of 2.9o/o and 2.4o/o, respectively (Mountainland AOG, 2013). lt is a
reasonable assumption that land use changes will occur along State Road 51 between these
two cities.
4.3 GROUNDWATER PATHWAY ANALYSIS
There are ?4 drinking water sources identified in the Utah Division of Drinking Water (DDW
database within four miles of the Site. Of these sources, 32 are active and 2 are inactive. The
wells serve four non-public and four public supply systems with a combined population of
approximately 55,974. The nearest active municipal drinking water well is located cross
gradient approximately one mile to the west and is part of the Spanish Fork City well system
Site lnvestigation Work Plan
Anderson Auto Wrecking Company
Utah DEQ/DERR
uTN000802773
(UDEQ/DDW,2013). Spanish Fork City owns other wells not within a municipal drinking water
system. The Preliminary Assessment has additional information on the drinking water sources
within four miles of the Site.
Data provided by the Utah Department of Natural Resources (UDNR), Division of Water Rights
(DWR) indicates that there are existing rights to 2,190 Points of Diversion (PODs) within a four-
mile radius of the Site. Of the 2,190 PODs,36 are listed as abandoned wells,2 are listed as
drains, one is listed as a spring, 43 are listed as river or creek re-diversions, 21 are returns, 74
are listed as surface PODs and the remaining 2,013 as underground. The underground PODs
are described as domestic, irrigation, stock watering, municipal, mining, power, or "othe/'
(UDNR/DWR, 2007). No contact was made with the owners of these underground PODs, so it
is unknown whether they are using the water for drinking water purposes. The Preliminary
Assessment has additional information on the locations of the PODs within four miles of the
Site.
Groundwater contamination in the shaliow groundwater at the Site is documented in a Phase ll
Subsurface lnvestigation Report. Benzene and arsenic exceeded screening levels in
groundwater samples collected from the Site (lHl Environmental,200T b). Analytical results are
reported on Tables 2 and 3. The source of the reported arsenic is unknown. lt is possible that
the benzene contamination originated from car crushing and engine removal activities, or from
the ASTs. Soil staining has been observed and may be a potential source of groundwater
contamination. Groundwater has not sampled near the historic storage areas for batteries,
engine blocks, and possible mercury switches.
All municipal wells within a four-mile radius of the Site are located upgradient from or cross
gradient to the Site. However, more characterization is necessary since the Site has not been
sufficiently evaluated and there are a number of PODs downgradient of the Site listed as being
used for culinary purposes (although this has not been independently evaluated).
4.4 SURFACE WATER PATHWAY ANALYSIS
Based on a review of water rights data, there are no surface water intakes within 15 miles
downstream of the Site (UDNR/DWR, 2013). There are two ditches and a pond near the north
property boundary of the Site which drain surface water runoff at the Site to Dry Creek located
downgradient about 1.2 miles. There are seasonal wetlands classified as Palustrine, Emergent,
and Seasonally Flooded approximately 200 yards north of the Site along lhe 1.2 mile stretch to
Dry Creek (USFW, 1990).
4.5 AIR EXPOSURE PATHWAY ANALYSIS
Anderson Auto Wrecking Company employs six people. The nearby Spanish Fork Landfill is
semi-active, as City workers and visitors drop off plant waste at the landfill. The owner/operator
of the salvage yard lives on the Site. ln addition, a residential subdivision is located east of the
Site along State Road 51 less than 300 yards away. A total of 77 people live within a quarter
mile of the Site and 47,688 people live within four miles of the Site (U.S. Census Bureau, 2010).
The risk is low for any contaminant volatilization into the ambient air and the subsequent
exposure via the air exposure pathway. The investigation will not include air sampling.
Site lnvestigation Work Plan
Anderson Auto Wrecking Company
Utah DEQ/DERR
uTN000802773
5.0 DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES
The Data Quality Objectives (DOO) process is utilized to identiff preliminary data gaps to the
Conceptualsite Model(CSM). The DQO process is a seven-step planning approach to develop
sampling designs for data collection activities that support decision making. DQOs are
qualitative and quantitative statements, developed using the DQO process, that clariff study
objectives, define the appropriate type of data, and speciff tolerable levels of potential decision
errors that will be used as the basis for establishing the quali$ and quantity of data needed to
support decisions as outlined in EPA's Guidance for the DQO Process. The DQO planning
approach for sampling at the Site is detailed on Table I and is illustrated by the CSM shown on
Figure 4.
6.0 SAMPLE LOCATIONS
The following is a discussion of sample locations and analysis. A description of the proposed
samples to be collected for the Site is included on Figure 5 and Figure 6 of this work plan. The
collection of environmental samples including groundwater, soil, surface water and sediment is
proposed for the Sl. The locations of these samples have been determined based on
knowledge of local groundwater flow from the probable source or sources, and from field
observations in 2013. A description of the planned sampling work for the Anderson Auto
Wrecking Company is included in the Tables section of this report. A summary of the
information presented in these Tables is as follows:
. Tables 4a, 4b, 4c and 4d show sample locations, descriptions, and rationale for
groundwater, soil, surface water and sediment, respectively.
. Table 5 is a sample analysis checklist that indicates the laboratory parameters for the
analyses of each sample.
6.1 SOURCE SAMPLES
There are clearly defined sources of contamination at the Site based on data collected from the
PA and other environmental investigations such as the Phase ll Subsurface lnvestigation
performed by lHl in 2007. A majority of the proposed sample locations are located to assess
the areas discussed below in the eastern and northwestern portions of the Site.
The eastern portion of the Site consists of the automobile crusher area surrounded by the
battery storage area (south), crushed car storage area (west), engine block storage area 1 and
2 (north) and miscellaneous part pull area (Figure 2). There are also four surface stain areas
ranging in size from approximately 35 square feet (ft'z) to 1,610 ft2 surrounding the automobile
crusher area.
The northwest portion of the Site consists of the aluminum / radiator storage area, engine block
storage area 3 and 4 and asphaltic tar-equipment storage area. There are also two surface
stain areas ranging in size from approximately 181 t( to 897 ft2 east of the aluminum / radiator
storage area (lHl Environmental, 2007c).
6.2 GROUNDWATER AND SOIL SAMPLES
The DERR will install eight borings for groundwater and soil sampling. Each boring location will
include collection of one groundwater and two soil samples (surface and subsurface soil) shown
Site lnvestigation Work Plan
Anderson Auto Wrecking Company
Utah DEQ/DERR
uTN000802773
on Figure 5. The pH of groundwater near the battery storage area will be assessed using test
strips. One background sample will be collected from the residential neighborhood east of the
Site. One field duplicate each for soil and groundwater and one equipment blank will be
collected for Quality Assurance/Quality Control (OA/OC) purposes. Additionally, two trip blanks
will be submitted for QA/QC purposes. One opportunity groundwater and soil sample will be
collected to determine potential source attribution. Groundwater and soil samples will be
analyzed for VOCs, ethylene glycol, PCBs/pesticides and total metals.
Three drinking water well samples, as shown on Figure 6, will be collected from municipal and
private drinking water wells to determine whether hazardous substances have been released to
groundwater and whether the release has impacted drinking water supplies. One upgradient
municipalwell sample (AAWC-11) will be collected as a background sample. The downgradient
private drinking water well sample (AAWC-I2) will be collected southeast of the Site. One
private drinking water well sample (AAWC-13) will be collected from the Site. One field
duplicate will be collected for QA/QC purposes. The municipal drinking water well samples will
be analyzed for VOCs, SVOCs, PCBs/pesticides and total metals. Tables 4a and 4b
summarize the proposed groundwater and soil sample analyses, location and rationale.
6.3 SURFACE WATER AND SEDIMENT SAMPLES
The DERR will collect three surface water and sediment samples to determine whether a
release to surface water has occurred as a result of the Site operations, and whether a release
has impacted surface water targets. Proposed sampling locations are shown on Figure 5. The
pH will also be evaluated for groundwater samples to determine any significant contrast in Site
conditions. One field duplicate will be collected from surface water and sediment for QA/QC
purposes. One opportunity surface water and sediment sample will be collected in the event
that a seep or other obvious drainage course is identified that might indicate a probable point of
entry (PPE) for contaminants to enter the irrigation ditch and/or pond. Surface water and
sediment samples will be analyzed for VOCs, ethylene glycol, PCBs/pesticides and total metals.
Tables 4c and 4d summarize the proposed surface water and sediment sample analyses,
location and rationale.
7.0 FIELD METHODS AND PROCEDURES
The following is a discussion of field procedures and includes sampling methods, field QA/QC
procedures, and investigation-derived waste.
7.1 SAMPLING METHODS
Sampling will proceed according to methods outlined in the DERR CERCLA Quality Assurance
Project Plan (QAPP) of September,2Ol l (as amended in September, 20'14) and other relevant
EPA guidance documents. All sampling events will be documented in a field logbook. An
equipment list is presented in Appendix B.
Sample locations are selected based on areas suspected to be contaminated by VOCs,
ethylene glycol, PCBs/pesticides and total metals identified from previous sampling events
and/or known operations conducted at the Site. Sample locations may have to be adjusted in
the field due to utilities or other Site conditions that make the proposed sampling point
inaccessible. Deviations from this Work Plan will be carefully documented in the field notes by
the Project Manager and noted in the Sl Analytical Results Report (ARR).
Site lnvestigation Work Plan
Anderson Auto Wrecking Company
UIah DEQ/DERR
uTN000802773
Each sample will be labeled after collection with the sample identification number, date, and
time of sample collection. All samples will then be placed in an ice chest and chilled to
approximately 4'Celsius. A chain-of-custody form will be completed in order to document
delivery of the samples to the analytical laboratory. Analyses requested of the laboratory will
include VOCs, ethylene glycol, PCBs/pesticides and total metals by an EPA-approved CLP
laboratory.
7.1.1 Groundwater and Soil Sample Collection
SoilSamplino
DERR anticipates eight proposed boring locations will be installed using direct push
methodologies to an anticipated maximum depth of 30 feet bgs. The boring locations will be
continuously sampled using a stainless steel four-foot length dual-tube configuration consisting
of a four-inch outer (casing) tube and a two-inch inner (sampling) tube. The tubes will be fitted
with new, disposable plastic liners of appropriate length provided by the drilling contractor for
that purpose.
Following retrieval of the direct push sampling tubes, each soil sample will be screened for
volatile vapors using a photoionization detector (PlD). Soil samples for laboratory analyses will
be collected from areas of highest PID readings and/or from areas of the soil column that are
obviously uncharacteristic of the native soils in the area if they are present. Otherwise, soil
samples will be collected from the saturated zone directly above the groundwater table. Soil
samples will be placed directly into new, clean four-ounce or eight-ounce glass sample
containers. The sample containers will be filled as completely as possible in order to reduce
headspace. The samples will be analyzed for VOCs, ethylene glycol, PCBs/pesticides and total
metals.
Groundwater Samplinq
Groundwater will be accessed with the use of a direct-push drilling unit. Groundwater samples
will be collected from the direct-push boring with the use of a peristaltic pump and collected
directly into the appropriate sample container. Following the collection of the sample, the boring
will be backfilled and capped with an asphalt or concrete patch (if necessary). All groundwater
samples will be collected in the appropriate sample container with appropriate preservatives if
applicable. The samples will be analyzed for VOCs, ethylene glycol, PCBs/pesticides and total
metals.
7.1.2 Surface Yllater and Sediment
Surface water and sediment samples will be collected downgradient of the Site within the two
irrigation ditches (east and west) and the suspected confluence of each irrigation ditch. A
surface water and sediment sample will also be collected from the pond located between the
east and west irrigation ditches. lt is possible that surface water will not be encountered during
the S!; however, a sample will be collected from the material that has collected in the ditches.
Downstream samples will be collected first starting with the surface water sample, taking care
not to disturb the underlying sediments. Surface water samples will be collected using a six foot
polyethylene scoop or disposable, weighted, polyethylene bailers placed directly into the
irrigation ditch or pond. Sediment samples will be collected using a six-foot scoop or stainless
steel spoon. Samples will be placed directly into new, clean, glass sample containers with the
Site lnvestigation Work Plan
Anderson Auto Wrecking Company
Utah DEQ/DERR
uTN000802773
appropriate preservative for each sample consistent with the volume and preservative required
by the analytical laboratory for testing.
7.1.3 Municipal and Private Drinking lflater Well Samples
The groundwater sample collected from each municipal and private well will be collected
utilizing the existing pump for the production well. Samples will be placed directly into new,
clean, glass sample containers with the appropriate preservative for each sample consistent
with the volume and preservative required by the analytical laboratory for testing. Sample
containers designated for VOC analysis will be completely fitled in order to eliminate headspace.
7.2 FIELD QUALITY CONTROL AND ASSURANCE PROCEDURES
The following sections discuss field QA/QC methods that will be implemented to aid in the
reduction of field errors. Samples will be handled and preserved per the criteria of the DERR
QAPP of September,2011 (as amended in September, 2014).
7.2.1 Sample Numbering Procedures/Rationale
The following designations will be made for samples: Anderson Auto Wrecking Company
(AAWC), groundwater (GW), soil (SO), surface water (SW), sediments (SE), sample number
and date collected. For example, a groundwater sample collected from location one on August
16, 2014, would be labeled as AAWC-GW-01-08162014. Quality Assurance samples will be
given the same designation as their respective media.
7.2.2 Field QC Samples
All samples will be handled and preserved in accordance with the QA/QC Criteria as described
in the DERR CERCLA QAPP of September,2011 (as amended in September,2Ol4). Every
effort will be made to ship the samples to the laboratory on a daily basis.
QC samples will be collected to insure the quality of the collected samples and the laboratory
data. QC samples will include the collection of a trip blank, a rinsate blank, and a triple volume
organic laboratory duplicate. The trip blank will be collected from de-ionized water in the DERR
offices and will determine if field samples were cross-contaminated during storage, transport or
shipping. The rinsate blank will be collected to insure the proper decontamination of sampling
equipment and will be collected by pouring de-ionized water over the field sampling equipment
following decontamination activities. The laboratory duplicate is an additional volume sample
used by the laboratory for instrument calibration and other internal checks. Field QC samples
will be listed on field sampling records.
7.2.3 Chain-Of-Gustody
Samples will be handled and delivered to the contract lab in accordance with chain of custody
protocols within the appropriate holding times as prescribed by the DERR CERCLA QApp of
September, 2O1 1 (as amended in September, 2O'l 4).
Site lnvestigation Work Plan
Anderson Auto Wrecking Company
Utah DEQ/DERR
uTN000802773
10
7.2.4 Analytical Parameters
Sample preservation methods include cooling with ice to 4 degrees Celsius (4'C) and other
appropriate preservative for all water samples. The environmental samples shipped via chain-
of-custody to a contract laboratory registered under EPA's Contract Laboratory Program (CLP),
and analyzed under routine analytical services (RAS) for the constituents on the target
compound list and target analyte list. Samples analyzed to medium level for soil and water
according to the SOM 1.2 Contract Required Quantitation Limits (CROL) should be sufficient
based on analytical data collected from previous sampling at the Site except for benzene, lead
and arsenic. lt will be better to analyze these three compounds at a low level.
7.3 INVESTIGATION DERIVED WASTE AND DECONTAMINATION
lnvestigation derived waste (lDW generated during field activities includes soil, purge water,
decontamination water, and disposable personal protection equipment. IDW management shall
be in accordance with applicable local, state, and federal regulations and guidelines.
All disposable sampling and personal protective equipment will be cleaned, bagged, removed
from the Site, and disposed of as non-hazardous material. All boring and non-disposable
sampling equipment will be decontaminated on-site using an Alconox@ and distilled water wash.
Drillers will be required to decontaminate all drilling equipment between borings with a high-
pressure steam cleaning system to minimize the potentia! for cross-contamination between
sampling locations.
8.0 CONCEPT OF OPERATIONS
Concept of operations includes a discussion on the sampling schedule, site safety, site access,
and logistics.
8.1 SCHEDULE
Sl sampling is tentatively scheduled for spring, 2015, and is contingent upon the EPA's approval
of this Work Plan. Field activities are expected to last 3 to 4 days depending on conditions at
the Site. Coordination with the landowners, lessees, laboratories, and the local health
department is on-going and concurrent with this Work Plan. All logistical functions will be
arranged by the Project Manager in advance of sampling.
8.2 SAFETY
On-site personnelwill avoid direct dermal contact, inhalation, and ingestion with Site materials.
All personnel directly involved with sample collection will wear new, clean, disposable nitrile
gloves, following the collection of each sample. Sampling will be conducted in Level D personal
protective equipment unless the Site Health and Safety Officer determines an upgrade is
necessary upon evaluation of Site conditions. A detailed Health and Safety Plan has been
prepared and will be reviewed with field personnel prior to the beginning of any fieldwork. A
Tailgate Safety Meeting form will be provided and reviewed by all personnel prior to start of
activities each field day.
ln the event of an accident, the nearest hospital is Mountain View Hospital (801-465-7104)
located at 1000 East 100 North in Payson, Utah. A copy of the Health and Safety Plan is
provided in Appendix C.
Site lnvestigation Work Plan
Anderson Auto Wrecking Company
Utah DEQ/DERR
uTN000802773
11
8.3 SITE ACCESS AND LOGISTICS
Site access and logistical functions will be arranged by the project manager in advance of the
Site sampling activities. Property owners will be asked to sign Consent for Access to Propefty
form and notified of their right to collect split samples. A copy of the Consent for Access fo
Propefty form is presented in Appendix D. Coordination with the EPA contract laboratory,
driller and the local health department will be arranged prior to the Site sampling activities.
Provisions for providing adequate field sampling equipment and supplies will be the
responsibility of the project manager.
9.0 DATA REDUCTION, VALIDATION, AND REPORTING
EPA will perform the data validation for the analytical procedures. After the receipt of the
validated data from the EPA, a draft Sl ARR will be prepared and will include a discussion of
investigative methodology, analytical results, summary tables of analytical data and figures
showing sampling locations. The draft Sl ARR will be submitted to EPA Region 8 for review and
approval.
1O.O REFERENGES
Anderson, J. On-Site lnterview with John Anderson (owner of Wrecking Yard) Performed during
October 8, 2009 Site Visit., 2009.
Anderson, P. B.; Susong, D. D.; Wold, S. R.; Heilweil, V. M.; Baskin, R. l. Hydrogeology of
Recharge Areas and Water Quality of the Principal Aquifers Along the Wasatch Front and
Adjacent Areas, Ufah; United States Geological Survey, 1994.
Ashcroft, G. L.; Jensen, D. T.; Brown, J. L. Utah Climate; Utah Climate Center: Logan, UT,
1992.
Brough, R. C.; Stevens, D. J.; Jones, D. L. Utah's Comprehensive Weather Almanac;
[Publishers Press: [Salt Lake City, Utah] (1900 W.2300 South, Salt Lake City 84119-0408),
1987.
Clark, D. W.; Appel, C. L. Ground-Water Resources of Northern Utah Valley, Ufah; Technical
Publication No. 80; 1985.
FEMA. Flood lnsurance Study of Utah County, Utah, Unincorporated Areas;1982.
lHl Environmental. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Deseft Point - Anderson Auto;
2007 a.
lHl Environmental. Phase ll Subsurface lnvestigation Repofi;2007 b.
lHl Environmental. Phase ll Supplemenfal Subsurtace lnvestigation Repoft, Desert Point -
Anderson Auto;2007 c.
Mountainland AOG. Mountainland Association of Govemments (AOG), Municipal Population
Projections. ,2013.
NRCS. Web Soil Survey-National Resources Conservation Service
http://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/AppM/ebSoilSurvey.aspx (accessed Dec 30, 2013).
Site lnvestigation Work Plan
Anderson Auto Wrecking Company
Utah DEGUDERR
uTN000802773
12
RB&G Engineering, lnc. Spanish Fork-Springville Landfill Sfudg 1988.
U.S. Census Bureau. U.S. Census 2010 Data; Utah Automated Geographic Reference Center:
Salt Lake Caty, Utah, 2010.
UDEQ/DERR. Preliminary Assessment - Andercon Auto Wrecking Company (EPA lD#
UTN000802773);201'1.
USFW. Fisheries Management Plan, 1990.
USGS. Charleston, Utah Quadrangle, 1999.
UDNR/DWR; Points of Diversion Data:2007.
UDEQ/DDW; Division of Drinking Water Systems ArcGlS database; 2013-
UDNR/DWR; Points of Divercion Data; 2013.
Site lnvestigation Work Plan
Anderson Auto t/Vrecking Gompany
Utah DEQ/DERR
uTN(xx)802773
13
FIGURES
Aluminum/Radiator, Engine
Block and Asphaltic Tar
EquipmentStorage Areas
Legend
Site Boundary
Utah Department of
Environmental Quality
Division of Environmental
Figure 2
Anderson Auto Wrecking Company
Site Map
1215 North State Road 51, Spanish Fork,
MW-4
Benzene: 13 ug/L
(lHl2007c)
GW-5
Benzene:7 uglL
(rHr2007b)
GW.1
Benzene: 6 ug/L
(Hr 2007b)
MW.2
Benzene:11 ug/L
(Hl 2007c)
MW-3
Benzene: 22 uglL
(Hl 2007c)
GW.4
Benzene:7 uglL
(Hr 2007b)
Benzene:2.3 mg/kg
Toluene: 56 mg/kg
Ethylbenzene: 19 mg/kg
Lead:410-520 mg/kg
(rHr2007b)
MW.5
Not-detect
(Hl 2007c)
Utah Department of
Environmental Quality
Division of Environmental
Figure 3
Anderson Auto Wrecking Company
Site Map with Previous Sample Locations
12 I 5 North State Road 5 I , Spanish Fork, Utah
Eol6oICLo(,Eoo-!
9Eooo=o-!
teE(Eo
co=(loECLooEoo-q6ooo=a-!
9oE(,U'
oo(!oofoooooCLofoEecov(5oo=ooE(Eo
o9
0fA8
8_
;
o.
9
91
6
9,
I
6q
r
E.
t
r
fEEO26
6o9E

E
;;
E
;o
tE;
3
qo

o)
oa
E
E
E€
o
o
.
=
,9
9a!r
'=
E
EO
)
6E
=obP
o-
.e
E
EE
iso.
:
9l
o
OEo$
!g'-
a

O
ss
oo
+EEg
9E
:EE:
oFgE
LO6P
cCfl
3
=6
(E
E
tE=o3o
.9
9
E.
e
c-80
a>
-Efr
E
oE
-g

=,
Fg
oo
cOooGo
oa
€6?,
1
<t
r
'i
dFoz
gE6
E
E

E
Eg
E
(L
E
6
3
e
f
i
E
fr

F
:(
L
(
)
otouIC,
,cCLEGooEt,o=(!=CLootrooo=otE3.9lr
Utah Department of
Environmental Quality
Division of Environmental
Response and Remediation
Figure 5
Anderson Auto Wrecking Company
Proposed Sample Locations:
Groundwater, Soil, Surface Water and
Sediment
l2l5 North State Road 51, Spanish Fork,
Legend
O Water Weils
Site Boundary
Utah Department of
Environmental Quality
Division of Environmental
and Remediation
Figure 6
Anderson Auto Wrecking Company
Proposed Sample Locations:
Municipal and Private Drinking
Water Wells
1215 North State Road 51, Spanish Fork, Utah
9E
E'
E
6o
N0
,
FO
EE
CL
.
E
o(
,
r
uE
*
s

*E
E
e
g
c
E
e
5i
E
r

pE
g
s
,
E

s
E=
ta
.gE-
0r
!E'
i
ocbo
E
*F
E
E
E
*
i
,
t
E
i
g
t
;
s
=
g
g
T
*
OO
.Ag=c,Eo6'6oo
,3
*
u
E

Ee
*
EE

ie
E
F
+
5

Ei
O>
v
O
-
.
*
z
^
O
-
O
-
_o
o
E
6
u
f
i
g
E
o
g
E9
o
"
.
E
H
E
R
l
Z
o
Eg
E
f

;E
,
E
E
;
IAoGtc=o00
tJ.A
Eg
I
E
s
g
s
s

fa
S
E
E
E
F
'

ii
E
E
E
E
F
i
E
E
E
E
E
f
f

ry
]aELctro6(,oo
gi
g
g
*
g
E
,
g
g
g
g
g
g
g
g
F
;
g
r
g
os,P

U|
oo
t
r
co
;E

:E
E6
=
.E
g

Et

:
o,

E
gg
-
i
g
s
i
g
i
r
I
g
s
g
a
r
f
i
g
g
E
i
*
coEootaE-cttoo.
EB
E
g
*
E
F
E
g
f
i
E
E

Ef
l
s

E
c
#-
i

Es
s

fi
*
E
]io.=IJ0,b-oEoclooo.igooF
Table 2: Anderson Auto Wrecking Company
Analytical Results for BTEXII
Data summarized from IHI Environmental Reports submitted under the Utah VCp.
BTE)O{ analyzed by EPA Method 82608.
TRPH analyzed by EPA Method 1664.
MCL - Maximum Contaminant Level.
RSL - EPA Regional Screening Level.
Bold values exceed the MCL or RSL.
NA - not analyzed.
NE - not established
Sample ID Benzene Toluene Ethyl-
Benzene
Phase II Subsurface Investigation Soil Samples(mg/kg) (IHI, 2007b)
Total Naph-
thalene
NA
NA
2.3
4.7
NA
NA
<0.0027
0.0082
0.0048
3.6
<0.0062
<0.0061
<0.0063
<0.0061
6.5
2.9
0.0096
<0.0064
<0.0062
3.6
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
0.0039
<0.002
0.7
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
0.7
TRPH
c-4 @2.5-3.5', 2.3 56 t9
NA NA NANA NA NA0.0071 <0.0027 <0.0027
0.034 0.1 0.00630.033 0.0079 0.00581.1 5,000 5.4
c-t @3'
c-2@3.s'
c-3@4-6',
NA
NA
t8
130
NA
NA
<0.0027
0.028
0.027
630
0.r2
<0.0061
<0.0063
<0.0061
t20
36
0.0088
0.017
0.014
630
<0.002
<0.002
0.021
<0.002
<0.002
l0
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
10
<180
<180
<180
4,100
210
<180
<200
1,800
410
NE
<180
<180
<lg0
190
5,100
2,100
<lg0
<190
330
NE
ND
ND
ND
0.083
ND
NE
3.8
3.5
J.J
3.5
6.7
NE
c-s @s.5'
c-6 @4'
PH-t @s'
PH-2@s',
PH-3 @4.s'
RSLs
c-t @ t-2'
c-2@t-2'
c-2 @ rs-16'
c-3 @t-2'
c-4 @ t-2'
c-4 @6-7',
PH-SSI @4-5',
PH-SS2 @ 4-s',
PH-SS3 @4-s',
RSLs
GW-t
GW-2
GW-3A
GW-4
GW-5
MCLs/RSL
MW-l
MW-2
MW-3
MW-4
MW-5
MCLs/RSL
NA NA NA
NA NA NA0.29 <0.12 4.1
0.0035 <0.0061
0.02s
<0.0061<0.0031 <0.0063 <0.0063<0.0031 <0.0061 <0.0061
2.2 6.5 t4
4.90.41
0.0086
0.0032
0.98<0.0064 <0.0064
0.016 <0.0064<0.0031 0.013 <0.0062
1.1 5,000 5.4
Phase II Supplemental Subsurface Investigation Soil Samples (mg/kd(Hl, 2007c)
0.0058 0.02
Phase II Subsurface Investigation Groundwater Samples (mS/L)(IHI, 2007b)0.006 <0.002<0.001 <0.002
<0.001 0.0230.007 <0.002 <0.002
<0.00t <0.002 <0.002
0.005 1.0 0.7
0.0034
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
Phase II supplemental subsurface Investigation Groundwater samples (mg/L)(HI, 2007c)<0.0010 <0.002
0.011 <0.002
0.022 <0.002 <0.002
0.013 <0.002 <0.002<0.0010 <0.002 <0.0020.005 1.0 0.7
Table 3: Anderson Auto Wrecking Company
Analytical Results for Metals
Data summarized from IHI Environmental Reports submiffed under the Utah VCP.
RSL - EPA Regional Screening Level.
MCL - Maximum Contaminant Level or Action Level (for Lead).
Lead screening level of 400 mglkg used in the Utah VCP.
Bold values exceed the MCL or RSL.
NA - not analyzed
le ID Arsenic Cadmium
Phase II Subsurface Investigotion Soil Samples (mg/kg) (HI,
ss @ c-2
ss @ c-4
RSLs
NA
NA
0.39
0.020
<0.0050
Lead
2007b)
410
s30
400
0.07
0.17
23
<0.00020
<0.00020
<0.00020
<0.00020
<0.00020
0.002
NA
NA
70
Phase II Subsudace Investigation Groundwater Samples (mg/L) (IHI, 2007b)
0.0074 <0.0040GW-l
GW-2
GW-3A
GW-4
GW-5
MCLs
0.078 <0.0040
<0.0040
<0.0040
<0.0050
<0.0050
<0.0050
<0.0050
<0.0050
0.01s
0.048 <0.0040
0.01 0.005
qEI4
!pEbqoo)
&oI3o0o
E.
5
l2
x
,Y
g
oq
dlgG=38Ebs
E-
Z
5{
{=5b&
,,
hB!ooAi
e
o,
g
lodt
s
oe
!i_x
a
ac
tapsoe
.o
'!
!9?
EEI
;t
s
-x
o
!oo
odi'I&dq
9
dt
s
ot
r
9
.
=
3X
oy
-x
4
,EEotoo
,t
i95box,
o
c6
!ndt
s
at9.
=
=lov
.Eaa!3oo
F_aEo6i
o
oe
.o
,E
E
EOocFt
;f
,
_x
4
E6
oa!
o,l
:oaro6egoO^
fi
E
70;t
s
s&,!a(,
oqo;o'Eg
,.
9
as
!Tqx
aY
^
tqFEEh
l
}E
i9do
go
cr'
aAY
9o
{t
rH$s€
:6c
o
,
q
o=
:
-^

!
=-
d!
2
->
,9s

i:
.e
!

I
q!

I
EQ
O
s
b3
EE€€6E
5o
;
abot
s
ad
l
too{pd
'i

o
EE
.v
3
o,o-eJ
'o!,5oa<95
a&o'orl
,oFoE3
.3
!d
u
o,abEr
.:
coB
95
'd
!Io!s{'o!
AIrl
!ooao;
i
';
9g.
t
oe
;co9-.
Y
Edaoq{o€.
qoXo&5
ad{oa
oq9q{oaoz
sooa3
ooaooa
osgH
q6
,
ao>9OE
s=
oao
ob'aE8
a,
o
o9FSE!
oaB
bco
'i
;

o
o9Fg
oa
)od
.9
{
,E
aqoEooroz
Ec
'
EO6.
5
SI
i=
€NYO
d9
IE!o
aaq
(-
)J'.
]
rOqa
'2
o5E
o
c
>
c
a&
x
;a
o
o
VJ
!!
;!49
i'&o!2,
5
o9
zo95
i;
rBEEE
9E
'a
{xq
tEE6a
)
3+
J!
i>
6I
u'
F
2
Jg
;
>
:l
!
?
B+
vd
!>
5.
3
oE
)
u-
o
;
.i
!
l3
:
Jt
)>
63
A.
.
E

2
)-
E
q
t
D
,
!
>H
9
3+
vt
;
>
6J
q
E2
;3
=
u-
a
i
6
a
,
!
>U
o
>
5J
a'
a
2
J-
q
j
a
-,
r
;c
0
-
()d
P
3+
u!

i
>
6.
3
qa
2
ue
i
,U
!
H_
u
+
;;
J
qa
2
ui

t=
u-
q
!
;4
-
a
!
<
o
=
>
53
n
r2
)-
&
!
,U
)
3+
Jr

i
>
6J
n
a2
J€
.
i
-u
0.
<
o
=
J!

!
>
5.
!
n'
a
)
J-
e
;
1
;
,
\
,5
x
o
=
>
6I
a
a2
u-
r
i
t3
-
"E
I3
i
9!
;>
6J
oa
2
U3
'
9*
i
.a
&
!
x
o
=
>
6J
D
a2
JE
;
,U
0.
dEoz
'o5
!ao
Bo
'o
!I
ioo
tao()
Io5
'!
ao
to6
!o
9EzrE€o
Bo()
BO>
aBo()>
EBo(J>
rBU>
(JB
oBUF
>B
>(.
)B
U>
9PU
c.
t
F-
rrq.
=
v
)
5E
R
8z

o
z.
?
.
=
f
f
;

p.
)t
)
a
..
4

..
AX
r
.
l
t.
l
<
<
Fq
.
6r
o
o?
z
-9
-
U=
E
{o
E
!{
4
<
{r
,

nr

U)
o3-
-
s
z
O+
:
-
?)
i
o^
'
=
r:
6
O
.
<^
!
(
,
2a21

;.
EP
'
(A
J
U
ctFzpQ
xa.o(-
)bo
.vQC)L
o(oo&E(€U)qLroU)o,;o€(Boo.loaCBU)LroCBBEtr=okOd.+osc,F
IolaF
6Aoc
OoicaF
Qs&!
OoJ
()ioI)El
o
oo,l
ta
roiL)>ioa*
roBOg&1:OoJ
.aa
6AE
()o
X
ii
'
i
>
i
j
J
--
'
e

2
u-
o
i
2U
?
3
i
9!
i>
5J
oa
2
u-
a
!
>x
x
d
=
a'
a
2
ue
i
?a
&
6€z
'o(,
'!o6
oo
too
EzE6a
P()>
BU
\=
=
ES
R
2i

r
L=
E

E.
)\
)
a
..
x
.
.
aX
I
.
l
ra
{
<
F.
r
{
a
dt

o
2l
,

z
UH
C
(o
>
9t
r
<
l)
L
u
)
FzpQ
C'
q(J6I
)
i4
oc)3i
-
v
<r
t
x
s€
i
l
Yo
\
t
n
L:
€
A
<N
(
,
(l
)
(!
trd&!CB
ar
)
tro9a,-oU)
()oaC6ooJ(l
)gtrCBaLr
(.
)
CB€oL.oc.
i
t+o-o(t3
g5
,i
.
.
Ee
a
(,
i
I
U
!DoAl0F
doII
!o{DoaEo!€Fsq5
{oqo!&
oioo)
€EoI
otEFOEoo:
,>
'
t
9t
s
99
r
o+!e
i!oo->
E
.3
9
OE
oa3a!9
ooo?oi
,>

.E
dEoo!
ooisa?o)
,x
E
-9
t
s
oooa!s5
9o{Eogoi
,x
E
tEoo!t
!!tro
oi90ogo;
->
E
€E
oao9a!E
ooi{o,>
,
E
oqoa
(Jonaor
(J
!J
Ed.]
ooo€{
'E

ai
3a
'd
9
g
':
r
ii

3
Edapooo€'
q{oo;'o-
-
t0
4
oo
ogao€'oz
IE9U
2€6b
6qo)
osOiEH
ob>9
o2
'aa?oq
o>E
coE6
'd
;

o
o9
fsoEo&B
o.9
6>EgE
'i
5

0
o9F$
t!aE9
a!o.
d
.9
{
,g4;
qeooEoaaz
qEioqEo
bo

t:
e€
i<oo
!.
s
;i
qdo
!
qa0&a
rOBoa
rQBoOpJ
a
qaE€o
JE
i
>
5J
h
E2
o;
3
=
')

di
i>
.
c
,U
.E
l3
+
>
6J
n
t2
?f
i
;t
r
r
U
k_
E
*
>;
.
E
q-
u
2
.o

q?
x
s.
i
>g
-
r
?
3:
9!
!>
5J
q
t2
ue
i
>t
-
o
l3
+
>
63
a
42
.4

CE
<
#i
;O
F
O
?
3+
>
63
,E
2
I
s.
i
;t
r
-
L
I3
+
>
5J
q
D2
u-
q
;
.U
E
l
_u
-
:
>
63
aa
2
Jg
i
;l
a
r
Uo
"E
k_
u
r
>;
.
!
q
a2
u
rq
^
D,
\
tg
-
9
t+
9t
J>
53
o
E2
iJ
.
q
l
;t
r
-
J!
i>
6I
hE
2
,U
?
t:
>
5s
6-
a

2
;3
=
o-
q
!
;t
-
a2
o
oo
o
o
o
o
oq
o0
o
oq
€EzECO
t0O>
SoQqOB
TcaqqUB
alaOB
@oo
laOB
\EAOQ
ala(JB
q()
oaOB
@qO
FFrgl

.E

'.
,
5E
R
Ei

i'
55
F
..
4

..
ax
l
.
I
r:
I
<
<
F.
E
A
o'
o
0?
Z
-u
-
dB
i
ts
o
=
Pt
s
<
9E
r
(
D
=-
-
5
2
<n
h
5E
t
2)
i
()
^
'
=
Yo
\

d
iK
8
2a
21
.
.
.
H?
T
r,
F
1

U dFzDU
6o.oQbo
l4o()
C)dod&'t
f
d0!ooc)a(,o(B()
..
1C)a.
d(t
)
u)
.c
'
$()
.odt-
!Ioo@F
6Eo6c
95bo!{D
oIo!'5
{EoEooo
oDIooo{ioooqo
o!Eoooo!ooo
Io!.Co€o{ooO
g,
)Loop'cooeIb7oPo
(,
)noo&F
Uiqotr
OIJ
AIo,l
!{!o!a)
€{to>'Eoo0.
!{aooo
ooaoa&
!aaoa!={EooQ
bo*qo
o&F
NUBaaar
NOo(-
)oIJ
Ea
!
Jr

i
>
6.
9
n
a2
JE
;
;F
.
Jt

i
>
dJ
n'
d

)
Je
i
,U
Jr

i
>
5J
A.
E
)
Jg
;
;P
.
X
o;
>
6I
q'
a
2
u_
o
;
9#
d
.6
a
!
9.
3
4
ur
g
>
69
q'
t

z
;3
a
u
qq
^
a,
e
.a
=
o=
>
6i
J-
q
i
,U
(Jo
E
98
:
9€
J
>
5.
9
4
52
ue
i
.a
l
B
;
>
6i
;3
-
J-
q
i
1
D
,
\
,U
&
cz
B
q
>
,.
8
q
Ba
B
c
9EzE6q
I>(-
)a
O-
B(J>
Q>
B(-
)>
B(.
)>
OB
>UB
caF-Fra{
t
r
h
EE
H
5:
s
f-
'
;
'
a
l-
s

cL
fC
)
(
,
..
1

..
ex
H
rd
<
<
FH
a
6'
o
2-
z
co
>
Ht
s
<
IJ
E
r
(
D
ct
iFz(,
ctaObo
,t
4
oC)5r
_
v
<t
a

x
O+
:
-
3)
?
o^
'
=
YO
\
d
E€
O
<^
r
r
,
C)o(dd(I
,aoaooo)a0o(doo.lOqdaIo)
I(€(.
)o,SLad$o-odt-
g32i

,.
E?
T
(a
i
(
J
!oalaF
Edil
ou!oaD
oIootroao{Eoooo
o!ooEoooao
3oo!oaoEoo6o
!o!o{Foa()
=.o3't
rolloatr

q.
l
ad
ui

oi
Eboqo
()o]oao!Il
Oo5t
Eo€orl
E{to€p
;tos6oi,o&
;E{to>'oo
aoo{o€.oao
oao!u,oE€o{.Fo6oO
aqoaqo
NooU>t:qAr
dHOOiOJ
6EE6a
=
a=
>
6.
s
hu
2
)_
4
:
'u
<r
l
-
i
>
5s
a'
8
2
;3
=
JE
;
,U
=
a=
JE
i>
6J
h'
E
2
,U
A
>
6s
J-
o
i
,U
>
5s
h-
a

2
Jg
;<c
0
-
Ai
!
8€
t
>
6e
qE
2UE
;
>E
-
Jd
I
>
a.
9
h'
a
2
3-
E
E
,U
A.
Q
9
:
o-
5
s
>
6J
ot
2
;3
=
o-
a
i
;E
'
-o2
to
E!oo
!o
oo
€q
€o
9EzaEdo
HO
6i(J
N*O>
>qd
N>(J
>a(J
IoqL)4
N.
=
=
5E
R
8z

oa
z.
?

.=
FE

E.
)l
)
v
)
&
ra
{
<
Fi
r
{
a
cn
_

o
A?
Z
tr
o
=
Ht
r
<
QL
U
)
dzU
GIo.
()b0
.Yoooa7
-
y
,
Et
t
.
gD
i
;
:l
o
\

d
TK
E
()
(€oddcaa.
Loa(l
)n(^oooJog(Ua()€(l
)a$C)
-o(dF
EA2'

..
HQ
I
ir
r
I
U
o
Ba
c
k
s
r
o
u
n
d
X
)D
D
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
v
Uoo
Bl
a
n
k
lp
i
k
e
tp
l
i
t
La
b

Du
p
x
x
Fi
e
l
d

Du
n
X
(odE(Fl
Dx
p
l
o
s
i
v
e
s
)&
G
tP
H
BT
E
X
N
lp
e
c
.

Or
s
.
ls
b
e
s
t
o
s
ln
i
o
n
s
NO
3
-

NO
2
Am
m
o
n
i
a
Su
l
l
i
d
e
Cv
a
n
i
d
e
fo
t
.

Me
t
a
l
s
X
X
X
x
X
X
X
x
x
X
X
PC
B
s
X
X
X
x
X
X
X
X
X
X
Pe
s
t
i
c
i
d
e
s
X
X
X
X
X
x
x
X
x
x
X
Se
m
i
-
V
o
l
s
X
X
x
X
X
x
x
x
X
Vo
l
a
t
i
l
e
s
x
X
X
X
X
X
X
x
X
o6t6l
Cr7
Dt
h
e
r
DOCo
n
d
oH
fe
m
p
aF0aq,a
o(c
0,L
o6e
0,
od'€cao
@6r5o
a(c
cicI
o6t€tro
o6o
oiCE
((E
oGL
o6Eo
cts
o6o
o6
aOGFL,
cc(i
(r
.U,
V-
ca
oo.d(t
)
(^
aCCt
Oo.6U)o(/
)
oodZ'
0o7.
ooeca
oo(I,.
oo-6a
oct,
aoe5)rhU)
ao6E'ho7a
o
a
a
,
o6orlEda
tsQB
BUB
!BoU
BUB
€o>(_
)B
r>=
=;3
6oB(-
)B
OBO
B(_
)B
NBQB
EQB
sP(JQts
\oBU>
rBQ>
a't3
I,t34
oIA.A()
+7D,:J=
(A(r
)O>
€.,,.J=
rov)U)QB
€ot)u)QB
I?,3
q)U)QB
7D7D:)=
c.
l
ca
(nUB4
c.
lbI0aklFzrl
tr2(,
Q&f-
lFlFQf-
l&cr
rr6l6zFilf-
l
FE2DzrdFU)e)
>=5
;FEQ
'
LN
-
]
U
qJ4oC)Uooo(!oq(daui()
!C6F
Ba
c
k
g
r
o
u
n
d
x
)o
n
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
v
x
x
Ue
Bl
a
n
k
X
io
i
k
e
ip
l
i
t
La
b

Du
o
X
X
Fi
e
l
d

Du
p
o6t6Ea{
rI
0x
p
l
o
s
i
v
e
s
)&
G
TP
H
BT
E
X
N
ip
e
c
.

Or
g
.
ls
b
e
s
t
o
s
{n
i
o
n
s
\o
3
-

NO
2
\m
m
o
n
i
a
lu
l
l
i
d
e
ly
a
n
i
d
e
To
t
.

Me
t
a
l
s
X
x
x
x
X
x
X
X
x
X
X
x
X
X
PC
B
s
X
X
X
X
X
)<
Pe
s
t
i
c
i
d
e
s
X
X
X
X
X
Se
m
i
-
V
o
l
s
X
X
X
X
X
X
Vo
l
e
t
i
l
e
s
X
X
X
x
X
X
X
X
€dCrE
Ot
h
e
r
DOon
d
DH
fe
m
p
aFatr6a
ooeq
oc,-
IU,
ts
IV.
oo.E!!q
LE7.
o.6ra
qGc,
oo
,a
Esaaov)
(cIII
o6BooqE
.h
odBoo-6(h
o6Boo6n
oBoo-6a
odioo6)n
o6Boo_6U)
odBoo,daa
oGBoo-6U)
o6tsao_6a
troEoo,)
ooa
oI6o7'
o!oah
troEo77
ooU)
oo.,
oo
oa
u
V-
a
3,
€oFlaq,
(,
caU)OB
+cc
ta=
II,3
\ocaV)OB
t-cqaUB
€caaOB
o
€
€
o\
NB(t
)QB
5,t]4
c{c{B(hUts
N-7t
)
..
)=
*c.
lB(AOB
N=2=
\oc.
lB./
)QB
a
?
ool
!V)UB
N7t
)
IJ=
e.
l
e.
l
ar
)UB
N'aI,
J=
e.
l
!aUB
6LU-
(-B
mcn()B
!a.J=
7-3
Ba()B
Bq(JB
AU)B
7.=
(\ai
U)
EdFz,lzan
rrct€zFIlr
l2Dzfr
lFcn9)
z>oEQ
i
.vooOa()qx(n()oda.r
i
()
-odF
APPENDIX A
Site Photographic Log
SITE PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG
Andercon Auto Wrecking Gompany
Utah Gounty, Spanish Fork, Utah 84660
GERCLIS ItH:
uTN000802773
Direction Photo
Taken:
Northeast
Description:
Looking along the eastern
boundary of the Site
adjacent to Utah 51.
Direction Photo
Taken:
Northwest
Description:
Looking at fencing along
the eastem boundary of
the Site followed by the
north portion of the Site.
SITE PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG
Andercon Auto Wrecking Gompany
Utah County, Spanish Fork, Utah 84660
CERCLIS !D#:
uTN000802773
Direction Photo
Taken:
West
Direction Photo
Taken:
Southwest
Description:
Looking at fencing along
the eastern boundary of
the Site adjacent to Utah
51.
Direction Photo
Taken:
West
Description:
Looking at the
residential home on the
Site.
SITE PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG
Anderson Auto Wrecking Company
Utah County, Spanish Fork, Utah 84660
CERCLIS ID#:
uTN000802773
Photo No.
7
Date:
10t11t13
ffis&
ffiE
Direction Photo
Taken:
Northwest
Description:
Looking at the former
office located on the Site.
SITE PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG
Anderson Auto Wrecking Gompany
Utah County, Spanish Fork, Utalr 94660
CERCLIS ItH:
uTN000802773
Direction Photo
Taken:
North
Looking at north adjoining
property of the Site.
Direction Photo
Taken:
North
Description:
Looking toward road
adjacent to Springville
Landfill.
Photo No.
12
Date:
10t11t13
Direction Photo
Taken:
East
Description:
Looking toward west
drainage ditch of the
Site.
SITE PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG
Anderson Auto Wrecking Company
Utah County, Spanish Fork, Utah 84660
CERGLIS ID#:
uTN000802773
Photo No.
11
Date:
10t11113 sh+.
:l r.U
Direction Photo
Taken:
East
Description:
Looking toward the pond
area north of the site.
Photo No.
12
Date:
10111t13
Direction Photo
Taken:
Northwest
Description:
Looking northwest at
possible convergence
of irrigation ditches
prior to discharging to
tributary of Dry Creek.
APPENDIX B
Equipment List
SITE: Anderson Arto Wrecking Company
SAMPLING EQUIPMENT CHECKLIST
for Site Inspection or Expanded Site Inspection
DATE: Spring,2015
TITLE: Environmental Scientist
TITLE: Environmental Scientist
PROJECTMANAGEk CtrisMartin
LIST COMPILEDBY: Ctris Martin
Sample Containers
Quantitv Unit ltem Notes
I case 40 ml VOA Vials
each 40 ml VOA Vials
T2vials per case
5 case I liter (32 oz.) Ambo Bottles w/Teflon cap 12 bottles per case
each % gal Amber Bottles
2 case I liter plastic bottles
each I liter plastic bottles
2 case 8 oz. Wide mouthjar
each 8 oz. Wide mouthjar
5 case 4 oz. Wide mouthjar
each 4 oz. Wide mouth jar
I bundle Plastic Sample Bags, 4,'by 6,'
I bundle Plastic Sample Bags, 6" by 9',
I bundle Plastic Sample Bags, 5,,by l2',
I bundle Plastic Sample Bags, 9,'by 12,'
I bundle Plastic Sample Bags, 12" by 18,'
each Paint Cans, I quart
each Paint Cans, I gallon
Vermiculite
12 bottles per case
24jars per case
24jars per case
100 per bundle, holds 2 - 40 ml vials
100 per bundle, holds I - 8 oz. jar
100 per bundle, holds I - I liter bottle
50 per bundle, holds paperwork & ice
50 per bundle, holds I - % gal amber bottle
Sample Preservation
Quantitv Unit ltem Notes
8 bag ice
case Nihic Acid
each Nitric Acid
case Hydrochloric Acid
each Hydrochloric Acid
not supplied - needs to be purchased
24 - 5 ml vials per case
5 ml vial
24 - I ml vials per case
I ml vial
not typically used
not typically used
Acetic Acid
Sodium Hydroxide
Other:
Other:
Sample Documentation
Quanti8 Unit ltem
each Laptop C.omputer w/ Scribe
each Field Printer
Notes
page 1 ofs
I each Field Book
each CLP Labels
each CLP Sample ID Tags
each CLP Custody Seals
each Chain-of-Cu$ody Forms
I each Digital Camera
each Digital Storage Cards
each 35mm Camera
roll 35mm Film
each Video Camera
each Video Cassettes for video camera
Reference Materials
if not using Forms II Lite
include recharger
speed (asa): exposure:
Quantity Unit Item
I each Site SamplePlan (uniqrc to site)
I each Health and Safety plan (unique to site)
I each Samplers Guide to Contract Laboratory program, EpA OSWER, 1996
I each Quality Assurance Project plan, UDEe/DERR, 201 I
each Other:
each Other:
Sample Shipping
Quanti8 Unit ltem Notes
2 each Ice Chest
I box Bubble Wrap
2 each FedEx Airbills
I roll PackagingTape
roll StrappingTape
Cardboard
4 each Custody Seals
Boxes for shipping m pieces for padding
Also Listed under Sample Documentation
Other:
Other:
Other:
Other:
Decontamination
Quantitv Unit Item
each Tap water
each Distilled Wder
each Deionized Water
box Alconox
each Rinse Water Sprayer
each Deionized Water Sprayer
in 5 gallon carboy
in 5 gallon carboy
in 5 gallon carboy
4lb. Box
page 2 of 5
each Deionized Water Spray Bottle
each BucketorTub
each Scrub Brush
I roll Paper Towels
I box Kimwipes
I bottle Hand Smitizer
container AntibacterialTowelettes
I each Garbage bags
Sample Collection
Quantitv Unit Item Notes
20 each Metal Spoons
each Shovel
each HandAuger
each Peristaltic pump
roll % O.D. Poly tubing
roll Silcon/Tygon tubing
each %" Disposable Bailer
each 1%', Disposable Baibr
roll Nylon Line
each Plastic Dropcloths
each Bucket/BarreVTank
each Suhnersible pump
each Generator
each Extension Cord
each Hose
I each Dipper Sampler
each pH Meter
each Conductivity Meter
package Lihnus paper
each 0.5 micron Filters
each Well Sounder
Surveying
include charger/power supply
1000'per roll - use down u,ell w/peristaltic pump
100'per roll - use dperistaltic pump
include valves for sampling
include valves for sampling
for use with bailers
to cover ground around well while bailing
to contain purge/decon waste wabr
include control unit
power for submersible pump
use with submersible pump
use with submersible pump
Quantity Unit ltem
for dissolved metal samples
Notes
I each Trimble GpS Unit
each Storey Pole
each Antenna
each Tape Measure
each 100 (upto 300') Engineers Tape
I each Tape Measure
each Measuring Wheel
each Hip Chain
each Brunton Compass
bundle Wooden Stakes
including recharger
Opional - for use with GpS
Optional - for use with GPS
include extra shing
page 3 of 5
I
1
bundle Wooden Lathes
bundle Pin Flags
roll Surveyer's Flagging
can Inverted Tip Spray Paint, White
crur Inverted Tip Spray Paint
each InvertedPaintApplicator
For marking proposed excavations for Blue Stakes
Color:
Safety/Personal Protection (provided by Department for each employee,
each field team member should individua[y bring the foilowing)
Unit Item NotesQuantity
I
I
I
I
I
I
each
each
pair each
each
each
each
each
each
each
each
each
Hard FIat
Safety Glasses
Steel-toed Boots
Rubber Boots
Full-face Respirator
Cloth Overalls
Cold Weather Gear
Safety Vest
Field Vest
Rain Gear
Other:
Other:
Other:
Other:
Additional Safety/Personal Protection
Quantity
I
6
I
I
box
each
each
each
pair
each
pair
each
each
each
bottle
can
each
each
Disposable Latex/Nitrile Gloves
Tyvek Overalls
Disposable Ear Plugs
Ear Muffs (hearing protection)
Leather Gloves
Dust Mask @isposable)
Respirdor Carhidges
Life Vests/Flotation Devise
Body Hamess
Safety Lines
Sunscreen
Irsect Repellent
Drinkirg Water Cooler
First Aid Kit
50 pair per box
Type: Acid Gas/HEPA
Use to tie offwhile sampling at edge of water
Use to tie offwhile sampling at edge of water
page 4 of 5
bottle Eyewash
can Wasp Spray
Other:
Other:
Other:
Miscellaneous Items
Quantitv Unit ltem Notes
each Flashlight
I each Tool Kit
pair Binoculars
pair 2-way Radios
each XRF Unit
Include Batteries
Include Recharger
each Radiation Meter Include Recharger/Batteries
I each HNU Photoionization Detector Include Recharger/Batteries
each Explosimeter/Orygen Indicator Include Recharger/Elatteries
each H2S Indicator Include Recharger/Batteries
each organic vapor Analyzer (ovA) Include Recharger/Batteries
2 each Map.Title: Work Plan Sampling Maps
Title:
Other:
each Maps
Other:
Other:
Other:
page 5 of 5
APPENDIX C
Health and Safety Plan
SITE HEALTH AND SAFEW PLAN
SITE NAME: Anderson Auto Wrecking Company
ADDRESS: 2890 Utah 51 Spanish Fork,
Utah 84660.
SITE CHARACTERISTICS
SITE DESCRIPTION: The Site consists of approximately 10 acres of land in an L-
shape along State Road 51. The Site is currently a salvage yard for old vehicles,trailers, tires, engines, scrap-metal and vehicle pafts. The current owner and
operator lives in a residence on the Site, and salvage operations occur on the backportion of the property,
SITE HISTORY: The residential home on the south portion of the Site was built in
1911 (IHI, 2OO7a). Historical use of the Site prior to that time is unknown, but waslikely for agricultural purposes based on the location, In 197g, Aldon Anderson
acquired the site, which was at that time undeveloped (IHI, 2oo7a). The auto-
salvage yard commenced operations within a year of the property purchase and has
continued to the present (IHI, 2007a). Anderson Auto Salvage currently operates
under a three-year business license (Anderson, 2OO9). The northern five acres of the
Site were sold to Granite Bail Bonds in 2009 (Anderson, 2OO9).
It is important to note that a number of landfills have operated in the vicinity of theSite, including the Spanish Fork Landfill, Springville Landfill and the Utah CountyLandfill. These three landfills comprise the Spanish Fork Landfill CERCLIS Site(UTN00962138), with the Springville Landfill property adjacent to the west side ofthe Anderson Auto property. Landfill material has been buried under the northernportion of the Site, and may have extended from the Springville Landfill property.
La_ndfill activity in the area continued until 1991 (IHI, 2OO7a). Based on all'availableinformation, no liners were installed, although the landfills were covered with a claycap (IHI, 2OO7a).
HAZARD EVALUATION
CONTAMINANTS LIKELY FOUND ON-SITE: Potential contaminants of concern include
benzene, lead, and arsenic. Based on the history of the Site, other contaminants
are possible and could include oil and grease, mercury from the possible storage ofmercury switches, other metals, pCBs and pesticides.
ON-SITE HAZARDS: Site is located near a State highway. Personnel on-site willneed to watch for vehicles operating in the area. The Site was also a salvage yardwith various tvpes of debris. Operating the direct-push unit throuqh asph-alt and
concrete will create noise hazards. Other hazards include underground utility lines,
water hazards related to pond and ditches and slip, trip, and fall hazards.
PRIMARY RourES oF EXPoSURE: Inhalation, ingestion and absorption.
SAFEW MEASURES
LEVEL OF PROTECTION: Level D will be utilized during the sampling activities. Thelevel will be upgraded to level C if determined necessary by the sampling teamleader who is the health and safety officer. In the event that level A or B is needed,
EPA and local authorities will be contacted and the Site will be turned over to an
agency with level A and/or B capabilities.
SAFEry EQUIPMENT:
Hard Hat
Steel-toed boots
Protective eyewear
Gloves
Hearing protection
SURVEILI-ANCE AND MONITORING EeUIpMENT: None
EMERGENCY CONTACTS
NEAREST HOSPITAL: Mountain View Hospital
ADDRESS: 1OOO E 1OO N
Payson, Utah 84651
PHONE: [phone]
DIRECTIONS: Drive southwest on UT-s1 Street toward Ridgefield Road. Turn rightonto 400 North/State 147. Turn left onto State Highway 156/Main Street. Continue
onto State Route 198 WUT-198 WS State Road to 1000 E 1OO N.
LOCAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT: Utah County Health Department
CONTACT: Bryce Larsen
ADDRESS: 151 S. University Ave.
Provo, UT 84601
PHONE: [phone]
SIGNATURES
DERR Sample Team Leader Date Supervisor Date
DERC$mpreieim Membil - D;te -
| oenR StmpG %;m-Mem6d;-----D;t;
2890 Utah 51, Spanish Fork, UT 84660 to 1000 E 100 N, Payson, UT 84651 - Google Ma... page 1 of 2
atl0t
€
D
vf
Google
0,100S @
Directions to 1000 E 100 N, Payson, UT 84651
8.9 mi - about 15 mins
woroo s 0,F)
w Csn$r St ,,,{c.nt.rst
For&
E4OOH@
@
E
nmin
))
=
€
w 8000 s sl
D
tIJ
r4
St@
c^
"a4yo,t
Ed@w 7300 s
u'%,
fiss-t
-f,
$r 800(r S w8000ssr w8l]00s
,.--*
-t'".*
E80{ s 9r t6s00 s
(@014 Google - Map data@014 Google -
Sri Sri Rsdha
Kdshna lemple
p:
E 8800 S St
,l
,- lll
-g'
,*,n""o].
,i
,Pt"
.li\:'
h
2oa
g
qtf
@4
od5 IF,a
https://maps.google.com/maps?f=d&source=s-d&sadde2890+Utah+51,+Spanish+Fork,+U... ltutz\l4
2890 Utah 51, Spanish Fork, UT 84660 to 1000 E 100 N, Payson, UT 84651 - Google Ma... Page 2 of 2
2890 Utah 51, Spanish
@ ,
X;l$:"H,ilwest
on ur-s1 s toward E Bidsefierd Rd
F ,. Iil,Jlitill*," E 400 ir/srate 147 w
(h 3. Turn left onto State Hwy 156 S/N Main StI Continue to follow N Main St
About 4 mins
4. Continue onto State Rte 198 WUT-198 WS State Rd
Continue to follow State Rte 198 WUT-198 W
About 7 mins
5. Turn left onto N 1000 E
About 1 min
6. Turn left onto E 100 s st
Destination will be on the left
These. direction_s are tor planning purposes only. You may find that construction projects, traffic, weather, or other events may cause
conditions to differ from the map results, and you should plan your route accordingly. You must obey all signs or notices regarding your
route.
Map data @2014 Google
weren't rioht?route on maos.oooole.com and at the bottom left.
@
tt
go 0.9 mi
total0.9 mi
go 1.0 mi
total2.0 mi
go 2.0 mi
total3.9 mi
go 4.8 mi
total8.7 mi
go 0.1 mi
total8.8 mi
go 381 ft
total8.9 mi
1000 E 100 N, Payson, UT84651
https://maps.google.com/maps?f=d&source=s-d&sadde2890+Utah+51,+Spanish+Fork,+U... llZlZOl4
APPENDIX D
Consent for Access to Property Form
CONSENT FOR ACCESS TO PROPERTY
Anderson Auto wrecking company, GERCLIS ID# urN000g02773
Spanish Fork, Utah
Name of Owner: Click hcre t(l entcr te.\t.
Address of Owner: (llick here ao entcr re.\t.
Address of Property Subject to Access: Click here to cflter tcxt.
A. I, the authorized representative of the owner of the property described above
("Owner"), consent to officers, employees, contractors, subcontractors, and other authorized
representatives of the United States Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") and the Utah
Department of Environmental Quality ("UDEQ") entering and having continued access to the
above referenced ("Propert5r") for the following purposes:
l. Conducting field inspections and investigations;
2. Taking samples of surface soil, subsurface soil, sediment and groundwater on the
Property;
3. Drilling, boring or punching of holes for surface and subsurface investigations;
and
4. other such actions as may be necessary to protect human health and the
environment.
B. Owner understands that these actions by EPA and UDEQ are undertaken pursuant
to their response and enforcement responsibilities under the Compreheniive Environmental
Response, compensation,and Liability Act ("GERCLA') 4zu.s.c. $ 9601, et seq.
Notwithstanding any provision of this Consent for Access, the UDEQ and EpAEain all oftheir
access authorities and rights, as well as all of their rights to require land/water use restrictions,
including enforcement authorities related thereto, under CERiLA, RCRA and any other
applicable federal or State statute or regulation. EPA, UDEQ, and Owner recognize that
granting access does not constitute an admission of liability under CERCLA, RtRa, and any
other applicable federal or State statute or regulation. EPA, UDEQ, and Owner retain all rights
and defenses under CERCLA, RCRA, and any other applicable federal or State statute or
legylation. Liability for damage caused by negligence is governed by applicable law. Nothing
in this consent for Access constitutes a waiver of sovereign immunity. - -
C. The undersigned certifies that he/she is fully authorized to grant the access
provided herein on behalf of Owner and to execute and legally bind Owner to this document.
Section 19-6-304 of the Utah Code Ann. provides that, upon request as indicated
below, the Owner may have a split sample if possible and may obtain an analysis of the sample
available. To these ends, please mark your preference below:
t I I wish to obtain splits of all samples collected on the Property and a receipt
describing each sample taken. I understand that I must provide the necessary
sample containers to obtain these splits. The responsibility of choosing an
analytical laboratory and the cost of analysis of the splits is solely mine.
t I When available to UDEQ, Owner wishes to obtain a copy of the final analytical
results report and laboratory data concerning the samples taken from the Property.
Indicate address where results should be sent to:
Name of Owner
By:Date:
Name
Title
C. The undersigned certifies that he/she is fully authorized to grant the access
provided herein on behalf of Owner and to execute and legally bind Owner to this document.
Section 19-6-304 of the Utah Code Ann. provides that, upon request as indicated
below, the Owner may have a split sample if possible and may obtain an analysis of the sample
available. To these ends, please mark your preference below:
[ ] I wish to obtain splits of all samples collected on the Property and a receipt
describing each sample taken. I understand that I must provide the necessary
sample containers to obtain these splits. The responsibility of choosing an
analytical laboratory and the cost of analysis of the splits is solely mine.
[ ] When available to UDEQ, Owner wishes to obtain a copy of the final analytical
results report and laboratory data concerning the samples taken from the Property.
Indicate address where results should be sent to:
Name of Owner
By: _
Name
Title
Date:

ERRC-154-21

November 5, 2021

Ryan Dunham
Site Assessment Manager
EPA Region 8
1595 Wynkoop Street
Denver, Colorado 80202-1129

Dear Mr. Dunham:

Enclosed for your review is a Site Inspection (SI) Analytical Results Report (ARR) for the
Anderson Auto Wrecking Company site (SEMS EPA ID UTN000802773) (herein referred to as
located in Spanish Fork, Utah County, Utah.

The Site came to the attention of the Division of Environmental Response and Remediation
(DERR) because benzene, lead, and arsenic were detected in groundwater and surface soil through
an environmental investigation performed in 2007. Data from additional studies, including an SI in
2018, indicated the presence of aluminum, arsenic, chromium, cobalt, iron, lead, and polycyclic
aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in groundwater at concentrations that could potentially affect human
health. The primary sources of these contaminants were determined to be a car crushing area,
miscellaneous battery and car part storage areas, and an asphaltic tar storage area associated with

Although contamination remains within Site groundwater and soil, the exposure potential is
low. There are no downgradient municipal drinking water wells within four miles, and no
downstream surface water intakes for drinking water within 15 miles. Metal concentrations in soils
are slightly elevated; however, the Site is generally fenced around the perimeter and bordered by
historical landfills, open fields, small industrial businesses, and a state highway. For these reasons,
the DERR recommends No Further Remedial Action Planned (NFRAP) for this Site.

Page 2

If you have any questions, please contact me at [phone], or by email at
[e-mail].

Sincerely,

Wes Sandlin
Site Assessment Project Manager
Division of Environmental Response and Remediation

WS/lg

Enclosure(s): Anderson Auto Wrecking Company Site Inspection Analytical Results Report

cc: Eric Edwards, Director, Utah County Health Department






6,7(,163(&7,21
$1$/<7,&$/5(68/765(3257



$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ&RPSDQ\
8WDK&RXQW\8WDK
871





1RYHPEHU 


6,7(,163(&7,21
$1$/<7,&$/5(68/765(3257


$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ&RPSDQ\
8WDK&RXQW\8WDK
871



8WDK'HSDUWPHQWRI(QYLURQPHQWDO4XDOLW\
'LYLVLRQRI(QYLURQPHQWDO5HVSRQVHDQG5HPHGLDWLRQ


3UHSDUHGE\ :HV6DQGOLQ



$SSURYHG BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 'DWH BBBBBBBB
  
:HV6DQGOLQ3URMHFW0DQDJHU

$SSURYHG BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 'DWH BBBBBBBB
  
7RP'DQLHOV6LWH$VVHVVPHQW6HFWLRQ0DQDJHU

$SSURYHG BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 'DWH BBBBBBBB
  
5\DQ'XQKDP6LWH$VVHVVPHQW0DQDJHU(3$5HJLRQ

6LWH,QVSHFWLRQ$QDO\WLFDO5HVXOWV5HSRUW      L
$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ&RPSDQ\871      

7DEOHRI&RQWHQWV
,1752'8&7,21
2%-(&7,9(6
6,7('(6&5,37,21
6LWH/RFDWLRQDQG'HVFULSWLRQ
6LWH+LVWRU\DQG3UHYLRXV:RUN
),(/'$&7,9,7,(6
'(9,$7,216)5207+(:25.3/$1
:$67(6285&(&+$5$&7(5,67,&6
:DVWH6RXUFH3URSHUWLHV
:DVWH6RXUFH6DPSOH/RFDWLRQV
:DVWH6RXUFH'DWD$VVHVVPHQW
*5281':$7(53$7+:$<
+\GURJHRORJ\
*URXQGZDWHU7DUJHWV
*URXQGZDWHU6DPSOH/RFDWLRQV
*URXQGZDWHU$QDO\WLFDO5HVXOWV
*URXQGZDWHU([SRVXUH3DWKZD\&RQFOXVLRQV
685)$&(:$7(53$7+:$<
+\GURORJ\
6XUIDFH:DWHU7DUJHWVDQG&RQFOXVLRQV
62,/(;32685(3$7+:$<
*HRORJ\
6RLO7DUJHWV
6XEVXUIDFH6RLO6DPSOH/RFDWLRQV
6XEVXUIDFH6RLO$QDO\WLFDO5HVXOWV
6RLO([SRVXUH3DWKZD\&RQFOXVLRQV
62,/9$32568%685)$&(,17586,213$7+:$<
6RLO9DSRU7DUJHWVDQG&RQFOXVLRQV
$,53$7+:$<
0HWHRURORJ\
$LU3DWKZD\7DUJHWVDQG&RQFOXVLRQV
'$7$48$/,7<
'DWD4XDOLW\$VVHVVPHQW
'DWD4XDOLW\2EMHFWLYHV

6LWH,QVSHFWLRQ$QDO\WLFDO5HVXOWV5HSRUW      LL
$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ&RPSDQ\871      

6800$5<$1'&21&/86,216
5()(5(1&(6

 

6LWH,QVSHFWLRQ$QDO\WLFDO5HVXOWV5HSRUW      LLL
$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ&RPSDQ\871      

/,672)),*85(6
)LJXUH 6LWH/RFDWLRQ0DS
)LJXUH 6DPSOH/RFDWLRQ0DS
)LJXUH *URXQGZDWHU6DPSOH/RFDWLRQ0DS
)LJXUH 6XEVXUIDFH6RLO6DPSOH/RFDWLRQ0DS

/,672)7$%/(6
7DEOH 6DPSOH/RFDWLRQV'HVFULSWLRQVDQG5DWLRQDOH
7DEOH 6DPSOH$QDO\VHV&KHFNOLVW
7DEOH *URXQGZDWHU6XPPDU\RI92&&RQFHQWUDWLRQV
7DEOH *URXQGZDWHU6XPPDU\RI692&&RQFHQWUDWLRQV
7DEOH *URXQGZDWHU6XPPDU\RI3HVWLFLGHDQG$URFORU&RQFHQWUDWLRQV
7DEOH *URXQGZDWHU6XPPDU\RI0HWDO&RQFHQWUDWLRQV
7DEOH 6RLO6XPPDU\RI92&&RQFHQWUDWLRQV
7DEOH 6RLO6XPPDU\RI692&&RQFHQWUDWLRQV
7DEOH 6RLO6XPPDU\RI3HVWLFLGHDQG$URFORU&RQFHQWUDWLRQV
7DEOH 6RLO6XPPDU\RI0HWDO&RQFHQWUDWLRQV
7DEOH 'DWD4XDOLW\2EMHFWLYHV

/,672)$33(1',&(6
$SSHQGL[$ +LVWRULFDO6DPSOLQJ/RFDWLRQ7DEOHDQG)LJXUH
$SSHQGL[% &RQVHQWIRU$FFHVVWR3URSHUW\
$SSHQGL[& )LHOG$FWLYLWLHV5HSRUW
$SSHQGL[' &RQWUDFWRU7ULS5HSRUWDQG'DWD9DOLGDWLRQ5HSRUW

6LWH,QVSHFWLRQ$QDO\WLFDO5HVXOWV5HSRUW      
$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ&RPSDQ\871      

,1752'8&7,21
8QGHUDXWKRULW\RIWKH&RPSUHKHQVLYH(QYLURQPHQWDO5HVSRQVH&RPSHQVDWLRQDQG/LDELOLW\
$FW&(5&/$RIWKH6XSHUIXQG$PHQGPHQWVDQG5HDXWKRUL]DWLRQ$FW6$5$RI
LQDFFRUGDQFHZLWKWKH1DWLRQDO2LODQG+D]DUGRXV6XEVWDQFHV3ROOXWLRQ&RQWLQJHQF\3ODQ
1&3DQGWKURXJKD&RRSHUDWLYH$JUHHPHQWZLWKWKH86(QYLURQPHQWDO3URWHFWLRQ$JHQF\
5HJLRQ(3$WKH8WDK'HSDUWPHQWRI(QYLURQPHQWDO4XDOLW\8'(4'LYLVLRQRI
(QYLURQPHQWDO5HVSRQVHDQG5HPHGLDWLRQ'(55KDVSUHSDUHGWKLV6LWH,QVSHFWLRQ6,
$QDO\WLFDO5HVXOWV5HSRUW$55IRUWKH$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ&RPSDQ\871
VXEVXUIDFHVRLOZHUH
FROOHFWHGDVSDUWRIWKLV6,7KHODERUDWRU\DQDO\WLFDOGDWDIURPWKHFROOHFWHGVDPSOHVDQGRWKHU
DFFXPXODWHGLQIRUPDWLRQLVVXPPDUL]HGLQWKLV6,$55
7KLVLQYHVWLJDWLRQZDVLQLWLDWHGEHFDXVHD3KDVH,,(QYLURQPHQWDO$VVHVVPHQW,+,
(QYLURQPHQWDOEGHWHFWHGEHQ]HQHDQGOHDGLQVRLODQGEHQ]HQHDQGDUVHQLFLQ
JURXQGZDWHUFRQFHQWUDWLRQVDERYHVFUHHQLQJOHYHOV7KHSXUSRVHRIWKLVUHSRUWLVWRSUHVHQWQHZ
GDWDVXPPDUL]HSHUWLQHQWUHVXOWVIURPSUHYLRXVVWXGLHVLGHQWLI\SRWHQWLDOO\KD]DUGRXV
FRQGLWLRQVGHVFULEHGDWDJDSVDQGGHWHUPLQHWKHPRVWDSSURSULDWHQH[WVWHSVWKDWFDQEHWDNHQWR
SURWHFWKXPDQDQGHQYLURQPHQWDOKHDOWKDWWKH6LWH
2%-(&7,9(6
7KHSULPDU\REMHFWLYHRIWKHVDPSOLQJSHUIRUPHGDWWKH6LWHZDVWRGHWHUPLQHWKHVRXUFHDQG
H[WHQWRIFRQWDPLQDWLRQWKDWFRXOGSRVHDWKUHDWWRKXPDQKHDOWKDQGWKHHQYLURQPHQW7KH
ILQGLQJVFRQWDLQHGKHUHLQVHUYHDVDUHFRUGRIKD]DUGRXVPDWHULDOVLGHQWLILHGZLWKLQVDPSOHVIURP
WKH6LWHDQGSURYLGHDEDVLVXSRQZKLFKWRGHWHUPLQHWKHDSSURSULDWHQHVVRIFRQWLQXHG
PDQDJHPHQWXQGHU&(5&/$RULQFOXGLQJLWZLWKLQDQRWKHUFOHDQXSSURJUDPRUDXWKRULW\7KLV
UHSRUWSUHVHQWVQHZGDWDIURPVXEVXUIDFHVRLODQGJURXQGZDWHUVDPSOHVDORQJZLWKOLPLWHGVRLO
DQGJURXQGZDWHUGDWDIURPSUHYLRXVLQYHVWLJDWLRQV7KHREMHFWLYHVRIWKHVDPSOLQJDVVRFLDWHG
ZLWKWKLV6,ZHUHWR
3URYLGHDQDUUDWLYHVXPPDU\RIWKHDFFXPXODWHGLQIRUPDWLRQLQWRDQ6,$55
,GHQWLI\SRWHQWLDOWDUJHWVWKDWPD\EHDIIHFWHGE\FRQWDPLQDWLRQDWWKH6LWHDVZHOO
DVRWKHUWDUJHWVWKDWPD\EHLPSDFWHGE\WKHPLJUDWLRQRIWKHFRQWDPLQDWLRQYLD
WKHVXVSHFWHGH[SRVXUHSDWKZD\VDQG
'HWHUPLQHLIIXUWKHUDVVHVVPHQWZRUNXQGHU&(5&/$RURWKHUDXWKRULW\LV
ZDUUDQWHGIRUWKH6LWH

6LWH,QVSHFWLRQ$QDO\WLFDO5HVXOWV5HSRUW      
$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ&RPSDQ\871      

6,7('(6&5,37,21
 6LWH/RFDWLRQDQG'HVFULSWLRQ
7KH6LWHLVORFDWHGDW1RUWK6WDWH5RDG6SDQLVK)RUN8WDK)LJXUH7KH
JHRJUDSKLFDOFRRUGLQDWHVIRUWKH6LWHDUHƒQRUWKDQGƒZHVW7KH6LWHLV
ORFDWHGLQWKHZHVWTXDUWHURI6HFWLRQ7RZQVKLS15DQJH(6SULQJYLOOH4XDGUDQJOH
%DNHU
7KH6LWHFRQVLVWVRIDSSUR[LPDWHO\DFUHVRIODQGLQDQ/VKDSHDORQJ6WDWH5RDGDQGZDV
SUHYLRXVO\XVHGDVDVDOYDJH\DUGIRUROGYHKLFOHVWUDLOHUVWLUHVHQJLQHVVFUDSPHWDODQGRWKHU
YHKLFOHSDUWV$QRFFXSLHGVLQJOHIDPLO\KRPHLVORFDWHGRQWKHVRXWKHDVWHUQFRUQHURIWKH6LWH
)LJXUH
$FUXVKLQJVWDWLRQXVHGWRFUXVKFDUVDQGRWKHUPHWDOOLFGHEULVZDVORFDWHGRQWKHVRXWKHUQ
SRUWLRQRIWKH\DUGEHKLQGDVLQJOHIDPLO\KRPH)LJXUH$QDUWHVLDQZHOOLVORFDWHGRQWKH
QRUWKHDVWHUQSRUWLRQRIWKH6LWH7KHZHOOGLVFKDUJHVZDWHULQWRDGUDLQDJHGLWFKZKLFKUXQV
DORQJWKHQRUWKHUQDQGHDVWHUQ6LWHERXQGDU\2QO\DVPDOOSRUWLRQRIYHKLFOHVVWRUHGDWWKH
ZUHFNLQJ\DUGUHPDLQDQGDUHORFDWHGLQWKHVRXWKZHVWFRUQHURIWKH6LWH6WRUDJHVKHGVDWWKH
ZUHFNLQJ\DUGVWRUHGFDUEDWWHULHVJDVROLQHFDQVHQJLQHZDVWHVVFUDSPHWDODVSKDOWLFWDUDQG
SDLQWDVZHOODVPLVFHOODQHRXVGHEULV6XUIDFHVWDLQVRQFHSUHVHQWLQWKHQRUWKHUQILYHDFUHVRI
WKH6LWHDUHQRORQJHUYLVLEOHEHFDXVHWKHWRSWZRIHHWRIVRLOKDYHEHHQWLOOHG8WDK'(4'(55
7KURXJKRXWWKHSURSHUW\VXUIDFHVRLOVFRQWDLQJODVVDQGPHWDOGHEULVRIYDULRXVVL]HV
7KUHHVPDOOEXVLQHVVHV30UHSDLUV866WUHHW5RGV &ROOLVLRQDQG1HZ&RQFHSW/RXYHUV
RSHUDWHRQSURSHUWLHVLPPHGLDWHO\VRXWKRIWKH6LWH7KH6SDQLVK)RUN/DQGILOO6SULQJYLOOH
/DQGILOODQGWKH8WDK&RXQW\/DQGILOORSHUDWHGLQFORVHSUR[LPLW\WRWKH6LWH7KHVHWKUHH
ODQGILOOVFRPSULVHWKH6SDQLVK)RUN/DQGILOO6XSHUIXQG(QWHUSULVH0DQDJHPHQW6\VWHP6(06
VLWH871ZLWKWKH6SULQJYLOOHDQG8WDK&RXQW\/DQGILOOSURSHUWLHVDGMDFHQWWRWKH
ZHVWVLGHRIWKH$QGHUVRQ$XWRSURSHUW\$SSHQGL[$)LJXUH$2SHQILHOGVDUHORFDWHGWR
WKHLPPHGLDWHQRUWKHDVWRIWKH6LWH5HVLGHQFHVDUHORFDWHGDORQJ6WDWH5RDGDFURVVWKHVWUHHW
IURPWKH6LWH7KH6LWHLVJHQHUDOO\IHQFHGDURXQGWKHSHULPHWHUEXWPXFKRIWKHIHQFHLVLQ
GLVUHSDLUSRWHQWLDOO\DOORZLQJDFFHVVWRWKH6LWH
 6LWH+LVWRU\DQG3UHYLRXV:RUN
7KHUHVLGHQWLDOKRPHORFDWHGDWWKH6LWHZDVFRQVWUXFWHGLQ+LVWRULFDOXVHRIWKH6LWHSULRU
WRWKDWWLPHLVXQNQRZQEXWZDVOLNHO\IRUDJULFXOWXUDOSXUSRVHV7KHDXWRVDOYDJH\DUGRSHUDWHG
IURPDSSUR[LPDWHO\XQWLO8WDK'LYLVLRQRI&RUSRUDWLRQVDQG&RPPHUFLDO&RGH

&RQWDPLQDWLRQZDVILUVWGHWHFWHGDWWKH6LWHLQ-XO\DVSDUWRI3KDVH,,(QYLURQPHQWDO
$VVHVVPHQWV,+,(QYLURQPHQWDOEF/HDGPJNJDQGEHQ]HQHPJNJ

6LWH,QVSHFWLRQ$QDO\WLFDO5HVXOWV5HSRUW      
$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ&RPSDQ\871      

ZHUHGHWHFWHGLQVRLOVDPSOHVDERYH86(3$UHVLGHQWLDOVRLO5HJLRQDO6FUHHQLQJ/HYHOV56/V
>OHDG PJNJEHQ]HQHPJNJ@$UVHQLF—J/DQGEHQ]HQH—J/ZHUHGHWHFWHG
LQJURXQGZDWHUDERYH86(3$0D[LPXP&RQWDPLQDQW/HYHOV0&/V>DUVHQLF —J/
EHQ]HQH —J/@3UHYLRXVVDPSOLQJORFDWLRQVDUHVKRZQLQ$SSHQGL[$)LJXUH$ZLWK
DQDO\WLFDOUHVXOWVVKRZQLQ$SSHQGL[$7DEOHV$DQG$$GGLWLRQDOO\VHYHUDOWHVWSLWVGXJ
GXULQJWKHLQYHVWLJDWLRQXQFRYHUHGPXQLFLSDOWUDVKDQGGHEULVDORQJWKHZHVWHUQERXQGDU\RIWKH
6LWHZKHUHKLVWRULFDOODQGILOODFWLYLW\PD\KDYHH[WHQGHGRQWRWKHSURSHUW\
7KH6LWHZDVDFFHSWHGLQWRWKH9ROXQWDU\&OHDQXS3URJUDP9&3LQ6HSWHPEHURI$VSDUW
RIWKH9&3SURFHVVWKH'(55UHTXHVWHGDGGLWLRQDOVDPSOLQJIRUSHVWLFLGHVSRO\FKORULQDWHG
ELSKHQ\OV3&%VPHWDOVYRODWLOHRUJDQLFFRPSRXQGV92&VDQGSRO\F\FOLFDURPDWLF
K\GURFDUERQV3$+V7KH9&3DSSOLFDQWIDLOHGWRFRPSO\ZLWKWKHUHTXHVWDQGZDVWHUPLQDWHG
IURPWKH9&3LQ$SULORI7KH6LWHZDVVXEVHTXHQWO\'LVFRYHUHGDQGHQWHUHGLQWRWKH
&RPSUHKHQVLYH(QYLURQPHQWDO5HVSRQVH&RPSHQVDWLRQVDQG/LDELOLW\,QIRUPDWLRQ6\VWHP
&(5&/,6GDWDEDVHLQ0DUFKRI
$3UHOLPLQDU\$VVHVVPHQW3$FRPSOHWHGLQ'HFHPEHUUHSRUWHGWKDWWKHH[WHQWRI
FRQWDPLQDWLRQDWWKH6LWHLVXQNQRZQDQGWKDWVRLOVWDLQLQJDQGKLVWRULFDODFWLYLW\DWWKH6LWH
VXJJHVWVWKDWFRQWDPLQDWLRQOLNHO\RULJLQDWHGWKURXJKDXWRPRWLYHVDOYDJHRSHUDWLRQV7KH3$
LGHQWLILHGDFDUFUXVKLQJDUHDHQJLQHEORFNVWRUDJHDUHDVDEDWWHU\VWRUDJHDUHDDQ
DOXPLQXPUDGLDWRUVWRUDJHDUHDDWDUVWRUDJHDUHDK\GURFDUERQVXUIDFHVWDLQVDQGKLVWRULFDO
ODQGILOOGHEULVDVSRVVLEOHFRQWDPLQDQWVRXUFHVDWWKH6LWH
),(/'$&7,9,7,(6
)LHOGDFWLYLWLHVZHUHFRQGXFWHGIURP0D\7KH'(55SHUVRQQHORQVLWHGXULQJ
VDPSOLQJDFWLYLWLHVZHUH&KULV0DUWLQDQG0HOLVVD2WWOH\$&RQVHQWIRU$FFHVVWR3URSHUW\
IRUP$SSHQGL[%ZDVVLJQHGE\WKHUHVSHFWLYHSURSHUW\RZQHUVSULRUWRVDPSOHFROOHFWLRQ
:HVWRQ6ROXWLRQV,QFZDVFRQWUDFWHGWRSURYLGHGLUHFWSXVKGULOOLQJVHUYLFHVDWWKH6LWH
)LHOGVDPSOLQJDFWLYLWLHVLQFOXGHGWKHDGYDQFHPHQWRIHLJKWERUHKROHV$$:&$$:&
$$:&$$:&$$:&$$:&$$:&DQG$$:&)LJXUH
*URXQGZDWHUDQGVXEVXUIDFHVRLOVDPSOHVZHUHFROOHFWHGIURPHDFKERUHKROHORFDWLRQ
6XEVXUIDFHVRLOVDPSOHVZHUHVFUHHQHGIRUYRODWLOHYDSRUVXVLQJDSKRWRLRQL]DWLRQGHWHFWRU
3,'DQGVDPSOHVZHUHFROOHFWHGIURPDUHDVRIKLJKHVW3,'UHDGLQJVDQGRUIURPDUHDVRIWKH
VRLOFROXPQWKDWZHUHXQFKDUDFWHULVWLFRIQDWLYHVRLOV$SSHQGL[&2WKHUZLVHVXEVXUIDFHVRLO
VDPSOHVZHUHFROOHFWHGIURPWKHVDWXUDWHG]RQHGLUHFWO\DERYHWKHJURXQGZDWHUWDEOH6XEVXUIDFH
VRLODQGJURXQGZDWHUILHOGGXSOLFDWHVDPSOHVZHUHFROOHFWHGIURPORFDWLRQ$$:&DQGJLYHQ
WKHGHVLJQDWLRQV$$:&6%DQG$$:&*:UHVSHFWLYHO\

6LWH,QVSHFWLRQ$QDO\WLFDO5HVXOWV5HSRUW      
$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ&RPSDQ\871      

,Q$SULO:HV6DQGOLQ7RP'DQLHOVDQG5RELQ2VWHUKRXGWRIWKH'(55YLVLWHGWKH6LWHWR
IROORZXSZLWKSURSHUW\RZQHUVDERXWFKDQJHVWKDWKDGRFFXUUHGDWWKH6LWHVLQFH7KH
SURSHUW\RZQHUVVROGWKHLUKRXVHDWWKH6LWHZKLFKLVQRZRFFXSLHGE\DQRWKHUIDPLO\7KH
HQJLQHEORFNPLVFHOODQHRXVSDUWSXOODQGEDWWHU\VWRUDJHDUHDVQHDUWKHIRUPHUDXWRFUXVKHU
ZHUHQRORQJHUSUHVHQWQRUZHUHWKHVXUIDFHVWDLQVSUHYLRXVO\GRFXPHQWHGLQWKHDUHD1HDUO\DOO
FDUVDQGVFUDSPHWDOKDGEHHQUHPRYHGIURPWKHSURSHUW\ZLWKRQO\IRXUFDUVDQGWHQFUXVKHG
FDUVUHPDLQLQJLQWKHVRXWKZHVWFRUQHU7KHQRUWKHUQILYHDFUHVRIWKH6LWHKDGEHHQWLOOHGE\
SURVSHFWLYHGHYHORSHUVUHPRYLQJWKHDOXPLQXPUDGLDWRUHQJLQHEORFNDQGDVSKDOWLFWDUVWRUDJH
DUHDVDORQJZLWKHYLGHQFHRIVXUIDFHVWDLQLQJ7KH'(55LVQRWDZDUHRIDQ\RWKHUFKDQJHVWR
WKH6LWH
'(9,$7,216)5207+(:25.3/$1
7KHIROORZLQJDUHGHYLDWLRQVIURPWKH(3$DSSURYHG6,:RUN3ODQIRUWKH6LWH8'(4'(55

6DPSOH$$:&*:ZDVQRWFROOHFWHGIURPWKH6SDQLVK)RUN&LW\PXQLFLSDOGULQNLQJ
ZDWHUZHOOGXHWRWKHPQRWEHLQJLQRSHUDWLRQGXULQJILHOGDFWLYLWLHV
6XUIDFHVRLOVDPSOHVZHUHQRWFROOHFWHG
1RQHRIWKHSURSRVHGVXUIDFHZDWHU$$:&6:WKURXJK$$:&6:RU
VHGLPHQWVDPSOHV$$:&6'WKURXJK$$:&6'DQGDVVRFLDWHGWULSEODQNV
ZHUHFROOHFWHGEHFDXVHWKHUHZDVQRZDWHULQWKHGLWFKHVVXUURXQGLQJWKH6LWHDWWKHWLPH
RIWKHVDPSOLQJHYHQW
%DFNJURXQGJURXQGZDWHUDQGVXUIDFHVRLOVDPSOHVDW$$:&ZHUHQRWFROOHFWHGGXH
WRXWLOLW\UHVWULFWLRQV
$PRQLWRULQJZHOOZDVGLVFRYHUHGLQWKHYLFLQLW\RISURSRVHGERUHKROH$$:&
WKHUHIRUHWKHERULQJZDVQRWGULOOHGDQGWKHZHOOZDVVDPSOHGLQVWHDG$VXEVXUIDFHVRLO
VDPSOHZDVQRWFROOHFWHGDWWKLVORFDWLRQ
7KHSULYDWHGULQNLQJZDWHUZHOO$$:&ZDVQRWIRXQGGXULQJWKH6,DQGLWZDVQRW
VDPSOHG
7KHWULSEODQNZDVDVVLJQHGWKHODEHO$$:&*:UDWKHUWKDQ$$:&*:
/DERUDWRU\TXDOLW\FRQWURO4&VDPSOHV$$:&*:DQG$$:&6%ZHUHQRW
FROOHFWHGEHFDXVHDGGLWLRQDOYROXPHVRIJURXQGZDWHUDQGVXEVXUIDFHVRLOFROOHFWHGDW
ORFDWLRQ$$:&ZHUHVXIILFLHQWIRUODERUDWRU\PDWUL[VSLNHPDWUL[VSLNHGXSOLFDWH
0606'DQDO\VHV

6LWH,QVSHFWLRQ$QDO\WLFDO5HVXOWV5HSRUW      
$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ&RPSDQ\871      

6LQFHGHGLFDWHGVDPSOLQJHTXLSPHQWDQGRUGLVSRVDEOHVZHUHXVHGDWHYHU\ORFDWLRQD
ULQVDWHEODQN$$:&*:ZDVQRWQHFHVVDU\
7KHVHFKDQJHVWRWKHZRUNSODQGLGQRWDOWHUWKHDELOLW\RIWKLV6,WRVXIILFLHQWO\GHVFULEH
FRQGLWLRQVDWWKH6LWH
:$67(6285&(&+$5$&7(5,67,&6
 :DVWH6RXUFH3URSHUWLHV
3UHYLRXVLQYHVWLJDWLRQVDWWKH6LWHGHWHFWHGEHQ]HQHDQGOHDGLQVRLODQGEHQ]HQHDQGDUVHQLFLQ
JURXQGZDWHUDERYHUHOHYDQWVFUHHQLQJOHYHOV,+,(QYLURQPHQWDOEF7KHVH
FRQWDPLQDQWVDVZHOODVOHDGDQG3$+VDUHWKHSULPDU\FRQWDPLQDQWVRIFRQFHUQDWWKH6LWH
6RLOVWDLQLQJDQGKLVWRULFDFWLYLW\DWWKH6LWHVXJJHVWFRQWDPLQDWLRQOLNHO\RULJLQDWHGWKURXJK
DXWRPRWLYHVDOYDJHRSHUDWLRQV3RWHQWLDOVRXUFHDUHDVLQFOXGHWKHDXWRFUXVKHUEDWWHU\VWRUDJH
HQJLQHEORFNDOXPLQXPUDGLDWRUDQGWDUVWRUDJHDUHDVK\GURFDUERQVXUIDFHVWDLQVDQGKLVWRULF
ODQGILOOGHEULV$QLQWHUYLHZZLWKWKHSURSHUW\RZQHUUHYHDOHGWKDWGXULQJRSHUDWLRQRIWKH
ZUHFNLQJ\DUGIOXLGVGUDLQLQJIURPFUXVKHGYHKLFOHVZHUHFROOHFWHGDQGWKHQGXPSHGLQWRWKH
QH[WFDUWREHFUXVKHG,+,(QYLURQPHQWDOD&DUVFRQWDLQDYDULHW\RIKD]DUGRXVPDWHULDOV
LQFOXGLQJKHDY\PHWDOVDQGSHWUROHXPK\GURFDUERQVWKDWPD\KDYHEHHQUHOHDVHGGXULQJ
FUXVKLQJRSHUDWLRQV
7KHSUHVHQFHRIEDWWHU\DFLGRUK\GURFDUERQVLQVRLOVPD\KDYHIDFLOLWDWHGPHWDOOHDFKLQJLQWR
VRLODQGJURXQGZDWHUDVPHWDOPRELOLW\LVODUJHO\LQIOXHQFHGE\IDFWRUVVXFKDVDFLGLW\
R[LGDWLRQUHGXFWLRQUHGR[SRWHQWLDODQGRUJDQLFPDWWHUFRQWHQW(YDQNRDQG']RPEDN
,QJHQHUDOOHDGLVPRVWO\UHWDLQHGLQWKHVRLODVXQGLVVROYHGSUHFLSLWDWHVVXUIDFHFRDWLQJVRQ
PLQHUDOVRUDVVXVSHQGHGRUJDQLFPDWWHU(YDQNRDQG']RPEDN$UVHQLFFRPSRXQGV
W\SLFDOO\VRUEWRVRLOVDQGDUHQRWWUDQVSRUWHGRYHUORQJGLVWDQFHVLQJURXQGZDWHURUVXUIDFH
ZDWHU(YDQNRDQG']RPEDN
([SRVXUHWREHQ]HQHRUDUVHQLFDWHOHYDWHGFRQFHQWUDWLRQVFDQEHH[WUHPHO\WR[LFWRKXPDQVDQG
ZLOGOLIHDQGORQJWHUPH[SRVXUHWRWKHVHVXEVWDQFHVFDQKDUPWKHIXQFWLRQRIFHOOVDQGRUJDQV
DQGOHDGWRFDQFHUV/HDGLVWR[LFDQGWKHH[SRVXUHDQGDFFXPXODWLRQRIOHDGYLDLQKDODWLRQRU
LQJHVWLRQFDQGDPDJHRUJDQIXQFWLRQDQGWKHQHUYRXVV\VWHPHVSHFLDOO\LQFKLOGUHQ3$+V
LQFOXGHPDQ\NQRZQFDUFLQRJHQVDQGFDQEHKDUPIXOWROLYHUOXQJDQGEUDLQIXQFWLRQ
 :DVWH6RXUFH6DPSOH/RFDWLRQV
*URXQGZDWHUDQGVXEVXUIDFHVRLOVDPSOHVZHUHFROOHFWHGIURPVRLOERULQJVDWWKHIROORZLQJ
ORFDWLRQV)LJXUHV

6LWH,QVSHFWLRQ$QDO\WLFDO5HVXOWV5HSRUW      
$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ&RPSDQ\871      

%DFNJURXQGVDPSOHV$$:&*:DQG$$:&6%ZHUHFROOHFWHGHDVWRIWKH
UHVLGHQWLDOQHLJKERUKRRGDWORFDWLRQ$$:&7KHWRWDOERUHKROHGHSWKZDVIHHW
EHORZJURXQGVXUIDFHEJVZLWKJURXQGZDWHUHQFRXQWHUHGDWIHHWEJV7KHVXEVXUIDFH
VRLOVDPSOHZDVFROOHFWHGIURPWKHVDWXUDWHG]RQHGLUHFWO\DERYHWKHJURXQGZDWHUWDEOH
7KHQRUWKDGMRLQLQJSURSHUW\RIWKH6LWHQHDUWKHDUWHVLDQZHOO$$:&7KHWRWDO
ERUHKROHGHSWKZDVIHHWEJV7KHGHSWKWRJURXQGZDWHUZDVQRWGRFXPHQWHG7KH
VXEVXUIDFHVRLOVDPSOHLQWHUYDOZDVWRIHHWEJV
7KHVRXWKHUQSURSHUW\ERXQGDU\QHDUWKHDXWRFUXVKHUPLVFHOODQHRXVSDUWSXOOEDWWHU\
VWRUDJHHQJLQHEORFNDQGFUXVKHGFDUVWRUDJHDUHDV$$:&$$:&DQG$$:&
7KHWRWDOERUHKROHGHSWKVZHUHIHHWEJVIRUERWKORFDWLRQVZLWKJURXQGZDWHU
HQFRXQWHUHGDWIHHWEJVDWERWKORFDWLRQV6XEVXUIDFHVRLOVDPSOH$$:&6%DQG
GXSOLFDWH$$:&6%ZHUHFROOHFWHGIURPWKHVDWXUDWHG]RQHVGLUHFWO\DERYHWKH
JURXQGZDWHUWDEOH6XEVXUIDFHVRLOVDPSOH$$:&6%ZDVFROOHFWHGQHDUWKH
WUDQVLWLRQEHWZHHQWDQDQGJUD\FOD\LQWKHVRLOFROXPQ
7KHZHVWHUQSRUWLRQRIWKH6LWHGRZQJUDGLHQWRIWKHVFUDSSHGFDUDUHD$$:&7KH
WRWDOERUHKROHGHSWKZDVIHHWEJVZLWKJURXQGZDWHUHQFRXQWHUHGDWIHHWEJV7KH
VXEVXUIDFHVRLOVDPSOHLQWHUYDOZDVDSSUR[LPDWHO\IHHWEJV
7KHQRUWKSRUWLRQRIWKH6LWHQHDUWKHDOXPLQXPDQGUDGLDWRUVWRUDJHDUHD$$:&
7KHWRWDOERUHKROHGHSWKZDVIHHWEJV7KHGHSWKWRJURXQGZDWHUDQGVXEVXUIDFHVRLO
LQWHUYDOZHUHQRWGRFXPHQWHG
'RZQJUDGLHQWVDPSOHVZHUHFROOHFWHGIURPWKHROGODQGILOODUHDORFDWHGLQDGUDLQDJH
EDVLQWRWKHZHVWRIWKH6LWH$$:&7KHWRWDOERUHKROHGHSWKZDVIHHWEJVZLWK
JURXQGZDWHUHQFRXQWHUHGDWIHHWEJV7KHVXEVXUIDFHVRLOVDPSOHLQWHUYDOZDVQRW
GRFXPHQWHG

*URXQGZDWHUVDPSOH$$:&*:ZDVFROOHFWHGIURPDQH[LVWLQJPRQLWRULQJZHOORQWKH
ZHVWHUQSRUWLRQRIWKH6LWHQHDUGRFXPHQWHGVXUIDFHVWDLQV$$:&)LJXUH'HSWKWR
JURXQGZDWHUZDVDSSUR[LPDWHO\IHHWEJV
6XEVXUIDFHVRLOVDPSOH$$:&6%ZDVFROOHFWHGIURPDVRLOERULQJVRXWKRIWKH866WUHHW
5RGV &ROOLVLRQSURSHUW\$$:&)LJXUH7KHWRWDOERUHKROHGHSWKZDVIHHWEJV
ZLWKJURXQGZDWHUHQFRXQWHUHGDWIHHWEJV7KHVXEVXUIDFHVRLOVDPSOHLQWHUYDOZDVWR
IHHWEJV
 :DVWH6RXUFH'DWD$VVHVVPHQW
3HUWLQHQW(3$JXLGDQFHLQGLFDWHVWKDWDQDO\WLFDOUHVXOWVIURPILHOGVDPSOHVVKRXOGEHFRPSDUHG
WRWKRVHIURPEDFNJURXQGVDPSOHVLQRUGHUWRGHWHUPLQHREVHUYHGFRQWDPLQDWLRQLQVRLOVRUDQ

6LWH,QVSHFWLRQ$QDO\WLFDO5HVXOWV5HSRUW      
$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ&RPSDQ\871      

REVHUYHGUHOHDVHLQRWKHUPHGLD6DPSOHVDUHLGHQWLILHGDVFRQWDPLQDWHGLIWKH\VLJQLILFDQWO\
H[FHHGEDFNJURXQGFRQFHQWUDWLRQV7KLVGHWHUPLQDWLRQLVPDGHXVLQJWZRFULWHULD
,IDVXEVWDQFHLVQRWGHWHFWHGLQWKHEDFNJURXQGVDPSOHWKHFRQFHQWUDWLRQRIWKH
VXEVWDQFHLQWKHVDPSOHPXVWHTXDORUH[FHHGWKHVDPSOHTXDQWLWDWLRQOLPLW64/WKH
ORZHVWFRQFHQWUDWLRQDWZKLFKDQDQDO\WHLVERWKSURYHQSUHVHQWDQGPHDVXUHGUHOLDEO\RU
,IWKHEDFNJURXQGVDPSOHFRQFHQWUDWLRQHTXDOVRUH[FHHGVWKH64/WKHVDPSOHPXVW
H[FHHGWKHEDFNJURXQGFRQFHQWUDWLRQE\DWOHDVWWKUHHWLPHV86(3$
,QWKLV6,LIDQDQDO\WHZDVVKRZQWREHSUHVHQWLQJURXQGZDWHUXVLQJHLWKHURIWKHDERYHFULWHULD
WKHUHVXOWVIRUWKHVDPSOHZHUHFRPSDUHGWRWKH(3$6XSHUIXQG&KHPLFDO'DWD0DWUL[6&'0
DQG0D[LPXP&RQWDPLQDQW/HYHO0&/EHQFKPDUNYDOXHV,IDQDQDO\WHZDVVKRZQWREH
SUHVHQWLQVRLOXVLQJHLWKHURIWKHDERYHFULWHULDWKHUHVXOWVIRUWKHVDPSOHZHUHWKHQFRPSDUHGWR
6&'0EHQFKPDUNYDOXHV
6&'0RQOLQHUHIHUHQFHV\VWHPKWWSVZZZHSDJRYVXSHUIXQGVXSHUIXQGFKHPLFDOGDWD
PDWUL[VFGPTXHU\
)RUWKHVRLOH[SRVXUHSDWKZD\WZRGLIIHUHQWYDOXHVWKDWUHODWHWRGLIIHUHQWWR[LFRORJLFDODIIHFWV
DUHJLYHQIURPWKH6&'0&DQFHU5LVN6FUHHQLQJ&RQFHQWUDWLRQ&56&DQG1RQ&DQFHU5LVN
6FUHHQLQJ&RQFHQWUDWLRQ1&56&EHQFKPDUNV)RUWKHJURXQGZDWHUH[SRVXUHSDWKZD\WKH
&56&DQG1&56&EHQFKPDUNVDUHJLYHQDVZHOODV0&/EHQFKPDUNVZKLFKDUHGULQNLQJ
ZDWHUVWDQGDUGV([FHHGLQJDJLYHQEHQFKPDUNGRHVQRWFRQVWLWXWHDFRQILUPHGWKUHDWWRKXPDQ
RUHQYLURQPHQWDOKHDOWKUDWKHUH[FHHGLQJDEHQFKPDUNLVDQLQGLFDWLRQWKDWDVDPSOLQJORFDWLRQ
PLJKWZDUUDQWIXUWKHUFRQVLGHUDWLRQDORQJRWKHUVLWHVSHFLILFIDFWRUV7DEOHVSURYLGHD
VXPPDU\RIDOOJURXQGZDWHUDQGVXEVXUIDFHVRLOVDPSOHVDQGKLJKOLJKWWKRVHZKLFKPHHWWKH
DERYHFULWHULDDQGH[FHHGDQ\RIWKHVHEHQFKPDUNYDOXHV7KHVHGDWDDUHSUHVHQWHGDORQJVLGH
UHIHUHQFH6&'0DQG0&/YDOXHVIRUHDFKDQDO\WH
*5281':$7(53$7+:$<
 +\GURJHRORJ\
7KH6LWHLVORFDWHGLQWKHFHQWHURI6RXWKHUQ8WDK9DOOH\7KHUHDUHIRXUDTXLIHUVLQWKHEDVLQILOO
GHSRVLWVRIWKHDUHDLQFOXGLQJDVKDOORZXQFRQILQHGDTXLIHUDVKDOORZDUWHVLDQDTXLIHUDGHHS
DUWHVLDQDTXLIHULQ3OHLVWRFHQHGHSRVLWVDQGDQDUWHVLDQDTXLIHULQGHSRVLWVRIHDUO\4XDWHUQDU\RU
7HUWLDU\DJH3%$QGHUVRQHWDO7KHGHHSDUWHVLDQDTXLIHUVDUHWKHSULQFLSDOXVH
DTXLIHUVIRU8WDK9DOOH\$TXLIHUWHVWVLQVRXWKHUQ8WDK9DOOH\LQGLFDWHWKDWFRQILQLQJOD\HUVLQ
WKHDUHDDUHRIWHQGLVFRQWLQXRXV3%$QGHUVRQHWDO7KHSULPDU\UHFKDUJHDUHDIRUWKH
FRQILQHGDTXLIHULVQHDUWKHPRXQWDLQIURQWVZKHUHDODFNRIILQHJUDLQHGGHSRVLWVLQKLELWV
GRZQZDUGPRYHPHQWRIJURXQGZDWHU

6LWH,QVSHFWLRQ$QDO\WLFDO5HVXOWV5HSRUW      
$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ&RPSDQ\871      

7KH6LWHLVVLWXDWHGLQWKHVHFRQGDU\UHFKDUJHDUHDZKHUHJURXQGZDWHUIURPWKHVKDOORZ
XQFRQILQHGDTXLIHUVHDVRQDOO\UHFKDUJHVWKHSULQFLSDODTXLIHU3%$QGHUVRQHWDO
*URXQGZDWHUDWWKH6LWHLVLQIHUUHGWRIORZWRWKHQRUWKZHVWWRZDUGV8WDK/DNH$FFRUGLQJWR
SUHYLRXVLQYHVWLJDWLRQVGHSWKWRJURXQGZDWHULVQRWFRQVLVWHQWDFURVVWKH6LWH,+,
(QYLURQPHQWDOF7KHGHSWKWRJURXQGZDWHUYDULHVIURPIHHWEJVRQWKHZHVWHUQ
SRUWLRQRIWKH6LWHWRDSSUR[LPDWHO\IHHWEJVRQWKHHDVWHUQSRUWLRQRIWKH6LWH7KH
LQFRQVLVWHQF\RIWKHZDWHUWDEOHPD\EHWKHUHVXOWRIORFDOL]HGSHUFKHGDTXLIHUVRUDUWHVLDQIORZ
IURPGHHSHUFRQILQHGDTXLIHUV7KLVLVFRQVLVWHQWZLWKWKHIDFWWKDWWKH6LWHFRQWDLQVDIORZLQJ
DUWHVLDQZHOOZDWHUULJKW
 *URXQGZDWHU7DUJHWV
7KHUHDUHDFWLYHGULQNLQJZDWHUVRXUFHVLGHQWLILHGLQWKH8WDK'LYLVLRQRI'ULQNLQJ:DWHU
GDWDEDVHZLWKLQIRXUPLOHVRIWKH6LWHVXSSO\LQJV\VWHPVZLWKDFRPELQHGSRSXODWLRQRI
a7KHQHDUHVWDFWLYHPXQLFLSDOGULQNLQJZDWHUZHOOLVORFDWHGFURVVJUDGLHQWDERXWRQH
PLOHWRWKHZHVWDQGLVSDUWRIWKH6SDQLVK)RUN&LW\ZHOOV\VWHP8WDK'LYLVLRQRI'ULQNLQJ
:DWHU&XUUHQWLQIRUPDWLRQGRHVQRWLQGLFDWHDQ\GRZQJUDGLHQWPXQLFLSDOGULQNLQJZDWHU
ZHOOVZLWKLQIRXUPLOHVRIWKH6LWH
'DWDSURYLGHGE\WKH8WDK'LYLVLRQRI:DWHU5LJKWVLQGLFDWHVWKDWWKHUHDUHH[LVWLQJULJKWVWR
3RLQWVRI'LYHUVLRQ32'VZLWKLQDIRXUPLOHUDGLXVRIWKH6LWH8WDK'LYLVLRQRI:DWHU
5LJKWV2IWKHVH32'VDUHOLVWHGDVDEDQGRQHGZHOOVWZRDVGUDLQVRQHDVDVSULQJ
DVULYHURUFUHHNGLYHUVLRQVDVUHWXUQVDVVXUIDFH32'VDQGWKHUHPDLQLQJDV
XQGHUJURXQG7KHXQGHUJURXQG32'VDUHOLVWHGDVGRPHVWLFLUULJDWLRQVWRFNZDWHULQJ
8WDK'LYLVLRQRI:DWHU5LJKWV,WLVXQNQRZQ
ZKHWKHU32'RZQHUVDUHXVLQJWKHZDWHUIRUGULQNLQJSXUSRVHVEXWLVXQOLNHO\DVPXQLFLSDO
GULQNLQJZDWHULVUHDGLO\DYDLODEOH
 *URXQGZDWHU6DPSOH/RFDWLRQV
*URXQGZDWHUVDPSOHVLQWKLV6,ZHUHFROOHFWHGIURPORFDWLRQVRQ6LWHDQGRQQHDUE\SURSHUWLHVLQ
RUGHUWRSURYLGHGDWDRQWKHSUHVHQFHRIKD]DUGRXVPDWHULDOVDQGEHXVHGDVDIRXQGDWLRQIRU
VXEVHTXHQWWHVWLQJ)LJXUH6DPSOLQJORFDWLRQVDUHGHVFULEHGLQ6HFWLRQ
 *URXQGZDWHU$QDO\WLFDO5HVXOWV
(DFKJURXQGZDWHUVDPSOHZDVDQDO\]HGIRU92&V6HPL9RODWLOH2UJDQLF&RPSRXQGV
692&VSHVWLFLGHV3&%V$URFORUVDQGPHWDOV7DEOHV%DVHGRQSUHYLRXVVDPSOLQJDW
WKH6LWHSULPDU\JURXQGZDWHUFRQWDPLQDQWVRIFRQFHUQLQWKLVVWXG\ZHUHEHQ]HQHDQGDUVHQLF
EXWZHUHQRWWKHRQO\FRQWDPLQDQWVGHWHFWHGLQJURXQGZDWHUVDPSOHV$QDO\WLFDOUHVXOWVLQFOXGH
WKHIROORZLQJ

6LWH,QVSHFWLRQ$QDO\WLFDO5HVXOWV5HSRUW      
$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ&RPSDQ\871      

%DFNJURXQGVDPSOH$$:&*:FROOHFWHGIURPDQXSJUDGLHQWORFDWLRQHDVWRIWKH
6LWHGLGQRWFRQWDLQDQ\92&692&SHVWLFLGHRU$URFORUFRQFHQWUDWLRQVDERYH64/V
$OXPLQXP—J/DUVHQLF—J/EDULXP—J/FDGPLXP
—J/FKURPLXP—J/FREDOW—J/LURQ—J/OHDG—J/
PDQJDQHVH—J/WKDOOLXP—J/DQGYDQDGLXP—J/ZHUHGHWHFWHG
DERYH6&'0EHQFKPDUNV>DOXPLQXP1&56& —J/DUVHQLF1&56& —J/
DUVHQLF&56& —J/EDULXP1&56& —J/FDGPLXP1&56& —J/
FKURPLXP1&56& —J/FKURPLXP&56& —J/FREDOW1&56& —J/
LURQ1&56& —J/OHDG0&/ —J/PDQJDQHVH1&56& —J/
WKDOOLXP1&56& —J/YDQDGLXP1&56& —J/@7KHVHUHVXOWVPD\QRWEH
UHOLDEOHGXHWRWKH4$4&FRQFHUQVGLVFXVVHGLQ6HFWLRQ
6DPSOH$$:&*:FROOHFWHGRQWKHDGMRLQLQJSURSHUW\WRWKHQRUWKRIWKH6LWHGLG
QRWFRQWDLQDQ\92&692&SHVWLFLGHRU$URFORUFRQFHQWUDWLRQVDERYH64/V$UVHQLF
—J/FKURPLXP—J/FREDOW—J/DQGLURQ—J/ZHUH
GHWHFWHGDERYH6&'0EHQFKPDUNV>DUVHQLF1&56& —J/DUVHQLF&56& 
—J/FKURPLXP1&56& —J/FKURPLXP&56& —J/FREDOW1&56& 
—J/LURQ1&56& —J/@EXWGLGQRWH[FHHGEDFNJURXQGFRQFHQWUDWLRQV
6DPSOHV$$:&*:DQGGXSOLFDWH$$:&*:FROOHFWHGQHDUWKHDXWRFUXVKHU
GLGQRWFRQWDLQDQ\PHDQLQJIXO92&692&SHVWLFLGHRU$URFORUFRQFHQWUDWLRQVDERYH
64/V$UVHQLF—J/FKURPLXP—J/FREDOW—J/DQG
LURQ—J/FRQFHQWUDWLRQVZHUHHOHYDWHGLQWKHVHVDPSOHV H[FHHGLQJ
6&'0EHQFKPDUNV>DUVHQLF1&56& —J/DUVHQLF&56& —J/FKURPLXP
1&56& —J/FKURPLXP&56& —J/FREDOW1&56& —J/LURQ1&56&
—J/@EXWQRWH[FHHGLQJEDFNJURXQGFRQFHQWUDWLRQV
6DPSOH$$:&*:FROOHFWHGZHVWGRZQJUDGLHQWRIWKHDXWRFUXVKHUGLGQRW
FRQWDLQDQ\92&692&SHVWLFLGHRU$URFORUFRQFHQWUDWLRQVDERYH64/V$OXPLQXP
—J/DUVHQLF—J/FKURPLXP—J/FREDOW—J/LURQ
—J/OHDG—J/DQGPDQJDQHVH—J/ZHUHGHWHFWHGDERYH
6&'0EHQFKPDUNV>DOXPLQXP1&56& —J/DUVHQLF1&56& —J/
DUVHQLF&56& —J/FKURPLXP1&56& —J/FKURPLXP&56& —J/
FREDOW1&56& —J/LURQ1&56& —J/OHDG0&/ —J/PDQJDQHVH
1&56& —J/@EXWGLGQRWH[FHHGEDFNJURXQGFRQFHQWUDWLRQV7KHVHUHVXOWVPD\
QRWEHUHOLDEOHGXHWR4$4&FRQFHUQVGLVFXVVHGLQ6HFWLRQ
6DPSOH$$:&*:FROOHFWHGLQWKHZHVWHUQSRUWLRQRIWKH6LWHGLGQRWFRQWDLQDQ\
92&692&SHVWLFLGHRU$URFORUFRQFHQWUDWLRQVDERYH64/V$UVHQLF—J/DQG
FKURPLXP—J/ZHUHGHWHFWHGDERYH6&'0EHQFKPDUNV>DUVHQLF1&56& 

6LWH,QVSHFWLRQ$QDO\WLFDO5HVXOWV5HSRUW      
$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ&RPSDQ\871      

—J/DUVHQLF&56& —J/FKURPLXP1&56& —J/FKURPLXP&56& 
—J/@EXWGLGQRWH[FHHGEDFNJURXQGFRQFHQWUDWLRQV
6DPSOH$$:&*:FROOHFWHGIURPDPRQLWRULQJZHOOLQWKHZHVWHUQSRUWLRQRIWKH
6LWHGLGQRWFRQWDLQDQ\92&692&SHVWLFLGHRU$URFORUFRQFHQWUDWLRQVDERYH64/V
$UVHQLF—J/ZDVGHWHFWHGDERYHLWV6&'0EHQFKPDUNV>DUVHQLF1&56& 
—J/DUVHQLF&56& —J/@EXWGLGQRWH[FHHGWKHEDFNJURXQGFRQFHQWUDWLRQ
6DPSOH$$:&*:FROOHFWHGIURPWKHDOXPLQXPUDGLDWRUHQJLQHEORFNDQGWDU
VWRUDJHDUHDGLGQRWFRQWDLQDQ\92&SHVWLFLGHRU$URFORUFRQFHQWUDWLRQVDERYH64/V
6HYHUDO692&VZHUHGHWHFWHGDERYH64/VQRWDEO\EHQ]RDDQWKUDFHQH—J/
EHQ]RDS\UHQH—J/DQGLQGHQRFGS\UHQH—J/H[FHHG6&'0
EHQFKPDUNV>EHQ]RDDQWKUDFHQH&56& —J/EHQ]RDS\UHQH&56& 
—J/LQGHQRFGS\UHQH&56& —J/@$UVHQLF—J/FKURPLXP
—J/DQGOHDG—J/ZHUHGHWHFWHGDERYH6&'0EHQFKPDUNV>DUVHQLF1&56& 
—J/DUVHQLF&56& —J/FKURPLXP1&56& —J/FKURPLXP&56& 
—J/OHDG0&/ —J/@EXWGLGQRWH[FHHGEDFNJURXQGFRQFHQWUDWLRQV
6DPSOH$$:&*:FROOHFWHGIURPWKHROGODQGILOODUHDZHVWRIWKH6LWHGLGQRW
FRQWDLQDQ\92&692&SHVWLFLGHRU$URFORUFRQFHQWUDWLRQVDERYH64/V$UVHQLF
—J/FKURPLXP—J/DQGOHDG—J/ZHUHGHWHFWHGDERYH6&'0
EHQFKPDUNV>DUVHQLF1&56& —J/DUVHQLF&56& —J/FKURPLXP1&56& 
—J/FKURPLXP&56& —J/OHDG0&/ —J/@EXWGLGQRWH[FHHG
EDFNJURXQGFRQFHQWUDWLRQV
 *URXQGZDWHU([SRVXUH3DWKZD\&RQFOXVLRQV
3UHYLRXVLQYHVWLJDWLRQVDWWKH6LWHGHWHFWHGEHQ]HQH—J/DQGDUVHQLF—J/LQ
JURXQGZDWHUDERYH0&/V>EHQ]HQH —J/DUVHQLF —J/@LQJURXQGZDWHUVDPSOHVLQWKH
ZHVWHUQSRUWLRQRIWKH6LWH$SSHQGL[$)LJXUH$,+,(QYLURQPHQWDOEF
*URXQGZDWHUVDPSOLQJFRQGXFWHGWKURXJKWKLV6,GLGQRWGHWHFWEHQ]HQHLQJURXQGZDWHU
VDPSOHVKRZHYHU3$+VLQFOXGLQJEHQ]RDDQWKUDFHQHEHQ]RDS\UHQHDQGLQGHQR
FGS\UHQHZHUHGHWHFWHGLQVDPSOH$$:&*:DERYH6&'0EHQFKPDUNV7KHVH
FRQWDPLQDQWVDSSHDUWREHORFDOL]HGLQJURXQGZDWHUQHDUWKHWDUVWRUDJHDUHDZKLFKLVDNQRZQ
VRXUFHIRU3$+V
6HYHUDOPHWDOVZHUHPHDVXUHGDERYH0&/DQGRU6&'0EHQFKPDUNVLQJURXQGZDWHUVDPSOHV
GXULQJWKLVLQYHVWLJDWLRQ7DEOH,QJHQHUDODUVHQLFFKURPLXPFREDOWLURQDQGOHDG
FRQFHQWUDWLRQVZHUHKLJKHVWLQFORVHSUR[LPLW\WRWKHDXWRFUXVKHU$$:&*:$$:&
*:$$:&*:DQGWKHDUWHVLDQZHOO$$:&*:$UVHQLFFKURPLXPDQGOHDG
ZHUHHOHYDWHGLQWKHDOXPLQXPUDGLDWRUHQJLQHEORFNDQGWDUVWRUDJHDUHD$$:&*:DQG

6LWH,QVSHFWLRQ$QDO\WLFDO5HVXOWV5HSRUW      
$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ&RPSDQ\871      

WKHROGODQGILOODUHDZHVWRIWKH6LWH$$:&*:7KLVVXJJHVWVWKDWWKHVHDUHDVDUH
FRQWULEXWLQJVRXUFHVWRJURXQGZDWHUFRQWDPLQDWLRQDWWKH6LWH2GGO\WKHJUHDWHVWPHWDO
FRQFHQWUDWLRQVZHUHGHWHFWHGLQWKHEDFNJURXQGVDPSOH$$:&*:ZLWKDOXPLQXP
DUVHQLFEDULXPFDGPLXPFKURPLXPFREDOWLURQOHDGPDQJDQHVHWKRULXPDQGYDQDGLXP
H[FHHGLQJ0&/DQGRU6&'0EHQFKPDUNV7DEOHKRZHYHUHOHYDWHGPHWDOFRQFHQWUDWLRQVLQ
WKHEDFNJURXQGVDPSOHPD\EHXQUHOLDEOHGXHWRWKH4$4&LVVXHVGLVFXVVHGLQ6HFWLRQ,I
WKHVHFRQFHQWUDWLRQVDUHDFFXUDWHWKHQWKHUHPD\EHDGGLWLRQDOFRQWDPLQDQWVRXUFHVXSJUDGLHQW
RIWKH6LWH
+XPDQH[SRVXUHWRWR[LFPHWDOVDQG3$+VGLUHFWO\WKURXJKWKHJURXQGZDWHUSDWKZD\LVXQOLNHO\
GXHWRWKHDEVHQFHRIGRZQJUDGLHQWPXQLFLSDOGULQNLQJZDWHUZHOOV)XUWKHUPRUHORFDO
K\GURJHRORJ\DORQJZLWKHYLGHQFHIURPJURXQGZDWHUVDPSOLQJDWWKH6LWHVXJJHVWWKDW
JURXQGZDWHUDWWKH6LWHKDVDQXSZDUGIORZFRPSRQHQW PDNLQJGRZQZDUGPLJUDWLRQRI
FRQWDPLQDQWVWRGHHSHUZHOOVLPSUREDEOH,WLVSRVVLEOHWKDWFRQWDPLQDWHGJURXQGZDWHULV
GLVFKDUJLQJWRVXUIDFHZDWHUWKURXJKQHDUE\VWUHDPVDQGZHWODQGVEXWWKHUHLVQRWFXUUHQWO\
HQRXJKLQIRUPDWLRQWRPDNHWKLVGHWHUPLQDWLRQ,QDQ\FDVHVXUIDFHZDWHUDORQJWKHPLOH
GRZQVWUHDPLQIOXHQFHSDWKZD\LVQRWXWLOL]HGIRUDQ\SXUSRVHXQWLOUHDFKLQJ8WDK/DNH
685)$&(:$7(53$7+:$<
 +\GURORJ\
8WDK9DOOH\K\GURORJ\LVQHDUO\DFORVHGV\VWHPZKHUHSUHFLSLWDWLRQFROOHFWVLQWKHPRXQWDLQV
DQGGUDLQVWRZDUGV8WDK/DNHLQWKHFHQWHURIWKHYDOOH\8WDK9DOOH\KDVRQO\RQHRXWOHWWKH
-RUGDQ5LYHUDWLWVQRUWKHUQHQG)(0$
(OHYDWLRQDWWKH6LWHLVDSSUR[LPDWHO\IHHWDERYHPHDQVHDOHYHODQGVXUIDFHWRSRJUDSK\
RIWKH6LWHJHQWO\VORSHVWRWKHZHVWDQGQRUWKZHVW,+,(QYLURQPHQWDOD7KHUHDUHWZR
GUDLQDJHGLWFKHVRQWKHQRUWKZHVWHUQDQGQRUWKHDVWHUQSRUWLRQRIWKH6LWH7KHQRUWKHDVWHUQGLWFK
GUDLQVUXQRIIIURPDQDUWHVLDQZHOORQWKH6LWH,+,(QYLURQPHQWDOD7KHQRUWKZHVWHUQ
GLWFKGUDLQVVXUIDFHUXQRIIGXULQJVWRUPVEXWLVGU\PRVWRIWKH\HDU7KHVHGUDLQDJHGLWFKHV
PHUJHWRWKHQRUWKRIWKH6LWHIRUPLQJDQLQWHUPLWWHQWVWUHDPWKDWOHDGVWR'U\&UHHNORFDWHG
aPLOHVGRZQJUDGLHQWRIWKH6LWH'U\&UHHNIORZVWRWKHQRUWKZHVWIRUaPLOHVEHIRUH
UHDFKLQJ8WDK/DNH8WDK/DNHLVPLOHVGRZQVWUHDPRIWKH6LWH7KHUHDUHVHDVRQDOZHWODQGV
FODVVLILHGDVSDOXVWULQHHPHUJHQWDQGVHDVRQDOO\IORRGHGDSSUR[LPDWHO\\DUGVQRUWKRIWKH
6LWHLQGLFDWLQJWKDWJURXQGZDWHUPD\VHDVRQDOO\GLVFKDUJHWRWKHVXUIDFH7KH6LWHLVQRWORFDWHG
ZLWKLQWKH8WDK&RXQW\\HDURU\HDUIORRGSODLQ)(0$
 6XUIDFH:DWHU7DUJHWVDQG&RQFOXVLRQV
%DVHGRQDUHYLHZRIZDWHUULJKWVGDWDWKHUHDUHQRVXUIDFHZDWHULQWDNHVZLWKLQGRZQVWUHDP
PLOHVRIWKH6LWH8WDK'(4'(55'U\&UHHNLVQRWODUJHHQRXJKWRVXSSRUWUHFUHDWLRQ

6LWH,QVSHFWLRQ$QDO\WLFDO5HVXOWV5HSRUW      
$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ&RPSDQ\871      

DQGLVQRWXVHGDVDILVKHU\6XUIDFHZDWHUDQGVHGLPHQWVDPSOHVZHUHQRWFROOHFWHGDVSDUWRI
WKLV6,EHFDXVHWKHUHZDVQRVXUIDFHZDWHUSUHVHQWGXULQJWKHVDPSOLQJHYHQW:KLOHVXUIDFLQJ
JURXQGZDWHUPD\SURPRWHWKHGRZQVWUHDPPLJUDWLRQRIFRQWDPLQDQWVYLDVXUIDFHZDWHULWZRXOG
EHLQWHUPLWWHQWDQGWKHUHZRXOGEHIHZWDUJHWV
62,/(;32685(3$7+:$<
 *HRORJ\
8WDK9DOOH\LVFKDUDFWHUL]HGE\EDVLQILOOVWUDWLJUDSK\FRQVLVWLQJRILQWHUEHGGHGDOOXYLXPDQG
ODFXVWULQHGHSRVLWVRI7HUWLDU\DQG4XDWHUQDU\DJH7KHILOOPDWHULDOVYDU\IURPFRDUVHJUDYHO
SUHYDOHQWDORQJWKHPRXQWDLQIURQWVWRILQHJUDLQHGVLOWVDQGFOD\VIRXQGWRZDUGV8WDK/DNH
&ODUNDQG$SSHO
 6RLO7DUJHWV
2QHRFFXSLHGVLQJOHIDPLO\KRPHLVORFDWHGRQ6LWH,QDGGLWLRQDUHVLGHQWLDOVXEGLYLVLRQLV
ORFDWHGHDVWRIWKH6LWHDORQJ6WDWH5RDGOHVVWKDQ\DUGVDZD\$WRWDORISHRSOHOLYH
ZLWKLQDTXDUWHUPLOHRIWKH6LWHDQGSHRSOHOLYLQJZLWKLQIRXUPLOHVRIWKH6LWH86
&HQVXV%XUHDX7KHUHLVDUHVLGHQWLDOQHLJKERUKRRGZLWK:KLVSHULQJ:LOORZV3DUN
ORFDWHGHDVWRIWKH6LWHDQGFRPPHUFLDOSURSHUWLHVDGMRLQLQJWKH6LWHWRWKHVRXWK5HHV
(OHPHQWDU\6FKRROLVORFDWHGXSJUDGLHQWDERXWIHHWVRXWKRIWKH6LWH7KHSRSXODWLRQRI
WKHFLWLHV6SDQLVK)RUNDQG6SULQJYLOOHLVH[SHFWHGWRLQFUHDVHDQQXDOO\DWDUDWHRIDQG
SHUFHQWUHVSHFWLYHO\0RXQWDLQODQG$2*,WLVDUHDVRQDEOHDVVXPSWLRQWKDWODQGXVH
FKDQJHVZLOORFFXUDORQJ6WDWH5RDGEHWZHHQWKHVHWZRFLWLHV
7KH6LWHLVIHQFHGDURXQGWKHSHULPHWHUDOWKRXJKVRPHRIWKHIHQFHLVLQGLVUHSDLUDQGFRXOG
DOORZDFFHVV$ODUJHZDOOJHQHUDOO\SURKLELWVSXEOLFDFFHVVWRWKH6LWHIURP6WDWH5RDGDQG
SXEOLFDFFHVVWRWKH6LWHIURPWKHQRUWKDQGZHVWLVXQOLNHO\DVWKLVDUHDLVXQGHYHORSHGDQG
FRQVLVWVRIIRUPHUODQGILOOV+RZHYHUWKHDUHDDURXQGWKH6LWHLVFKDQJLQJDVVKRZQE\WKHQHZ
UHVLGHQWLDOGHYHORSPHQWWRWKHHDVWRIWKH6LWH
 6XEVXUIDFH6RLO6DPSOH/RFDWLRQV
6XEVXUIDFHVRLOVDPSOHVZHUHFROOHFWHGWKURXJKWKLV6,IURPORFDWLRQVRQ6LWHDQGRQQHDUE\
SURSHUWLHVWRSURYLGHGDWDRQWKHSUHVHQFHRIKD]DUGRXVPDWHULDOVDQGEHXVHGDVDIRXQGDWLRQIRU
VXEVHTXHQWWHVWLQJ)LJXUH6DPSOLQJORFDWLRQVDUHGHVFULEHGLQ6HFWLRQ
 6XEVXUIDFH6RLO$QDO\WLFDO5HVXOWV
(DFKVXEVXUIDFHVRLOVDPSOHZDVDQDO\]HGIRU92&V692&VSHVWLFLGHV$URFORUVDQGPHWDOV
7DEOHV%DVHGRQSUHYLRXVVDPSOLQJDWWKH6LWHSULPDU\VRLOFRQWDPLQDQWVRIFRQFHUQLQ

6LWH,QVSHFWLRQ$QDO\WLFDO5HVXOWV5HSRUW      
$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ&RPSDQ\871      

WKLVVWXG\ZHUHEHQ]HQHDQGOHDGEXWZHUHQRWWKHRQO\FRQWDPLQDQWVGHWHFWHGLQVXEVXUIDFHVRLO
VDPSOHV$QDO\WLFDOUHVXOWVLQFOXGHWKHIROORZLQJ
%DFNJURXQGVDPSOH$$:&6%FROOHFWHGIURPDQXSJUDGLHQWORFDWLRQHDVWRIWKH
6LWHGLGQRWFRQWDLQDQ\GHWHFWDEOH92&SHVWLFLGHRU$URFORUFRQFHQWUDWLRQV7KHRQO\
GHWHFWDEOH692&ZDVGLPHWK\OSKWKDODWHDWDORZFRQFHQWUDWLRQRI—JNJ7KHUHLV
FXUUHQWO\QR6&'0EHQFKPDUNIRUGLPHWK\OSKWKDODWH$UVHQLFPJNJDQG
FKURPLXPPJNJZHUHGHWHFWHGLQWKHEDFNJURXQGVDPSOHDERYH6&'0
EHQFKPDUNV>DUVHQLF&56& PJNJFKURPLXP&56& PJNJ@/HDGZDV
GHWHFWHGDWDYHU\ORZFRQFHQWUDWLRQRIPJNJ
6DPSOH$$:&6%FROOHFWHGRQWKHDGMRLQLQJSURSHUW\WRWKHQRUWKRIWKH6LWHGLG
QRWFRQWDLQDQ\GHWHFWDEOH92&SHVWLFLGHRU$URFORUFRQFHQWUDWLRQV692&DQDO\VLV
GHWHFWHGRQO\GLPHWK\OSKWKDODWH—JNJDWDYDOXHEHORZWKHEDFNJURXQG
FRQFHQWUDWLRQ$UVHQLFPJNJDQGFKURPLXPPJNJZHUHGHWHFWHGDERYH
6&'0EHQFKPDUNV>DUVHQLF&56& PJNJFKURPLXP&56& PJNJ@EXW
GLGQRWH[FHHGDYDOXHWKUHHWLPHVWKHEDFNJURXQGFRQFHQWUDWLRQ/HDGZDVGHWHFWHGDWD
YHU\ORZFRQFHQWUDWLRQRIPJNJ
6DPSOHV$$:&6%DQGGXSOLFDWH$$:&6%FROOHFWHGQHDUWKHDXWRFUXVKHUGLG
QRWFRQWDLQDQ\GHWHFWDEOH92&SHVWLFLGHRU$URFORUFRQFHQWUDWLRQV692&DQDO\VLV
GHWHFWHGRQO\GLPHWK\OSKWKDODWHDQG—JNJDWYDOXHVEHORZWKHEDFNJURXQG
FRQFHQWUDWLRQ$UVHQLFDQGPJNJDQGFKURPLXPDQGPJNJZHUH
GHWHFWHGLQ$$:&6%DQG$$:&6%DERYH6&'0EHQFKPDUNV>DUVHQLF&56&
PJNJFKURPLXP&56& PJNJ@ZLWKDUVHQLFLQVDPSOH$$:&6%
H[FHHGLQJDYDOXHWKUHHWLPHVWKHEDFNJURXQGFRQFHQWUDWLRQ/HDGZDVGHWHFWHGDWDYHU\
ORZFRQFHQWUDWLRQVRIDQGPJNJ
6DPSOH$$:&6%FROOHFWHGZHVWGRZQJUDGLHQWRIWKHDXWRFUXVKHUGLGQRW
FRQWDLQDQ\GHWHFWDEOH92&SHVWLFLGHRU$URFORUFRQFHQWUDWLRQV692&DQDO\VLV
GHWHFWHGRQO\GLPHWK\OSKWKDODWH—JNJDWDYDOXHEHORZWKHEDFNJURXQG
FRQFHQWUDWLRQ$UVHQLFPJNJDQGFKURPLXPPJNJZHUHGHWHFWHGDERYH
6&'0EHQFKPDUNV>DUVHQLF&56& PJNJFKURPLXP&56& PJNJ@ZLWK
DUVHQLFDWDYDOXHWKUHHWLPHVWKHEDFNJURXQGFRQFHQWUDWLRQ/HDGZDVGHWHFWHGDWDYHU\
ORZFRQFHQWUDWLRQRIPJNJ
6DPSOH$$:&6%FROOHFWHGLQWKHZHVWHUQSRUWLRQRIWKH6LWHGLGQRWFRQWDLQDQ\
GHWHFWDEOH92&SHVWLFLGHRU$URFORUFRQFHQWUDWLRQV692&DQDO\VLVGHWHFWHGRQO\
GLPHWK\OSKWKDODWH—JNJDWDYDOXHEHORZWKHEDFNJURXQGFRQFHQWUDWLRQ$UVHQLF
PJNJDQGFKURPLXPPJNJZHUHGHWHFWHGDERYH6&'0EHQFKPDUNV>DUVHQLF
&56& PJNJFKURPLXP&56& PJNJ@ZLWKDUVHQLFDWDYDOXHWKUHHWLPHV

6LWH,QVSHFWLRQ$QDO\WLFDO5HVXOWV5HSRUW      
$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ&RPSDQ\871      

WKHEDFNJURXQGFRQFHQWUDWLRQ/HDGZDVGHWHFWHGDWDYHU\ORZFRQFHQWUDWLRQRI
PJNJ
6DPSOH$$:&6%FROOHFWHGIURPWKHDOXPLQXPDQGUDGLDWRUVWRUDJHDUHDGLGQRW
FRQWDLQDQ\GHWHFWDEOH92&SHVWLFLGHRU$URFORUFRQFHQWUDWLRQV692&DQDO\VLV
GHWHFWHGRQO\GLPHWK\OSKWKDODWH—JNJDWDYDOXHVLPLODUWRWKHEDFNJURXQG
FRQFHQWUDWLRQ$UVHQLFPJNJDQGFKURPLXPPJNJZHUHGHWHFWHGDERYH
6&'0EHQFKPDUNV>DUVHQLF&56& PJNJFKURPLXP&56& PJNJ@EXW
GLGQRWH[FHHGDYDOXHWKUHHWLPHVWKHEDFNJURXQGFRQFHQWUDWLRQ/HDGZDVGHWHFWHGDWD
YHU\ORZFRQFHQWUDWLRQRIPJNJ
6DPSOH$$:&6%FROOHFWHGIURPWKHROGODQGILOODUHDZHVWRIWKH6LWHGLGQRW
FRQWDLQDQ\GHWHFWDEOH92&SHVWLFLGHRU$URFORUFRQFHQWUDWLRQV692&DQDO\VLV
GHWHFWHGRQO\GLPHWK\OSKWKDODWH—JNJDWDYDOXHEHORZWKHEDFNJURXQG
FRQFHQWUDWLRQ$UVHQLFPJNJDQGFKURPLXPPJNJZHUHGHWHFWHGDERYH
6&'0EHQFKPDUNV>DUVHQLF&56& PJNJFKURPLXP&56& PJNJ@EXW
GLGQRWH[FHHGDYDOXHWKUHHWLPHVWKHEDFNJURXQGFRQFHQWUDWLRQ/HDGZDVGHWHFWHGDWD
YHU\ORZFRQFHQWUDWLRQRIPJNJ
6DPSOH$$:&6%DQRSSRUWXQLW\VDPSOHFROOHFWHGVRXWKRIWKH6LWHGLGQRWFRQWDLQ
DQ\GHWHFWDEOH92&VDVLGHIURPFDUERQGLVXOILGHDWDQHJOLJLEOHFRQFHQWUDWLRQRI
—JNJ1RSHVWLFLGHRU$URFORUFRQFHQWUDWLRQVZHUHGHWHFWHGLQWKHVDPSOH692&
DQDO\VLVGHWHFWHGRQO\GLPHWK\OSKWKDODWH—JNJDWDYDOXHEHORZWKHEDFNJURXQG
FRQFHQWUDWLRQ$UVHQLFPJNJDQGFKURPLXPPJNJZHUHGHWHFWHGDERYH
6&'0EHQFKPDUNV>DUVHQLF&56& PJNJFKURPLXP&56& PJNJ@EXW
GLGQRWH[FHHGDYDOXHWKUHHWLPHVWKHEDFNJURXQGFRQFHQWUDWLRQ/HDGZDVGHWHFWHGDWD
YHU\ORZFRQFHQWUDWLRQRIPJNJ
 6RLO([SRVXUH3DWKZD\&RQFOXVLRQV
3UHYLRXVLQYHVWLJDWLRQVDWWKH6LWHREVHUYHGVRLOVWDLQLQJRLOVKHHQVDQGSHWUROHXPVSLOOVDWWKH
6LWH,+,(QYLURQPHQWDODEF-$QGHUVRQ7KHVHLQYHVWLJDWLRQVGHWHFWHG
OHDGPJNJDQGEHQ]HQHPJNJH[FHHGLQJUHVLGHQWLDO56/V>OHDG PJNJ
EHQ]HQHPJNJ@LQVRLOQHDUWKHDXWRFUXVKHUEXWEHORZLQGXVWULDO56/V>OHDG PJNJ
EHQ]HQHPJNJ@$SSHQGL[$7DEOH$
6XEVXUIDFHVRLOVDPSOLQJFRQGXFWHGGXULQJWKLV6,GLGQRWGHWHFWOHDGRUEHQ]HQHLQVDPSOHV
DERYH6&'0EHQFKPDUNV%DFNJURXQGVDPSOH$$:&6%GHWHFWHGDUVHQLFDQGFKURPLXP
DERYH6&'0&56&EHQFKPDUNVEXWZLWKLQFRQFHQWUDWLRQUDQJHVFRPPRQIRUVRLOVLQWKHDUHD
6PLWKHWDO'LPHWK\OSKWKDODWHDFKHPLFDOXVHGIUHTXHQWO\LQSODVWLFVDQGLQVHFW
UHSHOODQWVZDVGHWHFWHGLQWKHEDFNJURXQGVDPSOHDWDUHODWLYHO\ORZFRQFHQWUDWLRQ0LFKLJDQ
'(4'LPHWK\OSKWKDODWHDQGFKURPLXPZHUHGHWHFWHGLQDOOVDPSOHVEXWGRQRWTXDOLI\

6LWH,QVSHFWLRQ$QDO\WLFDO5HVXOWV5HSRUW      
$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ&RPSDQ\871      

DVREVHUYHGUHOHDVHV$UVHQLFZDVGHWHFWHGLQDOOVDPSOHVDQGFRQFHQWUDWLRQVH[FHHGHGYDOXHV
JUHDWHUWKDQWKUHHWLPHVWKHEDFNJURXQGFRQFHQWUDWLRQLQVDPSOHV$$:&6%$$:&6%
DQG$$:&6%7KLVLQGLFDWHVDQREVHUYHGUHOHDVHRIDUVHQLFLQVXEVXUIDFHVRLOQHDUWKHDXWR
FUXVKHUDQGEDWWHU\VWRUDJHDUHDDQGLQWKHVRXWKZHVWSRUWLRQRIWKH6LWHDOWKRXJKWKHVH
FRQFHQWUDWLRQVDUHRQO\PRGHUDWHO\HOHYDWHG
+XPDQH[SRVXUHWREHQ]HQHLQWKHVRLOLVXQOLNHO\DWWKH6LWHDVELRGHJUDGDWLRQDQGYRODWLOL]DWLRQ
KDYHOLNHO\UHGXFHGWKHFRQWDPLQDQWWRDPLQLPDOFRQFHQWUDWLRQVLQFHLWZDVGHWHFWHGLQ
([SRVXUHWRDUVHQLFFKURPLXPDQGGLPHWK\OSKWKDODWHLQWKHVXEVXUIDFHLVDOVRXQOLNHO\XQOHVV
WKHVRXWKHUQSRUWLRQRIWKH6LWHLVH[FDYDWHG7KHSUHVHQFHRIOHDGLQVXUIDFHVRLOQHDUWKHDXWR
FUXVKHUPD\SRVHDVOLJKWULVNWRQHDUE\ZRUNHUVDQGRUWKHUHVLGHQWVRIWKHKRXVHLQFORVH
SUR[LPLW\WRWKHDXWRFUXVKHUKRZHYHUWKHVHFRQFHQWUDWLRQVRQO\VOLJKWO\H[FHHGLQGXVWULDO
56/V
62,/9$32568%685)$&(,17586,213$7+:$<
 6RLO9DSRU7DUJHWVDQG&RQFOXVLRQV
7KLVLQYHVWLJDWLRQGLGQRWLQFOXGHVRLOJDVRULQGRRUDLUVDPSOLQJ1R92&VLQFOXGLQJEHQ]HQH
RU692&VZHUHGHWHFWHGLQJURXQGZDWHURUVRLOVDPSOHVDWFRQFHQWUDWLRQVH[FHHGLQJ86(3$
9DSRU,QWUXVLRQ6FUHHQLQJ/HYHO9,6/V7KHULVNLVORZIRUDQ\FRQWDPLQDQWYRODWLOL]DWLRQLQWR
LQGRRUDLUDQGWKHVXEVHTXHQWH[SRVXUHYLDWKHVRLOYDSRUVXEVXUIDFHLQWUXVLRQSDWKZD\
$,53$7+:$<
 0HWHRURORJ\
7KH6SDQLVK)RUNDUHDH[SHULHQFHVPRGHUDWHZLQWHUVDQGKRWVXPPHUV7KHDYHUDJHGDLO\KLJK
WHPSHUDWXUHLVž)ZLWKDQDYHUDJHORZRIž)$VKFURIW-HQVHQDQG%URZQ7KH
UHJLRQLVFRQVLGHUHGVHPLDULGZLWKDQDYHUDJHDQQXDOSUHFLSLWDWLRQRILQFKHV6XPPHUV
DUHW\SLFDOO\GU\DQGPRVWSUHFLSLWDWLRQRFFXUVLQWKHVSULQJ:LQGFRQGLWLRQVYDU\GHSHQGLQJRQ
WKHWLPHRI\HDUDQGGLUHFWLRQRIVWRUPIURQWVKRZHYHUSUHYDLOLQJZLQGVLQWKH8WDK9DOOH\
EORZIURPVRXWKWRQRUWK%URXJK6WHYHQVDQG-RQHV$GGLWLRQDOO\WKH6LWHPD\
H[SHULHQFHFDQ\RQZLQGVGXHWRLWVSUR[LPLW\WRWKHPRXWKRI6SDQLVK)RUN&DQ\RQ
 $LU3DWKZD\7DUJHWVDQG&RQFOXVLRQV
7KLVLQYHVWLJDWLRQGLGQRWLQFOXGHDLUVDPSOLQJ7KHULVNLVPLQLPDOIRUDQ\FRQWDPLQDQW
YRODWLOL]DWLRQLQWRWKHDPELHQWDLUDQGWKHVXEVHTXHQWH[SRVXUHYLDWKHDLUH[SRVXUHSDWKZD\2Q
6LWHZRUNHUVDQGUHVLGHQWVRIWKHKRPHLQFORVHSUR[LPLW\WRWKHDXWRFUXVKHUPD\KDYHDORZ
ULVNRIH[SRVXUHWRILQHOHDGSDUWLFOHVLQWKHVXUIDFHVRLOEXWWKLVLVXQOLNHO\

6LWH,QVSHFWLRQ$QDO\WLFDO5HVXOWV5HSRUW      
$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ&RPSDQ\871      

'$7$48$/,7<
 'DWD4XDOLW\$VVHVVPHQW
7KH:HVWRQ6ROXWLRQVWULSUHSRUW$SSHQGL['LQFOXGHV/HYHO%GDWDYDOLGDWLRQDQGODERUDWRU\
DQDO\WLFDOUHVXOWVIRUDOOVDPSOHVFROOHFWHG7KHVHVDPSOHVZHUHFROOHFWHGLQDFFRUGDQFHZLWK
PHWKRGVRXWOLQHGLQWKH'(554XDOLW\$VVXUDQFH3URJUDP3ODQ3DOPHUHWDODQG
UHOHYDQW(3$JXLGDQFHGRFXPHQWV
7KH4$4&VDPSOHVFROOHFWHGDVSDUWRIWKHVDPSOLQJDFWLYLW\LQFOXGHGWKHFROOHFWLRQRIILHOG
GXSOLFDWHVDPSOHV$$:&*:DQG$$:&6%PDWUL[VSLNHPDWUL[VSLNHGXSOLFDWH
VDPSOHV$$:&*:DQG$$:&6%DQGDWULSEODQNVDPSOH$$:&*:7KH
ILHOGGXSOLFDWHVDFWDVDQH[WHUQDOFKHFNRQODERUDWRU\GDWD7KHDQDO\WLFDOUHVXOWVIRUWKHILHOG
GXSOLFDWHVDUHFRPSDUHGIRUWKHUHODWLYHSHUFHQWGLIIHUHQFH53'EHWZHHQWKHGXSOLFDWHDQG
SDUHQWGXSOLFDWHVDPSOHV7KH53'LVFDOFXODWHGDVIROORZV

53' 'LIIHUHQFHEHWZHHQGXSOLFDWHUHVXOWV[
0HDQRIGXSOLFDWHUHVXOWV

*HQHUDOO\DQ53'RILVFRQVLGHUHGDFFHSWDEOHIRUJURXQGZDWHUVDPSOHVDQGDQ53'
RILVDFFHSWDEOHIRUVRLOVDPSOHV$OOGHWHFWVIRUJURXQGZDWHUGXSOLFDWHVZHUHLQDFFHSWDEOH
DJUHHPHQW7KH53'VIRUGLPHWK\OSKWKDODWHDUVHQLFDQGYDQDGLXPLQ
VXEVXUIDFHVRLOGXSOLFDWHVZHUHQRWZLWKLQDFFHSWDEOHDJUHHPHQWWKHUHIRUHUHVXOWVIRUWKHVH
DQDO\WHVZHUHTXDOLILHGDVHVWLPDWHG-$OORWKHUVXEVXUIDFHVRLOGHWHFWVZHUHLQDFFHSWDEOH
DJUHHPHQW

7KHWULSEODQNGHWHFWHGDFHWRQH—J/DQGEXWDQRQH—J/DERYH64/VDQG
FKORUREHQ]HQH—J/EHORZWKH64/6LWHVDPSOHGHWHFWVIRUDFHWRQHZHUHTXDOLILHGDV
QRQGHWHFWV8GXHWRWKHORZOHYHORIFRQWDPLQDWLRQSUHVHQWLQWKHVDPSOHV$FHWRQHLVD
SRWHQWLDOODERUDWRU\FRQWDPLQDQWDQGPD\KDYHEHHQLQWURGXFHGWRWKHVDPSOHVLQWKHODERUDWRU\
7KH6LWHVDPSOHVKDGQRGHWHFWVIRUEXWDQRQHRUFKORUREHQ]HQH
2WKHUGDWDTXDOLW\FRQFHUQVLQFOXGHWKHIROORZLQJ
$OOJURXQGZDWHUVDPSOHVFROOHFWHGIRU92&DQDO\VLVPLQXV$$:&*:ZHUHQRW
SURSHUO\SUHVHUYHGWRDS+RIWKHUHIRUHDVHYHQGD\KROGLQJWLPHZDVDSSOLHG
6DPSOHV$$:&*:DQG$$:&*:ZHUHDQDO\]HGSDVWWKHKROGLQJWLPH1RQ
GHWHFWUHVXOWVIRUERWKVDPSOHVZHUHTXDOLILHGDVHVWLPDWHG8-DQGGHWHFWVZHUH
TXDOLILHGDVHVWLPDWHGZLWKDSRWHQWLDOQHJDWLYHELDV-
*URXQGZDWHUVDPSOHV$$:&*:DQG$$:&*:FROOHFWHGIRUPHWDODQDO\VLV
ZHUHUHFHLYHGE\WKHODERUDWRU\DWS+!7KHVDPSOHVZHUHDFLGLILHGDWWKHODERUDWRU\
DQGDOORZHGWRHTXLOLEUDWHIRUDWOHDVWKRXUV$IWHUIXUWKHUDGGLWLRQRIQLWULFDFLGWKH
S+RIVDPSOH$$:&*:UHPDLQHGDWS+!7KHFOLHQWDXWKRUL]HGGLJHVWLRQDQG

6LWH,QVSHFWLRQ$QDO\WLFDO5HVXOWV5HSRUW      
$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ&RPSDQ\871      

DQDO\VLVRIWKLVVDPSOHZLWKRXWIXUWKHUDFLGLILFDWLRQ$OOUHVXOWVIRUWKLVVDPSOHZHUH
TXDOLILHGDVHVWLPDWHG-0HWDODQDO\VLVIRU$$:&*:DQG$$:&*:
UHVXOWHGLQHOHYDWHGFRQFHQWUDWLRQVIRUQHDUO\DOOPHWDODQDO\WHVZKHQFRPSDUHGWRRWKHU
VDPSOHV/DERUDWRU\4$$&FKHFNVDSSHDUWREHSURSHUIRUWKLVVDPSOHEDWFKZLWK
TXDOLILFDWLRQVQRWHGE\WKHYDOLGDWRUVXJJHVWLQJWKDWWKHUHPD\KDYHEHHQ4&LVVXHV
ZLWKILHOGSURFHGXUHV3RWHQWLDOLVVXHVPD\LQFOXGHWKHVDPSOLQJRIDGLIIHUHQW
JURXQGZDWHULQWHUYDOZLWKDXQLTXHFKHPLVWU\RUJUHDWHUWXUELGLW\LQWKHVHVDPSOHV)RU
WKHVHUHDVRQVVDPSOHV$$:&*:DQG$$:&*:PD\QRWEHUHOLDEOH

 'DWD4XDOLW\2EMHFWLYHV
7KH'DWD4XDOLW\2EMHFWLYHV7DEOHZHUHPHWWKURXJKWKLV6,$OWKRXJKWKHEDFNJURXQG
JURXQGZDWHUVDPSOHPD\EHXQUHOLDEOHDQGWKHSURSRVHGVXUIDFHZDWHUVHGLPHQWVDPSOHVZHUH
QRWFROOHFWHGWKHDYDLODEOHLQIRUPDWLRQVXJJHVWVWKDWWKHULVNRIH[SRVXUHWRFRQWDPLQDQWVIURP
WKH6LWHLVORZ
6800$5<$1'&21&/86,216
$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ&RPSDQ\RSHUDWHGDW1RUWK6WDWH5RDG6SDQLVK)RUN8WDK
IURPDERXWXQWLO+LVWRULFDODUHDVRIRSHUDWLRQDQGVXVSHFWHGVRXUFHVRIFRQWDPLQDWLRQ
LQFOXGHDQDXWRPRELOHFUXVKLQJVWDWLRQHQJLQHEUHDNLQJDUHDVDQGVWRUDJHDUHDVIRUEDWWHULHV
UDGLDWRUVDQGHQJLQHEORFNV$QXPEHURIODQGILOOVRSHUDWHGLQFORVHSUR[LPLW\WRWKH6LWH
LQFOXGLQJWKH6SDQLVK)RUN/DQGILOO6SULQJYLOOH/DQGILOODQGWKH8WDK&RXQW\/DQGILOOZLWKD
SRUWLRQRIWKH6SULQJYLOOH/DQGILOOORFDWHGRQWKHQRUWKZHVWHUQSRUWLRQRIWKH6LWH2SHQILHOGV
DUHORFDWHGWRWKHLPPHGLDWHQRUWKZHVWGRZQJUDGLHQWRIWKH6LWH2QHUHVLGHQFHLVORFDWHGRQ
6LWHDQGDUHVLGHQWLDOGHYHORSPHQWLVORFDWHGVRXWKHDVWXSJUDGLHQWRIWKH6LWH
3UHYLRXVLQYHVWLJDWLRQVDWWKH6LWHGHWHFWHGEHQ]HQHDQGOHDGLQVRLODQGEHQ]HQHDQGDUVHQLFLQ
JURXQGZDWHUDERYHUHOHYDQWVFUHHQLQJOHYHOV7KLVLQYHVWLJDWLRQVRXJKWWRGHWHUPLQHWKH
VRXUFHVRIFRQWDPLQDQWVDWWKH6LWHDQGWKHH[WHQWRILPSDFWHGJURXQGZDWHUDQGVRLOVDURXQG
WKH6LWHWKURXJKWKHVDPSOLQJRIJURXQGZDWHUDQGVXEVXUIDFHVRLOV
(OHYDWHGOHYHOVRIPHWDOVLQFOXGLQJDUVHQLFFKURPLXPFREDOWLURQDQGOHDGZHUHGHWHFWHGLQ
JURXQGZDWHUVDPSOHVDWWKH6LWH6RXUFHVRIWKHVHFRQWDPLQDQWVOLNHO\LQFOXGHWKHDXWRFUXVKHU
EDWWHU\VFUDSSHGFDUDOXPLQXPUDGLDWRUDQGHQJLQHEORFNVWRUDJHDUHDV(OHYDWHG
FRQFHQWUDWLRQVRI3$+VZHUHGHWHFWHGLQJURXQGZDWHUQHDUWKHWDUVWRUDJHDUHD+XPDQH[SRVXUH
WRFRQWDPLQDQWVWKURXJKWKHJURXQGZDWHUSDWKZD\LVXQOLNHO\GXHWRWKHDEVHQFHRI
GRZQJUDGLHQWPXQLFLSDOGULQNLQJZDWHUZHOOVDQGDQXSZDUGK\GUDXOLFJUDGLHQWWKDWLVOLNHO\
RFFXUULQJDWWKH6LWH

6LWH,QVSHFWLRQ$QDO\WLFDO5HVXOWV5HSRUW      
$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ&RPSDQ\871      

%HQ]HQHDQGOHDGZHUHQRWGHWHFWHGLQVXEVXUIDFHVRLOVDPSOHVDWHOHYDWHGOHYHOVGXULQJWKLV
LQYHVWLJDWLRQ$UVHQLFDQGFKURPLXPZHUHGHWHFWHGDWVOLJKWO\HOHYDWHGOHYHOV+XPDQH[SRVXUH
WREHQ]HQHLQWKHVRLOLVXQOLNHO\DWWKH6LWHDVELRGHJUDGDWLRQDQGYRODWLOL]DWLRQKDVOLNHO\
UHGXFHGWKHFRQWDPLQDQWWRDPLQLPDOFRQFHQWUDWLRQVLQFHLWZDVGHWHFWHGLQ([SRVXUHWR
DUVHQLFDQGFKURPLXPLQWKHVXEVXUIDFHLVDOVRXQOLNHO\XQOHVVWKHVRXWKHUQSRUWLRQRIWKH6LWHLV
H[FDYDWHG7KHSUHVHQFHRIOHDGLQVXUIDFHVRLOQHDUWKHDXWRFUXVKHUPD\SRVHDVOLJKWULVNWR
QHDUE\ZRUNHUVDQGRUWKHUHVLGHQWVRIWKHKRXVHLQFORVHSUR[LPLW\WRWKHDXWRFUXVKHUKRZHYHU
OHDGFRQFHQWUDWLRQVDUHRQO\PRGHUDWHO\HOHYDWHG
7KHUHDUHQRVXUIDFHZDWHULQWDNHVZLWKLQGRZQVWUHDPPLOHVRIWKH6LWHDQG'U\&UHHNLVQRW
XVHGUHFUHDWLRQDOO\RUDVDILVKHU\)RUWKHVHUHDVRQVWKHULVNRIKXPDQH[SRVXUHYLDWKHVXUIDFH
ZDWHUSDWKZD\LVORZ7KHVRLOYDSRUVXEVXUIDFHLQWUXVLRQDQGDLUSDWKZD\VDUHQRWSDWKZD\VRI
FRQFHUQDWWKLV6LWH,WLVXQOLNHO\WKDWWDUJHWVZLOOEHLPSDFWHGIURPFRQWDPLQDQWVDWWKH6LWHYLD
WKHJURXQGZDWHUVXUIDFHZDWHUVRLOVRLOYDSRUVXEVXUIDFHLQWUXVLRQRUDLUSDWKZD\V
5()(5(1&(6
6LWH,QWHUYLHZZLWK-RKQ$QGHUVRQ2ZQHURI:UHFNLQJ<DUG

RI5HFKDUJH$UHDVDQG:DWHU4XDOLW\RIWKH3ULQFLSDO$TXLIHUVDORQJWKH:DVDWFK)URQW
+\GURJHRORJ\RI
5HFKDUJH$UHDVDQG:DWHU4XDOLW\RIWKH3ULQFLSDO$TXLIHUVDORQJWKH:DVDWFK)URQW
DQG$GMDFHQW$UHDV8WDK9RO:DWHU5HVRXUFHV,QYHVWLJDWLRQV5HSRUW86
*HRORJLFDO6XUYH\KWWSVGRLRUJZUL
&HQWHU
*HRORJLFDO6XUYH\0DS86*6
%URXJK5&'-6WHYHQVDQG'/-RQHV6DOW
/DNH&LW\873XEOLVKHUV3UHVV

2WKHU*RYHUQPHQW6HULHV*URXQG:DWHU5HVRXUFHVRI1RUWKHUQ8WDK9DOOH\8WDK
9RO7HFKQLFDO3XEOLFDWLRQ6DOW/DNH&LW\878WDK'HSDUWUUHQWRI1DWXUDO
5HVRXUFHV'LYLVLRQRI:DWHU5LJKWVKWWSSXEVHUXVJVJRYSXEOLFDWLRQ
(YDQNR&5DQG'$']RPEDN&RQWDPLQDWHG6RLOVDQG

6LWH,QVSHFWLRQ$QDO\WLFDO5HVXOWV5HSRUW      
$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ&RPSDQ\871      

*URXQG:DWHU5HPHGLDWLRQ7HFKQRORJLHV$QDO\VLV&HQWHUKWWSVFOX
LQRUJGRZQORDGWRRONLWPHWDOVSGI

$QGHUVRQ


HPHQWDO6XEVXUIDFH,QYHVWLJDWLRQ5HSRUW'HVHUW3RLQW$QGHUVRQ



3DOPHU(O
3URJUDP3ODQIRU(QYLURQPHQWDO'DWD2SHUDWLRQVIRUWKH&(5&/$%UDQFK)LQDO3ODQ

6PLWK'%:)&DQQRQ/*:RRGUXII)HGHULFR6RODQR-(.LOEXUQDQG'/)H\
,'&

5HIHUHQFH&HQWHU

$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ&RPSDQ\
8WDK&RXQW\
5HVSRQVHDQG5HPHGLDWLRQ
KWWSVVHFXUHXWDKJRYEHV
8WDK'LYLVLRQRI'ULQN
&LW\878WDK'LYLVLRQRI'ULQNLQJ:DWHU
*HRJUDSKLF,QIRUPDWLRQ'DWDEDVH/D\HU1DPH:USDG6KS










),*85(6


















7$%/(6
-XGJPHQWDO
VDPSOLQJZLOOEH
XVHGWRELDV
VDPSOHVWRZDUG
PRUHSRWHQWLDOO\
FRQWDPLQDWHGDUHDV
RUDUHDVWKDWUHTXLUH
IXUWKHU
FKDUDFWHUL]DWLRQ
'HWHFWLRQOLPLWV
XWLOL]HGE\WKH
ODERUDWRU\DUHWKH
(3$0HWKRG
'HWHFWLRQ/LPLW
0'/ SURFHGXUHV
IRXQGLQ7LWOH
&RGHRI)HGHUDO
5HJXODWLRQV&)5
3DUWV
DQG
6DPSOHORFDWLRQV
ZLOOEHGHWHUPLQHG
SULRUWRWKHVWDUWRI
ILHOGZRUN
3URSRVHGVDPSOH
ORFDWLRQVPD\EH
FKDQJHGLQWKHILHOG
GXHWRXWLOLW\
ORFDWLRQVGHEULV
FRQVWUXFWLRQ
DFWLYLWLHVDQG
EXLOGLQJV
7KHUHDUHIRXUSULQFLSDO
VWXG\TXHVWLRQVIRUWKH
6LWH
 :KDWLVWKHVRXUFHRI
WKHLPSDFWHGPDWHULDOV
RQWKH6LWH"
 +DV6LWHDQG
VXUURXQGLQJVRLOVEHHQ
LPSDFWHGE\92&V
692&VSHVWLFLGHV
3&%VDQGPHWDOV"
 +DV6LWHDQG
VXUURXQGLQJ
JURXQGZDWHUEHHQ
LPSDFWHGZLWK92&V
692&VSHVWLFLGHV
3&%VDQGPHWDOV"
 ,VLPSDFWHG
JURXQGZDWHULPSDFWLQJ
WKHSULYDWHGULQNLQJ
ZDWHUZHOOGRZQJUDGLHQW
RIWKH6LWH"
7KHTXHVWLRQWREH
UHVROYHGE\WKLV6,LVWR
GHWHUPLQHWKHFXUUHQW
FRQGLWLRQRIWKHSURSHUW\
DQGWRGHWHUPLQHLI
FRQWDPLQDWLRQIURPWKH
6LWHKDVPLJUDWHGLQWR
WKHHQYLURQPHQWYLDDQ\
SRWHQWLDOSDWKZD\VDQG
LVDIIHFWLQJSRWHQWLDO
HQYLURQPHQWDODQGRU
KXPDQKHDOWKWDUJHWV
7HDP0HPEHUV
'(553URMHFW0DQDJHU
&KULV0DUWLQ
+HDOWKDQG6DIHW\
2IILFHU
&UDLJ%DUQLW]
6LWH$VVHVVPHQW
0DQDJHU
'DOH8UEDQ
(QYLURQPHQWDO
7R[LFRORJLVW
6FRWW(YHUHWW
&(5&/$%UDQFK
0DQDJHU
'XDQH0RUWHQVHQ
/DERUDWRU\DQDO\WLFDO
GDWDIRUJURXQGZDWHU
VRLOVXUIDFHZDWHUDQG
VHGLPHQWVDPSOHVZLOO
EHFROOHFWHGWRDVVHVV
WKHSRWHQWLDOSUHVHQFH
RIFRQWDPLQDQWVDWWKH
6LWHDQGLI
FRQWDPLQDQWVDUH
PLJUDWLQJRIIVLWH
&RPSDULVRQRI
DQDO\WLFDOUHVXOWV
DJDLQVWWKH(3$
5HJLRQDO6FUHHQLQJ
/HYHOV56/VDQG
6XSHUIXQG&KHPLFDO
'DWD0DWUL[6&'0
%HQFKPDUNV
5HIHUHQFH'RVHDQG
&DQFHU5LVNZLOOEH
XVHGZKHQDYDLODEOH
7KH$QGHUVRQ$XWR
:UHFNLQJ&RPSDQ\LV
ORFDWHGRQ8WDKLQ
6SDQLVK)RUN8WDK
VXUURXQGHGE\
SUHGRPLQDQWO\DJULFXOWXUDO
DQGUHVLGHQWLDO
GHYHORSPHQWV
3RWHQWLDOKXPDQKHDOWK
WDUJHWVFRXOGEH
LPSDFWHGGXHWR
LQFUHDVHGUHVLGHQWLDO
GHYHORSPHQWVXUURXQGLQJ
WKH6LWHHVSHFLDOO\WKH
HDVWDGMRLQLQJ
FRPPXQLW\
6RLODQGJURXQGZDWHU
VDPSOHVZLOOEHFROOHFWHG
IURPORFDWLRQVRQWKH6LWH
DQGVXUURXQGLQJ
SURSHUWLHVWRGHWHUPLQH
VRXUFHDWWULEXWLRQDQG
EDFNJURXQGRQDQGRII
WKH6LWH6XUIDFHZDWHU
DQGVHGLPHQWVDPSOHV
ZLOOEHFROOHFWHGIURPWKH
HDVWDQGZHVWLUULJDWLRQ
GLWFKHVDQGWKHSRQG
ORFDWHGQHDUWKH
QRUWKZHVWFRUQHURIWKH
6LWHZKLFKHYHQWXDOO\
GUDLQVWRDIUHVKZDWHU
HPHUJHQWZHWODQG
IROORZHGE\DIUHVKZDWHU
SRQG
7KHHQGSRLQWRIWKH
VDPSOLQJHYHQWZLOOEH
GHSHQGHQWRQVDPSOH
UHVXOWV*URXQGZDWHU
VRLOVXUIDFHZDWHUDQG
VHGLPHQWVDPSOH
UHVXOWVZLOOEH
HYDOXDWHGWRGHWHUPLQH
WKHQH[WDSSURSULDWH
VWHSRUVFRSHRIZRUN









$33(1',;$
+LVWRULFDO6DPSOLQJ7DEOHVDQG)LJXUHV
 
7DEOH$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ
&RPSDQ\$QDO\WLFDO5HVXOWVIRU%7(;1
6DPSOH,' %HQ]HQH 7ROXHQH (WK\O
%HQ]HQH
7RWDO
;\OHQHV
1DSK
WKDOHQH
753+
3KDVH,,6XEVXUIDFH,QYHVWLJDWLRQ6RLO6DPSOHVPJNJ,+,E
&#¶ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 
&#¶ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 
&#¶      
&#¶    
&#¶ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 
&#¶ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ 
3+#¶      
3+#¶      
3+#¶      
56/V     1(
3KDVH,,6XSSOHPHQWDO6XEVXUIDFH,QYHVWLJDWLRQ6RLO6DPSOHVPJNJ,+,F
&#¶      
&#¶      
&#¶      
&#¶      
&#¶    
&#¶      
3+66#¶      
3+66#¶     
3+66#¶      
56/V      1(
3KDVH,,6XEVXUIDFH,QYHVWLJDWLRQ*URXQGZDWHU6DPSOHVPJ/,+,E
*:    1'
*:      1'
*:$      1'
*:    
*:      1'
0&/V56/     1(
3KDVH,,6XSSOHPHQWDO6XEVXUIDFH,QYHVWLJDWLRQ*URXQGZDWHU6DPSOHVPJ/,+,F
0:      
0:    
0:    
0:    
0:      
0&/V56/     1(
'DWDVXPPDUL]HGIURP,+,(QYLURQPHQWDO5HSRUWVVXEPLWWHGXQGHUWKH8WDK9&3
%7(;1DQDO\]HGE\(3$0HWKRG%
753+DQDO\]HGE\(3$0HWKRG
0&/±0D[LPXP&RQWDPLQDQW/HYHO
56/±(3$5HJLRQDO6FUHHQLQJ/HYHO
%ROGYDOXHVH[FHHGWKH0&/RU56/
1$±QRWDQDO\]HG
1(±QRWHVWDEOLVKHG
7DEOH$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ
&RPSDQ\$QDO\WLFDO5HVXOWVIRU0HWDOV
6DPSOH,' $UVHQLF &DGPLXP /HDG 0HUFXU\
3KDVH,,6XEVXUIDFH,QYHVWLJDWLRQ6RLO6DPSOHVPJNJ,+,E
66#& 1$ 1$
66#& 1$ 1$
56/V    
3KDVH,,6XEVXUIDFH,QYHVWLJDWLRQ*URXQGZDWHU6DPSOHVPJ/,+,E
*:    
*:  
*:$  
*:    
*:  
0&/V    
'DWDVXPPDUL]HGIURP,+,(QYLURQPHQWDO5HSRUWVVXEPLWWHGXQGHUWKH8WDK9&3
56/±(3$5HJLRQDO6FUHHQLQJ/HYHO
0&/±0D[LPXP&RQWDPLQDQW/HYHORU$FWLRQ/HYHOIRU/HDG
/HDGVFUHHQLQJOHYHORIPJNJXVHGLQWKH8WDK9&3
%ROGYDOXHVH[FHHGWKH0&/RU56/
1$±QRWDQDO\]HG









$33(1',;%
&RQVHQWIRU$FFHVVWR3URSHUW\)RUP



&216(17)25$&&(66723523(57<

$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ&RPSDQ\871
6SDQLVK)RUN8WDK&RXQW\8WDK


1DPHRI2ZQHURU2ZQHU5HSUHVHQWDWLYH

$GGUHVVRI2ZQHU 

$GGUHVVRI3URSHUW\6XEMHFWWR$FFHVV

$ ,WKHDXWKRUL]HGUHSUHVHQWDWLYHRIWKHRZQHURIWKH3URSHUW\
FRQVHQWWRRIILFHUVHPSOR\HHVFRQWUDFWRUVVXEFRQWUDFWRUVDQGRWKHUDXWKRUL]HGUHSUHVHQWDWLYHV
HQWHULQJDQGKDYLQJFRQWLQXHGDFFHVVWRWKHDERYHUHIHUHQFHG
\URQHRUPRUHRIWKHIROORZLQJSXUSRVHV

&RQGXFWLQJILHOGLQVSHFWLRQVDQGLQYHVWLJDWLRQV

7DNLQJVDPSOHVRIVRLODQGJURXQGZDWHURQWKH3URSHUW\

'ULOOLQJERULQJRUSXQFKLQJRIKROHVLIDSSOLFDEOHIRUVXUIDFHDQGVXEVXUIDFH
LQYHVWLJDWLRQVDQG

2WKHUVXFKDFWLRQVDVPD\EHQHFHVVDU\WRSURWHFWKXPDQKHDOWKDQGWKH
HQYLURQPHQW


% 2ZQHUXQGHUVWDQGVWKDWWKHVHDFWLRQVE\(3$DQG8'(4DUHXQGHUWDNHQSXUVXDQWWRWKHLU
UHVSRQVHDQGHQIRUFHPHQWUHVSRQVLELOLWLHVXQGHUWKH&RPSUHKHQVLYH(QYLURQPHQWDO5HVSRQVH
HWVHT1RWZLWKVWDQGLQJDQ\
SURYLVLRQRIWKLV&RQVHQWIRU$FFHVVWKH8'(4DQG(3$UHWDLQDOORIWKHLUDFFHVVDXWKRULWLHV
DQGULJKWVDVZHOODVDOORIWKHLUULJKWVWRUHTXLUHODQGZDWHUXVHUHVWULFWLRQVLQFOXGLQJ
HQIRUFHPHQWDXWKRULWLHVUHODWHGWKHUHWRXQGHU&(5&/$5&5$DQGDQ\RWKHUDSSOLFDEOHIHGHUDO
RU6WDWHVWDWXWHRUUHJXODWLRQ(3$8'(4DQG2ZQHUUHFRJQL]HWKDWJUDQWLQJDFFHVVGRHVQRW
FRQVWLWXWHDQDGPLVVLRQRIOLDELOLW\XQGHU&(5&/$5&5$DQGDQ\RWKHUDSSOLFDEOHIHGHUDORU
6WDWHVWDWXWHRUUHJXODWLRQ(3$8'(4DQG2ZQHUUHWDLQDOOULJKWVDQGGHIHQVHVXQGHU
&(5&/$5&5$DQGDQ\RWKHUDSSOLFDEOHIHGHUDORU6WDWHVWDWXWHRUUHJXODWLRQ/LDELOLW\IRU
GDPDJHFDXVHGE\QHJOLJHQFHLVJRYHUQHGE\DSSOLFDEOHODZ1RWKLQJLQWKLV&RQVHQWIRU$FFHVV
FRQVWLWXWHVDZDLYHURIVRYHUHLJQLPPXQLW\
 

& 7KHXQGHUVLJQHGFHUWLILHVWKDWKHVKHLVIXOO\DXWKRUL]HGWRJUDQWWKHDFFHVVSURYLGHG
KHUHLQRQEHKDOIRI2ZQHUDQGWRH[HFXWHDQGOHJDOO\ELQG2ZQHUWRWKLVGRFXPHQW



6HFWLRQRIWKH8WDK&RGH$QQSURYLGHVWKDWXSRQUHTXHVWDVLQGLFDWHG
EHORZWKH2ZQHUPD\KDYHDVSOLWVDPSOHLISRVVLEOHDQGPD\REWDLQDQDQDO\VLVRIWKHVDPSOH
DYDLODEOH7RWKHVHHQGVSOHDVHPDUN\RXUSUHIHUHQFHEHORZ

>@ ,ZLVKWRREWDLQVSOLWVRIDOOVDPSOHVFROOHFWHGRQWKH3URSHUW\DQGDUHFHLSW
GHVFULELQJHDFKVDPSOHWDNHQ,XQGHUVWDQGWKDW,PXVWSURYLGHWKHQHFHVVDU\
VDPSOHFRQWDLQHUVWRREWDLQWKHVHVSOLWV7KHUHVSRQVLELOLW\RIFKRRVLQJDQ
DQDO\WLFDOODERUDWRU\DQGWKHFRVWRIDQDO\VLVRIWKHVSOLWVLVVROHO\PLQH

>@ :KHQDYDLODEOHWR8'(42ZQHUZLVKHVWRREWDLQDFRS\RIWKHILQDODQDO\WLFDO
UHVXOWVUHSRUWDQGODERUDWRU\GDWDFRQFHUQLQJWKHVDPSOHVWDNHQIURPWKH3URSHUW\
,QGLFDWHDGGUHVVZKHUHUHVXOWVVKRXOGEHVHQWWRBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB



1DPHRI2ZQHU



%\BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB  'DWHBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB
1DPH
7LWOH










$33(1',;&
)LHOG$FWLYLWLHV5HSRUW

3DJHRI
),(/'$&7,9,7,(65(3257
$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ&RPSDQ\

'$7(

216,7(3(56211(/ &KULV0DUWLQ8'(4'(55

 &ROOHFWHG RQH GHLRQL]HG ZDWHU VDPSOH 6)6< ZLWK WKUHH PO DPEHU
DOLTXRWVDWWKH'(55RIILFH

'$7(

216,7(3(56211(/ &KULV0DUWLQ8'(4'(55
0HOLVVD2WWOH\8'(4'(55
(ULF6DQGXVN\(3$67$57:HVWRQ6HUYLFHV
&RUELQ%HQVRQ(3$67$576DJH(QYLURQPHQWDO

 :HDWKHULVDSSUR[LPDWHO\GHJUHHV)DKUHQKHLWž)DQGSDUWO\FORXG\6WDUWDW
VDPSOHORFDWLRQ$$:&8WLOLW\ORFDWHLQDGHTXDWHPRYHWR$$:&ORFDWHG
DGMDFHQWWRWKHVLWH

 $+HDOWK 6DIHW\EULHILQJZDVFRQGXFWHGEHWZHHQ&KULV0DUWLQ0HOLVVD2WWOH\
DQG(3$67$57

 )LQLVKHGVHWWLQJXSDQGVWDUWHGGULOOLQJDWVDPSOHORFDWLRQ$$:&

 $WIHHWEHORZJURXQGVXUIDFHEJVLWZDVREVHUYHGWKDWWKHVRLOLVPRVWO\WDQ
VLOWDQGFOD\ZLWKORZSODVWLFLW\1HDUWKLVORFDWLRQWKHVRLOJUDGHVIURPWDQWR
JUD\ZLWKDQLQFUHDVHLQLURQR[LGHVWDLQLQJ

 7HPSRUDU\ZHOOVHWDWIHHWEJV

 &ROOHFWHG$$:&6%IURPWRIHHWEJVIRUDQDO\VLVE\YRODWLOHRUJDQLF
FRPSRXQGV 92&V VHPLYRODWLOH RUJDQLF FRPSRXQGV 692&V SHVWLFLGHV
DURFORUVDQGWRWDOPHWDOV

 6WDUWHG FROOHFWLQJ $$:&*: IRUDQDO\VLV E\ 92&V 692&V SHVWLFLGHV
DURFORUVDQGWRWDOPHWDOV

 +RZHYHUWKHERULQJZHQWGU\DIWHUFROOHFWLQJIRU92&DQDO\VLV0RYHWRVDPSOH
ORFDWLRQ$$:&

 &ROOHFWHG $$:&6% IRU WKH VDPH DQDO\VHV DV FROOHFWHG IRU 6)6<
$GGLWLRQDOYROXPHFROOHFWHGIRUWKHODEGXSOLFDWH7RWDOGHSWKRIWKHERULQJLV
DERXWIHHWEJV

3DJHRI
 &ROOHFWHG $$:&*: IRU WKH VDPH DQDO\VHV DV FROOHFWHG IRU 6)6<
$GGLWLRQDOYROXPHFROOHFWHGIRUWKHODEGXSOLFDWH

 6WDUWHGGULOOLQJDWVDPSOHORFDWLRQ$$:&'XULQJGULOOLQJDPRQLWRULQJZHOO
ZDVGLVFRYHUHG'XHWRSRRU\LHOGWKXVIDULWZDVGHFLGHGWRFROOHFWIURPWKH
PRQLWRULQJZHOOZLWKRXWSXUJLQJ7RWDOGHSWKRIWKHERULQJLVDERXWIHHWEJV
'HSWKWRZDWHULVDERXWIHHWEJV

 &ROOHFWHG$$:&*:IRUWKHVDPHDQDO\VHVDVFROOHFWHGIRU6)6<1R
VRLO VDPSOH ZDV FROOHFWHG DW WKLV ORFDWLRQ GXH WR ERULQJ JRLQJ GU\ EHIRUH
FROOHFWLQJHQWLUHVDPSOHIRUDOODQDO\WHV67$57FRQWLQXHVWRGULOODQGZLOOGXFW
WDSHWKHHQGVRIWKHSRO\DFHWDWHOLQHUV

 &KULV0DUWLQDQG0HOLVVD2WWOH\GHSDUWWKHVLWH

'$7(

216,7(3(56211(/ &KULV0DUWLQ8'(4'(55
&UDLJ%DUQLW]8'(4'(55
(ULF6DQGXVN\(3$67$57:HVWRQ6HUYLFHV
&RUELQ%HQVRQ(3$67$576DJH(QYLURQPHQWDO

 &KULV 0DUWLQ DQG &UDLJ %DUQLW] DUULYH RQ WKH VLWH :HDWKHU LV PRVWO\ FOHDU
DSSUR[LPDWHO\ ž ) (3$ 67$57 RQ VLWH QHDU VDPSOH ORFDWLRQ $$:&
8'(4'(55ILQLVKVDPSOLQJDW$$:&QRZWKDWZDWHUKDVILOOHGWKHERULQJ

 &ROOHFWHG UHPDLQLQJ SRUWLRQ RI WKH DQDO\WHV LQFOXGLQJ 692&V SHVWLFLGHV DQG
DURFORUV

 0U&ULV&KLOGVDQG6WHYH6KURHGHUDUULYHRQWKHVLWH7KH\RZQVRPHRIWKH
SURSHUWLHVZKLFKDFFHVVZDVREWDLQHG

 (3$67$57PRYHWRVDPSOHORFDWLRQ$$:&DIWHUILQLVKLQJWKHERULQJDW
VDPSOHORFDWLRQDW$$:&7RWDOGHSWKRIWKHERULQJLVDERXWIHHWEJV
'HSWKWRZDWHULVDERXWIHHWEJV

 &ROOHFWHG$$:&6%IRUWKHVDPHDQDO\VHVDVFROOHFWHGIRU6)6<7KH
DSSUR[LPDWHGHSWKRIWKHVDPSOHLVWRIHHWEJV/RZUHFRYHU\RQ
JURXQGZDWHUREVHUYHGVRZDLWXQWLOWRPRUURZWRFROOHFWWKHJURXQGZDWHUVDPSOH

 (3$67$57FRPSOHWHVGULOOLQJDW$$:&8'(4'(55VWDUWVDPSOLQJDW
VDPSOHORFDWLRQ$$:&7RWDOGHSWKRIWKHERULQJLVDERXWIHHWEJV'HSWK
WRZDWHULVDERXWIHHWEJV

 &RQWLQXHGVDPSOLQJDW$$:&GXHWRORZIORZ

3DJHRI
 &ROOHFWHG$$:&*:IRUWKHVDPHDQDO\VHVDVFROOHFWHGIRU6)6<

 &ROOHFWHG$$:&6%IRUWKHVDPHDQDO\VHVDVFROOHFWHGIRU6)6<

 0HDVXUHGZDWHUTXDOLW\SDUDPHWHUVWREHWKHIROORZLQJ
'LVVROYHG2[\JHQPLOOLJUDPSHUOLWHUPJ/
S+
&RQGXFWLYLW\PLOOLVLHPHQVSHUFHQWLPHWHUPVFP
7HPSHUDWXUHƒ&

 8'(4'(55VWDUWVDPSOLQJDW$$:&,VVXHVZLWKSOXJJHGWXELQJ

 0RYHWRVDPSOHORFDWLRQ$$:&7RWDOGHSWKRIWKHERULQJLVDERXWIHHW
EJV'HSWKWRZDWHULVDERXWIHHWEJV:DLWWRUHFRYHUPRUHEHIRUHVWDUW
VDPSOLQJ6DPSOHORFDWLRQ$$:&KDVQRZDWHUHLWKHU

 0RYHWRVDPSOHORFDWLRQ$$:&7RWDOGHSWKLVDERXWIHHWEJV'HSWKWR
ZDWHULVIHHWEJV

 &ROOHFWHG$$:&*:

 &ROOHFWHG$$:&6%0HDVXUHGZDWHUTXDOLW\SDUDPHWHUVWREHWKH
IROORZLQJ
'LVVROYHG2[\JHQPLOOLJUDPSHUOLWHUPJ/
S+
&RQGXFWLYLW\PLOOLVLHPHQVSHUFHQWLPHWHUPVFP
7HPSHUDWXUHƒ&

 'HSDUWWKHVLWHDIWHUUHYLHZLQJVDPSOHORFDWLRQ$$:&

'$7(

216,7(3(56211(/ &KULV0DUWLQ8'(4'(55
&UDLJ%DUQLW]8'(4'(55
(ULF6DQGXVN\(3$67$57:HVWRQ6HUYLFHV
&RUELQ%HQVRQ(3$67$576DJH(QYLURQPHQWDO

 &KULV 0DUWLQ DQG &UDLJ %DUQLW] DUULYH RQ WKH VLWH :HDWKHU LV PRVWO\ FOHDU
DSSUR[LPDWHO\ž)(3$67$57RQVLWHQHDUVDPSOHORFDWLRQ$$:&

 8'(4'(55ILQLVKVDPSOLQJDW$$:&6HFRQGDWWHPSWXQVXFFHVVIXOVRZLOO
DEDQGRQDQGPRYHWRWKHQH[WORFDWLRQ

 8'(4'(55DUULYHDWVDPSOHORFDWLRQ$$:&*:7RWDOGHSWKLVDERXW
IHHWEJV'HSWKWRZDWHULVIHHWEJV

3DJHRI
 &ROOHFWHG$$:&*:IRU92&DQG692&DQDO\VHV7KHERULQJZHQWGU\
EHIRUHFROOHFWLRQFRPSOHWH2QHOLWHUDPEHUUHPDLQVWREHFROOHFWHGRQFHWKH
ERULQJUHFRYHUV

 &ROOHFWHG$$:&6%VDPSOHIRUWKHVDPHDQDO\VHVDVVDPSOHORFDWLRQ
$$:&

 7KHWRWDOGHSWKRIWKHERULQJDWVDPSOHORFDWLRQ$$:&LVDERXWIHHWEJV
'HSWKWRZDWHULVIHHWEJV

 &ROOHFWHG$$:&6%DQG$$:&6%IRUWKHVDPHDQDO\VHVDVVDPSOH
ORFDWLRQ$$:&

 &ROOHFWHG$$:&*:DQG$$:&*:IRUWKHVDPHDQDO\VHVDVVDPSOH
ORFDWLRQ$$:&7KHERULQJZHQWGU\ZLWKRQHOLWHUDPEHUUHPDLQLQJWREH
FROOHFWHG

 &ROOHFWHG$$:&6%QHDUWKHWUDQVLWLRQEHWZHHQWKHWDQDQGJUD\FOD\

 &ROOHFWHG$$:&*:7RWDOGHSWKLVDERXWIHHWEJV'HSWKWRZDWHULV
IHHWEJV

 'HSDUWWKHVLWH









$33(1',;'
&RQWUDFWRU7ULS5HSRUWDQG'DWD9DOLGDWLRQ5HSRUW





        
3URMHFW$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ
'$7$9$/,'$7,215(3257 6'*
  5HYLVLRQ
1RDQRPDOLHVZHUHREVHUYHGUHJDUGLQJVDPSOHPDQDJHPHQWZLWKRQHH[FHSWLRQQRWHGLQWKHFDVH
QDUUDWLYH6DPSOHWDJVZHUHQRWUHFHLYHGZLWKWKHVDPSOHVKRZHYHUVDPSOHWDJQXPEHUVZHUH
OLVWHGRQWKH&2&$FFRUGLQJWRWKHFDVHQDUUDWLYHWKLVSUDFWLFHLVFRQVLVWHQWZLWKSUHYLRXVGLUHFWLRQ
IURP(3$5HJLRQ
7KHVDPSOHVLQWKLV6'*ZHUHUHFHLYHGDWWKHODERUDWRU\ZLWKLQWKHWHPSHUDWXUHOLPLWVRI&“&
$FFRUGLQJWRWKHFDVHQDUUDWLYHDQGVDPSOHORJLQVKHHWIRUWKLV6'*WKHVDPSOHVZHUHUHFHLYHG
LQWDFWRQLFHDQGSURSHUO\SUHVHUYHGDVDSSOLFDEOH7KH&2&ZDVDSSURSULDWHO\VLJQHGDQGGDWHG
E\ILHOGDQGODERUDWRU\SHUVRQQHO&XVWRG\VHDOVZHUHSUHVHQWDQGLQWDFWRQWKHFRROHU
        
3URMHFW$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ
'$7$9$/,'$7,215(3257 6'*
  5HYLVLRQ
        
3URMHFW$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ
'$7$9$/,'$7,215(3257 6'*
  5HYLVLRQ
        
3URMHFW$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ
'$7$9$/,'$7,215(3257 6'*
  5HYLVLRQ
        
3URMHFW$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ
'$7$9$/,'$7,215(3257 6'*
  5HYLVLRQ
        
3URMHFW$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ
'$7$9$/,'$7,215(3257 6'*
  5HYLVLRQ










R
        
3URMHFW$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ
'$7$9$/,'$7,215(3257 6'*
  5HYLVLRQ
R
R






        
3URMHFW$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ
'$7$9$/,'$7,215(3257 6'*
  5HYLVLRQ
1RDQRPDOLHVZHUHREVHUYHGUHJDUGLQJVDPSOHPDQDJHPHQWZLWKRQHH[FHSWLRQQRWHGLQWKHFDVH
QDUUDWLYH6DPSOHWDJVZHUHQRWUHFHLYHGZLWKWKHVDPSOHVKRZHYHUVDPSOHWDJQXPEHUVZHUH
OLVWHGRQWKH&2&$FFRUGLQJWRWKHFDVHQDUUDWLYHWKLVSUDFWLFHLVFRQVLVWHQWZLWKSUHYLRXVGLUHFWLRQ
IURP(3$5HJLRQ
7KHVDPSOHVLQWKLV6'*ZHUHUHFHLYHGDWWKHODERUDWRU\ZLWKLQWKHWHPSHUDWXUHOLPLWVRI&“&
$FFRUGLQJWRWKHFDVHQDUUDWLYHDQGVDPSOHORJLQVKHHWIRUWKLV6'*WKHVDPSOHVZHUHUHFHLYHG
LQWDFWRQLFHDQGSURSHUO\SUHVHUYHGDVDSSOLFDEOH7KH&2&VZHUHDSSURSULDWHO\VLJQHGDQG
GDWHGE\ILHOGDQGODERUDWRU\SHUVRQQHO&XVWRG\VHDOVZHUHSUHVHQWDQGLQWDFWRQWKHFRROHUV
        
3URMHFW$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ
'$7$9$/,'$7,215(3257 6'*
  5HYLVLRQ
        
3URMHFW$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ
'$7$9$/,'$7,215(3257 6'*
  5HYLVLRQ
        
3URMHFW$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ
'$7$9$/,'$7,215(3257 6'*
  5HYLVLRQ
        
3URMHFW$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ
'$7$9$/,'$7,215(3257 6'*
  5HYLVLRQ
        
3URMHFW$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ
'$7$9$/,'$7,215(3257 6'*
  5HYLVLRQ








R
R
        
3URMHFW$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ
'$7$9$/,'$7,215(3257 6'*
  5HYLVLRQ










        
3URMHFW$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ
'$7$9$/,'$7,215(3257 6'*
  5HYLVLRQ

R
R







        
3URMHFW$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ
'$7$9$/,'$7,215(3257 6'*
  5HYLVLRQ




R
R




        
3URMHFW$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ
'$7$9$/,'$7,215(3257 6'*
  5HYLVLRQ


        
3URMHFW$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ
'$7$9$/,'$7,215(3257 6'*
  5HYLVLRQ
1RDQRPDOLHVZHUHREVHUYHGUHJDUGLQJVDPSOHPDQDJHPHQWZLWKRQHH[FHSWLRQQRWHGLQWKHFDVH
QDUUDWLYH6DPSOHWDJVZHUHQRWUHFHLYHGZLWKWKHVDPSOHVKRZHYHUVDPSOHWDJQXPEHUVZHUH
OLVWHGRQWKH&2&$FFRUGLQJWRWKHFDVHQDUUDWLYHWKLVSUDFWLFHLVFRQVLVWHQWZLWKSUHYLRXVGLUHFWLRQ
IURP(3$5HJLRQ7KHVDPSOHVLQWKLV6'*ZHUHUHFHLYHGDWWKHODERUDWRU\ZLWKLQWKHWHPSHUDWXUH
OLPLWVRI&“&$FFRUGLQJWRWKHFDVHQDUUDWLYHDQGVDPSOHORJLQVKHHWIRUWKLV6'*WKH
VDPSOHVZHUHUHFHLYHGLQWDFWDQGRQLFHKRZHYHUKDQGQRWDWLRQVRQWKH&2&LQGLFDWHGRQHYLDO
IRUVDPSOH+$&KDGDEURNHQFDSDQGWZRRIWKUHHYLDOVIRUVDPSOH+$'ZHUHUHFHLYHG
EURNHQ6XIILFLHQWVDPSOHUHPDLQHGIRUDQDO\VLV$OWKRXJKWKH&2&LQGLFDWHGWKHVDPSOHVZHUH
SUHVHUYHGWKHQDUUDWLYHQRWHGDOOVDPSOHVH[FHSW+$'KDGDPHDVXUHGS+RILQGLFDWLQJWKH\
ZHUH XQSUHVHUYHG 7KH &2& ZDV DSSURSULDWHO\ VLJQHG DQG GDWHG E\ ILHOG DQG ODERUDWRU\
SHUVRQQHO&XVWRG\VHDOVZHUHSUHVHQWDQGLQWDFWRQWKHFRROHU
        
3URMHFW$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ
'$7$9$/,'$7,215(3257 6'*
  5HYLVLRQ
        
3URMHFW$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ
'$7$9$/,'$7,215(3257 6'*
  5HYLVLRQ
        
3URMHFW$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ
'$7$9$/,'$7,215(3257 6'*
  5HYLVLRQ
        
3URMHFW$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ
'$7$9$/,'$7,215(3257 6'*
  5HYLVLRQ
        
3URMHFW$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ
'$7$9$/,'$7,215(3257 6'*
  5HYLVLRQ








        
3URMHFW$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ
'$7$9$/,'$7,215(3257 6'*
  5HYLVLRQ


R
R
R






        
3URMHFW$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ
'$7$9$/,'$7,215(3257 6'*
  5HYLVLRQ
        
3URMHFW$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ
'$7$9$/,'$7,215(3257 6'*
  5HYLVLRQ

        
3URMHFW$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ
'$7$9$/,'$7,215(3257 6'*
  5HYLVLRQ
        
3URMHFW$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ
'$7$9$/,'$7,215(3257 6'*
  5HYLVLRQ
        
3URMHFW$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ
'$7$9$/,'$7,215(3257 6'*
  5HYLVLRQ
        
3URMHFW$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ
'$7$9$/,'$7,215(3257 6'*
  5HYLVLRQ
        
3URMHFW$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ
'$7$9$/,'$7,215(3257 6'*
  5HYLVLRQ








R
        
3URMHFW$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ
'$7$9$/,'$7,215(3257 6'*
  5HYLVLRQ
R










        
3URMHFW$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ
'$7$9$/,'$7,215(3257 6'*
  5HYLVLRQ

R
R








        
3URMHFW$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ
'$7$9$/,'$7,215(3257 6'*
  5HYLVLRQ



R
R



        
3URMHFW$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ
'$7$9$/,'$7,215(3257 6'*
  5HYLVLRQ



        
3URMHFW$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ
'$7$9$/,'$7,215(3257 6'*
  5HYLVLRQ









        
3URMHFW$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ
'$7$9$/,'$7,215(3257 6'*
  5HYLVLRQ
        
3URMHFW$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ
'$7$9$/,'$7,215(3257 6'*
  5HYLVLRQ
        
3URMHFW$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ
'$7$9$/,'$7,215(3257 6'*
  5HYLVLRQ
        
3URMHFW$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ
'$7$9$/,'$7,215(3257 6'*
  5HYLVLRQ
        
3URMHFW$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ
'$7$9$/,'$7,215(3257 6'*
  5HYLVLRQ
        
3URMHFW$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ
'$7$9$/,'$7,215(3257 6'*
  5HYLVLRQ




R
R

$QDO\WH%ODQNFRQFHQWUDWLRQ
XJ/4XDOLILHG6DPSOHV
DQWLPRQ\
 0+$$0+$$0+$%
 0+$%0+$&0+$&
0+$&0+$'0+$'
 0+$'0+$'
WKDOOLXP
,&%0+$$0+$$0+$$
0+$$0+$$0+$%
,&% 0+$&0+$&0+$'
 ,&% 0+$'0+$'0+$'
FREDOW &&% 0+$'
FKURPLXP 0% 0+$'0+$'
YDQDGLXP 0% 0+$'
        
3URMHFW$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ
'$7$9$/,'$7,215(3257 6'*
  5HYLVLRQ




        
3URMHFW$QGHUVRQ$XWR:UHFNLQJ
'$7$9$/,'$7,215(3257 6'*
  5HYLVLRQ





R
R
APPENDIX D
ENVIRONMENTAL DATABASE INFORMATION
FORM-LBC-KXG
®kcehCoeG htiw tropeR ™paM suidaR RDE ehT
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com
Former Anderson Wrecking
2890 South State Street
Springville, UT 84663
Inquiry Number: 7025843.2s
June 21, 2022
SECTION PAGE
Executive Summary ES1
Overview Map 2
Detail Map 3
Map Findings Summary 4
Map Findings 8
Orphan Summary 14
Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking GR-1
GEOCHECK ADDENDUM
Physical Setting Source Addendum A-1
Physical Setting Source Summary A-2
Physical Setting SSURGO Soil Map A-5
Physical Setting Source Map A-15
Physical Setting Source Map Findings A-17
Physical Setting Source Records Searched PSGR-1
TC7025843.2s Page 1
Thank you for your business.
Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
The EDR FieldCheck System enables EDR’s customers to make certain online modifications to the maps and text contained in®
EDR Radius Map Reports. As a result, the maps and text contained in this Report may have been so modified. EDR has not taken
any action to verify any such modifications, and this report and the findings set forth herein must be read in light of this fact. The EDR
FieldCheck System accesses user-modified records from previously submitted reports. Any user-modified record from a previous report
that is plotted outside the search radius of this report may not be included in this report.
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data
Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from
other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL
DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION,
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE,
ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL,
CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY
LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings,
environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor
should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any
property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2020 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole
or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other
trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TC7025843.2s Page 1 of 1
5 EXPRESSWAY LANE PLUM 1200 EAST EXPRESSWAY SEMS-ARCHIVE Lower 1329, 0.252, SW
4 DOMINION ENERGY UTAH 1347 EXPRESSWAY LANE RCRA-VSQG Higher 914, 0.173, SSW
3 SPANISH FORK LANDFIL 1029 NORTH 1110 EAST SEMS-ARCHIVE Lower 192, 0.036, West
A2 ANDERSON AUTO WRECKI 2890 SOUTH STATE STR VCP TP
A1 ANDERSON AUTO WRECKI 2890 SOUTH STATE STR SEMS, LEAD SMELTERS TP
MAPPED SITES SUMMARY
Target Property Address:
2890 SOUTH STATE STREET
SPRINGVILLE, UT 84663
Click on Map ID to see full detail.
MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.)
ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTIONSITE NAME ADDRESS
EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.
4
5
6
0
4
5
6 0
4
5
6
0
45 6 0
4
5
6
0
4
5
6
0
4560
4560 46 00
4 5 60
4 5 6 0
4
5
6
0
4 6 0 0
4640
4
4680
4 6 8 0
4 5 6 0
4680
0
46004600
4640
4 6 4 0
4680
4 7 2 0
4 7 20
EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.
460
0
46
4
0
46
0
0
464
0
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
TargetDistance Total
Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Lists of Federal NPL (Superfund) sites
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000NPL
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Proposed NPL
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPNPL LIENS
Lists of Federal Delisted NPL sites
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Delisted NPL
Lists of Federal sites subject to
CERCLA removals and CERCLA orders
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500FEDERAL FACILITY
1 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500 1SEMS
Lists of Federal CERCLA sites with NFRAP
2 NR NR 1 0 1 0.500SEMS-ARCHIVE
Lists of Federal RCRA facilities
undergoing Corrective Action
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CORRACTS
Lists of Federal RCRA TSD facilities
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500RCRA-TSDF
Lists of Federal RCRA generators
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-LQG
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-SQG
1 NR NR NR 1 0 0.250RCRA-VSQG
Federal institutional controls /
engineering controls registries
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LUCIS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS ENG CONTROLS
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US INST CONTROLS
Federal ERNS list
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPERNS
Lists of state- and tribal
hazardous waste facilities
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ASHWS
Lists of state and tribal landfills
and solid waste disposal facilities
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SWF/LF
Lists of state and tribal leaking storage tanks
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LUST
TC7025843.2s Page 4
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
TargetDistance Total
Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LAST
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN LUST
Lists of state and tribal registered storage tanks
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FEMA UST
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.100UST
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.100AST
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250INDIAN UST
State and tribal institutional
control / engineering control registries
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INST CONTROL
Lists of state and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
1 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500 1VCP
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN VCP
Lists of state and tribal brownfield sites
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500BROWNFIELDS
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US BROWNFIELDS
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid
Waste Disposal Sites
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN ODI
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500ODI
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500DEBRIS REGION 9
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500IHS OPEN DUMPS
Local Lists of Hazardous waste /
Contaminated Sites
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS HIST CDL
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPCDL
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS CDL
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500PFAS
Local Land Records
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPLIENS 2
Records of Emergency Release Reports
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPHMIRS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSPILLS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSPILLS 90
Other Ascertainable Records
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA NonGen / NLR
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUDS
TC7025843.2s Page 5
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
TargetDistance Total
Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000DOD
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SCRD DRYCLEANERS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPEPA WATCH LIST
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.2502020 COR ACTION
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPTSCA
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPTRIS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSSTS
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000ROD
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRMP
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRAATS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPRP
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPADS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPICIS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPFTTS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPMLTS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPCOAL ASH DOE
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500COAL ASH EPA
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPCB TRANSFORMER
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRADINFO
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPHIST FTTS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPDOT OPS
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CONSENT
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000INDIAN RESERV
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUSRAP
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500UMTRA
1 NR NR NR NR NR TP 1LEAD SMELTERS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS AIRS
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250US MINES
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250ABANDONED MINES
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000UXO
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPDOCKET HWC
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPECHO
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FUELS PROGRAM
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPEMI
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250DRYCLEANERS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPEWA
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPFUDS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPMMRP
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPNPDES
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPTIER 2
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUIC
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUOPF
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPMINES MRDS
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRGA LF
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRGA LUST
6 0 0 1 1 1 3- Totals --
TC7025843.2s Page 6
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
TargetDistance Total
Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
NOTES:
TP = Target Property
NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance
Sites may be listed in more than one database
N/A = This State does not maintain a SHWS list. See the Federal CERCLIS list.
TC7025843.2s Page 7
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
2021-11-09 06:00:00Finish Date:
2015-02-17 05:00:00Start Date:
1SEQ:
SIAction Name:
SIAction Code:
00OU:
NFF:
NNPL:
ANDERSON AUTO WRECKING COMPANYSite Name:
UTN000802773EPA ID:
0802773Site ID:
08Region:
St PerfCurrent Action Lead:
LQual:
2012-01-19 05:00:00Finish Date:
2012-01-19 05:00:00Start Date:
1SEQ:
PAAction Name:
PAAction Code:
00OU:
NFF:
NNPL:
ANDERSON AUTO WRECKING COMPANYSite Name:
UTN000802773EPA ID:
0802773Site ID:
08Region:
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
2009-03-03 05:00:00Finish Date:
2009-03-03 05:00:00Start Date:
1SEQ:
DISCVRYAction Name:
DSAction Code:
00OU:
NFF:
NNPL:
ANDERSON AUTO WRECKING COMPANYSite Name:
UTN000802773EPA ID:
0802773Site ID:
08Region:
SEMS Detail:
NFRAP-Site does not qualify for the NPL based on existing informationNon NPL Status:
Not on the NPLNPL:
NFF:
49049FIPS Code:
03Cong District:
SPRINGVILLE, UT 84663City,State,Zip:
2890 SOUTH STATE STREETAddress:
ANDERSON AUTO WRECKING COMPANYName:
UTN000802773EPA ID:
0802773Site ID:
SEMS:
Site 1 of 2 in cluster A
Actual:
4599 ft.

Property SPRINGVILLE, UT 84663
Target LEAD SMELTERS2890 SOUTH STATE STREET N/A
A1 SEMSANDERSON AUTO WRECKING COMPANY 1012043055
To streamline review, fields that are "Not Reported" are omitted from this report. TC7025843.2s Page 8
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Automobiles/tires (Recycling)Primary Site-Sub Type:
Not on the NPLNPL:
(Recycling);Drums/tanks (Recycling);Waste/used oil (Recycling)
(Recycling);Chemicals/chemical waste (e.g., solvent recovery)
Batteries/scrap metals/secondary smelting/precious metal recoveryNon-Primary Site-Sub Type:
NNAI:
NFF Ind:
8Facility Region Id:
802773Site ID:
Lead Smelter Sites:
St PerfCurrent Action Lead:
NQual:
ANDERSON AUTO WRECKING COMPANY (Continued) 1012043055
04/18/2008Date Of Termination:
10/09/2007Date Of Agreement:
08/09/2007Date Of Application:
Terminated by agencyStatus:
[SONJA WALLACE]Project Manager:
9.94Site Acreage:
VCP-C059VCP Number:
SPRINGVILLE, UTCity,State,Zip:
2890 SOUTH STATE STREETAddress:
ANDERSON AUTO WRECKINGName:
VCP:
Site 2 of 2 in cluster A
Actual:
4599 ft.

Property SPRINGVILLE, UT
Target 2890 SOUTH STATE STREET N/A
A2 VCPANDERSON AUTO WRECKING S108669163
NNPL:
SPANISH FORK LANDFILLSite Name:
UTN009962138EPA ID:
0801818Site ID:
08Region:
SEMS Archive Detail:
Removal Only Site (No Site Assessment Work Needed)Non NPL Status:
Not on the NPLNPL:
NFF:
49049FIPS Code:
SPANISH FORK, UT 84660City,State,Zip:
1029 NORTH 1110 EASTAddress:
SPANISH FORK LANDFILLName:
UTN009962138EPA ID:
0801818Site ID:
SEMS Archive:
192 ft.
0.036 mi.
Relative:
Lower
Actual:
4582 ft.
Client Plot
< 1/8 SPANISH FORK, UT 84660
West 1029 NORTH 1110 EAST N/A
3 SEMS-ARCHIVESPANISH FORK LANDFILL 1009463035
To streamline review, fields that are "Not Reported" are omitted from this report. TC7025843.2s Page 9
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
2001-06-04 04:00:00Finish Date:
2000-11-28 05:00:00Start Date:
1SEQ:
RV ASSESSAction Name:
RSAction Code:
00OU:
NFF:
NNPL:
SPANISH FORK LANDFILLSite Name:
UTN009962138EPA ID:
0801818Site ID:
08Region:
EPA Perf In-HseCurrent Action Lead:
2006-03-20 05:00:00Finish Date:
1SEQ:
ARCH SITEAction Name:
VSAction Code:
00OU:
NFF:
SPANISH FORK LANDFILL (Continued) 1009463035
NoSmall Quantity On-Site Burner Exemption:
NoRecycler Activity with Storage:
NoTransfer Facility Activity:
NoTransporter Activity:
NoMixed Waste Generator:
NoImporter Activity:
NoShort-Term Generator Activity:
PrivateOperator Type:
QUESTAR GAS COMPANY DBA DOMINION ENERGY UTAHOperator Name:
PrivateOwner Type:
QUESTAR GAS COMPANY DBA DOMINION ENERGY UTAHOwner Name:
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84145Mailing City,State,Zip:
P.O. BOX 45360, M/S DNR206Mailing Address:
Handler ActivitiesActive Site Indicator:
Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity GeneratorFederal Waste Generator Description:
PrivateLand Type:
08EPA Region:
MANAGER, ENV COMPLIANCEContact Title:
[e-mail] Email:
801-324-3947Contact Telephone:
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84104Contact City,State,Zip:
WEST 200 SOUTHContact Address:
TINA MANIATISContact Name:
UTR000015362EPA ID:
SPANISH FORK, UT 84660Handler City,State,Zip:
1347 EXPRESSWAY LANEHandler Address:
DOMINION ENERGY UTAH - FEEDERLINE 26 REMOVALHandler Name:
20190731Date Form Received by Agency:
RCRA-VSQG:
914 ft.
0.173 mi.
Relative:
Higher
Actual:
4607 ft.

1/8-1/4 SPANISH FORK, UT 84660
SSW 1347 EXPRESSWAY LANE N/A
4 RCRA-VSQGDOMINION ENERGY UTAH - FEEDERLINE 26 REMOVAL 1025888655
To streamline review, fields that are "Not Reported" are omitted from this report. TC7025843.2s Page 10
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
QUESTAR GAS COMPANY DBA DOMINION ENERGY UTAHOwner/Operator Name:
OperatorOwner/Operator Indicator:
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84104Owner/Operator City,State,Zip:
1140 WEST 200 SOUTHOwner/Operator Address:
19811210Date Became Current:
PrivateLegal Status:
QUESTAR GAS COMPANY DBA DOMINION ENERGY UTAHOwner/Operator Name:
OwnerOwner/Operator Indicator:
Handler - Owner Operator:
MERCURYWaste Description:
D009Waste Code:
BARIUMWaste Description:
D005Waste Code:
ARSENICWaste Description:
D004Waste Code:
Hazardous Waste Summary:
NoSub-Part P Indicator:
NoManifest Broker:
NoRecycler Activity Without Storage:
NoExporter of Spent Lead Acid Batteries:
NoImporter of Spent Lead Acid Batteries:
NoRecognized Trader-Exporter:
NoRecognized Trader-Importer:
20190808Handler Date of Last Change:
NoSignificant Non-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe:
NoAddressed Significant Non-Complier Universe:
NoUnaddressed Significant Non-Complier Universe:
NoSignificant Non-Complier Universe:
N/AGroundwater Controls Indicator:
N/AHuman Exposure Controls Indicator:
NoInstitutional Control Indicator:
NoEnvironmental Control Indicator:
No NCAPS rankingCorrective Action Priority Ranking:
NoTSDFs Only Subject to CA under Discretionary Auth Universe:
NoTSDFs Potentially Subject to CA Under 3004 (u)/(v) Universe:
NoNon-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe:
NoSubject to Corrective Action Universe:
NoCorrective Action Workload Universe:
No202 GPRA Corrective Action Baseline:
Not on the Baseline2018 GPRA Renewals Baseline:
Not on the Baseline2018 GPRA Permit Baseline:
NoCommercial TSD Indicator:
NNHazardous Secondary Material Indicator:
---Active Site State-Reg Handler:
NoFederal Universal Waste:
NoUniversal Waste Destination Facility:
NoUniversal Waste Indicator:
NoOff-Site Waste Receipt:
NoUnderground Injection Control:
NoSmelting Melting and Refining Furnace Exemption:
DOMINION ENERGY UTAH - FEEDERLINE 26 REMOVAL (Continued) 1025888655
To streamline review, fields that are "Not Reported" are omitted from this report. TC7025843.2s Page 11
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
No Evaluations FoundEvaluations:
Evaluation Action Summary:
No Violations FoundViolations:
Facility Has Received Notices of Violations:
NATURAL GAS DISTRIBUTIONNAICS Description:
221210NAICS Code:
List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions:
NoElectronic Manifest Broker:
NoNon Storage Recycler Activity:
YesCurrent Record:
NoSpent Lead Acid Battery Exporter:
NoSpent Lead Acid Battery Importer:
NoRecognized Trader Exporter:
NoRecognized Trader Importer:
NoLarge Quantity Handler of Universal Waste:
Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity GeneratorFederal Waste Generator Description:
DOMINION ENERGY UTAH - FEEDERLINE 26 REMOVALHandler Name:
20190731Receive Date:
Historic Generators:
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84104Owner/Operator City,State,Zip:
1140 WEST 200 SOUTHOwner/Operator Address:
19811210Date Became Current:
PrivateLegal Status:
DOMINION ENERGY UTAH - FEEDERLINE 26 REMOVAL (Continued) 1025888655
VSAction Code:
00OU:
NFF:
NNPL:
EXPRESSWAY LANE PLUMESite Name:
UT0009134958EPA ID:
0801760Site ID:
08Region:
SEMS Archive Detail:
NFRAP-Site does not qualify for the NPL based on existing informationNon NPL Status:
Not on the NPLNPL:
NFF:
49049FIPS Code:
03Cong District:
SPANISH FORK, UT 84660City,State,Zip:
1200 EAST EXPRESSWAY LANEAddress:
EXPRESSWAY LANE PLUMEName:
UT0009134958EPA ID:
0801760Site ID:
SEMS Archive:
1329 ft.
0.252 mi.
Relative:
Lower
Actual:
4593 ft.

1/4-1/2 SPANISH FORK, UT 84660
SW 1200 EAST EXPRESSWAY LANE N/A
5 SEMS-ARCHIVEEXPRESSWAY LANE PLUME 1001814601
To streamline review, fields that are "Not Reported" are omitted from this report. TC7025843.2s Page 12
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
NQual:
2005-10-20 04:00:00Finish Date:
1SEQ:
PAAction Name:
PAAction Code:
00OU:
NFF:
NNPL:
EXPRESSWAY LANE PLUMESite Name:
UT0009134958EPA ID:
0801760Site ID:
08Region:
EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead:
1999-11-01 05:00:00Finish Date:
1999-11-01 05:00:00Start Date:
1SEQ:
DISCVRYAction Name:
DSAction Code:
00OU:
NFF:
NNPL:
EXPRESSWAY LANE PLUMESite Name:
UT0009134958EPA ID:
0801760Site ID:
08Region:
EPA Perf In-HseCurrent Action Lead:
2007-02-15 05:00:00Finish Date:
1SEQ:
ARCH SITEAction Name:
EXPRESSWAY LANE PLUME (Continued) 1001814601
To streamline review, fields that are "Not Reported" are omitted from this report. TC7025843.2s Page 13
ORPHAN SUMMARY
City EDR ID Site Name Site Address Zip Database(s)
Count: 0 records.
NO SITES FOUND
TC7025843.2s Page 14
UT AIRS Division of Air Quality Department of Environmental Quality 04/26/2022 04/27/2022 05/17/2022
UT AST Listing of Aboveground Storage Tanks Department of Environmental Quality 03/03/2022 03/04/2022 05/27/2022
UT BROWNFIELDS Brownfields Assessment Sites Department of Environmental Quality 11/09/2021 11/11/2021 02/02/2022
UT CDL Methamphetamine Contaminated Properties Listing Salt Lake Valley Health Department 02/16/2022 03/01/2022 05/27/2022
UT DRYCLEANERS Registered Drycleaners Department of Environmental Quality 04/19/2022 04/20/2022 05/16/2022
UT EWA Enforceable Written Assurances Department of Environmental Quality 03/07/2022 03/16/2022 06/13/2022
UT FUDS Formerly Used Defense Sites Utah AGRC 07/19/2021 07/19/2021 10/07/2021
UT INST CONTROL Sites with Institutional Controls Department of Environmental Quality 01/19/2022 01/20/2022 04/05/2022
UT LAST Leaking Aboveground Storage Tank Sites Department of Environmental Quality 03/03/2022 03/04/2022 05/27/2022
UT LUST Sites with Leaking Underground Storage Tanks Department of Environmental Quality 01/11/2022 01/12/2022 04/01/2022
UT MMRP Military Munitions Response Program Department of Environmental Quality 03/02/2022 03/16/2022 06/13/2022
UT NPDES Permitted Facilities Listing Department of Environmental Quality 03/08/2022 03/10/2022 06/06/2022
UT PFAS PFAS Site Information Listing Department of Environmental Quality 04/12/2022 04/13/2022 05/16/2022
UT RGA LF Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List Department of Environmental Quality 07/01/2013 01/16/2014
UT RGA LUST Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tan Department of Environmental Quality 07/01/2013 01/03/2014
UT SHWS This state does not maintain a SHWS list. See the Federal CE Department of Environmental Quality
UT SPILLS Spills Data Department of Environmental Quality 01/10/2022 01/13/2022 04/05/2022
UT SPILLS 90 SPILLS90 data from FirstSearch FirstSearch 07/31/2011 01/03/2013 02/11/2013
UT SWF/LF List of Landfills Department of Environmental Quality 10/07/2021 10/12/2021 01/10/2022
UT TIER 2 Tier 2 Facility Listing Department of Environmental Quality 12/31/2021 03/16/2022 06/13/2022
UT UIC UIC Site Location Listing Department of Natural Resources 01/19/2022 01/19/2022 04/13/2022
UT UOPF Used Oil Permitted Facilities Department of Environmental Quality 12/06/2021 12/07/2021 02/24/2022
UT UST List of Sites with Underground Storage Tanks Department of Environmental Quality 01/11/2022 01/12/2022 04/01/2022
UT VCP Voluntary Cleanup Sites List Department of Environmental Quality 12/27/2021 02/11/2022 05/10/2022
US 2020 COR ACTION 2020 Corrective Action Program List Environmental Protection Agency 09/30/2017 05/08/2018 07/20/2018
US ABANDONED MINES Abandoned Mines Department of Interior 03/10/2022 03/10/2022 06/14/2022
US BRS Biennial Reporting System EPA/NTIS 12/31/2019 03/02/2022 03/25/2022
US COAL ASH DOE Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data Department of Energy 12/31/2020 11/30/2021 02/22/2022
US COAL ASH EPA Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List Environmental Protection Agency 01/12/2017 03/05/2019 11/11/2019
US CONSENT Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library 12/31/2021 01/14/2022 03/25/2022
US CORRACTS Corrective Action Report EPA 02/28/2022 03/02/2022 03/17/2022
US DEBRIS REGION 9 Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations EPA, Region 9 01/12/2009 05/07/2009 09/21/2009
US DOCKET HWC Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing Environmental Protection Agency 05/06/2021 05/21/2021 08/11/2021
US DOD Department of Defense Sites USGS 06/07/2021 07/13/2021 03/09/2022
US DOT OPS Incident and Accident Data Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeli 01/02/2020 01/28/2020 04/17/2020
US Delisted NPL National Priority List Deletions EPA 04/27/2022 05/05/2022 05/31/2022
US ECHO Enforcement & Compliance History Information Environmental Protection Agency 01/01/2022 01/04/2022 01/10/2022
US EPA WATCH LIST EPA WATCH LIST Environmental Protection Agency 08/30/2013 03/21/2014 06/17/2014
US ERNS Emergency Response Notification System National Response Center, United States Coast 12/31/2021 03/01/2022 03/10/2022
US FEDERAL FACILITY Federal Facility Site Information listing Environmental Protection Agency 05/25/2021 06/24/2021 09/20/2021
US FEDLAND Federal and Indian Lands U.S. Geological Survey 04/02/2018 04/11/2018 11/06/2019
US FEMA UST Underground Storage Tank Listing FEMA 10/14/2021 11/05/2021 02/01/2022
US FTTS FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fu EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxi 04/09/2009 04/16/2009 05/11/2009
US FTTS INSP FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fu EPA 04/09/2009 04/16/2009 05/11/2009
US FUDS Formerly Used Defense Sites U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 12/01/2021 02/15/2022 05/10/2022
US FUELS PROGRAM EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing EPA 02/17/2022 02/17/2022 05/10/2022
US FUSRAP Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program Department of Energy 07/26/2021 07/27/2021 10/22/2021
TC7025843.2s Page GR-1
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
St Acronym Full Name Government Agency Gov Date Arvl. Date Active Date
US HIST FTTS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing Environmental Protection Agency 10/19/2006 03/01/2007 04/10/2007
US HIST FTTS INSP FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case Lis Environmental Protection Agency 10/19/2006 03/01/2007 04/10/2007
US HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System U.S. Department of Transportation 03/21/2022 03/21/2022 06/14/2022
US ICIS Integrated Compliance Information System Environmental Protection Agency 11/18/2016 11/23/2016 02/10/2017
US IHS OPEN DUMPS Open Dumps on Indian Land Department of Health & Human Serivces, Indian 04/01/2014 08/06/2014 01/29/2015
US INDIAN LUST R1 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 1 04/28/2021 06/11/2021 09/07/2021
US INDIAN LUST R10 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 10 10/12/2021 11/15/2021 02/08/2022
US INDIAN LUST R4 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 4 05/28/2021 06/22/2021 09/20/2021
US INDIAN LUST R5 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA, Region 5 10/12/2021 11/15/2021 02/08/2022
US INDIAN LUST R6 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 6 10/12/2021 11/15/2021 02/08/2022
US INDIAN LUST R7 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 7 10/12/2021 11/15/2021 02/08/2022
US INDIAN LUST R8 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 8 10/12/2021 11/15/2021 02/08/2022
US INDIAN LUST R9 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Environmental Protection Agency 10/12/2021 11/15/2021 02/08/2022
US INDIAN ODI Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands Environmental Protection Agency 12/31/1998 12/03/2007 01/24/2008
US INDIAN RESERV Indian Reservations USGS 12/31/2014 07/14/2015 01/10/2017
US INDIAN UST R1 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA, Region 1 10/14/2021 11/15/2021 02/08/2022
US INDIAN UST R10 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 10 10/12/2021 11/15/2021 02/08/2022
US INDIAN UST R4 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 4 05/28/2021 06/22/2021 09/20/2021
US INDIAN UST R5 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 5 04/06/2021 06/11/2021 09/07/2021
US INDIAN UST R6 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 6 10/12/2021 11/15/2021 02/08/2022
US INDIAN UST R7 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 7 10/12/2021 11/15/2021 02/08/2022
US INDIAN UST R8 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 8 10/12/2021 11/15/2021 02/08/2022
US INDIAN UST R9 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 9 10/12/2021 11/15/2021 02/08/2022
US INDIAN VCP R1 Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing EPA, Region 1 07/27/2015 09/29/2015 02/18/2016
US INDIAN VCP R7 Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng EPA, Region 7 03/20/2008 04/22/2008 05/19/2008
US LEAD SMELTER 1 Lead Smelter Sites Environmental Protection Agency 04/27/2022 05/05/2022 05/31/2022
US LEAD SMELTER 2 Lead Smelter Sites American Journal of Public Health 04/05/2001 10/27/2010 12/02/2010
US LIENS 2 CERCLA Lien Information Environmental Protection Agency 04/27/2022 05/05/2022 05/31/2022
US LUCIS Land Use Control Information System Department of the Navy 02/08/2022 02/11/2022 05/10/2022
US MINES MRDS Mineral Resources Data System USGS 04/06/2018 10/21/2019 10/24/2019
US MINES VIOLATIONS MSHA Violation Assessment Data DOL, Mine Safety & Health Admi 03/21/2022 03/22/2022 03/25/2022
US MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System Nuclear Regulatory Commission 03/11/2022 03/15/2022 06/14/2022
US NPL National Priority List EPA 04/27/2022 05/05/2022 05/31/2022
US NPL LIENS Federal Superfund Liens EPA 10/15/1991 02/02/1994 03/30/1994
US ODI Open Dump Inventory Environmental Protection Agency 06/30/1985 08/09/2004 09/17/2004
US PADS PCB Activity Database System EPA 01/20/2022 01/20/2022 03/25/2022
US PCB TRANSFORMER PCB Transformer Registration Database Environmental Protection Agency 09/13/2019 11/06/2019 02/10/2020
US PCS Permit Compliance System EPA, Office of Water 07/14/2011 08/05/2011 09/29/2011
US PCS ENF Enforcement data EPA 12/31/2014 02/05/2015 03/06/2015
US PCS INACTIVE Listing of Inactive PCS Permits EPA 11/05/2014 01/06/2015 05/06/2015
US PRP Potentially Responsible Parties EPA 01/25/2022 02/03/2022 02/25/2022
US Proposed NPL Proposed National Priority List Sites EPA 04/27/2022 05/05/2022 05/31/2022
US RAATS RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System EPA 04/17/1995 07/03/1995 08/07/1995
US RADINFO Radiation Information Database Environmental Protection Agency 07/01/2019 07/01/2019 09/23/2019
US RCRA NonGen / NLR RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated Environmental Protection Agency 02/28/2022 03/02/2022 03/17/2022
US RCRA-LQG RCRA - Large Quantity Generators Environmental Protection Agency 02/28/2022 03/02/2022 03/17/2022
US RCRA-SQG RCRA - Small Quantity Generators Environmental Protection Agency 02/28/2022 03/02/2022 03/17/2022
TC7025843.2s Page GR-2
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
St Acronym Full Name Government Agency Gov Date Arvl. Date Active Date
US RCRA-TSDF RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal Environmental Protection Agency 02/28/2022 03/02/2022 03/17/2022
US RCRA-VSQG RCRA - Very Small Quantity Generators (Formerly Conditionall Environmental Protection Agency 02/28/2022 03/02/2022 03/17/2022
US RMP Risk Management Plans Environmental Protection Agency 04/27/2022 05/04/2022 05/10/2022
US ROD Records Of Decision EPA 04/27/2022 05/05/2022 05/31/2022
US SCRD DRYCLEANERS State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing Environmental Protection Agency 01/01/2017 02/03/2017 04/07/2017
US SEMS Superfund Enterprise Management System EPA 04/27/2022 05/05/2022 05/31/2022
US SEMS-ARCHIVE Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive EPA 04/27/2022 05/05/2022 05/31/2022
US SSTS Section 7 Tracking Systems EPA 01/19/2022 01/19/2022 04/11/2022
US TRIS Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System EPA 12/31/2018 08/14/2020 11/04/2020
US TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act EPA 12/31/2016 06/17/2020 09/10/2020
US UMTRA Uranium Mill Tailings Sites Department of Energy 08/30/2019 11/15/2019 01/28/2020
US US AIRS (AFS) Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem ( EPA 10/12/2016 10/26/2016 02/03/2017
US US AIRS MINOR Air Facility System Data EPA 10/12/2016 10/26/2016 02/03/2017
US US BROWNFIELDS A Listing of Brownfields Sites Environmental Protection Agency 02/23/2022 03/10/2022 03/10/2022
US US CDL Clandestine Drug Labs Drug Enforcement Administration 02/22/2022 02/23/2022 05/10/2022
US US ENG CONTROLS Engineering Controls Sites List Environmental Protection Agency 02/21/2022 02/23/2022 05/24/2022
US US HIST CDL National Clandestine Laboratory Register Drug Enforcement Administration 02/22/2022 02/23/2022 05/10/2022
US US INST CONTROLS Institutional Controls Sites List Environmental Protection Agency 02/21/2022 02/23/2022 05/24/2022
US US MINES Mines Master Index File Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health A 02/01/2022 02/23/2022 05/24/2022
US US MINES 2 Ferrous and Nonferrous Metal Mines Database Listing USGS 05/06/2020 05/27/2020 08/13/2020
US US MINES 3 Active Mines & Mineral Plants Database Listing USGS 04/14/2011 06/08/2011 09/13/2011
US UXO Unexploded Ordnance Sites Department of Defense 12/31/2020 01/11/2022 02/14/2022
NY NY MANIFEST Facility and Manifest Data Department of Environmental Conservation 01/01/2019 10/29/2021 01/19/2022
PA PA MANIFEST Manifest Information Department of Environmental Protection 06/30/2018 07/19/2019 09/10/2019
WI WI MANIFEST Manifest Information Department of Natural Resources 05/31/2018 06/19/2019 09/03/2019
US AHA Hospitals Sensitive Receptor: AHA Hospitals American Hospital Association, Inc.
US Medical Centers Sensitive Receptor: Medical Centers Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
US Nursing Homes Sensitive Receptor: Nursing Homes National Institutes of Health
US Public Schools Sensitive Receptor: Public Schools National Center for Education Statistics
US Private Schools Sensitive Receptor: Private Schools National Center for Education Statistics
UT Daycare Centers Sensitive Receptor: Child Care Provider List Department of Health
US Flood Zones 100-year and 500-year flood zones Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
US NWI National Wetlands Inventory U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
UT State Wetlands Wetland Inventory Utah Geological Survey
US Topographic Map Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map U.S. Geological Survey
US Oil/Gas Pipelines Endeavor Business Media
US Electric Power Transmission Line Data Endeavor Business Media
TC7025843.2s Page GR-3
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
St Acronym Full Name Government Agency Gov Date Arvl. Date Active Date
STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION
� 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection
and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject
to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.
TC7025843.2s Page GR-4
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
St Acronym Full Name Government Agency Gov Date Arvl. Date Active Date
TC7025843.2s Page A-1
geologic strata.
of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the
Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics
2. Groundwater flow velocity.
1. Groundwater flow direction, and
Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principle investigative components:
forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration.
EDR’s GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in
2020Version Date:
14655532 SPANISH FORK, UTSouthwest Map:
2020Version Date:
14655534 SPANISH FORK PEAK, UTSoutheast Map:
2020Version Date:
14655536 SPRINGVILLE, UTNortheast Map:
2020Version Date:
14655514 PROVO, UTTarget Property Map:
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
4599 ft. above sea levelElevation:
4441674.0UTM Y (Meters):
446360.0UTM X (Meters):
Zone 12Universal Tranverse Mercator:
111.629535 - 111ˆ 37’ 46.33’’Longitude (West):
40.125571 - 40ˆ 7’ 32.06’’Latitude (North):
TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES
SPRINGVILLE, UT 84663
2890 SOUTH STATE STREET
FORMER ANDERSON WRECKING
TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE ADDENDUM®
TC7025843.2s Page A-2
should be field verified.
on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity
Source: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated
SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
TP
TP
0 1/2 1 Miles✩Target Property Elevation: 4599 ft.
North South
West East
47
1
4
47
1
5
47
1
4
47
1
0
46
9
9
46
7
7
46
3
9
46
2
1
46
1
2
45
9
9
45
9
1
45
8
4
45
6
5
45
6
4
45
5
5
45
5
4
45
4
4
45
4
4
45
4
3
45
5
3
45
5
3
45
5
3
45
5
6
45
6
0
45
6
6
45
7
2
45
7
9
45
7
4
45
9
9
46
2
0
46
3
5
46
5
5
46
9
1
47
0
7
47
0
7
47
0
8
47
1
8
47
0
7
General WNWGeneral Topographic Gradient:
TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY
should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or,
Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used to
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers).
sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic data
using site-specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other
Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional
GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY®
TC7025843.2s Page A-3
Not Reported
GENERAL DIRECTIONLOCATION
GROUNDWATER FLOWFROM TPMAP ID
hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table.
authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined
flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory
EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater
AQUIFLOW®
Search Radius: 1.000 Mile.
contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should
of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the
Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator
HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION
YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail MapPROVO
NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY
NWI Electronic
Data CoverageNWI Quad at Target Property
FEMA Q3 Flood data4955170375A
FEMA Q3 Flood data4902410025A
FEMA Q3 Flood data4955170355A
Additional Panels in search area:FEMA Source Type
FEMA Q3 Flood data4955170360A
Flood Plain Panel at Target Property FEMA Source Type
FEMA FLOOD ZONE
and bodies of water).
Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways
contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should
Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist
HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY®
TC7025843.2s Page A-4
Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994).
of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman
Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology
ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION
Stratifed SequenceCategory:CenozoicEra:
QuaternarySystem:
QuaternarySeries:
QCode: (decoded above as Era, System & Series)
at which contaminant migration may be occurring.
Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed
GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY
move more quickly through sandy-gravelly types of soils than silty-clayey types of soils.
characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumes
to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soil
using site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary
Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional
GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY®
EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.
2
3
1
4
4
3
1
4
6
5
0 1/16 1/8 1/4 Miles
TC7025843.2s Page A-6
Min: 7.4
Max: 8.4
Min: 1.41
Max: 4.23
50%), silt.
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and
FINE-GRAINED
50%), Lean Clay.
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and
FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Silty
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
Silt-Claysilt loam20 inches12 inches 2
Min: 7.4
Max: 8.4
Min: 1.41
Max: 4.23
50%), silt.
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and
FINE-GRAINED
50%), Lean Clay.
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and
FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Silty
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
Silt-Claysilt loam12 inches 7 inches 1
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification
Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
micro m/sec
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction
(pH)

> 46 inchesDepth to Watertable Min:
> 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min:
HighCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel:
Hydric Status: All hydric
Poorly drainedSoil Drainage Class:
water table, or are shallow to an impervious layer.
Class D - Very slow infiltration rates. Soils are clayey, have a highHydrologic Group:
silt loamSoil Surface Texture:
HOLDAWAYSoil Component Name:
Soil Map ID: 1
in a landscape. The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service SSURGO data.
for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns
Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information
The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil
DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY®
TC7025843.2s Page A-7

Soil Drainage Class:
water table, or are shallow to an impervious layer.
Class D - Very slow infiltration rates. Soils are clayey, have a highHydrologic Group:
silty clay loamSoil Surface Texture:
PAYSONSoil Component Name:
Soil Map ID: 2
Min: 7.4
Max: 8.4
Min: 1.41
Max: 4.23
50%), silt.
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and
FINE-GRAINED
50%), Lean Clay.
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and
FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Silty
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
Silt-Claysilt loam31 inches27 inches 6
Min: 7.4
Max: 8.4
Min: 1.41
Max: 4.23
50%), silt.
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and
FINE-GRAINED
50%), Lean Clay.
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and
FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Silty
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
Silt-Claysilt loam 7 inches 0 inches 5
Min: 7.4
Max: 8.4
Min: 1.41
Max: 4.23
50%), silt.
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and
FINE-GRAINED
50%), Lean Clay.
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and
FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Silty
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
Silt-Clay
material
cemented66 inches31 inches 4
Min: 7.4
Max: 8.4
Min: 1.41
Max: 4.23
50%), silt.
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and
FINE-GRAINED
50%), Lean Clay.
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and
FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Silty
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
Silt-Clayindurated27 inches20 inches 3
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification
Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
micro m/sec
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction
(pH)
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY®
TC7025843.2s Page A-8
8.5
Max: 9 Min:
Min: 0.42
Max: 1.41
more), Fat Clay.
limit 50% or
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and
FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Clayey
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
Silt-Clayclay68 inches48 inches 6
8.5
Max: 9 Min:
Min: 0.42
Max: 1.41
more), Fat Clay.
limit 50% or
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and
FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Clayey
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
Silt-Clayclay48 inches33 inches 5
8.5
Max: 9 Min:
Min: 0.42
Max: 1.41
more), Fat Clay.
limit 50% or
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and
FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Clayey
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
Silt-Clayclay33 inches20 inches 4
8.5
Max: 9 Min:
Min: 0.42
Max: 1.41
more), Fat Clay.
limit 50% or
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and
FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Clayey
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
Silt-Clayclay20 inches14 inches 3
8.5
Max: 9 Min:
Min: 0.42
Max: 1.41
more), Fat Clay.
limit 50% or
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and
FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Clayey
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
Silt-Claysilty clay14 inches 9 inches 2
8.5
Max: 9 Min:
Min: 0.42
Max: 1.41
more), Fat Clay.
limit 50% or
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and
FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Clayey
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
Silt-Claysilty clay loam 9 inches 0 inches 1
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification
Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
micro m/sec
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction
(pH)

> 114 inchesDepth to Watertable Min:
> 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min:
HighCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel:
Hydric Status: Unknown
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY®
TC7025843.2s Page A-9
7.9
Max: 9 Min:
Min: 0.42
Max: 1.41
50%), Lean Clay
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and
FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Clayey
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
Silt-Claysilty clay loam31 inches20 inches 5
7.9
Max: 9 Min:
Min: 0.42
Max: 1.41
50%), Lean Clay
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and
FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Clayey
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
Silt-Claysilty clay loam59 inches31 inches 4
7.9
Max: 9 Min:
Min: 0.42
Max: 1.41
50%), Lean Clay
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and
FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Clayey
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
Silt-Claysilty clay loam20 inches11 inches 3
7.9
Max: 9 Min:
Min: 0.42
Max: 1.41
50%), Lean Clay
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and
FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Clayey
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
Silt-Claysilty clay loam11 inches 5 inches 2
7.9
Max: 9 Min:
Min: 0.42
Max: 1.41
50%), Lean Clay
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and
FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Clayey
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
Silt-Claysilty clay loam 5 inches 0 inches 1
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification
Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
micro m/sec
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction
(pH)

> 107 inchesDepth to Watertable Min:
> 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min:
HighCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel:
Hydric Status: Partially hydric
Somewhat poorly drainedSoil Drainage Class:
water table, or are shallow to an impervious layer.
Class D - Very slow infiltration rates. Soils are clayey, have a highHydrologic Group:
silty clay loamSoil Surface Texture:
BRAMWELLSoil Component Name:
Soil Map ID: 3
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY®
TC7025843.2s Page A-10
7.9
Max: 9 Min:
Min: 14.11
Max: 42.34
50%), silt.
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and
FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Silty
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
Silt-Clay
loam
very fine sandy59 inches42 inches 5
7.9
Max: 9 Min:
Min: 14.11
Max: 42.34
50%), silt.
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and
FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Silty
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
Silt-Clay
loam
very fine sandy42 inches35 inches 4
7.9
Max: 9 Min:
Min: 14.11
Max: 42.34
50%), silt.
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and
FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Silty
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
Silt-Clayfine sandy loam35 inches12 inches 3
7.9
Max: 9 Min:
Min: 14.11
Max: 42.34
50%), silt.
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and
FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Silty
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
Silt-Clayfine sandy loam12 inches 7 inches 2
7.9
Max: 9 Min:
Min: 14.11
Max: 42.34
50%), silt.
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and
FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Silty
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
Silt-Clayfine sandy loam 7 inches 0 inches 1
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification
Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
micro m/sec
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction
(pH)

> 114 inchesDepth to Watertable Min:
> 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min:
HighCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel:
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Somewhat poorly drainedSoil Drainage Class:
movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures.
Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downwardHydrologic Group:
fine sandy loamSoil Surface Texture:
VINEYARDSoil Component Name:
Soil Map ID: 4
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY®
TC7025843.2s Page A-11
7.9
Max: 9 Min:
Min: 0.42
Max: 1.41
50%), Lean Clay
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and
FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Clayey
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
Silt-Claysilty clay loam 7 inches 0 inches 1
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification
Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
micro m/sec
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction
(pH)

> 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min:
> 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min:
HighCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel:
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Well drainedSoil Drainage Class:
water table, or are shallow to an impervious layer.
Class D - Very slow infiltration rates. Soils are clayey, have a highHydrologic Group:
silty clay loamSoil Surface Texture:
TAYLORSVILLESoil Component Name:
Soil Map ID: 6
No Layer Information available.

> 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min:
> 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min:
Not ReportedCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel:
Hydric Status: Unknown
Soil Drainage Class:
movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures.
Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downwardHydrologic Group:
fine sandy loamSoil Surface Texture:
PITSSoil Component Name:
Soil Map ID: 5
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY®
TC7025843.2s Page A-12
FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION
LOCATION
FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID
1.000State Database
Nearest PWS within 1 mileFederal FRDS PWS
1.000Federal USGS
WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION
SEARCH DISTANCE (miles)DATABASE
opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells.
professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water flow direction, and in forming an
EDR Local/Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental
LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS
7.9
Max: 9 Min:
Min: 0.42
Max: 1.41
50%), Lean Clay
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and
FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Clayey
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
Silt-Claysilty clay loam61 inches55 inches 5
7.9
Max: 9 Min:
Min: 0.42
Max: 1.41
50%), Lean Clay
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and
FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Clayey
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
Silt-Claysilty clay loam55 inches35 inches 4
7.9
Max: 9 Min:
Min: 0.42
Max: 1.41
50%), Lean Clay
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and
FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Clayey
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
Silt-Claysilty clay loam35 inches12 inches 3
7.9
Max: 9 Min:
Min: 0.42
Max: 1.41
50%), Lean Clay
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and
FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Clayey
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
Silt-Claysilty clay loam12 inches 7 inches 2
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification
Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
micro m/sec
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction
(pH)
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY®
TC7025843.2s Page A-13
1/4 - 1/2 Mile WNWUTDNR2000147559 25
1/4 - 1/2 Mile ENEUTDNR2000148192 24
1/4 - 1/2 Mile NEUTDNR2000148195 F23
1/4 - 1/2 Mile ESEUTDNR2000153644 22
1/4 - 1/2 Mile ENEUTDNR2000155923 D21
1/4 - 1/2 Mile ENEUTDNR2000148191 D20
1/4 - 1/2 Mile SouthUTDNR2000149169 E19
1/4 - 1/2 Mile SSEUTDNR2000149446 E18
1/4 - 1/2 Mile NEUTDNR2000148196 F17
1/4 - 1/2 Mile SSEUTDNR2000148284 E16
1/4 - 1/2 Mile ENEUTDNR2000152648 D15
1/4 - 1/2 Mile NNEUTDNR2000148194 14
1/8 - 1/4 Mile EastUTDNR2000149038 13
1/8 - 1/4 Mile ENEUTDNR2000149305 C12
1/8 - 1/4 Mile ENEUTDNR2000147934 C11
1/8 - 1/4 Mile NEUTDNR2000149575 B10
1/8 - 1/4 Mile EastUTDNR2000149576 B9
0 - 1/8 Mile EastUTDNR2000149574 B7
0 - 1/8 Mile ESEUTDNR2000149571 B6
0 - 1/8 Mile SouthUTDNR2000148528 5
0 - 1/8 Mile ENEUTDNR2000149573 B4
0 - 1/8 Mile WSWUTDNR2000149570 3
0 - 1/8 Mile SSEUTDNR2000149572 A1
STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION
LOCATION
FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID
Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location.
1/2 - 1 Mile WestUT4900414 AB113
FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION
LOCATION
FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID
1/2 - 1 Mile WNWUSGS40001185369 AC119
1/2 - 1 Mile WSWUSGS40001185300 AB118
1/2 - 1 Mile NWUSGS40001185415 98
1/2 - 1 Mile SouthUSGS40001185248 77
1/2 - 1 Mile SouthUSGS40001185258 O72
1/2 - 1 Mile NEUSGS40001185382 P70
1/2 - 1 Mile EastUSGS40001185312 N67
1/2 - 1 Mile SEUSGS40001185272 59
1/2 - 1 Mile SouthUSGS40001185259 M58
1/2 - 1 Mile SouthUSGS40001185257 M57
1/2 - 1 Mile SWUSGS40001185273 55
1/4 - 1/2 Mile NWUSGS40001185333 30
1/8 - 1/4 Mile NEUSGS40001185330 8
0 - 1/8 Mile SSEUSGS40001185313 A2
FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION
LOCATION
FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY®
TC7025843.2s Page A-14
1/2 - 1 Mile SSWUTDNR2000149559 86
1/2 - 1 Mile WSWUTDNR2000149642 85
1/2 - 1 Mile ESEUTDNR2000149975 S84
1/2 - 1 Mile NEUTDNR2000152575 83
1/2 - 1 Mile SouthUTDNR2000152450 82
1/2 - 1 Mile SEUTDNR2000154762 S81
1/2 - 1 Mile SEUTDNR2000147804 S80
1/2 - 1 Mile ENEUTDNR2000286454 R79
1/2 - 1 Mile ENEUTDNR2000280712 R78
1/2 - 1 Mile SSWUTDNR2000152031 76
1/2 - 1 Mile EastUTDNR2000292345 Q75
1/2 - 1 Mile EastUTDNR2000271329 Q74
1/2 - 1 Mile WSWUTDNR2000149555 73
1/2 - 1 Mile NEUTDNR2000148213 P71
1/2 - 1 Mile SouthUTDNR2000147564 O69
1/2 - 1 Mile NNWUTDNR2000148009 68
1/2 - 1 Mile WSWUTDNR2000149595 66
1/2 - 1 Mile EastUTDNR2000277212 N65
1/2 - 1 Mile EastUTDNR2000147534 N64
1/2 - 1 Mile SSEUTDNR2000152554 63
1/2 - 1 Mile SouthUTDNR2000152279 M62
1/2 - 1 Mile SouthUTDNR2000150741 M61
1/2 - 1 Mile SouthUTDNR2000147761 M60
1/2 - 1 Mile NEUTDNR2000148214 56
1/2 - 1 Mile ENEUTDNR2000148216 L54
1/2 - 1 Mile ENEUTDNR2000148215 L53
1/2 - 1 Mile ENEUTDNR2000148217 L52
1/2 - 1 Mile ENEUTDNR2000148190 L51
1/2 - 1 Mile NEUTDNR2000148084 J50
1/2 - 1 Mile SSWUTDNR2000147474 49
1/2 - 1 Mile ENEUTDNR2000155939 K48
1/2 - 1 Mile ENEUTDNR2000155931 K47
1/2 - 1 Mile ENEUTDNR2000310738 K46
1/2 - 1 Mile ENEUTDNR2000156003 K45
1/2 - 1 Mile ENEUTDNR2000155902 K44
1/2 - 1 Mile ENEUTDNR2000153521 K43
1/2 - 1 Mile ENEUTDNR2000147327 K42
1/2 - 1 Mile ENEUTDNR2000154728 K41
1/2 - 1 Mile ENEUTDNR2000154727 K40
1/2 - 1 Mile NEUTDNR2000148083 J39
1/4 - 1/2 Mile SSWUTDNR2000152948 I38
1/4 - 1/2 Mile SSWUTDNR2000150056 I37
1/4 - 1/2 Mile SSWUTDNR2000150055 I36
1/4 - 1/2 Mile WSWUTDNR2000149553 35
1/4 - 1/2 Mile NEUTDNR2000155929 H34
1/4 - 1/2 Mile NEUTDNR2000148197 H33
1/4 - 1/2 Mile NNEUTDNR2000149039 32
1/4 - 1/2 Mile SWUTDNR2000147928 31
1/4 - 1/2 Mile ENEUTDNR2000152649 H29
1/4 - 1/2 Mile NEUTDNR2000285669 G28
1/4 - 1/2 Mile ENEUTDNR2000148193 27
1/4 - 1/2 Mile NEUTDNR2000151033 G26
STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION
LOCATION
FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY®
TC7025843.2s Page A-15
1/2 - 1 Mile WestUTDNR2000268070 AB125
1/2 - 1 Mile WestUTDNR2000272210 AB124
1/2 - 1 Mile WestUTDNR2000264701 AB123
1/2 - 1 Mile WestUTDNR2000153809 AB122
1/2 - 1 Mile WestUTDNR2000263842 AB121
1/2 - 1 Mile NEUTDNR2000148087 120
1/2 - 1 Mile WNWUTDNR2000148045 AC117
1/2 - 1 Mile WNWUTDNR2000147707 AC116
1/2 - 1 Mile SWUTDNR2000149419 115
1/2 - 1 Mile ENEUTDNR2000152374 Z114
1/2 - 1 Mile NEUTDNR2000148292 112
1/2 - 1 Mile SSWUTDNR2000305710 AA111
1/2 - 1 Mile SSWUTDNR2000149792 AA110
1/2 - 1 Mile SEUTDNR2000152715 Y109
1/2 - 1 Mile ENEUTDNR2000152373 Z108
1/2 - 1 Mile SEUTDNR2000154063 Y107
1/2 - 1 Mile NNWUTDNR2000147430 106
1/2 - 1 Mile NEUTDNR2000148013 105
1/2 - 1 Mile SEUTDNR2000152720 Y104
1/2 - 1 Mile SSWUTDNR2000150022 103
1/2 - 1 Mile WNWUTDNR2000150019 102
1/2 - 1 Mile SWUTDNR2000149273 X101
1/2 - 1 Mile SSWUTDNR2000149471 100
1/2 - 1 Mile SWUTDNR2000149821 X99
1/2 - 1 Mile SSEUTDNR2000151217 W97
1/2 - 1 Mile SSEUTDNR2000150136 W96
1/2 - 1 Mile NEUTDNR2000152486 V95
1/2 - 1 Mile NEUTDNR2000149074 V94
1/2 - 1 Mile NWUTDNR2000156766 U93
1/2 - 1 Mile NWUTDNR2000154974 U92
1/2 - 1 Mile NWUTDNR2000153261 U91
1/2 - 1 Mile SSWUTDNR2000257799 T90
1/2 - 1 Mile ENEUTDNR2000149915 89
1/2 - 1 Mile SSEUTDNR2000151187 88
1/2 - 1 Mile SSWUTDNR2000304092 T87
STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION
LOCATION
FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY®
EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.
4
5
60
4
5
6 0
4
5
60
45 6 0
4
5
6
0
4
5 60
4
4 560
4560
4560 46 00
456
0
4 5 6 0
4 5 6
0
4 6 0 0
460 0
4640
4 6 4 0
4680
4 6 8 0
4 5 6 04560
4 7 2 04720
4680
4 6 8 0
6 0
4
6
0
0
4600
4 6 0 0
4 6 4 0
4640
4 6 4 0 4680
4 7 2 0
4 7 20
4
7
2
0
UT
TC7025843.2s Page A-17
1919Priority Date:Underground Water ClaimStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-2923Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
B4
ENE
0 - 1/8 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000149573UT WELLS
Underground Water WellSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
Q. I. & Viola L. HansenOwner:0Well ID:
.011Cubic ft/sec:Irrigation,Stockwatering,Uses:
1919Priority Date:Underground Water ClaimStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-2920Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
3
WSW
0 - 1/8 Mile
Lower
UTDNR2000149570UT WELLS
Not ReportedNote:
Not ReportedFeet to sea level: 70.00Feet below surface:
1958-08-28Level reading date: 1Ground water levels,Number of Measurements:
Not ReportedWell Hole Depth Units: Not ReportedWell Hole Depth:
ftWell Depth Units: 200Well Depth:
19580101Construction Date: Not ReportedAquifer Type:
Not ReportedFormation Type: Not ReportedAquifer:
Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area Unts: Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area:
Not ReportedDrainage Area Units: Not ReportedDrainage Area:
16020202HUC: Not ReportedDescription:
WellType: (D- 8- 3)17abc- 1Monitor Location:
USGS Utah Water Science CenterOrganization Name: USGS-UTOrganization ID:
A2
SSE
0 - 1/8 Mile
Lower
USGS40001185313FED USGS
Underground Water WellSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
Leatha J. HenriksenOwner:0Well ID:
.018Cubic ft/sec:Irrigation,Stockwatering,Uses:
1919Priority Date:Underground Water ClaimStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-2922Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
A1
SSE
0 - 1/8 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000149572UT WELLS
Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC7025843.2s Page A-18
Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area: Not ReportedDrainage Area Units:
Not ReportedDrainage Area: 16020202HUC:
PUMPAGE WELL. NOT FOUND SUMMER 1989Description:
WellType: (D- 8- 3)17bad- 1Monitor Location:
USGS Utah Water Science CenterOrganization Name: USGS-UTOrganization ID:
8
NE
1/8 - 1/4 Mile
Higher
USGS40001185330FED USGS
Underground Water WellSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
Leatha J. HenriksenOwner:0Well ID:
.091Cubic ft/sec:Domestic,Irrigation,Stockwatering,Uses:
1919Priority Date:Underground Water ClaimStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-2923Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
B7
East
0 - 1/8 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000149574UT WELLS
Underground Water WellSupply Source:
WRWater Right Type:Leatha J. HenriksenOwner:
0Well ID:.011Cubic ft/sec:
Irrigation,Stockwatering,Uses:1919Priority Date:
Underground Water Claim CertificatedStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-2921Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
B6
ESE
0 - 1/8 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000149571UT WELLS
Underground Water WellSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
American Mutual Building And Loan CompanyOwner:0Well ID:
.011Cubic ft/sec:Domestic,Stockwatering,Uses:
1900Priority Date:Underground Water ClaimStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-2078Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
5
South
0 - 1/8 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000148528UT WELLS
Underground Water WellSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
Leatha J. HenriksenOwner:0Well ID:
.091Cubic ft/sec:Domestic,Irrigation,Stockwatering,Uses:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC7025843.2s Page A-19
1908Priority Date:Underground Water ClaimStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-2713Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
C12
ENE
1/8 - 1/4 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000149305UT WELLS
Underground Water WellSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
Orton Family TrustOwner:430774Well ID:
.56Cubic ft/sec:Irrigation,Stockwatering,Uses:
19610912Priority Date:Appeal to Appropriate CertificatedStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-1592Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
C11
ENE
1/8 - 1/4 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000147934UT WELLS
Underground Water WellSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
Leatha J. HenriksenOwner:0Well ID:
.091Cubic ft/sec:Domestic,Irrigation,Stockwatering,Uses:
1919Priority Date:Underground Water ClaimStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-2923Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
B10
NE
1/8 - 1/4 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000149575UT WELLS
Underground Water WellSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
Leatha J. HenriksenOwner:0Well ID:
.091Cubic ft/sec:Domestic,Irrigation,Stockwatering,Uses:
1919Priority Date:Underground Water ClaimStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-2923Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
B9
East
1/8 - 1/4 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000149576UT WELLS
Not ReportedWell Hole Depth Units:
Not ReportedWell Hole Depth: Not ReportedWell Depth Units:
Not ReportedWell Depth: Not ReportedConstruction Date:
Not ReportedAquifer Type: Not ReportedFormation Type:
Not ReportedAquifer: Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area Unts:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC7025843.2s Page A-20
.5Cubic ft/sec:Irrigation,Stockwatering,Uses:
19650816Priority Date:Appeal to Appropriate RejectedStatus:
Terminated; right most likely consolidatedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-1889Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
E16
SSE
1/4 - 1/2 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000148284UT WELLS
Underground Water WellSupply Source:
WRWater Right Type:Sharon ForbushOwner:
0Well ID:.015Cubic ft/sec:
Domestic,Irrigation,Stockwatering,Uses:19930917Priority Date:
Appeal to Appropriate Permanently LapsedStatus:
Terminated; right most likely consolidatedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-6538Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
D15
ENE
1/4 - 1/2 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000152648UT WELLS
Underground Water DrainSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
Maurice D. & Sharon K. ForbushOwner:0Well ID:
.047Cubic ft/sec:Irrigation,Uses:
1905Priority Date:Underground Water ClaimStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-1805Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
14
NNE
1/4 - 1/2 Mile
Lower
UTDNR2000148194UT WELLS
Underground Water WellSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
Hearthstone Development Inc.Owner:0Well ID:
0Cubic ft/sec:Not ReportedUses:
1900Priority Date:Underground Water ClaimStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-2490Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
13
East
1/8 - 1/4 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000149038UT WELLS
Underground Water WellSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
Glenn B. OrtonOwner:430774Well ID:
.015Cubic ft/sec:Domestic,Irrigation,Stockwatering,Uses:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC7025843.2s Page A-21
Underground Water WellSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
Maurice D. & Sharon K. ForbushOwner:0Well ID:
.004Cubic ft/sec:Domestic,Irrigation,Uses:
1888Priority Date:Underground Water ClaimStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-1802Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
D20
ENE
1/4 - 1/2 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000148191UT WELLS
Underground Water WellSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
M. T. BarneyOwner:0Well ID:
.013Cubic ft/sec:Domestic,Irrigation,Stockwatering,Uses:
1900Priority Date:Underground Water ClaimStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-2596Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
E19
South
1/4 - 1/2 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000149169UT WELLS
Seepage and SpringsSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
Spanish Fork City CorporationOwner:0Well ID:
6Cubic ft/sec:Municipal,Uses:
19680610Priority Date:Appeal to Appropriate RejectedStatus:
Terminated; right most likely consolidatedApplication Status:
SurfaceType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-2826Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
E18
SSE
1/4 - 1/2 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000149446UT WELLS
Underground Water WellSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
Maurice D. & Sharon K. ForbushOwner:0Well ID:
.002Cubic ft/sec:Stockwatering,Uses:
1888Priority Date:Underground Water ClaimStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-1807Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
F17
NE
1/4 - 1/2 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000148196UT WELLS
Underground Water DrainSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
William L. ThompsonOwner:0Well ID:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC7025843.2s Page A-22
Underground Water WellSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
Maurice D. & Sharon K. ForbushOwner:0Well ID:
.022Cubic ft/sec:Stockwatering,Uses:
1896Priority Date:Underground Water ClaimStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-1803Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
24
ENE
1/4 - 1/2 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000148192UT WELLS
Underground Water DrainSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
Maurice D. & Sharon K. ForbushOwner:0Well ID:
.044Cubic ft/sec:Irrigation,Uses:
1890Priority Date:Underground Water ClaimStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-1806Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
F23
NE
1/4 - 1/2 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000148195UT WELLS
Underground Water Wells (6)Supply Source:WRWater Right Type:
Spanish Fork CityOwner:0Well ID:
0Cubic ft/sec:Municipal,Uses:
1877Priority Date:Share Statement CertificatedStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-7332Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
22
ESE
1/4 - 1/2 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000153644UT WELLS
Underground Water WellSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
Richard D Clifford And Julie A CliffordOwner:0Well ID:
.001Cubic ft/sec:Irrigation,Uses:
1888Priority Date:Underground Water ClaimStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-8652Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
D21
ENE
1/4 - 1/2 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000155923UT WELLS
Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC7025843.2s Page A-23
Underground Water Well (existing)Supply Source:
CHWater Right Type:Cole FowlerOwner:
0Well ID:0Cubic ft/sec:
Domestic,Irrigation,Uses:20141203Priority Date:
Appeal to Appropriate ApprovedStatus:ApprovedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:a40307Exchange #:
51-4937Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
G28
NE
1/4 - 1/2 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000285669UT WELLS
Underground Water WellSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
Maurice D. & Sharon K. ForbushOwner:0Well ID:
.005Cubic ft/sec:Domestic,Stockwatering,Uses:
1888Priority Date:Underground Water ClaimStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-1804Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
27
ENE
1/4 - 1/2 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000148193UT WELLS
Underground Water WellSupply Source:
WRWater Right Type:Morgan D. ForbushOwner:
34342Well ID:.015Cubic ft/sec:
Domestic,Irrigation,Stockwatering,Uses:19780616Priority Date:
Appeal to Appropriate Permanently LapsedStatus:
Terminated; right most likely consolidatedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-4845Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
G26
NE
1/4 - 1/2 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000151033UT WELLS
Underground Water WellSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
Spanish Fork CityOwner:429495Well ID:
.134Cubic ft/sec:Irrigation,Stockwatering,Uses:
19510405Priority Date:Appeal to Appropriate CertificatedStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-1233Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
25
WNW
1/4 - 1/2 Mile
Lower
UTDNR2000147559UT WELLS
Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC7025843.2s Page A-24
Underground Water WellSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
Utah Monument CompanyOwner:428430Well ID:
.031Cubic ft/sec:Domestic,Uses:
19610824Priority Date:Appeal to Appropriate CertificatedStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-1586Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
31
SW
1/4 - 1/2 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000147928UT WELLS
Not ReportedNote: Not ReportedFeet to sea level:
3.00Feet below surface: 1960-08-04Level reading date:
Not ReportedNote: Not ReportedFeet to sea level:
-2.09Feet below surface: 1991-02-22Level reading date:
Not ReportedNote:
Not ReportedFeet to sea level: -2.06Feet below surface:
1991-03-07Level reading date: 3Ground water levels,Number of Measurements:
Not ReportedWell Hole Depth Units: Not ReportedWell Hole Depth:
ftWell Depth Units: 171Well Depth:
19600101Construction Date: Not ReportedAquifer Type:
Not ReportedFormation Type: Not ReportedAquifer:
Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area Unts: Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area:
Not ReportedDrainage Area Units: Not ReportedDrainage Area:
16020202HUC: Not ReportedDescription:
WellType: (D- 8- 3)18aaa- 3Monitor Location:
USGS Utah Water Science CenterOrganization Name: USGS-UTOrganization ID:
30
NW
1/4 - 1/2 Mile
Lower
USGS40001185333FED USGS
Underground Water WellSupply Source:
WRWater Right Type:Becky JohnsonOwner:
0Well ID:.015Cubic ft/sec:
Domestic,Irrigation,Stockwatering,Uses:19930917Priority Date:
Appeal to Appropriate Permanently LapsedStatus:
Terminated; right most likely consolidatedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-6539Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
H29
ENE
1/4 - 1/2 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000152649UT WELLS
Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC7025843.2s Page A-25
Underground Water WellSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
Harold H. HansonOwner:0Well ID:
.022Cubic ft/sec:Stockwatering,Uses:
1890Priority Date:Underground Water ClaimStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-2909Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
35
WSW
1/4 - 1/2 Mile
Lower
UTDNR2000149553UT WELLS
Underground Water DrainSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
Nebo Vista TrustOwner:0Well ID:
.018Cubic ft/sec:Irrigation,Uses:
1905Priority Date:Underground Water ClaimStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-8655Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
H34
NE
1/4 - 1/2 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000155929UT WELLS
Underground Water DrainSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
Maurice D. & Sharon K. ForbushOwner:0Well ID:
.015Cubic ft/sec:Domestic,Uses:
1905Priority Date:Underground Water ClaimStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-1808Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
H33
NE
1/4 - 1/2 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000148197UT WELLS
Underground Water WellSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
Einer ChristensenOwner:0Well ID:
0Cubic ft/sec:Not ReportedUses:
1900Priority Date:Underground Water ClaimStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-2491Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
32
NNE
1/4 - 1/2 Mile
Lower
UTDNR2000149039UT WELLS
Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC7025843.2s Page A-26
Unnamed SpringSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
Fred J. StrongOwner:0Well ID:
.25Cubic ft/sec:Irrigation,Stockwatering,Uses:
1900Priority Date:Diligence ClaimStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
SurfaceType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-1725Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
J39
NE
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000148083UT WELLS
Underground Water WellSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
Earl K. JacksonOwner:32752Well ID:
0Cubic ft/sec:Domestic,Irrigation,Stockwatering,Uses:
19950412Priority Date:Appeal to Appropriate CertificatedStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-6800Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
I38
SSW
1/4 - 1/2 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000152948UT WELLS
Underground Water WellSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
Kevin MayberryOwner:32728Well ID:
.013Cubic ft/sec:Irrigation,Uses:
19610220Priority Date:Appeal to Appropriate CertificatedStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-3819Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
I37
SSW
1/4 - 1/2 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000150056UT WELLS
Underground Water WellSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
Kevin MayberryOwner:32752Well ID:
.013Cubic ft/sec:Irrigation,Uses:
19610220Priority Date:Appeal to Appropriate CertificatedStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-3818Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
I36
SSW
1/4 - 1/2 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000150055UT WELLS
Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC7025843.2s Page A-27
Wash CreekSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
Mesquite Presidio L.L.C.Owner:0Well ID:
0Cubic ft/sec:Irrigation,Uses:
19360213Priority Date:Share Statement CertificatedStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
SurfaceType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-7246Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
K43
ENE
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000153521UT WELLS
Wash CreekSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
Wash Creek Irrigation CompanyOwner:0Well ID:
2.23Cubic ft/sec:Irrigation,Uses:
19360213Priority Date:Appeal to Appropriate CertificatedStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
SurfaceType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-1037Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
K42
ENE
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000147327UT WELLS
Wash CreekSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
Kenneth H. And Alyce M. ArmstrongOwner:0Well ID:
0Cubic ft/sec:Irrigation,Uses:
19360213Priority Date:Share Statement CertificatedStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
SurfaceType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-8135Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
K41
ENE
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000154728UT WELLS
Wash CreekSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
Coray HoneOwner:0Well ID:
0Cubic ft/sec:Irrigation,Uses:
19360213Priority Date:Share Statement CertificatedStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
SurfaceType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-8134Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
K40
ENE
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000154727UT WELLS
Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC7025843.2s Page A-28
Underground Water Channel, Wash Creek SeepageSupply Source:
WRWater Right Type:Aaron ButlerOwner:
0Well ID:0Cubic ft/sec:
Irrigation,Uses:Not ReportedPriority Date:
Share StatementStatus:Not ReportedApplication Status:
SurfaceType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-8657Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
K47
ENE
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000155931UT WELLS
Underground Water Channel, Wash Creek SeepageSupply Source:
HTWater Right Type:Spanish Fork CityOwner:
0Well ID:0Cubic ft/sec:
Municipal,Uses:20160129Priority Date:
Appeal to Appropriate UnapprovedStatus:UnapprovedApplication Status:
SurfaceType of Diversion:a41380Exchange #:
51-8669Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
K46
ENE
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000310738UT WELLS
Underground Water Channel, Wash Creek SeepageSupply Source:
WRWater Right Type:Spanish Fork CityOwner:
0Well ID:0Cubic ft/sec:
Irrigation,Uses:Not ReportedPriority Date:
Share StatementStatus:Not ReportedApplication Status:
SurfaceType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-8669Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
K45
ENE
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000156003UT WELLS
Underground Water Channel, Wash Creek SeepageSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
Duane F. Hutchings 1995 Posterity TrustOwner:
0Well ID:0Cubic ft/sec:
Irrigation,Uses:Not ReportedPriority Date:
Share StatementStatus:Not ReportedApplication Status:
SurfaceType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-8644Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
K44
ENE
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000155902UT WELLS
Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC7025843.2s Page A-29
Underground ChannelSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
Wash Creek Irrigation CompanyOwner:0Well ID:
3Cubic ft/sec:Irrigation,Uses:
1903Priority Date:Underground Water ClaimStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-1801Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
L51
ENE
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000148190UT WELLS
Unnamed SpringSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
Fred J. StrongOwner:0Well ID:
.25Cubic ft/sec:Irrigation,Stockwatering,Uses:
1900Priority Date:Diligence ClaimStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
SurfaceType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-1725Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
J50
NE
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000148084UT WELLS
Unnamed DrainSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
Lynn H. ChildOwner:0Well ID:
.502Cubic ft/sec:Irrigation,Other,Uses:
19470325Priority Date:Appeal to Appropriate CertificatedStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-1160Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
49
SSW
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000147474UT WELLS
Underground Water Channel, Wash Creek SeepageSupply Source:
WRWater Right Type:Mapleton Heights LlcOwner:
0Well ID:0Cubic ft/sec:
Irrigation,Uses:Not ReportedPriority Date:
Share StatementStatus:Not ReportedApplication Status:
SurfaceType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-8661Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
K48
ENE
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000155939UT WELLS
Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC7025843.2s Page A-30
Not ReportedWell Hole Depth Units: Not ReportedWell Hole Depth:
ftWell Depth Units: 106Well Depth:
19630101Construction Date: Not ReportedAquifer Type:
Not ReportedFormation Type: Not ReportedAquifer:
Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area Unts: Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area:
Not ReportedDrainage Area Units: Not ReportedDrainage Area:
16020202HUC: Not ReportedDescription:
WellType: (D- 8- 3)17cbc- 1Monitor Location:
USGS Utah Water Science CenterOrganization Name: USGS-UTOrganization ID:
55
SW
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
USGS40001185273FED USGS
Underground Water WellSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
Wash Creek Pipeline CompanyOwner:0Well ID:
.052Cubic ft/sec:Domestic,Irrigation,Stockwatering,Uses:
192410Priority Date:Underground Water ClaimStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-1828Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
L54
ENE
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000148216UT WELLS
Underground Water WellSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
Wash Creek Pipeline CompanyOwner:0Well ID:
.029Cubic ft/sec:Domestic,Irrigation,Stockwatering,Uses:
192410Priority Date:Underground Water ClaimStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-1827Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
L53
ENE
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000148215UT WELLS
Underground Water WellSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
Wash Creek Pipeline CompanyOwner:0Well ID:
.028Cubic ft/sec:Domestic,Irrigation,Stockwatering,Uses:
192410Priority Date:Underground Water ClaimStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-1829Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
L52
ENE
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000148217UT WELLS
Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC7025843.2s Page A-31
143.70Feet below surface: 1964-03-23Level reading date:
Not ReportedNote:
Not ReportedFeet to sea level: 142.22Feet below surface:
1991-03-05Level reading date: 2Ground water levels,Number of Measurements:
Not ReportedWell Hole Depth Units: Not ReportedWell Hole Depth:
ftWell Depth Units: 295Well Depth:
19600101Construction Date: Not ReportedAquifer Type:
Not ReportedFormation Type: Not ReportedAquifer:
Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area Unts: Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area:
Not ReportedDrainage Area Units: Not ReportedDrainage Area:
16020202HUC: Not ReportedDescription:
WellType: (D- 8- 3)17cdc- 2Monitor Location:
USGS Utah Water Science CenterOrganization Name: USGS-UTOrganization ID:
M58
South
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
USGS40001185259FED USGS
Not ReportedNote:
Not ReportedFeet to sea level: 14.00Feet below surface:
1950-05-29Level reading date: 1Ground water levels,Number of Measurements:
Not ReportedWell Hole Depth Units: Not ReportedWell Hole Depth:
ftWell Depth Units: 47Well Depth:
19500101Construction Date: Not ReportedAquifer Type:
Not ReportedFormation Type: Not ReportedAquifer:
Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area Unts: Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area:
Not ReportedDrainage Area Units: Not ReportedDrainage Area:
16020202HUC: Not ReportedDescription:
WellType: (D- 8- 3)17dcc- 1Monitor Location:
USGS Utah Water Science CenterOrganization Name: USGS-UTOrganization ID:
M57
South
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
USGS40001185257FED USGS
Underground Water DrainSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
Elias A. StrongOwner:0Well ID:
.111Cubic ft/sec:Irrigation,Stockwatering,Uses:
1896Priority Date:Underground Water ClaimStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-1826Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
56
NE
1/2 - 1 Mile
Lower
UTDNR2000148214UT WELLS
Not ReportedNote:
Not ReportedFeet to sea level: -15.50Feet below surface:
1965-04-13Level reading date: 1Ground water levels,Number of Measurements:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC7025843.2s Page A-32
Domestic,Irrigation,Stockwatering,Uses:19900910Priority Date:
Appeal to Appropriate Permanently LapsedStatus:
Terminated; right most likely consolidatedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-6202Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
M62
South
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000152279UT WELLS
Underground Water WellSupply Source:
WRWater Right Type:A. David MerrillOwner:
34411Well ID:.015Cubic ft/sec:
Domestic,Irrigation,Uses:19811202Priority Date:
Appeal to Appropriate Permanently LapsedStatus:
Terminated; right most likely consolidatedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-4570Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
M61
South
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000150741UT WELLS
Underground Water WellSupply Source:
WRWater Right Type:Lila Jane C. Smith Revocable TrustOwner:
429497Well ID:.015Cubic ft/sec:
Domestic,Irrigation,Stockwatering,Uses:19580919Priority Date:
Appeal to Appropriate No Proof RequiredStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-1420Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
M60
South
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000147761UT WELLS
Not ReportedWell Hole Depth Units: Not ReportedWell Hole Depth:
ftWell Depth Units: 125Well Depth:
19540101Construction Date: Not ReportedAquifer Type:
Not ReportedFormation Type: Not ReportedAquifer:
Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area Unts: Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area:
Not ReportedDrainage Area Units: Not ReportedDrainage Area:
16020202HUC: Not ReportedDescription:
WellType: (D- 8- 3)17dda- 1Monitor Location:
USGS Utah Water Science CenterOrganization Name: USGS-UTOrganization ID:
59
SE
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
USGS40001185272FED USGS
Not ReportedNote: Not ReportedFeet to sea level:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC7025843.2s Page A-33
.007Cubic ft/sec:Domestic,Irrigation,Stockwatering,Uses:
1935Priority Date:Underground Water ClaimStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-2937Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
66
WSW
1/2 - 1 Mile
Lower
UTDNR2000149595UT WELLS
Underground Water WellSupply Source:CHWater Right Type:
Duane F. Hutchings 1995 Posterity TrustOwner:0Well ID:
0Cubic ft/sec:Domestic,Irrigation,Stockwatering,Uses:
20061204Priority Date:Appeal to Appropriate WithdrawnStatus:
Terminated; right most likely consolidatedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:a32236Exchange #:
51-8160Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
N65
East
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000277212UT WELLS
Underground Water WellSupply Source:
WRWater Right Type:Reuben Marvin & Louise T. GardnerOwner:
0Well ID:.015Cubic ft/sec:
Stockwatering,Uses:19500316Priority Date:
Appeal to Appropriate No Proof RequiredStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-1215Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
N64
East
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000147534UT WELLS
Underground Water WellSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
Ray D. WilliamsOwner:0Well ID:
.045Cubic ft/sec:Domestic,Stockwatering,Uses:
1912Priority Date:Underground Water ClaimStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-6435Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
63
SSE
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000152554UT WELLS
Underground Water WellSupply Source:
WRWater Right Type:Philip And Bonnie BeckOwner:
31698Well ID:.015Cubic ft/sec:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC7025843.2s Page A-34
Underground Water WellSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
Board Of Education Of Nebo School DistrictOwner:
429496Well ID:.015Cubic ft/sec:
Stockwatering,Uses:19510521Priority Date:
Appeal to Appropriate No Proof RequiredStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-1238Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
O69
South
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000147564UT WELLS
Underground Water DrainSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
Glade V. SchwartzOwner:0Well ID:
1Cubic ft/sec:Irrigation,Uses:
19630926Priority Date:Appeal to Appropriate RejectedStatus:
Terminated; right most likely consolidatedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-1666Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
68
NNW
1/2 - 1 Mile
Lower
UTDNR2000148009UT WELLS
Not ReportedNote: Not ReportedFeet to sea level:
23.60Feet below surface: 1965-04-13Level reading date:
Not ReportedNote: Not ReportedFeet to sea level:
24.11Feet below surface: 1991-02-25Level reading date:
Not ReportedNote:
Not ReportedFeet to sea level: 24.43Feet below surface:
1991-03-07Level reading date: 3Ground water levels,Number of Measurements:
Not ReportedWell Hole Depth Units: Not ReportedWell Hole Depth:
ftWell Depth Units: 65Well Depth:
19500101Construction Date: Not ReportedAquifer Type:
Not ReportedFormation Type: Not ReportedAquifer:
Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area Unts: Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area:
Not ReportedDrainage Area Units: Not ReportedDrainage Area:
16020202HUC: Not ReportedDescription:
WellType: (D- 8- 3)17ada- 1Monitor Location:
USGS Utah Water Science CenterOrganization Name: USGS-UTOrganization ID:
N67
East
1/2 - 1 Mile
Lower
USGS40001185312FED USGS
Underground Water WellSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
Board Of Education Of Nebo School DistrictOwner:0Well ID:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC7025843.2s Page A-35
Not ReportedNote: Not ReportedFeet to sea level:
25.00Feet below surface: 1960-12-06Level reading date:
Not ReportedNote:
Not ReportedFeet to sea level: 9.79Feet below surface:
1991-03-05Level reading date: 2Ground water levels,Number of Measurements:
Not ReportedWell Hole Depth Units: Not ReportedWell Hole Depth:
ftWell Depth Units: 127Well Depth:
19600101Construction Date: Not ReportedAquifer Type:
Not ReportedFormation Type: Not ReportedAquifer:
Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area Unts: Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area:
Not ReportedDrainage Area Units: Not ReportedDrainage Area:
16020202HUC: Not ReportedDescription:
WellType: (D- 8- 3)17cdc- 1Monitor Location:
USGS Utah Water Science CenterOrganization Name: USGS-UTOrganization ID:
O72
South
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
USGS40001185258FED USGS
Underground Water WellSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
Utah Savings & LoanOwner:428438Well ID:
.008Cubic ft/sec:Irrigation,Stockwatering,Uses:
1890Priority Date:Underground Water ClaimStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-1825Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
P71
NE
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000148213UT WELLS
Not ReportedNote:
Not ReportedFeet to sea level: 50.00Feet below surface:
1964-03-27Level reading date: 1Ground water levels,Number of Measurements:
Not ReportedWell Hole Depth Units: Not ReportedWell Hole Depth:
ftWell Depth Units: 205Well Depth:
18900101Construction Date: Not ReportedAquifer Type:
Not ReportedFormation Type: Not ReportedAquifer:
Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area Unts: Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area:
Not ReportedDrainage Area Units: Not ReportedDrainage Area:
16020202HUC: Not ReportedDescription:
WellType: (D- 8- 3) 8ddb- 1Monitor Location:
USGS Utah Water Science CenterOrganization Name: USGS-UTOrganization ID:
P70
NE
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
USGS40001185382FED USGS
Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC7025843.2s Page A-36
Underground Water WellSupply Source:
WRWater Right Type:Robert L. MooreOwner:
0Well ID:.015Cubic ft/sec:
Domestic,Irrigation,Stockwatering,Uses:19861003Priority Date:
Appeal to Appropriate Permanently LapsedStatus:
Terminated; right most likely consolidatedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-5845Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
76
SSW
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000152031UT WELLS
Underground Water WellSupply Source:CHWater Right Type:
Thomas H. GrieveOwner:0Well ID:
0Cubic ft/sec:Domestic,Irrigation,Uses:
20021216Priority Date:Appeal to Appropriate RejectedStatus:
Terminated; right most likely consolidatedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:t27335Exchange #:
51-7739Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
Q75
East
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000292345UT WELLS
Underground Water WellSupply Source:CHWater Right Type:
Thomas H. GrieveOwner:26600Well ID:
0Cubic ft/sec:Domestic,Irrigation,Uses:
20021216Priority Date:Appeal to Appropriate RejectedStatus:
Terminated; right most likely consolidatedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:a27334Exchange #:
51-7739Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
Q74
East
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000271329UT WELLS
Underground Water WellSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
Harold H. HansonOwner:436299Well ID:
.011Cubic ft/sec:Stockwatering,Uses:
1895Priority Date:Underground Water ClaimStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
Abandonded WellType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-2910Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
73
WSW
1/2 - 1 Mile
Lower
UTDNR2000149555UT WELLS
Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC7025843.2s Page A-37
19600404Priority Date:Appeal to Appropriate CertificatedStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-1457Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
S80
SE
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000147804UT WELLS
Underground Water Well (existing/provisional)Supply Source:CHWater Right Type:
The Duane F. Hutchings 1995 Posterity TrustOwner:
433675Well ID:0Cubic ft/sec:
Irrigation,Stockwatering,Uses:20150709Priority Date:
Appeal to Appropriate ApprovedStatus:ApprovedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:a40951Exchange #:
51-8161Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
R79
ENE
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000286454UT WELLS
Underground Water Well (existing/provisional)Supply Source:CHWater Right Type:
The Duane F. Hutchings 1995 Posterity TrustOwner:433675Well ID:
0Cubic ft/sec:Stockwatering,Uses:
20091214Priority Date:Appeal to Appropriate WithdrawnStatus:
Terminated; right most likely consolidatedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:a36132Exchange #:
51-8161Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
R78
ENE
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000280712UT WELLS
Not ReportedNote:
Not ReportedFeet to sea level: 141.60Feet below surface:
1965-04-13Level reading date: 1Ground water levels,Number of Measurements:
Not ReportedWell Hole Depth Units: Not ReportedWell Hole Depth:
ftWell Depth Units: 295Well Depth:
19610101Construction Date: Not ReportedAquifer Type:
Not ReportedFormation Type: Not ReportedAquifer:
Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area Unts: Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area:
Not ReportedDrainage Area Units: Not ReportedDrainage Area:
16020202HUC: Not ReportedDescription:
WellType: (D- 8- 3)20bab- 1Monitor Location:
USGS Utah Water Science CenterOrganization Name: USGS-UTOrganization ID:
77
South
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
USGS40001185248FED USGS
Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC7025843.2s Page A-38
WRWater Right Type:Mark B. HansonOwner:
0Well ID:.011Cubic ft/sec:
Not ReportedUses:1920Priority Date:
Pending Adjudication ClaimStatus:UnapprovedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-3720Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
S84
ESE
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000149975UT WELLS
Underground Water WellSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
Lee W. And Susan K. MitchellOwner:0Well ID:
.015Cubic ft/sec:Domestic,Irrigation,Stockwatering,Uses:
19930322Priority Date:Appeal to Appropriate CertificatedStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-6455Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
83
NE
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000152575UT WELLS
Underground Water WellSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
W. Kelly And Norma JohnsonOwner:138Well ID:
.015Cubic ft/sec:Domestic,Irrigation,Stockwatering,Uses:
19920317Priority Date:Appeal to Appropriate CertificatedStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-6329Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
82
South
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000152450UT WELLS
Underground Water WellSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
Duane F. Hutchings 1995 Posterity TrustOwner:429500Well ID:
0Cubic ft/sec:Stockwatering,Uses:
19600404Priority Date:Appeal to Appropriate CertificatedStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-8161Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
S81
SE
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000154762UT WELLS
Underground Water WellSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
The Duane F. Hutchings 1995 Posterity TrustOwner:429500Well ID:
.011Cubic ft/sec:Stockwatering,Uses:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC7025843.2s Page A-39
Underground Water WellSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
David A. GrotegutOwner:30793Well ID:
.015Cubic ft/sec:Domestic,Irrigation,Uses:
19790719Priority Date:Appeal to Appropriate CertificatedStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-4987Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
88
SSE
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000151187UT WELLS
Underground Water WellSupply Source:
HTWater Right Type:W. Kelly And Norma JohnsonOwner:
138Well ID:0Cubic ft/sec:
Domestic,Irrigation,Stockwatering,Uses:19960207Priority Date:
Appeal to Appropriate ApprovedStatus:ApprovedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:a19689Exchange #:
51-6329Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
T87
SSW
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000304092UT WELLS
Hill Stream flow & SpringsSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
New Northeast Spanish Fork Irrigation CompanyOwner:0Well ID:
4Cubic ft/sec:Irrigation,Stockwatering,Uses:
1890Priority Date:Diligence ClaimStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
SurfaceType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-2913Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
86
SSW
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000149559UT WELLS
Underground Water WellSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
Robert GrotegutOwner:8301Well ID:
.015Cubic ft/sec:Domestic,Irrigation,Stockwatering,Uses:
1895Priority Date:Underground Water ClaimStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-2983Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
85
WSW
1/2 - 1 Mile
Lower
UTDNR2000149642UT WELLS
Underground Water WellSupply Source:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC7025843.2s Page A-40
Underground Water WellSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
Stewart Farms L.C.Owner:0Well ID:
0Cubic ft/sec:Irrigation,Stockwatering,Uses:
1903Priority Date:Underground Water ClaimStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-8375Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
U92
NW
1/2 - 1 Mile
Lower
UTDNR2000154974UT WELLS
Underground Water WellSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
Shirl L. Ekins Family TrustOwner:0Well ID:
0Cubic ft/sec:Stockwatering,Uses:
1903Priority Date:Underground Water ClaimStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-7050Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
U91
NW
1/2 - 1 Mile
Lower
UTDNR2000153261UT WELLS
Underground Water Wells (2)Supply Source:
CHWater Right Type:W. Kelly And Norma JohnsonOwner:
0Well ID:0Cubic ft/sec:
Domestic,Irrigation,Stockwatering,Uses:19960207Priority Date:
Appeal to Appropriate ApprovedStatus:ApprovedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:a19689Exchange #:
51-6329Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
T90
SSW
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000257799UT WELLS
Underground Water WellSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
Garn And Jeannelle B. LloydOwner:33424Well ID:
.013Cubic ft/sec:Domestic,Irrigation,Stockwatering,Uses:
19610220Priority Date:Appeal to Appropriate CertificatedStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-3651Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
89
ENE
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000149915UT WELLS
Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC7025843.2s Page A-41
Underground Water WellSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
J. David & Julie A. NelsonOwner:30786Well ID:
0Cubic ft/sec:Irrigation,Uses:
1915Priority Date:Underground Water ClaimStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-3867Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
W96
SSE
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000150136UT WELLS
Underground Water WellSupply Source:
WRWater Right Type:Scot N. And Cynthia K. SilverOwner:
0Well ID:.015Cubic ft/sec:
Domestic,Irrigation,Stockwatering,Uses:19920604Priority Date:
Appeal to Appropriate Permanently LapsedStatus:
Terminated; right most likely consolidatedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-6365Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
V95
NE
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000152486UT WELLS
Underground Water WellSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
John D. ChildsOwner:0Well ID:
.011Cubic ft/sec:Domestic,Irrigation,Stockwatering,Uses:
188804Priority Date:Underground Water ClaimStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-2516Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
V94
NE
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000149074UT WELLS
Underground Water WellSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
Shirl L. Ekins Family TrustOwner:0Well ID:
0Cubic ft/sec:Stockwatering,Uses:
1903Priority Date:Underground Water ClaimStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
53-1604Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
U93
NW
1/2 - 1 Mile
Lower
UTDNR2000156766UT WELLS
Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC7025843.2s Page A-42
1910Priority Date:Underground Water ClaimStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-2848Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
100
SSW
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000149471UT WELLS
Underground Water WellSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
Ann A. TuttleOwner:0Well ID:
.015Cubic ft/sec:Domestic,Irrigation,Stockwatering,Uses:
1899Priority Date:Underground Water ClaimStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-3508Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
X99
SW
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000149821UT WELLS
Not ReportedNote:
Not ReportedFeet to sea level: -6.00Feet below surface:
1953-12-21Level reading date: 1Ground water levels,Number of Measurements:
Not ReportedWell Hole Depth Units: Not ReportedWell Hole Depth:
ftWell Depth Units: 121Well Depth:
19530101Construction Date: Not ReportedAquifer Type:
Not ReportedFormation Type: Not ReportedAquifer:
Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area Unts: Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area:
Not ReportedDrainage Area Units: Not ReportedDrainage Area:
16020202HUC: Not ReportedDescription:
WellType: (D- 8- 3) 7adc- 2Monitor Location:
USGS Utah Water Science CenterOrganization Name: USGS-UTOrganization ID:
98
NW
1/2 - 1 Mile
Lower
USGS40001185415FED USGS
Underground Water WellSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
J. David NelsonOwner:30794Well ID:
.015Cubic ft/sec:Irrigation,Uses:
19790907Priority Date:Appeal to Appropriate CertificatedStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-5012Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
W97
SSE
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000151217UT WELLS
Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC7025843.2s Page A-43
0Well ID:0Cubic ft/sec:
Domestic,Irrigation,Stockwatering,Uses:19940107Priority Date:
Appeal to Appropriate Permanently LapsedStatus:
Terminated; right most likely consolidatedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-6600Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
Y104
SE
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000152720UT WELLS
Underground Water WellSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
Ernest Vern WalkerOwner:0Well ID:
.033Cubic ft/sec:Domestic,Irrigation,Stockwatering,Uses:
1917Priority Date:Underground Water ClaimStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-3767Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
103
SSW
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000150022UT WELLS
Underground Water WellSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
Nathan B. HalesOwner:0Well ID:
.052Cubic ft/sec:Irrigation,Stockwatering,Uses:
1907Priority Date:Underground Water ClaimStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-3764Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
102
WNW
1/2 - 1 Mile
Lower
UTDNR2000150019UT WELLS
Underground Water WellSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
Dan D. And Michelle WilliamsOwner:0Well ID:
.022Cubic ft/sec:Domestic,Irrigation,Stockwatering,Uses:
1867Priority Date:Underground Water ClaimStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-2686Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
X101
SW
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000149273UT WELLS
Underground Water WellSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
Dean BettsOwner:0Well ID:
.045Cubic ft/sec:Domestic,Irrigation,Stockwatering,Uses:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC7025843.2s Page A-44
.015Cubic ft/sec:Domestic,Irrigation,Stockwatering,Uses:
19911004Priority Date:Appeal to Appropriate CertificatedStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-6290Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
Z108
ENE
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000152373UT WELLS
Underground Water WellSupply Source:
WRWater Right Type:Sam And Narene IrelandOwner:
123468Well ID:0Cubic ft/sec:
Domestic,Irrigation,Stockwatering,Uses:1935Priority Date:
Underground Water Claim CertificatedStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-7668Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
Y107
SE
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000154063UT WELLS
Underground Water WellSupply Source:
WRWater Right Type:Steven K. Davis Revocable TrustOwner:
0Well ID:.015Cubic ft/sec:
Stockwatering,Uses:19450602Priority Date:
Appeal to Appropriate No Proof RequiredStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-1124Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
106
NNW
1/2 - 1 Mile
Lower
UTDNR2000147430UT WELLS
Underground Water WellSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
Guy H. & L. RhoadsOwner:0Well ID:
.015Cubic ft/sec:Domestic,Irrigation,Stockwatering,Uses:
19631118Priority Date:Appeal to Appropriate RejectedStatus:
Terminated; right most likely consolidatedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-1670Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
105
NE
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000148013UT WELLS
Underground Water WellSupply Source:
WRWater Right Type:Mark E. MartinOwner:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC7025843.2s Page A-45
Underground Water DrainSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
John D. ChildsOwner:0Well ID:
.613Cubic ft/sec:Domestic,Irrigation,Uses:
1900Priority Date:Underground Water ClaimStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-1897Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
112
NE
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000148292UT WELLS
Underground Water WellSupply Source:
HTWater Right Type:Spanish Fork City CorporationOwner:
0Well ID:20.843Cubic ft/sec:
Municipal,Uses:20020314Priority Date:
Appeal to Appropriate ApprovedStatus:ApprovedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:a26429Exchange #:
51-1200Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
AA111
SSW
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000305710UT WELLS
Underground Water WellsSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
Spanish Fork City CorporationOwner:33950Well ID:
5Cubic ft/sec:Municipal,Uses:
19610627Priority Date:Appeal to Appropriate CertificatedStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-3483Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
AA110
SSW
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000149792UT WELLS
Underground Water WellSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
Monte C. And Pamela Sue BinghamOwner:21980Well ID:
0Cubic ft/sec:Domestic,Irrigation,Stockwatering,Uses:
20020603Priority Date:Appeal to Appropriate CertificatedStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-6596Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
Y109
SE
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000152715UT WELLS
Underground Water Well & DrainSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
Jerry Bart PurkeyOwner:788Well ID:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC7025843.2s Page A-46
29.0000Longitude seconds:
38Longitude minutes: 111Longitude degrees:
13.0000Latitude seconds: 6Latitude minutes:
40Latitude degrees: UTState:
40.0000Longitude seconds:
38Longitude minutes: 111Longitude degrees:
9.0000Latitude seconds: 6Latitude minutes:
40Latitude degrees: UTState:
47.0000Longitude seconds:
34Longitude minutes: 111Longitude degrees:
15.0000Latitude seconds: 4Latitude minutes:
40Latitude degrees: UTState:
48.0000Longitude seconds:
32Longitude minutes: 111Longitude degrees:
58.0000Latitude seconds: 2Latitude minutes:
40Latitude degrees: UTState:
1113248Longitude: 400258Latitude:
1113447Longitude: 400415Latitude:
1113829Longitude: 400613Latitude:
1113840Longitude: 400609Latitude:
1113912Longitude: 400653Latitude:
1113849Longitude: 400723Latitude:
Mixed (treated and untreated)Treatment: 10,001 - 50,000 PersonsPopulation served:
84660System zip:
UTSystem state: SPANISH FORKSystem city:
40 SOUTH MAINSystem address: Not ReportedSystem address:
SPANISH FORKSystem name: 00012000Retail population:
Not ReportedDate system deactivated: 7707Date system activated:
ActiveActivity status: UT4900414PWS ID:
12000Population:
GASEOUS CHLORINATION, POSTProcess:
DISINFECTIONTreatment Objective: Ground waterSource:
UTAHCounty: Not ReportedPWS zip:
Not ReportedPWS state: Not ReportedPWS city:
Not ReportedPWS address: Not ReportedPWS name:
Not ReportedPWS type: UT4900414PWS ID:
12000Population: Ground waterSource code:
SPANISH FORKOwner: 84660Zip:
UTState: SPANISH FORKCity:
Not ReportedCare of: 40 S MAINAddress:
SPANISH FORKPWS name: UT4900414PWS ID:
AB113
West
1/2 - 1 Mile
Lower
UT4900414FRDS PWS
Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC7025843.2s Page A-47
Underground Water WellSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
Sterling R. And Wayne H. SwensonOwner:0Well ID:
.022Cubic ft/sec:Domestic,Irrigation,Uses:
1900Priority Date:Underground Water ClaimStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-2809Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
115
SW
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000149419UT WELLS
Underground Water Well & DrainSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
Jerry Bart PurkeyOwner:0Well ID:
.015Cubic ft/sec:Domestic,Irrigation,Stockwatering,Uses:
19911004Priority Date:Appeal to Appropriate CertificatedStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
DrainType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-6290Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
Z114
ENE
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000152374UT WELLS
Not ReportedAnalysis result:
Not ReportedAnalysis method: 000Number of samples taken:
Not ReportedNumber of required samples: Not ReportedMaximum contaminant level:
YesMajor violator: 081594Violation awareness date:
012Violation period (months): 123193Violation end date:
010193Violation start date: Monitoring, RegularViolation type:
NITRITEContaminant: Not ReportedPWS telephone:
Not ReportedViolation source ID: 9440001Violation ID:
YesPWS currently has or had major violation(s) or enforcement:
Not ReportedAnalysis result:
Not ReportedAnalysis method: 000Number of samples taken:
Not ReportedNumber of required samples: Not ReportedMaximum contaminant level:
YesMajor violator: 081594Violation awareness date:
012Violation period (months): 123193Violation end date:
010193Violation start date: Monitoring, RegularViolation type:
NITRATEContaminant: Not ReportedPWS telephone:
Not ReportedViolation source ID: 9440002Violation ID:
YesPWS currently has or had major violation(s) or enforcement:
49.0000Longitude seconds:
38Longitude minutes: 111Longitude degrees:
23.0000Latitude seconds: 7Latitude minutes:
40Latitude degrees: UTState:
12.0000Longitude seconds:
39Longitude minutes: 111Longitude degrees:
53.0000Latitude seconds: 6Latitude minutes:
40Latitude degrees: UTState:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC7025843.2s Page A-48
-23.8Feet below surface: 1964-05-18Level reading date:
Not ReportedNote: Not ReportedFeet to sea level:
-17.0Feet below surface: 1964-07-22Level reading date:
Not ReportedNote: Not ReportedFeet to sea level:
-18.5Feet below surface: 1964-10-06Level reading date:
Not ReportedNote: Not ReportedFeet to sea level:
-25.5Feet below surface: 1965-03-04Level reading date:
Not ReportedNote:
Not ReportedFeet to sea level: -23.9Feet below surface:
1965-06-22Level reading date: 7Ground water levels,Number of Measurements:
ftWell Hole Depth Units: 368Well Hole Depth:
ftWell Depth Units: 350Well Depth:
19630523Construction Date: Confined single aquiferAquifer Type:
Valley FillFormation Type: Not ReportedAquifer:
Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area Unts: Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area:
Not ReportedDrainage Area Units: Not ReportedDrainage Area:
16020202HUC: FLOWING WELLDescription:
WellType: (D- 8- 3)18bdc- 1Monitor Location:
USGS Utah Water Science CenterOrganization Name: USGS-UTOrganization ID:
AB118
WSW
1/2 - 1 Mile
Lower
USGS40001185300FED USGS
Underground Water WellSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
Bernell J. HansenOwner:0Well ID:
.015Cubic ft/sec:Stockwatering,Uses:
19650126Priority Date:Appeal to Appropriate RejectedStatus:
Terminated; right most likely consolidatedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-1696Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
AC117
WNW
1/2 - 1 Mile
Lower
UTDNR2000148045UT WELLS
Underground Water WellsSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
Bernell HansenOwner:428222Well ID:
.015Cubic ft/sec:Domestic,Stockwatering,Uses:
19560709Priority Date:Appeal to Appropriate CertificatedStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-1368Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
AC116
WNW
1/2 - 1 Mile
Lower
UTDNR2000147707UT WELLS
Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC7025843.2s Page A-49
Underground Water Wells (6)Supply Source:
CHWater Right Type:South Jordan Canal CompanyOwner:
0Well ID:0Cubic ft/sec:
Municipal,Uses:19990929Priority Date:
Appeal to Appropriate ApprovedStatus:ApprovedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:a23773Exchange #:
51-7331Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
AB121
West
1/2 - 1 Mile
Lower
UTDNR2000263842UT WELLS
Seepage and drain ditchesSupply Source:WRWater Right Type:
Corporation Of The President Of The Aaronic OrderOwner:
0Well ID:
2Cubic ft/sec:Irrigation,Stockwatering,Uses:
188103Priority Date:Diligence ClaimStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
SurfaceType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-1728Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
120
NE
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
UTDNR2000148087UT WELLS
Not ReportedNote:
Not ReportedFeet to sea level: -9.80Feet below surface:
1964-05-18Level reading date: 1Ground water levels,Number of Measurements:
Not ReportedWell Hole Depth Units: Not ReportedWell Hole Depth:
ftWell Depth Units: 158Well Depth:
19560101Construction Date: Not ReportedAquifer Type:
Not ReportedFormation Type: Not ReportedAquifer:
Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area Unts: Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area:
Not ReportedDrainage Area Units: Not ReportedDrainage Area:
16020202HUC: Not ReportedDescription:
WellType: (D- 8- 3) 7cdd- 2Monitor Location:
USGS Utah Water Science CenterOrganization Name: USGS-UTOrganization ID:
AC119
WNW
1/2 - 1 Mile
Lower
USGS40001185369FED USGS
Not ReportedNote: Not ReportedFeet to sea level:
-25Feet below surface: 1963-06-12Level reading date:
Not ReportedNote: Not ReportedFeet to sea level:
-24.20Feet below surface: 1964-04-01Level reading date:
Not ReportedNote: Not ReportedFeet to sea level:
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC7025843.2s Page A-50
Uderground Water Wells (6, extising)Supply Source:
CHWater Right Type:Spanish Fork CityOwner:
0Well ID:0Cubic ft/sec:
Municipal,Uses:20000531Priority Date:
Appeal to Appropriate ApprovedStatus:ApprovedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:a24583Exchange #:
51-7517Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
AB125
West
1/2 - 1 Mile
Lower
UTDNR2000268070UT WELLS
Underground Water Wells (6) ExistingSupply Source:CHWater Right Type:
Lynn H. ChildOwner:0Well ID:
0Cubic ft/sec:Municipal,Uses:
20030717Priority Date:Appeal to Appropriate RejectedStatus:
Terminated; right most likely consolidatedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:a28092Exchange #:
51-1160Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
AB124
West
1/2 - 1 Mile
Lower
UTDNR2000272210UT WELLS
Underground Water Wells (6)Supply Source:
CHWater Right Type:Spanish Fork CityOwner:
0Well ID:0Cubic ft/sec:
Municipal,Uses:20000407Priority Date:
Appeal to Appropriate ApprovedStatus:ApprovedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:a24339Exchange #:
51-7412Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
AB123
West
1/2 - 1 Mile
Lower
UTDNR2000264701UT WELLS
Underground Water Wells (6)Supply Source:WRWater Right Type:
Spanish Fork CityOwner:0Well ID:
0Cubic ft/sec:Municipal,Uses:
1877Priority Date:Share Statement CertificatedStatus:
Perfected; proof filed, right certifiedApplication Status:
UndergroundType of Diversion:Not ReportedExchange #:
51-7461Water Right #:Water Rights DatabaseDatabase:
AB122
West
1/2 - 1 Mile
Lower
UTDNR2000153809UT WELLS
Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC7025843.2s Page A-51
Not Reported
: Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi/L.
: Zone 2 indoor average level >= 2 pCi/L and <= 4 pCi/L.
Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCi/L.
Federal EPA Radon Zone for UTAH County: 2
Short Term1185.753.084663
Long Term53.25.584663
__________________________________
Test TermNum TestsAverageMaximumZipcode
Radon Test Results
State Database: UT Radon
AREA RADON INFORMATION
GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
RADON
®
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model (DEM)
Source: United States Geologic Survey
EDR acquired the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006. The 7.5 minute DEM corresponds
to the USGS 1:24,000- and 1:25,000-scale topographic quadrangle maps. The DEM provides elevation data
with consistent elevation units and projection.
Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
Source: U.S. Geological Survey
HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION
Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and
500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood
Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL.
Source: FEMA
Telephone: [phone]
Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015
NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR
in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory
Source: Utah Geological Survey
Telephone: [phone]
HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION
AQUIFLOW Information SystemR
Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information
EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater
flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has
extracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table
information.
GEOLOGIC INFORMATION
Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit
Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - A digital
representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994).
STATSGO: State Soil Geographic Database
Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)
The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) leads the national
Conservation Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil
survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation
of soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO)
soil survey maps.
SSURGO: Soil Survey Geographic Database
Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)
Telephone: [phone]
SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Service, mapping
scales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360. Field mapping methods using national standards are used to
construct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database. SSURGO digitizing duplicates the
original soil survey maps. This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners, townships and county
natural resource planning and management.
TC7025843.2s Page PSGR-1
PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS
FEDERAL WATER WELLS
PWS: Public Water Systems
Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water
Telephone: [phone]
Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at
least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells, rivers and other sources.
PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data
Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water
Telephone: [phone]
Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) after
August 1995. Prior to August 1995, the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS).
USGS Water Wells: USGS National Water Inventory System (NWIS)
This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surface
water and/or groundwater. The groundwater data includes information on wells, springs, and other sources of groundwater.
STATE RECORDS
Water Rights Database
Source: Department of Natural Resources, Division of Water Rights
Telephone: [phone]
Division of Drinking Water Well Data
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION
Utah Oil, Gas and Mining Database
Source: Department of Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
The Well Data file contains one record of basic information for each well in the Utah Division of Oil, Gas and
Mining database.
RADON
State Database: UT Radon
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Test Results by Zip Code
Area Radon Information
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(USEPA) and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey.
The study covers the years 1986 - 1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at
private sources such as universities and research institutions.
EPA Radon Zones
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Sections 307 & 309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S. with the potential for elevated indoor
radon levels.
TC7025843.2s Page PSGR-2
PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
OTHER
Airport Landing Facilities: Private and public use landing facilities
Source: Federal Aviation Administration, 800-457-6656
Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater
Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Earthquake Fault Lines: The fault lines displayed on EDR’s Topographic map are digitized quaternary faultlines, prepared
in 1975 by the United State Geological Survey
STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION
© 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection
and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject
to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.
TC7025843.2s Page PSGR-3
PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
APPENDIX E
CREDENTIALS

Christina (Tina) Cheney
ESA Group Manager

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
Christina (Tina) joined Neil O. Anderson and Associates, a Terracon
Company, in 2004. In 2014 she began working for Terracon's Salt Lake City
office. Working under the guidance of Terracon's professional engineering
staff, which includes geotechnical engineers, geologists, and geoscientists,
she quickly gained extensive experience in environmental site investigations
and remediations.

Her specific expertise includes environmental site assessments; surface and
groundwater contamination assessments, prevention, monitoring, and
control; risk assessments and risk reduction recommendations; and other
areas of expertise relating to hazardous substances and/or hazardous waste
management.

Tina has 17 years of experience performing Phase I Environmental Site
Assessments (ESAs). She has conducted over 1,000 studies, including auto
shops/gasoline stations, residential properties, dairies, restaurants,
industrial properties, medical facilities, retail properties, and agricultural
properties. These studies have been conducted in Utah, Idaho, Wyoming,
Nevada, Washington, California, Colorado, New Mexico, Kansas, Indiana,
and Florida and have followed ASTM Standard E1527-13 and EPA's All
Appropriate Inquiry Standard. Phase I ESA report completion is often needed
to complete the sale of commercial property. For fewer suspect properties,
she has performed and managed the Transaction Screen Process, ASTM
Standard E1528-14, and Regulatory Database Reviews, understanding the
limits of those studies' recommendations were sometimes needed to
transition to a Phase I ESA when Potential Environmental Conditions should
be more thoroughly researched, evaluated and discussed.

PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Salt Lake City Corporation – Salt Lake City, Utah
Tina has managed Phase I ESAs for Salt Lake City Corporation since her
time in Salt Lake City. She has served as a Project Manager on the project
and as Group Manager. She reviewed historical and county records from
federal, state, and local agency databases, conducted interviews, conducted
site inspections, and authored reports.

Salt Lake County – Salt Lake City, Utah
Tina has managed Phase I ESAs for Salt Lake County, including Brownfield
Projects. She has served as a Project Manager and Group Manager on these
projects. She reviewed historical and county records from federal, state, and
local agency databases, conducted interviews, conducted site inspections,
identified recognized environmental conditions, and authored reports.

EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science, Brigham
Young University, Recreation
Management & Leisure
Services, 2002

Associate of Science, Ricks
College, Electronics Engineering
Technology, 1999

Associates of Science, Ricks
College, Computer Systems
Technology, 1999

REGISTRATIONS/
CERTIFICATIONS
Former Registered
Environmental Assessor
#30103 (2008-2012)

AHERA: Building Inspector

Christina (Tina) Cheney (continued)

Large, Confidential International Nonprofit Corporation - Throughout the United States
Tina has managed Phase I ESAs in Utah, Idaho, Wyoming, Florida, and Indiana for this large, confidential
nonprofit international corporation. She reviewed historical and county records from federal, state, and local
agency databases, conducted site inspections and authored the reports.

Confidential – National (2019)
Tina managed a multi-site portfolio project for a local law firm with sites in thirteen states. The project started
with Phase I ESAs, and follow-up Phase II sampling for soil vapor, asbestos, and mold sampling.

University of Utah – Several locations in Utah
Tina served as Project Manager and Group Manager for several Phase I ESAs for the University of Utah. She
has reviewed historical and county records from federal, state, and local agency databases, conducted
interviews and co-authored the reports.

Murray City RDA - Murray, Utah
Tina served as Project Manager and Group Manager for several Phase I ESAs for the City of Murray. She has
reviewed historical and county records from federal, state, and local agency databases, conducted interviews
and authored the reports.

Windermere Real Estate – Several locations in Utah
Tina served as Project Manager and Group Manager for several Phase I ESAs for Windermere Real Estate.
Recognized environmental conditions were identified at some of these locations, and a Phase II ESA was
recommended. She has reviewed historical and county records from federal, state, and local agency
databases, conducted interviews and co-authored the reports.

Wadsworth Development Group – Several locations in Utah
Tina served as Project Manager and Group Manager for several Phase I ESAs for Wadsworth Development
Group. She has reviewed historical and county records from federal, state, and local agency databases,
conducted interviews and authored the reports.

Sears Phase I ESAs - California, and Utah
Reviewed historical and county records, federal, state, and local agency databases, conducted interviews and
co-authored the reports. Recognized environmental conditions were identified and, a Phase II ESA was
recommended on several sites. Tina served as Project Manager for several concurrent Phase I ESAs for several
Sears' stores in California and Utah.

Ensign Group, Senior Care Facilities - Various Locations in Utah
Tina served as Project Manager for several concurrent Phase I ESAs for senior-care facilities in Utah. She
reviewed historical and county records from federal, state, and local agency databases, conducted interviews
and authored the reports.

Confidential Project – Downtown Salt Lake City, Utah
Tina served as Project Manager for this project. She reviewed historical and county records from federal,
state, and local agency databases, conducted interviews and authored the report. She identified a former gas
station at the site. Recognized environmental conditions were identified, and a Phase II ESA was
recommended.

Christina (Tina) Cheney (continued)

Parkway Commons - Murray, Utah
Tina served as Project Manager for the Phase I ESAs and limited sampling. Sampling included radon, lead in
water, and asbestos. She reviewed historical and county records from federal, state, and local agency
databases, conducted interviews and authored the report.

Wells Fargo Bank - Various Locations in Utah
Tina served as Project Manager for several Phase I ESAs throughout Utah for Wells Fargo Bank. She reviewed
historical and county records and federal, state, and local agency databases, conducted interviews, and
authored the reports. Visual and limited sampling for asbestos was included in some of the reports.

Cobalt Phase I ESAs - Salt Lake City, Utah
Reviewed historical and county records from federal, state, and local agency databases, conducted interviews,
and co-authored the report. Recognized environmental conditions were identified, and, a Phase II ESA was
recommended on several sites. Tina served as an assistant for several concurrent Phase I ESAs for several
industrial properties in the Salt Lake Valley.

Madera High School - Madera, California
Provided environmental assessment for the construction of a new high school in Madera. Neil O. Anderson &
Associates acted as the premier agent in performing the Initial Study, Preliminary Environmental Assessment
(PEA) Removal Action (RA) Reports for the site. Tina reviewed the Initial Study and worked with the Project
Manager on the write-up of the PEA Workplan, PEA, RA Workplan, and RA report.

Chinchiolo Stemilt Groundwater Monitoring - Stockton, California
Tina served as a staff scientist on this project, which involved quarterly and annual monitoring of the Central
Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board. Responsibilities included creating groundwater contour maps
from groundwater data collected from on-site monitoring wells, calculating the flow direction and hydraulic
gradient of groundwater at the subject property, analyzing and interpreting analytical data, and compiling the
quarterly and annual reports.

Kate Ballard
Project Manager

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
Kate Ballard joined Terracon Consultants, Inc. in March 2022. Working under
the guidance of Terracon’s environmental staff, which includes geotechnical
engineers, geologists, geoscientists, and environmental scientists, she has
extensive experience in environmental site investigations.

Kate has eight years of experience performing Phase I Environmental Site
Assessments (ESAs). She has worked on over 100 Phase I Environmental Site
Assessments (ESAs), including residential properties, restaurants,
agricultural properties, retail and industrial properties, gas stations, and
auto shops in California, Utah, Idaho, and Wyoming. Her specific expertise
includes environmental site assessments, preliminary wetland assessments,
Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 404 Nationwide Permits, surface and
groundwater contamination monitoring, and limited asbestos surveys.

PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Large, Confidential International Corporation – Utah, California, and
Idaho
Kate assisted on several Phase I ESAs throughout the intermountain west for
this large, confidential international corporation. She reviewed historical and
county records and federal, state, and local agency databases conducted site
investigations and interviews, and authored the reports.

Large, Confidential International Corporation – Utah, Idaho
Kate assisted on several Phase I ESAs throughout Utah and Idaho for this
large, confidential international corporation. She reviewed historical and
county records and federal, state, and local agency databases conducted site investigations and interviews,
and authored the reports. During an ESA conducted in Idaho, two former Underground Storage Tanks
(USTs), two USTs, and two Aboveground Storage Tanks (ASTs) were identified. Regulatory records indicated
the former USTs had been closed properly and it was recommended that no further investigation was
necessary for the former USTs. Additionally, it was recommended that the USTs and ASTs still present on site
be removed and sampling conducted prior to purchase of the property. Lead paint sampling was also included
in the Scope of Work.

Wasatch Pacific-Holladay Gun Club – Salt Lake County, Utah
Kate assisted on a Phase I ESA for Wasatch Pacific. She reviewed historical and county records and federal,
state, and local agency databases, conducted the site investigation and interviews, and authored the report.
Previous environmental investigations on the subject property found elevated lead concentrations in surface
soil from spent bullets. The former property owner entered into a Consent Agreement with the Utah Division
of Solid and Hazardous Waste (DSHW) to provide for site cleanup. She reviewed documents regarding the
cleanup and conducted additional interviews with personnel at DSHW. Her cleanup review indicated that the
subject property had been remediated to meet the risk-based soil cleanup level outlined in the Consent
Agreement, and no further action was recommended.
EDUCATION
Bachelor of Arts, Environmental
and Sustainability Studies,
University of Utah, Salt Lake
City, UT

WORK HISTORY
Terracon Consultants, Inc.,
Project Manager, 2022-Present
Frontier Corporation USA,
Environmental Scientist, 2019-
2022
IHI Environmental, Inc.
(acquired by Terracon in 2012),
Environmental Assessor, 2000-
2008, 2013
Kate Ballard (continued)

McNeil Development – Perry, Utah
Kate assisted on the Phase I ESA. She reviewed historical and county records and federal, state, and local
agency databases conducted the site investigation and interviews, and authored the report. She identified that
a portion of the subject property had been designated as a conservation easement for the U.S. Migratory Bird
Refuge. Given the intended use of the site, no further action was recommended. However, the client was
made aware that a Section 404 Nationwide Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers would be required
before disturbing any easement portion.

Tire Facility– North Salt Lake, Utah
Kate assisted on the Phase I ESA for the tire and automotive facility. She reviewed historical and county
records and federal, state, and local agency databases conducted the site investigation and interviews, and
authored the report. She identified an adjoining CERCLIS-listed site. A review of regulatory records identified
elevated levels of metals, semi-volatile, and volatile organic compounds in soils, sediments, and groundwater
underlying the site. Regulatory investigations were ongoing for the adjoining site. Based on the groundwater
flow direction identified for the area and the previous investigations conducted, potential impacts were
expected and further investigation was recommended.

Buffalo Ranch– Farmington, Utah
Kate assisted on the Phase I ESA. She reviewed historical and county records and federal, state, and local
agency databases conducted the site investigation and interviews, and authored the report. She identified
three recognized environmental conditions (RECs), including 2 ASTs without an SPCC plan, chemical storage,
and surface staining. Recommendations were made for the client to have the ASTs and chemical storage
removed before the real estate transaction. Additionally, further investigation was recommended for the
extensive surface staining.

Mt. Olivet Cemetery, Salt Lake City, Utah
Kate assisted on the Phase I ESA. She reviewed historical and county records and federal, state, and local
agency databases conducted the site investigation and interviews, and authored the report. She identified a
CERCLIS-listed site within the vicinity of the subject property, a historic CERCLIS/NFRAP-listed site on the
subject property, and elevated radon levels for the area. Upon further investigation, the potential impacts
from the REC and other environmental considerations were expected to be low.

Kelly Shaw, GIT
Geologist

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
Kelly Shaw joined Terracon Consultants, Inc. in March 2021. Working under
the guidance of Terracon’s environmental staff, which includes geotechnical
engineers, geologists, geoscientists, and environmental scientists, she has
experience in environmental site assessments, soil, and groundwater
sampling.

Her specific background includes geotechnical fieldwork and reporting,
construction observation, environmental fieldwork, and reporting. She has
worked on over 100 Phase I Environmental Site Assessments (ESAs),
including residential properties, restaurants, agricultural properties, retail
and industrial properties, railroad right-of-ways, and gas stations and auto
shops in California, Utah, Idaho, and Wyoming.

PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Large, Confidential International Corporation – Utah and Idaho
Kelly served as Project Manager on several Phase I ESAs throughout Utah
for this large, confidential international corporation. She reviewed historical
and county records, federal, state, and local agency databases, conducted
site investigations and interviews, and authored the reports.

Parc View Apartments – West Jordan, Utah
Kelly served as Project Manager on this Phase I ESA in West Jordan. She
reviewed historical and county records, federal, state, and local agency
databases, conducted the site investigation and interviews, and co-authored
the report.

Large, Confidential International Nonprofit Corporation –
Throughout the United States
Ms. Shaw served as Project Manager on several Phase I ESAs in Utah and
Idaho for this large, confidential, nonprofit international corporation. She
reviewed historical and county records, federal, state, and local agency
databases, conducted site investigations and interviews, and authored the
reports.

Dewar Plaza – Rock Springs, Wyoming
Kelly served as Project Manager on Phase I ESA in Rock City. She reviewed
historical and county records, federal, state, and local agency databases,
conducted the site investigation and interviews, and co-authored the report.

University of Utah – Several locations in Utah
Kelly served as Assistant Project Manager and Project Manager for several
Phase I ESAs for the University of Utah. She reviewed historical and county
records, federal, state, and local agency databases, conducted site
investigations and interviews, and authored the reports.

Providence Hall – Herriman, Utah

EDUCATION
B.S., Geology, California State
University - Fullerton, 2015

REGISTRATIONS/
CERTIFICATIONS
OSHA 40-hour HAZWOPER

Utah Groundwater and Soil
Sampling

Utah Asbestos Certification
#ASB-7607

Salt Lake County Pre-
Demolition Building Inspector
Utah PBI 172

Kelly Shaw, GIT (continued)

Kelly assisted on two Phase I ESAs for Providence Hall. She reviewed historical and county records, federal,
state, and local agency databases, conducted site investigations, and authored the reports.

CalTrans – Various locations in Southern California
Kelly reviewed historical and county records, federal, state, and local agency databases, conducted site
investigations, performed subsurface investigations, and assisted in report preparation.

Los Angeles World Airports (LAWA), LAX – Los Angeles, California
Kelly worked on several projects at LAX proper and several properties held by LAWA. She reviewed historical
and county records, federal, state, and local agency databases, conducted site inspections, p erformed
subsurface investigations and construction observations, and assisted in report preparation.

Los Angeles County Metro and Orange County Metro – Various locations throughout Los Angeles
and Orange Counties
Kelly worked on several Los Angeles and Orange Counties for Metro projects. She reviewed historical and
county records, federal, state, and local agency databases, conducted site inspections, performed subsurface
investigations, and assisted in report preparation.

APPENDIX F
DESCRIPTION OF TERMS AND ACRONYMS
Description of Selected General Terms and Acronyms
Term/Acronym Description
ACM
Asbestos Containing Material. Asbestos is a naturally occurring mineral, three varieties of which (chrysotile, amosite, crocidolite) have been
commonly used as fireproofing or binding agents in construction materials. Exposure to asbestos, as well as ACM, has been documented to
cause lung diseases including asbestosis (scarring of the lung), lung cancer and mesothelioma (a cancer of the lung lining).
Regulatory agencies have generally defined ACM as a material containing greater that one (1) percent asbestos, however some states (e.g.
California) define ACM as materials having 0.1% asbestos. In order to define a homogenous material as non-ACM, a minimum number of
samples must be collected from the material dependent upon its type and quantity. Homogenous materials defined as non-ACM must either
have 1) no asbestos identified in all of its samples or 2) an identified asbestos concentration below the appropriate regulatory threshold.
Asbestos concentrations are generally determined using polarized light microscopy or transmission electron microscopy. Point counting is an
analytical method to statistically quantify the percentage of asbestos in a sample. The asbestos component of ACM may either be friable or
non-friable. Friable materials, when dry, can be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure and have a higher potential for
a fiber release than non-friable ACM. Non-friable ACM are materials that are firmly bound in a matrix by plastic, cement, etc. and, if handled
carefully, will not become friable.
Federal and state regulations require that either all suspect building materials be presumed ACM or that an asbestos survey be performed
prior to renovation, dismantling, demolition, or other activities that may disturb potential ACM. Notifications are required prior to demolition
and/or renovation activities that may impact the condition of ACM in a building. ACM removal may be required if the ACM is likely to be
disturbed or damaged during the demolition or renovation. Abatement of friable or potentially friable ACM must be performed by a licensed
abatement contractor in accordance with state rules and NESHAP. Additionally, OSHA regulations for work classification, worker training and
worker protection will apply.
AHERA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act
AST
Aboveground Storage Tanks. ASTs are generally described as storage tanks less than 10% of which are below ground (i.e., buried). Tanks
located in a basement, but not buried, are also considered ASTs. Whether, and the extent to which, an AST is regulated, is determined on a
case-by-case basis and depends upon tank size, its contents and the jurisdiction of its location.
BGS Below Ground Surface
Brownfields State and/or tribal listing of Brownfield properties addressed by Cooperative Agreement Recipients or Targeted Brownfields Assessments.
BTEX Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, and Xylenes. BTEX are VOC components found in gasoline and commonly used as analytical indicators of
a petroleum hydrocarbon release.
CERCLA
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (a.k.a. Superfund). CERCLA is the federal act that regulates
abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous waste sites. Under this Act, joint and several liability may be imposed on potentially responsible parties
for cleanup-related costs.
CERCLIS
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System. An EPA compilation of sites having suspected or
actual releases of hazardous substances to the environment. CERCLIS also contains information on site inspections, preliminary assessments
and remediation of hazardous waste sites. These sites are typically reported to EPA by states and municipalities or by third parties pursuant
to CERCLA Section 103.
CESQG Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
Description of Selected General Terms and Acronyms
Term/Acronym Description
CREC
Controlled Recognized Environmental Condition is defined in ASTM E1527-13 as “a recognized environmental condition resulting from a past
release of hazardous substances or petroleum products that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority (for
example, as evidenced by the issuance of a no further action letter or equivalent, or meeting risk-based criteria established by regulatory
authority) , with hazardous substances or petroleum products allowed to remain in place subject to the implementation of required controls (for
example, property use restrictions, activity and use limitations, institutional controls, or engineering controls). A condition considered by the
environmental professional to be a controlled recognized environmental condition shall be listed in the findings section of the Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment report, and as a recognized environmental condition in the conclusions section of the Phase I Environmental
Site Assessment report.”
DOT U.S. Department of Transportation
EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
ERNS
Emergency Response Notification System. An EPA-maintained federal database which stores information on notifications of oil discharges
and hazardous substance releases in quantities greater than the applicable reportable quantity under CERCLA. ERNS is a cooperative data-
sharing effort between EPA, DOT, and the National Response Center.
ESA Environmental Site Assessment
FRP Fiberglass Reinforced Plastic
Hazardous
Substance
As defined under CERCLA, this is (A) any substance designated pursuant to section 1321(b)(2)(A) of Title 33, (B) any element, compound,
mixture, solution, or substance designated pursuant to section 9602 of this title; (C) any hazardous waste having characteristics identified
under or listed pursuant to section 3001 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act (with some exclusions); (D) any toxic pollutant listed under section
1317(a) of Title 33; (E) any hazardous air pollutant listed under section 112 of the Clean Air Act; and (F) any imminently hazardous chemical
substance or mixture with respect to which the EPA Administrator has taken action under section 2606 of Title 15. This term does not include
petroleum, including crude oil or any fraction thereof which is not otherwise listed as a hazardous substance under subparagraphs (A) through
(F) above, and the term include natural gas, or synthetic gas usable for fuel (or mixtures of natural gas and such synthetic gas).
Hazardous
Waste
This is defined as having characteristics identified or listed under section 3001 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act (with some exceptions). RCRA,
as amended by the Solid Waste Disposal Act of 1980, defines this term as a “solid waste, or combination of solid wastes, which because of
its quantity, concentration, or physical, chemical, or infectious characteristics may (A) cause, or significantly contribute to an increase in
mortality or an increase in serious irreversible, or incapacitating reversible illness; or (B) pose a substantial present or potential hazard to
human health or the environment when improperly treated, stored, transported, or disposed of, or otherwise managed.”
HREC
Historical Recognized Environmental Condition is defined in ASTM E1527-13 as “a past release of any hazardous substances or petroleum
products that has occurred in connection with the property and has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority
or meeting unrestricted residential use criteria established by a regulatory authority, without subjecting the property to any required controls
(for example, property use restrictions, activity and use limitations, institutional controls, or engineering controls). Before calling the past release
a historical recognized environmental condition, the environmental professional must determine whether the past release is a recognized
environmental condition at the time of the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment is conducted (for example, if there has been a change in
the regulatory criteria). If the EP considers the past release to be a recognized environmental condition at the time the Phase I ESA is
conducted, the condition shall be included in the conclusions section of the report as a recognized environmental condition.”
Description of Selected General Terms and Acronyms
Term/Acronym Description
IC/EC
A listing of sites with institutional and/or engineering controls in place. IC include administrative measures, such as groundwater use
restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, and post remediation care requirements intended to prevent exposure to
contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally required as part of the institutional controls. EC include various forms of caps,
building foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental media or
effect human health.
ILP Innocent Landowner/Operator Program
LQG Large Quantity Generators
LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tank. This is a federal term set forth under RCRA for leaking USTs. Some states also utilize this term.
MCL Maximum Contaminant Level. This Safe Drinking Water concept (and also used by many states as a ground water cleanup criteria) refers to
the limit on drinking water contamination that determines whether a supplier can deliver water from a specific source without treatment.
MSDS Material Safety Data Sheets. Written/printed forms prepared by chemical manufacturers, importers and employers which identify the physical
and chemical traits of hazardous chemicals under OSHA’s Hazard Communication Standard.
NESHAP National Emissions Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (Federal Clean Air Act). This part of the Clean Air Act regulates emissions of
hazardous air pollutants.
NFRAP Facilities where there is “No Further Remedial Action Planned,” as more particularly described under the Records Review section of this report.
NOV Notice of Violation. A notice of violation or similar citation issued to an entity, company or individual by a state or federal regulatory body
indicating a violation of applicable rule or regulations has been identified.
NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (Clean Water Act). The federal permit system for discharges of polluted water.
NPL The NPL is the EPA’s database of uncontrolled or abandoned hazardous waste facilities that have been listed for priority remedial actions
under the Superfund Program.
OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration or Occupational Safety and Health Act
PACM Presumed Asbestos-Containing Material. A material that is suspected of containing or presumed to contain asbestos, but which has not been
analyzed to confirm the presence or absence of asbestos.
PCB
Polychlorinated Biphenyl. A halogenated organic compound commonly in the form of a viscous liquid or resin, a flowing yellow oil, or a waxy
solid. This compound was historically used as dielectric fluid in electrical equipment (such as electrical transformers and capacitors, electrical
ballasts, hydraulic and heat transfer fluids), and for numerous heat and fire sensitive applications. PCB was preferred due to its durability,
stability (even at high temperatures), good chemical resistance, low volatility, flammability, and conductivity. PCBs, however, do not break
down in the environment and are classified by the EPA as a suspected carcinogen. 1978 regulations, under the Toxic Substances Control Act,
prohibit manufacturing of PCB-containing equipment; however, some of this equipment may still be in use today.
pCi/L picoCuries per Liter of Air. Unit of measurement for Radon and similar radioactive materials.
PLM Polarized Light Microscopy (see ACM section of the report, if included in the scope of services)
PST Petroleum Storage Tank. An AST or UST that contains a petroleum product.
Description of Selected General Terms and Acronyms
Term/Acronym Description
Radon
A radioactive gas resulting from radioactive decay of naturally-occurring radioactive materials in rocks and soils containing uranium, granite,
shale, phosphate, and pitchblende. Radon concentrations are measured in picoCuries per Liter of Air. Exposure to elevated levels of radon
creates a risk of lung cancer; this risk generally increases as the level of radon and the duration of exposure increases. Outdoors, radon is
diluted to such low concentrations that it usually does not present a health concern. However, radon can accumulate in building basements or
similar enclosed spaces to levels that can pose a risk to human health. Indoor radon concentrations depend primarily upon the building's
construction, design and the concentration of radon in the underlying soil and ground water. The EPA recommended annual average indoor
“action level” concentration for residential structures is 4.0 pCi/l.
RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. Federal act regulating solid and hazardous wastes from point of generation to time of disposal
(‘cradle to grave”). 42 U.S.C. 6901 et seq.
RCRA
Generators
The RCRA Generators database, maintained by the EPA, lists facilities that generate hazardous waste as part of their normal business
practices. Generators are listed as either large (LQG), small (SQG), or conditionally exempt (CESQG). LQG produce at least 1000 kg/month
of non-acutely hazardous waste or 1 kg/month of acutely hazardous waste. SQG produce 100-1000 kg/month of non-acutely hazardous waste.
CESQG are those that generate less than 100 kg/month of non-acutely hazardous waste.
RCRA
CORRACTS/TS
Ds
The USEPA maintains a database of RCRA facilities associated with treatment, storage, and disposal (TSD) of hazardous materials which are
undergoing “corrective action”. A “corrective action” order is issued when there is a release of hazardous waste or constituents into the
environment from a RCRA facility.
RCRA Non-
CORRACTS/TS
Ds
The RCRA Non-CORRACTS/TSD Database is a compilation by the USEPA of facilities which report storage, transportation, treatment, or
disposal of hazardous waste. Unlike the RCRA CORRACTS/TSD database, the RCRA Non-CORRACTS/TSD database does not include
RCRA facilities where corrective action is required.
RCRA
Violators List
RAATS. RCRA Administrative Actions Taken. RAATS information is now contained in the RCRIS database and includes records of
administrative enforcement actions against facilities for noncompliance.
RCRIS Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System, as defined in the Records Review section of this report.
REC
Recognized Environmental Conditions are defined by ASTM E1527-13 as “the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or
petroleum products in, on, or at a property: 1) due to any release to the environment; 2) under conditions indicative of a release to the
environment. De minimis conditions are not recognized environmental conditions.”
SCL State “CERCLIS” List (see SPL /State Priority List, below).
SPCC
Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasures. SPCC plans are required under federal law (Clean Water Act and Oil Pollution Act) for any
facility storing petroleum in tanks and/or containers of 55-gallons or more that when taken in aggregate exceed 1,320 gallons. SPCC plans
are also required for facilities with underground petroleum storage tanks with capacities of over 42,000 gallons. Many states have similar spill
prevention programs, which may have additional requirements.
SPL State Priority List. State list of confirmed sites having contamination in which the state is actively involved in cleanup activities or is actively
pursuing potentially responsible parties for clean up. Sometimes referred to as a State “CERCLIS” List.
SQG Small Quantity Generator
SWF/LF State and/or Tribal database of Solid Waste/Landfill facilities. The database information may include the facility name, class, operation type,
area, estimated operational life, and owner.
TPH Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
TRI Toxic Release Inventory. Routine EPA report on releases of toxic chemicals to the environment based upon information submitted by entities
subject to reporting under the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act.
Description of Selected General Terms and Acronyms
Term/Acronym Description
TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act. A federal law regulating manufacture, import, processing and distribution of chemical substances not specifically
regulated by other federal laws (such as asbestos, PCBs, lead-based paint and radon). 15 U.S.C 2601 et seq.
USACE United States Army Corps of Engineers
USC United States Code
USGS United States Geological Survey
USNRCS United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resource Conservation Service
UST
Underground Storage Tank. Most federal and state regulations, as well as ASTM E1527-13, define this as any tank, incl., underground piping
connected to the tank, that is or has been used to contain hazardous substances or petroleum products and the volume of which is 10% or
more beneath the surface of the ground (i.e., buried).
VCP State and/or Tribal facilities included as Voluntary Cleanup Program sites.
VOC Volatile Organic Compound
Wetlands
Areas that are typically saturated with surface or ground water that creates an environment supportive of wetland vegetation (i.e., swamps,
marshes, bogs). The Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (Technical Report Y-87-1) defines wetlands as areas inundated or
saturated by surface or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a
prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. For an area to be considered a jurisdictional wetland, it must
meet the following criteria: more than 50 percent of the dominant plant species must be categorized as Obligate, Facultative Wetland, or
Facultative on lists of plant species that occur in wetlands; the soil must be hydric; and, wetland hydrology must be present.
The federal Clean Water Act which regulates “waters of the US,” also regulates wetlands, a program jointly administered by the USACE and
the EPA. Waters of the U.S. are defined as: (1) waters used in interstate or foreign commerce, including all waters subject to the ebb and flow
of tides; (2) all interstate waters including interstate wetlands; (3) all other waters such as intrastate lakes, rivers, streams (including intermittent
streams), mudflats, sandflats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meadows, playa lakes, or natural ponds, etc., which the use,
degradation, or destruction could affect interstate/ foreign commerce; (4) all impoundments of waters otherwise defined as waters of the U. S.,
(5) tributaries of waters identified in 1 through 4 above; (6) the territorial seas; and (7) wetlands adjacent to waters identified in 1 through 6
above. Only the USACE has the authority to make a final wetlands jurisdictional determination.