DERR-1995-001661 - 0901a06880130b74

Michael O. Leavitt
Governor
Dianne R. Nielson, Ph.D.
Executive Director
Kent P. Gray
Director
State of Utah FILE COPY
/?»
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE AND REMEDIATION
168 North 1950 West
P.O. Box 144840
Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-4840
[phone] Voice
[phone] Fax
(801) 5364414 T.D.D.
ERRL-0813-95
June 27, 1995
Mr. Dave Lyon
Wasatch Electric
1574 South West Temple
Salt Lake City, Utah 84115
Re: Release Site EGGY, Wasatch ElecUic, 1574 South West Temple, Salt Lake City, Utah
Facility Identification No. 4001242
Dear Mr. Lyon:
The Utah Division of Environmental Response and Remediation (DERR) has reviewed the case
file for the facility identified above. Your state project manager, Victor Scherer, has recommended that
no further action be taken at this time, based upon review of the information contained in the file. The
DERR staff has not made an independent investigation of the site but has relied on the information
supplied by you or your consultant.
The information indicates that the petroleum contamination left in place at the facility no longer
poses a threat to human health or the environment at this time. In the future, if other evidence indicates
a spread of contamination from the Facility which may cause a threat to human health or the environment,
the DERR may require further action.
Sincerely,
A?«1 Kent P. Gray, Executive Secretary (UST)
Utah Solid and Hazardous Waste Control Board
KPGA^ES/jf
cc: Thomas L. Schlenker, M.D., M.P.H., Director, Salt Lake City/County Health Department
SCANNED
DERR.
Printed on recycled paper
mm.
CLOSE-OUT CHECKLIST AprU 17, 1995
(date revised)
This checklist is a guidehne for identifying and assessing exposure pathways and receptors of petroleum coniammation from LUST sites. This checklist is intended to
expedite the LUST case file close-out process by providing supporting documentation that remaining contamination is not expected to adversely impact those receptors.
RCLs, .MCLs. or Tier 1 Screening Levels (ASTM, 1994) have been exceeded and site-specific data have subsequently been collected (Tier 2 or 3 Evaluation). The
remaining contamination at this site does not appear to present current or fliture nsks lo human and environmental health, and site-specific cleanup levels have been set
using ASTM. 1994 or other methods.
The spaces provided in this checklist are checked if the condition for the particular exposure criterion applies to supponing and documenting low or no risk. Attach a
site map showing analytical results. This recommendation for case file close-out is in accordance with all sections of 40 CFR Subpans E and F, and Utah Administrative
Code R311-200. /^,,-,j/ , '^ ,
Project Manager (pnnt) c/ftCr j (?y t/^y<TJl Q.c(l^X-e- Date 6/^v/'/? Facility ID VOO / St V^t LUST IDj""
ity Name and Address |A)g.«;j>4-g/7 £l^C+riC I 57 ^ So. i^Jesi-'nivna/dy Facil
Closeout Peer Group Review aril
Executive Secretary (signature, date)
Tec-fr'/C
jfoncurrencfc (date)
|C^7^So. <0e^-r7B»y7/g f^^-C
f =^^= is .
1.0 ABATEMENT
A.
PRODUCT
RELEASED
7 Gasoline
c5 Diesel
Jet Fuel
i Waste oil
New Oil
Unknown
Other:
7 -iMKs re
^^(-<ii
PRODUCT INFORMATION
AMOUNT IF RELEASE
K.N0WN RATE
IF KNOWN
UtJK. f.^ii^
.t>A^/C
*>VW«J
[ptJK-
B. ENVIRONMENTAL
and OTHER IMPACTS
• /'
i-^Soil
Groundwater
Vapors
Free product
Surface water
Homes, businesses, utilities,
other structures.
Pipe permeation
Wells (municipal, domestic, irrigation,
stock, other)
C. SOURCE ABATEMENT
Leaks Source
Repaired Removed
Tank 5-9}
Piping
Dispenser
Free Product (amount)
Contaminated soil (amount)
Vapors
Successful Emergency Measures Taken:
Vapor evacuation
Utility line replacement or flushing
(sewer, water, other)
Alternative drinking water supplied
Residents/workers relocated
Other, explain:
2.0 SITE CHARACTERIZATION
A. ENVIRONMENTAL SENSrriVlTY
Specify ievel'df'envirpnmental sensitivity and point score {See TableJ,worksheet^., ^
attdch'eW ''^^'^...1:. ' '' '' "
Level 1 >65
Level II 40-65
Level III <40
Not applicable
Other method, describe below: CiSSU^frJQ^'i l^tJ I
Current Land Use:
Residential \ Commercial Industrial _Agricultural
B. EXPOSURE PATHWAYS AND RECEPTORS
..Buildings, utility lines, wells, and surface water have been evaluated and
'detennined to be not-at-risk exposure pathways or receptors. Risk-Based Cleanup
Levels (RBCLs) have been re-calculated and are expected to be protective of the
exposure pathways and receptors identified below:
B/T/E/X/N B/T/E/X/N
Nnrlikrly RBCLs Oh.servBd
Soil:
Indoor air inhalation
TiLeaching toGW* ' __^
Ingestion
Skin contact .: ."^.. - r, -; ,,, , -^ ••• , ^ .
Nnt Likely
^B/T/E/X/N, , ..,,
RBCLs ' ' '
,.. ^ B/T/E/X/NI
nhwrvp/j
r.miinHwatffr-
Indoor air inhalation
Ingestion
Skin contact
-I ..'^.;'"''--"" •'•• r- '•^-.>.).,v.': .>'v.M : -•• . ^ i.iv.' ,;) •;..., ..,,
A; V^t. .. ,.^.•'.'-•'>'^s.^ ?._^...;....
Sample Idcntlficaliiin
Type, Number, and
Location
iS-.-fe A|-^<ias-fc««s
SS* / - H
Si-fe Pi^ d'^sfiemser
SS^\
5j+eCj- 3as-ta«fe,
SS4 /l/P>=t^/
£S# 3 s.wef^d
under -Mtr/i aChroi/l
Si-h' ^ aai
:^5^^ A;o.e^
(Oor-r
RCL (soi); circle one)
Level 1
Level II
Level 111
RBCL
Siiil:
1 Indoor air inhalation
l.cachiiig to GW
Ingestion
Skin contact
Gruurulwaiiit:
Indoor air inhalation
Ingestion
Skin contact
..
Sample Dcpili
(feet his)
Initial Final
1
1
1
1
I 1 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
— 1
1
1
1
rejfr. 1
1
1
1
1
TPH
as gasoline
Initial Final
<3.0
(a.o
<Q.O
1
1
I
1
1
1— ••
1
^•0 1
r
1
1
1
1
1
na; 10 rec
30
100
300
. Petroleum Constituents in Soil aiiij Grtiur
(mg/kg, mg/L)
TPII
as diesel
Initial Final
<P'0 j
I
'3-
"99
jmmended
100
300
500
B
Initial Final
1
1
1
1
I 1
1
t
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0.005
.2
.3
1.0
T
Initial f-inat
1
1
1
1
•
1
1
1 t
1
1
1
1 I 1
1
1
1
1
1 1 1
1
1
1
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1,0
100
3(X)
900
idwatcf
i;
Initial i'inal
-
1
1
1
}
0.7 .
70
2(K)
6(X)
~
X
Initial Final
}
j
}
10
10(X)
30(X)
10,0(X)
Naphtli
Initial Final
1
1
0.02
2.0
5 0
10.0
- fr-
O & (.i
liiilial I'liial
V-J3-^l 6-^-^1
%00£> \/l/Q
%i6 1^
3,lO
10
3(M)
WH)
lUX)
TRI'll
Initial l-'inal
r—
1
1
1
1
1 1
1
1
1
KM)
3(K) ^^
5(X) '^P
^ €K<jx\JO^d O^rto-^er "3^ anci OUM rea^<#7^5 ^hovif^ no Conirxrvmo^Otri
f:\crr\u&t\rJci)kins\wp\cluscoui\cxposc2.clu
SITE PLAT
..c plat must show all buildings, tanks, lines, dispensers, underground utilities, proposed sampling locations
and depths, substances stored in tanks, and other important features.
Facility or Location ID No.VtfD/^V^ Drawn By'DaAAf T' Qil)/ey Date S-/^' ^1
T
North
-^
C xm^ S/v 7^7'"'^
^ j' ^ I £^! V- SSA;// ^J/Vg/i
~2iriL:M(KL
kri----::>
t?/v/PJ/hg-^
hcu.
r^^
''^^^^~Y^^
Xt/fr]'~9Kf>i(:ri
V
1. Indicate sample locations, depths and sample type (soil, groundwater, unified soil classification).
2. IfKJicate tank number that corresponds with information given on page 1 of the Closure Plan.
Key: Building, etc. outlines
Tank & Line outlines
Creeks, Rivers
0 = Monitoring Wells (MW-#,)
X = Sample Locations (SS-#, WS-#,)
[ ] = Water Wells (domestic, livestock, etc.)
Lines: s-s-s-
g-g-g-
= Sewer
= Gas
-p-p-p-
-w-w-w-
= Power
= Water
-t-t-t-
-d-d-d-
= Telephone
= French Drains
SI IK PLAT Ji
Ihe sitS plat must show all buildings, tanks, lines, dispensers, underground utilities, proposed sampling locations
and depths, substances stored in tanks, and other important features.
i-ucility or Location ID No. ^601A^ Drawn ByTo/Z-Tec^ C.D)ST/^dL. X-(IC< Datt^ 3-^<P- 9/
'1/
•/
<
Q
X
1 '^>^/^o'/y(3
North
^ Vr
o -y\. V)
hoi BAipQy
^
•35/7C7/-/ ayi/r^
Oh-tC-h')
U)-f.Q u'<9'<^ OQO%
P^<^,
indicate sample locations, depths and sample type (soil, groundwater, unified soil classification).
Indicate tank number that corresponds with information given on page 1 of the Closure Plan.
Kcv: Building, etc. outlines
Tank & Line outlines
Creeks, Rivers
0 = Monitoring Wells (MW-#,)
X = Sample Locations (SS-#, WS-#,)
[ ] = Water Wells (domestic, livestock, etc.)
u
^.
\\^c>.•. -s-s-s- = Sewer
-g-g-g- = Gas
-p-p-p- = Power
-w-w-w- = Water
-t-t-t- = Telephone
-d-d-d- = French Drains
.-•^'
rrr^
yy
G^^^^
FINAL PRIORITY ^
DESIGNATION i^
LUST SITE/PST FUND PRIORITIZATION CHECKLIST
The following LUST priority categories contain the elements used by LUST Project
-Managers that are critical for evaluating LUST sites and determining a specific level of
nriority for the site. The priority categories and prioritization elements presented herein are
'.- xied for use in y.".sr.:':•.':•: ' ::h ..-,; LUST Priorit:za:ion Mouule tr.at is .. "i:aily bc'.ri
ucveioped by UST staff. For any parucular LUST site, the Module will yieid a relative
output number designating a priority category. The LUST scientist will then apply the
criteria listed below to determine the necessary action.
Regardless of the level of environmental sensitivity of a site, the Project Manager must
determine on a case-by-case basis if any combination of the criteria listed below constimtes
.1 specific priority for LUST site review and action.
A. Highest Prioritv
Extent and degree ot contamination is not defined.
Free product on groundwater.
Dissolved aqueous plume is not contained and has migrated offsite.
Drinking water sources are impacted and alternative drinking water must be
supplied.
Impact to wells has occurred or is imminent.
Contaminated soils remain in place.
Surface water has been impacted and has the potential for contacting humans or
otherwise threatening the biota.
Wildlife is imperiled or impacted.
Vapors are present in residences or places of business or both.
10. RP is not known.
11. RP is known but unwilling or unable to cooperate with investigation and deanup.
12. PST Fund information is submitted and the e.xtent and degree of contamination is
defined.*
13. Release detection (interstital monitoring and inventory control) is
operational."
14. Product characterization is submitted.**
15. Other
B. Intermediate Prioritv
1 Extent and degree of contamination is defined.
Free product recovery initiated and product contained.
Free product has not migrated offsite.
Dissolved aqueous plume is being remediated and is contai:'id.
Dissolved plume has not migrated otfsite.
Contaminated soils remain in place but their e.xtent and degree of contaminauou
are known.
^___ Vapors are present on-site, but have not impacted residences or places of business.
8. Drinking water sources are not imperiled.
9. Humans and other animals are not likely to be e.xpoacd.
10. RP is known and willing to cooperate with investigation and cleanup.
11. Most of the PST Fund information has been submitted prior to March 1, 1991 but
delay is not caused by RP recalcitrance.
12. PST Fund information has not been submitted.
13. Release detection (interstital monitoring and inventory contro;, ^ not
operational.**
14, Other
Lowest Priority
_ No free product.
__ Groundwater not contaminated.
_ Contaminated soils have been removed or are in the process of being remediated
(e.xcavation or in situ treatment).
_ RP is known and willing to cooperate with investigation and cleanup.
JJJST case file ready to close out.
Participation in PST Fund not relevant.
Other
Make sure you complete and submit the xMemorandum of Project Manage
Recomm.endation stating the eligibility, or lack thereof, for the PST Fund.
** These criteria may assist in discerning an old release from a new one,
thereby assisting in determining eligibility for participation in PST Fund.